Finally, I am also firmly con-
vinced that what I have declared, here as elsewhere, is that
same Eternal, Unchangeable Truth, which makes every-
thing that is opposed to it Untruth; for otherwise assured-
ly I would not have thus taught it, but rather have taught
whatever else I held to be Truth.
vinced that what I have declared, here as elsewhere, is that
same Eternal, Unchangeable Truth, which makes every-
thing that is opposed to it Untruth; for otherwise assured-
ly I would not have thus taught it, but rather have taught
whatever else I held to be Truth.
Fichte - Nature of the Scholar
It is not Love that sets
up this object before it in outward representation, and se-
parates it into parts ;--it is Reflexion that does this. Thus,
in so far as man is Love,--and this he is always in the root
of his Life, and can be nothing but this, although it may
be that he is but the Love of himself,--but especially in
so far as he is the Love of God, he remains eternally and
for ever One, True, and Unchangeable as God himself, and
is indeed in reality God himself; and it is not merely a
bold metaphor, but a literal truth, that John utters when
he says:--" He who dwelleth in Love, dwelleth in God, and
God in him. " It is only his Reflexion which first estranges
him from this which is his own, proper Being, and not any
foreign Being;--and which strives, throughout a whole ma-
nifold Infinity, to lay hold of that which he himself is
and remains, now, everywhere, and for ever. Hence it is
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
541
not his Inward Essential Nature,--that which is his own,
which belongs to himself and to no other,--that is subject
to continual change, but it is only the Appearance or Ma-
nifestation of this Nature, which in itself is withdrawn from
outward Appearance, that suffers this continual change.
Formerly we said:--The eye of man conceals God from
him, and separates the pure light into coloured rays. Now
we say:--The eye of man conceals God from him, only
because he himself is concealed by it, and because his
vision never reaches his own True Being. What he sees
is ever himself, as we also said formerly ;--but he does not
see himself as he truly is;--his Being is one, but his vision
is infinite.
Love necessarily enters into Reflexion, and manifests it-
self there immediately as a Life which employs as its in-
strument a personal, sensuous Ex-istence,--and thus as In-
dividual Action;--and that indeed in a sphere peculiar to
itself and lying beyond all Sensuousness--in a wholly New
World. Wherever the Divine Love is, there is necessarily
this Manifestation; for thus only docs this Love reveal it-
self, and that without any new intervening principle; and,
on the contrary, where this Manifestation is not, there also
the Divine Love is not. It is altogether in vain to say to
him who does not dwell in Love--" Act morally,"--for only
in Love is the Moral World revealed, and without Love
there is no such world; and just as superfluous is it to say
this to him who does dwell in Love,--for his Love lives al-
ready in itself, and his activity, his moral Action, is merely
the silent Manifestation of this his Life. The Action is
nothing in and for itself, and it has no independent prin-
ciple in itself; but it flows forth, calmly and silently, from
Love, as light seems to flow forth from the sun, and as the
World does actually flow forth from the inward Love of God
to himself. If any man does not act, neither does he love;
and he who supposes that he loves, and yet does not act, in
him imagination alone is excited by some picture of Love
conveyed to him from without, to which picture there is
within him no corresponding, inward, self-supporting reality.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 542 THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION".
"He who says, I love God,"--thus speaks the same John,
after representing brotherly love, in a certain very just sense,
as in itself the Higher Morality--" he who says, I love God,
and hateth his brother, is a liar;"--or, as we would say, in
language more suitable to our age, although not a whit more
tenderly,--he is a sham, and has not the Love of God abid-
ing in him ;--abiding, I say, really indwelling within him,--
it is not the root of his True Life, but he can at most only
picture it in imagination.
Love is eternally complete, and contained within itself;
and, as Love, it has ever within itself complete Reality; it
is Reflexion alone that separates and divides into parts.
Hence,--and thus we return to the point which we reached
in our previous lecture,--hence the division of the One Di-
vine Life into different Individuals does not by any means
take place in Love but solely in Reflexion. The Individual,
who is revealed to himself only in Action, and all other In-
dividuals who appear around him, are but the Manifestation
of this One Love, not by any means the thing itself. In his
own Action, Love must be manifest, for otherwise it would
not exist; but the moral Action of others is not to him the
immediately apparent Manifestation of Love; the absence
of this does not immediately prove the absence of Love;--
therefore, as we said already in our previous lecture, he does
not desire the Morality and Religion of others uncondition-
ally, but only under the condition of their Freedom; and
the absence of this universal Morality does not disturb the
peace of Love, which is wholly independent of everything
beyond itself.
The Morality and Religion of the whole Spiritual World
are closely connected with the Action of each particular In-
dividual, as effect with cause. The Moral-Religious Man
desires to spread Morality and Religion universally. The
distinction between his Religion and the Religion of others
is but a distinction in Reflexion. The affection produced in
him by success or failure must therefore take place accord-
ing to the Law of Reflexion. But, as we have already seen
on another occasion, the peculiar affection of Reflexion is
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
543
approbation or disapprobation; not cold and indifferent, but
the more passionate the more loving the nature of the man.
Reflexion always bears with it an affection towards the
Morality of others; and this Reflexion is highest of all in
the Religious Man;--it is the true root of the World around
him, which he embraces with affection, and which is, to him,
purely and solely a Spiritual World.
From what we have now said, we obtain the principles by
which we may characterize more profoundly than we could
do in our former lecture, the disposition of the Religious
Man towards others;--or what would be commonly called
his Philanthropy.
In the first place, there is nothing further removed from
this Religious Philanthropy than a certain tender-hearted
catholicity of sentiment which we hear much bepraised now-
a-days. This mode of thought, far from being the Love of
God, is much rather that absolute shallowness and inward
vagrancy of a mind that is capable neither of Love nor of
Hate, which we have sufficiently described in one of our
earlier lectures. The Religious man does not concern him-
self about the physical happiness of the Human Race,--it
may be his especial calling to care for the higher wants of
men;--he desires no happiness for them save in the ways of
the Divine Order. He cannot desire to make them happy
by means of outward circumstances, as little as God can de-
sire this; for the Will and Counsel of God, even with regard
to his fellow-men, are always his. As it is the Will of God
that no one shall find peace and repose but in Him, and
that all men shall be continually driven onward by means of
sorrows and vexations to renounce themselves and to seek a
refuge in God;--so is this also the will and wish of the man
who is devoted to God. When they have again found their
Being in God, he will love this Being; their Being out of
God he hates with a perfect hatred, and his very love to-
wards their True Being consists in hate towards their im-
perfect Being. "Ye think that I am come to bring peace
on earth," says Jesus,--peace, that is, this same catholic
tender-hearted acceptance of things as they are;--"no, since
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 544
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
yc are such as ye are, I come not to bring peace but a
sword. " The Religious Man is likewise far removed from
the well-known and much-commended effort of this same
superficiality to put such a construction upon surrounding
events as may enable it to maintain itself in this comfort-
able frame of mind :--to explain them away, and to inter-
pret them into the Good and the Beautiful. He wishes to
see them as they are in truth; and he does so see them, for
Love sharpens his sight; he judges strictly but justly, and
penetrates even to the very root of every prevalent mode
of thought.
Having in his view what men might be, his ruling affec-
tion is a holy indignation at their actual existence, so un-
worthy and void of honour. Seeing that in the profoundest
depths of their nature they still bear within them the Di-
vine, although it does not find its way to outward Mani-
festation ;--considering that what they are accused of by
others is the source of the greatest wretchedness to them-
selves, and that what men call their wickedness is but the
outbreak of their own deeper misery;--reflecting that they
need but to stretch forth their hand to the Good that con-
stantly surrounds them in order to become at once worthy
and blessed;--seeing all this, he is filled with the deepest
melancholy,--the most heart-felt sorrow. His hate is ex-
cited only by the fanaticism of perversity, which is not
satisfied with being worthless in its own person, but, so far
as its influence extends, endeavours to make all others as
unworthy as itself, and which is profoundly irritated and
moved to hatred at the sight of anything better than itself.
For while the former is but the wretched work of Sin, the
latter is the work of the Devil;--for the Devil also hates
Goodness, not simply because it is good, which would be
wholly unintelligible, but from envy, and because he him-
self cannot attain to it. Just as, according to our recent
description, the man inspired of God desires that God alone,
as He is in Himself, should be revealed in His glory, at
all times, on all sides, and in all events, to him and to all
his brethren;--so, on the contrary, he who is inspired of
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
545
himself desires, that, to him and to his fellow-men, there
should be revealed at all times, on all sides, and in all
events, only the image of his own worthlessness. By thus
transcending his own Individuality, he passes the human
and natural boundaries of Egoism, and makes himself the
universal Ideal and God ;--all which the Devil also does in
like manner.
Finally, the Love of his fellow-men reveals itself in the
Religious Man, unalterably determined and for ever remain-
ing the same, in this :--that he never, under any condition,
ceases to labour for their ennoblement, and consequently
never, under any condition, gives up his Hope in them.
