(59) ydp refers to the unexpressed but
obvious answer to the previous question, 'Send aid, of course.
obvious answer to the previous question, 'Send aid, of course.
Demosthenese - First Philippic and the Olynthiacs
133).
It is therefore suspected
that in the text Terrdpaxowa has been repeated by mistake
from the previous clause, and that some smaller number such
as 'rpidxowa is intended (Westermann).
43. m'rroirs e? pfiulvew: a resolution not necessarily due to any
eagerness for personal service (such as Demosthenes afterwards
urged in Phil. i and 01. i), but probably arising from there
being no time to secure the services of others to man the
ships.
? 5 l. 44. here. mii'ru. KTXJ Aeschin. 3 ? 62 ,ucrcl. Tafim e? rfia
xpivos Gemo'TOKhfis dpxwr 611110011. KT)\.
45. 1'06 {mom-oi) 'rox'a-rou: 01. 107, 1 (a year with an inter-
calary month) beginning on 3rd July 352 B. C. and ending on
21st July 351 13. 0. (Ideler quoted by Voemel ed. 1829 p. 114).
e? xnropflmdw, perayn'rvw'w, Bqupopw'w (so. fio'av): the
first three months of the Attic year, extending in 351 8. 0.
from 22nd July to 18th Oct.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 190 THIRD 0L YNTHIAG III ? 5
46. pdyts, 'reluctantly' ; we may assume a pause in delivery
before this word, as also before Se? xo. vai's, 'only 10 vessels'
instead of 40. 'rd pvflfipua: the Eleusinian mysteries,
celebrated between the 14th, 15th, or 16th, and the 27th day
of the month Bo'e? dromion (Oct) Thus the Athenians waited
nearly a year before sending succours, and even those they
ultimately sent were miserably inadequate.
47. vaiis . . Kiwis: explained in one Ms by wohmm'is
,Bo'qfieias: 4 ? 43 TpLfiPGlS Kemis, Thuc. vi 31. The emphasis
falls on Se? xu. and stds and 1re? v're (instead of 60). Grote c. 87
viii 59.
4S. XapCS |. |. ov: Charidemus of 'npee? g, in N. of Euboea, was origin-
ally a comman er of mercenaries who served under Iphicrates in the
expedition against Amphipolis in 368-5 no. He was entrusted with the
care of certain hostages, but, instead of sending them to Athens, he
restored them to Amphipolis. He thereupon took service under Cotys
(chief of the Thracian tribe of Odrysae), who was at that time at enmity
with Athens. In 360 3. 0. , after engaging to join the Olynthians in defend-
ing Amphipolis against Timotheus, he was captured by the Athenians and
compelled to aid them against Olynthus. On the failure of these operations
on the part of Timotheus, he served in Asia Minor in the cause of Arts-
bazus, to whom he proved false. He next appealed to Athens, promising
to aid her in recovering the Chersonesus; but, on returning to Europe, he
broke this promise and entered the service of Cotys, whose daughter he
married. On the murder of Cotys (358) he supported his son Cersobleptes
in his struggle with Athens for the possession of the Chersonesus.
Ultimately he was forced to ratify a treaty ceding the Chersonesus to
Athens, and for this service he was actually presented with the Athenian
citizenship (857). In 352, notwithstanding the protest delivered bya client
of Demosthenes in the Speech against Aristocratcs, his person was declared
inviolable, and in 851 he was sent on the abortive expedition described
in the text. On the recall of Chares in 349 he was appointed by the
Athenians as commander in the war for the defence of Olynthus. He
joined the Olynthians in ravaging Pellene and Bottiaea (then in the hands
of Philip), but gave such ofl'ence by his insolence at Olynthus that he was
superseded by Chares. His earlier adventures are described in the Speech
again-st Aristocrat". After the battle of Chaeroneia (338) he was elected a
u-rpa-rqye? ; of Athens. He was the first to bring news of the death of Philip
(336). His surrender was demanded by Alexander in 335. Finally he
deserted to Darius and gave him advice as to the invasion of Greece, which
lied to his being falsely suspected of treachery and to his being put to
eath.
49. fiyye? hfl'q do'eeve? iv (cp. l. 37 drme? hdn . . rohzopm'bv):
the rumour was founded on fact, 4 ? 11, 1 ? 13. axe"
of the arrival of news, Thuc. i 61, 1, iii 33, 1, viii 96, 1 (cp. vi
104, 1 d'y'yshlai e? ? olrwv).
