e
p{re}sence
to ?
Chaucer - Boethius
?
e er?
e vndir hym.
[and] but-?
if ?
ou er?
ely man
wexest yuel oute of ? i witte. ? is figure amoneste? ? e ? {a}t axest ? e
heuene wi? ? i ry? t[e] visage. {and} hast areised ? i forhede to beren vp
on heye ? i corage so ? at ? i ? ou? t ne be nat yheuied ne put lowe vndir
foot. sen ? at ? i body is so heye areised.
PR{O}SA VLTI{M}A.
QUONIA{M} IGITUR UTI PAULO ANTE.
[Sidenote: [The 6^te p{ro}se {and} the laste. ]]
++? Er-fore ? an as I haue shewed a litel her byforne ? at al ? inge ? at is
ywist nis nat knowen by hys nature p{ro}pre. but by ? e nature of he{m}
? at comp{re}henden it. ? Lat vs loke now in as moche as it is leueful to
vs. as who sei? lat vs loken now as we mowen whiche ? {a}t ? e estat is of
? e deuyne substaunce so ? at we mowen [ek] knowen what his science is. ? e
comune iugement of alle creatures resonables ? an is ? is ? at god is
eterne. lat vs considere ? a{n} what is et{er}nite. For certys ? at shal
shewen vs to-gidre ? e deuyne nature {and} ? e deuyne science ? Eternite
? an is p{er}fit possessiou{n} {and} al togidre of lijf interminable
{and} ? at shewe? more clerely by ? e co{m}parisou{n} or collac{i}ou{n} of
temp{or}el ? inges. for al ? ing ? at lyue? in tyme it is p{re}sent {and}
p{ro}cedi? fro preterit? in to fut{ur}es. ? at is to sein. fro tyme
passed in to tyme comynge. ne ? er nis no ? ing establissed i{n} tyme ? at
may enbracen to-gidre al ? e space of hys lijf. for certys ? it ne ha? it
nat taken ? e tyme of ? e morwe. {and} it ha? lost ? at of ? ister-day. and
certys in ? e lijf of ? is day ? e ne lyuen no more but ry? t as in ? is
moeueable {and} t{ra}nsitorie moment. ? an ? ilke ? inge ? at suffri?
temp{or}el condic{i}ou{n}. a[l]? ough{e} ? at [it] bygan neuer to be. ne
? ough{e} it neu{er}e cese forto be. as aristotle demde of ? e worlde. and
al ? ou? ? at ? e lif of it be strecchid wi? infinite of tyme. ? it algates
nis it no swiche ? ing ? at men my? ten trowen by ry? t ? at it is eterne.
for al ? ou? ? at it comp{re}hende {and} embrace ? e space of life
infinite. ? it algates ne [em]brace? it nat ? e space of ? e lif
alto-gidre. for it ne ha? nat ? e fut{ur}es ? at ne ben nat ? it. ne it ne
ha? no lenger ? e p{re}t{er}it? ? at ben ydon or ypassed. but ? ilke ? ing
? an ? at ha? {and} co{m}prehendi? to-gidre alle ? e plente of ? e lif
i{n}terminable. to whom ? ere ne faili? nat of ? e fut{ur}e. {and} to whom
? er nis nat of ? e p{re}t{er}it escapid nor ypassed. ? ilk[e] same is
ywitnessed or yproued by ry? t to ben eterne. and it byhoue? by necessite
? at ? ilke ? inge be alwey p{re}sent to hym self {and} co{m}potent. as who
sei? alwey p{re}sent to hym self {and} so my? ty ? at al by ry? t at hys
plesaunce. {and} ? {a}t he haue al p{re}sent ? e infinit of ? e moeuable
tyme. wherfore som men trowe{n} wrongefully ? at whan ? ei heren ? at it
semid[e] to plato ? at ? is worlde ne had[de] neuer bygynnynge of tyme. ne
? at it neu{er}e shal haue faylynge. ? ei wenen i{n} ? is man{er}e ? at ? is
worlde ben maked coet{er}ne wi? his makere. as who sei? . ? ei wenen ? at
? is worlde {and} god ben maked to-gidre eterne. and it is a wrongful
wenynge. for o? er ? ing is it to ben yladd by lif interminable as plato
graunted[e] to ? e worlde. {and} o? er ? ing is it to embracen to-gidre
alle ?
