The
spuriousness
of the Philopatris has
defence is the difference between a public and been already shown.
defence is the difference between a public and been already shown.
William Smith - 1844 - Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities - b
The sub- discovers Truth among her retinue, the allegorical
ject is a dispute at Athens between Timocles, a description of which personage is very good. Lu-
Stoic, and Damis, an Epicurean, respecting the cian, indeed, excels in that kind of writing. The
being of the gods. Anxious as to its result, Zeus philosophers now open their case against him. He
summons all the deities to hear the arguments is charged with taking Dialogue out of their hands,
Hermes first calls the golden ones, then the and with persuading Menippus to side with him,
silver, and so forth ; not according to the beauty the only philosopher who does not appear among
of their workmanship, but the ricliness of their his accusers. This may afford another answer to
materials. On meeting, a squabble takes place those who would make Lucian an Epicurean.
about precedence, which is with some difficulty Under the name of Parrhesiades, Lucian advocates
quelled. Timocles then goes through his argui- his own cause ; and having gained it, becomes, in
ments for the existence of the gods, which Damis turn, accuser. The philosophers of the age are
refutes and ridicules. At this result, Zeus becomes summoned to the Acropolis, in the name of Virtue,
VOL. IL
36
## p. 818 (#834) ############################################
818
LUCIANUS.
LUCIANUS.
:
Philosophy, and Justice, but scarce one obeys the | uninvited, is particularly offensive in his behaviour.
call. Lucian undertakes to assemble them by In the midst of the banquet an absurd letter ar-
offering rewards. Immediately a vast concourse rives from Hetoimocles, a stoic, expostulating with
appear, quarrelling among themselves ; but when Aristaenetus, the host, for not having been invited.
they find that Philosophy herself is to be the The discussion that ensues sets all the philosophers
julge, they all run away. In his haste to escape, by the ears, and ends in a pitched battle. In
a cynic drops his wallet, which, instead of lupins, the midst of the confusion, Alcidamas upsets the
brown bread, or a book, is found to contain gold, chandelier ; and when lights are again brought,
pomatum, a sacrificing knife, a mirror, and dice. strange scenes are discovered. The cynic is making
Truth orders their lives to be inquired into by free with one of the music-women ; the stoic, Dio-
Logic, and the pretenders to be branded with the nysidorus, is endeavouring to conceal a cup under
figure of a fox or an ape. Lucian then borrows a his cloak. The similarity of this piece, and the
tishing-rod from the temple ; and having bited his 55th epistle of the third book of Alciphron, is too
hook with figs and gold, flings his line from the marked to be the result of accident. The relative
Acropolis. He draws up a great many different chronology of Alciphron and Lucian cannot be ac-
philosophers, but Plato, Chrysippus, Aristotle, &c. , curately settled (ALCIPHRON) ; but the dialogue
disown them all, and they are cast down headlong. is so much more highly wrought than the epistle,
This piece is valuable, noi only from its own merits, as to render Bergler's notion probable, that Lucian
but from containing some particulars of Lucian's was the copyist. Under this head we may also
life. 'Epuotiuos is chiefly an attack upon the notice the Nigrinus and the Parasite (Tepl Tapas
Stoics, but its design is also to show the impossi- DITUU ÝTOI ŐT. Té xvn Napariti). The Nigrinus
bility of becoming a true philosopher. The irony is has been reckoned one of Lucian's first efforts in
of a serious and Socratic turn, and the piece, though this style, and this seems borne out by a passage
carefully written, has little of Lucian's native in § 35. Wieland calls it a declaration of war
humour. From 13 it appears he was about forty against the philosophers, and thinks that it still
when he wrote it; and like the Niyrinus, it was bears traces of Lucian's rhetorical style. But
probably, therefore, one of his earliest productions though the piece may be considered as an attack
in this style. The Eůvoúxos, Eunuchus, is a ridi- on philosophic pride, its main scope is to satirise
culous dispute between two philosophic rivals for the Romans, whose pomp, vain-glory, and luxury,
the emperor's prize, the objection being that the are unfavourably contrasied with the simple habits
eunuchus is ipso fucto a disqualified person, and of the Athenians. The Parasitus is a mere piece
incapable of becoming a philosopher. From $ 12, of persifluge throughout. The dialogue is con-
it appears to have been written at Athens. The ducted like those of Socrates with the sophists,
A04Evôňs may be ranked in this class. It is a though the parasite, who may stand for the sophist,
dialogue on the love of falsehood, natural to some gets the better of the argument. The philosophical
men purely for its own sake. In § 2 Herodotus definition of parasitism in ý 9 is highly humorous,
and Ctesias are attacked as in the Verae Historiae, as well as the demonstration of its superiority to
as well as Hesiod and Honer. Poets, however, philosophy, on account of its unity and definiteness,
may be pardoned, but not whole states that adopt in which it equals arithmetic ; for two and two are
their fictions; and Lucian thinks it very hard to four with the Persians as well as the Greeks, but
be accused of impiety for disbelieving such extra- no two philosophers agree in their principles. So
vagancies. Some commentators have thought that also it is shown to be superior to philosophy, be-
the Christian miracles are alluded to in § 13 and cause no parasite ever turned philosopher, but many
§ 16 ; but this does not seem probable. The main philosophers have been parasites. The demonstra-
subject of the piece is the relation of several absurd tion of the non-existence of philosophy, sø 28, 29,
stories of ghosts, &c. , by a company of white. seems directed against Plato's Purmenides.
bearded philosophers. The Apametal, Fuyitiri, is The third and more miscellaneous class of
directed against the cynics, by whom Lucian seems Lucian's dialogues, in which the attacks upon
to have been attacked for his life of Peregrinus. mythology and philosophy are not direct but in-
In a conversation between A pollo and Zeus, the cidental, or which are mere pictures of manners,
latter asserts that he was so annoved by the stench contains some of his best. At the head must be
that ascended from the pyre, that, though he fled placed Tiuwv û pirávo, whos, Timon, which may
into Arabia, all the frankincense there could hardly perhaps be regarded as Lucian's masterpiece. The
drive it out. He is about to relate the whole story is that of the well-known Athenian mis
history to Apollo, when Philosophy rushes in, in anthrope mentioned by Plato, whose tower, Pau-
tears and trouble, and complains of the philosophers, sanias tells us (i. 30. S +), still existed in his time.
especially the cynics. She gives a history of her The introduction affords an opportunity for some
progress in India, Egypt, Chaldaea, &c. , before she sneers at Zeus. The dialogue between Plutus
reached the Greeks, and concludes with a complaint and Hermes, in which the former describes his
against the cynics. A pollo advises Jupiter to send way of proceeding with mankind, is very humorous
Miercury and Hercules to inquire into the lives of and well-sustained, though the imitation of Aris-
the cynics, and to punish the evil doers ; the tophanes is obvious. The story of Timon, which
greater part being mere vagabonds and runaway is very dramatically told, is too well known to need
slaves. Συμπόσιον ή Λαπίθαι, Convivium seu La- description here. The Νεκρικοί Διάλογοι, Diologi
pithuc, is one of Lucian's most humorous attacks on Murtuorum, are perhaps the best known of all
the philosophers. The scene is a wedding feast, at Lucian's works. The subject affords great scope
which a representative of each of the principal for moral reflection, and for satire on the vanity of
philosophic sects is present. Of all the guests these human pursuits. Wealth, power, beauty, strength,
are the only absurd and troublesome ones, the un. not forgetting the vain disputations of philosophy,
lettered portion behaving themselves with decency afford the materials ; and some cynic philosopher,
and propicity. The cynic Alcidamas, who comes Diogenes or Menippus, is generally the coinnen-
;
## p. 819 (#835) ############################################
LUCIANUS.
