Now precisely the
same pentameter (cum cecidit, etc.
same pentameter (cum cecidit, etc.
Ovid - 1869 - Juvenile Works and Spondaic Period
iv, 10, 2;.
Ub. 5 7-
4 There was no definite time fixed for the dcpositio barbac, but it usually-
coincided with the assumption of the toga 'drills (Suet. Calig. 10). Most
writers incorrectly make this statement refer to Ovid's twentieth or twenty-
second year, as Schanz, Gcsch. d. rom. Lit. n 3 , i, 293; J. Heuwes, De teni-
porc quo Of. A mores conscripti sint (Miinster, 1883), 14; Cruttwell, Rom.
Lit. 3c<>, etc.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 148 Robert S. Radford [1920
highly trained rhetorician. He is noted for his " swift light-
ness of touch," his brief, snappy sentences, his sharp con-
trasts, and his terse and highly polished epigrams (cf.
K. F. Smith, op. ciL Introd. 103 ff. ). Since we seek, how-
ever, to trace an actual historical development, it may be
worth while to return for a moment to ' Ovid ' in the mean-
ing of the perfected art of elegy, and to picture clearly the
numerous refinements which his finished technique embraces.
These rules include the breaking up of the long sentence and
the restriction of the thought to a single distich, the avoid-
ance of elision, especially in the latter half of both the hex-
ameter and the pentameter, the marked preference given in
the hexameter to the favorite masculine caesura (the semi-
quinaria), the ending of the pentameter with a dissyllable,
which should not be an adjective, but either a noun or a
verb, and above all the preponderance of dactyls in the
distich in direct opposition to the original and native char-
acter of the language. Through the observance of these
complex requirements the elegiac couplet gains an incom-
parable elegance and precision, at the same moment that it
loses its larger variety, freedom, and ease. Tibullus himself
had narrowed the sphere of Roman elegy by rejecting the
natural period and restricting the thought within the mini-
mum space of two lines. This limitation, which is unknown
to Catullus and Propertius, is undoubtedly a serious mistake,
and it finds little justification of any kind in the previous
history of the elegy. Yet, although he gave an artificial
form to the distich, Tibullus, through the expression of simple
and natural emotion, invariably retained its proper content,
and he could not foresee perhaps that the more brilliant but
more wayward Ovid would too often, through the absence
of sincere and genuine feeling, merge the elegy in the epigram
and make both form and content unduly artificial. Both
Tibullus and Ovid then were consummate artists, but both
yielded too much to the prevailing tendency of the Augustan
age in restricting the liberty and the spontaneity of their
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 149
verse. Tibullus is excessively rhetorical in form, Ovid is
excessively rhetorical in both form and thought. (See also
some just observations in Sellar, Horace and the Elegiac
Poets, 307. )
Even more characteristic of our poet, however, than the
unity of the distich and the tyrannis of the dissyllabic close
is the dactylic preponderance. We may say that Ovid is the
poet, par excellence, of the dactylic virtuosity, which appears
alike in his epic and his elegiac verse. While the Greek lan-
guage is twice as rich in dactyls as in spondees, in Latin this
relation is reversed, and the Roman language has almost
twice as many spondees as dactyls. In all the other poets
of Rome (with the exception only of Valerius Flaccus and a
few genuine elegies of Tibullus' second book) the spondees
considerably exceed the dactyls; Ovid alone has known -
like the Medea or the Circe of his own exuberant fancy -
how to transform, by the magic of his art, the slow but stately
spondees of his native speech into the light and graceful
dactyls of Hellenic verse. Through this supreme refinement
he has brought to fulfillment the mission which Ennius, the
hardy pioneer, had vaguely dreamed of nearly two centuries
before, and has banished from Latium the last trace of Italian
rusticity (cf. Hor. Epist. n, i, 160). He is the greatest artist
in verse that Rome produced, the supreme master both in
the elegy and in the epos. It is no wonder then that Lucian
Miiller exclaims in ecstatic admiration (De re metrica-, 522) :
" Hunc igitur virum, qui principatum haud dubie tenet artis
Latinae, veneremur, hunc imitemur. hie sciat se plurimum
profecisse, cui plurimum probetur Ovidius. huius quot sunt
versus, totidem sunt artificia, quovis Phidiae ilia vel Praxitelis
opere nonminora. " 6 Our chief metrical scholars have carried
their worship and adoration so far that they have ended by
creating a veritable ' Ovid myth. ' Ovid is Rome's one white
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 150 Robert S. Radford [1920
crow and he was always white. His art is free from the
trammels of place and time, and knows no process of growth,
no stage of development, but the Fates conferred upon the
divine man 7 at his birth a faculty that was miraculously
complete. Hence Lucian Miiller, op. oil. 346, pronounces a
passage in the Amores, which contains several elisions, inter-
polated, and declares those Epistles of the Heroines, which
show one or two polysyllabic closes, to be spurious (ib. 29 ff. ,
259). Hultgren, op. cit. 26 ff. , insists that the comparative
lack of virtuosity in the de Medicamine fragment is not the
result of immature art, but of pure accident, and asserts
that to attribute to Ovid any work actually lacking the
virtuosity would be to " place the head of Thersites upon
the body of Agamemnon " (ib. 32). Ehrengruber, who has
computed or collected the percentages of so many Latin
poets, announces the rule that each author has his definite
dactylic proportion from which he never greatly departs
(op. cit. x, 12 ff. ). Even such a master of statistics as Dro-
bisch, when he acutely observes that " the Amores of Ovid,
especially in the hexameter, fall short by a little more than
2% of the virtuosity attained in the Ars " (Ber. sacks. Ge-
sellsch. xxin [1871], 33), does not seem to have grasped the
full truth ; for he apparently thought of the decline in the
virtuosity as evenly distributed over the entire Amores.
In point of fact, nothing could be more erroneous than these
views. Thus Quintilian, ix, 3, 70, had before him a collection
of Ovidian epigrams quite similar to the Priapea and con-
taining rather frequent polysyllabic closes ; he actually
quotes the line, Cur ego non dicam, Furia, te ftiriam ?
In order to determine the whole question definitely, I have
carefully examined the three books of the Amores which we
now possess and which were not published before 2 B. C. ,
when the poet was forty-one. It is well known that there
was an earlier edition in five books, published in 14 B. C. ,
when the poet was already twenty-nine. According to my
7 Cf. Cic. Arch. 7, 16 : hunc dii'iiuim hominem, Africanum.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 151
results, nearly one-fourth of the poems in our present Amores
have been retained from the first edition with little change,
and still show the original spondaic form which they pos-
sessed at their first publication. The mature works of Ovid,
such as the Ars, show 57% of dactyls in the distich, while
the first edition of the Amores, according to my reconstruc-
tion, did not greatly exceed 48. 5%. The remaining three-
fourths of our present edition consists of poems which have
either been fully revised or newly written, and if the spondaic
fourth be subtracted, their percentage rises to more than $6 r , .
