No More Learning

Arab Historians of the Crusades
Selected and Translated from the Arabic Sources
by
Francesco Gabrieli
Translated from the Italian by E. J. Costello
? Translated from the Italian Storici Arabi delle Crociate First published in English in 1969 By Routledge & Kegan Paul plc
This edition first published in 2010 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN
Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge
270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2009.
To purchase your own copy of this or any of
Taylor & Francis or Routledge's collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www. eBookstore. tandf. co. uk.
(C) 1957 Giulio Einaudi Editore S. p. A. , Turin
This Translation (C) Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited 1969
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or
utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Publisher's Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent.
Disclaimer
The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those they have been unable to contact.
ISBN 0-203-09250-3 Master e-book ISBN
ISBN 13:978-0-415-56332-1 (hbk) ISBN 13:978-0-203-09250-7 (ebk)
ISBN 10:0-415-56332-1 (hbk) ISBN 10:0-203-09250-3 (ebk)
ARAB HISTORIANS OF THE CRUSADES
A VOLUME IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD SERIES
G. E. VON GRUNEBAUM, GENERAL EDITOR Published under the auspices of the
NEAR EASTERN CENTER UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES
Arab Historians of the Crusades
Selected and translated from the Arabic sources by
FRANCESCO GABRIELI
Translated from the Italian by E. J. Costello
? ROUTLEDGE & KEGAN PAUL LONDON, MELBOURNE AND HENLEY
Translated from the Italian Storici Arabi delle Crociate First published in English 1969 by Routledge & Kegan Paul plc 39 Store Street
London, WCIE 7DD
464 St. Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia and Broadway House, Newtown Road Henley-on-Thames
Oxon, RG9 1EN
First published as a paperback in 1984
This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2009.
To purchase your own copy of this or any of
Taylor & Francis or Routledge's collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www. eBookstore. tandf. co. uk.
Copyright (C) 1957 by Giulio Einaudi Editore S. p. A. , Turin This translation (C) Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited 1969
No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except for the quotation of brief passages in criticism
ISBN 0-203-09250-3 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-7102-0235-0 (Print Edition)
CONTENTS
Introduction by Francesco Gabrieli xiii Translator's note xx Bibliographic note xxi The authors and works xxii
PART ONE FROM GODFREY TO SALADIN
1
The Franks seize Antioch 2 The Muslim attack on the Franks, and its results 4 The Franks take Ma'arrat an-Nu'ma? n 5 The Franks conquer Jerusalem 6 The capture of Bohemond of Antioch 8 The death of Godfrey and the Frankish conquests that followed it 8 Saint-Gilles the Frank besieges Tripoli 9 Bohemond is liberated, and Baldwin defeated at Ramla 9 The Franks take Juba? il and Acre 10
2
Suqma? n and Chekermi? sh lead an expedition against the Franks 11 Baldwin of Edessa and Tancred of Antioch 12
3
The fall of Tripoli 15 The fall of Beiru? t 16 The fall of Sidon 17 The effects in Baghda? d of the events in Syria 17 The siege of Tyre 18
4
The defeat and death of Roger of Antioch at Bala? t 22 Baldwin, his death and his character 24
viii Contents 5
Zangi, man of destiny for Isla? m 25 Zangi takes the fortress of Ba'ri? n. The defeat of the Franks 25 Damascus and the Franks in alliance against Zangi 26
6
Zangi takes Edessa 30 Zangi's death, and a eulogy of him 32
7
The Second Crusade. The siege of Damascus 34
8
Nur ad-Din's victories and his triumph at Damascus 39 The death of Nur ad-Din 41
9
The Frankish cavalry 44 Frankish piracy 45 Frankish medicine 46 The Franks and marital jealousy 46 Orientalized Franks 47 The Templars at Jerusalem 48 The ransoming of prisoners 49 A proposal to send my son to Europe 50 The falcon of Acre 50 Christian piety and Muslim piety 50
PART TWO SALADIN AND THE THIRD CRUSADE
1
Saladin's character 53 His justice 56 Examples of his generosity 58 His courage and steadfastness 59 His zeal in the Holy War 60 His endurance and determination to win merit in God's eyes 62
Contents ix
Examples of his humanity and forgiveness 64
His unfailing goodness 65 2
Events preceding Hitti? n 69 Discord between the Franks in Syria; the Count of Tripoli joins Saladin 69 Prince Arna? t's treachery 70 Saladin attacks al-Karak 70 An incursion into the region of Acre 71 Saladin returns to his army and invades Frankish territory 71 The battle of Hitti? n 72 The Sultan Saladin and his army enter Frankish territory 75 The fall of Tiberias 78 The capture of the Great Cross on the day of battle 81 The conquest of the citadel of Tiberias 82 Saladin's treatment of the Templars and Hospitallers, beheading them
and causing general rejoicing at their extermination 82
Jerusalem reconquered 83
The Church of the Resurrection 88
Description of Jerusalem 90
The day of conquest, 17 rajab 95
The condition of the Franks on their departure from Jerusalem 96
Saladin's good works in Jerusalem, and the evil works that he effaced 97
A description of the sacred Rock--God preserve it! 100
Concerning the Oratory of David and other noble sanctuaries. The 103 churches are suppressed and 'madrasas' instituted