e p{re}sence to ? e lif interminable. ? e whiche ? ing it is clere
{and} manifest ? at it is p{ro}pre to ? e deuine ? ou? t. ne it ne sholde
nat semen to vs ? at god is elder ? an ? inges ? at ben ymaked by quantite
of tyme. but ra? er by ? e p{ro}prete of hys symple nature. for ? is ilke
infinit[e] moeuyng of temp{or}el ? inges folwi? ? is p{re}sentarie estat
of ? e lijf i{n}moeueable. {and} so as it ne may nat contrefeten it ne
feyne{n} it ne ben euene lyke to it. for ? e inmoeueablete. ? at is to
seyn ? at is i{n} ? e eternite of god. ? it faile? {and} falle? in to
moeuynge fro ? e simplicite of [the] p{re}sence of god. {and} disencresi?
to ? e infinite quantite of fut{ur}e {and} of p{re}terit. {and} so as it
ne may nat han togidre al ? e plente of ? e lif. algates ? itte for as
moche as it ne cesi? neuere forto ben in som manere it seme? somde[l] to
vs ? at it folwi? {and} resembli? ? ilke ? ing ? {a}t it ne may nat attayne
to. ne fulfille. {and} bynde? it self to som manere p{re}sence of ? is
litel {and} swifte moment. ? e whiche p{re}sence of ? is lytele {and}
swifte moment. for ? at it bere? a manere ymage or lykenesse of ? e ay
dwellynge p{re}sence of god. it graunte? to swiche manere ? inges as it
bitidi? to ? at it seme? hem ? at ? ise ? inges han ben {and} ben {and} for
[? {a}t] ? e p{re}sence of swiche litel moment ne may nat dwelle ? er-for
[it] rauyssid[e] {and} took ? e infinit[e] wey of tyme. ? at is to seyn by
successiou{n}. {and} by ? is man{er}e it is ydon. for ? at it sholde
continue ? e lif in goynge of ? e whiche lif it ne my? t[e] nat embrace ? e
plente in dwellynge. {and} for ? i yif we willen putte wor? i name[s] to
? inges {and} folwen plato. lat vs seyn ? a{n} so? ely ? at god is et{er}ne.
{and} ? at ? e worlde is p{er}petuel. ? an syn ? at euery iugeme{n}t knowe?
{and} comp{re}hendi? by hys owen nature ? inges ? at ben subiect vnto hym.
? ere is so? ely al-wey to god an et{er}ne {and} p{re}sentarie estat.
{and} ? e science of hym ? at ouer-passe? alle temp{or}el moe[ue]m{en}t
dwelli? in ? e symplicite of hys p{re}sence {and} embrace? {and}
considere? alle ? e infinit spaces of tymes p{re}terit? {and} fut{ur}es
{and} loke? in ? is symple knowynge alle ? inges of p{re}t{er}it ry? t as
? ei weren ydoon p{re}sently ry? t now ? yif ? ou wolt ? an ? enke {and}
avise{n} ? e p{re}science by whiche it knowe? al[le] ? i{n}ges ? ou ne
shalt nat demen it as p{re}science of ? inges to comen. but ? ou shalt
deme{n} [it] more ry? tfully ? at it is science of presence or of
instaunce ? at neuer ne fayle? . for whiche it nis nat ycleped
p{ro}uidence but it sholde ra? er be cleped purueaunce ? at is establissed
ful fer fro ry? t lowe ? inges. {and} byholde? from a-fer alle ? inges ry? t
as it were fro ? e heye hey? te of ? inges. whi axest ? ou ? an or why
disputest ? ou ? an ? at ? ilke ? inges ben don by necessite whiche ? at ben
yseyen {and} yknowen by ? e deuyne sy? t. syn ? at for so? e men ne maken
nat ? ilke ? i{n}ges necessarie. whiche ? at ? e[i] seen be ydoon in hir{e}
sy? t. for addi? ? i byholdynge any necessite to ? ilke ? inges ? at ? ou
byholdest p{re}sent. ? Nay q{uo}d I. _p. _ Certys ? an yif men my? te maken
any digne comparisou{n} or collac{i}ou{n} of ? e p{re}sence diuine. {and}
of ? e p{re}sence of mankynde. ry? t so as ? e seen so{m}me ? inges in ? is
temp{or}el presente. ry? t so see? god alle ? inges by hys eterne
p{re}sent. ? wherfore ? is dyuyne p{re}science ne chaunge? nat ? e nature
ne ? e p{ro}prete of ? inges but byholde?
wexest yuel oute of ? i witte. ? is figure amoneste? ? e ? {a}t axest ? e
heuene wi? ? i ry? t[e] visage. {and} hast areised ? i forhede to beren vp
on heye ? i corage so ? at ? i ? ou? t ne be nat yheuied ne put lowe vndir
foot. sen ? at ? i body is so heye areised.
