Subsequent after, was
violently
opposed by pope Gregory I.
William Smith - 1844 - Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities - b
20.
Monodia
archae CPolitani Libro adrersus Responsiones Grae- in Obitum Manuelis Palaeologi Imperatoris. A
corum de Processione Spiritus Sancti. This work, Latin version of this Monody by Niccolo Perotti
with a Latin version, was published by Arcudio. 7. is given in the Annales Ecclesiastici of Bzovius, vol.
Responsio ad quatuor Argumenta Mazimi Planudae xviii. p. 72, &c. 21. Orationes Quatuor ad Italos.
de Processione Spiritus Sancti ex solo Patre : pub- Three of these orations, designed to rouse the states
lished, with a Latin version, by Arcudio. 8. Grae- and princes of Western Europe against the Turks,
corum Confessio de Verbis Consecrationis, et Transub were published at Paris, A. d. 1471, and apparently
stantiatione. A Latin version of this, by Niccolo a second time in A. D. 1500 (Panzer, vol. ii. p.
Sagundino, is contained in the Museum Italicum of 332), and the whole four in the second volume of
Mabillon, vol. i. part ii. p. 243, &c. 9. De Sancto the Consultationes alque Orationes Turcicae of Ni.
Eucharistiae Mysterio, et quod per Verba Domini colas Reusner. An Italian version, we know not
maxime fiat Consecratio, contra Marcum Ephesium ; whether of the three or four, was printed, probably
or, De Sacramento Eucharistiae, et quibus Verbis at Venice, A. D. 1471. (Panzer, vol. iii.
Christi Corpus conficiatur. A Latin version of this Ad Ludovicum Francorum Regem de sua Electione
was published, as we have noticed above, at Stras- in Legatum ad ipsum et Ducem Burgundiae, pub-
burg, A. D. 1513; and also at Nuremburg, A. D. lished in the Spicilegium of I'Achéry, vol. iv. Paris,
1527. (Panzer, vol. vii. p. 473). One appears in 1661. 23. Various Epistolae and Orationes, in-
the Bibliotheca Putrum (vol. xxvi. p. 787, &c. ed. cluding apparently some of those already noticed,
Lyon. 1677). 10. De ea Parte Evangelii, ' Si eum in 1 vol. 4to. , without note of place or year of pub-
volo manere', &c. , erudita et valde utilis Disceptatio, lication, but known to have been printed by Guil.
printed with the Dialoge of Salonius, of Vienna, Fitchet, Paris, about 1470 or 1472. (Panzer, vol.
4to. Haguenau, 1532, Panzer, vol. vii. p. 109. 11. ii. p. 271. )
Ad Paulum II. P. M. Epistola, qua suas de Pro His versions into Latin were of the following
cessione Spiritus Sancti lucubrationes ei affert et works: 1. Xenophontis de Dictis et Factis Socratis,
dicat ; and, 12. Ad Paulum II. P. M. de Errore Libri IV, printed in various editions of Xenophon,
Paschatis. These two letters are inserted in the and separately in 4to, at Louvain, a, D. 1533. 2.
Latina et Italica D. Marci Bibliotheca Codd. MSto | Aristotelis Metaphysicorum Libri XIV, repeatedly
rum per Titulos Digesta, of Zanetti. FoL Venice, printed. 3. Theophrasti Metaphysica, repeatedly
1741, pp. 76, 196.
printed, subjoined to his version of the Metaphysica
II.
PHILOSOPHICAL AND MISCELLANEOUS of Aristotle. 4. Basilii Magni Oratio in illud
WORKS: 13. In Calumniatorem Platonis, Libri 'Attende tibi ipsi; et Homilia in Christi Natalem.
V. ; a reply in Latin to the Comparationes Philoso These homilies are extant only in MS. The ver-
phorum Platonis et Aristotelis of George of Tre- sions of Aristotle and Theophrastus are contained,
bizond. [GEORGIUS, No. 48, TRAPEZUNTIUS. ) with the work In Culumniatorem Platonis, in a
Bessarion's work was first printed at Rome by volume published by Aldus, Venice, 1516. (Aloy-
Sweynheym and Pannartz, A. D. 1469. 14. De sius Bandinius, De Vita et Rebus gestis Bessarionis
Natura et Arte adversus eundem Trapezuntium. Cardinalis Nicaeni Commentarius, 4to, Rome, 1777 ;
This work, written some time before the pre- Hody, De Graecis Illustribus Linguae Graecae, &c.