50. ofixe? rL--vopto'avns: Thuc. v 13 voplo'av-rcs ofi8e? va mude
etmu e? 'n. Katpbv . . 1'00 fioquiv, 'occasion for sending
succours. '
51. dclvei-l-(e): Aor. , 'discontinued' the expedition at the
critical moment. On the arrival of fresh news, Charidemus
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? Ill ? 5, 6 THIRD 0L YNTHIAC' 191
was ultimately despatched. d-n-6o-rohov (cp. cmihos):
especially of a naval expedition.
52. b Katpbs 0. 676s, 'the very opportunity,' reminds the
hearer of 6 1mde Kdtpe? i in ? 3, brought home to him again in
? 6 e? 're? pou woke/mu Kalpe? s 11s.
54. e? ve? xket: fivte? xkovv is quoted from Xen. C'yr. v 3, 56;
five? xh'qaa il). ? 3, Dem. 21 ? 15; fivwxhsT-ro Aeschin. 3 ? 44.
But the single augment is the reading of 8, here and in 35 ? 30 ;
it is also found in Aristotle's Genet. of Athens 11 ? 1 e? vdixkow.
Possibly it was only the double compound rap-evoxXG; that had
the double augment (18 ? 50 rap-nvdvxh'qa'fie). Cp. dvopOG,
dwfipflonv : ? 1r - (1110,0063, e? 1r - nvu'ipOovv 01' (better) e? 1r - nvbpflow
(Rehdantz-Blass p. 1828; cp. Rutherford New Phryn'it-hus
pp. 83--7).
? 6 l. 56. m'nt av mus lxot: preceded by 16. new rapehnhu-
06m in Prooem. 30 and by rafrra ,u. e? v ib. 41 ; cp. Isocr. 12 ? 22,
Plato Protag. 324 B.
58. Yva. pi] . . 16. 611": after e? /mio'Onv, ' mentioned a
moment ago. ' The s eaker's purpose still remains the same,
and the Suhj. is used) just as if the principal verb had been
Present; 19 ? 1 Talifas 'lva. Kwhl'rnQ', ol I'd/LOL avm'rya'yov (was,
01% I'm. Kuplas 'ro'is ddmoiia'z rozfi're (Goodwin llIT. ? 318).
The Subj. is also found in 2 ? 24, but the explanation there
would be somewhat different (see note). 1% . . xp c'6||. e9(a. )
. . 7061-9; ' what use shall we make of it '2' 'how shal we deal
with it'! ' 4 ? 33.
(59) ydp refers to the unexpressed but
obvious answer to the previous question, 'Send aid, of course. '
59. el . . p. 11 Ofia-ers maer cGe? Nel KATbl To AYNATdN,
'if you do not sen succours with might and main to the best qf
your power. '
cee? uoc is a poetic and archaic word, never found in the
Greek of Demosthenes, who uses instead the synonyms {axes
(seven times, e. g. l. 299), and 619mm: (very often). Thucydides
himself uses 0'0e? vos only once, i 86, 2 nawpme? a e? v 'rdxet ml
1rav-rl crOe? veL. ncwrl cee? uel is in fact the only phrase in
which o'Be? l/as survives in prose, e. g. Plato Laws 646 A ? 62976w
row-r). afle? ch Ka'rd. Tb dwa-rbv, 854B ezihafiei'o'Oaz xpedw
rat/Tl afle? vez, Xen. Resp. Lac. 4 ? 5 dpfi? ovzn 1r6hsl. war-rt
afle? vez, Cyr. vi 1, 42 fi-r-rov 6. 11 Tar/Tl 110616: dapolfi'owro, v'iii
5, 25 our/6400a: . . 507107606"! raw-rt afle? vez, Hell. vi 5, 2
flonflfio'w 1rav'rl o'fie? vel, Diodor. xvi 75 flon0e'z'v . . 1rav1'l
afle? vsz. In l'lato P/Laedrus 2070 Ta 100 Xahxnfiovlou afle? vos
is mock heroic (Rutherford New th/n'ichus p. 10 note).
Ku're? l 'rb auuq're? u, again, involvas the collocation of at least
e
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 192 THIRD 0L YNTHIAC' III ? ? 6, 7
five short syllables, and is therefore unlikely to be a phrase of
the orator's own ; it is never used by Demosthenes himself.