819
LUCIANUS.
tator. When Croesus and Menippus meet on the smallness of mankind when viewed from a philo-
banks of the Styx, it is easy to see which will sophic, as well as a physical height. Lucian seenis
have the advantage. The disappointments of those to have put his own sentiment into the mouth of
who lie in wait for the inheritance of the rich, Charon (s 16), Tayyedoia Tauta, W 'Epuſ. The
afford a fertile theme, which, however, Lucian hias Katándous Túpavvos, Cataplus sive Tyrannus, is
worn rather thread-bare. In a few of the dialogues in fact a dialogue of the dead. The persone are
it must be owned that some of the great men of Charon, Clotho, Hermes, a cynic philosopher, the
antiquity are flippantly and unjustly attacked, and tyrant Megnpenthes, the cobbler Micylius, and
especially Socrates. Among the moderns these certain rich men. The reluctance of Megapenthes
dialogues have been imitated by Fontenelle and to obey the summons of Clotho, and his ludicrous
Lord Lyttelton. The Mévintosi Nervouarteia, attempts at evasion, are happily contrasted with
Necyomanteia, bears some analogy to the Dialogues the alacrity of Micyllus. The latter being left
of the dead. Menippus relates his descent into behind on the banks of the Styx, swims after
Hades, and the sights that he sees there, par- Charon's boat, which being full, he finds a place on
ticularly the punishment of the great and powerful the shoulders of the tyrant, and does not cease
The genuineness of this piece has been doubted. tormenting him the whole way. There is consi-
Du Soul thought that it was written by Menippus derable drollery in his pretended lament for his old
himself, who, as we learn from Diogenes Laërtius lasts and slippers, when requested by Mercury to
(vi. 101), wrote a Necyomanteia, but Hemsterhuis grieve a little, just for the sake of keeping up the
discards this onjecture. It certainly wants Lucian's custom. Megapenthes' description of the indige
pungency; but arguments from style are not always nities which his household offer to his body while
safe. In the ʼlxapouévitnos Tiepvédelos, Icaro- lying in state, and which, though conscious of them,
Menippus, on the contrary, which is in Lucian's best he is powerless to resist, is very striking. "Overpos
vein, and a master-piece of Aristophanic humour, 7 'AXEKT PÚwv, Somnium seu Gallus. Here we have
Menippus, disgusted with the disputes and pre the cobbler Micyllus again, who has been dreaming
tensions of the philosophers, resolves on a visit to the that he has fallen heir to Eucrates, a nouveau riche.
stars, for the purpose of seeing how far their theories From this state of felicity he is awakened by the
are correct. By the mechanical aid of a pair of crowing of his cock, which he threatens to kill as
wings he reaches the moon, and surveys thence soon as he gets up. The cock discovers hinıself to
the miserable passions and quarrels of men. Hence be Pythagoras in one of his transmigratory states,
he proceeds to Olympus, and is introduced to the which gives occasion to some jokes at the expense
Thunderer himself
. Here he is witness of the of that philosophy. The cock then endeavours to
manner in which human prayers are received in persuade Micyllus that he is much happier than
heaven. They ascend by enormous ventholes, and the rich men whom he envies, and in order to con-
become andible when Zeus removes the covers. vince him, desires him to pluck one of the long
Strange is the variety of their tenor! Some pray feathers from his tail, which has the power of con-
to be kings, others that their onions may grow ; ferring invisibility. Micyllus, who has evidently
one sailor begs a north wind, another a south ; the a lurking spite against the bird, plucks out both his
husbandman wants rain ; the fuller, sunshine. long feathers, much to the discomfiture of Pytha-
Zeus himself is represented as a partial judge, goras, whom, however, the cobbler consoles by
and as influenced by the largeness of the rewards telling that he looks much handsomer so than he
promised to him. At the end he pronounces judg- would with only one. Being now invisible, Py-
ment against the philosophers, and threatens in thagoras and Micyllus go round to the houses of
four days to destroy them all. Then he cuts Me- several rich men, and behold their miseries and
nippus's wings, and hands him over to Hermes, vices. This piece may be reckoned among the
who carries him to earth by the ear. With a best of Lucian's. Als katnyopoúuevos, Bis Aau
malicious pleasure Menippus hastens to the Poecile satus, so called from Lucian's being arraigned by
to announce to the assembled philosophers their Rhetoric and Dialogue, is chiefly valuable for the
approaching destruction. Xápwv &TO KOTOûrtes, information it contains of the author's life and
Contemplantes, is a very elegant dialogue, but of a literary pursuits. Zeus finds fault with Homer
graver turn than the preceding. Charon visits the for calling the gods happy, when they have got so
earth to see the course of life there, and what it is much to do, and when there are still so many un-
that always makes men weep when they enter his decided causes on hand. To clear these off a court
boat. He requests Hermes to be his Cicerone. is appointed, at which Justice is to preside. The
To get a good view they pile Pelion upon Ossa ; first cause is Drunkenness versus the Academy, for
but this not being high enough, Oeta must follow, depriving him of Polemo. The plaintiff being
and then Parnassus : a passage evidently meant to naturally disqualified for pleading, the Academy
ridicule Homer. Parnassus being at top Charon undertakes both sides of the question. Next we
and Hermes seat themselves on each of the peaks. have the Porch versus Pleasure, which is defended
Then pass in review Milo the wrestler, Cyrus, by Epicurus. After two or three more causes
Croesus, and other celebrated characters. In this Lucian is accused by Rhetoric of desertion, and by
piece, as Hemsterhuis observes, our author has not Dialogue of having lowered and perverted his style.
been very scrupulous about chronology. In the We may here also mention the Kpovocónwv, Crona
interview between Croesus and Solon, Lucian Solon, and the 'ETIOtonal Kpovikal, Epistolae Sa-
follows Herodotus, but inverts the order of the turnales, which turn on the institution and customs
happy. Of all Lucian's dialogues this is perhaps of the Saturnalia.
the most poetical: as in the description of the Amongst the dialogues which may be regarded
passions flying about ; the comparison of cities to as mere pictures of manners, without any polemical
bee-hives attacked by wasps ; the likening of tendency, may be reckoned the 'Epwtes, to which
human lives to bubbles ; the death of cities as well / allusion has already been made in a former part of
as individuals. The whole is a picture of the this notice. Tlie Εταιρικοί Διάλογοι, Dalogi
3 6 2
## p. 820 (#836) ############################################
820
LUCIANUS.
LUCIANUS.
Meretricii, describe the manners of the Greek Hc- | fernal regions is reviewed, and the folly of grief
tacrae or courtezans, with liveliness and fidelity ; demonstrated in a rather serious manner. Tipos
perhaps too much so for the interests of morality. | analõeutov, Adversus Indoctum, is a bitter attack
Γιλοίον η Ευχαί, Ναυirium seu Tota. In this upon a rich man who thought to acquire a character
piece the company form various wishes, which are for learning by collecting a large library. Tepl 10Ů
in turn derided by Lucian. The imitation of Plato | μη ραδίως πιστεύειν διαβολή, Νon temere credendum
in the opening is very strong.
essc Delationi. The title of this piece sufficiently
Dialogues which cannot with propriety be placed explains its subject. It is in the grave style ; but
under any of the preceding heads, are the Eixóves, is well written, and has something of the air of a
Imagines, which has been already adverted to in rhetorical declamation.
the sketch of Lucian's life. “Υπέρ των Εικόνων, 7. Poems. These consist of two mock tragedies,
Pro Imuginibus, a defence of the preceding, with called Tpayonodáypa and 'Okurous, and about fifty
the flattery of which the lady who was the subject epigrams. The Tragopodagra, as its name implies,
of it pretended to be displeased. Tófapıs, Tvsercinis, turns on the subject of the gout ; its malignity and
a dialogue between a Greek and Scythin, on the pertinacity are set forth, and the physicians who
subject of friendship, in which several remarkable pretend to cure it exposed. This little drama dis-
instances are related on both sides. It is in the plays considerable vigour of fancy. It has been
grave style. The 'Aváxapois, Anuchursis, is an thought that Lucian wrote it to beguile a fit of the
attack upon the Greek gymnasia, in a dialogue be- malady which forms its subject. The Ocypus,
tween Solon and Anachursis. It also turns on the which turns on the same theme, is much inferior,
education of youth. Here too the irony is of a and perhaps a frigid imitation by some other hand.
