Parliament
took sfeps r'?
Arthur Schlesinger - Colonial Merchants and the American Revolution
Y.
Journ.
, Aug.
30.
*Bos. Chron. , June 11, 1770; 5 M. H. S. Colls. , vol. ix, pp. 43o-431-
In face of this universally accepted evidence, however, it should be
noted that the statistics in Macpherson's Annals of Commerce do not
disclose any abnormal increase in English exportations to Russia,
Holland or Germany.
4 Writings (Smyth), vol. v, p. 252.
'Bos. Chron. , Jan. 8, 1770; also N. Y. Journ. , Jan. 18.
? N. Y. Gas. & Merc. , Sept. 3, 1770.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? NON-IMPORTATION 239
the new trade with northern Europe. At the instigation
of the colonial agents, the merchants in American trade at
Bristol and London finally petitioned Parliament in Janu-
ary and February, 1770, for a total repeal of the Towns-
hend duties. 1 The manufacturing towns absolutely refused
to movp! and thus the rqemnrials lacked the solid business
support whirh had hrrn {Hran tn t^"* ^"TTIrlpd for the repeal
nf thr Stnmr1 Art The petition of the London merchants
furnished merely the occasion, not the cause, for Lord
North's motion to repeal all the Townshend duties save
the tea tax. The ministry had announced its intention as
early as 1769 so to proceed; and Lord North's motion was
based on the claim that the Townshend law, the product of
a former m^j^try wag "prppostprn1fc" in so farj^s jt im-
posed taxes nn British rr^a/nu>fa<c{ures. 2 He did not deny
that "dangerous combinations" had been formed beyond
the Atlantic and that the British merchants with American
connections were discontented; but it was clear that the
former consideration made him reluctant to make any con-
cessions at all, while the force of the latter was minimized by
the practical certainty that the non-importation agreements
could not continue much longer. In conclusion, then, it
would appear that the effects of American trade coercion
were off-set by a fortuitous expansion of British commerce;
and that the partial repeal was produced by a desire to
correct a law, passed by a former ministry and based upon
a principle injurious to British commercial interests.
lVa. Mag. , vol. xii, p. 164; Pa. Gas. , Apr. 26, 1770.
* Parliamentary History, vol. xvi, pp. 853-855; 5 M. H. S. Colls. , vol.
ix, pp. 421-422.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? CHAPTER VI
COLONIAL PROSPERITY AND A NEW PERIL (1770-1773)
THE three years that followed the breakdown of the
great mercantile combination were, for the most part, years
of material prosperity and political calm. In the earlier
years the merchants of the commercial provinces had been
the backbone of the demand for a restricted parliamentary
control; but in the period following the autumn of 1770
tV|o on^r,no^rvf ffr<<>> ^piTlrTT' fll j"*"""^ \\\\A tin radicals
was broken. The merchants were dominated by a desire to
prevent any further strengthening of non-mercantile power
in provincial politics and by a substantial satisfaction in the
concessions that Parliament had made. The influence of
yras fhrnwp jfl
well enoughalone; "and the return of better times_seemed
anjfraf utnbTe argument in favor of this position. Happy it
would have been for the merchant class and for the stability
of the British empire if the merchants had not been induced
to depart from this position during a few critical weeks in
the fall of 1773!