The whole phrase, in both its parts, must in fact be regarded
as a quotation. The orator reminds his audience of their duty
to their allies by quoting a formula. customary in treaties of
alliance. KATA TO ATNATON is preceded by dupehs'iv in
the treaty quoted in Thuc. v 23 ? ? 1, 3 (421 13. 0. ), and by
1301196131 in v 47 ? ? 3, 5 (420) ; while l'lANTl EOENEI KATA
TO ATNATON is quoted with e? mxoupei'u in v 23 ? 4, and is
found with BOHGEIN in at least fifteen inscriptions z--OIA.
II i 6 = Hicks no. 65 (395-- 13. 0. ); 7 = Hicks no. 67 (395--) ; 15
l. 25 = Ditt. p. 104 (387--) ; Iv ii 15 c 23 = Hicks no. 80 (387--);
11 i 17 l. 51 = Hicks no. 81, 49 (878-); 521. 17 = Ditt. p. 130,
Hicks no. 88 (368--) ; IV ii 49 b 11. 5, 9, 16 ; 57 b = Ditt. p. 149
(362--); 59 b 16 = Ditt. p. 152, Hicks no. 97 (361-); Hicks
no. 99, 10 (360--56); and no. 100, 16 (357? ); II i 66 bp.
406 = Ditt. p. 159, Hicks no. 109 (356--); 112 (0. 356--40);
Iv ii 116b (341--); Ir i 311 l. 19 (2843--). We may even go
further than this. It can hardly be doubted that a formal
treaty containing this very phrase had already been concluded
between Athens and Olynthus. A treaty of alliance is clearly
implied by ? 2 Haws Tot/s avaadxovs odm'opev, and by ? 16
oils, ei 71'0)\? ,1L7)UOI. ? V, e? ToZ/tws a'a'ia'ew 2'11ria'xv017/1. 60a. From the
analogy of similar documents we may infer (with Hartel Dem.
Antrdgc p. 532) that the treaty was drawn up in the following
i'ormz--vataxla. thxfie? wv 16v e? 'lri epq'mys Kai 'Aenvalwv e? s'
1611 (is! xpovow e'civ ns {1] e? 1ri woke/Lg: ? 1ri Xahmfie? as fl Kan-1'1.
7% t) Kant Oahu-Frau, fiOflOETV 'Aflnvalovs now) other Kafion
av e? na'y'ye? hhwo'w Xahmfie'is Karo. 16 5111111161" Kai e? dv ns ly
e? 1ri rohe? aq: e? 1r' 'Aflnvatovs KTA. It has been proposed by
Kohler and Hartel to connect with this alliance a fra mentary
inscription (CIA. II i 105 = Hicks no. 106) giving the names
of certain envoys who (apparently with a view to ratifying this
treaty) were to administer the oaths To'is Xahmoe? wv 166v e? 1rl
quixns e? mreptois. The Chalcidians and their oaths are also the
subject of no. 106. The first of these inscriptions is restored as
belonging to the archonship of Theellus (01. 107, 2 = 351--0 13. 0. ) ;
the second certainly belongs to that of Callimachus (0]. 107,
4 = 349--8 11. 0. )
62. iflpwanko'res . . germ-6(a) (1 ? 14, 54 ? 20) K'l')\. , 'you
will have conducted the war in Philip's interests' (? 17 1rdv-ra
. . o'u-yxaraoxevdo'av-res 0. 6793). In 4 ? 41 Demosthenes describes
the Athenians as virtually making Philip their own commander.
1rdv'r(o. ), 'in all respects. '
? 7 l. 63. inrfipxov--(66) E'npdgapev--(69) e? x-Irohepcio'm: in
l
l
H
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? III ? 7 THIRD 0L YNTHIAG 193
these three successive sentences we have three instances of
asyndeton, each combined with the simplest forms of construc-
tion, and all leading up to the inference clearly drawn at the
beginning of the next section. im- pxov . . KeK'r pe? vot:
4 ? 13 e? Oe? hovras i'nrdpxew. Se? vupv 'l'l-VO. KeK-rqp- vou: 2
? 1 1. 6.