In other words, the remaining poems show practically the
same virtuosity as the mature works. In the second section
of this paper I shall exhibit these results more fully and in
tabular form. It is evident therefore that Ovid first com-
posed in spondees, which is precisely what we should expect
on a priori grounds. For, Latin being a highly spondaic
language, it seems just about as possible for a youthful poet
to lisp in Chinese or in Choctaw as in Latin dactyls. We
may go further, however, and assert that even if Ovid, on
his first appearance in 27 B. C. , had possessed all the miraculous
gifts with which he has been credited, he would not have
actually composed in dactyls. It is true that even at this
early date Tibullus was highly esteemed, 8 yet the memory
of the free republic was still cherished, and the more natural
school of Catullus was still preferred. Hence, in all proba-
bility, even if the youthful Ovid had possessed the dactylic
faculty, he would have lacked the will to virtuosity, since
the latter implies also a willingness to sacrifice the larger
perspicuity of expression and the normal descriptive word
orders. Furthermore, two of the three highly dactylic elegies
of Tibullus' second book were not composed until 22 B. C. ,
five years later, as is shown by their imitation of Propertius
(Xemethy. op. cii. . ^S).
The importance of the reconstruction of the first edition
* . . . Leunturque Tibullus
Kt placet, et iam Ir (xc. A Honshu prhiripe notus erat. Trist. n, 464.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 152 Robert S. Radford [1920
of the Amores and of the consequent recovery of the youthful
or ' spondaic ' Ovid cannot easily be overestimated. Freed
from fanciful and unwarranted presuppositions, we are at
liberty to restore the actual, historical Ovid, and we shall be
able to show in the sequel, as I believe, that this great artistic
genius, beginning, just like Catullus, with simple nature and
therefore in some cases with only 37% of dactyls in the distich,
has made in less than twenty years an unparalleled develop-
ment in his art, and, by veritably creating a new language,
such as Ennius and his eager successors achieved only in
part, has been able, in the works of his full maturity, com-
posed after the age of thirty-five, to rise to 57% of dactyls
in the distich. I do not seek, however, to reconstruct the
spondaic period of Ovid's art for a purely theoretical purpose
nor with the aim of contrasting in an abstract manner the
first Amores with all the remaining works; I wish rather to
restore the poet's early life, and partly by following in the
footsteps of eminent critics, such as Gruppe, Plessis, Klee-
mann, Ehrengruber, Ribbeck, Marx, Schanz, and Cartault,
partly by completing and enlarging their work. I hope to
endow him with an appropriate set of spondaic works. These
juvenile works are, from the Appendix Vergiliana. at least
Catalepton, ix, and from the Corpus Tibullianum the whole
of the Messalla Collection as well as two of the six elegies
contained in Tibullus' second or posthumous book. The
proper discussion of these poems naturally requires a series
of articles. In the present study I shall deal only with the
metrical development, while in several articles to be published
shortly in the American Journal of Philology, I shall examine
in detail, with the help of Burman's much neglected Index,
the language of the juvenile poems in relation to Ovid's mature
works and also sketch more fully the history of the contro-
versy which has raged for more than a century among critics
over the authorship and value of the Messalla Collection. 9
9 So far as concerns the Lygdamus elegies, a most just and admirable ac-
count of the controversy is given by H. de la \~ille de Mirmont, op. cit. 339-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 153
A briefer outline, however, of the various opinions of
scholars cannot be wholly omitted here, especially as the
controversy over the Lygdamus poems constitutes one of the
most amazing chapters in the whole history of literary criti-
cism. I may begin with the so-called Messalla Collection.
This latter is a collection of famous poems emanating from
the household of the great Augustan statesman, Valerius
Messalla. In our fourteenth-century codices it forms a
single book, added to the unfinished second book of Tibullus
and apparently published, like the posthumous second book,
in 19 B. C. The Italian scholars of the fifteenth century have
wrongly divided this additional book into two, the so-called
third and fourth books of Tibullus, and for the purpose of
avoiding confusion it seems best to retain this division.
(Probably, as all the mediaeval citations show, there were
originally only ' two books of Tibullus,' and the second book
of 1 1 ii verses was first divided at the close of the Middle
Ages into the second and third books which our late codices
exhibit ; see Ullrich, op. clt. 69. ) In the six elegies of the
third book a youth apparently of eighteen or nineteen, yet
already famous as a poet and employing the pseudonym of
Lygdamus, seeks to w r in back the love of the fair Neaera,
who has divorced him. It is probable, too, that he has given
cause for the divorce, though naturally this is not admitted
and he pleads a difficult case with wonderful facility. Al-
though the poems of unhappy love easily admit. of being
turned to ridicule by an unfair critic like Voss, I know of no
juster criticism upon them than that of Teuffel, written in
mature life and before he (like Dissen) had lent an ear to the
slanders of Voss : " These elegies, through the freshness and
sincerity of the feeling and the graceful ease of the verse, do
their author no discredit. " 10 As is well known, Lygdamus
403. Although the author does not fully understand the real issues, I \vish
to acknowledge my deep indebtedness to the historical part of this fine study.
10 Quoted by Kleemann, op. cil. 17, from Pauly's Rcalcncyclopaedie, vi. 2,
1950 (1852).
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 154 Robert S. Radford [1920
tells us the exact date of his birth (5, 18). " My parents
first beheld my birthday," he says, " in the year in which
both the consuls met an equal fate " (cum cecidit fato consul
uterque pari) he means in 43 B. C. , when Hirtius and Pansa
were both slain in battle before Mutina.
Now precisely the
same pentameter (cum cecidit, etc. ) is used by Ovid, Trist.
iv, 10, 6, to give his own birth-date of 43 B. C. The Renais-
sance editors, Scaliger and Vulpius, perhaps attached less
importance to the dozen or more whole lines and half-lines
which Ovid and Lygdamus have in common, and the numerous
other amazing coincidences, but they knew well that, in the
case of different poets, the date of birth and the birth-line
cannot be borrowed. Wishing therefore to preserve the third
book for Tibullus and to prevent it from being assigned to
Ovid, they pronounced the birth-line an interpolation from
the Tristia and bracketed the whole distich. The same pro-
cedure was followed later by Broukhuysen (1708), Wunderlich
(1817), Bahrens (1876), and Ramsay (1887).