so sensible of their darflTM-J froTM P<<'"*" rand tnm11ltr11 thit
they will not rashly heinducetj tp e,ptfT *"*n
promote disorder for thn fntnrg,
due subordination t"_2pfffi
Even Thomas Cushing, who as speaker of the Massachusetts
House of Representatives had been a leading spokesman for
1 N. Y. Col. Docs. , vol . viii, p. 217.
240
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? COLONIAL PROSPERITY
241
radical colonial demands and who as a merchant continued
somewhat restive under the existing trade regulations, pre-
ferred that "high points about the supreme authority of
Parliament" should "fall asleep" lest there be "great
danger of bringing on a rupture fatal to both countries. " 1
John Adams wrote in his diary at this time that he had
learned wisdom from his experience in f1ghting in behalf
of the people's rights: "I shall certainly become more re-
tired and cautious. I shall certainly mind my own farm
and my own office. "2 As "Chronus" expressed it, the
public had become impatient with the "group of gloomy
mortals" who prated unceasingly of tyranny. He noted
that justice was duly administered by " learned and judicious
men who have estates and property of their own and who
are therefore likely to be as tenacious of the public rights
and liberties as any other person can be; " that shops were
filled with merchandise, business thriving; that ships were
plying a brisk trade abroad and farmers were busily cultivat-
ing their own lands. Were such men slaves groaning from
lack of liberty? he queried; and he reminded his readers
of the evils resulting in the past from following " officious
Patriots," men who " have nothing to lose, but when public
rule and order are broken in upon and all things are thrown
into confusion, they may be gainers. " *
After six years of almost continuous agitation and bad
business conditions, the merchants turned, with a sense of
profound relief, to the pleasant task of wooing the profits
of commerce. Conditions generally were favorable to the
pursuit of this beguiling occupation. The non-importation
had caused a net balance of trade in favor of the com-
1 4 M. H. S. Colls. , vol. iv, p. 360.
1 Works (Adams, C. R), vol. ii, p. 260.
? Mass. Gos. & Post-Boy, Jan. 6, 1772.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 242
THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763. 1776
mercial provinces; and for the first time in memory, gold
was imported from England in the course of commerce.
-The great demand for corn in France, Spain and Italy,
had enabled the American
merchants to pay off their standing debts in England: and,
due to tne non-importation, they had orderedtheir balance
to~Ee transm1tted to them in bullion instead of in the form
oi merchand1se. 1 It_v75S~W1Tn~gfeat elation that a Phila-
delph1a newspaper announced that the brig Dolphin had
brought to Philadelphia ? 6000 sterling in specie from Lon-
don, and a little later, that two vessels had arrived with
? 10,000 more, "this being some of the golden fruits of
the Non-Importation. . . " * The same thing went on at
other ports. *
With so much inactive capital on hand, the re-opening
of trade in the last months of 1770 caused the colonial
merchants to invest in great quantities of British wares.
English houses met them more than half way with liberal
extensions of credit in order to regain the American market.
In such centres as New England and Pennsylvania, British
importations increased three- to fivefold. "Commerce never
was in a more flourishing state. " 4 In fact, business was
experiencing too rapid a recovery from depression; the mer-
chants became greatly overstocked, and in the course of the
next year or so, competition at times caused goods to sell
lower than the first cost and charges. 8 Meantime, however,
1 Mass. Gas. & Post-Boy, Sept . 24, 1770; Mass. Spy, Oct. 30; London.
Chron. , Nov. 8; Parliamentary History, vol. xvi, p. 861.
1 Pa. Journ. , Aug. 30, Nov. 1, 1770.
'S. C. Gas. , Nov. 22, 1771; Am. Hist. Rev. , vol. viii, p. 320.
* Hutchinson, Mass. Bay, vol. iii, p. 350.
? Collins, Letter-Book 1761-1773, Dec. 6, 1771; Feb. 28, Oct. 8, 1772;
Mch. 23, Apr. 28, Aug. 3, 1773; Brown, John Hancock His Book, p. 175;.
"A Merchant" in MOM. Sfy, Jan. 9, 1772.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? COLONIAL PROSPERITY 243
the merchants felt they were enjoying a deserved feast after
a long and trying fast.
, The newspaper advertising indicated that colonial agricul-
I tural products and certain varieties of domestic manufac-
tures were enjoying a wider sale than ever before. The
1 Bostonian and New Yorker could expect to find in the local
? shops Pennsylvania flour and iron, "Choice Philadelphia
\Beer," potash kettles cast at Salisbury, Conn. , Rhode Island
1cheese, Virginia tobacco, and Carolina pitch, indigo and
pee. The first volume of Blackstone was reprinted at
Boston for two dollars although the price of the British
edition way three times as great. Lynn shoes for women,.
