No More Learning

89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 534
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
means of that Freedom which Thou Thyself wilt not take
away,--as it ever is done, and indeed never can be other-
wise done, in Heaven,--in the Idea, in the world as it is in
itself, and without relation to Freedom. "
For example :--Yonder they complain that misery is so
abundant in the world, and go about with a zeal, praise-
worthy in itself, to make it somewhat less. Alas! the mi-
sery that lies most open to view is not the true misery;--
since things are as they are, misery is the best of all that is
in the world; and since the world does not improve not-
withstanding all this misery, one might almost believe that
there is not yet enough of misery in it:--that the image of
God, Humanity, should be sullied, degraded, and trodden in
the dust,--this is the true misery in the world, which fills
the Religious Man with holy indignation. Perchance thou
dost alleviate the sorrows of humanity, so far as thy hand
can reach, by the sacrifice of thine own dearest enjoyments.
But this may happen only on account of Nature having
given thee a system of nerves so sensitive, and so harmoni-
ously attuned with the rest of humanity, that every sorrow
which thou beholdest repeats itself more keenly in thine
own organization;--and then it is to this delicate organiza-
tion that our thanks are due;--in the Spiritual World thy
deed passes unnoticed. Hadst thou done the like deed
in holy indignation that the Son of Eternity, in whom also
there dwells something god-like, should be tormented by
such trifles as these, and should be left there so forsaken by
his fellows;--with the desire that he might have at least
one glad hour in which he might raise his eyes joyfully and
thankfully to Heaven;--with the purpose that in thy hand
he might see the saving hand of God, and might know of a
surety that the arm of God is not yet shortened, but that He
has yet everywhere instruments and servants to do His will,
and that thus Faith and Hope and Love might arise in his
soul;--if thus what thou desiredst to help had been his In-
ward Nature, and not his Outward, which is ever without
true value;--then had thy deed been the outward expres-
sion of a Moral-Religious Spirit.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 535
LECTURE X.
SURVEY OF THE WHOLE SUBJECT FROM THE STAND-
POINT OF TRUE RELIGION;--DELINEATION
OF THE BLESSED LIFE.
Now that it is our purpose to bring these lectures to a close,
let us once more combine into one view the doctrine which
we have built up before you.
Life in itself is One; it remains unchangeably the same; and, since it is the perfect fulfilment of the Love of Life
that dwells in it, it is perfect Blessedness. This True Life
exists, at bottom, wherever any form or degree of Life is to
be found; but it may be concealed by an admixture of the
elements of Death and Nothingness; and then, by means of
pain and torment and mortification of this imperfect Life, it
forces itself onward towards its development. We have
followed, with our own eyes, this development of the True
Life out of the imperfect Apparent Life by which it may at
first be concealed;--to-day it is our purpose to accompany
this Life into the central-point of its dominion and to invest
it with all its glory. In our last lecture we characterized
the highest Form of Actual Life--that is--since Reality
consists wholly in a Form of Reflexion, whilst the absolutely
indestructible Form of Reflexion is Infinity--that Life which
flows forth in an Infinite Time, and employs the personal
Ex-istence of Man as its instrument, and hence manifests
itself as Action--we have, I say, characterized this Life by
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 53G
TIIK DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
the name of the Higher Morality. We were constrained
to admit that, on account of the separation of the one Essen-
tial Divine Nature into many Individuals--a separation un-
alterably imposed by the law of Reflexion--the activity of
each particular Individual cannot avoid striving after an
outward result, not wholly dependent on the Individual
himself, in the surrounding world of Freedom;--that never-
theless the Blessedness of such an Individual will not be
disturbed by the failure of this result, provided only that he
raise himself to a true comprehension of that which he
strives after unconditionally, as distinguished from that
which he only seeks conditionally;--which comprehension
we termed the standpoint of True Religion. With
respect to this latter point especially, I referred you to our
present lecture, in which I promised a more thorough ex-
position of this subject.
I shall prepare the way for this exposition by a survey of
our whole subject from its profoundest standpoint.
Being ex-ists; and the Ex-istence of Being is necessarily
Consciousness, or Reflexion according to fixed laws, which
are contained in, and are to be developed from, Reflexion
itself:--this is the fundamental principle, now sufficiently
explained on all sides, of our whole doctrine. It is Being
alone that ex-ists,--that "is," in Ex-istence, and by whose
being in it alone Ex-istence is ;--that eternally abides in it
as it is in itself, and without whose indwelling within it Ex-
istence would vanish into Nothingness:--no one doubts this,
and no one who understands it can doubt it . But in Ex-ist-
ence, as Ex-istence,--i e. in Reflexion, Being immediately
changes its absolutely incomprehensible Form, which can
only be described as pure Life and Activity, into an Essence
or Nature--a specific and definite mode of Being; so that
we have never spoken of Being, and no one can ever speak
of Being, otherwise than by speaking of its Essence or
Nature. Although, therefore, our Being is ever in itself the
Being of Being; and thus remains, and can never become
other than this; yet that which we ourselves, and for our-
selves, are, have, and possess,--i. e. in the Form of ourselves,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? J. KCTUttE X.
