ivtovs limits the
immediately
preceding general descrip-
tion, 'roi's wept 1'ch trrpa'revope?
tion, 'roi's wept 1'ch trrpa'revope?
Demosthenese - First Philippic and the Olynthiacs
389--90 ET.
, and
Gilbert Gk. Const. Ant. i 3362:301 ET. ) Owing to the
critical position of affairs, Demosthenes here urges the im-
mediate appointment of an extraordinary commission for the
repeal of certain laws.
Bartel (Dem. Antn'ige p. 536) holds that the orator's proposal for the
appointment of vonoee? -ml. is not to be taken seriously as a formal and
definite motion. Such a proposal could not legally be put to an immedi-
ate vote, and, owing to the difficulty as well as the lengthy procedure and
uncertain result of a legislative trial, it was of no practical use for the
immediate emergency. He considers it probable that, by showing how it
was possible to make use of the theoric fund, the orator was really putting
pressure on his audience with a view to make them better inclined to
carry out the measures which had been resolved. But these notes of
warning were uttered in vain, for Olynthus had already fallen before the
citizen force had reached the place. The proposals and counsels of
Demosthenes had as little result now as two years before; it may even be
conjectured that we are indebted to this fact for the preservation of these
masterpieces of his art.
92. Inseam-re: 24 ? 25 Tall: vonofie? ras Ka9LeT're, ? 26 n. 9--
lf'eaOaL 11. , ? 27 Kaflldat 11. , ? 29 Kafilfoue? vwv raw 1! . . .
'rot'rroms: 24 ? 33 oted below; cp. e? v 'ro'is Bursa-10. 79, e? v flair.
fi 06100: 003. : Mid. used of the people; 'enact no
statute,' i. e. 'let the commissioners enact no statute. ' The
commissioners would be taken from the people themselves, and
the part are treated as the whole (K. ) Prohibition is here,
as usual, expressed b pa? with Subj. pfi Wide, and affirmative
command by Imper. (were (Goodwin MT. 5 259).
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 111 ? 10, 11 THIRD OLYNTHIAC 197
93. eia't--lxavotz 23 ? 87 urapxbu'rwv 'roa'or'rrwu v6,u. wv, Isocr.
7 ? 39 rd nhfifl'r] . . n51! vbawv, 8 ? 50 whole-rout TLHe? /reyoi rib/mus.
94. sis Tb napov: 18 ? 207, Ep. 6 ? 2, 29 ? 10 rpm): 16
1rap6v. hie-are: 24 ? 33 1'61! voawv 're? 'w mat-'va [. Li7 e? Eci'vm
AUITGL ande? va. eat at; e? v vol/. oOe? 'rais (l. 92).
? 11 l. 95. 're? 'w Oewpuabv, 'our festival-fund. ' From the time of
Pericles the poorer citizens received grants from the treasury to enable them
to pay the two obols charged for admission to ordinary places in the theatre
(Plut. Per. 9, and Ulpian on Ol. i init. ) This measure is attributed to
Cleophon in Aristotle s Const. of Athens 28 ? 8. The grants were originally
paid out of the surplus funds in tle? e treasury (Isocr. 8 ? 82 Eilnpdzi'dav-ro Tb
1f? I. I. miner/0v 1631/ 1rd v Ii ' my "Adm-0. 9 xix-rd. rdAav-rov Ii; rhvb xfia'r cw
nightmare" eimpe'plza). Pig/ti) first the fund was in charge of thepHellegto-
tamiae, or treasurers of the Athenian confederation. During the ad-
ministration of Eubulus (354739) it was managed by special oflicials, oi
e'rri 'rb 9mpix6v (mentioned in Aristot. Le. 43 ? 1, 47 ? 2). The surplus of
the revenue available for purposes of war was paid into the ' theoric fund'
on the understanding that it should he used to meet the expenses of war,
if necessary. But this understanding was soon disregarded. The poorer
classes were reluctant to give up their dole, and were supported in this
by the popular orators of the day. Hence the state was hampered in its
preparations for war, and, to meet the expenses required for that purpose,
had no alternative to levying an extraordinary war-tax. An attempt to
restore the fund to its proper purpose was made by Apollodorus, [59] ? 4
E'ypadu \Il'rit'bldlfll e'V 'rfi flouAfi 'A'n'ondprG 501M61in Kai ? ? fivsyxe 1rpo-
Bolikcvaot sis 'riw dfipov, M'va diaxetporovfiual. Tbv Binov err: doxsi 16.
