No More Learning

297. hqppd'mv, ' perquisites ' ; used of petty or illicit gains
in 2 ? 28, 5 ? 12, 8 ? 25. 'rois Mevoiicn wapd 16v
lwrpiiv o-vrfiots StSope? vm-s, 'the diet ordered by physicians for
invalids. ' leiG Kiowa, or do'fieve? a-repa, are contrasted by
Hippocrates with lo'xupd. Blarra. (817 c). rots is best taken with
curious, and is not needed to complete the sense of do'Bevoim,
which means 'when men are ill ' (so Funkh'anel and Weil).
298. mtpd 165v larva : Plato Gorg. 467 c 01 ? dpp. axa 1rlvov-rs:
1rap6. 16v la'rva. SLSope? vm-s : 20 ? 15 n'iw 10. 95. 703v dhhwv
mum's>> oiooae? vwv. For the Part. separated from the Art.
by the Noun cp. 5 ? 8 mike? Xp'fipm'r' d? ezh6iusvm
T01}; is sometimes regarded as doing double duty, being taken with
doesvoiiat as well as with curious (Westermann). dceevofim. is
bracketed by Cobet and others, but the corresponding participle occurs in
the parallel passages Prooem. 53, 4, Lucian dcme'roede mad. 5 (cp. Liban. iv
821, 24 ioure? ru; 10k voaofww), though not in Philostr. V. Apoll. 7, 26
(all quoted on p. 67). Osterlnann Philol. 1858, 755 f agrees with
Funkh'zinel Neue Jahrh. 75 (1857) 4451' in regarding mi; roiq as in-
admissible in Demosthenes or any other classical author; he also objects to
making 10? ; stand instead of mi; 102; in Demosthenes, though this use is
found in Thuc. v 77, 2, Eur. Hec. 996, and Plato Lysis 205 D. While
Funkhanel takes it with aurims, Ostermann takes it with 81,80,260",
making mn'mg a predicate, 'the things that are offered as food. ' Cp.
Rehduutz Index s. v. participium.
299. txeiv(a): 'rd. ULTIG. oii'r' lo'xirv--e? i. (cp. Prooem. 53,
4) : quoted by Athen. 270 B, and imitated by Sallust Hist, 01'.
M. L'icini'i, illis (alimentis carce'ris) cxiguitale more prohibemr,
senescunt vires; and Symmachus Ep. i 23 parvis nutrinwntis
quamquam a mortc defendimur, nihil lumen ad robuslam vala-
tudinem pronwvemur. toxi'rv : 9 ? 72, 21 ? 45, Prooem. l. c. ;
10707: 18 ? 303, 21 ? 294, [60] ? 14 (all the examples in Dem. ;
cp. note on ravrl a'fle? vel. 3 ? 6).
300. raw-re. ) : 1d Maya-m. For the sense of the context cp.
Aristoph. V esp. 700 f.
302. Smpxfi: only in [50] ? 23 Tp0? i1V ozapK-F]. (uro-
yve? v'rus, 'having reJected,' or 'renounced' (them), 6 ? 16
dwe'yi'vaa'lce Bnfialovs, used absolutely 4 ? 42.
303. lo-rv. . . havidvov'ra (6 ? 29 fir . . dmamxha): here
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:11 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 220 THIRD 0L YNTHIAO' III ? ? 33, 34
suggested by a desire for symmetry with 'rou'ai'rr' ion-(v. See
note on 2 ? 26 l. 240.
? 34 l. 304. ofmoiiv 0'1'1 pic-60? opdv Myers; 'do you then
mean stipendiary service? ' i. e. 'do you mean that the sums set
apart for the theorie fund should be given us in the form of pay
for service '4' This implies that those who did not serve would
lose their allowances. Pay for military service was already
customary (Gilbert Gk. Const. Ant. i 3562:319 Engl. ed. ).
Demosthenes desired to apply further funds to this purpose
(1 ? 19 Ti 0171! ; . . 0'1) 'ypdzpeis 'raU'r' 6211a; o'rpaflw'rmd; K'rh. ) He
meets the supposed objection to this transfer of the theorie
fund by a prompt rejoinder admitting the fact, but adding that
in his view everything should be put on the same footing,
so that none of the citizens should receive payment except for
services actually rendered, whether in the field or otherwise.
305. Irfiv afflip' U'I'W'l'agw: 1 ? 20, 14 ? 23 pla mill-rails '5
uniform and comprehensive system. '
306. d-irdv-mv : apparently neuter, op. 11. 319 f, 1 ? 20 l. 179.