His Action is indeed the necessary Manifestation of his
Love; but, on the other hand, this Action necessarily pro-
ceeds towards an outward world, presupposes an outward
world as its sphere, aud assumes that he entertains the
Thought of something actually existing in this outward
world. Without the extinction of this Love in him, neither
his Action, nor this Thought necessarily assumed in his Ac-
tion, can ever cease. As often as it fails of the anticipated
result, so often is he forced back upon himself to create,
from the fountain of Love that eternally flows within him,
a new impulse, and new means of accomplishing his pur-
pose; and is thereby impelled to a fresh effort, and should
even this fail, again to another;--at each renewed attempt,
assuming that what has not hitherto been successful, may
yet be accomplished this time, or the next time, or at some
future time ;--or, even if it should not be accomplished by
him individually, yet that, through his aid, and by means of
his previous labours, it may be accomplished by some one
following in his steps. Thus does Love become to him an
ever-flowing fountain of Faith and Hope :--not in God, for
God is ever-present, living within him, and therefore he has
no need of Faith to enable him to see God; and God ever
gives Himself to him whole and perfect as He is in Himself,
and therefore there is no room for Hope:--but Faith in
Man, and Hope in Man. It is this firm and immovable
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 54<;
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
Faith, this untiring Hope, through which he can raise him-
self, whenever he will, far above all the indignation or the
sorrow with which he may be filled by the contemplation of
present Reality, and can invite into his heart the surest
peace, the most indestructible repose. Let him look beyond
the Present to the Future ! --in that glance he has a whole
Eternity before him, and may, without cost to himself add
to the vista cycle upon cycle as far as thought can reach.
At last--and where then is the End ? --at last all must
arrive at the sure haven of Eternal Peace and Blessedness;
--at last the Kingdom and the Power and the Glory of God
must surely come!
And thus have we gathered into one point the essential
elements of a picture of the Blessed Life, in so far as such
a picture is possible. Blessedness itself consists in Love,
and in the eternal satisfaction of Love;--it is inaccessible
to Reflexion; it can only be negatively expressed by the
understanding, and hence by our description, which is the
language of the understanding. We can only show that the
Blessed are free from pain, trouble, and privation;--where-
in their Blessedness positively consists, cannot be described,
but must be immediately felt.
Unblessedness comes of Doubt which continually drags us
to and fro, and of Uncertainty which spreads around us an
impenetrable night in which our feet can find no sure path.
The Religious Man is for ever secured from the possibility
of Doubt and Uncertainty. In every possible moment he
knows distinctly what he wills, and ought to will; for the
innermost root of his Life--his Will--for ever flows forth
from the Divinity, immediately and without the possibility
of error; its indication is infallible, and for that indication
he has an infallible perception. In every possible moment
he knows assuredly that in all Eternity he shall know what
he shall will, and ought to will; that in all Eternity the
fountain of Divine Love which has burst forth in him shall
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
547
never be dried up, but shall uphold him securely, and bear
him onward for ever. It is the root of his Existence; it
has now arisen upon him clear and bright, and his eye is
fixed upon it with unspeakable Love:--how could that foun-
tain ever be dried up, how could that leader and guardian
ever turn aside? Whatever may come to pass around him,
nothing appears to him strange or unaccountable; he knows
assuredly, whether he understand it or not, that it is in
God's World, and that there nothing can be that does not
directly tend to Good.
In him there is no fear for the Future, for the absolute
fountain of all Blessedness eternally bears him on towards it;--no sorrow for the Past, for in so far as he was not in
God he was nothing, and this is now at an end, and since
he has dwelt in God he has been born into Life; while in
so far as he was in God, that which he has done is assuredly
right and good. He has never aught to deny himself, nor
aught to long for; for he is at all times in eternal possession
of the fulness of all that he is capable of enjoying. For
him all labour and effort have vanished; his whole Outward
Ex-istence flows forth, softly and gently, from his Inward
Being, and issues out into Reality without difficulty or hin-
drance. To use the language of one of our great Poets :--
"Ever pure and mirror-bright and even,
Light as zephyr-breath of Heaven,
Life amidst the Immortals glides away.
Moons are waning, generations wasting,--
Their celestial youth blooms everlasting,
Changeless 'midst a ruined world's decay. " *
Thus much have I desired to say to you, in these lectures,
concerning the True Life and its Blessedness. It is true
that we might say much more on this subject; and that, in
particular, it would be very interesting, now that we have
learned to know the Moral-Religious Man in the central-
* Schiller's " Das Ideal und das Leben," Merivale's Translation.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 548
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
point of his Being, to accompany him thence out into com-
mon life, and even into the most ordinary concerns and cir-
cumstances of his Existence, and there to contemplate him
in all his admirable serenity and loveliness. But without a
fundamental knowledge of that first central-point such a
description might become, to the hearer, either empty de-
clamation, or else a mere air-castle, producing indeed for
the moment an aesthetic pleasure, but containing within it-
self no true ground of persistence;--and this is the reason
why we rather choose to abstain from this prolongation of
our subject. As to principles, we have already said enough
--perhaps more than enough.
In order that we may add a fitting conclusion to our
whole work, I invite you here once again.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 54! )
LECTURE XL
CONCLUSION.
The subject of our present inquiry has been completely
exhausted in our last lecture, so far as it can be here ex-
hausted; and it only remains for me to point out its general
practical application,--respecting, of course, those limits
which are imposed upon me by good manners, and by that
free and liberal relation which these Lectures have estab-
lished between you and me, and which this day brings to a
close.
It was my desire to establish between us the fullest pos-
sible understanding; as it were, to penetrate you with
myself and in turn to be penetrated by you. I believe that
I have actually expressed the ideas which were here to be
clothed in words, with a clearness that at least had not pre-
viously been attained, and also that I have succeeded in
setting forth these ideas in their natural connexion. But
even after the clearest exposition of such ideas, and after a
very accurate comprehension of them, there may yet remain
a great gulf fixed between the giver and the receiver; and
much may be awanting to a complete understanding after
exhausting all possible means of communication. In this
Age of ours, we have to calculate upon this defect as the
rule ;--the opposite is the exception.
There are two chief causes that give rise to this want of a
thorough reception of proffered instruction in this Age.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 550
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
In the first place, the hearer does not give himself up, as
he ought to do, with his whole mind, to the instruction pre-
sented to him; but he may perhaps approach it only with
the understanding, or with the fancy. In the first case, he
regards it merely with curiosity, or with the desire of know-
ing what shape and form it may assume;--but is otherwise
indifferent about its substance, whether it may prove to be
this, that, or the other thing. In the second case, he merely
amuses himself with the succession of pictures, phenomena,
pleasing words, and modes of speech that may be passed in
review before his fancy, but is otherwise indifferent to the
substance. He represents it to himself as something out of
and separate from himself; and thus places it at a distance
from himself, instead of trying it honestly by his own Love,
as he ought to do, and seeing how it may answer to that.
He then attributes this same disposition to the speaker, be-
lieving that he too has no other motive than that of specu-
lating how he may pass the time in an agreeable way, letting
his ingenuity and dialectic art be admired, producing fine
phrases, and such like. But were he to put the question,
even although it were only to his own heart, whether the
speaker is himself earnestly and vitally penetrated by what
he says, and even to suppose that he wished so to penetrate
others if he were able to do so,--he would fear thereby to
transgress the limits of individual right, insult the speaker,
perhaps even make him out to be a fanatic. Should this
supposition not be made, where nevertheless it both could
and should be made, then indeed no harm is done to the
speaker, since he can easily disregard this foreign judgment
which falls so far short of his true meaning; but harm is
assuredly done to the hearer himself, for to him the impart-
ed instruction is no more than what he takes it to be, and
for him it contains no application to Life if he himself does
not give it this applicatioa This cold and indifferent con-
templation by the Understanding alone is the characteristic
of the scientific mode of thought, and all actual develop-
ment of Science commences with this indifference towards
the Substance and interest only in the correctness of the
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XT.
551
Form;--remaining in this indifference until it has attained
its completion; but, as soon as it is thus completed, flow-
ing back into Life, to which all things are at last related.
Our aim in the present lectures was not in the first instance
Scientific,--notwithstanding that, in passing, I have fre-
quently taken notice of the scientific wants of my hearers,
so far as they were known to me,--but it was Practical.
Now therefore, at their close, we must at once declare that
we have nothing to say against the supposition being made
that what we have said in these lectures has been said by
us with entire and perfect earnestness ;--that the principles
we have asserted have, in our own case, arisen from Life
and flowed back upon Life;--that we have certainly desired
that these principles should also influence the Love and
Life of our hearers;--and that only in the event of such an
influence having been actually exerted should we consider
our object perfectly accomplished, and believe that our com-
munication has been as complete as it ought to have been.
A second obstacle to thorough communication in our Age
is the prevalent maxim, that we ought to embrace no party,
and decide neither for nor against;--a mode of thought
which is called Scepticism, and assumes also many other
distinguished names. We have already spoken of this
mode of thought in the course of these lectures. It is
founded upon an absolute want of Love, even in its most
common form--that of Self-love;--and this is the lowest
grade of that vagrancy of mind which we have already de-
scribed, in which man cannot trouble himself even concern-
ing his own destiny;--or it is the wholly brutish opinion
that Truth is of no value, and that no advantage can be had
from the knowledge of it. In order to escape from this
treacherous Scepticism,--which is by no means acuteness,
but, on the contrary, the lowest degree of stupidity,--we
must at least make up our minds as to whether there is any
Truth at all, whether it is attainable by man, and whether,
when attained, it possesses any value for him . Now at the
conclusion of these discourses I must confess, that should
any man not yet have attained to certainty on these points,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 552
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
--should he even find it necessary to ask time for considera-
tion before resolving on a decisive yes or no with reference
to the results we have announced,--and perhaps, admitting
the expertness of the statement, yet profess that he has not
arrived at any judgment on the matter itself,--I must, I
say, confess that the communication and mutual influence
between such an one and myself has proved to be of the
shallowest sort; and that he has received only an addition
to his existing store of possible opinions, whilst I intended
something much better for him. To me it is--not so cer-
tain as the sun in heaven or as this feeling of my own body,
--but infinitely more certain, that there is Truth, that it
is attainable by man, and clearly conceivable by him. I am
also firmly convinced that I, for my part, have seized upon
this Truth from a certain point of view peculiar to myself
and with a certain degree of clearness; for otherwise I would
assuredly have kept silence, and abstained from teaching it
either by speech or writing.
