30
owrnplav
roi's e?
Demosthenese - First Philippic and the Olynthiacs
34 rohhi'bv a>> Xpnpdrwv 1rplaa'0ai.
qupd'ruv
has probably no recondite meaning. It does not refer to sums
of money either offered to Demosthenes by the Olynthians or
the king of Persia, or required for sending help to Olynthus,
or distributed among Athenian orators by Phili , or among the
people in general by Eubulus. Nevertheless, t e fact that the
question of the distribution of the theoric fund was being
raised (? ? 19, 20) would give additional point to the word.
2. cl. ? avepbv--o'xo1retr? : this dependent clause is the virtual
object of e? he? aOai. The order is: at 1r6pl (Too-row wept) 6>>:
01016215, ? tlll? p09 'ye? vorro To ,ue? hhov ovvolo'ew Tfi roha.
ye? vovro 16: this collocation (--ro 16) would have been avoided
by Isocrates.
3. nepl--o'xo'lre'i're: 3 ? 18 1rspi rpaypd'rwv 1rpo'r60ii axo1rei'v.
4. 8r: in causal sense (Goodwin MT. ? 713), 'now that,'
less strong than (in, but stronger than d. Cp. Plato Symp.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 126 FIRST OLYNTHIAC I ? 1, 2
206 life 51'] 7031-0 6 5pm; ? 01! ! ! def. rotvw : here a particle
of transition rather than inference.
5. "flew, 'to be willing' or 'ready. ' flouhope? vuv,
'wishing' (Shilleto on FL. p. 348 ? 26, and Donaldson's
New Cralylus ? 463). Here the ordinarily weak sense of
? 0e? hew is strengthened by position and also by the adverb
1rpo0o/ws.
6. m" yap pdvov--e? 'lreMeiv el'n'e'iv: this sentence clearly
implies that there are advantages even in unpremeditated
speeches, as well as in those that are carefully prepared before-
hand. Demosthenes apparently intends his audience to suppose
that he is himself ready to trust to that inspiration which the
good fortune of Athens often supplies, rather than to any
elaborate reparation. In fact, however, he was generally
most unwilling to speak on the spur of the moment (Plut.
Dem. 8, 9). He distinctly avows premeditation in 21 ? 191
? p? T d): e'dKeu/Ae? vo. Kai WGPGO'KCUGO'ILe? IIG. miwa he? 'yw viiv. ? 711) 6'
e? oxe? ? 0az ,u. e? u . . ? 11,u. l ml 01'": Av dpvnficl-qv, Kai #e/Lehnrnxe? vai 'y'
(i); as,>> udhw'r' e? aol. It has been conjectured that Demosthenes
may have been preceded either by some such orator as Phocion,
who had possibly dwelt on the long consideration which he had
bestowed on the question (so Weil), or by the witty extempor-
aneous speaker Demades (ofi'ros Annoufle? uea Xe? 'yov-rz i'nre? p 'Ohvv-
01w! dr-re? heyev, Suidns). In the latter case si' n xpria'L/aov
e'axe/me? vos fist us may be a modest reference to men like
Demosthenes himself (so Voemel); while the sequel may be
regarded as an ironical but good-humoured allusion to the ready
speakers on the opposite side, who (as Demosthenes was fully
conscious) were more popular with his audience (Rehdantz,
followed by Blass, who, however, holds that this was the first
speech in the debate). GHSchaefer (followed by Heslop) says
of fixer 11s Dem. at de 11: certa loquitur . . 1mm se ipsu'm
intelligit. e? o-xeppe? vos: Mid. as in 15 ? 25 ; Mid. and Pass.
in 21 ? 191 quoted in last note.
7. win" av . . Mpovre is the apodosis to st dxolia'arre, implied
in the conditional participle alcove-owes.
8. iapcre? pas nix-qs: 4 ? 12, so. elvac, ? 10 T5: there? pas
d/uhefas (iv 14; 06117, 8 ? 48 50m? Tafi'ro. dandy-)7: pexdhm eivcu.
