No More Learning

Both the fragments contain Christian allusions.
It has been suggested that the Old English poem was a
translation from an early German one; but the evidence adduced
is far from satisfactory. The speeches given in the fragments
have nothing corresponding to them in Ekkehard's text, and
there is a noteworthy difference in the portraiture of the heroine's
character. Probably, nothing more than the tradition was derived
from abroad, and at a very early date, if we may judge from the
form of the names.
In the fragments, Guthhere is represented as king of the
Burgundians. Since there can be no doubt that he is the
Burgundian king Gundicarius (Gundaharius) who was defeated
and slain by the Huns about the year 437, we must conclude
that Ekkehard's nomenclature was affected by the political
geography of his own day, when Worms was a Frankish town.
The other chief characters are known only from German and
E. L. I. CH. III.


## p. 34 (#54) ##############################################

34
Early National Poetry
Scandinavian tradition. But the story may very well be founded
on fact, as it is likely enough that Attila did take hostages from
the princes of eastern Gaul. In the Bavarian fragments the
hero belongs not to Aquitaine but to Langres. Now, the country
round Langres and Chalon-sur-Saône (Hiltgund's home in the
Latin poem), although the latter was included in the Burgundy
of the tenth century, must once have been settled by Franks
from the Netherlands; for we find here, in later times, districts
called pagus Hamauorum and pagus Hattuariorum. This
settlement, as Zeuss pointed out long ago, probably took place
in the reign of Constantius Chlorus. Hence, there may have been
Frankish princes at Chalon and Langres in the time of Attila.
The rest of the poems which we have to treat in this
chapter are preserved in the Exeter Book. It will be con-
venient to take Widsith first; for, though not an epic itself, it
contains much matter in common with poems of that type.
Indeed, so many princes and peoples are mentioned in the course
of the poem that its importance for the history of the migration
period can hardly be overestimated.
In the introduction (11. 1-9) it is stated that the poet
belonged to the Myrgingas, a people or rather dynasty whose
territories, apparently, were conterminous with those of the Angli
(cf. ll. 41 ff. ), and that, in company with a princess named Ealhhild,
he visited the court of the Gothic king Eormenric. Then, in
Il. 10 ff. , he begins to enumerate the princes with whom he was
acquainted. This list contains the names of many kings famous
in history and tradition together with those of the peoples which
they governed, the formula employed being “A. ruled over B. "
Among them we find Gifica (Gibicho), Breca, Finn, Hnaef, Saeferth
(Sigeferth ? ) and Ongentheow, who have been mentioned above,
as well as Attila, Eormenric, Theodric (king of the Franks) and
others, some of whom are not known from other sources. In
Il. 35–44 there is a reference to the single combat of Offa, king
of Angel, a story which is given by Saxo (pp. 113 ff. ), Svend
Aagesen and the Vitae Duorum Offarum. In 11. 45–49 we
hear of the long and faithful partnership of Hrothgar and
Hrothwulf and of their victory over Ingeld, an incident to which
Beowulf (IL. 83 ff. ) has only a vague allusion. Then, in 1L 50 ff.
the poet again speaks of his journeys and gives a list of the
nations he had visited. This list is twice interrupted (11. 65–67,
70—74) by references to the generosity with which he had been


## p. 35 (#55) ##############################################

Widsith
35
treated by Guthhere, king of the Burgundians, and by Aelfwine
(Alboin) in Italy. In Il. - 76—78 there is another interruption
referring to the power of Casere, i. e. the Greek emperor. Then,
in II. 88 ff, the poet tells of the gifts he had received from
Eormenric, from his lord Eadgils, prince of the Myrgingas and
from Ealhhild, and also of his own skill as a minstrel. At l. 109,
he begins an enumeration of the Gothic heroes he had visited,
most of whom are known to us from Jordanes, Völsunga Saga
(probably also Hervarar Saga), Vilkina Saga and German tradi-
tions. In 11. 119 ff. he speaks of the ceaseless warfare round the
forest of the Vistula, when the Goths had to defend their country
against the Huns. The list closes with a reference to the martial
deeds of Wudga and Hama, who are mentioned also in Waldhere
and Beowulf as well as in Vilkina Saga, the former also in many
other continental authorities. The epilogue consists of a short
reflection on the life of wandering minstrels and on the advantages
gained by princes in treating them generously.
Apart from the introduction and epilogue, which may originally
have been in prose, this poem appears to have been composed in
strophic form. Its date cannot be determined with certainty.
There is nothing, however, to prevent us from assigning it to
the seventh century or even an earlier date; for, though a Christian
element is present (11. 15, 82—87, 131-134), it is very slight and
may be removed without affecting the structure of the poem.
Alboin, who died about 572, is, probably, the latest person men-
tioned. Now Ealhhild's father bears the same name (Eadwine)
as Alboin's father, i. e. Audoin, king of the Langobardi, a fact
which has led many scholars to believe that Ealhhild was Alboin's
sister, and, consequently, that the poet lived towards the close of
the sixth century. This hypothesis, however, involves, practically,
the reconstruction of the whole poem; for the poet repeatedly
speaks of his visits to Eormenric who, as we know from Ammianus
Marcellinus (xxxi, 3. 1. ), died about two centuries before Alboin,
and clearly implies that Ealhhild was his contemporary, whereas
he only once alludes to Alboin, in a passage covering five lines.
The identity of the two names is, therefore, probably a mere
coincidence. As a matter of fact, the heroes commemorated in
the poem lived at wide intervals from one another, though
Eormenric and persons apparently contemporary with him figure
more prominently than the rest. With greater probability one
might suppose that traditions existed of a famous minstrel who
1 Cf. Paulus Diaconus, Hist. Lang. I, 27.
3–2


