The central Academy is divided into eight main sec-
tions: the departments of physico-mathematical science,
of geology and geography, of chemical sciences, of biolog-
ical sciences and medicine, of technical or applied sci-
ences, of history and philosophy, of economics and law,
and of literature and languages.
tions: the departments of physico-mathematical science,
of geology and geography, of chemical sciences, of biolog-
ical sciences and medicine, of technical or applied sci-
ences, of history and philosophy, of economics and law,
and of literature and languages.
Soviet Union - 1952 - Soviet Civilization
org/access_use#pd-google
? ECONOMIC AHD CULTURAL PROGRESS
some way to satisfy the truly insatiable demand. "19
On the eve of the Second World War there were six
times as many libraries, with eighteen times as many
books, as in 1913. The Nazis destroyed 43,000 libraries
with their 100,000,000 books. Yet at the end of the
Fourth Five-Year Plan there were 15 percent more public
libraries and clubhouses than in 1940. Book publishing
of all types was 84 percent higher than pre-war and six-
teen times higher than in 1913. The year 1951 saw the
number of libraries maintained by the State and public
organizations rise to 350,000, containing more than 700,-
000,000 books.
By the end of 1951 many millions of copies had been
issued of all the chief Russian classics in the novel, the
drama and poetry. For instance, the various works of
Alexander Pushkin had been published beyond a total
of 57,000,000, of Maxim Gorky beyond 59,000,000 and
of Leo Tolstoy beyond 42,000,000. Even in the rather
abstract sphere of philosophy the Soviets print editions
ranging in number from 10,000 to 150,000, including
translations of the outstanding classics from Plato and
Aristotle to the nineteenth century.
It is enlightening to compare publishing figures for
the first twenty years of the Soviet regime with the last
twenty years of Tsarist rule. Precise data are available
as of October, 1947, and are as follows:
Copies
Copies
Author
1888-1917
1918-1947
Chekhov, Anton O.
Gogol, Nikolai V.
Gorky, Maxim
Griboedov, Alexander S.
627,000
5,813,000
1,083,000
619,000
18,386,000
10,526,000
44,504,000
1,173,000
213
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATIOH
Copies
Copies
Author
1888-1917
1918-1947
Herzen, Alexander I.
167,000
1,810,000
Lermontov, Mikhail Y.
4,036,000
9,740,000
Nekrasov, Nikolai A.
254,000
9,648,000
Ostrovsky, Alexander N.
254,000
3,350,000
Pushkin, Alexander S.
10,711,000
35,429,000
Saltykov-Shchedrin, Mikhail
E. 231,000
7,884,000
Tolstoy, Leo N.
10,784,000
26,459,000
Turgenev, Ivan S.
?
12,432,000
Soviet publishers have also issued by the millions the
translated work of foreign authors. Victor Hugo heads
the list with more than 6,600,000 copies; Guy de
Maupassant is next with more than 4,000,000; while
Balzac, Barbusse, Dickens, Rolland and Zola total over
2,000,000 each. An official survey by the Soviet Book
Chamber in 1951 showed that books by 210 American
authors have appeared in the Soviet Union since 1918.
These added up to 44,400,000 copies, translated into no
less than fifty of the languages used in the U. S. S. R.
Jack London came first with 12,259,000 copies; Mark
Twain second with 4,267,000; Ernest Thompson Seton
third with more than 2,300,000; O. Henry fourth with
1,649,000; and Theodore Dreiser fifth with 1,445,000.
The Soviet people often celebrate the birthdays or
other anniversaries of famous world writers. Thus in Feb-
ruary, 1952, the Russian press and literary journals made
a great deal of the 150th anniversary of Victor Hugo's
birth. Publishers were getting ready for the press a two-
volume edition of his selected works to be issued in 90,000
copies; and a special subscription edition of his complete
works in 150,000 copies. Soviet readers and critics see
214
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECOHOMIC AHD CULTURAL PROGRESS
in Hugo a powerful defender of the disinherited and
oppressed, and one who fought passionately for democ-
racy and the liberation of the masses. In 1952 the Soviet
Union also celebrated the 500th anniversary of the birth
of Leonardo da Vinci.
In all of the arts progress similar to that in education
and literature has taken place. Lenin himself set the tone
when he said: "Art belongs to the people. It ought to
extend with deep roots into the very thick of the broad
toiling masses. It ought to be intelligible to these masses
and loved by them. And it ought to unify the freedom,
thought and will of these masses, and elevate them. It
ought to arouse and develop artists among them. "20 Up
till 1917 the fine arts (as distinct from the folk arts) were
the private property of a small minority at the top. The
overwhelming majority of the people did not have the
money to buy tickets for performances of drama, ballet,
opera and music. Now all this is changed. And in no
country on earth do a larger proportion of the population
share in the enjoyment of all the arts than in Soviet
Russia.
Not only do huge audiences attend professional pro-
ductions everywhere, but amateur art circles flourish by
the scores of thousands. The wide network of amateur
groups are mainly sponsored and equipped by the trade
unions, which make available to them their 8,000 club-
houses and 80,000 recreation rooms. In 1951 there
entered the national elimination contests 102,000 amateur
groups with over 2,000,000 members. Included were
14,000 symphony orchestras, brass bands and string en-
sembles, 12,000 dance groups, 25,000 choral groups and
40,000 drama groups.
During my two trips to the Soviet Union, in 1932
215
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
and 1938, I went frequently to the theatre, ballet and
opera and was always struck by the first-rate quality of the
performances, including presentations of Shakespeare's
plays. As a Shakespeare enthusiast since my school days,
I have been impressed by the immense popularity of
England's greatest dramatist throughout the U. S. S. R.
Shakespeare festivals are a common occurrence there and
Shakespeare's plays have been published in hundreds of
thousands of copies in at least twenty languages. A special
section of the All-Russian Theatrical Society concerns
itself entirely with Shakespeare and the Western Euro-
pean Theatre. This section organizes scholarly research
and lectures on Shakespeare, and arranges an annual
conference on his work every year in April, which is
known as "Shakespeare Month. "
Although in my opinion the quality of Soviet archi-
tecture has remained mediocre, artists and writers have
on the whole set a high record of accomplishment. The
compelling music of Shostakovich, Prokofiev and Khacha-
turian has won international acclaim. The work of
Eisenstein, Pudovkin and Dovzhenko in the motion
picture ranks as classic. Mikhail Sholokhov and Alexei
Tolstoy are among the greatest novelists of our time.
As for the status of painting and sculpture, Mr. F. B.