65. oii'rs . . Eedppet rein-we, 'feared (not 'mistrusted')
them. ' Oappe'iu (a) with Ace. is 'not to fear,' Xen. Cyr. v 5,
42 has as . . Oappfia'wo'w, Anal). iii 2, 20 rd: mixers Oappe'i're,
Plato Phaedo 88 B Miami: 0. , Phaedr.
that in the text Terrdpaxowa has been repeated by mistake
from the previous clause, and that some smaller number such
as 'rpidxowa is intended (Westermann).
43. m'rroirs e? pfiulvew: a resolution not necessarily due to any
eagerness for personal service (such as Demosthenes afterwards
urged in Phil. i and 01. i), but probably arising from there
being no time to secure the services of others to man the
ships.
? 5 l. 44. here. mii'ru. KTXJ Aeschin. 3 ? 62 ,ucrcl. Tafim e? rfia
xpivos Gemo'TOKhfis dpxwr 611110011. KT)\.
45. 1'06 {mom-oi) 'rox'a-rou: 01. 107, 1 (a year with an inter-
calary month) beginning on 3rd July 352 B. C. and ending on
21st July 351 13. 0. (Ideler quoted by Voemel ed. 1829 p. 114).
e? xnropflmdw, perayn'rvw'w, Bqupopw'w (so. fio'av): the
first three months of the Attic year, extending in 351 8. 0.
from 22nd July to 18th Oct.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 190 THIRD 0L YNTHIAG III ? 5
46. pdyts, 'reluctantly' ; we may assume a pause in delivery
before this word, as also before Se? xo. vai's, 'only 10 vessels'
instead of 40. 'rd pvflfipua: the Eleusinian mysteries,
celebrated between the 14th, 15th, or 16th, and the 27th day
of the month Bo'e? dromion (Oct) Thus the Athenians waited
nearly a year before sending succours, and even those they
ultimately sent were miserably inadequate.
47. vaiis . . Kiwis: explained in one Ms by wohmm'is
,Bo'qfieias: 4 ? 43 TpLfiPGlS Kemis, Thuc. vi 31. The emphasis
falls on Se? xu. and stds and 1re? v're (instead of 60). Grote c. 87
viii 59.
4S. XapCS |. |. ov: Charidemus of 'npee? g, in N. of Euboea, was origin-
ally a comman er of mercenaries who served under Iphicrates in the
expedition against Amphipolis in 368-5 no. He was entrusted with the
care of certain hostages, but, instead of sending them to Athens, he
restored them to Amphipolis. He thereupon took service under Cotys
(chief of the Thracian tribe of Odrysae), who was at that time at enmity
with Athens. In 360 3. 0. , after engaging to join the Olynthians in defend-
ing Amphipolis against Timotheus, he was captured by the Athenians and
compelled to aid them against Olynthus. On the failure of these operations
on the part of Timotheus, he served in Asia Minor in the cause of Arts-
bazus, to whom he proved false. He next appealed to Athens, promising
to aid her in recovering the Chersonesus; but, on returning to Europe, he
broke this promise and entered the service of Cotys, whose daughter he
married. On the murder of Cotys (358) he supported his son Cersobleptes
in his struggle with Athens for the possession of the Chersonesus.
Ultimately he was forced to ratify a treaty ceding the Chersonesus to
Athens, and for this service he was actually presented with the Athenian
citizenship (857). In 352, notwithstanding the protest delivered bya client
of Demosthenes in the Speech against Aristocratcs, his person was declared
inviolable, and in 851 he was sent on the abortive expedition described
in the text. On the recall of Chares in 349 he was appointed by the
Athenians as commander in the war for the defence of Olynthus. He
joined the Olynthians in ravaging Pellene and Bottiaea (then in the hands
of Philip), but gave such ofl'ence by his insolence at Olynthus that he was
superseded by Chares. His earlier adventures are described in the Speech
again-st Aristocrat". After the battle of Chaeroneia (338) he was elected a
u-rpa-rqye? ; of Athens. He was the first to bring news of the death of Philip
(336). His surrender was demanded by Alexander in 335. Finally he
deserted to Darius and gave him advice as to the invasion of Greece, which
lied to his being falsely suspected of treachery and to his being put to
eath.
49. fiyye? hfl'q do'eeve? iv (cp. l. 37 drme? hdn . . rohzopm'bv):
the rumour was founded on fact, 4 ? 11, 1 ? 13. axe"
of the arrival of news, Thuc. i 61, 1, iii 33, 1, viii 96, 1 (cp. vi
104, 1 d'y'yshlai e? ? olrwv).
