But to return from this
digression
to the Equites, and that henceforward we read only of
Servian constitution.
Servian constitution.
William Smith - 1844 - Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities - c
ii.
21;
important events are assigned to Servius by uni- Dionys. iv. 9; Liv. i. 46). The king had good
versal tradition. First he established a constitu- reasons for mistrusting the patricians. Accordingly,
tion, in which the plebs took its place as the second when he took up his residence on the Esquiline,
part of the nation, and of which we shall speak he would not allow them to dwell there, but ns-
more fully below. Secondly, he extended the po- signed to them the valley, which was called after
moerium, or hallowed boundary of the city (Dict. them the Patricius Vicus, or Patrician Street
of Antiq. s. v. Pomoerium), and completed the city (Festus s. v. ). Meantime, the long and uninter-
by incorporating with it the Quirinal, Viminal and rupted popularity of the king seemed to deprive
Esquiline hills. He surrounded the whole with L. Tarquinius more and more of the chance of
a stone wall called after him the wall of Ser. regaining the throne of his father. The patricians,
vius Tullius ; and from the Porta Collina to the anxious to recover their supremacy, readily joined
Esquiline Gate where the hills sloped gently to the Tarquinius in a conspiracy to assassinate the king.
plain, he constructed a gigantic mound, nearly a The legend of his death is too celebrated to be
mile in length, and a moat, one hundred feet in omitted here, although it perhaps contains no fur-
breadth and thirty in depth, from which the earth ther truth than that Servius fell a victim to a pa-
of the mound was dug: Rome thus acquired a trician conspiracy, the leader of which was the son
circumference of five miles, and this continued to or descendant of the former king. The legend ran
be the legal extent of the city till the time of the as follows. Servius Tullius, soon after his succes-
emperors, although suburbs were added to it. sion, gave his two daughters in marriage to the two
Thirdly, Servius established an important alliance sons of Tarquinius Priscus. L. Tarquinius the elder
with the Latins, by which Rome and the cities of was married to a quiet and gentle wife ; Aruns,
Latium became the members of one great league. the younger, to an aspiring and ambitious woman.
As leagues of this kind were always connected the character of the two brothers was the very
among the ancients with the worship at some opposite of the wives who had fallen to their lot';
common temple, a temple of Diana or the Moon was for Lucius was proud and haughty, but Arung un-
built upon the Aventine, which was not included ambitious and quiet. The wife of Aruns, enraged
in the pomoerium, as the place of the religious at the long life of her father, and fearing that
meetings of the two nations. It appears that the at his death her husband would tamely resign
Sabines likewise shared in the worship of this the sovereignty to his elder brother, resolved to
temple. There was a celebrated tradition, that a destroy both her father and her husband. Her
Sabine husbandman had a cow of extraordinary fiendish spirit put into the heart of Lucius thoughts
beauty and size, and that the soothsayers had pre- of crime which he had never entertained before.
dicted that whoever should sacrifice this cow to Lucius murdered his wife, and the younger Tullia
Diana on the Aventine, would raise his country to her husband ; and the survivors, without even the
rule over the confederates. The Sabine, anxious to show of mourning, were straightway joined in un-
Becure the supremacy of his own people, had driven hallowed wedlock. Tullia now incessantly urged
the cow to Rome, and was on the point of sacri- her husband to murder her father, and thus obtain
ficing her before the altar, when the crafty Roman the kingdom which he so ardently coveted. It was
priest rebuked him for daring to offer it with un- said that their design was hastened by the belief
washed hands. While the Sabine went and washed that Servius, in order to complete his legislation,
in the Tiber, the Roman sacrificed the cow. The entertained the thought of laying down his kingly
gigantic horns of the animal were preserved down power, and establishing the consular form of go-
to very late times, nailed up in the vestibule (Liv. vernment. The patricians were no less alarmed at
i. 45). From the fact that the Aventine was se. this scheme, as it would have had the effect of con-
lected as the place of meeting, it has been inferred | firming for ever the hated laws of Servius. Their
that the supremacy of Rome was acknowledged by mutual hatred and fears united them closely_to
the Latins; but since we find it expressly stated gether; and when the conspiracy was ripe, Tar-
that this supremacy was not acquired till the reign quinius entered the forum arrayed in the kingly
of Tarquinius Superbus, this view is perhaps not robes, seated himself in the royal chair in the
strictly correct. (Comp. Niebuhr, Lectures on the senate- house, and ordered the senators to be sum-
History of Rome, p. 118, London, 1848. )
moned to him as their king. At the first news of
After Servius had established his new constitu- the commotion, Servius hastened to the senate-
tion, he did homage to the majesty of the cen- house, and standing at the door-way, ordered Tar-
turies, by calling them together, and leaving them quinius to come down from the throne. Tarquinius
to decide whether he was to reign over them or sprang forward, seized the old man, and flung him
not. The body which he had called into existence, the stone steps. Covered with blood, the
naturally ratified his power, and declared him to king was hastening home ; but, before he reached
be their king. The patricians, however, were far it, he was overtaken by the servants of Tarquinius,
from acquiescing in the new order of things, and and murdered. Tullia drove to the senate-house,
hated the man who had deprived them of their and greeted her husband as king ; but her trans-
exclusive rule, and had conferred such important ports of joy struck even him with horror. He bade
benefits upon the plebeians. In addition to his her go home ; and as she was returning, her cha-
constitutional changes in favour of the second order rioteer pulled up, and pointed out the corpse of her
in the state, tradition related, that out of his pri- father lying in his blood across the road. She
vate wealtb, he discharged the debts of those who commanded him to drive on; the blood of her
were reduced to indigence ; that he deprived the father spirted over the carriage and on her dress ;
1
lov
:
VOL. III.
4 G
## p. 1186 (#1202) ##########################################
1186
TULLIUS.
TULLIUS.
.
