It is quite
possible that the average decisions of an Athenian jury
may have been as good and satisfactory as those of an
English.
possible that the average decisions of an Athenian jury
may have been as good and satisfactory as those of an
English.
Demosthenese - 1869 - Brodribb
He could have had nothing to do but to
advise private clients. By the year 324 Alexander
had returned from that long expedition in which he
had carried his army through the heart of Asia to the
banks of the Indus. He had left behind him one of
his old Macedonian friends in the government of the
rich satrapy of Babylonia. Harpalus (this was the
> man's name) was greedy and extravagant, and wasted
the resources of his province in a luxury which he had
learnt during his residence in the East. It was said
that he loaded his table with the most costly delicacies,
and filled his gardens with exotic plants of every
variety. He had found it convenient to please the
people of Athens by splendid presents, and particu-
larly by very liberal gifts of wheat for free and general
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 148 DEJIOSTHENES.
distribution. For all this he had received votes of
thanks and been made an Athenian citizen. He was
afraid, however, to face Alexander, who, he well knew,
showed no mercy to delinquent satraps. So he fled
from Asia to Europe with an immense treasure of 5000
talents (about a million and' a quarter pounds sterling),
and landed at Cape Sunium, in Attica. He might
reasonably flatter himself that he would not be an
unwelcome visitor at Athens, but in this he was dis-
appointed. There was the fear of the wrath of
Alexander; and the fear, too, that Harpalus might
possibly intend to assume the position of a tyrant or
despot. His offers, whatever they were, were rejected;
but there was a debate in the Assembly, and a rumour
reached Alexander that Athens had received him and
his armament. This was at the time untrue; but
when he sent away his ships and asked leave to be
admitted into the city with a few personal attendants,
the people, remembering his past favours, no longer
refused. Having gained his point, he tried to per-
suade them that they might defy Alexander with a
prospect of success, and that he was himself able and
willing to furnish them with the necessary funds.
Some of the orators supported his views. But he
could do nothing with Phocion or with Demosthenes.
This was fatal to his project. Soon there came
envoys from Antipater, Alexander's deputy in Mace-
donia, requiring his surrender. But this both Phocion
and Demosthenes, notwithstanding the danger of the
crisis, opposed. So alarmed, however, were the people
at the thought of Alexander's probable vengeance, that .
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LAST DAYS OF DEMOSTIIENES. 149
they decided on arresting Harpalus and sequestrating
his treasure till they could learn what view Alexander
took of the matter; and this much they did on the
motion of Demosthenes himself. It seems possible, as
has been suggested, that Demosthenes proposed this
motion with an mfie? re-pcnse? e, and may have wished
to detain Harpalus and his treasure, and to wait the
course of events. Harpalus contrived to escape; but
his treasure--that part of it at least which he'had
brought to Athens after dismissing his fleet, and which
amounted,' according to statements made by Demos-
thenes on his authority, to about 720 talents--1-emained
behind. This, of course, ought to have been returned--
and the people were, it seems, prepared to do so; but
when the money was counted it was found that there
was no more than 350 talents, barely half the original
sum. How was the deficiency to be explained'!
There was a great stir and outcry. People said that
it must have been used in bribery, and that the
missing money must have stuck to the fingers of the
orators and public men. There was a general feeling
that somebody ought to be punished, but there was
not a scrap of evidence against any one, and no means
of procuring it.
Demosthenes proposed to have the affair investigated
by the court of Areopagus. It was not easy to see what
better course could have been taken. At the same time,
the members of that court must have felt that they could
hardly hope, under the circumstances, to arrive at a per-
fectly satisfactory' result. No doubt they commanded
the public confidence, as they were all men of age and
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 150 DEAIOSTHENES.
experience, and were from their position above the
motives which occasionally swayed other courts. Great
latitude was allowed them ; and practically they often
decided cases not simply on the evidence before them,
but on hearsay, and on that personal knowledge which
men in their rank would be sure to possess. They
took the utmost pains with the present inquiry, and
were engaged on it for six months. They went so far as
' to search the houses of the principal public men, with
the exception of one who had been lately married--an
exception perhaps to be attributed to a sense (if delicacy.
At last they published their report, with a list of the
names of persons whom they considered chargeable with
having improperly possessed themselves of the missing
money. '
In this list appeared the name of Demosthenes as
a debtor to the amount of 'twenty talents. The next
step was to give the accused parties the choice of
taking their trial or of paying the sum with which the
Areopagus had debited them. Of those brought to
trial, Demosthenes was the first. He was tried before
a jury of 1500 of his fellow-citizens, was found guilty,
a. nd sentenced to pay a fine of fifty talents (about
? 12,000). It is very possible that among the jury
which condemned him there may have been many who
wished to please Alexander, and many, too, of the
friends of Harpalus. It must, however, be remem-
bered that the decision of the Areopagus could not
fail to influence their verdict. Demosthenes would
not or could not pay the fine. He was imprisoned,
but in a few days was able to escape to Troezcn, in the
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LA ST DA Y S OF DEM OSTH ENES. '15 1
territory of Argos. It was but a few months that> he
remained there. _ _ _ .
'We can hardly bring ourselves to believe that he
was really guilty. Of course we can judge> only
by probabilities; and it is certain that the court of
Areopagus must have had grounds for their suspicion.
We must bear in mind that they merely drew up a
list of persons whose case in their opinion required
further judicial inquiry. There is no reason foriassum-
ing that they regarded the guilt of Demosthenes as
certain. The inquiry was lon,? ,r and difficult ; and the
decision ultimately arrived at could have been hardly
meant to express confident assurance. If Demosthenes
publicly stated, on Harpa1us's authority, the amount of
the treasure, it seems strange that he should have made
himself a party to the disappearance of a portion of it.
It may be that the statement he made had not been
verified by him, and it may have been altogether errone-
ous. It is pleasant to find that both Dr T hirlwalland
Mr Grote incline to acquit him of this mean dishonesty.
It may be worth while to mention a story told by Plut-
arch about this painful passage in the life of Demos-
thenes. Like many of his stories, it is probably a pure
fiction, but it is at least amusing. Harpalus, he tells
us, won over the orator to his side by sending a
singularly beautiful golden cup, his admiration of which
he had noted. Along with the cup were twenty talents,
the sum with which the Areopagus had debited him.
