17 Jameson, Jordan, and
Kotansky
1993 with Clinton 1996a.
Ancient-greek-cults-a-guide
Scholars are divided as to whether his elevation came through the patronage of the Peisistratids or a few years later under the nascent democracy, but it is clear that Theseus was to be the Athenian answer to Dorian Herakles (whose cults were already widespread in Attica).
Gradually, local traditions about Theseus were expanded, and unrelated cults were provided with Thesean credentials.
This process was accelerated when the politically adroit general Kimon, responding to an oracular command to "bring home the bones" of Theseus, contrived to find the hero's remains on the newly conquered island of Skyros (476).
Perhaps the bones of some prehistoric behemoth, the remains were ceremoniously laid to rest in a new shrine, the Theseion (the location of which is still unknown) and a levy was passed in order to finance a state cult and annual festival called the Theseia.
The resulting ritual cycle, which was readily assimilated into the existing festival calendar, commemorated events in the "biography" of the hero, especially his triumphant return from Krete via Delos and his landing at the port of Phaleron, celebrated in the preexisting vintage festival of the Oschophoria.
Theseus' return was placed in the seed- sowing month of Pyanopsion, so the mixture of pulses and cereals consumed in the Apolline festival of the Pyanepsia (Bean Boiling) was explained as the potluck soup created when Theseus and his companions pooled the last of their rations for a homecoming meal.
24 Whereas the Spartans had focused on enlarging a collection of Atreid heroes in order to appropriate their creden- tials and prestige, the Athenians molded and elevated Theseus to fit the new ideals established by the democracy.
Further reading
Antonaccio 1995 argues from an archaeologist's perspective against the con- ventional wisdom linking hero cult with the spread of epic and the rise of the polis. Boedeker 1998 discusses the value of Orestes as a "Spartan" hero, while Mayor 2000 (Chapter 3) examines the cults and relics of Pelops, Orestes, and Theseus in the context of ancient fossil discoveries. Kearns 1989 explores the functions of heroic figures, especially as they relate to Attic subgroups such as tribe and deme. Larson 1995b and Lyons 1997 deal with heroines and their cults. Clay 2004 is a valuable discussion of the evidence for the cults of poets, especially Archilochus' cult on Paros and Thasos.
207
NOTES
1 METHODS, SOURCES, AND CONCEPTS FOR THE STUDY OF ANCIENT GREEK CULTS
1 Graf 1991a; Fowler 2000.
2 Vernant 1980. 92-109.
3 Vernant 1983a.
4 Malkin 1994, 2001; Hall 1997, 2002a; papers in Dougherty and Kurke eds
2003.
5 Habicht 1985; Musti and Bingen 1996; Alcock, Cherry and Elsner eds 2001;
Arafat 1996. 1-79; Hutton 2005.
6 Burkert 1985. 227-34; Bell 1997. 72-76, 1998.
7 Burkert 1987; Langdon 1987.
8 Meuli 1946; Burkert 1983b. 1-72; Girard 1977; Hamerton-Kelly ed. 1987;
Robbins 1998.
9 Be? rard 1989; Detienne et al. 1989.
10 Thomson 1943; Samuel 1972. 64-65; Hannah 2005. 16-70.
11 Nilsson 1951 Vol 1. 166-214; Connor 1987; Graf 1996.
12 Van Straten 1974; Jameson 1988; Pulleyn 1997; Furley and Bremer 2001. See also
the papers in Versnel ed. 1981; Linders and Nordquist eds 1987.
13 Yavis 1949; Rupp 1974; Gould 1973; Sinn 2000. See also the papers in Marinatos
and Ha? gg eds 1993.
14 Bergquist 1998, 1990; Bookidis 1993. See also the papers in Murray ed. 1990.
15 Corbett 1970; Burkert 1996; Scheer 2000; Nick 2002. 9-99. Contra the concept
of the cult statue: Donohue 1997.
16 Linders 1972, 1975; Aleshire 1989; Harris 1995; Hamilton 2000.
17 Rouse 1975 [1902]; Van Straten 2000 [1992]; Baumbach 2004. See also the
papers in Linders and Nordquist eds 1987.
18 Snodgrass 1980. 54; Sourvinou-Inwood 1993; Morris 1997. 34-42.
19 de Polignac 1984, 1995. See also the papers in Alcock and Osborne eds 1994.
