No More Learning

This small force gradually increased during the first half of the seven-
teenth century, and during that period was engaged in a practically
continuous and on the whole successful struggle with the Company's
adversaries in India. In 1669, after the transfer of Bombay to the
Company, a further development took place; the construction of
small armed craft at Bombay, for the protection of the Persian Gulf
and Arabian Sea trade, was commenced, among them being two
brigantines built by a descendant of the Elizabethan shipwright,
Phineas Pett; and in 1686 the whole marine establishment was finally
transferred from Surat to Bombay, the marine stores being housed in
Bombay castle and the ships anchored in Bombay harbour. After this
date the Company's sea-forces were officially styled the Bombay
Marine; an officer was regularly appointed “Admiral” every year;
while a supply of men for both upper and lower decks was maintained
as far as possible by drafts from England. The Marine suffered to some
extent from the lawlessness and insubordination which marked the
end of the seventeenth and the early years of the eighteenth centuries.
Two vessels, the Revenge and Hunter, played an active part in Keigwin's
rebellion of 1683;2 disease and financial embarrassment were re-
sponsible for reductions of the strength of the force; while desertion
was so frequent that in 1724 it was decided to keep the pay of all
scamen two months in arrears.
In 1716 the Marine comprised one ship of 32 guns, four grabs with
20 to 28 guns, and twenty smaller grabs and gallivats, carrying 5 to
12 guns apiece. This force made an unsuccessful attempt to seize
Gheria (Vijayadrug), the stronghold of Angria, in 1717; and in the
following year made a fruitless attack upon Kenery (Khanderi) island,
under the command of Manuel de Castro, whom the president,
Charles Boone, much to the annoyance of the English personnel, had
1 Cf. Hobson-Jobson, s. vv.
2 Strachey, Keigwin's Rebellion, pp. 38-9.


## p. 145 (#181) ############################################

THE BOMBAY DOCKYARD
145
appointed Admiral of the Fleet for the occasion. Co-operation with
the Portuguese seemed fated to end in disaster, for in 1722 a joint
expedition by the Bombay Marine and a Portuguese land force against
the fort of Alibag was badly defeated, owing largely to the mistakes
and malingering of the Portuguese viceroy and his general and the
poor quality of the Bombay troops. Commodore Mathews of the
English Navy participated in this action with four English ships,
which had been dispatched by the Home Government in 1721 to
assist in clearing the Eastern seas of European pirates. A contem-
porary writer gives an amusing description of Mathews's choleric
treatment of the Portuguese authorities after the failure of the ex-
pedition, of which the only creditable feature was the bravery dis-
played by the officers and seamen of the Company's Marine. During
the first three decades of the eighteenth century the antagonism of
the Portuguese, the Marathas, and the Sidi of Janjira obliged the
Bombay Council to improve the strength and status of the Marine;
a pension scheme for the widows of office. s and seamen was instituted;
several new vessels were purchased; and the crews of the Company's
trading vessels were freely borrowed for the manning of their warships.
Consequently by 1735 the annual expenditure on the Marine had
increased to nearly two lakhs of rupees, and the fleet comprised seven
large warships and a variety of gallivats and smaller vessels. 2
From the earliest years of the Company's possession of Bombay,
a marine establishment ashore, distinct from the force afloat, was
maintained under the direction of the Commodore of the Marine,
and included, among other officials, a storekeeper, a paymaster and
a purser marine. The last-named was concerned with supplies of all
kinds to the ships and indented for their cost by a monthly bill on
the paymaster, who had "the charge and direction of watering and
ballasting the Company's vessels and of purchasing what timber and
coir were wanted for their service". An important step was taken in
1735, when the Bombay Council decided to transfer their shipbuilding
yard from Surat to Bombay, and brought thither with it Lavji
Nasarvanji Wadia, the Parsi shipbuilder, who had been foreman of
the Surat yard. His first duty was to select a site for a dockyard, the
only dock available at that date being a mud basin, which filled and
emptied with the tide. The first dock, constructed on the site chosen
by Lavji, and known to-day as the Upper Old Bombay Dock, was
eventually opened in 1754. A second dock, the Middle Old Bombay
Dock, was completed in 1762; and a third, the Lower Old Bombay
Dock, in 1765. For the next forty years these three docks were the
boast of Bombay and the wonder of travellers like Grose (1750), Ives
(1758) and Parsons (1775). Lavji Nasarvanji, who served as master-
builder from 1735 to 1774 and was succeeded in office by his two
1 Downing, History of the Indian Wars (ed. Foster), pp. 63-5.
• Bombay City Gazetteet, 11, 277.
CHIVI
10


## p. 146 (#182) ############################################

146
THE COMPANY'S MARINE
grandsons, made continual additions to the Company's fleet, and the
reputation for strength and seaworthiness of the teakwood ships built
by him and his grandsons was so widespread and so well deserved
that the office of master-builder remained in the hands of the Wadia
family until 1885, when the work of construction and repair was
entrusted to an English chief constructor, trained in the royal dock-
yards, with a staff of European assistants. The most notable member
of the family was Jamshedji Bomanji, who, between 1793 and 1821,
built several line-of-battle ships and frigates for the Royal Navy,
besides war vessels and other craft for the East India Company.
During his tenure of office he witnessed the completion in 1807 of a
fourth dock, the Upper Duncan Dock, and the construction in 1810
of an outer or repairing dock, the Lower Duncan Dock, both of which
were named after Jonathan Duncan, who was governor of Bombay
from 1795 to 1811. 1
Meanwhile the Marine, which in 1740 comprised a hundred
officers and about two thousand seamen, who were chiefly English
but occasionally deserters of other European nations, had commenced
to lay the foundation of its subsequent reputation. In December,
1738, Commodore Bagwell, in command of four cruisers, heavily
defeated Sambhaji Angria's fleet at the mouth of the Rajapur river;2
in 1739, after the fall of Bassein, Captain Inchbird of the Marine
negotiated a treaty with the Marathas ;; and in 1756 a fleet of ten
ships, under the command of Commodore James, co-operated with
a royal squadron under Vice-Admiral Watson and a military force
under Clive in a second attack upon Angria's fort of Gheria. The
operations on this occasion were wholly successful; the fort was cap-
tured on 13 February, 1756; and the piratical chief of the Konkani
ceased from that date to figure in the politics of Western India. On
the outbreak of the Seven Years' War, Commodore James (who
subsequently became governor of Greenwich Hospital) added to his
reputation by capturing a French vessel in 1756 and carrying her as
prize to Bombay, and by voyaging round the coast of India in the
height of the south-west monsoon, with the object of proving that
communication between the eastern and western coasts of India was
possible at all seasons. This feat of navigation, which enlarged the
views of the authorities as to the potential value of the Marine, proved
doubly advantageous to the English; for the commodore not only
brought to Bengal the earliest news of the outbreak of war with
France, but also lent the services of five hundred of his seamen co
Watson and Clive, for their attack on Chandernagore in March,
Bombay City Gazetteet, 11, 283 and n. ; Campbell, Bombay Town and Island Historical
Materials, 11, 194 sqq. Cf. Low, Indian Navy, 1, 174-5.
* Low, op. cit. 1, 107. Cf. Forrest, Bombay Selections (Home Series), 11, 72-4.
3 Low, op. cit. 1, 114.
4 Idem, 1, 132 599.
5 Madras Public Dispatch to the Company, 6 June, and Public Consultations, 3 May,
1757