9. Gwekeeiv dv: orat. obl. for an e? re? hfloi. 650's" a;
find. me (11. 311 hexfie? v-rwv)----aipeo'w yeve? rrdau: Ep. 1 ? 4 fiddler
Till! Tail! ,Behrlo'rwv al'pso'w Karao'r'iio'ar, lsocr. 6 ? 4 iv' e? E drdv-rwv
imiv egg 113v [inBe'vav e? he? o'fial. 'rd. o'upzpopdrra'ra.
? 2 l. 12. plv 06v introduces the subject of the speech, as in
4? 2,2? 3,3? 3, 18? ? 3, 9.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? I ? 2 FIRST 0L YNTHIAC' 127
13. opuwfiv (Maids : personifying 6 1rd. de Kaipe? s. For similar
personifications cp. 18 ? 172 6 Kaipos e? xeivor . . dvdpa. {lather
(and Soph. El. 75), 19 ? 81 1'7 'ydp decm. Kai rd 1re1rpa'y/Le? v'
we Bag, and ? 119 rafi-r' 00x2 [306, Plato Protag. 361 A 60ch
'11an 1', dp'n. #5060: 16311 Mwa Ibo-rep dvfipanros mr-ryyopeiv re Kai
Kara'yehc'iv, Kill cl (pan/1'71! )uiBoz, slrre'iv 8. 1! 81-1. . . , Thuc. ii 43, 2.
14. ? xelvow, ' those ' or 'yonder,' the affairs of distant
Olynthus; separated from rpayud-rwv to emphasise xii/Iv and
0. 17102}. The latter pronoun implies pcrsmml service, ? 6 4111701):
e? Eiovras.
15. inre? p : 1repl, 4 ? ? 1, 4. o-orr'qptas min-6W: re? iv
rpaypdrwv (schol. ); 3 ? 21 19711 1131' rpaynd'rwv o'w-mplav, 36
?
30 owrnplav roi's e? airroii 1rpd. 'y,u. aow(and ? 49 'rov cdw'avra rd.
1rpii'y/1ara), 5 ? 7 1rspl oquplas Kal Icon/6511 1rpa'y/Ldrwv, ? 17 (below)
,Boan-re? ov 1on wpd'y/Lao'w. fipe'is KT)>>, '1 know not how
we ('you and I,' less invidious than 'you ') seem to me to be
disposed in the matter'----a cautious way of hinting at the
general reluctance to adopt a vigorous policy (K. )
Otherwise, Demosthenes might have said (with Lucian 1. 0. ) mivu 6M-
yu'ipme 5x111! Semi/aw 1rsz gird, or (with the scholiast) figOPIaofiucy m7,
013 upodexonev. Hermog. 111 411 your imaxoiisrai. airervnrv- 41AM
ro'fi-ro' {\'um'lpov e'u'n 1'02; 'AO'r'vn-iois' 1rd): 061/ nepre? nheg'ev; " 011K 015'--1rpoq
GUT"-
17. rd. 7' e? pol Soxoiiv-ra, ' my own humble (7') opinion. '
18. +181], 'at once,' 'forthwith'; 4 ? 8, 7 ? ? 8, 15, 29 end;
C'IA. ii 609, 12 (Wordsworth's Athens and Attica p. 1903) e? he? a'Ow.
rpei's dv5pos 17511. rfiv BofiOeiav: the succours in question,
now being debated as the order of the day. repair-Remi-
wad-0m: usually regarded as having for its object either 1171!
13013061111! or was m'rrmis, in which case 61m; (preceded by a
comma) would mean 'in order that,' or 'that so. ' This makes
the ae? v clause inordinately long, besides giving an inadequate
sense. Rapidity of preparation could not in itself lead to the
succours consisting of Athenians alone. It is therefore better
to take the clause beginning with (firms as the object of rape-
a'xeudo'aoOaL. Thuc. ii 99 rapeokeudf'ovro 81w: . . e? a'flahoiiinv
(Weil). 'rfiv 'raxto-rqv : cp. 4 ? 23 and 3 ? 2 r-hu 1rpo'n'11v.
19. 811-09 smefimfl the usual Ind. Fut. with firm after
rapaoxevdfcofiai (15 ? 28, 24 ? ? 113, 115), xarao'xevdfl'ea'Oal. (8
? 13), o'KorreTv (2 ? ? 2, 12; 3 ? 1, 6 ? 5, 9 ? ? 29, 51, 63, 69, 75;
14 ? ? 7, 14, 41; 15 ? 30, 18 ? 231, 19 ? ? 250, 262, etc. ) The
Ind. Fut. is adopted by Blass in preference to the Aor. Subj.