Taylor, an Associate of the Royal Canadian Academy of
Arts, offered the opinion, after a visit to Soviet Russia
in 1951, that the "Soviet standard of workmanship and
craftsmanship and all-round technical capacity in the
visual arts is the highest I know of in the world today. "21
Significant, too, was the testimony in 1947 of General
Walter Bedell Smith, at that time American Ambassador
to the U. S. S. R. , before a House of Representatives sub-
committee on Foreign Affairs: "The Soviet Union is
216
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL PROGRESS
setting a higher cultural standard within its borders, I
believe, than exists anywhere else in the world. I say that
advisedly. . . . I mean, at least according to my tastes, the
Soviet radio, the Soviet ballet, the opera, their puppet
theatres -- things of that sort -- are based on a higher
cultural level than that which public demand dictates
in this country. "22
Along with the enormous expansion of recreational
facilities in the arts has gone a comparable development
in sports, which are constantly encouraged by the Min-
istry of Public Health and which come under the super-
vision of the Committee on Affairs of Physical Culture
and Sport -- a body directly accountable to the Cabinet.
Scattered throughout the country are 150,000 athletic
organizations with more than 23,000,000 members and
coordinated into forty large sports societies, the best
known of which are Bolshevik, Dynamo and Spartacus.
The Government gives every aid to a broad people's
program of sports and exercise, believing that they are
essential to national defense as well as to health.
Today all citizens enjoy ample opportunity to take
part in indoor and outdoor sports of a most varied nature.
This contrasts with the old Tsarist days when the masses
of the people had neither the leisure, the money nor the
equipment to participate in sports. The upper classes
themselves were not given much to outdoor sports. Writ-
ing about the typical pre-revolutionary Russian, Sir
Maurice Baring states: "His chief pastimes were singing,
endless conversation, chess playing, broiling himself red
in steambaths, guzzling tremendous amounts of tea and
vodka. "23 The Soviet Russians have not lost any of these
particular skills, but have added a great many others.
As to chess, the most intellectual of all popular games,
217
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
millions now play it and enter into local, regional or
national competitions. Children are urged to start learn-
ing the game at an early age. In 1951 Soviet citizens won
the world's chess championship for both men and women.
Mr. Harry Schwartz, critical commentator of The New
York Times on Soviet affairs, acknowledges that "the
U. S. S. R. does stand pre-eminent" in chess. "Soviet pri-
macy is complete," he says, "and the U. S. S. R. has at least
a dozen players who rank at the very top of the chess
ladder, a greater number than any other country. "24
As for other sports, boating, swimming, rowing, ski-
ing, skating, ice-hockey, basketball, volleyball, soccer,
tennis, bicycling, boxing, wrestling, marksmanship, track,
cross-country meets, horseback riding, horse-racing and
mountain climbing are all popular. Tennis is for most
Russians a new game in which they are not yet very
proficient. But in soccer their teams are a match for
those from other European countries. Cross-country
racing -- on foot or on ski -- is probably the first in
popularity and in a single season draws as many as 6,000,-
000 competitors (foot) and 10,000,000 (ski).
In 1952 the Soviet Union for the first time took part
in the Olympic Games, held in Helsinki, Finland, July
19-August 3. Competing against the teams of sixty-six
other nations, the Soviet athletes, both men and women,
showed great prowess in a number of events. The Olym-
pics do not tabulate official team scores, but according to
the unofficial Western scoring system the United States
won first place with a total of 614 points, while Soviet
Russia came second with 5531^. A marked feature of
the Games was the display of good fellowship between
the Soviet entrants and those from other countries, in-
cluding the United States. After Soviet oarsmen had pre-
218
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECOHOMIC AN. D CULTURAL PROGRESS
sented the U. S. crew a scull, the American captain said:
"They couldn't have been nicer. They're a swell bunch
of fellows. "
Later, after the U. S. crew had won the eight-oar
championship over the Soviet crew in the finals, the Rus-
sians lavishly wined and dined the victors. At the end
of the banquet the Soviet chairman rose and said: "Wel-
come, friends of America! We are happy for these friend-
ships we have made on the water. We want the sports-
men of Russia and the sportsmen of America always to
compete in this friendly spirit. " Then he offered a toast
to "international understanding"; and everyone stood up
and clinked glasses of vodka. *
In my account of Soviet Russia's achievements in
World War II and of its remarkable economic progress
under the Five-Year Plans, I noted how rapidly the coun-
try has forged ahead in the realm of science. In every
sphere of existence the Soviets stress the utilization of
scientific principles and techniques for the solution of
problems, in place of the dependence, characteristic of
Tsarist times, on the myths and methods of supernatural-
ism. As early as 1918, when the Government had its back
to the wall, Premier Lenin drew up a far-seeing "Draft
of a Plan of Scientific and Technical Work," which out-
lined some of the more significant scientific tasks facing
the nation.
As the eminent British physicist and Fellow of the
Royal Society, Professor J. D. Bernal, has said: "The great
change which the Revolution brought was to make con-
scious for the first time the necessary connection between
the ordered development of science and the life and work
? For a more detailed account of this episode, see The New York
Times, July 25, 1952.
219
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATIOH
of the whole community. . . . Lenin had a wider and
deeper knowledge of science than any statesman of his day,
and even in the most difficult period of famine and civil
war he laid the foundations of an entirely new develop-
ment of science. . . . The task that was undertaken was
not to push forward the bounds of knowledge by the work
of a few isolated scientists, but to make scientific the
whole productive and cultural activity of 160,000,000
people. "25
As compared with only several thousand scientific
workers under the old regime, the Soviet Union had 80,-
000 in 1939 and 150,000 by the end of 1951, of whom
about 60,000 were women. These figures do not include
700,000 laboratory specialists and 1,000,000 technicians
on all levels. The Academy of Sciences of the U. S. S. R. , re-
garded as so important that it is directly responsible to
the Cabinet, has its headquarters in Moscow and acts as
a general staff for the furtherance of scientific endeavor
throughout the country. It not only arranges numberless
conferences and meetings on scientific topics, but initiates
and coordinates scientific research from one end of the
land to the other. Colleges and universities, under the
Ministry of Higher Education, also have their own scien-
tific institutes and conduct extensive research.
The central Academy is divided into eight main sec-
tions: the departments of physico-mathematical science,
of geology and geography, of chemical sciences, of biolog-
ical sciences and medicine, of technical or applied sci-
ences, of history and philosophy, of economics and law,
and of literature and languages. The Academy maintains
various institutes, laboratories, field stations, museums
and observatories totaling more than seventy. It has
affiliates in many remote districts of the U. S. S. R. and in
220
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECONOMIC AHD CULTURAL PROGRESS
all the Union Republics. Twelve out of sixteen of those
Republics now have their own Academies of Science.