307. 16 pe? pos, 'his share,' 'his dividend' (K. ), from the
public funds. stU--thXOL, 'might be what the state
re uires,' i. e. 'what the needs of the state require each several
citizen to be. ' 7000' is predicate to inriipxot. For the neuter
applied to persons cp. 25? 6 665w: roil0', 61rep e? a-re? , (Swain-at
Kal (Wham; 16:1! 116ng sivehvlhude? vaz, 57 ? 9 10010 5' fill (of
Eubulides).
308. irrrdpxot: the mood is hard to explain. The Opt. with
Yva is sometimes found after 'a leading verb which implies a
reference to the past as well as the present,' as in 22 ? 11
1007011 EXEL 'rdv 'rpe? 'rroi/ 6 116140;, two. #7753 recddfivac [1475' e? Eara'r'n-
Ofimu ye? vot-r' e? 1rl rip" dfi/Lqu. There Exez 'iinplies the past ex-
istence of the law ; the law was made as it is, so that it might
not be possible' etc. ; Iva ,m'] is followed by Opt. after Kai-rat
24 ? 145 and after 'ye? 'ypar'raz? 147 (Goodwin MT. ? 323) ; cp.
Plato Rep. 4100 (mudee? ew) Kama-ram", i'vo. . . depawezioivro,
Isaeus 3? 21 rd; e? KpapTupias millres Town/Leda, Iva. . . ,u'l] e'Eel'r]
. . l'l,u. eTs 're 1H0'T6170tT6 (Kuhner ? 553, 411). But inrdpxot can
hardly be said 'to depend on a past verb of saying to be
mentally supplied' (Goodwin l. c. ); on the contrary, we must
clearly understand the present from Myers in l. 304. Possibly
the Opt.
is due to the influence of an implied condition such
as d hliovre TOI'IS 1rspl Tde fiewpmdw v6,u. ovs (so Weil). Opiatiwm
intellige dc casu cogz'tato (Voemel). Heslop explains the Opt.
as 'exprcssing the object contemplated by the orator when he
mentally framed hisproposition ' ; with Abbott and Matheson
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:11 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? III ? 34 THIRD 0L YNTHIAG 221
it ' expresses the result asstill remote. ' Probably Demosthenes
is thinking of some formal proposal published by him before
the delivery of this speech ; cp. fi'ya-yov in ? 35 l. 319.
Egan-w dyew fio-uxtav, 'suppose it possible to be at peace';
similarly (310) c-vpfiatvu. and (313) low-l. are virtually cou-
ditional clauses, which may sometimes be treated as interroga-
tives, as in ? 18 11. 157, 159, 160, and as (by Voemel) in the
text. Op. 18 ? ? 117, 198, 274; 22 ? ? 11, 26.
309. ohm pe? vuv Bah-rtaw: sc. i'wrw or e? 'a-rat, 'by staying at
home he will be all the better, because he is withdrawn from
the temptation to act dishonourably from indigence. ' Here we
have the personal construction preferred (as often) to the im-
personal, [Le? vew ai'rrbv ,Be? hrle? v e? a'n. This interpretation is that
suggested by Lobeck on Soph. Aj. 634 erla-awv yap "Ania
Keiiflwu 1') #017611 ,mi'rav, cp. OT. 1368, and accepted by Weil and
others. Cp. Thuc. ii 17 To Hehaa'yucov dp'ybv (Luewov, Lys.
20 ? 4 erlr'rwv fill 13 1ra'r'hp al'nofi ,ui] hyroup'yv'lo'as i) Too'aii'ra. T6311
e? av-rofi dvahu'm'as, Dion. Hal. Ant. Rom. vi 9 erlrrwv yap av . .
'ye? uon-o 1') 101091-09 1ro)\['r1)s drofiamfiv.
olikol. pe'vwv Behrimv : sometimes taken in apposition to the
subject of fifldpxotz~'( . . be what the state requires), in the event
of peace, by remaining at home and being all the better for it (18 ? 257, 45
? 54). . ; in the event of war, by personal service . . ; if too old for military
service, by receiving duly regulated wages for domestic superintendence'
(Rehdantz). findpxuv, 1. 312, would thus be an echo of bwdpxot (cp.
Westermann). But it is awkward to treat the Adj. Beh'rtmv as parallel
to the participles on either side of it. Cp. CFSchnitzer Eos 2 (18135) 619.
8C IvSeuw: 18 ? 257, 57 ? 45 rohhzi. Sol/Mm). Kal Tam-we.
