No More Learning

This volume tends to prove that the movement had one pioneer
and two leaders. The pioneer was Sir Thomas Wyatt, who was
joined in the leadership by Henry Howard, known as earl of
Surrey. A sketch of their lives, especially of that of the former,


## p. 167 (#189) ############################################

Sir Thomas Wyatt
167
1
may be of interest as helping to show the extent to which England
was brought into touch with European influences.
Thomas Wyatt was born in or about 1503, and was educated
at Cambridge, possibly, also, at Oxford. In 1511, his father was
joint constable with Sir Thomas Boleyn of Norwich Castle, and,
as a boy, he made the acquaintance of a lady-Sir Thomas's
daughter Anne-with whose name report was to link his own very
closely. In 1525, after holding certain offices about the person
of the king, Thomas Wyatt accompanied Sir Thomas Cheney on a
diplomatic mission to France. In 1526–7, he was sent with Sir
John Russell, the English ambassador, to the papal court; and
visited Venice, Ferrara, Bologna and Florence. On his return,
he was captured by the imperial forces under the constable of
Bourbon, but escaped. In 1529–30, he was high marshal at Calais.
In 1537, he went as ambassador to the emperor, and remained
abroad, mainly in Spain, till 1539; in the April of that year he was
recalled, in consequence of the intrigues of his fellow-ambassador,
Bonner. At the end of the same year he was despatched to
Flanders to see the emperor and followed him to Paris, returning
in 1540. On the fall of Cromwell, who had supported Wyatt,
Bonner succeeded in obtaining Wyatt's imprisonment in the
Tower; whence, having either denied the accusation or pleaded
for mercy, he was afterwards released. He retired to his house at
Allington, in Kent, and employed his leisure in writing his satires
and his paraphrase of the penitential psalms. In 1542, we find him
knight of the shire for Kent; and, in the summer of that year,
hastening in ill health on a mission to conduct the imperial
ambassador to London, he caught a fever, and died on the road, at
Sherborne, on 11 October. One other episode of his life remains
to be mentioned. He was commonly regarded as, in youth, the
lover of Anne Boleyn; and it was reported that, when the
king wished to make that lady his wife, Wyatt informed him
of his previous relations with her. Whatever the truth of an
obscure matter, Wyatt was chief ewerer at the coronation of
Henry's second queen in 1533; and, though we find him committed
to the Tower in May 1536, the period of her downfall, it was
probably only as a witness. One of his sonnets, Whoso list to
hunt, has clear reference to Anne Boleyn, ending, as it does, with
the line : 'Noli me tangere ; for Caesar's I am'; for, though it is
imitated from Romanello? or Petrarch (157, Una candida cerva),
it may yet be of personal application. There is also an epigram
According to Nott, p. 571.
1
1


## p. 168 (#190) ############################################

168
The New English Poetry
Of His Love called Anna, and another reference to Anne has
been found by some in the sonnet Though I myself be bridled
of my mind. His confinement in May 1536 was, undoubtedly, one
of the facts in his life which induced him to regard May as his
unlucky month.
It will be seen that Wyatt frequently travelled abroad, and
that he spent a period of some months in Italy. And it was from
Italy that he drew the ideas and the form by means of which
English poetry was rejuvenated. The changes which English versi-
fication passed through in the period between Chaucer and the
Elizabethans are described elsewhere? Neither the principles of
rhythm and accent, it would seem, nor even the grammar of Chaucer
were fully understood by his followers, Lydgate, Occleve and Hawes.
In place of Chaucer's care in arranging the stress and pause of his
line, there is chaotic carelessness; and the diction is redundant,
feeble and awkward. Meanwhile, the articulate final -e, of which
Chaucer made cunning use, had been dropping out of common
speech, and the accent on the final syllable of words derived from
the French, such as favour, virtue, travail, had begun to move
back to the first syllable, with the result of producing still further
prosodical confusion and irregularity. It was the mission of Wyatt
and his junior contemporary, Surrey, to substitute order for con-
fusion, especially by means of the Italian influence which they
brought to bear on English poetry, an influence afterwards united
by Spenser (Gabriel Harvey assisting) with the classical influence.
Wyatt's chief instrument was the sonnet, a form which he was
the first English writer to use. Of all forms, the sonnet is that in
which it is most difficult to be obscure, turgid, or irregular. Its
small size and precise structure force on the writer compression,
point and intensity, for a feeble sonnet proclaims itself feeble at a
glance. No better corrective could have been found for vague
thought, loose expression and irregular metre; and the introduction
of the sonnet stands as the head and front of Wyatt's benefaction
to English poetry. His model-in thought, and, up to a certain
point, in form-was the sonnet of Petrarch, of whom he was a close
student. Wyatt's sonnets number about thirty: ten of them are
translations of Petrarch, and two others show a debt to the same
author. But either he did not apprehend, or he deliberately
decided not to imitate, the strict Petrarchian form; and the
great majority of the English sonneteers before Milton followed
his example. The main difference is this: that, whereas the
1 Cf, the sonnet : Ye that in love finde luck.
* See post, chap. xl.
1
а


## p. 169 (#191) ############################################

Wyatt's Sonnets
169
a
sextett of the strict Petrarchian sonnet never ends with a
couplet, the sonnets of Sir Thomas Wyatt, and Elizabethan sonnets :
in general, nearly always do. The effect produced, that of a forcible
ending, is opposed to the strict principles of the sonnet, which
should rise to its fullest height at the conclusion of the octave, to
sink to rest gradually in the sextett. But the final couplet has
been used so freely and to such noble ends by English writers that
objection is out of place. Wyatt was possibly induced to adopt
this form partly by the existence of the favourite Chaucerian
rime royal stanza of seven lines, riming ababbcc.
Of Wyatt's
sonnets, two or three (e. g. Was never file; Some fowles there
be; How oft have I) do actually, by their sense, fall into two
divisions of seven lines; but it is plain that this was not the prin-
ciple on which he constructed his sonnets. For the most part, the
separation of octave and sextett is clearly marked, and the rimes
of the former are arranged in Petrarchian fashion, abbaabba, with
occasional variations, of which abbaacca is a not uncommon form.
The effect of the sonnet-form on Wyatt's thought and diction we
shall examine presently; for the moment, we are concerned with
his metrical reforms. He was a pioneer, and perfection was not to
be expected of him. He has been described as a man stumbling
over obstacles, continually falling but always pressing forward.
Perhaps the best way of illustrating his merits and his short-
comings is to quote one of his sonnets in full; and it will be con-
venient for the purpose to take his version of a sonnet of Petrarch
which was also translated by Surrey, in order to compare later the
advance made by the younger writer.
The longe love, that in my thought I barber,
And in my hart doth kepe his residence,
Into my face preaseth with bold pretence,
And there campeth, displaying his banner.
She that me learns to love, and to suffer,
And willes that my trust, and lustes negligence
Be reined by reason, shame, and reverence,
With his hardinesse takes displeasure.
Wherwith love to the hartes forest he fleeth,
Leavyng his enterprise with paine and crye,
And there him hideth and not appeareth.
What may I do? when my maister feareth,
But in the field with him to live and dye,
For good is the life, endyng faithfully.
The author of this sonnet clearly has much to learn. The
scanning of harber, banner, suffer, campeth, preaseth, forest as
iambics is comprehensible; but, in line 6, we have to choose


