E
yclopædia
Britannica, Ath
ed.
ed.
Cambridge History of English Literature - 1908 - v06
John Fletcher, a study in dramatic method.
Chicago, 1905.
The Sources of Fletcher's Monsieur Thomas. Anglia, vol. xxx, p. 89.
1907.
Hickson, S. The Shares of Shakespeare and Fletcher in The Two Noble
Kinsmen. Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review, April 1847.
Rptd in N. Shaksp. Soc. Trans. , 1874.
Introductions to the separate plays in the Variorum edition of Beaumont and
Fletcher. 1904-8.
Koeppel, E. Quellenstudien zu den Dramen Ben Jonson's, John Marston's
und Beaumont's und Fletcher's. Münchener Beiträge, vol. xi. 1895.
Langbaine. pp. 203-218.
Leonbardt, B. Ueber Beaumont und Fletchers Knight of the Burning
Pestle. Annaberg, 1885.
## p. 440 (#458) ############################################
440
Bibliography
Leonhardt, B. Beziehungen von Beaumont und Fletcher's Philaster. . .
Shakespeare's Hamlet und Cymbeline. Anglia, vol. VIII, p. 424. 1885.
Koch, M. Review of the preceding. Engl. Stud. vol. 1x, p. 361. 1886.
Bonduca. Engl. Stud. vol. XIII, p. 36. 1889.
Zu Beaumont und Fletcher's Knight of the Burning Pestle. Engl.
Stud. vol. XII, pp. 307-313. 1889.
Die Textvarianten von (i) Beaumont und Fletchers Philaster, or
Love lies a Bleeding, nebst einer Zusammenstellung der Ausgaben, etc.
Anglia, vol. xix, pp. 34–74; (ii) The Knight of the Burning Pestle,
vol. xix, pp. 509-541; (iii) Bonduca, vol. xx, pp. 421-451; (iv) The Maids
Tragedy, vol. XXIII, pp. 14-66; (v) Rule a Wife and Have a Wife,
vol. xxiv, pp. 311-340; (vi) A King and No King, vol. XXVI, pp. 313-344;
(vii) Thierry and Theodoret, vol. xxvi, pp. 345-363. 1897-1903.
Littledale, H. The Two Noble Kinsmen. Part 11. Introduction, etc. N.
Shaksp. Soc. Publ. 1885.
Macaulay, G. C. Francis Beaumont, a critical study. 1883.
Malone, E. Historical Account of the English Stage, in M. 's edition of
Shakespeare. 1790. [Contains extracts from the Stationers' register,
Herbert's Office-book, etc. )
Mason, J. Monck. Comments on the Plays of Beaumont and Fletcher. 1797.
Mitford, J. Cursory notes on various passages in the text of Beaumont and
Fletcher as edited by Dyce, A. 1856.
Murch, H. S. The Knight of the Burning Pestle. Edited with introduction,
notes, etc. New York, 1908.
Oliphant, E. H. The Works of Beaumont and Fletcher. Engl. Stud. vol. XIV,
pp. 53-94; vol. xv, pp. 321-360; vol. xvi, pp. 180-200. 1890–2.
Rapp, M. Studien über das englische Theater. Archiv für die neneren
Sprachen, vol. xx, pp. 1-37. 1856.
Rosenbach, A. S. N. The Curious Impertinent in English Dramatic Litera-
ture. . . . Mod. Lang. Notes, vol. XVII, p. 357. 1902.
Salmacis and Hermaphroditus not by Francis Beaumont. Shakesp. Soc.
Papers, vol. II, p. 94. 1847.
Schelling's Elizabethan Drama. Vol. 11, pp. 182–239.
Seward, T. Introduction to the 1750 edition of the Works (see above).
Spalding, W. Letter on Shakespeare's authorship of The Two Noble
Kinsmen. Edinburgh, 1833. Rptd in N. Shaksp. Soc. Trans. , 1876.
Spedding, H. On the several shares of Shakespeare and Fletcher in Henry
VIII. N. Shaksp. Soc. Trans. , Appendix, 1874.
Stiefel, A. L. Zur Quellenfrage von John Fletcher's Monsieur Thomas.
Engl. Stud. vol. XXXVI, p. 238. 1906.
