No More Learning

Romanus Sclerus had within the Empire a formidable and powerful
foe in the person of that Maniaces whom the ephemeral authority of
Michael V had sent back to Italy. In his new position of favourite,
Romanus desired above all things to make use of his influence to avenge
himself. He prevailed upon Constantine to recall his enemy, and in the
meantime ravaged Maniaces' estates and offered violence to his wife.
Maniaces was not of a temper to submit to such usage. Supported by his
troops he raised the standard of revolt against the Emperor, and caused
his own successor, sent out by the Emperor, to be assassinated. He then
began his campaign by marching upon Constantinople, there to have
· himself proclaimed Emperor. But he met with a check at Otranto, and
in February 1043 he embarked, landing soon afterwards at Dyrrhachiun,
whence he advanced upon Salonica in the hope of drawing after him
Bogislav's Serbs, who had recently defeated some Byzantine troops in
1042 near Lake Scutari. But, unfortunately for him, his successes soon
came to an end. At Ostrovo he encountered the army sent against him
by Constantine. He was defeated and killed. The Empire was saved.
At about the same time the chroniclers Scylitzes and Zonaras speak
of another revolt, hatched this time in Cyprus by Theophilus Eroticus,
which, however, does not appear to have involved the government in
serious danger. Such did not prove to be the case with a rising which
broke out in September 1047, and for three months threatened to
deprive Constantine of the throne. Its leader was Leo Tornicius. Con-
stantine IX in his heart cared little for the defence of the Empire, and
consequently neglected the army; the depredations on the treasury
went on apace; there were pressing dangers on the eastern and western
frontiers; and, because of all this, malcontents were numerous. The
rising broke out at Hadrianople, among military commanders who had
been displaced or passed over, and Tornicius put himself at its head.
This man was of Armenian origin and traced his descent from the


## p. 111 (#153) ############################################

Revolt of Tornicius
111
Bagratid kings. Besides all the wrongs which he shared with the other
generals, he had special grievances of his own: in the first place, Con-
stantine's policy in Armenia; then, probably, a love-affair which the
Emperor had broken off. Tornicius, who was a cousin of the Emperor,
was on very intimate terms with a sister of his, named Euprepia. Now
between Constantine and Euprepia relations were somewhat strained,
and it was to punish his sister as well as his cousin, for whom, be it
said, he had no liking, that he sent him to the provinces in honour-
able exile as strategus, and later compelled him to become a monk.
It was this which led Tornicius to resolve upon rebellion, and to take
the leadership of a movement which had long existed in the
army.
On
15 June the whole body of conspirators met at Hadrianople, and soon
afterwards Leo was proclaimed Emperor. Thereupon the insurgents
set out for Constantinople with the army corps from Macedonia. In
these circumstances, Constantine shewed remarkable energy. In spite of
the illness by which he was just then tormented, he set to work to arm
the troops in Constantinople, who barely numbered a thousand, and gave
orders to summon the imperial army by forced marches from the depths
of Armenia. If Tornicius, who had reached the walls of Constantinople,
had made the smallest exertion, he would have had the Empire in his
grasp, but hoping to be acclaimed by the people and unwilling to shed
blood, he remained inactive beneath the ramparts of the town. Mean-
while, Constantine on the other hand was acting. He scattered money
among the enemy's troops, won over officers and men, and could then
await the army from the East and the Bulgarian contingents which he
had demanded. Matters were at this point when, in the beginning of
October, Tornicius left Constantinople to take up a position on the road
from Hadrianople to Arcadiopolis, and to engage in a fruitless siege of
the little town of Rhaedestus. After this he relapsed into inactivity. It
was then, in the month of December, that the army from Armenia reached
Constantinople. Constantine, feeling himself sure of ultimate victory
over a foe so strangely passive, was reluctant to shed blood. The hostile
army was gradually overcome by bribes, hunger, and promises, and
Tornicius soon found himself, with his lieutenant Vatatzes, practically
deserted. Both were made prisoners, their eyes were put out on
24 December 1047, and a little later they suffered death.
While within the borders of his empire Constantine's government
was disturbed by the revolts of Maniaces and Tornicius, outside it
the enemies of Byzantium were also on the alert. In 1043 it became
necessary to take arms against the Russians, who were defeated. As
a result of this campaign and in order to seal the peace which followed,
a Greek princess was married to Yaroslav's son, Vsevolod. Next year,
in 1044, there broke out the war with Armenia which ended in the
complete and lamentable overthrow of that ancient kingdom, and the
appearance on the frontiers of the Empire of the Seljūq Turks. Ani
CH. IN.


## p. 112 (#154) ############################################

112
Annexation of Armenia: Michael Cerularius
was betrayed to the Greeks, and the last King of Armenia, Gagik II, went
forth to live in gilded exile at Bizou. The Katholikos Petros, who had
engineered the surrender of Ani, was also deported, first to Constanti-
nople and later to Sebastea, where he died some years afterwards. To the
misfortune of both, Armenia was made into a Byzantine province, so
that the Empire, without a buffer-state, from this time onwards had to
encounter single-handed the race who, in the end, were one day to
conquer it. To complete the picture, it will be shewn elsewhere that Asia
Minor was not the only ground on which the Byzantine troops were to
measure their strength during the reign of Monomachus. With varying
success, their generals were obliged to confront Arabs, Patzinaks, Lom-
bards, and Normans. Every frontier was threatened, South Italy was lost,
and as a final calamity Michael Cerularius was about to make a complete
and definitive breach with the Roman Church, which alone might per-
haps have been able to save the ancient Greek Empire.
On the death of the Patriarch Alexius on 22 February 1043,
Constantine's government raised to the Patriarchal throne, with circum-
stances of considerable irregularity, the first minister of the Empire,
the man who was to be famous as Michael Cerularius. His consecration
took place on 25 March. Cerularius' ordination was merely an incident
in his career. In 1040, as a result of the conspiracy which he had
organised against the Emperor Michael with a view to taking his place,
he had been condemned to deportation and had been forced to assume
the monastic habit. Still, if Michael found himself on the patriarchal
throne merely through a chapter of accidents, he brought to it, not
indeed any striking virtues, but a fine intellect, wide culture, and iron
will. And, moreover, in all that he did he had a definite aim. Now that
he had reached the highest ecclesiastical position in the Empire and was
second only to the Basileus, he attempted to set up on the shores of the
Bosphorus a Pontificate analogous to that of the Pope at Rome, so that
he would have been in fact Emperor and Patriarch at the same time.
This was, indeed, the real cause of the Schism and of his conduct towards
Constantine IX. It was at the very close of the reign of Constantine
Monomachus, when the Emperor was well known to be ill and near his
end, that Cerularius threw down the brand of discord.
Throughout the pontificate of Alexius relations with Rome had been
excellent, and there were no signs whatever of a conflict when in 1053 it
suddenly burst forth. Cerularius had chosen his opportunity with skill.
The Emperor had grown old and seemed to have no energy left; the Pope,
Leo IX, was unfortunately placed in Italy under the yoke of the
Normans. That Leo, in spite of his misfortunes, should have attempted
to extend his authority over the Greek sees in southern Italy is possible,
and indeed probable enough, for the authority of Constantinople had
sunk extremely low in the West. Nevertheless, the provocation came from
Cerularius. Through the medium of Leo, Archbishop of Ochrida, Ceru-