## p. 170 (#192) ############################################

170
The New English Poetry
between a heavy stress on the unimportant word my, or an
articulated final -e in lustes; while, in line 8, we can hardly escape
hardinesse, and must have either takës again, or dis-plè-a-sùre
(a possibility which receives some very doubtful support from
line 8 of the sonnet, Love, Fortune, and my minde, in the almost
certainly corrupt version in the first edition of Totteľs Miscellany).
In lines 11 and 12, we find the curious fact that appeareth is rimed
with feareth, not on the double rime but on the last syllable only;
while the last line throws a heavy emphasis on the. The author, ,
in fact, seems to have mastered the necessity of having ten
syllables in a decasyllabic line, but to be very uncertain still
in questions of accent and rhythm. Some of the lines irresistibly
suggest a man counting the syllables on his fingers, as, indeed,
the reader is often compelled to do on a first acquaintance;
on the other hand, we find a beautiful line like the tenth,
which proves the author, however unskilled as yet, to be a poet.
The use of the caesura is feeble and often pointless, and the total
impression is that of a man struggling with difficulties too great
for him. But it is fair to remember two things: first, that pro-
nunciation was then in a state of flux (in one of his satires we find
Wyatt scanning honour as an iambic and as a trochee in the same
line); secondly, that he made great advance in technique, and
that some of the ruggedness of his work (not including this sonnet),
as it appears in the first edition of Tottels Miscellany, is due to a
faulty text, partly corrected in the second edition. Nott, who
published the original MS in 1816, discovered that Wyatt had
occasionally marked the caesura with his own hand, and sometimes
indicated the mode of disposing of a redundant syllable. There
are sonnets (for instance, Unstable dream) which run perfectly
smoothly—to say no more-showing that mastery came with
practice, and that errors were not due to want of correct aim
and comprehension.
This, then the introduction of the sonnet with its chastening
and strengthening influence on metre and diction-is Wyatt's
great service to English poetry; but his service did not end
there. His close study of Petrarch and other Italian authors
resulted in an innovation quite as important, the introduction
of the personal note. The conventionality of character, sentiment
and machinery inherited from the Roman de la Rose disappeared;
and, in its place, came poetry professedly and intentionally personal,
and, within limits, actually introspective. Following Petrarch,
Wyatt sang, in his love-poetry, almost exclusively of his own


## p. 171 (#193) ############################################

Wyatt's Treatment of Love 171
sufferings at the cruelty, much more rarely of his own joy in the
kindness, of his mistress. To say that many of the sonnets are
translations and, therefore, cannot represent the actual feelings
of the translator, is to question the sincerity of almost every
Elizabethan sonneteer. The pleasures and pains of love are the
same in all ages; it is the convention of expression which
changes. The new convention, of which the existence must
be recognised in Wyatt, is a convention of personal emotion,
in which the poet at least pretends to be singing of his own
heart. And in Wyatt we meet with constant proof that he is
so singing. In imitating Petrarch, he frequently adopted to
the full the Petrarchian scheme for the content of a sonnet-the
selection of an image which is then elaborated with as many
cognate and subsidiary metaphors as may be. Take, for instance,
Wyatt's sonnet My galley charged with forgetfulnesse, which is
copied from Petrarch's Passa la nave mia colma d'obblio. His
heart is a ship, steered cruelly through a winter sea by his foe, who
is his lord; the oars are thoughts; the winds are sighs and fearful-
ness; the rain is tears; the clouds are disdain; the cords are twisted
with error and ignorance; while reason, that should be his consort
(or comfort), is drowned. If there were nothing of superior matter
to this in Wyatt, his achievement would almost be limited to his
metrical reforms; but the genuineness and originality of the poet
are shown in other sonnets in which he either alters his original,
modifying some more than usually strained conceit into something
in better taste, or writes with no original but his own heart. See
lines 5—8 in his sonnet, Yet was I never of your love agreved, in
which he flatly contradicts the sentiment of Petrarch. And, more
than once, he flies in the face of the slavery to the mistress pre-
scribed in the code of chivalric love from which he drew much of
his inspiration; declaring roundly (e. g. in the sonnet, My love to
skorn) that,
As there is a certayn time to rage:
So is there time such madnes to aswage;
and bids his cruel mistress a manly farewell. It is not fanciful,
perhaps, to find such a sentiment characteristically English.
The chivalric ideal, codified in Castiglione's Il Cortegiano, was, 1
as we shall see further in discussing Surrey, of great weight in
this, the last century of chivalry in England; but there is, perhaps,
something in our temperament that forbade its complete accept-
ance in the matter of the servitude of love.


## p. 172 (#194) ############################################

172
The New English Poetry
The same sentiment appears even more clearly in Wyatt's
lyrics not in sonnet form, and especially in those composed of
short lines. A delightful song in three quatrains of octosyllabic
lines, Madame, withouten many wordes, is as brave and cavalier a
way of demanding a 'yes' or 'no' as Suckling himself could have
uttered ; and What should I say! Since Faith is dead, a little
song of tetrasyllabic lines with a refrain, is a resolute if graceful
farewell. It is in these lighter lyrics that some of Wyatt's finest
work is to be found. Forget not yet the tried intent is known to
all readers of poetry. It is marked, with other poems, by two
things : the use of the refrain and the unmistakable impression it
conveys of having been written to be sung. The refrain is a
valuable means of knitting a poem together, helping Wyatt almost
as much as the practice of the short poem-in a metre imitated, as
a rule, from Italian or French--towards being clear, exact and
musical. Of the influence of music on the writing of poetry more
will be said elsewhere. It would be rash to state that in the
reign of Henry VIII music so far followed the rhythm of poetry as
to exert a good influence on its form. Still, a lyric was, in those
days, written, as a matter of course, to be sung, and when poems
sing themselves it may be safe to give to music a share in the
good work. We do not find in Wyatt the elaborate metrical
harmonies that grew up in Elizabeth's days. His stanzas are
always short, and simple in construction, without much involution
of rime, and they have a sweetness, a dignity and a sincerity that
make them strongly attractive. But their place in the history of
English poetry is more important than their intrinsic qualities.
Here, for the first time, we find deliberately studied and worked
upon by the poetic imagination that cry of the heart, which, be-
ginning with the recognised pains of the chivalric lover, became
the subject, in a thousand moods and forms, of what may not
unfairly be considered the finest achievement of English poetry.
Besides sonnets and other lyrics, Wyatt's work falls under
three heads : epigrams, satires and devotional pieces. Epigram
means, with Wyatt, not a stinging stave of wit, but a single
conceit or paradox vividly expressed-for instance: The lover
compareth his hart to the over-charged gonne (which may be
specially noticed because a later use of the same idea will help
to show the deterioration of the school of Wyatt); Comparison
of love to a streame falling from the Alpes; How by a kisse
he found both his life and death; and so forth. The epigrams,
indeed, differ little in matter from the more metaphysical of the
sonnets; though, here and there, we find the form used for the