serious cast. Tepi bpxńoews, De Sultatione, a dis- Of the epigrams some are tolerable, but the greater
putation between Lucian and Crates, a stoic philo- part indifferent, and calculated to add but little to
Bopher, respecting dancing. It has been observed Lucian's fame. Of some the genuineness may be
before that Lucian was an ardent admirer of dan- suspected.
cing, especially the pantomimic sort, to which he In the preceding account of Lucian's works
here gives the advantage over tragedy. The piece those have been omitted, of whose spuriousness
is hardly worthy of Lucian, but contains some scarce a doubt can be entertained. These are :-
curious particulars of the art of dancing among the 'Aλκύων ή περί Μεταμορφώσεως, Halcyon seu de
ancients. Acádegis após 'Holodov, Dissertatio cum | Transforinatione. This dialogue is completely op-
Hesiodo. A charge against that poet that he cannot posed to Lucian's manner, as the fabulous tale of
predict futurity, as he gave out. The genuineness the Halcyon, which he would have ridiculed, is
is doubtful.
treated seriously. It has been attributed to Leo
6. MISCELLANEOUS Pieces. We are now to the academician. For the rest, the style is agree-
enumerate those few works of Lucian which do not able enough. Nepi tñs 'Aotpodoylns, De Astro-
fall under
any of the preceding divisions, and which logia, containing a serious defence of astrology, can
not being in the form of dialogues, bear some never have been Lucian's. The Ionic dialect, too,
analogy to the modern essay. Ipos tòv eimóvta condemns it; the affected use of which Lucian
Ilpoundeús el év nóyous, Ad eum qui dixerat Pro- ridicules in his Quom. Hist. § 18.
The same
metheus es in Verbis. A reply to somebody who objections apply to the ſlepi tñs Lupins Seow, De
had compared him to Prometheus. Allusion has Dea Syria, also in the Ionic dialect. Though the
already been made to this piece, which, as the scholiast on the Nubes of Aristophanes ascribes it
title implies, turns chiefly on his own works. Teved to Lucian we may safely reject it. Such a narrative
Juoiwv, De Sacrificiis. The absurdities of the of superstitious rites could never have come from
heathen worship, especially of the Egyptian, are his pen, without at least a sneer, or a word of cas-
pointed out in a serious style. This was probably tigation. Nor would he have sacrificed his beard
an early production. Tepl Twv én uloq ovvóvtwv, at the temple of Hierapolis, as in the last sentence
De Mercede Conductis, was written to dissuade a the author represents himself as having done. The
Greek philosopher from accepting a place in a Kuvirós, Cynicus, is abjudicated by the scholiast,
Roman household, by giving a humorous description and with reason ; for the cynic worsts Lucian in
of the miseries attending it. This little piece the argument about his tenets. The Χαρίδημος η
abounds with wit and good sense, and may be repi kaldous, Charidemus seu de Pulchro, is a frigid
placed among Lucian's most amusing productions. imitation of Plato, bearing no mark of Lucian's
It is likewise valuable for the picture it contains of hand, and has been rejected by the best critics.
Roman manners, which Lucian has here painted in Népwv nepi tñs úpuxñs Toû 'lo@nov, Nero, seu
highly unfavourable colours, but perhaps with some de Fossione Isthmi. Wieland seems to have stood
exaggeration and caricature. The 'Atuloyla nepi alone in asserting this dialogue to be Lucian's.
TWV ÉTTà this ouv. , Apologia pro de Merc. Cond. , is From the concluding part the author appears to
Lucian's defence against a charge of inconsistency, have been alive at the time of Nero's death. It
in having accepted his Egyptian office, after having contains some curious particulars of that emperor's
written the foregoing piece. The chief ground of singing.
The spuriousness of the Philopatris has
defence is the difference between a public and been already shown.
private office, and indeed the charge was absurd. It is probable that several of Lucian's works
As already mentioned, this piece contains some are lost. In the Life of Demonax, § 1, he mentions
particulars of Lucian's life. 'TTÈP TOû ev Tŷ Tpoo- having written a life of Sostratus, which is not now
ayopevoel atalouatos, Pro Lapsu in Salutando, a extant. Of his rhetorical pieces perhaps the greater
playful little piece, though containing some curious part is lost, as Suidas says of them gérpantai
learning, in which Lucian excuses himself for auto & telpa.
having saluted a great man with úziaive in the Lucian's merits as a writer consist in his know-
morning, instead of xaipe. In the Tepi mevbolls, ledge of human nature, which, however, he gene-
De Luctu, the received opinion concerning the in- rally viewed on its worst side ; his strong conimon
## p. 821 (#837) ############################################
LUCIANUS.
821
LUCIANUS.
:
Bense ; the fertility of his invention ; the raciness of Lucian's works:- Florence, 1496, fol. (printer
of his humour ; and the simplicity and Attic grace unknown) Editio Princeps. First Aldine edition,
of his diction. His knowledge was probably not Venice, 1503, fol. This edition, printed from bad
very profound, and it may be suspected that he MSS. and very incorrect, was somewhat improved
was not always master of the philosophy that he in the second Aldine, 1522, fol. , but is still inferior
attacked. He nowhere grapples with the tenets to the Florentine. In this edition the Peregrinus
of a sect, but confines himself to ridiculing the and Philopulris are generally wanting, which had
manners of the philosophers, or at most some of the been put into the Index Expurgutorius, by the
salient and obvious points of their doctrines. Du court of Rome. The Aldine, however, served as
Soul, in a note on the Hippias, $ 3, has collected the basis of subsequent editions, till 1615, when
two or three passages to show Lucian's ignorance Bourdelot published at Paris a Greck and Latin
of the elements mathematics ; and from this edition in folio, the text corrected from MSS. and
charge he has hardly, perhaps, been rescued by the Editio Princeps. This was repeated with
the defence of Belin de Ballu. He had, however, emendations in the Saumur edition, 1619. Le
the talent of displaying what he did know to the Clerc's edition, 2 vols. 8vo. , Amsterdam, 1687, is
best advantage ; and as he had travelled much and very incorrect. In 1730 Tib. Hemsterhuis begin
held extensive intercourse with mankind, he had to print his excellent edition, but dying in 1736.
opportunities to acquire that sort of knowledge before a quarter of it had been finished, the editor-
which books alone can never give. Gesner justly ship was assigned to J. F. Reitz, and the book was
calls him Holkúratos, and affirms that there is published at Amsterdam, in 3 vols. 4to. , in 1743.
scarcely a sect or race of men whose history or In 1746 K. K. Reitz, brother of the editor, printed
chief characteristics he has not noted: presenting at Utrecht an Index, or Lericon Luciuneum, in 1
us with the portraits of philosophers of almost vol. 4to. , which, though extensive, is not complete.
every sect ; rhetors, flatterers, parasites ; rich and The edition of Hemsterhuis, besides his own notes,
poor, old and young ; the superstitions and the also contains those of Jensius, Kuster, L. Bos,
atheistic ; Romans, Athenians, Scythians ; im- Vitringa, Du Soul, Gesner, Reitz, and other com-
postors, actors, courtezans, soldiers, clowns, kings, mentators. An appendix to the notes of Hems-
tyrants, gods and goddesses. (Dissert. de Philop. xvi. ) terhuis, taken from a MS. in the Leyden library,
His writings have a more modern air than those of was published at that place by J. Geel, 1824, 4to.
any other classic author ; and the keenness of his Hemsterhuis corrected the Latin version for his
wit, the richness, yet extravagance of his humour, edition as far as De Sacrificiis; and of the re-
the fertility and liveliness of his fancy, his proneness mainder a new translation was made by Gesner.
to scepticism, and the clearness and simplicity of his The reprint by Schmidt, Mittau 1776–80, 8 vols.
style, present us with a kind of compound between 8vo. , is incorrect. The Bipont edition, in 10 vols.