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
and from that day forward the street bore the this point we are entirely in the dark. Niebuhr,
name of the Vicus Sceleratus, or Wicked Street in the first edition of his history, inclined strongly
The body lay unburied, for Tarquinius said scof- to the opinion that Rome was of Etruscan origin,
fingly, “Romulus too went without burial ;” and and in his lectures, delivered in the year 1826, he
this impious mockery is said to have given rise to adopted the Etruscan tradition respecting the origin
his surname of Superbus (Liv. i. 46–48 ; Ov. of Servius Tullius, on the ground " that Etruscan
Fast. vi. 581, foll. ). Servius had reigned forty. | literature is so decidedly more ancient than that of
four years. His memory was long cherished by the Romans, that he did not hesitate to give pre-
the plebeians, and his birth-day was celebrated on ference to the traditions of the former. ” (Lectures,
the nones of every month, for it was remembered p. 84. ) In the second edition of his history, how-
that he was born on the nones of some month, but ever, Niebuhr so completely abandoned his former
the month itself had become a matter of uncer- idea of the Etruscan origin of Rome, that he would
tainty. At a later time, when the oppressions of not even admit the Etruscan origin of the Luceres, a
the patricians became more and more intolerable, point in which most subsequent scholars dissent
the senate found it necessary to forbid the markets from him ; and in his Lectures of the year 18:28,
to be holden on the nones, lest the people should he strongly maintains the Latin origin of Servius
attempt an insurrection to restore the laws of Tullius, and asserts his belief that "Etruscan lite-
their martyred monarch. (Macrob. Sat. i. 13. ) rature is mostly assigned to too early a period, and
The Roman traditions, as we have seen, were that to the time from the Hannibalian war down to
unanimous in making Servius Tullius of Latin the time of Sulla, a period of somewhat more than a
origin. He is universally stated to have been the century, most of the literary productions of the Etrus-
son of a native of Corniculum, which was a Latin cans must be referred. ” (Lectures, p. 125. ) But the
town ; and Niebuhr, in his Lectures, supposes that fact is that whether we are to follow the Etruscan
he may have been the offspring of a marriage be- or the Roman tradition about Servius is one of
tween one of the Luceres and a woman of Corni- those points on which no certainty can be by any
culum, previously to the establishment of the con possibility obtained. So much seems clear, that
nubium, and that this may be the foundation of Servius usurped the throne : he seized the royalty
the story of his descent. His name Tullius also upon the murder of the former king, without being
indicates a Latin origin, since the Tullii are ex- elected by the senate and the comitia, and he in-
pressly mentioned as one of the Alban gentes troduced great constitutional changes, apparently
which were received into the Latin state in the to strengthen his power against a powerful faction
reign of Tullus Hostilius. (Liv. i. 30. ) His in- | in the state. It is equally clear that his reign
stitutions, likewise, bear all the traces of a Latin came to a violent end: he was dethroned and
character. But the Etruscan tradition about this murdered by the descendants of the previous king,
king was entirely different, and made him a native in league with his enemies in the state, who sought
of Etruria. This Etruscan tradition was related to recover the power of which they had been dis-
by the emperor Claudius, in a speech which he possessed. Now if we are right in our supposition
made upon the admission of some Lugdunensian that Tarquinius Priscus and Tarquinius Superbus
Gauls into the senate ; and the fragments of which were both of Etruscan origin, and represent an
are still preserved on two tables discovered at Etruscan sovereignty at Rome (TARQUINIUS), it
Lyons in the sixteenth century, and since the time seems to follow that the reign of Servius Tullius
of Lipsius have been printed in most editions of represents a successful attempt of the Latins to
Tacitus. In this speech Claudius says
that, ac-
recover their independence, or in any case the so-
cording to the Tuscans, Servius was the faithful com- vereignty of an Etruscan people different from the
panion of Caeles Vibenna, and shared all his for-
one to which the Tarquins belonged. Further than
tunes: that at last being overpowered by a variety of this we cannot go ; and it seems to us impossible
disasters, he quitted Etruria with the remains of to determine which supposition has the greatest pre-
the army which had served under Caeles, went to ponderance of evidence in its favour. K. O. Müller
Rome, and occupied the Caelian Hill, calling it so adopted the latter supposition. He believed that
after his former commander: that he exchanged the Etruscan town of Tarquinii was at the head of
his Tuscan name Masturna for the Roman one of the twelve cities of Etruria at this time, that it
Servius Tullius, obtained the kingly power, and conquered Rome, and that the reign of Tarquinius
wielded it to the great good of the state. ” This Priscus represents the supremacy of the state of
Caeles Vibenna was well known to the Roman Tarquinii at Rome. He further supposed that the
writers, according to whom he came himself to supremacy of Tarquinii may not have been uni-
Rome, though the statements in whose reign he versally acknowledged throughout Etruria, and
came differed greatly. All accounts, however, re- that the army of Caeles and of his lieutenant Mas-
present him as a leader of an army raised by him- tarna perhaps belonged to the town of Volsinii,
self, and not belonging to any state, and as coming which wished to maintain its independence against
to Rome by the invitation of the Roman kings, to Tarquinii ; that it was with the remains of this
assist them. (CAELES. ] There can be no question army that Mastarna eventually conquered Rome,
that the emperor Claudius drew his account from and thus destroyed the dominion of Tarquinii in
Etruscan annals ; and there is no reason for dis- that city. (Müller, Etrusker, vol. i. p. 121. )
believing that Caeles Vibenna and Mastarna are
CONSTITUTION OF SERVIUS TULLIUS.
historical personages, for, as Niebuhr ohserves,
Caeles is too frequently and too distinctly men- The most important event connected with the
tioned to be fabulous, and his Etruscan name can reign of Servius Tullius is the new constitution
not have been invented by the Romans. The value which he gave to the Roman state. The details of
of the tradition about Mastarna would very much this constitution are stated in different articles in
depend upon the date of the Etruscan authorities, the Dictionary of Antiquities, and it is therefore only
from whom Claudius derived his account ; but on ) necessary to give here a general outline, which the
1
1
ܪ
t
66
1
1
## p. 1187 (#1203) ##########################################
TULLIUS.
1187
TULLIUS.
reader can fill up by references to the work just | inhabitants in each regio, and of their property,
mentioned. The two main objects of the consti- for purposes of taxation, and for levying the troops
tution of Servius were to give the plebs political for the armies. Further, each country tribe or
independence, and to assign to property that in- regio was divided into a certain number of Pagi,
fluence in the state which had previously belonged a name which had been given to the divisions of
to birth exclusively ; and it cannot be questioned the Roman territory as early as the reign of Numa
that the military and financial objects, which he (Dionys. ii. 76); and each Pagus also formed an
Becured by the changes he introduced, were re- organised body, with a Magister Pausi at its hend,
garded by him as of secondary importance. In who kept a register of the naines and of the pro-
order to carry his purpose into effect Servius made perty of all persons in the pagus, mised the taxes,
a two-fold division of the Roman people, one ter- and summoned the people, when necessary, to war.
ritorial, and the other according to property. He Each pagus had its own sacred rites and common
first divided the whole Roman territory into Re- sanctuary, connected with which was a yearly fes-
giones, and the inhabitants into Tribus, the people tival called Puganalia, at which all the Pagani took
of each region forming a tribe. The city was part. Dionysius anys that the Pagi were fortified
divided into four regions or tribes, and the country places, established by Servius Tullius, to which the
around into twenty-six regions or tribes, so that country people might retreat in case of an hostile in-
the entire number of Tribus Urbanae and Tribus road ; but this is scarcely correct, for even if Servius
Rusticae, as they were respectively called, amounted Tullius established such fortified places, it is evident
to thirty. (Livi i. 43 ; Dionys. iv. 14, 15. ) Livy that the word was used to indicate a local division,
does not mention the number of the country tribes and must have been given to the country adjoining
in his account of the Servian constitution, and we the fortified place as well as to the fortified place
are indebted to Fabius Pictor, the oldest of the itself. (Dionys. iv. 15; Varr. L. L. vi. 24, 26 ;
Roman annalists (Dionys. l. c. ), and to Varro (ap. Macrob. Saturn. i. 16 ; Ov. Fast. i. 669 ; Dict. of
Non. p. 43), for the number of twenty-six. More- Antiq. s. v. Pagi. ) As the country tribes were
over Livy, when he speaks of the whole number of divided into Pagi, so were the city tribes divided
the tribes in B. C. 495, says that they were made into Vici, with a Magister Vici at the head of each,
twenty-one in that year. (Liv. ii. 21 ; comp. Dionys. who performed duties analogous to those of the
vii. 61. ) Hence the statements of Fabius Pictor Magister Pagi. The Vici in like manner had their
and Varro might appear to be doubtful. But in own religious rites and sanctuaries, which were
the first place their account has the greatest in- erected at spots where two or more ways met (in
ternal probability, since the number thirty plays compitis); and consequently their festival, cor-
such an important part in the Roman constitution, responding to the Paganalia, was called Compitalia.