537
of the Ego, of Reflexion in Consciousness,--this is never
Being in itself, but only Being in our Form, as Essence or
Nature. How then is this Being, which certainly does
not enter into Form in all its native purity,--how is it yet
connected with Form ? --does it not thereby irrevocably
project forth from itself, and set up beside itself, a second,
wholly new Being,--which new and second Being is al-
together impossible? Answer:--Ask not for the "How;"
--be satisfied with the fact. They are connected; there is
such a bond, which,--higher than all Reflexion, proceeding
from no Reflexion, and not recognizing the jurisdiction of
Reflexion,--yet appears beside, and indissolubly associated
with, Reflexion. In this companionship with Reflexion, this
bond is Feeling;--and, since it is a bond, it is Love;--and,
since it is the bond that unites Pure Being and Reflexion,
it is the Love of God. In this Love, Being and Ex-istence,
God and Man, are One; wholly transfused and lost in each
other;--it is the point of intersection of the A and B we
have spoken of above ;--the act of Being, in supporting and
maintaining itself in Ex-istence, is its Love for itself, which
we do not conceive of as Feeling only because we do not
conceive of it at all. The Manifestation of this act of
Being, in supporting and maintaining itself in Ex-istence,
in companionship with Reflexion,--that is, the Feeling of
this act of Self-existence,--is our Love towards it; or, in
strict truth, its own Love towards itself in the Form of
Feeling; since we have no power to love it, but only itself
has power to love itself in us.
This--not its, nor ours--but this reciprocal Love, which
first separates us into two, and then binds us together into
one, is the original creator of our oft-mentioned abstract con- yception of a Pure Being, or a God. What is it which thus
carries us beyond all determinate and comprehensible Ex-ist- /ence, and beyond the whole world of absolute Reflexion? It
is our Love which no Ex-istence can satisfy. Conception does
here that only which it alone can do;--it defines and fashions
this Love, by abstracting from its object, which only by its
means becomes an object, everything that does not satisfy
zb
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 538
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
this Love; leaving in it nothing but the pure negation of all
Conceivability associated with infinite and eternal Loveable-
ness. What then is it that assures us of God but pure,self-
sufficing Love, which is superior to all the doubt that is born
of Reflexion and is only possible therein ? --and what makes
this Love thus self-sufficient, but that it is the immediate self-
supporting and self-maintaining Life of the Absolute itself?
Not Reflexion, which by virtue of its very nature divides it-
self into parts, and thus is ever at variance with itself;--no,
Love is the source of all Certainty, all Truth, all Reality.
The conception of God, which has thus become a purely
abstract conception, gives shape and definition to this Love,
we said. In its own immediate Life, on the contrary--and I
entreat you to note this well--this Love is not thus defined
and fashioned; but it is, and it has and holds its object, not
by any means in conception, which never overtakes it, but
immediately in Love; and that indeed as it is in itself, be-
cause it is in truth nothing else than the self-supporting Life
of Absolute Being. Now it is this substance and material of
Love, which, in the first place, makes the Reflexion of Life
assume the form of a permanent objective Essence or Na-
ture; and then again divides, even to Infinity, the Nature
which has thus arisen, clothing it with new and ever-varied
Forms;--and thus creates its World. I ask :--What is it
then that gives a true and proper fundamental Substance
to this World, the Nature and Form of which are evident-
ly products of Reflexion? It is obviously the Absolute
Love;--the Absolute, I say,--or, as we may now express it,
--the Love of God towards his Ex-istence, or, the Love of
that Ex-istence towards the Living God. And what re-
mains for Reflexion? To give an objective standing to this
Substance, and to fashion it into an infinite succession of
objective Forms. But even with reference to this last
point,--What is it then that prevents Reflexion from ever
pausing in this work, and impels it incessantly forward from
each Form towards another, and from this again to another,
in endless succession? It is the inextinguishable Love for
that which necessarily escapes Reflexion, which lies con-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTUHE X.
539
cealed behind all Reflexion, and is therefore necessarily to
be sought for behind all Reflexion, and under all its infi-
nitely varied Forms,--the pure and real Absolute;--this it
is which impels Reflexion onward through Eternity, and
stretches it out into a living Eternity. Love is therefore
higher than all Reason; it is itself the fountain of Reason
and the root of Reality; the sole creator of Life and Time;
--and thus I have finally declared to you the highest, real
point of view of a Doctrine of Being, Life, and Blessedness,
--that is, of True Speculation, towards which we have
hitherto been gradually advancing.
