No More Learning

417. [341. 8st is most naturally taken with mum". Cp.
Prooem. 24? 2 fiqdlws oih'w ifielldedficu, [52] ? 1 fiqfilws 1a i/zeufi-F)
papa-upofivras', 55 ? 7 figBlws nap-rupofiu-ras, [47] ? 31 and [49] ? 66
fiqolws with e? mopxeiv, [43] ? 78 poolws Kareqtpovno'e Tifiv 116/mill,
[44] ? 3 ex 1011 dhhorplwv [Bodies dvahlo'xova'w, 21 ? 139 MW" 16.
il/eudfi fida'r' e? mvevowwv.
M560); is taken by seine editors with draw, either 'are easy to find'
(EMnller), or 'remain nnmolested,' 'are allowed their own way"; cp. ? 32
p dim; {tr-rm, 'will easily take up its position' (Hahn Bemc'rkungen p. 694
of Cmnnwnlatioms in human Mommscni 1877). Halm doubts whether the
phrase in the text can be used in the sense--614v rive; evades [seek-as
\Peiiswv'riu.
418. 8 TL av rox'q're (\fimpifbptevoz), 'at random. ' 1(--
1rpoo-80Kfiv, ' what must (Kai) we expect? '
? 47 l. 420. mis; 'how! ' exceptionally anSWered by 871w,
'when. '
421. o'rparw'rras K'rh. : predicative accusatives.
422. 'HBv c'rpar'q'yovpivwv : ? 25.
423. 76v ei'rtwe? 'w: in the technical sense, 'his audit'; not
metaphorical, as in 1 ? 28.
425. els 7060' ---o. lo'X1'M1s: ? 37. In such phrases the
subject is far more frequently a person than a. thing. Thus
in Lysias, as against nineteen examples with a person, there is
only one without, viz. 14 ? 2 dpapfli/m'ra . . els Toaofi'rov Kaklas
d? t7ne? va (Frohberger ad loc. ) Cp. Dem. 3 ll. 6, 33.
426. 16v o'rparqye? v--Oavd'rou: 2? 29. Probablya reference
to Antocles (23 ? 104), Cephisodotus (23 ? 153), Leosthenes
(Died. xv 95), Callisthenes (Aeschin. 2 ? 30), and Chares (ib.
? 71). Sauppe.
427. xpfve'rm: 2 ? 25 ; usually followed by a simple Gen. ;
here (as in Aeschin. 3 ? 52) by mp1. Qavd-rou to correspond with
the construction necessary after dywvtc'ao'Oau.
429. depa'lroSw're? iv, 'kidnappers,' often coupled with Xw-rro-
away, 'thieves' (lit. 'clothes-stealers'), 9 ? 22; both of them
species of the genus KaKoUp-yoc, 'malefactors ' (Meier u. Schomann
Att. Proc. p. 86 Lipsius).
430. hanroSwiw Give-rev: Lys. 13 ? 68 (of a Xw'lroov-nis)
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? IV ? ? 47, 48 FIRST PHILIPPIO' 121
bpeis Kplvav-res . . Kal Kara'yve? v-res 0,6106 fidva'rov, draw/ma. -
vlo'ai dure? dore, Xen. Mam. i2, 62.
431. wpocfixov'ros Oavd-rov.
? 48 l. 433. wepuiov-res (? 10), near the beginning of the
sentence, echoed by qreprepxopeao. at the end. C . ? 41 119011006
repeated, and 2 ? ? 6, 7 ne? inpe? vou . . 176515611. he rhetorical
term for this figure of speech is mixhos. p. er Aakefimpovfimv
----'rfiv Gqfiatwv: it is mainly the friends of Sparta among the
Athenians who are here described as retailing Philip's specious
promises of ' concerting with Sparta the destruction (or humilia-
tion) of Thebes,' and 'breaking up the free states' in Boeotia
and Arcadia (ASchaefer Dem. ii 752). There were similar
rumours in 344 3. 0. (6? 14). The fall of Thebes was to
be brought about by the restoration of Orchomenus, . Thespiae
and Plataea (16 ? ? 4, 25 ; Grote c. 87 viii 43). This was con-
templated by Sparta after the successes of the Phocian com-
mander, Onomarchus, in 353 B. o. (ASchaefer i 5112), and
:(ictuallgy carried out after the battle of Chaeroneia in 338
iii 19 .
435. rd; irohwetas Smfiv: dependent on ? aal, 'to break
up the free states,' by transforming them into oligarchies. 8
? 43 7? ); roharelas Kal T'Fls ongoxparlas, [17] ? 10 rd; rah-rein
. . Karahiwo'c, 15 ? 20 TOI'IY 'rc'ts rohzrelas Karahuovras Kai 1. 1. 69-
w'rdv'ras els 6M'yapxlav. Cp. 8? o? xl? sw in 5 ? 10, 16 ? 30, 19 ? 81,
Isocr. 5 ? 43. oi 8 obs . . 1r? 1rop? ev instead of 01 6E
1rpe? o13e1s 1re1ro,u? e? va. ? dis fiaaihe? a, which would have involved a
slight hiatus. The regular infinitival construction after ? a? rl
is thus changed into the exceptional construction with (1)5.
Goodwin M T. ? 753, 2.
Some (e. g. Rehdantz) would even prefer restoring the Infinitive and
supposing d>>; to have come in by mistake from 6;; Baame? a. The same
variation, however, occurs in Isocr. 17 ? 25 ofiros ae? v quzIaOru' 4mm. 115v
' xknuairwv, ? 76) 8' (in 55! ; pa wapli Toni-rev Kouia'acrOal. 16 xpva'iov. In
0 her rallel passag'es 8n in Dem. 22 ? 23 and it; in 27 ? 19 are (as in the
text) istant from t e verb. In 20 ? 135 and 24 ? 204 the clause with an
begins the sentence ; in 16 ? 20 and 19 ? 88 it is in apposition to 701770 in
70610 d)", and in 21 ?