## p. 113 (#155) ############################################

Schism of the Eastern and Western Churches
113
larius wrote to John of Trani a letter, which was really intended for the
Pope and the West generally. In this letter he attacked the customs of
the Latin Church, particularly the use of unleavened bread and the ob-
servance of Saturday as a fast. At the same time a violent composition
by the monk Nicetas Stethatus was circulated in the Byzantine Church,
in which these two charges were taken up afresh, and an attack was
also made on the celibacy of the clergy. These usages were declared to
be heretical. Questions of dogma were not touched upon. Finally
Cerularius of his own authority closed all those churches in Constanti-
nople which observed the Latin ritual.
Leo IX replied at once; without discussing the trivial charges of the
Patriarch, he removed the controversy to its true ground, namely, the
Roman claim to primacy of jurisdiction, and demanded, before entering
on any discussion, the submission of the Patriarch. The latter at first
yielded, and wrote to the Pope a letter respectful in tone and favourable
to union. It is certain, however, that he was compelled to take this step
by the Emperor, who was himself urged on by the Greeks living in Italy,
among others by the Catapan Argyrus. Leo IX wrote in January 1054
to Constantine, entrusting his letter to three legates who arrived in
April, bearing also a letter to Cerularius very sharp and harsh in tone
and deeply irritating to the Patriarch, as was also the attitude assumed
towards him by the three legates? . On the other hand, Constantine was
won over to the Roman cause by the very affectionate epistle addressed
to him by Leo IX, and immediately proceeded to carry out the Pope's
wishes. Unfortunately at this juncture Leo IX died, on 19 April, and
his successor was not chosen until April 1055. The legates no longer
had sufficient authority to enable them to act, and Cerularius, taking
advantage of his position, began to write and intrigue, with a view to
winning over Eastern Christendom to his cause, beginning with Peter,
Patriarch of Antioch. The legates, for their part, in spite of their
diminished authority, solemnly excommunicated Cerularius and his sup-
porters. The step turned out a mistake on the Latin side. The Patriarch
was only waiting for this opportunity to shew himself in his true colours.
He demanded, indeed, an interview with the legates, who had already
quitted Constantinople on 17 July 1054, but were recalled by the
Emperor's orders. Suddenly, however, suspicions of Cerularius arose.
The Emperor, fearing an ambush, again sent off the legates, for it was
rumoured that the Patriarch intended to stir up the people to assas-
sinate them. It was upon the Emperor that the brunt of Cerularius'
anger fell. At his instigation a rising was let loose in Constantinople, and
Constantine was forced to abase himself before the victorious Patriarch.
With the Emperor's sanction, he at once held a synod in St Sophia on
20 July, the Roman bull was condemned, an anathema was pronounced,
1 See infra, Chapter 1x. pp. 268-69.
C. JIED, H. VOL. IV. CH. IV.
8


## p. 114 (#156) ############################################

114
Literary renaissance
and a few days later the bull was burned. The separation was an
accomplished fact. Its unhappy consequences were to make themselves
soon and lastingly felt.
From the point of view of civilisation, the reign of Constantine
Monomachus must be considered one of the most fortunate, for a true
literary renaissance flourished at Constantinople under the auspices of
the Emperor. Though not himself learned, Constantine was a man
of taste, and liked to surround himself with cultivated people. His
court was the resort of the most intellectual men of the day, and it was
owing to their entreaties that he decided to re-open the University of
Constantinople. The most distinguished scholars at that time were John
Xiphilin, Constantine Lichudes, Cerularius, John Mauropus, Psellus, and
Nicetas Byzantius. They were all bound together by friendship, all loved
and pursued letters and jurisprudence, and some, like Xiphilin, Lichudes,
and Cerularius, were destined to reach the highest positions in Church
and State. The first foundation of Constantine goes back to 1045. With
the help of his friends, he began the restoration of the science of juris-
prudence, founding a School of Law by his Novel περί του Νομοφύλακος.
Then he decided that in the new University all branches of learning
should be taught. Psellus was entrusted with the teaching of philosophy,
Nicetas Byzantius and Mauropus with that of grammar, rhetoric, and
orthography. Thus was formed the School of St Peter, so called from
the place where the new“masters” lectured. Law was lodged at St George
of Mangana, the faculty took the name of the School of the Laws, and
Xiphilin became its head. A library was added to the school. It was
there that the historian Michael Attaliates taught. In these schools of
higher learning law was taught in the first place, but the other branches
of humane learning were not neglected. Plato, Homer, the ancient his-
torians, and theology found their commentators. Psellus was undoubtedly
the most conspicuous of the professors, the most applauded and discussed.
Unfortunately these savants were not endowed only with learning and
virtues. They had also defects, of which vanity and arrogance were not
perhaps the worst. Before long, quarrels broke out between them and the
courtiers, then disputes arose among the learned themselves, then difficulties
grew up even with the Emperor to such an extent that by about 1050 the
enterprise was ruined. Constantine IX was forced to close his University,
and to disgrace Lichudes and Mauropus. Xiphilin became a monk, and
Psellus joined him at Olympus, only, however, to return before long on
the death of Monomachus.
From the artistic standpoint, the reign of Constantine Monomachus
is memorable for that stately building, St George of Mangana, which
made heavy demands upon the treasury. The Emperor also beautified
St Sophia, and enriched it with precious objects intended to serve for
divine worship. We also know that he built several hospitals and refuges
for the poor.


