"
"Why does Plutocracy fight autarchy?
"Why does Plutocracy fight autarchy?
Ezra-Pound-Japan-Letters-essays
182 SECTION IV: ESSAYS
Introductory Text-book [In Four Chapters]
Chap. 1. "All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their constitution or confederation, not from want of honor and virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation. "--John Adams.
Chap. 2. ". . . and if the national bills issued, be bottomed (as is indispens- able] on pledges of specific taxes for their redemption within certain and moderate epochs, and be of proper denominations for circulation, no inter- est on them would be necessary or just, because they would answer to everyone of the purposes of the metallic money withdrawn and replaced by them. " --Thomas Jefferson (1816, letter to Crawford).
Chap. 3. ". . . and gave to the people of this Republic the greatest blessing THEY EVER HAD--THEIR OWN PAPER TO PAY THEIR OWN DEBTS. "--Abraham Lincolu.
Chap. 4. "The Congress shall have power: To coin money, regulate the value thereof and of foreign coin, and to fix the standards of weights and measures. " Constitution of the United States, Article I Legislative Depart- ment, Section 8, p. 5. Done in the convention by the unanimous consent of the States, 7th September, 1787, and of the Independence of the United States the twelfth. In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names. --GeorgeWashington,PresidentandDeputyfromVirginia.
This "text" was followed by a half page of notes and bibliography. Thus:
The abrogation of this last mentioned power derives from the ignor- ance mentioned in my first quotation. Of the three preceding cita- tions, Lincoln's has become the text of Willis Overholser's recent History of Money in the U. S. ; the first citation was taken as opening text by Jerry Voorhis in his speech in the House of Representatives June 6, 1938; and the passage from Jefferson is the nucleus of my Jefferson and/or Mussolini.
Douglas' proposals are a subhead under the main idea in Lin- coln's sentence; Gesell's "invention" is a special case under Jeffer- son's general law. I have done my best to make simple summaries and clear definitions in various books and pamphlets and recommend as introductory study, apart from C. H. Douglas' Economic Democracy and Gesell's Natural Economic Order, Chris. HoUis' Two Nations, McNair Wilson's Promise to Pay, Larraiiaga's Gold, Glut and Govern- ment and M. Butchart's compendium of three centuries' thought, that is an anthology of what has been said, in Money. (Originally pub- lished by Nott. )
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS 183
There again I have nothing to retract. I left copies of the above work with a number of senators and congressmen last year in Washington, also with a few historians. The more they knew already, the more nearly saw the bearing of my four chapters. I doubt if anyone can further, or to advantage condense, the thought of John Adams than I have in Cantos 62/71, and I have made a start on Jefferson in my Jefferson and/or Mussolini. Both of which volumes can be explained. There is no reason for someone in Tokyo refraining from issuing a commentary, but I doubt if an adequate history of the U. S. can be written without including the essential ideas which I have there set together. The compendia of histoire morale contempomine made by Remy de Gourmont and Henry James, I have at least indicated in my Make it New.
At this point I would offer a word of warning to Japanese alumni of American, or other Occidental universities. With the exception of Frobenius' Forschungsinstitut in Frankfurt, our universities are not, they most emphatically are not, in the foreguard of Western thought. There is a time lag of 20, 40 or 60 years in what they teach in economics, history and literature. They may be more lively in departments of material science. At any rate most of their Japanese alumni were taught ideas belonging to Western decadence. And that decadence was nowhere more notable than in Western tendency to erect museums rather than temples.
Now the museum is all very well in its way. The juvenile student can see bits and pieces of what has been achieved in the past, which may keep him from narrow provincialism both of place and of time.
In the study of comparative literature, T. S. Eliot has acutely observed that, "existing masterworks constitute a plenum, whereof the divers parts have inter-related proportions and values. The relations of extant works are modified by new work that is really new. "
It is also true that the real writers of any epoch collaborate, sometimes consciously and voluntarily, sometimes unconsciously and even against their own will.
Yeats and I collaborated voluntarily. Yeats and F. M. (Hueffer) Ford involuntarily. Cummings is possibly unconscious of collaboration, etc. However, a museum is made up of fragments. An attempt to present the literature of a country or continent is bound to appear fragmentary or at least made up of heteroclite matter of different degrees of importance. Even more so when we come to translated literature. There is no uniform merit in translations, any more than in works. One nation may have an epic. An- other a set of plays. But one dimension is common to all masterworks,
? 184 SECTION IV: ESSAYS
namely, they contain the quintessence of racial quality. I have seen Villon in Paris 500 years after his lines were written.
I have seen Boccaccio and Goldoni in Italy, and it is commonplace that "London is full of Dickens. " By which laconic phrases one means that the "news" printed by these authors is still the event of the day in their countries.
Whatever I have compiled either in essays or in anthologies has been in an attempt to set together maxima of achievement, that is, work in which at least some of the qualities of writing and concept have attained the highest known degree. And my results are I think largely confirmed by the findings of England's most distinguished resident critic, T. S. Eliot (born American). And to a certain extent I think Yeats and F. M. Ford would have agreed with us, however long it may take the literary bureaucracies and the book trade to admit it. In several cases even the book-trade has had to give way 20 or 25 years after the fact.
I am therefore recommending my own finding re comparative litera- ture. I am recommending Brooks Adams and subsequent "new" economists in the field of history. I have elsewhere cited various other compendia. Germany is talking of Karl von Stein and of Ruhland instead of Marx. The thought of an epoch does not present itself in all departments. La Tour du Pin, Fabre, Frazer, Burbank, may seem names picked up at hazard. Strictly scientific names are world-known--it is only when you get to the border- line between material (practical) science and culture that the vital writers may lie hidden for half a century before coming into their own. In the fields of history or economics the vital writers may be half absorbed and super- seded before being known to more than three hundred readers. After which they crop up again later as "sources," the "source" for practical purposes having very little importance save for retrospective scholars, very little, that is, in proportion to the immense importance of getting the right solu- tion, whether for an anti-tubercular serum, or for an economic (monetary) process.
John Adams remarked that "very few people have the chance to choose their system of government. " It is extremely difficult to make a thorough reform of studies that have become fixed or waterlogged through a century or more of university habit. There is, on the other hand, a grand chance of effecting an up-to-date system, if you deliberately set out to present a relatively unexplored foreign culture, and can do so without superstitions, at any rate looking clearly at definite facts either established or provable, and not caring a hang whether these facts have been acceptable to the controllers of the educational [videlicet mis-educational or obfuscatory)
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS 1 85
system in the countries which you elect to investigate.
If Japan can produce a better, that is clearer and more incisive, set of
brochures showing the real thought of the founders of America's social form, than now exists in America, so much the greater your glory. The best and most revolutionary book on Botticelli was brought out by one of your citizens. It was, or at least appeared to me to be, extremely original in its treatment of Botticelli's details as comparable with Oriental treatments. The impartial and alien eye really saw what the familiar native eye had taken for granted. So much for suggested imports to Japan. When it comes to exports, we in the Occident wonder whether a Japanese history exists; or at any rate we fear that no translation of your history exists that will tell us as much of Japan as the tong-kien-kang-mou in De Moyriac de Mailla's version tells us of China. You can't order such works over night. De Mailla's French makes literature of even rather dull passages. Klaproth's Nippon o Dai Itsi Ran does not. It is merely well printed. We want to know more about you. There is a gap between Kagekiyo and the new dredger-plus plywood veneers.
