No More Learning

? ? . ,___. ,~.
--. --.
. . -_s
it it
is a
is a
is a
"; a
is
is
it a is
is
a
it is
? III.
ETERNAL RECURRENCE.
1053
MY philosophy reveals the triumphant thought through which all other systems of thought must
? ultimately perish. It is the great
thought: those races that cannot bear it are doomed; those which regard it as the greatest blessing are destined to rule.
1054.
The greatest of all fights: for this purpose a
new weapon is required.
A hammer: a terrible alternative must be
created. Europe must be brought face to face with the logic of facts, and confronted with the question whether its will for ruin is really earnest.
General levelling down to mediocrity must be avoided. Rather than this it would be preferable to perish.
. 1055.
A pessimistic attitude of mind and a pessi mistic doctrine and ecstatic Nihilism, rriay in
'
disciplinary
? ? ? ETERNAL RECURRENCE.
I
423
certain circumstances even prove indispensable to
the philosopher--that to say, as
form of pressure, or hammer, with which he can
smash up degenerate, perishing races and them out of existence; with which he can beat track to a new order of life, or instil longing for nonentity in those who are degenerate and who desire to perish.
1056.
wish to teach the thought which gives unto many the right to cancel their existences--the great disciplinary thought.
mighty
put
? ~
The period 01 greatest danger.
The foundation of an oligarchy above peoples
and their interests: education directed at establishing political policy for humanity in general.
A counterpart qfjesuitism.
.
1057.
'Eternal Recurrence. A prophecy.
I. The exposition of the doctrine and its theo
retical first principles and results. 2. The proof of the doctrine.
Probable results which will follow from its being believed. (It makes everything break open. )
(a) The means of enduring it.
(b) The means of ignoring it. 4. Its place in history means.
? ? !
a
is a
is
3.
I
*Q->> ,. _
a
a
a
? 424
THE WILL TO POWER.
1058.
The two greatest philosophical points of view
(both discovered by Germans).
That of becoming and that of evolution. (b) That based upon the values of existence
(a)
the wretched form of German pessimism must first be overcome ! )-- Both points of view reconciled by me in a
decisive manner.
Everything becomes and returns for ever,
--escaj>e is impossible!
Granted that we could appraise the value'of
(but
? existence, what would be the result of it? thought of recurrence is a principle of selection in the service of power (and barbarity
The ripeness of man for this thought.
1059.
I. The thought of eternal recurrence: its first principles, which must necessarily be true were true. What its result is.
2. It the most oppressive thought: its prob able results, provided be not prevented, that to say, provided all values be not transvalued.
The means of enduring it: the transvalua tion of all values. Pleasure no longeiltowbefound in certainty, but in uncertainty ';prfo'longer " cause
continual creativeness; no longer , the will to self-preservation, but\to_ p_o_wer; no
longer the modest 'expression "it 'all only sub jective," but "it all our work! let us be proud of it. "
andde? ffe'ctffibiitfl
The
? ? is
is
l).
3.
is
it
is
if it
? >>
ETERNAL RECURRENCE.
1060
425
In order to endure the thought of recurrence, freedom from morality necessary; new means against the fact pain (pairf 'regarded as the instru ment, as'the father of pleasure; there no accre tive consciousness of pain); pleasure derived from all kinds of uncertainty and tentativeness, as counterpoise to extreme fatalism; suppression of
the concept "necessity" suppression of the " will "
of " absolute knowledge. "
Greatest elevation of man's consciousness
suppression
strength, as that which creates superman.
of
? proves
1061.
The two extremes of thought--the materialistic and the platonic--are reconciled in eternal recur rence: both are regarded as ideals.