## p. 36 (#56) ##############################################

36
Early National Poetry
lived at the court of a prince named Eadgils, and that on the
basis of these traditions later minstrels built up lists of the
chief national heroes known to them. Against this suggestion,
however, stands the fact that the minstrel's name is really
unknown, for Widsith is an obviously fictitious name (meaning
“far-travelled") and must be explained by the statement in ll. 2 f.
as to the extent of the poet's journeys. On the other hand, any
hypothesis which would represent the minstrel as a fictitious
character is open to the objection that, in that case, he would
hardly have been associated with so obscure a person as Eadgils,
prince of the Myrgingas, a family not mentioned except in this
poem. On the whole, then, the hypothesis that the kernel of the
poem is really the work of an unknown fourth century minstrel,
who did visit the court of Eormenric, seems to involve fewer
difficulties than any other. In that case, of course, such passages
as Il. 82 ff. must be regarded as merely the last stage in a process
of accretion which had been going on for some three centuries.
The elegy of Deor is a much shorter poem than Widsith
:(42 lines in all) and in its general tone presents a striking
contrast to it. While Widsith tells of the glory of famous heroes
and, incidentally, of the minstrel's own success, Deor is taken up
with stories of misfortune, which are brought forward in illustra-
tion of the poet's troubles. The strophic form is preserved
throughout and, except in the last fifteen lines, which seem to
have been somewhat remodelled, each strophe ends with a refrain
(a phenomenon for which it would be difficult to find a parallel in
Old English poetry): “That (trouble) was got over (or brought to
an end); so can this be. ”
Originally, perhaps, every strophe referred to a different story
of trouble. Thus, strophe 1 deals with the misfortunes suffered by
Weland at the hands of Nithhad and strophe 2 with the wrongs
done by Weland to Beaduhild. For both these we may refer to
the Old Norse poem Völundarkviða. In strophe 3 we hear of
the passionate love of Geat, presumably the mythical person from
whom the English kings traced their descent. Strophe 4 speaks
of the thirty years' exile of a certain Theodric, probably the same
Theodric who, in Waldhere, is associated with Widia (Wudga). In
German tradition, from the Hildebrandslied onwards, as well as by
most modern writers, he is identified with Theodric, king of the
Ostrogoths (Dietrich von Bern). Strophe 5 deals with the cruelty
of Eormenric and the sufferings of his people. What follows is not


## p. 37 (#57) ##############################################

Deor. The Wanderer 37
so clear, and Il. 31–34 are the work of a Christian. The closing
lines, however, are very remarkable. The poet states that he had
been the bard of the Heodeningas, and that he had been displaced
from his office by a skilful minstrel called Heorrenda. Now, the
name Heodeningas must mean either the descendants of Heoden
or, like the Old Norse Hiaðningar, Heoden (Heðinn) himself and
his people. The story of Heðinn's flight with Hildr, the daughter
of Högni, was well known in the north? and, apparently, also in
England, if we may judge from Widsith, l. 21. Again, Heorrenda
is identical with Hiarrandi, the name of Heðinn's father in the
Norse accounts; in the Austrian poem Kudrun, however, which
seems to contain the same story in a corrupt form, Horant is a
near relative of Hetel (Heðinn) and also a famous minstrel.
Hagena (Högni), according to Widsith, was king of the Holmryge,
a people probably in eastern Pomerania, and Heoden also may
have belonged to the same region. When these persons lived we
do not know; but such evidence as we have points to a period
anterior to the sixth century. There is nothing in the story to
justify the supposition that they are of mythical origin.
Here again, as in the case of Widsith, it is possible that a
poem has been built up round the memory of a famous minstrel,
-one who met with misfortune in later life. Yet we have
no knowledge of such a person from other sources, while the
statement given in the poem itself as to its origin is quite
definite. If this statement is true, the poem must, of course, be
very ancient. But there seems to be no valid reason for disputing
its antiquity; for the four lines which show Christian influence
may very well be a later addition, while the supposed identity of
the exiled Theodric with Theodric the Ostrogoth must be regarded
as a somewhat doubtful hypothesis at the best.
The rest of the shorter poems contain no proper names. Their
subjects seem to be drawn rather from typical characters and
situations than from the experiences of historical or legendary
persons. They are of quite uncertain date, though, doubtless,
much later than the two poems we have just discussed. They
betray little or no trace of strophic form.
The Wanderer is a rather long elegy (115 lines), depicting
the sufferings of a man who has lost his lord. Alone and friendless,
he travels over the sea, seeking a home where he can find
* Cf. Skaldskaparmal, cap. 50, Sörla Thattr, cap. 5 ff. , Saxo, pp. 158 f.