(Finally, Love, as it is the source of all Truth and cer-
tainty generally, so is it the source of completed Truth in
the actual man and his life. Completed Truth is Science;
and the element of Science is Reflexion. Just as Science
becomes clear to itself as the Love of the Absolute, and
comprehends this Absolute, as it necessarily must, as lying
wholly beyond all Reflexion, and inaccessible to it in any
possible Form,--does it attain to pure objective Truth; and
so does it even thereby become capable of apprehending
and distinguishing Reflexion, which formerly it had always
confounded with Reality; of completely recognising and
comprehending all the products of Reflexion in Reality;--
and, thus, of laying the foundation of a Doctrine of Know-
ledge. In short, the Reflexion which has become Divine
Love, and is therefore wholly absorbed in God himself,--
is the standpoint of Science:--this I desired to avail myself
of a fitting opportunity to mention in passing. )
And now to present this to you in a form which may
be easily retained, and also to connect it with a previous
illustration:--We have already twice translated the words
of John--"In the beginning was the Word, &c. "--into the
language of our immediate theme:--in the first instance,
thus:--" In the beginning, and absolutely associated with
Being, was Ex-istence;" and then, in the second instance,
after we had more distinctly recognised the manifold in-
ward modifications of Ex-istence, and had combined these
together under the name Form, thus :--" In the beginning,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 540
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
anil absolutely associated with God, or Being, was Form. "
Now, however, since we have seen that Consciousness with
all its manifold Forms, which before we had held to be
the True Ex-istence, is but Ex-istence at second hand, and
indeed the mere Appearance or Manifestation of Ex-istence,
and have recognised the True and Absolute Ex-istence, in
its own proper Form, as Love;--now, we render these same
words, thus:-- " In the beginning, before all Time, and
the absolute Creator of all Time, is Love; and Love is in
God, for it is his own act whereby he maintains himself
in Ex-istence; and Love is itself God,--God is in it, and
for ever abides in it, as he is in himself. By it and from
it, as the fundamental Substance of all Ex-istence, are, by
means of living Reflexion, all things made, and without it
is not anything made that is made; and it for ever be-
comes flesh, in us and around us, and dwells among us;
and, if we will, we may behold for ever before our eyes,
its glory, as the glory of the Eternal and necessary Efflu-
ence of the Godhead. "
True Life is Love; and, as Love, holds and possesses with-
in itself its own object--the object of this Love--bound up,
interpenetrated, transfused, and wholly absorbed in it:--
eternally One and the same Love. It is not Love that sets
up this object before it in outward representation, and se-
parates it into parts ;--it is Reflexion that does this. Thus,
in so far as man is Love,--and this he is always in the root
of his Life, and can be nothing but this, although it may
be that he is but the Love of himself,--but especially in
so far as he is the Love of God, he remains eternally and
for ever One, True, and Unchangeable as God himself, and
is indeed in reality God himself; and it is not merely a
bold metaphor, but a literal truth, that John utters when
he says:--" He who dwelleth in Love, dwelleth in God, and
God in him. " It is only his Reflexion which first estranges
him from this which is his own, proper Being, and not any
foreign Being;--and which strives, throughout a whole ma-
nifold Infinity, to lay hold of that which he himself is
and remains, now, everywhere, and for ever. Hence it is
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
541
not his Inward Essential Nature,--that which is his own,
which belongs to himself and to no other,--that is subject
to continual change, but it is only the Appearance or Ma-
nifestation of this Nature, which in itself is withdrawn from
outward Appearance, that suffers this continual change.
Formerly we said:--The eye of man conceals God from
him, and separates the pure light into coloured rays. Now
we say:--The eye of man conceals God from him, only
because he himself is concealed by it, and because his
vision never reaches his own True Being. What he sees
is ever himself, as we also said formerly ;--but he does not
see himself as he truly is;--his Being is one, but his vision
is infinite.
Love necessarily enters into Reflexion, and manifests it-
self there immediately as a Life which employs as its in-
strument a personal, sensuous Ex-istence,--and thus as In-
dividual Action;--and that indeed in a sphere peculiar to
itself and lying beyond all Sensuousness--in a wholly New
World. Wherever the Divine Love is, there is necessarily
this Manifestation; for thus only docs this Love reveal it-
self, and that without any new intervening principle; and,
on the contrary, where this Manifestation is not, there also
the Divine Love is not. It is altogether in vain to say to
him who does not dwell in Love--" Act morally,"--for only
in Love is the Moral World revealed, and without Love
there is no such world; and just as superfluous is it to say
this to him who does dwell in Love,--for his Love lives al-
ready in itself, and his activity, his moral Action, is merely
the silent Manifestation of this his Life. The Action is
nothing in and for itself, and it has no independent prin-
ciple in itself; but it flows forth, calmly and silently, from
Love, as light seems to flow forth from the sun, and as the
World does actually flow forth from the inward Love of God
to himself. If any man does not act, neither does he love;
and he who supposes that he loves, and yet does not act, in
him imagination alone is excited by some picture of Love
conveyed to him from without, to which picture there is
within him no corresponding, inward, self-supporting reality.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 542 THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION".
"He who says, I love God,"--thus speaks the same John,
after representing brotherly love, in a certain very just sense,
as in itself the Higher Morality--" he who says, I love God,
and hateth his brother, is a liar;"--or, as we would say, in
language more suitable to our age, although not a whit more
tenderly,--he is a sham, and has not the Love of God abid-
ing in him ;--abiding, I say, really indwelling within him,--
it is not the root of his True Life, but he can at most only
picture it in imagination.
Love is eternally complete, and contained within itself;
and, as Love, it has ever within itself complete Reality; it
is Reflexion alone that separates and divides into parts.