Shortly afterwards, when the proposals of Harpalus
were being discussed in the Assembly, Demosthenes,
who had previously oooosed them, appeared with a
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 152 DEJUOSTIIENES.
woollen bandage round his throat, and pretended that
he could not speak, from an attack of quinsy. _ Some
wag remarked that it must be the silver quinsy. The
people laughed, but were angry. Such is the story.
But, as a fact, Demosthenes did not drop his opposition
to Harpalus. It was on his motion, as we have seen, that
Harpalus was arrested and his treasure sequestrated.
We left the great orator in exile at Troezen. He was
recalled soon after the death of Alexander in 323 no.
An attempt was then made once more to rid Greece of
the Macedonian ascendancy. It was finally crushed
by Antipater in the battle of Crannon in 322 13. 0. ' The
conqueror demanded the surrender of the leading anti-
Macedonian orators--Demosthenes, of course, among
them. Athens from this moment ceased to exist as a
free state. A Macedonian garrison was introduced;
there was a wholesale disfranchisement of citizens,
and a new political constitution was imposed on the
city. Demosthenes did not remain to be a witness of
this degradation. He had been welcomed back to his
native Athens with joyful enthusiasm; now he must
leave her for ever. He took refuge in the little island
of Calauria, ofl' the coast of Argolis. It was here that
he chose to die rather than fall into the hands of the
"exile-hunters," as the emissaries of Antipater were
called. Within the precincts of an ancient temple of
Neptune, regarded of old as an inviolable sanctuary,
he swallowed poison, retaining in his last moments
sufiicient presence of mind to expire outside the sacred
enclosure, to which, in Greek belief, death would have
been a pollution.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? CHAPTER XIV.
nsuosrnmnzs AT THE mu.
Ir has seemed most convenient not to interrupt our
sketch of the political career of Demosthenes with_
any allusions to his purelyr forensic engagements. He
became, comparatively early in 1ife--that is to say, when
he was probably under thirty years of age--a very suc-
cessful pleader in large practice. It may be as well now
to give the reader some idea of the work with which he
was occupied, and of the speeches which in this capa-
city he was called on to deliver.
At Athens there was no separate and distinct class
answering to our bar. But there were professional
orators and rhetoricians in abundance, who made it
their business to compose speeches for plaintiffs and
defendants. They did not, however, as a rule, make
the speeches themselves; they merely prepared them
and put them in the hands of their clients, who com-
mitted them to memory and then addressed the court.
Of course it would often happen that a man felt him-
self quite unequal to such an ordeal, and would get an
experienced speaker to plead for him. Most, however,
of the forensic speeches of Demosthenes which have
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 154 DEMOSTHENES.
come down to us, were written for delivery by the
plaintiff or the defendant in person. Part of the
orator's art consisted in adapting them to the style and
manner of man his client happened to be. This cir-
cumstance often gives piquancy to these speeches.
They abound in amusing passages illustrative of
many varieties of Athenian life. VVe have descrip
tive touches of the peculiar ways of the commercial
rogue, of the money-lender, of the fraudulent trustee.
Fortune has been kind in preserving for us something
like thirty orations of Demosthenes, in which these and
kindred figures present themselves to our notice. We
thus peep into the banking-house and the factory, and
see the Athenian citizen bargaining with merchants and
shipowners, or busy with his farm, or making his last
will and testament.
Athens was a city in which lawsuits could not fail
to be plentiful. It was a centre of trade, and a resort
of foreigners from all parts. Then, too, there were the
mines of Laurium along the coast; there were quarries
of marble ; and the adjacent seas were famous for their
fisheries. Athenian manufactures, too, were highly
prized. From the shores of the Black Sea and the
islands of the ZEgean there was a good trade in corn,
timber, wine, and wool. Here were all the materials
of commerce, and consequently of litigation. Many
an Athenian citizen was himself in business; and the
city seems to have swarmed with bustling, enterprising
foreigners who found it convenient to make it their
home. The law courts had plenty of work to do--so
much so, indeed, that the " law's delay " appears to have
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 155
been as familiar to Athenians as to ourselves. " Some
people," says Xenophen, if he really wrote the treatise
attributed to him on the Athenian republic, " complain
that a man often waits a twelvemonth at Athens before
he can obtain an audience of the Senate or of the
popular assembly. The fact is, they have so much to
do there that it is impossible to attend to every man's
application; some, therefore, are compelled to. go away
unheard. " Ill-natured persons, it seems, hinted that
anybody could obtain a hearing by means of a bribe.
Xenophon admits that there may be some truth in this ;
but he adds, speaking from his own knowledge, "that
for no amount of gold and silver which could be offered
would it be possible for the Athenians to transact all
the business that is brought before them. " Athens, in
fact, was the place to which nearly all causes from the
islands of the Higean were brought for trial; and to
which, too, it was probably best and safest that they
should be brought. Athenian trials were conducted in
a way which to us seems singular, and which at first sight
might appear very unfavourable to the administration
of justice. Causes were heard, as with us, before juries;
but at Athens a jury commonly numbered 500, and
might number 1000 or even more. It was, in fact,
trial before a popular assembly. There was a president,
but he was not armed with the controlling powers of
an English judge. Everything was left to the jury;
the law of the case as well as the facts was for them to
decide. To us this may seem the height of absurdity ;
but still at Athens it worked moderately well, and in a
majority of cases we may believe that it secured at
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 156 _ DEMOSTHENES.
least substantial justice. The Athenian juror, it is
true, had not received what we call a lege? il education ;
but he was naturally critical and sharp-witted, and he
was well practised in the hearing of causes.
It is quite
possible that the average decisions of an Athenian jury
may have been as good and satisfactory as those of an
English. There was, of course, a danger of their being
swayed too much at times by political considerations.
But to this we know that an English jury is also liable.
There was another and a worse danger. The popula-
tion of Athens was comparatively small; and so it
would often happen that plaintiff and defendant, and the
case at issue between them, would be well known to the
jurors. The Athenian pleader was continually' appeal-
ingt6 the personal knowledge of the jury, and would
in this manner supplement deficiencies in the evidence.