3
Conrad of Montferrat at Tyre; Saladin's fruitless siege 104
4
The Franks march on Acre and besiege it 108 Another battle, and an attack by the Arabs 110 The pitched battle before Acre 110
x Contents
Saladin withdraws from the Franks, who are able to renew the siege of
Acre 112 The arrival of the Egyptian army and of the fleet by sea 113 The siege-towers are burnt down 116 Various incidents during the siege 118 A ship from Beiru? t reaches Acre by means of a ruse 118 The story of the swimmer Isa 118 An ambush 119 Saladin's humanity 119 Frankish women of peace and war 120
5
Conrad of Montferrat and the Third Crusade 123 Frederick Barbarossa's Crusade and his death 123 The arrival of the Kings of France and England 125 Saladin's summons to the Holy War 126 The last attack on Acre and the surrender of the city 127 Acre, incapable of further resistance, negotiates with the Franks 128 Letters arrive from the city 130 The garrison agree to surrender in return for their lives 131 The enemy takes possession of Acre 131 Massacre of the Muslim prisoners 131
6
Peace negotiations and the treaty 133
7
The assassination of Conrad of Montferrat 141
8
Saladin's illness and death 146
PART THREE THE AYYUBIDS AND THE INVASION OF EGYPT
1
The Fifth Crusade 151
The Franks gather in Syria, march on Egypt and take Damietta, which 151 is recovered by the Muslims
Contents xi
The Franks besiege and take Damietta 152 The Muslims reconquer Damietta from the Franks 154 Other details of the Frankish surrender 156
2
Two Arabic letters written by Frederick 166 3
Saint Louis' Crusade 168 The Franks arrive in Egypt and occupy Damietta 168 Al-Malik as-Salih withdraws and encamps at Mansura 169 The Franks advance and take up position facing the Muslims 170 A surprise attack on the Muslims at Mansura. The death of the ami? r
Fakhr ad-Din Yusuf. The subsequent Muslim victory 171 The Muslim fleet attacks and cripples the Frankish fleet 172 Total rout of the Franks, and the capture of the King of France 173 The assassination of al-Malik al-Mu'azzam Turansha? h 175 The decision to put the Princess Shajar ad-Durr, the mother of Khali? l,
on the throne, with 'Izz ad-Din the Turcoman as military commander 176 The reconquest of Damietta 176 Prologue and epilogue to Saint Louis' Crusade 178 Saint Louis in Tunisia 178
PART FOUR THE MAMLU? KS AND THE LIQUIDATION OF THE CRUSADERS
1
Baibars against Tripoli and Antioch. His letter to Bohemond VI 182 Negotiations with Hugh III, King of Cyprus and Jerusalem 186 The destruction of Hisn al-Akra? d 188 An unsuccessful attack on Cyprus 190
The arrival at Acre of the Emperor Frederick, King of the Franks 158
Jerusalem is handed over to the Franks 159
Muslim grief in Damascus. Frederick in Jerusalem 162
Later relations between the Hohenstaufen and the Ayyubids. The later Hohenstaufen 163
xii Contents 2
Qalawu? n's treaty with the Templars at Tortosa 192 The treaty with Acre 193 Formula of the oath taken by the Sultan, swearing to keep this truce 197 Formula of the Frankish oath 198 The fall of al-Marqab 199 The fall of Maraqiyya 202 The fall of Tripoli 203
3
The fall of Acre 206
Index 210
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this book is to help the European reader to see the period of the Crusades from 'the other side', through the eyes and the minds of the men who at that time were the enemy. Such an experience is particularly interesting and informative in the case of the mediaeval conflict between Christianity and Islam, two civilizations which then had a great deal in common. They were founded on similar attitudes of mind and religious concepts, and it was their common struggle for universality that brought them into conflict and drove them to fanaticism. Nowadays the fanaticism has died down, at least among Christians, and the battles are fought on other fields, although the issues are still the same. We no longer speak of daggers and hammers of the Faith; in fact a sympathetic and conciliatory attitude to Islam is characteristic of Christians today; an attitude that may not be shared by the other side. But the violence of the old antagonism still blazes from the pages of the mediaeval chroniclers and polemicists, and we tend still to see the 'enemy' of the Crusades in the light of that old theological and racial hatred, which later conflicts have deepened and embittered. It is only in poetry that Clorinda is brought from the camp of Sulaiman and Argantes to die reconciled with the Faith. Those who wish to rise above this view of history and to see more than one aspect of the situation must take a closer look at the enemy's attitudes and ideals, his way of life and methods of warfare, as they appear in the pages of the Arab chroniclers and historians of the time. The evidence they present is as plentiful and as valuable as that of their European contemporaries. Of course the slogans are back-to-front: 'Christian swine' has been substituted for 'Saracen dog', and the vision of the Holy Rock, upon which the Prophet's foot rested on the night of his miraculous ascent into heaven, for that of the Holy Sepulchre. The saintly Godfrey is replaced by the saintly Saladin. This is not the place for religious and philosophical pronouncements. All we have tried to do is to offer to the historian and the interested layman a selection of the opposition's views to set beside the picture presented by European writers.