Swift and Voltaire. There was abundance to 8vo. , 1789—93, is an accurate and elegant reprint
justify his attack in systems against which of Hemsterhuis's edition, with the addition of col-
they were directed. Yet he establishes nothing in lations of Parisian MSS. ; but the omission of the
their stead. His aim is only to pull down ; to Greek index is a drawback to it. A good edition
spread a universal scepticism. Nor were his assaults of the text and scholia only is that of Schmieder,
confined to religion and philosophy, but extended to Halle, 1800—1801, 2 vols. 8vo. Lehman's edition,
every thing old and venerated, the poems of Homer Leipzig, 182)-31, 9 vols. 8vo. , is well spoken of.
and Hesiod, and the history of Herodotus. Yet There is a very convenient edition of the text by
writing as he did amidst the doomed idols of an W. Dindorf, with a Latin version, but without
absurd superstition, and the contradictory tenets of notes, published at Paris, 1840, 8vo.
an almost equally absurd philosophy, his works had Amongst editions of separate pieces may be
undoubtedly a beneficial influence on the cause of named Colloquia Selecta, by Hemsterhuis, Amst.
truth. That they were indirectly serviceable to 1708, 12mo. , and 1732. Dialogi Selecti, by Edward
Christianity, can hardly be disputed ; but, though Leedes, London, 8vo. , 1710 and 1726. Mythologie
Lucian is generally just in his representations of Dramatique de Lucien, avec le texte Grecque par
the Christians, we may be sure that such a result J. B. Gail, Paris, 1798, 4to. Dialogues des Morts,
was as far from his wishes as from his thoughts. par le même, Paris, 1806, 8voLa Luciade, avec
Photius (Cod. 128) gives a very high character le texte Grecque par Courier, Paris, 1818, 12mo.
of Lucian's style, of the purity of which he Toxaris, Halle, 1825, and Alexander, Cöln, 18:28
piqued himself, as may be seen in the Bis Acc. S 8vo. , with notes and prolegomena by K. G. Jacob.
34, and other places, though occasional exceptions Alexander, Demonax, Gallus, Icaromenirpus, &c. ,
might perhaps be pointed out. Erasmus, who was by Fritzsche, Leipzig, 1826. Dialogi Deorum,
a great admirer of Lucian, and translated many Ibid. 1829.
of his works into Latin, gives the following cha- Lucian has been translated into most of the
racter of his writings in one of his epistles, and European languages. In German there is an excel-
which, making a little allowance for the studied lent version by Wieland (Leipzig, 1788–9, 6 vols.
antithesis of the style, is not far from the truth. 8vo. ), accompanied with valuable comments and
“Tantum obtinet in dicendo gratiae, tantum in in- illustrations. " The French translation of D’Ablan-
veniendo felicitatis, tantum in jocando leporis, in court (Paris, 1654, 2 vols. 4to. ) is elegant but un-
mordendo aceti ; sic titillat allusionibus, sic seria faithful. There is another version by B. de Ballu,
nugis, nugas seriis miscet ; sic ridens vera dicit, Paris, 1788, 6 vols. 8vo. In Italian there is a
vera dicendo ridet ; sic hominum mores, affectus, translation by Manzi, 1819–20. Among the
studia, quasi penicillo depingit, neque legenda, sed English versions may be named one by several
plane spectanda, oculis exponit, ut nulla comoedia, hands, including W. Moyle, Sir H. Shere, and
nulla satyrah
, cum hujus dialogis conferri debeat, Charles Blount, London, 1711. For this edition,
seu voluptatem spectes, seu spectes utilitatem. ” which had been undertaken several years before it
The following are some of the principal editions was published, Dryden wrote a life of Lucian, a
a
!
3 G 3
## p. 822 (#838) ############################################
822
LUCIFER.
LUCILIUS.
hasty performance, containing some gross errors. The works of this fierce polemic, which, although
The best English version is that of Dr. Franklin, all alike deformed by the same unseemly harshness
2 vols. 4to. London, 1780, and 4 vols. 8vo. London, and passion, are extremely valuable, on account of
1781 ; but some of the pieces are omitted. Mr. the numerous quotations from Scripture every
Tooke's version (2 vols. 4 to. London, 1820) is of where introduced, may be arranged in the follow-
little value.
[T. D. ] ing order:
LUCIE'NUS, a Roman senator, a friend of M. 1. Epistola ad Eusebium, written in the month
Varro, and one of the speakers in his dialogue De of March or April, 355. II. De non conveniendo
Re Rustica (ii. 5). He is supposed to be the same cum Haereticis, written between 356 and 358, at
person with Lucienus or Luscienus mentioned by Germanica, while suffering under the persecution
Cicero (ad Att. vii. 5).
(W. B. D. ] of Eudoxius, the Arian bishop of that place. 111.
LUCIFER. [PHOSPHORUS. )
De Regibus Apostolicis, written at Eleutheropolis in
LUCIFER, bishop of Cagliari, hence sumamed 358. IV. Ad Constantium Aurustum pro Suncto
Caluritanus, first appears in ecclesiastical history Athanasio, Liliri 11. , written at the same place,
as joint legate with Eusebius of Vercelli [EUSEBIUS about 360. V. De non parcendo in Deum delin-
VerceLLENSIS) from pope Liberius to the council quentibus, written about the same time with the
of Milan (A. D. 354), where, along with his col- preceding. VI. Muriendum pro Filio Dei, written
league, he displayed such determined firmness in about the beginning of 301, on being interrogated
withstanding the demands of the Arian emperor, respecting the authorship of the tract Ad Constun-
that he was first cast into prison, and then trans- tium. VII. Epistolu al Florentium Magistrum
ported from place to place as an exile, every where Officiorum, written at the same time with the pre-
enduring hardships and cruelty. While residing ceding. An Epistola ad Cutholicos, written while
at Eleutheropolis in Syria he composed in vigorous imprisoned at Milan, is lost.
but coarse and unpolished style his chief work, en- The Editio Princeps of the works of Lucifer
titled Ad Constantium Augustum pro Sancto Atha- appeared at Paris, 8vo. 1568, superintended by
ausio Libri 11. , which, although containing forcible Joannes Tillius, bishop of Meaux (Meldensis), and
arguments in favour of the truth, is characterised dedicated to pope Pius the Fifth. Although in
by such outrageous intemperance of expression, that many respects very imperfect, it was reprinted
many passages bear more resemblance to the ravings without alteration in the Alagna Bibliotheca Patrum,
of a furious madman than to the calm reasoning fol. Colon. 1618, vol. iv. p. 121, and also in the
which would become a Christian minister. Con- Paris collection. But even these are superior to
stantius, either in anger or contempt, inquired of the text exhibited in the Biblioth. Patrum Mar.