PR{O}SA VLTI{M}A.
QUONIA{M} IGITUR UTI PAULO ANTE.
[Sidenote: [The 6^te p{ro}se {and} the laste. ]]
++? Er-fore ? an as I haue shewed a litel her byforne ? at al ? inge ? at is
ywist nis nat knowen by hys nature p{ro}pre. but by ? e nature of he{m}
? at comp{re}henden it. ? Lat vs loke now in as moche as it is leueful to
vs. as who sei? lat vs loken now as we mowen whiche ? {a}t ? e estat is of
? e deuyne substaunce so ? at we mowen [ek] knowen what his science is. ? e
comune iugement of alle creatures resonables ? an is ? is ? at god is
eterne. lat vs considere ? a{n} what is et{er}nite. For certys ? at shal
shewen vs to-gidre ? e deuyne nature {and} ? e deuyne science ? Eternite
? an is p{er}fit possessiou{n} {and} al togidre of lijf interminable
{and} ? at shewe? more clerely by ? e co{m}parisou{n} or collac{i}ou{n} of
temp{or}el ? inges. for al ? ing ? at lyue? in tyme it is p{re}sent {and}
p{ro}cedi? fro preterit? in to fut{ur}es. ? at is to sein. fro tyme
passed in to tyme comynge. ne ? er nis no ? ing establissed i{n} tyme ? at
may enbracen to-gidre al ? e space of hys lijf. for certys ? it ne ha? it
nat taken ? e tyme of ? e morwe. {and} it ha? lost ? at of ? ister-day. and
certys in ? e lijf of ? is day ? e ne lyuen no more but ry? t as in ? is
moeueable {and} t{ra}nsitorie moment. ? an ? ilke ? inge ? at suffri?
temp{or}el condic{i}ou{n}. a[l]? ough{e} ? at [it] bygan neuer to be. ne
? ough{e} it neu{er}e cese forto be. as aristotle demde of ? e worlde. and
al ? ou? ? at ? e lif of it be strecchid wi? infinite of tyme. ? it algates
nis it no swiche ? ing ? at men my? ten trowen by ry? t ? at it is eterne.
for al ? ou? ? at it comp{re}hende {and} embrace ? e space of life
infinite. ? it algates ne [em]brace? it nat ? e space of ? e lif
alto-gidre. for it ne ha? nat ? e fut{ur}es ? at ne ben nat ? it. ne it ne
ha? no lenger ? e p{re}t{er}it? ? at ben ydon or ypassed. but ? ilke ? ing
? an ? at ha? {and} co{m}prehendi? to-gidre alle ? e plente of ? e lif
i{n}terminable. to whom ? ere ne faili? nat of ? e fut{ur}e. {and} to whom
? er nis nat of ? e p{re}t{er}it escapid nor ypassed. ? ilk[e] same is
ywitnessed or yproued by ry? t to ben eterne. and it byhoue? by necessite
? at ? ilke ? inge be alwey p{re}sent to hym self {and} co{m}potent. as who
sei? alwey p{re}sent to hym self {and} so my? ty ? at al by ry? t at hys
plesaunce. {and} ? {a}t he haue al p{re}sent ? e infinit of ? e moeuable
tyme. wherfore som men trowe{n} wrongefully ? at whan ? ei heren ? at it
semid[e] to plato ? at ? is worlde ne had[de] neuer bygynnynge of tyme. ne
? at it neu{er}e shal haue faylynge. ? ei wenen i{n} ? is man{er}e ? at ? is
worlde ben maked coet{er}ne wi? his makere. as who sei? . ? ei wenen ? at
? is worlde {and} god ben maked to-gidre eterne. and it is a wrongful
wenynge. for o? er ? ing is it to ben yladd by lif interminable as plato
graunted[e] to ? e worlde. {and} o? er ? ing is it to embracen to-gidre
alle ?