The Crusades burst upon the Muslim empire at a crucial moment in its history. The wave of Arab conquests had passed and Arab military activity was confined to defence, while the Turks were still building up their military supremacy within the Muslim empire before their great onslaught on the Christian world. Islam had already suffered at Christian hands during the Byzantine wars, particularly during the tenth century, but this violent attack by the Latin empire, on grounds that were fundamentally and conspicuously religious, took the Muslim world completely by surprise and found it in a state of political disunity that obstructed the speed and efficiency of its preparations for war. Grousset's formula--initial Muslim anarchy versus Frankish monarchy--is an accurate summary of the situation in Syria during the last decade of the eleventh century and the first decade of the twelfth. The land was divided among rival Turkish ami? rs, Seljuqid Ata-begs and their vassals. The Fatimids of Egypt maintained a tenuous control of Palestine. In Baghda? d the 'Abbasid Caliph reigned under the tutelage of the Turkish Sultan, the dignity of his position a mere
xiv Introduction
shadow of what it had been in the days of al-Mansu? r and al-Ma'mu? n'. The potentates of southern Syria and the Fatimid commanders in Palestine did their feeble best to put up a resistance, but the Crusaders spread like a stain through the empire, while the Anti- Crusade, vainly urged and hoped for by Baghda? d, remained as ineffective as ever.
During the third and fourth decades of the twelfth century Muslim resistance stiffened as a result of the efforts of the Artuqids of Mardi? n, Tughtiki? n of Damascus and, in particular, Zangi and Nur ad-Din, Ata-begs of Mosul. When the frontier county of Edessa fell to the Crusaders, Zangi turned his attention to Syria with the double aim of uniting it under his rule and driving the Franks back to the sea. Arabism as a political force was now of only secondary importance. The dynasties that led the counter-attack were Turkish in race and in social and military organization, although their culture was still Arabic. Saladin's rise to power in some ways interrupted and in others continued this movement toward Turkish supremacy. He was of Kurdish origin, educated in both the Turkish and the Arabic cultures, and profoundly orthodox in his faith and his way of life. He brought Egypt back to the path of orthodoxy as the centre of his empire and gave Arabism new prestige. The two monarchs faced one another on the plain of Hitti? n, and the Latin crown of Jerusalem rolled in the dust.
The Third Crusade succeeded in stemming the Muslim advance and propping up the tottering Christian states in Palestine. By the use of diplomacy and force the Ayyubids al-'Adil and al-Kamil maintained the equilibrium throughout the middle years of the century. They drove back the Fifth Crusade and kept Frederick II within bounds, but they failed to mount an effective counter-offensive against the Christian states. This was left to the Mamlu? k Sultans, Turkish slaves from southern Russia and the Caucasus who by the middle of the thirteenth century had taken over the control of Egypt from the enfeebled Ayyubids. It was to these uncivilized soldiers, who perfected the system of military feudalism introduced by the Seljuqids and continued by the Ayyubids, that Islam owed its deliverance both from the Mongol invasions (the victory at 'Ain Jalu? t in 1260 saved Syria) and from the Crusaders. The West could not maintain forever its artificial empire across the Mediterranean. The Papacy had diverted the lofty religious impulse of the first Crusades to serve its own ends in the struggle for power in Europe, reducing the Cross to a mere symbol on a flag carried into battle against baptized Christians (in the Crusade against the Albigenses and the war against the Hohenstaufen). Now it had to look on helplessly while Antioch, Tripoli and Acre fell one after the other and the Muslims finally regained control of Palestine. The Templars' last stand in the Holy Land was also, unknown to them, a foretaste of the catastrophe that was to befall them in the West.
These two eventful centuries, which. brought the whole Christian world into conflict with Islam (although the Greek Church was the innocent victim of Western diplomatic errors) on territory that the Muslims had held for five hundred years, are faithfully recorded by Muslim historians of this and the succeeding era.
We have used the term 'Muslim' because many of the authors are not Arabic by birth, but 'Arabic' would be justifiable on the grounds of the language used (for the Persian historians and those few who had so far written in Turkish, add almost nothing to the history of the Crusades), or 'Arabo-Muslim' on the grounds of the spirit that inspired them, although the Arabic-speaking Christian historians of Egypt also had a part to play.
The Frankish invasions, by which the Muslims meant invasions by European Christians as opposed to the Byzantine Rumi, in spite of the havoc and loss of life that they caused,
Introduction xv
and the cost to Islam of the resistance that led up to the final victory, were never, for Muslim chroniclers, a single subject to be treated in isolation. Although of the greatest importance to them, as to the West, they were always incorporated into the customary literary forms, given their place in annals recording general history, or used in the writing of biographies of the Muslim individuals or dynasties who set themselves up as champions of the Faith. One would search Muslim historical writings in vain for a composite, specific History of the Wars against the Franks.
Such a work can be composed, however, by juxtaposing and interweaving material from the various types of historical writing of the period. First come the general histories of the Muslim world, like Ibn al-Athi? r's classic work, lesser-known annals by Sibt Ibn al-Jauzi and Ibn al-Fura? t and later compilations. Next come chronicles of cities and regions: Ibn al-Qala? nisi's of northern Syria and Kama? l ad-Din's of Mesopotamia, histories of regions and their dynasties like those of al-Maqrizi and Ibn Wasil and purely dynastic ones like Abu Shama's. Finally there are the biographies or records of the deeds of a certain person. Among these are the biographies of Saladin by 'Ima? d ad-Din and Baha? ' ad-Din and the official biographies of the first Mamlu? k Sultans by Ibn 'Abd az-Zahir. A unique work of the greatest historical and literary value is Usama's brilliant autobiography. The range of styles is wide: some works are simply dry lists of events, some are written in turgid rhymed prose (saj'); some are intelligent and accurate, others merely superficial compilations of unsubstantiated facts. What they have in common is, as one would expect, a scornful and hostile attitude toward the impious, fanatical infidels who invaded the territories of Islam.
