Reed somewhat incautiously
observes, “a specimen of almost every author who
contributed to support it,” should not have con tained a single performance by such distinguished poets as Greene, Peele, Nash, and Lodge.
observes, “a specimen of almost every author who
contributed to support it,” should not have con tained a single performance by such distinguished poets as Greene, Peele, Nash, and Lodge.
Dodsley - Select Collection of Old Plays - v1
A select collection of old plays : In twelve volumes.
Dodsley, Robert, ed. 1703-1764, London : S. Prowett, 1825-1833.
http://hdl. handle. net/2027/pst. 000005347995
Public Domain, Google-digitized
http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
We have determined this work to be in the public domain, meaning that it is not subject to copyright. Users are free to copy, use, and redistribute the work in part or in whole. It is possible that current copyright holders, heirs or the estate of the authors of individual portions of the work, such as illustrations or photographs, assert copyrights over these portions. Depending on the nature of subsequent use that is made, additional rights may need to be obtained independently of anything we can address. The digital images and OCR of this work were produced by Google, Inc. (indicated by a watermark on each page in the PageTurner). Google requests that the images and OCR not be re-hosted, redistributed or used commercially. The images are provided for educational, scholarly, non-commercial purposes.
| |
|
Bolooloolool - -
- o
|-
|
|
| ||
|
-|
|
|-
--
| |
-
|
*. . . . - Eloilo Bioloolool o - I -
-
o
THE CARNEGIE LIBRARY of
(The 3. jerutgglgamia state (Jollege
class no. §§. o. . . O'S -
BOOK NO. TYQ,&# w—
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES
i
O L D -PLAY S.
*- VOLUME I.
PREFACES.
HISTORIA HISTRIONICA. GOD'S PROMISEs. THE FOUR P's.
FERREX AND PORREX.
DAMON AND PITHIAS. NEW CUSTOME.
M. DCCC. Xxv.
A
SELECT COLLECTION Or
L A Y S. IN TWELVE VOLUMES.
OLDP
WOL. I.
A NEW EDITION :
WITH
ADDITIONAL NOTES AND CORRECTIONs, BY THE LATE
ISAAC REED, OCTAVIUS GILCHRIST, AND THE EDITOR.
LONDON: -
SEPTIMUS PROWETT, M. D. ccc. xxv.
OLD BOND STREET.
as,
do
** o
•,
• ~•* • ~ •• *•• • • *+ •
• **•
-• ••. . . *•••• . . . *,• ••••
---------
••• •••••
soulou. L “populawd url *131 10out **Inoo
•
••*
→
*^
*o. *
•→* ••
** |-
a o,
••
•• →*
& “I
DRAMATIS PERSONAE.
CAIUS MARIUs.
Young MARIUs. SY LLA.
Q. POMPEY. ANTHON. Y. LEPIDUs. Oct AVIUS.
SCIPIO.
JUNIU's BRUTUs. LUCRETI Us.
CINNA.
LUCIUS FAvorINUs. PAUSANIUs.
CARINNA. LUCIUS MERULA. CETHEG Us. SULPITIUs. CAIUs GRANIUs.
LECTORI Us. TUDITANUs. ARCATHIUs.
ARISTION. ARCHELAUS. PEDRO.
Po PPEY.
CURTALL. CAPTAIN.
Clown, Soldiers, Magistrates' Lictors, Citizens, &c.
CoRN ELIA. FULVIA.
-
1. {}3. #.
fy
1.
e
ADVERTISEMENT THE PRESENT EDITION.
THE length of the prefatory matter to the Editions of this Collection of Old Plays by Mr. Dodsley, in 1744, and by Mr. Reed, in 1780, renders it unne
cessary now to add more than a very short statement of what has been done to make the present under taking acceptable.
Five and forty years have elapsed since the last reprint was published, and during that interval
ardour of pursuit in this particular department has considerably increased the stock of knowledge pre viously obtained regarding the early drama and poetry of England. Mr. Reed, by his laborious in dustry, acquired additional information, appended
by him in MS. to a copy of the Old Plays of 1780, which subsequently devolved into the possession of
the late Mr. Octavius Gilchrist, long known as a tasteful and patient literary antiquary. He joined
his acquisitions to those of Mr. Reed, and their latest notes and illustrations are here inserted,
b
ii
together with such farther intelligence, connected
with the subject, as the Editor had obtained from
the enquiries of others, or discovered by his own research.
It is singular that a series of Old Plays, collected professedly for the purpose of illustrating the rise and progress of the stage in this country, and comprising, as Mr. Reed somewhat incautiously
observes, “a specimen of almost every author who
contributed to support it,” should not have con tained a single performance by such distinguished poets as Greene, Peele, Nash, and Lodge. The conjecture of Mr. Malone, and of other biographers
that Shakespeare did not begin write for the Theatre until about 1591; when, therefore, men
tioned that the four authors above named ceased
produce plays before very soon after the date when our great dramatist commenced his career,
obvious how necessary must be, with view ascertain the correctness Dryden's re-echoed as sertion, that Shakespeare “created first stage,”
examine the efforts
sors. For this purpose, plays great celebrity
substituted others included, but which,
his immediate predeces the present edition, four
their day have been Ford and Shirley, hitherto
was needless retain, because reprints the works both those poets
are the eve publication, under the care Mr. Gifford. Recollecting how much each per
\
to thea it is
on
of
for of of
of
to it
it
in
by inof of
of it
or
to is to is,
to
iii
formance will gain by his editorship, it might be prudent also to shun comparison.
The arrangement of the plays by Mr. Reed was ac
cording to the dates when they were printed; but if his object were, as he states, “to shew the progress of
genius,” it is quite evident that by this plan he accom plished nothing; since the time of publication was
not unfrequently far distant from that when the piece
was actually written: thus Marlow's Jew of Malta, the author of which was killed in 1593, obtained a
place in the same volume with May's Heir, and
Davenant's Wits, the one written perhaps thirty and the other forty years afterwards. Nevertheless,
the success of any attempt to insert them according
to the period when they were first produced must often depend upon mere conjecture, and such a
plan would likewise be open to other objections. ” Upon the whole, therefore, it was thought best not
to disturb the course followed in 1780 beyond the
insertion of the four plays new to the present
edition, in vacancies occasioned by the omission of the following:
'Tis Pity she's a Whore, by John Ford. The Bird in a Cage, by James Shirley.
* In order however, to enable the reader to peruse the plays chronologically or otherwise, a list of the whole
series has been supplied in the 12th vol. made out according to the dates when they were actually, or may be supposed to have been written.
iv
The Gamester, by the same, Andromana, by the same.
. Instead of these,
The Wounds of Civil War, by Thomas Lodge.
Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay, by Robt. Greene.
Summer's Last Will and Testament, by Thomas Nash, and
Edward I. by George Peele,
have been inserted. To the twelfth volume have
also been added two very early and rare dramatic specimens—the one an Interlude, called The
Worlde and the Chylde, printed by Wynkin de Worde, in 1522, and the other, The Tragicall Comedie of Apius and Virginia, published in 1575.
have been transferred from the 12th volume of the
last edition the 1st volume the present.
Although Mr. Reed bestowed great attention
his undertaking, and removed many the imper
fections Mr. Dodsley's original collection; and although might supposed from his preface, that
consulting earlier and better copies, and collating
the plays, had rendered the text sufficiently perfect, yet the fact that performed this
irksome part the duty Editor with less care than the rest. Neither do his later MS. notes shew
For the sake of more convenient
reference, by having the introductory matter together, the Dialogue Plays and Players, called Historia Histrionica, and Sir W. Davenant's Patent 1662,
is, an
of
he
of
all by
of
be
he
it of
to
all on
of
of
on
V
that he was conscious of the defectiveness of his labours in this particular; and excepting in a very
few instances, and as applied to a very few pages, Mr. Gilchrist did not attempt to remedy How
necessary
was that such collation should
made will apparent from the many instances which the variations are now marked. In seve
ral the plays gross errors this kind had crept into almost every page; and though others they were less numerous, still they were frequent
and important. Sometimes the words the old
copies were departed from without notice necessity, and several instances, dedications,
songs, and parts the dialogue were omitted, while whole speeches were assigned wrong characters. The Editor does not make this state
ment diminish the degree gratitude due Mr. Reed for what did accomplish, nor
attract credit himself for the performance tedious and generally thankless task: mentions
regulation the metre. The old printers,
well known, were often quite regardless the verse; either, because attention requiring
too much room, did not suit the price which play was published, because the manuscript, often
surreptitiously obtained, reached them very confused and imperfect state. several places
merely
matter fact.
He aware how much might yet done the
In
to at it, by
of
or
is
at
be
in
it to in of
as all it ato be
of
to
in of
of
he
of
in * to all it.
he
a a ofasin of
is ato or be
of
a
vi
Mr. Gilchrist's suggestions in this respect have been adopted; and in general, wherever the measure could be distinctly ascertained, and restored without
violence to the text, the attempt has been made. It
has not unfrequently happened that the omission or insertion of a single unimportant word or syllable
would have accomplished the object; but the Editor preferred the observance of fidelity to any trifling
exercise of ingenuity. It may be added that Mr. Reed paid less attention to punctuation than importance the sense required.