What I really know of Japan I have got from Fenollosa's notes on the Noh and from a handful of "very much over-civilized" young men to whom the Noh was familiar. I cannot suppose this to be a "working knowledge" but I believe it to be a much more "real" knowledge than I should have got by starting at the "practical end" and omitting the fragments vouch-safed to me.
In struggling against enormous odds (meaning financial odds) for a mutual understanding between Japan and the Occident, there is still the danger that a Japanese educated in the U. S. A. might occasionally believe a statement printed in English or American newspapers without first looking carefully at the date line, and name of the agency supplying said news. It cannot be too firmly understood that "some" agencies and newspapers exist mainly, or even wholly, for the purpose of causing the stock markets to wobble, their "political" purposes being a mere cover for this means to putrid profit. I personally feel that some of you might get your European news via the U. S. A. even if as many of your students have gone to Germany
(have they? ) as to the U. S. A. Re which possibility I register the simple statement made to me two years ago by an American publisher. (Parenth- esis: my friends often urge me to be "reasonable. ") The publisher said: "Facts unfavorable to Germany and Italy are news; facts favorable to Italy and Germany are propaganda. "
Against which I set a revealing statement made by Otto Dietrich (Ter- ramare pamphlets no. 13): "The Fiihrer will never create an office unless
? 186 SECTION IV: ESSAYS
thoroughly convinced of the suitability of the person selected for it. " Perhaps the spiritual descendents and unconscious followers of Con- fucius do him more honor than physical descendents who spend their time
borrowing money.
11 From Rapallo: An Ezra Pound Letter
It is impossible to explain contemporary Europe to Japan without a long economic preface, possibly a longer preface than the average reader has patience for. One can roughly indicate the cycle of Occidental infamies since the founding of the Bank of England about 1696 A. D. , via the suppres- sion of paper money in England's American colonies, Cobbett's struggles against the ruin of agriculture in England, industrialization, the ruin of land owners by financial chicane, etc. Suffice it to say that by 1935 we were all fed up with the fall of empires, kingdoms, etc. It was all "old stuff. " Governments had flopped, Austria was, later, a minor collapse, but for over a century and a quarter no man had laid hands on a Rothschild. That item was NEWS with a big "N," but not one European journalist in a hundred had sense to know it, and not one in a thousand could print his perception if he had one. Three hundred million or whatever golden schillings or whatever had gone into Skoda gun works, to make trouble, via Vienna. The reply was the Anschluss, the incorporation of Austria in the German Reich.
In one sense history, not merely ideological history, is built out of phrases. It is built out of crystallizations of words into very brief groups, say five, six, or a dozen words. These words become fact. And it is impossible to exaggerate their force, because they cannot come into existence save as proof of a state of understanding. I mean clear understanding, not mere confused apprehension or suspicion.
Hjaimar Schacht made history in 1938: "GeJd, dem keine Ver- brauchsgiiter gegeniiberstehen, ist ja nichts als bedriicktes Papier. " Money that isn't issued against commerciable goods is mere printed paper.
Of course you have to know quite a bit of economics to understand why this sentence is history. Aristotle left certain terms undefined, or at any rate failed to "educate" the Occident and give it a clear (when I say clear, I mean clear) understanding of certain properties of money. Some people contin- ued to think of money as "a universally accepted commodity delivered in measured amounts. " By 640 A. D. the Tang dynasty had got round to using paper money, that is, "an admonition or memorandum of how much the
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS
187
holder of a certain kind of piece of paper ought to receive in the common market. " The inscription of the Tang notes is essentially the same as that on the ten lire notes in Italy today.
Then came the word "credit. " By 1623 the Sienese Bank, the Monte dei Paschi, had discovered the basis of sound credit, namely the abundance of nature and the responsibility of the whole people. Jefferson knev^^ that it was unnecessary for the U. S. Government to pay two dollars (out of the people's pocket) for every dollar's worth of goods or services delivered to the government. In other words he knew that the state need not rent its own credit from a clique of individuals either American or foreign. Nevertheless even today men go on confusing mandates or orders to deliver what exists and promises to hand over something which may exist next year or the year after. I hope the Japanese student will find two words, one for each of these paper implements, and then refrain from using the two words indifferently and confusedly. If you do this, the Occident will come to sit at your feet.
In the meantime, very informative work is being printed in Italy. I need hardly say that the Axis Powers are the most interesting phenomena in the Occident at this moment, A. D. 1940, year of the Fascist Era xviii. Gerarchia, a monthly magazine founded by Mussolini, contains on p. 345, the month current, the words "probJemi economici, cioe sociali" ("Economic prob- lems, that is to say social").
This also is history. It shows the final penetration of a whole realm of ideas that scattered economists and reformers have been hammering at, and trying to hammer into the public mind for the past 20 years.
There is, indeed, need for a drastic and burning revision of the rubbish taught in all Western universities in the departments of history and eco- nomics. Beginning with Brooks Adams the live thought of half a century runs through authors who are practically excluded--I mean 100% (one hundred per cent) excluded--from the frousty beaneries of the U. S. A. , England, etc. C. H. Douglas, Gesell, Chris. Mollis, McNair Wilson, Over- holser, Larraiiaga, Butchart's compendium, do not figure among the au- thors revealed to our students. An Italian minority, chiefly non- universitaire, I should say, is served by a flock of periodicals which do treat these subjects, often in an "unreadable" manner. However, as you are enjoying a new Italo-Japanese amity society, you might do worse than to fill its reading room with copies of Gerarchia, Rivista deJ Lavoro and publica- tions of this sort. G. Pellizzi is now editing Civilta Fascista, but for brevity's sake it is now possible to make a short cut via Odon Por's Finanza Nuova,
an 80-page summary of new financial ideas (published by Le Monnier, Firenze, 10 lire). Apart from brief restatement of ideas and experiments
? 188 SECTION IV: ESSAYS
elsewhere, the opening pages of this book give the clearest, and for the first time so far as I know, an adequate statement of the basic differences of theory, and, be it said, the superiorities of Corporate State finance over other proposals and experiments. You cannot understand the new Europe without knowledge of the Italian Fascist revolution and you cannot under- stand that revolution without distinguishing two components in it: the men who, led by Mussolini, regenerated Italy, and the men who, seeing that they could not prevent the regeneration, went along with it for what they could make out of it. Por is distinctly in the first group.
"There had been retouches, but not root changes, because the state intervention did not get down to bed rock, but left the hegemony to preda- tory groups. "
"Autarchy set going as constructive reply to the disintegrating power of money-ocracy, was quickly seen by the latter to be a deadly attack, to be
resisted by all means whatsoever, including war.
". . . . it is at any rate clear that it is not the national aggregates that are
fighting . . . but financial cliques prodding the peoples to fight.
"
"Why does Plutocracy fight autarchy? " asks Por.
"In the first place autarchy aims at producing enough goods for national
needs. Money no longer dictates production, but an autarchic-cooperative order does the dictating and money depends on this order for its volume and value. "
I wonder if I can translate that sentence any more clearly? Por goes on:
"In short, the cooperative autarchy abolishes money as merchandise as it has abolished labor as merchandise. "
The Italian word is merce. We might say: Under autarchia neither money nor labor [is] something a clique can sweat profits out of.