## p. 115 (#157) ############################################

Deaths of Zoë and Constantine IX
115
יר
Life in the women's apartments of the palace remained throughout
the reign what it had been at the beginning, that is to say very far
from edifying. Zoë, as she grew old, devoted herself to distilling per-
fumes, and flinging away public money on innumerable absurd caprices.
Theodora, a good deal neglected, spent her time in devotion, and in
counting her fortune which she hoarded up with care.
with care. Constantine fell
under the dominion of a dwarf, at whose hands he narrowly escaped
assassination, and was then subjugated by a young Alan princess, whom
he loaded with presents and looked forward to marrying at some future
time. Meanwhile Zoë died in 1050, and Constantine it appears greatly
lamented the aged Empress. By rights Theodora should now have
regained power. But she never thought of doing so, and the only
concession which Constantine made to her feelings was to refrain from
marrying the Alan princess. “The aged sovereign,” says Psellus, “would
never have endured to be at once Empress and first subject of an
upstart. ” He contented himself, as in Sclerena's case, with bestowing on
his mistress the title of Augusta, indulging in countless acts of insensate
prodigality for her and her family, and putting himself thus in the
most ridiculous position to the delight of his enemies and the grief of
Psellus.
In the early days of 1055 the Emperor, whose health was failing
more and more and who had besides broken with his sister-in-law and
caused her to quit the palace, retired to his favourite monastery, St
George of Mangana. Feeling himself dying, he summoned a council to
his side to choose his successor, regardless of Theodora. The choice fell
on an obscure man named Nicephorus, at that time in Bulgaria. But
there still existed in the capital a party which had remained loyal to the
princess born in the purple. It was this party which, without waiting
for the arrival of Nicephorus or the death of the Emperor, proclaimed
Theodora afresh as the sole Empress of Constantinople, and sent orders
to have the pretender arrested at Salonica. He was then deported to the
interior of Asia Minor. Constantine IX died on 11 January 1055, and
was solemnly buried besides Sclerena in the monastery of Mangana.
Once again Theodora, now aged seventy-five, was momentarily to resume
the government of the Empire.
Theodora (1055–1056).
With this aged virgin the glorious history of the Macedonian House
comes to an end. Founded in blood in the ninth century, it dies out in
the eleventh in barrenness, weakness, and shame, the wretched but just
reward of a long series of moral iniquities. We know not with what feelings
the Byzantines watched its extinction, nor what presentiments visited
them as to the future of the State. One fact alone is known to us, that
Theodora supported and favoured Cerularius and his faction, and that it
CH. IV.
8–2


## p. 116 (#158) ############################################

116
Death of Theodora. Michael VI Stratioticus
בל
was owing to this party of intriguers that she again took up the govern-
ment. It is probable that the Patriarch had views of his own, and was
awaiting the propitious moment when he might quietly pass from the
patriarchal palace to the imperial. But, in the first place, Theodora's
reign proved a very brief one. It did not last eighteen months. And,
besides, strange to relate, when Cerularius put himself forward to "give
the law,” he found that Theodora stood her ground, resisted, and in the
end disgraced the Patriarch. With him were dismissed several of the
great generals, among them Bryennius and Comnenus, and the reign of
the eunuchs began. If this was a misfortune for the Empire, it proved
at least that the Empress had a will of her own and meant to be obeyed.
As might have been expected, the court immediately began to urge
projects of marriage on Theodora, but the Empress was no more disposed
at the close of her life than in earlier days to accept an expedient which
had turned out so ill in the case of her sister Zoë. Without any support
or counsel but such as she could obtain from her eunuchs, she took up
the task of governing, and of holding in check the whole military party
whose two chief leaders had been disgraced. At the head of affairs she
set an ecclesiastic, Leo Paraspondylus, the protosyncellus, a man of great
merit, upright, honest, and intelligent, but abrupt and dictatorial to a
degree, which accounts for the unpopularity he soon incurred. In addition
to this, the Empress' parsimony and the intrigues of Cerularius helped to
cool the attachment which the Byzantines had shewn for their sovereign.
A seditious outbreak was plainly imminent when Theodora died, rather
unexpectedly, on 31 August 1056. As soon as the first symptoms of her
malady appeared, there was great agitation among the palace eunuchs.
The party in power was by no means ready to throw up
the
game.
Leo
Paraspondylus therefore hastily summoned a council to meet around the
dying Theodora's bed and provide for the succession. They made choice
of an old patrician, who had spent his life in camps, Michael Stratioticus,
who seemed to have the qualities requisite for letting himself be governed
and at the same time commanding the support of the army. Cerularius
was at once consulted, and after some hesitation, before the closing eyes
of the sovereign and authorised by a faint sign of consent from her, he
crowned and proclaimed Stratioticus Emperor.
Michael VI Stratioticus (1056–1057).
Michael VI, the poor old man who was now to affix his trembling
signature to the last page of the history of the Macedonian family, be-
longed to the aristocracy of Constantinople and was descended from
that Joseph Bringas who had been chief minister under Romanus II.
To the clique who hoped to govern in his name he was a mere figure-
head. His age, his want of capacity, the weakness of his position, un-
supported by any party in the State, were for the eunuchs and especially


## p. 117 (#159) ############################################

Discontent of the army. Revolt under Isaac Comnenus 117
יי
for Leo Paraspondylus so many pledges that they would be confirmed
in all their authority. By way of precaution, however, the court, on
raising him to the throne, exacted from him an oath that he would never
act contrary to the wishes of his ministers. It is plain that they were
counting without the strength of the great feudal families, every one of
which aspired to sovereign power, and also without the popular outbreaks
which they expected to crush without difficulty. In reality the eunuchs
were grossly deceived in their calculations.
On the very morrow, indeed, of Michael's proclamation Theodosius,
the president of the Senate, attempted to organise an outbreak. He
was a cousin of Constantine IX, and in this capacity fancied that he
had rights to the succession. But he had no supporters either in the
army or the palace or among the clergy. At the head of a troop of
dependents, the most he could do was to break open the prisons and to
appear in front of the palace and St Sophia. The doors were shut against
him ; no difficulty was found in arresting him and he was sent into exile
at Pergamus. Michael VI and his court fancied that their troubles had
ended with this slight attempt at a revolt; they were already dis-
tributing profuse gifts to the Senate and the people and planning some
few changes in the official staff, when, in rapid succession, the Emperor
quarrelled with some of the most popular commanders in the army, with
Catacalon Cecaumenus whom he dismissed, with the “Francopol” Hervé
whom he ill-treated, with Nicephorus Bryennius to whom he refused the
restoration of his estates formerly confiscated by Theodora, and, above
all, with Isaac Comnenus. On Easter Day 1057 he denied to all of
them the favours which they came to ask, and by the advice of his
minister launched out into a flood of invective against each of them.
It was the divorce of the court from the army which he so unthinkingly
pronounced. There was only one sequel to so sinister a beginning, and
that was revolt.
The conspirators immediately gathered at St Sophia, and in concert
with the Patriarch deliberated how they might best get rid of the
Emperor and his eunuchs. Without further delay they hailed Isaac
Comnenus as the future Emperor, afterwards returning to their estates
in Asia Minor to prepare for war. It was on 8 June 1057 in the plain
of Gunaria in Paphlagonia that Isaac was proclaimed Emperor. Imme-
diately afterwards the rebel army began its march upon Constantinople
and reached Nicaea. Everywhere the pretender was recognised, the Asiatic
themes submitting to his authority. Michael VI for his part, as soon as
he learned what had taken place, attempted to organise the defence.
Unfortunately he had no commanders of any capacity on his side, though
on the other hand his army was more numerous than that of his
opponents. The imperial troops set forth, led by a certain Theodore,
and made their way towards Nicaea. At Petroë they halted, not far
from the camp of Comnenus, and here it was that the battle took place
CH. IV.


