8, 38, 49 ; an
elliptical
phrase, here = 02?
Demosthenese - First Philippic and the Olynthiacs
6V lows Karelrry, and Plato Tim.
18E ,myxaviiadm
. . limos . . e'Kd/repoi guhh'lyfiovrai, Kat in) T6 adro'is Exflpa. . .
'yi'yVflTaL (Weil). Cp. Aesch. C'ho. 265 iri-yfiQ', 81m: p. 91
iree? aerai ris, followed b d1ra'y'yelhy, and [Plato] Ale. ii, where
81m: ,m') Meal. is followe by rifixwo'w in 138 B and by rahwqufi
in 148 B. Conversely in Plato Gory. 481 A rapao'Keudare? ov . .
drrws ,ui) 5Q dimly ,urlde? ghfly 1rdpd r611 deaO'rfiv is followed by
lirrws ,Lii) drrodavc'iral. . . dhh' dOdvaros germ, and by fin-ms
fiiu'm'erai, and in Aeschin. 3? 64 (hrs): ,ui] TQM/Lefme by fire):
i/mdueialie and 151m: ,ui) term.
In the genuine speeches of Demosthenes 6m>>; in object clauses is found
with Fut. Ind. 78 times; with Snbj. only 6 times after primary tenses
(5 ? 17 Mifl-g, 6 ? 25 eil'pnre, 9 ? 69 dvdrpe'dln, 14 ? 22 Jun, 21 ? 166
flwwofirs, 24 5 107 nixum), and only 4 times after secondary tenses
(18 ? 32 drriaunv, 19 ? ? 15, 230 ys'w'rm, ye'vuovrm, 54 ? 17 i'vawai). Of
these ten Subjunctives only one is that of the sigmatic or. , dvdrpe? dm,
and even this is made doubtful by the quotation in Aristeides ii 625, which
has dvarpe? iper (accepted by Blass). In the text the use present us with
the only instance in Demosthenes of an object clause with iirrme, in which
a siginatic is combined with a non-sigmatic form of the Subjunetive
(Weber's Absichlssiitze ii 38 f, 121). quGrju-e-re should therefore be preferred.
Goodwin, however, considers it very arbitrary to change 301101;"1-4
to BUflQfiO'QTE, and leave r6011" (MT. ? 364). no. 1. wt] "6. 6 H--
1rp6'repov is considered parenthetical by Blass in his ed. of Reh antz.
Halm (Comnieritationes in honoram anmseni p. 694) disapproves of this
parenthesis, but does not make the Aor. Subj. dependent on napaansvd-
craaQau. He prefers suggesting 'iva pi; #3011".
20. 'rm'rrbv arrep Kat: ? 11, 3 ? 12 l. 112. 1rp6-repov does
not refer to any belated succours recently sent to Olynthus, but
to previous cases of remissness in the course of the war with
Philip, ? 8 l. 62. For example, in 352 11. 0. , when Philip was
besieging 'de'iov rcixos near the Thracian Chersonesus, Athens
did nothing effectual against him. 'The Athenians relapsed
into their former languor and renounced or postponed their
intended annament' (Grote c. 87 viii 59). rpwfietav--
{psi-z Xen. Hell. ii 1, 6 1re? ,u. 1rsw rpe? afleis ra9rd re e? pofivrds . .
21. fins . . e? pei: relative with Fut. Ind. , denoting purpose,
2 ? 11 (Goodwin M T. ? 565). wape? o'ral. rots npdypdo'w,
' watch the proceedings' or 'course of events,' especially Philip's
negotiations with Olynthus implied in ? 4 ll. 30, 35.
? 3 l. 22. Se? os: predicate. Eur. Heracl. 739 rofrro 'ydp ? 6,80s,
Tro. 240 el r65' fir 1711. 111 4:6,309, Plato Rep. 465B Mo; 5% r3 r4}
rdaxovri rolls dhhovs [301,0er (Sauppe). ndvofipyos,
' unscrupulous. '
23. Sewe? s, ' clever. ' vapmros: 4 ? 9. wpe? ypau'w
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? I ? ? a, 4 FIRST 0L YNTHIAG 129'
Xpfio-Out, 'to turn events to account'; 2 ? 3, 8 ? 77, Isocr.
3 ? 21.