and the thirty tribes would thus correspond to the (Dionys. iv. 14 ; Dict. of Antiq. s. vv. Vicus and
thirty curiae ; and in the second place Niebuhr Compitalia. )
has called attention to the fact that in the war with The main object which Servius had in view in
Porsena, Rome lost a considerable part of her ter- the institution of the tribes was to give an organi-
ritory, and thus the number of her tribes would sation to the plebeians, of which they had been
naturally be reduced. When, however, Niebuhr entirely destitute before ; but whether the patricians
proceeds to say that the tribes were reduced in the were included in the tribes or not, is a subject of
war with Porsena from thirty to twenty, because great difficulty, and has given rise to great differ-
it was the ancient practice in Italy to deprive a ence of opinion among modern scholars, some
conquered nation of a third part of its territory, he regarding the division into tribes as a local division
seems to have forgotten, as Becker has remarked, of the whole Roman people, and consequently of
that the four city tribes could not have been taken patricians and their clients as well as of plebeians,
into account in such a forfeiture, and that conse- while others look upon it as simply an organisation
quently a third part of the territory would not of the second order. The undoubted object of
have been ten tribes. Into this question, however, Servius Tullius in the institution of the tribes led
it is unnecessary further to enter. The conquest Niebuhr to maintain that the patricians could not
of Porsena bad undoubtedly broken up the whole possibly have belonged to the tribes originally ;
Servian system ; and thus it was all the easier to but as we find them in the tribes at a later period
form a new tribe in B. C. 504, when the gens (Liv. iv. 24, v. 30, 32), he supposed that they were
Claudia migrated to Rome. (Liv. ii. 16. ) It would admitted into them by the legislation of the de-
appear that an entirely new distribution of the cemvirs. But probable as this might appear, all
tribes became necessary, and this was probably the evidence we possess goes the other way, and
carried into effect in B. C. 495, soon after the battle tends to show that the tribes were a local division
of the lake of Regillus. In fact the words of Livy of the whole Roman people. In the first place, if
(ii. 21) already referred to state as much, for he Servius had created thirty local tribes for the plebs
does not say that before this year there were alone, from which the patricians were excluded, it
twenty tribes, or that the twenty-first was then is not easy to see why the three ancient tribes of
added for the first time, but simply that twenty- the Ramnes, Tities, and Luceres, should not have
one tribes were then formed (Romae tribus una et continued in existence. This we know was not the
viginti factae). The subsequent increase in the num- case ; for it is certain, that the three ancient tribes
ber of the tribes, till they reached that of thirty-five, disappear from the time of the Servian constitution,
is related in the Dictionary of Antiquities (s. v. and that their names alone were retained by the
Tribus).
But to return from this digression to the Equites, and that henceforward we read only of
Servian constitution. Each tribe was an organised the division of the patricians into thirty curiae :
body, with a magistrate at its head, called $u- indeed it is expressly said that the pural yerikal
Adpxos by Dionysius (iv. 14), and Curator Tribus were abolished by Servius, and that the Qural TO#-
by Varro (L. L. vi. 86), whose principal duty ap- xal were established in their place. (Dionys. iv.
pears to have consisted in keeping a register of the 14. ) Secondly, it is certain that all the tribes of the
4 6 2
## p. 1188 (#1204) ##########################################
1188
TULLIUS.
TULLIUS.
+
1
year B. C. 495, with the exception of the Crustu- 1 100,000 asses: the second class those who had at
mina, take their names from patrician gentes. least 75,000 asses : the third those who had at
Thirdly, the establishment of the Claudian tribe, least 50,000 asses: the fourth those who had at
consisting as it did mainly of the patrician Claudia least 25,000 asses: and the fifth those who had
geng, is almost of itself sufficient to prove that at least 10,000 asses, according to Böckh's pro-
patricians were included in the Servian tribes. bable conjecture, for Dionysius makes the sum
Niebuhr lays great stress upon the fact that in no necessary for admission to this class 12,500 asses
instance do we find the patricians voting in the (127 minae) and Livy 11,000 asses. It must be
Comitia Tributa before the time of the decemvirs ; recollected, however, that these numbers are not
but as Becker very justly remarks, this does not the ancient onee, when the as was a pound weight
prove any thing, as we have no reason for supposing of copper, but those of the sixth century of the
that the Comitia Tributa were established by city. The original numbers were probably 20,000,
Servius along with the tribes. Such an assembly 15,000, 10,000, 5000, and 2000 asses respectively,
would have had no meaning in the Servian consti- which were increased fivefold, when the as was
tution, and would have been opposed to its first coined so much lighter. (Böckh, Metrologische
principles. The Comitia Tributa were called into Untersuchungen, c. xxix. ) Further, for military
existence, when the plebs began to struggle after purposes each of the five classes was divided into
independence, and had tribunes of their own at elder (Seniores) and younger (Juniores) men : the
their head ; and it is certainly improbable that former consisting of men from the age of 46 to 60,
patricians should have been allowed to vote in the latter of men from the age of 17 to 45. It
assemblies summoned by plebeian magistrates to was from the Juniores that the armies of the state
promote the interests of the plebs. The Comitia were levied: the Seniores were not obliged to serve
Tributa must not therefore be regarded as assem- in the field, and could only be called upon to
blies of the tribes, as Becker has justly remarked, defend the city. Moreover, all the soldiers had to
but as assemblies of the plebeians, who voted find their own arms and armour ; but it was so
according to tribes, as their natural divisions. arranged that the expense of the equipment should
Hence as the same writer observes, we see the be in proportion to the wealth of each class.
full force of the expression in the Leges Valeria Servius however did not make this arrangement
Horatia, Publilia and Hortensia : “ quod tributim of the people for military purposes alone. He had
plebes jussisset. ”
another and more important object in view, namely,
The tribes therefore were an organisation of the the creation of a new national assembly, which was
whole Roman people, patricians as well as plebeians, to possess the powers formerly exercised by the
according to their local divisions ; but they were Comitia curiata, and thus become the sovereign
instituted, as we have already remarked, for the assembly in the state. For this purpose he divided
benefit of the plebeians, who had not, like the each classis into a certain number of centuriae, each
patricians, possessed previously any political organi- of which counted as one vote. But in accordance
sation. At the same time, though the institution with the great principle of his constitution, which,
of the tribes gave the plebeians a political organi- as has been several times remarked, was to give
sation, it conferred upon them no political power, the preponderance of power to wealth, a century
no right to take any part in the management of was not made of a fixed number of men ; but the
public affairs or in the elections. These rights, first or richest class contained a far greater number
however, were bestowed upon them by another of centuries than any of the other classes, although
institution of Servius Tullius, which was entirely they must at the same time have contained a much
distinct from and had no connection with the smaller number of men, Thus the first class con-
thirty tribes. He made a new division of the tained 80 centuries, the second 20, the third 20,
whole Roman people into Classes according to the the fourth 20, and the fifth 30, in all 170. One
amount of their property, and he so arranged these half of the centuries consisted of Seniores, and the
classes that the wealthiest persons, whether patri- other half of Juniores ; by which an advantage was
cians or plebeians, should possess the chief power given to age and experience over youth and rash-
and influence. In order to ascertain the property ness, for the Seniores, though possessing an equal
of each citizen, he instituted the Census, which was number of votes, must of course have been very
a register of Roman citizens and their property, | inferior in number to the Juniores. Besides these
and enacted that it should be taken anew from 170 centuries of the classes, Servius formed five
time to time. Under the republic it was taken other centuries, admission into which did not
afresh, as is well known, every five years, Lists depend upon the census. Of these the smiths and
of the citizens were made out by the curator tribus carpenters (fabri) formed two centuries, and the
or magistrate of each tribe, and each citizen had to horn-blowers and trumpeters (cornicines and tubi-
state upon oath the amount and value of his pro- cines) two other centuries : these four centures
perty. According to the returns thus obtained a voted with the classes, but Livy and Dionysius
division of the citizens was made, which determined give a different statement as to which of the classes
the tax (tributum), which each citizen was to pay, they voted with. The other century not belonging
the kind of military service he was to perform, to the classes, and erroneously called the sixth
and the position he was to occupy in the popular class by Dionysius, comprised all those persons
assembly. The whole arrangenient was of a mili- whose property did not amount to that of the fifth
tary character. The people assembled in the Campus class. This century, however, consisted of three
as an army (exercitus, or, according to the more subdivisions according to the amount of their pro-
ancient expression, classis), and was therefore perty, called respectively the accensi velati, the
divided into two parts, the cavalry (equites), and proletarii and capite censi : the accensi velati were
infantry (pedites). The infantry was divided into those whose property was at least 1500 asses, or
five classes. The first class contained all those originally 300 asses, and they served as supernu-
persons whose property amounted at least to meraries in the army without arms, but ready to
## p. 1189 (#1205) ##########################################
TULLIUS.
1189
TULLIUS.
TULLIUS.
De second class those who had at
1: the third those who has a
s: the fourth those who bad
1; and the bath those who had
Lsses, according to Bockel mit
for Dionyuas makes the sun
ission to this ciass 12,5W 140
Livy 11,000 asset. Il est be
rer, that these pubbers are st
when the as ras a perdre
of the suruh century of the
nunc bers were probably St.