50. ofixe? rL--vopto'avns: Thuc. v 13 voplo'av-rcs ofi8e? va mude
etmu e? 'n. Katpbv . . 1'00 fioquiv, 'occasion for sending
succours. '
51. dclvei-l-(e): Aor. , 'discontinued' the expedition at the
critical moment. On the arrival of fresh news, Charidemus
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? Ill ? 5, 6 THIRD 0L YNTHIAC' 191
was ultimately despatched. d-n-6o-rohov (cp. cmihos):
especially of a naval expedition.
52. b Katpbs 0. 676s, 'the very opportunity,' reminds the
hearer of 6 1mde Kdtpe? i in ? 3, brought home to him again in
? 6 e? 're? pou woke/mu Kalpe? s 11s.
54. e? ve? xket: fivte? xkovv is quoted from Xen. C'yr. v 3, 56;
five? xh'qaa il). ? 3, Dem. 21 ? 15; fivwxhsT-ro Aeschin. 3 ? 44.
But the single augment is the reading of 8, here and in 35 ? 30 ;
it is also found in Aristotle's Genet. of Athens 11 ? 1 e? vdixkow.
Possibly it was only the double compound rap-evoxXG; that had
the double augment (18 ? 50 rap-nvdvxh'qa'fie). Cp. dvopOG,
dwfipflonv : ? 1r - (1110,0063, e? 1r - nvu'ipOovv 01' (better) e? 1r - nvbpflow
(Rehdantz-Blass p. 1828; cp. Rutherford New Phryn'it-hus
pp. 83--7).
? 6 l. 56. m'nt av mus lxot: preceded by 16. new rapehnhu-
06m in Prooem. 30 and by rafrra ,u. e? v ib. 41 ; cp. Isocr. 12 ? 22,
Plato Protag. 324 B.
58. Yva. pi] . . 16. 611": after e? /mio'Onv, ' mentioned a
moment ago. ' The s eaker's purpose still remains the same,
and the Suhj. is used) just as if the principal verb had been
Present; 19 ? 1 Talifas 'lva. Kwhl'rnQ', ol I'd/LOL avm'rya'yov (was,
01% I'm. Kuplas 'ro'is ddmoiia'z rozfi're (Goodwin llIT. ? 318).
The Subj. is also found in 2 ? 24, but the explanation there
would be somewhat different (see note). 1% . . xp c'6||. e9(a. )
. . 7061-9; ' what use shall we make of it '2' 'how shal we deal
with it'! ' 4 ? 33.
(59) ydp refers to the unexpressed but
obvious answer to the previous question, 'Send aid, of course. '
59. el . . p. 11 Ofia-ers maer cGe? Nel KATbl To AYNATdN,
'if you do not sen succours with might and main to the best qf
your power. '
cee? uoc is a poetic and archaic word, never found in the
Greek of Demosthenes, who uses instead the synonyms {axes
(seven times, e. g. l. 299), and 619mm: (very often). Thucydides
himself uses 0'0e? vos only once, i 86, 2 nawpme? a e? v 'rdxet ml
1rav-rl crOe? veL. ncwrl cee? uel is in fact the only phrase in
which o'Be? l/as survives in prose, e. g. Plato Laws 646 A ? 62976w
row-r). afle? ch Ka'rd. Tb dwa-rbv, 854B ezihafiei'o'Oaz xpedw
rat/Tl afle? vez, Xen. Resp. Lac. 4 ? 5 dpfi? ovzn 1r6hsl. war-rt
afle? vez, Cyr. vi 1, 42 fi-r-rov 6. 11 Tar/Tl 110616: dapolfi'owro, v'iii
5, 25 our/6400a: . . 507107606"! raw-rt afle? vez, Hell. vi 5, 2
flonflfio'w 1rav'rl o'fie? vel, Diodor. xvi 75 flon0e'z'v . . 1rav1'l
afle? vsz. In l'lato P/Laedrus 2070 Ta 100 Xahxnfiovlou afle? vos
is mock heroic (Rutherford New th/n'ichus p. 10 note).
Ku're? l 'rb auuq're? u, again, involvas the collocation of at least
e
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 192 THIRD 0L YNTHIAC' III ? ? 6, 7
five short syllables, and is therefore unlikely to be a phrase of
the orator's own ; it is never used by Demosthenes himself.