Likewise extremely important are the Academy of
Medical Sciences and the Lenin Academy of Agricultural
Sciences.
A revolutionary advance since 1917 has been the car-
rying over of the methods of science into agriculture and
peasant life, ever the last refuge of traditional super-
naturalism. Throughout the Soviet Republic today, the
farmers, in their efforts to obtain a good harvest, no
longer resort to prayer, religious ritual and priests sprink-
ling the fields with holy water; they rely instead upon
tractors, combines and other machine techniques, as well
as on the general principles of scientific, collectivized
agriculture. Today the U. S. S. R. has hundreds of agri-
cultural institutes, experimental stations and experi-
mental farms. And most of the collectives carry on re-
search in their own small laboratories, with the aid and
advice of the Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
Of course science is closely linked up with the eco-
nomic system of socialist planning, which has turned
the whole country into one vast laboratory where, be-
cause of the central controls, public ownership and all
but unlimited funds, there can be carried on scientific
experiments and undertakings of unparalleled scope.
The great hydroelectric-irrigation-afforestation projects
described in the last section are excellent examples of
what large-scale planning on a scientific basis can do.
And they have had the special attention of the Academy
of Sciences and its research facilities. Planning is, in fact,
an essential factor in all scientific method, since the scien-
tific solution of a problem always involves some definite
plan of action, whether fairly simple or quite complex.
221
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
Soviet science operates within the general -- and
limiting -- postulates and principles of Marxism. Yet the
record shows that within those limits broad and vigorous
scientific discussions have constantly taken place. For
example, in the famous genetics controversy centering
around Trofim Lysenko's theory, opposed to modern
Mendelism, that under certain circumstances living spe-
cies can inherit acquired characteristics, open discussions
raged in the Soviet Union for a decade. In 1948 the
Academy of Agricultural Sciences held a week-long con-
ference on the subject in which scientists on both sides
of the question gave their uncensored opinions. Pravda
printed every word of the debate, which later appeared
in a thick tome published in 500,000 copies.
A careful study of the controversy by Dr. Bernhard
J. Stern of Columbia University indicates that both
Lysenko and many non-Soviet scientists who answered
him were laboring under grave misunderstandings. In
his attack on American geneticists Lysenko unfortunate-
ly relied on articles in the 1947 edition of the Encyclo-
pedia Americana which were reprinted by the editors
without change from the 1917 edition. "They were there-
fore written," as Dr. Stern says, "about 1917 or 1918,
and reflect genetic doctrines of thirty years ago rather
than of today. 26 . . . However meritorious," concludes Dr.
Stern, "Lysenko's positive practical achievements are,*
his critical analysis of genetic theory represents an attack
upon positions long abandoned by the vanguard of
geneticists in this country and in England. . . . Thus it
becomes clear that the gap between Lysenko and genetic-
ists does not appear to be absolute, and may be further
? Some Western scientists believe that Lysenko may have succeeded
in introducing into Soviet agriculture, not the inheritance of acquired
characteristics, but directed mutations.
222
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECONOMIC ANJD CULTURAL PROGRESS
narrowed as reliable evidence becomes more readily avail-
able to both groups. "27
The outcome of the Soviet genetics debate was that
in July, 1948, the Agricultural Academy voted in favor
of Lysenko's position. A few weeks later the U. S. S. R.
Academy of Sciences also officially adopted the Lysenko
view and stated that his report, "which has been approved
by the Central Committee of the Ail-Union Communist
Party, lays down the party line in biology. "28 The
Academy of Sciences then put into effect a series of meas-
ures to ensure the acceptance of Lysenko's principles
throughout the country. The worst aspect of this situa-
tion was not that Soviet scientists may have taken over
the wrong theory, but that they and the Communist Party
set up an official line from which dissent would clearly
be dangerous. Soviet Marxism makes allowance for
changes in its formulations, and such changes do frequent-
ly occur; but the more fundamental ones must have
official Communist approval.
It is in the light of this fact that we must qualify the
otherwise excellent statements of Lenin and Stalin against
dogmatic attitudes. For instance, Lenin asserted in 1899:
"In no sense do we regard the Marxist theory as some-
thing complete and unassailable. On the contrary, we
are convinced that this theory is only the cornerstone of
that science which socialists must advance in all direc-
tions if they do not wish to fall behind life. "29
In 1950, in his comments on the extended Soviet
linguistics controversy, Stalin wrote: "Textualists and
Talmudists regard Marxism, the separate deductions and
formulas of Marxism, as a collection of dogmas which
'never' change, regardless of the changes in the condi-
tion of development of society. . . . But Marxism as a
223
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
science cannot stand still; it develops and perfects itself.
In the course of its development Marxism cannot but
be enriched by new experience, by new knowledge;
consequently, its separate formulas and deductions can-
not but change in the course of time, cannot but be re-
placed by new formulas and deductions corresponding
to the new historical tasks. Marxism does not recognize
any immutable deductions and formulas, applicable to
all epochs and periods. Marxism is an enemy of all dog-
matism. "30
The lamentable truth is that despite the undeniable
progress of Soviet culture since 1917, especially in the
tremendous increase of cultural facilities for the people,
it still is subject to Communist and governmental censor-
ship, whether science, literature or even music is con-
cerned. A comment on Soviet writing by Professor
Ernest J. Simmons, Columbia's well-known Russian ex-
pert, is to the point: "Since the whole manufacturing
process of the printed word -- paper, presses, publishing
houses, distribution -- is ultimately under government
control, the Party has an economic strangle-hold on the
output and content of literature. The propaganda line
that determines the broad direction of literary content
is usually initiated in the Politburo and announced by
the Central Committee in resolutions which have almost
the force of law. "31
Yet, as Professor Simmons acknowledges, in Soviet
Russia "much of high worth has been achieved in the
arts and sciences. " And he solves the seeming paradox
in this manner: "The proposition must be squarely
faced, with all its implications, that many Soviet creative
artists and thinkers may have come quite seriously and
honestly to accept as convictions what at first may have
224
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? BCOHOMIC AHD CULTURAL PROGRESS
been regarded by them as hostile controls of the Com-
munist government under which they live. Are we too
far removed from the kind of religious faith that turns
the ends achieved by instruments of control into fighting
convictions? Though art cannot serve propaganda, pro-
paganda can serve art by giving it a renewed meaning
and purpose, and a new virility. After all, the cathedrals
of Notre Dame and Chartres are in a real sense glorious
artistic monuments to Christian propaganda. . . .