ceding, was printed with it as a sixth book. *15. Instauratoribus ; Boerner, De Doctis Hominibus
Ad Plethonem de Quatuor Quaestionibus Platonicis Graecis ; Fabric. Bibl. Graec. vol. xi. p. 422, &c. ;
Epistola ; written in Greek, and printed with a Cave, Hist. Litt. vol. ii. Appendix by Gery and
Latin version" by Reimar, Leyden, A. D. 1722, Wharton, pp. 138, 139; Oudin, Commentar. de
from a MS, in the Bodleian Library. 16. Ad Scriptor. Eccles. vol. iii. col. 2411, &c. ; Niceron,
Michaelem Apostolium et Andronicum Callistum Mémoires, vol. xxi. p. 129 ; Ducas, Hist. Byzant.
Epistolae. In these letters he severely reprehends c. xxxi. ; Phranza, Philelphus Epistolae, Labbe
Apostolius for the violent attack which he had | Concilia, Mansi Concilia, U. cc. ; Panzer, Annales
made on Theodore Gaza, and commends Callistus, Typographici (U. cc. and vol. ii. p. 411, vol. viii.
who had replied in a moderate and decent manner pp. 363, 434); Laonicus Chalcocondyles, Historia
to the attack of Apostolius. The letters of Bes | Turcarum, vol. vi. viii. pp. 155, 228, ed. Paris, pp.
sarion were pablished by Boivin in his Historia 121, 178, ed. Venice ; Nic. Comnenus Papadopoli,
Academiae Regiae Inscriptionum, vol. ii. p. 456. Hist. Gymnas. Putavini, vol. ii. lib. ii. c. 8, p. 171. )
17. Ad Demetrium et Andronicum Plethonis Filios, 22. CALECAS. (CALECAS. )
Epistola. This letter, written to the sons of George 23. CAMATERUS. (CSMATERUS. )
Gemistus after their father's death, was published 24. CAMENIATA. (CAMENLATA. ]
## p. 592 (#608) ############################################
592
JOANNES.
JOANNES.
25. CANANUS. (CANANUS. )
wanting to lead to the suspicion that its presence
26. CANTACUZENUS. (Joannes V. , emperor in the Greek epistles is owing to the mistake of
See above. ]
some transcriber, who has confounded this John
27. CAPPADOx, or the CAPPADOCIAN (1). John the Cappadocian with the subject of the next ar-
the Cappadocian was made patriarch of Constanti- eicle. It is certainly remarkable that the title, if
nople (he was the second patriarch of the name of assumed, should have incurred no rebuke from the
John, Chrysostom being John I,) A. D. 517 or 518, jealousy of the popes, not to speak of the other
a short time before the death of the aged emperor patriarchs equal in dignity to John ; or that, if
Anastasius. Of his previous history and opinions once assumed, it should have been dropped again,
we have little or no information, except that he which it must have been, since the employment of
was, before his election to the patriarchate, a pres- it by the younger John of Cappadocia, many years
byter and syncellus of Constantinople.
Subsequent after, was violently opposed by pope Gregory I. as
events mther indicate that his original leaning an unauthorized assumption. (JOANNES CAPPA-
was to the opponents of the Council of Chalcedon : Dox, 2. ) We may conjecture, perhaps, that it was
but he had either too little firmness or too little assumed by the patriarchs of Constantinople with
principle to follow out steadily the inclination of out opposition from their fellow-prelates in the
his own mind, but appears to have been in a East during the schism of the Eastern and Western
great degree the tool of others. On the death churches, and quietly dropped on the termination
of Anastasius and the accession of Justin I. the of the schism, that it might not prevent the re-
orthodox party among the inhabitants of Constan-establishment of friendly relations. (Theophanes,
tinople raised a tumult, and compelled John to Chronog. pp. 140-142, ed. Paris, pp. 112, 113,
anathematize Severus of Antioch, and to insert in ed. Venice, pp. 253–256, ed. Bonn ; Cave, Hist.