New England cod-fish hooks, Milton paper and Boston-
, made sails had an established clientele. Philadelphia news-
papers advertised locally-made watches, bar steel, pot and
pearlashes. Governor Franklin of New Jersey transmitted
to the home government the report that, during the non-
j importation struggle, a new slitting mill had been erected in
( Morris County, so contrived as to be an appendage to a
grist mill and in such a manner as to evade the parliamentary
prohibition. 1
The general satisfaction of the merchants was not dis-
turbed by the vestiges of the old restrictive and revenue
measures which still remained on the statute book. Even
complaints against the absence of a circulating medium
ceased, until the resumption of commercial relations with
Great Britain again drained off the gold supply; and in May,
1771.
Parliament took sfeps r'? > ^mr|j^ta the condition of
currency stringency that had been potentially present since
^ tender in 1764. This act provided
that paper, issued by the colonies as security to their public
1 1 N. J. Arch. , vol. x, p.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 244
THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
creditors, might be made, by the colonial assemblies, a legal
tender for the payment of provincial duties and taxes. 1
yThe conduct of the merchants and their customers toward
the importation and use of duty-laden tea during this period
throws considerable light upon their philosophical attitude
toward those " high points about the supremacy of Parlia-
ment" vvhich, according to Cushing, should best "fall
asleep. "J Outside of the ports of New York and Philadel-
phia, the tea duty was universally acquiesced in, notwith-
standing the widespread resolutions of boycott that had been
adopted against customed articles in 1770. No efforts what-
soever were made to enforce the non-importation in these
provinces, so far as the newspapers recorded;2 and the
popular apathy failed to provoke criticism or protest. Even
the arch-radical, John Adams, could confide to his diary,
on February 14, 1771, that he had " dined at Mr. Hancock's
with the members, Warren, Church, Cooper, &c. and Mr.
Harrison, and spent the whole afternoon, and drank green
tea, from Holland, I hope, but don't know. " 8
When in the autumn months of 1773 public sentiment
underwent an abrupt and radical change for reasons that
will be discussed later, further light was thrown on the state
of public mind that had existed prior to that time. Thus,
in August, 1774, Robert Findlay was adjudged by the
Charles County, Md. , Committee to have " fully and satis-
factorily exculpated himself of any intention to counteract
the resolutions of America" because he showed that his
113 George III, c. 57. Vide also Macpherson, Annals of Com. , vol.
iii, p. 53&
1 The single recorded instance in any of the thirteen provinces was
the case of John Turner, a New York shopkeeper, who was detected in
the act of selling some dutied tea about six weeks after the New York
agreement had been adopted. N. Y. Gas. & Merc. , Aug. 20, 1770.
? Works (Adams, C. F. ), vol. ii, p. 255.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? COLONIAL PROSPERITY 245
orders for dutied tea had been sent in the fall of 1773. *
Likewise T. C. Williams & Company of Annapolis issued a
statement in October, 1774, with reference to the tea con-
signed to them in the Peggy Stewart, in which they declared:
When we ordered this tea [in May, 1774], we did nothing more
than our neighbours; for it is well known that most merchants,
both here and in Baltimore, that ordered fall goods, ordered
tea as usual; and to our certain knowledge, in the months of
April, May and June last, near thirty chests were imported into
this city by different merchants, and the duties paid without
the least opposition. . . . We therefore think it hard, nay cruel
usage, that our characters should be thus blasted for only doing
what most people in this province that are concerned in trade,
have likewise done. 2
At Charleston, S. C. , the importation of dutied tea had
also been carried on during the years 1771-1773 with ab-
solutely no attempt at concealment. 8 At the public meeting,
held in December, 1773, upon the arrival of the East India
Company's ship, it was strongly argued that " Tea had ever
been spontaneously imported and the Duty paid; that every
subject had an equal right to send that article from the
Mother Country into their Province, and therefore it was
unreasonable to exclude the Hon. East India Company from
the same privilege. " * Indeed, while the people were still
in session, some dutied teas on board the tea-ship, not owned
by the East India Company, were landed and carted past the
meeting-place to the stores of private merchants! 5
1 Md. Gas. , Aug. 11, 1774; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 703-704.
1 Md. Gas. , Oct. 27, 1774-
1 S. C. Gas. , Nov. 29, Dec. 6, 20, 1773.
*N. Y. Gasetteer, Dec. 23, 1773.