## p. 38 (#58) ##############################################

38
Early National Poetry
protection. In sleep, visions of his former happiness come back
to him. When he awakes, his heart sinks at the sight of the
grey waves and the falling snow. Then he passes on to reflect
on the vicissitudes of human life and on the ruined castles which
may be seen in all directions, testifying to the destruction that
has overtaken their owners. The poem throws an interesting
light on the close nature of the relationship subsisting in early
times between lord and man. It has been suggested that
Cynewulf was the author; but this view is now generally aban-
doned. Indeed, the Christian element is slight and may be due
to later additions.
The Seafarer is a poem of about the same length as The
Wanderer and resembles it in several passages rather closely.
The sequence of thought, however, is much less clear. The poet
begins by reflecting on the miseries which he has endured when
travelling by sea in winter-miseries of which the landsman in
his comfortable castle knows nothing. Yet in ll. 33 ff. he says
that he has an irresistible impulse to try the seaman's life. He
who feels this desire cannot be deterred by any of the pleasures
of home, however fortunately circumstanced he may be. From
1. 64 onwards, he begins a comparison between the transitory
nature of earthly pleasures and the eternal rewards of religion,
concluding with an exhortation to his hearers to fix their hopes
on heavener to explain the appar take it as a di
In order to explain the apparent contradictions of the poem,
some scholars have proposed to take it as a dialogue between
an old seaman and a young man who wishes to try the seaman's
life; but there is a good deal of disagreement as to the distribu-
tion of the lines. The second half of the poem, with its religious
reflections, is believed by many to be a later addition. If that
be not the case, it is at least questionable whether we are justi-
fied in classing The Seafarer among national poems.
The Wife's Complaint is another poem which presents serious
difficulties owing to obscurity in the train of thought. Indeed,
in at least one passage the obscurity is so great that one can
hardly believe the text, as it stands, to be correct. The speaker
is a woman who bewails the ever increasing troubles with which
she is beset. First, her husband departed from her over the
sea. Then, apparently at the instigation of his relatives, she is
imprisoned in an old dwelling dug out of the earth, under an


## p. 39 (#59) ##############################################

The Husband's Message 39
oak, where she sits in solitude bewailing her troubles the whole
day long. She has no friends at hand, and all the vows of lasting
love which she and her husband had exchanged in time past
have come to nothing.
The Husband's Message, so far as it can be read, is a much
simpler poem; but, unfortunately, a number of letters have been
lost in ll. 2–6 and 32—40 owing to a large rent in the MS. The
poem is in the form of a speech addressed, apparently by means
of a staff inscribed with runic letters, to a woman of royal rank.
The speech is a message from the woman's husband (or possibly
lover), who has had to leave his country in consequence of a
vendetta. It is to the effect that he has succeeded in gaining for
himself a position of wealth and dignity in another land. He now
wishes to assure her that his devotion is unchanged, to remind
her of the vows they had made in times past and to ask her
to sail southwards to join him as soon as spring comes.
This is the gist of the poem as it appears in almost all editions.
It has recently been pointed out, however, that the seventeen
lines which immediately precede it in the MS and which have
generally been regarded as a riddle-unconnected with the poem
itself-seem really to form the beginning of the speech. In these
lines the object speaking states that once it grew by the seashore,
but that a knife and human skill have fitted it to give utterance
to a message which requires to be delivered privately.
Again, more than one scholar has remarked that the poem
looks very much like a sequel to The Wife's Complaint. Others
have denied the connection between the two poems on the ground
that in The Wife's Complaint, 1. 15, the lady's imprisonment is
attributed to the husband himself. But it should be observed
that this passage is scarcely intelligible in its present form and,
further, that it seems to conflict with what is said elsewhere in
the poem. On the whole the balance of probability seems to
me to be in favour of the connection.
The Ruin follows The Husband's Message in the Exeter
Book and suffers from the same rent. It differs, somewhat, in
character from the rest of these poems in that the misfortunes
which it tells of are those not of a person but of a place. First
the poet describes an ancient building, or rather group of
buildings, deserted, roofless and tottering. Then he goes on to
reflect that these buildings were once richly adorned, full of


## p. 40 (#60) ##############################################

40
Early National Poetry
proud warriors and gay with feasting—until the day came when
their defenders were annihilated. As it is clearly stated that
the buildings were of stone, and stress is laid on the marvellous
skill shown in their construction, there can be little doubt that
the subject is drawn from one of the Roman cities or castles in
Britain. The reference to many banqueting halls in l. 24 seems
to point to a place of considerable size; and, from the mention
of hot baths in ll. 39 ff. , several scholars have inferred that Bath
is intended. But, unfortunately, so much of the text is lost that
the description cannot clearly be made out.
T A brief reference should be added, in conclusion, to the few
traces that remain of the religious poetry of heathen times. The
higher forms of such poetry, such as the hymns used in royal
sanctuaries or at great popular festivals, have entirely perished.
The songs which have been preserved seem to be in the nature of
incantations for securing the fertility of the fields or for warding
off witchcraft, and even these are largely transformed through
Christian influence. Some of them occur in descriptions of the
magical ceremonies at which they were sung. We may notice
especially the verses used for the blessing of the plough when the
first furrow is drawn. They are addressed to "Erce, the mother
of the earth,” and are in the form of a prayer that the Almighty
will grant her rich fields, full of barley and wheat. Then the earth
is greeted as “mother of mankind. ” Other verses, less affected
by Christian ideas, speak of the shafts shot by female beings
(witches or valkyries) which ride through the air, and of the
means by which these shafts can be averted or expelled.
Another set of verses, in which the god Woden is mentioned,
describes the magic properties of nine herbs. It is probable that
all these songs, together with the descriptions of the ceremonies
accompanying them, were written down at a comparatively late
period, when the heathen practices which survived among the
peasantry-apart from the more harmful species of magic-were
no longer regarded as dangerous.