## p. 118 (#160) ############################################

118
Fall of Michael VI
on 20 August. It was waged with fury, and degenerated into a mas-
sacre. Though at first defeated, in the end Isaac Comnenus was the
victor, thanks to Catacalon, who came up in time to reinforce the
wavering centre and left wing of the rebels.
Even after the battle of Petroë, the unfortunate Michael still
hoped to save his crown by winning over the Senate and the popu-
lace of Constantinople. Unluckily for himself, the poor Emperor had
now contrived to fall out with Michael Cerularius, who for his part
was busy plotting against him.
Though feeling at heart that all was
lost, Michael VI nevertheless tried to negotiate with Comnenus. Through
Psellus and two other senators, he offered Isaac the title of Caesar, en-
gaging also to adopt him and name him his successor, as well as to pardon
all the rebels. This was on 24 August. The revolted troops were already
at Nicomedia, and the embassy sent in Michael's name had been secretly
won over to the cause of Comnenus. After an exchange of views had
taken place, and some counter-proposals had been made on behalf of
Isaac, the envoys returned to Constantinople. There, while ostensibly
rendering an account of their mission to the Emperor, in reality during
the whole of 29 August they were, with Cerularius, organising the revolt
and weaving the conspiracy which ended in the abdication of Michael VI.
As soon as all was completed, Michael VI's embassy, consisting of the
same men as before, set out again for Comnenus' camp, and on the
same day, 30 August, the revolt broke out at Constantinople. The struggle
was not a bloody one, but was marked by the personal intervention of
the Patriarch, who suddenly at St Sophia openly ranged himself on the
side of the rebels, sanctioned the proclamation of Comnenus as Emperor,
and took the direction of the revolutionary movement into his own
hands. His first care was to send a number of bishops to the palace with
instructions to tonsure the Emperor at once, to clothe him with the
monastic habit, and to send him to a convent in Constantinople, where
soon afterwards he died. On 31 August 1057 amid indescribable en-
thusiasm Comnenus made his triumphal entry into the Sacred Palace.
The next day, or the day after, he was crowned by the Patriarch. Thus
was the dynasty of the Comneni solemnly inaugurated. That of the
Macedonians had become extinct.


## p. 119 (#161) ############################################

119
CHAPTER V.
(A)
THE STRUGGLE WITH THE SARACENS (717-867).
At the accession of Leo III (25 March 717), when the great Arab
army was encamped in western Asia Minor and the Anatolic troops had
gone to Constantinople to place their strategus on the throne, the posi-
tion of the Empire seemed almost desperate; and the Arab commander,
Maslamah, having some understanding with Leo, was confident of reducing
it to subjection. During the spring he took Sardis and Pergamus; and,
when it became clear that no assistance was to be expected from Leo, he
advanced to Abydos, crossed to Thrace, destroyed the forts on the road,
and encamped before Constantinople (July). On 1 September a fleet under
a certain Sulaimān joined him, and was followed by another under Omar
ibn Hubaira ; but, while the ships were sailing round the city, twenty
of them became separated from the rest and were destroyed by fire-ships
(3 September). After this the fleet was content with inactivity and
safety; but an offer of ransom was refused, and in the severe winter the
army lost heavily in horses and camels. In the spring fresh ships came
from Egypt and Africa besides military reinforcements, and an attack by
Slavs was repulsed; but Omar was defeated by the Bulgarians whom Leo
had called to his assistance, and in Bithynia a foraging party was routed.
Moreover, the Egyptian sailors deserted, and through information obtained
from them Leo destroyed with Greek fire many newly-arrived ships.
After this the blockade on the sea side was practically raised, while the
besiegers were starving. Accordingly Omar II, who succeeded the Caliph
Sulaimān in September 717, recalled the Muslim armament (15 August
718); but many ships were destroyed by a storm or captured on the
retreat, and only a few reached Syria. The garrison of Taranta, which
was thought to be too much exposed, was then withdrawn, and no more ex-
peditions were made while Omar lived. To prevent a recrudescence of the
Arab sea-power, after the accession of the Caliph Yazid II (February 720)
a Roman fleet sailed to Egypt and attacked Tinnis. The expedition of
716-718 was in fact the last attempt upon Constantinople, and the
neglect of the fleet which followed the removal of the capital from
Damascus to Babylonia in 750 made a repetition impossible; hence the
war was reduced to a series of plundering raids, until the occupation of
Crete and Sicily by western Arabs caused the naval warfare to revive
under new conditions. The character of these incursions was so well
CH. V.