wepto'wa Xpriptm'a. Tie Smurridemg arpariwnxd. rival. ei-re Osw uni, xekwe? wwv
pill 163! ve? uwv, lira-v ne? henos fi, 15. wepto'vra. ripen-a rfis townie-cw; v-rpa-
Tim-nin eivm. "A. This attempt belongs to t is same date as the Euboic
war, assigned to 350 14. 0. by ASchaefer, to 349 by Baran, and to 3&3 by
Weil and Blass. III the last case the proposal of Apollodorus would be
later than the date of the present speech. Apollodorus failed in his object,
and was condemned to pay a fine of one talent, [59] ? 8. We are even tol
that a law was carried by Eubulus enacting that the mere proposal t
apply the theoric fund to purposes of war should be punishable by death
(Libanius on OZ. iand schol. ) This is probably a mistaken inference
from the ambiguous use of dnoAe? UOal. in ? 121. 105 q. v. Demosthenes, at
any rate, shows considerable caution in approaching the subject in 1 ? ?
19-- and in the text. For the present he did not succeed in bringing
about any reform. In 34. 6 (0]. 108, 2) Eubulus compelled the Athenians to
ratify the peace of Philocrates by siruply threatening to apply the theoric
fund to the purposes of war (19 ? 291). It was not until Athens was
in imminent peril in 339 (01. 110, 2), on the eve of the battle of
Chaeroneia, that Demosthenes succeeded in carrying his point (Philo-
chorus Frag. 135). Cp. Thirlwall v 300, and ASchaefer i 199-2082. See
also note on 1 ? 191. 171.
o'mtch DIVING", 'just plainly,' 'thus unreservedly' (in con-
trast to the more cautious language of 1 ? 19); 23 ? ? 48, 53;
36 ? 26; 001. 956: 7' oi'rrwo't 20 ? 97, (pavest oiirw(s) 18 ? 136,
27 ? ? 21, 22; 45 ? ? 18, 136, 1). oz'rrwal 27 ? 29, fiqfilws oUrw(s)
18 ? 126, 31 ? 9, (iwrucpvs ol'rrwo't 19 ? 36, 6:"th oii-rws 21 ? 99.
oil-nob), or oli-rwa'i, precedes Mme; 23 ? 85, 32 ? 27, dunxpus
19 ? 154, cixpcfii'bs [35] ? 25, Kara? ave? is [35] ? 27, and ['45st
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 198 THIRD 0L YNTHIAG III ? 11
Lys. 18 ? 15, etc. , but never precedes (mews (Relidantz Index 2
oil'rw[s']).
96.
ivtovs limits the immediately preceding general descrip-
tion, 'roi's wept 1'ch trrpa'revope? vwv. Cp. 27 ? 23 6011 51140. , 18
? 12 1repl 5w e? vlwv.
97. Oewpme? . (Xp'fiawra), 'as theoric money. ' The word has
been suspected; it is not necessary for the sense, and its
omission would make the two parallel clauses each end with
a verb diave? /Lova'w ll Kaflwrfiaw.
98. 'rolls ammams, ' those who shirk service,' 'deserters,'
Lycurg. ? 39 1! : . . 5111115017 61/ d'raKTov ar'rrbu inroaeivar 1667. 11;
(The verb is not found elsewhere in Demosthenes; drdK-rws
occurs in ? 34. ) Certain classes of citizens obtained exemption
from military service either as merchants (Aristoph. Ecol. 1027),
or farmers of public taxes ([59] ? 27), or as members of choruses
(21 ? 15, 39 ? 16). Members of the Council were also exempt
(Lyeurg. ? 37). Those who absented themselves without leave
were liable to a 7pa? h darpareias (Lys. 14 ? 7).
minor 85 filmy "Anion/169 li? tl? 0flfli fwd-s 1T); O'Tpa'rsias, dune nopnnkw
si; 75. Awmia'm. xa-ni xaipw 013v rip! dun/1131' oi. Xopn'yoi rein; vsw-ni-rou;
Kai. 10i1s 5K 701'; Ka-ruhe-yov pe? Aur-m. e'wehe? yowo (Ulpian). Heslop suggests
that some further laws must have been passed, under which evasion of
military service had become common.
deq'ious Kan-rio'w: 23 ? 55 6. 04301! 1rore'i, ? 85 0104,3011; wapfixs,
19 ? 258 quSov e? r'io'ar. 1rozor'io'w is here avoided, as it is required
in the parallel clause below. "sinus and deupore? povs are in
parallel positions, and in alliterative correspondence with one
another. firm, 'and so. '
99. devpore? pous (opp. to 1rp006,u. ous): Xen. Hell. vi 2, 19,
Acschin. 3 ? 245, 6. 0144111 ib. 177, Dem. 23 ? 194, Thuc. i7], 4.