" He is a scoundrel ; you all know him to be one,"---
this was the sort of language commonly addressed to a
jury at Athens. Alsehines, in prosecuting one Timar-
chus, dwells on the notoriety of the ma. n's guilt and
wickedness--~" Such," he says, "is the testimony of the
whole people of Athens, and it is not right that they
should be convicted of perjury. " This strikes us as
a very loose method of procedure. Yet we find it
repeatedly in the speeches of Demosthenes. And it is
what we must expect where the judicial system is made
thoroughly democratic. We must not be surprised at
the savage invective with which the greatest Athenian
orators thought it seemly to interlard their speeches.
Even with us and all our restrictions, advocates contrive
occasionally to indulge in considerable licence, and did
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 157
so formerly to a much greater extent ; and it is, perhaps,
a question whether some of the most offensive passages
in Demosthenes and Aischines might not be paralleled
from English pleadings.
Another evil of the Athenian judicial system was the
division of responsibility. One out of 500 or 1000
jurors might very well shelter himself under the excuse,
that if he decided wrongly from carelessness or parti-
alit , the result would not be muchyaffectcd. On the
other hand, there were advantages which will occur to
the minds of those who are acquainted with the history
of free institutions. Corruption and bribery cannot have
been particularly easy. Nor, again, could anything like
ixitir'nidation be well practised. The fact, too, that rich
and poor were brought together to discharge an import-
ant public function, would have a salutary effect. It
would make them feel that they were members of one
commonwealth, and inspire them with a respect for its
laws. It would call out many of their best sentiments,
as well as sharpen their intellects. Their decisions
may have sometimes been such as we with our modern
ideas cannot approve; but, on the whole, it may be
assumed that they commanded the confidence of the
people. The Athenian may have had a perverse fond-
ness for listening to the wranglings of rival plead-
ers ; but he did his best generally to hear both sides
fairly, and to decide rightly. The jury system, with all
its accompaniments of trained oratory and carefully-
composed speeches, was contemporaneous with the
marvellous development of Athenian literature in the
age of Pericles. To it we are certainly indebted
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 158 DEMOSTHENES.
for some of the most splendid monuments of hmiran'
genius.
Such numerous juries could hardly have been fit to
deal with cases involving a multitude of intricate de-
tails connected with money accounts or valuations of
property. Matters of this kind were usually referred,
as with us, to a court of arbitration--public arbitra-
tors being annually appointed. Of these we hear con-
tinually in the forensic speeches of the Athenian
orators, and we may take it for granted that much of
the law business was disposed of by them. Indeed,
it was the regular practice to submit ordinary private
disputes to arbitrators in the first instance; but,
as might have been expected in a democratic state,
there was always an appeal from their decisions to a
jury.
On the whole, it is not unlikely that justice was
fairly well administered in the Athenian courts. Such,
at all events, seems to have been the opinion of the
Greek world; and we can hardly suppose that that
opinion was without foundation. Some of the draw-
backs of the system have been already noted, and they
were no doubt considerable. A clerrer and unscrupulous
advocate might have had a better chance at Athensthan
he would have with us. It is, of course, an immense
advantage that atrained lawyer should preside over a
court, and sum up the case, and point out to the jury
the general principles by which they should be guided.
It is probable that the want of this was often felt
at Athens, and led occasionally to unfortunate results.
Still, we may be sure that the average Athenian was
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 159
a man of intelligence, and perfectly open to reason.
Practice, too, made him tolerably well acquainted with
his country's laws. It is the greatest mistake to con-
ceive of Athens as " a fierce democracy. " Her citizens
were for the most part moderately-cultivated persons,
of a tolerant temper, and willing to obey the laws and
the constitution. A successful Athenian advocate must
have come up to a rather high standard ;_ and if
his invective was sometimes coarse and offensively
personal, it must have been set off by a certain
amount of wit, and have been accompanied with acute
reasoning. '
Much of the litigation at Athens arose out of bot-/'~'
tomry cases--that is, loans of moncy on the security of
a ship or of its cargo. Business of this kind was trans-
acted on a great scale; and as the risk was consider-
able, the interest charged was high--as much some-
times as thirty per cent. There seem to have been end-
less trickeries connected with it. One of Demosthenes'
speeches, for instance, was on behalf of two joint lenders
who had advanced some money on the security of a
wine cargo. Two brothers, merchants of Phaselis in
Pamphylia, were the borrowers. Phaselis, it appears;
had a very bad commercial reputation; and there were
said to be more actions brought against its traders at
Athens than against all the other traders put together.
In this case Demosthenes' client stated that the bor-
rowers of his moneyhad broken their agreement---" that
they had not shipped the stipulated quantity of wine ;
that they had raised a further loan on the same secu-
rity; that they had not purchased a sufficient return
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 160 DEMOSTHENES.
cargo; that, on their return, they had not entered the
regular port of Athens, but had put into a little obscure
harbour known as ' Smugglers' Creek; ' and that, when
the repayment of the loan was demanded, they falsely
represented that the vessel had been wrecked. " Before
the matter was settled, one of the borrowers died, and
his property went to his brother, Lacritus, who, accord-
ing to the lenders' statement, had verbally engaged to
see that the loan should be repaid. So Lacritus was
sued for the amount, although very possibly he was
not legally liable, and may merely have been a "referee "
for his brother, and have stated, as such, that to the
best of his belief they were solvent. He was a man
of some note, having been a pupil of Isocrates, and
being himself a rather celebrated teacher of rhetoric.
He was, in fact, what the Greeks called a "sophist. "
On this he seems to have presumed; and he went
about bragging of his connection with "the great Iso-
crates. " Demosthenes makes his client say: "These
sophists are 'a bad lot. ' It is no affair of mine if a
man chooses to be a sophist, and to pay fees to Isocra-
tes ; but they must not, because they think themselves
clever, be allowed to swindle other people out of their
money. Lacritus does not trust to the justice of his
case; but he thinks that, as he has learnt oratory, he
shall be able to make you think exactly what he pleases.