Matters remained in this state until the German peasant
poet of Mecklenburg and the great classical translator, Johann
Heinrich Voss, appeared upon the scene (1810). Voss's works
abound in homely and realistic scenes of village and country-
life, and his idyl, Luise, published in 1795, furnished Goethe
with a model for Hermann und Dorothea. He was naturally
much attracted by the simple pastoral elegy of Tibullus, and
when he came, in the third book, to the poems of Lygdamus
with their brilliant pictures of elegance and wealth, he saw
at once that this courtly city poet could not possibly be
Tibullus. He therefore removed the name of Tibullus from
the third book and substituted that of Lygdamus. So far
he showed himself an excellent critic, but he did not stop
here. He poured forth against the romanticist masquerading
under the name of the unworldly Tibullus a torrent of vitupera-
tion and of coarse abuse that is well-nigh incredible, and that
many of our editors of Tibullus and many of our orthodox
historians of Roman literature have ever since repeated in the
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 155
most credulous or most servile fashion, but naturally in lan-
guage somewhat more decorous and more restrained. 11 Al-
though Voss never possessed any great vogue in Germany at
large as a critic, his authority among classical philologians
was immense, and it is chiefly to his violent attack upon the
Lygdamus elegies that we must ascribe the hopeless con-
fusion that has since arisen among scholars and that has
made the question of the authorship of these poems an in-
soluble ' mystery. ' A part of the responsibility for the en-
tanglement belongs, however, to W. Hertzberg, the well-
known editor of Propertius. He also was possessed of great
authority in his day, although his conclusions were usually
hasty and Plessis, Etudes sur Properce, 80, charges him with
an " incurable recklessness " (une incurable legerete). Otto
Friedrich Gruppe, a critic of the first order, had just published
his standard work, Die rdmische Elegie (1838). In a brilliant
and forceful chapter of this book (pp. 105-143) he confidently
identifies Lygdamus with Ovid and Neaera with Ovid's second
wife, the " blameless spouse " of the Tristia, iv, 10, 71, who
did not, however, long remain married to the poet. Hertz-
berg at once came forward to answer Gruppe and, as Teuffel
believed (op. cit. 380), to make the identification with Ovid
forever impossible. He apparently believed that the Her aides,
which stood first in the older editions, were the earliest works
of Ovid. Naturally he experienced little difficulty in showing
that these poems consist almost entirely of dactyls, 12 and
11 Of course every classical scholar must entertain the kindliest feeling and
the greatest respect for the famous translator of the Odyssey and of the Georgics,
but no account of the Lygdamus controversy can be intelligible which fails
to bring out strongly Voss's violent prejudices and his scurrilous language.
Fuss, op. cit. 54, cites numerous examples of the latter, and protests earnestly
against such unfair methods of controversy. It appears to the present writer,
however, that greater blame attaches to Voss's obsequious followers than to
Voss himself. For Voss was a privileged character as a man of genius who
had a distinct point of view the simple life and the return to nature. Many
of the scholars, however, who have been content to take their criticism at
second hand from Voss, have no special point of view and no excuse that seems
valid.
" In his versification Ovid skips and dances, so that his hexameter, even
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 156 Robert S. Radford [1920
show an excessive accumulation of rhetorical effects. There-
fore, he concludes, the Lygdamus elegies, which are written
in spondees and in a natural style, cannot possibly be the
work of Ovid. With the recklessness which Plessis has
justly noted, he adds : " These characteristics of the metre
are precisely those which stand out most sharply in youth. "
The truth is just the reverse, and Hultgren correctly lays
down the rule that the more the poet advances towards the
prime of life, the more the proportion of dactyls and of dactylic
beginnings increases. 13
The majority of careful students, be it said to their credit,
have never accepted the prejudiced views of Voss : thus the
elegies have been vigorously defended by Spohn (1819), by
Golbery, the Lemaire editor (1826), by Fuss (1867), and by
Cranstoun, the English translator (1872). Much more
moderate views are also to be found in Cruttwell (1877),
Ribbeck (1889), and Sellar (1892). Finally, Plessis, in his
Pocsie Latine (1909), in the chapter devoted to Lygdamus
(pp. 361-376), has at once paid a beautiful tribute to the
genuine merits of these elegies and given a noble exemplifica-
tion of the true critic's art. In his view, they proceed from
a youthful poet of rare and brilliant genius, whose native
generosity and tenderness of feeling have not yet been spoiled
by contact with the corruptions of the world.
Gruppe had made it probable that the Lygdamus elegies
are the work of Ovid, but he had not proved it. This proof
was, however, definitely rendered by S. Kleemann (1876),
who, in an elaborate dissertation, with the help of Burman's
in the more serious poems (Tristia and Fasti), has nothing but dactyls in almost
a half of the verses " (Hallische Jahrbiicher i [1839], 1024 ff. , quoted by Teuffel,
op. dt. 380 ff. , and by Kleemann, op. fit. 42 ff. ).
13 Op. fit. 29 : " Hexametri Ovidiani illustria exempla sunt, quae decent
eo magis crescere numerum dactylorum, quo magis ipse in arte procedat. . . .
Dubitari amplius nequit, quin poetarum elegiacorum poemata, minus dactylice
in principio distichi constructa, inter opera iuvenilis aetatis referenda, carmina
autem cum plurimis initiis dactylicis florenti aetati adnumeranda sint. " Klee-
mann, op. fit. 29, justly lays down the same canon for Tibullus : "arte erudita
in hexametris dactylus crebrior fit. "
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 157
Index, examined the language minutely and pronounced it
wholly Ovidian. It should be added that Kleemann used
only a part of the available material from the Index and the
Ovidian corpus perhaps not more than one-half but
even this, in my judgment, is far more than is strictly neces-
sary for purposes of valid proof. Kleemann's study was much
praised by the reviewers, but otherwise it has received little
attention. 14 The reasons for this neglect are not far to seek.
Many scholars had accepted without question and without
independent study the distorted views of Voss which came
to them in a slightly diluted form through the voluminous
commentary of Dissen ; others lay entrenched in fancied
security behind the barrier of the metre which Hertzberg
had so conveniently and so confidently provided. Strangely
enough, the Index to Ovid remained practically a closed book.
As soon as the Burman Index is used, the whole Messalla
Appendix is seen to be unmistakably the work of the youthful
Ovid, aetate eighteen to twenty-four. 15 There is complete
identity of vocabulary, and all the most characteristic Ovidian-
isms are in the Appendix, except only those which were de-
veloped later for the sake of the virtuosity and which are
conveniently enumerated by Eschenburg. The evidence
which is drawn merely from repeated tags and half-verses,
without distinctive peculiarity of usage, is of course incon-
clusive for an author like Ovid who borrows so freely from
contemporary poets, but the proof that rests upon the plain-
est and simplest idioms often recurring is one that scarcely
admits of doubt or question. The Lygdamus poems, com-
11 An honorable exception is Professor K. P. Harrington's scholarly edition
of the Roman elegiac poets (Selections, 1914). Professor Harrington com-
ments on the possible identity of Ovid and Lygdamus with complete candor
and with an open mind, although he does not commit himself definitely (Introd.