## p. 147 (#183) ############################################

MARATHA SEA-FIGHTS
147
>
1757. 1 During the struggle between France and England, the Bombay
Marine was employed in co-operating with the Royal Navy in various
engagements off the Indian coasts, and in earning the title of “The
Police of the Indian Seas” by hunting the pirates of Western India
and the Persian Gulf. It also laid the foundation of the present Marine
Survey of India in 1772, when Lieutenant Robinson, in command of
a schooner, a ketch and a patamar, managed to explore and chart
the coasts of Kathiawar, Sind and Mekran and a certain part of
Arabia and Persia. 3
In 1774 the Bombay Government, in pursuance of the agreement
made with Raghunatha Rau, determined to invade Salsette and take
Thana by storm. This action was carried out on 28 December, 1774,
by a Bombay force under General Gordon and a squadron of the
Bombay Marine under Commodore John Watson, who was mortally
wounded on the third day of the siege. Later on the Maratha War
gave rise to another affair in which the reputation of the service was
signally maintained by the Ranger, a small vessel commanded by
Lieutenant Pruen, which was attacked in 1783 by a Maratha fleet of
eleven ships, under the command of the Peshwa's admiral, Anandrava
Dhulap. The Ranger, which was carrying several military officers as
passengers, fought against these unequal odds until nearly every
officer and seaman aboard was either killed or dangerously wounded,
and being at last overpowered, was carried off to Vijayadrug, whence
she was subsequently restored to the Company. 5 In 1780 the Marine
formed part of Sir Edward Hughes's squadron in the operations against
Hyder Ali; two years later Commodore Armytage, in command of
the Bombay and other ships, helped to capture Rajamandrug, Kun-
dapur, Mangalore and other places on the Malabar coast; while
vessels of the Bombay Marine rendered good service in 1796 at the
capture of the ports of Ceylon. In the pauses of the warfare engen-
dered by the march of political events the Company's ships continued
to harass their ancient foes, the pirates, and fought several engage-
ments, of which the most noteworthy took place in 1797 between the
Vigilant, commanded by Lieutenant Hayes, and four large vessels of
the Sanganian pirates. The Vigilant was suddenly attacked while
crossing the Gulf of Cutch on a political mission, but managed after
three hours' desperate fighting to drive off the enemy with heavy loss.
In consequence of the steady growth of the Marine, the eighteenth
century witnessed various administrative changes in the dockyard
establishment. In 1739 the post of Marine Paymaster was abolished,
his duties being transferred to the Purser Marine, and about the same
date a Superintendent of Marine was appointed on a salary of £220
a year. The establishment over which he presided consisted at that
1 Low, op. cit. 1, 138. But cf. Hill, Bengal in 1756–7, III, 157.
. Cf. Hobson-Jobson, s. v. • Low, op. cit. I, 185 $99.
Cf. vol. v, p. 257, supra.
• Low, op. cit. I, 158. • Idem, 1, 202.
3
10-2


## p. 148 (#184) ############################################

148
THE COMPANY'S MARINE
date of eight commanders, one of whom was styled commodore,
a purser marine in charge of accounts and victualling, a master-
builder, and other heads of departments. To these were added in
1754 a master attendant, who twenty-three years later (1777) ranked
as second senior officer of the Marine and acted as assistant to the
superintendent for the control of port-dues and the sail-making and
rigging establishments. In 1778 the office of Superintendent of
Marine was abolished in favour of a Marine Board, advocated by the
court of directors, which was not immediately constituted and only
functioned for a short time. In its place the post of Comptroller of
Marine was created in 1785 and was held in rotation by the two
junior members of the Bombay Council, who were expected merely
to exercise general supervision over the various officers of Marine and
secure obedience to the policy of the directors, while all executive
orders relating to daily marine and dockyard administration were
issued by the governor in council.
The valuable service rendered by the Bombay Marine during the
second half of the eighteenth century was largely responsible for a
revision of the Marine Regulations by the court of directors in 1798.
Relative rank and retiring pensions were conferred upon the officers
of the service, and the privilege of private trading, which had till then
been allowed to all members, was formally abolished. The duties of
the Marine were now defined to be (a) protection of trade, (b) sup-
pression of piracy and general war-service, (c) convoy transports
and conveyance of troops, (d) marine surveying in Eastern waters.
A Marine Board was established, composed of a civilian superintendent
as president, a master attendant, a commodore and two captains,
these four appointments being reserved for the four senior officers of
the Marine. The remaining personnel at this date consisted of thirteen
captains, thirty-three first lieutenants, twenty-one second lieutenants
and thirty-seven volunteers. The regulations of 1798 were amended
by the issue in 1814 of a warrant of precedence in India, by the pub-
lication in 1820 of new regulations as to uniform, and by the tem-
porary abolition of the rank of commander and the provision of
additional captains' appointments in 1824. Later on, in 1827, a
royal warrant was issued, conferring upon Marine officers equal
rank, according to their degrees, with officers of the Royal Navy,
within the limits of the East India Company's charter; by the issue
of an Admiralty warrant empowering Bombay Marine ships to fly
the Union Jack and pennant; and thirdly by an order that the
appointment of superintendent, as head of the Marine Service, should
i future be held by an officer of the Royal Navy. Finally, in 1830, the
title of the service, which included at that date twelve captains, nine
commanders, fifty-one lieutenants and sixty-nine midshipmen, was
altered to that of "the Indian Navy”. 1
1 Low, op. cit. I, 213 599.
of