Hence,--and thus we return to the point which we reached
in our previous lecture,--hence the division of the One Di-
vine Life into different Individuals does not by any means
take place in Love but solely in Reflexion. The Individual,
who is revealed to himself only in Action, and all other In-
dividuals who appear around him, are but the Manifestation
of this One Love, not by any means the thing itself. In his
own Action, Love must be manifest, for otherwise it would
not exist; but the moral Action of others is not to him the
immediately apparent Manifestation of Love; the absence
of this does not immediately prove the absence of Love;--
therefore, as we said already in our previous lecture, he does
not desire the Morality and Religion of others uncondition-
ally, but only under the condition of their Freedom; and
the absence of this universal Morality does not disturb the
peace of Love, which is wholly independent of everything
beyond itself.
The Morality and Religion of the whole Spiritual World
are closely connected with the Action of each particular In-
dividual, as effect with cause. The Moral-Religious Man
desires to spread Morality and Religion universally. The
distinction between his Religion and the Religion of others
is but a distinction in Reflexion. The affection produced in
him by success or failure must therefore take place accord-
ing to the Law of Reflexion. But, as we have already seen
on another occasion, the peculiar affection of Reflexion is
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
543
approbation or disapprobation; not cold and indifferent, but
the more passionate the more loving the nature of the man.
Reflexion always bears with it an affection towards the
Morality of others; and this Reflexion is highest of all in
the Religious Man;--it is the true root of the World around
him, which he embraces with affection, and which is, to him,
purely and solely a Spiritual World.
From what we have now said, we obtain the principles by
which we may characterize more profoundly than we could
do in our former lecture, the disposition of the Religious
Man towards others;--or what would be commonly called
his Philanthropy.
In the first place, there is nothing further removed from
this Religious Philanthropy than a certain tender-hearted
catholicity of sentiment which we hear much bepraised now-
a-days. This mode of thought, far from being the Love of
God, is much rather that absolute shallowness and inward
vagrancy of a mind that is capable neither of Love nor of
Hate, which we have sufficiently described in one of our
earlier lectures. The Religious man does not concern him-
self about the physical happiness of the Human Race,--it
may be his especial calling to care for the higher wants of
men;--he desires no happiness for them save in the ways of
the Divine Order. He cannot desire to make them happy
by means of outward circumstances, as little as God can de-
sire this; for the Will and Counsel of God, even with regard
to his fellow-men, are always his. As it is the Will of God
that no one shall find peace and repose but in Him, and
that all men shall be continually driven onward by means of
sorrows and vexations to renounce themselves and to seek a
refuge in God;--so is this also the will and wish of the man
who is devoted to God. When they have again found their
Being in God, he will love this Being; their Being out of
God he hates with a perfect hatred, and his very love to-
wards their True Being consists in hate towards their im-
perfect Being. "Ye think that I am come to bring peace
on earth," says Jesus,--peace, that is, this same catholic
tender-hearted acceptance of things as they are;--"no, since
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 544
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
yc are such as ye are, I come not to bring peace but a
sword. " The Religious Man is likewise far removed from
the well-known and much-commended effort of this same
superficiality to put such a construction upon surrounding
events as may enable it to maintain itself in this comfort-
able frame of mind :--to explain them away, and to inter-
pret them into the Good and the Beautiful. He wishes to
see them as they are in truth; and he does so see them, for
Love sharpens his sight; he judges strictly but justly, and
penetrates even to the very root of every prevalent mode
of thought.
Having in his view what men might be, his ruling affec-
tion is a holy indignation at their actual existence, so un-
worthy and void of honour. Seeing that in the profoundest
depths of their nature they still bear within them the Di-
vine, although it does not find its way to outward Mani-
festation ;--considering that what they are accused of by
others is the source of the greatest wretchedness to them-
selves, and that what men call their wickedness is but the
outbreak of their own deeper misery;--reflecting that they
need but to stretch forth their hand to the Good that con-
stantly surrounds them in order to become at once worthy
and blessed;--seeing all this, he is filled with the deepest
melancholy,--the most heart-felt sorrow. His hate is ex-
cited only by the fanaticism of perversity, which is not
satisfied with being worthless in its own person, but, so far
as its influence extends, endeavours to make all others as
unworthy as itself, and which is profoundly irritated and
moved to hatred at the sight of anything better than itself.
For while the former is but the wretched work of Sin, the
latter is the work of the Devil;--for the Devil also hates
Goodness, not simply because it is good, which would be
wholly unintelligible, but from envy, and because he him-
self cannot attain to it. Just as, according to our recent
description, the man inspired of God desires that God alone,
as He is in Himself, should be revealed in His glory, at
all times, on all sides, and in all events, to him and to all
his brethren;--so, on the contrary, he who is inspired of
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
545
himself desires, that, to him and to his fellow-men, there
should be revealed at all times, on all sides, and in all
events, only the image of his own worthlessness. By thus
transcending his own Individuality, he passes the human
and natural boundaries of Egoism, and makes himself the
universal Ideal and God ;--all which the Devil also does in
like manner.
Finally, the Love of his fellow-men reveals itself in the
Religious Man, unalterably determined and for ever remain-
ing the same, in this :--that he never, under any condition,
ceases to labour for their ennoblement, and consequently
never, under any condition, gives up his Hope in them.