100. elm/56w: far more frequent in Demosthenes, Thucy-
dides, Isocrates, and Xenophon than e? miv (2 ? 21) or 6'1rfiv,
Thuc. v 47, viii 58, Isocr. 5 ? 38, and much oftener used with '
Aor. than with Pres. Subj. (Zycha in Wiener Studien vii 111).
rain-a, 'these legal provisions. ' The effect of the repeal
of the law of Eubulus (assuming it was already in force) would
be to make it possible to propose a. decree reviving the law
which assigned the surplus revenue to military purposes.
101. 686v: also used metaphorically in 18 ? 15 e? mr-rds 1179
6,005): Kai ducalas 65017, ? 322 6p0hv Kai ducalav 'r'hv 656v T'fis
7l'0)\LTE? aS eZM/mv, 24 ? 7 el Karrprwo'ev fir e? 1r' 614' fihfiev 666v,
? 38 e? gb' e'xotd'rnv dfl'tlll'l'a Thu 65611 1:311 ddmnmi'rwv, ? ? 106, 153
666v aftKl/Ud'L, 14 ? 23 cl: :5de Korean), 22 ? 26 ? 61. 11 rohhds
6601): 643 6a). 16v ve? pwv e? 1rl 1011s fiELK-rme? vovs.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? III ? 11, 12 THIRD OLYNTHIAC' 199
102. 'rbv ype? rlmvhu), 'one who is ready to propose' (by
decree). For the F ut. Part. cp. 4 ? 47.
? 12l. 103. 1rpl. v . . npigan, pf] o'Ko'Ire'i'rc ('look for'): ? 13
(Goodwin MT. ? 628).
104. threw, 'for proposing,' 11. 107, 116. inre? p {Iva
64f iapfiv: for similar contrast of prepositions cp. 4 ? 50 iner
15,1161! Kafi' h/MW. _
105. (inrohe? o'em, 'to be ruined,' not 'destroyed. ' The ref.
is not necessarily to any penalty of death, as supposed by
Libanius, ? 5 of Arg. to 0! . i, v6,u. ov e? '0ev-ro 1rspl r611 0ewpm65v
1015er xpnmi-rwu, Bdrm-roll daruhoUI/Ta 1Q 'ypdzfiaI/n Ite'raflelval.
' 'rafi'r' els 'rv'yv dpxalav 'roiEw Kai 'yeve? o'dm a'rpanwnxe? . What is
meant is probably d'rlpia or loss of political status owing to
inability to pay a heavy fine. It is paraphrased by 1ra062v n
Kaxov in l. 107, described as calculated to inspire fear in l. 110,
it is a {Tl/Ma. in l. 116, and a 1rpofi1r-rov Kaxe? v in l. 121. In [59]
? ? 8, 9 dvap-Irdfi'ew and dveheiv are applied to the fate inflicted
for a similar proposal, and in 8 ? 40 the phrase Kde-r' drohcb-
)uww is applied to persons who are certainly still alive. (See
also Blass Att. Ber. III i 316 f2, Holm iii 0. 12 n. 5, Max Miller
Bliitter f. d. bayr. Gymn. xi 174. )
It is maintained by Blass, l. c. , that the proposal of Apollodorus to
apply the theoric fund to military purposes ([59] ? 4) must belong to a
later date than 01. iii, because Demosthenes does not imply in the text
that any such attempt had already been made. The opposite opinion is
held by EMiiller (West. 7 p. 404), Hartel (Dem. Studie'n i 29 f), and Bamn
(Wiener Studien vii 205 f). The text seems indecisive.
106. nepwfiyvee'em, 'to result. '
107. meeiv without Art. after demonstrative Pron. 'rm'rrou:
ep. 2 ? 15 101710 . . , 1ra0eiv, 6 ? 3, 8 ? 43, 9 ? 23.