"In the Middle Ages society was sure of the church;
it provided a definite pattern of life that took man hope-
fully from the cradle to the grave. Men did not wish to
escape the controls of the church; on the contrary, these
controls had become convictions, for they had come to be
accepted on faith. To a considerable extent the same
may be true in the Soviet Union with regard to the Party.
Life is officially represented as sure, and the future is
always presented in a hopeful light as all struggle toward
the great 'Age of Communism. ' Under such conditions,
for the creative spirit art and life become one. There
is no more desire to escape from a socialist art than there
was to escape from a Christian art in the Middle Ages. "82
Dr. Simmons' analysis rings true to me.
Although I think it is semantically incorrect to call
communism a religion, the Soviet Communists do sub-
scribe to and teach an integrated and inclusive way of
life, with definite implications for every field of human
endeavor, which fills the vacuum left by the decline of
religious supernaturalism. To this Marxist philosophy
they and scores of millions of Soviet citizens who are not
members of the Communist Party render supreme com-
mitment. This general viewpoint on man and the uni-
verse sets up as the ultimate ethical goal the welfare of
225
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILTZATIOH
humanity upon this earth, and expounds a militant
message of human betterment. It advocates an advanced
morality at least in the sense of insisting that men should
subordinate their personal pleasures and desires to work-
ing together for the common good, and that all exploita-
tion of man by man should cease.
No matter how much one may disagree with or dis-
like the Soviet way of life, one must admit that the formu-
lation and teaching of the complex philosophy of Dia-
lectical Materialism is a genuine cultural achievement.
Unhappily Soviet philosophers have weakened their own
case by displaying a formidable ignorance of American
philosophy, especially in their continued misunderstand-
ing of the American school of Naturalism led by the late
John Dewey. They still rely on a rather shallow footnote
run by Lenin in his Materialism and Empirio-Criticism
condemning William James and his pragmatism. The
Dialectical Materialists have never taken the trouble to
discover how much Dewey differs from James and has
improved on him. Yet Dialectical Materialism, in spite
of its provincialism, its taint of being the official Soviet
philosophy and other weaknesses, takes its place today as
one of the outstanding philosophical systems of the twen-
tieth century.
According to Marxist theory, when the Soviet polit-
ical dictatorship fades away, the dictatorial controls over
Soviet culture will also disappear. This is a consumma-
tion most earnestly to be desired. For otherwise the art,
literature and science of the U. S. S. R. will in the long run
find themselves at a dead end, with originality, fresh
ideas and that questioning of authority and basic assump-
tions so necessary to progress all stifled in a dreary medi-
ocrity of official doctrine and prescribed taste.
226
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? CHAPTER VI CONTRASTS BETWEEN SOVIET
SOCIALISM AND FASCISM
1. Ten Fundamental Differences
As we come to the end of Part I of this book, a com-
parison between Soviet socialism and fascism will serve
both to summarize much that we have covered and to ex-
pose one of the most dangerous weapons in the arsenal of
anti-Soviet propaganda. For the claim that Soviet social-
ism and fascism are, after all, just the same is a provoca-
tive device that goes far in whipping up the passions of
war. This unscrupulous charge seeks to turn upon the
Soviet Union the justified hatred and fear which the
peoples of the world have felt, and still feel, toward the
Nazi and fascist regimes. The notion of a fundamental
identity between the Soviet regime and fascism is espe-
cially widespread in the United States, where the Hearst
press in particular makes a point of referring to the Soviet
system as "Red Fascism. "
In the decade prior to the outbreak of the Second
World War the appeasers of fascism, and other enemies
of cooperation between the U. S. S. R. and the Western
democracies, were continually branding Soviet Russia as
just another fascist nation. There was method in this
madness, for it became a major factor in preventing a
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
genuine peace front, while there was still time, against
the fascist aggression of the German, Italian and Japanese
Governments. The post-war revival of the fallacy of
equating Communist and fascist regimes can again have
catastrophic consequences for world peace, since it leads
to serious misunderstandings of Soviet policy.
The charge that Soviet socialism and fascism are
essentially the same falls quickly to the ground under
objective analysis. We can note at least ten fundamental
differences between the two systems. Soviet socialism as
compared with fascism stands, first, for evolution to full
political democracy instead of for permanent dictator-
ship; second, for racial democracy and equality instead
of racial discrimination and persecution; third, for equal-
ity of the sexes instead of the treatment of women as
inferiors; fourth, for the expansion of the trade unions
instead of their destruction; fifth, for an unceasing em-
phasis on the proletariat, the class struggle and the class-
less society instead of a glossing over of class conflict and
the continuation of a class system; sixth, for a planned
socialist economy operated for use and abundance instead
of a monopolistic capitalist economy run on behalf of
profits and aggression; seventh, for the development and
expansion of culture instead of its general retrogression
and debasement; eighth, for the intellectual formulation
and teaching of an inclusive, integrated and anti-super-
natural philosophy of life instead of a primitive pot-
pourri of tribal superstition, conceit and blood-thirsty
war-cries; ninth, for government by leaders with intel-
lect, social idealism and international vision instead of
leaders noted for their ignorance, egotism and savage
nationalism; and, tenth, for international peace and dis-
armament instead of war and an armaments race.
228
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET SOCIALISM AHD FASCISM
2. Attitudes towards Democracy
The most common misunderstanding concerning
the nature of Soviet socialism and fascism is that since
both have employed violence to attain power and have
established political dictatorships, they are therefore the
same. This is like saying that because police departments
and gangs of thugs in American cities are armed with rifles
and revolvers and use force to achieve certain objectives,
therefore their fundamental character and social effects
are substantially identical. Or, to take another example,
it is like stating that there is no real difference between
surgeons and murderers due to the fact that they both
resort to knives in the pursuit of their professions.
The central fallacy is of course to treat two forms of
government or two groups of men as equivalent, regard-
less of their ultimate ends, if they hold certain means in
common. Pushing this species of argument further, we
could assert that the American Government under Presi-
dent Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Nazi Government
under Chancellor Adolf Hitler were of the same sort
because they both relied upon armies, navies and air
fleets to win a war. Or going far back into the past, we
could say that General George Washington and the
American armies of 1776 were fundamentally on the
same moral level as General Francisco Franco and the
Spanish fascist armies of 1936-38, for the reason that they
both used the violent means of revolution.