36).
15 In justice to myself, it is only fair to state that I reached my conclusions
as to the identity of Lygdamus and Ovid at a time when I was acquainted
neither with Gruppe's results nor with those of Kleemann and Ehrengruber,
but was obliged to rely upon the simple text of Ovid and Eichert's lexicon to
the Metamorphoses (Hanover, 1886).
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 1-8 Robert S. Radford [1920
posed at eighteen or nineteen, contain about ninety specific
and striking Ovidianisms ; Kleemann gives about half of
these. The Panegyric Upon Messalla contains probably more
than a hundred Ovidianisms ; Ehrengruber has already called
attention to all of these, and in order to explain their occur-
rence, has propounded the ingenious theory that the Pane-
gyric was a school exercise composed in a later age by some
pupil of the rhetoricians who had access to all the works of
Ovid and pilfered most freely from them all. 16 Next, as the
metre shows, come the six little letters of Sulpicia, the kins-
woman of Messalla, in which this lady (with Ovid's sympa-
thetic assistance) undertakes the part of wooing the shy
youth, Cerinthus; they contain more than twelve Ovidian-
isms. About 21 B. C. , aetate twenty-two, Ovid composed the
five charming elegies giving in fuller form the story of the
same pair of happy lovers, Sulpicia and Cerinthus ; they
show more than forty Ovidianisms and 47. 4% of dactyls,
thus approaching closely to the proportion of the first Amores
(about 48. 5%). The exquisite imitation of Tibullus, Nulla
tuum nobis (iv, 13), that closes the collection, has ten Ovidian-
isms. Since Ovid edits the unfinished second book, the two
spondaic elegies, with Ovidian language and thought, are in
all probability his work, and can no longer be ascribed to
Tibullus either in whole or in part. The poem in honor of
Messalinus (n, 5) has, in fact, long occasioned difficulty, and
has been known for nearly a century as the ' suspected elegy. '
The other Ovidian elegy, n, 2, is evidently a continuation of
the Sulpicia group, and celebrates the birthday of the shy but
sorely smitten lover Cerinthus, who is now happily married
to Sulpicia and is therefore given his true name of Cornutus.
This poem is rightly assigned to the ' fourth book ' by Gruppe.
The conclusions which we have reached upon grounds of
language and metre are supported also by strong external
16 Op. cil. x, 71 ; n, 28; in, So, etc. This treatise of more than 700 pages
in all is a magnificent collection of material and, in spite of its technically
erroneous conclusion, is truly a masterly piece of work.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 159
evidence. Thus in the letters of the exile Ovid refers in
unmistakable terms to the issuance of the Appendix, when
he writes that it was Messalla who first induced him to ven-
ture upon the publication of his works. 17 He mentions
expressly the epicedion which he had composed upon the
death of his patron and which was sung in the forum (Pont.
i, 7, 29 fL), but he also refers again and again to poems which
he had composed in Messalla's honor in his early youth.
Thus he writes that not even the eldest son, Messalinus, can
remember the time when he " first began to venerate Mes-
salla " (Pont, n, 3, 79 ff. ). This last statement scarcely
applies, I think, to our Panegyric, but can be more fitly
referred to an earlier eulogy which we fortunately still possess
-I mean Catalepton ix (xi), contained in the Appendix
Vergiliana, a poem which celebrates Messalla's triumph over
Aquitania, and which was therefore written in the year
27 B. C. Ribbeck, Appendix Vergil. Proleg. 12, and Gesch.
d. rom. Die/it, u, 200, has already, on stylistic and metrical
grounds, identified the author of this elegy with ' Lygdamus,'
and both Marx (Pauly-Wissowa, i, 1326, s. v. Albius) and
Schanz, op. cit. 282, p. 233, speak approvingly of this view.
I find on examination that these judgments are strongly
supported by the language of the poem, and this elegy may
therefore be confidently regarded as the earliest extant work
of Ovid, written in his seventeenth year ; in fact, in a brief
monograph and admirable commentary which was published
some years ago, but has just come into my hands at the
moment of writing (De Ovidio elegiac in Messallam auctore,
Budapest, 1909), Nemethy, I find, has already clearly per-
ceived and, in large measure, convincingly demonstrated the
Ovidian authorship of the Catalepton. Messalinus, the eldest
son, quindecemvir 19 B. C. , consul 3 B. C. . was probably born
about 38-36 B. C. , and can therefore scarcely have been more
than ten years of age when this eulogy was composed.
I have not yet spoken of the date of the second eulogy
17 Pont, u, 3, 75 ff. (addressed to Cotta, the younger son).
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 160 Robert S. Radford [1920
which we possess, namely, the elaborate Panegyric of the
Messalla Collection. This brilliant and highly rhetorical
work is metrically more advanced than the Lygdamus elegies
and was certainly composed at a later date than these poems.
Undoubtedly, by an ingenious literary or artistic fiction, the
Panegyric itself purports to be written in the year of Messalla's
consulship, 31 B. C. , and the events of the years 30-27 B. C. ,
namely, the expeditions to Aquitania and the Orient, which
had already been expressly celebrated by Tibullus (i, 7) and
by the youthful Ovid (Catalepton, ix) , are nowhere mentioned
as having actually occurred. Special students of the Pane-
gyric, however, have long seen that the Gallic and Egyptian
campaigns are well known to the clever writer, and are most
skilfully introduced into the poem by way of prophecy (vati-
cinium ex eventu}. 18 The Panegyric was therefore composed
after the Lygdamus elegies, and the first draft of the poem
must have been drawn up about the year 23 B. C. ; it treats
chiefly the earlier career of Messalla, which had not previously
been made the subject of poetic encomium. We are not at
present fully in a position to state how Ovid was occupied
in the interval between the composition of the Lygdamus
poems and the Panegyric. It is true that H. de la Ville de
Mirmont confidently assumes (Jeunesse d'Ovide, 209) that
it was shortly after the two early marriages and about his
twentieth year that our poet visited Asia Minor and Sicily
in the suite of the poet Macer, and at first glance the Pane-
gyric also, in its present revised and perfected form, appears
to contain probable or possible references to Sicily (vss. 197,
200). We must carefully refrain, however, from drawing
hasty conclusions at present and must frankly admit that
we cannot at once determine the exact date of the year which
Ovid spent with Macer in Asia and Sicily (Pont, n, 10, 21 ft". ).
A brief word must be said, however, upon Ovid's relation
to the Ciris (the legend of Scylla and Nisus) in the Appendix
18 See Hartung, op. ell. 38 ff. ; Ehrengruber, op. cit. i, 7 ; x, 71 ; also Belling,
Albius Tibullus: Untersuchung, 205 ff.
