make its
appearance
until school days.
Childens - Folklore
?
Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl.
handle.
net/2027/usu.
39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www.
hathitrust.
org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3.
0
? ? sion set or at a home computer than in the streets or the playgrounds. But
they are also more directly exploitable by the marketplace, which has steadily
developed them as a consumer resource over the past two decades. Much
of the disquiet of modern parents has to do with this increasing and direct
availability of their children to the marketplace through television. Three
hundred years of the bourgeoisie's sloughing off the parochial folk controls
over children through the culture of traditional neighborhood games has been
called into question by this sudden susceptibility of modern children to com-
mercial infringement.
But children's sharing of this vicarious media world with their par-
ents doesn't mean that they are no longer children. Most parents deny that
they simply bow to what television suggests for their children (Sutton-Smith
1986), and those other special arrangements for children's domestication
(schools, books, toys, and recreation programs) continue apace. Whatever
may be happening to their parents in the occupational world, it is still the
fate of children to be put in their own separate zoos run by adult educators
and other supervisors of children. This fundamental segregation is not al-
tered because there is this new development of shared symbolic television
space. Nor is there much indication of any modification on the American
scene of the desire by most educated parents to shelter real children from
real violence, grossness, vulgarity, or sex, no matter what may be happen-
ing on the television screen or in dysfunctional families. In short, childhood
continues but we often have so little adequate descriptive research about it
that we cannot tell how it is different or how it is the same as in times past.
THE DISJUNCTION OF CHILD AND ADULT
The basic underlying condition of modern childhood seems to be its disjunc-
tion from adulthood. Modern enculturation is founded on this discontinu-
ity. In folklore terms this means that as long as the two groups, adult and
child, differ in power and life space, then the interaction between them will
lead to the kinds of tensions from which the lore of each group about the
other will usually arise. The more unique their separate needs and their op-
position, the greater the folklore and the development of group lore calcu-
lated to respond to them. On the one hand, there are the parents, the teach-
ers, and the psychological experts banding together for the preservation of
their own values about childhood; on the other, there are dyads, cliques, and
gangs of children developing their own business of life and often using tra-
ditional materials to do so.
Mechling asks whether there can be a theory that makes all the ma-
terial of this work hang together, that unites the irrational with the ratio-
297
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? nal, the spirit of childlore with the socialization of adults. Perhaps to expect
the two to be brought together is a "rational" kind of view, "an enlighten-
ment view" that is simply not what children's folklore is about and presum-
ably not what folklore scholars should be about (Spariosu 1989). The very
danger of this sourcebook is that it provides more means for some adults
to supervise children more carefully in order to get rid of their folklore. What
Tatar aptly writes about adult revisions of fairytales for children stands for
their approach to children's play in general: There is "the idea that a litera-
ture targeted for them must stand in the service of pragmatic instrumental-
ity rather than foster an unproductive form of playful pleasure" (1992, xxv).
Bauman, the erstwhile director of the largest funded project on children's
folklore and education, expresses concern that researchers themselves con-
tinue to place too much emphasis on the didactic uses of children's folklore
and neglect in consequence the study of "the aggressive, obscene, scatologi-
cal, antiauthoritarian, and inversive elements. . , that any student of childen's
folklore knows well to be a central part of the expressive culture of child-
hood" (1982, 173). Here Bauman is referring to children's folklore that very
few folklorists have cared to publish, such as the article "High Kybo Floater:
Food and Feces in the Speech Play at a Boy Scout Camp" (Mechling 1984b).
Perhaps some of the adults reading this book will acknowledge the memo-
ries of childhood being evoked here that they have hitherto refused to ac-
knowledge; in consequence, they may make more provision for this rueful
joyfulness to take place in childhood. After all, a conclusion about play, by
all those who work in play therapy at least, is that a major meaning of play
in childhood is that it is a pretense of society and self of a vigorous and life-
restoring kind (Erikson 1950). Play's promise may lie in human optimism
and commitment to life, rather than those other incidental correlates of prob-
lem solving, creativity, and imagination that have taken on a vogue in re-
cent psychology and education.
THEORY FOR CHILDREN'S FOLKLORE
Perhaps there is something we can do for Mechling's theoretical call with-
out falling into the usual rationalistic traps. If we begin by not accepting the
usual romantic disjunction of childhood and adulthood but instead apply
to children the same kind of theories we apply to adults in distinctive cul-
tural groups, we might make some progress. It is, for example, the promise
of children's folklore that it can bring a sense of the same cultural relativity
to our view of childhood that we generally apply to other groups. Thus, al-
though the "savages" and the "women" may have escaped from the unilinear
theory of cultural evolution (of which Zumwalt speaks), the children are still
298 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? not free. By and large in official academic and educational quarters their life
is thought of as a series of steps and stages to higher forms of adult matu-
rity. Whereas just as cultural relativity implies that each human group fash-
ions its own forms of human adaptation and expression and that each has
its wonder and beauty (as well as disasters), so with childhood there is an
aesthetic for each age, which may be celebrated (or cursed) by adults, rather
than simply glossed as an inevitably inferior step on the way to the "won-
ders" of adults' civilization, reason, and morality.
Importantly, because children are members of the most politically
powerless group, their folklore is usually favored for purposes that are not
especially those of the children. It is seldom possible to be rationally in fa-
vor of children without interfering with much that they do that is not very
rational. For this reason, we see the study of children's folklore as a very
special territory in which groundbreaking research can still be accomplished,
that is, if we pay it the tribute of considering it in terms of various contem-
porary cultural theories that are taken very seriously on the adult level but
seldom applied to children. Thus we may argue that the whole field of
children's folklore can take new directions by incorporating the recent cul-
tural ideas about power as expressed among heteronomous groups of schol-
ars like James C. Scott, Roger M. Keesing, Joan N. Radner, and Susan S.
Lanser. Our first step is to recognize that their theories allow us to look be-
neath the superficially placid surface of children's play to understand how
important are the power-related aspects of children's folklore and its forma-
tion. It would not be false to argue that although there are multiple inter-
pretations of children's folklore in the foregoing pages, the dominant theme
throughout is that of the power the children exercise over each other, and
the power they seek in their relationship to adults, mythical or real. There
is also throughout these chapters a diffuse and seldom fully explicated rheto-
rics of progress at work. When one considers that 99 percent of the books
about or for children have progress as their explicit or hidden agenda, the
child-power-oriented contents of this book constitutes a massive denial of
the validity of those adultcentric orientations.
PERFORMANCE STUDIES IN CHILDREN'S FOLKLORE
Before we proceed further with the power analysis, however, we need also
mention what might be regarded as an equally valid contemporary concern
in current adult folklore with tradition as a series of cultural perfor-
mances. This focus manifests itself in a concern with the microanalytics of
the ways in which the children themselves maintain and present their own
traditional folk culture to each other in behavior, speech, gestures, rules,
299
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? codes, and secrets (Sutton-Smith 1989a). We need not spend time on dem-
onstrating what this means in this conclusion, because it is very well shown
by a number of the articles in this Sourcebook, particularly those by Beresin
and the authors in Section III. This approach, which privileges aesthetic per-
formance issues, is refreshingly alive compared with the older concern with
collecting texts only or making formal accounts children's activities. Still,
along with the rhetoric of progress, the rhetoric of fancy, of which perfor-
mance theory is a manifestation, leads to an idealization of childhood life,
and pleasant and nostalgic as that is for us elders, it can be called into ques-
tion (Sutton-Smith, in press). Power theorists, for example, tend to downplay
performance theory's implicit avoidance or perpetuation of the inequalities
of race, gender, social class, sexuality, and nationality, which are present in
the world of folklore (Briggs 1993). In defense of performance, however, we
could argue that these performance-oriented studies nicely demonstrate that
despite the importance of the power context of the folklore which we are
about to discuss, the lore itself, whatever its rhetorical usage, is sustained
primarily by the very universal interest of players in the enjoyment they get
through their own activation of these playforms. There is an inherent and
probably built-in neurological logic to play that is the first cause of all of
these phenomena, no matter what other important causes may also come
to be served within the larger culture. There is nothing that will allow us to
say that the children's own drive for aesthetic enjoyment is not as impor-
tant as their drive for empowerment. What we can say is that both of these
rhetorics so well evidenced in this work contrast mightily with all other books
about and for childhood in which the rhetoric of progress is dominant. This
book is a powerful manifesto against what has been taken for granted
throughout the culture throughout the past two hundred years, that the busi-
ness of childhood is to grow up and shut up.