20 van Gennep 1960. 65-115; Brelich 1969; Vidal-Naquet 1986; Dowden 1989. See
also the papers in Padilla ed. 1999; Dodd and Faraone eds 2003.
21 Moulinier 1975 [1952]; Parker 1983; Douglas 1994 [1966].
22 Kaestner 1976; Schlesier 1991-92; Scullion 1994, 2000. See also the papers in
Ha? gg and Alroth eds 2005.
23 Sourvinou-Inwood 2000 [1990]. 15.
24 Beard and North 1990. 1-18; Sourvinou-Inwood 2000 [1988], 2000 [1990];
Parker 2005. 89-115.
208
NOTES
2 PROGENITOR AND KING: ZEUS
1 Kn 02 = PY 172 (Pylos), Fp 05 (Knossos), etc. [Chadwick and Ventris 1973]; Ge? rard-Rousseau 1968. 72-74; Dowden 2006. 9-11, 28-29.
2 Paus. 1. 32. 2; Cook 1964 [1914-] Vol. 2. 868-987; Langdon 1976; Dowden 2006. 54-64.
3 Isoc. 9. 14-15 (Aiakos); Paus. 2. 29. 6-8 (Hellanios); Ap. Rhod. Argon. 2. 516-27 with schol. ; Callim. fr. 75. 32-37 Pf. (Ikmaios); Heraclides Creticus 2. 8 [Pfister 1951] (Akraios); Langdon 1976. 79-87.
4 Hughes 1991. 92-96.
5 Paus. 8. 38. 2-6; Burkert 1983b. 84-93, 109-16; Voutiras and Tiverios 1997, no.
461 (coins).
6 Buxton 1986. 67-72; Hughes 1991. 102-7. Jost 2002 argues for a real human
sacrifice.
7 Hes. fr. 163 M-W; Apollod. Bibl. 3. 8. 1 (further sources in Frazer's 1921 edition,
ad loc. ); Jost 1985. 180-5, 249-69.
8 Cf. Theophrastus in Porph. Abst. 2. 28-30; other primary sources in Patillon and
Bouffartigue eds 1977-, Vol. 2. 51-58. Meuli 1975 [1946]. 954, 1005; Smith
1982. 57-65; Burkert 1983b. 12-22, 136-43, 2001. 10-11.
9 Paus. 3. 12. 9; West 1969; Pritchett 1971-, Vol. 2. 272 n. 78; Jacquemin 2000. 62-
64.
10 Isoc. 9. 57; Plut. Vit. Arist. 20. 4; Paus. 9. 2. 5-7; Wycherley 1957. 25-30; Rosivach
1978, 1987; Raaflaub 2000.
11 Aesch. Suppl. 26-27, Ag. 244-47, 1384-87, Cho. 244-45, and so on; Ar. Plut.
1175-84; Ath. 15. 692f-693c (citing comic poets); Garland 1987. 137-38; Cole
1988. 892; Dowden 2006. 80-85.
12 [Dem. ] 43. 14, 82 (Zeus Phratrios); Apollod. 2. 8. 4 (Patroo? s); Sjo? vall 1931. 49-52;
Hedrick 1991. 241-68; Lambert 1993. 205-25.
13 Catling 1990 (Messapeai); Parker 2005. 16-18 (Herkeios).
14 Aesch. Supp. 443-48; Dem. 21. 53; Ath. 11. 473b-c (jar); Sjo? vall 1931. 53-74;
Nilsson 1951 Vol. 1. 25-34 (snake stele from Boiotia); Parker 2005. 15-16.
15 Thuc. 1. 126. 6 with schol. , referring to the seventh century; Jameson 1965. 159-
72; Dowden 2006. 65-67.
16 Eust. Od. 22. 481; Suda s. v. Dios ko ? idion (fleece); Simon 1983. 12-15.
17 Jameson, Jordan, and Kotansky 1993 with Clinton 1996a.
18 Garland 1987. 136-37.
19 Bianchi 1953. 13-204; Gould 1973; Graf 1985. 24-31.
20 Solon fr. 44b Ruschenbusch = Pollux 8. 142.
21 Willetts 1962. 199-223; Verbruggen 1981. 17-26.
22 KN Fp 1. 2 [Chadwick and Ventris 1973]; Chadwick 1985. 197; Perlman 1995;
Sporn 2002. 378.