## p. 173 (#195) ############################################

Wyatt's Satires
173
a
strong expression of personal feeling, as in Wiat, being in prison,
to Brian (written, probably, during his incarceration in 1540, to
his friend Sir Francis Bryan, also a poet), and in The Lover pro-
fesseth himself constant. For the matter of a few of the epigrams,
and for the construction of all, Wyatt's model is the Strambotti of
Serafino; the form throughout is a decasyllabic octave riming
abababcc, and, for his ideas, the writer generally sought far
and wide through such foreign and classical learning as he
possessed. Seneca, Josephus and Ausonius (possibly following
Plato) are among the authors on whom he draws. Of greater
interest, both intrinsic and technical, are his satires, which were
written in his retirement at Allington towards the close of
his active and chequered life. They are three in number. The
first, of the meane and sure estate written to John Poins,
tells the fable of the town and country mouse, which he adapts
from Horace (Sat. II, vi), being, possibly, acquainted also with
Henryson's poem The Uponlandis Mous and the Burges Mous,
though that poem was not yet printed; while the conclusion is
enlarged from Persius, Sat. III. The second, Of the courtiers life
written to John Poins, is an adaptation of a satire of Luigi
Alamanni, and explains that the author, scorning the obsequious-
ness and deceit demanded of courtiers, finds it better to live in
retirement; the third, How to use the court and him selfe therin,
written to syr Fraunces Bryan, takes its general ideas from
Horace's advice to Tiresias (Sat. II, v), and preaches ironically
the doctrine, ‘Put money in thy purse. ' The adaptations are free,
and ideas are drawn from more than one author. There are
several references, for instance, to Chaucer, and the references are,
in general, modernised. Adaptations though they be, these satires
have every mark of sincerity. The evils of court life and the
blessings of honest retirement are a common theme with the
authors collected in Tottel's Miscellany; no other contributor
writes with such convincing fervour, such manly rectitude, as
Wyatt. His personality and his strong feeling are more patent in
the satires than in any other of his poems; and their very rugged-
ness of form seems as in the later case of Donne or Marston—to
be adopted for the better expression of honest indignation. Fifty
years afterwards, Hall, the author of the Virgidemiarum, believed
himself to be the first English satirist, and from the fact that
Wyatt's satires were not previously imitated it is clear that he was
in advance of his time. The metre adopted by Wyatt is that
of Alamanni, the terza rima, decasyllabic lines with ‘linked' rimes
>


## p. 174 (#196) ############################################

174
The New English Poetry
ababcbcdcded, etc. This, too, is the scheme of rime he uses in his
versions of the seven penitential psalms, which were probably
composed during the same period of his life as the satires. Each
psalm is introduced by a fanciful narrative, modelled on Beza's
Praefatio Poetica, of the moods in which David wrote it. The
versions themselves are very free; the psalms, in fact, are used
rather as pretexts for the expression of the poet's own feelings
than as originals for rendering anew. He is appalled by the sense
of his sinfulness, fretted 'to the bones' with remorse, and full
of apprehensions of the Judgment. Wyatt also translated other
psalms. Warton's statement that he translated the whole Psalter
is, apparently, erroneous; and the only other surviving version
is that of Psalm 37.
Enough has been said to show that Wyatt was, for his time,
a well-read man in French, Italian and classical literature. He
knew something, too, of Chaucer, as the frequent references to, or
quotations from, his works show; but his almost exclusive use of
French and Italian models indicates that he did not study Chaucer
for his versification'. His poetry conveys the charm of a brave
and strong spirit; his technical faults are those of a pioneer; but
his great claim to recognition, like that of his contemporary and
follower, Surrey, lies in his successful effort to raise his native
tongue to dignity by making it the vehicle of 'polite' and courtly
poetry, an effort which his model, Petrarch, had himself made in
his time. For this purpose, both Wyatt and Surrey use, accord-
ing to the prescription of Castiglione, the ordinary diction of
their day, free from affectation of archaism and from vulgarity;
and it is rare for the modern reader to encounter unfamiliar
words in their poetry.
The exact relation of Surrey to Wyatt has been a matter of
dispute. The accident of birth, no doubt, led to Surrey's poems
being placed before those of Wyatt in Tottels Miscellany, and
this accident may have induced commentators to regard Surrey as
the master of Wyatt, rather than to take the probably more truthful
view, that each influenced the other, but that Wyatt was the pioneer.
He was, at any rate, an older man than Surrey, who was born in
1516 (? ). Henry Howard was the eldest son of lord Thomas Howard,
son of Thomas, earl of Surrey and duke of Norfolk, and himself be-
came, by courtesy, earl of Surrey in 1524, on his father's succeeding
to the dukedom. From a poem to which reference will be made later
it seems possible that he was educated with the duke of Richmond,
1 [See addenda. ]


## p. 175 (#197) ############################################

a
Henry Howard, earl of Surrey 175
Henry VII's natural son, who, later, married his sister. At any
rate, he was brought up in all the virtues and practices of chivalry,
which find a large place in his poems. He visited the Field of the
Cloth of Gold with the duke of Richmond, possibly accompanied
him thence to Paris to study and lived with him, later, at Windsor.
In 1536, the duke died, and the same year saw the execution of
Surrey's cousin, Anne Boleyn. In 1540, we find him a leader in the
tournament held at the marriage of Anne of Cleves, and, after a
mission to Guisnes, he was appointed, in 1541, steward of Cambridge
university. Part of the next year he spent in the Fleet prison, on
a charge of having sent a challenge ; but, being soon released on
payment of a heavy fine, he began his military career by joining
his father in an expedition against the Scots. The next episode
in his life is difficult of explanation : he was brought before the
privy council on a charge of eating meat in Lent and of breaking
windows in the city with a cross-bow. His own explanation was
(cf. London! hast thou accusèd me) that it was an access of
protestant fervour: he regarded himself as 'a figure of the Lord's
behest,' sent to warn the sinful city of her doom. In this connec-
tion, it is fair to remember that, later, he was accused of being
inimical to the new religion. The obvious explanation was that
the proceeding was a piece of Mohockism on the part of a (possibly
intoxicated) man of twenty-seven. At any rate, Surrey had to suffer
for the excess He was again shut up in the Fleet, where, pro-
bably, he paraphrased one or more of the psalms. On his release,
he was sent, in October 1543, to join the English troops then
assisting the emperor in the siege of Landrecy; and, in 1544, he
won further military honour by his defence of Boulogne. On his
return, he was thrown into prison at Windsor, owing to the
intrigues of his father's enemy, Jane Seymour's brother, the earl
of Hertford; was released, again imprisoned, and beheaded in
January 1546/7.
In his military prowess, his scholarship, his position at court,
his poetry and his mastery in chivalric exercises, Surrey is almost
as perfect a knight as Sidney himself. And what strikes the
reader most forcibly in the love poems which form the bulk of his
work is their adherence to the code of the chivalric courts of love.
There is not to be found in Surrey the independence, the
manliness or the sincerity of Wyatt. In his love poems, he is an
accomplished gentlenian playing a graceful game, with what good
effect on English poetry will be seen shortly. Surrey was formally
married at 16; but the subject of many of his poems was not his