CHILDREN'S FOLKLORE AS A MANIFESTATION OF POWER RELATIONSHIPS
The material of children's folklore permits us to look at it as a power phe-
nomenon in a number of ways:
1. An earlier way was to describe the various transformations of
power that are mirrored by the play structures themselves (Sutton-Smith
1954). Thus, if games are ordered in terms of their increasing complexity
with age, one can sketch out the sequence of power transformations that
playing children participate in with age. Structurally, using the writings of
either Propp or Levi-Strauss, one can generate the binary character and or-
der of power relationships as thus mirrored in child development. Younger
children deal in central person power relationships ("it" games) and these
300 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? are transformed with age so that the power originally centered on the cen-
tral person is increasingly shared with or shifted to the hands of the group
of others (sports). The games very neatly model the crucial nature of power
achieved or lost in the interaction between opposing characters or groups.
The games constitute a simple grammar of the nature of political power in
which all children participate insofar as they play games of any sort. The
research of Roberts and Sutton-Smith (Sutton-Smith 1972a) also established
on an anthropological (and not just psychological) level that cross-cultur-
ally the triad of games of chance, strategy, and physical skill mirrored par-
allel processes in the larger societies of which they were a part. Both of these
kinds of research on types and levels of power had their heyday in the intel-
lectual climate of "structuralism. "
2. With the increasing vogue for ethnographic and performance stud-
ies in folklore, it became clear that when particular groups playing particu-
lar games were studied in their own context many complications were ob-
served that greatly modified the picture of power relationships sketched in
the above fairly abstract ways. The chapter by Hughes in the present vol-
ume is a groundbreaking example of such research. It turns out that quite
apart from the larger abstract structural account of power relationships de-
scribed above, there are many other power manipulations also taking place
on a more covert level. The rules of the games state one power relationship;
the actual gaming of those rules reveals differences in the various ways in
which every group attempts to manipulate those rules in their own favor.
3. In addition, however, to the machinations of the players within their
own games or folklore from which various power relationships and systems
can be inferred, what Scott et al. make clear is that folklore also contains
echoes of the way in which the players are also relating to the adult culture
of which they are a part when these games are played. Traditionally, play
has been seen as largely a mimetic phenomenon, an interpretation which
privileges the adult world as the model. What is apparent, however, is that
much of play is a mockery of that adult world at the same time as it is a
mimicry. So what we wish to sketch in the rest of this conclusion is not only
the way in which play models and manifests power relationships, but also
the way in which play expresses power and powerlessness by being sub-
versive of the normative culture of which it is a part. But it is important to
stress here that the play is generally both dialectically normative and sub-
versive at the same time in varying degrees (Sutton-Smith 1978a). By sub-
versive we mean all those multifaceted expressions of the child groups that
undermine the authority of the dominant culture, well illustrated in this vol-
ume in the chapters by Jorgensen, McDowell, Mechling, Sullivan, and
301
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? Zumwalt. It is at the privileged site of clandestine folklore that the subver-
sive thrives. Scott (1990) has argued that a partly sanitized, ambiguous and
coded version of this subversive "hidden transcript" is always present some-
where in the public discourse of subordinate groups, and further: "The dia-
lectic of disguise and surveillance that pervades relations between the weak
and the strong will help us, I think, to understand the cultural patterns of
domination and subordination. The theatrical imperatives that normally
prevail in situations of domination produce a public transcript in close con-
formity with how the dominant group would work to have things appear.
The dominant never control the stage absolutely, but their wishes normally
prevail. In the short run, it is in the interest of the subordinate to produce a
more or less credible performance" (1990, 40).
Most of the research to this point has been done on the way in which
subordinate colonial, racial, ethnic, or gender groups use their own folklore.
McMahon has shown, for example, the daring ways that women undermine
their more powerful spouses while in their very presence using coded and
apparently joking statements that the women know will be incorrectly per-
ceived by their husbands. These "flaunted" hidden transcripts are clandes-
tinely and gleefully understood by the other women present (McMahon
1993). Likewise, as children compose the most powerless subaltern group,
we should expect them to have multiple and complex ways of subverting
authority-behaviors that must be taken into account by researchers.
Sutton-Smith (1990a) has presented a typology for identifying the stra-
tegic ways that children create the folklore that subverts adults and em-
powers children. His provisional schemata consists of disorder, failure, and
antithesis. We can rephrase these categories and further develop them in terms
of the literature in the adult field of resistance as follows: Disorder and fail-
ure are similar to Radner's and Lanser's "appropriation" and "incompetence,"
which are categories in their typology for the identification of women's
strategic codes (1993). The latter, Sutton-Smith's antithesis, is like the logic
of opposition in Keesing's discussion of "contestation" (1992) because it is a
way that empowers and subverts under the noses of those who wield power.
To illustrate the material for a further analysis of children's folklore as a docu-
mentation of power relationships, consider the following details:
Disorder. Here we deal with the delight that children have in creat-
ing disorder out of order. On the child level this is reflected in unisons of
shoutings and noise-making, knocking down blocks and sand castles, laugh-
ing hysterically at deviations in adult behavior (as in cartoons, Charlie
Chaplin, Three Stooges, Batley) rolling about on the ground, falling down
on purpose, phonological and repetitive babble, telling stories full of mixed
302 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? disasters such as being lost, stolen, angry, dead, stepped on, hurt, burned,
killed, crashed, and so forth (Sutton-Smith 1981b). Remembering that adults
also take joy in carnivals, festivals, roller coasters, clowns, rock concerts,
and contact sports, where disorder is also a central characteristic, it is pos-
sible to argue that this impulse for disorderly play is a universal character-
istic, perhaps itself not unrelated to such human disorderly fatefulness as war,
catastrophe, hurricanes, death, and riots. Bakhtin's emphasis upon laugh-
ter as the basic and universal human reaction against fate through its disor-
dering impact, further suggests a certain universality in the phenomenon. We
remember his accounts of the orgiastic peasant festivals described by Rabelais
as such a deep and universal reaction to endless suppression. As a character
in Paul Willis's more modern Learning to Labour says about the battle that
some adolescent British boys put up against their schooling, "I think that
fuckin laffing is the most important thing in fuckin everything. Nothing ever
stops me laffing . . . I don't know why I want to laff, I dunno why it's so
fuckin important. It just is. . . . I think it's just a good gift, that's all, because
you can get out of any situation. If you can laff, if you can make yourself
laff, I mean really convincingly, it can get you out of millions of things. . . .