Finally, I am also firmly con-
vinced that what I have declared, here as elsewhere, is that
same Eternal, Unchangeable Truth, which makes every-
thing that is opposed to it Untruth; for otherwise assured-
ly I would not have thus taught it, but rather have taught
whatever else I held to be Truth. For a long time it has
been attempted, in and out of rhyme, among the great read-
ing and writing public, to bring upon me the suspicion that I
hold this last-mentioned singular opinion; and I have fre-
quently pled guilty to the charge in print. But printed letters
do not blush,--thus do my accusers seem to think,--and they
continue to entertain good hope of me that I shall, one day
or other, become ashamed of this charge, which, for that pur-
pose, they still continue to repeat;--and I have therefore de-
sired once for all, by word of mouth, in the presence of a nu-
merous and honourable assembly, and looking them in the
face, to confess the truth of this accusation against me. In
all my attempts at communication with my fellow-men, and
consequently in these discourses also, it has ever been, in
the first place, my earnest purpose and aim, by every means
in my power, to make that which I myself have perceived,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
553
clear and intelligible to others, and, in so far as it lay with
me, to force them to such comprehension; being well as-
sured that a conviction of the truth and justice of what I
had taught would then follow of itself;--and thus it has cer-
tainly been my aim, at all times, and consequently at this
time, to"disseminate my convictions," to "make proselytes," or
by whatever other phrase they who hate this design, which
I thus candidly avow, may choose to describe it. That mo-
desty which is so frequently, and in so many ways, recom-
mended to me, which says :--" See, here is my opinion, and
how I for my part regard the matter, although I am like-
wise of opinion that this opinion of mine is no better than
all the other opinions that have arisen since the beginning
of the world, or those that will arise even till its end"
such modesty, I say, I cannot assume, for reasons which I
have already adduced, and likewise for this reason:--that I
consider such modesty to be the greatest immodesty; and
even hold it to be a frightful arrogance, and worthy of all
abhorrence, to suppose that any one should desire to know
how we personally regard the matter; or to open our mouth
to teach, so long as we are not conscious of Knowledge but
only of Opinion. When it has happened that my hearers
have not understood me, and for that reason have not been
convinced, I have then had no alternative but submission;
for there are no outward logical means of compelling under-
standing, since understanding and conviction arise only from
the inmost depths of Life and its Love;--but to submit
beforehand to this want of understanding, and to reckon
upon it, even during instruction, as upon a necessary result,
--this I cannot do, and have never done, either at any pre-
vious time or in these lectures.
These obstacles to a more intimate and fruitful communi-
cation upon subjects of earnest thought are constantly
maintained and renewed, even in those who possess both
the desire and the power of rising superior to them, by
means of the daily influences that surround us in this Age.
When my meaning shall appear more distinctly, you will
perceive that I have hitherto neither directly mentioned
Bc
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 554
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
these things, nor indirectly hinted at them ;--now, however,
after mature reflexion and consideration, I have determined
to explore the nature of these influences, to try them by
their own principles; and, by means of this deeper investi-
gation, to arm you against them for the future, so far as I,
or any other foreign power, can do so.
I shall not be withheld from doing this by the almost
universal hatred which, as I am well aware, is entertained
against what is called polemics; for this hatred itself pro-
ceeds from that very influence which I undertake to com-
bat, and is indeed one of its chief elements. Where this
hatred has not yet become something still more worthless
and contemptible,--of which more hereafter,--it is at least
a diseased aversion to all that strict distinction and dis-
crimination which is necessarily produced by controversy;
and the unconquerable love of that confusion and vagrancy
of spirit, in which the most opposite things are confounded,
and which we have already sufficiently described.
As little shall I be withheld from this investigation by
the admonition which one hears so frequently:--that we
should rise superior to such things and despise them. It is
surely not to be expected that, in our Age, any man of cha-
racter who is possessed of clear Knowledge should fail to
despise the supposition that he could, in his own person, be
hurt or degraded by a judgment proceeding from such in-
fluences; and such admonishers perhaps do not consider
what fulness of contempt they themselves deserve, and often
indeed receive, through their first reminding us of the con-
tempt which is due from us to such things.
I shall not be withheld from this investigation by the
common supposition that we wrangle and dispute only in
order to gratify personal feelings, and to retaliate upon those
who have injured us in some way;--by which supposition
weak men, who are ignorant of any certain Truth and of its
value, think they have obtained a creditable ground for
hating and despising, with seeming justice, those polemics
which otherwise would drive them from their propriety.
That any one should believe that we could set ourselves in
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
opposition to anything upon mere personal grounds, proves
nothing more than that such an one, for his part, would
himself do so merely upon such grounds; and that, should
he at any time enter into controversy, mere personal ill-will
would certainly be his motive for doing so; and here theD
we willingly accept the counsel given to us above to despise
such things: for that such an one should, without farther
proof, set us down as his fellow, is an insult which can only
be repaid with contempt, and will be so requited by every
honest man.
Neither shall I be withheld from this investigation by its
being said that there are but few who speak or think thus;
for this assertion is simply a falsehood, with which the culp-
able timidity of better men imposes upon itself. At a mo-
derate calculation, ninety-nine out of every hundred among
the cultivated classes in Germany think thus; and in the
highest circles, which give the tone to all the others, this
Scepticism is most virulent; and therefore the party we
have indicated cannot at present decrease but must in-
crease. And even if there are but few speakers belonging
to it, and but few who publish its sentiments through the
press, this arises only from the speakers being always, and
in every case, the fewer in number; while the portion who
do not print anything read, and refresh themselves in the
secret silence of their minds with the published expression
of their own sentiments. That this is indeed the case with
the last-mentioned section of this party, and that we do no
injustice to the public by this accusation, however carefully
they may watch over their expressions so long as they pre-
serve their composure, becomes indisputably manifest so
soon as they get into a passion;--which always ensues when
any one attacks one of their speakers and mouthpieces.
Then they all arise, man by man, and unite against the
common enemy, as if each individual thought himself at-
tacked in his own dearest possessions.
Thus although we may set aside and disregard the indi-
vidual persons composing this party who are known to us,
yet we ought not to dismiss the thing itself with mere con-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 556
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
tempt; since it is the cause of the decisive majority of the
age;--nay, carries with it almost universal consent, and will
long continue to do so. The careful avoidance of any con-
tact with such things, under the pretext of being superior to
them, is not unlike cowardice; and it seems as if one was
afraid of soiling one's fingers in those dim corners;--while,
on the contrary, the potent sun-light must be able to dis-
perse the darkness of these dens, without necessarily ab-
sorbing any part of it. It cannot indeed open the eyes of
the blind inhabitants of the dens, but it may enable the
seeing to perceive what goes on there.
In our former lectures* we have shown, adverting to it
also from time to time in these, that the mode of thought
prevalent in this Age precisely reverses the ideas of Hon-
our and Shame,--regarding what is in truth dishonourable
as its real glory, and the truly honourable as its shame.
Thus, as must be immediately evident to every one who has
listened to us with calm attention, the above-mentioned
Scepticism, which the Age is accustomed to honour under
the name of acuteness, is obvious stupidity, shallowness, and
weakness of understanding. Most especially and preemi-
nently, however, this total perversity of the Age is exhibited
in its judgment of Religion. I must have altogether wasted
my words if I have not made this much at least evident to
you,--that all Irreligion goes no further than the surface of
things and mere empty show;--that it therefore presup-
poses a want of strength and energy of mind, and conse-
quently betrays weakness both of intellect and character;--
that Religion, on the contrary, raising itself above mere
appearance, and penetrating to the very nature of things,
necessarily exhibits the most felicitous use of the spiritual
powers, the greatest depth and acuteness of thought, and
the highest strength of character, which is indeed insepar-
able from these;--that, therefore, according to the princi-
ples by which we pass judgment upon Honour, the Irreli-
* " Characteristics of the Present Age. "
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
557
gious Man must be held in light esteem and despised;--the
Religious Man, on the contrary, highly honoured. The
mode of thought prevalent in this Age completely reverses
all this. With the majority of the men of our day, nothing
causes more immediate and certain disgrace than when any
one allows himself to be penetrated by a religious thought
or sentiment; consequently nothing can more surely bring
honour to a man than to keep himself free from such
thoughts or sentiments. What appears to furnish some
excuse to the Age for holding such an opinion, is this:--
that it can conceive of Religion only as Superstition, and
that it thinks it has a right to despise this Superstition as
something to which it is vastly superior; and, since this
Superstition and Religion are identical, therefore to despise
all Religion. Herein, its total want of understanding, and
the immeasurable ignorance arising therefrom, plays it two
mischievous tricks at once. For, in the first place, it is not
true that the Age is superior to Superstition;--the Age, as
one may plainly see at every turn, is yet essentially filled
with Superstition, for it trembles with terror whenever the
root of its Superstition is even touched by any powerful
hand. Besides, and this is the chief thing, Superstition is
itself the absolute antipodes of Religion; it is even Irreli-
gion merely in another form;--it is the melancholy form of
Irreligion, while that which the Age would willingly assume
if it could, merely as a liberation from that melancholy, is
the gay form of Irreligion. Now, we can easily understand
how a man may enjoy a more comfortable frame of mind in
the latter state than in the former,--and one cannot grudge
men this little improvement in their condition;--but how
Irreligion, which, notwithstanding this change in the nature
of its outward form, still remains essentially the same, can
by such change become reasonable and worthy of honour,
no man of understanding will ever comprehend.