"The state having established its rule over the economic system ex- tends this rule over the financial. "
"If you consider that the Bank of England is owned by international financiers who are very hard to identify, and that the British Government has not the power to direct the bank's actions always and everywhere; and that the Banque de France is owned by private capitalists and that many seats on its board of directors are, as it were, hereditary in the plutocratic families: Rothschild, Neuflize, Hottinguer, Wendel, Duchemin, etc. who control the key industries, including the arms business, you can measure the meaning of the reorganization of the Banca d'ltalia. "
"It has become really national because no international interest can get
to work inside it.
. " . .
. " . .
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS 189
"The credit of a corporatively organized country is limited to its real riches. "
"These consist in its physical resources in their natural state bettered by modern processes of labor, plus the vital activities of the population and the state of the sciences; of the culture and the intellectual and moral education of the people and the efficient ordering of its institutions. The true wealth is not money. Money is the means accepted to actuate produc-
. "
means to develop the nation's wealth will be provided without having resource to foreign financings. "
All this may seem to be nothing but very plain common sense. Japan may have arrived at this state of sanity and progressed beyond it, for all I know. But you may take it from me that Europe, in general, had not done so by September last year. Even among the bright reformers in various "pro- gressive sectors" such as the U. S. A. (New Deal); Alberta (Social Credit, sabotaged by Monty Norman and the London bleeders); New Zealand (amply reviewed by Por in a later chapter of his Finanza Nuova), some of the essential parts of the mechanism had been omitted.
It is for the above very simple ideas that the Axis Powers are fighting against mouldy superstition. That much you can take as news item, whether you agree with me or not, as to the value of the ideas in themselves.
12 From Rapallo: An Ezra Pound Letter
Japan is to be congratulated on bringing Mr. Matsuoka to her Foreign Office. Having sat at Geneva he knows just how rotten the League was. He knows to anatomthekindofswindlerwhomadeit. Heknowsthementalitythatwas in it, and is in the Carnegie peace swindle. He knows to what degree the latter sniveling gang of pacifists has refrained from using its endowments honestly and how well it has blocked any research into the real causes of war. And this knowledge of his might be of world use.
Funk's plan is a complete answer to the infamies proposed by Streit and Co. But that doesn't mean that Funk's plan will get any adequate publicity in America. You might think it would . . . you might think my compatriots would be able to see the sense of collaborating in a new world order instead
tion and stimulate the exchange of riches
"No sector of the economy can get stranded; all the necessary monetary
. .
? 190
SECTION IV: ESSAYS
of keeping their collective heads in a bag, but if so, you have neglected to note the thoroughness of the obfuscation, various strata of which date from 1863, or 1873, or 1920.
The w^ork of the Vanguard Press in flooding America with cheap editions of Marx, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin might have been harmless, might even have been useful, had the Americans known their own history. But they have not known their own history; do not know it, and are not in the process of learning it.
As to their learning anything from their papers . . . they have been and are being served by men who sell news that is wanted. Unwanted news just doesn't "sell. "
Rip van Wendell Willkie reads, and has read, the same news sheet as Roosevelt and Morgenthau . . . that is to say, he is pre-conditioned by news-baths carefully prepared by Reuters, Havas, etc. . . . namely, by the propaganda of Rothschild, Lazard and the rest of the most poisonous dregs of humanity. This has been going on for some time.
If Japan gets a "bum" deal, it will be due quite as much to the American people's real ignorance as to any ill-will or even to the blind greed of a minority.
Boak Carter has tried to tell 'em (the Americans) some of the story. The more cats he lets out, the more difficulty he has of getting any time on the air, or of even holding a column.
A quite dear old friend writes me that she is not exactly praying, but concentrating her will every evening to stop Hitler (about whom she knows nothing). She is not a venomous woman and she likes German opera.
A quite bright New York journalist thinks 1 am in danger of being imprisoned here in Italy for the sentiments expressed in a quotation which I have had stamped on my writing paper. He does not recognize the quota- tion as being a motto of Mussolini, despite the fact that it is followed by the "m" now used all over this country to indicate citations from the writings or speeches of II Duce. The quotation is: "liberty is not a right but a duty. "
You Japanese are said to be very ingenious. Go on. Invent something. Find me a mental gimlet that will let a squirt of light into the indubitably active "minds" of America. "Listen-in to Tokyo! " Yes, brother. And the sooner Tokyo starts telling the American people its own history, i. e. the history of
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS 191
the U. S. A. , the sooner the American people will find out. For, of their own motion and initiative, they are not finding it out.
God alone knows what we Americans know of Japan. None of us reads Japanese. Some tens of and hundreds of thousands of us can read German, French and Italian.
Note to your own honor that Italy billed their taking of Somaliland as the FIRST time the British Empire had lost a colony. Spain said, "the first time in 300 years. " A day later came Japanese opinion to the effect that it was the first time since the American Revolution, when we Yanks took out 13 colonies all at once! (Nevertheless, it took us five years, not two months. )
? 192
APPENDIX
APPENDIX I
'ME . ART! !
7AMI KDtfMM^
? APPENDIX 193
Tami Koume, The Art of S Etherism, or Spiritico-Etheric Art
I AM AN artist; I must live in my art; my life is in my art. This being the case, I can ill throw my pencil for a pen, in order to set forth in so many words the principles as well as the inner meanings of my life-problem, the Spiritico- etheric Art.
However, for the enlightened public, who are not yet well acquainted with my art, but kind enough to be curious to know what that is in reality, I would fain forgo the advantages, and try to describe the nature and content oftheartinwhichI havebeenspirituallyawakened,throughtruthful speculation, and by means of entire devotion to the cause of the all-great and mystical Universe.
We are now standing at the critical moment of humanity. We must be saved by something. Hence who would venture to say that the Universe should d[eny? ] the cries vehemently uttered by the chosen few, who par- ticipate in the saving councils of Nature? There are [a] few born now, whose spiritual and intellectual capacities represent the ages of [a] thousand years hence; for nature does not bring forth children useful only for the present age.
In last May, 1920, I have exhibited my artistic creations on my own account, to show the content of my art-life; in other words, I have attempted to reveal the processes that have led my art from artificial creations "to super-artificial-growing-creations. "
Now these "Super-artificial-growing-creations" stand as a sort of medium between self and the universe, while self is a kind of medium in like manner between the universe and the growing creations; and so I have provisionally styled this art then a mediumistic school. But this term, convenient as it is, [is] apt to be misunderstood as to the essential signifi- cance thereof, on account of its already enjoying a peculiar technical usage of its own; besides, it is rather too superficial to be applied to my spirit- saving art.
Upon this I was forced temporarily to coin a new term, which is but a symbol of my art, by which symbol, I, ,- (which I make bold to pronounce Reitherism or ft Etherism] the essential features of my art-life, it is to be hoped, might be made somewhat plainer. Let me here remark par ex- ceJJence that this sign being the symbol of my art, has no conventional pronuciation, but only serves to signify the inner meaning of my art, and may thus be pronounced as above indicated, because it is an artistic repre- sentation of my art-life.
? 194
APPENDIX
Historically speaking, the art that applies colouring matters on the surface, has been called painting, whose development, it is quite needless to repeat here.