There are few analyses or discussions of the enemy's military aims. Polemics of this sort had only a brief popularity, during the peace negotiations of the Third Crusade. The presence of an armed enemy on Muslim soil could arouse only one response--the military reprisals enjoined by the Qur'a? n, which commands the faithful to press on into enemy territory until the foe is either exterminated or converted to the True Faith. There could be no real peace (sulh) with the Franks or with any other infidel enemy, only a temporary truce (hudna) when opportune or necessary. The celebrated peace, or truce, of 1192 between Richard and Saladin, was strongly opposed by many Muslims, in principle if not in fact. The two hundred years of the Crusades could not have passed in continuous warfare. There were of course periods of truce, and even, in the twelfth century, cases of 'unholy alliance' between Muslims and Christians against the co-religionists of one side or the other. (Ibn al-Qala? nisi gives a frank account of the most scandalous of these alliances, that between the Franks and Damascus to block Zangi's advance in 1140. )
Peace was not however the favourite subject of the Muslim historians--nor perhaps of any historian. Muslim accounts of the Crusades are endless, often merely monotonous, descriptions of battles, skirmishes, ambushes, raids. Slaughter, pillage and devastation are the most common words in the accounts of the Holy War. Only the names of the combatants change. Where the early historians describe the fall of the coastal cities of Syria to the Franks in a welter of blood and flame, two hundred years later we can read of the same scenes, often in the same words but with the roles reversed. Qui gladio ferit gladio perit, although there is always admiration for valour and self-sacrifice, qualities to be found on both sides. The most intense conflicts of the two centuries took place during the Third Crusade, at Hitti? n and the siege of Acre, when the opposing personalities were thrown into highest relief, the fighting was more widespread and its implications more dramatic. The
xvi Introduction
monotonous military chroniclers sound almost inspired. Their accounts of daily life in the camp of Tiberias, of fights to the death under the walls of Acre, of marches and counter- marches at Saladin's command, have something of the atmosphere of religious epic. Equally important, though sometimes tiresomely detailed and confused, are their accounts of the long peace negotiations. It is a pity that the original text has not been preserved as Qalawu? n's treaties were by the Mamlu? k historians.
For two hundred years Christianity and Islam, face to face in the Holy Land, were officially enemies bound to ceaseless warfare, interspersed only with precarious truces. This official attitude was accepted by the Muslim historians of the time and limited the range and depth of their approach. They reveal no interest in the social, economic or cultural organization of the Frankish states. Occasionally self-congratulation or contempt leads them to mention cases in which Islam's superior culture and way of life have made their mark on the enemy, for example the case of the ruler of Shaqi? f Arnu? n mentioned in biographies of Saladin. He spoke Arabic and studied literature and Islamic law, but the only use he made of his knowledge was to try to deceive the enemy (Saladin, that noble Prince, punished him with nothing worse than imprisonment). The only hint to be found of interest in Frankish customs, ideas and way of life appears not in the serious histories but in the autobiography of the unprejudiced Usama; his accounts have not been forgotten in this volume. When mediaeval Muslims write of Christian beliefs or observances they create a grotesque caricature (see for example 'Ima? d ad-Din on the fall of Christian Jerusalem), based on misconceptions that can only be equalled in Christian accounts of Islamic beliefs and practices. In this respect each side gives as good as it gets and the Crusades were totally ineffective as a means of acquainting either side with the nobler aspects of the other's faith. It is also clear from the Muslim sources that what little exchange there was of men and ideas was almost always the result of Frankish initiative. William of Tyre, who learnt Arabic and who wrote a history of the Orient (now lost) from Arabic sources, had no parallel in the Muslim camp.
The main interest of the Muslim historians is, naturally, their own side and its heroes. It is this aspect of their work, complementing the European sources, that is also of greatest interest to Western readers. In their opening chapters the Arab historians give us frank and lucid discussions of the success of the First Crusade (there is a bitter passage in Kama? l ad-Din accusing the rival ami? rs in Syria of blindly and selfishly welcoming the Frankish invasion and profiting by it). They greet with relief, although sometimes with reservations about the claims to legitimacy that were advanced, the rise of the great champions of the Muslim resistance: Tughtiki? n, Zangi, Nur ad-Din, Saladin. Damascus' brave fight against the besieging Franks is the most distinguished example of resistance in open warfare by local and municipal troops. Not long after this, still in the first stage of the war, Zangids, Ayyubids and Mamlu? ks in succession took over the responsibility for controlling and unifying the defence, theoretically the duty of the Caliph in Baghda? d. The Caliphate, already a mere shadow of its former self, disappeared altogether in the course of the Crusades, having done nothing more effective than issue pious exhortations and homilies, and messages of congratulation to the victorious champions of the Faith. The annals of the Anti-Crusade are those of certain Muslim dynasties--Zangid, Mamlu? k and others--whose members carried the burden of the Holy War for a variety of reasons, both religious and
Introduction xvii
political, and sometimes sacrificed their whole lives to the cause. It is understandable that their chroniclers, out of piety, gratitude and devotion to the dynasty, have been generous with their eulogies.