? ?
Ub. 5 7-
4 There was no definite time fixed for the dcpositio barbac, but it usually-
coincided with the assumption of the toga 'drills (Suet. Calig. 10). Most
writers incorrectly make this statement refer to Ovid's twentieth or twenty-
second year, as Schanz, Gcsch. d. rom. Lit. n 3 , i, 293; J. Heuwes, De teni-
porc quo Of. A mores conscripti sint (Miinster, 1883), 14; Cruttwell, Rom.
Lit. 3c<>, etc.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 148 Robert S. Radford [1920
highly trained rhetorician. He is noted for his " swift light-
ness of touch," his brief, snappy sentences, his sharp con-
trasts, and his terse and highly polished epigrams (cf.
K. F. Smith, op. ciL Introd. 103 ff. ). Since we seek, how-
ever, to trace an actual historical development, it may be
worth while to return for a moment to ' Ovid ' in the mean-
ing of the perfected art of elegy, and to picture clearly the
numerous refinements which his finished technique embraces.
These rules include the breaking up of the long sentence and
the restriction of the thought to a single distich, the avoid-
ance of elision, especially in the latter half of both the hex-
ameter and the pentameter, the marked preference given in
the hexameter to the favorite masculine caesura (the semi-
quinaria), the ending of the pentameter with a dissyllable,
which should not be an adjective, but either a noun or a
verb, and above all the preponderance of dactyls in the
distich in direct opposition to the original and native char-
acter of the language. Through the observance of these
complex requirements the elegiac couplet gains an incom-
parable elegance and precision, at the same moment that it
loses its larger variety, freedom, and ease. Tibullus himself
had narrowed the sphere of Roman elegy by rejecting the
natural period and restricting the thought within the mini-
mum space of two lines. This limitation, which is unknown
to Catullus and Propertius, is undoubtedly a serious mistake,
and it finds little justification of any kind in the previous
history of the elegy. Yet, although he gave an artificial
form to the distich, Tibullus, through the expression of simple
and natural emotion, invariably retained its proper content,
and he could not foresee perhaps that the more brilliant but
more wayward Ovid would too often, through the absence
of sincere and genuine feeling, merge the elegy in the epigram
and make both form and content unduly artificial. Both
Tibullus and Ovid then were consummate artists, but both
yielded too much to the prevailing tendency of the Augustan
age in restricting the liberty and the spontaneity of their
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 149
verse. Tibullus is excessively rhetorical in form, Ovid is
excessively rhetorical in both form and thought. (See also
some just observations in Sellar, Horace and the Elegiac
Poets, 307. )
Even more characteristic of our poet, however, than the
unity of the distich and the tyrannis of the dissyllabic close
is the dactylic preponderance. We may say that Ovid is the
poet, par excellence, of the dactylic virtuosity, which appears
alike in his epic and his elegiac verse. While the Greek lan-
guage is twice as rich in dactyls as in spondees, in Latin this
relation is reversed, and the Roman language has almost
twice as many spondees as dactyls. In all the other poets
of Rome (with the exception only of Valerius Flaccus and a
few genuine elegies of Tibullus' second book) the spondees
considerably exceed the dactyls; Ovid alone has known -
like the Medea or the Circe of his own exuberant fancy -
how to transform, by the magic of his art, the slow but stately
spondees of his native speech into the light and graceful
dactyls of Hellenic verse. Through this supreme refinement
he has brought to fulfillment the mission which Ennius, the
hardy pioneer, had vaguely dreamed of nearly two centuries
before, and has banished from Latium the last trace of Italian
rusticity (cf. Hor. Epist. n, i, 160). He is the greatest artist
in verse that Rome produced, the supreme master both in
the elegy and in the epos. It is no wonder then that Lucian
Miiller exclaims in ecstatic admiration (De re metrica-, 522) :
" Hunc igitur virum, qui principatum haud dubie tenet artis
Latinae, veneremur, hunc imitemur. hie sciat se plurimum
profecisse, cui plurimum probetur Ovidius. huius quot sunt
versus, totidem sunt artificia, quovis Phidiae ilia vel Praxitelis
opere nonminora. " 6 Our chief metrical scholars have carried
their worship and adoration so far that they have ended by
creating a veritable ' Ovid myth. ' Ovid is Rome's one white
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 150 Robert S. Radford [1920
crow and he was always white. His art is free from the
trammels of place and time, and knows no process of growth,
no stage of development, but the Fates conferred upon the
divine man 7 at his birth a faculty that was miraculously
complete. Hence Lucian Miiller, op. oil. 346, pronounces a
passage in the Amores, which contains several elisions, inter-
polated, and declares those Epistles of the Heroines, which
show one or two polysyllabic closes, to be spurious (ib. 29 ff. ,
259). Hultgren, op. cit. 26 ff. , insists that the comparative
lack of virtuosity in the de Medicamine fragment is not the
result of immature art, but of pure accident, and asserts
that to attribute to Ovid any work actually lacking the
virtuosity would be to " place the head of Thersites upon
the body of Agamemnon " (ib. 32). Ehrengruber, who has
computed or collected the percentages of so many Latin
poets, announces the rule that each author has his definite
dactylic proportion from which he never greatly departs
(op. cit. x, 12 ff. ). Even such a master of statistics as Dro-
bisch, when he acutely observes that " the Amores of Ovid,
especially in the hexameter, fall short by a little more than
2% of the virtuosity attained in the Ars " (Ber. sacks. Ge-
sellsch. xxin [1871], 33), does not seem to have grasped the
full truth ; for he apparently thought of the decline in the
virtuosity as evenly distributed over the entire Amores.
In point of fact, nothing could be more erroneous than these
views. Thus Quintilian, ix, 3, 70, had before him a collection
of Ovidian epigrams quite similar to the Priapea and con-
taining rather frequent polysyllabic closes ; he actually
quotes the line, Cur ego non dicam, Furia, te ftiriam ?
In order to determine the whole question definitely, I have
carefully examined the three books of the Amores which we
now possess and which were not published before 2 B. C. ,
when the poet was forty-one. It is well known that there
was an earlier edition in five books, published in 14 B. C. ,
when the poet was already twenty-nine. According to my
7 Cf. Cic. Arch. 7, 16 : hunc dii'iiuim hominem, Africanum.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 151
results, nearly one-fourth of the poems in our present Amores
have been retained from the first edition with little change,
and still show the original spondaic form which they pos-
sessed at their first publication. The mature works of Ovid,
such as the Ars, show 57% of dactyls in the distich, while
the first edition of the Amores, according to my reconstruc-
tion, did not greatly exceed 48. 5%. The remaining three-
fourths of our present edition consists of poems which have
either been fully revised or newly written, and if the spondaic
fourth be subtracted, their percentage rises to more than $6 r , .