## p. 176 (#198) ############################################

176 The New English Poetry
wife, but his ‘lady' in the chivalric sense, the mistress whose
'man' he had become by a vow of fealty. Setting aside the
legends that have grown up about this fair Geraldine, from their
root in Nashe's fiction, The Unfortunate Traveller (1594), to the
sober 'biography' of Anthony à Wood and others, the pertinent
facts that may be regarded as true are no more than these : that
Elizabeth Fitz-Gerald was a daughter of the ninth earl of Kildare,
and, on her father's death in the Tower, was brought up in the
household of princess Mary, becoming one of her ladies of the
chamber. That she was a mere child when Surrey first began to
address poems to her confirms the impression received by the
candid reader: these poems, in fact, are the result, not of a
sincere passion, but of the rules of the game of chivalry as played
in its decrepitude and Surrey's youth. Like Wyatt, he takes his
ideas from Petrarch, of whose sonnets he translates four com-
pletely, while Ariosto provides another; and his whole body of
poetry contains innumerable ideas and images drawn from
Petrarch, but assimilated and used in fresh settings. The frailtie
and hurtfulnesse of beautie; Vow to love faithfully howsoever he
be rewarded; Complaint that his ladie after she knew of his
love kept her face alway hidden from him; Description of
Spring, wherin eche thing renewes, save onelie the lover ; Com-
plaint of a lover, that defied love, and was by love after the more
tormented; Complaint of a diyng lover refused upon his ladies
injust mistaking of his writyng—such are the stock subjects, as
they may almost be called, of the Petrarchists which Surrey repro-
duces. But he reproduces them in every case with an ease and
finish that prove him to have mastered his material, and his
graceful fancies are admirably expressed. Earlier in the chapter
we quoted Wyatt's translation of a sonnet by Petrarch. Let us
compare with it Surrey's version of the same:
Love that liveth, and reigneth in my thought,
That built his seat within my captive brest,
Clad in the armes, wherin with me he fought,
Oft in my face he doth his banner rest.
She, that me taught to love, and suffer payne,
My doutfull hope, and eke my hote desyre,
With shamefast cloke to shadowe and refraine,
Her smilyng grace converteth straight to yre.
And cowarde Love then to the hart apace
Taketh his flight, whereas he lurkes, and plaines
His purpose lost, and dare not shewe his face.
For my lordes gilt thus faultlesse byde I paynes.
Yet from my lorde shall not my foote remove,
Swete is his death, that takes his end by love.
-


## p. 177 (#199) ############################################

* Poulter's Measure'
177
The advance in workmanship is obvious at a glance. There is no
need to count Surrey's syllables on the fingers, and the caesuras
are arranged with variety and skill. The first line contains one of the
very few examples in Surrey's poems of an accented weak syllable
(livèth), and there, as in nearly all the other cases, in the first two
feet of the line. It will be noticed, however, that, whereas Wyatt
was content with two rimes for his octave, in Petrarchian fashion,
Surrey frankly makes up his sonnet of three quatrains and a couplet,
which was the form the sonnet mainly took in the hands of his
Elizabethan followers. Once or twice, Surrey runs the same pair
of rimes right through his first twelve lines; but gains, on the
whole, little advantage thus. Whichever plan he follows, the
result is the same: that, improving on Wyatt's efforts, he makes
of the sonnet—what had never existed before in English poetry-
a single symphonic effect. It is worth noting, too, that, though
his references to Chaucer are even more frequent than Wyatt's,
Surrey polishes and refines, never leaving unaltered the archaisms
which Wyatt sometimes incorporated with his own language.
A favourite metre of Surrey--a metre used now and then
by Wyatt, too—is one of which the student of this period may
grow tired as he traces its decadence through Turbervile,
Googe and others, to its brief restoration to honour in the
hands of Southwell. It was of English origin, being, probably,
a development of the ballad quatrain, and was commonly called
'poulter's measure, from the dozen of eggs that varies, or varied
then, between twelve and fourteen. An example will explain the
name:
Suche waiward waies hath love, that most part in discord
Our willes do stand, whereby our hartes but seldom doe accord.
Disceit is his delight, and to begile, and mock
The simple hartes whom he doth strike with froward divers strok.
It is, as the reader will see, the 'common time' of the hymn-book ;
a combination of two sixes with a fourteener; or, as later writers
preferred to have it printed, a stanza of 6686, only the second and
fourth lines riming. It is easy to write, because there is no doubt
about the accent, and because it saves rimes; and while, in feeble
hands, it can become a monotonous jog-trot, it is lyrical in quality,
and has in Wyatt's hands a strength, in Surrey's, an elegance, and
in Southwell's, a brilliance, which should redeem it from total con-
demnation. One of Surrey's most delightful poems, Complaint of
the absence of her lover being upon the sea, is written in this
metre, in the management of which, as in that of all the others he
E. L. III.
CH. VIII.
12