23 IC II. 2 12-17; West 1965; Furley and Bremer 2001 Vol. 1. 65-76, Vol. 2. 1-20.
24 MacGillivray, Driessen and Sackett 2000.
25 Verbruggen 1981. 71-99; Sakellarakis 1988a, b; Sporn 2002. 218-23.
26 Eur. fr. 472 TrGF = Porph. Abst. 4. 19; Willetts 1962. 239-43.
27 Porph. Vit. Pyth. 17 [Des Places 1982]; Kokolakis 1995; Postlethwait 1999.
28 For Zeus Ammon, see Chapter 13.
29 Parke 1967. 1-163; Gartziou-Tatti 1990. An edition of the collected responses
from Dodona is in preparation.
30 Stella G. Miller 1988; Stephen G. Miller 2002; Miller et al. 2004. 50-53, 124-31;
Pache 2004. 95-134.
31 Morgan 1990. 26-56.
32 Pind. Ol. 6. 64-70; Parke 1967. 164-93.
209
NOTES
33 Herrmann 1972. 67-68; Mallwitz 1988. 85-89; Kyrieleis 1990, 2003. 55; Anton- accio 1995. 170-76.
3 LADY OF GRAND TEMPLES: HERA
1 Of 28 (Thebes), Kn 02 = PY 172 (Pylos) [Chadwick and Ventris 1973]; Po? tscher 1961; O'Brien 1993. 114 n. 2; Hall 2002b.
2 Hdt. 1. 31; Pind. Ol. 7. 83, Nem. 10. 22-23, etc. ; Burkert 1983b. 162-68; O'Brien 1993. 142-56; de Polignac 1995. 41-45; Hall 1995. 592-96.
3 Callim. fr. 66 Pf. (robe, Amymone); Paus. 2. 13. 3 (Hebe), 2. 17. 1 (Eleutherion), 2. 38. 2 (Kanathos); Caskey and Amandry 1952. 197-99; Billot 1997. 46-47.
4 Schattner 1990. 40-86; O'Brien 1993. 40-41.
5 Gruben 1986. 324-40. Bibliography: Mazarakis Ainian 1997. 199-202.
6 Asius in Duris FGrH 76 F 60; Kyrieleis 1988, 1993.
7 Menodotus FGrH 541 F 1; Burkert 1979. 123-42; Kron 1988; O'Brien 1993. 54-
66.
8 Simon 1986. 74-91; de Polignac 1997.
9 Fleischer 1973. 202-23; Romano 1980. 250-71.
10 Salmon 1972. 175-78, Tomlinson 1977, 1992.
11 Eumelus in Paus. 2. 3. 11 (hide away); Paus. 2. 3. 6-8 (Glauke/Deima); Schol. Eur.
Med. 264 [Schwartz]; Johnston 1997; Menadier 2002.
12 Will 1955. 103-18, Reichert-Su? dbeck 2000. 167-70.
13 Herrmann 1972. 92; Mallwitz 1988. 102-3; Moustaka 2002a, b.
14 Paus. 5. 16. 2-8; Scanlon 1984; Serwint 1993.
15 Cipriani 1997.
16 van Keuren 1989. 23-44; de La Genie`re 1994.
17 Strabo 6. 1. 1; Pedley 1990. 61-75; Zancani-Montuoro and Zanotti-Bianco 1951-;
Kossatz-Deissmann 1988, nos. 59-60 (terracottas).
18 Arist. [Mir. ausc. ] 96, 338a; de Sensi Sestito 1984; Greco 1997. 194, 196; Spadea
1997.
19 Aesch. Eum. 213-14; Ar. Thesm. 973-76; Salviat 1964.
20 Clark 1998; Schachter 1981-, Vol. 1. 242-50; Burkert 1988.
21 Paus. 8. 22. 2; Jost 1985. 358-60.
4 MISTRESS OF CITADELS: ATHENA
1 V 52 = KN 208 (Knossos) [Chadwick and Ventris 1973]; Ge? rard-Rousseau 1968. 44-45; Chadwick 1985. 194; Nilsson 1927. 420-32; Simon 1969. 179-84, fig. 163.