Thus the majority of the Age unconditionally scorn and
despise Religion. How then do they find it practicable to
give outward expression to this scorn? Do they assail
Religion with argument? How could that be, since they
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 55S
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
know nothing whatever about Religion? Or perhaps with
derision? How could that be, since even derision neces-
sarily presupposes some conception of that which is derided,
which they have not? No ! ? they only repeat by rote that,
here or there, such or such things have been said, which
may perhaps refer to Religion; and then without adding
anything of their own, they laugh, and of course every polite
person laughs with them for company;--not, by any means
as if the first or any of his followers were actually moved to
laughter by a really comical representation in his own mind,
--which indeed is wholly impossible without a similar con-
ception,--but only in accordance with the general agree-
ment; and so, by and by, the whole company laugh together
without any single individual among them being conscious
of any ground for laughter, although each one supposes that
his neighbour perchance may have some such ground.
To continue our illustration by reference to present cir-
cumstances, and indeed to our immediate occupation:--for
the narrative of how I was first induced to deliver courses
of popular-philosophical lectures to a mixed audience in this
city would carry us too far. This, however, once got over,
every one who has any acquaintance whatever with the
subject will immediately understand, that if the purely
scientific purpose be laid aside, there is nothing left in Phi-
losophy, generally interesting or generally intelligible to a
mixed audience, but Religion. That the awakening of reli-
gious sentiment would be the true and proper purpose of
these addresses, I distinctly announced at the conclusion of
my lectures of last winter,* which are now in print, and in
print for this same purpose;--and I added by way of ex-
planation, that those lectures were but a preparation for
this purpose, and that in them we had traversed only the
principal sphere of the Religion of the Understanding, while
we had left altogether untouched the whole sphere of the
Religion of Reason. It was to be expected of me that, if I
"Characteristics of the Present Age. "
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LKCTURE XT.
559
should ever resume these discourses, I should resume them
where I had left off. Further, it was requisite that I should
describe the subject of such popular lectures in a popular
way; and I found that the title "The Way towards the
Blessed Life " would completely and truly characterize these
lectures. I still believe that I have not erred in this; and
you yourselves can determine, now that you have heard the
matter to an end, whether you have heard me point out the
Way towards the Blessed Life, and whether you have heard
anything else than this. And thus it came to pass that an
announcement to that effect was made in the public jour-
nals, which to this moment seems to me quite fitting and
natural.
It could not, however, be unexpected on my part, and in-
deed it seemed to me quite as natural as my announcement
itself, that to a majority such as we have described, my an-
nouncement and my whole undertaking should seem pre-
eminently comic, and that they should discover in it a rich
source of laughter. I should have found it quite natural that publishers of newspapers and editors of pamphlets would
place regular reporters in my lecture-hall in order to guide
into their own channels the fountain of the ridiculous which
was here expected to flow forth in such abundance, and thus
employ it for the amusement of their readers. "The Way
towards the Blessed Life! --We do not know indeed what the
man may mean by Life, or by Blessed Life, but it is a
strange collocation of words which have never before reached
our ears in this connexion: it is easy to see that nothing
will come of this but things which no well-bred man would
choose to mention in good society; and, in any case, could
not the man have foreseen that we should laugh at him ? --
and since, if he were a reasonable man, he would have
desired to avoid this at all hazards, his unpolished stupidity
is manifest. We shall have a laugh beforehand, in accord-
ance with the general agreement; and then during this
operation some idea may perchance occur to one of us by
which to justify our laughter. "
Nor is it altogether impossible that such an idea might
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 560 THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
be discovered. For example, might it not be said :--" How
blessed ought we to esteem the man himself who seeks to
show others the Way towards the Blessed Life! " At first
glance the sally seems witty; but let us take patience to cast
a second glance upon it . Suppose the case that he who is
spoken of rests calm and tranquil in clear possession of his
own principles;--have you not done him an unmerited in-
sult by thus speaking of him ? --" Yes, but then to speak so
of himself,--is not that shameless self-praise? " To have
spoken directly of himself,--that surely he could not do; for
a grave man must have other topics besides himself on which
to speak, if he will speak. But suppose that in the asser-
tion that there is a certain mode of thought by which peace
and tranquillity are spread over Life, and in the promise to
communicate this mode of thought to others, there is neces-
sarily contained the assumption that one does himself pos-
sess it; and, since nothing but peace can thereby arise, that
he has likewise, by means of it, attained this peace and
tranquillity; and also that it is impossible to declare the
first of these in a rational way without at the same time
tacitly recognising the other; then we must let the result
be as it will. And would it then be such gross presumption,
and give room for such inextinguishable laughter, if such
an one, compelled by the connexion of his subject, had re-
marked that he did not regard himself either as a block-
head, or as a bad and miserable man?
And this, indeed, is precisely the peculiar impudence and
peculiar absurdity of the majority of whom we now speak;
and in what we have just said we have brought to light the
innermost principle of their Life. According to the princi-
ples which, although they may perhaps be unperceived by
this majority, yet lie at the bottom of all their judgments,
all intercourse among men ought to be founded on the tacit
assumption that we are all in the same way miserable sin-
ners; he who regards others as anything better than this is
a fool, and he who represents himself to be anything better
is a presumptuous coxcomb:--both should be laughed at.
Miserable sinners in Art and Science:--none of us indeed
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
561
can either know or do anything; we shall, nevertheless, en-
ter into a tacit agreement modestly to acknowledge each
other, and talk among ourselves about each other's merits;
--but he who misinterprets this bargain and conducts
himself in real earnest, as if he actually knew and could do
something, acts in opposition to the agreement and is a pre-
sumptuous fool. Miserable sinners in Life:--the ultimate
purpose of all our emotions and endeavours is to improve
our outward circumstances,--who does not know that ? --the
conventional mode of life indeed requires that this should
not exactly be said to others in so many words, for then
others would be compelled to admit it in words, and to
avoid this certain conventional pretexts have been set up;
but each one must be supposed tacitly to assume it, and he
who sets himself in opposition to this tacit assumption
is not only a presumptuous fool but a hypocrite into the
bargain.
From the principle to which we have adverted arises the
well-known complaint which is made against the few in the
nation who are animated by better principles--a complaint
which we hear everywhere, and everywhere may read; the
complaint:--" What! the man will speak to us of the Beau-
tiful and the Noble! How little does he know us! Let
him give us, in insipid jests, the true picture of our own
trivial and frivolous life;--that pleases us, and then he is
our man and has a knowledge of his Age. We indeed see
well enough that that which we do not desire is excellent,
and that that which pleases us is bad and miserable; but yet we desire only the latter, for--such indeed we are. "
From this principle also proceed all the accusations of ar-
rogance and presumption which the authors make against
each other in print, and the men of the world against each
other in words; and the whole amount of the recognised
coinage of wit which passes current among the public. I
pledge myself, if the problem should be proposed, to trace
back the whole store of ridicule in the world, setting aside
at most a mere fraction for other causes, either to this prin-
ciple :--" He knows not yet that men are miserable sin-
cc
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 5G2
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
ners," or to this other:--" He thinks himself something
better than all of us besides,"--or to both of these principles
put together. Usually the two principles are found united.
Thus, to the mind of the majority, the ridiculousness of at-
tempting to point out the " Way towards the Blessed Life"
did not consist merely in my believing that I could point
out such a way, but also in my assuming that I should
find hearers, and especially hearers who should return to a
second lecture with the intention of having this way pointed
out to them; and, in case I should find such, in their believ-
ing that they should find here anything which they could
carry away with them.
In this supposition of the common sinfulness of all men
the majority live on;--this supposition they require every
one to make; and he who on the contrary rejects it, him
they laugh at if they are in a good humour, or get angry
with if they are irritated;--which latter is usually the case
when they encounter such searching investigations into
their true nature as the present has been. Through this
very supposition they thus become bad, profane, irreligious,
and all the more so the longer they abide in it. On the
contrary, the good and honest man, although he acknow-
ledges his defects and unweariedly labours to amend them,
yet does not esteem himself radically bad and essentially
a sinner; for he who recognizes himself as such in his own
nature is thereby reconciled to it, and consequently is so
and remains so. Besides what is deficient in him, the good
man also recognizes what he is possessed of, and must recog-
nize it, for he has to make use of it. That he does not give
the honour to himself is understood; for he who still has a
self,--in him assuredly there is nothing good. Just as little
does he assume men to be bad, and to be miserable sinners,
in his actual intercourse with them, whatever he may think
theoretically of the society around him; but he assumes
them on the contrary to be good. With the sinfulness that
is in them he has nothing to do, and to that he does not
address himself; but he addresses himself to the good that
is assuredly in them, although it may be concealed. With
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
563
respect to whatever ought not to be in them, he does not
even assume its existence, but acts towards them as if it
were not there; while, on the contrary, he calculates with
confidence on everything that, according to existing circum-
stances, ought to be in them, as upon something that must
be, something that is to be assumed, and from which they
can on no account be released. For example:--should he
teach, it is not by mere listless vagrancy that he will be
understood, but only by earnest attention; for such listless
vagrancy ought not to be, and besides it is of far more im-
portance that a man should learn to be attentive than that
he should learn particular doctrines. He will not spare nor
conciliate the aversion to ascertained Truth, but he will defy
it;--for this aversion ought not to exist, and he who cannot
endure Truth ought not to receive it at his hands;--firmness
of character is of far higher value than any positive truth,
and without the former no one is capable of appropriating
anything resembling the latter. But will he not then
seek to delight and influence others? Ccrtainby:--but only
by means of what is just and right, and only in the way of
the Divine Order;--in any other way than this he will as-
suredly neither influence nor delight them. It is a very
complacent supposition indulged in by that majority, that
there is many an excellent man, in art, in doctrine, or in
life, who is most anxious to please them; only that he does
not know how to set about it rightly because he is not
sufficiently versed in the depths of their character, and that
therefore they must tell him how they would wish to have
it done. What if he understood them far more deeply than
they themselves shall ever be able to do, but did not desire
to make this knowledge apparent in his intercourse with
them, only because he cared not to live after their fashion,
and would not accommodate himself to them until they
themselves had first become pure in his sight?