The biographical and preliminary matter each
play has been rendered more complete than hitherto
by the improved state information regarding our
early poets and poetry: some instances has been re-written; others, entirely new, and
nearly cases, additional and perhaps useful notes have been appended. The conciseness
the plan established the outset prevented the introduction of critical remarks.
the notes generally, the Editor did not feel himself liberty make any change: they are
inserted they stood the edition 1780, while the farther MS. illustrations of Mr. Reed
and Mr. Gilchrist are given they left them. Of the printed notes, few might have been wholly omitted, some considerably abbreviated, and others advantageously altered; but under the circum
stances, was deemed prudent reprint them
it
as at
all
to
a to
in in
to all
of
it of
to
its
in as
it is
of in
in In
vii
entire. Those for which the Editor is responsible are marked with the letter C. He has been anxious
in them to avoid prolixity, and where verbal criti cism was necessary he has subjoined no more quo-
tations from contemporary writers than he thought
necessary for illustration. Perhaps the notes on
some of the plays now first re-printed would have been fewer had the Editor not been desirous to
make the whole work consistent. The new matter
by Mr. Reed and Mr. Gilchrist is distinguished by the initials of their names.
-
London, January, 1826.
C.
_---- --------------
MR. REED'S PREFACE.
THE Works of our ancient dramatic writers have suffered a very long, and, some few excepted, a very general neglect. Though possessed of innu
merable beauties, they have been known in so
imperfect a manner, that their very names have
almost escaped the readers of the present times.
The merits of writers are not always to be esti
mated from the reputation which they bear with
the public. Accident and caprice contribute to advance some authors above their due rank; and
the same causes as frequently depress below their proper stations, others who are entitled to a supe rior degree of regard. The truth of these obser vations might be illustrated by instances without number. Many productions have been at first coldly received,
which afterwards have met with the highest applause. Some have been praised and
neglected; while others, from a concurrence of circumstances in which excellence hath had no
concern, have for a time acquired a share of favour which they have been unable to retain. Such hath
X MR. REED's PREFACE.
been the revolution of taste, that not a few works
have been both applauded and condemned by the
same persons; and this will be esteemed the less
extraordinary, when it is considered how many,
who pronounce on the beauties or defects of authors, decide without any previous knowledge of
what they approve or censure, how many rely on the opinion of others, and how few are capable of exercising any judgment of their own.
To whatever cause it is to be ascribed, there can be no question but that the works of those who flourished in the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and her
successor were not until lately much studied; and
the dramatic poets were not less neglected than
their contemporary brethren. Even those who are
now held in the greatest reverence were not exempt from the same contemptuous treatment, and in
consequence of it were almost suffered to sink into oblivion and obscurity. Many parts of Shakspeare,
the God of our present idolatry, and some whole Plays, remained involved in the darkness which
change manners and customs the lapse near two centuries had occasioned; and the repu tation which our favourite author possessed de
some degree the frequent representa
very few his plays the theatres. How
was read may seen the example Sir Richard Steele, who does not appear have
pended
tion little
to
he a
in
of
be
on
at by
all in
of
of
a of
of
MR. REED's PREFACE. xi
been acquainted with so popular a play as The
Taming of a Shrew".
To account for so general a disregard towards
the early writers for the stage may not be an easy task, though it would not be difficult to prove the injustice of Many causes are assigned.
The fanaticism, which prevailed about the middle
the last century, had fatal influence over the
theatre for some time. The intemperance reli
gious zeal carried destruction along with wherever the works of taste were be met with and its
dominion continued long, that few the dra matic poets, who flourished when the civil wars broke out, remained the Restoration. The
convulsions the times, which had interrupted kind diversions, produced also change the
the people; and those who adhered their return from exile, brought home fondness for the French school, which soon superseded and sunk into disrepute the rude,
but nervous, productions their predecessors. Those who obtained the direction of dramatic
entertainments this period, had also been ba nished from their country, and had acquired the
same taste. Regularity therefore took place the wild native efforts genius, which were soon driven from the stage; the contemporaries and immediate successors Shakspeare became obso
See last Edition Shakspeare, vol. III. 586.
manners monarchy,
with them
*
of
of
of of
so
a
p.
of
at
of
to
a to
of on
a
of
it.
to
all
at
of ; in
it
be of
of
xii MR. REED's PREFACE
lete, the humour which they possessed was lost, and the allusions, which depended temporary circumstances, being forgotten, grew tasteless and insipid.
The refinements French manners also created disgust the coarseness which was com
mon the conversation our forefathers; and,
though there was improvement the morals the people, must acknowledged, that affec
tation delicacy reigned, totally inconsistent with those gross and vulgar modes expression
antiquary, than gratify taste rendered.
delicate being accustomed the improvements
which luxury and riches introduce. The polish
modern fashions agrees with the barbarity
ancient manners. The early efforts our ances tors the dramatic walk were therefore soon laid
aside: their pictures human life were exchanged
frequently
found ancient writers.
The first attempts any art are always rude and imperfect, more calculated exercise the sagacity
for scenes displaying the follies their turn, have submitted
the day; which, the same fate, being
little adapted the theatre,
evening's
this time
entertainment
gotten dramas
Vanbrugh, and Cibber, now exhibit characters almost obsolete those Ben Jonson,
Beaumont and Fletcher; and such names the latter cannot ensure continuance fame, the
the present volumes.
furnish many
the for Congreve,
a
as
to
of
a of
on
if
to to
of as of
to to
of in
as
or
of of
so
of
as
by to it be
as in at
ill
at
an of
an
at in of
bf
in in
be no
in an in of a
all
of of
MR. REED's PREFACE.
Reed somewhat incautiously
observes, “a specimen of almost every author who
contributed to support it,” should not have con tained a single performance by such distinguished poets as Greene, Peele, Nash, and Lodge. The conjecture of Mr. Malone, and of other biographers
that Shakespeare did not begin write for the Theatre until about 1591; when, therefore, men
tioned that the four authors above named ceased
produce plays before very soon after the date when our great dramatist commenced his career,
obvious how necessary must be, with view ascertain the correctness Dryden's re-echoed as sertion, that Shakespeare “created first stage,”
examine the efforts
sors. For this purpose, plays great celebrity
substituted others included, but which,
his immediate predeces the present edition, four
their day have been Ford and Shirley, hitherto
was needless retain, because reprints the works both those poets
are the eve publication, under the care Mr. Gifford. Recollecting how much each per
\
to thea it is
on
of
for of of
of
to it
it
in
by inof of
of it
or
to is to is,
to
iii
formance will gain by his editorship, it might be prudent also to shun comparison.
The arrangement of the plays by Mr. Reed was ac
cording to the dates when they were printed; but if his object were, as he states, “to shew the progress of
genius,” it is quite evident that by this plan he accom plished nothing; since the time of publication was
not unfrequently far distant from that when the piece
was actually written: thus Marlow's Jew of Malta, the author of which was killed in 1593, obtained a
place in the same volume with May's Heir, and
Davenant's Wits, the one written perhaps thirty and the other forty years afterwards. Nevertheless,
the success of any attempt to insert them according
to the period when they were first produced must often depend upon mere conjecture, and such a
plan would likewise be open to other objections. ” Upon the whole, therefore, it was thought best not
to disturb the course followed in 1780 beyond the
insertion of the four plays new to the present
edition, in vacancies occasioned by the omission of the following:
'Tis Pity she's a Whore, by John Ford. The Bird in a Cage, by James Shirley.
* In order however, to enable the reader to peruse the plays chronologically or otherwise, a list of the whole
series has been supplied in the 12th vol. made out according to the dates when they were actually, or may be supposed to have been written.
iv
The Gamester, by the same, Andromana, by the same.
. Instead of these,
The Wounds of Civil War, by Thomas Lodge.
Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay, by Robt. Greene.
Summer's Last Will and Testament, by Thomas Nash, and
Edward I. by George Peele,
have been inserted. To the twelfth volume have
also been added two very early and rare dramatic specimens—the one an Interlude, called The
Worlde and the Chylde, printed by Wynkin de Worde, in 1522, and the other, The Tragicall Comedie of Apius and Virginia, published in 1575.
have been transferred from the 12th volume of the
last edition the 1st volume the present.
Although Mr. Reed bestowed great attention
his undertaking, and removed many the imper
fections Mr. Dodsley's original collection; and although might supposed from his preface, that
consulting earlier and better copies, and collating
the plays, had rendered the text sufficiently perfect, yet the fact that performed this
irksome part the duty Editor with less care than the rest. Neither do his later MS. notes shew
For the sake of more convenient
reference, by having the introductory matter together, the Dialogue Plays and Players, called Historia Histrionica, and Sir W. Davenant's Patent 1662,
is, an
of
he
of
all by
of
be
he
it of
to
all on
of
of
on
V
that he was conscious of the defectiveness of his labours in this particular; and excepting in a very
few instances, and as applied to a very few pages, Mr. Gilchrist did not attempt to remedy How
necessary
was that such collation should
made will apparent from the many instances which the variations are now marked. In seve
ral the plays gross errors this kind had crept into almost every page; and though others they were less numerous, still they were frequent
and important. Sometimes the words the old
copies were departed from without notice necessity, and several instances, dedications,
songs, and parts the dialogue were omitted, while whole speeches were assigned wrong characters. The Editor does not make this state
ment diminish the degree gratitude due Mr. Reed for what did accomplish, nor
attract credit himself for the performance tedious and generally thankless task: mentions
regulation the metre. The old printers,
well known, were often quite regardless the verse; either, because attention requiring
too much room, did not suit the price which play was published, because the manuscript, often
surreptitiously obtained, reached them very confused and imperfect state. several places
merely
matter fact.