2 Herington 1955; Hopper 1963; Demargne 1984 no. 124 (striding Athena); Hurwit 1999. 99-137; Ferrari 2002a.
3 Romano 1980. 42-53; Kroll 1982.
4 Jeppesen 1979, 1983; Elderkin 1941.
5 Herington 1955. 48-59, 1963; Ridgway 1992. 131-35; Hurwit 1995.
6 Paus. 1. 26. 6-7; Harris 1995. 104-22.
7 Ridgway 1992. 135-37; Mark 1993.
8 Soph. TrGF 844 (Athena Ergane); Ridgway 1984; Mansfield 1985.
9 Photius s. v. Kallunte ? ria kai Plunte ? ria; Mikalson 1975. 160, 163-64; Robertson
1996b. 48-52.
10 Xen. Hell. 1. 4. 12 (veil); Samuel 1972. 104-5, 124. Early (c. 700) temple of Athena
Poliouchos on Paros: Schilardi 1988.
11 Schol. Lucian Dial. meret. 2. 1; Deubner 1932. 9-17, 40-50; Burkert 1983b. 143-
54, 2001.
Further reading
Antonaccio 1995 argues from an archaeologist's perspective against the con- ventional wisdom linking hero cult with the spread of epic and the rise of the polis. Boedeker 1998 discusses the value of Orestes as a "Spartan" hero, while Mayor 2000 (Chapter 3) examines the cults and relics of Pelops, Orestes, and Theseus in the context of ancient fossil discoveries. Kearns 1989 explores the functions of heroic figures, especially as they relate to Attic subgroups such as tribe and deme. Larson 1995b and Lyons 1997 deal with heroines and their cults. Clay 2004 is a valuable discussion of the evidence for the cults of poets, especially Archilochus' cult on Paros and Thasos.
207
NOTES
1 METHODS, SOURCES, AND CONCEPTS FOR THE STUDY OF ANCIENT GREEK CULTS
1 Graf 1991a; Fowler 2000.
2 Vernant 1980. 92-109.
3 Vernant 1983a.
4 Malkin 1994, 2001; Hall 1997, 2002a; papers in Dougherty and Kurke eds
2003.
5 Habicht 1985; Musti and Bingen 1996; Alcock, Cherry and Elsner eds 2001;
Arafat 1996. 1-79; Hutton 2005.
6 Burkert 1985. 227-34; Bell 1997. 72-76, 1998.
7 Burkert 1987; Langdon 1987.
8 Meuli 1946; Burkert 1983b. 1-72; Girard 1977; Hamerton-Kelly ed. 1987;
Robbins 1998.
9 Be? rard 1989; Detienne et al. 1989.
10 Thomson 1943; Samuel 1972. 64-65; Hannah 2005. 16-70.
11 Nilsson 1951 Vol 1. 166-214; Connor 1987; Graf 1996.
12 Van Straten 1974; Jameson 1988; Pulleyn 1997; Furley and Bremer 2001. See also
the papers in Versnel ed. 1981; Linders and Nordquist eds 1987.
13 Yavis 1949; Rupp 1974; Gould 1973; Sinn 2000. See also the papers in Marinatos
and Ha? gg eds 1993.
14 Bergquist 1998, 1990; Bookidis 1993. See also the papers in Murray ed. 1990.
15 Corbett 1970; Burkert 1996; Scheer 2000; Nick 2002. 9-99. Contra the concept
of the cult statue: Donohue 1997.
16 Linders 1972, 1975; Aleshire 1989; Harris 1995; Hamilton 2000.
17 Rouse 1975 [1902]; Van Straten 2000 [1992]; Baumbach 2004. See also the
papers in Linders and Nordquist eds 1987.
18 Snodgrass 1980. 54; Sourvinou-Inwood 1993; Morris 1997. 34-42.
19 de Polignac 1984, 1995. See also the papers in Alcock and Osborne eds 1994.
20 van Gennep 1960. 65-115; Brelich 1969; Vidal-Naquet 1986; Dowden 1989. See
also the papers in Padilla ed. 1999; Dodd and Faraone eds 2003.
21 Moulinier 1975 [1952]; Parker 1983; Douglas 1994 [1966].
22 Kaestner 1976; Schlesier 1991-92; Scullion 1994, 2000. See also the papers in
Ha? gg and Alroth eds 2005.
23 Sourvinou-Inwood 2000 [1990]. 15.
24 Beard and North 1990. 1-18; Sourvinou-Inwood 2000 [1988], 2000 [1990];
Parker 2005. 89-115.
208
NOTES
2 PROGENITOR AND KING: ZEUS
1 Kn 02 = PY 172 (Pylos), Fp 05 (Knossos), etc. [Chadwick and Ventris 1973]; Ge? rard-Rousseau 1968. 72-74; Dowden 2006. 9-11, 28-29.