And thus, with the delineation of what we usually see around us in this Age, I have also pointed out the means
by which we may rise superior to it and separate ourselves
from it. Let a man only not be ashamed of being wise,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
?
up this object before it in outward representation, and se-
parates it into parts ;--it is Reflexion that does this. Thus,
in so far as man is Love,--and this he is always in the root
of his Life, and can be nothing but this, although it may
be that he is but the Love of himself,--but especially in
so far as he is the Love of God, he remains eternally and
for ever One, True, and Unchangeable as God himself, and
is indeed in reality God himself; and it is not merely a
bold metaphor, but a literal truth, that John utters when
he says:--" He who dwelleth in Love, dwelleth in God, and
God in him. " It is only his Reflexion which first estranges
him from this which is his own, proper Being, and not any
foreign Being;--and which strives, throughout a whole ma-
nifold Infinity, to lay hold of that which he himself is
and remains, now, everywhere, and for ever. Hence it is
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
541
not his Inward Essential Nature,--that which is his own,
which belongs to himself and to no other,--that is subject
to continual change, but it is only the Appearance or Ma-
nifestation of this Nature, which in itself is withdrawn from
outward Appearance, that suffers this continual change.
Formerly we said:--The eye of man conceals God from
him, and separates the pure light into coloured rays. Now
we say:--The eye of man conceals God from him, only
because he himself is concealed by it, and because his
vision never reaches his own True Being. What he sees
is ever himself, as we also said formerly ;--but he does not
see himself as he truly is;--his Being is one, but his vision
is infinite.
Love necessarily enters into Reflexion, and manifests it-
self there immediately as a Life which employs as its in-
strument a personal, sensuous Ex-istence,--and thus as In-
dividual Action;--and that indeed in a sphere peculiar to
itself and lying beyond all Sensuousness--in a wholly New
World. Wherever the Divine Love is, there is necessarily
this Manifestation; for thus only docs this Love reveal it-
self, and that without any new intervening principle; and,
on the contrary, where this Manifestation is not, there also
the Divine Love is not. It is altogether in vain to say to
him who does not dwell in Love--" Act morally,"--for only
in Love is the Moral World revealed, and without Love
there is no such world; and just as superfluous is it to say
this to him who does dwell in Love,--for his Love lives al-
ready in itself, and his activity, his moral Action, is merely
the silent Manifestation of this his Life. The Action is
nothing in and for itself, and it has no independent prin-
ciple in itself; but it flows forth, calmly and silently, from
Love, as light seems to flow forth from the sun, and as the
World does actually flow forth from the inward Love of God
to himself. If any man does not act, neither does he love;
and he who supposes that he loves, and yet does not act, in
him imagination alone is excited by some picture of Love
conveyed to him from without, to which picture there is
within him no corresponding, inward, self-supporting reality.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 542 THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION".
"He who says, I love God,"--thus speaks the same John,
after representing brotherly love, in a certain very just sense,
as in itself the Higher Morality--" he who says, I love God,
and hateth his brother, is a liar;"--or, as we would say, in
language more suitable to our age, although not a whit more
tenderly,--he is a sham, and has not the Love of God abid-
ing in him ;--abiding, I say, really indwelling within him,--
it is not the root of his True Life, but he can at most only
picture it in imagination.
Love is eternally complete, and contained within itself;
and, as Love, it has ever within itself complete Reality; it
is Reflexion alone that separates and divides into parts.
Hence,--and thus we return to the point which we reached
in our previous lecture,--hence the division of the One Di-
vine Life into different Individuals does not by any means
take place in Love but solely in Reflexion. The Individual,
who is revealed to himself only in Action, and all other In-
dividuals who appear around him, are but the Manifestation
of this One Love, not by any means the thing itself. In his
own Action, Love must be manifest, for otherwise it would
not exist; but the moral Action of others is not to him the
immediately apparent Manifestation of Love; the absence
of this does not immediately prove the absence of Love;--
therefore, as we said already in our previous lecture, he does
not desire the Morality and Religion of others uncondition-
ally, but only under the condition of their Freedom; and
the absence of this universal Morality does not disturb the
peace of Love, which is wholly independent of everything
beyond itself.
The Morality and Religion of the whole Spiritual World
are closely connected with the Action of each particular In-
dividual, as effect with cause. The Moral-Religious Man
desires to spread Morality and Religion universally. The
distinction between his Religion and the Religion of others
is but a distinction in Reflexion. The affection produced in
him by success or failure must therefore take place accord-
ing to the Law of Reflexion. But, as we have already seen
on another occasion, the peculiar affection of Reflexion is
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
543
approbation or disapprobation; not cold and indifferent, but
the more passionate the more loving the nature of the man.
Reflexion always bears with it an affection towards the
Morality of others; and this Reflexion is highest of all in
the Religious Man;--it is the true root of the World around
him, which he embraces with affection, and which is, to him,
purely and solely a Spiritual World.
From what we have now said, we obtain the principles by
which we may characterize more profoundly than we could
do in our former lecture, the disposition of the Religious
Man towards others;--or what would be commonly called
his Philanthropy.
In the first place, there is nothing further removed from
this Religious Philanthropy than a certain tender-hearted
catholicity of sentiment which we hear much bepraised now-
a-days. This mode of thought, far from being the Love of
God, is much rather that absolute shallowness and inward
vagrancy of a mind that is capable neither of Love nor of
Hate, which we have sufficiently described in one of our
earlier lectures. The Religious man does not concern him-
self about the physical happiness of the Human Race,--it
may be his especial calling to care for the higher wants of
men;--he desires no happiness for them save in the ways of
the Divine Order. He cannot desire to make them happy
by means of outward circumstances, as little as God can de-
sire this; for the Will and Counsel of God, even with regard
to his fellow-men, are always his. As it is the Will of God
that no one shall find peace and repose but in Him, and
that all men shall be continually driven onward by means of
sorrows and vexations to renounce themselves and to seek a
refuge in God;--so is this also the will and wish of the man
who is devoted to God. When they have again found their
Being in God, he will love this Being; their Being out of
God he hates with a perfect hatred, and his very love to-
wards their True Being consists in hate towards their im-
perfect Being. "Ye think that I am come to bring peace
on earth," says Jesus,--peace, that is, this same catholic
tender-hearted acceptance of things as they are;--"no, since
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 544
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
yc are such as ye are, I come not to bring peace but a
sword. " The Religious Man is likewise far removed from
the well-known and much-commended effort of this same
superficiality to put such a construction upon surrounding
events as may enable it to maintain itself in this comfort-
able frame of mind :--to explain them away, and to inter-
pret them into the Good and the Beautiful. He wishes to
see them as they are in truth; and he does so see them, for
Love sharpens his sight; he judges strictly but justly, and
penetrates even to the very root of every prevalent mode
of thought.
Having in his view what men might be, his ruling affec-
tion is a holy indignation at their actual existence, so un-
worthy and void of honour. Seeing that in the profoundest
depths of their nature they still bear within them the Di-
vine, although it does not find its way to outward Mani-
festation ;--considering that what they are accused of by
others is the source of the greatest wretchedness to them-
selves, and that what men call their wickedness is but the
outbreak of their own deeper misery;--reflecting that they
need but to stretch forth their hand to the Good that con-
stantly surrounds them in order to become at once worthy
and blessed;--seeing all this, he is filled with the deepest
melancholy,--the most heart-felt sorrow. His hate is ex-
cited only by the fanaticism of perversity, which is not
satisfied with being worthless in its own person, but, so far
as its influence extends, endeavours to make all others as
unworthy as itself, and which is profoundly irritated and
moved to hatred at the sight of anything better than itself.
For while the former is but the wretched work of Sin, the
latter is the work of the Devil;--for the Devil also hates
Goodness, not simply because it is good, which would be
wholly unintelligible, but from envy, and because he him-
self cannot attain to it. Just as, according to our recent
description, the man inspired of God desires that God alone,
as He is in Himself, should be revealed in His glory, at
all times, on all sides, and in all events, to him and to all
his brethren;--so, on the contrary, he who is inspired of
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
545
himself desires, that, to him and to his fellow-men, there
should be revealed at all times, on all sides, and in all
events, only the image of his own worthlessness. By thus
transcending his own Individuality, he passes the human
and natural boundaries of Egoism, and makes himself the
universal Ideal and God ;--all which the Devil also does in
like manner.
Finally, the Love of his fellow-men reveals itself in the
Religious Man, unalterably determined and for ever remain-
ing the same, in this :--that he never, under any condition,
ceases to labour for their ennoblement, and consequently
never, under any condition, gives up his Hope in them.
His Action is indeed the necessary Manifestation of his
Love; but, on the other hand, this Action necessarily pro-
ceeds towards an outward world, presupposes an outward
world as its sphere, aud assumes that he entertains the
Thought of something actually existing in this outward
world. Without the extinction of this Love in him, neither
his Action, nor this Thought necessarily assumed in his Ac-
tion, can ever cease. As often as it fails of the anticipated
result, so often is he forced back upon himself to create,
from the fountain of Love that eternally flows within him,
a new impulse, and new means of accomplishing his pur-
pose; and is thereby impelled to a fresh effort, and should
even this fail, again to another;--at each renewed attempt,
assuming that what has not hitherto been successful, may
yet be accomplished this time, or the next time, or at some
future time ;--or, even if it should not be accomplished by
him individually, yet that, through his aid, and by means of
his previous labours, it may be accomplished by some one
following in his steps. Thus does Love become to him an
ever-flowing fountain of Faith and Hope :--not in God, for
God is ever-present, living within him, and therefore he has
no need of Faith to enable him to see God; and God ever
gives Himself to him whole and perfect as He is in Himself,
and therefore there is no room for Hope:--but Faith in
Man, and Hope in Man. It is this firm and immovable
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 54<;
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
Faith, this untiring Hope, through which he can raise him-
self, whenever he will, far above all the indignation or the
sorrow with which he may be filled by the contemplation of
present Reality, and can invite into his heart the surest
peace, the most indestructible repose. Let him look beyond
the Present to the Future ! --in that glance he has a whole
Eternity before him, and may, without cost to himself add
to the vista cycle upon cycle as far as thought can reach.