? Drayton, J. , Memoirs of the American Revolution (Charleston,
1821), vol. i, p. 98.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 246 THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
This contemporary evidence x is abundantly supported by
the official figures of the British government on the tea
importations into the colonies. 2 At Boston . a total of
,173 077 pounds of dutied tea was imported from December
j, 1770 to January fi, 1773 without art1culate protest from
the r^difaljO "Three hundred whole and fifty-five half
Chests came in Vessels belonging to Mr. John Hancock the
Patriot," stated the comptroller of customs at Boston in a
letter of September 29, 1773, to John Pownall, under-secre-
tary of state in the colonial department. 4 In the other
importing provinces, the amount of dutied tea received from
December 1, 1770 to January 5, 1773 was less in quantity
but probably about equal in proportion to their normal
volume of trade. At Rhode Island, the quantity of dutied
tea entered was 20,833 pounds; at Patuxent, Md. , 33,304
pounds; at the several Virginia ports, 79,527 pounds; at
Charleston, S. C. , 48,540 pounds; and at Savannah, 12,931
pounds, ^hr totfll f Or ,fl
Vr>r1f ami Pwinsvlvjmifr was g8o. 8? T jv^pHs on which the
duty was paid without arousing comment.
W<>w York null . Pluk1dfiiLiliii--were the only naTt,g of
BriHlh Aimrina where thg people faithfullv observed the
1 For further confirmatory evidence, vide, in the case of Massachu-
setts, Mass. Gas. & Post-Boy, Dec. 6, 1773; for Maryland, Md. Gas. ,
Aug. 18, 1774; for Georgia, Ga. Gas. , July 27, 1774. Cf. Meredith's
statement in House of Commons, 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1624-1625.
ViKbstract prepared in the office of the inspector of imports and ex-
ports; quoted by Channing, History of U. S. , vol. iii, p. 128 n.
1"Q" in the Bos. Eve. Post, Nov. 15, 1773, declared that 173 different
merchants were concerned in this importation; but a letter from Boston
in the Pa. Packet, Dec. 13, 1773, claimed' that the number of importers
had been confounded with the number of importations.
4Letter of Benjamin Hallowell; Stevens, Facsimiles, vol. xxiv, no.
2029, p. 5. A chest contained 340 pounds. Vide also John Adams's
Works, vol. ii, p. 381.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? COLONIAL PROSPERITY 247
boycott against dutied tea. 1 These places were the chief
centers for tea-smuggling in America. Unembarrassed by
the presence of the Customs Board, the enterprising mer-
chants of these ports drove a brisk trade with Holland,
Sweden and Germany and with the Dutch island of St.
Eustatius for contraband tea, powder and other supplies but
particularly for the forbidden tea. 2 Lieutenant Governor
Colden ancj Lord Dartmouth exchanged views on the sub-
ject, agreeing in the sentiment that the illicit trade between
New York and Holland prevailed "to an enormous de-
gree. "' "It is well known," wrote Samuel Seabury in
1774, " that little or no tea has been entered at the Customs
House for several years. All that is imported is smuggled
from Holland, and the Dutch Islands in the West Indies. " *
Gilbert Barkly, a Philadelphia merchant of sixteen years'
standing, wrote in May, 1773, of the extensive smuggling
of tea "from Holland, France, Sweden, Lisbon &c, St.
Eustatia, in the West Indies &c. " 5 Smuggling " has amaz-
ingly encreased within these twenty years past," asserted
"A Tradesman of Philadelphia. " * Hutchinson informed
the home government that "in New York they import
scarce any other than Dutch teas. In Rhode Island and
Pennsylvania, it is little better. " T Since smuggled tea was
1 Contemporaries realized this. E. g. , vide "A Tradesman of Phila-
delphia" in Pa. Journ. , Aug. 17, 1774.
1Letters of Hutchinson in Mass. Arch. , vol. xxvii, p. 317; Bos. Gas. ,
Nov. 27, Dec. 4, 1775; N. Engl. Chron. , July 29.
? N. Y. Col. Docs. , vol. viii, pp. 487, 510-512.
4 Free Thoughts on the Proceedings of the Continental Congress . . .
By a Farmer (1774). Also vide Becker, N. Y. Parties, 1760-1776, p. 84,
n. 158.