Die Nachahmung Spanischer Komödien in England. Archiv für die
neueren Sprachen, vol. xcix, pp. 271-310. 1897. [Argues that Love's
Cure is derived from La fuerza de la costumbre of G. de Castro. ]
Review of Koeppel's Quellen-studien. Zeitschr. für vergleich. Litt.
vol. XII, p. 241. 1898.
Ueber die Quelle von J. Fletchers Island Princess. Archiv für die
neueren Sprachen, vol. cili, pp. 277-308. 1899.
Swinburne, A. C. Beaumont and Fletcher.
E yclopædia Britannica, Ath
ed. 1875. Also printed in Studies in Prose and Poetry (pp. 53-83), 1894.
Thompson, E. N. 8. Elizabethan dramatic co-operation. Engl. Stud. vol. XL,
p. 30. 1908.
Thorndike, A. H. The Influence of Beaumont and Fletcher on Shakespeare.
1901.
Ward. Vol. 11, pp. 643–764.
Weber, H. Introduction, etc. in W's edition of Beaumont and Fletcher, 1812.
1
## p. 441 (#459) ############################################
Chapter V
441
VI. GENERAL.
[In addition to many of the above. ]
A. Before 1800.
Cibber, Theophilus. Lives of the Poets. Vol. 1, pp. 154–164. 1753.
Collier, J. A Short View of the Immorality and Profaneness of the English
Stage. 1698.
Commendatory Verses prefixed to the folio of 1647.
Dryden, John. An Essay of Dramatic Poesy. 1668.
Defence of the Epilogue, or An Essay on the Dramatic Poetry of the
Last Age. 1672.
Preface to Troilus and Cressida. 1679.
Flecknoe, R. A short Discourse on the English Stage. 1664.
Rymer, T. The Tragedies of the Last Age. . . . 1678.
B. From 1800.
Aronstein, P. Die Moral des Beaumont-Fletcherschen Dramas. Anglia,
vol. XXXI, p. 141. 1908.
Beaumont and Fletcher. National Quarterly Review, vol. XXXIII, p. 302. 1876.
Brereton, J. Le Gay. Marginalia on Beaumont and Fletcher, vols. I and II.
Sydney University Library Publ. , vols. III and iv.
Bullen, A. H. Art. Fletcher. Dict. of Nat. Biogr. vol. xix. 1889.
Coleridge, S. T. Lectures and Notes on Shakespeare. In Literary Remains
of S. T. C. Vol. 11. 1836. Rptd in Bohn's Standard Library, 1883.
(Contains many dispersed remarks on Beaumont and Fletcher. ]
Courthope. Vol. iv, pp. 304-347. 1903.
Cowden Clarke, C. Beaumont and Fletcher. Gentleman's Magazine, June
1871.
Crofts, E. Chapters in the History of English Literature. pp. 258-283. 1884.
Cyclopaedia of English Literature. Ed. Chambers, R. Vol. 1, pp. 203-210.
1843-4. New ed. Vol. 1, pp. 468-477. 1901.
Donne, W. B. Essays on the Drama. pp. 34-66. 1863.
Dyce's edition of Beaumont and Fletcher. Reviews in Edinburgh Review,
July 1847; Eclectic Magazine, Oct. 1847; Quarterly Review, Sept. 1848.
Genest.
Greg, W. W. Pastoral Poetry and Pastoral Drama. pp. 264-282, 327-330.
1906.
Grosart, A. B. Art. Beaumont. Dict. of Nat. Biogr. vol. iv. 1885.
Hallam, H. Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the 15th, 16th and
17th centuries. Vol. 111, pp. 98-113. 1843.
Hazlitt, W. Lectures on the Elizabethan Drama. 1821.
Jusserand, E. Tr. Vol. 11, pp. 812-821.
Lowell, R. The Old English Dramatists. pp. 100-112. 1892.
Mézières, A. Contemporains et successeurs de Shakespeare. 2nd ed. Paris,
1864. (Vol. II, p. 21. )
Saintsbury, G. History of Elizabethan Literature. pp. 254–266. 1887.
Schack, A. von. Die englischen Dramatiker vor, neben und nach Shake-
speare. 1893.
Schelling's Elizabethan Drama. Vol. II, pp. 182–239.
Schlegel, A. W. von. Ueber dramatische Kunst und Litteratur. Heidelberg
Vol. 11, part 2, p. 288. 1811.
