No More Learning

We feel inclined to believe, that the Martyrology of Tallagh
had been written-- but perhaps not in its completed state -- be fore JEngus had composed his FelirL Nor does follow, because Blathmac, who had been martyred for the faith at Iona on the 19th July, a. d. 823, and Feidhlimidh Mac Crimhthainn,
Martyrologies, ascribed both to Eusebius and to St. Jerome, were extant in his time, or before a. d. 787, when such testimony supposed to have been recorded. These martyrologies are considered to be oldest compilations of the kind. Sea Ibid. , p. 682.
See Professor Eugene O'Curry's Lectures on the Manuscript Materials of Ancient Irish History, Lect. xvii. pp. 362, 363, 364. Yet, in Father Michael O'Clery's preface to poem of Marianus Gorman, he states, that the Martyr ology of jEngus Ceile De had been composed from the Martyrology of Tam- lacht. In this latter, the names and dates for two holy men are found, and both died many years after iEngus himself. " These are Blathmac, the son of Flann, monarch of Erinn, who died for the faith, at the hands af the Danes, in the island of Hi, or Iona, on the 19th of July, in the year 823; and Feidhli midh Mac Crimhthainn, King of Munster, who died on the 18th of August, in the year 845, according to the Annals of the Four Masters, but whose festival
placed in the kalendar at the 28th of August". It supposed, according to the best accounts, that ^Engus wrote his work in or before a. d. 798, and so far as Mr. O'Curry ascertained, " no saint found in who died after that year". Wherefore, would appear, that ! >t. iEngus composed Martyrology, distinct from that known as the Tallagh Martyrology. However, seems to be the case, this Martyrology of St. ^Engus must have been identical with his Festilogy.
1t must be remarked that D'Achery in his Spicilegium, sive Collectio Veterum aliquot Scriptorum, has published " Martyrologium vetustissimum Sancti Hiero- nymi Presbyteri nomine insignitum". Tomus Quartus. This even imperfect, since he appends the following remarks -- " Castera legi non potuerunt in MS. ut- pote tineis corrosa; silicet ab hac die ad viii. Kal. Jan, quo incipit hocce Marty rologium". It must be confessed, if this Martyrology, for the most part, were written by St. Jeromj, has been interpolated by some one, who lived since his time, as the names of many among the more recent saints are contained in it. See the remarks of Henry Valeisius, in his Appendix to the edition of Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, on this subject. The edition of the Martyr ology of Tallaght, published by the liev. Dr. Kelly, must have been prepared from copy, differing from that more complete one, described by Colgan
only contains the names of Irish, and omits the list of foreign saints.
since
it
is 11
it
;
a
a
it
:,
is
it
?
a
it a
it
is
a !
is
it
a if
is
it
a
is,
St. sEngusius Hagiographus. 25
King of Munster, who died on the 18th of August, a. d. 845, have been entered in that these names had not been intro duced in copies, transcribed after the death of JEngus. 1 Aa we are not likely ever to recover the original copy of the Tallagh
criticism must remain at fault, in reference to its real author or authors.
We find more accurate description of what has been called the Hieronyman Tallagh Martyrology, than had been furnished either by Colgan or Bollandus. 2 This comes from the pen of Father John Baptist Soller. 3 It does not appear that Bollandus had ever seen Colgan's copy; but Soller, however, inspected and describes as containing ten vellum folia of large size, with nearly half leaf, and covered with another leaf of similar mate rial and appearance. In the commencement of this Codex, some modern hand has inscribed Martyrologium Tamlactense et Opuscula S. engussi Keledei. In two different places noted, as having belonged to the convent of Donegal! . Those leaves were not clearly traced nor well arranged. Many names in
this Codex were almost illegible. It was defective from iv of the Kalends of February to the iv of the Ides of March; so that the months of January and March were not perfect. The whole of February was missing. The April month was alone com plete. May ran on to the 20th day, or to the xiii of the Ka lends of June. June and July were wanting. August began from the iv Nones, but its remaining days were preserved. In September were missing the'xii, xi, and x days of the October Kalends. October continued to the iii of the Kalends of No vember. The whole of November was missing. December commenced only at xv of the Kalends of January. Soller de clares, after diligent examination, he could easily observe that this Codex had been over-rated by the members of his society. Papebroke had frequently mentioned to him that Colgan or the Irish Minorite Fathers at Louvain had merely sent extracts of this copy to Bollandus. Besides the insertion of Irish proper names in this Martyrology, there were found other festivals, added by comparatively modern hand. Among these, he no tices the feast of St. Joseph, the Revelation of St. Michael the Archangel, the festival of All Saints, and many other solemni
Mr. O'Curry, from circumstances already alluded to, seems to doubt if Aengus had anything to do with its authorship. See Lectures on the Manuscript Materials Ancient Irish History, Lect. xvii. p. 362. "
Bollandus has published some extracts from Colgan's copy, sub nomine Martyrologia Hieronymiani Tamlactensis", at the last days of the January month in his Acta Sanctorum.