'not merely because it is more usual, but also because it makes
better sense. The text represents the succours as about to be
actually sent. ' The Aor. Subj. pfl mien-re can be combined
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 128 FIRST 0L YNTHIAO I ? 2, 3
with the Fat. Ind. , as in Aristoph. Ecol. 495 ,uxi] Kai TLS had:
6? ? Tllt xii/1. 6V lows Karelrry, and Plato Tim. 18E ,myxaviiadm
. . limos . . e'Kd/repoi guhh'lyfiovrai, Kat in) T6 adro'is Exflpa. . .
'yi'yVflTaL (Weil). Cp. Aesch. C'ho. 265 iri-yfiQ', 81m: p. 91
iree? aerai ris, followed b d1ra'y'yelhy, and [Plato] Ale. ii, where
81m: ,m') Meal. is followe by rifixwo'w in 138 B and by rahwqufi
in 148 B. Conversely in Plato Gory. 481 A rapao'Keudare? ov . .
drrws ,ui) 5Q dimly ,urlde? ghfly 1rdpd r611 deaO'rfiv is followed by
lirrws ,Lii) drrodavc'iral. . . dhh' dOdvaros germ, and by fin-ms
fiiu'm'erai, and in Aeschin. 3? 64 (hrs): ,ui] TQM/Lefme by fire):
i/mdueialie and 151m: ,ui) term.
In the genuine speeches of Demosthenes 6m>>; in object clauses is found
with Fut. Ind. 78 times; with Snbj. only 6 times after primary tenses
(5 ? 17 Mifl-g, 6 ? 25 eil'pnre, 9 ? 69 dvdrpe'dln, 14 ? 22 Jun, 21 ? 166
flwwofirs, 24 5 107 nixum), and only 4 times after secondary tenses
(18 ? 32 drriaunv, 19 ? ? 15, 230 ys'w'rm, ye'vuovrm, 54 ? 17 i'vawai). Of
these ten Subjunctives only one is that of the sigmatic or. , dvdrpe? dm,
and even this is made doubtful by the quotation in Aristeides ii 625, which
has dvarpe? iper (accepted by Blass). In the text the use present us with
the only instance in Demosthenes of an object clause with iirrme, in which
a siginatic is combined with a non-sigmatic form of the Subjunetive
(Weber's Absichlssiitze ii 38 f, 121). quGrju-e-re should therefore be preferred.
Goodwin, however, considers it very arbitrary to change 301101;"1-4
to BUflQfiO'QTE, and leave r6011" (MT. ? 364). no. 1. wt] "6. 6 H--
1rp6'repov is considered parenthetical by Blass in his ed. of Reh antz.
Halm (Comnieritationes in honoram anmseni p. 694) disapproves of this
parenthesis, but does not make the Aor. Subj. dependent on napaansvd-
craaQau. He prefers suggesting 'iva pi; #3011".
20. 'rm'rrbv arrep Kat: ? 11, 3 ? 12 l. 112. 1rp6-repov does
not refer to any belated succours recently sent to Olynthus, but
to previous cases of remissness in the course of the war with
Philip, ? 8 l. 62. For example, in 352 11. 0. , when Philip was
besieging 'de'iov rcixos near the Thracian Chersonesus, Athens
did nothing effectual against him. 'The Athenians relapsed
into their former languor and renounced or postponed their
intended annament' (Grote c. 87 viii 59). rpwfietav--
{psi-z Xen. Hell. ii 1, 6 1re? ,u. 1rsw rpe? afleis ra9rd re e? pofivrds . .
21. fins . . e? pei: relative with Fut. Ind. , denoting purpose,
2 ? 11 (Goodwin M T. ? 565). wape? o'ral. rots npdypdo'w,
' watch the proceedings' or 'course of events,' especially Philip's
negotiations with Olynthus implied in ? 4 ll. 30, 35.