As I have reiterated throughout this book, the Soviet
Republic has always considered the dictatorship of the
proletariat as a transitional measure necessary for the
firm establishment of socialism in the U. S. S. R. and as a
governmental form to be superseded when the need for
229
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl.
? ECONOMIC AHD CULTURAL PROGRESS
some way to satisfy the truly insatiable demand. "19
On the eve of the Second World War there were six
times as many libraries, with eighteen times as many
books, as in 1913. The Nazis destroyed 43,000 libraries
with their 100,000,000 books. Yet at the end of the
Fourth Five-Year Plan there were 15 percent more public
libraries and clubhouses than in 1940. Book publishing
of all types was 84 percent higher than pre-war and six-
teen times higher than in 1913. The year 1951 saw the
number of libraries maintained by the State and public
organizations rise to 350,000, containing more than 700,-
000,000 books.
By the end of 1951 many millions of copies had been
issued of all the chief Russian classics in the novel, the
drama and poetry. For instance, the various works of
Alexander Pushkin had been published beyond a total
of 57,000,000, of Maxim Gorky beyond 59,000,000 and
of Leo Tolstoy beyond 42,000,000. Even in the rather
abstract sphere of philosophy the Soviets print editions
ranging in number from 10,000 to 150,000, including
translations of the outstanding classics from Plato and
Aristotle to the nineteenth century.
It is enlightening to compare publishing figures for
the first twenty years of the Soviet regime with the last
twenty years of Tsarist rule. Precise data are available
as of October, 1947, and are as follows:
Copies
Copies
Author
1888-1917
1918-1947
Chekhov, Anton O.
Gogol, Nikolai V.
Gorky, Maxim
Griboedov, Alexander S.
627,000
5,813,000
1,083,000
619,000
18,386,000
10,526,000
44,504,000
1,173,000
213
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATIOH
Copies
Copies
Author
1888-1917
1918-1947
Herzen, Alexander I.
167,000
1,810,000
Lermontov, Mikhail Y.
4,036,000
9,740,000
Nekrasov, Nikolai A.
254,000
9,648,000
Ostrovsky, Alexander N.
254,000
3,350,000
Pushkin, Alexander S.
10,711,000
35,429,000
Saltykov-Shchedrin, Mikhail
E. 231,000
7,884,000
Tolstoy, Leo N.
10,784,000
26,459,000
Turgenev, Ivan S.
?
12,432,000
Soviet publishers have also issued by the millions the
translated work of foreign authors. Victor Hugo heads
the list with more than 6,600,000 copies; Guy de
Maupassant is next with more than 4,000,000; while
Balzac, Barbusse, Dickens, Rolland and Zola total over
2,000,000 each. An official survey by the Soviet Book
Chamber in 1951 showed that books by 210 American
authors have appeared in the Soviet Union since 1918.
These added up to 44,400,000 copies, translated into no
less than fifty of the languages used in the U. S. S. R.
Jack London came first with 12,259,000 copies; Mark
Twain second with 4,267,000; Ernest Thompson Seton
third with more than 2,300,000; O. Henry fourth with
1,649,000; and Theodore Dreiser fifth with 1,445,000.
The Soviet people often celebrate the birthdays or
other anniversaries of famous world writers. Thus in Feb-
ruary, 1952, the Russian press and literary journals made
a great deal of the 150th anniversary of Victor Hugo's
birth. Publishers were getting ready for the press a two-
volume edition of his selected works to be issued in 90,000
copies; and a special subscription edition of his complete
works in 150,000 copies. Soviet readers and critics see
214
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECOHOMIC AHD CULTURAL PROGRESS
in Hugo a powerful defender of the disinherited and
oppressed, and one who fought passionately for democ-
racy and the liberation of the masses. In 1952 the Soviet
Union also celebrated the 500th anniversary of the birth
of Leonardo da Vinci.
In all of the arts progress similar to that in education
and literature has taken place. Lenin himself set the tone
when he said: "Art belongs to the people. It ought to
extend with deep roots into the very thick of the broad
toiling masses. It ought to be intelligible to these masses
and loved by them. And it ought to unify the freedom,
thought and will of these masses, and elevate them. It
ought to arouse and develop artists among them. "20 Up
till 1917 the fine arts (as distinct from the folk arts) were
the private property of a small minority at the top. The
overwhelming majority of the people did not have the
money to buy tickets for performances of drama, ballet,
opera and music. Now all this is changed. And in no
country on earth do a larger proportion of the population
share in the enjoyment of all the arts than in Soviet
Russia.
Not only do huge audiences attend professional pro-
ductions everywhere, but amateur art circles flourish by
the scores of thousands. The wide network of amateur
groups are mainly sponsored and equipped by the trade
unions, which make available to them their 8,000 club-
houses and 80,000 recreation rooms. In 1951 there
entered the national elimination contests 102,000 amateur
groups with over 2,000,000 members. Included were
14,000 symphony orchestras, brass bands and string en-
sembles, 12,000 dance groups, 25,000 choral groups and
40,000 drama groups.
During my two trips to the Soviet Union, in 1932
215
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
and 1938, I went frequently to the theatre, ballet and
opera and was always struck by the first-rate quality of the
performances, including presentations of Shakespeare's
plays. As a Shakespeare enthusiast since my school days,
I have been impressed by the immense popularity of
England's greatest dramatist throughout the U. S. S. R.
Shakespeare festivals are a common occurrence there and
Shakespeare's plays have been published in hundreds of
thousands of copies in at least twenty languages. A special
section of the All-Russian Theatrical Society concerns
itself entirely with Shakespeare and the Western Euro-
pean Theatre. This section organizes scholarly research
and lectures on Shakespeare, and arranges an annual
conference on his work every year in April, which is
known as "Shakespeare Month. "
Although in my opinion the quality of Soviet archi-
tecture has remained mediocre, artists and writers have
on the whole set a high record of accomplishment. The
compelling music of Shostakovich, Prokofiev and Khacha-
turian has won international acclaim. The work of
Eisenstein, Pudovkin and Dovzhenko in the motion
picture ranks as classic. Mikhail Sholokhov and Alexei
Tolstoy are among the greatest novelists of our time.
As for the status of painting and sculpture, Mr. F. B.