Swinburne, A. C. The earlier plays of Beaumont and Fletcher. In The
English Review, May 1910.
The Sources of Fletcher's Monsieur Thomas. Anglia, vol. xxx, p. 89.
1907.
Hickson, S. The Shares of Shakespeare and Fletcher in The Two Noble
Kinsmen. Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review, April 1847.
Rptd in N. Shaksp. Soc. Trans. , 1874.
Introductions to the separate plays in the Variorum edition of Beaumont and
Fletcher. 1904-8.
Koeppel, E. Quellenstudien zu den Dramen Ben Jonson's, John Marston's
und Beaumont's und Fletcher's. Münchener Beiträge, vol. xi. 1895.
Langbaine. pp. 203-218.
Leonbardt, B. Ueber Beaumont und Fletchers Knight of the Burning
Pestle. Annaberg, 1885.
## p. 440 (#458) ############################################
440
Bibliography
Leonhardt, B. Beziehungen von Beaumont und Fletcher's Philaster. . .
Shakespeare's Hamlet und Cymbeline. Anglia, vol. VIII, p. 424. 1885.
Koch, M. Review of the preceding. Engl. Stud. vol. 1x, p. 361. 1886.
Bonduca. Engl. Stud. vol. XIII, p. 36. 1889.
Zu Beaumont und Fletcher's Knight of the Burning Pestle. Engl.
Stud. vol. XII, pp. 307-313. 1889.
Die Textvarianten von (i) Beaumont und Fletchers Philaster, or
Love lies a Bleeding, nebst einer Zusammenstellung der Ausgaben, etc.
Anglia, vol. xix, pp. 34–74; (ii) The Knight of the Burning Pestle,
vol. xix, pp. 509-541; (iii) Bonduca, vol. xx, pp. 421-451; (iv) The Maids
Tragedy, vol. XXIII, pp. 14-66; (v) Rule a Wife and Have a Wife,
vol. xxiv, pp. 311-340; (vi) A King and No King, vol. XXVI, pp. 313-344;
(vii) Thierry and Theodoret, vol. xxvi, pp. 345-363. 1897-1903.
Littledale, H. The Two Noble Kinsmen. Part 11. Introduction, etc. N.
Shaksp. Soc. Publ. 1885.
Macaulay, G. C. Francis Beaumont, a critical study. 1883.
Malone, E. Historical Account of the English Stage, in M. 's edition of
Shakespeare. 1790. [Contains extracts from the Stationers' register,
Herbert's Office-book, etc. )
Mason, J. Monck. Comments on the Plays of Beaumont and Fletcher. 1797.
Mitford, J. Cursory notes on various passages in the text of Beaumont and
Fletcher as edited by Dyce, A. 1856.
Murch, H. S. The Knight of the Burning Pestle. Edited with introduction,
notes, etc. New York, 1908.
Oliphant, E. H. The Works of Beaumont and Fletcher. Engl. Stud. vol. XIV,
pp. 53-94; vol. xv, pp. 321-360; vol. xvi, pp. 180-200. 1890–2.
Rapp, M. Studien über das englische Theater. Archiv für die neneren
Sprachen, vol. xx, pp. 1-37. 1856.
Rosenbach, A. S. N. The Curious Impertinent in English Dramatic Litera-
ture. . . . Mod. Lang. Notes, vol. XVII, p. 357. 1902.
Salmacis and Hermaphroditus not by Francis Beaumont. Shakesp. Soc.
Papers, vol. II, p. 94. 1847.
Schelling's Elizabethan Drama. Vol. 11, pp. 182–239.
Seward, T. Introduction to the 1750 edition of the Works (see above).
Spalding, W. Letter on Shakespeare's authorship of The Two Noble
Kinsmen. Edinburgh, 1833. Rptd in N. Shaksp. Soc. Trans. , 1876.
Spedding, H. On the several shares of Shakespeare and Fletcher in Henry
VIII. N. Shaksp. Soc. Trans. , Appendix, 1874.
Stiefel, A. L. Zur Quellenfrage von John Fletcher's Monsieur Thomas.
Engl. Stud. vol. XXXVI, p. 238. 1906.
Die Nachahmung Spanischer Komödien in England. Archiv für die
neueren Sprachen, vol. xcix, pp. 271-310. 1897. [Argues that Love's
Cure is derived from La fuerza de la costumbre of G. de Castro. ]
Review of Koeppel's Quellen-studien. Zeitschr. für vergleich. Litt.
vol. XII, p. 241. 1898.