## p. 120 (#162) ############################################

120
Character of the Wars
understood on the Arab side that in the ninth century it was an accepted
rule that two raids were made each year, one from 10 May to 10 June
when grass was abundant, and, after a month's rest for the horses, another
from 10 July to 8 September, with sometimes a third in February and
March ; and the size of the forces may be gauged from the fact that a
commander was once superseded for retreating when he had still 7000
men. Longer expeditions were often made; but even these rarely had any
object but plunder or blackmail. A frontier fortress was indeed occa-
sionally occupied, but it was often recovered after a short interval, and
more frequently forts were taken only that they might be destroyed and the
enemy thereby deprived of a base; and the whole result of 150 years of war
was only the annexation by the Arabs of the district between the Sarus
and the Lamus, which however included the important towns of Tarsus
and Adana and the strong fortress of Lulum. Raids through the Cilician
Gates were signalled to Constantinople by a chain of beacons, and a
cluster of fortresses was erected on the heights of the Taurus range; but the
Romans were generally content to hold the strong places, and, when
opportunity offered, overwhelm parties of marauders. Occasionally they
made counter-raids; but these had even less permanent result than those
of the Arabs, until under the rule of the energetic Caesar Bardas a
blow was dealt after which the decaying Caliphate never recovered its
offensive power, and the way was laid open for a Roman advance.
Under Yazid only sporadic raids were made, with little result. Omar
ibn Hubaira won a victory in Armenia Quarta (721), and a fortress in
Cilicia was taken (723); but ‘Abbās ibn al-Walīd after taking a fort in
Paphlagonia allowed his men to scatter, and most of the parties were anni-
hilated (722). After Caliph Hishām's accession, however, more systematic
plans were adopted. In 724 his son Sa'īd and his cousin Marwān with
the combined forces of Syria and Mesopotamia, coming from Melitene,
stormed a fort and massacred the garrison, though a detachment under
Kathir? was cut to pieces; and this was followed by the capture of the
great fortress of Camacha on the Euphrates (which the Romans must
have recovered since 711); and in 726 Maslamah took Neo-Caesarea. After
this a series of raids was carried out by Hishām's son Mu‘āwiyah, who in
727 took Gangra, which he demolished, and Tataeum', and with naval as-
sistance besieged Nicaea. In 728 he took Semaluos in the Armeniac theme;
in 729 he raided northern Asia Minor, while Sa'id, coming from the south,
reached Caesarea, and an Egyptian fleet harried the coast. In 730 Mu'a-
wiyah took the fortress of Charsianum; in 731 he found the frontier too
well guarded to cross in force, and his lieutenant, Battāl, was routed;
but in 732 he plundered Paphlagonia and penetrated to Acroïnon (Prym-
nessus), though on the retreat his rearguard was annihilated, while his
brother Sulaimān reached Caesarea. In 733 the two brothers joined forces
i Theoph. Xon (corrupt); corr. from Mahbūb Xeonp.
2 Theoph. ’Areoüs, Arab. “Taiba. ' See Ramsay, Hist. Geogr. , pp. 143, 439.


## p. 121 (#163) ############################################

Battle of Acrożnon
121
and their vanguard under Battāl captured a general; in 734 Mu'āwiyah
reached the west coast, plundering proconsular Asia as he went; in 735
he returned by way of the north, while Sulaimān raided Cappadocia. In
736 on another joint expedition Mu'āwiyah was killed by a fall from his
horse, but Sulaimān after wintering in Roman territory invaded Asia
and carried off a Pergamene who claimed to be Justinian's son Tiberius
and was granted imperial honours by Hishām. In 738 he took a fort
in Pontus and captured a patrician's son, who with other prisoners
was put to death in 740 on a report that Leo had killed his Muslim
prisoners; and in 739 his brother Maslamah, coming from Melitene, seized
some of the subterranean granaries that were numerous in Cappadocia.
Assistance by sea was prevented by the activity of the Roman fleet,
which in 736 captured part of a fleet returning from a raid and in 739
attacked Damietta in great force and carried off many captives. .
For 740 a great invasion was planned. Sulaimān crossed the frontier
in May and encamped before Tyana, sending his cousin Ghamr to Asia
and Malik and Battāl to Phrygia, where they took Synada and besieged
Acroïnon; but these last were routed by Leo himself and both killed,
after which the whole army returned to Syria. Not this victory, however,
so much as the internal troubles of the Caliphate caused in the following
years the slackness of the Arab offensive.
In 742 Sulaiman marched into the heart of Asia Minor, and
Constantine V, who had succeeded Leo in June 741, left his capital on
27 June and came to Crasus in Phrygia to meet him; but Artavasdus'
rebellion forced him to fee to the Anatolics at Amorium, leaving the
road open to the enemy. However, Hishām's death (February 743) and
the accession of the incapable Caliph Walīd II prevented the Arabs from
making the most of this opportunity, and in 743 the Romans destroyed the
fortress of Sozopetra south-west of Melitene.
After the murder of Walid (April 744) the Caliphate fell into anarchy;
and, order having been restored in the Empire by Artavasdus' overthrow
(November), the advantage lay with the Romans. Constantine again de-
stroyed Sozopetra, which had been insufficiently restored, and threatened
Perrhe (Hişn Manşūr), where the fortifications had been repaired and a
strong garrison posted. He forced Germanicea (Marʻash) and Doliche
to capitulate; allowing the garrisons to march out, he removed the in-
habitants to Roman territory and demolished the fortifications (746).
After this a great outbreak of plague prevented him from pursuing his
advantage, and in 748 Walīd ibn Hishām restored Germanicea. In
747 however an Egyptian squadron which had come to Cyprus was un-
expectedly attacked in harbour and almost annihilated; and from this
time the Egyptian fleet disappears for 100 years.
In June 751 Constantine set out to recover Camacha, but sent the
Armenian Khushan, who had fled to the Romans in 750, against the fort,
while he himself besieged Melitene. Mesopotamia being in revolt, its
CH. V.


## p. 122 (#164) ############################################

122
Campaigns of Constantine V
By
Emir could not bring help, and the place capitulated; the inhabitants
with their portable property were then escorted to a place of safety, after
which the town was demolished. Thence Constantine went on to Claudias,
which he also took, removing the population of the district to Roman
territory; but at Arsamosata he failed. Meanwhile Khushan, having
taken Camacha and placed a garrison in it, advanced to Theodosiopolis
(Erzerūm), which he took and destroyed, making the garrison prisoners
and deporting the inhabitants. The merciful treatment which Constan-
tine accorded to his enemies and to the civil populations is a bright spot
among
the atrocities of these wars. The Romans were never as cruel as the
Arabs, but this striking leniency may fairly be set against the character
which anti-Iconoclast writers draw of this Emperor.
the Caliph Marwān II's death (July 751) the new Abbasid dynasty
was firmly established, but many revolts followed. When in 754 ‘Abdal-
lāh, Emir of Syria, had started to invade the Empire, he heard of the
death of his nephew, the Caliph Saffäḥ (19 June), and returned to make
an unsuccessful bid for the Caliphate. His successor in Syria, his brother
Salīḥ, in 756 entered Cappadocia through the pass of Adata, but on
hearing that Constantine was about to march against him returned home.
Thereupon followed an exchange of prisoners. In 757 Salīḥ began to
rebuild the walls of Mopsuestia, which had been overthrown by an
earthquake in 756; and “Abd-al-Wahhāb, who had been made Emir of
Mesopotamia by his uncle the Caliph Manşūr, rebuilt Claudias and
began to rebuild Melitene. To prevent this Constantine marched to the
Pyramus (758); but the army at Melitene, reinforced by some Persians,
the best troops of the Caliphate, under Hasan was too strong to attack,
and the rebuilding of Melitene and Mopsuestia was completed. In 759,
while the Emperor was engaged with Slavonic enemies, Adana, abandoned
by the Romans, was occupied by Salīḥ, a garrison, partly of Persians,
being placed there, and a fort erected on the Sarus opposite it. In 760,
while Constantine was fighting the Bulgarians, the Caliph's brother
“Abbās defeated the Armeniac strategus Paul on the Melas between
Melitene and Caesarea with great loss, Paul himself being killed and
42 high officers captured.
For the next five years both sides were occupied, Manşūr with insur-
rections and Chazar invasions, and Constantine with Bulgarian wars, and
in 766 there was an exchange of prisoners. This year a strong force of
Arabs and Persians under ‘Abbās and Hasan besieged Camacha (August);
but, well defended by its commandant, it resisted all their efforts, and on
the approach of winter they retired. Some of the army, however, who had
separated from the rest for a pillaging expedition, penetrated beyond
Caesarea, avoiding roads and towns, but were attacked on their return and
fled in confusion to Melitene and Theodosiopolis. The Arabs then set
themselves to restore the fortifications of Arsamosata ; but in 768 an
army which had been ravaging Armenia Quarta crossed the Arsanias and