*Bos. Chron. , June 11, 1770; 5 M. H. S. Colls. , vol. ix, pp. 43o-431-
In face of this universally accepted evidence, however, it should be
noted that the statistics in Macpherson's Annals of Commerce do not
disclose any abnormal increase in English exportations to Russia,
Holland or Germany.
4 Writings (Smyth), vol. v, p. 252.
'Bos. Chron. , Jan. 8, 1770; also N. Y. Journ. , Jan. 18.
? N. Y. Gas. & Merc. , Sept. 3, 1770.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? NON-IMPORTATION 239
the new trade with northern Europe. At the instigation
of the colonial agents, the merchants in American trade at
Bristol and London finally petitioned Parliament in Janu-
ary and February, 1770, for a total repeal of the Towns-
hend duties. 1 The manufacturing towns absolutely refused
to movp! and thus the rqemnrials lacked the solid business
support whirh had hrrn {Hran tn t^"* ^"TTIrlpd for the repeal
nf thr Stnmr1 Art The petition of the London merchants
furnished merely the occasion, not the cause, for Lord
North's motion to repeal all the Townshend duties save
the tea tax. The ministry had announced its intention as
early as 1769 so to proceed; and Lord North's motion was
based on the claim that the Townshend law, the product of
a former m^j^try wag "prppostprn1fc" in so farj^s jt im-
posed taxes nn British rr^a/nu>fa<c{ures. 2 He did not deny
that "dangerous combinations" had been formed beyond
the Atlantic and that the British merchants with American
connections were discontented; but it was clear that the
former consideration made him reluctant to make any con-
cessions at all, while the force of the latter was minimized by
the practical certainty that the non-importation agreements
could not continue much longer. In conclusion, then, it
would appear that the effects of American trade coercion
were off-set by a fortuitous expansion of British commerce;
and that the partial repeal was produced by a desire to
correct a law, passed by a former ministry and based upon
a principle injurious to British commercial interests.
lVa. Mag. , vol. xii, p. 164; Pa. Gas. , Apr. 26, 1770.
* Parliamentary History, vol. xvi, pp. 853-855; 5 M. H. S. Colls. , vol.
ix, pp. 421-422.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? CHAPTER VI
COLONIAL PROSPERITY AND A NEW PERIL (1770-1773)
THE three years that followed the breakdown of the
great mercantile combination were, for the most part, years
of material prosperity and political calm. In the earlier
years the merchants of the commercial provinces had been
the backbone of the demand for a restricted parliamentary
control; but in the period following the autumn of 1770
tV|o on^r,no^rvf ffr<<>> ^piTlrTT' fll j"*"""^ \\\\A tin radicals
was broken. The merchants were dominated by a desire to
prevent any further strengthening of non-mercantile power
in provincial politics and by a substantial satisfaction in the
concessions that Parliament had made. The influence of
yras fhrnwp jfl
well enoughalone; "and the return of better times_seemed
anjfraf utnbTe argument in favor of this position. Happy it
would have been for the merchant class and for the stability
of the British empire if the merchants had not been induced
to depart from this position during a few critical weeks in
the fall of 1773!