In other words, the remaining poems show practically the
same virtuosity as the mature works. In the second section
of this paper I shall exhibit these results more fully and in
tabular form. It is evident therefore that Ovid first com-
posed in spondees, which is precisely what we should expect
on a priori grounds. For, Latin being a highly spondaic
language, it seems just about as possible for a youthful poet
to lisp in Chinese or in Choctaw as in Latin dactyls. We
may go further, however, and assert that even if Ovid, on
his first appearance in 27 B. C. , had possessed all the miraculous
gifts with which he has been credited, he would not have
actually composed in dactyls. It is true that even at this
early date Tibullus was highly esteemed, 8 yet the memory
of the free republic was still cherished, and the more natural
school of Catullus was still preferred. Hence, in all proba-
bility, even if the youthful Ovid had possessed the dactylic
faculty, he would have lacked the will to virtuosity, since
the latter implies also a willingness to sacrifice the larger
perspicuity of expression and the normal descriptive word
orders. Furthermore, two of the three highly dactylic elegies
of Tibullus' second book were not composed until 22 B. C. ,
five years later, as is shown by their imitation of Propertius
(Xemethy. op. cii. . ^S).
The importance of the reconstruction of the first edition
* . . . Leunturque Tibullus
Kt placet, et iam Ir (xc. A Honshu prhiripe notus erat. Trist. n, 464.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 152 Robert S. Radford [1920
of the Amores and of the consequent recovery of the youthful
or ' spondaic ' Ovid cannot easily be overestimated. Freed
from fanciful and unwarranted presuppositions, we are at
liberty to restore the actual, historical Ovid, and we shall be
able to show in the sequel, as I believe, that this great artistic
genius, beginning, just like Catullus, with simple nature and
therefore in some cases with only 37% of dactyls in the distich,
has made in less than twenty years an unparalleled develop-
ment in his art, and, by veritably creating a new language,
such as Ennius and his eager successors achieved only in
part, has been able, in the works of his full maturity, com-
posed after the age of thirty-five, to rise to 57% of dactyls
in the distich. I do not seek, however, to reconstruct the
spondaic period of Ovid's art for a purely theoretical purpose
nor with the aim of contrasting in an abstract manner the
first Amores with all the remaining works; I wish rather to
restore the poet's early life, and partly by following in the
footsteps of eminent critics, such as Gruppe, Plessis, Klee-
mann, Ehrengruber, Ribbeck, Marx, Schanz, and Cartault,
partly by completing and enlarging their work. I hope to
endow him with an appropriate set of spondaic works. These
juvenile works are, from the Appendix Vergiliana. at least
Catalepton, ix, and from the Corpus Tibullianum the whole
of the Messalla Collection as well as two of the six elegies
contained in Tibullus' second or posthumous book. The
proper discussion of these poems naturally requires a series
of articles. In the present study I shall deal only with the
metrical development, while in several articles to be published
shortly in the American Journal of Philology, I shall examine
in detail, with the help of Burman's much neglected Index,
the language of the juvenile poems in relation to Ovid's mature
works and also sketch more fully the history of the contro-
versy which has raged for more than a century among critics
over the authorship and value of the Messalla Collection. 9
9 So far as concerns the Lygdamus elegies, a most just and admirable ac-
count of the controversy is given by H. de la \~ille de Mirmont, op. cit. 339-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 153
A briefer outline, however, of the various opinions of
scholars cannot be wholly omitted here, especially as the
controversy over the Lygdamus poems constitutes one of the
most amazing chapters in the whole history of literary criti-
cism. I may begin with the so-called Messalla Collection.
This latter is a collection of famous poems emanating from
the household of the great Augustan statesman, Valerius
Messalla. In our fourteenth-century codices it forms a
single book, added to the unfinished second book of Tibullus
and apparently published, like the posthumous second book,
in 19 B. C. The Italian scholars of the fifteenth century have
wrongly divided this additional book into two, the so-called
third and fourth books of Tibullus, and for the purpose of
avoiding confusion it seems best to retain this division.
(Probably, as all the mediaeval citations show, there were
originally only ' two books of Tibullus,' and the second book
of 1 1 ii verses was first divided at the close of the Middle
Ages into the second and third books which our late codices
exhibit ; see Ullrich, op. clt. 69. ) In the six elegies of the
third book a youth apparently of eighteen or nineteen, yet
already famous as a poet and employing the pseudonym of
Lygdamus, seeks to w r in back the love of the fair Neaera,
who has divorced him. It is probable, too, that he has given
cause for the divorce, though naturally this is not admitted
and he pleads a difficult case with wonderful facility. Al-
though the poems of unhappy love easily admit. of being
turned to ridicule by an unfair critic like Voss, I know of no
juster criticism upon them than that of Teuffel, written in
mature life and before he (like Dissen) had lent an ear to the
slanders of Voss : " These elegies, through the freshness and
sincerity of the feeling and the graceful ease of the verse, do
their author no discredit. " 10 As is well known, Lygdamus
403. Although the author does not fully understand the real issues, I \vish
to acknowledge my deep indebtedness to the historical part of this fine study.
10 Quoted by Kleemann, op. cil. 17, from Pauly's Rcalcncyclopaedie, vi. 2,
1950 (1852).
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 154 Robert S. Radford [1920
tells us the exact date of his birth (5, 18). " My parents
first beheld my birthday," he says, " in the year in which
both the consuls met an equal fate " (cum cecidit fato consul
uterque pari) he means in 43 B. C. , when Hirtius and Pansa
were both slain in battle before Mutina.
Now precisely the
same pentameter (cum cecidit, etc. ) is used by Ovid, Trist.
iv, 10, 6, to give his own birth-date of 43 B. C. The Renais-
sance editors, Scaliger and Vulpius, perhaps attached less
importance to the dozen or more whole lines and half-lines
which Ovid and Lygdamus have in common, and the numerous
other amazing coincidences, but they knew well that, in the
case of different poets, the date of birth and the birth-line
cannot be borrowed. Wishing therefore to preserve the third
book for Tibullus and to prevent it from being assigned to
Ovid, they pronounced the birth-line an interpolation from
the Tristia and bracketed the whole distich. The same pro-
cedure was followed later by Broukhuysen (1708), Wunderlich
(1817), Bahrens (1876), and Ramsay (1887).