24. clixwv: by handing over Potidaea to the Olynthians (2
? 7). file' liv 'n'oxu: sc. el'va, cp. 2 ? 10, 4 ? 46, 8 ? 68,
9 ? 54. Otherwise, it ma be taken impersonally, as in Thuc.
i 142 d'rav 16x31, and Aesc in. 3 ? 42 at oih-w 117x01 (so Heslop),
dgte? -rrw-'ros--wtvowo: referring to drethc'fiv, 'his threats
may well be believed,' judging from the experience of the past.
25. fipis : further explained and particularised by 'r'hv drou-
Ffav Tijv huere? pav.
26. 'rpe? dl'q'rm: supposed to mean 'convert to his own use,'
'turn towards himself,' or 'overturn,' but Tpe? 1rw0ai is not
found in this sense.
The rendering ne sibi advertat (Engelhardt) is nevertheless approved by
Voemel, who quotes Herod. iii 72 two. . . e'n-wmimum-w. reps" KC" 1:. (01' 11;)
taxan min. Tpu'arq'rm (where Stein reads e? m-rpe? mrmt with Vat. ) Heslop
thinks that, although Demosthenes would not have used 7pe'dn1nu alone
in the above sense, he 'might venture to do so in combination with
wapaaminrm, by which its meaning would in some measure be deter-
mined. ' AGennadios, writing to me from Athens in Nov. 1894, says--
civa'vaars'ov mivrw; o'rpe'wy 15, mini Femrbopdv fin-o 113v o'vywaps'wuv Kai.
iron-mune? vmv KMi8mv va Sc'vopwv, ? ? ' fie e? vvoias 1'1 1rd. 6. 1'1; leuxq'i KAe'aw
6'11 101'; 'lrrnel'izn 1r? >> KAa? 1d? eL l/ Expviva-ro (Aristoph. 'q. 166).
27. napao'rrda'nrat, 'wrest to his own use. ' Xen. Hell. iv
8, 33 rapea'rfi're? Twas- 1017 @apvafidfov, 'to detach from another's
side to one's own' (L 8: S). 'l'l. raw (5th npaypdrwv,
'some part of our public interests,' e. g. the relations of
Olynthus to Athens, 18 ? 278 11. 311 6'va Tl Kwauvelie-rm Ti 1re? Xet,
ii). 303, 2 ? 31.
? 4 l. 27. of: pfiv dXMd), 'howevcr,' 'not but that' ; 4 ? 38,
2 ? 22, 5 ? 3, 8 ? ?
8, 38, 49 ; an elliptical phrase, here = 02? ,m'yv
(dduu-qre? ov e? a'rlv) dhhd.
28. e? meme? 'is, 'upon a reasonable view,' ' may fairly be said'
(to be actually best for us). The adverb modifies the force of
fle? hna'rov in the following paradox. It is wrongly explained in
the Etym. Magn. as meaning rapa56$ws, or rap' emaa, a sense
suggested doubtless by the context and by Hermog. iii 359
Walz, and also implied in the rendering 'strange to say ' (K. ),
but not contained in the word itself. 8 Sun-paxa'wwrov--
Be'knu'rov inn-Iv: a paradox like those in 4 ? 2, 9 ? 5. After
alarming the people by showing the strength of their adver-
saries, the orator turns off skilfully to a topic of encouragement
(K)
30. 'l'bflK'l'JPI-OV Kai. fin-re? iv Kri'rroppv'rrmv, 'his having got it
into his sole power to publish or conceal his designs ' (K. ) [26]
K
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 130 FIRST OLYNTHIAC' I ? ? 4, 5
? 18 e? he? 'yxu Tdrrbppirra 1'7]: rah-reins, 18 ? 235 (Philip) e? '1rpa'r'rev
3 56551611 afi-rq'i oil npohe? 'ywv 6'11 10? ; l/lfl? lG'/LGULV, 005' e? v rq'i (pave-pi;
flouhevoueuos.
32. 8eth K'rh. : 18 ? 235 drhe? is am; 6e0'1r6117s, iryeudw,
Ke? pios mil/raw. Cp. ib. 246, 19 ? 184, Isocr. 2 ? ? 18, 24, Livy
ix 18, and Napier's Peninsular W or viii 5 (quoted by VVhiston)
The first element of success in war is that everything should emanate
from one head. rapid-v, ' paymaster. '
33. airre? v: ipsum, emphatic. wpbs . . 1'6 . . wpdrrso'aai:
Inf. with Article as Acc. after a Preposition (Goodwin MT.