Towering above them all, wringing admiration even from the enemy, is Saladin himself. His origins were obscure, his rise to power unorthodox and violent. He was destined to become the incarnation, for good or ill, of the power and prestige, and also the humanity and nobility, of the oriental civilization of the Middle Ages. At the same time, he was an inflexibly orthodox defender of its faith. The portrait of him drawn by Baha? ' ad-Din and 'Ima? d ad-Din, clearly that of the Muslim optimus princeps, is that of the pious leader rather than of a gallant knight, and it fails to explain the fascination that this man exerted on his contemporaries and successors, friends and ene-mies alike. But the legend which gives him a place in Dante's Limbo and in so many tales and epics is not to be found in his own country where the deeds of the less humane Baibars are more widely celebrated. There are vivid accounts in Muslim chronicles of both these heroes of the Islamic counter-offensive, as well as of Zangi, Nur ad-Din, al-Kamil and other great defenders of Islam.
Faithful characterization is one of the great merits of Muslim historians and is practised (with other motives) in the brief but illuminating sketches of enemy leaders: Baldwin II's shrewdness, Richard Coeur de Lion's prowess in war, the indomitable energy of Conrad of Montferrat, Frederick II's diplomacy and sceptical irony; all were noted and independently confirmed by Muslim historians. Other judgments carry less authority; for example the description of the saintly Louis IX as a cunning rogue: is it cunning to end a life of austere faith and quixotic idealism in a foolish expedition to Tunisia in the height of summer? (Yet how vividly he springs to life, in all his dignified affability, in Ibn Wasil's account of his conversation with an Egyptian plenipotentiary in the prison at Mansura. )
The Arab histories of the Crusades compare favourably with their Christian counterparts in their rich accumulation of material and chronological information (although this is not always consistent either internally or with the dating given in European sources) and in their faithful characterization. We would not expect from them either serene impartiality in their attitude to the enemy, or originality and depth of understanding. The views expressed are those of mediaeval Muslim historians in general, alternating between pragmatism and mechanical, pietistic theology. One man stands out as a true historian from the ranks of more or less diligent chroniclers: Ibn al-Athi? r. His reputation among Orientalists has recently diminished, because of the free and tendentious use he makes of his sources, but the qualities that reduce his reliability as documentary evidence are those of an original thinker, outstanding among so many passive compilers of facts.
Although for this period the Arabs have no historian of the stature of William of Tyre, their general level of scholarship is probably higher than that of their Christian contemporaries. It is noticeable that the Arabs are for the most part more experienced in the techniques of their art and more professional in their approach.
Islam had already suffered at Christian hands during the Byzantine wars, particularly during the tenth century, but this violent attack by the Latin empire, on grounds that were fundamentally and conspicuously religious, took the Muslim world completely by surprise and found it in a state of political disunity that obstructed the speed and efficiency of its preparations for war. Grousset's formula--initial Muslim anarchy versus Frankish monarchy--is an accurate summary of the situation in Syria during the last decade of the eleventh century and the first decade of the twelfth. The land was divided among rival Turkish ami? rs, Seljuqid Ata-begs and their vassals. The Fatimids of Egypt maintained a tenuous control of Palestine. In Baghda? d the 'Abbasid Caliph reigned under the tutelage of the Turkish Sultan, the dignity of his position a mere
xiv Introduction
shadow of what it had been in the days of al-Mansu? r and al-Ma'mu? n'. The potentates of southern Syria and the Fatimid commanders in Palestine did their feeble best to put up a resistance, but the Crusaders spread like a stain through the empire, while the Anti- Crusade, vainly urged and hoped for by Baghda? d, remained as ineffective as ever.
During the third and fourth decades of the twelfth century Muslim resistance stiffened as a result of the efforts of the Artuqids of Mardi? n, Tughtiki? n of Damascus and, in particular, Zangi and Nur ad-Din, Ata-begs of Mosul. When the frontier county of Edessa fell to the Crusaders, Zangi turned his attention to Syria with the double aim of uniting it under his rule and driving the Franks back to the sea. Arabism as a political force was now of only secondary importance. The dynasties that led the counter-attack were Turkish in race and in social and military organization, although their culture was still Arabic. Saladin's rise to power in some ways interrupted and in others continued this movement toward Turkish supremacy. He was of Kurdish origin, educated in both the Turkish and the Arabic cultures, and profoundly orthodox in his faith and his way of life. He brought Egypt back to the path of orthodoxy as the centre of his empire and gave Arabism new prestige. The two monarchs faced one another on the plain of Hitti? n, and the Latin crown of Jerusalem rolled in the dust.
The Third Crusade succeeded in stemming the Muslim advance and propping up the tottering Christian states in Palestine. By the use of diplomacy and force the Ayyubids al-'Adil and al-Kamil maintained the equilibrium throughout the middle years of the century. They drove back the Fifth Crusade and kept Frederick II within bounds, but they failed to mount an effective counter-offensive against the Christian states. This was left to the Mamlu? k Sultans, Turkish slaves from southern Russia and the Caucasus who by the middle of the thirteenth century had taken over the control of Egypt from the enfeebled Ayyubids. It was to these uncivilized soldiers, who perfected the system of military feudalism introduced by the Seljuqids and continued by the Ayyubids, that Islam owed its deliverance both from the Mongol invasions (the victory at 'Ain Jalu? t in 1260 saved Syria) and from the Crusaders. The West could not maintain forever its artificial empire across the Mediterranean. The Papacy had diverted the lofty religious impulse of the first Crusades to serve its own ends in the struggle for power in Europe, reducing the Cross to a mere symbol on a flag carried into battle against baptized Christians (in the Crusade against the Albigenses and the war against the Hohenstaufen). Now it had to look on helplessly while Antioch, Tripoli and Acre fell one after the other and the Muslims finally regained control of Palestine. The Templars' last stand in the Holy Land was also, unknown to them, a foretaste of the catastrophe that was to befall them in the West.