108. dadiehfiirm.
Gilbert Gk. Const. Ant. i 3362:301 ET. ) Owing to the
critical position of affairs, Demosthenes here urges the im-
mediate appointment of an extraordinary commission for the
repeal of certain laws.
Bartel (Dem. Antn'ige p. 536) holds that the orator's proposal for the
appointment of vonoee? -ml. is not to be taken seriously as a formal and
definite motion. Such a proposal could not legally be put to an immedi-
ate vote, and, owing to the difficulty as well as the lengthy procedure and
uncertain result of a legislative trial, it was of no practical use for the
immediate emergency. He considers it probable that, by showing how it
was possible to make use of the theoric fund, the orator was really putting
pressure on his audience with a view to make them better inclined to
carry out the measures which had been resolved. But these notes of
warning were uttered in vain, for Olynthus had already fallen before the
citizen force had reached the place. The proposals and counsels of
Demosthenes had as little result now as two years before; it may even be
conjectured that we are indebted to this fact for the preservation of these
masterpieces of his art.
92. Inseam-re: 24 ? 25 Tall: vonofie? ras Ka9LeT're, ? 26 n. 9--
lf'eaOaL 11. , ? 27 Kaflldat 11. , ? 29 Kafilfoue? vwv raw 1! . . .
'rot'rroms: 24 ? 33 oted below; cp. e? v 'ro'is Bursa-10. 79, e? v flair.
fi 06100: 003. : Mid. used of the people; 'enact no
statute,' i. e. 'let the commissioners enact no statute. ' The
commissioners would be taken from the people themselves, and
the part are treated as the whole (K. ) Prohibition is here,
as usual, expressed b pa? with Subj. pfi Wide, and affirmative
command by Imper. (were (Goodwin MT. 5 259).
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 111 ? 10, 11 THIRD OLYNTHIAC 197
93. eia't--lxavotz 23 ? 87 urapxbu'rwv 'roa'or'rrwu v6,u. wv, Isocr.
7 ? 39 rd nhfifl'r] . . n51! vbawv, 8 ? 50 whole-rout TLHe? /reyoi rib/mus.
94. sis Tb napov: 18 ? 207, Ep. 6 ? 2, 29 ? 10 rpm): 16
1rap6v. hie-are: 24 ? 33 1'61! voawv 're? 'w mat-'va [. Li7 e? Eci'vm
AUITGL ande? va. eat at; e? v vol/. oOe? 'rais (l. 92).
? 11 l. 95. 're? 'w Oewpuabv, 'our festival-fund. ' From the time of
Pericles the poorer citizens received grants from the treasury to enable them
to pay the two obols charged for admission to ordinary places in the theatre
(Plut. Per. 9, and Ulpian on Ol. i init. ) This measure is attributed to
Cleophon in Aristotle s Const. of Athens 28 ? 8. The grants were originally
paid out of the surplus funds in tle? e treasury (Isocr. 8 ? 82 Eilnpdzi'dav-ro Tb
1f? I. I. miner/0v 1631/ 1rd v Ii ' my "Adm-0. 9 xix-rd. rdAav-rov Ii; rhvb xfia'r cw
nightmare" eimpe'plza). Pig/ti) first the fund was in charge of thepHellegto-
tamiae, or treasurers of the Athenian confederation. During the ad-
ministration of Eubulus (354739) it was managed by special oflicials, oi
e'rri 'rb 9mpix6v (mentioned in Aristot. Le. 43 ? 1, 47 ? 2). The surplus of
the revenue available for purposes of war was paid into the ' theoric fund'
on the understanding that it should he used to meet the expenses of war,
if necessary. But this understanding was soon disregarded. The poorer
classes were reluctant to give up their dole, and were supported in this
by the popular orators of the day. Hence the state was hampered in its
preparations for war, and, to meet the expenses required for that purpose,
had no alternative to levying an extraordinary war-tax. An attempt to
restore the fund to its proper purpose was made by Apollodorus, [59] ? 4
E'ypadu \Il'rit'bldlfll e'V 'rfi flouAfi 'A'n'ondprG 501M61in Kai ? ? fivsyxe 1rpo-
Bolikcvaot sis 'riw dfipov, M'va diaxetporovfiual. Tbv Binov err: doxsi 16.