Perhaps, as he is so clever, he will undertake to prove
that black is white--that the money was never bor-
rowed at all--or that it has been paid---or that the
bond is waste paper--or that the borrowers had a right
to use our money as they liked. " It is possible, as has
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 161
been supposed, that Demosthenes is really hitting at
Isoerates in his abuse of Lacritus. '
In one of his speeches he argues against the right of
a man to take a name already borne by one of his
brothers. The case is a rather singular one. Manti-
theus, the son of Mantias, brings an action against his
half-brother Boeotus for having got himself registered
as Mantitheus. Boeotus was the son of Mantias by a
mistress, herself an Athenian citizen, and so capable,
according to Athenian law, of transmitting citizenship
to her offspring. Every citizen's child was enrolled or
registered on the citizen-list at an early age, and then
again subsequently on reaching manhood. Boeotus
received his name on the first of these occasions. Be-
fore the second registration had taken place, his father
died. Disliking the name, which suggested a familiar
Greek proverb, "like a Boeotian hog," he contrived on
this second occasion to get himself enrolled under his
brother's name of Mantitheus. In this manner the '
legal designation of the two brothers became the same.
It should be noted that at Athens a citizen was de- ; _'
scribed by his own name, by that of his father, and:'T1.
that of his parish or township--Attica being divided it
into so many townships, or domes, as they were called.
In a comparatively small community this might not
be inconvenient. What, however, Bocotus had done,
could hardly fail to lead to confusion. His half-
brother, in the speech composed for him by Demos-
thenes, hints that matters would be all the worse, as
Jlceotus kept rather questionable company. Unpleasant
mistakes, too, as he points out, would probably arise
A. 0. S. B. vol. iv. 1,
I
u
U
x
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 162 DEMOS THENES.
out of unpaid debts and appearances in the law courts.
In fact, the son of the lawful wife would often be
credited with the scrapes into which the son of the
mistress was likely to get himself.
"You tiresome Boeotus," says Demosthenes' client,
who really seems to have been a much-injured man,
"I would wish you, if possible, to renounce all
your bad ways; but if that is too much to hope,
pray oblige me to this extent: cease to give your-
self trouble; cease to harass me with litigation; be
content that you have gained a franchise, a property,
a father. No one seeks to dispossess you ; nor do
I. If, as you pretend to be a brother, you act
like a brother, people will believe that you are my
kinsman. But if you plot against me, go to law with
me, envy me, slander me, it will be thought that you
have intruded into a strange family, and treat the
members as if they were alien to you. As to me per-
sonally, however wrong my father may have been in
refusing to acknowledge you, I certainly am innocent.
It was not my business to know who were his sons;
it was for him to show me whom I was to regard as
brothers. As long as he forebore to acknowledge you,
I held you no kinsman; ever since he acknowledged
you, I have regarded you as he did. You have had
your portion of the inheritance after my father's death;
you participate in our religious worship, in our civil
rights--no one excludes you from these. What woull
you have'! Whoever hears the name will have to ask
which of us two are meant; then, if the person means
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 163
you, he will reply, ' The one whom Mantias was com-
pelled to adopt. ' Do you wish for this 'l "
We pass to quite a different case. It is a dis-
pute between two neighbouring Attic farmcrs. * Their
holdings were in a hilly part of Attica, and were
separated by a public road. It is an action for damages
which the plaintiff, Callicles, alleged that he had sus-
tained through the obstruction of a water-course, which
carried off the drainage from the surrounding hills.
The defendaut's father had built a wall on his land,
with the view of diverting the water into the road.
It seems that in Attica a proprietor might turn off his
drainage into a public way, to the great detriment, as
may well be supposed, of the country roads, which, in
hilly districts, must at times have been almost impas-
sable. The effect of the wall in this case was, that
after heavy rains the plaintifi"s farm was overflowed,
as well as the road. For this the plaintiff brought his
action. The defendant, Demosthenes' client, pleaded
in justification that the well in question had been law-
fully erected by his father fifteen years ago; that no
objection was then raised by the plaintiffs family;
that the so-called watercourse was not really a water-
course, but was part of his own land, as it was planted
with fruittrees, and contained an old family burial-
ground. The stream, too, which caused the mischief,
did not come to the defendant from a neighbour's
farm ; it flowed down the road both above and below
him: the flood which it occasioned in wet weather was
' Speech against Callicles.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 164 DEMOSTHENES.
a natural misfortune, from 'which others had suffered as
well as the plaintifi'--only, they had never thought of
going to law about it. The defendant broadly hints
that the plaintiff has an eye to his property, and is
trying to oust him from it by a vexatious action. The
matter in dispute was trifling enough, and the must have been inclined to laugh at the solemnity with
which they were implored to give their best attention
to all the details of the case. "There is no greater
nuisance" (so the defendant begins his pleading) " than
a covetous neighbour, which it has been my lot to
meet with. Callicles has set his heart on my land, and
worries me with litigation. First he got his cousin to
claim it from me, but I defeated that claim. I beseech
you all to hear me with attention--not because I am
any speaker, but that you may learn by the facts how
groundless the action is. " After he has explained the
facts, he asks pathetically what he is to do with the
'water, if he may not drain it off either into the public
road or into private ground. " Surely," he adds, with
a touch of bucolic humour, "the plaintiff won't force
me to drink it up 'Q " The damage done could not have
been very ruinous, if we may judge from a single
specimen. It appears that the mothers of the two
litigants used to visit each other, as country neighbours;
and on one occasion, when the defendant's mother was
calling at the plaintiffs house, she found the family
plunged in the deepest distress, and apparently crushed
by some more than ordinary calamity. It would seem
that the rustic mind then, as now, was peculiarly
sensitive to the most ludicrously trifling loss, and
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 165
delighted in describing it with the most violent exag-
geration. The injured farmer's wife, on this occasion,
pointed with tears to four bushels of barley which had
got wet and were being dried, and to a jar of oil,
which had indeed fallen down, but which was not
damaged. For this they wanted to claim, according to
the defendant, 1000 drachms, or about ? 40, by way of
compensation. An Attic farmer, it would seem (like
his English representative), was not likely to suffer
from asking too little. There is something very
characteristic in the following remark, which Demos-
thenes' client makes about his opponent: "In going
to law with me," he says, " I hold the plaintiif to be
thoroughly wicked and infatuated. "
In another * somewhat interesting case, Demosthenes
pleads for an unfortunate man who had been ejected
from his township, and was thereby in danger of ceasing
_ to be an Athenian citizen. At Athens, citizenship was
the subject of the strictest scrutiny; and the registers of
the townships were kept with the utmost care. Every
citizen, as has been already noted, had to be twice
registered; and to insure accuracy, and to exclude
questionable persons, the lists were from time to time
revised. Even with all these precautions, cases of
disputed citizenship not unfrequently occurred.
