No More Learning

7 Vernant 1991. 211-12. Contra: Detienne 1989b. 9-10.
8 Graf 1979b; Hollinshead 1980. 84-112, Bremmer 2002.
9 Paus. 3. 16. 7 (Tauroi); Plut. Vit. Lyc. 18, Inst. Lac. 239c-d (Roman spectacle);
Lebessi 1991. 99-103; Calame 1997. 156-69.
10 Cf. the cult of Hera at Samos, where the cult statue was bound with the willow-
like lugos, most likely the same plant. King 1983.
11 Hsch. s. v. brudaliga and brullichistai (masked dancers); Carter 1987.
12 Dawkins 1906-7, 1929. 192, 199.
13 Paus. 4. 4. 2-3; de Polignac 1995. 33-41; Calame 1997. 141-56; Cole 2004. 178-
230.
14 Paus. 3. 10. 7 (Karyai), 4. 16. 9-10 (Aristomenes); Larson 1997; Brulotte 2002.
15 Pind. Pyth. 2. 7, Nem. 1. 1-6; Paus. 6. 22. 8-11 (Letrinoi), 5. 14. 6 (Olympia);
Burkert 1985. 150.
16 Hollinshead 1980. 30-91, 1985; Lyons 1997. 139-57; Themelis 2002. 108-12.
17 IG II2 1514. 15-19; Linders 1972. 7-20; Rhodes and Dobbins 1979. Translation
adapted from Cole 2004. 215.
214
NOTES
18 Romano 1980. 83-97.
19 Versions of the story were attached to Brauron and Mounichia: Sale 1975.
20 Bevan 1987; Parker 2005. 228-48.
21 Brelich 1969. 229-311; Kahil 1977, 1983; Perlman 1989; Calame 1997. 98-101
with bib. Contra the standard initiatory explanation: Sourvinou-Inwood 1988;
Faraone 2003, to be read with Hatzopoulos 1994. 25-33.
22 Laumonier 1958. 62-101; LiDonnici 1992b.
23 Oppenheim 1949; Seltman 1952. 42; Fleischer 1973. 74-88, 310-24, 1983;
Morris 2001.
24 Jacobsthal 1951; Bammer 1974, 1984. 165-211, 1990; Simon 1986. 27-39.
25 Bammer, Brein, and Wolff 1978. 132-38; Bammer 1998.
26 IK Bd. 11, 1a. 14; Etym. Magn. 252. 11 s. v. daitis; Romano 1980. 242-43.
27 LiDonnici 1999. Contra: Smith 1996.
28 Hdt. 1. 26 (ropes); Xen. An. 5. 3. 6 (bank); Ael. VH 3. 26; Polyaenus Strat. 6. 50.
29 Gallet de Santerre 1958. 127-34, 252-57, 1975; Desborough 1964. 44-46;
Snodgrass 2000b. 395-96.
30 Romano 1980. 197-201; Stewart 1990. 108, Figs 34-35.
31 Gallet de Santerre 1958. 165-73; Sale 1961; Antonaccio 1995. 183-86; Larson
1995b. 118-21.
9 THE PERSUASIVE GODDESS: APHRODITE
1 Karageorghis 1977. 199-227; Boedeker 1974. 1-17; Bonnet and Pirenne-Delforge 1999; Budin 2003. 243-82.
2 Paus. 8. 5. 2 (Agapenor); Tac. Hist. 2. 3 (Kinyras); Chadwick 1956.
3 Maier 1976. 221; Maier and Karageorghis 1984. 99.
4 Hurst 1975; Karageorghis 1982. 103-4; Budin 2003. 163, 173.
5 Phot. Bibl. s. v. Aphroditos; Philochorus FGrH 328 F 184; Sophocleous 1985;
Pirenne Delforge 1994. 348-56; Ferrari 2002b. 108-11; MacLachlan 2002.
6 Paus. 3. 23. 1; Coldstream and Huxley 1973. 34-36, 311-13; Flemberg 1991. 19-
20, 1995; Bonnet and Pirenne Delforge 1999. 264-68.
7 Kato Symi: see Chapter 11. Bousquet 1938; Mazarakis Ainian 1997. 215-16;
Sporn 2002. 386.
8 Servais-Soyez 1983; Edwards 1984.
9 Paus 1. 14. 7; Knigge 1982; Reese 1989. The altar attributed instead to Hermes:
Osanna 1992.
10 Burn 1987. 28-44 (Meidias); Pirenne Delforge 1994. 48-74; Rosenzweig 2004. 29-
44.
11 Paus. 6. 25. 1; Redfield 2003. 322-24.
12 Paus. 1. 22. 3; cf. Philemon in Ath. 13. 569d. Pirenne Delforge 1988, 1994. 15-62;
Rosenzweig 2004. 13-28, 59-81.
13 Menander in Ath. 14. 659d (tetradistai).
14 IG II2 4596 (Athens, 284 BCE); Merkelbach 1986 (Erythrai).
15 IG XII 5. 552; Paus. 9. 16. 3-4; Sokolowski 1964; Croissant and Salviat 1966.
16 Paus. 3. 17. 5; Osanna 1990.
17 Paus. 3. 15. 10-11; Faraone 1992. 74-93, 136-40; Pirenne Delforge 1994. 193-
216; Steiner 2001. 160-68.