wepto'wa Xpriptm'a. Tie Smurridemg arpariwnxd. rival. ei-re Osw uni, xekwe? wwv
pill 163! ve? uwv, lira-v ne? henos fi, 15. wepto'vra. ripen-a rfis townie-cw; v-rpa-
Tim-nin eivm. "A. This attempt belongs to t is same date as the Euboic
war, assigned to 350 14. 0. by ASchaefer, to 349 by Baran, and to 3&3 by
Weil and Blass. III the last case the proposal of Apollodorus would be
later than the date of the present speech. Apollodorus failed in his object,
and was condemned to pay a fine of one talent, [59] ? 8. We are even tol
that a law was carried by Eubulus enacting that the mere proposal t
apply the theoric fund to purposes of war should be punishable by death
(Libanius on OZ. iand schol. ) This is probably a mistaken inference
from the ambiguous use of dnoAe? UOal. in ? 121. 105 q. v. Demosthenes, at
any rate, shows considerable caution in approaching the subject in 1 ? ?
19-- and in the text. For the present he did not succeed in bringing
about any reform. In 34. 6 (0]. 108, 2) Eubulus compelled the Athenians to
ratify the peace of Philocrates by siruply threatening to apply the theoric
fund to the purposes of war (19 ? 291). It was not until Athens was
in imminent peril in 339 (01. 110, 2), on the eve of the battle of
Chaeroneia, that Demosthenes succeeded in carrying his point (Philo-
chorus Frag. 135). Cp. Thirlwall v 300, and ASchaefer i 199-2082. See
also note on 1 ? 191. 171.
o'mtch DIVING", 'just plainly,' 'thus unreservedly' (in con-
trast to the more cautious language of 1 ? 19); 23 ? ? 48, 53;
36 ? 26; 001. 956: 7' oi'rrwo't 20 ? 97, (pavest oiirw(s) 18 ? 136,
27 ? ? 21, 22; 45 ? ? 18, 136, 1). oz'rrwal 27 ? 29, fiqfilws oUrw(s)
18 ? 126, 31 ? 9, (iwrucpvs ol'rrwo't 19 ? 36, 6:"th oii-rws 21 ? 99.
oil-nob), or oli-rwa'i, precedes Mme; 23 ? 85, 32 ? 27, dunxpus
19 ? 154, cixpcfii'bs [35] ? 25, Kara? ave? is [35] ? 27, and ['45st
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 198 THIRD 0L YNTHIAG III ? 11
Lys. 18 ? 15, etc. , but never precedes (mews (Relidantz Index 2
oil'rw[s']).
96.
ivtovs limits the immediately preceding general descrip-
tion, 'roi's wept 1'ch trrpa'revope? vwv. Cp. 27 ? 23 6011 51140. , 18
? 12 1repl 5w e? vlwv.
97. Oewpme? . (Xp'fiawra), 'as theoric money. ' The word has
been suspected; it is not necessary for the sense, and its
omission would make the two parallel clauses each end with
a verb diave? /Lova'w ll Kaflwrfiaw.
98. 'rolls ammams, ' those who shirk service,' 'deserters,'
Lycurg. ? 39 1! : . . 5111115017 61/ d'raKTov ar'rrbu inroaeivar 1667. 11;
(The verb is not found elsewhere in Demosthenes; drdK-rws
occurs in ? 34. ) Certain classes of citizens obtained exemption
from military service either as merchants (Aristoph. Ecol. 1027),
or farmers of public taxes ([59] ? 27), or as members of choruses
(21 ? 15, 39 ? 16). Members of the Council were also exempt
(Lyeurg. ? 37). Those who absented themselves without leave
were liable to a 7pa? h darpareias (Lys. 14 ? 7).
minor 85 filmy "Anion/169 li? tl? 0flfli fwd-s 1T); O'Tpa'rsias, dune nopnnkw
si; 75. Awmia'm. xa-ni xaipw 013v rip! dun/1131' oi. Xopn'yoi rein; vsw-ni-rou;
Kai. 10i1s 5K 701'; Ka-ruhe-yov pe? Aur-m. e'wehe? yowo (Ulpian). Heslop suggests
that some further laws must have been passed, under which evasion of
military service had become common.
deq'ious Kan-rio'w: 23 ? 55 6. 04301! 1rore'i, ? 85 0104,3011; wapfixs,
19 ? 258 quSov e? r'io'ar. 1rozor'io'w is here avoided, as it is required
in the parallel clause below. "sinus and deupore? povs are in
parallel positions, and in alliterative correspondence with one
another. firm, 'and so. '
99. devpore? pous (opp. to 1rp006,u. ous): Xen. Hell. vi 2, 19,
Acschin. 3 ? 245, 6. 0144111 ib. 177, Dem. 23 ? 194, Thuc. i7], 4.