## p. 178 (#200) ############################################

178 The New English Poetry
attempts, he shows himself a born poet, with a good ear and a
knowledge of the necessity of relating line to line and cadence to
cadence, so that a poem may become a symphonic whole.
His clearest title to fame, however, rests on his translations
from the Aeneid of Vergil into blank verse. There is unrimed
verse even in Chaucer (Tale of Melibeus); and the movement
against rime as a piece of medieval barbarity, which was
supported, later, by Gabriel Harvey and even by Campion and
found its greatest exponent in Milton, had already begun. Still,
it is most likely that it was from Italian poetry (possibly Molza's
translation of Vergil', 1541) that Surrey immediately drew the
idea. The merits of the translation do not very much concern us ;
the merit of having introduced to England the metre of Tambur-
laine the Great, The Tempest, Paradise Lost and The Excursion
is one that can hardly be overrated. Surrey's own use of the
metre, if a little stiff and too much inclined to make a break at
the end of each line, is a wonderful achievement for his time, and
a further proof of his genuine poetical ability.
We have referred to Surrey as a perfect knight; and, in one of
his poems, which all readers will possibly agree in thinking his
best and sincerest, he gives a picture of his youth which shows in
little all the elements of the courtier-knight. This is the Elegy on
the duke of Richmond, as it has been called (So cruell prison how
coulde betide, alas), which he wrote early in 1546 during his im-
prisonment in 'proude Windsor,' the scene of his earlier and
happier days. In this, he draws a picture of the life led by himself
and his friend. We hear, first of all, of the large green courts
whence the youths were wont to look up, sighing, to the ladies in
the Maidens' Tower; then of the dances, the tales of chivalry and
love; the tennis court, where the ball was often missed because
the player was looking at the ladies in the gallery ; the knightly
exercises on horseback and on foot; the love-confidences ex-
changed; the stag-hunt in the forest; the vows of friendship, the
bright honour. Here is as clear and complete a picture of the
standard of knighthood as any that exists; and chivalry, decaying
and mainly reminiscent as it may even then have been, was the
inspiration of Surrey's life and of his poetry. It must be noted of
him, too, that he shows a fresh and original delight in nature, and
was probably the author (as stated in England's Helicon) of the
famous pastoral Phylida was a fayer mayde? .
1
1
| Published under the name of cardinal Ippolito de' Medici.
See the chapter on Song-books in volume iv.


## p. 179 (#201) ############################################

Lord Vaux.
Nicholas Grimald
179
Of the other contributors to Tottel's Miscellany, only four are
known by name: Nicholas Grimald, Thomas lord Vaux, John
Heywood and Edward Somerset. Of these, the nearest to Wyatt
and Surrey is lord Vaux, like them a courtier and trained
in the spirit of chivalry. Only two of his poems appear in
Tottel's Miscellany: Thassault of Cupid upon the fort, which was
probably suggested by Dunbar, and The aged lover renounceth
love, the song of which the grave-digger in Hamlet is singing
a corrupt version as he digs Ophelia's grave. The Paradyse of
Dayniy Devises, which will be noticed later, contains the bulk
of his surviving poetry; this falls into two main divisions : poetry
of love and chivalry, and religious poetry. A brave, simple and
musical writer, Vaux is among the best of the poets of his day.
He is by no means free from the Petrarchian conceits favoured by
his two forerunners; but his reflections on the brevity of life show
a serious and devout mind, and possibly his best poem is When
I look back, in which he craves the forgiveness of God for the
faults and follies of youth. John Heywood is better known
as a playwright than as a lyrical poet; the single poem which
appears in Tottel's Miscellany is a not unpleasing description of
the physical and moral charms of his lady, in a style which
became exceedingly common. For chastity, she is Diana, for
truth, Penelope ; after making her, nature lost the mould, and
so forth. But the freshness has not yet worn off such statements,
and the poem not only has a natural sweetness about it, but
contains one of the few simple references to country things which
are to be found in the volume. Somerset's contribution is entitled
The pore estate to be holden for best, and merely states, in two
septets of rimed twelve-syllabled lines, a favourite commonplace
with these authors. The fact that the first letters of the lines
with the last letter of the last line make up the author's name, is
significant of artificiality.
From one point of view, Grimald is a very interesting poet.
About Wyatt, Surrey and Vaux there is no trace of the professional
author. Their poetry was partly the accomplishment of their class,
partly the natural expression of feelings aroused by their own
lives and the life of their day. Grimald was no courtier, and his
literary work was that of the professed man of letters. Educated
at Cambridge and Oxford, he became chaplain to bishop Ridley,
under whom he translated a work of Aeneas Sylvius and Laurentius
Valla's book against the donation of Constantine. Early in Mary's
reign, he was imprisoned for heresy, but recanted, and is said to
have become a spy during the Marian persecutions. In 1556,
122


## p. 180 (#202) ############################################

180
The New English Poetry
Tottel had published Grimald's translation of Cicero De Officiis;
and it has been supposed, not without possibility, that he was
associated with Tottel, perhaps as editor, in the publication of the
Miscellany. The first edition (June 1557) contained forty of his
poems, and gives his name in full. In the second edition, published
a month later, at least thirty of these poems have disappeared,
and the author's name has shrunk to N. G. The facts have never
been explained. Grimald is particularly fond of 'poulter's measure'
and long lines, which, mainly by good use of his learning, he
succeeds in keeping above the level of doggerel. He excels in
complimentary and elegiac verse; and has left at least two
delightful poems: the Funerall song, upon the deceas of Annes
his mother, which is not only a quaint mixture of learning and
homeliness, but a golden tribute to the subject of the elegy, and
The Garden, which celebrates, with unquestionable enjoyment,
the pleasures and profit to be drawn from nature. In another
of his poems, The Lover asketh pardon of his dere, for feeyng
from her, in which he plays upon his lady's name of Day,
Courthope finds the Petrarchian convention replaced by the
earliest notes in English poetry of that manner which culminated
in the "metaphysical” style. ' The value of Grimald, however,
lies not so much in his matter or his music, as in his attempt to be
distinct and terse through the application of his knowledge of the
classics to English poetry. He studied and translated Latin
epigrams, and, to some extent, was a forerunner of the later
classical influence on English diction and construction.
That the remainder of the authors in Tottel's Miscellany are
declared "uncertain' does not, necessarily, mean that they were
unknown. Men, and sometimes women, wrote for the amusement
of themselves and their friends, not for publication. Their verses
were handed round, copied out into the manuscript books, of
which many survive in public and private libraries, and admired
in a small circle. Puttenham (The Arte of English Poesie, 1589)
speaks of
notable Gentlemen in the Court that have written commendably and sup-
pressed it agayne, or els suffred it to be publisht without their owne names
to it: as if it were a discredit for a Gentleman to seeme learned, and to shew
him selfe amourous of any good Art.
Tottel's Miscellany is the first symptom of the breaking down of
this bashful exclusiveness, under the desire for poetry felt by lovers
and by those outside the court circle who had begun to share in
the spread of knowledge and taste due to the renascence.
the 'book of songs and sonnets' the absence of which Master
It was