You'd go fuckin berserk if you didn't have a laff occasionally" (Willis 1977,
29). What this and some of the earlier examples show is that no matter what
dimensions of universality laughter and disorder may have, much of this
apparently irrational playfulness is in childhood directed against adult sup-
pression and interference and order. Other examples in this volume are the
pranks examined by Mechling and Jorgensen as well as Fine's mention of
his data on children's fartlore. What we have in this material on closer view
is a demystification of the structure of the dominant adult culture that dem-
onstrates its ephemeral control. Sluckin, for example, discusses what is called
a "taxi" ritual by some British schoolboys in which when one denies to the
teacher that he has passed wind, then the whole class passes wind (1981,
32). Many a schoolteacher has been unraveled simply by being laughed at
by the whole class either openly or surreptitiously. Such behavior is so com-
mon that "taunting the teacher" may actually constitute a genre in its own
right (Oxrieder 1976). As it has been explained elsewhere, however, much
of the disorder of children's play is an assertion of control within that play
itself, rather than being directed at the adult culture (Sutton-Smith 1977).
Apparently life as well as adults generate this response in us all.
Failure. Modern childen grow up in an achievement society where
they are graded endlessly on their accomplishments. A kind of disorder, there-
fore, which they especially seem to cherish is the disorder of failure, though
unlike many of the earlier physical disorders this one apparently doesn't
303
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ?
make its appearance until school days. Perhaps the most spectacular ex-
amples are the moron jokes, where stupidity is most celebrated. But folly
and stupidity is revered also in riddles (You go to the bathroom American.
You come out of the bathroom American. What are you in the bathroom?
European). There are Mary Jane jokes (Mary Jane went to the doctor and
he told her she was going to have twins. She laughed and laughed because
she knew she hadn't done it twice), cruel mummy jokes, elephant jokes, dead
baby jokes, Helen Keller jokes, Dolly Parton jokes, Christa McCauliffe jokes,
grosser than gross jokes, and so forth. In many of these there is fictional-
ized failure at the expense of some conventional attitude or authority or
nicety or decency. The teller achieves a magical distance in telling the tale
of the failures of life-not in some way unlike the adult gambler whose
mastery is in choosing how and where to lose, or a golf player whose mas-
tery is much of the time in choosing to play badly for the rest of his or her
life, but at least to keep playing. It is not hard to see much of the folklore
of childhood, or adulthood for that matter, as a lore of empowerment, of
fictional mastery over the presented fates.
The general undercurrent of an interest in playful disorder or failures
becomes public on those occasions when it is suddenly used directly against
authority, as when a class clown is applauded by his or her peers for sabo-
taging a teacher's efforts in the classroom with his or her nonsense or "tra-
ditional" inappropriate answers. These particular occasions justify us in say-
ing that much of children's folklore exists in an interstitial world between
fantasy and reality. This is like most of the subcultures that Scott discusses,
where there are multiple traditions of antagonism but these are muted and
indirect and fantasied until a moment when particular hostilities bring them
to the surface. But they do nevertheless exist as an ongoing culture of self-
regard and group confirmation. This is as true of the adult underclass as it
is of the child underclass.
Antithesis. Disorder is at base a fairly undirected primordial chaos.
Failure directs the blame at the persons who are stupid or without power.
The implication that more powerful persons are responsible is not directly
drawn. But with antithesis the fictional attack upon the mighty is rendered
more clearly. Antithesis is an expressive behavior that presupposes an op-
positional tension and demystifies the dominant culture through parody,
mirroring, or inversion. Sullivan cites the work of the Knapps, who recorded
the following song parody: "My Bonnie lies over the ocean; my Bonnie lies
over the sea. My daddy lies over my mommy, and that's how they got little
me (Knapp and Knapp 1976, 172, 185). So, too, Bronner recorded several
song parodies such as "Row, row row your boat; gently down the stream.
304 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? Throw your teacher overboard, and listen to her scream" (1988, 101).
Other kinds of antithesis suggested by the writings of Radner and
Lanser include such concepts as that of trivialization, in which subversive
expressions play off dominant culture expectations about what is trivial.
When Butler (1989, 94) asked a young Dutch girl to recite her favorite
jump-rope rhyme, the child responded with this verse (which rhymes in
Dutch): "A dog made a poopoo/Under a tree/A Frenchman came along/And
ate it. " Although the child's mother and grandmother were present, there
was little that could be said about the child responding to a request to re-
cite a "mere" jump-rope rhyme. Then there is indirection, which Radner and
Lanser (1993) define as hedging or leaving out key words that members of
the group know are also part of the text. Reinterpreting their category for
women's strategy coding, we include here what Dundes (1967) terms the
"evasive answer," which is one of his thirteen genres of children's folklore.
Indirection can also occur with tongue twisters that are disguised so as to ap-
pear innocent: "I slit a sheet, a sheet I slit. Upon this slitted sheet I sit" (Dundes
1967; Galvin 1990, 168). Also, adults may be familiar with only one ver-
sion of a text, such as: "Jeff and Mary sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G. First
comes love, then comes marriage. Then comes Jeff in the baby-
carriage. "Children, however, may actually know another version of the text
in which "F-U-C-K-I-N-G" replaces "kissing. " In the presence of disapprov-
ing adults, the words are just whispered or, as Zumwalt has illustrated in
this Sourcebook, just abbreviated: "Oh , you M-F, T-S, T-B-B! " Or there is
Radner's and Lanser's distraction, which is similar to indirection but involves
drowning out of a message, such as children's humming the tune of "Jack
and Jill" instead of reciting a version known to the group, such as "Jack and
Jill/Went up the hill/To get a pail of water/Jill came down with a five dollar
bill/Do you really think she went up for water? " And most adults would
choose to ignore a version of Jingle Bells, sung by a twelve-year-old boy in
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: "Jingle bells, shotgun shells; Santa Claus is dead.
Someone stole my . 30-. 30 and shot him in the head" (Bronner 1988, 108).
Such examples demonstrate how challenging and socially relevant the
study of children's subversive folklore is, but beyond this what is the value
of developing such a typology? The broad goal is presumably to identify
forms of folklore that are hidden in order to understand the relation of
children's folklore to various forms of domination. Other related critical
questions to be explored include discovering under which conditions
children's folklore becomes subversive and by what processes children as well
as other oppressed groups create subversive folklore. How do the forms of
children's folklore relate to different forms of domination and dominant
305
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? cultural values?
In setting out these examples of various kinds of subversion, how-
ever, it is necessary to emphasize the methodological point that researchers
need to avoid the trap of "reading into" children's folklore what simply isn't
there. Subversion is more than a text; it is an event that must be systemati-
cally accounted for before determining whether a particular act is subver-
sive. A child could repeat some of these rhymes above with no sense what-
soever of such implication. This is the point implied by Winslow in an early
work on children's derogatory epithets. As Winslow demonstrated, there are
levels of meaning and contexts that exist in the ethnography of speaking.
Researchers must be careful before assuming that the expression is always
used in the same manner. For example, "A child may good-naturedly accept
his nickname in the course of normal social interaction, but the same name
may be used derogatorily in other contexts, especially if it is repeated
enough" (1969, 256). This means close examination of the context-both
historical and situational. Determinations can never simply be made by read-
ing textual surfaces in abstraction from the specific event. For example, in
Butler's Skipping Around the World: The Ritual Nature of Folk Rhymes
(1989) and Lurie's Don't Tell the Grown-ups: Subversive Children's Litera-
ture (1990), each scholar has provided the reader with examples of children's
folklore that are only potentially subversive, with little contextual informa-
tion to support the researchers' interpretations. Therefore, we suggest pro-
ceeding cautiously in making such power interpretations, first recording or
noting the situation which is external to the folklore itself and then actually
identifying the taboos and values imposed on children.
Yet it is not our intent either to romanticize subversive aspects of
children's folklore as "playful" nor to divert attention from darker aspects
by ignoring instances of victimization of children by children. Some children's
advocates fall into the trap of not only celebrating children's folklore purely
for its didactic uses or viewing it as innocent diversion, but assuming the
"unity" or "inclusiveness" of children as a group. Diversity exists everywhere
and, as a result, uneven power relations also exist among children. Children
as well have multiple identities related to gender, class, religion, and race.