He aware how much might yet done the
In
to at it, by
of
or
is
at
be
in
it to in of
as all it ato be
of
to
in of
of
he
of
in * to all it.
he
a a ofasin of
is ato or be
of
a
vi
Mr. Gilchrist's suggestions in this respect have been adopted; and in general, wherever the measure could be distinctly ascertained, and restored without
violence to the text, the attempt has been made. It
has not unfrequently happened that the omission or insertion of a single unimportant word or syllable
would have accomplished the object; but the Editor preferred the observance of fidelity to any trifling
exercise of ingenuity. It may be added that Mr. Reed paid less attention to punctuation than importance the sense required.
The biographical and preliminary matter each
play has been rendered more complete than hitherto
by the improved state information regarding our
early poets and poetry: some instances has been re-written; others, entirely new, and
nearly cases, additional and perhaps useful notes have been appended. The conciseness
the plan established the outset prevented the introduction of critical remarks.
the notes generally, the Editor did not feel himself liberty make any change: they are
inserted they stood the edition 1780, while the farther MS. illustrations of Mr. Reed
and Mr. Gilchrist are given they left them. Of the printed notes, few might have been wholly omitted, some considerably abbreviated, and others advantageously altered; but under the circum
stances, was deemed prudent reprint them
it
as at
all
to
a to
in in
to all
of
it of
to
its
in as
it is
of in
in In
vii
entire. Those for which the Editor is responsible are marked with the letter C. He has been anxious
in them to avoid prolixity, and where verbal criti cism was necessary he has subjoined no more quo-
tations from contemporary writers than he thought
necessary for illustration. Perhaps the notes on
some of the plays now first re-printed would have been fewer had the Editor not been desirous to
make the whole work consistent. The new matter
by Mr. Reed and Mr. Gilchrist is distinguished by the initials of their names.
-
London, January, 1826.
C.
_---- --------------
MR. REED'S PREFACE.
THE Works of our ancient dramatic writers have suffered a very long, and, some few excepted, a very general neglect. Though possessed of innu
merable beauties, they have been known in so
imperfect a manner, that their very names have
almost escaped the readers of the present times.
The merits of writers are not always to be esti
mated from the reputation which they bear with
the public. Accident and caprice contribute to advance some authors above their due rank; and
the same causes as frequently depress below their proper stations, others who are entitled to a supe rior degree of regard. The truth of these obser vations might be illustrated by instances without number. Many productions have been at first coldly received,
which afterwards have met with the highest applause. Some have been praised and
neglected; while others, from a concurrence of circumstances in which excellence hath had no
concern, have for a time acquired a share of favour which they have been unable to retain. Such hath
X MR. REED's PREFACE.
been the revolution of taste, that not a few works
have been both applauded and condemned by the
same persons; and this will be esteemed the less
extraordinary, when it is considered how many,
who pronounce on the beauties or defects of authors, decide without any previous knowledge of
what they approve or censure, how many rely on the opinion of others, and how few are capable of exercising any judgment of their own.
To whatever cause it is to be ascribed, there can be no question but that the works of those who flourished in the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and her
successor were not until lately much studied; and
the dramatic poets were not less neglected than
their contemporary brethren. Even those who are
now held in the greatest reverence were not exempt from the same contemptuous treatment, and in
consequence of it were almost suffered to sink into oblivion and obscurity. Many parts of Shakspeare,
the God of our present idolatry, and some whole Plays, remained involved in the darkness which
change manners and customs the lapse near two centuries had occasioned; and the repu tation which our favourite author possessed de
some degree the frequent representa
very few his plays the theatres. How
was read may seen the example Sir Richard Steele, who does not appear have
pended
tion little
to
he a
in
of
be
on
at by
all in
of
of
a of
of
MR. REED's PREFACE. xi
been acquainted with so popular a play as The
Taming of a Shrew".
To account for so general a disregard towards
the early writers for the stage may not be an easy task, though it would not be difficult to prove the injustice of Many causes are assigned.
The fanaticism, which prevailed about the middle
the last century, had fatal influence over the
theatre for some time. The intemperance reli
gious zeal carried destruction along with wherever the works of taste were be met with and its
dominion continued long, that few the dra matic poets, who flourished when the civil wars broke out, remained the Restoration. The
convulsions the times, which had interrupted kind diversions, produced also change the
the people; and those who adhered their return from exile, brought home fondness for the French school, which soon superseded and sunk into disrepute the rude,
but nervous, productions their predecessors. Those who obtained the direction of dramatic
entertainments this period, had also been ba nished from their country, and had acquired the
same taste. Regularity therefore took place the wild native efforts genius, which were soon driven from the stage; the contemporaries and immediate successors Shakspeare became obso
See last Edition Shakspeare, vol. III. 586.
manners monarchy,
with them
*
of
of
of of
so
a
p.
of
at
of
to
a to
of on
a
of
it.
to
all
at
of ; in
it
be of
of
xii MR. REED's PREFACE
lete, the humour which they possessed was lost, and the allusions, which depended temporary circumstances, being forgotten, grew tasteless and insipid.
The refinements French manners also created disgust the coarseness which was com
mon the conversation our forefathers; and,
though there was improvement the morals the people, must acknowledged, that affec
tation delicacy reigned, totally inconsistent with those gross and vulgar modes expression
antiquary, than gratify taste rendered.
delicate being accustomed the improvements
which luxury and riches introduce. The polish
modern fashions agrees with the barbarity
ancient manners. The early efforts our ances tors the dramatic walk were therefore soon laid
aside: their pictures human life were exchanged
frequently
found ancient writers.
The first attempts any art are always rude and imperfect, more calculated exercise the sagacity
for scenes displaying the follies their turn, have submitted
the day; which, the same fate, being
little adapted the theatre,
evening's
this time
entertainment
gotten dramas
Vanbrugh, and Cibber, now exhibit characters almost obsolete those Ben Jonson,
Beaumont and Fletcher; and such names the latter cannot ensure continuance fame, the
the present volumes.
furnish many
the for Congreve,
a
as
to
of
a of
on
if
to to
of as of
to to
of in
as
or
of of
so
of
as
by to it be
as in at
ill
at
an of
an
at in of
bf
in in
be no
in an in of a
all
of of
MR. REED's PREFACE.
xiii
Dekkars, Middletons,
their contemporaries, must give up their claim to
Chapmans, and Marstons,
immortality
It is a misfortune which must attend all who write
for the stage, that their happiest exertions in deli
neating life and manners lose their force in the
course of a few years, and the more faithfully they
are painted, the sooner their colouring dies away.
The whimsical caprices of fashion are perpetually changing, and, as they pass daily before our eyes,
seldom leave any memorial of their existence. They sometimes are almost literally the children of a day; and, when they expire, so much of the
attraction as depends on such transient circum stances is necessarily lost. That no small stress is laid on what cannot be long relished, may be seen by the practice of modern writers. It may be asked, who has with more success than the late Mr.
Foote catched the fleeting Cynthia of a minute 2 whose dramatic pieces afforded more satisfaction on the stage 2 Yet, with that unequalled facility
transferring characters from life the theatre
which possessed, his works are already laid aside, and must, they are remembered century hence, indebted the industry some painful
searcher into antiquity for recovering lost allusions
and forgotten facts. The truth there are few \ but prefer the applause those they live with
the approbation succeeding times. Their repre
without a murmur.
of
if
to of
all
to
is,
a
be
of he
of
to
xiv MR. REED's PREFACE.
sentations therefore are often so closely connected with the fluctuations of fashion, that it has some
times been necessary for an author to be his own commentator. Cibber lived to see the characters
of his own coxcombs become obsolete ; and, not very late in life”, was obliged to point out the
distinction between the fops he had drawn, and the
new race of these insignificant beings which had
sprung up to succeed them. Can it then be won
dered at, that we no longer receive pleasure from
the exhibition of the Foppingtons and Fashions, which afforded so much entertainment to the fre
quenters of our theatres at the beginning of this
century? That the charm is now lost, must be felt
every time these characters appear on the stage. The humour of them is so interwoven with fashions now no longer familiar, that some late attempts to adapt them to modern manners have only contri
buted to destroy the remains of spirit and meaning which were left in them.