His Action is indeed the necessary Manifestation of his
Love; but, on the other hand, this Action necessarily pro-
ceeds towards an outward world, presupposes an outward
world as its sphere, aud assumes that he entertains the
Thought of something actually existing in this outward
world. Without the extinction of this Love in him, neither
his Action, nor this Thought necessarily assumed in his Ac-
tion, can ever cease. As often as it fails of the anticipated
result, so often is he forced back upon himself to create,
from the fountain of Love that eternally flows within him,
a new impulse, and new means of accomplishing his pur-
pose; and is thereby impelled to a fresh effort, and should
even this fail, again to another;--at each renewed attempt,
assuming that what has not hitherto been successful, may
yet be accomplished this time, or the next time, or at some
future time ;--or, even if it should not be accomplished by
him individually, yet that, through his aid, and by means of
his previous labours, it may be accomplished by some one
following in his steps. Thus does Love become to him an
ever-flowing fountain of Faith and Hope :--not in God, for
God is ever-present, living within him, and therefore he has
no need of Faith to enable him to see God; and God ever
gives Himself to him whole and perfect as He is in Himself,
and therefore there is no room for Hope:--but Faith in
Man, and Hope in Man. It is this firm and immovable
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 54<;
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
Faith, this untiring Hope, through which he can raise him-
self, whenever he will, far above all the indignation or the
sorrow with which he may be filled by the contemplation of
present Reality, and can invite into his heart the surest
peace, the most indestructible repose. Let him look beyond
the Present to the Future ! --in that glance he has a whole
Eternity before him, and may, without cost to himself add
to the vista cycle upon cycle as far as thought can reach.
At last--and where then is the End ? --at last all must
arrive at the sure haven of Eternal Peace and Blessedness;
--at last the Kingdom and the Power and the Glory of God
must surely come!
And thus have we gathered into one point the essential
elements of a picture of the Blessed Life, in so far as such
a picture is possible. Blessedness itself consists in Love,
and in the eternal satisfaction of Love;--it is inaccessible
to Reflexion; it can only be negatively expressed by the
understanding, and hence by our description, which is the
language of the understanding. We can only show that the
Blessed are free from pain, trouble, and privation;--where-
in their Blessedness positively consists, cannot be described,
but must be immediately felt.
Unblessedness comes of Doubt which continually drags us
to and fro, and of Uncertainty which spreads around us an
impenetrable night in which our feet can find no sure path.
The Religious Man is for ever secured from the possibility
of Doubt and Uncertainty. In every possible moment he
knows distinctly what he wills, and ought to will; for the
innermost root of his Life--his Will--for ever flows forth
from the Divinity, immediately and without the possibility
of error; its indication is infallible, and for that indication
he has an infallible perception. In every possible moment
he knows assuredly that in all Eternity he shall know what
he shall will, and ought to will; that in all Eternity the
fountain of Divine Love which has burst forth in him shall
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE X.
547
never be dried up, but shall uphold him securely, and bear
him onward for ever. It is the root of his Existence; it
has now arisen upon him clear and bright, and his eye is
fixed upon it with unspeakable Love:--how could that foun-
tain ever be dried up, how could that leader and guardian
ever turn aside? Whatever may come to pass around him,
nothing appears to him strange or unaccountable; he knows
assuredly, whether he understand it or not, that it is in
God's World, and that there nothing can be that does not
directly tend to Good.
In him there is no fear for the Future, for the absolute
fountain of all Blessedness eternally bears him on towards it;--no sorrow for the Past, for in so far as he was not in
God he was nothing, and this is now at an end, and since
he has dwelt in God he has been born into Life; while in
so far as he was in God, that which he has done is assuredly
right and good. He has never aught to deny himself, nor
aught to long for; for he is at all times in eternal possession
of the fulness of all that he is capable of enjoying. For
him all labour and effort have vanished; his whole Outward
Ex-istence flows forth, softly and gently, from his Inward
Being, and issues out into Reality without difficulty or hin-
drance. To use the language of one of our great Poets :--
"Ever pure and mirror-bright and even,
Light as zephyr-breath of Heaven,
Life amidst the Immortals glides away.
Moons are waning, generations wasting,--
Their celestial youth blooms everlasting,
Changeless 'midst a ruined world's decay. " *
Thus much have I desired to say to you, in these lectures,
concerning the True Life and its Blessedness. It is true
that we might say much more on this subject; and that, in
particular, it would be very interesting, now that we have
learned to know the Moral-Religious Man in the central-
* Schiller's " Das Ideal und das Leben," Merivale's Translation.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 548
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
point of his Being, to accompany him thence out into com-
mon life, and even into the most ordinary concerns and cir-
cumstances of his Existence, and there to contemplate him
in all his admirable serenity and loveliness. But without a
fundamental knowledge of that first central-point such a
description might become, to the hearer, either empty de-
clamation, or else a mere air-castle, producing indeed for
the moment an aesthetic pleasure, but containing within it-
self no true ground of persistence;--and this is the reason
why we rather choose to abstain from this prolongation of
our subject. As to principles, we have already said enough
--perhaps more than enough.
