No More Learning

Reciprocity” is a piece of egregious vulgarity;
the mere fact that what I do cannot and may not
be done by another, that there is no such thing as
equivalence (except in those very select circles
where one actually has one's equal, inter pares),
that in a really profound sense a man never re-
quites because he is something unique in himself
and can only do unique things,—this fundamental
conviction contains the cause of aristocratic aloof-
·ness from the mob, because the latter           in
equality, and consequently in the feasibility of equiva-
lence and “reciprocity.