Taylor, an Associate of the Royal Canadian Academy of
Arts, offered the opinion, after a visit to Soviet Russia
in 1951, that the "Soviet standard of workmanship and
craftsmanship and all-round technical capacity in the
visual arts is the highest I know of in the world today. "21
Significant, too, was the testimony in 1947 of General
Walter Bedell Smith, at that time American Ambassador
to the U. S. S. R. , before a House of Representatives sub-
committee on Foreign Affairs: "The Soviet Union is
216
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL PROGRESS
setting a higher cultural standard within its borders, I
believe, than exists anywhere else in the world. I say that
advisedly. . . . I mean, at least according to my tastes, the
Soviet radio, the Soviet ballet, the opera, their puppet
theatres -- things of that sort -- are based on a higher
cultural level than that which public demand dictates
in this country. "22
Along with the enormous expansion of recreational
facilities in the arts has gone a comparable development
in sports, which are constantly encouraged by the Min-
istry of Public Health and which come under the super-
vision of the Committee on Affairs of Physical Culture
and Sport -- a body directly accountable to the Cabinet.
Scattered throughout the country are 150,000 athletic
organizations with more than 23,000,000 members and
coordinated into forty large sports societies, the best
known of which are Bolshevik, Dynamo and Spartacus.
The Government gives every aid to a broad people's
program of sports and exercise, believing that they are
essential to national defense as well as to health.
Today all citizens enjoy ample opportunity to take
part in indoor and outdoor sports of a most varied nature.
This contrasts with the old Tsarist days when the masses
of the people had neither the leisure, the money nor the
equipment to participate in sports. The upper classes
themselves were not given much to outdoor sports. Writ-
ing about the typical pre-revolutionary Russian, Sir
Maurice Baring states: "His chief pastimes were singing,
endless conversation, chess playing, broiling himself red
in steambaths, guzzling tremendous amounts of tea and
vodka. "23 The Soviet Russians have not lost any of these
particular skills, but have added a great many others.
As to chess, the most intellectual of all popular games,
217
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
millions now play it and enter into local, regional or
national competitions. Children are urged to start learn-
ing the game at an early age. In 1951 Soviet citizens won
the world's chess championship for both men and women.
Mr. Harry Schwartz, critical commentator of The New
York Times on Soviet affairs, acknowledges that "the
U. S. S. R. does stand pre-eminent" in chess. "Soviet pri-
macy is complete," he says, "and the U. S. S. R. has at least
a dozen players who rank at the very top of the chess
ladder, a greater number than any other country. "24
As for other sports, boating, swimming, rowing, ski-
ing, skating, ice-hockey, basketball, volleyball, soccer,
tennis, bicycling, boxing, wrestling, marksmanship, track,
cross-country meets, horseback riding, horse-racing and
mountain climbing are all popular. Tennis is for most
Russians a new game in which they are not yet very
proficient. But in soccer their teams are a match for
those from other European countries. Cross-country
racing -- on foot or on ski -- is probably the first in
popularity and in a single season draws as many as 6,000,-
000 competitors (foot) and 10,000,000 (ski).
In 1952 the Soviet Union for the first time took part
in the Olympic Games, held in Helsinki, Finland, July
19-August 3. Competing against the teams of sixty-six
other nations, the Soviet athletes, both men and women,
showed great prowess in a number of events. The Olym-
pics do not tabulate official team scores, but according to
the unofficial Western scoring system the United States
won first place with a total of 614 points, while Soviet
Russia came second with 5531^. A marked feature of
the Games was the display of good fellowship between
the Soviet entrants and those from other countries, in-
cluding the United States. After Soviet oarsmen had pre-
218
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECOHOMIC AN. D CULTURAL PROGRESS
sented the U. S. crew a scull, the American captain said:
"They couldn't have been nicer. They're a swell bunch
of fellows. "
Later, after the U. S. crew had won the eight-oar
championship over the Soviet crew in the finals, the Rus-
sians lavishly wined and dined the victors. At the end
of the banquet the Soviet chairman rose and said: "Wel-
come, friends of America! We are happy for these friend-
ships we have made on the water. We want the sports-
men of Russia and the sportsmen of America always to
compete in this friendly spirit. " Then he offered a toast
to "international understanding"; and everyone stood up
and clinked glasses of vodka. *
In my account of Soviet Russia's achievements in
World War II and of its remarkable economic progress
under the Five-Year Plans, I noted how rapidly the coun-
try has forged ahead in the realm of science. In every
sphere of existence the Soviets stress the utilization of
scientific principles and techniques for the solution of
problems, in place of the dependence, characteristic of
Tsarist times, on the myths and methods of supernatural-
ism. As early as 1918, when the Government had its back
to the wall, Premier Lenin drew up a far-seeing "Draft
of a Plan of Scientific and Technical Work," which out-
lined some of the more significant scientific tasks facing
the nation.
As the eminent British physicist and Fellow of the
Royal Society, Professor J. D. Bernal, has said: "The great
change which the Revolution brought was to make con-
scious for the first time the necessary connection between
the ordered development of science and the life and work
? For a more detailed account of this episode, see The New York
Times, July 25, 1952.
219
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATIOH
of the whole community. . . . Lenin had a wider and
deeper knowledge of science than any statesman of his day,
and even in the most difficult period of famine and civil
war he laid the foundations of an entirely new develop-
ment of science. . . . The task that was undertaken was
not to push forward the bounds of knowledge by the work
of a few isolated scientists, but to make scientific the
whole productive and cultural activity of 160,000,000
people. "25
As compared with only several thousand scientific
workers under the old regime, the Soviet Union had 80,-
000 in 1939 and 150,000 by the end of 1951, of whom
about 60,000 were women. These figures do not include
700,000 laboratory specialists and 1,000,000 technicians
on all levels. The Academy of Sciences of the U. S. S. R. , re-
garded as so important that it is directly responsible to
the Cabinet, has its headquarters in Moscow and acts as
a general staff for the furtherance of scientific endeavor
throughout the country. It not only arranges numberless
conferences and meetings on scientific topics, but initiates
and coordinates scientific research from one end of the
land to the other. Colleges and universities, under the
Ministry of Higher Education, also have their own scien-
tific institutes and conduct extensive research.
The central Academy is divided into eight main sec-
tions: the departments of physico-mathematical science,
of geology and geography, of chemical sciences, of biolog-
ical sciences and medicine, of technical or applied sci-
ences, of history and philosophy, of economics and law,
and of literature and languages. The Academy maintains
various institutes, laboratories, field stations, museums
and observatories totaling more than seventy. It has
affiliates in many remote districts of the U. S. S. R. and in
220
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECONOMIC AHD CULTURAL PROGRESS
all the Union Republics. Twelve out of sixteen of those
Republics now have their own Academies of Science.
Likewise extremely important are the Academy of
Medical Sciences and the Lenin Academy of Agricultural
Sciences.