000, and 2000 asses resperetet
,
zsed frefald, ybes the a tu
Lighter. (Bockh, Metraatide
zin) furber, for at
le sive classes was dinded
take the arms and places of such as might fall in equites ; but as we know that the equestrian census
battle: the proletarii were those who had at least in the later times of the republic was four times
375 asses, or originally 75 asses, and they were the amount of that of the first class, it is probable
sometimes armed in pressing danger at the public that the same census was established by Servius
expense : while the cupite censi were all those whose Tullius. Niebuhr indeed supposed that the sex
property was less than the sum last mentioned, and suffragia comprised all the patricians, independent
they were never called upon to serve till the time of the property they possessed ; but this supposition
of Marius. Thus the infantry or Pedites contained is, independent of other considerations, disproved
in all 175 centuries.
by the fact that we have express mention of a
The cavalry or Equitos were divided by Servius patrician, L. Tarquitius, who was compelled on
Tullius into 18 centuries, which did not comprise account of his poverty to serve on foot.
Seniores or Juniores, but consisted only of men The 175 centuries of pedites and the 18 of
below the age of forty-six. The early history and equites thus made a total of 193 centuries. Of
arrangement of the Equites have given rise to these, 97 formed a majority of votes in the as-
much discussion among modern scholars, into which sembly. Although all the Roman citizens had a
we cannot enter here, (See Dict. of Antiq. 8. v. vote in this assembly, which was called the Co
Equites. ) It is sufficient for our present purpose mitia Centuriata, from the voting by centuries,
to state that Tarquinius Priscus had divided each it will be seen at once that the poorer classes had
of the three ancient centuries of equites into two not much influence in the assembly ; for the 18
troops, called respectively the first (priores) and centuries of the equites and the 80 centuries of
second (posteriores) Ramnes, Tities, and Luceres. the first class, voted first ; and if they could come
These three double centuries Servius Tullius formed to an agreement upon any measure, they possessed
into six new centuries, usually called the sex at once a majority, and there was no occasion to
suffragia : and as they were merely a new organi- call upon the centuries of the other classes to vote
sation of the old body, they must have consisted at all. This was the great object of the institution,
exclusively of patricians. Besides these six cen- which was to give the power to wealth, and not
turies, Servius formed twelve others, taken from either to birth or to numbers.
the richest and most distinguished families in the The preceding account of the centuries has been
state, plebeian as well as patrician. There can be taken from Livy (i. 43) and Dionysius (iv. 16,
little question that a certain amount of property foll. ), wbo agree in all the main points. The
was necessary for admission to all the equestrian account of Cicero (de Re Publ. ii. 22) cannot be re-
centuries, as well in consequence of the timocratic conciled with that of Livy and Dionysius, and
principle of this part of the Servian constitution, as owing to the corruptions of the text it is hopeless
on account of the express statement of Dionysius to make the attempt. The few discrepancies be-
(iv. 18) that the equites were chosen by Servius tween Livy and Dionysius will be seen by the
out of the richest and most illustrious families, and following table, taken from Becker, by which the
of Cicero (de Rep. ii. 22) that they were of the reader will also perceive more clearly the census
highest census (censu maximo). Neither of these of each class, the number of centuries or votes
writers nor Livy mentions the property which was which each contained, and the order in which they
necessary to entitle a person to a place among the voted.
id younger Jasiores, sea : 5
f men from the age of 45 234
from the age of 17 13 43 k
res that the arties of the main
"Djores were not oblid !
could only be caled spet
(oreover, a! ! the soldiers init
s and armor ; but is 13
pense of the equipment should
the wea'th of each c28.
did not make this aspect
itary purposes alone Hebel
portant object in T, name
r national asseza bis, which was
rs formeris exercised by
thus become the green
6. For this purpose be crted
tain number of cat
3
LIVY.
DIONYSIUS.
EQUITES. Centuriae
18 EQUITES. --Centuriae
18
one rote. But in and
ole of his constituat, vide
aimes remarked, was to me
power to sealth, a ceny
ed number of men ; les the
in tained a far greater rente
of the other cases, 2 aan
time hare contained a to
1. Thus the first cas or
be second 90, the thin 1
! fith 30, in ali iva in
nsisted of Spides and the
br which ap adaran na
ence over youth an 34
bough possessing 21
of course bare beret
e Junior Besides these
I. CLASSIS-Census 100 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
40
40
2
I. Classis. -Census 100,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
Centuriae Fabrum
II. CLASSIS. -Census 75,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
40
40
O
10
10
10
10
2
III. Classis. -Census 50,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
IV. CLASSIS. –Census 25,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
10
10
II. CLASSIS. --Census 75 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
Centuriae Fabrum
III. CLASSIS. –Census 50 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
IV. CLASSIS. –Census 25 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
Centuriae cornic. et tubic.
V. CLASSIS. --Census 124 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
15
.
V. CLASSIS. –Census 11,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
Centuriae accensorum,
cornicinum, tubicinum
Centuria capite censorum
15
15
3
1
VI. Classis.
Centuria capite censorum
asees, Serring tur je
sion into which had DX
Of these the saith oi
ed two centures and the
Plers (CRITERIOS 200 m
les: these fear coape
bat Lirt and Dixos
as to which of the day
les century a belung
zeously called the stih
rised all those see
jount so cizi di te
erer, consisted of time
he amount of their ar
the Gras'
:-
Sum total of the Centuriae
194
Sum total of the Centuriae
193
the arreste
pf leas: 15m ses
zer smed ss at
12t arus, bet ir*
4 63
## p. 1190 (#1206) ##########################################
1190
TULLIUS.
TULLUS.
1
.
1
There can be little doubt that the number in the laws ascribed to him ; since the original laws,
Dionysius is the correct one. According to Livy's if they were ever committed to writing, must long
number cases might have arisen in which it was since have perished. (Niebuhr, Hisl. of Rome,
impossible to obtain a majority, as ninety-seven vol. i. p. 249. )
might have voted for a measure and ninety-seven The principal modern writers who have treated
against it. Moreover, Cicero (de Rep. ii. 22) de of the Servian constitution are: Niebuhr, Hist. of
scribes ninety-six as the minority. The other Romne, vol
. i. p. 398, foll. ; Göttling, Geschichte der
discrepancies between Livy and Dionysius are of Römischen Staatsverfassung, p. 230, foll
. ; Gerlach,
no great importance, and need not be discussed Die Verfassung d. Servius in ihrer Entwickelung,
further in this place.
Basel, 1837 ; Huschke, Die Verfassung d. Kön.
The Assembly of the Centuries, or Comilia Cen-Serv. Tull. , Heidelberg, 1838 ; Peter, Epochen d.
turiata, was made by Servius, as we have already Verfassungsgesch. der Römisch. Republ. , Leigzig,
remarked, the sovereign assembly of the nation, 1841; Walter, Gesch. d. Römisch. Rechts, p. 31,
and it accordingly stept into the place formerly foll. , 2nd ed. ; Becker, Handbuch d. Römisch. Alter-
occupied by the Comitia Curiata. Servius trans- thümer, vol. ii. pt. i. p. 164, foll.
ferred to it from the latter assembly the right of TU'LLIUS TIRO. [Tiro. ]
electing kings and the higher magistrates, of TU'LLIUS VALENTI'NUS. (VALENTINUS. )
enacting and repealing laws, and of deciding TULLUS, A'TTIUS. [TULLIUS, ATTJUS. )
upon war, and jurisdiction in cases of appeal from TULLUS, CALVI'SIUS. 1. C. , consul with
the sentence of a judge. He did not, however, A. Cornelius Palma in A. D. 109 (Fasti).
abolish the Comitia Curiatn, but on the contrary 2. P. , consul suffectus in a. D. 110.
he allowed them very great power and influence TULLUS, CLOEʼLIUS or CLUI'LIUS.
in the state. He not only permitted them to [CLOELIUS Tullus. ]
retain the exercise of such rights as affected their TULLUS HOSTI'LIUS. (HOSTILIUS.