Works by scholars such as Fischer (1986) on ethnicity have even shown that
although some differences often deny inclusiveness, they can be fundamen-
tal in identity formation for the group itself. As Roemer in this volume notes,
researchers have generally ignored differences in, for example, children's rid-
dling styles resulting from varying ages as well as ethnic heritages. This di-
versity is most apparent, for example, in studies like that of Stoeltje (1978),
who noted subtle but important differences in hand-clapping games of Anglo
306 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? and African American girls.
Obviously, the ideal is neither to reject nor to romanticize whatever
there is in the children's world of powerlessness nor to make value judgments
about what is appropriate to record. In exploring the ingenious ways that
children create, regardless of their ethical flavor, we come to understand the
simultaneous processes of their accommodation to adult values and their
expressions of subversiveness. At times children's lore is an expression of
defiance, challenging controlling forces in a symbolic power struggle, but
sometimes this folklore is cruel, directed at members of the child's own group,
such as when tag becomes "cooties tag" because the targeted child is said
to have "cooties" because of race, religion, gender, or class. Such examples
include what Sullivan terms "rhymes of prejudice" and provide us with very
clear examples of children's folklore that adults have consistently avoided
including in scholarly folklore collections. Children quite naturally replicate
adult hierarchies in their own play and are as likely to generate cruel, dark,
or mean folklore as they are to generate kindlier forms. Modern idealiza-
tion of children's play as a part of childhood "innocence" often makes it
difficult to recognize or accept these phenomena.
Finally, these investigations of folklore as power show that there is a
real need to seriously reassess our fieldwork in relation to the voice and au-
thority we exercise, which is an ethical concern well articulated by Fine and
Mechling in this Source Book. For whether the author collects texts, or stud-
ies performance, or looks at power relationships in ethnographic ways, or
romanticizes play, or contrastingly emphasizes its cruelty; whether appreciat-
ing or depreciating the children's own power struggles; whether rationaliz-
ing childhood or glorying in its irrationality-all of these are as much a com-
mentary on the stance or rhetorics of the authority as on the condition of
childhood. Children's folklore and that of adults was once much used to
confer authenticity on the nationality or the ethnicity of the folk being stud-
ied, and also to claim authenticity for the discoveries of the scholar so in-
volved. The activity of the Brothers Grimm is perhaps the most famous case
in point (Briggs 1993). Postulating the authenticity of children's endeavors
has, however, hardly been a prestigious activity in our post-Enlightenment
culture, where adults are generally more interested in children's progress than
in their past. But there has always been a small minority of scholars, from
Newall to the Opies, who have hung in at their child-oriented posts and at-
tempted to make us realize there was something there in children's folklore
worth preserving or recording-whether they called it tradition, "natural"
childhood, or folk subculture.
We pay a tribute to these scholars, as well as to the contributors to
307
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? this Source Book, for their research of whatever kind and for the scholarly
merit they derive from the authenticity of their own research endeavors. It
is a scholarly "game" to engage one's fellows with a more adequate approach
to the scholarly subject matter than existed hitherto, as if there is only our
own new way of being authentic. But our editorial gamesmanship requires
that we suggest, on the contrary, that there are multiple ways of being au-
thentic about the authenticity of those we study. It is not a zero sum game.
We live, rather, in a world of multiple childhoods and multiple ways in which
these can be studied, to the credit of all parties. We say this despite our own
persistent rhetoric about child empowerment. We choose to finish, therefore,
selectively by asking the question how is it that our adult culture so typi-
cally suppresses the power-related aspects of children's lives so clearly rep-
resented in this present document? Is the "triviality barrier" (Sutton-Smith
1970a) in children's folklore only an adult reaction formation against the
dangers of recognizing that the world would be very different if we attended
to the neotony of children's struggles for power?
308 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? GLOSSARY
AN AID FOR SOURCE BOOK READERS
This list of terms was created by Source Book contributors, who listed and
defined those words that they considered basic for readers' understanding
of their respective chapters. It is hoped that this glossary will be useful for
those who are new to the field of folklore and for students in the classroom.
analytical category: form of classification generated by analyst for the
purposes of comparison (see cultural category).
antithesis: a category in McMahon and Sutton-Smith's typology for
children's subversive folklore that represents expressive behaviors that pre-
suppose an oppositional tension and demystify the dominant culture through
parody, mirroring, or inversion.
block element: one or more features of a riddle proposition that in-
terferes with the proposition's facile solution.
bounded (or closed) society: homogeneous social group marked by
isolation from other groups; members rely on one another for subsistence
and social functions. Usually used to describe aboriginal and peasant com-
munities (see open society).
catch riddle: a type of riddle in which the surprise or victimization
of the respondent is a necessary element in the proposition.
childhood underground: a term used to describe the subculture of
children that exists apart from the culture dominated and controlled by
adults. In their book One Potato, Two Potato: The Secret Education of
American Children (1976), Mary and Herbert Knapp explain this concept
in detail.
childlore: children's folklore.
children's folklore: shared expressive behaviors of children; more spe-
cifically, according to Bauman, ". . . the traditional formalized play activi-
ties of children, including forms of speech play and verbal art, that are en-
gaged in and maintained by the children themselves, within the peer group.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? Familiar genres of children's folklore include riddles, games, jokes, taunts,
retorts, hand-claps, counting-out rhymes, catches, ring plays, and jump-rope
rhymes . . . distinguished on the one hand from nursery rhymes . . . It is
likewise distinguished from, though it may share items and genres and have
other continuities with, adult folklore" (1982, 172).
contentious fiddling: a type of riddling interaction during which par-
ticipants are verbally aggressive, take liberties with one another, and test each
other's social competence. See McDowell 1979, 122.
context: according to Duranti and Goodwin, the "notion of context
. . involves a fundamental juxtaposition of two entries: 1) a focal event;
and 2) a field of action within which that event is embedded" (1992, 3). The
relationship between focal event and context is "much like that between 'or-
ganism' and 'environment. '. . . 4) Contextual attributes most often attended
to in folkloristic and anthropological scholarship include: a) setting ("i. e. ,
the social and spatial framework within which encounters are situated"); b)
behavorial environment ("i. e. , the way that participants use their bodies and
behavior as a resource for framing and organizing their talk"); c) language
as context (the "way in which talk itself both invokes context and provides
context for other talk"); and d) extrasituational context (that is, the partici-
pants' "background knowledge") (pages 6-8).
cultural category: form of classification generated by members of a
cultural group to describe themselves (see analytical category).
descriptive routine: a madeup (that is, nontraditional) riddlelike rou-
tine depending solely or primarily on the technique of description. For an
alternate definition, see McDowell 1979.
dialogue riddle: a type of riddle in which the proposition contains a
quotation from characters in a fictitious interactional encounter. The riddle
answer identifies the speakers. See Abrahams and Dundes 1972, 135. For
an example, see riddle no. 14 in Roemer's chapter in this volume.
disorder and anarchy: a category in McMahon and Sutton-Smith's ty-
pology for children's subversive folklore that represents expressive behav-
iors as types of appropriation that demystify the structure of the dominant
culture by demonstrating its ephemeral nature.
distraction: a category in Radner and Lanser's typology for women's
strategic coding, adapted by McMahon and Sutton-Smith to indicate the
forms of children's folklore that subvert authority by drowning out a mes-
sage.
double dutch: a style of children's jump rope utilizing two ropes or
one long rope doubled, turned egg beater fashion. Typically, two people turn,
one at each end, with a jumper performing specific rhythmic motions in the
310 GLOSSARY
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
?