Lucifer, through Florentius, the magister officiorum, fol. Lugdun. 1687, vol. iv. p. 181, since here we
whether he was really the author of this invective, find not only many changes introduced without
but no immediate punishment appears to have MS. authority, but all the scriptural quotations
followed the bold acknowledgment, and any scheme accommodated to the vulgate version. Much better
of vengeance which might have been meditated than any of the preceding is the edition contained
was frustrated by the death of the tyrant. The in the Bibliotheca Patrum of Galland, vol. vi. p. 115
violent and ungovernable temper of the Sardinian (fol. Venet. 1770), but by far the best is that pub-
prelate, who was now restored to freedom, along lished by the brothers Coleti (fol. Venet. 1778),
with other victims of religious persecution, soon whose labours presented this father for the first
began to introduce confusion and discord among time in a satisfactory form. (Hieronym. de Viris
his own friends. He increased the disorders which IU. 95, Advers. Luciferian. Dial. ; Rufin. H. E.
agitated the church at Antioch by interfering in i. 30 ; Sulp. Sever. H. S. ii. 48 ; Socrat. H. E. ii.
ject is a dispute at Athens between Timocles, a description of which personage is very good. Lu-
Stoic, and Damis, an Epicurean, respecting the cian, indeed, excels in that kind of writing. The
being of the gods. Anxious as to its result, Zeus philosophers now open their case against him. He
summons all the deities to hear the arguments is charged with taking Dialogue out of their hands,
Hermes first calls the golden ones, then the and with persuading Menippus to side with him,
silver, and so forth ; not according to the beauty the only philosopher who does not appear among
of their workmanship, but the ricliness of their his accusers. This may afford another answer to
materials. On meeting, a squabble takes place those who would make Lucian an Epicurean.
about precedence, which is with some difficulty Under the name of Parrhesiades, Lucian advocates
quelled. Timocles then goes through his argui- his own cause ; and having gained it, becomes, in
ments for the existence of the gods, which Damis turn, accuser. The philosophers of the age are
refutes and ridicules. At this result, Zeus becomes summoned to the Acropolis, in the name of Virtue,
VOL. IL
36
## p. 818 (#834) ############################################
818
LUCIANUS.
LUCIANUS.
:
Philosophy, and Justice, but scarce one obeys the | uninvited, is particularly offensive in his behaviour.
call. Lucian undertakes to assemble them by In the midst of the banquet an absurd letter ar-
offering rewards. Immediately a vast concourse rives from Hetoimocles, a stoic, expostulating with
appear, quarrelling among themselves ; but when Aristaenetus, the host, for not having been invited.
they find that Philosophy herself is to be the The discussion that ensues sets all the philosophers
julge, they all run away. In his haste to escape, by the ears, and ends in a pitched battle. In
a cynic drops his wallet, which, instead of lupins, the midst of the confusion, Alcidamas upsets the
brown bread, or a book, is found to contain gold, chandelier ; and when lights are again brought,
pomatum, a sacrificing knife, a mirror, and dice. strange scenes are discovered. The cynic is making
Truth orders their lives to be inquired into by free with one of the music-women ; the stoic, Dio-
Logic, and the pretenders to be branded with the nysidorus, is endeavouring to conceal a cup under
figure of a fox or an ape. Lucian then borrows a his cloak. The similarity of this piece, and the
tishing-rod from the temple ; and having bited his 55th epistle of the third book of Alciphron, is too
hook with figs and gold, flings his line from the marked to be the result of accident. The relative
Acropolis. He draws up a great many different chronology of Alciphron and Lucian cannot be ac-
philosophers, but Plato, Chrysippus, Aristotle, &c. , curately settled (ALCIPHRON) ; but the dialogue
disown them all, and they are cast down headlong. is so much more highly wrought than the epistle,
This piece is valuable, noi only from its own merits, as to render Bergler's notion probable, that Lucian
but from containing some particulars of Lucian's was the copyist. Under this head we may also
life. 'Epuotiuos is chiefly an attack upon the notice the Nigrinus and the Parasite (Tepl Tapas
Stoics, but its design is also to show the impossi- DITUU ÝTOI ŐT. Té xvn Napariti). The Nigrinus
bility of becoming a true philosopher. The irony is has been reckoned one of Lucian's first efforts in
of a serious and Socratic turn, and the piece, though this style, and this seems borne out by a passage
carefully written, has little of Lucian's native in § 35. Wieland calls it a declaration of war
humour. From 13 it appears he was about forty against the philosophers, and thinks that it still
when he wrote it; and like the Niyrinus, it was bears traces of Lucian's rhetorical style. But
probably, therefore, one of his earliest productions though the piece may be considered as an attack
in this style. The Eůvoúxos, Eunuchus, is a ridi- on philosophic pride, its main scope is to satirise
culous dispute between two philosophic rivals for the Romans, whose pomp, vain-glory, and luxury,
the emperor's prize, the objection being that the are unfavourably contrasied with the simple habits
eunuchus is ipso fucto a disqualified person, and of the Athenians. The Parasitus is a mere piece
incapable of becoming a philosopher. From $ 12, of persifluge throughout. The dialogue is con-
it appears to have been written at Athens. The ducted like those of Socrates with the sophists,
A04Evôňs may be ranked in this class. It is a though the parasite, who may stand for the sophist,
dialogue on the love of falsehood, natural to some gets the better of the argument. The philosophical
men purely for its own sake. In § 2 Herodotus definition of parasitism in ý 9 is highly humorous,
and Ctesias are attacked as in the Verae Historiae, as well as the demonstration of its superiority to
as well as Hesiod and Honer. Poets, however, philosophy, on account of its unity and definiteness,
may be pardoned, but not whole states that adopt in which it equals arithmetic ; for two and two are
their fictions; and Lucian thinks it very hard to four with the Persians as well as the Greeks, but
be accused of impiety for disbelieving such extra- no two philosophers agree in their principles. So
vagancies. Some commentators have thought that also it is shown to be superior to philosophy, be-
the Christian miracles are alluded to in § 13 and cause no parasite ever turned philosopher, but many
§ 16 ; but this does not seem probable. The main philosophers have been parasites. The demonstra-
subject of the piece is the relation of several absurd tion of the non-existence of philosophy, sø 28, 29,
stories of ghosts, &c. , by a company of white. seems directed against Plato's Purmenides.
bearded philosophers. The Apametal, Fuyitiri, is The third and more miscellaneous class of
directed against the cynics, by whom Lucian seems Lucian's dialogues, in which the attacks upon
to have been attacked for his life of Peregrinus. mythology and philosophy are not direct but in-
In a conversation between A pollo and Zeus, the cidental, or which are mere pictures of manners,
latter asserts that he was so annoved by the stench contains some of his best. At the head must be
that ascended from the pyre, that, though he fled placed Tiuwv û pirávo, whos, Timon, which may
into Arabia, all the frankincense there could hardly perhaps be regarded as Lucian's masterpiece. The
drive it out. He is about to relate the whole story is that of the well-known Athenian mis
history to Apollo, when Philosophy rushes in, in anthrope mentioned by Plato, whose tower, Pau-
tears and trouble, and complains of the philosophers, sanias tells us (i. 30. S +), still existed in his time.
especially the cynics. She gives a history of her The introduction affords an opportunity for some
progress in India, Egypt, Chaldaea, &c. , before she sneers at Zeus. The dialogue between Plutus
reached the Greeks, and concludes with a complaint and Hermes, in which the former describes his
against the cynics. A pollo advises Jupiter to send way of proceeding with mankind, is very humorous
Miercury and Hercules to inquire into the lives of and well-sustained, though the imitation of Aris-
the cynics, and to punish the evil doers ; the tophanes is obvious. The story of Timon, which
greater part being mere vagabonds and runaway is very dramatically told, is too well known to need
slaves. Συμπόσιον ή Λαπίθαι, Convivium seu La- description here. The Νεκρικοί Διάλογοι, Diologi
pithuc, is one of Lucian's most humorous attacks on Murtuorum, are perhaps the best known of all
the philosophers. The scene is a wedding feast, at Lucian's works. The subject affords great scope
which a representative of each of the principal for moral reflection, and for satire on the vanity of
philosophic sects is present. Of all the guests these human pursuits. Wealth, power, beauty, strength,
are the only absurd and troublesome ones, the un. not forgetting the vain disputations of philosophy,
lettered portion behaving themselves with decency afford the materials ; and some cynic philosopher,
and propicity. The cynic Alcidamas, who comes Diogenes or Menippus, is generally the coinnen-
;
## p. 819 (#835) ############################################
LUCIANUS.