the diptychs the names of the fathers of the Council Litt. vol. i. p. 503 ; Fabric. Bill. Gr. vol. xi. p. 99. )
of Chalcedon, and restore to them those of the pa- 28. CAPPADOx, or the CAPPADOCIAN (2), patri-
triarchs Euphemius and Macedonius. These dip- arch of Constantinople, known by the surname
tychs were two tables of ecclesiastical dignitaries, Nesteuta (YNOTEÚTTS), or JEJUNATOR, the
one containing those who were living, and the other FASTER. He is Joannes IV. in the list of the
those who had died, in the peace and communion of patriarchs of Constantinople. He was a deacon of
the church, so that insertion was a virtual declaration the great church at Constantinople, and succeeded
of orthodoxy; erasure, of heresy or schism. These Eutychius (EUTYCHIUS) in the patriarchate A. D.
measures, extorted in the first instance by popular 582, in the reign of the emperor Tiberius II. In
violence, were afterwards sanctioned by a synod of a council held at Constantinople a. D. 589, for the
forty bishops. In A. D. 519 John, at the desire examination of certain charges against Gregory,
and almost at the command of the emperor Justin, patriarch of Antioch (GREGORIUS, ecclesiastical and
Bought a reconciliation with the Western church, literary, No. 5; EVAGRIUS, No. 3), John assumed
from which, during the reign of Anastasius, the the title of universal patriarch (oinovuevinds natpi-
Eastern churches had been disunited. John ac- ápxns), or perhaps resumed it after it bad fallen
cepted the conditions of pope Hormisdas, and into disuse. (See above, No. 27. ) Upon the in-
anathematized the opponents of the Council of telligence of this reaching the pope, Pelagius II. ,
Chalcedon, erasing from the diptychs the names of he protested against it most loudly, and annulled
Acacius, Euphemius, and Macedonius, three of his the acts of the council as informal. A letter written
predecessors, and inserting those of popes Leo I. in the most vehement manner by Pelagius to the
and Hormisdas himself. Hormisdas, on this, wrote Eastern bishops who had been present in the
a congratulatory letter to John, exhorting him to council, appears among his Epistolae in the Con-
seek to bring about the reconciliation of the pa- cilia (Ep. viii. vol. v. col. 948, ed. Labbe, vol. ix.
triarchs of Antioch and Alexandria to the orthodox col. 900, ed. Mansi); but some doubt has been
church. John the Cappadocian died about the be- cast on its genuineness. Gregory I. , or the Great,
ginning or middle of the year 520, as appears by who (in A. D. 590) succeeded Pelagius, was
a letter of Hormisdas to his successor, Epiphanius. equally earnest in his opposition, and wrote to
John the Cappadocian wrote several letters or the emperor Maurice and to the patriarchs of Alex-
other papers, a few of which are still extant. Two andria and Antioch, and to John himself, to protest
short letters ('ETIOtolal), one to Joannes or John, against it. (Gregorius Papa, Epistolae, lib. iv. ep.
patriarch of Jerusalem, and one to Epiphanius, 32, 36, 38, 39, apud Concilia, vol. v. col. 1181,
bishop of Tyre, are printed in Greek, with a Latin &c. , ed. Labbe, vol. x. col. 1206, &c. , ed. Mansi. )
version, in the Concilia, among the documents re- John, however, retained the title probably till
lating to the Council of Constantinople in a. d. his death (about A. D. 596); and far from being
536. (Vol. v. col. 185, ed. Labbe, vol. viii. col. odious to the Greek Christians, was and is re-
1065—1067, ed. Mansi. ) Four Relationes or Li- verenced by them as a saint.
belli are extant only in a Latin version among the John of Cappadocia wrote: 1. Ακολουθία και
Epistolae of pope Hormisdas in the Concilia. (Vol. zážis et économoyovuévw ouvrayeida, Conse-
iv. col. 1472, 1486, 1491, 1521, ed. Labbe ; vol. quentia et Ordo erga eos qui peccata confitentur
viii. col. 436, 451, 457, 488, ed. Mansi. )
observanda; called by Cave Libellzus Poenitenti-
It is remarkable that in the two short Greek alis, and by Allatius, Praris Graecis praescripta in
letters addressed to Eastern prelates, John takes confessione peragenda. This work, there is every
the title of οικουμενικός Πατριάρχης, Oecumenical, reason to conclude, has been much interpolated :
or universal patriarch, and is supposed to be the and Oudin (De Scriptor. Eccles. vol. i. col. 1473,
first that assumed this ambitious designation. It seq. ) affirms is altogether the production of a later
is remarkable, however, that in those pieces of his, age. It is given by Morinus in the Appendix
which were addressed to pope Hormisdas, and (pp. 77–90) to his work, Commentarius Historicus
which are extant only in the Latin rersion, the de Disciplina in Administratione Sucramenti Poeni-
title does not appear; and circumstances are not tentiae, fol. Paris, 1651. 2. Abyos após adv péd-
a
## p. 593 (#609) ############################################
JOANNES.