## p. 149 (#185) ############################################

MARINE REGULATIONS
149
The principal administrative changes after that date consisted in
the appointment in 1831 of a Controller of the Dockyard in super-
session of the master attendant, the institution in 1838-9 as an
integral branch of the Marine of a steam-packet service for the carriage
of mails to Egypt; the gradual substitution of steamers for the old
teak sailing vessels;' and successive alterations in the numbers of
the service, which was officially declared in 1847 to consist of eight
captains, sixteen commanders, sixty-eight lieutenants, 110 midship-
men, fourteen pursers and twelve clerks, fourteen masters and twenty-
one second masters. The post of Superintendent of Marine disappeared
in 1848, the holder at that date being styled Commander-in-Chief of
the Indian Navy; and the broad pennant of the Indian Navy, which
had till then been identical with that of the Royal Navy, was super-
seded by a red flag with a yellow cross and the East India Company's
cognisance of a yellow lion and crown in the upper corner nearest the
mast. On the assumption by the crown in 1858 of direct rule in India,
the title of the Indian Navy was changed to that of Her Majesty's
Indian Navy; and in the following year the duties of the Controller
of the Dockyard, which also included the administration of the port
and other duties now performed by the Bombay Port Trust, were
limited to the commercial work of the port, while his dockyard duties
were transferred to a dockmaster, now known as the staff officer. In
1863 a new code of regulations was issued; the name of the service
was once again changed to the Bombay Marine; and the recruitment
of European seamen was prohibited, their places being taken by
Indians belonging to the seafaring classes of the western coast
descendants, in fact, of the coast pirates with whom the Marine waged
so fierce a struggle in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
The war services of the Bombay Marine continued during the first
half of the nineteenth century. It shared in the Egyptian campaign
of 1801, helped to guard the Bay of Bengal from French aggression
in 1803, assisted at the capture of Mauritius in 1810, and participated
in the conquest of Java in 1811. In 1813 it was employed against the
Sultan of Sambar; in 1815 it blockaded the piratical strongholds of
Cutch and Kathiawar; it assisted in the attack on Suvarndrug and
Madangadh during the third Maratha War; and it practically ex-
terminated piracy in the Persian Gulf in 1819. The siege and capture
of Mocha in 1820 offered the opportunity for a fresh display of prowess
a
on the part of the Marine;: in the following year four ships under
Captain Hardy, Commander Stout and Lieutenants Dominicetti and
Robinson reduced the Ben-ibu-Ali Arabs to submission; and in 1826
Commodore Hayes and other officers of the Marine received the
thanks of parliament for their “skilful, gallant and meritorious
1 Cf. Hoskins, British Routes to India, pp. 193 899.
Low, op. cit. 1, 310 599,
• Dodwell, Founder of Modern Egypt, p. 60; Low, op. cit. 1, 299 sqq.


## p. 150 (#186) ############################################

150
THE COMPANY'S MARINE
exertions” against Ava. Between 1830 and 1863 the Indian Navy
was on practically continuous service in India and the Persian Gulf.
The power of the Beni-yas Arabs was broken by Captain Sawyer of
the Elphinstone in 1835; in 1838 the Indian Navy provided a blockading
squadron at the mouth of the Indus; it served under Admiral Maitland
in the Persian Gulf and at the capture of Aden in 1839; it co-operated
with the Royal Navy during the China War of 1840–2; the officers
and crews of three vessels under Commander Nott fought at Miani
and Hyderabad (Sind) in 1843. The Company's vessels carried
troops to Vingurla during the insurrection of 1844-5 in the Southern
Maratha country; in 1846 the Elphinstone (Captain Young) shared in
the capture of Ruapetapeka (New Zealand); during the siege of
Multan in 1848–9 the Indus flotilla was provided by the Indian Navy;
its vessels captured Bet island in 1850, played an important part in
the second Burma War of 1852, suppressed piracy on the north-east
coast of Borneo in the same year, and helped the Turks to defend
Hodeida in 1856.
On the outbreak of war with Persia in 1855, the sea forces were
drawn entirely from the Indian Navy, with Rear-Admiral Leeke in
command and Commodore Ethersay of the Company's service as
second. Bushire was taken in 1855 and Muhammarah in 1857—the
latter operation, which had to be carried out under great difficulties,
evoking from the governor-general in council a well-merited eulogy
on the judgment, skill and discipline shown by all ranks. The Indian
Navy distinguished itself during the military operations in South
China and at the seizure of Perim island in 1857; it provided naval
brigades for service ashore during the Mutiny, while Captain Jones
of the Indian Navy held the Arab tribes of the Persian Gulf at bay
during the same grave crisis. The tale of the active war services of
the Bombay Marine forces ends with the China War of 1860, when
the attack on the Taku forts was led by the Coromandel, commanded
by Lieutenant Walker.
The organisation of the Indian trooping service in 1867 sounded
the knell of the Indian Navy as a fighting force. The officers' cadre
was then enlarged to include twelve commanders, ten first, eleven
second, and seven third officers, and 109 engineers. One resident
transport officer was appointed from the service. Ten years later
(1877), however, in consultation with Captain (afterwards Admiral)
Bythesea, the Indian Government effected a radical reorganisation
of their naval establishment. The Bombay service was amalgamated
with other marine establishments in India, under the title of Her
Majesty's Indian Marine, the combined establishments being divided
into a western division concentrated at Bombay and an eastern
division at Calcutta; and the duties of the service were declared to be
(a) transport of troops and government stores, (6) maintenance of
station ships in Burma, the Andamans, Aden, and the Persian Gulf