Ifthe works of writers so near our own days so
soon lose their effect, and the restoration of them
to the theatre is become a task of such difficulty, the exclusion of performances of a more remote
period will scarcely be considered as a very for midable objection to the merit of them. In fact, the same causes have had the same effects in both
cases; and at present the earliest pieces are likely. * See his Apology, p. 303. edit. 1750.
|
MR. REED's PR EFACE. XV
to be more read, and better understood, than even those of only fifty years standing. At a time when
destruction seemed to threaten most of the pro
ductions of the early stage, and after, it is to be feared, many of them were irrecoverably lost, the explanation of those writers, who may be esteemed
the classics of this country, began to engage the
attention of some of the ablest writers of the pre sent times. Struck with the absurd alterations and
wild conjectures of critics, who mangled and dis figured their authors, instead of elucidating their
obscurity, they determined to search into contem porary writers for a solution of such doubts as had been created chiefly by time. The success which attended their enquiries soon shewed the necessity
of an acquaintance with works which had until then been overlooked, to obtain a perfect knowledge of some of our most esteemed authors. It shewed
also, that many beauties had long remained un known and unnoticed; that fame had not always accompanied worth; and that those who wished for
information concerning ancient manners would not be able to obtain it so well from any other source. When the value of such kind of performances
became known, other difficulties arose; the ma terials, which were to answer these excellent pur
poses, were not to be obtained by those who were best able to make use of them. Works, which
cease to be popular, are in a short time destroyed; 3
xvi MR. REED's PREFACE.
the fugitive pieces of ages would soon perish, account the slender form their publication,
they were not from time time collected and
published manner more likely ensure their duration. As the use of such collections now
confessed on all hands, be lamented that
care was not taken sooner preserve such slight performances from the ravages time and acci
dent. What might have been accomplished with
the greatest ease the last century now become undertaking much difficulty. Many works
are totally lost; some are already become
valuable editions industry
manuscripts; and several, the best
are sought after vain. The few persons hath lately been employed,
with much credit themselves, forming collec
tions which have been singular advantage the public, may seen some late publications;
and the liberality the present age nothing
more remarkable, than the alacrity with which
the possessors such curiosities communicate them those who have occasion consult them.
The present volumes were originally compiled
exist, that Oxford.
This afterwards came into the possess
late Mr. Garrick; and, with great additions, hath
since been bequeathed him The British Museum. The mention this gentleman's name
from the only collection then known which had been formed the Earls
the
1
by by
to is
of to of
of
in inof
to to in of
it,
all
on of
of to is in
in is to is
to
as
of a
as
of
be of
to
of in
to
to be
in a
as
an
if on of
to
MR. REED’S PREFACE. xvii
naturally reminds the Editor, that he should be
deficient in point of gratitude, if he omitted to notice the readiness with which he was allowed the
free use of whatever Mr. Garrick's library contained for the service of this work. It is no extravagant compliment to the memory of a man, who hath
contributed more to the public entertainment than any person of the present age; that in this parti
cular he had, as in many other parts of his character, no superior, and scarcely an equal. His wish to forward any literary undertaking is too well known, and hath been too often acknowledged by those who were obliged to him, to need any eulo gium on this subject at present; and his death
cannot but occasion a sigh to arise in the breast of every one who had the happiness of his acquaint
ance.
As the public hath long been in possession of the
present work, it will perhaps be deemed unneces
sary to take up the reader's time in pointing out
the value of what he is about to peruse. It may, however, be with decency asserted, that it is cal
culated to afford a great degree of entertainment to
those who would be acquainted from what slight beginnings the English theatre arose to present
state aprovement. will shew the progress
genius the course more than century; and will exhibit specimen almost every author
who contributed support the stage during that
to a
C
a
its
of it
of in
of It of
xviii MR. REED's PREFACE.
period. The vices and follies, the manners, cus toms, fashions, caprices, and pursuits of our ances tors, will here pass in review before us; and in so
lively a manner, that he who would draw a com parison between the modes of living of the present and former times, may be furnished with materials
to make his judgment from. If he should chance to find anything offensive to delicacy, he will recol
lect the times in which these Plays appeared are not to be commended for the observation of a strict
decorum. There are many proofs, that the courts of Elizabeth, and her two successors, were ex
tremely licentious in conversation; and it would be vain to expect a greater degree of chastity at the
public theatres, than was to be found where Royalty
resided, especially when it is known that each sovereign was in this particular highly censurable.
The first Edition of the present Volumes was one
of the many excellent plans produced by the late
Mr. Robert Dodsley, a man to whom literature is
under so many obligations, that it would be un
pardonable to neglect this opportunity of informing
those who may have received any pleasure from the
work, that they owe it to a person whose merit and abilities raised him from an obscure situation in life
to affluence and independence. Modest, sensible, and humane, he retained the virtues which first
brought him into notice, after he had obtained wealth sufficient to satisfy every wish which could
MR. REED's PREFACE. xix
arise from the possession of
friend, encourager men
quired the esteem and respect
acquainted with him. was his happiness pass
the greater part his life with those whose names will be revered posterity; most whom was loved much for the virtues his heart, he was admired on account of his excellent
writings. After life spent the exercise social duty, fell martyr the gout,
house friend", the year 1764, when nearly arrived the age years.
every
the had
He was generous genius; and ac
who were
From this digression, may called one,
us return what introduced the former edition this collection. hath been customary with
those who have given new editions works which
have exercised the abilities other persons,
very diffuse pointing out the defects their
predecessors, and dwell with great satisfaction
on mistakes, which the most careful editors cannot
avoid falling into. This practice the more condemned, every person who has had any
concern undertakings this kind, must con vinced the fallibility claims unerring
perfection. When Mr. Dodsley undertook the present publication,the duties editor English
works were not well understood they have been since. The collation copies had not
Mr. Spence, Durham.
of in
* as
an
at
of
of
it, 61
in
it.
at
let
as he
so
to
as
of
all
of a
ofof of all
if
it of
It of
to a
as in athe
a
by of
of
It
in a
by
an toof
ofto
of to be
he at of
be
to be
to
is be of of
of
XX
MR. REED's PREFACE.
that time been practised in any case that the editor is informed of (for it is certain neither Theobald, nor any other editor of Shakespeare, nor either of
the gentlemen who had published Chaucer or Spenser, had any claim to praise on this account), and a knowledge of the writings of contemporary
authors was still less deemed necessary. In con sequence of these false ideas of the requisites which
an editor ought to possess, there are some imper fections in the former edition, which would have
been avoided had the same person lived to super
intend a republication of his work. One of these
faults arose from his reliance on the first copy of a
play, sometimes the most erroneous one, which
chance put into his hand; but the most material
was from his want of acquaintance with the litera
ture of the last century. This latter circumstance
occasioned many words and phrases which were obscure, or not understood, to be changed for
others more familiar and intelligible. As fidelity in publishing any author is an indispensable quality in
an editor, the liberty which Mr. Dodsley ventured upon is certainly not to be defended or excused. His several innovations have therefore been silently removed, without burthening the page with an unnecessary note, except where the words restored required an explanation. The different copies by
which the present edition has been collated, are set down at the end of each play.
*. . . *
MR. REED's PREFACE. xxi
In printing the text, the Editor hath been
careful not to fall into the error of his predecessor,
and therefore hath scarcely ever indulged himself in alterations from conjecture. The many experi
ments of this kind which were made by the first editors of Shakespeare and other writers, and the futility of them all, as hath appeared from the enquiries of later commentators, have sufficiently
convinced him that such a mode of getting rid of the difficulties which occur in ancient writers, is more calculated to shew the boldness of the critic,
than to give credit to his knowledge, either of the authors, or the habits, fashions, humours, or customs,
of former times. He hath, therefore, in not more than two or three instances, departed from the
text, and never without noting the variation, that no
one who may choose the rejected words, or is able to explain them to his satisfaction, may be obliged
to quit the old copies, if they shall be deemed intitled to a preference.
In commenting on the several plays, the Editor hath generally had recourse to contemporary
writers, for the explanations of words or phrases which are peculiar to the times; and the same
practice hath been observed in elucidating the particular customs which are referred to in the several volumes. In the course of these remarks,
the reader will see how much the present collection hath been indebted to the late edition of Shake
xxii MR. REED's PREFACE.
speare. As it cannot be expected that many will become purchasers of these volumes who are not possessed of that work, it hath generally been
referred to in the course of the several notes. It would be some satisfaction to the Editor, if he
could say, that the obscurities which are
found were completely explained; and sorry acknowledge, that several remain unattempted.
They are, however, not very numerous, and will,
entitled the pardon every candid To throw light every difficult passage work the present, requires more reading than can expected from any one person.
was very soon after this collection went the press, that the Editor became convinced how im
perfectly the task which had entered upon would performed, was depend entirely
his own endeavours; and, very fortunately, that aid which he wished for was offered him, the
thinks,
reader. such
politest manner, gentleman
under many great obligations, besides his commu
nications this work. When known, that him the public are indebted for the notes signed with the letter the reader will regret that there
are not greater proportion the whole number
under that signature. From another gentleman, whose knowledge antiquarian subjects the world
hath been long acquainted with, the notes marked were received; and those which have the
whom
S. P.
on
in
a
if he
to
he a be a
of
all it
is to
to
to
be
S,
by
be as
all
he in to is
is
to
he
in It
to
of to
he
on
be
quarters,
MR. REED's PREFACE.
xxiii
letter N annexed to them, are such observations as occurred to the printer of the first six volumes, in reading the proof sheets. To these gentlemen the editor esteems himself much indebted for their kindness and attention. From them arises the
principal assistance hath boast very few notes marked with different letters he was
favoured with other friends, whom begs
here make his acknowledgments. And hath
many reasons flatter himself, that the commen
tary would have been much enlarged from other
There are two alterations the present edition from the former, which he believes will need no apology. These are, the arrangement the plays,
now changed according the chronological order
which they were published, and the removal some, which were formerly printed, for others
diffidence his abilities for the under taking had not deterred him from solicitation.
which seem have fairer claim served. Some
being pre these rejected pieces have been
complete edition one author;
lately published
and the others are such have been thrown out
the advice gentleman whose sentiments concerning them must confirmed every one
who will afford them
perusal".