Matters remained in this state until the German peasant
poet of Mecklenburg and the great classical translator, Johann
Heinrich Voss, appeared upon the scene (1810). Voss's works
abound in homely and realistic scenes of village and country-
life, and his idyl, Luise, published in 1795, furnished Goethe
with a model for Hermann und Dorothea. He was naturally
much attracted by the simple pastoral elegy of Tibullus, and
when he came, in the third book, to the poems of Lygdamus
with their brilliant pictures of elegance and wealth, he saw
at once that this courtly city poet could not possibly be
Tibullus. He therefore removed the name of Tibullus from
the third book and substituted that of Lygdamus. So far
he showed himself an excellent critic, but he did not stop
here. He poured forth against the romanticist masquerading
under the name of the unworldly Tibullus a torrent of vitupera-
tion and of coarse abuse that is well-nigh incredible, and that
many of our editors of Tibullus and many of our orthodox
historians of Roman literature have ever since repeated in the
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 155
most credulous or most servile fashion, but naturally in lan-
guage somewhat more decorous and more restrained. 11 Al-
though Voss never possessed any great vogue in Germany at
large as a critic, his authority among classical philologians
was immense, and it is chiefly to his violent attack upon the
Lygdamus elegies that we must ascribe the hopeless con-
fusion that has since arisen among scholars and that has
made the question of the authorship of these poems an in-
soluble ' mystery. ' A part of the responsibility for the en-
tanglement belongs, however, to W. Hertzberg, the well-
known editor of Propertius. He also was possessed of great
authority in his day, although his conclusions were usually
hasty and Plessis, Etudes sur Properce, 80, charges him with
an " incurable recklessness " (une incurable legerete). Otto
Friedrich Gruppe, a critic of the first order, had just published
his standard work, Die rdmische Elegie (1838). In a brilliant
and forceful chapter of this book (pp. 105-143) he confidently
identifies Lygdamus with Ovid and Neaera with Ovid's second
wife, the " blameless spouse " of the Tristia, iv, 10, 71, who
did not, however, long remain married to the poet. Hertz-
berg at once came forward to answer Gruppe and, as Teuffel
believed (op. cit. 380), to make the identification with Ovid
forever impossible. He apparently believed that the Her aides,
which stood first in the older editions, were the earliest works
of Ovid. Naturally he experienced little difficulty in showing
that these poems consist almost entirely of dactyls, 12 and
11 Of course every classical scholar must entertain the kindliest feeling and
the greatest respect for the famous translator of the Odyssey and of the Georgics,
but no account of the Lygdamus controversy can be intelligible which fails
to bring out strongly Voss's violent prejudices and his scurrilous language.
Fuss, op. cit. 54, cites numerous examples of the latter, and protests earnestly
against such unfair methods of controversy. It appears to the present writer,
however, that greater blame attaches to Voss's obsequious followers than to
Voss himself. For Voss was a privileged character as a man of genius who
had a distinct point of view the simple life and the return to nature. Many
of the scholars, however, who have been content to take their criticism at
second hand from Voss, have no special point of view and no excuse that seems
valid.
" In his versification Ovid skips and dances, so that his hexameter, even
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 156 Robert S. Radford [1920
show an excessive accumulation of rhetorical effects. There-
fore, he concludes, the Lygdamus elegies, which are written
in spondees and in a natural style, cannot possibly be the
work of Ovid. With the recklessness which Plessis has
justly noted, he adds : " These characteristics of the metre
are precisely those which stand out most sharply in youth. "
The truth is just the reverse, and Hultgren correctly lays
down the rule that the more the poet advances towards the
prime of life, the more the proportion of dactyls and of dactylic
beginnings increases. 13
The majority of careful students, be it said to their credit,
have never accepted the prejudiced views of Voss : thus the
elegies have been vigorously defended by Spohn (1819), by
Golbery, the Lemaire editor (1826), by Fuss (1867), and by
Cranstoun, the English translator (1872). Much more
moderate views are also to be found in Cruttwell (1877),
Ribbeck (1889), and Sellar (1892). Finally, Plessis, in his
Pocsie Latine (1909), in the chapter devoted to Lygdamus
(pp. 361-376), has at once paid a beautiful tribute to the
genuine merits of these elegies and given a noble exemplifica-
tion of the true critic's art. In his view, they proceed from
a youthful poet of rare and brilliant genius, whose native
generosity and tenderness of feeling have not yet been spoiled
by contact with the corruptions of the world.
Gruppe had made it probable that the Lygdamus elegies
are the work of Ovid, but he had not proved it. This proof
was, however, definitely rendered by S. Kleemann (1876),
who, in an elaborate dissertation, with the help of Burman's
in the more serious poems (Tristia and Fasti), has nothing but dactyls in almost
a half of the verses " (Hallische Jahrbiicher i [1839], 1024 ff. , quoted by Teuffel,
op. dt. 380 ff. , and by Kleemann, op. fit. 42 ff. ).
13 Op. fit. 29 : " Hexametri Ovidiani illustria exempla sunt, quae decent
eo magis crescere numerum dactylorum, quo magis ipse in arte procedat. . . .
Dubitari amplius nequit, quin poetarum elegiacorum poemata, minus dactylice
in principio distichi constructa, inter opera iuvenilis aetatis referenda, carmina
autem cum plurimis initiis dactylicis florenti aetati adnumeranda sint. " Klee-
mann, op. fit. 29, justly lays down the same canon for Tibullus : "arte erudita
in hexametris dactylus crebrior fit. "
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 157
Index, examined the language minutely and pronounced it
wholly Ovidian. It should be added that Kleemann used
only a part of the available material from the Index and the
Ovidian corpus perhaps not more than one-half but
even this, in my judgment, is far more than is strictly neces-
sary for purposes of valid proof. Kleemann's study was much
praised by the reviewers, but otherwise it has received little
attention. 14 The reasons for this neglect are not far to seek.
Many scholars had accepted without question and without
independent study the distorted views of Voss which came
to them in a slightly diluted form through the voluminous
commentary of Dissen ; others lay entrenched in fancied
security behind the barrier of the metre which Hertzberg
had so conveniently and so confidently provided. Strangely
enough, the Index to Ovid remained practically a closed book.
As soon as the Burman Index is used, the whole Messalla
Appendix is seen to be unmistakably the work of the youthful
Ovid, aetate eighteen to twenty-four. 15 There is complete
identity of vocabulary, and all the most characteristic Ovidian-
isms are in the Appendix, except only those which were de-
veloped later for the sake of the virtuosity and which are
conveniently enumerated by Eschenburg. The evidence
which is drawn merely from repeated tags and half-verses,
without distinctive peculiarity of usage, is of course incon-
clusive for an author like Ovid who borrows so freely from
contemporary poets, but the proof that rests upon the plain-
est and simplest idioms often recurring is one that scarcely
admits of doubt or question. The Lygdamus poems, com-
11 An honorable exception is Professor K. P. Harrington's scholarly edition
of the Roman elegiac poets (Selections, 1914). Professor Harrington com-
ments on the possible identity of Ovid and Lygdamus with complete candor
and with an open mind, although he does not commit himself definitely (Introd.