819
LUCIANUS.
tator. When Croesus and Menippus meet on the smallness of mankind when viewed from a philo-
banks of the Styx, it is easy to see which will sophic, as well as a physical height. Lucian seenis
have the advantage. The disappointments of those to have put his own sentiment into the mouth of
who lie in wait for the inheritance of the rich, Charon (s 16), Tayyedoia Tauta, W 'Epuſ. The
afford a fertile theme, which, however, Lucian hias Katándous Túpavvos, Cataplus sive Tyrannus, is
worn rather thread-bare. In a few of the dialogues in fact a dialogue of the dead. The persone are
it must be owned that some of the great men of Charon, Clotho, Hermes, a cynic philosopher, the
antiquity are flippantly and unjustly attacked, and tyrant Megnpenthes, the cobbler Micylius, and
especially Socrates. Among the moderns these certain rich men. The reluctance of Megapenthes
dialogues have been imitated by Fontenelle and to obey the summons of Clotho, and his ludicrous
Lord Lyttelton. The Mévintosi Nervouarteia, attempts at evasion, are happily contrasted with
Necyomanteia, bears some analogy to the Dialogues the alacrity of Micyllus. The latter being left
of the dead. Menippus relates his descent into behind on the banks of the Styx, swims after
Hades, and the sights that he sees there, par- Charon's boat, which being full, he finds a place on
ticularly the punishment of the great and powerful the shoulders of the tyrant, and does not cease
The genuineness of this piece has been doubted. tormenting him the whole way. There is consi-
Du Soul thought that it was written by Menippus derable drollery in his pretended lament for his old
himself, who, as we learn from Diogenes Laërtius lasts and slippers, when requested by Mercury to
(vi. 101), wrote a Necyomanteia, but Hemsterhuis grieve a little, just for the sake of keeping up the
discards this onjecture. It certainly wants Lucian's custom. Megapenthes' description of the indige
pungency; but arguments from style are not always nities which his household offer to his body while
safe. In the ʼlxapouévitnos Tiepvédelos, Icaro- lying in state, and which, though conscious of them,
Menippus, on the contrary, which is in Lucian's best he is powerless to resist, is very striking. "Overpos
vein, and a master-piece of Aristophanic humour, 7 'AXEKT PÚwv, Somnium seu Gallus. Here we have
Menippus, disgusted with the disputes and pre the cobbler Micyllus again, who has been dreaming
tensions of the philosophers, resolves on a visit to the that he has fallen heir to Eucrates, a nouveau riche.
stars, for the purpose of seeing how far their theories From this state of felicity he is awakened by the
are correct. By the mechanical aid of a pair of crowing of his cock, which he threatens to kill as
wings he reaches the moon, and surveys thence soon as he gets up. The cock discovers hinıself to
the miserable passions and quarrels of men. Hence be Pythagoras in one of his transmigratory states,
he proceeds to Olympus, and is introduced to the which gives occasion to some jokes at the expense
Thunderer himself
. Here he is witness of the of that philosophy. The cock then endeavours to
manner in which human prayers are received in persuade Micyllus that he is much happier than
heaven. They ascend by enormous ventholes, and the rich men whom he envies, and in order to con-
become andible when Zeus removes the covers. vince him, desires him to pluck one of the long
Strange is the variety of their tenor! Some pray feathers from his tail, which has the power of con-
to be kings, others that their onions may grow ; ferring invisibility. Micyllus, who has evidently
one sailor begs a north wind, another a south ; the a lurking spite against the bird, plucks out both his
husbandman wants rain ; the fuller, sunshine. long feathers, much to the discomfiture of Pytha-
Zeus himself is represented as a partial judge, goras, whom, however, the cobbler consoles by
and as influenced by the largeness of the rewards telling that he looks much handsomer so than he
promised to him. At the end he pronounces judg- would with only one. Being now invisible, Py-
ment against the philosophers, and threatens in thagoras and Micyllus go round to the houses of
four days to destroy them all. Then he cuts Me- several rich men, and behold their miseries and
nippus's wings, and hands him over to Hermes, vices. This piece may be reckoned among the
who carries him to earth by the ear. With a best of Lucian's. Als katnyopoúuevos, Bis Aau
malicious pleasure Menippus hastens to the Poecile satus, so called from Lucian's being arraigned by
to announce to the assembled philosophers their Rhetoric and Dialogue, is chiefly valuable for the
approaching destruction. Xápwv &TO KOTOûrtes, information it contains of the author's life and
Contemplantes, is a very elegant dialogue, but of a literary pursuits. Zeus finds fault with Homer
graver turn than the preceding. Charon visits the for calling the gods happy, when they have got so
earth to see the course of life there, and what it is much to do, and when there are still so many un-
that always makes men weep when they enter his decided causes on hand. To clear these off a court
boat. He requests Hermes to be his Cicerone. is appointed, at which Justice is to preside. The
To get a good view they pile Pelion upon Ossa ; first cause is Drunkenness versus the Academy, for
but this not being high enough, Oeta must follow, depriving him of Polemo. The plaintiff being
and then Parnassus : a passage evidently meant to naturally disqualified for pleading, the Academy
ridicule Homer. Parnassus being at top Charon undertakes both sides of the question. Next we
and Hermes seat themselves on each of the peaks. have the Porch versus Pleasure, which is defended
Then pass in review Milo the wrestler, Cyrus, by Epicurus. After two or three more causes
Croesus, and other celebrated characters. In this Lucian is accused by Rhetoric of desertion, and by
piece, as Hemsterhuis observes, our author has not Dialogue of having lowered and perverted his style.
been very scrupulous about chronology. In the We may here also mention the Kpovocónwv, Crona
interview between Croesus and Solon, Lucian Solon, and the 'ETIOtonal Kpovikal, Epistolae Sa-
follows Herodotus, but inverts the order of the turnales, which turn on the institution and customs
happy. Of all Lucian's dialogues this is perhaps of the Saturnalia.
the most poetical: as in the description of the Amongst the dialogues which may be regarded
passions flying about ; the comparison of cities to as mere pictures of manners, without any polemical
bee-hives attacked by wasps ; the likening of tendency, may be reckoned the 'Epwtes, to which
human lives to bubbles ; the death of cities as well / allusion has already been made in a former part of
as individuals. The whole is a picture of the this notice. Tlie Εταιρικοί Διάλογοι, Dalogi
3 6 2
## p. 820 (#836) ############################################
820
LUCIANUS.
LUCIANUS.
Meretricii, describe the manners of the Greek Hc- | fernal regions is reviewed, and the folly of grief
tacrae or courtezans, with liveliness and fidelity ; demonstrated in a rather serious manner. Tipos
perhaps too much so for the interests of morality. | analõeutov, Adversus Indoctum, is a bitter attack
Γιλοίον η Ευχαί, Ναυirium seu Tota. In this upon a rich man who thought to acquire a character
piece the company form various wishes, which are for learning by collecting a large library. Tepl 10Ů
in turn derided by Lucian. The imitation of Plato | μη ραδίως πιστεύειν διαβολή, Νon temere credendum
in the opening is very strong.
essc Delationi. The title of this piece sufficiently
Dialogues which cannot with propriety be placed explains its subject. It is in the grave style ; but
under any of the preceding heads, are the Eixóves, is well written, and has something of the air of a
Imagines, which has been already adverted to in rhetorical declamation.
the sketch of Lucian's life. “Υπέρ των Εικόνων, 7. Poems. These consist of two mock tragedies,
Pro Imuginibus, a defence of the preceding, with called Tpayonodáypa and 'Okurous, and about fifty
the flattery of which the lady who was the subject epigrams. The Tragopodagra, as its name implies,
of it pretended to be displeased. Tófapıs, Tvsercinis, turns on the subject of the gout ; its malignity and
a dialogue between a Greek and Scythin, on the pertinacity are set forth, and the physicians who
subject of friendship, in which several remarkable pretend to cure it exposed. This little drama dis-
instances are related on both sides. It is in the plays considerable vigour of fancy. It has been
grave style. The 'Aváxapois, Anuchursis, is an thought that Lucian wrote it to beguile a fit of the
attack upon the Greek gymnasia, in a dialogue be- malady which forms its subject. The Ocypus,
tween Solon and Anachursis. It also turns on the which turns on the same theme, is much inferior,
education of youth. Here too the irony is of a and perhaps a frigid imitation by some other hand.