The following list the rejected plays:
Mustapha,
The Shepherd's Holiday, Joseph Rutter.
Dodsley, Robert, ed. 1703-1764, London : S. Prowett, 1825-1833.
http://hdl. handle. net/2027/pst. 000005347995
Public Domain, Google-digitized
http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
We have determined this work to be in the public domain, meaning that it is not subject to copyright. Users are free to copy, use, and redistribute the work in part or in whole. It is possible that current copyright holders, heirs or the estate of the authors of individual portions of the work, such as illustrations or photographs, assert copyrights over these portions. Depending on the nature of subsequent use that is made, additional rights may need to be obtained independently of anything we can address. The digital images and OCR of this work were produced by Google, Inc. (indicated by a watermark on each page in the PageTurner). Google requests that the images and OCR not be re-hosted, redistributed or used commercially. The images are provided for educational, scholarly, non-commercial purposes.
| |
|
Bolooloolool - -
- o
|-
|
|
| ||
|
-|
|
|-
--
| |
-
|
*. . . . - Eloilo Bioloolool o - I -
-
o
THE CARNEGIE LIBRARY of
(The 3. jerutgglgamia state (Jollege
class no. §§. o. . . O'S -
BOOK NO. TYQ,&# w—
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES
i
O L D -PLAY S.
*- VOLUME I.
PREFACES.
HISTORIA HISTRIONICA. GOD'S PROMISEs. THE FOUR P's.
FERREX AND PORREX.
DAMON AND PITHIAS. NEW CUSTOME.
M. DCCC. Xxv.
A
SELECT COLLECTION Or
L A Y S. IN TWELVE VOLUMES.
OLDP
WOL. I.
A NEW EDITION :
WITH
ADDITIONAL NOTES AND CORRECTIONs, BY THE LATE
ISAAC REED, OCTAVIUS GILCHRIST, AND THE EDITOR.
LONDON: -
SEPTIMUS PROWETT, M. D. ccc. xxv.
OLD BOND STREET.
as,
do
** o
•,
• ~•* • ~ •• *•• • • *+ •
• **•
-• ••. . . *•••• . . . *,• ••••
---------
••• •••••
soulou. L “populawd url *131 10out **Inoo
•
••*
→
*^
*o. *
•→* ••
** |-
a o,
••
•• →*
& “I
DRAMATIS PERSONAE.
CAIUS MARIUs.
Young MARIUs. SY LLA.
Q. POMPEY. ANTHON. Y. LEPIDUs. Oct AVIUS.
SCIPIO.
JUNIU's BRUTUs. LUCRETI Us.
CINNA.
LUCIUS FAvorINUs. PAUSANIUs.
CARINNA. LUCIUS MERULA. CETHEG Us. SULPITIUs. CAIUs GRANIUs.
LECTORI Us. TUDITANUs. ARCATHIUs.
ARISTION. ARCHELAUS. PEDRO.
Po PPEY.
CURTALL. CAPTAIN.
Clown, Soldiers, Magistrates' Lictors, Citizens, &c.
CoRN ELIA. FULVIA.
-
1. {}3. #.
fy
1.
e
ADVERTISEMENT THE PRESENT EDITION.
THE length of the prefatory matter to the Editions of this Collection of Old Plays by Mr. Dodsley, in 1744, and by Mr. Reed, in 1780, renders it unne
cessary now to add more than a very short statement of what has been done to make the present under taking acceptable.
Five and forty years have elapsed since the last reprint was published, and during that interval
ardour of pursuit in this particular department has considerably increased the stock of knowledge pre viously obtained regarding the early drama and poetry of England. Mr. Reed, by his laborious in dustry, acquired additional information, appended
by him in MS. to a copy of the Old Plays of 1780, which subsequently devolved into the possession of
the late Mr. Octavius Gilchrist, long known as a tasteful and patient literary antiquary. He joined
his acquisitions to those of Mr. Reed, and their latest notes and illustrations are here inserted,
b
ii
together with such farther intelligence, connected
with the subject, as the Editor had obtained from
the enquiries of others, or discovered by his own research.
It is singular that a series of Old Plays, collected professedly for the purpose of illustrating the rise and progress of the stage in this country, and comprising, as Mr. Reed somewhat incautiously
observes, “a specimen of almost every author who
contributed to support it,” should not have con tained a single performance by such distinguished poets as Greene, Peele, Nash, and Lodge. The conjecture of Mr. Malone, and of other biographers
that Shakespeare did not begin write for the Theatre until about 1591; when, therefore, men
tioned that the four authors above named ceased
produce plays before very soon after the date when our great dramatist commenced his career,
obvious how necessary must be, with view ascertain the correctness Dryden's re-echoed as sertion, that Shakespeare “created first stage,”
examine the efforts
sors. For this purpose, plays great celebrity
substituted others included, but which,
his immediate predeces the present edition, four
their day have been Ford and Shirley, hitherto
was needless retain, because reprints the works both those poets
are the eve publication, under the care Mr. Gifford. Recollecting how much each per
\
to thea it is
on
of
for of of
of
to it
it
in
by inof of
of it
or
to is to is,
to
iii
formance will gain by his editorship, it might be prudent also to shun comparison.
The arrangement of the plays by Mr. Reed was ac
cording to the dates when they were printed; but if his object were, as he states, “to shew the progress of
genius,” it is quite evident that by this plan he accom plished nothing; since the time of publication was
not unfrequently far distant from that when the piece
was actually written: thus Marlow's Jew of Malta, the author of which was killed in 1593, obtained a
place in the same volume with May's Heir, and
Davenant's Wits, the one written perhaps thirty and the other forty years afterwards. Nevertheless,
the success of any attempt to insert them according
to the period when they were first produced must often depend upon mere conjecture, and such a
plan would likewise be open to other objections. ” Upon the whole, therefore, it was thought best not
to disturb the course followed in 1780 beyond the
insertion of the four plays new to the present
edition, in vacancies occasioned by the omission of the following:
'Tis Pity she's a Whore, by John Ford. The Bird in a Cage, by James Shirley.
* In order however, to enable the reader to peruse the plays chronologically or otherwise, a list of the whole
series has been supplied in the 12th vol. made out according to the dates when they were actually, or may be supposed to have been written.
iv
The Gamester, by the same, Andromana, by the same.
. Instead of these,
The Wounds of Civil War, by Thomas Lodge.
Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay, by Robt. Greene.
Summer's Last Will and Testament, by Thomas Nash, and
Edward I. by George Peele,
have been inserted. To the twelfth volume have
also been added two very early and rare dramatic specimens—the one an Interlude, called The
Worlde and the Chylde, printed by Wynkin de Worde, in 1522, and the other, The Tragicall Comedie of Apius and Virginia, published in 1575.
have been transferred from the 12th volume of the
last edition the 1st volume the present.
Although Mr. Reed bestowed great attention
his undertaking, and removed many the imper
fections Mr. Dodsley's original collection; and although might supposed from his preface, that
consulting earlier and better copies, and collating
the plays, had rendered the text sufficiently perfect, yet the fact that performed this
irksome part the duty Editor with less care than the rest. Neither do his later MS. notes shew
For the sake of more convenient
reference, by having the introductory matter together, the Dialogue Plays and Players, called Historia Histrionica, and Sir W. Davenant's Patent 1662,
is, an
of
he
of
all by
of
be
he
it of
to
all on
of
of
on
V
that he was conscious of the defectiveness of his labours in this particular; and excepting in a very
few instances, and as applied to a very few pages, Mr. Gilchrist did not attempt to remedy How
necessary
was that such collation should
made will apparent from the many instances which the variations are now marked. In seve
ral the plays gross errors this kind had crept into almost every page; and though others they were less numerous, still they were frequent
and important. Sometimes the words the old
copies were departed from without notice necessity, and several instances, dedications,
songs, and parts the dialogue were omitted, while whole speeches were assigned wrong characters. The Editor does not make this state
ment diminish the degree gratitude due Mr. Reed for what did accomplish, nor
attract credit himself for the performance tedious and generally thankless task: mentions
regulation the metre. The old printers,
well known, were often quite regardless the verse; either, because attention requiring
too much room, did not suit the price which play was published, because the manuscript, often
surreptitiously obtained, reached them very confused and imperfect state. several places
merely
matter fact.
He aware how much might yet done the
In
to at it, by
of
or
is
at
be
in
it to in of
as all it ato be
of
to
in of
of
he
of
in * to all it.
he
a a ofasin of
is ato or be
of
a
vi
Mr. Gilchrist's suggestions in this respect have been adopted; and in general, wherever the measure could be distinctly ascertained, and restored without
violence to the text, the attempt has been made. It
has not unfrequently happened that the omission or insertion of a single unimportant word or syllable
would have accomplished the object; but the Editor preferred the observance of fidelity to any trifling
exercise of ingenuity. It may be added that Mr. Reed paid less attention to punctuation than importance the sense required.