? 800). The articular Inf. is extremely common in Demo-
sthenes, as also in Thucydides. The average number of
examples per Teubner page is in Thucydides '45, in his
'speeches' nearly 1 ; in the 'public orations' of Demosthenes
1'25, and in the First Olynthiac as high as 2'75.
Gildersleeve in Trans. of American Philal. Association 1878, AJP. iii
197, 199, viii 330, 332. There are also papers by Stix (without statistics),
Zum Gebrauch des Inf. mit Artikel bei Dem. Rottweil 1881, and by
RWagner, dc Inf. apud oratores Atticos cum amiculo coniuncto, Schwerin
1885.
35. Karmayds can only refer to a compact of submission,
as is proved b the subsequent context. a; (iv . .
wotfio-aH-(o), ' w ich he would make,' if the Olynthians listened
to his advances.
37. e? vav-rlws 4X": antistrophic to rpoe? xel. at the end of the
parallel clause in l. 35.
? 5 l. 37. Sfihov--ii-ri: an iambic trimeter (noticed by
'Maximus Planudes,' v 471 Walz = Syrianus i 28 Rabe), as
in 21 ? 165, 35 ? 22. Hexameters have been detected in 4 ? 6,
18 ? ? 143, 198; 19 ? 75, 23 ? ? 14, 50, 134, 144. Similarly
viv--Xe? pas is a choliambus (with anapaest in second foot).
But in none of these exx. does the verse really arrest attention
by any exact coincidence with the limits of the clause or Ke? ihov
(which here ends with 56517:). They are therefore hardly excep-
tions to the rule in Aristotle's Rhet. iii 8, 3 fit/0ro 6:? e? xew
row M'yov, ue? rpov 6% mi. Op. Cic. Orator 189 versus saepe in
orationc per imprudentiam dicimus (with notes on pp. 206-8,
ed. Sandys).
38. "Irepi = inr? pz 4 ? 1, 19 ? 94, 20 ? 124, 45 ? 11. In all
these passages we have inre? p in the second clause corresponding
to 1repl in the first. The use of WW inre? p or 0116' z'nre? p prevents
the collocation of more than two short syllables----d)\)\a mspl,
0068 1repl (cp. note on Lept. ? 124, ed. Sandys). The repetition
of i'nre? p before avao'rdo'sws is avoided for the same reason.
\'nre? p must be understood with draw-racer>>: Kai avapanawaot
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? I ? 5 FIRST 0L YNTHIAO 131
(in a. different sense to l'nre? p with ae? pous Xe? pas) 'to save their
country from destruction (devastation) and servitude. ' Cp.
Thuc. v 59, l inre? p 're 1ra'rpi50s i7 ,udx-q Eu'rai Kai l'me? p apxfis
(iaa Kai Bovhelas.
39. xwfiuva'ioua-w : perhaps preferable to woke/1. 066111, because
Demosthenes is here arguing on the assumption of Philip's
making terms with the Olynthians, Ta; Karahha'yiis l. 35, con--
trasted with Ta 100 1ro>\e? ,uou 1. 34. Though several phrases in
the speech (e. g. 11. 53, 192) imply war with the Olynthians, it is
clearly not yet in full force, and may still be averted by coming
to terms (cp. Hartcl's Dem. Antra'ge p. 532).
40. 'AML'lroht're? iv K'rX. : clo'ehfldrv "yap mama; (so. rods avoi-
gavras 1a; mihas) 1rpdrrous e? ? 6vevoe he? 'waI' "61 rd? >> ldlwv rohirdiv
00K e? ? eioaofie, 1re? o'q) 76 'n'he? ou 06 ,ue? hhe-re 1rcpl e? pe? iio'repov rorofi'roi
'yew'ycreo'daz ;" (schol. ) Thirlwall (v 196) suggests that this is only
a conjectural explanation of the text. Diodorus (xvi 8) states
that Philip, on entering Amphipolis through a breach in the
walls, em'led his adversaries and treated the rest with kindness
(? l)\GI/0ptil'lrw8 rpoonve? XO-q). This is 'confirmed by an inscri -
tion still extant among the ruins of Amphipolis, which recor s
a decree of perpetual banishment, and confiscation of property,
against Stratocles (? 8 l. 65) . . and Philo ' (Thirlwall l. c. ,
Leake Northern Greece iii 187, ASchaefer Dem. ii 22 2).