e p{re}sence to ? e lif interminable. ? e whiche ? ing it is clere
{and} manifest ? at it is p{ro}pre to ? e deuine ? ou? t. ne it ne sholde
nat semen to vs ? at god is elder ? an ? inges ? at ben ymaked by quantite
of tyme. but ra? er by ? e p{ro}prete of hys symple nature. for ? is ilke
infinit[e] moeuyng of temp{or}el ? inges folwi? ? is p{re}sentarie estat
of ? e lijf i{n}moeueable. {and} so as it ne may nat contrefeten it ne
feyne{n} it ne ben euene lyke to it. for ? e inmoeueablete. ? at is to
seyn ? at is i{n} ? e eternite of god. ? it faile? {and} falle? in to
moeuynge fro ? e simplicite of [the] p{re}sence of god. {and} disencresi?
to ? e infinite quantite of fut{ur}e {and} of p{re}terit. {and} so as it
ne may nat han togidre al ? e plente of ? e lif. algates ? itte for as
moche as it ne cesi? neuere forto ben in som manere it seme? somde[l] to
vs ? at it folwi? {and} resembli? ? ilke ? ing ? {a}t it ne may nat attayne
to. ne fulfille. {and} bynde? it self to som manere p{re}sence of ? is
litel {and} swifte moment. ? e whiche p{re}sence of ? is lytele {and}
swifte moment. for ? at it bere? a manere ymage or lykenesse of ? e ay
dwellynge p{re}sence of god. it graunte? to swiche manere ? inges as it
bitidi? to ? at it seme? hem ? at ? ise ? inges han ben {and} ben {and} for
[? {a}t] ? e p{re}sence of swiche litel moment ne may nat dwelle ? er-for
[it] rauyssid[e] {and} took ? e infinit[e] wey of tyme. ? at is to seyn by
successiou{n}. {and} by ? is man{er}e it is ydon. for ? at it sholde
continue ? e lif in goynge of ? e whiche lif it ne my? t[e] nat embrace ? e
plente in dwellynge. {and} for ? i yif we willen putte wor? i name[s] to
? inges {and} folwen plato. lat vs seyn ? a{n} so? ely ? at god is et{er}ne.
{and} ? at ? e worlde is p{er}petuel. ? an syn ? at euery iugeme{n}t knowe?
{and} comp{re}hendi? by hys owen nature ? inges ? at ben subiect vnto hym.
? ere is so? ely al-wey to god an et{er}ne {and} p{re}sentarie estat.
{and} ? e science of hym ? at ouer-passe? alle temp{or}el moe[ue]m{en}t
dwelli? in ? e symplicite of hys p{re}sence {and} embrace? {and}
considere? alle ? e infinit spaces of tymes p{re}terit? {and} fut{ur}es
{and} loke? in ? is symple knowynge alle ? inges of p{re}t{er}it ry? t as
? ei weren ydoon p{re}sently ry? t now ? yif ? ou wolt ? an ? enke {and}
avise{n} ? e p{re}science by whiche it knowe? al[le] ? i{n}ges ? ou ne
shalt nat demen it as p{re}science of ? inges to comen. but ? ou shalt
deme{n} [it] more ry? tfully ? at it is science of presence or of
instaunce ? at neuer ne fayle? . for whiche it nis nat ycleped
p{ro}uidence but it sholde ra? er be cleped purueaunce ? at is establissed
ful fer fro ry? t lowe ? inges. {and} byholde? from a-fer alle ? inges ry? t
as it were fro ? e heye hey? te of ? inges. whi axest ? ou ? an or why
disputest ? ou ? an ? at ? ilke ? inges ben don by necessite whiche ? at ben
yseyen {and} yknowen by ? e deuyne sy? t. syn ? at for so? e men ne maken
nat ? ilke ? i{n}ges necessarie. whiche ? at ? e[i] seen be ydoon in hir{e}
sy? t. for addi? ? i byholdynge any necessite to ? ilke ? inges ? at ? ou
byholdest p{re}sent. ? Nay q{uo}d I. _p. _ Certys ? an yif men my? te maken
any digne comparisou{n} or collac{i}ou{n} of ? e p{re}sence diuine. {and}
of ? e p{re}sence of mankynde. ry? t so as ? e seen so{m}me ? inges in ? is
temp{or}el presente. ry? t so see? god alle ? inges by hys eterne
p{re}sent. ? wherfore ? is dyuyne p{re}science ne chaunge? nat ? e nature
ne ? e p{ro}prete of ? inges but byholde?