1rpzi'y,u. a-ra TOl'JS e? heufie? pous 1'] rei/[a fitdfi'e-rm rote'iv: Theognis
384--90, Thuc. iii 45, 4. TL . . uiu'xp6v: preferred to
ala'pru n, which would have involved hiatus either before or
after dve'tyK-u, or before dnnhhaype? vos.
310. dquayp? vos: 14 ? 31 i'v' st'nroplav 'rwa K-mo'daevos
drahha'yfi 1'57": brapxollo'm revlas. In time of peace Demo-
sthenes apparently allows part of the surplus to be spent in
promoting the comfort of the poorer citizens.
311, rotoi'rov: i. e. We? hepos. o-rpafle? rqs--tmdpxwv:
sc. fish-rim! e? 'a'mt.
314. 1g>> rfis fihmlus: i. e. over 60; ? 4, [13] ? 4. Ito-(u)
taken with hupfie? vmv alone; ep. 6 ? 28 6. . . dFOKde/LGI'OL,
and Thuc. v 9, 5. d'rdk'rws, 'irregularly,' as a dole from
the theoric fund, without doing any recognised duty; 1. 318
draElav. The Adv. used here alone by Dem. ; the Adj. in 4
? 36 and 25? 15.
315. Ev 1501] 'rcifisu, 'under the same regulation ' (as those of
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:11 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 222 THIRD 0L YNTHIAC' III ? ? 34, 35
age for military service), i. e. as a recognition of work actually
done. [13] ? 4 Ma'deva finds (Mal xpfivou 1a lo'ov Exacr-rov KT)\.
316. 1rdv'r' e? dmpe? iv ink, ' by superintending and managing
all needful business. ' In any case, an Athenian spent the year
after the expiration of liability to military service in discharging
the duties of a own-unis or arbitrator (Aristot. Coast. of Athens
53 ? 3), and he was still entitled to receive pay for attendance
at the Iaw-courts,1the Council, and the public Assembly.
t? ope? ivz 25 ? 11 1rdv1-a. 1'6. 1011 dvflpu'maw e? ? ope? iv (of Aim), the
only other example of the Present in Demosthenes.
Sun. va : the Verb is used of the duties of an Athenian envoy
18 ? 277, and of Athenian legislation 24 ? 92.
? 351. 317. Show, 'in short'; cp. 1 ? 5, 2 ? ? 7, 14. oii'r'
ddaeMw--wkfiv pmpa'w, ' having made only a small diminution
or addition ' (in the total expenditure). Demosthenes implies
that, under his proposed reform, about the same total sum
will be paid to the citizens, but the jn-incjples of the payment
will be better organised. 21 ? 189 1d 6' 611111. cl; {was 1r>nl|v mivu
purpe? v draw" dwi'lhwxa, and [Xen. ] quoted on p. 68.
whfiv pixprfi, 'only to a small extent,' is preferred by Blass (in his
ed. of Rehdantz) and is taken with 'r v draitav dvehu'w. But
pucin in Demosthenes (except when use as an Adj. ) is almost always
found with a Com arative, four times with npdrepov, twice with wAeiovs or
rm>>, once with iur-rspov; we also have aiqui ivweev, mver "MW nmpe? i.
whfiv ptprv 'r'nv draifiav dvthv is Bekker's text (1 5 24);
mist quod paululum te'men'tatem coe'rc'ui (Sauppe), 'only removing a little
the irregularity that exists' (Heslop); i. e. Demosthenes had not proposed
any new laws, he only desired to put a check on an irregular organisation.
For this purpose he had suggested the repeal of certain laws (5 10).
The exaggeration in oi'rr' dtbelu'av oii're wpoeri; is (on this view)
corrected by whfiv umpe? v in the next clause, which reduces to a
harmless minimum the proposed improvement in organisation. Sanppe
objects to joining,I 1m,>> fLLKpe? I! with the previous context (as Bekker did
in 1825 and 1835, and also Rudiger), (1) because this phrase does not
suit 'Irpoo'eetg, as Demosthenes had really added nothing new; 2)
because fiyv 6. 70/5qu tivexdw, if it stands alone, means the same as e g
16. 8w fi'ycwov rflv 1re? Mv.
It seems best to regard rfiv draitmv dvehu'w as leading up to elg
16. 5w flycwov, which is not really synonymous with it, but gives the
result of the removal of disorder in the establishment of order, Plato Tim.
8A (19 165w m'rriw ' 0. av Ex 'rfi; d-rmfiag. It also seems Mai; to regard
ddishniv and 11900 e 9 not as referring to laws but to payments. This
view is supported by AmuBe?