The biographical and preliminary matter each
play has been rendered more complete than hitherto
by the improved state information regarding our
early poets and poetry: some instances has been re-written; others, entirely new, and
nearly cases, additional and perhaps useful notes have been appended. The conciseness
the plan established the outset prevented the introduction of critical remarks.
the notes generally, the Editor did not feel himself liberty make any change: they are
inserted they stood the edition 1780, while the farther MS. illustrations of Mr. Reed
and Mr. Gilchrist are given they left them. Of the printed notes, few might have been wholly omitted, some considerably abbreviated, and others advantageously altered; but under the circum
stances, was deemed prudent reprint them
it
as at
all
to
a to
in in
to all
of
it of
to
its
in as
it is
of in
in In
vii
entire. Those for which the Editor is responsible are marked with the letter C. He has been anxious
in them to avoid prolixity, and where verbal criti cism was necessary he has subjoined no more quo-
tations from contemporary writers than he thought
necessary for illustration. Perhaps the notes on
some of the plays now first re-printed would have been fewer had the Editor not been desirous to
make the whole work consistent. The new matter
by Mr. Reed and Mr. Gilchrist is distinguished by the initials of their names.
-
London, January, 1826.
C.
_---- --------------
MR. REED'S PREFACE.
THE Works of our ancient dramatic writers have suffered a very long, and, some few excepted, a very general neglect. Though possessed of innu
merable beauties, they have been known in so
imperfect a manner, that their very names have
almost escaped the readers of the present times.
The merits of writers are not always to be esti
mated from the reputation which they bear with
the public. Accident and caprice contribute to advance some authors above their due rank; and
the same causes as frequently depress below their proper stations, others who are entitled to a supe rior degree of regard. The truth of these obser vations might be illustrated by instances without number. Many productions have been at first coldly received,
which afterwards have met with the highest applause. Some have been praised and
neglected; while others, from a concurrence of circumstances in which excellence hath had no
concern, have for a time acquired a share of favour which they have been unable to retain. Such hath
X MR. REED's PREFACE.
been the revolution of taste, that not a few works
have been both applauded and condemned by the
same persons; and this will be esteemed the less
extraordinary, when it is considered how many,
who pronounce on the beauties or defects of authors, decide without any previous knowledge of
what they approve or censure, how many rely on the opinion of others, and how few are capable of exercising any judgment of their own.
To whatever cause it is to be ascribed, there can be no question but that the works of those who flourished in the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and her
successor were not until lately much studied; and
the dramatic poets were not less neglected than
their contemporary brethren. Even those who are
now held in the greatest reverence were not exempt from the same contemptuous treatment, and in
consequence of it were almost suffered to sink into oblivion and obscurity. Many parts of Shakspeare,
the God of our present idolatry, and some whole Plays, remained involved in the darkness which
change manners and customs the lapse near two centuries had occasioned; and the repu tation which our favourite author possessed de
some degree the frequent representa
very few his plays the theatres. How
was read may seen the example Sir Richard Steele, who does not appear have
pended
tion little
to
he a
in
of
be
on
at by
all in
of
of
a of
of
MR. REED's PREFACE. xi
been acquainted with so popular a play as The
Taming of a Shrew".
To account for so general a disregard towards
the early writers for the stage may not be an easy task, though it would not be difficult to prove the injustice of Many causes are assigned.
The fanaticism, which prevailed about the middle
the last century, had fatal influence over the
theatre for some time. The intemperance reli
gious zeal carried destruction along with wherever the works of taste were be met with and its
dominion continued long, that few the dra matic poets, who flourished when the civil wars broke out, remained the Restoration. The
convulsions the times, which had interrupted kind diversions, produced also change the
the people; and those who adhered their return from exile, brought home fondness for the French school, which soon superseded and sunk into disrepute the rude,
but nervous, productions their predecessors. Those who obtained the direction of dramatic
entertainments this period, had also been ba nished from their country, and had acquired the
same taste. Regularity therefore took place the wild native efforts genius, which were soon driven from the stage; the contemporaries and immediate successors Shakspeare became obso
See last Edition Shakspeare, vol. III. 586.
manners monarchy,
with them
*
of
of
of of
so
a
p.
of
at
of
to
a to
of on
a
of
it.
to
all
at
of ; in
it
be of
of
xii MR. REED's PREFACE
lete, the humour which they possessed was lost, and the allusions, which depended temporary circumstances, being forgotten, grew tasteless and insipid.
The refinements French manners also created disgust the coarseness which was com
mon the conversation our forefathers; and,
though there was improvement the morals the people, must acknowledged, that affec
tation delicacy reigned, totally inconsistent with those gross and vulgar modes expression
antiquary, than gratify taste rendered.
delicate being accustomed the improvements
which luxury and riches introduce. The polish
modern fashions agrees with the barbarity
ancient manners. The early efforts our ances tors the dramatic walk were therefore soon laid
aside: their pictures human life were exchanged
frequently
found ancient writers.
The first attempts any art are always rude and imperfect, more calculated exercise the sagacity
for scenes displaying the follies their turn, have submitted
the day; which, the same fate, being
little adapted the theatre,
evening's
this time
entertainment
gotten dramas
Vanbrugh, and Cibber, now exhibit characters almost obsolete those Ben Jonson,
Beaumont and Fletcher; and such names the latter cannot ensure continuance fame, the
the present volumes.
furnish many
the for Congreve,
a
as
to
of
a of
on
if
to to
of as of
to to
of in
as
or
of of
so
of
as
by to it be
as in at
ill
at
an of
an
at in of
bf
in in
be no
in an in of a
all
of of
MR. REED's PREFACE.
Reed somewhat incautiously
observes, “a specimen of almost every author who
contributed to support it,” should not have con tained a single performance by such distinguished poets as Greene, Peele, Nash, and Lodge. The conjecture of Mr. Malone, and of other biographers
that Shakespeare did not begin write for the Theatre until about 1591; when, therefore, men
tioned that the four authors above named ceased
produce plays before very soon after the date when our great dramatist commenced his career,
obvious how necessary must be, with view ascertain the correctness Dryden's re-echoed as sertion, that Shakespeare “created first stage,”
examine the efforts
sors. For this purpose, plays great celebrity
substituted others included, but which,
his immediate predeces the present edition, four
their day have been Ford and Shirley, hitherto
was needless retain, because reprints the works both those poets
are the eve publication, under the care Mr. Gifford. Recollecting how much each per
\
to thea it is
on
of
for of of
of
to it
it
in
by inof of
of it
or
to is to is,
to
iii
formance will gain by his editorship, it might be prudent also to shun comparison.
The arrangement of the plays by Mr. Reed was ac
cording to the dates when they were printed; but if his object were, as he states, “to shew the progress of
genius,” it is quite evident that by this plan he accom plished nothing; since the time of publication was
not unfrequently far distant from that when the piece
was actually written: thus Marlow's Jew of Malta, the author of which was killed in 1593, obtained a
place in the same volume with May's Heir, and
Davenant's Wits, the one written perhaps thirty and the other forty years afterwards. Nevertheless,
the success of any attempt to insert them according
to the period when they were first produced must often depend upon mere conjecture, and such a
plan would likewise be open to other objections. ” Upon the whole, therefore, it was thought best not
to disturb the course followed in 1780 beyond the
insertion of the four plays new to the present
edition, in vacancies occasioned by the omission of the following:
'Tis Pity she's a Whore, by John Ford. The Bird in a Cage, by James Shirley.
* In order however, to enable the reader to peruse the plays chronologically or otherwise, a list of the whole
series has been supplied in the 12th vol. made out according to the dates when they were actually, or may be supposed to have been written.
iv
The Gamester, by the same, Andromana, by the same.
. Instead of these,
The Wounds of Civil War, by Thomas Lodge.
Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay, by Robt. Greene.
Summer's Last Will and Testament, by Thomas Nash, and
Edward I. by George Peele,
have been inserted. To the twelfth volume have
also been added two very early and rare dramatic specimens—the one an Interlude, called The
Worlde and the Chylde, printed by Wynkin de Worde, in 1522, and the other, The Tragicall Comedie of Apius and Virginia, published in 1575.
have been transferred from the 12th volume of the
last edition the 1st volume the present.
Although Mr. Reed bestowed great attention
his undertaking, and removed many the imper
fections Mr. Dodsley's original collection; and although might supposed from his preface, that
consulting earlier and better copies, and collating
the plays, had rendered the text sufficiently perfect, yet the fact that performed this
irksome part the duty Editor with less care than the rest. Neither do his later MS. notes shew
For the sake of more convenient
reference, by having the introductory matter together, the Dialogue Plays and Players, called Historia Histrionica, and Sir W. Davenant's Patent 1662,
is, an
of
he
of
all by
of
be
he
it of
to
all on
of
of
on
V
that he was conscious of the defectiveness of his labours in this particular; and excepting in a very
few instances, and as applied to a very few pages, Mr. Gilchrist did not attempt to remedy How
necessary
was that such collation should
made will apparent from the many instances which the variations are now marked. In seve
ral the plays gross errors this kind had crept into almost every page; and though others they were less numerous, still they were frequent
and important. Sometimes the words the old
copies were departed from without notice necessity, and several instances, dedications,
songs, and parts the dialogue were omitted, while whole speeches were assigned wrong characters. The Editor does not make this state
ment diminish the degree gratitude due Mr. Reed for what did accomplish, nor
attract credit himself for the performance tedious and generally thankless task: mentions
regulation the metre. The old printers,
well known, were often quite regardless the verse; either, because attention requiring
too much room, did not suit the price which play was published, because the manuscript, often
surreptitiously obtained, reached them very confused and imperfect state. several places
merely
matter fact.