These two eventful centuries, which. brought the whole Christian world into conflict with Islam (although the Greek Church was the innocent victim of Western diplomatic errors) on territory that the Muslims had held for five hundred years, are faithfully recorded by Muslim historians of this and the succeeding era.
We have used the term 'Muslim' because many of the authors are not Arabic by birth, but 'Arabic' would be justifiable on the grounds of the language used (for the Persian historians and those few who had so far written in Turkish, add almost nothing to the history of the Crusades), or 'Arabo-Muslim' on the grounds of the spirit that inspired them, although the Arabic-speaking Christian historians of Egypt also had a part to play.
The Frankish invasions, by which the Muslims meant invasions by European Christians as opposed to the Byzantine Rumi, in spite of the havoc and loss of life that they caused,
Introduction xv
and the cost to Islam of the resistance that led up to the final victory, were never, for Muslim chroniclers, a single subject to be treated in isolation. Although of the greatest importance to them, as to the West, they were always incorporated into the customary literary forms, given their place in annals recording general history, or used in the writing of biographies of the Muslim individuals or dynasties who set themselves up as champions of the Faith. One would search Muslim historical writings in vain for a composite, specific History of the Wars against the Franks.
Such a work can be composed, however, by juxtaposing and interweaving material from the various types of historical writing of the period. First come the general histories of the Muslim world, like Ibn al-Athi? r's classic work, lesser-known annals by Sibt Ibn al-Jauzi and Ibn al-Fura? t and later compilations. Next come chronicles of cities and regions: Ibn al-Qala? nisi's of northern Syria and Kama? l ad-Din's of Mesopotamia, histories of regions and their dynasties like those of al-Maqrizi and Ibn Wasil and purely dynastic ones like Abu Shama's. Finally there are the biographies or records of the deeds of a certain person. Among these are the biographies of Saladin by 'Ima? d ad-Din and Baha? ' ad-Din and the official biographies of the first Mamlu? k Sultans by Ibn 'Abd az-Zahir. A unique work of the greatest historical and literary value is Usama's brilliant autobiography. The range of styles is wide: some works are simply dry lists of events, some are written in turgid rhymed prose (saj'); some are intelligent and accurate, others merely superficial compilations of unsubstantiated facts. What they have in common is, as one would expect, a scornful and hostile attitude toward the impious, fanatical infidels who invaded the territories of Islam.
There are few analyses or discussions of the enemy's military aims. Polemics of this sort had only a brief popularity, during the peace negotiations of the Third Crusade. The presence of an armed enemy on Muslim soil could arouse only one response--the military reprisals enjoined by the Qur'a? n, which commands the faithful to press on into enemy territory until the foe is either exterminated or converted to the True Faith. There could be no real peace (sulh) with the Franks or with any other infidel enemy, only a temporary truce (hudna) when opportune or necessary. The celebrated peace, or truce, of 1192 between Richard and Saladin, was strongly opposed by many Muslims, in principle if not in fact. The two hundred years of the Crusades could not have passed in continuous warfare. There were of course periods of truce, and even, in the twelfth century, cases of 'unholy alliance' between Muslims and Christians against the co-religionists of one side or the other. (Ibn al-Qala? nisi gives a frank account of the most scandalous of these alliances, that between the Franks and Damascus to block Zangi's advance in 1140. )
Peace was not however the favourite subject of the Muslim historians--nor perhaps of any historian. Muslim accounts of the Crusades are endless, often merely monotonous, descriptions of battles, skirmishes, ambushes, raids. Slaughter, pillage and devastation are the most common words in the accounts of the Holy War. Only the names of the combatants change. Where the early historians describe the fall of the coastal cities of Syria to the Franks in a welter of blood and flame, two hundred years later we can read of the same scenes, often in the same words but with the roles reversed. Qui gladio ferit gladio perit, although there is always admiration for valour and self-sacrifice, qualities to be found on both sides. The most intense conflicts of the two centuries took place during the Third Crusade, at Hitti? n and the siege of Acre, when the opposing personalities were thrown into highest relief, the fighting was more widespread and its implications more dramatic. The
xvi Introduction
monotonous military chroniclers sound almost inspired. Their accounts of daily life in the camp of Tiberias, of fights to the death under the walls of Acre, of marches and counter- marches at Saladin's command, have something of the atmosphere of religious epic. Equally important, though sometimes tiresomely detailed and confused, are their accounts of the long peace negotiations. It is a pity that the original text has not been preserved as Qalawu? n's treaties were by the Mamlu? k historians.
For two hundred years Christianity and Islam, face to face in the Holy Land, were officially enemies bound to ceaseless warfare, interspersed only with precarious truces. This official attitude was accepted by the Muslim historians of the time and limited the range and depth of their approach. They reveal no interest in the social, economic or cultural organization of the Frankish states. Occasionally self-congratulation or contempt leads them to mention cases in which Islam's superior culture and way of life have made their mark on the enemy, for example the case of the ruler of Shaqi? f Arnu? n mentioned in biographies of Saladin. He spoke Arabic and studied literature and Islamic law, but the only use he made of his knowledge was to try to deceive the enemy (Saladin, that noble Prince, punished him with nothing worse than imprisonment). The only hint to be found of interest in Frankish customs, ideas and way of life appears not in the serious histories but in the autobiography of the unprejudiced Usama; his accounts have not been forgotten in this volume. When mediaeval Muslims write of Christian beliefs or observances they create a grotesque caricature (see for example 'Ima? d ad-Din on the fall of Christian Jerusalem), based on misconceptions that can only be equalled in Christian accounts of Islamic beliefs and practices. In this respect each side gives as good as it gets and the Crusades were totally ineffective as a means of acquainting either side with the nobler aspects of the other's faith. It is also clear from the Muslim sources that what little exchange there was of men and ideas was almost always the result of Frankish initiative. William of Tyre, who learnt Arabic and who wrote a history of the Orient (now lost) from Arabic sources, had no parallel in the Muslim camp.