? 3 l. 22. Se? os: predicate. Eur. Heracl. 739 rofrro 'ydp ? 6,80s,
Tro. 240 el r65' fir 1711. 111 4:6,309, Plato Rep. 465B Mo; 5% r3 r4}
rdaxovri rolls dhhovs [301,0er (Sauppe).
has probably no recondite meaning. It does not refer to sums
of money either offered to Demosthenes by the Olynthians or
the king of Persia, or required for sending help to Olynthus,
or distributed among Athenian orators by Phili , or among the
people in general by Eubulus. Nevertheless, t e fact that the
question of the distribution of the theoric fund was being
raised (? ? 19, 20) would give additional point to the word.
2. cl. ? avepbv--o'xo1retr? : this dependent clause is the virtual
object of e? he? aOai. The order is: at 1r6pl (Too-row wept) 6>>:
01016215, ? tlll? p09 'ye? vorro To ,ue? hhov ovvolo'ew Tfi roha.
ye? vovro 16: this collocation (--ro 16) would have been avoided
by Isocrates.
3. nepl--o'xo'lre'i're: 3 ? 18 1rspi rpaypd'rwv 1rpo'r60ii axo1rei'v.
4. 8r: in causal sense (Goodwin MT. ? 713), 'now that,'
less strong than (in, but stronger than d. Cp. Plato Symp.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 126 FIRST OLYNTHIAC I ? 1, 2
206 life 51'] 7031-0 6 5pm; ? 01! ! ! def. rotvw : here a particle
of transition rather than inference.
5. "flew, 'to be willing' or 'ready. ' flouhope? vuv,
'wishing' (Shilleto on FL. p. 348 ? 26, and Donaldson's
New Cralylus ? 463). Here the ordinarily weak sense of
? 0e? hew is strengthened by position and also by the adverb
1rpo0o/ws.
6. m" yap pdvov--e? 'lreMeiv el'n'e'iv: this sentence clearly
implies that there are advantages even in unpremeditated
speeches, as well as in those that are carefully prepared before-
hand. Demosthenes apparently intends his audience to suppose
that he is himself ready to trust to that inspiration which the
good fortune of Athens often supplies, rather than to any
elaborate reparation. In fact, however, he was generally
most unwilling to speak on the spur of the moment (Plut.
Dem. 8, 9). He distinctly avows premeditation in 21 ? 191
? p? T d): e'dKeu/Ae? vo. Kai WGPGO'KCUGO'ILe? IIG. miwa he? 'yw viiv. ? 711) 6'
e? oxe? ? 0az ,u. e? u . . ? 11,u. l ml 01'": Av dpvnficl-qv, Kai #e/Lehnrnxe? vai 'y'
(i); as,>> udhw'r' e? aol. It has been conjectured that Demosthenes
may have been preceded either by some such orator as Phocion,
who had possibly dwelt on the long consideration which he had
bestowed on the question (so Weil), or by the witty extempor-
aneous speaker Demades (ofi'ros Annoufle? uea Xe? 'yov-rz i'nre? p 'Ohvv-
01w! dr-re? heyev, Suidns). In the latter case si' n xpria'L/aov
e'axe/me? vos fist us may be a modest reference to men like
Demosthenes himself (so Voemel); while the sequel may be
regarded as an ironical but good-humoured allusion to the ready
speakers on the opposite side, who (as Demosthenes was fully
conscious) were more popular with his audience (Rehdantz,
followed by Blass, who, however, holds that this was the first
speech in the debate). GHSchaefer (followed by Heslop) says
of fixer 11s Dem. at de 11: certa loquitur . . 1mm se ipsu'm
intelligit. e? o-xeppe? vos: Mid. as in 15 ? 25 ; Mid. and Pass.
in 21 ? 191 quoted in last note.
7. win" av . . Mpovre is the apodosis to st dxolia'arre, implied
in the conditional participle alcove-owes.
8. iapcre? pas nix-qs: 4 ? 12, so. elvac, ? 10 T5: there? pas
d/uhefas (iv 14; 06117, 8 ? 48 50m? Tafi'ro. dandy-)7: pexdhm eivcu.
9. Gwekeeiv dv: orat. obl. for an e? re? hfloi. 650's" a;
find. me (11. 311 hexfie? v-rwv)----aipeo'w yeve? rrdau: Ep. 1 ? 4 fiddler
Till! Tail! ,Behrlo'rwv al'pso'w Karao'r'iio'ar, lsocr. 6 ? 4 iv' e? E drdv-rwv
imiv egg 113v [inBe'vav e? he? o'fial. 'rd. o'upzpopdrra'ra.