1062>>
If the universe had a goal, that goal would have been reached by now. If any sort of un foreseen final state existed, that state also would have been reached" If were capable of any halting or stability of any "being," would only have possessed this capability of becoming stable for one instant in its development; and again becoming would have been at an end for ages, and with all thinking and all "spirit. " The fact of " intellects " being in state of development
that the universe can have no goal, no
? ? . v . "\'NWW_~'M
_,. ,. - --W---_,----~
~
a
it
it
'
it
is
'
;
;a
is
? THE WILL TO PoWER.
final state, and is incapable of being. But the old habit of thinking of some purpose in regard to all
phenomena, and of thinking of a directing and creating deity in regard to the universe, is so powerful, that the thinker has to go to great pains in order to avoid thinking of the very aimlessness of the world as intended. The idea that the universe intentionally evades a goal,'and even knows artificial means wherewith it prevents itself from falling into a circular movement, must occur
to all those who would fain attribute to the uni verse the capacity of eternally regenerating itself --that is to say, they would fain impose upon a finite, definite force which is invariable in quantity, like the universe, the miraculous gift of renewing
its forms and its conditions for all eternity. Although the universe is no longer a God, it must still be capable of the divine power of creating and transforming; it must forbid itself to relapse into any one of its previous forms; it must not only have the intention, but also the means, of avoiding any sort of repetition; every
second of its existence, even, it must control every single one of its movements, with the view of avoiding goals, final states, and repetitions--and all the other results of such an unpardonable and insane method of thought and desire. All this is
nothing more than the old religious mode of thought and desire, which, in spite of all, longs to . . believe that in some Way or other the universe resembles the old, beloved, infinite, and infinitely-
creative God--that in some way or other "the old God still lives "--that longing of Spinoza's.
426
? ? ? ? ETERNAL RECURRENCE.
427
which expressed in the words " deus sive natura "
he really felt was " natura sive deus Which, then, the proposition and belief in which the decisive change, the present preponderance of the scientific spirit over the religious and god' fancying spirit, best formulated? Ought not to be: the universe, as force, must not be thought of as unlimited, because cannot be thought of in this way,--we forbid ourselves the concept in
finite force, because incompatible with the idea of force? Whence follows that the universe lacks the power of eternal renewal.
1063.
of the conservation of energy inevitably involves eternal recurrence.
1064.
That state of equilibrium has never been reached, proves that impossible. But in infinite space must have been reached. Like wise in spherical space. The form of space must be the cause of the eternal movement, and ulti mately of all "imperfection. "
That "energy" and "stability" and "immut ability " are contradictory. The measure of energy (dimensionally) fixed,though essentially fluid.
" That which timeless " must be refuted. At any given moment of energy, the absolute condi tions for new distribution of all forces are present;
cannot remain stationary. Change part of
(what
? ---
Theprinciple
? ? W_'__ it
___. '-. _'_ ,_
is
a
is
is is
a it
is is
it is
it is
it it is
'
it
").
it
? 428
THE WILL To POWER.
its essence, therefore time is as well: by this means, however, the necessity of change has only been established once more in theory.
1065.
A certain emperor always bore the fleeting nature of all things in his mind, in order not to value them too seriously, and to be able to live quietly in their midst. Conversely, everything seems to me much too important for it to be so fleeting; I seek an eternity for everything: ought one to pour the most precious salves and wines into the sea? My consolation is that everything
that has been is eternal: the sea will wash it up again.
1066.
The new concept of the universe. The universe exists; it is nothing that grows into existence and that passes out of existence. Or, better still, it develops, it passes away, but it never began to develop, and has never ceased from passing away; it maintains itself in both states. . . . It lives on itself, its excrements are its nourishment. '
We need not concern ourselves for one instant with the hypothesis of a created world. The conl cept "create" is to-day utterly indefinable and
unrealisable; it is but a word which hails from superstitious ages ; nothing can be explained with a word. The last attempt that was made to con ceive of a world that began occurred quite recently,
? ? ? ? ETERNAL RECURRENCE.
429
in many cases with the help of logical reasoning, _----generally, too, as you will guess, with an
ulterior theological motive.