A revolutionary advance since 1917 has been the car-
rying over of the methods of science into agriculture and
peasant life, ever the last refuge of traditional super-
naturalism. Throughout the Soviet Republic today, the
farmers, in their efforts to obtain a good harvest, no
longer resort to prayer, religious ritual and priests sprink-
ling the fields with holy water; they rely instead upon
tractors, combines and other machine techniques, as well
as on the general principles of scientific, collectivized
agriculture. Today the U. S. S. R. has hundreds of agri-
cultural institutes, experimental stations and experi-
mental farms. And most of the collectives carry on re-
search in their own small laboratories, with the aid and
advice of the Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
Of course science is closely linked up with the eco-
nomic system of socialist planning, which has turned
the whole country into one vast laboratory where, be-
cause of the central controls, public ownership and all
but unlimited funds, there can be carried on scientific
experiments and undertakings of unparalleled scope.
The great hydroelectric-irrigation-afforestation projects
described in the last section are excellent examples of
what large-scale planning on a scientific basis can do.
And they have had the special attention of the Academy
of Sciences and its research facilities. Planning is, in fact,
an essential factor in all scientific method, since the scien-
tific solution of a problem always involves some definite
plan of action, whether fairly simple or quite complex.
221
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
Soviet science operates within the general -- and
limiting -- postulates and principles of Marxism. Yet the
record shows that within those limits broad and vigorous
scientific discussions have constantly taken place. For
example, in the famous genetics controversy centering
around Trofim Lysenko's theory, opposed to modern
Mendelism, that under certain circumstances living spe-
cies can inherit acquired characteristics, open discussions
raged in the Soviet Union for a decade. In 1948 the
Academy of Agricultural Sciences held a week-long con-
ference on the subject in which scientists on both sides
of the question gave their uncensored opinions. Pravda
printed every word of the debate, which later appeared
in a thick tome published in 500,000 copies.
A careful study of the controversy by Dr. Bernhard
J. Stern of Columbia University indicates that both
Lysenko and many non-Soviet scientists who answered
him were laboring under grave misunderstandings. In
his attack on American geneticists Lysenko unfortunate-
ly relied on articles in the 1947 edition of the Encyclo-
pedia Americana which were reprinted by the editors
without change from the 1917 edition. "They were there-
fore written," as Dr. Stern says, "about 1917 or 1918,
and reflect genetic doctrines of thirty years ago rather
than of today. 26 . . . However meritorious," concludes Dr.
Stern, "Lysenko's positive practical achievements are,*
his critical analysis of genetic theory represents an attack
upon positions long abandoned by the vanguard of
geneticists in this country and in England. . . . Thus it
becomes clear that the gap between Lysenko and genetic-
ists does not appear to be absolute, and may be further
? Some Western scientists believe that Lysenko may have succeeded
in introducing into Soviet agriculture, not the inheritance of acquired
characteristics, but directed mutations.
222
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ECONOMIC ANJD CULTURAL PROGRESS
narrowed as reliable evidence becomes more readily avail-
able to both groups. "27
The outcome of the Soviet genetics debate was that
in July, 1948, the Agricultural Academy voted in favor
of Lysenko's position. A few weeks later the U. S. S. R.
Academy of Sciences also officially adopted the Lysenko
view and stated that his report, "which has been approved
by the Central Committee of the Ail-Union Communist
Party, lays down the party line in biology. "28 The
Academy of Sciences then put into effect a series of meas-
ures to ensure the acceptance of Lysenko's principles
throughout the country. The worst aspect of this situa-
tion was not that Soviet scientists may have taken over
the wrong theory, but that they and the Communist Party
set up an official line from which dissent would clearly
be dangerous. Soviet Marxism makes allowance for
changes in its formulations, and such changes do frequent-
ly occur; but the more fundamental ones must have
official Communist approval.
It is in the light of this fact that we must qualify the
otherwise excellent statements of Lenin and Stalin against
dogmatic attitudes. For instance, Lenin asserted in 1899:
"In no sense do we regard the Marxist theory as some-
thing complete and unassailable. On the contrary, we
are convinced that this theory is only the cornerstone of
that science which socialists must advance in all direc-
tions if they do not wish to fall behind life. "29
In 1950, in his comments on the extended Soviet
linguistics controversy, Stalin wrote: "Textualists and
Talmudists regard Marxism, the separate deductions and
formulas of Marxism, as a collection of dogmas which
'never' change, regardless of the changes in the condi-
tion of development of society. . . . But Marxism as a
223
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
science cannot stand still; it develops and perfects itself.
In the course of its development Marxism cannot but
be enriched by new experience, by new knowledge;
consequently, its separate formulas and deductions can-
not but change in the course of time, cannot but be re-
placed by new formulas and deductions corresponding
to the new historical tasks. Marxism does not recognize
any immutable deductions and formulas, applicable to
all epochs and periods. Marxism is an enemy of all dog-
matism. "30
The lamentable truth is that despite the undeniable
progress of Soviet culture since 1917, especially in the
tremendous increase of cultural facilities for the people,
it still is subject to Communist and governmental censor-
ship, whether science, literature or even music is con-
cerned. A comment on Soviet writing by Professor
Ernest J. Simmons, Columbia's well-known Russian ex-
pert, is to the point: "Since the whole manufacturing
process of the printed word -- paper, presses, publishing
houses, distribution -- is ultimately under government
control, the Party has an economic strangle-hold on the
output and content of literature. The propaganda line
that determines the broad direction of literary content
is usually initiated in the Politburo and announced by
the Central Committee in resolutions which have almost
the force of law. "31
Yet, as Professor Simmons acknowledges, in Soviet
Russia "much of high worth has been achieved in the
arts and sciences. " And he solves the seeming paradox
in this manner: "The proposition must be squarely
faced, with all its implications, that many Soviet creative
artists and thinkers may have come quite seriously and
honestly to accept as convictions what at first may have
224
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? BCOHOMIC AHD CULTURAL PROGRESS
been regarded by them as hostile controls of the Com-
munist government under which they live. Are we too
far removed from the kind of religious faith that turns
the ends achieved by instruments of control into fighting
convictions? Though art cannot serve propaganda, pro-
paganda can serve art by giving it a renewed meaning
and purpose, and a new virility. After all, the cathedrals
of Notre Dame and Chartres are in a real sense glorious
artistic monuments to Christian propaganda. . . .