98 it is separated by another sentence from 'rL' Man:
WGRut'herford Classical Review 1896 x 6; cp. Karlowa Progr. 1883 1194).
n Lys. 7 ? 19 Weidner brackets (it; ? mnvl before ldfi- Cp. Am. Jam-n.
Phil. iv 88, 531, xvi 395.
436. npe? crflus Mk: that these negotiations with Persia
were not a mere rumour only is shown by a letter sent by
Darius to Alexander, stating that Philip had entered into an
alliance with Artaxerxes (III) Ochus (Arrian ii 14, 2, quoted by
ASchaefer Dem. ii 33'). Gas : for els or 1rp6s, only found with
the Ace. of persons. fianMo: without the Article, often
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 122 FIRST PHILIPPIG IV ? ? 48--50
used of the king of Persia. e? v 'IMvpto'is (1 ? 23)--'rnx(-
gel-v: a rumour probably founded on fact. Justin viii 3, 7
(before attacking Olynthus, Philip) per 'regna. vitittit et opulentis-
simas civitates, qui opinionem sererent regem Philippum magnet
pecunia locare ct muros ct civitates et fana et temple facienda
(ASchaefer Dem. ii 27 2).
437. ct St--wepispxdpek: a fresh turn is given to the last
plause, as in? 36 after the last aim, and in 19 ? 73 after the
ast abs.
? 49 l. 439. pewew: metaphorical, as in Plato Rep. 562D
dxpdrou (e'kequplas) #001105, Hor. Odes i 37, 12 fortuna dulci
ebria.
441. e? veipo-rroheiv: with Acc. Aristoph. Nub. 16 empoan
0' Yr'rrous. e? p'qptav--Kmhuo'dv-ruv: 20 ? 74 rolls Kwhzi-
oovras, [13] ? 19 Ti): 'ribv e? uavnwoo/te? vwv e? pnplas ci'n'ohaziwv,
Lys. 12 ? 98 ? 1217;qu 10v e? mKoup'rlo'e? wwv, Isocr. 14 ? 61 and 19
? 29, Thuc. ii 51, 5, supra ? 23 "rip! waparan/Le? vnv, Soph. Ant.
261 0155' 6 Kwhlfia'wv rap-71v. Goodwin MT. ? 840. GP. 1. 314.
442. e? wqppe? vov: 32 ? 10, 37 ? 2; 18 ? 168 e? 1rap0els (of
Philip).
443. m" pe? vrol. . . 061-0>> ya: 49 ? 38 06 ne? vror 066% 7061-6 y'
6450. 0" (the reading of S for 01': ,ue? vroi 1'). Here the Mss
wrongly place 76 after ,iu'vroi, similarly after /. u';, in 14 ? 32,
now corrected into cl 6% M; T6511 1' bwapxbvrwv.
? 50 l. 448. Td--dworrrepei, 'keeps us out of our own' ; 27
? ? 12, 24, 37; 18 ? 13, 31 ? 6, 36 ? 36, 49 ? 2.
449. fiX-Irto'ape? v . . (452) dvayxao'evlo-e? pda: Ind. of direct
discourse retained, as usual, after primary tense (Goodwin
MT. ? 689, 1).
450. 'I'LVGZ eg. Philip, Onomarchus, Cersobleptes, or Chari-
demus. \'nre? p: contrasted with me' fipaiv, 3 ? 12.
("pnfluz sc. rpdEas (25 ? 7), or rpaxfle? vra. (19 ? 241).
451. e? v--Jfip'iv 61rd, 'depends on ourselves,' 'is in our own
hands' ; 23 ? 24, Lys. 25 ? 8, Herod. vi 109. Kdv pfi viiv
GOAwpev, 'if we shall not now be willing,' vim referring to the
time immediately following the present; 'if we are not now
willing' would be expressed by ei ah vfiv e'fle? Xo/uv (Goodwin
MT. ? 444).
452. lid-(es: the doubt expressed here vanishes in the
Olynthiacs.
453. 6. 1! "61' (MW : resumed from ll. 446 f.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 1V ? 50, 51 FIRST PHILIPPIC' 123
454. {adv-? 901), combined with the Perf. Participles forms
a Fut. Perf. (Goodwin MT. ? 80).
456. dm'ivMG): sc. e? 'arai.
457. :6 elBe? vdi: sc. 662.
? 51 l. 459. E16: pe? v 05v : a frequent formula for introducing
the peroration by marking the contrast between the speaker's
attitude and that of others. 063:) followed by re, 18 ? 216,
20? 76, 24 ? 29, 74 etc. d. are: the deliberative (or
parliamentary) speeches previously delivered by Demosthenes
were 0')". 14 1repl rc'bv ova/ropie? v, 15 1'11er rfis 'Podlwv e? heulieplar,
and 16 brre? p Me'ydkorrokire? 'w. The only extant forensic speech
already delivered by himself in a public cause was Or. 20 rpbs
Aerrrlvrlv. 1'pr Xdpw : ? 38 'n'pdr fidovriu.
460. eiMpqv is regarded by Goodwin MT. ? ? 156, 533 as
having 'a sense ap roaehing that of the gnomic Aorist,' and
as therefore followed by the Subj. It seems better to con-
sider werewpe? vos <3, 'I have been and am still convinced,'as
one of the many examples of the retention of the Subj. with
(Sir after a past tense (ib. ?