advise private clients. By the year 324 Alexander
had returned from that long expedition in which he
had carried his army through the heart of Asia to the
banks of the Indus. He had left behind him one of
his old Macedonian friends in the government of the
rich satrapy of Babylonia. Harpalus (this was the
> man's name) was greedy and extravagant, and wasted
the resources of his province in a luxury which he had
learnt during his residence in the East. It was said
that he loaded his table with the most costly delicacies,
and filled his gardens with exotic plants of every
variety. He had found it convenient to please the
people of Athens by splendid presents, and particu-
larly by very liberal gifts of wheat for free and general
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 148 DEJIOSTHENES.
distribution. For all this he had received votes of
thanks and been made an Athenian citizen. He was
afraid, however, to face Alexander, who, he well knew,
showed no mercy to delinquent satraps. So he fled
from Asia to Europe with an immense treasure of 5000
talents (about a million and' a quarter pounds sterling),
and landed at Cape Sunium, in Attica. He might
reasonably flatter himself that he would not be an
unwelcome visitor at Athens, but in this he was dis-
appointed. There was the fear of the wrath of
Alexander; and the fear, too, that Harpalus might
possibly intend to assume the position of a tyrant or
despot. His offers, whatever they were, were rejected;
but there was a debate in the Assembly, and a rumour
reached Alexander that Athens had received him and
his armament. This was at the time untrue; but
when he sent away his ships and asked leave to be
admitted into the city with a few personal attendants,
the people, remembering his past favours, no longer
refused. Having gained his point, he tried to per-
suade them that they might defy Alexander with a
prospect of success, and that he was himself able and
willing to furnish them with the necessary funds.
Some of the orators supported his views. But he
could do nothing with Phocion or with Demosthenes.
This was fatal to his project. Soon there came
envoys from Antipater, Alexander's deputy in Mace-
donia, requiring his surrender. But this both Phocion
and Demosthenes, notwithstanding the danger of the
crisis, opposed. So alarmed, however, were the people
at the thought of Alexander's probable vengeance, that .
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LAST DAYS OF DEMOSTIIENES. 149
they decided on arresting Harpalus and sequestrating
his treasure till they could learn what view Alexander
took of the matter; and this much they did on the
motion of Demosthenes himself. It seems possible, as
has been suggested, that Demosthenes proposed this
motion with an mfie? re-pcnse? e, and may have wished
to detain Harpalus and his treasure, and to wait the
course of events. Harpalus contrived to escape; but
his treasure--that part of it at least which he'had
brought to Athens after dismissing his fleet, and which
amounted,' according to statements made by Demos-
thenes on his authority, to about 720 talents--1-emained
behind. This, of course, ought to have been returned--
and the people were, it seems, prepared to do so; but
when the money was counted it was found that there
was no more than 350 talents, barely half the original
sum. How was the deficiency to be explained'!
There was a great stir and outcry. People said that
it must have been used in bribery, and that the
missing money must have stuck to the fingers of the
orators and public men. There was a general feeling
that somebody ought to be punished, but there was
not a scrap of evidence against any one, and no means
of procuring it.
Demosthenes proposed to have the affair investigated
by the court of Areopagus. It was not easy to see what
better course could have been taken. At the same time,
the members of that court must have felt that they could
hardly hope, under the circumstances, to arrive at a per-
fectly satisfactory' result. No doubt they commanded
the public confidence, as they were all men of age and
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 150 DEAIOSTHENES.
experience, and were from their position above the
motives which occasionally swayed other courts. Great
latitude was allowed them ; and practically they often
decided cases not simply on the evidence before them,
but on hearsay, and on that personal knowledge which
men in their rank would be sure to possess. They
took the utmost pains with the present inquiry, and
were engaged on it for six months. They went so far as
' to search the houses of the principal public men, with
the exception of one who had been lately married--an
exception perhaps to be attributed to a sense (if delicacy.
At last they published their report, with a list of the
names of persons whom they considered chargeable with
having improperly possessed themselves of the missing
money. '
In this list appeared the name of Demosthenes as
a debtor to the amount of 'twenty talents. The next
step was to give the accused parties the choice of
taking their trial or of paying the sum with which the
Areopagus had debited them. Of those brought to
trial, Demosthenes was the first. He was tried before
a jury of 1500 of his fellow-citizens, was found guilty,
a. nd sentenced to pay a fine of fifty talents (about
? 12,000). It is very possible that among the jury
which condemned him there may have been many who
wished to please Alexander, and many, too, of the
friends of Harpalus. It must, however, be remem-
bered that the decision of the Areopagus could not
fail to influence their verdict. Demosthenes would
not or could not pay the fine. He was imprisoned,
but in a few days was able to escape to Troezcn, in the
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LA ST DA Y S OF DEM OSTH ENES. '15 1
territory of Argos. It was but a few months that> he
remained there. _ _ _ .
'We can hardly bring ourselves to believe that he
was really guilty. Of course we can judge> only
by probabilities; and it is certain that the court of
Areopagus must have had grounds for their suspicion.
We must bear in mind that they merely drew up a
list of persons whose case in their opinion required
further judicial inquiry. There is no reason foriassum-
ing that they regarded the guilt of Demosthenes as
certain. The inquiry was lon,? ,r and difficult ; and the
decision ultimately arrived at could have been hardly
meant to express confident assurance. If Demosthenes
publicly stated, on Harpa1us's authority, the amount of
the treasure, it seems strange that he should have made
himself a party to the disappearance of a portion of it.
It may be that the statement he made had not been
verified by him, and it may have been altogether errone-
ous. It is pleasant to find that both Dr T hirlwalland
Mr Grote incline to acquit him of this mean dishonesty.
It may be worth while to mention a story told by Plut-
arch about this painful passage in the life of Demos-
thenes. Like many of his stories, it is probably a pure
fiction, but it is at least amusing. Harpalus, he tells
us, won over the orator to his side by sending a
singularly beautiful golden cup, his admiration of which
he had noted. Along with the cup were twenty talents,
the sum with which the Areopagus had debited him.