important events are assigned to Servius by uni- Dionys. iv. 9; Liv. i. 46). The king had good
versal tradition. First he established a constitu- reasons for mistrusting the patricians. Accordingly,
tion, in which the plebs took its place as the second when he took up his residence on the Esquiline,
part of the nation, and of which we shall speak he would not allow them to dwell there, but ns-
more fully below. Secondly, he extended the po- signed to them the valley, which was called after
moerium, or hallowed boundary of the city (Dict. them the Patricius Vicus, or Patrician Street
of Antiq. s. v. Pomoerium), and completed the city (Festus s. v. ). Meantime, the long and uninter-
by incorporating with it the Quirinal, Viminal and rupted popularity of the king seemed to deprive
Esquiline hills. He surrounded the whole with L. Tarquinius more and more of the chance of
a stone wall called after him the wall of Ser. regaining the throne of his father. The patricians,
vius Tullius ; and from the Porta Collina to the anxious to recover their supremacy, readily joined
Esquiline Gate where the hills sloped gently to the Tarquinius in a conspiracy to assassinate the king.
plain, he constructed a gigantic mound, nearly a The legend of his death is too celebrated to be
mile in length, and a moat, one hundred feet in omitted here, although it perhaps contains no fur-
breadth and thirty in depth, from which the earth ther truth than that Servius fell a victim to a pa-
of the mound was dug: Rome thus acquired a trician conspiracy, the leader of which was the son
circumference of five miles, and this continued to or descendant of the former king. The legend ran
be the legal extent of the city till the time of the as follows. Servius Tullius, soon after his succes-
emperors, although suburbs were added to it. sion, gave his two daughters in marriage to the two
Thirdly, Servius established an important alliance sons of Tarquinius Priscus. L. Tarquinius the elder
with the Latins, by which Rome and the cities of was married to a quiet and gentle wife ; Aruns,
Latium became the members of one great league. the younger, to an aspiring and ambitious woman.
As leagues of this kind were always connected the character of the two brothers was the very
among the ancients with the worship at some opposite of the wives who had fallen to their lot';
common temple, a temple of Diana or the Moon was for Lucius was proud and haughty, but Arung un-
built upon the Aventine, which was not included ambitious and quiet. The wife of Aruns, enraged
in the pomoerium, as the place of the religious at the long life of her father, and fearing that
meetings of the two nations. It appears that the at his death her husband would tamely resign
Sabines likewise shared in the worship of this the sovereignty to his elder brother, resolved to
temple. There was a celebrated tradition, that a destroy both her father and her husband. Her
Sabine husbandman had a cow of extraordinary fiendish spirit put into the heart of Lucius thoughts
beauty and size, and that the soothsayers had pre- of crime which he had never entertained before.
dicted that whoever should sacrifice this cow to Lucius murdered his wife, and the younger Tullia
Diana on the Aventine, would raise his country to her husband ; and the survivors, without even the
rule over the confederates. The Sabine, anxious to show of mourning, were straightway joined in un-
Becure the supremacy of his own people, had driven hallowed wedlock. Tullia now incessantly urged
the cow to Rome, and was on the point of sacri- her husband to murder her father, and thus obtain
ficing her before the altar, when the crafty Roman the kingdom which he so ardently coveted. It was
priest rebuked him for daring to offer it with un- said that their design was hastened by the belief
washed hands. While the Sabine went and washed that Servius, in order to complete his legislation,
in the Tiber, the Roman sacrificed the cow. The entertained the thought of laying down his kingly
gigantic horns of the animal were preserved down power, and establishing the consular form of go-
to very late times, nailed up in the vestibule (Liv. vernment. The patricians were no less alarmed at
i. 45). From the fact that the Aventine was se. this scheme, as it would have had the effect of con-
lected as the place of meeting, it has been inferred | firming for ever the hated laws of Servius. Their
that the supremacy of Rome was acknowledged by mutual hatred and fears united them closely_to
the Latins; but since we find it expressly stated gether; and when the conspiracy was ripe, Tar-
that this supremacy was not acquired till the reign quinius entered the forum arrayed in the kingly
of Tarquinius Superbus, this view is perhaps not robes, seated himself in the royal chair in the
strictly correct. (Comp. Niebuhr, Lectures on the senate- house, and ordered the senators to be sum-
History of Rome, p. 118, London, 1848. )
moned to him as their king. At the first news of
After Servius had established his new constitu- the commotion, Servius hastened to the senate-
tion, he did homage to the majesty of the cen- house, and standing at the door-way, ordered Tar-
turies, by calling them together, and leaving them quinius to come down from the throne. Tarquinius
to decide whether he was to reign over them or sprang forward, seized the old man, and flung him
not. The body which he had called into existence, the stone steps. Covered with blood, the
naturally ratified his power, and declared him to king was hastening home ; but, before he reached
be their king. The patricians, however, were far it, he was overtaken by the servants of Tarquinius,
from acquiescing in the new order of things, and and murdered. Tullia drove to the senate-house,
hated the man who had deprived them of their and greeted her husband as king ; but her trans-
exclusive rule, and had conferred such important ports of joy struck even him with horror. He bade
benefits upon the plebeians. In addition to his her go home ; and as she was returning, her cha-
constitutional changes in favour of the second order rioteer pulled up, and pointed out the corpse of her
in the state, tradition related, that out of his pri- father lying in his blood across the road. She
vate wealtb, he discharged the debts of those who commanded him to drive on; the blood of her
were reduced to indigence ; that he deprived the father spirted over the carriage and on her dress ;
1
lov
:
VOL. III.
4 G
## p. 1186 (#1202) ##########################################
1186
TULLIUS.
TULLIUS.
.