18 Williams 1986; Reichert-Su? dbeck 2000. 33-53.
19 The text is the late Babylonian Counsels of Wisdom: Lambert 1960. 102-3.
Traditional view: e. g. Yamauchi 1973; MacLachlan 1992.
20 Assante 2003; Westenholz 1989; Henshaw 1994. 191-270.
21 Contra: Budin 2006.
22 Ath. 13. 573c-d; Plut. Mor. 871a-b; Simonides 14 Page FGE; Brown 1991.
215
NOTES
23 Clearchus in Ath. 12. 516. Hdt. 1. 199, the earliest text to mention the phenome- non, is usually dismissed as a fabrication; cf. the Apocryphal Epistle of Jeremiah (= Baruch) 6. 42-43.
24 Just. Epit. 21. 2-3 (vow). Also relevant is Pind. Pyth. 2. 18-20, possibly a con- temporary reference to the vow.
25 Sourvinou-Inwood 1974, 1978. 120-21; MacLachlan 1992. 161-62; Redfield 2003. 332-34, 411-16.
26 Barra Bagnasco 1990; Schindler 1998. 15-70; Redfield 2003. 210-14.
27 Pru? ckner 1968; Sourvinou-Inwood 1978; Redfield 2003. 346-85.
28 Roebuck 1951; Boardman 1999. 118-33; Love 1972a. 70-76, 1972b. 402-5.
29 Asclepiades FGrH 12 F 28; IG I2 190, 1, 5. (c. 420). Cf. Kearns 1989. 173;
Rosenzweig 2004. 83-89.
30 Eur. Hipp. 1424-26; Welter 1941. 34; Burkert 1979. 111-18; Musti, Beschi, and
Torelli 1982 Vol. 2. 320.
31 Ar. Lys. 387-96; Atallah 1966; Winkler 1990. 188-209; Detienne 1994
[1977]. 99-122, 133-44; Reed 1995.
32 Paus. 2. 34. 12 (Hermione), 10. 38. 12 (Naupaktos), 2. 10. 4-6 (Sikyon).
10 EPIPHANY AND TRANSFORMATION: DIONYSOS
1 Xa 06, 102, 1419 (Pylos) [Chadwick and Ventris 1973]; Chadwick 1985. 194.
2 Zeitlin 1982. 129-38; Henrichs 1993; Cole 1993b.
3 Hedreen 1992. 67-103.
4 Thomson 1943. 58-59.
5 Otto 1965. 154-55.
6 Caskey 1981; Caskey and Caskey 1986. 39-43.
7 Hedreen 1992. 13-66.
8 Jeanmaire 1951. 220-28; Casadio 1994. 183-91; Simantoni-Bournia 2002.
9 Gallet de Santerre 1958. 266; Romano 1980. 190-96; Cole 1993a. 30-31.
10 Clay 2002; Jameson 1993.
11 Plut. Quaest. conv. 655e (Pithoigia); Hamilton 1992. 123-46; Ham 1999.
12 Eur. IT 947-60 (Orestes); Phanodemus FGrH 325 F 11 (Limnaion).
13 Arist. [Ath. Pol. ] 3. 5; Parker 2005. 303-4.
14 Segal 1961. 221; Noe? l 1999. 150-51.
15 Theopompus FGrH 115 F 347 a, b (Hermes Chthonios); Pickard-Cambridge
1968. 1-25; Burkert 1983b. 213-47; Hamilton 1992; Robertson 1993; Humphreys
2004. 223-75; Parker 2005. 290-305.
16 Paus. 1. 38. 8; Schol. Arist. Ach. 243a.
17 Burkert 2001. 1-36. Contra: Winkler 1990. 58-62.
18 Xen. Hipparch. 3. 2 (choruses in agora); Goldhill 1987; Connor 1990; Sourvinou-
Inwood 2002. 67-140.
19 Eratosthenes in Schol. Hom. Il. 22. 29; Apollod. Bibl. 3. 14. 7; Dietrich 1961;
Pickard-Cambridge 1968. 42-56; Henrichs 1990.
20 Romano 1982.
21 Arist. [Ath. Pol. ] 57. 1 (King Archon); Schol. Ar. Ran. 479; Phot. s. v. ta ek to ? n
hamaxo ? n; Wycherley 1965.
22 Frontisi-Ducroux 1991. 167-74; Carpenter 1997. 70-84; Peirce 1998.
23 Dodds 1951. 270-82; Henrichs 1978; Bremmer 1984; Versnel 1990. 137-46.
24 Obbink 1993. 68-78. LSAM no. 48 (Miletos, third century) may attest omo-
phagy.
25 Alcaeus fr. 129. 9 LP; Ael. NA 12. 34; Graf 1985. 74-80.
26 Clay 1996; Furley and Bremer 2001 Vol. 2. 52-84.
216
NOTES
27 E. g. Soph. Ant. 1127-30; Eur. Ion 1122-31 (blood).
28 Apollod. Bibl. 2. 2. 2; SEG 15 (1958) 195; Hsch. s. v. Agrania (Iphinoe? ). In an early
variant of the myth, Hera inflicted madness and "the white disease," leprosy, on Proitos' daughters when they jeered at her modest cult statue (Hes. frs. 37. 10-15, 130-33 M-W).
29 Paus. 2. 22. 1, 23. 7-8; Burkert 1983b. 171-79; Hughes 1991. 131-33; Casadio 1994. 83-116.
30 Soph. fr. 255 Radt; Eur. Phoen. 229-31.
31 Plut.