Ueber die Quelle von J. Fletchers Island Princess. Archiv für die
neueren Sprachen, vol. cili, pp. 277-308. 1899.
Swinburne, A. C. Beaumont and Fletcher.
E yclopædia Britannica, Ath
ed. 1875. Also printed in Studies in Prose and Poetry (pp. 53-83), 1894.
Thompson, E. N. 8. Elizabethan dramatic co-operation. Engl. Stud. vol. XL,
p. 30. 1908.
Thorndike, A. H. The Influence of Beaumont and Fletcher on Shakespeare.
1901.
Ward. Vol. 11, pp. 643–764.
Weber, H. Introduction, etc. in W's edition of Beaumont and Fletcher, 1812.
1
## p. 441 (#459) ############################################
Chapter V
441
VI. GENERAL.
[In addition to many of the above. ]
A. Before 1800.
Cibber, Theophilus. Lives of the Poets. Vol. 1, pp. 154–164. 1753.
Collier, J. A Short View of the Immorality and Profaneness of the English
Stage. 1698.
Commendatory Verses prefixed to the folio of 1647.
Dryden, John. An Essay of Dramatic Poesy. 1668.
Defence of the Epilogue, or An Essay on the Dramatic Poetry of the
Last Age. 1672.
Preface to Troilus and Cressida. 1679.
Flecknoe, R. A short Discourse on the English Stage. 1664.
Rymer, T. The Tragedies of the Last Age. . . . 1678.
B. From 1800.
Aronstein, P. Die Moral des Beaumont-Fletcherschen Dramas. Anglia,
vol. XXXI, p. 141. 1908.
Beaumont and Fletcher. National Quarterly Review, vol. XXXIII, p. 302. 1876.
Brereton, J. Le Gay. Marginalia on Beaumont and Fletcher, vols. I and II.
Sydney University Library Publ. , vols. III and iv.
Bullen, A. H. Art. Fletcher. Dict. of Nat. Biogr. vol. xix. 1889.
Coleridge, S. T. Lectures and Notes on Shakespeare. In Literary Remains
of S. T. C. Vol. 11. 1836. Rptd in Bohn's Standard Library, 1883.
(Contains many dispersed remarks on Beaumont and Fletcher. ]
Courthope. Vol. iv, pp. 304-347. 1903.
Cowden Clarke, C. Beaumont and Fletcher. Gentleman's Magazine, June
1871.
Crofts, E. Chapters in the History of English Literature. pp. 258-283. 1884.
Cyclopaedia of English Literature. Ed. Chambers, R. Vol. 1, pp. 203-210.
1843-4. New ed. Vol. 1, pp. 468-477. 1901.
Donne, W. B. Essays on the Drama. pp. 34-66. 1863.
Dyce's edition of Beaumont and Fletcher. Reviews in Edinburgh Review,
July 1847; Eclectic Magazine, Oct. 1847; Quarterly Review, Sept. 1848.
Genest.
Greg, W. W. Pastoral Poetry and Pastoral Drama. pp. 264-282, 327-330.
1906.
Grosart, A. B. Art. Beaumont. Dict. of Nat. Biogr. vol. iv. 1885.
Hallam, H. Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the 15th, 16th and
17th centuries. Vol. 111, pp. 98-113. 1843.
Hazlitt, W. Lectures on the Elizabethan Drama. 1821.
Jusserand, E. Tr. Vol. 11, pp. 812-821.
Lowell, R. The Old English Dramatists. pp. 100-112. 1892.
Mézières, A. Contemporains et successeurs de Shakespeare. 2nd ed. Paris,
1864. (Vol. II, p. 21. )
Saintsbury, G. History of Elizabethan Literature. pp. 254–266. 1887.
Schack, A. von. Die englischen Dramatiker vor, neben und nach Shake-
speare. 1893.
Schelling's Elizabethan Drama. Vol. II, pp. 182–239.
Schlegel, A. W. von. Ueber dramatische Kunst und Litteratur. Heidelberg
Vol. 11, part 2, p. 288. 1811.
Swinburne, A. C. The earlier plays of Beaumont and Fletcher. In The
English Review, May 1910.