2 Paus. 1. 32. 2; Cook 1964 [1914-] Vol. 2. 868-987; Langdon 1976; Dowden 2006. 54-64.
3 Isoc. 9. 14-15 (Aiakos); Paus. 2. 29. 6-8 (Hellanios); Ap. Rhod. Argon. 2. 516-27 with schol. ; Callim. fr. 75. 32-37 Pf. (Ikmaios); Heraclides Creticus 2. 8 [Pfister 1951] (Akraios); Langdon 1976. 79-87.
4 Hughes 1991. 92-96.
5 Paus. 8. 38. 2-6; Burkert 1983b. 84-93, 109-16; Voutiras and Tiverios 1997, no.
461 (coins).
6 Buxton 1986. 67-72; Hughes 1991. 102-7. Jost 2002 argues for a real human
sacrifice.
7 Hes. fr. 163 M-W; Apollod. Bibl. 3. 8. 1 (further sources in Frazer's 1921 edition,
ad loc. ); Jost 1985. 180-5, 249-69.
8 Cf. Theophrastus in Porph. Abst. 2. 28-30; other primary sources in Patillon and
Bouffartigue eds 1977-, Vol. 2. 51-58. Meuli 1975 [1946]. 954, 1005; Smith
1982. 57-65; Burkert 1983b. 12-22, 136-43, 2001. 10-11.
9 Paus. 3. 12. 9; West 1969; Pritchett 1971-, Vol. 2. 272 n. 78; Jacquemin 2000. 62-
64.
10 Isoc. 9. 57; Plut. Vit. Arist. 20. 4; Paus. 9. 2. 5-7; Wycherley 1957. 25-30; Rosivach
1978, 1987; Raaflaub 2000.
11 Aesch. Suppl. 26-27, Ag. 244-47, 1384-87, Cho. 244-45, and so on; Ar. Plut.
1175-84; Ath. 15. 692f-693c (citing comic poets); Garland 1987. 137-38; Cole
1988. 892; Dowden 2006. 80-85.
12 [Dem. ] 43. 14, 82 (Zeus Phratrios); Apollod. 2. 8. 4 (Patroo? s); Sjo? vall 1931. 49-52;
Hedrick 1991. 241-68; Lambert 1993. 205-25.
13 Catling 1990 (Messapeai); Parker 2005. 16-18 (Herkeios).
14 Aesch. Supp. 443-48; Dem. 21. 53; Ath. 11. 473b-c (jar); Sjo? vall 1931. 53-74;
Nilsson 1951 Vol. 1. 25-34 (snake stele from Boiotia); Parker 2005. 15-16.
15 Thuc. 1. 126. 6 with schol. , referring to the seventh century; Jameson 1965. 159-
72; Dowden 2006. 65-67.
16 Eust. Od. 22. 481; Suda s. v. Dios ko ? idion (fleece); Simon 1983. 12-15.
17 Jameson, Jordan, and Kotansky 1993 with Clinton 1996a.
18 Garland 1987. 136-37.
19 Bianchi 1953. 13-204; Gould 1973; Graf 1985. 24-31.
20 Solon fr. 44b Ruschenbusch = Pollux 8. 142.
21 Willetts 1962. 199-223; Verbruggen 1981. 17-26.
22 KN Fp 1. 2 [Chadwick and Ventris 1973]; Chadwick 1985. 197; Perlman 1995;
Sporn 2002. 378.
23 IC II. 2 12-17; West 1965; Furley and Bremer 2001 Vol. 1. 65-76, Vol. 2. 1-20.
24 MacGillivray, Driessen and Sackett 2000.
25 Verbruggen 1981. 71-99; Sakellarakis 1988a, b; Sporn 2002. 218-23.
26 Eur. fr. 472 TrGF = Porph. Abst. 4. 19; Willetts 1962. 239-43.
27 Porph. Vit. Pyth. 17 [Des Places 1982]; Kokolakis 1995; Postlethwait 1999.
28 For Zeus Ammon, see Chapter 13.
29 Parke 1967. 1-163; Gartziou-Tatti 1990. An edition of the collected responses
from Dodona is in preparation.
30 Stella G. Miller 1988; Stephen G. Miller 2002; Miller et al. 2004. 50-53, 124-31;
Pache 2004. 95-134.