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
and from that day forward the street bore the this point we are entirely in the dark. Niebuhr,
name of the Vicus Sceleratus, or Wicked Street in the first edition of his history, inclined strongly
The body lay unburied, for Tarquinius said scof- to the opinion that Rome was of Etruscan origin,
fingly, “Romulus too went without burial ;” and and in his lectures, delivered in the year 1826, he
this impious mockery is said to have given rise to adopted the Etruscan tradition respecting the origin
his surname of Superbus (Liv. i. 46–48 ; Ov. of Servius Tullius, on the ground " that Etruscan
Fast. vi. 581, foll. ). Servius had reigned forty. | literature is so decidedly more ancient than that of
four years. His memory was long cherished by the Romans, that he did not hesitate to give pre-
the plebeians, and his birth-day was celebrated on ference to the traditions of the former. ” (Lectures,
the nones of every month, for it was remembered p. 84. ) In the second edition of his history, how-
that he was born on the nones of some month, but ever, Niebuhr so completely abandoned his former
the month itself had become a matter of uncer- idea of the Etruscan origin of Rome, that he would
tainty. At a later time, when the oppressions of not even admit the Etruscan origin of the Luceres, a
the patricians became more and more intolerable, point in which most subsequent scholars dissent
the senate found it necessary to forbid the markets from him ; and in his Lectures of the year 18:28,
to be holden on the nones, lest the people should he strongly maintains the Latin origin of Servius
attempt an insurrection to restore the laws of Tullius, and asserts his belief that "Etruscan lite-
their martyred monarch. (Macrob. Sat. i. 13. ) rature is mostly assigned to too early a period, and
The Roman traditions, as we have seen, were that to the time from the Hannibalian war down to
unanimous in making Servius Tullius of Latin the time of Sulla, a period of somewhat more than a
origin. He is universally stated to have been the century, most of the literary productions of the Etrus-
son of a native of Corniculum, which was a Latin cans must be referred. ” (Lectures, p. 125. ) But the
town ; and Niebuhr, in his Lectures, supposes that fact is that whether we are to follow the Etruscan
he may have been the offspring of a marriage be- or the Roman tradition about Servius is one of
tween one of the Luceres and a woman of Corni- those points on which no certainty can be by any
culum, previously to the establishment of the con possibility obtained. So much seems clear, that
nubium, and that this may be the foundation of Servius usurped the throne : he seized the royalty
the story of his descent. His name Tullius also upon the murder of the former king, without being
indicates a Latin origin, since the Tullii are ex- elected by the senate and the comitia, and he in-
pressly mentioned as one of the Alban gentes troduced great constitutional changes, apparently
which were received into the Latin state in the to strengthen his power against a powerful faction
reign of Tullus Hostilius. (Liv. i. 30. ) His in- | in the state. It is equally clear that his reign
stitutions, likewise, bear all the traces of a Latin came to a violent end: he was dethroned and
character. But the Etruscan tradition about this murdered by the descendants of the previous king,
king was entirely different, and made him a native in league with his enemies in the state, who sought
of Etruria. This Etruscan tradition was related to recover the power of which they had been dis-
by the emperor Claudius, in a speech which he possessed. Now if we are right in our supposition
made upon the admission of some Lugdunensian that Tarquinius Priscus and Tarquinius Superbus
Gauls into the senate ; and the fragments of which were both of Etruscan origin, and represent an
are still preserved on two tables discovered at Etruscan sovereignty at Rome (TARQUINIUS), it
Lyons in the sixteenth century, and since the time seems to follow that the reign of Servius Tullius
of Lipsius have been printed in most editions of represents a successful attempt of the Latins to
Tacitus. In this speech Claudius says
that, ac-
recover their independence, or in any case the so-
cording to the Tuscans, Servius was the faithful com- vereignty of an Etruscan people different from the
panion of Caeles Vibenna, and shared all his for-
one to which the Tarquins belonged. Further than
tunes: that at last being overpowered by a variety of this we cannot go ; and it seems to us impossible
disasters, he quitted Etruria with the remains of to determine which supposition has the greatest pre-
the army which had served under Caeles, went to ponderance of evidence in its favour. K. O. Müller
Rome, and occupied the Caelian Hill, calling it so adopted the latter supposition. He believed that
after his former commander: that he exchanged the Etruscan town of Tarquinii was at the head of
his Tuscan name Masturna for the Roman one of the twelve cities of Etruria at this time, that it
Servius Tullius, obtained the kingly power, and conquered Rome, and that the reign of Tarquinius
wielded it to the great good of the state. ” This Priscus represents the supremacy of the state of
Caeles Vibenna was well known to the Roman Tarquinii at Rome. He further supposed that the
writers, according to whom he came himself to supremacy of Tarquinii may not have been uni-
Rome, though the statements in whose reign he versally acknowledged throughout Etruria, and
came differed greatly. All accounts, however, re- that the army of Caeles and of his lieutenant Mas-
present him as a leader of an army raised by him- tarna perhaps belonged to the town of Volsinii,
self, and not belonging to any state, and as coming which wished to maintain its independence against
to Rome by the invitation of the Roman kings, to Tarquinii ; that it was with the remains of this
assist them. (CAELES. ] There can be no question army that Mastarna eventually conquered Rome,
that the emperor Claudius drew his account from and thus destroyed the dominion of Tarquinii in
Etruscan annals ; and there is no reason for dis- that city. (Müller, Etrusker, vol. i. p. 121. )
believing that Caeles Vibenna and Mastarna are
CONSTITUTION OF SERVIUS TULLIUS.
historical personages, for, as Niebuhr ohserves,
Caeles is too frequently and too distinctly men- The most important event connected with the
tioned to be fabulous, and his Etruscan name can reign of Servius Tullius is the new constitution
not have been invented by the Romans. The value which he gave to the Roman state. The details of
of the tradition about Mastarna would very much this constitution are stated in different articles in
depend upon the date of the Etruscan authorities, the Dictionary of Antiquities, and it is therefore only
from whom Claudius derived his account ; but on ) necessary to give here a general outline, which the
1
1
ܪ
t
66
1
1
## p. 1187 (#1203) ##########################################
TULLIUS.
1187
TULLIUS.
reader can fill up by references to the work just | inhabitants in each regio, and of their property,
mentioned. The two main objects of the consti- for purposes of taxation, and for levying the troops
tution of Servius were to give the plebs political for the armies. Further, each country tribe or
independence, and to assign to property that in- regio was divided into a certain number of Pagi,
fluence in the state which had previously belonged a name which had been given to the divisions of
to birth exclusively ; and it cannot be questioned the Roman territory as early as the reign of Numa
that the military and financial objects, which he (Dionys. ii. 76); and each Pagus also formed an
Becured by the changes he introduced, were re- organised body, with a Magister Pausi at its hend,
garded by him as of secondary importance. In who kept a register of the naines and of the pro-
order to carry his purpose into effect Servius made perty of all persons in the pagus, mised the taxes,
a two-fold division of the Roman people, one ter- and summoned the people, when necessary, to war.
ritorial, and the other according to property. He Each pagus had its own sacred rites and common
first divided the whole Roman territory into Re- sanctuary, connected with which was a yearly fes-
giones, and the inhabitants into Tribus, the people tival called Puganalia, at which all the Pagani took
of each region forming a tribe. The city was part. Dionysius anys that the Pagi were fortified
divided into four regions or tribes, and the country places, established by Servius Tullius, to which the
around into twenty-six regions or tribes, so that country people might retreat in case of an hostile in-
the entire number of Tribus Urbanae and Tribus road ; but this is scarcely correct, for even if Servius
Rusticae, as they were respectively called, amounted Tullius established such fortified places, it is evident
to thirty. (Livi i. 43 ; Dionys. iv. 14, 15. ) Livy that the word was used to indicate a local division,
does not mention the number of the country tribes and must have been given to the country adjoining
in his account of the Servian constitution, and we the fortified place as well as to the fortified place
are indebted to Fabius Pictor, the oldest of the itself. (Dionys. iv. 15; Varr. L. L. vi. 24, 26 ;
Roman annalists (Dionys. l. c. ), and to Varro (ap. Macrob. Saturn. i. 16 ; Ov. Fast. i. 669 ; Dict. of
Non. p. 43), for the number of twenty-six. More- Antiq. s. v. Pagi. ) As the country tribes were
over Livy, when he speaks of the whole number of divided into Pagi, so were the city tribes divided
the tribes in B. C. 495, says that they were made into Vici, with a Magister Vici at the head of each,
twenty-one in that year. (Liv. ii. 21 ; comp. Dionys. who performed duties analogous to those of the
vii. 61. ) Hence the statements of Fabius Pictor Magister Pagi. The Vici in like manner had their
and Varro might appear to be doubtful. But in own religious rites and sanctuaries, which were
the first place their account has the greatest in- erected at spots where two or more ways met (in
ternal probability, since the number thirty plays compitis); and consequently their festival, cor-
such an important part in the Roman constitution, responding to the Paganalia, was called Compitalia.