## p. 123 (#165) ############################################

Expedition of the Caliph Mahdi
123
destroyed the works, though after their retreat the task was completed.
The citizens were however suspected of collusion with the enemy and re-
moved to Palestine, a fate which also befel the inhabitants of Germanicea
(769), which was re-fortified and garrisoned.
In 770 Laodicea Combusta was taken, and in 771 some of the Arme-
nians who had fled to the Romans with Khushan set out to return to
their old homes, and a force under the commandant of Camacha which
pursued them was surprised and cut to pieces. In 775 Thumāma
marched along the Isaurian coast, supported by a fleet, and besieged
Syce. Constantine thereupon sent the Anatolics, Armeniacs, and Bucell-
arii, who occupied the only pass by which Thumāma could retreat, while
the Cibyrrhaeots anchored in the harbour and cut off his communications
with the ships; but by a desperate attack he cut his way through the
cavalry and returned with many prisoners from the neighbourhood, while
the fleet sailed to Cyprus and captured the governor. Constantine, wish-
ing to be free to deal with the Bulgarians, now made proposals for peace,
but these were rejected.
The deaths of Emperor and Caliph in 775 were followed by greater ac-
tivity on both sides. Constantine had recently given his chief attention to
the Bulgarians and had been content with merely checking Arab inroads;
but in 776 Leo IV, who, though from ill health unable to lead armies, was
an able and vigorous ruler, sent an expedition to Samosata which carried
off many captives. The Muslims were ransomed by the Caliph Mahdi,
who on his side prepared a larger force than had been seen since 740 with
many of the best Persian troops under 'Abbās, which took the underground
granary of Casis with the men in it and reached but did not take Ancyra.
In 777 Thumāma made an expedition by land and Ghamr by sea; but Thu-
māma quarrelled with the Emir ‘Isa, the Caliph's great-uncle, and so in 778
no raid took place. In these circumstances Leo sent the five Asiatic themes
to Cilicia and Syria, and they besieged 'Isa in Germanicea without oppo-
sition from Thumāma, who was at Dābiq. Failing to take Germanicea,
they plundered the country, and the Thracesian strategus, Michael Lacha-
nodraco, was attacked by a force sent by Thumāma, but defeated them
with heavy loss, after which the whole army returned with many captives,
largely Syrian Jacobites, and laden with spoil. In 779 Thumāma again
remained inactive, though ordered to make an invasion, and the Romans
destroyed the fortifications of Adata. The veteran Hasan was then ap-
pointed to command, and with a large force from Syria, Mesopotamia,
and Khurāsān entered the Empire by the pass of Adata. Leo ordered
his generals not to fight, but to bring the inhabitants into the fortresses
and send out parties of picked men, to prevent foraging and to destroy
the fodder and provisions. Hasan therefore occupied Dorylaeum without
opposition, but after fifteen days lack of fodder for the horses forced
him to retreat.
The Caliph now determined to take the field himself, and on 12 March
CH, V.


## p. 124 (#166) ############################################

124
Expedition of Rashid
780 left Baghdad with an even larger army and marched through Aleppo
to Adata; here by Hasan's advice he ordered the fortifications to be re-
stored (they were completed in 785), and advanced to Arabissus, whence
he returned, leaving the command to his son Hārūn, afterwards known
as ar-Rashid, supported by Hasan and other capable advisers. This
expedition was however hardly more successful than the last. Thumāma,
since «Īsa's death no longer disaffected, being sent westwards, reached
Asia, but was there defeated by Lachanodraco, his brother falling in the
battle; afterwards Rashid marched towards the north and besieged
Semaluos for thirty-eight days, during which the Arabs suffered heavy
loss, and the garrison then surrendered on condition that their lives were
spared and that they were not separated from one another. The army
thereupon returned to Syria. After this expedition Tarsus, which had
been abandoned by the Romans, was occupied and rebuilt by the Arabs.
In September 780 Leo died; and, under the female rule which followed,
Asia Minor was again laid open to the enemy. In June 781 the Asiatic
themes were sent to the frontier, commanded not by a soldier but a
eunuch, the treasurer John. The separate themes, however, retained their
strategi, and 'Abd-al-Kabir, who had invaded by the pass of Adata, was
defeated by Lachanodraco and the Armenian Tadjat, strategus of the
Bucellarii, who had gone over to the Romans in 780. After this ‘Abd-
al-Kabir abandoned the expedition, for which he was imprisoned. The
Caliph now made a great effort, and on 9 February 782 Rashid left Baghdad
at the head of a larger force than any that had been sent in the previous
years, in which contingents from Syria, Mesopotamia, Arabia, and Khurā-
sān were included; and, the Empress Irene having just sent an army to
Sicily against the rebel Elpidius, the invaders had an easier task. Enter-
ing by the Cilician Gates, Rashid took the fortress of Magida and
advanced into Phrygia, where he left Rabī' to besiege Nacolea and sent
Yahyà the Barmecide to Asia, and after defeating Nicetas, Count of
Opsicium, he reached Chrysopolis. Yaḥyà inflicted a crushing defeat on
Lachanodraco, but on his way to join Rashid found his road blocked on
the Sangarius by Anthony the Domestic of the Scholae, whom Irene had
sent by sea from Constantinople; but Tadjat from hostility to Irene's
chief minister, the eunuch Stauracius, opened communications with Rashid,
and on promise of pardon and reward returned to the Arabs. By his
advice Rashid proposed peace; but, when Stauracius, Anthony, and Peter
the magister came to discuss terms, he treacherously made them prisoners.
Irene, wishing to recover Stauracius and crippled by the loss of Tadjat
and Anthony, was forced to accept his conditions. A three years' truce
was then made on condition that she paid tribute, ransomed the prisoners,
supplied guides and markets for the army on its retreat, and surrendered
Tadjat's wife and property. After mutual presents the Arabs returned
laden with spoil (31 August). Mopsuestia and the fort opposite Adana
were then rebuilt by the Arabs.