? ? sion set or at a home computer than in the streets or the playgrounds. But
they are also more directly exploitable by the marketplace, which has steadily
developed them as a consumer resource over the past two decades. Much
of the disquiet of modern parents has to do with this increasing and direct
availability of their children to the marketplace through television. Three
hundred years of the bourgeoisie's sloughing off the parochial folk controls
over children through the culture of traditional neighborhood games has been
called into question by this sudden susceptibility of modern children to com-
mercial infringement.
But children's sharing of this vicarious media world with their par-
ents doesn't mean that they are no longer children. Most parents deny that
they simply bow to what television suggests for their children (Sutton-Smith
1986), and those other special arrangements for children's domestication
(schools, books, toys, and recreation programs) continue apace. Whatever
may be happening to their parents in the occupational world, it is still the
fate of children to be put in their own separate zoos run by adult educators
and other supervisors of children. This fundamental segregation is not al-
tered because there is this new development of shared symbolic television
space. Nor is there much indication of any modification on the American
scene of the desire by most educated parents to shelter real children from
real violence, grossness, vulgarity, or sex, no matter what may be happen-
ing on the television screen or in dysfunctional families. In short, childhood
continues but we often have so little adequate descriptive research about it
that we cannot tell how it is different or how it is the same as in times past.
THE DISJUNCTION OF CHILD AND ADULT
The basic underlying condition of modern childhood seems to be its disjunc-
tion from adulthood. Modern enculturation is founded on this discontinu-
ity. In folklore terms this means that as long as the two groups, adult and
child, differ in power and life space, then the interaction between them will
lead to the kinds of tensions from which the lore of each group about the
other will usually arise. The more unique their separate needs and their op-
position, the greater the folklore and the development of group lore calcu-
lated to respond to them. On the one hand, there are the parents, the teach-
ers, and the psychological experts banding together for the preservation of
their own values about childhood; on the other, there are dyads, cliques, and
gangs of children developing their own business of life and often using tra-
ditional materials to do so.
Mechling asks whether there can be a theory that makes all the ma-
terial of this work hang together, that unites the irrational with the ratio-
297
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? nal, the spirit of childlore with the socialization of adults. Perhaps to expect
the two to be brought together is a "rational" kind of view, "an enlighten-
ment view" that is simply not what children's folklore is about and presum-
ably not what folklore scholars should be about (Spariosu 1989). The very
danger of this sourcebook is that it provides more means for some adults
to supervise children more carefully in order to get rid of their folklore. What
Tatar aptly writes about adult revisions of fairytales for children stands for
their approach to children's play in general: There is "the idea that a litera-
ture targeted for them must stand in the service of pragmatic instrumental-
ity rather than foster an unproductive form of playful pleasure" (1992, xxv).
Bauman, the erstwhile director of the largest funded project on children's
folklore and education, expresses concern that researchers themselves con-
tinue to place too much emphasis on the didactic uses of children's folklore
and neglect in consequence the study of "the aggressive, obscene, scatologi-
cal, antiauthoritarian, and inversive elements. . , that any student of childen's
folklore knows well to be a central part of the expressive culture of child-
hood" (1982, 173). Here Bauman is referring to children's folklore that very
few folklorists have cared to publish, such as the article "High Kybo Floater:
Food and Feces in the Speech Play at a Boy Scout Camp" (Mechling 1984b).
Perhaps some of the adults reading this book will acknowledge the memo-
ries of childhood being evoked here that they have hitherto refused to ac-
knowledge; in consequence, they may make more provision for this rueful
joyfulness to take place in childhood. After all, a conclusion about play, by
all those who work in play therapy at least, is that a major meaning of play
in childhood is that it is a pretense of society and self of a vigorous and life-
restoring kind (Erikson 1950). Play's promise may lie in human optimism
and commitment to life, rather than those other incidental correlates of prob-
lem solving, creativity, and imagination that have taken on a vogue in re-
cent psychology and education.
THEORY FOR CHILDREN'S FOLKLORE
Perhaps there is something we can do for Mechling's theoretical call with-
out falling into the usual rationalistic traps. If we begin by not accepting the
usual romantic disjunction of childhood and adulthood but instead apply
to children the same kind of theories we apply to adults in distinctive cul-
tural groups, we might make some progress. It is, for example, the promise
of children's folklore that it can bring a sense of the same cultural relativity
to our view of childhood that we generally apply to other groups. Thus, al-
though the "savages" and the "women" may have escaped from the unilinear
theory of cultural evolution (of which Zumwalt speaks), the children are still
298 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? not free. By and large in official academic and educational quarters their life
is thought of as a series of steps and stages to higher forms of adult matu-
rity. Whereas just as cultural relativity implies that each human group fash-
ions its own forms of human adaptation and expression and that each has
its wonder and beauty (as well as disasters), so with childhood there is an
aesthetic for each age, which may be celebrated (or cursed) by adults, rather
than simply glossed as an inevitably inferior step on the way to the "won-
ders" of adults' civilization, reason, and morality.
Importantly, because children are members of the most politically
powerless group, their folklore is usually favored for purposes that are not
especially those of the children. It is seldom possible to be rationally in fa-
vor of children without interfering with much that they do that is not very
rational. For this reason, we see the study of children's folklore as a very
special territory in which groundbreaking research can still be accomplished,
that is, if we pay it the tribute of considering it in terms of various contem-
porary cultural theories that are taken very seriously on the adult level but
seldom applied to children. Thus we may argue that the whole field of
children's folklore can take new directions by incorporating the recent cul-
tural ideas about power as expressed among heteronomous groups of schol-
ars like James C. Scott, Roger M. Keesing, Joan N. Radner, and Susan S.
Lanser. Our first step is to recognize that their theories allow us to look be-
neath the superficially placid surface of children's play to understand how
important are the power-related aspects of children's folklore and its forma-
tion. It would not be false to argue that although there are multiple inter-
pretations of children's folklore in the foregoing pages, the dominant theme
throughout is that of the power the children exercise over each other, and
the power they seek in their relationship to adults, mythical or real. There
is also throughout these chapters a diffuse and seldom fully explicated rheto-
rics of progress at work. When one considers that 99 percent of the books
about or for children have progress as their explicit or hidden agenda, the
child-power-oriented contents of this book constitutes a massive denial of
the validity of those adultcentric orientations.
PERFORMANCE STUDIES IN CHILDREN'S FOLKLORE
Before we proceed further with the power analysis, however, we need also
mention what might be regarded as an equally valid contemporary concern
in current adult folklore with tradition as a series of cultural perfor-
mances. This focus manifests itself in a concern with the microanalytics of
the ways in which the children themselves maintain and present their own
traditional folk culture to each other in behavior, speech, gestures, rules,
299
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? codes, and secrets (Sutton-Smith 1989a). We need not spend time on dem-
onstrating what this means in this conclusion, because it is very well shown
by a number of the articles in this Sourcebook, particularly those by Beresin
and the authors in Section III. This approach, which privileges aesthetic per-
formance issues, is refreshingly alive compared with the older concern with
collecting texts only or making formal accounts children's activities. Still,
along with the rhetoric of progress, the rhetoric of fancy, of which perfor-
mance theory is a manifestation, leads to an idealization of childhood life,
and pleasant and nostalgic as that is for us elders, it can be called into ques-
tion (Sutton-Smith, in press). Power theorists, for example, tend to downplay
performance theory's implicit avoidance or perpetuation of the inequalities
of race, gender, social class, sexuality, and nationality, which are present in
the world of folklore (Briggs 1993). In defense of performance, however, we
could argue that these performance-oriented studies nicely demonstrate that
despite the importance of the power context of the folklore which we are
about to discuss, the lore itself, whatever its rhetorical usage, is sustained
primarily by the very universal interest of players in the enjoyment they get
through their own activation of these playforms. There is an inherent and
probably built-in neurological logic to play that is the first cause of all of
these phenomena, no matter what other important causes may also come
to be served within the larger culture. There is nothing that will allow us to
say that the children's own drive for aesthetic enjoyment is not as impor-
tant as their drive for empowerment. What we can say is that both of these
rhetorics so well evidenced in this work contrast mightily with all other books
about and for childhood in which the rhetoric of progress is dominant. This
book is a powerful manifesto against what has been taken for granted
throughout the culture throughout the past two hundred years, that the busi-
ness of childhood is to grow up and shut up.