## p. 41 (#61) ##############################################

CHAPTER IV
OLD ENGLISH CHRISTIAN POETRY
ONLY two names emerge from the anonymity which shrouds
the bulk of Old English Christian poetry, namely, those of
Caedmon and Cynewulf; and, in the past, practically all the
religious poetry we possess has been attributed to one or other
of these two poets. But, as we shall see, the majority of the
poems to be considered here should rather be regarded as the
work of singers whose names have perished, as folk-song, as
manifestations of the spirit of the people in the same sense in
which the tale of Beowulf's adventures embodied the aspirations
of all valiant thegns, or the epic of Waldhere summarised the
popular ideals of love and honour. The subject of the Christian
epic is, indeed, for the most part, apparently, foreign and even,
at times, oriental : the heroes of the Old and New Testaments,
the saints as they live in the legends of the church, furnish the
theme. The method of treatment hardly differs, however, from
that followed in non-Christian poetry; the metrical form, with
rare exceptions, is the alliterative line, constructed on the same
principles as in Beowulf; Wyrd has become the spirit of Pro-
vidence, Christ and His apostles have become English kings or
chiefs, followed, as in feudal duty bound, by hosts of clansmen;
the homage paid to the Divine Son is the allegiance due to
the scion of an Anglian king, comparable to that paid by Beowulf
to his liege lord Hygelac, or to that displayed by Byrhtnoth on
the banks of the Panta; the ideals of early English Christianity
do not differ essentially from those of English paganism. And yet
there is a difference.
The Christianity of England in the seventh and eighth
centuries, and the Latin influences brought in its wake, which
inspired the poetry under discussion, was a fusion, a com-
mingling, of two different strains. Accustomed as we are to date
the introduction of Christianity into England from the mission
of St Augustine, we are apt to forget that, prior to the landing


## p. 42 (#62) ##############################################

42 Old English Christian Poetry
of the Roman missionary on the shores of Kent, Celtic missionaries
from the islands of the west had impressed upon the northern
kingdoms, the earliest home of literary culture in these islands,
a form of Christianity differing in many respects from the more
theological type preached and practised by St Augustine and his
followers. Oswald, the martyr king of Northumbria, had been
followed from Iona, where, in his youth, he had found sanctuary,
by Aidan, the apostle of the north, to whose missionary enterprise
was due the conversion of the rude north Anglian tribes. The
monastery at Streoneshalh, or Whitby, for ever famous as the
home of Caedmon, was ruled by the abbess Hild in accordance
with Celtic, not Roman, usage ; and though, at the synod of
Whitby in 664, the unity of the church in England was assured
by the submission of the northern church to Roman rule, yet
the influence of Celtic Christianity may be traced in some of
the features that most characteristically distinguish Christian
from non-Christian poetry. It would, for instance, be hard to
deny that the depth of personal feeling expressed in a poem
like The Dream of the Rood, the joy in colour attested by the
vivid painting of blossom and leaf in The Phoenix and the
melancholy sense of kinship between the sorrow of the human
heart and the moaning of the grey cold waves that make The
Seafarer a human wail, are elements contributed to English
poetry by the Celts. St Columba had built his monastery on
the surf-beaten shores of the Atlantic, where man's dependence
on nature was an ever-present reality. The Celtic monastery was
the home of a brotherhood of priests, and the abbot was the father
of a family as well as its ecclesiastical superior.
The Christian
virtues of humility and meekness, in which the emissaries of
the British church found Augustine deficient, were valued in
Iona above orthodoxy and correctness of religious observance;
and the simplicity of ecclesiastical organisation characteristic of
Celtic Christianity, differing from the comparatively elaborate
nature of Roman organisation and ritual, produced a simple
form of Christianity, realdily understood by the unlettered people
of the north. It is the personal relation of the soul to God the
Father, the humanity of Christ, the brotherhood of man, the
fellowship of saints, that the Celtic missionaries seem to have
preached to their converts; and these doctrines inspired the
choicest passages of Old English religious poetry, passages worthy
of comparison with some of the best work of a later, more self-
conscious and introspective age.


## p. 43 (#63) ##############################################

Changes wrought by Christianity
43
This subjectivity is a new feature in English literature; for
most non-Christian English poetry is epic. Beowulf is a tale of
brave deeds nobly done, with but few reflections concerning them.
At rare intervals, scattered here and there throughout the poem, we
meet with some touch of sentiment, a foreboding of evil to come, a
few words on the inexorable character of fate, an exhortation to
do great deeds so that after death the chosen warrior may fare
the better, occasionally a half-Christian reference to an all-ruling
Father (probably the addition of a later and Christian hand);
but, as a rule, no introspection checks the even flow of narrative:
arma virumque cano. When Christianity became the source
of poetic inspiration, we find the purely epic character of a poem
modified by the introduction of a lyric element. The hero no
longer aspires to win gold from an earthly king ; his prize is a
heavenly crown, to be won, it may even be, in spiritual conflict;
the glories of life on earth are transitory; earthly valour cannot
atone for the stains of sin upon the soul; the beauty of nature,
in her fairest aspects, cannot compare with the radiance of a
better land; the terror that lurks waiting for the evil-doer upon
earth fades away at the contemplation of that day of wrath and
mourning when the Judge of all the earth shall deal to every
man according to his deeds. The early Christian poet does not
sing of earthly love; we have no erotic poetry in pre-Conquest
England; but the sentiment that gives life to the poetry of Dante
and Milton is not absent from the best of our early poets' attempts
at religious self-expression.
Beyond the fact that his name seems to imply that he was of
Celtic descent, we have no knowledge of the historical Caedmon
other than that to be derived from the often-quoted passage in
Bede:
In the monastery of this abbess (i. e. the abbess Hild at Streoneshalb)
there was a certain brother specially distinguished and honoured by divine
grace, for he was wont to make songs such as tended to religion and piety.
Whatsoever he had learned from scholars concerning the Scriptures he
forthwith decked out in poetio language with the greatest sweetness and
fervour. . . . Many others, also, in England, imitated him in the composition of
religious songs. He had not, indeed, been taught of men, or through men, to
practise the art of song, but he had received divine aid, and his power of song
was the gift of God. Wherefore he could never compose any idle or false
song, but only those which pertained to religion and which his pious tongue
might fitly sing. The man had lived in the world till the time that he
was of advanced age, and had never learnt any poetry. And as he was
often at a feast when it was arranged, to promote mirth, that they should
all in turn sing to the harp, whenever he saw the harp come near him he
arose out of shame from the feast and went home to his house. Having