100. elm/56w: far more frequent in Demosthenes, Thucy-
dides, Isocrates, and Xenophon than e? miv (2 ? 21) or 6'1rfiv,
Thuc. v 47, viii 58, Isocr. 5 ? 38, and much oftener used with '
Aor. than with Pres. Subj. (Zycha in Wiener Studien vii 111).
rain-a, 'these legal provisions. ' The effect of the repeal
of the law of Eubulus (assuming it was already in force) would
be to make it possible to propose a. decree reviving the law
which assigned the surplus revenue to military purposes.
101. 686v: also used metaphorically in 18 ? 15 e? mr-rds 1179
6,005): Kai ducalas 65017, ? 322 6p0hv Kai ducalav 'r'hv 656v T'fis
7l'0)\LTE? aS eZM/mv, 24 ? 7 el Karrprwo'ev fir e? 1r' 614' fihfiev 666v,
? 38 e? gb' e'xotd'rnv dfl'tlll'l'a Thu 65611 1:311 ddmnmi'rwv, ? ? 106, 153
666v aftKl/Ud'L, 14 ? 23 cl: :5de Korean), 22 ? 26 ? 61. 11 rohhds
6601): 643 6a). 16v ve? pwv e? 1rl 1011s fiELK-rme? vovs.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? III ? 11, 12 THIRD OLYNTHIAC' 199
102. 'rbv ype? rlmvhu), 'one who is ready to propose' (by
decree). For the F ut. Part. cp. 4 ? 47.
? 12l. 103. 1rpl. v . . npigan, pf] o'Ko'Ire'i'rc ('look for'): ? 13
(Goodwin MT. ? 628).
104. threw, 'for proposing,' 11. 107, 116. inre? p {Iva
64f iapfiv: for similar contrast of prepositions cp. 4 ? 50 iner
15,1161! Kafi' h/MW. _
105. (inrohe? o'em, 'to be ruined,' not 'destroyed. ' The ref.
is not necessarily to any penalty of death, as supposed by
Libanius, ? 5 of Arg. to 0! . i, v6,u. ov e? '0ev-ro 1rspl r611 0ewpm65v
1015er xpnmi-rwu, Bdrm-roll daruhoUI/Ta 1Q 'ypdzfiaI/n Ite'raflelval.
' 'rafi'r' els 'rv'yv dpxalav 'roiEw Kai 'yeve? o'dm a'rpanwnxe? . What is
meant is probably d'rlpia or loss of political status owing to
inability to pay a heavy fine. It is paraphrased by 1ra062v n
Kaxov in l. 107, described as calculated to inspire fear in l. 110,
it is a {Tl/Ma. in l. 116, and a 1rpofi1r-rov Kaxe? v in l. 121. In [59]
? ? 8, 9 dvap-Irdfi'ew and dveheiv are applied to the fate inflicted
for a similar proposal, and in 8 ? 40 the phrase Kde-r' drohcb-
)uww is applied to persons who are certainly still alive. (See
also Blass Att. Ber. III i 316 f2, Holm iii 0. 12 n. 5, Max Miller
Bliitter f. d. bayr. Gymn. xi 174. )
It is maintained by Blass, l. c. , that the proposal of Apollodorus to
apply the theoric fund to military purposes ([59] ? 4) must belong to a
later date than 01. iii, because Demosthenes does not imply in the text
that any such attempt had already been made. The opposite opinion is
held by EMiiller (West. 7 p. 404), Hartel (Dem. Studie'n i 29 f), and Bamn
(Wiener Studien vii 205 f). The text seems indecisive.
106. nepwfiyvee'em, 'to result. '
107. meeiv without Art. after demonstrative Pron. 'rm'rrou:
ep. 2 ? 15 101710 . . , 1ra0eiv, 6 ? 3, 8 ? 43, 9 ? 23.
108. dadiehfiirm.