## p. 151 (#187) ############################################

THE INDIAN MARINE
151
for political, police, lighting and other purposes, (c) maintenance of
gunboats on the Irawadi and Euphrates, (d) building, repairing,
manning and general supervision of all local government vessels and
launches and all craft used for military purposes. In 1878 a naval
constructor was appointed from England for the first time, and this
was the prelude to the retirement in 1885 of the last of the Wadias,
whose connection with the dockyard as master-builders had lasted
without a break for one hundred and fifty years. In 1882 the appoint-
ments of Superintendent of Marine at Bombay and Calcutta, which
were included in the reorganisation scheme of 1877, were abolished
in favour of a single appointment of director, to be held always by an
officer of the Royal Navy with Bombay as his headquarters, assisted
by a deputy, chosen from the Indian Marine and stationed at Cal-
cutta. The anomalous position of the officers and crews of the Marine,
who were not subject to the provisions of the Naval Discipline Act
and Merchant Shipping Act, was regulated by the passing of the
Indian Marine Service Act, 1884 (47 & 48 Vict. c. 38), which enabled
the governor-general in council to legislate for the maintenance of
discipline; and simultaneously the post of assistant secretary to the
Government of India (Marine Department), which had been created
in 1880 and held by Admiral Bythesea, was replaced by that of
assistant director of the Indian Marine. An Admiralty warrant of
the same year (1884) sanctioned the use by ships of the Indian Marine
as ensign of a blue flag with the Star of India in the fly, and as marine
jack of a union jack with a narrow blue border. Finally in 1891 the
title of the service was once more altered to that of“The Royal Indian
Marine” by an order in council, which also provided that officers
of the service, with the titles of commander, lieutenant and sub-
lieutenant, should rank with, but junior to, officers of the Royal Navy
of equal rank, and should wear the same uniform as the latter, with
the exception of the device on epaulettes, sword-hilt, badges and
buttons, and of the gold lace on the sleeves.
This retrospect may fitly conclude with a brief notice of the Naval
Defence Squadron and of the later progress of the Indian Marine
Survey. The former, which was established at Bombay in 1871 for the
defence of the Indian coasts, consisted in 1889 of two turret-ships and
seven torpedo boats, commanded by officers and manned by crews
of the Indian Marine. In 1892 the squadron, which had been increased
by the purchase of two torpedo gunboats, was placed under the com-
mand of an officer of the Royal Navy, while the other officers were
chosen partly from the Royal Navy and partly from the Royal Indian
Marine. The crews comprised both bluejackets and lascars. In 1903
the squadron was abolished, and the defence of India by sea was
entrusted wholly to the Royal Navy.
The history of the survey during the nineteenth century opens with
the establishment in 180g of a Marine Survey department in Bengal,
a


## p. 152 (#188) ############################################

152
THE COMPANY'S MARINE
which charted the east coast of Africa as far south as Zanzibar, the
Persian Gulf and other seas, before it was abolished in 1828 during
Lord William Bentinck's administration. The work of the depart-
ment, however, was considered sufficiently important to be carried
on between 1828 and 1839 by two vessels, which explored the coasts
of Africa and Socotra, the Maldive and Laccadive islands, and the
mouth of the Indus. After 1844 comprehensive surveys were con-
ducted on the Jehlam and Indus rivers, in the Gulf of Cutch and
other parts of the west coast of India, in the Bay of Bengal, on the
Pegu coast and the rivers of Burma, and in Malacca and Sumatra.
In 1861 the control of the Indian Marine Survey was transferred to
the Admiralty, but seventeen years later (1878) it was again organised
in Calcutta as a department of the Indian Marine. The headquarters
were transferred from Calcutta to Bombay in 1882, and a year later
it was decided to reserve the appointments of surveyor in charge and
his senior assistants for officers of the Royal Navy and to fill the junior
officers' grades from the Royal Indian Marine. From 1894 the senior
assistants' appointments were also thrown open to the latter service.
Since its first establishment the Royal Indian Marine has performed
much valuable work in the charting and delineation of the coasts of
India, Burma, the Persian Gulf and Africa, besides materially ad-
vancing scientific knowledge of the fauna of the Indian seas.


## p. 153 (#189) ############################################

CHAPTER IX
THE ARMIES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY
It was not for many years after its incorporation that the Company
of Merchants of London trading into the East Indies found it necessary
to employ military forces to protect its possessions and its interests,
but guards of peons, undisciplined and armed after the native fashion,
were enrolled in its factories, from the time when these were first
established. These peons could hardly be regarded as soldiers, and
were employed rather to add to the dignity of the Company's officials
than for purposes of defence. Later in the seventeenth century pro-
vision was made for the defence of the larger factories by the main-
tenance at each of a small body of European soldiers, under an ensign,
and a “gun-room crew"supplied by the Company's ships, to work the
guns of the factory.
In 1662 King Charles II sent out a small force to defend Bombay,
which was part of the dowry of his queen, but the Portuguese did not
vacate the factory until 1665, by which time the force had suffered
severely from the climate, and numbered, besides Captain Henry
Cary, who commanded it, only one ensign, four sergeants, six corporals,
four drummers, ninety-seven privates and some details, including
two gunners and a gunner's mate. In 1668, when the king leased
Bombay to the East India Company, its garrison consisted of twenty
commissioned and non-commissioned officers, 124 privates and fifty-
four Topasses, or half-caste Portuguese, and this force eventually
became the nucleus of the ist Bombay European Regiment. ' In 1711
the garrison of Madras consisted of 250 European soldiers and 200
Topasses, and in 1748 various independent companies were embodied
as a regiment, afterwards the ist Madras Fusiliers, in which Robert
Clive received his first commission as an ensign. 2
It is generally believed that Dupleix, in his war with the English
Company on the east coast, was the first to employ Indian sepoys
trained in the European manner, but this was not so. The French
settlement of Mahé was founded in 1721, near the English settlement
of Tellicherri, on the west coast, and it was here, in hostilities which
lasted from 1721 to 1729, that the term sepoy first appears as the
name of a military force in European service. They were condottieri,
whose loyalty was not always above suspicion, but they had some
knowledge of European methods of war, for a French royal officer
described them as well trained. 3
1 Foster, Factories, 1668-9, p. 67; Malabari, Bombay in the Making, pp. 188–97.
• In 1748, G. B. Macleson, Lord Clive, p. 33.
• Dodwell, Sepoy Recruitment, pp. 2, 6, 7.