## p. 44 (#64) ##############################################

44
Old English Christian Poetry
done so on one occasion, he left the house of entertainment, and went out
to the stables, the charge of the horses having been committed to him for
that night. When, in due time, he stretched his limbs on the bed there and
fell asleep, there stood by him in a dream a man who saluted him and
greeted him, calling on him by name : “ Caedmon, sing me something. "
Then he answered and said: “I cannot sing anything, and therefore I
came ont from this entertainment and retired here, as I know not how to sing. "
Again he who spoke to him said: “Yet you could sing. ” Then said Caedmon:
“What shall I sing? " He said: “Sing to me the beginning of all things. ” On
receiving this answer, Caedmon at once began to sing, in praise of God the
Creator, verses and words which he had never heard, the order of which
is as follows [quorum iste est sensus]: “Now let us praise the guardian of
the heavenly kingdom, the power of the Creator and the counsel of His
mind, the works of the Father of glory; how He, the eternal Lord, originated
every marvel. He, the holy Creator, first created the heaven as a roof for
the children of the earth; then the eternal Lord, guardian of the human
race, the almighty Baler, afterwards fashioned the world as a soil for men. ”
Then he arose from his sleep, and he had firmly in his memory all that he
sang while asleep. And to these words he soon added many others, in the
same style of song, worthy of God. Book iv, ch. 24. (Trans. Miller. )
Bede goes on to narrate how, the matter having been made
known to the abbess, she caused the best scholars to test the
new poet's powers, and how, when it was proved that a divine
gift had, indeed, been bestowed upon the neat-herd, she urged
him to abandon his worldly calling and to become a monk.
Which thing he did, and, progressing in his new vocation,
all that he could learn by listening he pondered in his heart and, ruminating
like some clean beast, he turned it into the sweetest of songs. His song and
his music were so delightful to hear, that even his teachers wrote down
the words from his lips and learnt them. He sang first of the earth's creation
and the beginning of man and all the story of Genesis, which is the first book
of Moses; and afterwards about the departure of the people of Israel from
the land of Egypt and their entry into the land of promise; and about
many other narratives in the books of the canon of Scripture; and about
Christ's incarnation and His passion and His ascension into heaven; and
about the coming of the Holy Ghost, and the teaching of the apostles;
and again about the day of judgment to come, and about the terror of
hell torment, and about the kingdom of heaven, he composed many a
song. And he also composed many others about the divine blessings and
judgments.
While making due allowance for a possible desire on Bede's part
to extol the fame of an earlier contemporary-Bede himself
died in 735—we should remember that Bede is one of the most
careful and trustworthy of historians, and that he lived not far
from the scene of Caedmon's life; it would, therefore, appear
that we have not sufficient reason for rejecting as untrue the
enumeration of Caedmon's literary achievements as given in the
above passage.


## p. 45 (#65) ##############################################

Caedmon's Hymn
45
The hymn was first published in its Northumbrian form? by
Wanley, in his Catalogus historico-criticus (1705), p. 287, as
canticum illud Saxonicum Caedmonis a Baeda memoratum;
and, from that day to this, it has been regarded by the majority
of scholars as the genuine work of Caedmon.
Bede gives a Latin version of the lines, which corresponds very
closely to the original, but which he introduces thus : Caedmon
coepit cantare. . . versus quorum iste est sensus; and, in conclusion,
he reiterates : Hic est sensus, non autem ordo ipse verborum,
as if he had given a merely approximate rendering of his original.
Much discussion has hinged upon the exact meaning to be
attached to the words sensus and ordo, though Bede is evidently
alluding merely to the difficulty of reproducing poetry in prose,
for he continues : neque enim possunt carmina, quamvis optime
composita, ex alia in aliam linguam ad verbum sine detrimento
sui decoris ac dignitatis transferri. The West Saxon version
of the lines is preserved in the English translation of Bede's
Ecclesiastical History, with the introductory comment: "bara
endebyrdnis bis is. ” Now “endebyrdnis” simply means ordo,
and it may be safe to assume that both Bede's Latin version and
the West Saxon version are attempts at translation from the
original Northumbrian.
Bede's detailed enumeration of Caedmon's other achievements
must be held responsible for the attribution to Caedmon of a large
number of religious poems of a similar character, extant only in
West Saxon form, in the Bodl. MS, Junius XI, an opinion which,
in the light of modern critical scholarship, is no longer tenable.
Indeed, no one would to-day seriously maintain even that these
poems are all by one author; it is more likely, as we shall see,
that more than one writer has had a hand in each. But the
fact that it is impossible to claim these particular poems for
Caedmon does not militate against the probability of his having
composed similar, though, perhaps, shorter pieces, which may have
been worked upon later by more scholarly hands. Religious
poetry, sung to the harp as it passed from hand to hand, must
have flourished in the monastery of the abbess Hild, and the
kernel of Bede's story concerning the birth of our earliest poet
must be that the brethren and sisters on that bleak northern
shore spoke “to each other in psalms and hymns and spiritual
songs. "
* See Cambridge Univ. Lib. MS. Kk, 5, 16, Fol. 128.
? Cf. post, Chapter vi.