At last--and where then is the End ? --at last all must
arrive at the sure haven of Eternal Peace and Blessedness;
--at last the Kingdom and the Power and the Glory of God
must surely come!
And thus have we gathered into one point the essential
elements of a picture of the Blessed Life, in so far as such
a picture is possible. Blessedness itself consists in Love,
and in the eternal satisfaction of Love;--it is inaccessible
to Reflexion; it can only be negatively expressed by the
understanding, and hence by our description, which is the
language of the understanding. We can only show that the
Blessed are free from pain, trouble, and privation;--where-
in their Blessedness positively consists, cannot be described,
but must be immediately felt.
Unblessedness comes of Doubt which continually drags us
to and fro, and of Uncertainty which spreads around us an
impenetrable night in which our feet can find no sure path.
The Religious Man is for ever secured from the possibility
of Doubt and Uncertainty. In every possible moment he
knows distinctly what he wills, and ought to will; for the
innermost root of his Life--his Will--for ever flows forth
from the Divinity, immediately and without the possibility
of error; its indication is infallible, and for that indication
he has an infallible perception. In every possible moment
he knows assuredly that in all Eternity he shall know what
he shall will, and ought to will; that in all Eternity the
fountain of Divine Love which has burst forth in him shall
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
547
never be dried up, but shall uphold him securely, and bear
him onward for ever. It is the root of his Existence; it
has now arisen upon him clear and bright, and his eye is
fixed upon it with unspeakable Love:--how could that foun-
tain ever be dried up, how could that leader and guardian
ever turn aside? Whatever may come to pass around him,
nothing appears to him strange or unaccountable; he knows
assuredly, whether he understand it or not, that it is in
God's World, and that there nothing can be that does not
directly tend to Good.
In him there is no fear for the Future, for the absolute
fountain of all Blessedness eternally bears him on towards it;--no sorrow for the Past, for in so far as he was not in
God he was nothing, and this is now at an end, and since
he has dwelt in God he has been born into Life; while in
so far as he was in God, that which he has done is assuredly
right and good. He has never aught to deny himself, nor
aught to long for; for he is at all times in eternal possession
of the fulness of all that he is capable of enjoying. For
him all labour and effort have vanished; his whole Outward
Ex-istence flows forth, softly and gently, from his Inward
Being, and issues out into Reality without difficulty or hin-
drance. To use the language of one of our great Poets :--
"Ever pure and mirror-bright and even,
Light as zephyr-breath of Heaven,
Life amidst the Immortals glides away.
Moons are waning, generations wasting,--
Their celestial youth blooms everlasting,
Changeless 'midst a ruined world's decay. " *
Thus much have I desired to say to you, in these lectures,
concerning the True Life and its Blessedness. It is true
that we might say much more on this subject; and that, in
particular, it would be very interesting, now that we have
learned to know the Moral-Religious Man in the central-
* Schiller's " Das Ideal und das Leben," Merivale's Translation.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 548
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
point of his Being, to accompany him thence out into com-
mon life, and even into the most ordinary concerns and cir-
cumstances of his Existence, and there to contemplate him
in all his admirable serenity and loveliness. But without a
fundamental knowledge of that first central-point such a
description might become, to the hearer, either empty de-
clamation, or else a mere air-castle, producing indeed for
the moment an aesthetic pleasure, but containing within it-
self no true ground of persistence;--and this is the reason
why we rather choose to abstain from this prolongation of
our subject. As to principles, we have already said enough
--perhaps more than enough.
In order that we may add a fitting conclusion to our
whole work, I invite you here once again.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 54! )
LECTURE XL
CONCLUSION.
The subject of our present inquiry has been completely
exhausted in our last lecture, so far as it can be here ex-
hausted; and it only remains for me to point out its general
practical application,--respecting, of course, those limits
which are imposed upon me by good manners, and by that
free and liberal relation which these Lectures have estab-
lished between you and me, and which this day brings to a
close.
It was my desire to establish between us the fullest pos-
sible understanding; as it were, to penetrate you with
myself and in turn to be penetrated by you. I believe that
I have actually expressed the ideas which were here to be
clothed in words, with a clearness that at least had not pre-
viously been attained, and also that I have succeeded in
setting forth these ideas in their natural connexion. But
even after the clearest exposition of such ideas, and after a
very accurate comprehension of them, there may yet remain
a great gulf fixed between the giver and the receiver; and
much may be awanting to a complete understanding after
exhausting all possible means of communication. In this
Age of ours, we have to calculate upon this defect as the
rule ;--the opposite is the exception.
There are two chief causes that give rise to this want of a
thorough reception of proffered instruction in this Age.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 550
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
In the first place, the hearer does not give himself up, as
he ought to do, with his whole mind, to the instruction pre-
sented to him; but he may perhaps approach it only with
the understanding, or with the fancy. In the first case, he
regards it merely with curiosity, or with the desire of know-
ing what shape and form it may assume;--but is otherwise
indifferent about its substance, whether it may prove to be
this, that, or the other thing. In the second case, he merely
amuses himself with the succession of pictures, phenomena,
pleasing words, and modes of speech that may be passed in
review before his fancy, but is otherwise indifferent to the
substance. He represents it to himself as something out of
and separate from himself; and thus places it at a distance
from himself, instead of trying it honestly by his own Love,
as he ought to do, and seeing how it may answer to that.
He then attributes this same disposition to the speaker, be-
lieving that he too has no other motive than that of specu-
lating how he may pass the time in an agreeable way, letting
his ingenuity and dialectic art be admired, producing fine
phrases, and such like. But were he to put the question,
even although it were only to his own heart, whether the
speaker is himself earnestly and vitally penetrated by what
he says, and even to suppose that he wished so to penetrate
others if he were able to do so,--he would fear thereby to
transgress the limits of individual right, insult the speaker,
perhaps even make him out to be a fanatic. Should this
supposition not be made, where nevertheless it both could
and should be made, then indeed no harm is done to the
speaker, since he can easily disregard this foreign judgment
which falls so far short of his true meaning; but harm is
assuredly done to the hearer himself, for to him the impart-
ed instruction is no more than what he takes it to be, and
for him it contains no application to Life if he himself does
not give it this applicatioa This cold and indifferent con-
templation by the Understanding alone is the characteristic
of the scientific mode of thought, and all actual develop-
ment of Science commences with this indifference towards
the Substance and interest only in the correctness of the
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XT.
551
Form;--remaining in this indifference until it has attained
its completion; but, as soon as it is thus completed, flow-
ing back into Life, to which all things are at last related.
Our aim in the present lectures was not in the first instance
Scientific,--notwithstanding that, in passing, I have fre-
quently taken notice of the scientific wants of my hearers,
so far as they were known to me,--but it was Practical.
Now therefore, at their close, we must at once declare that
we have nothing to say against the supposition being made
that what we have said in these lectures has been said by
us with entire and perfect earnestness ;--that the principles
we have asserted have, in our own case, arisen from Life
and flowed back upon Life;--that we have certainly desired
that these principles should also influence the Love and
Life of our hearers;--and that only in the event of such an
influence having been actually exerted should we consider
our object perfectly accomplished, and believe that our com-
munication has been as complete as it ought to have been.
A second obstacle to thorough communication in our Age
is the prevalent maxim, that we ought to embrace no party,
and decide neither for nor against;--a mode of thought
which is called Scepticism, and assumes also many other
distinguished names. We have already spoken of this
mode of thought in the course of these lectures. It is
founded upon an absolute want of Love, even in its most
common form--that of Self-love;--and this is the lowest
grade of that vagrancy of mind which we have already de-
scribed, in which man cannot trouble himself even concern-
ing his own destiny;--or it is the wholly brutish opinion
that Truth is of no value, and that no advantage can be had
from the knowledge of it. In order to escape from this
treacherous Scepticism,--which is by no means acuteness,
but, on the contrary, the lowest degree of stupidity,--we
must at least make up our minds as to whether there is any
Truth at all, whether it is attainable by man, and whether,
when attained, it possesses any value for him . Now at the
conclusion of these discourses I must confess, that should
any man not yet have attained to certainty on these points,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 552
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
--should he even find it necessary to ask time for considera-
tion before resolving on a decisive yes or no with reference
to the results we have announced,--and perhaps, admitting
the expertness of the statement, yet profess that he has not
arrived at any judgment on the matter itself,--I must, I
say, confess that the communication and mutual influence
between such an one and myself has proved to be of the
shallowest sort; and that he has received only an addition
to his existing store of possible opinions, whilst I intended
something much better for him. To me it is--not so cer-
tain as the sun in heaven or as this feeling of my own body,
--but infinitely more certain, that there is Truth, that it
is attainable by man, and clearly conceivable by him. I am
also firmly convinced that I, for my part, have seized upon
this Truth from a certain point of view peculiar to myself
and with a certain degree of clearness; for otherwise I would
assuredly have kept silence, and abstained from teaching it
either by speech or writing.