36).
15 In justice to myself, it is only fair to state that I reached my conclusions
as to the identity of Lygdamus and Ovid at a time when I was acquainted
neither with Gruppe's results nor with those of Kleemann and Ehrengruber,
but was obliged to rely upon the simple text of Ovid and Eichert's lexicon to
the Metamorphoses (Hanover, 1886).
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 1-8 Robert S. Radford [1920
posed at eighteen or nineteen, contain about ninety specific
and striking Ovidianisms ; Kleemann gives about half of
these. The Panegyric Upon Messalla contains probably more
than a hundred Ovidianisms ; Ehrengruber has already called
attention to all of these, and in order to explain their occur-
rence, has propounded the ingenious theory that the Pane-
gyric was a school exercise composed in a later age by some
pupil of the rhetoricians who had access to all the works of
Ovid and pilfered most freely from them all. 16 Next, as the
metre shows, come the six little letters of Sulpicia, the kins-
woman of Messalla, in which this lady (with Ovid's sympa-
thetic assistance) undertakes the part of wooing the shy
youth, Cerinthus; they contain more than twelve Ovidian-
isms. About 21 B. C. , aetate twenty-two, Ovid composed the
five charming elegies giving in fuller form the story of the
same pair of happy lovers, Sulpicia and Cerinthus ; they
show more than forty Ovidianisms and 47. 4% of dactyls,
thus approaching closely to the proportion of the first Amores
(about 48. 5%). The exquisite imitation of Tibullus, Nulla
tuum nobis (iv, 13), that closes the collection, has ten Ovidian-
isms. Since Ovid edits the unfinished second book, the two
spondaic elegies, with Ovidian language and thought, are in
all probability his work, and can no longer be ascribed to
Tibullus either in whole or in part. The poem in honor of
Messalinus (n, 5) has, in fact, long occasioned difficulty, and
has been known for nearly a century as the ' suspected elegy. '
The other Ovidian elegy, n, 2, is evidently a continuation of
the Sulpicia group, and celebrates the birthday of the shy but
sorely smitten lover Cerinthus, who is now happily married
to Sulpicia and is therefore given his true name of Cornutus.
This poem is rightly assigned to the ' fourth book ' by Gruppe.
The conclusions which we have reached upon grounds of
language and metre are supported also by strong external
16 Op. cil. x, 71 ; n, 28; in, So, etc. This treatise of more than 700 pages
in all is a magnificent collection of material and, in spite of its technically
erroneous conclusion, is truly a masterly piece of work.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? Vol. li] The Juvenile Works of Ovid 159
evidence. Thus in the letters of the exile Ovid refers in
unmistakable terms to the issuance of the Appendix, when
he writes that it was Messalla who first induced him to ven-
ture upon the publication of his works. 17 He mentions
expressly the epicedion which he had composed upon the
death of his patron and which was sung in the forum (Pont.
i, 7, 29 fL), but he also refers again and again to poems which
he had composed in Messalla's honor in his early youth.
Thus he writes that not even the eldest son, Messalinus, can
remember the time when he " first began to venerate Mes-
salla " (Pont, n, 3, 79 ff. ). This last statement scarcely
applies, I think, to our Panegyric, but can be more fitly
referred to an earlier eulogy which we fortunately still possess
-I mean Catalepton ix (xi), contained in the Appendix
Vergiliana, a poem which celebrates Messalla's triumph over
Aquitania, and which was therefore written in the year
27 B. C. Ribbeck, Appendix Vergil. Proleg. 12, and Gesch.
d. rom. Die/it, u, 200, has already, on stylistic and metrical
grounds, identified the author of this elegy with ' Lygdamus,'
and both Marx (Pauly-Wissowa, i, 1326, s. v. Albius) and
Schanz, op. cit. 282, p. 233, speak approvingly of this view.
I find on examination that these judgments are strongly
supported by the language of the poem, and this elegy may
therefore be confidently regarded as the earliest extant work
of Ovid, written in his seventeenth year ; in fact, in a brief
monograph and admirable commentary which was published
some years ago, but has just come into my hands at the
moment of writing (De Ovidio elegiac in Messallam auctore,
Budapest, 1909), Nemethy, I find, has already clearly per-
ceived and, in large measure, convincingly demonstrated the
Ovidian authorship of the Catalepton. Messalinus, the eldest
son, quindecemvir 19 B. C. , consul 3 B. C. . was probably born
about 38-36 B. C. , and can therefore scarcely have been more
than ten years of age when this eulogy was composed.
I have not yet spoken of the date of the second eulogy
17 Pont, u, 3, 75 ff. (addressed to Cotta, the younger son).
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t45q4vr7s Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 160 Robert S. Radford [1920
which we possess, namely, the elaborate Panegyric of the
Messalla Collection. This brilliant and highly rhetorical
work is metrically more advanced than the Lygdamus elegies
and was certainly composed at a later date than these poems.
Undoubtedly, by an ingenious literary or artistic fiction, the
Panegyric itself purports to be written in the year of Messalla's
consulship, 31 B. C. , and the events of the years 30-27 B. C. ,
namely, the expeditions to Aquitania and the Orient, which
had already been expressly celebrated by Tibullus (i, 7) and
by the youthful Ovid (Catalepton, ix) , are nowhere mentioned
as having actually occurred. Special students of the Pane-
gyric, however, have long seen that the Gallic and Egyptian
campaigns are well known to the clever writer, and are most
skilfully introduced into the poem by way of prophecy (vati-
cinium ex eventu}. 18 The Panegyric was therefore composed
after the Lygdamus elegies, and the first draft of the poem
must have been drawn up about the year 23 B. C. ; it treats
chiefly the earlier career of Messalla, which had not previously
been made the subject of poetic encomium. We are not at
present fully in a position to state how Ovid was occupied
in the interval between the composition of the Lygdamus
poems and the Panegyric. It is true that H. de la Ville de
Mirmont confidently assumes (Jeunesse d'Ovide, 209) that
it was shortly after the two early marriages and about his
twentieth year that our poet visited Asia Minor and Sicily
in the suite of the poet Macer, and at first glance the Pane-
gyric also, in its present revised and perfected form, appears
to contain probable or possible references to Sicily (vss. 197,
200). We must carefully refrain, however, from drawing
hasty conclusions at present and must frankly admit that
we cannot at once determine the exact date of the year which
Ovid spent with Macer in Asia and Sicily (Pont, n, 10, 21 ft". ).
A brief word must be said, however, upon Ovid's relation
to the Ciris (the legend of Scylla and Nisus) in the Appendix
18 See Hartung, op. ell. 38 ff. ; Ehrengruber, op. cit. i, 7 ; x, 71 ; also Belling,
Albius Tibullus: Untersuchung, 205 ff.
? ?