## p. 46 (#66) ##############################################

46
Old English Christian Poetry
The most important of the religious poems at one time
attributed to Caedmon are Genesis, Exodus, Daniel.
From the point of view of the historian of literature, Genesis
is the most interesting of these. It is a poetical paraphrase of
the first of the canonical books in the Old Testament, extending
to the story of the sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham. The poem
opens with the praise of the Creator in a style recalling the
lines quoted by Bede. The poet then proceeds to relate the revolt
and fall of the angels (which, according to ancient theology,
necessitated the creation of man to fill the vacant place in
heaven), and then the creation of the earth, in accordance with
the opening chapters of the Vulgate. At this point we have a
repetition of the first motif, the fall of the angels ; Satan, in
anger at having fallen from his high estate, avenges himself on
God by tempting man; and the rest of the narrative proceeds
in accordance with the Biblical narrative.
Attention had been drawn to metrical and linguistic peculiarities
distinguishing the second version (Genesis B) of the fall of the
angels and the temptation (II. 235–851) from the rest of
the poem; but it remained for Sievers to point out that this
obviously interpolated passage was borrowed from a foreign
source, that the structure of the alliterative lines resembled
that in vogue amongst continental Saxons and that the voca-
bulary and syntax were now and again Old Saxon, not English.
Relying upon the accuracy of his observation in detail, he then
hazarded the bold conjecture that these lines were an Anglicised
version of a portion of an Old Saxon paraphrase of the Old
Testament, long lost, composed by the author of the Old Saxon
paraphrase of the New Testament, commonly known as the
Heliand. This brilliant conjecture has since been confirmed
by the discovery in the Vatican library of portions of the Old
Saxon original, which dates from the latter part of the ninth
century. One of the Old Saxon fragments so found corresponded
to a passage in the Old English Genesis. Caedmonian authorship
is, therefore, rendered impossible for the interpolation, and the
scholarship of the author seems to preclude the possibility that an
unlearned man was the author of the rest of the poem, though
Caedmon's hymns may have been familiar to, and used by, the
writer. It matters little whether we assume the interpolated
passage to be the work of an Old Saxon monk resident in
* Cf. the Latin Praefatio prefixed to the Heliand.


## p. 47 (#67) ##############################################

Genesis
47
England, but unable to dissociate himself entirely from native
habits of speech, or whether we look upon it as a somewhat
imperfect translation from Old Saxon by some Old English monk
whom professional duties—we need only think of Boniface-had
brought into contact with the learning and literature of the
continent. At any rate it is an early, and a pleasing, instance
of the fruitful exchange of literary ideas between two great
nations.
The relative age of the two poems is a matter still under
discussion Genesis B cannot have been composed earlier than
the second half of the ninth century, since we know that the author
of the Heliand, upon whose work it is based, wrote in response to
a command from king Lewis the Pious; but we have hardly any
data for determining whether it is earlier or later in date of
composition than Genesis A. Its author, like the author of the
Heliand, apparently made use of the works of bishop Avitus of
Vienne, the medieval Latin poet.
Genesis A contains not a few passages illustrative of that
blending of heathen and Christian elements which is characteristic
of Old English religious poetry. The description of Old Testament
fights shows that the spirit of the author of the Battle of Finns-
burh is to be found beneath the veneer of Christianity. And,
on the other hand, the description of the dove, seeking rest
and finding none, could only be the work of a Christian poet.
The tenderness of feeling for the dumb creation, and the joy in
“rest after toil” which it expresses, are due to Christian influences
upon the imaginative powers of an Old English scop
Genesis B contains some fine poetic passages. The character
of Satan is admirably conceived, and the familiar theme of a
lost paradise is set forth in dignified and dramatic language
not unworthy of the height of its great argument. In the
dark regions and “swart mists” of Hell, Satan and his host,
swept thither by the Lord of Heaven himself, indulge in a
joy that is purely heathen, in contemplating the vengeance
to be taken on the race that has supplanted them in the favour
of God.
Exodus is a paraphrase of a portion only of the book from
which it takes its name, i. e. the passage of the Israelites through
the Red Sea and the destruction of the Egyptians. Part of the
For a discussion of the possible relation between the Satan of Genesis B and the
Satan of Paradise Lost, of, Stopford Brooke, Early English Literature, vol. a,
pp. 101 ff. and Morley, English Writers, vol. II, p. 109.
hand, the at the ven
and findino