CHILDREN'S FOLKLORE AS A MANIFESTATION OF POWER RELATIONSHIPS
The material of children's folklore permits us to look at it as a power phe-
nomenon in a number of ways:
1. An earlier way was to describe the various transformations of
power that are mirrored by the play structures themselves (Sutton-Smith
1954). Thus, if games are ordered in terms of their increasing complexity
with age, one can sketch out the sequence of power transformations that
playing children participate in with age. Structurally, using the writings of
either Propp or Levi-Strauss, one can generate the binary character and or-
der of power relationships as thus mirrored in child development. Younger
children deal in central person power relationships ("it" games) and these
300 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? are transformed with age so that the power originally centered on the cen-
tral person is increasingly shared with or shifted to the hands of the group
of others (sports). The games very neatly model the crucial nature of power
achieved or lost in the interaction between opposing characters or groups.
The games constitute a simple grammar of the nature of political power in
which all children participate insofar as they play games of any sort. The
research of Roberts and Sutton-Smith (Sutton-Smith 1972a) also established
on an anthropological (and not just psychological) level that cross-cultur-
ally the triad of games of chance, strategy, and physical skill mirrored par-
allel processes in the larger societies of which they were a part. Both of these
kinds of research on types and levels of power had their heyday in the intel-
lectual climate of "structuralism. "
2. With the increasing vogue for ethnographic and performance stud-
ies in folklore, it became clear that when particular groups playing particu-
lar games were studied in their own context many complications were ob-
served that greatly modified the picture of power relationships sketched in
the above fairly abstract ways. The chapter by Hughes in the present vol-
ume is a groundbreaking example of such research. It turns out that quite
apart from the larger abstract structural account of power relationships de-
scribed above, there are many other power manipulations also taking place
on a more covert level. The rules of the games state one power relationship;
the actual gaming of those rules reveals differences in the various ways in
which every group attempts to manipulate those rules in their own favor.
3. In addition, however, to the machinations of the players within their
own games or folklore from which various power relationships and systems
can be inferred, what Scott et al. make clear is that folklore also contains
echoes of the way in which the players are also relating to the adult culture
of which they are a part when these games are played. Traditionally, play
has been seen as largely a mimetic phenomenon, an interpretation which
privileges the adult world as the model. What is apparent, however, is that
much of play is a mockery of that adult world at the same time as it is a
mimicry. So what we wish to sketch in the rest of this conclusion is not only
the way in which play models and manifests power relationships, but also
the way in which play expresses power and powerlessness by being sub-
versive of the normative culture of which it is a part. But it is important to
stress here that the play is generally both dialectically normative and sub-
versive at the same time in varying degrees (Sutton-Smith 1978a). By sub-
versive we mean all those multifaceted expressions of the child groups that
undermine the authority of the dominant culture, well illustrated in this vol-
ume in the chapters by Jorgensen, McDowell, Mechling, Sullivan, and
301
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? Zumwalt. It is at the privileged site of clandestine folklore that the subver-
sive thrives. Scott (1990) has argued that a partly sanitized, ambiguous and
coded version of this subversive "hidden transcript" is always present some-
where in the public discourse of subordinate groups, and further: "The dia-
lectic of disguise and surveillance that pervades relations between the weak
and the strong will help us, I think, to understand the cultural patterns of
domination and subordination. The theatrical imperatives that normally
prevail in situations of domination produce a public transcript in close con-
formity with how the dominant group would work to have things appear.
The dominant never control the stage absolutely, but their wishes normally
prevail. In the short run, it is in the interest of the subordinate to produce a
more or less credible performance" (1990, 40).
Most of the research to this point has been done on the way in which
subordinate colonial, racial, ethnic, or gender groups use their own folklore.
McMahon has shown, for example, the daring ways that women undermine
their more powerful spouses while in their very presence using coded and
apparently joking statements that the women know will be incorrectly per-
ceived by their husbands. These "flaunted" hidden transcripts are clandes-
tinely and gleefully understood by the other women present (McMahon
1993). Likewise, as children compose the most powerless subaltern group,
we should expect them to have multiple and complex ways of subverting
authority-behaviors that must be taken into account by researchers.
Sutton-Smith (1990a) has presented a typology for identifying the stra-
tegic ways that children create the folklore that subverts adults and em-
powers children. His provisional schemata consists of disorder, failure, and
antithesis. We can rephrase these categories and further develop them in terms
of the literature in the adult field of resistance as follows: Disorder and fail-
ure are similar to Radner's and Lanser's "appropriation" and "incompetence,"
which are categories in their typology for the identification of women's
strategic codes (1993). The latter, Sutton-Smith's antithesis, is like the logic
of opposition in Keesing's discussion of "contestation" (1992) because it is a
way that empowers and subverts under the noses of those who wield power.
To illustrate the material for a further analysis of children's folklore as a docu-
mentation of power relationships, consider the following details:
Disorder. Here we deal with the delight that children have in creat-
ing disorder out of order. On the child level this is reflected in unisons of
shoutings and noise-making, knocking down blocks and sand castles, laugh-
ing hysterically at deviations in adult behavior (as in cartoons, Charlie
Chaplin, Three Stooges, Batley) rolling about on the ground, falling down
on purpose, phonological and repetitive babble, telling stories full of mixed
302 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? disasters such as being lost, stolen, angry, dead, stepped on, hurt, burned,
killed, crashed, and so forth (Sutton-Smith 1981b). Remembering that adults
also take joy in carnivals, festivals, roller coasters, clowns, rock concerts,
and contact sports, where disorder is also a central characteristic, it is pos-
sible to argue that this impulse for disorderly play is a universal character-
istic, perhaps itself not unrelated to such human disorderly fatefulness as war,
catastrophe, hurricanes, death, and riots. Bakhtin's emphasis upon laugh-
ter as the basic and universal human reaction against fate through its disor-
dering impact, further suggests a certain universality in the phenomenon. We
remember his accounts of the orgiastic peasant festivals described by Rabelais
as such a deep and universal reaction to endless suppression. As a character
in Paul Willis's more modern Learning to Labour says about the battle that
some adolescent British boys put up against their schooling, "I think that
fuckin laffing is the most important thing in fuckin everything. Nothing ever
stops me laffing . . . I don't know why I want to laff, I dunno why it's so
fuckin important. It just is. . . . I think it's just a good gift, that's all, because
you can get out of any situation. If you can laff, if you can make yourself
laff, I mean really convincingly, it can get you out of millions of things. . . .
You'd go fuckin berserk if you didn't have a laff occasionally" (Willis 1977,
29). What this and some of the earlier examples show is that no matter what
dimensions of universality laughter and disorder may have, much of this
apparently irrational playfulness is in childhood directed against adult sup-
pression and interference and order. Other examples in this volume are the
pranks examined by Mechling and Jorgensen as well as Fine's mention of
his data on children's fartlore. What we have in this material on closer view
is a demystification of the structure of the dominant adult culture that dem-
onstrates its ephemeral control. Sluckin, for example, discusses what is called
a "taxi" ritual by some British schoolboys in which when one denies to the
teacher that he has passed wind, then the whole class passes wind (1981,
32). Many a schoolteacher has been unraveled simply by being laughed at
by the whole class either openly or surreptitiously. Such behavior is so com-
mon that "taunting the teacher" may actually constitute a genre in its own
right (Oxrieder 1976). As it has been explained elsewhere, however, much
of the disorder of children's play is an assertion of control within that play
itself, rather than being directed at the adult culture (Sutton-Smith 1977).