The main interest of the Muslim historians is, naturally, their own side and its heroes. It is this aspect of their work, complementing the European sources, that is also of greatest interest to Western readers. In their opening chapters the Arab historians give us frank and lucid discussions of the success of the First Crusade (there is a bitter passage in Kama? l ad-Din accusing the rival ami? rs in Syria of blindly and selfishly welcoming the Frankish invasion and profiting by it). They greet with relief, although sometimes with reservations about the claims to legitimacy that were advanced, the rise of the great champions of the Muslim resistance: Tughtiki? n, Zangi, Nur ad-Din, Saladin. Damascus' brave fight against the besieging Franks is the most distinguished example of resistance in open warfare by local and municipal troops. Not long after this, still in the first stage of the war, Zangids, Ayyubids and Mamlu? ks in succession took over the responsibility for controlling and unifying the defence, theoretically the duty of the Caliph in Baghda? d. The Caliphate, already a mere shadow of its former self, disappeared altogether in the course of the Crusades, having done nothing more effective than issue pious exhortations and homilies, and messages of congratulation to the victorious champions of the Faith. The annals of the Anti-Crusade are those of certain Muslim dynasties--Zangid, Mamlu? k and others--whose members carried the burden of the Holy War for a variety of reasons, both religious and
Introduction xvii
political, and sometimes sacrificed their whole lives to the cause. It is understandable that their chroniclers, out of piety, gratitude and devotion to the dynasty, have been generous with their eulogies.
Towering above them all, wringing admiration even from the enemy, is Saladin himself. His origins were obscure, his rise to power unorthodox and violent. He was destined to become the incarnation, for good or ill, of the power and prestige, and also the humanity and nobility, of the oriental civilization of the Middle Ages. At the same time, he was an inflexibly orthodox defender of its faith. The portrait of him drawn by Baha? ' ad-Din and 'Ima? d ad-Din, clearly that of the Muslim optimus princeps, is that of the pious leader rather than of a gallant knight, and it fails to explain the fascination that this man exerted on his contemporaries and successors, friends and ene-mies alike. But the legend which gives him a place in Dante's Limbo and in so many tales and epics is not to be found in his own country where the deeds of the less humane Baibars are more widely celebrated. There are vivid accounts in Muslim chronicles of both these heroes of the Islamic counter-offensive, as well as of Zangi, Nur ad-Din, al-Kamil and other great defenders of Islam.
Faithful characterization is one of the great merits of Muslim historians and is practised (with other motives) in the brief but illuminating sketches of enemy leaders: Baldwin II's shrewdness, Richard Coeur de Lion's prowess in war, the indomitable energy of Conrad of Montferrat, Frederick II's diplomacy and sceptical irony; all were noted and independently confirmed by Muslim historians. Other judgments carry less authority; for example the description of the saintly Louis IX as a cunning rogue: is it cunning to end a life of austere faith and quixotic idealism in a foolish expedition to Tunisia in the height of summer? (Yet how vividly he springs to life, in all his dignified affability, in Ibn Wasil's account of his conversation with an Egyptian plenipotentiary in the prison at Mansura. )
The Arab histories of the Crusades compare favourably with their Christian counterparts in their rich accumulation of material and chronological information (although this is not always consistent either internally or with the dating given in European sources) and in their faithful characterization. We would not expect from them either serene impartiality in their attitude to the enemy, or originality and depth of understanding. The views expressed are those of mediaeval Muslim historians in general, alternating between pragmatism and mechanical, pietistic theology. One man stands out as a true historian from the ranks of more or less diligent chroniclers: Ibn al-Athi? r. His reputation among Orientalists has recently diminished, because of the free and tendentious use he makes of his sources, but the qualities that reduce his reliability as documentary evidence are those of an original thinker, outstanding among so many passive compilers of facts.
Although for this period the Arabs have no historian of the stature of William of Tyre, their general level of scholarship is probably higher than that of their Christian contemporaries. It is noticeable that the Arabs are for the most part more experienced in the techniques of their art and more professional in their approach. The reason for this has been mentioned: the Arab histories of the Crusades are usually only a section of a general historical panorama.
This volume is by no means the first attempt in the West to show the other aspect of the Crusades. More than a century ago, at the end of Michaud's Bibliothe`que des Croisades, that great scholar Reinaud, Michele Amari's teacher, produced a volume of Chroniques Arabes (Paris, 1829), in which he strung together as a continuous narrative translations and
xviii Introduction
paraphrases of passages from various mediaeval Arab historians. They were taken from the manuscripts of the Bibliothe`que du Roi, then almost entirely unedited. This pioneer work, which is still of use to the non-Arabist, was designed to give a coherent account of the Crusades from Arabic sources rather than to present those sources for their own sakes. This was also the aim of the section called 'Historiens Orientaux' of the great Recueil des Historiens des Croisades, published in the second half of the nineteenth century under the auspices of the Acade? mie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres. Most of the Oriental section was edited by Barbier de Meynard, and the five volumes published (Paris, 1872-1906) contain extracts, in the original and in translation, of such historians as Ibn al-Athi? r, Abu Shama and Abu l-Fida? . This imposing work is ill-adapted for reading as a continuous narrative, and has also been criticized for its choice of extracts and for errors in the text and the translations. Nevertheless it remains a standard work of reference for both Orientalists and mediaevalists.