The more advanced painting of the present age has so far progressed as to be able to delineate mental phenomena. But those schools of painting are unable to exhibit anything decisively and analytically as to the origin of all things, and the substance of the mind.
They only deceive themselves and others through unsatisfactory self- affirmations. I, who found it impossible to conform to this state of unrea- son, have at last arrived at this my art, Reitherism, or Spiritico-etheric Art, through purest and truest intuition, and by means of sincerest speculation and pious devotion, even willingly risking physical safety. I was thus saved.
Reitherism is an artification of human life.
Reitherism is a beautification of all things material and immaterial. It is again a beautiful manifestation of Spirit.
Those who are possessed of a beauty-consciousness, will all
acknowledge that, in general. Art means an all-round consciousness- operation that goes for creating beauty artificially. It is a philosophical representation of this truth.
The birth of art is either an Anschauung or an intuitive operation. Art is or should be an Artificial creation, that represents its objects through its own cells. Hence Art is again purest philosophy that deals with the Uni- verse or human life, by imparting its own life to the objects or subjects it has to do with.
The conclusion of art is beauty itself. Beauty consciousness, aesthetic consciousness, is a bodily experience of the life-forms of the good.
Good is the primary intuition or direct-perception that is to be harmo- nized and incorporated with the truth.
In the sense of truth. Art is the mental form of humanity. It is universal- ly a self-contemplation and self-reflection.
In fine, the true, the good, and the beautiful, or truth, goodness and beauty, must form a trinity in unity.
The essence or essential quality of beauty is inexpressible.
True Art is a radiation of high toned or high flooded sense of beauty, that is impressed on practical life of humanity. The ecstasy of faith seems to be the same with an eternal purification of the rapture felt in the moment of love.
The essence of beauty is not to be touched outside the region of self-
? APPENDIX 1 95
knowledge. If it is so, old aesthetics is but a puppet logic, for it cannot go beyond shadowing forth superficial differences of nature.
In the puppet logic, art is defined to be an enjoyment of life. Such views are boastfully entertained by the ignorant, who consider themselves (i. e. men) most high-stationed in the universe, as lords of creation, thus deceiv- ing themselves and others, under the shadow of old antiquated aesthetics, or so-called science of beauty. In fine, man has no right to define art an enjoyment of human life.
If there are any enjoyable elements in art, they are, must be, the es- sential nature of art herself, not her definable meaning, much like the aesthetic impressions accompanying the ecstasy or rapture of faith.
***
The littleness of self or ego, cannot but be felt by those who have become conscious of their own intrinsic nature.
Many and various problems that men cannot solve by means of the progress of science and development of reason, must not be struck away or blotted out as merely unthinkable or incomprehensible.
At least, I myself cannot blunder away the essential power, great and mystic, of the Universe, which we bodily experience irresistibly--and this by lukewarm reasons of science or psychology. No; God forbid!
In such mood, we cannot but exclaim admiringly, when we gaze upon the millions of bright, shining heavenly bodies, "O God, how splendid! " We thus cry to that irresistible might of Nature, and this superartificial power, "O God! " However we have become conscious of these grand
phenomena, so as to extort from us such rapturous exclamations, we cannot deny the Absolute Power called God, pervading the whole Universe.
However, the "God" I admire is not the God of monotheism or polytheism; neither is he the impersonal God of pantheism, though in his essential nature he somewhat approaches the latter. Positively it is not the God of Atheism, said to be one with the Universe.
I deemGodtobeonewiththeUniverse,butthatissointheisticpointof view. Yes; I intuit the existence of God, great and mystical. To recognize the Universal Consciousness or Gosmic soul, is to acknowledge God. The narrow and poor intellect of man can only touch some portion of Universal Consciousness, great and mystic, merely by negating himself.
Men are not aware of the preciousness of negating themselves. But yet those who are awaking to the salvation of their own souls, are approaching the precious state of self-negation daily more and more, nearer and nearer, by self-discipline and deep sincerity--this is not denied by God himself.
? 196 APPENDIX
Now simple or pure ego I call the state in which human personality, with its minimum conscious condition, is harmonized and interfused with the consciousness of the Universe. But, what is the state of simple ego, or pure ego, here introduced rather mystically? That is the state of realization or bodily experience of spiritual enlightenment, rational and exalted, attained by inspiratory judgement and reasonable speculation--a state, free from all doubts, and impure ideas, transcending little human personalities, wherein reigns naivety and simplicity.
In this state, minimum human consciousness being present, conscious- ness manifestations in the cerebral cells subsiding, superhuman powers of extraordinary spirituality are dominant.
Such artists who are conscientious enough to live in truth and purity, should bravely renounce all those petty ingenuities, learned from conven- tions, and listen to the voice of conscience, for these petty ingenuities only tend to deceive others as well as the artists themselves.
Although we are determined to part with the shallow self-affirmatory modes of representation taught to us from historical education, so pertina- cious are we men, that we feel much grudge to do away with those skills which have been our companions years long. But those earnest artists who have once listened to the precious voice of conscience, cannot but re- nounce all grudge to live the pure and true life of enlightened artists.
If not so, chefs d'oeuvre themselves are not much better, nay far worse, than those rough lines drawn by children expressive of their love toward nature. They are simply productions of time devoted to ingenuity.
True Art must be love towards humanity, born necessarily for saving the disquietude men entertain in respect to the present existence.
For us who endeavor to live in the soul-saving art, there is no need of a temple or church occupying and enclosing a portion of space. All phe- nomena pervading the infinite universe; nay, one single constellation glittering in the firmament, one single flower emitting sweet fragrance in the field--these are a thousand times better than myriad volumes of printed books, being a direct teaching of God bestowed on us mortals.
The works of Cezanne and van Gogh are manifestations of love apprehended necessarily from Nature. The still lifes of Gezanne are smiling lives, while van Gogh's plants are portions of breathing Nature. They cannot but feel, as though inanimate nature were his or her brothers and sisters.
Yes! all things are our brothers and sisters. All things, men, animals, plants, nay mountains, rivers, desks, papers, all are so. At least I perceive
? APPENDIX 197
them to be so. One's own work--what does it consist of? It is a synthesis of himself, the canvas, and colouring matters. In other words, the work here produced, is an animated object, as it were, which has absorbed my spirit, and got combined with paints on the canvas to be manifested thus.
In one's own productions one's life dwells, and animate some of the elements (spiritual elements) that go to constitute one's self. One's own works produced on such faith are one's brothers, kith and kin, to be sure!
One's work of art is, so to speak, a fragment or detachment of one's own life. Therefore works of art that are not in earnest, and falsely represented, are so many useless cuttings-away of the artist's life! An artist, if he fears death, cannot execute (growing) works. But, to think of death without any (growing) work, this is far more unbearable indeed!
Such artists who fear death, and at the same time fear the appearance of their growing works--these have no right to exist in the noble world of art. I have said, all things in Nature are our brothers.
Yes! so they truly are. All things in Nature are the workings and manifestations of Ether. Men too, in the beginning of their existence, are but simple cells. The germinal cells have, each of them, specific cell-mind, which I christen provisionally Spiritual element.
The spiritual element, which pervades the universe, according to its different operations, sometimes makes organic manifestations, and some- times inorganic manifestations. Strictly speaking, the distinction between organic and inorganic, is, simply, based on the point of view from human standard.