## p. 48 (#68) ##############################################

#8
Old English Christian Poetry
poem? , in which the ancestors of the Israelites are enumerated and
described, is, possibly, the work of a second poet, as it is simpler
in style than the body of the poem, and the theme is not entirely
relevant; there is certainly a break after 1. 445. The distinctive
feature of the poem is the beauty and vigour with which martial
scenes are depicted. Here again, the feeling of the old epic
writers, under another guise, is clearly apparent. Not even in
Judith or The Battle of Maldon do we find more successful
attempts in dramatic grouping; the din and clash of battle, though
no actual battle is described, the war-wolf and the raven greedy
for prey, the heaving of the shields, the brandishing of battle-bills,
recall the martial tone of the best war-poetry of our battle-loving
ancestors. The author of Genesis A writes as though afraid to
depart even from the wording of his original; the author of
Exodus, possessed by the lust for word-painting, draws upon an
exuberant imagination steeped in reminiscences of brave blows
and doughty deeds, not even nominally Christian.
The poem entitled Danid need not detain us. After a
historical introduction, for which the poet is not indebted to his
source, he versifies selected portions of the book of Daniel? The
poem has one new feature. The author uses his material for
homiletic purposes and inculcates certain moral virtues : for
instance, the duty of humility and obedience to the will of God.
Daniel is transmitted in the Junian codex. A portion of the
subject, dealing with the episode of the three children in the fiery
furnace, is transmitted also in the Exeter Book, in a short poem of
75 lines called Azarias, in which are the beautiful lines descriptive
of the change wrought by the appearance of the angel of the Lord:
Then 'twas in the oven when the angel came,
Windy cool and winsome, to the weather likest
When is sent to earth in the summer tide,
Dropping down of dew-rain at the dawn of day3.
Three minor poems, originally thought to be one, and by
Grein called Crist and Satan, should be mentioned here,
since, by reason of their being transmitted in the codex MS
Bodl. XI, they, together with the three more important poems
just discussed, have been attributed to Caedmon. The first of
them deals with the subject of the Fall of the Angels, the second
with Chrisť s Harrowing of Hell and His resurrection, together
with a brief account of His ascension and coming to judgment,
1 Ll. 362_-445.
• Up to chapter v, 22.
8 Stopford Brooke's version.


## p. 49 (#69) ##############################################

Cynewulf
49
the third with Christ's Temptation. Only the first is complete,
All three, probably, belong to the end of the ninth century and
all have a homiletic tendency. The second has been compared
with the Crist of Cynewulf, with which it is linked by virtue of
theme as well as by style. The description of the last judgment
suggests the more impressive picture of that event contained
in Crist, and the Harrowing of Hell recalls, and can sustain
comparison with, examples of later more elaborate treatment of
the same subject. By their religious fervour, and by their ap-
parently ruder form, it is possible that these poems are nearer to
the original body of Caedmon's work than the poems previously
discussed.
The finest of all the poems erroneously attributed to Caedmon
is the fragment entitled Judith. As there seems to be ground
for supposing that this beautiful fragment, worthy of the skill
of a scop whose Christianity had not sufficed to quell his martial
instincts, his pride in battle and his manly prowess, is of later
date than has been thought by certain historians, it is dealt with
in a later chapter of the present volume.
Turning to Cynewulf and the poems that may be, or have
been, attributed to him, we are on somewhat safer ground. The
personality of the poet is, indeed, wrapped in an obscurity
hardly less deep than that which hides Caedmon. The only
truth at which we can arrive concerning him is that he must be
the author of four well-known poems, since he marked them as
his own by the insertion of his signature in runes. Conjecture
has been busy to prove that he may have been identical with
a certain abbot of Peterborough, who lived about the year 1000.
But this hypothesis has ceased to be tenable since we know that
the West Saxon transcript of his poems, the only form in which
the accredited ones are preserved, cannot be the original ; more-
over, the abbot invariably spelt his name Cinwulf. Equally
impossible is the theory that he was Cynewulf, bishop of
Lindisfarne, who died in 781 or 783. The latter lived in
troublous times, and nothing we know of his life agrees with
inferences we may reasonably draw from autobiographical
allusions in Cynewulf's poems. A theory that the author was
certainly of Northumbrian origin was, in the first instance, based
upon an erroneous interpretation of the first riddle in a col-
lection of Old English Riddles long attributed to him. Dietrich
gave the solution as Coenwulf, the supposed Northumbrian
form of the name Cynewulf. But, apart from the fact that
E. L. I. CH. IV.


## p. 50 (#70) ##############################################

50
Old English Christian Poetry
syllabic riddles are not known in Old English literature, we
must remember that, on the four occasions when the poet
spelt his own name, he used one or other of two forms, i. e.
Cynewulf or Cynwulf. Both these forms must go back to an
older one in which the medial e appeared as ¿. In Northumbria,
this medial i became e, roughly speaking, about 800; in Mercia
the transition was practically accomplished by 750. This fact
lends colour to the hypothesis of Wülker that Cynewulf was a
Mercian, a theory which A. S. Cook has adopted in support of a
conjecture of his own, namely, that the poet was a certain
Cynulf, an ecclesiastic who was present, as his signature to a
decree proves, at a synod held at Clovesho in 803. The synod
was an important one, in so far as at it the archbishop of
Canterbury was recognised as primate of the English church.
Cynulf's signature, following close upon that of the bishop of
Dunwich, leads A. S. Cook to the further assumption that he
was a priest in the diocese of Dunwich, where he would have
ample opportunity for studying those sea-effects, the description
of which is characteristic of his poetry. Whether or not Cynewulf
is to be identified with this ecclesiastic, there is no doubt
that the assumption of Mercian origin would do away with
one or two difficulties which the assumption of Northumbrian
origin in the narrower sense leaves unsolved. During the latter
half of the eighth century, Northumbria was, politically, too
troubled to be a “kindly nurse” of letters, though, on the other
hand, it might be asserted that the political unrest of Northumbria
may be reflected in the melancholy nature and “autumnal grace"
of Cynewulf's poetry. Again, though there is no doubt that a Mercian
origin would facilitate the transcription of the poems into West
Saxon, yet we have West Saxon transcripts of other originally
Northumbrian poems, a fact which affects the value of geographical
arguments of this nature.
The most valid, albeit negative, argument against taking the
term Northumbrian to mean simply non-West Saxon, hence,
possibly, Mercian, is that we have no definite evidence for the
existence of a Mercian school of poetry, such as the development
of a poet like Cynewulf seems to postulate. His undisputed work
is of too mature a character to seem to be the spontaneous product
of a self-made singer, unfostered by literary society. Moreover,
he excels more especially in descriptions of the sea and the sea-
coast, a point in which a dweller inland might easily have been
deficient. Notable in this respect are Elene, which we know to be