This volume--a very modest work compared with either of these two--of course includes passages from both. Most of the excerpts, however, are taken directly from the original texts, nearly all of which have now been published or are available in the collection of photostats of historical manuscripts at the Fondazione Caetani per gli studi musulmani in Rome. Seventeen authors are represented; certainly not an exhaustive list of all the Muslim sources for the Crusades, but including all the most important ones and as many as possible of the various types of historical literary writings mentioned earlier. The translation is inevitably fairly free, for a literal translation would be impossible to read easily for any length of time. The precise references given will enable Arabists to verify particular points. While acknowledging our debt to earlier translators, where they have existed, and apologizing for our inevitable errors, we hope that the best interpretation of these passages will be found here, based on emendations to the text that will easily be reconstructed by the specialist.
The criteria of choice will be quite obvious: historical importance, human or literary interest and amusing or picturesque detail--without much historical importance perhaps, but the sort of vivid image that remains fixed in the memory, and is almost too appealing to Muslim historians and modern anthologists.
The second section of the book, devoted to Saladin and the Third Crusade, is inevitably, by both these criteria, the largest. We hope that the book as a whole will give a picture of the period that is both clear in outline and accurate in detail, and that as far as space allows the authors' characteristic styles will be revealed.
I have come to the end of several months spent in the company of these Muslim historians of the Crusades, listening again to their fierce and fanatical hostility to our ancestral faith, their zeal and love for their own faith and its traditions, and their admiration for the champions and martyrs who devoted themselves to its defence. I have studied the Muslim world for many years, but I must confess that never before have I experienced such a sympathetic comprehension and respect for a civilization whose faults and failings need no emphasis but which possessed inspiring qualities of endurance, dedication and self-sacrifice, amazing elasticity and powers of recuperation, and an unyielding faith in the absolute and supreme Law. When qualities such as these are shown by an enemy they
Introduction xix tend to be described in terms of their associated defects. It is time for us, without either
denying our own faith or shirking the facts, to give them the name they deserve. Rome, September 1957.
In this second edition certain errors have been corrected and the bibliography brought up to date.
June 1963.
FRANCESCO GABRIELI
TRANSLATOR'S NOTE
In transcribing Arabic proper nouns we have ignored, for the sake of typographical simplicity, the distinction between long and short vowels and the normal and emphatic consonants. As a guide to pronunciation where the stress does not fall on the penultimate syllable words have been accented by a bar if long or by an acute accent if short. The titles of the sections are sometimes the author's and sometimes the editor's; it did not seem necessary to complicate the layout by distinguishing between the two.
F. G.
A standard transliteration of Arabic words into English has been used except in a few cases,
where we have kept a very familiar anglicized form.
E. J. C.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTE
General modern histories of the Crusades written by non-Orientalists who have however made use of Reinaud and the Recueil (see above) are R. Grousset, Histoire des Croisades et du Royaume Franc de Je? rusalem, Paris 91934-36; S. Runciman, A History of the Crusades, Cambridge, 1951-54, both in three volumes with enormous bibliographies (R. Grousset has also produced a popular general outline of the period, L'e? pope? e des Croisades, Paris, 1939); and A. Waas, Geschichte der Kreuzzu? ge, Freiburg, 1956, 2 vols. Two volumes have so far appeared of the great History of the Crusades, the work of many collaborators edited by La Monte and Setton: The first hundred years and The later Crusades, 1189-1311, Philadelphia, 1955 and 1962.
The definitive work on Muslim historiography and its varieties is F. Rosenthal, A History of Muslim Historiography, Leiden, 1952; for a review and fundamental evaluation of the Arab historians of the Crusades see C. Cahen, La Syrie du Nord a` l'e? poque des Croisades et la principaute? franque d'Antioche, Paris, 1940, pp. 33-93 ('Les sources arabes'), which has been brought up to date by Cahen in his article on the Crusades in Encyclope? die de llslam, 2nd ed. (1961), pp. 64-67. See also my own chapter Historiography of the Crusades in Historians of the Middle East, Oxford, 1962, pp pp. 98-107. A bibliography of individual authors and subjects would, I think, be too specialized to be useful; I shall only mention H. A. R. Gibb's three important studies: 'Notes on the arabic materials for the history of the early Crusades', in Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, VII (1935), pp. 739-54; 'The arabic sources for the life of Saladin', in Speculum, XXV (1950), pp. 58-72; and 'The achievement of Saladin', in Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, XXXV (1952), pp. 44-60 (for Saladin see also my own profile in Storia e civilta` musulmana, Naples, 1947 and Florence, 1948); also J. Kraemer, Der Sturz des Ko? nigreiches Jerusalem (583-1187) in der Darstellung des 'Ima? d ad-Din al-Ka? tib al-Isfaha? ni? , Wiesbaden, 1952; B. Lewis, 'The sources for the history of the Syrian Assassins', in Speculum, XXVII (1952), pp. 475-89; F. Gabrieli, 'Gli Ospitalieri di San Giovanni negli storici musulmani delle Crociate', in Annuario della R. Scuola Archeologica di Atene, VIII-IX (1929), pp.