serious cast. Tepi bpxńoews, De Sultatione, a dis- Of the epigrams some are tolerable, but the greater
putation between Lucian and Crates, a stoic philo- part indifferent, and calculated to add but little to
Bopher, respecting dancing. It has been observed Lucian's fame. Of some the genuineness may be
before that Lucian was an ardent admirer of dan- suspected.
cing, especially the pantomimic sort, to which he In the preceding account of Lucian's works
here gives the advantage over tragedy. The piece those have been omitted, of whose spuriousness
is hardly worthy of Lucian, but contains some scarce a doubt can be entertained. These are :-
curious particulars of the art of dancing among the 'Aλκύων ή περί Μεταμορφώσεως, Halcyon seu de
ancients. Acádegis após 'Holodov, Dissertatio cum | Transforinatione. This dialogue is completely op-
Hesiodo. A charge against that poet that he cannot posed to Lucian's manner, as the fabulous tale of
predict futurity, as he gave out. The genuineness the Halcyon, which he would have ridiculed, is
is doubtful.
treated seriously. It has been attributed to Leo
6. MISCELLANEOUS Pieces. We are now to the academician. For the rest, the style is agree-
enumerate those few works of Lucian which do not able enough. Nepi tñs 'Aotpodoylns, De Astro-
fall under
any of the preceding divisions, and which logia, containing a serious defence of astrology, can
not being in the form of dialogues, bear some never have been Lucian's. The Ionic dialect, too,
analogy to the modern essay. Ipos tòv eimóvta condemns it; the affected use of which Lucian
Ilpoundeús el év nóyous, Ad eum qui dixerat Pro- ridicules in his Quom. Hist. § 18.
The same
metheus es in Verbis. A reply to somebody who objections apply to the ſlepi tñs Lupins Seow, De
had compared him to Prometheus. Allusion has Dea Syria, also in the Ionic dialect. Though the
already been made to this piece, which, as the scholiast on the Nubes of Aristophanes ascribes it
title implies, turns chiefly on his own works. Teved to Lucian we may safely reject it. Such a narrative
Juoiwv, De Sacrificiis. The absurdities of the of superstitious rites could never have come from
heathen worship, especially of the Egyptian, are his pen, without at least a sneer, or a word of cas-
pointed out in a serious style. This was probably tigation. Nor would he have sacrificed his beard
an early production. Tepl Twv én uloq ovvóvtwv, at the temple of Hierapolis, as in the last sentence
De Mercede Conductis, was written to dissuade a the author represents himself as having done. The
Greek philosopher from accepting a place in a Kuvirós, Cynicus, is abjudicated by the scholiast,
Roman household, by giving a humorous description and with reason ; for the cynic worsts Lucian in
of the miseries attending it. This little piece the argument about his tenets. The Χαρίδημος η
abounds with wit and good sense, and may be repi kaldous, Charidemus seu de Pulchro, is a frigid
placed among Lucian's most amusing productions. imitation of Plato, bearing no mark of Lucian's
It is likewise valuable for the picture it contains of hand, and has been rejected by the best critics.
Roman manners, which Lucian has here painted in Népwv nepi tñs úpuxñs Toû 'lo@nov, Nero, seu
highly unfavourable colours, but perhaps with some de Fossione Isthmi. Wieland seems to have stood
exaggeration and caricature. The 'Atuloyla nepi alone in asserting this dialogue to be Lucian's.
TWV ÉTTà this ouv. , Apologia pro de Merc. Cond. , is From the concluding part the author appears to
Lucian's defence against a charge of inconsistency, have been alive at the time of Nero's death. It
in having accepted his Egyptian office, after having contains some curious particulars of that emperor's
written the foregoing piece. The chief ground of singing.
The spuriousness of the Philopatris has
defence is the difference between a public and been already shown.
private office, and indeed the charge was absurd. It is probable that several of Lucian's works
As already mentioned, this piece contains some are lost. In the Life of Demonax, § 1, he mentions
particulars of Lucian's life. 'TTÈP TOû ev Tŷ Tpoo- having written a life of Sostratus, which is not now
ayopevoel atalouatos, Pro Lapsu in Salutando, a extant. Of his rhetorical pieces perhaps the greater
playful little piece, though containing some curious part is lost, as Suidas says of them gérpantai
learning, in which Lucian excuses himself for auto & telpa.
having saluted a great man with úziaive in the Lucian's merits as a writer consist in his know-
morning, instead of xaipe. In the Tepi mevbolls, ledge of human nature, which, however, he gene-
De Luctu, the received opinion concerning the in- rally viewed on its worst side ; his strong conimon
## p. 821 (#837) ############################################
LUCIANUS.
821
LUCIANUS.
:
Bense ; the fertility of his invention ; the raciness of Lucian's works:- Florence, 1496, fol. (printer
of his humour ; and the simplicity and Attic grace unknown) Editio Princeps. First Aldine edition,
of his diction. His knowledge was probably not Venice, 1503, fol. This edition, printed from bad
very profound, and it may be suspected that he MSS. and very incorrect, was somewhat improved
was not always master of the philosophy that he in the second Aldine, 1522, fol. , but is still inferior
attacked. He nowhere grapples with the tenets to the Florentine. In this edition the Peregrinus
of a sect, but confines himself to ridiculing the and Philopulris are generally wanting, which had
manners of the philosophers, or at most some of the been put into the Index Expurgutorius, by the
salient and obvious points of their doctrines. Du court of Rome. The Aldine, however, served as
Soul, in a note on the Hippias, $ 3, has collected the basis of subsequent editions, till 1615, when
two or three passages to show Lucian's ignorance Bourdelot published at Paris a Greck and Latin
of the elements mathematics ; and from this edition in folio, the text corrected from MSS. and
charge he has hardly, perhaps, been rescued by the Editio Princeps. This was repeated with
the defence of Belin de Ballu. He had, however, emendations in the Saumur edition, 1619. Le
the talent of displaying what he did know to the Clerc's edition, 2 vols. 8vo. , Amsterdam, 1687, is
best advantage ; and as he had travelled much and very incorrect. In 1730 Tib. Hemsterhuis begin
held extensive intercourse with mankind, he had to print his excellent edition, but dying in 1736.
opportunities to acquire that sort of knowledge before a quarter of it had been finished, the editor-
which books alone can never give. Gesner justly ship was assigned to J. F. Reitz, and the book was
calls him Holkúratos, and affirms that there is published at Amsterdam, in 3 vols. 4to. , in 1743.
scarcely a sect or race of men whose history or In 1746 K. K. Reitz, brother of the editor, printed
chief characteristics he has not noted: presenting at Utrecht an Index, or Lericon Luciuneum, in 1
us with the portraits of philosophers of almost vol. 4to. , which, though extensive, is not complete.
every sect ; rhetors, flatterers, parasites ; rich and The edition of Hemsterhuis, besides his own notes,
poor, old and young ; the superstitions and the also contains those of Jensius, Kuster, L. Bos,
atheistic ; Romans, Athenians, Scythians ; im- Vitringa, Du Soul, Gesner, Reitz, and other com-
postors, actors, courtezans, soldiers, clowns, kings, mentators. An appendix to the notes of Hems-
tyrants, gods and goddesses. (Dissert. de Philop. xvi. ) terhuis, taken from a MS. in the Leyden library,
His writings have a more modern air than those of was published at that place by J. Geel, 1824, 4to.
any other classic author ; and the keenness of his Hemsterhuis corrected the Latin version for his
wit, the richness, yet extravagance of his humour, edition as far as De Sacrificiis; and of the re-
the fertility and liveliness of his fancy, his proneness mainder a new translation was made by Gesner.
to scepticism, and the clearness and simplicity of his The reprint by Schmidt, Mittau 1776–80, 8 vols.
style, present us with a kind of compound between 8vo. , is incorrect. The Bipont edition, in 10 vols.