See Acta Sanctorum, tomus vi. , in his learned Preface to new edition of Usuard's Martyrology. In this he treats regarding various copies of the Martyrology ascribed to St. Jerome, cap. art
Martyrology,
1,
1, ? ? 1, 2.
a 3
it is
3
*1
of
a
a
A
aa it
,
it,
it,
26 The Life and Works of
ties of a like description. After this Martyrology, Soller found a list of what he conjectures to be Irish names, running through three leaves. In fine, there were opuscula or fragments of tracts in the Irish language, of which he was entirely ignorant. This
Soller declares to be a complete description of the Codex. 1
Of the Martyrology, attributed to JEngus and Molruan, Oolgan appears to have possessed two copies. Even these were not
entire. The names of saints are simply set down in this work, which, for stated reasons, he preferred calling the Martyrology of Tallagh or Tamlacht. In the first place, it had been com posed by joint labour on the part of JEngus and Molruan, at Tallagh. Secondly, because it could not be cited as the work of both saints, without tediousness and confusion; the more so, as he had been obliged frequently to quote another Martyrology, . the sole production of iEngus. Thirdly, because it is reasonably conjectured, that ancient writers called it the Martyrology of Tamlacht. Thus, Marianus Gorman, who lived more than five hundred years before Colgan's time, in the preface to his Martyr ology remarks, that St. JEngus composed his metrical Festilogy, from the Martyrology of Tamlacht, which had previously been written. The latter work, therefore, was supposed to differ in no respect from the Martyrology of ^ngus and Melruan, which had been composed at Tallaght. There was no other Martyr ology known to be extant in Colgan's time, and that could better deserve the title of the Tallagh Martyrology, or which, in fact, was distinguished by this latter appellation. Fourthly, the work entitled, " Martyrology of iEngus and Mcelruan", con tains the names of its reputed authors and other saints, who were their contemporaries, but who departed this life after their time. Among others, we find recorded therein the name, St. Corpre, Bishop of Clonmacnoise, who died a. d. 899 ; but we do not find the name of St. Cormac Mac Cuileannan, king and bishop, who departed this life in the earlier part of the tenth century, nor, in fact, of any saint, who died after a. d. 900. Hence, Colgan is under an impression, that certain subsequent additions were made to the joint work of ^Engus and Melruan, by some monk belonging to the monastery of Tallagh, who lived towards the close of the ninth, and who died in the beginning of the tenth century 2
An opinion was entertained by some ancient writers, that this Martyrology and the Feilire had been composed by ^En- gus at Tallaght, whilst engaged in following the humbler
1 See ibid. , ? 2, . Til.
1 Colgan's Acta Sanctorum Biberniae, xi. Marlii. Vita S. jEngussii, cap. xii.
p. 581. In Harris' Ware, a similar opinion has been adopted. See vol. iji. Writers of Ireland, book i. chap. v. p. 62.