Introductory Text-book [In Four Chapters]
Chap. 1. "All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their constitution or confederation, not from want of honor and virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation. "--John Adams.
Chap. 2. ". . . and if the national bills issued, be bottomed (as is indispens- able] on pledges of specific taxes for their redemption within certain and moderate epochs, and be of proper denominations for circulation, no inter- est on them would be necessary or just, because they would answer to everyone of the purposes of the metallic money withdrawn and replaced by them. " --Thomas Jefferson (1816, letter to Crawford).
Chap. 3. ". . . and gave to the people of this Republic the greatest blessing THEY EVER HAD--THEIR OWN PAPER TO PAY THEIR OWN DEBTS. "--Abraham Lincolu.
Chap. 4. "The Congress shall have power: To coin money, regulate the value thereof and of foreign coin, and to fix the standards of weights and measures. " Constitution of the United States, Article I Legislative Depart- ment, Section 8, p. 5. Done in the convention by the unanimous consent of the States, 7th September, 1787, and of the Independence of the United States the twelfth. In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names. --GeorgeWashington,PresidentandDeputyfromVirginia.
This "text" was followed by a half page of notes and bibliography. Thus:
The abrogation of this last mentioned power derives from the ignor- ance mentioned in my first quotation. Of the three preceding cita- tions, Lincoln's has become the text of Willis Overholser's recent History of Money in the U. S. ; the first citation was taken as opening text by Jerry Voorhis in his speech in the House of Representatives June 6, 1938; and the passage from Jefferson is the nucleus of my Jefferson and/or Mussolini.
Douglas' proposals are a subhead under the main idea in Lin- coln's sentence; Gesell's "invention" is a special case under Jeffer- son's general law. I have done my best to make simple summaries and clear definitions in various books and pamphlets and recommend as introductory study, apart from C. H. Douglas' Economic Democracy and Gesell's Natural Economic Order, Chris. HoUis' Two Nations, McNair Wilson's Promise to Pay, Larraiiaga's Gold, Glut and Govern- ment and M. Butchart's compendium of three centuries' thought, that is an anthology of what has been said, in Money. (Originally pub- lished by Nott. )
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS 183
There again I have nothing to retract. I left copies of the above work with a number of senators and congressmen last year in Washington, also with a few historians. The more they knew already, the more nearly saw the bearing of my four chapters. I doubt if anyone can further, or to advantage condense, the thought of John Adams than I have in Cantos 62/71, and I have made a start on Jefferson in my Jefferson and/or Mussolini. Both of which volumes can be explained. There is no reason for someone in Tokyo refraining from issuing a commentary, but I doubt if an adequate history of the U. S. can be written without including the essential ideas which I have there set together. The compendia of histoire morale contempomine made by Remy de Gourmont and Henry James, I have at least indicated in my Make it New.
At this point I would offer a word of warning to Japanese alumni of American, or other Occidental universities. With the exception of Frobenius' Forschungsinstitut in Frankfurt, our universities are not, they most emphatically are not, in the foreguard of Western thought. There is a time lag of 20, 40 or 60 years in what they teach in economics, history and literature. They may be more lively in departments of material science. At any rate most of their Japanese alumni were taught ideas belonging to Western decadence. And that decadence was nowhere more notable than in Western tendency to erect museums rather than temples.
Now the museum is all very well in its way. The juvenile student can see bits and pieces of what has been achieved in the past, which may keep him from narrow provincialism both of place and of time.
In the study of comparative literature, T. S. Eliot has acutely observed that, "existing masterworks constitute a plenum, whereof the divers parts have inter-related proportions and values. The relations of extant works are modified by new work that is really new. "
It is also true that the real writers of any epoch collaborate, sometimes consciously and voluntarily, sometimes unconsciously and even against their own will.
Yeats and I collaborated voluntarily. Yeats and F. M. (Hueffer) Ford involuntarily. Cummings is possibly unconscious of collaboration, etc. However, a museum is made up of fragments. An attempt to present the literature of a country or continent is bound to appear fragmentary or at least made up of heteroclite matter of different degrees of importance. Even more so when we come to translated literature. There is no uniform merit in translations, any more than in works. One nation may have an epic. An- other a set of plays. But one dimension is common to all masterworks,
? 184 SECTION IV: ESSAYS
namely, they contain the quintessence of racial quality. I have seen Villon in Paris 500 years after his lines were written.
I have seen Boccaccio and Goldoni in Italy, and it is commonplace that "London is full of Dickens. " By which laconic phrases one means that the "news" printed by these authors is still the event of the day in their countries.
Whatever I have compiled either in essays or in anthologies has been in an attempt to set together maxima of achievement, that is, work in which at least some of the qualities of writing and concept have attained the highest known degree. And my results are I think largely confirmed by the findings of England's most distinguished resident critic, T. S. Eliot (born American). And to a certain extent I think Yeats and F. M. Ford would have agreed with us, however long it may take the literary bureaucracies and the book trade to admit it. In several cases even the book-trade has had to give way 20 or 25 years after the fact.
I am therefore recommending my own finding re comparative litera- ture. I am recommending Brooks Adams and subsequent "new" economists in the field of history. I have elsewhere cited various other compendia. Germany is talking of Karl von Stein and of Ruhland instead of Marx. The thought of an epoch does not present itself in all departments. La Tour du Pin, Fabre, Frazer, Burbank, may seem names picked up at hazard. Strictly scientific names are world-known--it is only when you get to the border- line between material (practical) science and culture that the vital writers may lie hidden for half a century before coming into their own. In the fields of history or economics the vital writers may be half absorbed and super- seded before being known to more than three hundred readers. After which they crop up again later as "sources," the "source" for practical purposes having very little importance save for retrospective scholars, very little, that is, in proportion to the immense importance of getting the right solu- tion, whether for an anti-tubercular serum, or for an economic (monetary) process.
John Adams remarked that "very few people have the chance to choose their system of government. " It is extremely difficult to make a thorough reform of studies that have become fixed or waterlogged through a century or more of university habit. There is, on the other hand, a grand chance of effecting an up-to-date system, if you deliberately set out to present a relatively unexplored foreign culture, and can do so without superstitions, at any rate looking clearly at definite facts either established or provable, and not caring a hang whether these facts have been acceptable to the controllers of the educational [videlicet mis-educational or obfuscatory)
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS 1 85
system in the countries which you elect to investigate.
If Japan can produce a better, that is clearer and more incisive, set of
brochures showing the real thought of the founders of America's social form, than now exists in America, so much the greater your glory. The best and most revolutionary book on Botticelli was brought out by one of your citizens. It was, or at least appeared to me to be, extremely original in its treatment of Botticelli's details as comparable with Oriental treatments. The impartial and alien eye really saw what the familiar native eye had taken for granted. So much for suggested imports to Japan. When it comes to exports, we in the Occident wonder whether a Japanese history exists; or at any rate we fear that no translation of your history exists that will tell us as much of Japan as the tong-kien-kang-mou in De Moyriac de Mailla's version tells us of China. You can't order such works over night. De Mailla's French makes literature of even rather dull passages. Klaproth's Nippon o Dai Itsi Ran does not. It is merely well printed. We want to know more about you. There is a gap between Kagekiyo and the new dredger-plus plywood veneers.