so sensible of their darflTM-J froTM P<<'"*" rand tnm11ltr11 thit
they will not rashly heinducetj tp e,ptfT *"*n
promote disorder for thn fntnrg,
due subordination t"_2pfffi
Even Thomas Cushing, who as speaker of the Massachusetts
House of Representatives had been a leading spokesman for
1 N. Y. Col. Docs. , vol . viii, p. 217.
240
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? COLONIAL PROSPERITY
241
radical colonial demands and who as a merchant continued
somewhat restive under the existing trade regulations, pre-
ferred that "high points about the supreme authority of
Parliament" should "fall asleep" lest there be "great
danger of bringing on a rupture fatal to both countries. " 1
John Adams wrote in his diary at this time that he had
learned wisdom from his experience in f1ghting in behalf
of the people's rights: "I shall certainly become more re-
tired and cautious. I shall certainly mind my own farm
and my own office. "2 As "Chronus" expressed it, the
public had become impatient with the "group of gloomy
mortals" who prated unceasingly of tyranny. He noted
that justice was duly administered by " learned and judicious
men who have estates and property of their own and who
are therefore likely to be as tenacious of the public rights
and liberties as any other person can be; " that shops were
filled with merchandise, business thriving; that ships were
plying a brisk trade abroad and farmers were busily cultivat-
ing their own lands. Were such men slaves groaning from
lack of liberty? he queried; and he reminded his readers
of the evils resulting in the past from following " officious
Patriots," men who " have nothing to lose, but when public
rule and order are broken in upon and all things are thrown
into confusion, they may be gainers. " *
After six years of almost continuous agitation and bad
business conditions, the merchants turned, with a sense of
profound relief, to the pleasant task of wooing the profits
of commerce. Conditions generally were favorable to the
pursuit of this beguiling occupation. The non-importation
had caused a net balance of trade in favor of the com-
1 4 M. H. S. Colls. , vol. iv, p. 360.
1 Works (Adams, C. R), vol. ii, p. 260.
? Mass. Gos. & Post-Boy, Jan. 6, 1772.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 242
THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763. 1776
mercial provinces; and for the first time in memory, gold
was imported from England in the course of commerce.
-The great demand for corn in France, Spain and Italy,
had enabled the American
merchants to pay off their standing debts in England: and,
due to tne non-importation, they had orderedtheir balance
to~Ee transm1tted to them in bullion instead of in the form
oi merchand1se. 1 It_v75S~W1Tn~gfeat elation that a Phila-
delph1a newspaper announced that the brig Dolphin had
brought to Philadelphia ? 6000 sterling in specie from Lon-
don, and a little later, that two vessels had arrived with
? 10,000 more, "this being some of the golden fruits of
the Non-Importation. . . " * The same thing went on at
other ports. *
With so much inactive capital on hand, the re-opening
of trade in the last months of 1770 caused the colonial
merchants to invest in great quantities of British wares.
English houses met them more than half way with liberal
extensions of credit in order to regain the American market.
In such centres as New England and Pennsylvania, British
importations increased three- to fivefold. "Commerce never
was in a more flourishing state. " 4 In fact, business was
experiencing too rapid a recovery from depression; the mer-
chants became greatly overstocked, and in the course of the
next year or so, competition at times caused goods to sell
lower than the first cost and charges. 8 Meantime, however,
1 Mass. Gas. & Post-Boy, Sept . 24, 1770; Mass. Spy, Oct. 30; London.
Chron. , Nov. 8; Parliamentary History, vol. xvi, p. 861.
1 Pa. Journ. , Aug. 30, Nov. 1, 1770.
'S. C. Gas. , Nov. 22, 1771; Am. Hist. Rev. , vol. viii, p. 320.
* Hutchinson, Mass. Bay, vol. iii, p. 350.
? Collins, Letter-Book 1761-1773, Dec. 6, 1771; Feb. 28, Oct. 8, 1772;
Mch. 23, Apr. 28, Aug. 3, 1773; Brown, John Hancock His Book, p. 175;.
"A Merchant" in MOM. Sfy, Jan. 9, 1772.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? COLONIAL PROSPERITY 243
the merchants felt they were enjoying a deserved feast after
a long and trying fast.
, The newspaper advertising indicated that colonial agricul-
I tural products and certain varieties of domestic manufac-
tures were enjoying a wider sale than ever before. The
1 Bostonian and New Yorker could expect to find in the local
? shops Pennsylvania flour and iron, "Choice Philadelphia
\Beer," potash kettles cast at Salisbury, Conn. , Rhode Island
1cheese, Virginia tobacco, and Carolina pitch, indigo and
pee. The first volume of Blackstone was reprinted at
Boston for two dollars although the price of the British
edition way three times as great. Lynn shoes for women,.
New England cod-fish hooks, Milton paper and Boston-
, made sails had an established clientele. Philadelphia news-
papers advertised locally-made watches, bar steel, pot and
pearlashes. Governor Franklin of New Jersey transmitted
to the home government the report that, during the non-
j importation struggle, a new slitting mill had been erected in
( Morris County, so contrived as to be an appendage to a
grist mill and in such a manner as to evade the parliamentary
prohibition. 1
The general satisfaction of the merchants was not dis-
turbed by the vestiges of the old restrictive and revenue
measures which still remained on the statute book. Even
complaints against the absence of a circulating medium
ceased, until the resumption of commercial relations with
Great Britain again drained off the gold supply; and in May,
1771.