He aware how much might yet done the
In
to at it, by
of
or
is
at
be
in
it to in of
as all it ato be
of
to
in of
of
he
of
in * to all it.
he
a a ofasin of
is ato or be
of
a
vi
Mr. Gilchrist's suggestions in this respect have been adopted; and in general, wherever the measure could be distinctly ascertained, and restored without
violence to the text, the attempt has been made. It
has not unfrequently happened that the omission or insertion of a single unimportant word or syllable
would have accomplished the object; but the Editor preferred the observance of fidelity to any trifling
exercise of ingenuity. It may be added that Mr. Reed paid less attention to punctuation than importance the sense required.
The biographical and preliminary matter each
play has been rendered more complete than hitherto
by the improved state information regarding our
early poets and poetry: some instances has been re-written; others, entirely new, and
nearly cases, additional and perhaps useful notes have been appended. The conciseness
the plan established the outset prevented the introduction of critical remarks.
the notes generally, the Editor did not feel himself liberty make any change: they are
inserted they stood the edition 1780, while the farther MS. illustrations of Mr. Reed
and Mr. Gilchrist are given they left them. Of the printed notes, few might have been wholly omitted, some considerably abbreviated, and others advantageously altered; but under the circum
stances, was deemed prudent reprint them
it
as at
all
to
a to
in in
to all
of
it of
to
its
in as
it is
of in
in In
vii
entire. Those for which the Editor is responsible are marked with the letter C. He has been anxious
in them to avoid prolixity, and where verbal criti cism was necessary he has subjoined no more quo-
tations from contemporary writers than he thought
necessary for illustration. Perhaps the notes on
some of the plays now first re-printed would have been fewer had the Editor not been desirous to
make the whole work consistent. The new matter
by Mr. Reed and Mr. Gilchrist is distinguished by the initials of their names.
-
London, January, 1826.
C.
_---- --------------
MR. REED'S PREFACE.
THE Works of our ancient dramatic writers have suffered a very long, and, some few excepted, a very general neglect. Though possessed of innu
merable beauties, they have been known in so
imperfect a manner, that their very names have
almost escaped the readers of the present times.
The merits of writers are not always to be esti
mated from the reputation which they bear with
the public. Accident and caprice contribute to advance some authors above their due rank; and
the same causes as frequently depress below their proper stations, others who are entitled to a supe rior degree of regard. The truth of these obser vations might be illustrated by instances without number. Many productions have been at first coldly received,
which afterwards have met with the highest applause. Some have been praised and
neglected; while others, from a concurrence of circumstances in which excellence hath had no
concern, have for a time acquired a share of favour which they have been unable to retain. Such hath
X MR. REED's PREFACE.
been the revolution of taste, that not a few works
have been both applauded and condemned by the
same persons; and this will be esteemed the less
extraordinary, when it is considered how many,
who pronounce on the beauties or defects of authors, decide without any previous knowledge of
what they approve or censure, how many rely on the opinion of others, and how few are capable of exercising any judgment of their own.
To whatever cause it is to be ascribed, there can be no question but that the works of those who flourished in the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and her
successor were not until lately much studied; and
the dramatic poets were not less neglected than
their contemporary brethren. Even those who are
now held in the greatest reverence were not exempt from the same contemptuous treatment, and in
consequence of it were almost suffered to sink into oblivion and obscurity. Many parts of Shakspeare,
the God of our present idolatry, and some whole Plays, remained involved in the darkness which
change manners and customs the lapse near two centuries had occasioned; and the repu tation which our favourite author possessed de
some degree the frequent representa
very few his plays the theatres. How
was read may seen the example Sir Richard Steele, who does not appear have
pended
tion little
to
he a
in
of
be
on
at by
all in
of
of
a of
of
MR. REED's PREFACE. xi
been acquainted with so popular a play as The
Taming of a Shrew".
To account for so general a disregard towards
the early writers for the stage may not be an easy task, though it would not be difficult to prove the injustice of Many causes are assigned.
The fanaticism, which prevailed about the middle
the last century, had fatal influence over the
theatre for some time. The intemperance reli
gious zeal carried destruction along with wherever the works of taste were be met with and its
dominion continued long, that few the dra matic poets, who flourished when the civil wars broke out, remained the Restoration. The
convulsions the times, which had interrupted kind diversions, produced also change the
the people; and those who adhered their return from exile, brought home fondness for the French school, which soon superseded and sunk into disrepute the rude,
but nervous, productions their predecessors. Those who obtained the direction of dramatic
entertainments this period, had also been ba nished from their country, and had acquired the
same taste. Regularity therefore took place the wild native efforts genius, which were soon driven from the stage; the contemporaries and immediate successors Shakspeare became obso
See last Edition Shakspeare, vol. III. 586.
manners monarchy,
with them
*
of
of
of of
so
a
p.
of
at
of
to
a to
of on
a
of
it.
to
all
at
of ; in
it
be of
of
xii MR. REED's PREFACE
lete, the humour which they possessed was lost, and the allusions, which depended temporary circumstances, being forgotten, grew tasteless and insipid.
The refinements French manners also created disgust the coarseness which was com
mon the conversation our forefathers; and,
though there was improvement the morals the people, must acknowledged, that affec
tation delicacy reigned, totally inconsistent with those gross and vulgar modes expression
antiquary, than gratify taste rendered.
delicate being accustomed the improvements
which luxury and riches introduce. The polish
modern fashions agrees with the barbarity
ancient manners. The early efforts our ances tors the dramatic walk were therefore soon laid
aside: their pictures human life were exchanged
frequently
found ancient writers.
The first attempts any art are always rude and imperfect, more calculated exercise the sagacity
for scenes displaying the follies their turn, have submitted
the day; which, the same fate, being
little adapted the theatre,
evening's
this time
entertainment
gotten dramas
Vanbrugh, and Cibber, now exhibit characters almost obsolete those Ben Jonson,
Beaumont and Fletcher; and such names the latter cannot ensure continuance fame, the
the present volumes.
furnish many
the for Congreve,
a
as
to
of
a of
on
if
to to
of as of
to to
of in
as
or
of of
so
of
as
by to it be
as in at
ill
at
an of
an
at in of
bf
in in
be no
in an in of a
all
of of
MR. REED's PREFACE.
xiii
Dekkars, Middletons,
their contemporaries, must give up their claim to
Chapmans, and Marstons,
immortality
It is a misfortune which must attend all who write
for the stage, that their happiest exertions in deli
neating life and manners lose their force in the
course of a few years, and the more faithfully they
are painted, the sooner their colouring dies away.
The whimsical caprices of fashion are perpetually changing, and, as they pass daily before our eyes,
seldom leave any memorial of their existence. They sometimes are almost literally the children of a day; and, when they expire, so much of the
attraction as depends on such transient circum stances is necessarily lost. That no small stress is laid on what cannot be long relished, may be seen by the practice of modern writers. It may be asked, who has with more success than the late Mr.
Foote catched the fleeting Cynthia of a minute 2 whose dramatic pieces afforded more satisfaction on the stage 2 Yet, with that unequalled facility
transferring characters from life the theatre
which possessed, his works are already laid aside, and must, they are remembered century hence, indebted the industry some painful
searcher into antiquity for recovering lost allusions
and forgotten facts. The truth there are few \ but prefer the applause those they live with
the approbation succeeding times. Their repre
without a murmur.
of
if
to of
all
to
is,
a
be
of he
of
to
xiv MR. REED's PREFACE.
sentations therefore are often so closely connected with the fluctuations of fashion, that it has some
times been necessary for an author to be his own commentator. Cibber lived to see the characters
of his own coxcombs become obsolete ; and, not very late in life”, was obliged to point out the
distinction between the fops he had drawn, and the
new race of these insignificant beings which had
sprung up to succeed them. Can it then be won
dered at, that we no longer receive pleasure from
the exhibition of the Foppingtons and Fashions, which afforded so much entertainment to the fre
quenters of our theatres at the beginning of this
century? That the charm is now lost, must be felt
every time these characters appear on the stage. The humour of them is so interwoven with fashions now no longer familiar, that some late attempts to adapt them to modern manners have only contri
buted to destroy the remains of spirit and meaning which were left in them.