## p. 181 (#203) ############################################

>
• Uncertain' Authors
181
a
Slender lamented in The Merry Wives of Windsor (1, 1). Reading
bad gone some way towards taking the place of listening to the
bard or jongleur, and Tottel was enterprising enough to attempt
to satisfy the new demand. But the authors living and dead
remained, in many cases, anonymous. One of the poets of the
Miscellany was, probably, Wyatt's friend, Sir Francis Bryan, though
his pieces have not been identified. The range of subjects among
these uncertain' authors is limited. Of the love-poems, some
continue the Petrarchian style of Wyatt and Surrey; others
complain in more native fashion of the fickleness and frailty of
Praises of the mean estate and warnings of the un-
certainty of life and the vanity of human wishes are very
numerous. We find here the ideas introduced by Wyatt and
Surrey repeated a hundred times; and certain conceits and ideas
(e. g. that of nature losing, or breaking, the mould, the uncertain
state of a lover, 'That all thing sometime finde ease of their paine,
save onely the lover,' and so forth) are common to all. One or two
poems raise an impression of something more than fashion. In
particular, the author of a set of 'poulter's' called Of the wretched-
nes of this world seems to speak from his heart. In complaining
of the lapse of good laws and the increase of evil customs and
wicked men, he expresses, perhaps only more forcibly, and not
more sincerely, than his fellows, the feelings roused in all by the
decay of the old feudal order before the new England of Elizabeth
came to restore security and an ideal. The reigns of Edward VI
and Mary, and, to a great extent, the latter part of that of
Henry VIII, were not favourable to the growth of poetry; and
we find the fellows and successors of Wyatt and Surrey content to
carry on their tradition without improving on the versification
of the latter (one of them is guilty of the line : 'Of Henry, sonne
to sir John Williams knight') or adding to the stock of subjects
and ideas. Some of the authors, clearly, were familiar with the
work of Boccaccio—the story of Troilus and Cressida is a favourite
reference and one poem contains the earliest English translation
of a passage of Ovid, the letter of Penelope to Ulysses. As regards
the metres, 'poulter's measure’ is the most prominent; deca-
syllables and eights are common, and the rimes are often on the
scheme of the rime royal stanza. Alliteration, which Grimald
favoured to some extent, is more common among the ‘uncertain'
authors than in Wyatt and Surrey? .
1 Courthope, Hist. Eng. Poet. 11. p. 165, points out that Piers Plowman had recently
been reprinted and may have encouraged alliteration by its example.


## p. 182 (#204) ############################################

182
The New English Poetry
One of those 'uncertain' authors, according to his own
account, was Thomas Churchyard. The son of a farmer and born
near Shrewsbury, Churchyard gave some part of his long life
to war, the rest to poetry. He served under the emperor and
other famous captains in Scotland, in Ireland, in the Low Countries
and in France, where he was taken prisoner and escaped. He was,
in fact, a soldier of fortune, and, on laying down his arms, he
continued to look to fortune for a maintenance. That fortune
played him false till he was over seventy, denying him the court
place he desired and rewarding him then only with a pension from
the queen, was not the whole secret of his frequent reflections on
the vanity of human wishes, for that was a trick of the times. And
beneath his complaints lay a poetic bravery which goes far to
atone for the monotony of his style and the poverty of his thought.
Soldier-like, he ruffles it in a glittering display of similes and
comparisons. His ingenuity in this field is inexhaustible, and one
little commonplace is decked out in a hundred guises till the brain
is dazzled. The display covers very little substance, and his fond-
ness for alliteration and the monotony of his stress (which he
seems to drive home by his practice of marking his caesuras with
a blank space in the printed line) make his valiant ‘fourteeners’
‘
and “common-time' stanzas prized rather for the rarity of his
editions than for the merit of his poetry. At the same time,
Churchyard was, for his period, a smooth and accomplished
versifier, who had taken to heart the lesson taught by Wyatt and
Surrey, and who did his share of the work of restoring form and
order to English poetry.
His earliest publication seems to have been a three-leaved
poem, The myrrour of man! Early in his career he is found in
controversy, and employing a weapon which he always found
seful, the broadside. In 1563 came his best work, the long
'tragedy' of Shore's Wife in A Mirror for Magistrates. In
1575, he published the first of the books with the alliterative titles
or sub-titles which he liked-Churchyardes Chippes. In 1578, he
began to make use of matter which served him well, his military
experiences : the Wofull Warres in Flaunders of that year was
followed by the Generall Rehearsall of Warres (Churchyard's
Choise), which reviews the deeds of the soldiers and sailors of
England from the time of Henry VIII, and his descriptions of the
sieges of Leith and Edinburgh are among the best of his narrative
1 A. H. Bullen in the D. of N, B. , 8. v. The notice contains a good deal of biblio.
graphical information which it is difficult to obtain elsewhere.


## p. 183 (#205) ############################################

Thomas Tusser
183
poems. In the next year, 1579, he appears in a new light as
devising and describing 'shows' for the queen on her progresses.
Others of his principal works were The Praise of Poetrie (1595),
in which he attempted to do in verse what Sidney's Apologie had
done in prose, and The Worthines of Wales (1587), a vigorous book
which, to some extent, anticipates the Poly-Olbion of Michael
Drayton. He translated three books of Ovid's Tristia and began
a translation of Pliny which he destroyed. Grumbling, hoping,
quarrelling and making friends again, with Nashe (who realised his
merit) and others, paying fine homage to the great men of his day,
he continued writing till his voice sounded strange in the new era,
long after Colin Clout had described him as 'old Palaemon that
sung so long untill quite hoarse he grew. '
The decadence of the school of Wyatt and Surrey may be seen
in other miscellanies, which will soon be considered; but, for the
moment, we must turn aside to a poet who felt none of the Italian
influence–Thomas Tusser.
>
Tusser, who was born in Essex about 1525, became a singing
boy at St Paul's, was at Eton under Nicholas Udall, who, he
records, flogged him, and went on to King's College and Trinity Hall,
Cambridge. Leaving the university for reasons of ill-health, he
.
entered, as a musician, the service of William lord Paget, who,
later, was privy seal to Mary. Of lord Paget and his two sons,
Henry and Thomas, in succession, he considered himself ever after-
wards the retainer. In 1553, or thereabouts, he left London
for a farm near Brantham, in Suffolk, where he introduced into
England the culture of barley. In 1557, he published his
Hundreth good pointes of husbandrie, which was enlarged in
1570, or earlier, by. A hundreth good poynts of huswifery, again,
in 1573, to Five hundreth pointes of good husbandry, and again
in 1577 and 1580—to run through five more editions before the
end of the century. His life was restless. At one time we find
him a lay-clerk in Norwich cathedral, thanks to Sir Robert
Southwell, of the family of Southwell the poet; later, he is
quarrelling over tithes near Witham, in Essex, then in London,
and again in Cambridge, possibly as a choirman at Trinity Hall.
In 1580, he died in the parish of St Mildred, Poultry, where he is
buried.
The Hundreth and Five Hundreth points are an extraordinary,
but most entertaining, collection of maxims on farming, weather-
lore, forestry, agriculture, thrift, virtue, religion and life in
2