## p. 154 (#190) ############################################

154
THE ARMIES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY
Dumas, the predecessor of Dupleix, first employed on the east
coast sepoys from the west coast. În 1744 the council at Pondichery
considered the company of sepoys to be hardly worth its pay, but the
outbreak of war with the English Company obliged them not only to
retain it, but to obtain another company from Mahé. 1 The French
capture Madras in 1746, and the English Company was obliged to
turn its attention to the organisation of a force for the defence of its
possessions. In 1748 Captain Stringer Lawrence of the 14th Foot,
the "father of the Indian Army", arrived at Fort St David, then
temporarily the Company's principal factory on the east coast, with
the king's commission as major, to command all the Company's
troops in the East Indies. He embodied the Madras European
Regiment and enlisted 2000 sepoys, “at first scarcely better disciplined
than common peons”, who were organised in independent companies,
out his activities were arrested by his capture by the French. Admiral
Boscawen, who arrived at Fort St David with orders to assume the
command both at sea and on land, sent him to attack Ariancopang,
near Pondichery, where he was taken and was detained until the
Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle, concluded in October, 1748, led to a cessa-
tion of hostilities and the restoration of Madras to the English Com-
pany. The organisation of the Company's forces then proceeded; the
sepoys were placed under an English commander and the "gun-
were superseded by two companies of artillery from
England, one at Fort St George and one at Fort St David. Lawrence
was granted leave to England, and his task was carried on by Robert
Clive, now a captain. His great feat of capturing and defending Arcot
in 1751 was performed with 200 European soldiers and 300 sepoys,
and the conduct of the latter proved how greatly their military spirit
had improved under Clive. The quality of Eastern troops always
depends largely on the character of those by whom they are led.
Lawrence returned from England, and the hostilities between the
two Companies continued in India, though their countries were at
peace. In September, 1754, a squadron of six ships under Admiral
Charles Watson, with the 39th Foot (Primus in Indis) under Colonel
John Adlercron, and a detachment of Royal Artillery, arrived at
Fort St George, and in the following year Clive, who in 1753 had
gone to England for reasons of health, returned with the king's com-
mission as a lieutenant-colonel, and assumed charge of Fort St David
as governor. Late in 1756 he was obliged to proceed to Bengal, in
order to recover Calcutta, and the troops which accompanied him,
or joined him later, consisted of detachments of the artillery, of the
39th Foot under Major Eyre Coote, and of the Madras and Bombay
European Regiments, and a force of sepoys from Madras; and he had
also at his disposal the Bengal European Regiment recently enrolled
1 Dodwell, op. cit. p. 5.
· Idem, p. 8.
Love, Vestiges of Old Madras, II, 447.
room crews
a
3


## p. 155 (#191) ############################################

ORIGIN OF THE PRESIDENCY ARMIES
155
by Major Killpatrick, and a force of Bengal sepoys. His campaign
in Bengal will be noticed later.
In 1757 the Seven Years' War broke out, and the two Companies
were again involved in hostilities in India. The war had not been
unforeseen, and the Madras Council was fully aware of the risk which
it ran in detaching so large a force, with its best officer, to Bengal, but
the plight of that presidency admitted of no delay. In June, 1758,
the French, under Lally, captured Fort St David, and in December
occupied the Black Town of Madras and opened the siege of Fort
St George, but were obliged to retreat on the arrival of a British
squadron in February, 1759.
Till then the sepoys had been organised in independent companies.
But the important development of organising them in battalions was
now introduced. The English Company had decided on the measure
before war broke out, but had had no opportunity of accomplishing it.
Lally's siege had provided further evidence of the difficulty of con-
trolling independent companies, and early in 1759 Lawrence presided
over a committee, whose proposals provided for a sepoy force of 7000
men, formed into seven battalions, each consisting of a grenadier com-
pany and eight battalion companies, each company commanded by a
subadar, with a jamadar and a due proportion of non-commissioned
officers. Each battalion was commanded by a native commandant,
but its training was the care of two British subaltern officers and three
sergeants, and three inspecting captains were appointed to supervise
the training of the whole force, which was the real foundation of the
Indian Army as it exists to-day. 2
Clive's victory at Plassey, and the deposition of Siraj-ud-daula,
established the Company as the predominant authority in Bengal,
and the maintenance of its power required a respectable military
force. The 39th Foot was recalled to Europe, but all ranks were
permitted to volunteer for the Company's service, and five officers
and about 350 men were transferred to the Bengal establishment, the
officers receiving a step in rank. : The two companies of the Bombay
European Regiment and the detachment of the Madras European
Regiment were also transferred to Bengal," and a few battalions of
sepoys were raised, to each of which were posted two officers from
the European Regiment.
The armies of Bengal, Madras and Bombay now developed in-
dependently. Communication between the three presidencies was
difficult and tedious, and each was confronted with dangers which
necessitated a rapid increase in and improvement of its armed forces.
In Bengal the outbreak of war between the Company and Mir Kasim,
his massacre of 2000 sepoys at Patna, and of about two hundred
Britons there and elsewhere, and his alliance with the Nawab-
1 Innes, Bengal European Regiment, pp. 15, 16. • Love, op. cit. 11, 566.
• Idem, 11, 513.
• Innes, op. cit. pp. 69, 70.


## p. 156 (#192) ############################################

156 THE ARMIES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY
Wazir of Oudh and the Emperor Shah 'Alam against the Company
led to a great expansion of the Bengal army, and Clive, during his
second term of office in Bengal, which ended in 1767, reorganised
both the army and the civil administration. In the Madras
Presidency the wars with the principality of Mysore, and in Bombay
the Maratha wars, lasting from 1775 to 1782, lcd in like manner
to great increases in the presidency armies. Thus, in Bengal the
number of sepoy battalions rose from one in 1757 to nineteen in
1764. The native ranks in each battalion consisted of a commandant,
an adjutant and ten companies, two of which were grenadiers, each
company commanded by a subadar, with three jamadars, and con-
sisting of five havildars, four naiks, two tomtoms and seventy sepoys.
Each company had its own stand of colours. Besides these sepoys,
there were on the strength of the Bengal army in 1765 four companies
of artillery, twenty-four companies of European infantry, a troop of
hussars, and about 1200 irregular cavalry. After the conclusion of
peace the hussars were dismounted and incorporated with the
European infantry, all the irregular cavalry, except 300, were dis-
missed, the European battalion, 1600 strong, was augmented and
formed into three single-battalion regiments of nine companies each,
and each consisting of 731 rank and file with the same establishment
of officers as a king's regiment of the line, and three more battalions
of sepoys were raised. Clive then organised the Bengal army in three
brigades, each consisting of a troop of irregular cavalry, a company
of artillery, a battalion of European infantry, and seven battalions
of sepoys. In the Maratha War six sepoy battalions from the first
brigade were ordered to the West of India, but six new battalions
were raised to take their place in Bengal, and several battalions
trained by British officers for the Nawab-Wazir of Oudh were
incorporated in the Bengal army.
In 1780, in consequence of the defeat of Colonel Baillie and the
invasion by Hyder Ali of the Lower Carnatic, the Bengal Government
increased its military establishment by raising the strength of each
sepoy battalion to 1000 and dividing it into two battalions of five
companies. A major commanded each regiment, a captain each
battalion, and a lieutenant each company.
During the war in the Carnatics the Bengal Presidency assisted the
Madras Presidency with both European and native troops, and in
1785 the Bengal army was reorganised. Each of the two-battalion
regiments of sepoys was amalgamated into a single-battalion regiment
of ten companies, and the army was divided into six brigades. Each
of the three European battalions was divided into a two-battalion
regiment, allowing one European battalion to each brigadę,& the
1 Innes, op. cit. pp. 229, 230.
3 Broome, Bengal Army, p. 431.
5 Vol. v, p. 284.
2 Williams, Bengal Infantry, p. 5.
4 Idem, pp. 533-40.
• Inncs, op. cit. p. 280.