Ifthe works of writers so near our own days so
soon lose their effect, and the restoration of them
to the theatre is become a task of such difficulty, the exclusion of performances of a more remote
period will scarcely be considered as a very for midable objection to the merit of them. In fact, the same causes have had the same effects in both
cases; and at present the earliest pieces are likely. * See his Apology, p. 303. edit. 1750.
|
MR. REED's PR EFACE. XV
to be more read, and better understood, than even those of only fifty years standing. At a time when
destruction seemed to threaten most of the pro
ductions of the early stage, and after, it is to be feared, many of them were irrecoverably lost, the explanation of those writers, who may be esteemed
the classics of this country, began to engage the
attention of some of the ablest writers of the pre sent times. Struck with the absurd alterations and
wild conjectures of critics, who mangled and dis figured their authors, instead of elucidating their
obscurity, they determined to search into contem porary writers for a solution of such doubts as had been created chiefly by time. The success which attended their enquiries soon shewed the necessity
of an acquaintance with works which had until then been overlooked, to obtain a perfect knowledge of some of our most esteemed authors. It shewed
also, that many beauties had long remained un known and unnoticed; that fame had not always accompanied worth; and that those who wished for
information concerning ancient manners would not be able to obtain it so well from any other source. When the value of such kind of performances
became known, other difficulties arose; the ma terials, which were to answer these excellent pur
poses, were not to be obtained by those who were best able to make use of them. Works, which
cease to be popular, are in a short time destroyed; 3
xvi MR. REED's PREFACE.
the fugitive pieces of ages would soon perish, account the slender form their publication,
they were not from time time collected and
published manner more likely ensure their duration. As the use of such collections now
confessed on all hands, be lamented that
care was not taken sooner preserve such slight performances from the ravages time and acci
dent. What might have been accomplished with
the greatest ease the last century now become undertaking much difficulty. Many works
are totally lost; some are already become
valuable editions industry
manuscripts; and several, the best
are sought after vain. The few persons hath lately been employed,
with much credit themselves, forming collec
tions which have been singular advantage the public, may seen some late publications;
and the liberality the present age nothing
more remarkable, than the alacrity with which
the possessors such curiosities communicate them those who have occasion consult them.
The present volumes were originally compiled
exist, that Oxford.
This afterwards came into the possess
late Mr. Garrick; and, with great additions, hath
since been bequeathed him The British Museum. The mention this gentleman's name
from the only collection then known which had been formed the Earls
the
1
by by
to is
of to of
of
in inof
to to in of
it,
all
on of
of to is in
in is to is
to
as
of a
as
of
be of
to
of in
to
to be
in a
as
an
if on of
to
MR. REED’S PREFACE. xvii
naturally reminds the Editor, that he should be
deficient in point of gratitude, if he omitted to notice the readiness with which he was allowed the
free use of whatever Mr. Garrick's library contained for the service of this work. It is no extravagant compliment to the memory of a man, who hath
contributed more to the public entertainment than any person of the present age; that in this parti
cular he had, as in many other parts of his character, no superior, and scarcely an equal. His wish to forward any literary undertaking is too well known, and hath been too often acknowledged by those who were obliged to him, to need any eulo gium on this subject at present; and his death
cannot but occasion a sigh to arise in the breast of every one who had the happiness of his acquaint
ance.
As the public hath long been in possession of the
present work, it will perhaps be deemed unneces
sary to take up the reader's time in pointing out
the value of what he is about to peruse. It may, however, be with decency asserted, that it is cal
culated to afford a great degree of entertainment to
those who would be acquainted from what slight beginnings the English theatre arose to present
state aprovement. will shew the progress
genius the course more than century; and will exhibit specimen almost every author
who contributed support the stage during that
to a
C
a
its
of it
of in
of It of
xviii MR. REED's PREFACE.
period. The vices and follies, the manners, cus toms, fashions, caprices, and pursuits of our ances tors, will here pass in review before us; and in so
lively a manner, that he who would draw a com parison between the modes of living of the present and former times, may be furnished with materials
to make his judgment from. If he should chance to find anything offensive to delicacy, he will recol
lect the times in which these Plays appeared are not to be commended for the observation of a strict
decorum. There are many proofs, that the courts of Elizabeth, and her two successors, were ex
tremely licentious in conversation; and it would be vain to expect a greater degree of chastity at the
public theatres, than was to be found where Royalty
resided, especially when it is known that each sovereign was in this particular highly censurable.
The first Edition of the present Volumes was one
of the many excellent plans produced by the late
Mr. Robert Dodsley, a man to whom literature is
under so many obligations, that it would be un
pardonable to neglect this opportunity of informing
those who may have received any pleasure from the
work, that they owe it to a person whose merit and abilities raised him from an obscure situation in life
to affluence and independence. Modest, sensible, and humane, he retained the virtues which first
brought him into notice, after he had obtained wealth sufficient to satisfy every wish which could
MR. REED's PREFACE. xix
arise from the possession of
friend, encourager men
quired the esteem and respect
acquainted with him. was his happiness pass
the greater part his life with those whose names will be revered posterity; most whom was loved much for the virtues his heart, he was admired on account of his excellent
writings. After life spent the exercise social duty, fell martyr the gout,
house friend", the year 1764, when nearly arrived the age years.
every
the had
He was generous genius; and ac
who were
From this digression, may called one,
us return what introduced the former edition this collection. hath been customary with
those who have given new editions works which
have exercised the abilities other persons,
very diffuse pointing out the defects their
predecessors, and dwell with great satisfaction
on mistakes, which the most careful editors cannot
avoid falling into. This practice the more condemned, every person who has had any
concern undertakings this kind, must con vinced the fallibility claims unerring
perfection. When Mr. Dodsley undertook the present publication,the duties editor English
works were not well understood they have been since. The collation copies had not
Mr. Spence, Durham.
of in
* as
an
at
of
of
it, 61
in
it.
at
let
as he
so
to
as
of
all
of a
ofof of all
if
it of
It of
to a
as in athe
a
by of
of
It
in a
by
an toof
ofto
of to be
he at of
be
to be
to
is be of of
of
XX
MR. REED's PREFACE.
that time been practised in any case that the editor is informed of (for it is certain neither Theobald, nor any other editor of Shakespeare, nor either of
the gentlemen who had published Chaucer or Spenser, had any claim to praise on this account), and a knowledge of the writings of contemporary
authors was still less deemed necessary. In con sequence of these false ideas of the requisites which
an editor ought to possess, there are some imper fections in the former edition, which would have
been avoided had the same person lived to super
intend a republication of his work. One of these
faults arose from his reliance on the first copy of a
play, sometimes the most erroneous one, which
chance put into his hand; but the most material
was from his want of acquaintance with the litera
ture of the last century. This latter circumstance
occasioned many words and phrases which were obscure, or not understood, to be changed for
others more familiar and intelligible. As fidelity in publishing any author is an indispensable quality in
an editor, the liberty which Mr. Dodsley ventured upon is certainly not to be defended or excused. His several innovations have therefore been silently removed, without burthening the page with an unnecessary note, except where the words restored required an explanation. The different copies by
which the present edition has been collated, are set down at the end of each play.
*. . . *
MR. REED's PREFACE. xxi
In printing the text, the Editor hath been
careful not to fall into the error of his predecessor,
and therefore hath scarcely ever indulged himself in alterations from conjecture. The many experi
ments of this kind which were made by the first editors of Shakespeare and other writers, and the futility of them all, as hath appeared from the enquiries of later commentators, have sufficiently
convinced him that such a mode of getting rid of the difficulties which occur in ancient writers, is more calculated to shew the boldness of the critic,
than to give credit to his knowledge, either of the authors, or the habits, fashions, humours, or customs,
of former times. He hath, therefore, in not more than two or three instances, departed from the
text, and never without noting the variation, that no
one who may choose the rejected words, or is able to explain them to his satisfaction, may be obliged
to quit the old copies, if they shall be deemed intitled to a preference.
In commenting on the several plays, the Editor hath generally had recourse to contemporary
writers, for the explanations of words or phrases which are peculiar to the times; and the same
practice hath been observed in elucidating the particular customs which are referred to in the several volumes. In the course of these remarks,
the reader will see how much the present collection hath been indebted to the late edition of Shake
xxii MR. REED's PREFACE.
speare. As it cannot be expected that many will become purchasers of these volumes who are not possessed of that work, it hath generally been
referred to in the course of the several notes. It would be some satisfaction to the Editor, if he
could say, that the obscurities which are
found were completely explained; and sorry acknowledge, that several remain unattempted.
They are, however, not very numerous, and will,
entitled the pardon every candid To throw light every difficult passage work the present, requires more reading than can expected from any one person.
was very soon after this collection went the press, that the Editor became convinced how im
perfectly the task which had entered upon would performed, was depend entirely
his own endeavours; and, very fortunately, that aid which he wished for was offered him, the
thinks,
reader. such
politest manner, gentleman
under many great obligations, besides his commu
nications this work. When known, that him the public are indebted for the notes signed with the letter the reader will regret that there
are not greater proportion the whole number
under that signature. From another gentleman, whose knowledge antiquarian subjects the world
hath been long acquainted with, the notes marked were received; and those which have the
whom
S. P.
on
in
a
if he
to
he a be a
of
all it
is to
to
to
be
S,
by
be as
all
he in to is
is
to
he
in It
to
of to
he
on
be
quarters,
MR. REED's PREFACE.
xxiii
letter N annexed to them, are such observations as occurred to the printer of the first six volumes, in reading the proof sheets. To these gentlemen the editor esteems himself much indebted for their kindness and attention. From them arises the
principal assistance hath boast very few notes marked with different letters he was
favoured with other friends, whom begs
here make his acknowledgments. And hath
many reasons flatter himself, that the commen
tary would have been much enlarged from other
There are two alterations the present edition from the former, which he believes will need no apology. These are, the arrangement the plays,
now changed according the chronological order
which they were published, and the removal some, which were formerly printed, for others
diffidence his abilities for the under taking had not deterred him from solicitation.
which seem have fairer claim served. Some
being pre these rejected pieces have been
complete edition one author;
lately published
and the others are such have been thrown out
the advice gentleman whose sentiments concerning them must confirmed every one
who will afford them
perusal".
The following list the rejected plays:
Mustapha,
The Shepherd's Holiday, Joseph Rutter.