Finally, I am also firmly con-
vinced that what I have declared, here as elsewhere, is that
same Eternal, Unchangeable Truth, which makes every-
thing that is opposed to it Untruth; for otherwise assured-
ly I would not have thus taught it, but rather have taught
whatever else I held to be Truth. For a long time it has
been attempted, in and out of rhyme, among the great read-
ing and writing public, to bring upon me the suspicion that I
hold this last-mentioned singular opinion; and I have fre-
quently pled guilty to the charge in print. But printed letters
do not blush,--thus do my accusers seem to think,--and they
continue to entertain good hope of me that I shall, one day
or other, become ashamed of this charge, which, for that pur-
pose, they still continue to repeat;--and I have therefore de-
sired once for all, by word of mouth, in the presence of a nu-
merous and honourable assembly, and looking them in the
face, to confess the truth of this accusation against me. In
all my attempts at communication with my fellow-men, and
consequently in these discourses also, it has ever been, in
the first place, my earnest purpose and aim, by every means
in my power, to make that which I myself have perceived,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
553
clear and intelligible to others, and, in so far as it lay with
me, to force them to such comprehension; being well as-
sured that a conviction of the truth and justice of what I
had taught would then follow of itself;--and thus it has cer-
tainly been my aim, at all times, and consequently at this
time, to"disseminate my convictions," to "make proselytes," or
by whatever other phrase they who hate this design, which
I thus candidly avow, may choose to describe it. That mo-
desty which is so frequently, and in so many ways, recom-
mended to me, which says :--" See, here is my opinion, and
how I for my part regard the matter, although I am like-
wise of opinion that this opinion of mine is no better than
all the other opinions that have arisen since the beginning
of the world, or those that will arise even till its end"
such modesty, I say, I cannot assume, for reasons which I
have already adduced, and likewise for this reason:--that I
consider such modesty to be the greatest immodesty; and
even hold it to be a frightful arrogance, and worthy of all
abhorrence, to suppose that any one should desire to know
how we personally regard the matter; or to open our mouth
to teach, so long as we are not conscious of Knowledge but
only of Opinion. When it has happened that my hearers
have not understood me, and for that reason have not been
convinced, I have then had no alternative but submission;
for there are no outward logical means of compelling under-
standing, since understanding and conviction arise only from
the inmost depths of Life and its Love;--but to submit
beforehand to this want of understanding, and to reckon
upon it, even during instruction, as upon a necessary result,
--this I cannot do, and have never done, either at any pre-
vious time or in these lectures.
These obstacles to a more intimate and fruitful communi-
cation upon subjects of earnest thought are constantly
maintained and renewed, even in those who possess both
the desire and the power of rising superior to them, by
means of the daily influences that surround us in this Age.
When my meaning shall appear more distinctly, you will
perceive that I have hitherto neither directly mentioned
Bc
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 554
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
these things, nor indirectly hinted at them ;--now, however,
after mature reflexion and consideration, I have determined
to explore the nature of these influences, to try them by
their own principles; and, by means of this deeper investi-
gation, to arm you against them for the future, so far as I,
or any other foreign power, can do so.
I shall not be withheld from doing this by the almost
universal hatred which, as I am well aware, is entertained
against what is called polemics; for this hatred itself pro-
ceeds from that very influence which I undertake to com-
bat, and is indeed one of its chief elements. Where this
hatred has not yet become something still more worthless
and contemptible,--of which more hereafter,--it is at least
a diseased aversion to all that strict distinction and dis-
crimination which is necessarily produced by controversy;
and the unconquerable love of that confusion and vagrancy
of spirit, in which the most opposite things are confounded,
and which we have already sufficiently described.
As little shall I be withheld from this investigation by
the admonition which one hears so frequently:--that we
should rise superior to such things and despise them. It is
surely not to be expected that, in our Age, any man of cha-
racter who is possessed of clear Knowledge should fail to
despise the supposition that he could, in his own person, be
hurt or degraded by a judgment proceeding from such in-
fluences; and such admonishers perhaps do not consider
what fulness of contempt they themselves deserve, and often
indeed receive, through their first reminding us of the con-
tempt which is due from us to such things.
I shall not be withheld from this investigation by the
common supposition that we wrangle and dispute only in
order to gratify personal feelings, and to retaliate upon those
who have injured us in some way;--by which supposition
weak men, who are ignorant of any certain Truth and of its
value, think they have obtained a creditable ground for
hating and despising, with seeming justice, those polemics
which otherwise would drive them from their propriety.
That any one should believe that we could set ourselves in
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
opposition to anything upon mere personal grounds, proves
nothing more than that such an one, for his part, would
himself do so merely upon such grounds; and that, should
he at any time enter into controversy, mere personal ill-will
would certainly be his motive for doing so; and here theD
we willingly accept the counsel given to us above to despise
such things: for that such an one should, without farther
proof, set us down as his fellow, is an insult which can only
be repaid with contempt, and will be so requited by every
honest man.
Neither shall I be withheld from this investigation by its
being said that there are but few who speak or think thus;
for this assertion is simply a falsehood, with which the culp-
able timidity of better men imposes upon itself. At a mo-
derate calculation, ninety-nine out of every hundred among
the cultivated classes in Germany think thus; and in the
highest circles, which give the tone to all the others, this
Scepticism is most virulent; and therefore the party we
have indicated cannot at present decrease but must in-
crease. And even if there are but few speakers belonging
to it, and but few who publish its sentiments through the
press, this arises only from the speakers being always, and
in every case, the fewer in number; while the portion who
do not print anything read, and refresh themselves in the
secret silence of their minds with the published expression
of their own sentiments. That this is indeed the case with
the last-mentioned section of this party, and that we do no
injustice to the public by this accusation, however carefully
they may watch over their expressions so long as they pre-
serve their composure, becomes indisputably manifest so
soon as they get into a passion;--which always ensues when
any one attacks one of their speakers and mouthpieces.
Then they all arise, man by man, and unite against the
common enemy, as if each individual thought himself at-
tacked in his own dearest possessions.
Thus although we may set aside and disregard the indi-
vidual persons composing this party who are known to us,
yet we ought not to dismiss the thing itself with mere con-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 556
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
tempt; since it is the cause of the decisive majority of the
age;--nay, carries with it almost universal consent, and will
long continue to do so. The careful avoidance of any con-
tact with such things, under the pretext of being superior to
them, is not unlike cowardice; and it seems as if one was
afraid of soiling one's fingers in those dim corners;--while,
on the contrary, the potent sun-light must be able to dis-
perse the darkness of these dens, without necessarily ab-
sorbing any part of it. It cannot indeed open the eyes of
the blind inhabitants of the dens, but it may enable the
seeing to perceive what goes on there.
In our former lectures* we have shown, adverting to it
also from time to time in these, that the mode of thought
prevalent in this Age precisely reverses the ideas of Hon-
our and Shame,--regarding what is in truth dishonourable
as its real glory, and the truly honourable as its shame.
Thus, as must be immediately evident to every one who has
listened to us with calm attention, the above-mentioned
Scepticism, which the Age is accustomed to honour under
the name of acuteness, is obvious stupidity, shallowness, and
weakness of understanding. Most especially and preemi-
nently, however, this total perversity of the Age is exhibited
in its judgment of Religion. I must have altogether wasted
my words if I have not made this much at least evident to
you,--that all Irreligion goes no further than the surface of
things and mere empty show;--that it therefore presup-
poses a want of strength and energy of mind, and conse-
quently betrays weakness both of intellect and character;--
that Religion, on the contrary, raising itself above mere
appearance, and penetrating to the very nature of things,
necessarily exhibits the most felicitous use of the spiritual
powers, the greatest depth and acuteness of thought, and
the highest strength of character, which is indeed insepar-
able from these;--that, therefore, according to the princi-
ples by which we pass judgment upon Honour, the Irreli-
* " Characteristics of the Present Age. "
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
557
gious Man must be held in light esteem and despised;--the
Religious Man, on the contrary, highly honoured. The
mode of thought prevalent in this Age completely reverses
all this. With the majority of the men of our day, nothing
causes more immediate and certain disgrace than when any
one allows himself to be penetrated by a religious thought
or sentiment; consequently nothing can more surely bring
honour to a man than to keep himself free from such
thoughts or sentiments. What appears to furnish some
excuse to the Age for holding such an opinion, is this:--
that it can conceive of Religion only as Superstition, and
that it thinks it has a right to despise this Superstition as
something to which it is vastly superior; and, since this
Superstition and Religion are identical, therefore to despise
all Religion. Herein, its total want of understanding, and
the immeasurable ignorance arising therefrom, plays it two
mischievous tricks at once. For, in the first place, it is not
true that the Age is superior to Superstition;--the Age, as
one may plainly see at every turn, is yet essentially filled
with Superstition, for it trembles with terror whenever the
root of its Superstition is even touched by any powerful
hand. Besides, and this is the chief thing, Superstition is
itself the absolute antipodes of Religion; it is even Irreli-
gion merely in another form;--it is the melancholy form of
Irreligion, while that which the Age would willingly assume
if it could, merely as a liberation from that melancholy, is
the gay form of Irreligion. Now, we can easily understand
how a man may enjoy a more comfortable frame of mind in
the latter state than in the former,--and one cannot grudge
men this little improvement in their condition;--but how
Irreligion, which, notwithstanding this change in the nature
of its outward form, still remains essentially the same, can
by such change become reasonable and worthy of honour,
no man of understanding will ever comprehend.
Thus the majority of the Age unconditionally scorn and
despise Religion. How then do they find it practicable to
give outward expression to this scorn? Do they assail
Religion with argument? How could that be, since they
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 55S
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
know nothing whatever about Religion? Or perhaps with
derision? How could that be, since even derision neces-
sarily presupposes some conception of that which is derided,
which they have not? No ! ? they only repeat by rote that,
here or there, such or such things have been said, which
may perhaps refer to Religion; and then without adding
anything of their own, they laugh, and of course every polite
person laughs with them for company;--not, by any means
as if the first or any of his followers were actually moved to
laughter by a really comical representation in his own mind,
--which indeed is wholly impossible without a similar con-
ception,--but only in accordance with the general agree-
ment; and so, by and by, the whole company laugh together
without any single individual among them being conscious
of any ground for laughter, although each one supposes that
his neighbour perchance may have some such ground.