## p. 157 (#193) ############################################

RECRUITMENT OF OFFICERS
157
other troops assigned to each brigade being a company of artillery,
with lascars, and six battalions of sepoys. These orders remained in
force until 1796.
In 1765 the Madras establishment of seven battalions of sepoys was
increased to ten battalions, each 900 strong, a captain, a lieutenant
and an ensign being posted to each battalion; and in the following
year, when the Northern Circars (Sarkars) fell into the Company's
possession, eight new battalions were raised there. These, known as
the Circar battalions, were numbered separately from the Carnatic
battalions. They invariably served, in time of peace, in the Telugu
country, where they were raised, and were inferior, both in discipline
and courage, to the Carnatic battalions. The military force of the
Madras Presidency grew throughout the Mysore War, and was re-
organised in 1784, when the distinction between the Carnatic and
Circar battalions was abolished, the former being numbered from
1 to 21, and the latter from 22 to 29, while the raising of new bat-
talions brought the number up to thirty-five; but in 1785 the number
of battalions on the Madras establishment was reduced to twenty-one,
the Circar battalions being broken up and distributed among the
battalions which were retained. This introduced a “mixed”
system
of recruiting, under which the composition of each unit was a matter
of accident, “tempered from time to time by the predilections of the
officer who commanded it".
The Bombay army developed on a smaller scale. Its European
soldiers were formed into a regiment during the War of the Austrian
Succession, and before 1796 its sepoy battalions had reached twelve
in number.
The recruitment of European officers for the Company's troops was
at first a matter of difficulty. Until 1748 and again later, when the
seven sepoy battalions were formed, many sergeants were promoted
to the rank of ensign, but such promotions gradually became excep-
tional. “The great objection to these ranker-officers was their un-
seasonable drunkenness” and a tendency to continue to associate
with those of the rank from which they had risen. Both Clive and
Cootc observed these faults, and Coote remarked: “There is little
dependence on this kind of men's behaviour, who are raised from
sergeants to rank with gentlemen ”. 3. A few young writers followed
Clive's example, and received commissions.
Mixed blood was not a disqualification for the Company's com-
mission, which was often given to the sons of officers who had formed
irregular unions in India, as an acknowledgement of their fathers'
services, but colour was to some extent a bar, and later the Company
required of cadets appointed in India a certificate that they were not
a
the sons of wives or concubines of pure Indian blood. Foreign
i Wilson, Madras Army, 1, 224.
? Dodwell, Sepoy Recruitmenl, pp. 25-7.
• Dodwell, Nabobs of Madras, p. 42.
• Idem.


## p. 158 (#194) ############################################

158 THE ARMIES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY
1
officers, deserters and released prisoners of war were sometimes ad-
mitted to the Company's service, and in some instances served it well,
but naturally could not always be trusted when opposed to their own
countrymen, and an attempt to maintain a Foreign Legion failed.
A Frenchman who served in the ranks of the Madras European
Regiment, but never received a commission, was Bernadotte, after-
wards a marshal of France and king of Sweden.
The most valuable source of recruitment was the royal army.
Officers of king's regiments leaving India were permitted to volunteer
for the Company's service, in which they usually received a step in
rank, and when peace in Europe led to the reduction of regiments
there was always a number of officers on half-pay and in reduced
circumstances who were glad to accept employment under the East
India Company. Such officers improved the efficiency, the social
status and the military spirit of the officers in the Company's armies.
When service in those armies became attractive the directors dis-
couraged local appointments, and took the military patronage, as it
became more valuable, into their own hands. They first sent out
volunteers, who served in the ranks until vacancies occurred, and
later, cadets, who were sent out as such, and received commissions as
soon as they had acquired a sufficient knowledge of drill and military
duties.
The native troops first employed against the French were Moplahs,
and “Moors” and Hindus from Mangalore and Tellicherri. Later,
in the Carnatic battalions, Muslims were the most numerous class,
Tamils coming next. The “Telingas” of the Circar battalions have
already been noticed, and in spite of their poor reputation as soldiers
they continued to be recruited after the amalgamation of the Carnatic
and Circar battalions, the classes in the mixed battalions coming in
the following order in numerical strength: (1) Muslims, (2) Telingas,
(3) Tamils, (4) Rajputs, Marathas and Brahmans, and (5) other
castes.
Of the quality of the early sepoy force various opinions were ex-
pressed, some very unfavourable, but the Carnatic regiments, at least,
fought well when well led, and against the low opinion of them held
by some of the Company's officials we may set the confession of Lally:
You would be surprised at the difference between the black troops of the English
and ours; it is greater than that between a Nawab and a cooly; theirs will even
venture to attack white troops, while ours will not even look at their black ones. ”
Nevertheless, the poor quality of recruits obtainable even in the
Carnatic was noticed as early as in 1788, and in 1795 the Madras
Government, probably in consequence of Lord Cornwallis's criticism
of the produce of their recruiting grounds, proposed to draw recruits,
1 Broome, op. cit. pp. 392, 393.
2 Dodwell, Sepoy Recruitment, chap. vii.
3 Idem, p. 12.