## p. 184 (#206) ############################################

184
The New English Poetry
6
general. The title-pages given in the bibliography to this chapter
are in the spirit of the work itself, which is full of a shrewd and
kindly humour, and a ripe, if pedestrian, wisdom. The book gives
a complete picture of the farmer's life of the day; and, for two
centuries at least, it was read far and wide as a practical manual
of farming. The year is divided into months; and the duties of
each month in farm, garden and house, together with many of its
customs, superstitions and observances, not without their value for
the antiquary and the student of manners, are set forth in rimed
four-foot anapaestic couplets (the metre of Bonnie Dundee), that
carry the modern reader along at a hand-gallop till he is ready to
drop, but must have proved very easy reading to the country
gentlemen and farmers of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
And, the better to fix the precepts in the mind, each month has its
epitome in verse which could be learned by heart. The greater
part of Tusser's work is in the metre mentioned above; but the
prefatory poems, of which there are many, offer a more interesting
variety of metrical experiment than any work of the same date. In
the 'Epistle to Lord William Paget' he uses a stanza of six
lines of eight, rimed ababcc; the 'Epistle to Lord Thomas
Paget' is an example of metre which Swinburne was afterwards
to use with wonderful effect in combination with another: it is
the 7776, riming aaab, with double-rimes at a, which forms the
last part of the stanza of Proserpine, only Tusser doubles it
into aaabcccb. "To the Reader' is written in 'Skeltonics,' a long
(and, in Tusser's case, regular) stanza of four-syllabled iambic lines
riming aabbccdeeffggd. The other metres need not be mentioned in
detail, but two must be singled out. The Conditions of Husbandrie
consists of stanzas, of which the last two lines are Tusser's favourite
four-foot anapaests; while the first two are either among the rare
examples of the use of the amphibrach (u-u), or, more probably,
are two-foot anapaests with a double rime. The 'Preface to
the Buyer' is interesting, as the first example of the three-foot
anapaestic line which was used, later, by Shenstone and Prior, and
which is familiar to all as the metre of Cowper's 'I am monarch
of all I survey. ' Tusser's ingenuity leads him into many faults; he
affects acrostics and alliteration (in his Things Thriftie there are
twelve couplets in which every word begins with a T; every line
but the last two of his Ladder to Thrift ends in ie or y); but
these things are easily pardoned to a man who was writing, not to
please the literary circles of the town, but to fix his maxims in the
heads of the country; and the same ingenuity stood him in good


## p. 185 (#207) ############################################

Barnabe Googe
185
stead in the matter of metre. He was too good a scholar, with too
good an ear, to leave things as irregular as they had been in the
hands of Skelton. Taking measures and feet that were English
and familiar, he polished and combined them with no contemptible
skill, uniting an ease in movement with a terseness and exact-
ness of expression that were new in this field; though he lies
outside the main stream of development and has, on that account,
been too much neglected, his achievement and influence were
valuable. He has been accused of carelessness and wilfulness
in rime, perhaps unfairly. Many of the cases that have been
cited might, if studied patiently and systematically, prove to
be documents for the provincial or common pronunciation of
the day. Certain of Tusser's compressions and elisions (e. g.
his frequent use of an ablative absolute) found no imitator till
Browning.
We have seen the influence of the classics on the form of
English poetry beginning feebly to make itself felt with Grimald.
That influence must not be confounded with the study and transla-
tion of classical authors, which had begun earlier, with Barclay,
Gavin Douglas and Surrey; for, while Surrey, for instance, had
translated from the Aeneid, the influence moulding his own work
was almost entirely Italian. But the study of the classics was soon
to exercise its own influence; and, six years after the first publica-
tion of Totteľs Miscellany, we find Barnabe Googe introducing
in his Eglogs, Epytaphes and Sonettes (1563) the form of the
pastoral, which, doubtless, he had learned from Barclay's adapta-
tions of the eclogues of Mantuan. Barnabe Googe, the son of
a recorder of Lincoln, was born about 1540, educated at Cam-
bridge and Oxford and, after travelling in France and Spain
(see his poems written on starting and returning), taken into
the service of Sir William Cecil. His earliest literary work was
a translation of a satirical allegory, the Zodiacus Vitae of Mar-
cellus Palingenius. His original poems appear to have been written
before 1561, when he started for the continent, for they were then
left in the hands of his friend, Blundeston, who took them ‘all
togyther unpolyshed,' to the printer. Googe returned in time
to correct them and to finish one of the poems, Cupido Conquered.
The eclogues, epitaphs and sonnets (i. e. songs, for he has left no
sonnets proper) were his last original work. He died in or about
1594. His eclogues are eight in number, and are interesting,
partly because of the influence they must have exerted on Spenser,


## p. 186 (#208) ############################################

186
The New English Poetry
and partly from the manner of their treatment. Googe was an
earnest protestant; and he combines with the pastoral of the
classical idyllists some horror at their views of love, much devout
thought and considerable indignation against Bonner and his
works. His eclogues, indeed, are a curious mixture ; for, while the
talk is chiefly of love, the poet rarely fails to improve the occasion.
In eclogue II, for instance-one of the most beautiful of the set in
structure and rhythm-we have the death-song of Damoetas as he
dies for love of a cruel mistress. In eclogue iv, the ghost of
Damoetas visits Meliboeus and warns him to avoid love, which not
only makes men wretched in life but dooms them after death.
The eclogue is aimed against the pagan view both of love and
heroism. In the sixth eclogue, as elsewhere in Googe, we hear
that idleness is the root of love, a complaint which can be cured
by exercise and work. In the eighth, Cornix sums up in a
religious discourse. We have noticed in Tottels Miscellany the
evidence of a troubled time of transition in politics and social life.
The same evidence occurs in Googe. “Nobylitie begins to fade,
and Carters up do sprynge,' he cries; the chief. estate is in the
hands of Sir John Straw and Sir John Cur, who, though they
think themselves noble, are but fish which, ‘bred up in durtye
Pooles, wyll ever stynke of mudde. The fifth and sixth of the
eclogues are borrowed from the Diana of Montemayor, and,
possibly, are the first traces in English poetry of the influence
of the Spanish romances.
The pastoral, then, with Googe, is not a refuge from the life of
his times, but a means of giving vent to his thoughts about it; and
the third eclogue, from which we have quoted, goes some way
towards explaining why the revival initiated by Wyatt and Surrey
was not carried on with more fervour. As a metrist, Googe is
careless and often feeble. The metre of his eclogues is the
fourteener line; he cuts it into two on his page ; but, even so, is
not always certain how many feet it should contain. This practice
of division, when applied, as in his epitaphs, to decasyllabic lines,
results in a monotonous fall of the caesura after the second foot.
His songs are largely moral in tone, like his eclogues. Their
limited range of metre shows a lack of invention; and, though the
movement is free, we miss the genuine lyrical note which less
learned poets were then achieving.
In Turbervile, Googe's friend and fellow-worker, the school of
Wyatt and Surrey comes perilously near its nadir. George
Turbervile was born of a good Dorset family, and was educated