What I really know of Japan I have got from Fenollosa's notes on the Noh and from a handful of "very much over-civilized" young men to whom the Noh was familiar. I cannot suppose this to be a "working knowledge" but I believe it to be a much more "real" knowledge than I should have got by starting at the "practical end" and omitting the fragments vouch-safed to me.
In struggling against enormous odds (meaning financial odds) for a mutual understanding between Japan and the Occident, there is still the danger that a Japanese educated in the U. S. A. might occasionally believe a statement printed in English or American newspapers without first looking carefully at the date line, and name of the agency supplying said news. It cannot be too firmly understood that "some" agencies and newspapers exist mainly, or even wholly, for the purpose of causing the stock markets to wobble, their "political" purposes being a mere cover for this means to putrid profit. I personally feel that some of you might get your European news via the U. S. A. even if as many of your students have gone to Germany
(have they? ) as to the U. S. A. Re which possibility I register the simple statement made to me two years ago by an American publisher. (Parenth- esis: my friends often urge me to be "reasonable. ") The publisher said: "Facts unfavorable to Germany and Italy are news; facts favorable to Italy and Germany are propaganda. "
Against which I set a revealing statement made by Otto Dietrich (Ter- ramare pamphlets no. 13): "The Fiihrer will never create an office unless
? 186 SECTION IV: ESSAYS
thoroughly convinced of the suitability of the person selected for it. " Perhaps the spiritual descendents and unconscious followers of Con- fucius do him more honor than physical descendents who spend their time
borrowing money.
11 From Rapallo: An Ezra Pound Letter
It is impossible to explain contemporary Europe to Japan without a long economic preface, possibly a longer preface than the average reader has patience for. One can roughly indicate the cycle of Occidental infamies since the founding of the Bank of England about 1696 A. D. , via the suppres- sion of paper money in England's American colonies, Cobbett's struggles against the ruin of agriculture in England, industrialization, the ruin of land owners by financial chicane, etc. Suffice it to say that by 1935 we were all fed up with the fall of empires, kingdoms, etc. It was all "old stuff. " Governments had flopped, Austria was, later, a minor collapse, but for over a century and a quarter no man had laid hands on a Rothschild. That item was NEWS with a big "N," but not one European journalist in a hundred had sense to know it, and not one in a thousand could print his perception if he had one. Three hundred million or whatever golden schillings or whatever had gone into Skoda gun works, to make trouble, via Vienna. The reply was the Anschluss, the incorporation of Austria in the German Reich.
In one sense history, not merely ideological history, is built out of phrases. It is built out of crystallizations of words into very brief groups, say five, six, or a dozen words. These words become fact. And it is impossible to exaggerate their force, because they cannot come into existence save as proof of a state of understanding. I mean clear understanding, not mere confused apprehension or suspicion.
Hjaimar Schacht made history in 1938: "GeJd, dem keine Ver- brauchsgiiter gegeniiberstehen, ist ja nichts als bedriicktes Papier. " Money that isn't issued against commerciable goods is mere printed paper.
Of course you have to know quite a bit of economics to understand why this sentence is history. Aristotle left certain terms undefined, or at any rate failed to "educate" the Occident and give it a clear (when I say clear, I mean clear) understanding of certain properties of money. Some people contin- ued to think of money as "a universally accepted commodity delivered in measured amounts. " By 640 A. D. the Tang dynasty had got round to using paper money, that is, "an admonition or memorandum of how much the
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS
187
holder of a certain kind of piece of paper ought to receive in the common market. " The inscription of the Tang notes is essentially the same as that on the ten lire notes in Italy today.
Then came the word "credit. " By 1623 the Sienese Bank, the Monte dei Paschi, had discovered the basis of sound credit, namely the abundance of nature and the responsibility of the whole people. Jefferson knev^^ that it was unnecessary for the U. S. Government to pay two dollars (out of the people's pocket) for every dollar's worth of goods or services delivered to the government. In other words he knew that the state need not rent its own credit from a clique of individuals either American or foreign. Nevertheless even today men go on confusing mandates or orders to deliver what exists and promises to hand over something which may exist next year or the year after. I hope the Japanese student will find two words, one for each of these paper implements, and then refrain from using the two words indifferently and confusedly. If you do this, the Occident will come to sit at your feet.
In the meantime, very informative work is being printed in Italy. I need hardly say that the Axis Powers are the most interesting phenomena in the Occident at this moment, A. D. 1940, year of the Fascist Era xviii. Gerarchia, a monthly magazine founded by Mussolini, contains on p. 345, the month current, the words "probJemi economici, cioe sociali" ("Economic prob- lems, that is to say social").
This also is history. It shows the final penetration of a whole realm of ideas that scattered economists and reformers have been hammering at, and trying to hammer into the public mind for the past 20 years.
There is, indeed, need for a drastic and burning revision of the rubbish taught in all Western universities in the departments of history and eco- nomics. Beginning with Brooks Adams the live thought of half a century runs through authors who are practically excluded--I mean 100% (one hundred per cent) excluded--from the frousty beaneries of the U. S. A. , England, etc. C. H. Douglas, Gesell, Chris. Mollis, McNair Wilson, Over- holser, Larraiiaga, Butchart's compendium, do not figure among the au- thors revealed to our students. An Italian minority, chiefly non- universitaire, I should say, is served by a flock of periodicals which do treat these subjects, often in an "unreadable" manner. However, as you are enjoying a new Italo-Japanese amity society, you might do worse than to fill its reading room with copies of Gerarchia, Rivista deJ Lavoro and publica- tions of this sort. G. Pellizzi is now editing Civilta Fascista, but for brevity's sake it is now possible to make a short cut via Odon Por's Finanza Nuova,
an 80-page summary of new financial ideas (published by Le Monnier, Firenze, 10 lire). Apart from brief restatement of ideas and experiments
? 188 SECTION IV: ESSAYS
elsewhere, the opening pages of this book give the clearest, and for the first time so far as I know, an adequate statement of the basic differences of theory, and, be it said, the superiorities of Corporate State finance over other proposals and experiments. You cannot understand the new Europe without knowledge of the Italian Fascist revolution and you cannot under- stand that revolution without distinguishing two components in it: the men who, led by Mussolini, regenerated Italy, and the men who, seeing that they could not prevent the regeneration, went along with it for what they could make out of it. Por is distinctly in the first group.
"There had been retouches, but not root changes, because the state intervention did not get down to bed rock, but left the hegemony to preda- tory groups. "
"Autarchy set going as constructive reply to the disintegrating power of money-ocracy, was quickly seen by the latter to be a deadly attack, to be
resisted by all means whatsoever, including war.
". . . . it is at any rate clear that it is not the national aggregates that are
fighting . . . but financial cliques prodding the peoples to fight.
"
"Why does Plutocracy fight autarchy? " asks Por.
"In the first place autarchy aims at producing enough goods for national
needs. Money no longer dictates production, but an autarchic-cooperative order does the dictating and money depends on this order for its volume and value. "
I wonder if I can translate that sentence any more clearly? Por goes on:
"In short, the cooperative autarchy abolishes money as merchandise as it has abolished labor as merchandise. "
The Italian word is merce. We might say: Under autarchia neither money nor labor [is] something a clique can sweat profits out of.