The whole phrase, in both its parts, must in fact be regarded
as a quotation. The orator reminds his audience of their duty
to their allies by quoting a formula. customary in treaties of
alliance. KATA TO ATNATON is preceded by dupehs'iv in
the treaty quoted in Thuc. v 23 ? ? 1, 3 (421 13. 0. ), and by
1301196131 in v 47 ? ? 3, 5 (420) ; while l'lANTl EOENEI KATA
TO ATNATON is quoted with e? mxoupei'u in v 23 ? 4, and is
found with BOHGEIN in at least fifteen inscriptions z--OIA.
II i 6 = Hicks no. 65 (395-- 13. 0. ); 7 = Hicks no. 67 (395--) ; 15
l. 25 = Ditt. p. 104 (387--) ; Iv ii 15 c 23 = Hicks no. 80 (387--);
11 i 17 l. 51 = Hicks no. 81, 49 (878-); 521. 17 = Ditt. p. 130,
Hicks no. 88 (368--) ; IV ii 49 b 11. 5, 9, 16 ; 57 b = Ditt. p. 149
(362--); 59 b 16 = Ditt. p. 152, Hicks no. 97 (361-); Hicks
no. 99, 10 (360--56); and no. 100, 16 (357? ); II i 66 bp.
406 = Ditt. p. 159, Hicks no. 109 (356--); 112 (0. 356--40);
Iv ii 116b (341--); Ir i 311 l. 19 (2843--). We may even go
further than this. It can hardly be doubted that a formal
treaty containing this very phrase had already been concluded
between Athens and Olynthus. A treaty of alliance is clearly
implied by ? 2 Haws Tot/s avaadxovs odm'opev, and by ? 16
oils, ei 71'0)\? ,1L7)UOI. ? V, e? ToZ/tws a'a'ia'ew 2'11ria'xv017/1. 60a. From the
analogy of similar documents we may infer (with Hartel Dem.
Antrdgc p. 532) that the treaty was drawn up in the following
i'ormz--vataxla. thxfie? wv 16v e? 'lri epq'mys Kai 'Aenvalwv e? s'
1611 (is! xpovow e'civ ns {1] e? 1ri woke/Lg: ? 1ri Xahmfie? as fl Kan-1'1.
7% t) Kant Oahu-Frau, fiOflOETV 'Aflnvalovs now) other Kafion
av e? na'y'ye? hhwo'w Xahmfie'is Karo. 16 5111111161" Kai e? dv ns ly
e? 1ri rohe? aq: e? 1r' 'Aflnvatovs KTA. It has been proposed by
Kohler and Hartel to connect with this alliance a fra mentary
inscription (CIA. II i 105 = Hicks no. 106) giving the names
of certain envoys who (apparently with a view to ratifying this
treaty) were to administer the oaths To'is Xahmoe? wv 166v e? 1rl
quixns e? mreptois. The Chalcidians and their oaths are also the
subject of no. 106. The first of these inscriptions is restored as
belonging to the archonship of Theellus (01. 107, 2 = 351--0 13. 0. ) ;
the second certainly belongs to that of Callimachus (0]. 107,
4 = 349--8 11. 0. )
62. iflpwanko'res . . germ-6(a) (1 ? 14, 54 ? 20) K'l')\. , 'you
will have conducted the war in Philip's interests' (? 17 1rdv-ra
. . o'u-yxaraoxevdo'av-res 0. 6793). In 4 ? 41 Demosthenes describes
the Athenians as virtually making Philip their own commander.
1rdv'r(o. ), 'in all respects. '
? 7 l. 63. inrfipxov--(66) E'npdgapev--(69) e? x-Irohepcio'm: in
l
l
H
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? III ? 7 THIRD 0L YNTHIAG 193
these three successive sentences we have three instances of
asyndeton, each combined with the simplest forms of construc-
tion, and all leading up to the inference clearly drawn at the
beginning of the next section. im- pxov . . KeK'r pe? vot:
4 ? 13 e? Oe? hovras i'nrdpxew. Se? vupv 'l'l-VO. KeK-rqp- vou: 2
? 1 1. 6.
65. oii'rs . . Eedppet rein-we, 'feared (not 'mistrusted')
them. ' Oappe'iu (a) with Ace. is 'not to fear,' Xen. Cyr. v 5,
42 has as . . Oappfia'wo'w, Anal). iii 2, 20 rd: mixers Oappe'i're,
Plato Phaedo 88 B Miami: 0. , Phaedr.