Shortly afterwards, when the proposals of Harpalus
were being discussed in the Assembly, Demosthenes,
who had previously oooosed them, appeared with a
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 152 DEJUOSTIIENES.
woollen bandage round his throat, and pretended that
he could not speak, from an attack of quinsy. _ Some
wag remarked that it must be the silver quinsy. The
people laughed, but were angry. Such is the story.
But, as a fact, Demosthenes did not drop his opposition
to Harpalus. It was on his motion, as we have seen, that
Harpalus was arrested and his treasure sequestrated.
We left the great orator in exile at Troezen. He was
recalled soon after the death of Alexander in 323 no.
An attempt was then made once more to rid Greece of
the Macedonian ascendancy. It was finally crushed
by Antipater in the battle of Crannon in 322 13. 0. ' The
conqueror demanded the surrender of the leading anti-
Macedonian orators--Demosthenes, of course, among
them. Athens from this moment ceased to exist as a
free state. A Macedonian garrison was introduced;
there was a wholesale disfranchisement of citizens,
and a new political constitution was imposed on the
city. Demosthenes did not remain to be a witness of
this degradation. He had been welcomed back to his
native Athens with joyful enthusiasm; now he must
leave her for ever. He took refuge in the little island
of Calauria, ofl' the coast of Argolis. It was here that
he chose to die rather than fall into the hands of the
"exile-hunters," as the emissaries of Antipater were
called. Within the precincts of an ancient temple of
Neptune, regarded of old as an inviolable sanctuary,
he swallowed poison, retaining in his last moments
sufiicient presence of mind to expire outside the sacred
enclosure, to which, in Greek belief, death would have
been a pollution.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? CHAPTER XIV.
nsuosrnmnzs AT THE mu.
Ir has seemed most convenient not to interrupt our
sketch of the political career of Demosthenes with_
any allusions to his purelyr forensic engagements. He
became, comparatively early in 1ife--that is to say, when
he was probably under thirty years of age--a very suc-
cessful pleader in large practice. It may be as well now
to give the reader some idea of the work with which he
was occupied, and of the speeches which in this capa-
city he was called on to deliver.
At Athens there was no separate and distinct class
answering to our bar. But there were professional
orators and rhetoricians in abundance, who made it
their business to compose speeches for plaintiffs and
defendants. They did not, however, as a rule, make
the speeches themselves; they merely prepared them
and put them in the hands of their clients, who com-
mitted them to memory and then addressed the court.
Of course it would often happen that a man felt him-
self quite unequal to such an ordeal, and would get an
experienced speaker to plead for him. Most, however,
of the forensic speeches of Demosthenes which have
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 154 DEMOSTHENES.
come down to us, were written for delivery by the
plaintiff or the defendant in person. Part of the
orator's art consisted in adapting them to the style and
manner of man his client happened to be. This cir-
cumstance often gives piquancy to these speeches.
They abound in amusing passages illustrative of
many varieties of Athenian life. VVe have descrip
tive touches of the peculiar ways of the commercial
rogue, of the money-lender, of the fraudulent trustee.
Fortune has been kind in preserving for us something
like thirty orations of Demosthenes, in which these and
kindred figures present themselves to our notice. We
thus peep into the banking-house and the factory, and
see the Athenian citizen bargaining with merchants and
shipowners, or busy with his farm, or making his last
will and testament.
Athens was a city in which lawsuits could not fail
to be plentiful. It was a centre of trade, and a resort
of foreigners from all parts. Then, too, there were the
mines of Laurium along the coast; there were quarries
of marble ; and the adjacent seas were famous for their
fisheries. Athenian manufactures, too, were highly
prized. From the shores of the Black Sea and the
islands of the ZEgean there was a good trade in corn,
timber, wine, and wool. Here were all the materials
of commerce, and consequently of litigation. Many
an Athenian citizen was himself in business; and the
city seems to have swarmed with bustling, enterprising
foreigners who found it convenient to make it their
home. The law courts had plenty of work to do--so
much so, indeed, that the " law's delay " appears to have
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 155
been as familiar to Athenians as to ourselves. " Some
people," says Xenophen, if he really wrote the treatise
attributed to him on the Athenian republic, " complain
that a man often waits a twelvemonth at Athens before
he can obtain an audience of the Senate or of the
popular assembly. The fact is, they have so much to
do there that it is impossible to attend to every man's
application; some, therefore, are compelled to. go away
unheard. " Ill-natured persons, it seems, hinted that
anybody could obtain a hearing by means of a bribe.
Xenophon admits that there may be some truth in this ;
but he adds, speaking from his own knowledge, "that
for no amount of gold and silver which could be offered
would it be possible for the Athenians to transact all
the business that is brought before them. " Athens, in
fact, was the place to which nearly all causes from the
islands of the Higean were brought for trial; and to
which, too, it was probably best and safest that they
should be brought. Athenian trials were conducted in
a way which to us seems singular, and which at first sight
might appear very unfavourable to the administration
of justice. Causes were heard, as with us, before juries;
but at Athens a jury commonly numbered 500, and
might number 1000 or even more. It was, in fact,
trial before a popular assembly. There was a president,
but he was not armed with the controlling powers of
an English judge. Everything was left to the jury;
the law of the case as well as the facts was for them to
decide. To us this may seem the height of absurdity ;
but still at Athens it worked moderately well, and in a
majority of cases we may believe that it secured at
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 156 _ DEMOSTHENES.
least substantial justice. The Athenian juror, it is
true, had not received what we call a lege? il education ;
but he was naturally critical and sharp-witted, and he
was well practised in the hearing of causes.
It is quite
possible that the average decisions of an Athenian jury
may have been as good and satisfactory as those of an
English. There was, of course, a danger of their being
swayed too much at times by political considerations.
But to this we know that an English jury is also liable.
There was another and a worse danger. The popula-
tion of Athens was comparatively small; and so it
would often happen that plaintiff and defendant, and the
case at issue between them, would be well known to the
jurors. The Athenian pleader was continually' appeal-
ingt6 the personal knowledge of the jury, and would
in this manner supplement deficiencies in the evidence.
" He is a scoundrel ; you all know him to be one,"---
this was the sort of language commonly addressed to a
jury at Athens. Alsehines, in prosecuting one Timar-
chus, dwells on the notoriety of the ma. n's guilt and
wickedness--~" Such," he says, "is the testimony of the
whole people of Athens, and it is not right that they
should be convicted of perjury. " This strikes us as
a very loose method of procedure. Yet we find it
repeatedly in the speeches of Demosthenes. And it is
what we must expect where the judicial system is made
thoroughly democratic. We must not be surprised at
the savage invective with which the greatest Athenian
orators thought it seemly to interlard their speeches.