## p. 159 (#195) ############################################

SEPOY RECRUITMENT
159
to the number of six or seven hundred annually, from Bengal and
Bombay. The Bombay Government rejected the proposal, on the
ground that the natives of their presidency would not willingly serve
beyond its limits, and that they could not find, within those limits,
sufficient recruits for their own army, but the Supreme Government
agreed to supply recruits, not "stout Bengalese", as the originator of
the scheme, in his ignorance of Bengal and its inhabitants, had sug-
gested, but men more accustomed to military service. Two large
drafts were supplied, but the scheme was an utter failure. Owing to
the price of grain in the south, which was so high that a sepoy could
hardly live on his pay, and the uncongenial surroundings, it was found
impossible to keep the Bengal recruits with the colours, and they
deserted in such numbers that recruitment in the north was aban-
doned. 1
The Bengal army at first drew its recruits from the mixed classes
of adventurers to be found in the Bengal provinces, and from 1776
onwards from the kingdom of Oudh, enlisting chiefly Brahmans and
Rajputs, described as a brave, manly race of people. ”
It is not necessary to suppose that the discipline was exact, or the training perfect,
but both were infinitely superior to anything possessed by the Company's opponents.
The power of marching and manæuvring in solid formations, and of concentrating
fire, and the use of well-served guns enabled small bodies of the Company's soldiers
to overcome the loosely arrayed hordes of their adversaries. 3
In 1796 the armies of the three presidencies were, for the first time,
completely reorganised. 4 To Bengal were allotted three, and to
Madras two battalions, and to Bombay six companies of artillery, all
with complementary companies of lascars. Bengal was to maintain
three, and Madras and Bombay each two battalions of European
infantry, of ten companies, and Bengal and Madras were each to
maintain four regiments of regular native cavalry. The single-
battalion native infantry regiments were formed into regiments of
two battalions, of which Bengal had twelve, Madras eleven, and
Bombay six, with a single battalion of marines. The establishment of
British officers allowed to regiments of native cavalry and infantry
was nearly the same as in king's regiments. The reorganisation had
more than one serious defect. To the colonel commanding an infantry
regiment was transferred most of the authority which should have
been exercised by lieutenant-colonels commanding battalions, with
the result that the latter officers lost the respect of the sepoys. Both
Sir Thomas Munro and Sir John Malcolm considered the establish-
ment of British officers excessive, and believed that it would diminish
the sense of responsibility in the native officers. They would have
preferred the allotment, made after the Mutiny of 1857, of six or seven
1 Dodwell, Sepoy Recruitment, pp. 33-7.
• Imperial Gazetteer of India, iv, 330.
Malcolm, Political History, pp. 495-6.
Broome, op. cit. p. 503.
• Idem, iv, 333.


## p. 160 (#196) ############################################

160 THE ARMIES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY
British officers to a battalion, to act as field officers and regimental
staff, the command of companies being left to the native officers; but
the provision of British officers was less generous than it appeared to
be. As the Company's territories extended, and it attended more
closely toʻmatters of administrative detail, Europeans were required
for many duties for which the establishment of the civil service was
insufficient, and with which its members were not well fitted to cope.
Public works, the staff and commissariat of the army, “political”,
that is to say diplomatic service at the courts of ruling chiefs, surveys,
the supervision of trunk roads, the administration of newly annexed
territory, the command and control generally of contingents and
irregular troops raised in native states and newly annexed territory,
and, later, the control of the civil police, were provided almost en-
tirely by officers of the army, and those deputed on such duties
remained on the establishments of their regiments, which they rejoined
when the regiment was ordered on active service, or when, by seniority,
they succeeded to the command. Allowing, besides this heavy drain,
for the number of officers on furlough, now, with pensions, granted
for the first time, the number of officers actually on duty with a regi-
ment of cavalry or a battalion of infantry was seldom more than half
the establishment. 1
The sources of recruitment have already been described. The
quality of the officers was for some time poor, with several brilliant
exceptions. This was partly due to the Company's treatment of its
military officers, which was parsimonious in the extreme, and pro-
duced many unfortunate results. The material inducement offered to
tempt candidates was an initial salary of about £120 a year, often in
an expensive environment and a noxious climate. It was practically
impossible for a young officer to keep out of debt. To set up the most
modest of households cost about £200,2 and an extract from a junior
officer's account-book shows his expenditure, in no way extravagant,
to have been Rs. 265 a month, while his pay was Rs. 195. Sir Thomas
Munro, who joined the Madras army in 1780, and held a staff ap-
pointment as a lieutenant, thus describes his attempts to live within
his means:
My dress grows tattered in one quarter whilst I am establishing funds to repair
it in another, and my coat is in danger of losing the sleeves, while I am pulling it
off to try a new waistcoat.
Later, while holding a comparatively lucrative civil appointment, he
writes:
I have dined to-day on porridge, made of half-ground flour instead of oatmeal,
and I shall most likely dine to-morrow on plantain fritters, this simplicity of fare
being the effect of necessity, not of choice.
If the Company had many bad bargains it had largely itself to thank.
1 Official Army Lists.
2 Williamson, East India Vade Mecum, 1, 173.
• Carey, Good Old Days, 1, 233.
• Idem, I, 229.
3