593
JOANNES
λοντα εξαγορεύσει τον εαυτου πνευματικών πατέρα, | nice, 1524, and among those subjoined to that
Ad eos qui peccatorum Confessionem Patri suo printed by Melchior Sessa and Petrus de Ravanis,
Spirituali edituri sunt Sermo; also given by Mori- fol. Venice, 1525. Yet, notwithstanding these
nus (pp. 91–97). Bat Morinus himself doubts three editions, it is described in the catalogue of
the genuineness of this work, and Oudin (l. c. ) de MSS. in the King's Library at Paris, as “ineditus”;
nies it altogether. 3. Tepl Metavolas nalékpa and was given, as if for the first time, by Iriarte
Telas rai rapdevias royos, Sermo de Poenitentia, in the Regiae Bibliothecae Matritensis Codices Gracci
Continentia, et Virginitate. This discourse is in MSS. vol. i. p. 316, &c. There is another treatise
some MSS. ascribed to Chrysostom, and is printed of Joannes Charax, De Orthographia, extant in
in the editions of his works by Morell, vol. i. p. MS. Harles expresses his uncertainty whether
809, and Savil, vol. vii. p. 641. 4. Abyos nepl the work printed by Aldus was the same as that
ψευδοπροφητών και ψευδοδιδασκάλων και αθέων | given by Iriarte ; but a comparison of the two
;
αιρετικών, και περί σημείων της συντελείας του shows their identity. Gesner suspects that the
αιώνος τούτου, Sermo de Pseudopropactis a falsis | work Περί διαλέκτων, printed in the Thesaurus
Doctoribus et impiis Haereticis, et de Signis Consum Cornucopiae of Aldus, and usually ascribed to
mationis hujus Saeculi. This discourse, which is Joannes Philoponus (PHILOPONUS], is by Joannes
ascribed in some MSS. to Chrysostom, and printed Charax.
in some editions of his works (vol. vii. p. 221, ed. 32. CHRYSOLORAS. (CHRYSOLORAS. ]
Savil, who, however, regards it as spurious, vol. 33. CHRYSOSTOMUS. [CHRYSOSTOMUB. ]
viii. ed. Montfaucon, in Spuriis, p. 72, or p. 701 in 34. CINNAMUS. (CINNAMUS. )
the reprint of Montfaucon's edition, Paris, 1836), is 35. Of CITRUS (now Kitro or Kidrob), in Mace
by Vossius, Petavius, Cave, and Assenani ascribed donia, the ancient Pydna. Joannes was bishop of
to John of Cappadocia. 5. De Sacramento Baptis. Citrus about A. D. 1200. He wrote 'Afrokpioens
matis ad Leandrum Hispalensem. This work, | προς Κωνσταντίνος Αρχιεπίσκοπον Δυρραχίου τον
mentioned by Isidore of Seville (De Scriptorib. Kabáovar. Responsa ad Constantinum Cabasilum,
Eccles. c. 26), is lost: it contained only a collection Archiepiscopum Dyrrachii, of which sixteen answers,
of passages from older writers on the subject of with the questions prefixed, are given with a Latin
trine immersion. 6. Epistolarum ad diversos Li- version in the Jus Graeco-Romanum of Leun-
ber. This work, which is mentioned by Trithe- clavius (fol. Frankfort, 1596), lib. v. p. 323. A
mius (De Ecclesiasticis Scriptoribus, c. 224), is also larger portion of the Responsa is given in the Sy-
lost. 7. Pracoepta od Monachum quendam, extant nopsis Juris Graeci of Thomas Diplouaticius (Diplo
in MS. in the Vatican Library at Rome, and in the vatizio). Several MSS. of the Responsa contain
King's Library at Paris. 8. Tlapayzeniai diá twenty-four answers, others thirty-two; and Nic.
popo. Tois Torois, Admonitiones Diversae ad Comnenus Papadopoli, citing the work in his Prae
Fideles.
archae CPolitani Libro adrersus Responsiones Grae- in Obitum Manuelis Palaeologi Imperatoris. A
corum de Processione Spiritus Sancti. This work, Latin version of this Monody by Niccolo Perotti
with a Latin version, was published by Arcudio. 7. is given in the Annales Ecclesiastici of Bzovius, vol.