## p. 187 (#209) ############################################

Turbervile
187
at Winchester and New College. Later, he became secretary to
Thomas Randolph, and accompanied him on his embassy to
Russia, whence he wrote 'certain letters in verse,' which may
be found in the first volume of Hakluyt. Like Googe, he com-
posed very little original poetry, though he was an energetic
translator. Ovid's Heroical Epistles, Mantuan's Eclogues and
Mancinus's Plaine Path to Perfect Vertue were all translated by
him between 1567 and 1568, and the first had run through five
editions by 1605. That Turbervile was a man of taste is proved
by his lines to Surrey in the last of which, by the way, he scans
Earle's, as he always does, as a dissyllable); praising him because
our mother tongue by him hath got such light, As ruder speech
thereby is banished quite,' and because he puts each word in
place. The refining influence of Surrey was what Turbervile
admired and attempted, with some success, to carry on in his
Epitaphs, Epigrams, Songs and Sonets (1567), his only volume of
original poetry. The praise of Surrey shows no little skill in
managing the heroic couplet with ease and point; but the in-
evitable double-six-and-fourteener had a fatal attraction for him,
and becomes in his hands little better than doggerel. The reason
was partly, no doubt, that his stock of ideas was small. He fell
back very largely on Wyatt for his matter, and, in attempting to
refine Wyatt, he waters him down sadly. Of Wyatt's eight-line
adaptation of Serafino, The furious goone, Turbervile makes
eighteen lines. Of the famous epigram about the two men, the
noose and the gold, which Plato (if he were the author of the
Greek version) wrote in two lines, Ausonius in four and Wyatt
in eight (For shamefast harm of great, and hatefull nede)
Turbervile makes twelve; Wyatt's Complaint upon Love to
Reason is imitated in 'poulter's measure' and enlarged to allow
Plato, Tullie, Plutarch, Sense and Reason herself all to speak
against Love; Turbervile's Pretie epigram of a scholer, that
having read Vergil's Aenidos, maried a curst wife, takes seven
stanzas to say what a writer in Tottel's Miscellany, whom Warton
is inclined to believe to be Sir Thomas More, had said in two; and
instances could be multiplied. Turbervile's satire addressed To
the Rayling Rout of Sycophants (by which he means critics)
throws an interesting side-light on the literary activity of the age ;
at least one of his poems, The green that you would wish me
wear, is deservedly well known for its beauty and spirit, while
his Lover is a good example of an airy and delicate use of very
short lines which Googe never accomplished.
Thomas Howell, the author of The Arbor of Amitie (1568)
a


## p. 188 (#210) ############################################

188 The New English Poetry
Newe Sonets, and pretie Pamphlets (1568) and the better known
Devises (1581), is a poet of greater variety than either Googe or
Turbervile. Two points of detail should secure his memory from
oblivion: first, that his Devises contains a poem beginning Goe
learned booke, and unto Pallas sing, believed to contain the
earliest extant reference in literature to Sidney's Arcadia, which
Howell must have seen in manuscript; and, next, that A Dreame,
in the same volume, is written in the fourteen-lined stanza, possibly
of Scots origin, which was used, later, by Montgomerie and is best
known through The Jolly Beggars of Burns. For the rest, Howell,
of whose life little is known beyond that he was born possibly at
Dunster in Somerset, educated possibly at Oxford, and was certainly
gentleman-retainer in the related families of the earls of Pembroke
and of Shrewsbury, was a close student of Tottel 8 Miscellany and
reproduced, in all sincerity, but with no spark of genius, the
thoughts and the characteristics of the school of Wyatt and Surrey.
He knew his Petrarch, and he knew his Chaucer; and he devoted
himself to repeating in the approved style of the time the approved
truths about the sorrows of love, the uncertainty of fortune and the
briefness of life. To Howell, as to his contemporaries, the fourteen-
syllabled line offered irresistible attractions; but he wins interest
by the variety of metres he attempts, and by giving, perhaps, a
foretaste of the flexibility which was shortly to constitute one of
the greatest charms of lyrical poetry.
Of Humfrey Gifford, whose Posie of Gilloflowers was published
in 1580, and of Matthew Grove, whose Historie of Pelops and
Hippodamia with the Epigrams, songes and sonnettes that follow
it, was published in 1587, little need be said. Gifford, who was
a friend of the Stafford family, was a translator from the French
and Italian and a versifier of small merit, who writes, mainly, in
decasyllabic lines, but employs, also, the popular fourteeners. He
is not above riddles, anagrams and so forth. One of his poems,
however, entitled For Souldiers, is a brave and spirited piece in a
complicated but easy-moving, swinging metre; and the prose
epistle to the reader may be mentioned as containing a sentence
which, possibly, suggested to Shakespeare lago's speech in Othello
(III, 3): 'Who steals my purse, steals trash,' etc. Of Matthew
Grove, even his publisher knew practically nothing. Unless his
poems, too, were published (as was probably the case) some time
after they were written, his was a belated voice singing on the eve
of the Armada much as men had sung under Henry VIII, and as
if Sidney and Spenser had never been.
To return now to the miscellanies. The earliest to follow


## p. 189 (#211) ############################################

Miscellanies
189
.
Tottels Miscellany was The Paradyse of Daynty Devises (1576)
devised and written for the most part' by Richard Edwards
but not, apparently, published till ten years after his death.
Edwards was master of the children of the queen's chapel, and
is best known not by his lyrics, but by his plays. He was a poet,
however, of no small merit, and of his own poems in this volume
one, at least, rises to a high level : In going to my naked bed,
with its refrain on amantium irae, “The falling out of faithful
friends renewing is of love. ' The tone of the collection (which
opens with a translation from St Bernard) is, on the whole, very
serious and didactic; the motives of love and honour that had
inspired Wyatt and Surrey have dropped out of use, and in their
place we find but few signs of any joy in life. The pleasant woes
of the lover have given place to apprehensions of the shortness and
vanity of life and the need of preparing for death and judgment,
themes familiar to the poets of two centuries earlier. The contri-
butors to the volume, in its first (1576) and second (1578) editions,
number, in all, twenty-three, with two anonymous poems. The
author who signs himself 'My luke is losse' is an ingenious con-
triver of metrical patterns and repetitions, though a monotonous
poet; William Hunnis, Edwards's successor in office and, like
him, a dramatist, is over-ingenious, too, but one of the best of the
company; among the others are Jasper Heywood, the translator
of Seneca; M. Yloop (? Pooly); Richard Edwards himself; Thomas
lord Vaux (see above); Francis Kinwelmersh, a writer of sincere
religious poems, whose contributions include a delightful song by
A Vertuous Gentlewoman in the praise of her love and his carol
From Virgin's wombe, which was deservedly popular with the
musicians; W. R. , who, possibly, is Ralegh, though the attribution
of the single poem signed with these initials was changed in the
second edition; Richard Hill; D. S.