The partitive Genitives 'Ap? |. 1ro)\i. -rcirv, here and in l.
. . limos . . e'Kd/repoi guhh'lyfiovrai, Kat in) T6 adro'is Exflpa. . .
'yi'yVflTaL (Weil). Cp. Aesch. C'ho. 265 iri-yfiQ', 81m: p. 91
iree? aerai ris, followed b d1ra'y'yelhy, and [Plato] Ale. ii, where
81m: ,m') Meal. is followe by rifixwo'w in 138 B and by rahwqufi
in 148 B. Conversely in Plato Gory. 481 A rapao'Keudare? ov . .
drrws ,ui) 5Q dimly ,urlde? ghfly 1rdpd r611 deaO'rfiv is followed by
lirrws ,Lii) drrodavc'iral. . . dhh' dOdvaros germ, and by fin-ms
fiiu'm'erai, and in Aeschin. 3? 64 (hrs): ,ui] TQM/Lefme by fire):
i/mdueialie and 151m: ,ui) term.
In the genuine speeches of Demosthenes 6m>>; in object clauses is found
with Fut. Ind. 78 times; with Snbj. only 6 times after primary tenses
(5 ? 17 Mifl-g, 6 ? 25 eil'pnre, 9 ? 69 dvdrpe'dln, 14 ? 22 Jun, 21 ? 166
flwwofirs, 24 5 107 nixum), and only 4 times after secondary tenses
(18 ? 32 drriaunv, 19 ? ? 15, 230 ys'w'rm, ye'vuovrm, 54 ? 17 i'vawai). Of
these ten Subjunctives only one is that of the sigmatic or. , dvdrpe? dm,
and even this is made doubtful by the quotation in Aristeides ii 625, which
has dvarpe? iper (accepted by Blass). In the text the use present us with
the only instance in Demosthenes of an object clause with iirrme, in which
a siginatic is combined with a non-sigmatic form of the Subjunetive
(Weber's Absichlssiitze ii 38 f, 121). quGrju-e-re should therefore be preferred.
Goodwin, however, considers it very arbitrary to change 301101;"1-4
to BUflQfiO'QTE, and leave r6011" (MT. ? 364). no. 1. wt] "6. 6 H--
1rp6'repov is considered parenthetical by Blass in his ed. of Reh antz.
Halm (Comnieritationes in honoram anmseni p. 694) disapproves of this
parenthesis, but does not make the Aor. Subj. dependent on napaansvd-
craaQau. He prefers suggesting 'iva pi; #3011".
20. 'rm'rrbv arrep Kat: ? 11, 3 ? 12 l. 112. 1rp6-repov does
not refer to any belated succours recently sent to Olynthus, but
to previous cases of remissness in the course of the war with
Philip, ? 8 l. 62. For example, in 352 11. 0. , when Philip was
besieging 'de'iov rcixos near the Thracian Chersonesus, Athens
did nothing effectual against him. 'The Athenians relapsed
into their former languor and renounced or postponed their
intended annament' (Grote c. 87 viii 59). rpwfietav--
{psi-z Xen. Hell. ii 1, 6 1re? ,u. 1rsw rpe? afleis ra9rd re e? pofivrds . .
21. fins . . e? pei: relative with Fut. Ind. , denoting purpose,
2 ? 11 (Goodwin M T. ? 565). wape? o'ral. rots npdypdo'w,
' watch the proceedings' or 'course of events,' especially Philip's
negotiations with Olynthus implied in ? 4 ll. 30, 35.
? 3 l. 22. Se? os: predicate. Eur. Heracl. 739 rofrro 'ydp ? 6,80s,
Tro. 240 el r65' fir 1711. 111 4:6,309, Plato Rep. 465B Mo; 5% r3 r4}
rdaxovri rolls dhhovs [301,0er (Sauppe). ndvofipyos,
' unscrupulous. '
23. Sewe? s, ' clever. ' vapmros: 4 ? 9. wpe? ypau'w
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? I ? ? a, 4 FIRST 0L YNTHIAG 129'
Xpfio-Out, 'to turn events to account'; 2 ? 3, 8 ? 77, Isocr.
3 ? 21.