Several attempts have been made lately to show
that the concept that "the universe has an infinite past " (regressus in infinitum) contradictory:
was even demonstrated, true, at the price of confounding the head with the tail. Nothing can prevent" me from calculating backwards from this moment of time, and of saying: "I shall never reach the end"; just as can calculate without end in forward direction, from the same moment. It only when Iwish to commit the error--I shall be careful to avoid it--of reconcil ing this correct concept of regressus in infinitum
with the absolutely unrealisable concept of a finite progressus up to the present; only when con
sider the direction (forwards or backwards) as logically indifferent, that take hold of the head --this very moment--and think hold the tail:
. this pleasure leave to you, Mr. Diihring! . have come across this thought in other
thinkers before me,-and every timeI found that was determined by other ulterior motives (chiefly theological, in favour of creator spiritus). 1f the universe were in any way able to congeal,
to dry up, to perish; or were capable of attaining to state of equilibrium; or had
any kind of goal at all which long
of time, immutability, and finality reserved for
(in short, to speak metaphysically, becoming
could resolve itself into being or into nonentity), this state ought already to have been reached.
? lapse
? ? if
it
. . .
. v _. _Le _~_,,. . . _\_ it
I aI
it
if it
Ia II
it is
a a
is
if it
. .
I
is a
? THE WILL To POWER.
But it has not been reached: it therefore follows. . . . This is the only certainty we can grasp, which can serve as a corrective to a host of cosmic hypotheses possible in themselves. If, for instance, materialism cannot consistently escape the conclusion of a finite state, which William Thomson has traced out for then materialism
thereby refuted.
If the universe may be conceived as definite
quantity of energy, as a definite number of centres of energy,--and every other concept remains indefinite and therefore useless,--it follows there from that the universe must go through calcul able number of combinations in the great game of chance which constitutes its existence. In infinity, at some moment or other, every possible combina tion must once have been realised; not only this, but must have been realised an infinite number of times. And inasmuch as between every one of these combinations and its next recurrence
every other possible combination would
sarily have been undergone, and since every one of these combinations would determine the whole series in the same order, a circular movement of absolutely identical series thus demonstrated:
the universe thus shown to be circular movement which has already repeated itself an infinite number of times, and which plays its game for all eternity. --This conception not
simply materialistic; for were this, would not involve an infinite recurrence of identical cases, but finite state. Owing to the fact that the uni verse has not reached this finite state, materialism
430
? neces
? ? a
it
if it
is
it
is
a
is
a
a
is
it,
? energy
ETERNAL RECURRENCE.
431
shows itself to be but an imperfect and pro visional hypothesis.
1067
And do ye know what " the universe ". is to my mind? Shall I show it to you in my mirror?
This universe is a monster of energy, beginning or end ; a fixed and brazen quantity of
which grows neither bigger nor smaller, which does not consume itself, but only alters its face; as a whole its bulk is immutable, it is a household without either losses or gains, but like wise without increase and without sources of revenue, surrounded by nonentity as by a frontier. It is nothing vague or wasteful, it does not stretch into infinity; but is a definite quantum of energy located in limited space, and not in space which would be anywhere empty. It is rather energy everywhere, the play of forces and force-waves, at the same time om: and many, agglomerat ing here and diminishing there, a sea of forces storming and raging in itself, for ever changing, for ever rolling back over -incalculable ages to
recurrence, with an ebb and flow of its forms, producing the most complicated things out of the most simple structures; producing the most ardent, most'savage, and most contradictory things out of the quietest, most rigid, and most frozen material, and then returning from multifariousness to uniformity, from the play of contradictions back into the delight of consonance, saying yea unto
' itself, even in this homogeneity of its courses and ages; for ever blessing itself as something which
withoutv
? ? ? ? THE WILL TO POWER.
recurs for all eternity,--a becoming which knows not satiety, or disgust, or wearinessz--this, my Dionysian world Of eternal self-creation, of eternal self-destruction, this mysterious world of twofold voluptuousness; this, my "Beyond Good and Evil," without aim, unless there is an aim in the
bliss of the circle, without will, unless a ring must by nature keep goodwill to itself,--would you have a name for my world?
A solution of all your riddles? Do ye also want a light, ye most concealed, strongest and most undaunted men of the blackest midnight ? --This world is the Will to Power--and nothing else! And even ye your selves are this will to power--and nothing besides ! '
432
? PRINTED BY THY. EDINBURGH PRESS, EDINBURGH
? ?