Swift and Voltaire. There was abundance to 8vo. , 1789—93, is an accurate and elegant reprint
justify his attack in systems against which of Hemsterhuis's edition, with the addition of col-
they were directed. Yet he establishes nothing in lations of Parisian MSS. ; but the omission of the
their stead. His aim is only to pull down ; to Greek index is a drawback to it. A good edition
spread a universal scepticism. Nor were his assaults of the text and scholia only is that of Schmieder,
confined to religion and philosophy, but extended to Halle, 1800—1801, 2 vols. 8vo. Lehman's edition,
every thing old and venerated, the poems of Homer Leipzig, 182)-31, 9 vols. 8vo. , is well spoken of.
and Hesiod, and the history of Herodotus. Yet There is a very convenient edition of the text by
writing as he did amidst the doomed idols of an W. Dindorf, with a Latin version, but without
absurd superstition, and the contradictory tenets of notes, published at Paris, 1840, 8vo.
an almost equally absurd philosophy, his works had Amongst editions of separate pieces may be
undoubtedly a beneficial influence on the cause of named Colloquia Selecta, by Hemsterhuis, Amst.
truth. That they were indirectly serviceable to 1708, 12mo. , and 1732. Dialogi Selecti, by Edward
Christianity, can hardly be disputed ; but, though Leedes, London, 8vo. , 1710 and 1726. Mythologie
Lucian is generally just in his representations of Dramatique de Lucien, avec le texte Grecque par
the Christians, we may be sure that such a result J. B. Gail, Paris, 1798, 4to. Dialogues des Morts,
was as far from his wishes as from his thoughts. par le même, Paris, 1806, 8voLa Luciade, avec
Photius (Cod. 128) gives a very high character le texte Grecque par Courier, Paris, 1818, 12mo.
of Lucian's style, of the purity of which he Toxaris, Halle, 1825, and Alexander, Cöln, 18:28
piqued himself, as may be seen in the Bis Acc. S 8vo. , with notes and prolegomena by K. G. Jacob.
34, and other places, though occasional exceptions Alexander, Demonax, Gallus, Icaromenirpus, &c. ,
might perhaps be pointed out. Erasmus, who was by Fritzsche, Leipzig, 1826. Dialogi Deorum,
a great admirer of Lucian, and translated many Ibid. 1829.
of his works into Latin, gives the following cha- Lucian has been translated into most of the
racter of his writings in one of his epistles, and European languages. In German there is an excel-
which, making a little allowance for the studied lent version by Wieland (Leipzig, 1788–9, 6 vols.
antithesis of the style, is not far from the truth. 8vo. ), accompanied with valuable comments and
“Tantum obtinet in dicendo gratiae, tantum in in- illustrations. " The French translation of D’Ablan-
veniendo felicitatis, tantum in jocando leporis, in court (Paris, 1654, 2 vols. 4to. ) is elegant but un-
mordendo aceti ; sic titillat allusionibus, sic seria faithful. There is another version by B. de Ballu,
nugis, nugas seriis miscet ; sic ridens vera dicit, Paris, 1788, 6 vols. 8vo. In Italian there is a
vera dicendo ridet ; sic hominum mores, affectus, translation by Manzi, 1819–20. Among the
studia, quasi penicillo depingit, neque legenda, sed English versions may be named one by several
plane spectanda, oculis exponit, ut nulla comoedia, hands, including W. Moyle, Sir H. Shere, and
nulla satyrah
, cum hujus dialogis conferri debeat, Charles Blount, London, 1711. For this edition,
seu voluptatem spectes, seu spectes utilitatem. ” which had been undertaken several years before it
The following are some of the principal editions was published, Dryden wrote a life of Lucian, a
a
!
3 G 3
## p. 822 (#838) ############################################
822
LUCIFER.
LUCILIUS.
hasty performance, containing some gross errors. The works of this fierce polemic, which, although
The best English version is that of Dr. Franklin, all alike deformed by the same unseemly harshness
2 vols. 4to. London, 1780, and 4 vols. 8vo. London, and passion, are extremely valuable, on account of
1781 ; but some of the pieces are omitted. Mr. the numerous quotations from Scripture every
Tooke's version (2 vols. 4 to. London, 1820) is of where introduced, may be arranged in the follow-
little value.
[T. D. ] ing order:
LUCIE'NUS, a Roman senator, a friend of M. 1. Epistola ad Eusebium, written in the month
Varro, and one of the speakers in his dialogue De of March or April, 355. II. De non conveniendo
Re Rustica (ii. 5). He is supposed to be the same cum Haereticis, written between 356 and 358, at
person with Lucienus or Luscienus mentioned by Germanica, while suffering under the persecution
Cicero (ad Att. vii. 5).
(W. B. D. ] of Eudoxius, the Arian bishop of that place. 111.
LUCIFER. [PHOSPHORUS. )
De Regibus Apostolicis, written at Eleutheropolis in
LUCIFER, bishop of Cagliari, hence sumamed 358. IV. Ad Constantium Aurustum pro Suncto
Caluritanus, first appears in ecclesiastical history Athanasio, Liliri 11. , written at the same place,
as joint legate with Eusebius of Vercelli [EUSEBIUS about 360. V. De non parcendo in Deum delin-
VerceLLENSIS) from pope Liberius to the council quentibus, written about the same time with the
of Milan (A. D. 354), where, along with his col- preceding. VI. Muriendum pro Filio Dei, written
league, he displayed such determined firmness in about the beginning of 301, on being interrogated
withstanding the demands of the Arian emperor, respecting the authorship of the tract Ad Constun-
that he was first cast into prison, and then trans- tium. VII. Epistolu al Florentium Magistrum
ported from place to place as an exile, every where Officiorum, written at the same time with the pre-
enduring hardships and cruelty. While residing ceding. An Epistola ad Cutholicos, written while
at Eleutheropolis in Syria he composed in vigorous imprisoned at Milan, is lost.
but coarse and unpolished style his chief work, en- The Editio Princeps of the works of Lucifer
titled Ad Constantium Augustum pro Sancto Atha- appeared at Paris, 8vo. 1568, superintended by
ausio Libri 11. , which, although containing forcible Joannes Tillius, bishop of Meaux (Meldensis), and
arguments in favour of the truth, is characterised dedicated to pope Pius the Fifth. Although in
by such outrageous intemperance of expression, that many respects very imperfect, it was reprinted
many passages bear more resemblance to the ravings without alteration in the Alagna Bibliotheca Patrum,
of a furious madman than to the calm reasoning fol. Colon. 1618, vol. iv. p. 121, and also in the
which would become a Christian minister. Con- Paris collection. But even these are superior to
stantius, either in anger or contempt, inquired of the text exhibited in the Biblioth. Patrum Mar.
Lucifer, through Florentius, the magister officiorum, fol. Lugdun. 1687, vol. iv. p. 181, since here we
whether he was really the author of this invective, find not only many changes introduced without
but no immediate punishment appears to have MS. authority, but all the scriptural quotations
followed the bold acknowledgment, and any scheme accommodated to the vulgate version. Much better
of vengeance which might have been meditated than any of the preceding is the edition contained
was frustrated by the death of the tyrant. The in the Bibliotheca Patrum of Galland, vol. vi. p. 115
violent and ungovernable temper of the Sardinian (fol. Venet. 1770), but by far the best is that pub-
prelate, who was now restored to freedom, along lished by the brothers Coleti (fol. Venet. 1778),
with other victims of religious persecution, soon whose labours presented this father for the first
began to introduce confusion and discord among time in a satisfactory form. (Hieronym. de Viris
his own friends. He increased the disorders which IU. 95, Advers. Luciferian. Dial. ; Rufin. H. E.
agitated the church at Antioch by interfering in i. 30 ; Sulp. Sever. H. S. ii. 48 ; Socrat. H. E. ii.