## p. 125 (#167) ############################################

Campaigns of Constantine VI
125
In 785 the rebuilding of Adata was finished; but the work was faulty,
and the walls were soon so much damaged by the wet winter that early in
786 the Romans easily took and destroyed the town, which was evacuated
by its garrison; they also overthrew the fortifications of Sozopetra. Both
these frontier places were immediately rebuilt.
In 786 Irene, to carry out her religious policy, changed the composi-
tion of the themes and probably deposed the iconoclast strategi', thereby
impairing the military strength of the Empire, which, while she ruled, was
unable to cope with the Arabs; and in September 788 the Romans were
defeated in the Anatolic theme with heavy loss. In 790 some soldiers
who were being conveyed by sea from Egypt to Syria were captured by
the Romans, but an Arab fleet sailed to Cyprus and thence to Asia Minor,
and, meeting the Cibyrrhaeots in the bay of Attalia, captured Theophilus
the admiral, who was offered rich gifts by Rashīd, now Caliph, to join the
Arabs, but on his refusal beheaded.
In September 791 Constantine VI, having now assumed the govern-
ment, marched through Amorium to attack Tarsus, but had only reached
the Lycaonian desert when, perhaps from scarcity of water, he returned
(October). In 792 he restored his mother to her rank and place, and,
having driven the Armeniacs, who had caused her downfall, to mutiny,
overcame them by the help of some Armenian auxiliaries (793), who,
not having received the expected reward, betrayed Camacha to the
lieutenant of ‘Abd-al-Malik, Emir of Mesopotamia (29 July). The same
year Thebasa in Cappadocia from lack of water surrendered to ‘Abd-al-
Malik's son ‘Abd-ar-Raḥmān on condition that the officers were allowed
to go free (October). In the autumn of 794 Sulaimān invaded northern Asia
Minor, accompanied by Elpidius, who had fled to the Arabs and received
recognition as Emperor; but many men perished from cold, and a safe
retreat was only obtained by making terms (January 795).
In the spring of 795 Faļl led a raid, but Constantine himself marched
against him (April) and defeated a party which had nearly reached the
west coast (8 May). In 796 he was occupied with the Bulgarians, and
Mahomet ibn Mu'āwiyah reached Amorium and carried off captives. In
797 Rashid in person invaded the Empire by the Cilician Gates, and
Constantine, accompanied by Stauracius and other partisans of Irene,
again took the field (March); but Stauracius, fearing that success might
bring the Emperor popularity, spread a report that the enemy had
retreated, and Constantine returned to lose his throne and his sight
(19 August). Meanwhile Rashid took the fort known to the Arabs as
aş-Şafsāf (the willow); near the Cilician Gates, while ‘Abd-al-Malik plun-
dered the country as far as Ancyra, which he took, and then rejected
? Bury, Luter Roman Empire, 11. p. 485.
2 In such cases the prisoners were probably held as hostages or to ransom, and,
if their lives were forfeited, they were spared if they apostatised or turned traitors.
3 This seems to be Andrasus, but must be a different place from Adrasus in Isauria.
cu. Y.


## p. 126 (#168) ############################################

126
Nicephorus and Rashid
Irene's proposals for a truce. In 798 ‘Abd-al-Malik extended his ravages
to Malagina, where he carried off the horses and equipment from Stau-
racius' stables, while ‘Abd-ar-Raḥmān made many captives in Lydia
and reached Ephesus, and in the autumn another party defeated Paul
of Opsicium and captured his camp.
In 799 the Chazars invaded Armenia, and so this time Rashid accepted
Irene's offers of tribute and made peace”; but her successor Nicephorus
refused payment (803). Accordingly in August 803, while he was occupied
with Vardan's rebellion, the Caliph's son Qāsim, who had just been named
Emir of al-'Awāşim (the defences), a province in North Syria instituted in
789, entered Cappadocia by the Cilician Gates and besieged Corum, while
one of his lieutenants besieged a fort which the Arabs call Sinān; but,
being distressed by lack of food and water, he agreed to retire upon 320
prisoners being released. In 804 Rashid himself advanced through the
same pass to Heraclea (Cybistra) in April, while another party under Ibrā-
him took aş-Şafsāf and Thebasa, which they dismantled. Nicephorus
started in person to meet Ibrāhīm (August); but on hearing that the
Caliph's vanguard had taken and dismantled Ancyra turned back and,
having met the enemy at Crasus, suffered defeat; but the lateness of the
season made it difficult to maintain the army, and Rashid accepted tribute
and made peace, the Emperor agreeing not to rebuild the dismantled
fortresses. An exchange of prisoners was also arranged and took place
during the winter. In 805 the Caliph was occupied in Persia, and Nice-
phorus, contrary to the treaty, rebuilt Ancyra, Thebasa, and aş-Şafsāf.
He also sent an army into Cilicia, which took Tarsus, making the garrison
prisoners, and ravaged the lands of Mopsuestia and Anazarbus; but the
garrison of Mopsuestia attacked them and recovered most of the prisoners
and spoil. Accordingly in 806 Rashid, with a large army from Syria,
Palestine, Persia, and Egypt, crossed the frontier (11 June) and took
Heraclea after a month's siege (August) and Tyana, where he ordered a
mosque to be built, while his lieutenants took the Fort of the Slavs by
the Cilician Gates, Thebasa, Malacopea, Sideropalus (Cyzistra)”, aş-Şafsāf,
Sinān, and Semaluos, and a detachment even reached Ancyra. Nicephorus,
threatened by the Bulgarians, could not resist, and sent three clerics by
whom peace was renewed on the basis of an annual tribute and a per-
sonal payment for the Emperor and his son, who thereby acknowledged
themselves the Caliph's servants. Since Nicephorus again bound himself
not to rebuild the dismantled forts, Rashid undertook to restore Semaluos,
Sinān, and Sideropalus uninjured. As soon, however, as the Arabs had
withdrawn, Nicephorus, presuming on the lateness of the season, again
restored the forts, whereupon the Caliph unexpectedly returned and retook
Thebasa.
i The peace is nowhere recorded, but seems to follow from the absence of
hostilities and the action ascribed to Nicephorus.
2 I identify this with Dhū’l Kilāó (E. H. R. , 1901, p. 86, n. 195).