Responsio ad quatuor Argumenta Mazimi Planudae xviii. p. 72, &c. 21. Orationes Quatuor ad Italos.
de Processione Spiritus Sancti ex solo Patre : pub- Three of these orations, designed to rouse the states
lished, with a Latin version, by Arcudio. 8. Grae- and princes of Western Europe against the Turks,
corum Confessio de Verbis Consecrationis, et Transub were published at Paris, A. d. 1471, and apparently
stantiatione. A Latin version of this, by Niccolo a second time in A. D. 1500 (Panzer, vol. ii. p.
Sagundino, is contained in the Museum Italicum of 332), and the whole four in the second volume of
Mabillon, vol. i. part ii. p. 243, &c. 9. De Sancto the Consultationes alque Orationes Turcicae of Ni.
Eucharistiae Mysterio, et quod per Verba Domini colas Reusner. An Italian version, we know not
maxime fiat Consecratio, contra Marcum Ephesium ; whether of the three or four, was printed, probably
or, De Sacramento Eucharistiae, et quibus Verbis at Venice, A. D. 1471. (Panzer, vol. iii.
Christi Corpus conficiatur. A Latin version of this Ad Ludovicum Francorum Regem de sua Electione
was published, as we have noticed above, at Stras- in Legatum ad ipsum et Ducem Burgundiae, pub-
burg, A. D. 1513; and also at Nuremburg, A. D. lished in the Spicilegium of I'Achéry, vol. iv. Paris,
1527. (Panzer, vol. vii. p. 473). One appears in 1661. 23. Various Epistolae and Orationes, in-
the Bibliotheca Putrum (vol. xxvi. p. 787, &c. ed. cluding apparently some of those already noticed,
Lyon. 1677). 10. De ea Parte Evangelii, ' Si eum in 1 vol. 4to. , without note of place or year of pub-
volo manere', &c. , erudita et valde utilis Disceptatio, lication, but known to have been printed by Guil.
printed with the Dialoge of Salonius, of Vienna, Fitchet, Paris, about 1470 or 1472. (Panzer, vol.
4to. Haguenau, 1532, Panzer, vol. vii. p. 109. 11. ii. p. 271. )
Ad Paulum II. P. M. Epistola, qua suas de Pro His versions into Latin were of the following
cessione Spiritus Sancti lucubrationes ei affert et works: 1. Xenophontis de Dictis et Factis Socratis,
dicat ; and, 12. Ad Paulum II. P. M. de Errore Libri IV, printed in various editions of Xenophon,
Paschatis. These two letters are inserted in the and separately in 4to, at Louvain, a, D. 1533. 2.
Latina et Italica D. Marci Bibliotheca Codd. MSto | Aristotelis Metaphysicorum Libri XIV, repeatedly
rum per Titulos Digesta, of Zanetti. FoL Venice, printed. 3. Theophrasti Metaphysica, repeatedly
1741, pp. 76, 196.
printed, subjoined to his version of the Metaphysica
II.
PHILOSOPHICAL AND MISCELLANEOUS of Aristotle. 4. Basilii Magni Oratio in illud
WORKS: 13. In Calumniatorem Platonis, Libri 'Attende tibi ipsi; et Homilia in Christi Natalem.
V. ; a reply in Latin to the Comparationes Philoso These homilies are extant only in MS. The ver-
phorum Platonis et Aristotelis of George of Tre- sions of Aristotle and Theophrastus are contained,
bizond. [GEORGIUS, No. 48, TRAPEZUNTIUS. ) with the work In Culumniatorem Platonis, in a
Bessarion's work was first printed at Rome by volume published by Aldus, Venice, 1516. (Aloy-
Sweynheym and Pannartz, A. D. 1469. 14. De sius Bandinius, De Vita et Rebus gestis Bessarionis
Natura et Arte adversus eundem Trapezuntium. Cardinalis Nicaeni Commentarius, 4to, Rome, 1777 ;
This work, written some time before the pre- Hody, De Graecis Illustribus Linguae Graecae, &c.