Parliament took sfeps r'? > ^mr|j^ta the condition of
currency stringency that had been potentially present since
^ tender in 1764. This act provided
that paper, issued by the colonies as security to their public
1 1 N. J. Arch. , vol. x, p.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 244
THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
creditors, might be made, by the colonial assemblies, a legal
tender for the payment of provincial duties and taxes. 1
yThe conduct of the merchants and their customers toward
the importation and use of duty-laden tea during this period
throws considerable light upon their philosophical attitude
toward those " high points about the supremacy of Parlia-
ment" vvhich, according to Cushing, should best "fall
asleep. "J Outside of the ports of New York and Philadel-
phia, the tea duty was universally acquiesced in, notwith-
standing the widespread resolutions of boycott that had been
adopted against customed articles in 1770. No efforts what-
soever were made to enforce the non-importation in these
provinces, so far as the newspapers recorded;2 and the
popular apathy failed to provoke criticism or protest. Even
the arch-radical, John Adams, could confide to his diary,
on February 14, 1771, that he had " dined at Mr. Hancock's
with the members, Warren, Church, Cooper, &c. and Mr.
Harrison, and spent the whole afternoon, and drank green
tea, from Holland, I hope, but don't know. " 8
When in the autumn months of 1773 public sentiment
underwent an abrupt and radical change for reasons that
will be discussed later, further light was thrown on the state
of public mind that had existed prior to that time. Thus,
in August, 1774, Robert Findlay was adjudged by the
Charles County, Md. , Committee to have " fully and satis-
factorily exculpated himself of any intention to counteract
the resolutions of America" because he showed that his
113 George III, c. 57. Vide also Macpherson, Annals of Com. , vol.
iii, p. 53&
1 The single recorded instance in any of the thirteen provinces was
the case of John Turner, a New York shopkeeper, who was detected in
the act of selling some dutied tea about six weeks after the New York
agreement had been adopted. N. Y. Gas. & Merc. , Aug. 20, 1770.
? Works (Adams, C. F. ), vol. ii, p. 255.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? COLONIAL PROSPERITY 245
orders for dutied tea had been sent in the fall of 1773. *
Likewise T. C. Williams & Company of Annapolis issued a
statement in October, 1774, with reference to the tea con-
signed to them in the Peggy Stewart, in which they declared:
When we ordered this tea [in May, 1774], we did nothing more
than our neighbours; for it is well known that most merchants,
both here and in Baltimore, that ordered fall goods, ordered
tea as usual; and to our certain knowledge, in the months of
April, May and June last, near thirty chests were imported into
this city by different merchants, and the duties paid without
the least opposition. . . . We therefore think it hard, nay cruel
usage, that our characters should be thus blasted for only doing
what most people in this province that are concerned in trade,
have likewise done. 2
At Charleston, S. C. , the importation of dutied tea had
also been carried on during the years 1771-1773 with ab-
solutely no attempt at concealment. 8 At the public meeting,
held in December, 1773, upon the arrival of the East India
Company's ship, it was strongly argued that " Tea had ever
been spontaneously imported and the Duty paid; that every
subject had an equal right to send that article from the
Mother Country into their Province, and therefore it was
unreasonable to exclude the Hon. East India Company from
the same privilege. " * Indeed, while the people were still
in session, some dutied teas on board the tea-ship, not owned
by the East India Company, were landed and carted past the
meeting-place to the stores of private merchants! 5
1 Md. Gas. , Aug. 11, 1774; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 703-704.
1 Md. Gas. , Oct. 27, 1774-
1 S. C. Gas. , Nov. 29, Dec. 6, 20, 1773.
*N. Y. Gasetteer, Dec. 23, 1773.