31 Morgan 1990. 26-56.
32 Pind. Ol. 6. 64-70; Parke 1967. 164-93.
209
NOTES
33 Herrmann 1972. 67-68; Mallwitz 1988. 85-89; Kyrieleis 1990, 2003. 55; Anton- accio 1995. 170-76.
3 LADY OF GRAND TEMPLES: HERA
1 Of 28 (Thebes), Kn 02 = PY 172 (Pylos) [Chadwick and Ventris 1973]; Po? tscher 1961; O'Brien 1993. 114 n. 2; Hall 2002b.
2 Hdt. 1. 31; Pind. Ol. 7. 83, Nem. 10. 22-23, etc. ; Burkert 1983b. 162-68; O'Brien 1993. 142-56; de Polignac 1995. 41-45; Hall 1995. 592-96.
3 Callim. fr. 66 Pf. (robe, Amymone); Paus. 2. 13. 3 (Hebe), 2. 17. 1 (Eleutherion), 2. 38. 2 (Kanathos); Caskey and Amandry 1952. 197-99; Billot 1997. 46-47.
4 Schattner 1990. 40-86; O'Brien 1993. 40-41.
5 Gruben 1986. 324-40. Bibliography: Mazarakis Ainian 1997. 199-202.
6 Asius in Duris FGrH 76 F 60; Kyrieleis 1988, 1993.
7 Menodotus FGrH 541 F 1; Burkert 1979. 123-42; Kron 1988; O'Brien 1993. 54-
66.
8 Simon 1986. 74-91; de Polignac 1997.
9 Fleischer 1973. 202-23; Romano 1980. 250-71.
10 Salmon 1972. 175-78, Tomlinson 1977, 1992.
11 Eumelus in Paus. 2. 3. 11 (hide away); Paus. 2. 3. 6-8 (Glauke/Deima); Schol. Eur.
Med. 264 [Schwartz]; Johnston 1997; Menadier 2002.
12 Will 1955. 103-18, Reichert-Su? dbeck 2000. 167-70.
13 Herrmann 1972. 92; Mallwitz 1988. 102-3; Moustaka 2002a, b.
14 Paus. 5. 16. 2-8; Scanlon 1984; Serwint 1993.
15 Cipriani 1997.
16 van Keuren 1989. 23-44; de La Genie`re 1994.
17 Strabo 6. 1. 1; Pedley 1990. 61-75; Zancani-Montuoro and Zanotti-Bianco 1951-;
Kossatz-Deissmann 1988, nos. 59-60 (terracottas).
18 Arist. [Mir. ausc. ] 96, 338a; de Sensi Sestito 1984; Greco 1997. 194, 196; Spadea
1997.
19 Aesch. Eum. 213-14; Ar. Thesm. 973-76; Salviat 1964.
20 Clark 1998; Schachter 1981-, Vol. 1. 242-50; Burkert 1988.
21 Paus. 8. 22. 2; Jost 1985. 358-60.
4 MISTRESS OF CITADELS: ATHENA
1 V 52 = KN 208 (Knossos) [Chadwick and Ventris 1973]; Ge? rard-Rousseau 1968. 44-45; Chadwick 1985. 194; Nilsson 1927. 420-32; Simon 1969. 179-84, fig. 163.
2 Herington 1955; Hopper 1963; Demargne 1984 no. 124 (striding Athena); Hurwit 1999. 99-137; Ferrari 2002a.
3 Romano 1980. 42-53; Kroll 1982.
4 Jeppesen 1979, 1983; Elderkin 1941.
5 Herington 1955. 48-59, 1963; Ridgway 1992. 131-35; Hurwit 1995.
6 Paus. 1. 26. 6-7; Harris 1995. 104-22.
7 Ridgway 1992. 135-37; Mark 1993.
8 Soph. TrGF 844 (Athena Ergane); Ridgway 1984; Mansfield 1985.
9 Photius s. v. Kallunte ? ria kai Plunte ? ria; Mikalson 1975. 160, 163-64; Robertson
1996b. 48-52.
10 Xen. Hell. 1. 4. 12 (veil); Samuel 1972. 104-5, 124. Early (c. 700) temple of Athena
Poliouchos on Paros: Schilardi 1988.
11 Schol. Lucian Dial. meret. 2. 1; Deubner 1932. 9-17, 40-50; Burkert 1983b. 143-
54, 2001.