## p. 51 (#71) ##############################################

His Personality
51
his, and Andreas which is very possibly his. The following lines,
for instance, must, surely, be the work of one whose daily life had
been spent in contact with the sea :
Over the sea-marges
Hourly urged they on. . . the wave-riding horses.
Then they let o'er Fifel's wave foaming stride along
Steep-stemmed rushers of the sea. Oft withstood the bulwark,
O'er the surging of the waters, swinging strokes of waves 1,
Further, assuming Guthlac B to be by Cynewulf, we may note
the fact that the fen-journey of the original has been transformed
into a sea-voyage, and this would appear to tell against an East
Anglian authorship.
The final result of much discussion seems to resolve itself
into this : that Cynewulf was not a West Saxon, but, probably,
a Northumbrian, though Mercian origin is not impossible; and
that he wrote towards the end of the eighth century. This latter
point will find further support when we proceed to discuss the
individual poems.
We know nothing else concerning Cynewulf with any degree of
certainty. We infer from the nature of his poetry that he was of
a deeply religious nature, but it is hazardous to deduce the
character of a poet from his apparently subjective work; we
learn that he lived to an old age, which he felt to be a burden;
that, at some time of his life, he had known the favour of
princes and enjoyed the gifts of kings; he must have been the
thegn or scop of some great lord, and not merely an itinerant
singer or gleeman, as some critics have beld. He was a man
of learning, certainly a good Latin scholar, for some of his work
is based upon Latin originals. Critics are not agreed as to
the period of life in which he occupied himself with the compo-
sition of religious poetry, nor as to the chronological order of his
works. Some scholars assume that, after leading until old age the
life of a man of the world, and attaining some distinction as an
author of secular poetry-of which, by the way, if the Riddles are
rejected, we have no trace-he became converted by the vision
described in The Dream of the Rood, and devoted himself ever
afterwards to religious poetry, the last consummate effort of his
poetic powers being Elene. There are two drawbacks to this
theory, the first being that we cannot base biographical deductions
with any certainty upon a poem like The Dream of the Rood, which
we have no historical grounds for claiming as Cynewulf's; the
· Stopford Brooke's version.
• See p. 58.
4–2


## p. 52 (#72) ##############################################

52
Old English Christian Poetry
second, that it is difficult to assume that a man advanced in years
could have composed so large a quantity of religious poetry as,
even after the most rigid exclusion of the unlikely, we are com-
pelled to attribute to him. Other critics hold that The Dream of
the Rood was followed immediately by Elene, and that all other
Cynewulfian poems were written later. If that be so, the poet's
art must have undergone very rapid deterioration, for all the other
poems attributed to him are inferior to Elene and The Dream.
The poems marked as Cynewulf's own by the insertion of runes
are Crist, Juliana, The Fates of the Apostles and Elene. Crist is
the first poem in the codex known as the Exeter Book, a manuscript
I preserved in the cathedral library at Exeter. The first eight pages,
and, consequently, the opening portion of Crist, are missing. The
manuscript probably dates from the eleventh century and is,
apparently, written throughout by one and the same hand.
Juliana is contained in the same book, and, of other poems
attributed to Cynewulf, and certainly belonging to his school,
Guthlac, Andreas and The Phoenix will be mentioned below.
Crist falls into three clearly defined parts, the first dealing with
the advent of Christ on earth, the second with His ascension, the
third with His second advent to judge the world. The second part
contains Cynewulf's signature in runes? The unity of the poem
has not remained unquestioned Scholars have brought forward
linguistic and metrical arguments to prove that we are dealing not
with one but with three poems; that source, theme and treat-
ment differ so greatly as to render the assumption of a common
authorship for all three incredible, and to reduce us to the necessity
of denying authorship by Cynewulf to any but the second part,
which is signed by him. Almost the best argument brought forward
by these iconoclastic critics is the undoubted fact that Cynewulf's
signature occurs, as a rule, near the conclusion of a poem, not
in the middle, and that it does so occur towards the end of the
second part. A further valid argument against the unity of the
poem might be derived from the theme of the second part.
This deals with Christ's reception in Heaven after His sojourn on
earth, and only by some stretch of imagination can the event be
looked upon as parallel to His twofold coming on earth. Yet
critics have discovered a link with the first part in a passage
definitely referring to Christ's first advent, and the references to
the last judgment in the runic passage have been regarded as an
ure occurs, as critics is the unest argument
1 Ll. 797 ff.
' LI, 586—599.


## p. 53 (#73) ##############################################

Crist
53
anticipation of the third part. The question is a nice one and is
not, at present, capable of solution.