24. clixwv: by handing over Potidaea to the Olynthians (2
? 7). file' liv 'n'oxu: sc. el'va, cp. 2 ? 10, 4 ? 46, 8 ? 68,
9 ? 54. Otherwise, it ma be taken impersonally, as in Thuc.
i 142 d'rav 16x31, and Aesc in. 3 ? 42 at oih-w 117x01 (so Heslop),
dgte? -rrw-'ros--wtvowo: referring to drethc'fiv, 'his threats
may well be believed,' judging from the experience of the past.
25. fipis : further explained and particularised by 'r'hv drou-
Ffav Tijv huere? pav.
26. 'rpe? dl'q'rm: supposed to mean 'convert to his own use,'
'turn towards himself,' or 'overturn,' but Tpe? 1rw0ai is not
found in this sense.
The rendering ne sibi advertat (Engelhardt) is nevertheless approved by
Voemel, who quotes Herod. iii 72 two. . . e'n-wmimum-w. reps" KC" 1:. (01' 11;)
taxan min. Tpu'arq'rm (where Stein reads e? m-rpe? mrmt with Vat. ) Heslop
thinks that, although Demosthenes would not have used 7pe'dn1nu alone
in the above sense, he 'might venture to do so in combination with
wapaaminrm, by which its meaning would in some measure be deter-
mined. ' AGennadios, writing to me from Athens in Nov. 1894, says--
civa'vaars'ov mivrw; o'rpe'wy 15, mini Femrbopdv fin-o 113v o'vywaps'wuv Kai.
iron-mune? vmv KMi8mv va Sc'vopwv, ? ? ' fie e? vvoias 1'1 1rd. 6. 1'1; leuxq'i KAe'aw
6'11 101'; 'lrrnel'izn 1r? >> KAa? 1d? eL l/ Expviva-ro (Aristoph. 'q. 166).
27. napao'rrda'nrat, 'wrest to his own use. ' Xen. Hell. iv
8, 33 rapea'rfi're? Twas- 1017 @apvafidfov, 'to detach from another's
side to one's own' (L 8: S). 'l'l. raw (5th npaypdrwv,
'some part of our public interests,' e. g. the relations of
Olynthus to Athens, 18 ? 278 11. 311 6'va Tl Kwauvelie-rm Ti 1re? Xet,
ii). 303, 2 ? 31.
? 4 l. 27. of: pfiv dXMd), 'howevcr,' 'not but that' ; 4 ? 38,
2 ? 22, 5 ? 3, 8 ? ?
8, 38, 49 ; an elliptical phrase, here = 02? ,m'yv
(dduu-qre? ov e? a'rlv) dhhd.
28. e? meme? 'is, 'upon a reasonable view,' ' may fairly be said'
(to be actually best for us). The adverb modifies the force of
fle? hna'rov in the following paradox. It is wrongly explained in
the Etym. Magn. as meaning rapa56$ws, or rap' emaa, a sense
suggested doubtless by the context and by Hermog. iii 359
Walz, and also implied in the rendering 'strange to say ' (K. ),
but not contained in the word itself. 8 Sun-paxa'wwrov--
Be'knu'rov inn-Iv: a paradox like those in 4 ? 2, 9 ? 5. After
alarming the people by showing the strength of their adver-
saries, the orator turns off skilfully to a topic of encouragement
(K)
30. 'l'bflK'l'JPI-OV Kai. fin-re? iv Kri'rroppv'rrmv, 'his having got it
into his sole power to publish or conceal his designs ' (K. ) [26]
K
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 130 FIRST OLYNTHIAC' I ? ? 4, 5
? 18 e? he? 'yxu Tdrrbppirra 1'7]: rah-reins, 18 ? 235 (Philip) e? '1rpa'r'rev
3 56551611 afi-rq'i oil npohe? 'ywv 6'11 10? ; l/lfl? lG'/LGULV, 005' e? v rq'i (pave-pi;
flouhevoueuos.
32. 8eth K'rh. : 18 ? 235 drhe? is am; 6e0'1r6117s, iryeudw,
Ke? pios mil/raw. Cp. ib. 246, 19 ? 184, Isocr. 2 ? ? 18, 24, Livy
ix 18, and Napier's Peninsular W or viii 5 (quoted by VVhiston)
The first element of success in war is that everything should emanate
from one head. rapid-v, ' paymaster. '
33. airre? v: ipsum, emphatic. wpbs . . 1'6 . . wpdrrso'aai:
Inf. with Article as Acc. after a Preposition (Goodwin MT.