St. yEngusius Hagiographus. 27
duties of a farm servant. Sufficient evidence can be adduced, however, to prove, that the Feilire could not have been issued until some years after St. Melruan's death. The " title prefixed to the Martyrology is couched in those terms: Incipit Mar- tyrologium iEngussii, filii Hua-oblenii et Melruanii". It shows, that both saints must have been joint labourers at the work, previous to the death of Melruan, in the year 792, although some additions were undoubtedly made in the succeed ing century. Wherefore, Marianus Gorman, in the preface to his Martyrology, has rightly observed, in Colgan's opinion,
that St. iEngus took the saints, named in his Festilogy, from the Martyrology of Tallagh, which had been first composed. '
1 See Colgan's Acta Sanctorum Hiberniae, xi. Martii Vita S. JEngussii, cap. xiii. p. 581. Dr. Ledwich strives to show, that this Martyrology was first written in the ninth century, because it has the names of Moelruan, Aengus, and other later saints. See Antiquities of Ireland, p. 365. " It is true that, considered in its present state", says Dr. Lanigan, "it was not completed until even the end of that century; but does it follow that Aengus and Moelruan had no share in drawing it up ? He adds, that in its second preface, it cites the Martyrology of St. Jerome. Here the doctor is wrong ; for this martyrology is quoted, not in any preface to the Martyrology of Tallagh, alias that of Aengus and Moelruan, but in the second preface to the Feslilogium of Aengus (See AA. SS. p. 581). He then tells us that the Martyrology called of St. Jerome, was not known until about the ninth cen tury ; but might not about the ninth century, be implied to take in part of the eighth, prior to Aengus having been engaged in any of these works? The Doctor says that Launoy has proved, that this martyrology was fabricated about the ninth century. Now in the passage, which he refers to, Launoy has not even attempted to prove it ; and all that he says, is that the martyro logy called of St. Jerome cannot be proved to have been written by that saint on any authority prior to the reign of Charlemagne. But the Doctor cares nothing about inaccuracies and misquotations, provided he could make the reader believe, that martyrologies are not to be depended upon. Yet Launoy was, in the little he has said, mistaken ; for the martyrology ascribed to St. Jerome, or rather to Eusebius and St. Jerome, as quoted by Aengus, is men tioned more than once by Bede, who lived many years before Charlemagne. Thus he cites (L. 2 in Marcum, cap. 26) Martyrologium Eusebii et Hieronymi vocabulis insignitum ; and {Retract, in Act. Ap. cap. he states, that Eusebius is said to have been the author, and Jerome the translator (See more in Bollan- dus' General Preface, cap. 4. at January). That Eusebius compiled sort of Martyrology considered certain (ib. , cap. 3); and the learned Bollandists, Henschenius and Papebrochius {Prolog, ad Martyrol. Bed. at March, Tom. were inclined to think, that was not only translated, but likewise augmented
by St. Jerome. Be this as may, well known, that what
the Martyrology of St. Jerome was not written by him but,
have been originally compiled, not long after his time, and
many very learned men to be the oldest extant. D'Achery has published it
Spicileg. Tom. 4), and in his Monitum states from Henry Valois, that was used by Gregory the Great, and existed many years earlier. Since those times some names have been added to such as that of Gregory himself, which D'Achery has marked in Italics. Among these that of St. Patrick, and perhaps the Doctor had heard so, on which account he wished to deny its anti quity. Much more might be said on this subject, were this the place tor doing so. Meanwhile the reader may consult also Tillemont, Hist. Eccl. torn. xii. at St. Jerome, art. 44". See Dr. Lanigan's Ecclesiastical History ofIreland, vol, iii. chap. xx. x. n. 102, pp.
249, 250,
now called supposed to considered by
-
?
1
is
is
i. )
it,
1 it
(
it
;
is it
is is
it it
4. ?
is
i. ?
a 2)
28 The Life and Works of
Mr. O'Curry appears to attribute this preface to the pen of Father Michael O'Clery. The Martyroiogy of Tallagh is ge nerally believed to be the oldest Martyroiogy of our Irish saints known to be extant; and with their festival days it often records the immediate fathers and churches of our national
saints. The Martyroiogy of Tallagh has been published by the late Rev. Professor Matthew Kelly, D. D. , of Maynooth
College. In the year 1847, he procured a copy, partially de fective, from the Burgundian Library at Brussels, and this he published in 1857, just before his lamented death. Its defects
have been supplied, in parts, from other Irish Martyrologies. It contains valuable historic notes and additions. 1 However, it is to be regretted, that the learned editor had not been able to obtain a more complete --yet still deficient --copy for publica tion, which Colgan had once procured. Indeed, a number of similar copies, had they been available, must have greatly en hanced the value and accuracy of such an interesting work.
VI. --St. ^Engus was probably ordained Priest at TallagJd. -- Treatise of St. JEngus " De Sanctis Hiberniae". -- The " Sal- tair-na-ranri'. -- Pedigrees of Jrith Saints attributed to his authorship.
Although Aengus is said to have become a professed monk in Clonenagh Monastery, and to have concealed the fact of his en rolment in the ecclesiastical order, when he sought admission to Maelruan's Monastery at Tallagh,2 it is probable, our saint had only received clerical tonsure, or at most minor orders, when he first left Dysartenos. Were Aengus advanced to the priesthood at this period of life, a necessity for celebrating the holy sacrifice of Mass very frequently,3 with the performance of other peculiar sacerdotal functions, must soon have revealed his rank to Abbot Maelruan, and to the members of his community. Even were those solitary or strictly private Masses, formerly permitted to be
1 In 1849, the Rev. Dr. Todd likewise procured from the Belgian govern ment the loan of a MS. containing this, as well as O'Gorman's and Aengus' Martyrologies, all in Father Michael O'Clery's handwriting. Professor O'Curry made accurate transcripts from it, for Dr. Todd's private library. See Lec tures on the Manuscript Materials of Ancient Irish History, Lect. xvii. pp. 362, 363.