and the thirty tribes would thus correspond to the (Dionys. iv. 14 ; Dict. of Antiq. s. vv. Vicus and
thirty curiae ; and in the second place Niebuhr Compitalia. )
has called attention to the fact that in the war with The main object which Servius had in view in
Porsena, Rome lost a considerable part of her ter- the institution of the tribes was to give an organi-
ritory, and thus the number of her tribes would sation to the plebeians, of which they had been
naturally be reduced. When, however, Niebuhr entirely destitute before ; but whether the patricians
proceeds to say that the tribes were reduced in the were included in the tribes or not, is a subject of
war with Porsena from thirty to twenty, because great difficulty, and has given rise to great differ-
it was the ancient practice in Italy to deprive a ence of opinion among modern scholars, some
conquered nation of a third part of its territory, he regarding the division into tribes as a local division
seems to have forgotten, as Becker has remarked, of the whole Roman people, and consequently of
that the four city tribes could not have been taken patricians and their clients as well as of plebeians,
into account in such a forfeiture, and that conse- while others look upon it as simply an organisation
quently a third part of the territory would not of the second order. The undoubted object of
have been ten tribes. Into this question, however, Servius Tullius in the institution of the tribes led
it is unnecessary further to enter. The conquest Niebuhr to maintain that the patricians could not
of Porsena bad undoubtedly broken up the whole possibly have belonged to the tribes originally ;
Servian system ; and thus it was all the easier to but as we find them in the tribes at a later period
form a new tribe in B. C. 504, when the gens (Liv. iv. 24, v. 30, 32), he supposed that they were
Claudia migrated to Rome. (Liv. ii. 16. ) It would admitted into them by the legislation of the de-
appear that an entirely new distribution of the cemvirs. But probable as this might appear, all
tribes became necessary, and this was probably the evidence we possess goes the other way, and
carried into effect in B. C. 495, soon after the battle tends to show that the tribes were a local division
of the lake of Regillus. In fact the words of Livy of the whole Roman people. In the first place, if
(ii. 21) already referred to state as much, for he Servius had created thirty local tribes for the plebs
does not say that before this year there were alone, from which the patricians were excluded, it
twenty tribes, or that the twenty-first was then is not easy to see why the three ancient tribes of
added for the first time, but simply that twenty- the Ramnes, Tities, and Luceres, should not have
one tribes were then formed (Romae tribus una et continued in existence. This we know was not the
viginti factae). The subsequent increase in the num- case ; for it is certain, that the three ancient tribes
ber of the tribes, till they reached that of thirty-five, disappear from the time of the Servian constitution,
is related in the Dictionary of Antiquities (s. v. and that their names alone were retained by the
Tribus).
But to return from this digression to the Equites, and that henceforward we read only of
Servian constitution. Each tribe was an organised the division of the patricians into thirty curiae :
body, with a magistrate at its head, called $u- indeed it is expressly said that the pural yerikal
Adpxos by Dionysius (iv. 14), and Curator Tribus were abolished by Servius, and that the Qural TO#-
by Varro (L. L. vi. 86), whose principal duty ap- xal were established in their place. (Dionys. iv.
pears to have consisted in keeping a register of the 14. ) Secondly, it is certain that all the tribes of the
4 6 2
## p. 1188 (#1204) ##########################################
1188
TULLIUS.
TULLIUS.
+
1
year B. C. 495, with the exception of the Crustu- 1 100,000 asses: the second class those who had at
mina, take their names from patrician gentes. least 75,000 asses : the third those who had at
Thirdly, the establishment of the Claudian tribe, least 50,000 asses: the fourth those who had at
consisting as it did mainly of the patrician Claudia least 25,000 asses: and the fifth those who had
geng, is almost of itself sufficient to prove that at least 10,000 asses, according to Böckh's pro-
patricians were included in the Servian tribes. bable conjecture, for Dionysius makes the sum
Niebuhr lays great stress upon the fact that in no necessary for admission to this class 12,500 asses
instance do we find the patricians voting in the (127 minae) and Livy 11,000 asses. It must be
Comitia Tributa before the time of the decemvirs ; recollected, however, that these numbers are not
but as Becker very justly remarks, this does not the ancient onee, when the as was a pound weight
prove any thing, as we have no reason for supposing of copper, but those of the sixth century of the
that the Comitia Tributa were established by city. The original numbers were probably 20,000,
Servius along with the tribes. Such an assembly 15,000, 10,000, 5000, and 2000 asses respectively,
would have had no meaning in the Servian consti- which were increased fivefold, when the as was
tution, and would have been opposed to its first coined so much lighter. (Böckh, Metrologische
principles. The Comitia Tributa were called into Untersuchungen, c. xxix. ) Further, for military
existence, when the plebs began to struggle after purposes each of the five classes was divided into
independence, and had tribunes of their own at elder (Seniores) and younger (Juniores) men : the
their head ; and it is certainly improbable that former consisting of men from the age of 46 to 60,
patricians should have been allowed to vote in the latter of men from the age of 17 to 45. It
assemblies summoned by plebeian magistrates to was from the Juniores that the armies of the state
promote the interests of the plebs. The Comitia were levied: the Seniores were not obliged to serve
Tributa must not therefore be regarded as assem- in the field, and could only be called upon to
blies of the tribes, as Becker has justly remarked, defend the city. Moreover, all the soldiers had to
but as assemblies of the plebeians, who voted find their own arms and armour ; but it was so
according to tribes, as their natural divisions. arranged that the expense of the equipment should
Hence as the same writer observes, we see the be in proportion to the wealth of each class.
full force of the expression in the Leges Valeria Servius however did not make this arrangement
Horatia, Publilia and Hortensia : “ quod tributim of the people for military purposes alone. He had
plebes jussisset. ”
another and more important object in view, namely,
The tribes therefore were an organisation of the the creation of a new national assembly, which was
whole Roman people, patricians as well as plebeians, to possess the powers formerly exercised by the
according to their local divisions ; but they were Comitia curiata, and thus become the sovereign
instituted, as we have already remarked, for the assembly in the state. For this purpose he divided
benefit of the plebeians, who had not, like the each classis into a certain number of centuriae, each
patricians, possessed previously any political organi- of which counted as one vote. But in accordance
sation. At the same time, though the institution with the great principle of his constitution, which,
of the tribes gave the plebeians a political organi- as has been several times remarked, was to give
sation, it conferred upon them no political power, the preponderance of power to wealth, a century
no right to take any part in the management of was not made of a fixed number of men ; but the
public affairs or in the elections. These rights, first or richest class contained a far greater number
however, were bestowed upon them by another of centuries than any of the other classes, although
institution of Servius Tullius, which was entirely they must at the same time have contained a much
distinct from and had no connection with the smaller number of men, Thus the first class con-
thirty tribes. He made a new division of the tained 80 centuries, the second 20, the third 20,
whole Roman people into Classes according to the the fourth 20, and the fifth 30, in all 170. One
amount of their property, and he so arranged these half of the centuries consisted of Seniores, and the
classes that the wealthiest persons, whether patri- other half of Juniores ; by which an advantage was
cians or plebeians, should possess the chief power given to age and experience over youth and rash-
and influence. In order to ascertain the property ness, for the Seniores, though possessing an equal
of each citizen, he instituted the Census, which was number of votes, must of course have been very
a register of Roman citizens and their property, | inferior in number to the Juniores. Besides these
and enacted that it should be taken anew from 170 centuries of the classes, Servius formed five
time to time. Under the republic it was taken other centuries, admission into which did not
afresh, as is well known, every five years, Lists depend upon the census. Of these the smiths and
of the citizens were made out by the curator tribus carpenters (fabri) formed two centuries, and the
or magistrate of each tribe, and each citizen had to horn-blowers and trumpeters (cornicines and tubi-
state upon oath the amount and value of his pro- cines) two other centuries : these four centures
perty. According to the returns thus obtained a voted with the classes, but Livy and Dionysius
division of the citizens was made, which determined give a different statement as to which of the classes
the tax (tributum), which each citizen was to pay, they voted with. The other century not belonging
the kind of military service he was to perform, to the classes, and erroneously called the sixth
and the position he was to occupy in the popular class by Dionysius, comprised all those persons
assembly. The whole arrangenient was of a mili- whose property did not amount to that of the fifth
tary character. The people assembled in the Campus class. This century, however, consisted of three
as an army (exercitus, or, according to the more subdivisions according to the amount of their pro-
ancient expression, classis), and was therefore perty, called respectively the accensi velati, the
divided into two parts, the cavalry (equites), and proletarii and capite censi : the accensi velati were
infantry (pedites). The infantry was divided into those whose property was at least 1500 asses, or
five classes. The first class contained all those originally 300 asses, and they served as supernu-
persons whose property amounted at least to meraries in the army without arms, but ready to
## p. 1189 (#1205) ##########################################
TULLIUS.
1189
TULLIUS.
TULLIUS.
De second class those who had at
1: the third those who has a
s: the fourth those who bad
1; and the bath those who had
Lsses, according to Bockel mit
for Dionyuas makes the sun
ission to this ciass 12,5W 140
Livy 11,000 asset. Il est be
rer, that these pubbers are st
when the as ras a perdre
of the suruh century of the
nunc bers were probably St.