ceding, was printed with it as a sixth book. *15. Instauratoribus ; Boerner, De Doctis Hominibus
Ad Plethonem de Quatuor Quaestionibus Platonicis Graecis ; Fabric. Bibl. Graec. vol. xi. p. 422, &c. ;
Epistola ; written in Greek, and printed with a Cave, Hist. Litt. vol. ii. Appendix by Gery and
Latin version" by Reimar, Leyden, A. D. 1722, Wharton, pp. 138, 139; Oudin, Commentar. de
from a MS, in the Bodleian Library. 16. Ad Scriptor. Eccles. vol. iii. col. 2411, &c. ; Niceron,
Michaelem Apostolium et Andronicum Callistum Mémoires, vol. xxi. p. 129 ; Ducas, Hist. Byzant.
Epistolae. In these letters he severely reprehends c. xxxi. ; Phranza, Philelphus Epistolae, Labbe
Apostolius for the violent attack which he had | Concilia, Mansi Concilia, U. cc. ; Panzer, Annales
made on Theodore Gaza, and commends Callistus, Typographici (U. cc. and vol. ii. p. 411, vol. viii.
who had replied in a moderate and decent manner pp. 363, 434); Laonicus Chalcocondyles, Historia
to the attack of Apostolius. The letters of Bes | Turcarum, vol. vi. viii. pp. 155, 228, ed. Paris, pp.
sarion were pablished by Boivin in his Historia 121, 178, ed. Venice ; Nic. Comnenus Papadopoli,
Academiae Regiae Inscriptionum, vol. ii. p. 456. Hist. Gymnas. Putavini, vol. ii. lib. ii. c. 8, p. 171. )
17. Ad Demetrium et Andronicum Plethonis Filios, 22. CALECAS. (CALECAS. )
Epistola. This letter, written to the sons of George 23. CAMATERUS. (CSMATERUS. )
Gemistus after their father's death, was published 24. CAMENIATA. (CAMENLATA. ]
## p. 592 (#608) ############################################
592
JOANNES.
JOANNES.
25. CANANUS. (CANANUS. )
wanting to lead to the suspicion that its presence
26. CANTACUZENUS. (Joannes V. , emperor in the Greek epistles is owing to the mistake of
See above. ]
some transcriber, who has confounded this John
27. CAPPADOx, or the CAPPADOCIAN (1). John the Cappadocian with the subject of the next ar-
the Cappadocian was made patriarch of Constanti- eicle. It is certainly remarkable that the title, if
nople (he was the second patriarch of the name of assumed, should have incurred no rebuke from the
John, Chrysostom being John I,) A. D. 517 or 518, jealousy of the popes, not to speak of the other
a short time before the death of the aged emperor patriarchs equal in dignity to John ; or that, if
Anastasius. Of his previous history and opinions once assumed, it should have been dropped again,
we have little or no information, except that he which it must have been, since the employment of
was, before his election to the patriarchate, a pres- it by the younger John of Cappadocia, many years
byter and syncellus of Constantinople.
Subsequent after, was violently opposed by pope Gregory I. as
events mther indicate that his original leaning an unauthorized assumption. (JOANNES CAPPA-
was to the opponents of the Council of Chalcedon : Dox, 2. ) We may conjecture, perhaps, that it was
but he had either too little firmness or too little assumed by the patriarchs of Constantinople with
principle to follow out steadily the inclination of out opposition from their fellow-prelates in the
his own mind, but appears to have been in a East during the schism of the Eastern and Western
great degree the tool of others. On the death churches, and quietly dropped on the termination
of Anastasius and the accession of Justin I. the of the schism, that it might not prevent the re-
orthodox party among the inhabitants of Constan-establishment of friendly relations. (Theophanes,
tinople raised a tumult, and compelled John to Chronog. pp. 140-142, ed. Paris, pp. 112, 113,
anathematize Severus of Antioch, and to insert in ed. Venice, pp. 253–256, ed. Bonn ; Cave, Hist.