2 Regarding the first statement, Colgan says of him, " Monnchum professus in nobili monasterio de Cluain-edhneach", and in the second instance, " cleri- c. ile institulum occultans". See Acta Sanctorum Hiberniae, xi. Marlii. Vita S. Aengussii, cap. ii. v. , pp. 579, 580.
3 See that very learned treatise of Cardinal Bona, Rerum Lilurgicarum de his quae ad Missam generatim speclant, Lib. i. cap. iv. pp. 203, 204, for proofs of frequently offering the Holy Victim of propitiation, and from the earliest ages of the Christian Church. Opera Omnia Emin. Dom. D. Joannis Bona, & R. E. Card. Pres. Ord. Cis. Antwerp edition, a. >>. 1723, folio.
St. ^Engusius Eagiographus. 29
celebrated in many ancient churches,1 allowed as a practice in our early religious houses, the secret of our saint's priestly ordi nation could not long be concealed. It is more difficult to com prehend how, as a monk, he had not been questioned on the subject of his having already received the peculiar and noticeable ecclesiastical tonsure. However, there can hardly be any doubt, after Abbot Maelruan discovered the real name, virtues, and learn ing of his highly-gifted disciple, with his dispositions for the office, Aengns must soon have been raised to the sacerdotal dignity. For want of more complete records, referring to our saint's biography, not having seen many early copies of his works, and with little serving for autobiography in his own writings, our present imperfect lights, regarding his private acts, occasionally require us to launch upon a sea of conjecture.
Towards the saints of his country, iEngus seems to have en tertained an extraordinary veneration. According to Colgan'a account, he wrote five distinct books, " De Sanctis Hiberniae", which treat, in a particular manner, about their several lives, or on matters pertaining to them. In the first book, he gives the different distinctions of these saints in classes; he enumerates three hundred and forty-five bishops, two hundred and ninety- nine abbots and priests, and seventy-eight deacons. These he has comprised within"the limits of three chapters. The second book is known as the Homonymi", or the enumeration of saints bearing similar names, but distinguished by various other titles. It mentions eight hundred and fifty-five distinct persons, under sixty-two different names, and it is divided into two parts ; the first part containing fifty chapters, on holy men of the same name, and the second twelve chapters on holy women. The third book, known as the " Book of Sons", divides the saints into another classification. It names saints who are descended from the same father, and afterwards only sons, each cited by the father's name. Lastly, are enumerated female saints, in their descent from the same father. The names of ninety-four
fathers,8 who had one saint, or more saints than one as children, are here preserved, although the number of saints cannot be
1 Cardinal Bona, Eerum Lkurgicarum de his quae ad Mtssam generatim spec- tant. Having described different rites for celebrating the Holy Sacrifice, he remarks : " actas aliquondo in Monasteriis Missas a solo sacerdote nemine praesente et respondente, quae idcirco solitariae dictae Bint" . . . Verum Missas privatas non a Monachis, sed a primae Ecclesiae Patribus originem traxisse capite sequenti ostendam : Missas autem solitarias in coenobiis actas ex indulgentia, ut loquitur Kduensis, sive ex privilegio ; canonicae sanctiones de monstrate, quae sublatis omnibus privileges, ne quis solus Missas agerat, dis- tricte prohibuerunt". Lib. i. cap. xiii. p. 230.
2 Colgan adds, " omissis aliquot ahis, quae prae nimia exesi codicis vetustate legi non possunt". Acta Sanctorum Hiberniae, xi. Martii. Vila S. JSngussii, cap. xiv. p. 581.
30 Tlie Life and Works of
discovered. The fourth book comprises the names of two hundred and ten saints, with their maternal genealogy. It would appear from this title, that the paternal genealogy of those saints had been previously written, either by another hand, or by that of jEngus. The fifth " Book of Litanies" enumerates, in form of an invocation, a long list of saints. In several of its invocations, the principal name, with associated disciples, is generally found. This name usually pertains to the saint who presided over a particular monastery, with the
number of holy disciples under his rule; or a saint who was buried at some particular church, with his companions, who " slept in the Lord" ; or perchance some apostle, who, with his numerous band of missionaries, went forth to preach the Gospel to benighted nations. 1 The names, or native places of many foreigners, who flocked to the hives of learning and sanctity in Ireland, are noted in an especial manner. Here are found in
voked the names of Italian, Egyptian, British, and Gallic saints, who had been buried in Ireland. 2
Dr. Lanigan incorrectly asserts, that the foregoing work is sometimes called Saltair-na-rann, which means, the Metrical or Multipartite Psalter. 3 But it would appear from Colgan's