## p. 161 (#197) ############################################

ARMY LIFE
161
Cadets were at first allowed to find accommodation for themselves
in punch-houses, but were afterwards lodged in barracks, and sub-
jected to discipline. Early in the nineteenth century a college was
established at Barasat, fourteen miles from Calcutta, where they were
instructed in drill and the Hindustani language, but the officers in
charge of them lived at a distance, and except in class and on parade
they were subjected to hardly any control or discipline. The ruin of
many promising young men, the premature deaths of not a few, and
the disgrace and shame that overtook no mean portion of the crowd
of unfortunate youths, led to the closing of the college in 1811, and
cadets were then posted to regiments, but, owing to the comparatively
small number of British officers then doing duty with most native regi-
ments, discipline was not sufficiently strict, and it would have been
well for the Company's armies if Sir Thomas Munro's advice that all
· young men destined for native regiments should be attached for a year
or two to a British regiment, in order to learn their duties and acquire
military discipline, had been followed then, instead of much later.
The college for cadets at Addiscombe was founded in 1812.
The life of regimental officers in cantonments far from presidency
towns was insufferably dull and tedious. Books, book-clubs and news-
papers were few; there was practically no civilised female society, and
the monotony of the long hot-weather days, perforce spent indoors,
was dreary. Some procured books for themselves, and studied their
profession, the languages of the country, and history; some practised
music and painting, and some indulged in sport, but the sole relaxa-
tions of many were gambling and drinking. Their drink, beer, claret,
sherry, madeira and brandy, was expensive, and, if indulged in to
excess, unwholesome in the Indian climate. The mortality was great,
and ill-health, gambling and drinking produced tempers ready to take,
and equally ready to give, offence. Duels were not uncommon, and
were sometimes fatal. Concubinage was the natural result of the
absence of European women.
The number of European women to be found in Bengal and its dependencies
(early in the nineteenth century] cannot amount to two hundred and fifty, while
the European male inhabitants of respectability, including military officers, may
be taken at four thousand,
writes one officer, in a book” dedicated to the directors of the East
India Company. “The case speaks for itself”, he continues, “for, even
T
if disposed to marry, the latter have not the means. ” Young officers
could not be expected to accept a state of lifelong celibacy, and the
native “housekeeper" was an established institution. From such
unions, and from the marriages of European soldiers, sprang the class
known first as East Indians, then as Indo-Britons, then as Eurasians,
Carey, op. cit. I, 236–43.
· Buckle, Bengal Artillery, pp. 33, 34.
3 Williamson, op. cit. 1, 453.
CHIVI
11


## p. 162 (#198) ############################################

162 THE ARMIES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY
and now, officially but inaccurately, as “Anglo-Indians”. These
irregular unions were recognised not only by the officers' comrades
and superiors, but by the court of directors, who perceived that a
body of officers living with native mistresses would cost them less than
officers married to ladies of their own class and nation, and requiring
provision for their families. After the introduction of the furlough
rules, and as India became more accessible, the standard of morals
gradually improved, and, though it was long before the native mistress
ceased to be an institution, she retired 1, y degrees into the background,
and finally disappeared.
In 1824 the armies of the three presidencies, having grown greatly
in numbers during the third Maratha, the Pindari, and the Nepal
wars, were again reorganised. The two-battalion regiments of native
infantry were divided into single-battalion regiments, of which Bengal
now had sixty-eight, Madras fifty-two, and Bombay twenty-four. The
artillery was more than doubled in strength, and was divided into
brigades and batteries of horse, and battalions and companies of foot,
artillery. Bengal and Madras each had eight, and Bombay three
regiments of regular native cavalry, and Bengal had, in addition, five,
and Bombay three regiments of irregular cavalry. 1
In the same year the first Burmese War broke out, and three regiments
of Bengal infantry, ordered to march overland to Arakan, providing
their own transport, mutinied. Whether or not transport, as was urged
on their behalf, was unprocurable, there is no doubt that it was most
difficult to obtain, and most costly, and the men suspected that the
order was a device to compel them to cross the “black water”, and
thus to break their caste. Their petitions were disregarded, they broke
into mutiny, and they were““shot down and sabred on parade”. The
commander-in-chief protested against the finding of the court of
enquiry that the mutiny was “an ebullition of despair against being
compelled to march without the means of doing so”, but it was
certainly just.
The Company's behaviour to its military forces was too obviously
that of a group of traders towards their servants ever to command
from them that unquestioning loyalty and obedience with which the
royal troops served the king, and the record of disaffection and
mutinies in its armies is a long one. In 1674 and 1679 the European
force in Bombay mutinied in consequence of reductions in its pay, 4
and in 1683 Captain Richard Keigwin, commanding that force,
having been deprived of his seat in council, and the allowances
attached to it, rebelled against the Company, and declared that he
held the fort and island of Bombay on behalf of the king. Vice-
Admiral Sir Thomas Grantham eventually persuaded him, on the
1 Imperial Gazetteer of India, iv, 336.
2 Idem, iv, 336.
• Malcolm, Political History, p. 484.
• Malabari, op. cit. pp. 189, 190.


## p. 163 (#199) ############################################

MUTINIES
163
promise of a free pardon, to surrender in accordance with the royal
command, and he left for England. 1
In 1758 nine captains of the Bengal European Regiment, resenting
their supersession by officers of the Madras and Bombay detachments,
which were incorporated with the regiment, resigned their com-
missions together, but Clive dealt firmly with them. Six were dismissed
the service, and the other three were restored, with loss of seniority,
on expressing their contrition. In 1764 a mutiny in the Bengal Euro-
pean Regiment, fomented by the large numbers of foreigners who
had been enlisted, was suppressed, but was followed by a mutiny of
the sepoys, who were discontented with their share of the prize-money,
and with a new code of regulations and system of manquvres intro-
duced by Major Hector Munro, then commanding the Bengal army.
Munro quelled this mutiny with great, but not unnecessary severity,
the leading mutineers being blown from guns in the presence of their
disaffected comrades. "
The mutiny of the British officers of the Bengal army caused by the
reduction of batta, or field allowance, has been described in volume v. 5
In 1806 a mutiny broke out in the native ranks of the Madras army.
Orders had been issued that the sepoys were to wear shakos instead
of turbans, that they were to shave their beards, and that caste-marks
and ear-rings were not to be worn on parade. The men regarded these
orders as an attack on their religion, and the garrison of Vellore,
where some of the Mysore princes were interned, hoisted the Mysore
flag, and murdered their British officers and some of the European
soldiers, but the remnant of these, under Sergeant Brodie, held out
against them until a small force under Colonel Gillespie arrived from
Arcot, blew open the gates of the fortress, cut down 400 mutineers,
and captured nearly all the rest. There had also been trouble at
Hyderabad, but Gillespie's prompt action crushed the mutiny.
In 1809 a "white mutiny” broke out in the Madras army. Some
of its senior officers had personal grievances, some allowances had
been reduced, and the pay of the officers generally was less than that
of those on the Bengal establishment, but their chief complaint was
that the officers of the king's service monopolised the favours of the
local government, and held most of the staff appointments and
“situations of active trust, respectability, and emolument”, as they
were described by Lieutenant-Colonel the Hon. Arthur St Leger, one
of the leaders of the movement. The relative status of the officers of
the king's and the Company's services had long been a thorny ques-
tion, and the case for the Company's officers was thus moderately
>
1 Vol. v, p. 102, supra.
· Inncs, op.