Even with us and all our restrictions, advocates contrive
occasionally to indulge in considerable licence, and did
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 157
so formerly to a much greater extent ; and it is, perhaps,
a question whether some of the most offensive passages
in Demosthenes and Aischines might not be paralleled
from English pleadings.
Another evil of the Athenian judicial system was the
division of responsibility. One out of 500 or 1000
jurors might very well shelter himself under the excuse,
that if he decided wrongly from carelessness or parti-
alit , the result would not be muchyaffectcd. On the
other hand, there were advantages which will occur to
the minds of those who are acquainted with the history
of free institutions. Corruption and bribery cannot have
been particularly easy. Nor, again, could anything like
ixitir'nidation be well practised. The fact, too, that rich
and poor were brought together to discharge an import-
ant public function, would have a salutary effect. It
would make them feel that they were members of one
commonwealth, and inspire them with a respect for its
laws. It would call out many of their best sentiments,
as well as sharpen their intellects. Their decisions
may have sometimes been such as we with our modern
ideas cannot approve; but, on the whole, it may be
assumed that they commanded the confidence of the
people. The Athenian may have had a perverse fond-
ness for listening to the wranglings of rival plead-
ers ; but he did his best generally to hear both sides
fairly, and to decide rightly. The jury system, with all
its accompaniments of trained oratory and carefully-
composed speeches, was contemporaneous with the
marvellous development of Athenian literature in the
age of Pericles. To it we are certainly indebted
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 158 DEMOSTHENES.
for some of the most splendid monuments of hmiran'
genius.
Such numerous juries could hardly have been fit to
deal with cases involving a multitude of intricate de-
tails connected with money accounts or valuations of
property. Matters of this kind were usually referred,
as with us, to a court of arbitration--public arbitra-
tors being annually appointed. Of these we hear con-
tinually in the forensic speeches of the Athenian
orators, and we may take it for granted that much of
the law business was disposed of by them. Indeed,
it was the regular practice to submit ordinary private
disputes to arbitrators in the first instance; but,
as might have been expected in a democratic state,
there was always an appeal from their decisions to a
jury.
On the whole, it is not unlikely that justice was
fairly well administered in the Athenian courts. Such,
at all events, seems to have been the opinion of the
Greek world; and we can hardly suppose that that
opinion was without foundation. Some of the draw-
backs of the system have been already noted, and they
were no doubt considerable. A clerrer and unscrupulous
advocate might have had a better chance at Athensthan
he would have with us. It is, of course, an immense
advantage that atrained lawyer should preside over a
court, and sum up the case, and point out to the jury
the general principles by which they should be guided.
It is probable that the want of this was often felt
at Athens, and led occasionally to unfortunate results.
Still, we may be sure that the average Athenian was
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 159
a man of intelligence, and perfectly open to reason.
Practice, too, made him tolerably well acquainted with
his country's laws. It is the greatest mistake to con-
ceive of Athens as " a fierce democracy. " Her citizens
were for the most part moderately-cultivated persons,
of a tolerant temper, and willing to obey the laws and
the constitution. A successful Athenian advocate must
have come up to a rather high standard ;_ and if
his invective was sometimes coarse and offensively
personal, it must have been set off by a certain
amount of wit, and have been accompanied with acute
reasoning. '
Much of the litigation at Athens arose out of bot-/'~'
tomry cases--that is, loans of moncy on the security of
a ship or of its cargo. Business of this kind was trans-
acted on a great scale; and as the risk was consider-
able, the interest charged was high--as much some-
times as thirty per cent. There seem to have been end-
less trickeries connected with it. One of Demosthenes'
speeches, for instance, was on behalf of two joint lenders
who had advanced some money on the security of a
wine cargo. Two brothers, merchants of Phaselis in
Pamphylia, were the borrowers. Phaselis, it appears;
had a very bad commercial reputation; and there were
said to be more actions brought against its traders at
Athens than against all the other traders put together.
In this case Demosthenes' client stated that the bor-
rowers of his moneyhad broken their agreement---" that
they had not shipped the stipulated quantity of wine ;
that they had raised a further loan on the same secu-
rity; that they had not purchased a sufficient return
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 160 DEMOSTHENES.
cargo; that, on their return, they had not entered the
regular port of Athens, but had put into a little obscure
harbour known as ' Smugglers' Creek; ' and that, when
the repayment of the loan was demanded, they falsely
represented that the vessel had been wrecked. " Before
the matter was settled, one of the borrowers died, and
his property went to his brother, Lacritus, who, accord-
ing to the lenders' statement, had verbally engaged to
see that the loan should be repaid. So Lacritus was
sued for the amount, although very possibly he was
not legally liable, and may merely have been a "referee "
for his brother, and have stated, as such, that to the
best of his belief they were solvent. He was a man
of some note, having been a pupil of Isocrates, and
being himself a rather celebrated teacher of rhetoric.
He was, in fact, what the Greeks called a "sophist. "
On this he seems to have presumed; and he went
about bragging of his connection with "the great Iso-
crates. " Demosthenes makes his client say: "These
sophists are 'a bad lot. ' It is no affair of mine if a
man chooses to be a sophist, and to pay fees to Isocra-
tes ; but they must not, because they think themselves
clever, be allowed to swindle other people out of their
money. Lacritus does not trust to the justice of his
case; but he thinks that, as he has learnt oratory, he
shall be able to make you think exactly what he pleases.
Perhaps, as he is so clever, he will undertake to prove
that black is white--that the money was never bor-
rowed at all--or that it has been paid---or that the
bond is waste paper--or that the borrowers had a right
to use our money as they liked. " It is possible, as has
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 161
been supposed, that Demosthenes is really hitting at
Isoerates in his abuse of Lacritus. '
In one of his speeches he argues against the right of
a man to take a name already borne by one of his
brothers. The case is a rather singular one. Manti-
theus, the son of Mantias, brings an action against his
half-brother Boeotus for having got himself registered
as Mantitheus. Boeotus was the son of Mantias by a
mistress, herself an Athenian citizen, and so capable,
according to Athenian law, of transmitting citizenship
to her offspring. Every citizen's child was enrolled or
registered on the citizen-list at an early age, and then
again subsequently on reaching manhood. Boeotus
received his name on the first of these occasions. Be-
fore the second registration had taken place, his father
died. Disliking the name, which suggested a familiar
Greek proverb, "like a Boeotian hog," he contrived on
this second occasion to get himself enrolled under his
brother's name of Mantitheus. In this manner the '
legal designation of the two brothers became the same.