? Drayton, J. , Memoirs of the American Revolution (Charleston,
1821), vol. i, p. 98.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 246 THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
This contemporary evidence x is abundantly supported by
the official figures of the British government on the tea
importations into the colonies. 2 At Boston . a total of
,173 077 pounds of dutied tea was imported from December
j, 1770 to January fi, 1773 without art1culate protest from
the r^difaljO "Three hundred whole and fifty-five half
Chests came in Vessels belonging to Mr. John Hancock the
Patriot," stated the comptroller of customs at Boston in a
letter of September 29, 1773, to John Pownall, under-secre-
tary of state in the colonial department. 4 In the other
importing provinces, the amount of dutied tea received from
December 1, 1770 to January 5, 1773 was less in quantity
but probably about equal in proportion to their normal
volume of trade. At Rhode Island, the quantity of dutied
tea entered was 20,833 pounds; at Patuxent, Md. , 33,304
pounds; at the several Virginia ports, 79,527 pounds; at
Charleston, S. C. , 48,540 pounds; and at Savannah, 12,931
pounds, ^hr totfll f Or ,fl
Vr>r1f ami Pwinsvlvjmifr was g8o. 8? T jv^pHs on which the
duty was paid without arousing comment.
W<>w York null . Pluk1dfiiLiliii--were the only naTt,g of
BriHlh Aimrina where thg people faithfullv observed the
1 For further confirmatory evidence, vide, in the case of Massachu-
setts, Mass. Gas. & Post-Boy, Dec. 6, 1773; for Maryland, Md. Gas. ,
Aug. 18, 1774; for Georgia, Ga. Gas. , July 27, 1774. Cf. Meredith's
statement in House of Commons, 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1624-1625.
ViKbstract prepared in the office of the inspector of imports and ex-
ports; quoted by Channing, History of U. S. , vol. iii, p. 128 n.
1"Q" in the Bos. Eve. Post, Nov. 15, 1773, declared that 173 different
merchants were concerned in this importation; but a letter from Boston
in the Pa. Packet, Dec. 13, 1773, claimed' that the number of importers
had been confounded with the number of importations.
4Letter of Benjamin Hallowell; Stevens, Facsimiles, vol. xxiv, no.
2029, p. 5. A chest contained 340 pounds. Vide also John Adams's
Works, vol. ii, p. 381.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:36 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? COLONIAL PROSPERITY 247
boycott against dutied tea. 1 These places were the chief
centers for tea-smuggling in America. Unembarrassed by
the presence of the Customs Board, the enterprising mer-
chants of these ports drove a brisk trade with Holland,
Sweden and Germany and with the Dutch island of St.
Eustatius for contraband tea, powder and other supplies but
particularly for the forbidden tea. 2 Lieutenant Governor
Colden ancj Lord Dartmouth exchanged views on the sub-
ject, agreeing in the sentiment that the illicit trade between
New York and Holland prevailed "to an enormous de-
gree. "' "It is well known," wrote Samuel Seabury in
1774, " that little or no tea has been entered at the Customs
House for several years. All that is imported is smuggled
from Holland, and the Dutch Islands in the West Indies. " *
Gilbert Barkly, a Philadelphia merchant of sixteen years'
standing, wrote in May, 1773, of the extensive smuggling
of tea "from Holland, France, Sweden, Lisbon &c, St.
Eustatia, in the West Indies &c. " 5 Smuggling " has amaz-
ingly encreased within these twenty years past," asserted
"A Tradesman of Philadelphia. " * Hutchinson informed
the home government that "in New York they import
scarce any other than Dutch teas. In Rhode Island and
Pennsylvania, it is little better. " T Since smuggled tea was
1 Contemporaries realized this. E. g. , vide "A Tradesman of Phila-
delphia" in Pa. Journ. , Aug. 17, 1774.
1Letters of Hutchinson in Mass. Arch. , vol. xxvii, p. 317; Bos. Gas. ,
Nov. 27, Dec. 4, 1775; N. Engl. Chron. , July 29.
? N. Y. Col. Docs. , vol. viii, pp. 487, 510-512.
4 Free Thoughts on the Proceedings of the Continental Congress . . .
By a Farmer (1774). Also vide Becker, N. Y. Parties, 1760-1776, p. 84,
n. 158.