In order that we may add a fitting conclusion to our
whole work, I invite you here once again.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 54! )
LECTURE XL
CONCLUSION.
The subject of our present inquiry has been completely
exhausted in our last lecture, so far as it can be here ex-
hausted; and it only remains for me to point out its general
practical application,--respecting, of course, those limits
which are imposed upon me by good manners, and by that
free and liberal relation which these Lectures have estab-
lished between you and me, and which this day brings to a
close.
It was my desire to establish between us the fullest pos-
sible understanding; as it were, to penetrate you with
myself and in turn to be penetrated by you. I believe that
I have actually expressed the ideas which were here to be
clothed in words, with a clearness that at least had not pre-
viously been attained, and also that I have succeeded in
setting forth these ideas in their natural connexion. But
even after the clearest exposition of such ideas, and after a
very accurate comprehension of them, there may yet remain
a great gulf fixed between the giver and the receiver; and
much may be awanting to a complete understanding after
exhausting all possible means of communication. In this
Age of ours, we have to calculate upon this defect as the
rule ;--the opposite is the exception.
There are two chief causes that give rise to this want of a
thorough reception of proffered instruction in this Age.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 550
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
In the first place, the hearer does not give himself up, as
he ought to do, with his whole mind, to the instruction pre-
sented to him; but he may perhaps approach it only with
the understanding, or with the fancy. In the first case, he
regards it merely with curiosity, or with the desire of know-
ing what shape and form it may assume;--but is otherwise
indifferent about its substance, whether it may prove to be
this, that, or the other thing. In the second case, he merely
amuses himself with the succession of pictures, phenomena,
pleasing words, and modes of speech that may be passed in
review before his fancy, but is otherwise indifferent to the
substance. He represents it to himself as something out of
and separate from himself; and thus places it at a distance
from himself, instead of trying it honestly by his own Love,
as he ought to do, and seeing how it may answer to that.
He then attributes this same disposition to the speaker, be-
lieving that he too has no other motive than that of specu-
lating how he may pass the time in an agreeable way, letting
his ingenuity and dialectic art be admired, producing fine
phrases, and such like. But were he to put the question,
even although it were only to his own heart, whether the
speaker is himself earnestly and vitally penetrated by what
he says, and even to suppose that he wished so to penetrate
others if he were able to do so,--he would fear thereby to
transgress the limits of individual right, insult the speaker,
perhaps even make him out to be a fanatic. Should this
supposition not be made, where nevertheless it both could
and should be made, then indeed no harm is done to the
speaker, since he can easily disregard this foreign judgment
which falls so far short of his true meaning; but harm is
assuredly done to the hearer himself, for to him the impart-
ed instruction is no more than what he takes it to be, and
for him it contains no application to Life if he himself does
not give it this applicatioa This cold and indifferent con-
templation by the Understanding alone is the characteristic
of the scientific mode of thought, and all actual develop-
ment of Science commences with this indifference towards
the Substance and interest only in the correctness of the
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XT.
551
Form;--remaining in this indifference until it has attained
its completion; but, as soon as it is thus completed, flow-
ing back into Life, to which all things are at last related.
Our aim in the present lectures was not in the first instance
Scientific,--notwithstanding that, in passing, I have fre-
quently taken notice of the scientific wants of my hearers,
so far as they were known to me,--but it was Practical.
Now therefore, at their close, we must at once declare that
we have nothing to say against the supposition being made
that what we have said in these lectures has been said by
us with entire and perfect earnestness ;--that the principles
we have asserted have, in our own case, arisen from Life
and flowed back upon Life;--that we have certainly desired
that these principles should also influence the Love and
Life of our hearers;--and that only in the event of such an
influence having been actually exerted should we consider
our object perfectly accomplished, and believe that our com-
munication has been as complete as it ought to have been.