It should be noted that at Athens a citizen was de- ; _'
scribed by his own name, by that of his father, and:'T1.
that of his parish or township--Attica being divided it
into so many townships, or domes, as they were called.
In a comparatively small community this might not
be inconvenient. What, however, Bocotus had done,
could hardly fail to lead to confusion. His half-
brother, in the speech composed for him by Demos-
thenes, hints that matters would be all the worse, as
Jlceotus kept rather questionable company. Unpleasant
mistakes, too, as he points out, would probably arise
A. 0. S. B. vol. iv. 1,
I
u
U
x
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 162 DEMOS THENES.
out of unpaid debts and appearances in the law courts.
In fact, the son of the lawful wife would often be
credited with the scrapes into which the son of the
mistress was likely to get himself.
"You tiresome Boeotus," says Demosthenes' client,
who really seems to have been a much-injured man,
"I would wish you, if possible, to renounce all
your bad ways; but if that is too much to hope,
pray oblige me to this extent: cease to give your-
self trouble; cease to harass me with litigation; be
content that you have gained a franchise, a property,
a father. No one seeks to dispossess you ; nor do
I. If, as you pretend to be a brother, you act
like a brother, people will believe that you are my
kinsman. But if you plot against me, go to law with
me, envy me, slander me, it will be thought that you
have intruded into a strange family, and treat the
members as if they were alien to you. As to me per-
sonally, however wrong my father may have been in
refusing to acknowledge you, I certainly am innocent.
It was not my business to know who were his sons;
it was for him to show me whom I was to regard as
brothers. As long as he forebore to acknowledge you,
I held you no kinsman; ever since he acknowledged
you, I have regarded you as he did. You have had
your portion of the inheritance after my father's death;
you participate in our religious worship, in our civil
rights--no one excludes you from these. What woull
you have'! Whoever hears the name will have to ask
which of us two are meant; then, if the person means
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 163
you, he will reply, ' The one whom Mantias was com-
pelled to adopt. ' Do you wish for this 'l "
We pass to quite a different case. It is a dis-
pute between two neighbouring Attic farmcrs. * Their
holdings were in a hilly part of Attica, and were
separated by a public road. It is an action for damages
which the plaintiff, Callicles, alleged that he had sus-
tained through the obstruction of a water-course, which
carried off the drainage from the surrounding hills.
The defendaut's father had built a wall on his land,
with the view of diverting the water into the road.
It seems that in Attica a proprietor might turn off his
drainage into a public way, to the great detriment, as
may well be supposed, of the country roads, which, in
hilly districts, must at times have been almost impas-
sable. The effect of the wall in this case was, that
after heavy rains the plaintifi"s farm was overflowed,
as well as the road. For this the plaintiff brought his
action. The defendant, Demosthenes' client, pleaded
in justification that the well in question had been law-
fully erected by his father fifteen years ago; that no
objection was then raised by the plaintiffs family;
that the so-called watercourse was not really a water-
course, but was part of his own land, as it was planted
with fruittrees, and contained an old family burial-
ground. The stream, too, which caused the mischief,
did not come to the defendant from a neighbour's
farm ; it flowed down the road both above and below
him: the flood which it occasioned in wet weather was
' Speech against Callicles.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 164 DEMOSTHENES.
a natural misfortune, from 'which others had suffered as
well as the plaintifi'--only, they had never thought of
going to law about it. The defendant broadly hints
that the plaintiff has an eye to his property, and is
trying to oust him from it by a vexatious action. The
matter in dispute was trifling enough, and the must have been inclined to laugh at the solemnity with
which they were implored to give their best attention
to all the details of the case. "There is no greater
nuisance" (so the defendant begins his pleading) " than
a covetous neighbour, which it has been my lot to
meet with. Callicles has set his heart on my land, and
worries me with litigation. First he got his cousin to
claim it from me, but I defeated that claim. I beseech
you all to hear me with attention--not because I am
any speaker, but that you may learn by the facts how
groundless the action is. " After he has explained the
facts, he asks pathetically what he is to do with the
'water, if he may not drain it off either into the public
road or into private ground. " Surely," he adds, with
a touch of bucolic humour, "the plaintiff won't force
me to drink it up 'Q " The damage done could not have
been very ruinous, if we may judge from a single
specimen. It appears that the mothers of the two
litigants used to visit each other, as country neighbours;
and on one occasion, when the defendant's mother was
calling at the plaintiffs house, she found the family
plunged in the deepest distress, and apparently crushed
by some more than ordinary calamity. It would seem
that the rustic mind then, as now, was peculiarly
sensitive to the most ludicrously trifling loss, and
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:56 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/coo. 31924026456347 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? DEMOSTHENES AT THE BAR. 165
delighted in describing it with the most violent exag-
geration. The injured farmer's wife, on this occasion,
pointed with tears to four bushels of barley which had
got wet and were being dried, and to a jar of oil,
which had indeed fallen down, but which was not
damaged. For this they wanted to claim, according to
the defendant, 1000 drachms, or about ? 40, by way of
compensation. An Attic farmer, it would seem (like
his English representative), was not likely to suffer
from asking too little. There is something very
characteristic in the following remark, which Demos-
thenes' client makes about his opponent: "In going
to law with me," he says, " I hold the plaintiif to be
thoroughly wicked and infatuated. "
In another * somewhat interesting case, Demosthenes
pleads for an unfortunate man who had been ejected
from his township, and was thereby in danger of ceasing
_ to be an Athenian citizen. At Athens, citizenship was
the subject of the strictest scrutiny; and the registers of
the townships were kept with the utmost care. Every
citizen, as has been already noted, had to be twice
registered; and to insure accuracy, and to exclude
questionable persons, the lists were from time to time
revised. Even with all these precautions, cases of
disputed citizenship not unfrequently occurred.