1 See also Harris' Ware, vol. iii. Writers of Ireland, book i. chap. v. pp. 62, 53.
8 The portion of this work, known as the Litany, has been translated and published for the first time in the Irish Ecclesiastical Record, vol. iii. Nos. xxxii. and xxxiii. , for May and June, 1867. The original Irish occupies one side of the page, in the Irish characters ; while on the opposite side, there is a correct English translation, by a competent scholar, writing under the initials B. M. C. Explanatory notes are found at the foot of nearly all those pages. A learned dissertation precedes this Litany, taken from the Archives of St. Isidore's Franciscan Convent, at Rome. Some years ago. Dr. Todd examined this MS. , containing ten folia, which he found to have constituted a part of the Boole of Leinster. This fact would seem to identify it with the MS. seen at Louvain, and described by Father Soller, the Bollandist, as we have al ready stated. In point of antiquity, therefore, this version dates back to the first half of the twelfth century. These folia contain the Martyrology of Tallaght --to which allusion has been already made --together with five of seven works attributed to iEngus. Ward and Colgan consulted this MS. ; for their readings seem to bave been marked, and these are very useful in assisting the Irish scholar to decipher certain words. However legible in their time, these are nearly altogether defaced at present. In Ward's and Sirin's Acts of St. Eumold, published at Louvain in 1662, this Litany is quoted at great length, p. 206. With the exception of the . groups of seven bishops, nearly all the saints, whose intercession is invoked, are given.
3 Ecclesiastical History of Ireland, vol. iii. chap. xx. ? x. p. 247. And in note (106, p. 251) he remarks on this passage: "Under this title Colgan says (t? 6. ,p. 582) that it appears in some old Irish MSS. and that he got a part of it with the inscription, from Saltair-na-rann composed by Aengus Cele-De. He observes, that the latest saint mentioned in it is St. Tigernach, son of St. Mella, and founder of Doire-nielle (see chap. xix. ? 13), who died abbot of Kill-achad, in the now county of (Javan, on the 4th of November, a. d. 805 (806). See AA. SS. p. 796, and Archdall at Kitlachad). This is a strong proof of the assertion that Aengus was the author of this work".
St. ^Engusius Hagiographus. 31
statement, that the Saltair-na-rann was altogether a distinct work. 1 After describing the work, " De Sanctis Hibemiae", he mentions the Saltair-na-rann as having been composed in the Irish language ; and, of course, as being distinct from the first named treatise, which had been written mostly in Latin. Yet, I must confess, that the sentences employed by Colgan in his account are rather ambiguous. 2 The work entitled " De Sanctis
Hiberniae", does not appear to have been a metrical compo sition, as may be seen in extracts taken from and found in many of Colgan's notes. The Saltair-na-rann comprises His tory of the Old Testament,5 written in verse,4 and which attributed to ^Engus as its author. We are informed, that the Chronicle of . ^Engus Ceile De, known as Saltair-na-Rann, i. e. " Saltair of the Poems" or " Verses", has been so called, because, Salm, " Psalm", and Poem are the same. 6 It contains one hundred and fifty poems, composed in the finest style of the
Gaelic language, as understood in the eighth century.
This celebrated work of Aengus Ceile De has been called
There MS. Martyrology, entitled Saltair-na-Rann, preserved in the British Museum [Egerton, 185]. It a thin, small quarto-sized volume in verse, and, with exception of a few pages, has been written in the bold and accurate hand of Dubhaltach Mac Firbisigh, about the year 1650. It consists of sixty-seven pages, containing five quatrains, or twenty lines, on eacb page. The title in accordance with the second quatrain, which, as Angli cised, thus begins:
" The Saltair of the verses shall be the name Of my poem not an unwise title".
This Saltair-na-Rann, however, entirely distinct from that of Aengus Ceile De.
" Opus ex jam memoratis opusculis conflatum in quibusdam antiquis patriae membranis patrio sermone intitulatur Saltuir-na-rann quae vox Latiue red- dita Psalterium metricum, nunc Psalterium multipartitum denotat. Et in utroque sensu, diversa S. Aengussii opera recte sic inscribi poterant". Acta Sanctorum Hiberniae, xi. Marlii. Vita <S. Aengussii, cap. xv. pp. 681, 582. know not on what authority Harris makes the following statement with regard to iEngus, when he says, "to him ascribed by some Psalter- na-rann, being a Miscellany Collection of Irish affairs, in prose and verse, Latin and Irish". Harris' Ware, vol.