A second obstacle to thorough communication in our Age
is the prevalent maxim, that we ought to embrace no party,
and decide neither for nor against;--a mode of thought
which is called Scepticism, and assumes also many other
distinguished names. We have already spoken of this
mode of thought in the course of these lectures. It is
founded upon an absolute want of Love, even in its most
common form--that of Self-love;--and this is the lowest
grade of that vagrancy of mind which we have already de-
scribed, in which man cannot trouble himself even concern-
ing his own destiny;--or it is the wholly brutish opinion
that Truth is of no value, and that no advantage can be had
from the knowledge of it. In order to escape from this
treacherous Scepticism,--which is by no means acuteness,
but, on the contrary, the lowest degree of stupidity,--we
must at least make up our minds as to whether there is any
Truth at all, whether it is attainable by man, and whether,
when attained, it possesses any value for him . Now at the
conclusion of these discourses I must confess, that should
any man not yet have attained to certainty on these points,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 552
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
--should he even find it necessary to ask time for considera-
tion before resolving on a decisive yes or no with reference
to the results we have announced,--and perhaps, admitting
the expertness of the statement, yet profess that he has not
arrived at any judgment on the matter itself,--I must, I
say, confess that the communication and mutual influence
between such an one and myself has proved to be of the
shallowest sort; and that he has received only an addition
to his existing store of possible opinions, whilst I intended
something much better for him. To me it is--not so cer-
tain as the sun in heaven or as this feeling of my own body,
--but infinitely more certain, that there is Truth, that it
is attainable by man, and clearly conceivable by him. I am
also firmly convinced that I, for my part, have seized upon
this Truth from a certain point of view peculiar to myself
and with a certain degree of clearness; for otherwise I would
assuredly have kept silence, and abstained from teaching it
either by speech or writing. Finally, I am also firmly con-
vinced that what I have declared, here as elsewhere, is that
same Eternal, Unchangeable Truth, which makes every-
thing that is opposed to it Untruth; for otherwise assured-
ly I would not have thus taught it, but rather have taught
whatever else I held to be Truth. For a long time it has
been attempted, in and out of rhyme, among the great read-
ing and writing public, to bring upon me the suspicion that I
hold this last-mentioned singular opinion; and I have fre-
quently pled guilty to the charge in print. But printed letters
do not blush,--thus do my accusers seem to think,--and they
continue to entertain good hope of me that I shall, one day
or other, become ashamed of this charge, which, for that pur-
pose, they still continue to repeat;--and I have therefore de-
sired once for all, by word of mouth, in the presence of a nu-
merous and honourable assembly, and looking them in the
face, to confess the truth of this accusation against me. In
all my attempts at communication with my fellow-men, and
consequently in these discourses also, it has ever been, in
the first place, my earnest purpose and aim, by every means
in my power, to make that which I myself have perceived,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
553
clear and intelligible to others, and, in so far as it lay with
me, to force them to such comprehension; being well as-
sured that a conviction of the truth and justice of what I
had taught would then follow of itself;--and thus it has cer-
tainly been my aim, at all times, and consequently at this
time, to"disseminate my convictions," to "make proselytes," or
by whatever other phrase they who hate this design, which
I thus candidly avow, may choose to describe it. That mo-
desty which is so frequently, and in so many ways, recom-
mended to me, which says :--" See, here is my opinion, and
how I for my part regard the matter, although I am like-
wise of opinion that this opinion of mine is no better than
all the other opinions that have arisen since the beginning
of the world, or those that will arise even till its end"
such modesty, I say, I cannot assume, for reasons which I
have already adduced, and likewise for this reason:--that I
consider such modesty to be the greatest immodesty; and
even hold it to be a frightful arrogance, and worthy of all
abhorrence, to suppose that any one should desire to know
how we personally regard the matter; or to open our mouth
to teach, so long as we are not conscious of Knowledge but
only of Opinion. When it has happened that my hearers
have not understood me, and for that reason have not been
convinced, I have then had no alternative but submission;
for there are no outward logical means of compelling under-
standing, since understanding and conviction arise only from
the inmost depths of Life and its Love;--but to submit
beforehand to this want of understanding, and to reckon
upon it, even during instruction, as upon a necessary result,
--this I cannot do, and have never done, either at any pre-
vious time or in these lectures.
These obstacles to a more intimate and fruitful communi-
cation upon subjects of earnest thought are constantly
maintained and renewed, even in those who possess both
the desire and the power of rising superior to them, by
means of the daily influences that surround us in this Age.
When my meaning shall appear more distinctly, you will
perceive that I have hitherto neither directly mentioned
Bc
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 554
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
these things, nor indirectly hinted at them ;--now, however,
after mature reflexion and consideration, I have determined
to explore the nature of these influences, to try them by
their own principles; and, by means of this deeper investi-
gation, to arm you against them for the future, so far as I,
or any other foreign power, can do so.
I shall not be withheld from doing this by the almost
universal hatred which, as I am well aware, is entertained
against what is called polemics; for this hatred itself pro-
ceeds from that very influence which I undertake to com-
bat, and is indeed one of its chief elements. Where this
hatred has not yet become something still more worthless
and contemptible,--of which more hereafter,--it is at least
a diseased aversion to all that strict distinction and dis-
crimination which is necessarily produced by controversy;
and the unconquerable love of that confusion and vagrancy
of spirit, in which the most opposite things are confounded,
and which we have already sufficiently described.
As little shall I be withheld from this investigation by
the admonition which one hears so frequently:--that we
should rise superior to such things and despise them. It is
surely not to be expected that, in our Age, any man of cha-
racter who is possessed of clear Knowledge should fail to
despise the supposition that he could, in his own person, be
hurt or degraded by a judgment proceeding from such in-
fluences; and such admonishers perhaps do not consider
what fulness of contempt they themselves deserve, and often
indeed receive, through their first reminding us of the con-
tempt which is due from us to such things.
I shall not be withheld from this investigation by the
common supposition that we wrangle and dispute only in
order to gratify personal feelings, and to retaliate upon those
who have injured us in some way;--by which supposition
weak men, who are ignorant of any certain Truth and of its
value, think they have obtained a creditable ground for
hating and despising, with seeming justice, those polemics
which otherwise would drive them from their propriety.
That any one should believe that we could set ourselves in
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
opposition to anything upon mere personal grounds, proves
nothing more than that such an one, for his part, would
himself do so merely upon such grounds; and that, should
he at any time enter into controversy, mere personal ill-will
would certainly be his motive for doing so; and here theD
we willingly accept the counsel given to us above to despise
such things: for that such an one should, without farther
proof, set us down as his fellow, is an insult which can only
be repaid with contempt, and will be so requited by every
honest man.