To continue our illustration by reference to present cir-
cumstances, and indeed to our immediate occupation:--for
the narrative of how I was first induced to deliver courses
of popular-philosophical lectures to a mixed audience in this
city would carry us too far. This, however, once got over,
every one who has any acquaintance whatever with the
subject will immediately understand, that if the purely
scientific purpose be laid aside, there is nothing left in Phi-
losophy, generally interesting or generally intelligible to a
mixed audience, but Religion. That the awakening of reli-
gious sentiment would be the true and proper purpose of
these addresses, I distinctly announced at the conclusion of
my lectures of last winter,* which are now in print, and in
print for this same purpose;--and I added by way of ex-
planation, that those lectures were but a preparation for
this purpose, and that in them we had traversed only the
principal sphere of the Religion of the Understanding, while
we had left altogether untouched the whole sphere of the
Religion of Reason. It was to be expected of me that, if I
"Characteristics of the Present Age. "
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LKCTURE XT.
559
should ever resume these discourses, I should resume them
where I had left off. Further, it was requisite that I should
describe the subject of such popular lectures in a popular
way; and I found that the title "The Way towards the
Blessed Life " would completely and truly characterize these
lectures. I still believe that I have not erred in this; and
you yourselves can determine, now that you have heard the
matter to an end, whether you have heard me point out the
Way towards the Blessed Life, and whether you have heard
anything else than this. And thus it came to pass that an
announcement to that effect was made in the public jour-
nals, which to this moment seems to me quite fitting and
natural.
It could not, however, be unexpected on my part, and in-
deed it seemed to me quite as natural as my announcement
itself, that to a majority such as we have described, my an-
nouncement and my whole undertaking should seem pre-
eminently comic, and that they should discover in it a rich
source of laughter. I should have found it quite natural that publishers of newspapers and editors of pamphlets would
place regular reporters in my lecture-hall in order to guide
into their own channels the fountain of the ridiculous which
was here expected to flow forth in such abundance, and thus
employ it for the amusement of their readers. "The Way
towards the Blessed Life! --We do not know indeed what the
man may mean by Life, or by Blessed Life, but it is a
strange collocation of words which have never before reached
our ears in this connexion: it is easy to see that nothing
will come of this but things which no well-bred man would
choose to mention in good society; and, in any case, could
not the man have foreseen that we should laugh at him ? --
and since, if he were a reasonable man, he would have
desired to avoid this at all hazards, his unpolished stupidity
is manifest. We shall have a laugh beforehand, in accord-
ance with the general agreement; and then during this
operation some idea may perchance occur to one of us by
which to justify our laughter. "
Nor is it altogether impossible that such an idea might
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 560 THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
be discovered. For example, might it not be said :--" How
blessed ought we to esteem the man himself who seeks to
show others the Way towards the Blessed Life! " At first
glance the sally seems witty; but let us take patience to cast
a second glance upon it . Suppose the case that he who is
spoken of rests calm and tranquil in clear possession of his
own principles;--have you not done him an unmerited in-
sult by thus speaking of him ? --" Yes, but then to speak so
of himself,--is not that shameless self-praise? " To have
spoken directly of himself,--that surely he could not do; for
a grave man must have other topics besides himself on which
to speak, if he will speak. But suppose that in the asser-
tion that there is a certain mode of thought by which peace
and tranquillity are spread over Life, and in the promise to
communicate this mode of thought to others, there is neces-
sarily contained the assumption that one does himself pos-
sess it; and, since nothing but peace can thereby arise, that
he has likewise, by means of it, attained this peace and
tranquillity; and also that it is impossible to declare the
first of these in a rational way without at the same time
tacitly recognising the other; then we must let the result
be as it will. And would it then be such gross presumption,
and give room for such inextinguishable laughter, if such
an one, compelled by the connexion of his subject, had re-
marked that he did not regard himself either as a block-
head, or as a bad and miserable man?
And this, indeed, is precisely the peculiar impudence and
peculiar absurdity of the majority of whom we now speak;
and in what we have just said we have brought to light the
innermost principle of their Life. According to the princi-
ples which, although they may perhaps be unperceived by
this majority, yet lie at the bottom of all their judgments,
all intercourse among men ought to be founded on the tacit
assumption that we are all in the same way miserable sin-
ners; he who regards others as anything better than this is
a fool, and he who represents himself to be anything better
is a presumptuous coxcomb:--both should be laughed at.
Miserable sinners in Art and Science:--none of us indeed
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
561
can either know or do anything; we shall, nevertheless, en-
ter into a tacit agreement modestly to acknowledge each
other, and talk among ourselves about each other's merits;
--but he who misinterprets this bargain and conducts
himself in real earnest, as if he actually knew and could do
something, acts in opposition to the agreement and is a pre-
sumptuous fool. Miserable sinners in Life:--the ultimate
purpose of all our emotions and endeavours is to improve
our outward circumstances,--who does not know that ? --the
conventional mode of life indeed requires that this should
not exactly be said to others in so many words, for then
others would be compelled to admit it in words, and to
avoid this certain conventional pretexts have been set up;
but each one must be supposed tacitly to assume it, and he
who sets himself in opposition to this tacit assumption
is not only a presumptuous fool but a hypocrite into the
bargain.
From the principle to which we have adverted arises the
well-known complaint which is made against the few in the
nation who are animated by better principles--a complaint
which we hear everywhere, and everywhere may read; the
complaint:--" What! the man will speak to us of the Beau-
tiful and the Noble! How little does he know us! Let
him give us, in insipid jests, the true picture of our own
trivial and frivolous life;--that pleases us, and then he is
our man and has a knowledge of his Age. We indeed see
well enough that that which we do not desire is excellent,
and that that which pleases us is bad and miserable; but yet we desire only the latter, for--such indeed we are. "
From this principle also proceed all the accusations of ar-
rogance and presumption which the authors make against
each other in print, and the men of the world against each
other in words; and the whole amount of the recognised
coinage of wit which passes current among the public. I
pledge myself, if the problem should be proposed, to trace
back the whole store of ridicule in the world, setting aside
at most a mere fraction for other causes, either to this prin-
ciple :--" He knows not yet that men are miserable sin-
cc
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 5G2
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
ners," or to this other:--" He thinks himself something
better than all of us besides,"--or to both of these principles
put together. Usually the two principles are found united.
Thus, to the mind of the majority, the ridiculousness of at-
tempting to point out the " Way towards the Blessed Life"
did not consist merely in my believing that I could point
out such a way, but also in my assuming that I should
find hearers, and especially hearers who should return to a
second lecture with the intention of having this way pointed
out to them; and, in case I should find such, in their believ-
ing that they should find here anything which they could
carry away with them.
In this supposition of the common sinfulness of all men
the majority live on;--this supposition they require every
one to make; and he who on the contrary rejects it, him
they laugh at if they are in a good humour, or get angry
with if they are irritated;--which latter is usually the case
when they encounter such searching investigations into
their true nature as the present has been. Through this
very supposition they thus become bad, profane, irreligious,
and all the more so the longer they abide in it. On the
contrary, the good and honest man, although he acknow-
ledges his defects and unweariedly labours to amend them,
yet does not esteem himself radically bad and essentially
a sinner; for he who recognizes himself as such in his own
nature is thereby reconciled to it, and consequently is so
and remains so. Besides what is deficient in him, the good
man also recognizes what he is possessed of, and must recog-
nize it, for he has to make use of it. That he does not give
the honour to himself is understood; for he who still has a
self,--in him assuredly there is nothing good. Just as little
does he assume men to be bad, and to be miserable sinners,
in his actual intercourse with them, whatever he may think
theoretically of the society around him; but he assumes
them on the contrary to be good. With the sinfulness that
is in them he has nothing to do, and to that he does not
address himself; but he addresses himself to the good that
is assuredly in them, although it may be concealed. With
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
563
respect to whatever ought not to be in them, he does not
even assume its existence, but acts towards them as if it
were not there; while, on the contrary, he calculates with
confidence on everything that, according to existing circum-
stances, ought to be in them, as upon something that must
be, something that is to be assumed, and from which they
can on no account be released. For example:--should he
teach, it is not by mere listless vagrancy that he will be
understood, but only by earnest attention; for such listless
vagrancy ought not to be, and besides it is of far more im-
portance that a man should learn to be attentive than that
he should learn particular doctrines. He will not spare nor
conciliate the aversion to ascertained Truth, but he will defy
it;--for this aversion ought not to exist, and he who cannot
endure Truth ought not to receive it at his hands;--firmness
of character is of far higher value than any positive truth,
and without the former no one is capable of appropriating
anything resembling the latter. But will he not then
seek to delight and influence others? Ccrtainby:--but only
by means of what is just and right, and only in the way of
the Divine Order;--in any other way than this he will as-
suredly neither influence nor delight them. It is a very
complacent supposition indulged in by that majority, that
there is many an excellent man, in art, in doctrine, or in
life, who is most anxious to please them; only that he does
not know how to set about it rightly because he is not
sufficiently versed in the depths of their character, and that
therefore they must tell him how they would wish to have
it done. What if he understood them far more deeply than
they themselves shall ever be able to do, but did not desire
to make this knowledge apparent in his intercourse with
them, only because he cared not to live after their fashion,
and would not accommodate himself to them until they
themselves had first become pure in his sight?
And thus, with the delineation of what we usually see around us in this Age, I have also pointed out the means
by which we may rise superior to it and separate ourselves
from it. Let a man only not be ashamed of being wise,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
?