Apparently life as well as adults generate this response in us all.
Failure. Modern childen grow up in an achievement society where
they are graded endlessly on their accomplishments. A kind of disorder, there-
fore, which they especially seem to cherish is the disorder of failure, though
unlike many of the earlier physical disorders this one apparently doesn't
303
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ?
make its appearance until school days. Perhaps the most spectacular ex-
amples are the moron jokes, where stupidity is most celebrated. But folly
and stupidity is revered also in riddles (You go to the bathroom American.
You come out of the bathroom American. What are you in the bathroom?
European). There are Mary Jane jokes (Mary Jane went to the doctor and
he told her she was going to have twins. She laughed and laughed because
she knew she hadn't done it twice), cruel mummy jokes, elephant jokes, dead
baby jokes, Helen Keller jokes, Dolly Parton jokes, Christa McCauliffe jokes,
grosser than gross jokes, and so forth. In many of these there is fictional-
ized failure at the expense of some conventional attitude or authority or
nicety or decency. The teller achieves a magical distance in telling the tale
of the failures of life-not in some way unlike the adult gambler whose
mastery is in choosing how and where to lose, or a golf player whose mas-
tery is much of the time in choosing to play badly for the rest of his or her
life, but at least to keep playing. It is not hard to see much of the folklore
of childhood, or adulthood for that matter, as a lore of empowerment, of
fictional mastery over the presented fates.
The general undercurrent of an interest in playful disorder or failures
becomes public on those occasions when it is suddenly used directly against
authority, as when a class clown is applauded by his or her peers for sabo-
taging a teacher's efforts in the classroom with his or her nonsense or "tra-
ditional" inappropriate answers. These particular occasions justify us in say-
ing that much of children's folklore exists in an interstitial world between
fantasy and reality. This is like most of the subcultures that Scott discusses,
where there are multiple traditions of antagonism but these are muted and
indirect and fantasied until a moment when particular hostilities bring them
to the surface. But they do nevertheless exist as an ongoing culture of self-
regard and group confirmation. This is as true of the adult underclass as it
is of the child underclass.
Antithesis. Disorder is at base a fairly undirected primordial chaos.
Failure directs the blame at the persons who are stupid or without power.
The implication that more powerful persons are responsible is not directly
drawn. But with antithesis the fictional attack upon the mighty is rendered
more clearly. Antithesis is an expressive behavior that presupposes an op-
positional tension and demystifies the dominant culture through parody,
mirroring, or inversion. Sullivan cites the work of the Knapps, who recorded
the following song parody: "My Bonnie lies over the ocean; my Bonnie lies
over the sea. My daddy lies over my mommy, and that's how they got little
me (Knapp and Knapp 1976, 172, 185). So, too, Bronner recorded several
song parodies such as "Row, row row your boat; gently down the stream.
304 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? Throw your teacher overboard, and listen to her scream" (1988, 101).
Other kinds of antithesis suggested by the writings of Radner and
Lanser include such concepts as that of trivialization, in which subversive
expressions play off dominant culture expectations about what is trivial.
When Butler (1989, 94) asked a young Dutch girl to recite her favorite
jump-rope rhyme, the child responded with this verse (which rhymes in
Dutch): "A dog made a poopoo/Under a tree/A Frenchman came along/And
ate it. " Although the child's mother and grandmother were present, there
was little that could be said about the child responding to a request to re-
cite a "mere" jump-rope rhyme. Then there is indirection, which Radner and
Lanser (1993) define as hedging or leaving out key words that members of
the group know are also part of the text. Reinterpreting their category for
women's strategy coding, we include here what Dundes (1967) terms the
"evasive answer," which is one of his thirteen genres of children's folklore.
Indirection can also occur with tongue twisters that are disguised so as to ap-
pear innocent: "I slit a sheet, a sheet I slit. Upon this slitted sheet I sit" (Dundes
1967; Galvin 1990, 168). Also, adults may be familiar with only one ver-
sion of a text, such as: "Jeff and Mary sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G. First
comes love, then comes marriage. Then comes Jeff in the baby-
carriage. "Children, however, may actually know another version of the text
in which "F-U-C-K-I-N-G" replaces "kissing. " In the presence of disapprov-
ing adults, the words are just whispered or, as Zumwalt has illustrated in
this Sourcebook, just abbreviated: "Oh , you M-F, T-S, T-B-B! " Or there is
Radner's and Lanser's distraction, which is similar to indirection but involves
drowning out of a message, such as children's humming the tune of "Jack
and Jill" instead of reciting a version known to the group, such as "Jack and
Jill/Went up the hill/To get a pail of water/Jill came down with a five dollar
bill/Do you really think she went up for water? " And most adults would
choose to ignore a version of Jingle Bells, sung by a twelve-year-old boy in
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: "Jingle bells, shotgun shells; Santa Claus is dead.
Someone stole my . 30-. 30 and shot him in the head" (Bronner 1988, 108).
Such examples demonstrate how challenging and socially relevant the
study of children's subversive folklore is, but beyond this what is the value
of developing such a typology? The broad goal is presumably to identify
forms of folklore that are hidden in order to understand the relation of
children's folklore to various forms of domination. Other related critical
questions to be explored include discovering under which conditions
children's folklore becomes subversive and by what processes children as well
as other oppressed groups create subversive folklore. How do the forms of
children's folklore relate to different forms of domination and dominant
305
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? cultural values?
In setting out these examples of various kinds of subversion, how-
ever, it is necessary to emphasize the methodological point that researchers
need to avoid the trap of "reading into" children's folklore what simply isn't
there. Subversion is more than a text; it is an event that must be systemati-
cally accounted for before determining whether a particular act is subver-
sive. A child could repeat some of these rhymes above with no sense what-
soever of such implication. This is the point implied by Winslow in an early
work on children's derogatory epithets. As Winslow demonstrated, there are
levels of meaning and contexts that exist in the ethnography of speaking.
Researchers must be careful before assuming that the expression is always
used in the same manner. For example, "A child may good-naturedly accept
his nickname in the course of normal social interaction, but the same name
may be used derogatorily in other contexts, especially if it is repeated
enough" (1969, 256). This means close examination of the context-both
historical and situational. Determinations can never simply be made by read-
ing textual surfaces in abstraction from the specific event. For example, in
Butler's Skipping Around the World: The Ritual Nature of Folk Rhymes
(1989) and Lurie's Don't Tell the Grown-ups: Subversive Children's Litera-
ture (1990), each scholar has provided the reader with examples of children's
folklore that are only potentially subversive, with little contextual informa-
tion to support the researchers' interpretations. Therefore, we suggest pro-
ceeding cautiously in making such power interpretations, first recording or
noting the situation which is external to the folklore itself and then actually
identifying the taboos and values imposed on children.
Yet it is not our intent either to romanticize subversive aspects of
children's folklore as "playful" nor to divert attention from darker aspects
by ignoring instances of victimization of children by children. Some children's
advocates fall into the trap of not only celebrating children's folklore purely
for its didactic uses or viewing it as innocent diversion, but assuming the
"unity" or "inclusiveness" of children as a group. Diversity exists everywhere
and, as a result, uneven power relations also exist among children. Children
as well have multiple identities related to gender, class, religion, and race.