000, and 2000 asses resperetet
,
zsed frefald, ybes the a tu
Lighter. (Bockh, Metraatide
zin) furber, for at
le sive classes was dinded
take the arms and places of such as might fall in equites ; but as we know that the equestrian census
battle: the proletarii were those who had at least in the later times of the republic was four times
375 asses, or originally 75 asses, and they were the amount of that of the first class, it is probable
sometimes armed in pressing danger at the public that the same census was established by Servius
expense : while the cupite censi were all those whose Tullius. Niebuhr indeed supposed that the sex
property was less than the sum last mentioned, and suffragia comprised all the patricians, independent
they were never called upon to serve till the time of the property they possessed ; but this supposition
of Marius. Thus the infantry or Pedites contained is, independent of other considerations, disproved
in all 175 centuries.
by the fact that we have express mention of a
The cavalry or Equitos were divided by Servius patrician, L. Tarquitius, who was compelled on
Tullius into 18 centuries, which did not comprise account of his poverty to serve on foot.
Seniores or Juniores, but consisted only of men The 175 centuries of pedites and the 18 of
below the age of forty-six. The early history and equites thus made a total of 193 centuries. Of
arrangement of the Equites have given rise to these, 97 formed a majority of votes in the as-
much discussion among modern scholars, into which sembly. Although all the Roman citizens had a
we cannot enter here, (See Dict. of Antiq. 8. v. vote in this assembly, which was called the Co
Equites. ) It is sufficient for our present purpose mitia Centuriata, from the voting by centuries,
to state that Tarquinius Priscus had divided each it will be seen at once that the poorer classes had
of the three ancient centuries of equites into two not much influence in the assembly ; for the 18
troops, called respectively the first (priores) and centuries of the equites and the 80 centuries of
second (posteriores) Ramnes, Tities, and Luceres. the first class, voted first ; and if they could come
These three double centuries Servius Tullius formed to an agreement upon any measure, they possessed
into six new centuries, usually called the sex at once a majority, and there was no occasion to
suffragia : and as they were merely a new organi- call upon the centuries of the other classes to vote
sation of the old body, they must have consisted at all. This was the great object of the institution,
exclusively of patricians. Besides these six cen- which was to give the power to wealth, and not
turies, Servius formed twelve others, taken from either to birth or to numbers.
the richest and most distinguished families in the The preceding account of the centuries has been
state, plebeian as well as patrician. There can be taken from Livy (i. 43) and Dionysius (iv. 16,
little question that a certain amount of property foll. ), wbo agree in all the main points. The
was necessary for admission to all the equestrian account of Cicero (de Re Publ. ii. 22) cannot be re-
centuries, as well in consequence of the timocratic conciled with that of Livy and Dionysius, and
principle of this part of the Servian constitution, as owing to the corruptions of the text it is hopeless
on account of the express statement of Dionysius to make the attempt. The few discrepancies be-
(iv. 18) that the equites were chosen by Servius tween Livy and Dionysius will be seen by the
out of the richest and most illustrious families, and following table, taken from Becker, by which the
of Cicero (de Rep. ii. 22) that they were of the reader will also perceive more clearly the census
highest census (censu maximo). Neither of these of each class, the number of centuries or votes
writers nor Livy mentions the property which was which each contained, and the order in which they
necessary to entitle a person to a place among the voted.
id younger Jasiores, sea : 5
f men from the age of 45 234
from the age of 17 13 43 k
res that the arties of the main
"Djores were not oblid !
could only be caled spet
(oreover, a! ! the soldiers init
s and armor ; but is 13
pense of the equipment should
the wea'th of each c28.
did not make this aspect
itary purposes alone Hebel
portant object in T, name
r national asseza bis, which was
rs formeris exercised by
thus become the green
6. For this purpose be crted
tain number of cat
3
LIVY.
DIONYSIUS.
EQUITES. Centuriae
18 EQUITES. --Centuriae
18
one rote. But in and
ole of his constituat, vide
aimes remarked, was to me
power to sealth, a ceny
ed number of men ; les the
in tained a far greater rente
of the other cases, 2 aan
time hare contained a to
1. Thus the first cas or
be second 90, the thin 1
! fith 30, in ali iva in
nsisted of Spides and the
br which ap adaran na
ence over youth an 34
bough possessing 21
of course bare beret
e Junior Besides these
I. CLASSIS-Census 100 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
40
40
2
I. Classis. -Census 100,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
Centuriae Fabrum
II. CLASSIS. -Census 75,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
40
40
O
10
10
10
10
2
III. Classis. -Census 50,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
IV. CLASSIS. –Census 25,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
10
10
II. CLASSIS. --Census 75 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
Centuriae Fabrum
III. CLASSIS. –Census 50 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
IV. CLASSIS. –Census 25 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
Centuriae cornic. et tubic.
V. CLASSIS. --Census 124 minae.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
15
.
V. CLASSIS. –Census 11,000 asses.
Centuriae Seniorum
Centuriae Juniorum
Centuriae accensorum,
cornicinum, tubicinum
Centuria capite censorum
15
15
3
1
VI. Classis.
Centuria capite censorum
asees, Serring tur je
sion into which had DX
Of these the saith oi
ed two centures and the
Plers (CRITERIOS 200 m
les: these fear coape
bat Lirt and Dixos
as to which of the day
les century a belung
zeously called the stih
rised all those see
jount so cizi di te
erer, consisted of time
he amount of their ar
the Gras'
:-
Sum total of the Centuriae
194
Sum total of the Centuriae
193
the arreste
pf leas: 15m ses
zer smed ss at
12t arus, bet ir*
4 63
## p. 1190 (#1206) ##########################################
1190
TULLIUS.
TULLUS.
1
.
1
There can be little doubt that the number in the laws ascribed to him ; since the original laws,
Dionysius is the correct one. According to Livy's if they were ever committed to writing, must long
number cases might have arisen in which it was since have perished. (Niebuhr, Hisl. of Rome,
impossible to obtain a majority, as ninety-seven vol. i. p. 249. )
might have voted for a measure and ninety-seven The principal modern writers who have treated
against it. Moreover, Cicero (de Rep. ii. 22) de of the Servian constitution are: Niebuhr, Hist. of
scribes ninety-six as the minority. The other Romne, vol
. i. p. 398, foll. ; Göttling, Geschichte der
discrepancies between Livy and Dionysius are of Römischen Staatsverfassung, p. 230, foll
. ; Gerlach,
no great importance, and need not be discussed Die Verfassung d. Servius in ihrer Entwickelung,
further in this place.
Basel, 1837 ; Huschke, Die Verfassung d. Kön.
The Assembly of the Centuries, or Comilia Cen-Serv. Tull. , Heidelberg, 1838 ; Peter, Epochen d.
turiata, was made by Servius, as we have already Verfassungsgesch. der Römisch. Republ. , Leigzig,
remarked, the sovereign assembly of the nation, 1841; Walter, Gesch. d. Römisch. Rechts, p. 31,
and it accordingly stept into the place formerly foll. , 2nd ed. ; Becker, Handbuch d. Römisch. Alter-
occupied by the Comitia Curiata. Servius trans- thümer, vol. ii. pt. i. p. 164, foll.
ferred to it from the latter assembly the right of TU'LLIUS TIRO. [Tiro. ]
electing kings and the higher magistrates, of TU'LLIUS VALENTI'NUS. (VALENTINUS. )
enacting and repealing laws, and of deciding TULLUS, A'TTIUS. [TULLIUS, ATTJUS. )
upon war, and jurisdiction in cases of appeal from TULLUS, CALVI'SIUS. 1. C. , consul with
the sentence of a judge. He did not, however, A. Cornelius Palma in A. D. 109 (Fasti).
abolish the Comitia Curiatn, but on the contrary 2. P. , consul suffectus in a. D. 110.
he allowed them very great power and influence TULLUS, CLOEʼLIUS or CLUI'LIUS.
in the state. He not only permitted them to [CLOELIUS Tullus. ]
retain the exercise of such rights as affected their TULLUS HOSTI'LIUS. (HOSTILIUS.