? 800). The articular Inf. is extremely common in Demo-
sthenes, as also in Thucydides. The average number of
examples per Teubner page is in Thucydides '45, in his
'speeches' nearly 1 ; in the 'public orations' of Demosthenes
1'25, and in the First Olynthiac as high as 2'75.
Gildersleeve in Trans. of American Philal. Association 1878, AJP. iii
197, 199, viii 330, 332. There are also papers by Stix (without statistics),
Zum Gebrauch des Inf. mit Artikel bei Dem. Rottweil 1881, and by
RWagner, dc Inf. apud oratores Atticos cum amiculo coniuncto, Schwerin
1885.
35. Karmayds can only refer to a compact of submission,
as is proved b the subsequent context. a; (iv . .
wotfio-aH-(o), ' w ich he would make,' if the Olynthians listened
to his advances.
37. e? vav-rlws 4X": antistrophic to rpoe? xel. at the end of the
parallel clause in l. 35.
? 5 l. 37. Sfihov--ii-ri: an iambic trimeter (noticed by
'Maximus Planudes,' v 471 Walz = Syrianus i 28 Rabe), as
in 21 ? 165, 35 ? 22. Hexameters have been detected in 4 ? 6,
18 ? ? 143, 198; 19 ? 75, 23 ? ? 14, 50, 134, 144. Similarly
viv--Xe? pas is a choliambus (with anapaest in second foot).
But in none of these exx. does the verse really arrest attention
by any exact coincidence with the limits of the clause or Ke? ihov
(which here ends with 56517:). They are therefore hardly excep-
tions to the rule in Aristotle's Rhet. iii 8, 3 fit/0ro 6:? e? xew
row M'yov, ue? rpov 6% mi. Op. Cic. Orator 189 versus saepe in
orationc per imprudentiam dicimus (with notes on pp. 206-8,
ed. Sandys).
38. "Irepi = inr? pz 4 ? 1, 19 ? 94, 20 ? 124, 45 ? 11. In all
these passages we have inre? p in the second clause corresponding
to 1repl in the first. The use of WW inre? p or 0116' z'nre? p prevents
the collocation of more than two short syllables----d)\)\a mspl,
0068 1repl (cp. note on Lept. ? 124, ed. Sandys). The repetition
of i'nre? p before avao'rdo'sws is avoided for the same reason.
\'nre? p must be understood with draw-racer>>: Kai avapanawaot
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? I ? 5 FIRST 0L YNTHIAO 131
(in a. different sense to l'nre? p with ae? pous Xe? pas) 'to save their
country from destruction (devastation) and servitude. ' Cp.
Thuc. v 59, l inre? p 're 1ra'rpi50s i7 ,udx-q Eu'rai Kai l'me? p apxfis
(iaa Kai Bovhelas.
39. xwfiuva'ioua-w : perhaps preferable to woke/1. 066111, because
Demosthenes is here arguing on the assumption of Philip's
making terms with the Olynthians, Ta; Karahha'yiis l. 35, con--
trasted with Ta 100 1ro>\e? ,uou 1. 34. Though several phrases in
the speech (e. g. 11. 53, 192) imply war with the Olynthians, it is
clearly not yet in full force, and may still be averted by coming
to terms (cp. Hartcl's Dem. Antra'ge p. 532).
40. 'AML'lroht're? iv K'rX. : clo'ehfldrv "yap mama; (so. rods avoi-
gavras 1a; mihas) 1rpdrrous e? ? 6vevoe he? 'waI' "61 rd? >> ldlwv rohirdiv
00K e? ? eioaofie, 1re? o'q) 76 'n'he? ou 06 ,ue? hhe-re 1rcpl e? pe? iio'repov rorofi'roi
'yew'ycreo'daz ;" (schol. ) Thirlwall (v 196) suggests that this is only
a conjectural explanation of the text. Diodorus (xvi 8) states
that Philip, on entering Amphipolis through a breach in the
walls, em'led his adversaries and treated the rest with kindness
(? l)\GI/0ptil'lrw8 rpoonve? XO-q). This is 'confirmed by an inscri -
tion still extant among the ruins of Amphipolis, which recor s
a decree of perpetual banishment, and confiscation of property,
against Stratocles (? 8 l. 65) . . and Philo ' (Thirlwall l. c. ,
Leake Northern Greece iii 187, ASchaefer Dem. ii 22 2).
The partitive Genitives 'Ap? |. 1ro)\i. -rcirv, here and in l.