? 2 l. 12. plv 06v introduces the subject of the speech, as in
4? 2,2? 3,3? 3, 18? ? 3, 9.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? I ? 2 FIRST 0L YNTHIAC' 127
13. opuwfiv (Maids : personifying 6 1rd. de Kaipe? s. For similar
personifications cp. 18 ? 172 6 Kaipos e? xeivor . . dvdpa. {lather
(and Soph. El. 75), 19 ? 81 1'7 'ydp decm. Kai rd 1re1rpa'y/Le? v'
we Bag, and ? 119 rafi-r' 00x2 [306, Plato Protag. 361 A 60ch
'11an 1', dp'n. #5060: 16311 Mwa Ibo-rep dvfipanros mr-ryyopeiv re Kai
Kara'yehc'iv, Kill cl (pan/1'71! )uiBoz, slrre'iv 8. 1! 81-1. . . , Thuc. ii 43, 2.
14. ? xelvow, ' those ' or 'yonder,' the affairs of distant
Olynthus; separated from rpayud-rwv to emphasise xii/Iv and
0. 17102}. The latter pronoun implies pcrsmml service, ? 6 4111701):
e? Eiovras.
15. inre? p : 1repl, 4 ? ? 1, 4. o-orr'qptas min-6W: re? iv
rpaypdrwv (schol. ); 3 ? 21 19711 1131' rpaynd'rwv o'w-mplav, 36
?
30 owrnplav roi's e? airroii 1rpd. 'y,u. aow(and ? 49 'rov cdw'avra rd.
1rpii'y/1ara), 5 ? 7 1rspl oquplas Kal Icon/6511 1rpa'y/Ldrwv, ? 17 (below)
,Boan-re? ov 1on wpd'y/Lao'w. fipe'is KT)>>, '1 know not how
we ('you and I,' less invidious than 'you ') seem to me to be
disposed in the matter'----a cautious way of hinting at the
general reluctance to adopt a vigorous policy (K. )
Otherwise, Demosthenes might have said (with Lucian 1. 0. ) mivu 6M-
yu'ipme 5x111! Semi/aw 1rsz gird, or (with the scholiast) figOPIaofiucy m7,
013 upodexonev. Hermog. 111 411 your imaxoiisrai. airervnrv- 41AM
ro'fi-ro' {\'um'lpov e'u'n 1'02; 'AO'r'vn-iois' 1rd): 061/ nepre? nheg'ev; " 011K 015'--1rpoq
GUT"-
17. rd. 7' e? pol Soxoiiv-ra, ' my own humble (7') opinion. '
18. +181], 'at once,' 'forthwith'; 4 ? 8, 7 ? ? 8, 15, 29 end;
C'IA. ii 609, 12 (Wordsworth's Athens and Attica p. 1903) e? he? a'Ow.
rpei's dv5pos 17511. rfiv BofiOeiav: the succours in question,
now being debated as the order of the day. repair-Remi-
wad-0m: usually regarded as having for its object either 1171!
13013061111! or was m'rrmis, in which case 61m; (preceded by a
comma) would mean 'in order that,' or 'that so. ' This makes
the ae? v clause inordinately long, besides giving an inadequate
sense. Rapidity of preparation could not in itself lead to the
succours consisting of Athenians alone. It is therefore better
to take the clause beginning with (firms as the object of rape-
a'xeudo'aoOaL. Thuc. ii 99 rapeokeudf'ovro 81w: . . e? a'flahoiiinv
(Weil). 'rfiv 'raxto-rqv : cp. 4 ? 23 and 3 ? 2 r-hu 1rpo'n'11v.
19. 811-09 smefimfl the usual Ind. Fut. with firm after
rapaoxevdfcofiai (15 ? 28, 24 ? ? 113, 115), xarao'xevdfl'ea'Oal. (8
? 13), o'KorreTv (2 ? ? 2, 12; 3 ? 1, 6 ? 5, 9 ? ? 29, 51, 63, 69, 75;
14 ? ? 7, 14, 41; 15 ? 30, 18 ? 231, 19 ? ? 250, 262, etc. ) The
Ind. Fut. is adopted by Blass in preference to the Aor. Subj.