Neither shall I be withheld from this investigation by its
being said that there are but few who speak or think thus;
for this assertion is simply a falsehood, with which the culp-
able timidity of better men imposes upon itself. At a mo-
derate calculation, ninety-nine out of every hundred among
the cultivated classes in Germany think thus; and in the
highest circles, which give the tone to all the others, this
Scepticism is most virulent; and therefore the party we
have indicated cannot at present decrease but must in-
crease. And even if there are but few speakers belonging
to it, and but few who publish its sentiments through the
press, this arises only from the speakers being always, and
in every case, the fewer in number; while the portion who
do not print anything read, and refresh themselves in the
secret silence of their minds with the published expression
of their own sentiments. That this is indeed the case with
the last-mentioned section of this party, and that we do no
injustice to the public by this accusation, however carefully
they may watch over their expressions so long as they pre-
serve their composure, becomes indisputably manifest so
soon as they get into a passion;--which always ensues when
any one attacks one of their speakers and mouthpieces.
Then they all arise, man by man, and unite against the
common enemy, as if each individual thought himself at-
tacked in his own dearest possessions.
Thus although we may set aside and disregard the indi-
vidual persons composing this party who are known to us,
yet we ought not to dismiss the thing itself with mere con-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 556
THE DOCTRINE OF RELIGION.
tempt; since it is the cause of the decisive majority of the
age;--nay, carries with it almost universal consent, and will
long continue to do so. The careful avoidance of any con-
tact with such things, under the pretext of being superior to
them, is not unlike cowardice; and it seems as if one was
afraid of soiling one's fingers in those dim corners;--while,
on the contrary, the potent sun-light must be able to dis-
perse the darkness of these dens, without necessarily ab-
sorbing any part of it. It cannot indeed open the eyes of
the blind inhabitants of the dens, but it may enable the
seeing to perceive what goes on there.
In our former lectures* we have shown, adverting to it
also from time to time in these, that the mode of thought
prevalent in this Age precisely reverses the ideas of Hon-
our and Shame,--regarding what is in truth dishonourable
as its real glory, and the truly honourable as its shame.
Thus, as must be immediately evident to every one who has
listened to us with calm attention, the above-mentioned
Scepticism, which the Age is accustomed to honour under
the name of acuteness, is obvious stupidity, shallowness, and
weakness of understanding. Most especially and preemi-
nently, however, this total perversity of the Age is exhibited
in its judgment of Religion. I must have altogether wasted
my words if I have not made this much at least evident to
you,--that all Irreligion goes no further than the surface of
things and mere empty show;--that it therefore presup-
poses a want of strength and energy of mind, and conse-
quently betrays weakness both of intellect and character;--
that Religion, on the contrary, raising itself above mere
appearance, and penetrating to the very nature of things,
necessarily exhibits the most felicitous use of the spiritual
powers, the greatest depth and acuteness of thought, and
the highest strength of character, which is indeed insepar-
able from these;--that, therefore, according to the princi-
ples by which we pass judgment upon Honour, the Irreli-
* " Characteristics of the Present Age. "
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LECTURE XI.
557
gious Man must be held in light esteem and despised;--the
Religious Man, on the contrary, highly honoured. The
mode of thought prevalent in this Age completely reverses
all this. With the majority of the men of our day, nothing
causes more immediate and certain disgrace than when any
one allows himself to be penetrated by a religious thought
or sentiment; consequently nothing can more surely bring
honour to a man than to keep himself free from such
thoughts or sentiments. What appears to furnish some
excuse to the Age for holding such an opinion, is this:--
that it can conceive of Religion only as Superstition, and
that it thinks it has a right to despise this Superstition as
something to which it is vastly superior; and, since this
Superstition and Religion are identical, therefore to despise
all Religion. Herein, its total want of understanding, and
the immeasurable ignorance arising therefrom, plays it two
mischievous tricks at once. For, in the first place, it is not
true that the Age is superior to Superstition;--the Age, as
one may plainly see at every turn, is yet essentially filled
with Superstition, for it trembles with terror whenever the
root of its Superstition is even touched by any powerful
hand. Besides, and this is the chief thing, Superstition is
itself the absolute antipodes of Religion; it is even Irreli-
gion merely in another form;--it is the melancholy form of
Irreligion, while that which the Age would willingly assume
if it could, merely as a liberation from that melancholy, is
the gay form of Irreligion. Now, we can easily understand
how a man may enjoy a more comfortable frame of mind in
the latter state than in the former,--and one cannot grudge
men this little improvement in their condition;--but how
Irreligion, which, notwithstanding this change in the nature
of its outward form, still remains essentially the same, can
by such change become reasonable and worthy of honour,
no man of understanding will ever comprehend.
Thus the majority of the Age unconditionally scorn and
despise Religion. How then do they find it practicable to
give outward expression to this scorn? Do they assail
Religion with argument? How could that be, since they
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:12 GMT / http://hdl. handle.