the diptychs the names of the fathers of the Council Litt. vol. i. p. 503 ; Fabric. Bill. Gr. vol. xi. p. 99. )
of Chalcedon, and restore to them those of the pa- 28. CAPPADOx, or the CAPPADOCIAN (2), patri-
triarchs Euphemius and Macedonius. These dip- arch of Constantinople, known by the surname
tychs were two tables of ecclesiastical dignitaries, Nesteuta (YNOTEÚTTS), or JEJUNATOR, the
one containing those who were living, and the other FASTER. He is Joannes IV. in the list of the
those who had died, in the peace and communion of patriarchs of Constantinople. He was a deacon of
the church, so that insertion was a virtual declaration the great church at Constantinople, and succeeded
of orthodoxy; erasure, of heresy or schism. These Eutychius (EUTYCHIUS) in the patriarchate A. D.
measures, extorted in the first instance by popular 582, in the reign of the emperor Tiberius II. In
violence, were afterwards sanctioned by a synod of a council held at Constantinople a. D. 589, for the
forty bishops. In A. D. 519 John, at the desire examination of certain charges against Gregory,
and almost at the command of the emperor Justin, patriarch of Antioch (GREGORIUS, ecclesiastical and
Bought a reconciliation with the Western church, literary, No. 5; EVAGRIUS, No. 3), John assumed
from which, during the reign of Anastasius, the the title of universal patriarch (oinovuevinds natpi-
Eastern churches had been disunited. John ac- ápxns), or perhaps resumed it after it bad fallen
cepted the conditions of pope Hormisdas, and into disuse. (See above, No. 27. ) Upon the in-
anathematized the opponents of the Council of telligence of this reaching the pope, Pelagius II. ,
Chalcedon, erasing from the diptychs the names of he protested against it most loudly, and annulled
Acacius, Euphemius, and Macedonius, three of his the acts of the council as informal. A letter written
predecessors, and inserting those of popes Leo I. in the most vehement manner by Pelagius to the
and Hormisdas himself. Hormisdas, on this, wrote Eastern bishops who had been present in the
a congratulatory letter to John, exhorting him to council, appears among his Epistolae in the Con-
seek to bring about the reconciliation of the pa- cilia (Ep. viii. vol. v. col. 948, ed. Labbe, vol. ix.
triarchs of Antioch and Alexandria to the orthodox col. 900, ed. Mansi); but some doubt has been
church. John the Cappadocian died about the be- cast on its genuineness. Gregory I. , or the Great,
ginning or middle of the year 520, as appears by who (in A. D. 590) succeeded Pelagius, was
a letter of Hormisdas to his successor, Epiphanius. equally earnest in his opposition, and wrote to
John the Cappadocian wrote several letters or the emperor Maurice and to the patriarchs of Alex-
other papers, a few of which are still extant. Two andria and Antioch, and to John himself, to protest
short letters ('ETIOtolal), one to Joannes or John, against it. (Gregorius Papa, Epistolae, lib. iv. ep.
patriarch of Jerusalem, and one to Epiphanius, 32, 36, 38, 39, apud Concilia, vol. v. col. 1181,
bishop of Tyre, are printed in Greek, with a Latin &c. , ed. Labbe, vol. x. col. 1206, &c. , ed. Mansi. )
version, in the Concilia, among the documents re- John, however, retained the title probably till
lating to the Council of Constantinople in a. d. his death (about A. D. 596); and far from being
536. (Vol. v. col. 185, ed. Labbe, vol. viii. col. odious to the Greek Christians, was and is re-
1065—1067, ed. Mansi. ) Four Relationes or Li- verenced by them as a saint.
belli are extant only in a Latin version among the John of Cappadocia wrote: 1. Ακολουθία και
Epistolae of pope Hormisdas in the Concilia. (Vol. zážis et économoyovuévw ouvrayeida, Conse-
iv. col. 1472, 1486, 1491, 1521, ed. Labbe ; vol. quentia et Ordo erga eos qui peccata confitentur
viii. col. 436, 451, 457, 488, ed. Mansi. )
observanda; called by Cave Libellzus Poenitenti-
It is remarkable that in the two short Greek alis, and by Allatius, Praris Graecis praescripta in
letters addressed to Eastern prelates, John takes confessione peragenda. This work, there is every
the title of οικουμενικός Πατριάρχης, Oecumenical, reason to conclude, has been much interpolated :
or universal patriarch, and is supposed to be the and Oudin (De Scriptor. Eccles. vol. i. col. 1473,
first that assumed this ambitious designation. It seq. ) affirms is altogether the production of a later
is remarkable, however, that in those pieces of his, age. It is given by Morinus in the Appendix
which were addressed to pope Hormisdas, and (pp. 77–90) to his work, Commentarius Historicus
which are extant only in the Latin rersion, the de Disciplina in Administratione Sucramenti Poeni-
title does not appear; and circumstances are not tentiae, fol. Paris, 1651. 2. Abyos após adv péd-
a
## p. 593 (#609) ############################################
JOANNES.