"The state having established its rule over the economic system ex- tends this rule over the financial. "
"If you consider that the Bank of England is owned by international financiers who are very hard to identify, and that the British Government has not the power to direct the bank's actions always and everywhere; and that the Banque de France is owned by private capitalists and that many seats on its board of directors are, as it were, hereditary in the plutocratic families: Rothschild, Neuflize, Hottinguer, Wendel, Duchemin, etc. who control the key industries, including the arms business, you can measure the meaning of the reorganization of the Banca d'ltalia. "
"It has become really national because no international interest can get
to work inside it.
. " . .
. " . .
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS 189
"The credit of a corporatively organized country is limited to its real riches. "
"These consist in its physical resources in their natural state bettered by modern processes of labor, plus the vital activities of the population and the state of the sciences; of the culture and the intellectual and moral education of the people and the efficient ordering of its institutions. The true wealth is not money. Money is the means accepted to actuate produc-
. "
means to develop the nation's wealth will be provided without having resource to foreign financings. "
All this may seem to be nothing but very plain common sense. Japan may have arrived at this state of sanity and progressed beyond it, for all I know. But you may take it from me that Europe, in general, had not done so by September last year. Even among the bright reformers in various "pro- gressive sectors" such as the U. S. A. (New Deal); Alberta (Social Credit, sabotaged by Monty Norman and the London bleeders); New Zealand (amply reviewed by Por in a later chapter of his Finanza Nuova), some of the essential parts of the mechanism had been omitted.
It is for the above very simple ideas that the Axis Powers are fighting against mouldy superstition. That much you can take as news item, whether you agree with me or not, as to the value of the ideas in themselves.
12 From Rapallo: An Ezra Pound Letter
Japan is to be congratulated on bringing Mr. Matsuoka to her Foreign Office. Having sat at Geneva he knows just how rotten the League was. He knows to anatomthekindofswindlerwhomadeit. Heknowsthementalitythatwas in it, and is in the Carnegie peace swindle. He knows to what degree the latter sniveling gang of pacifists has refrained from using its endowments honestly and how well it has blocked any research into the real causes of war. And this knowledge of his might be of world use.
Funk's plan is a complete answer to the infamies proposed by Streit and Co. But that doesn't mean that Funk's plan will get any adequate publicity in America. You might think it would . . . you might think my compatriots would be able to see the sense of collaborating in a new world order instead
tion and stimulate the exchange of riches
"No sector of the economy can get stranded; all the necessary monetary
. .
? 190
SECTION IV: ESSAYS
of keeping their collective heads in a bag, but if so, you have neglected to note the thoroughness of the obfuscation, various strata of which date from 1863, or 1873, or 1920.
The w^ork of the Vanguard Press in flooding America with cheap editions of Marx, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin might have been harmless, might even have been useful, had the Americans known their own history. But they have not known their own history; do not know it, and are not in the process of learning it.
As to their learning anything from their papers . . . they have been and are being served by men who sell news that is wanted. Unwanted news just doesn't "sell. "
Rip van Wendell Willkie reads, and has read, the same news sheet as Roosevelt and Morgenthau . . . that is to say, he is pre-conditioned by news-baths carefully prepared by Reuters, Havas, etc. . . . namely, by the propaganda of Rothschild, Lazard and the rest of the most poisonous dregs of humanity. This has been going on for some time.
If Japan gets a "bum" deal, it will be due quite as much to the American people's real ignorance as to any ill-will or even to the blind greed of a minority.
Boak Carter has tried to tell 'em (the Americans) some of the story. The more cats he lets out, the more difficulty he has of getting any time on the air, or of even holding a column.
A quite dear old friend writes me that she is not exactly praying, but concentrating her will every evening to stop Hitler (about whom she knows nothing). She is not a venomous woman and she likes German opera.
A quite bright New York journalist thinks 1 am in danger of being imprisoned here in Italy for the sentiments expressed in a quotation which I have had stamped on my writing paper. He does not recognize the quota- tion as being a motto of Mussolini, despite the fact that it is followed by the "m" now used all over this country to indicate citations from the writings or speeches of II Duce. The quotation is: "liberty is not a right but a duty. "
You Japanese are said to be very ingenious. Go on. Invent something. Find me a mental gimlet that will let a squirt of light into the indubitably active "minds" of America. "Listen-in to Tokyo! " Yes, brother. And the sooner Tokyo starts telling the American people its own history, i. e. the history of
? SECTION IV: ESSAYS 191
the U. S. A. , the sooner the American people will find out. For, of their own motion and initiative, they are not finding it out.
God alone knows what we Americans know of Japan. None of us reads Japanese. Some tens of and hundreds of thousands of us can read German, French and Italian.
Note to your own honor that Italy billed their taking of Somaliland as the FIRST time the British Empire had lost a colony. Spain said, "the first time in 300 years. " A day later came Japanese opinion to the effect that it was the first time since the American Revolution, when we Yanks took out 13 colonies all at once! (Nevertheless, it took us five years, not two months. )
? 192
APPENDIX
APPENDIX I
'ME . ART! !
7AMI KDtfMM^
? APPENDIX 193
Tami Koume, The Art of S Etherism, or Spiritico-Etheric Art
I AM AN artist; I must live in my art; my life is in my art. This being the case, I can ill throw my pencil for a pen, in order to set forth in so many words the principles as well as the inner meanings of my life-problem, the Spiritico- etheric Art.
However, for the enlightened public, who are not yet well acquainted with my art, but kind enough to be curious to know what that is in reality, I would fain forgo the advantages, and try to describe the nature and content oftheartinwhichI havebeenspirituallyawakened,throughtruthful speculation, and by means of entire devotion to the cause of the all-great and mystical Universe.
We are now standing at the critical moment of humanity. We must be saved by something. Hence who would venture to say that the Universe should d[eny? ] the cries vehemently uttered by the chosen few, who par- ticipate in the saving councils of Nature? There are [a] few born now, whose spiritual and intellectual capacities represent the ages of [a] thousand years hence; for nature does not bring forth children useful only for the present age.
In last May, 1920, I have exhibited my artistic creations on my own account, to show the content of my art-life; in other words, I have attempted to reveal the processes that have led my art from artificial creations "to super-artificial-growing-creations. "
Now these "Super-artificial-growing-creations" stand as a sort of medium between self and the universe, while self is a kind of medium in like manner between the universe and the growing creations; and so I have provisionally styled this art then a mediumistic school. But this term, convenient as it is, [is] apt to be misunderstood as to the essential signifi- cance thereof, on account of its already enjoying a peculiar technical usage of its own; besides, it is rather too superficial to be applied to my spirit- saving art.
Upon this I was forced temporarily to coin a new term, which is but a symbol of my art, by which symbol, I, ,- (which I make bold to pronounce Reitherism or ft Etherism] the essential features of my art-life, it is to be hoped, might be made somewhat plainer. Let me here remark par ex- ceJJence that this sign being the symbol of my art, has no conventional pronuciation, but only serves to signify the inner meaning of my art, and may thus be pronounced as above indicated, because it is an artistic repre- sentation of my art-life.
? 194
APPENDIX
Historically speaking, the art that applies colouring matters on the surface, has been called painting, whose development, it is quite needless to repeat here.