"In the Middle Ages society was sure of the church;
it provided a definite pattern of life that took man hope-
fully from the cradle to the grave. Men did not wish to
escape the controls of the church; on the contrary, these
controls had become convictions, for they had come to be
accepted on faith. To a considerable extent the same
may be true in the Soviet Union with regard to the Party.
Life is officially represented as sure, and the future is
always presented in a hopeful light as all struggle toward
the great 'Age of Communism. ' Under such conditions,
for the creative spirit art and life become one. There
is no more desire to escape from a socialist art than there
was to escape from a Christian art in the Middle Ages. "82
Dr. Simmons' analysis rings true to me.
Although I think it is semantically incorrect to call
communism a religion, the Soviet Communists do sub-
scribe to and teach an integrated and inclusive way of
life, with definite implications for every field of human
endeavor, which fills the vacuum left by the decline of
religious supernaturalism. To this Marxist philosophy
they and scores of millions of Soviet citizens who are not
members of the Communist Party render supreme com-
mitment. This general viewpoint on man and the uni-
verse sets up as the ultimate ethical goal the welfare of
225
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILTZATIOH
humanity upon this earth, and expounds a militant
message of human betterment. It advocates an advanced
morality at least in the sense of insisting that men should
subordinate their personal pleasures and desires to work-
ing together for the common good, and that all exploita-
tion of man by man should cease.
No matter how much one may disagree with or dis-
like the Soviet way of life, one must admit that the formu-
lation and teaching of the complex philosophy of Dia-
lectical Materialism is a genuine cultural achievement.
Unhappily Soviet philosophers have weakened their own
case by displaying a formidable ignorance of American
philosophy, especially in their continued misunderstand-
ing of the American school of Naturalism led by the late
John Dewey. They still rely on a rather shallow footnote
run by Lenin in his Materialism and Empirio-Criticism
condemning William James and his pragmatism. The
Dialectical Materialists have never taken the trouble to
discover how much Dewey differs from James and has
improved on him. Yet Dialectical Materialism, in spite
of its provincialism, its taint of being the official Soviet
philosophy and other weaknesses, takes its place today as
one of the outstanding philosophical systems of the twen-
tieth century.
According to Marxist theory, when the Soviet polit-
ical dictatorship fades away, the dictatorial controls over
Soviet culture will also disappear. This is a consumma-
tion most earnestly to be desired. For otherwise the art,
literature and science of the U. S. S. R. will in the long run
find themselves at a dead end, with originality, fresh
ideas and that questioning of authority and basic assump-
tions so necessary to progress all stifled in a dreary medi-
ocrity of official doctrine and prescribed taste.
226
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? CHAPTER VI CONTRASTS BETWEEN SOVIET
SOCIALISM AND FASCISM
1. Ten Fundamental Differences
As we come to the end of Part I of this book, a com-
parison between Soviet socialism and fascism will serve
both to summarize much that we have covered and to ex-
pose one of the most dangerous weapons in the arsenal of
anti-Soviet propaganda. For the claim that Soviet social-
ism and fascism are, after all, just the same is a provoca-
tive device that goes far in whipping up the passions of
war. This unscrupulous charge seeks to turn upon the
Soviet Union the justified hatred and fear which the
peoples of the world have felt, and still feel, toward the
Nazi and fascist regimes. The notion of a fundamental
identity between the Soviet regime and fascism is espe-
cially widespread in the United States, where the Hearst
press in particular makes a point of referring to the Soviet
system as "Red Fascism. "
In the decade prior to the outbreak of the Second
World War the appeasers of fascism, and other enemies
of cooperation between the U. S. S. R. and the Western
democracies, were continually branding Soviet Russia as
just another fascist nation. There was method in this
madness, for it became a major factor in preventing a
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET CIVILIZATION
genuine peace front, while there was still time, against
the fascist aggression of the German, Italian and Japanese
Governments. The post-war revival of the fallacy of
equating Communist and fascist regimes can again have
catastrophic consequences for world peace, since it leads
to serious misunderstandings of Soviet policy.
The charge that Soviet socialism and fascism are
essentially the same falls quickly to the ground under
objective analysis. We can note at least ten fundamental
differences between the two systems. Soviet socialism as
compared with fascism stands, first, for evolution to full
political democracy instead of for permanent dictator-
ship; second, for racial democracy and equality instead
of racial discrimination and persecution; third, for equal-
ity of the sexes instead of the treatment of women as
inferiors; fourth, for the expansion of the trade unions
instead of their destruction; fifth, for an unceasing em-
phasis on the proletariat, the class struggle and the class-
less society instead of a glossing over of class conflict and
the continuation of a class system; sixth, for a planned
socialist economy operated for use and abundance instead
of a monopolistic capitalist economy run on behalf of
profits and aggression; seventh, for the development and
expansion of culture instead of its general retrogression
and debasement; eighth, for the intellectual formulation
and teaching of an inclusive, integrated and anti-super-
natural philosophy of life instead of a primitive pot-
pourri of tribal superstition, conceit and blood-thirsty
war-cries; ninth, for government by leaders with intel-
lect, social idealism and international vision instead of
leaders noted for their ignorance, egotism and savage
nationalism; and, tenth, for international peace and dis-
armament instead of war and an armaments race.
228
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015020686591 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? SOVIET SOCIALISM AHD FASCISM
2. Attitudes towards Democracy
The most common misunderstanding concerning
the nature of Soviet socialism and fascism is that since
both have employed violence to attain power and have
established political dictatorships, they are therefore the
same. This is like saying that because police departments
and gangs of thugs in American cities are armed with rifles
and revolvers and use force to achieve certain objectives,
therefore their fundamental character and social effects
are substantially identical. Or, to take another example,
it is like stating that there is no real difference between
surgeons and murderers due to the fact that they both
resort to knives in the pursuit of their professions.
The central fallacy is of course to treat two forms of
government or two groups of men as equivalent, regard-
less of their ultimate ends, if they hold certain means in
common. Pushing this species of argument further, we
could assert that the American Government under Presi-
dent Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Nazi Government
under Chancellor Adolf Hitler were of the same sort
because they both relied upon armies, navies and air
fleets to win a war. Or going far back into the past, we
could say that General George Washington and the
American armies of 1776 were fundamentally on the
same moral level as General Francisco Franco and the
Spanish fascist armies of 1936-38, for the reason that they
both used the violent means of revolution.
As I have reiterated throughout this book, the Soviet
Republic has always considered the dictatorship of the
proletariat as a transitional measure necessary for the
firm establishment of socialism in the U. S. S. R. and as a
governmental form to be superseded when the need for
229
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-06-10 17:30 GMT / http://hdl.