## p. 127 (#169) ############################################

Recovery of Camacha
127
The neutralisation of Cyprus, effected in 689, was considered as still
in force; but after the breach of the treaty of 804 a fleet under Humaid in
805 ravaged the island and carried 16,000 Cypriots, among whom was the
archbishop, as prisoners to Syria (806), but on the renewal of
peace they
were sent back. In 807 Humaid landed in Rhodes and harried the island,
though unable to take the fortified town; but after touching at Myra on
the
way
back
many of his ships were wrecked in a storm.
Early in 807 the Romans, who must previously have recovered Tyana,
occupied the Cilician Gates, and, when the Arab commander tried to pass,
defeated and killed him. Rashīd himself then came to the pass of Adata, and
sent Harthama with a Persian army into Roman territory; but he effected
nothing and his force suffered severely from hunger. The Romans failed
to take Germanicea and Melitene, and the Caliph after assigning to Har-
thama the task of rebuilding Tarsus returned to Syria (14 July), recalled
probably by the news of disturbances in the East. In 808 an exchange
of prisoners was effected at Podandus.
During the civil war which followed Rashid's death (March 809) the
Romans recovered Camacha, which was surrendered by its commandant
in exchange for his son, who had been captured; but wars with Bulgarians
and Slavs prevented them from taking full advantage of the situation.
It was fortunate for them that during the terrible years 811—814 the
Arabs were unable to organise a serious attack.
In 810 Faraj rebuilt Adana and the fort opposite, and in 811 another
leader invaded the Armeniac theme and defeated Leo the strategus at Eu-
chaita, capturing the soldiers' pay and making many prisoners (2 March);
but in 812 Thābit, Emir of Tarsus, having crossed the frontier in August,
was defeated by the Anatolic strategus, another Leo, afterwards Emperor,
and lost many horses and waggons. After 813, though no peace was
made, other occupations on both sides prevented active hostilities; but
about 818 Leo V, now delivered from the Bulgarians, took advantage of
the disturbances in Egypt to send a fleet to Damietta.
In September 813 Ma'mūn became sole Caliph; but, Syria and Meso-
potamia being almost wholly in the hands of rebels, he could not engage
in foreign war, and in 817 a new rival arose in his uncle Ibrāhīm. On
his submission (819) the Syrian rebel Nașr asked help of the Anatolic
general, Manuel, and Leo sent envoys to treat with him; but the indig-
nation of Nașr's followers at a Christian alliance forced him to put them to
death, while Ma'mūn prevented interference by sending the exile Thomas
into Asia Minor with Arab auxiliaries, who after the murder of Leo (Decem-
ber 820) was joined by most of the Asiatic themes and remained in arms
till 823. During these troubles 'Abdallāh ibn Tāhir recovered Camacha
(822), and some adventurers who had been expelled from Spain and occu-
pied Alexandria ravaged Crete and the Aegean islands. After the overthrow
of Thomas, Michael II proposed a definite peace(825); but Ma’mūn, having
just then been delivered from Nasr, refused to tie his hands and sent
CH. V.


## p. 128 (#170) ############################################

128
Campaigns of the Caliph Ma'mūn
raiding parties into the Empire, who were defeated at Ancyra and at
another place and lost one of their leaders.
In December 827 the Spanish adventurers wereexpelled from Alexandria
and established themselves in Crete. The Cibyrrhaeot strategus Craterus
gained a victory over them (828), but waited to give his men a night's
rest; and, as he kept no watch, his force was surprised and cut to pieces,
and his ships were captured. He himself escaped in a trading-vessel to
Cos, but was pursued, taken, and crucified. In 829 the corsairs annihilated
the Aegean fleet off Thasos, and the islands lay at their mercy; but Oory-
phas collected a new naval force, and for some time checked their ravages.
Ma'mūn had been hindered from pursuing the war by the rebellion of
the Khurrami sectaries under Bābak in Azarbā’ījān and Kurdistān; and
about 829 some of these, under a leader who took the name of Theophobus,
joined the Romans. Thus strengthened, Theophilus, who succeeded
Michael in October 829, crossed the frontier and destroyed Sozopetra, kill-
ing the men and enslaving the women, whereupon Ma’mūn started for Asia
Minor (26 March 830). Having received a welcome ally in Manuel, who,
having been calumniated at court, had fled to save his life, he sent his son
‘Abbās to rebuild Sozopetra and passed the Cilician Gates (10 July),
where he found no army to oppose him. Magida soon capitulated, and
Corum was taken and destroyed (19 July), but the lives of the garrison
were spared, while Sinān surrendered to “Ujaif and Soandus to Ashnās.
After taking Semaluos the Caliph returned to Damascus.
Early in 831 Theophilus entered Cilicia and defeated a local force,
after which he returned in triumph with many prisoners to Constantinople.
But the position in Sicily caused him to use his success in order to obtain
peace, and he sent the archimandrite John, afterwards Patriarch, with
500 prisoners and an offer of tribute in return for a five years' truce, but
with instructions to promise Manuel free pardon if he returned. Ma'mun,
who had started for another campaign, received the envoy at Adana and
refused a truce; but with Manuel John had more success, for, while ac-
companying 'Abbās in an invasion of Cappadocia the next year, he deserted
to the Romans. Meanwhile Ma'mūn crossed the frontier (26 June)', be-
sieged Lulum, and received the surrender of Antigus and Heraclea, while
his brother Mu'taşim took thirteen forts and some subterranean granaries,
and Yahyà took and destroyed Tyana. Failing to take Lulum, Ma'mūn,
having heard of the revolt of Egypt, left ‘Ujaif to continue the siege and
returned to Syria (end of September). The garrison of Lulum succeeded
in taking ‘Ujaif prisoner, but, after an attempt at relief by Theophilus
had failed, released him on condition of his obtaining them a favourable
capitulation, and the place was annexed, whereby the command of the
pass fell into the hands of the Arabs (832). Meanwhile Ma'mūn re-
turned from Egypt (April), and Theophilus again sent to offer tribute;
1 I have made a slight emendation in Țabari's text in order to bring the day of
the month into accord with the day of the week.


## p.