593
JOANNES
λοντα εξαγορεύσει τον εαυτου πνευματικών πατέρα, | nice, 1524, and among those subjoined to that
Ad eos qui peccatorum Confessionem Patri suo printed by Melchior Sessa and Petrus de Ravanis,
Spirituali edituri sunt Sermo; also given by Mori- fol. Venice, 1525. Yet, notwithstanding these
nus (pp. 91–97). Bat Morinus himself doubts three editions, it is described in the catalogue of
the genuineness of this work, and Oudin (l. c. ) de MSS. in the King's Library at Paris, as “ineditus”;
nies it altogether. 3. Tepl Metavolas nalékpa and was given, as if for the first time, by Iriarte
Telas rai rapdevias royos, Sermo de Poenitentia, in the Regiae Bibliothecae Matritensis Codices Gracci
Continentia, et Virginitate. This discourse is in MSS. vol. i. p. 316, &c. There is another treatise
some MSS. ascribed to Chrysostom, and is printed of Joannes Charax, De Orthographia, extant in
in the editions of his works by Morell, vol. i. p. MS. Harles expresses his uncertainty whether
809, and Savil, vol. vii. p. 641. 4. Abyos nepl the work printed by Aldus was the same as that
ψευδοπροφητών και ψευδοδιδασκάλων και αθέων | given by Iriarte ; but a comparison of the two
;
αιρετικών, και περί σημείων της συντελείας του shows their identity. Gesner suspects that the
αιώνος τούτου, Sermo de Pseudopropactis a falsis | work Περί διαλέκτων, printed in the Thesaurus
Doctoribus et impiis Haereticis, et de Signis Consum Cornucopiae of Aldus, and usually ascribed to
mationis hujus Saeculi. This discourse, which is Joannes Philoponus (PHILOPONUS], is by Joannes
ascribed in some MSS. to Chrysostom, and printed Charax.
in some editions of his works (vol. vii. p. 221, ed. 32. CHRYSOLORAS. (CHRYSOLORAS. ]
Savil, who, however, regards it as spurious, vol. 33. CHRYSOSTOMUS. [CHRYSOSTOMUB. ]
viii. ed. Montfaucon, in Spuriis, p. 72, or p. 701 in 34. CINNAMUS. (CINNAMUS. )
the reprint of Montfaucon's edition, Paris, 1836), is 35. Of CITRUS (now Kitro or Kidrob), in Mace
by Vossius, Petavius, Cave, and Assenani ascribed donia, the ancient Pydna. Joannes was bishop of
to John of Cappadocia. 5. De Sacramento Baptis. Citrus about A. D. 1200. He wrote 'Afrokpioens
matis ad Leandrum Hispalensem. This work, | προς Κωνσταντίνος Αρχιεπίσκοπον Δυρραχίου τον
mentioned by Isidore of Seville (De Scriptorib. Kabáovar. Responsa ad Constantinum Cabasilum,
Eccles. c. 26), is lost: it contained only a collection Archiepiscopum Dyrrachii, of which sixteen answers,
of passages from older writers on the subject of with the questions prefixed, are given with a Latin
trine immersion. 6. Epistolarum ad diversos Li- version in the Jus Graeco-Romanum of Leun-
ber. This work, which is mentioned by Trithe- clavius (fol. Frankfort, 1596), lib. v. p. 323. A
mius (De Ecclesiasticis Scriptoribus, c. 224), is also larger portion of the Responsa is given in the Sy-
lost. 7. Pracoepta od Monachum quendam, extant nopsis Juris Graeci of Thomas Diplouaticius (Diplo
in MS. in the Vatican Library at Rome, and in the vatizio). Several MSS. of the Responsa contain
King's Library at Paris. 8. Tlapayzeniai diá twenty-four answers, others thirty-two; and Nic.
popo. Tois Torois, Admonitiones Diversae ad Comnenus Papadopoli, citing the work in his Prae
Fideles.