The more advanced painting of the present age has so far progressed as to be able to delineate mental phenomena. But those schools of painting are unable to exhibit anything decisively and analytically as to the origin of all things, and the substance of the mind.
They only deceive themselves and others through unsatisfactory self- affirmations. I, who found it impossible to conform to this state of unrea- son, have at last arrived at this my art, Reitherism, or Spiritico-etheric Art, through purest and truest intuition, and by means of sincerest speculation and pious devotion, even willingly risking physical safety. I was thus saved.
Reitherism is an artification of human life.
Reitherism is a beautification of all things material and immaterial. It is again a beautiful manifestation of Spirit.
Those who are possessed of a beauty-consciousness, will all
acknowledge that, in general. Art means an all-round consciousness- operation that goes for creating beauty artificially. It is a philosophical representation of this truth.
The birth of art is either an Anschauung or an intuitive operation. Art is or should be an Artificial creation, that represents its objects through its own cells. Hence Art is again purest philosophy that deals with the Uni- verse or human life, by imparting its own life to the objects or subjects it has to do with.
The conclusion of art is beauty itself. Beauty consciousness, aesthetic consciousness, is a bodily experience of the life-forms of the good.
Good is the primary intuition or direct-perception that is to be harmo- nized and incorporated with the truth.
In the sense of truth. Art is the mental form of humanity. It is universal- ly a self-contemplation and self-reflection.
In fine, the true, the good, and the beautiful, or truth, goodness and beauty, must form a trinity in unity.
The essence or essential quality of beauty is inexpressible.
True Art is a radiation of high toned or high flooded sense of beauty, that is impressed on practical life of humanity. The ecstasy of faith seems to be the same with an eternal purification of the rapture felt in the moment of love.
The essence of beauty is not to be touched outside the region of self-
? APPENDIX 1 95
knowledge. If it is so, old aesthetics is but a puppet logic, for it cannot go beyond shadowing forth superficial differences of nature.
In the puppet logic, art is defined to be an enjoyment of life. Such views are boastfully entertained by the ignorant, who consider themselves (i. e. men) most high-stationed in the universe, as lords of creation, thus deceiv- ing themselves and others, under the shadow of old antiquated aesthetics, or so-called science of beauty. In fine, man has no right to define art an enjoyment of human life.
If there are any enjoyable elements in art, they are, must be, the es- sential nature of art herself, not her definable meaning, much like the aesthetic impressions accompanying the ecstasy or rapture of faith.
***
The littleness of self or ego, cannot but be felt by those who have become conscious of their own intrinsic nature.
Many and various problems that men cannot solve by means of the progress of science and development of reason, must not be struck away or blotted out as merely unthinkable or incomprehensible.
At least, I myself cannot blunder away the essential power, great and mystic, of the Universe, which we bodily experience irresistibly--and this by lukewarm reasons of science or psychology. No; God forbid!
In such mood, we cannot but exclaim admiringly, when we gaze upon the millions of bright, shining heavenly bodies, "O God, how splendid! " We thus cry to that irresistible might of Nature, and this superartificial power, "O God! " However we have become conscious of these grand
phenomena, so as to extort from us such rapturous exclamations, we cannot deny the Absolute Power called God, pervading the whole Universe.
However, the "God" I admire is not the God of monotheism or polytheism; neither is he the impersonal God of pantheism, though in his essential nature he somewhat approaches the latter. Positively it is not the God of Atheism, said to be one with the Universe.
I deemGodtobeonewiththeUniverse,butthatissointheisticpointof view. Yes; I intuit the existence of God, great and mystical. To recognize the Universal Consciousness or Gosmic soul, is to acknowledge God. The narrow and poor intellect of man can only touch some portion of Universal Consciousness, great and mystic, merely by negating himself.
Men are not aware of the preciousness of negating themselves. But yet those who are awaking to the salvation of their own souls, are approaching the precious state of self-negation daily more and more, nearer and nearer, by self-discipline and deep sincerity--this is not denied by God himself.
? 196 APPENDIX
Now simple or pure ego I call the state in which human personality, with its minimum conscious condition, is harmonized and interfused with the consciousness of the Universe. But, what is the state of simple ego, or pure ego, here introduced rather mystically? That is the state of realization or bodily experience of spiritual enlightenment, rational and exalted, attained by inspiratory judgement and reasonable speculation--a state, free from all doubts, and impure ideas, transcending little human personalities, wherein reigns naivety and simplicity.
In this state, minimum human consciousness being present, conscious- ness manifestations in the cerebral cells subsiding, superhuman powers of extraordinary spirituality are dominant.
Such artists who are conscientious enough to live in truth and purity, should bravely renounce all those petty ingenuities, learned from conven- tions, and listen to the voice of conscience, for these petty ingenuities only tend to deceive others as well as the artists themselves.
Although we are determined to part with the shallow self-affirmatory modes of representation taught to us from historical education, so pertina- cious are we men, that we feel much grudge to do away with those skills which have been our companions years long. But those earnest artists who have once listened to the precious voice of conscience, cannot but re- nounce all grudge to live the pure and true life of enlightened artists.
If not so, chefs d'oeuvre themselves are not much better, nay far worse, than those rough lines drawn by children expressive of their love toward nature. They are simply productions of time devoted to ingenuity.
True Art must be love towards humanity, born necessarily for saving the disquietude men entertain in respect to the present existence.
For us who endeavor to live in the soul-saving art, there is no need of a temple or church occupying and enclosing a portion of space. All phe- nomena pervading the infinite universe; nay, one single constellation glittering in the firmament, one single flower emitting sweet fragrance in the field--these are a thousand times better than myriad volumes of printed books, being a direct teaching of God bestowed on us mortals.
The works of Cezanne and van Gogh are manifestations of love apprehended necessarily from Nature. The still lifes of Gezanne are smiling lives, while van Gogh's plants are portions of breathing Nature. They cannot but feel, as though inanimate nature were his or her brothers and sisters.
Yes! all things are our brothers and sisters. All things, men, animals, plants, nay mountains, rivers, desks, papers, all are so. At least I perceive
? APPENDIX 197
them to be so. One's own work--what does it consist of? It is a synthesis of himself, the canvas, and colouring matters. In other words, the work here produced, is an animated object, as it were, which has absorbed my spirit, and got combined with paints on the canvas to be manifested thus.
In one's own productions one's life dwells, and animate some of the elements (spiritual elements) that go to constitute one's self. One's own works produced on such faith are one's brothers, kith and kin, to be sure!
One's work of art is, so to speak, a fragment or detachment of one's own life. Therefore works of art that are not in earnest, and falsely represented, are so many useless cuttings-away of the artist's life! An artist, if he fears death, cannot execute (growing) works. But, to think of death without any (growing) work, this is far more unbearable indeed!
Such artists who fear death, and at the same time fear the appearance of their growing works--these have no right to exist in the noble world of art. I have said, all things in Nature are our brothers.
Yes! so they truly are. All things in Nature are the workings and manifestations of Ether. Men too, in the beginning of their existence, are but simple cells. The germinal cells have, each of them, specific cell-mind, which I christen provisionally Spiritual element.
The spiritual element, which pervades the universe, according to its different operations, sometimes makes organic manifestations, and some- times inorganic manifestations. Strictly speaking, the distinction between organic and inorganic, is, simply, based on the point of view from human standard.