Works by scholars such as Fischer (1986) on ethnicity have even shown that
although some differences often deny inclusiveness, they can be fundamen-
tal in identity formation for the group itself. As Roemer in this volume notes,
researchers have generally ignored differences in, for example, children's rid-
dling styles resulting from varying ages as well as ethnic heritages. This di-
versity is most apparent, for example, in studies like that of Stoeltje (1978),
who noted subtle but important differences in hand-clapping games of Anglo
306 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? and African American girls.
Obviously, the ideal is neither to reject nor to romanticize whatever
there is in the children's world of powerlessness nor to make value judgments
about what is appropriate to record. In exploring the ingenious ways that
children create, regardless of their ethical flavor, we come to understand the
simultaneous processes of their accommodation to adult values and their
expressions of subversiveness. At times children's lore is an expression of
defiance, challenging controlling forces in a symbolic power struggle, but
sometimes this folklore is cruel, directed at members of the child's own group,
such as when tag becomes "cooties tag" because the targeted child is said
to have "cooties" because of race, religion, gender, or class. Such examples
include what Sullivan terms "rhymes of prejudice" and provide us with very
clear examples of children's folklore that adults have consistently avoided
including in scholarly folklore collections. Children quite naturally replicate
adult hierarchies in their own play and are as likely to generate cruel, dark,
or mean folklore as they are to generate kindlier forms. Modern idealiza-
tion of children's play as a part of childhood "innocence" often makes it
difficult to recognize or accept these phenomena.
Finally, these investigations of folklore as power show that there is a
real need to seriously reassess our fieldwork in relation to the voice and au-
thority we exercise, which is an ethical concern well articulated by Fine and
Mechling in this Source Book. For whether the author collects texts, or stud-
ies performance, or looks at power relationships in ethnographic ways, or
romanticizes play, or contrastingly emphasizes its cruelty; whether appreciat-
ing or depreciating the children's own power struggles; whether rationaliz-
ing childhood or glorying in its irrationality-all of these are as much a com-
mentary on the stance or rhetorics of the authority as on the condition of
childhood. Children's folklore and that of adults was once much used to
confer authenticity on the nationality or the ethnicity of the folk being stud-
ied, and also to claim authenticity for the discoveries of the scholar so in-
volved. The activity of the Brothers Grimm is perhaps the most famous case
in point (Briggs 1993). Postulating the authenticity of children's endeavors
has, however, hardly been a prestigious activity in our post-Enlightenment
culture, where adults are generally more interested in children's progress than
in their past. But there has always been a small minority of scholars, from
Newall to the Opies, who have hung in at their child-oriented posts and at-
tempted to make us realize there was something there in children's folklore
worth preserving or recording-whether they called it tradition, "natural"
childhood, or folk subculture.
We pay a tribute to these scholars, as well as to the contributors to
307
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? this Source Book, for their research of whatever kind and for the scholarly
merit they derive from the authenticity of their own research endeavors. It
is a scholarly "game" to engage one's fellows with a more adequate approach
to the scholarly subject matter than existed hitherto, as if there is only our
own new way of being authentic. But our editorial gamesmanship requires
that we suggest, on the contrary, that there are multiple ways of being au-
thentic about the authenticity of those we study. It is not a zero sum game.
We live, rather, in a world of multiple childhoods and multiple ways in which
these can be studied, to the credit of all parties. We say this despite our own
persistent rhetoric about child empowerment. We choose to finish, therefore,
selectively by asking the question how is it that our adult culture so typi-
cally suppresses the power-related aspects of children's lives so clearly rep-
resented in this present document? Is the "triviality barrier" (Sutton-Smith
1970a) in children's folklore only an adult reaction formation against the
dangers of recognizing that the world would be very different if we attended
to the neotony of children's struggles for power?
308 CONCLUSION: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? GLOSSARY
AN AID FOR SOURCE BOOK READERS
This list of terms was created by Source Book contributors, who listed and
defined those words that they considered basic for readers' understanding
of their respective chapters. It is hoped that this glossary will be useful for
those who are new to the field of folklore and for students in the classroom.
analytical category: form of classification generated by analyst for the
purposes of comparison (see cultural category).
antithesis: a category in McMahon and Sutton-Smith's typology for
children's subversive folklore that represents expressive behaviors that pre-
suppose an oppositional tension and demystify the dominant culture through
parody, mirroring, or inversion.
block element: one or more features of a riddle proposition that in-
terferes with the proposition's facile solution.
bounded (or closed) society: homogeneous social group marked by
isolation from other groups; members rely on one another for subsistence
and social functions. Usually used to describe aboriginal and peasant com-
munities (see open society).
catch riddle: a type of riddle in which the surprise or victimization
of the respondent is a necessary element in the proposition.
childhood underground: a term used to describe the subculture of
children that exists apart from the culture dominated and controlled by
adults. In their book One Potato, Two Potato: The Secret Education of
American Children (1976), Mary and Herbert Knapp explain this concept
in detail.
childlore: children's folklore.
children's folklore: shared expressive behaviors of children; more spe-
cifically, according to Bauman, ". . . the traditional formalized play activi-
ties of children, including forms of speech play and verbal art, that are en-
gaged in and maintained by the children themselves, within the peer group.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
? ? Familiar genres of children's folklore include riddles, games, jokes, taunts,
retorts, hand-claps, counting-out rhymes, catches, ring plays, and jump-rope
rhymes . . . distinguished on the one hand from nursery rhymes . . . It is
likewise distinguished from, though it may share items and genres and have
other continuities with, adult folklore" (1982, 172).
contentious fiddling: a type of riddling interaction during which par-
ticipants are verbally aggressive, take liberties with one another, and test each
other's social competence. See McDowell 1979, 122.
context: according to Duranti and Goodwin, the "notion of context
. . involves a fundamental juxtaposition of two entries: 1) a focal event;
and 2) a field of action within which that event is embedded" (1992, 3). The
relationship between focal event and context is "much like that between 'or-
ganism' and 'environment. '. . . 4) Contextual attributes most often attended
to in folkloristic and anthropological scholarship include: a) setting ("i. e. ,
the social and spatial framework within which encounters are situated"); b)
behavorial environment ("i. e. , the way that participants use their bodies and
behavior as a resource for framing and organizing their talk"); c) language
as context (the "way in which talk itself both invokes context and provides
context for other talk"); and d) extrasituational context (that is, the partici-
pants' "background knowledge") (pages 6-8).
cultural category: form of classification generated by members of a
cultural group to describe themselves (see analytical category).
descriptive routine: a madeup (that is, nontraditional) riddlelike rou-
tine depending solely or primarily on the technique of description. For an
alternate definition, see McDowell 1979.
dialogue riddle: a type of riddle in which the proposition contains a
quotation from characters in a fictitious interactional encounter. The riddle
answer identifies the speakers. See Abrahams and Dundes 1972, 135. For
an example, see riddle no. 14 in Roemer's chapter in this volume.
disorder and anarchy: a category in McMahon and Sutton-Smith's ty-
pology for children's subversive folklore that represents expressive behav-
iors as types of appropriation that demystify the structure of the dominant
culture by demonstrating its ephemeral nature.
distraction: a category in Radner and Lanser's typology for women's
strategic coding, adapted by McMahon and Sutton-Smith to indicate the
forms of children's folklore that subvert authority by drowning out a mes-
sage.
double dutch: a style of children's jump rope utilizing two ropes or
one long rope doubled, turned egg beater fashion. Typically, two people turn,
one at each end, with a jumper performing specific rhythmic motions in the
310 GLOSSARY
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-24 15:03 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/usu. 39060010034923 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#cc-by-nc-nd-3. 0
?