'not merely because it is more usual, but also because it makes
better sense. The text represents the succours as about to be
actually sent. ' The Aor. Subj. pfl mien-re can be combined
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:10 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc1. 31175009758841 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 128 FIRST 0L YNTHIAO I ? 2, 3
with the Fat. Ind. , as in Aristoph. Ecol. 495 ,uxi] Kai TLS had:
6? ? Tllt xii/1. 6V lows Karelrry, and Plato Tim. 18E ,myxaviiadm
. . limos . . e'Kd/repoi guhh'lyfiovrai, Kat in) T6 adro'is Exflpa. . .
'yi'yVflTaL (Weil). Cp. Aesch. C'ho. 265 iri-yfiQ', 81m: p. 91
iree? aerai ris, followed b d1ra'y'yelhy, and [Plato] Ale. ii, where
81m: ,m') Meal. is followe by rifixwo'w in 138 B and by rahwqufi
in 148 B. Conversely in Plato Gory. 481 A rapao'Keudare? ov . .
drrws ,ui) 5Q dimly ,urlde? ghfly 1rdpd r611 deaO'rfiv is followed by
lirrws ,Lii) drrodavc'iral. . . dhh' dOdvaros germ, and by fin-ms
fiiu'm'erai, and in Aeschin. 3? 64 (hrs): ,ui] TQM/Lefme by fire):
i/mdueialie and 151m: ,ui) term.
In the genuine speeches of Demosthenes 6m>>; in object clauses is found
with Fut. Ind. 78 times; with Snbj. only 6 times after primary tenses
(5 ? 17 Mifl-g, 6 ? 25 eil'pnre, 9 ? 69 dvdrpe'dln, 14 ? 22 Jun, 21 ? 166
flwwofirs, 24 5 107 nixum), and only 4 times after secondary tenses
(18 ? 32 drriaunv, 19 ? ? 15, 230 ys'w'rm, ye'vuovrm, 54 ? 17 i'vawai). Of
these ten Subjunctives only one is that of the sigmatic or. , dvdrpe? dm,
and even this is made doubtful by the quotation in Aristeides ii 625, which
has dvarpe? iper (accepted by Blass). In the text the use present us with
the only instance in Demosthenes of an object clause with iirrme, in which
a siginatic is combined with a non-sigmatic form of the Subjunetive
(Weber's Absichlssiitze ii 38 f, 121). quGrju-e-re should therefore be preferred.
Goodwin, however, considers it very arbitrary to change 301101;"1-4
to BUflQfiO'QTE, and leave r6011" (MT. ? 364). no. 1. wt] "6. 6 H--
1rp6'repov is considered parenthetical by Blass in his ed. of Reh antz.
Halm (Comnieritationes in honoram anmseni p. 694) disapproves of this
parenthesis, but does not make the Aor. Subj. dependent on napaansvd-
craaQau. He prefers suggesting 'iva pi; #3011".
20. 'rm'rrbv arrep Kat: ? 11, 3 ? 12 l. 112. 1rp6-repov does
not refer to any belated succours recently sent to Olynthus, but
to previous cases of remissness in the course of the war with
Philip, ? 8 l. 62. For example, in 352 11. 0. , when Philip was
besieging 'de'iov rcixos near the Thracian Chersonesus, Athens
did nothing effectual against him. 'The Athenians relapsed
into their former languor and renounced or postponed their
intended annament' (Grote c. 87 viii 59). rpwfietav--
{psi-z Xen. Hell. ii 1, 6 1re? ,u. 1rsw rpe? afleis ra9rd re e? pofivrds . .
21. fins . . e? pei: relative with Fut. Ind. , denoting purpose,
2 ? 11 (Goodwin M T. ? 565). wape? o'ral. rots npdypdo'w,
' watch the proceedings' or 'course of events,' especially Philip's
negotiations with Olynthus implied in ? 4 ll. 30, 35.
? 3 l. 22. Se? os: predicate. Eur. Heracl. 739 rofrro 'ydp ? 6,80s,
Tro. 240 el r65' fir 1711. 111 4:6,309, Plato Rep. 465B Mo; 5% r3 r4}
rdaxovri rolls dhhovs [301,0er (Sauppe).
