neither the atheistic claim that god is not elevated above of all the rest (god is indeed, for Hegel, the truth of nature and history), nor the irreli- gious claim that there is no
spiritualisation
of the world, are Hegel's fun- damental positions.
Hegels Philosophy of the Historical Religions
How Protestant?
Hegel is lutheran insofar as he is a child of his time. 52 therefore, he offers a very reflected Protestantism, that has learned to avoid the nonsensical (metaphysical) versions of (pre-enlightened) Christianity. if we now look at lutheran Protestantism in relation to three common topics, the three 'sola-principles' of luther, we can try to discern how and in what way Hegel is reacting on them.
does Hegel's philosophy accept 'sola fide'? For Hegel, faith is necessary in relation to Christ's death and resurrection, (V5: 284) to begin a reli- gious Christian community. But faith is only one of the religious expres- sions and is one-sided, although Hegel also accepts devotion as a kind of practical faith. Hegel presents specific theological topics from Christian faith, such as the trinity, the son of man, and spirit. spirit is considered the basic notion of religion, as well as of the philosophical doctrine of religion. For, in the pietist Protestantism of his day, there is the minimal form of immediate knowledge, where god is given in consciousness as spirit. it is just this form that is interesting to Hegel, so that he can link that consciousness with philosophy, which justifies it.
is there a philosophical understanding of 'sola scriptura'? Hegel accepts the Bible as the basis of Christian faith and as a book of the people (in their own language). However, such a Biblical basis is not sufficient. Hegel is aware of the problems of reading the Bible and of translation, and exegetical, (rationalistic) ways of reading the text,53 and that, in modern times, a lot of problems have arisen for which 'the letter' alone has no solution. thus, only 'the spirit' could provide a solution, but it must be inspired spirit, and that inspiration is only certain by the witness of that spirit; and the highest witness is for him: philosophical thinking.
52 insofar as he is not taking into account the eastern churches (deliberately, in his manuscript V5: 89).
53 Hegel is here alluding to the discussion between lessing and goeze, as well as to schleiermacher.
? 266 lu de vos
is there a philosophical justification of 'sola gratia'? Hegel remarks in his courses54 that there seems to be a theological opposition between grace and freedom. He himself, however, interprets the enjoyment ('Genuss'), that i am in the grace of god, or that his spirit is living in me, as the conscious union of reconciliation. it is just this reconciliation for all (not just for individuals or particular communities) that provides a conceptual solution to the problem. if everyone can use his own freedom (or spirit) to realise spirit, then grace is present for everybody. Perhaps here, this strange sort of philosophical interpretation is not bound to a particular church but is really aware of the Christian sense of salvation. it is in fact not the church that is the aim of the Christian message, but the salvation of the world (by Christ himself and not some church or another), sublated in spirit as such. For the sake of participation in this reconciliation, Hegel is interested in the sacrifice of the heart, not through a symbolic cultic act, but in reality, so that the subject attains an "absolute conviction" ('Gesin- nung') (V5, p. 284), which is at the same time the Christian (Protestant) inspiration for (and the guarantee of ) worldly institutions! such a convic- tion instantiates the morally active subjectivity (of everybody), the result of the freedom of history, within ethical institutions, insofar as these are absolutely guaranteed by god. such a conviction is not the same as Prot- estant-theological moralism, or the (felt) claim of absolute moral 'ought's' about families or states. Hegel's critique of such forms is the critique of a (in Hegel's view) sectarian (or traditionally understood) Protestantism (as the case of de Wette has shown). the same philosophical argument is valid against Catholicism: neither a church, nor theologians (as semi- priests) has the authority to render binding decisions (or to criticise in a sermon legally discussed decisions), for, in that case, they repeat the servitude of the laymen by prescribing what is valid for, and also the valid insight of, everybody!
Hegel's philosophical view of the Protestant position is thus not a tra- ditional, 'nai? ve' (or felt) lutheran view. Very specifically, and against com- mon Protestant inspiration, it consists only of three main views. these topics are indeed taken from the Christian tradition, but are worked out in such a way that they are rationally understood (but not of course in the sense of simply being de-mythologized and reduced to preconceived
54 in both courses, there are no further remarks about the teleologically difficult prob- lem that the activity of grace could present difficulties in relation to freedom (V3: 249, 1824).
? hegel and protestantism 267
scientific results) and elevated to a rational core available to everybody, which is the task of philosophy itself.
First of all, God as spirit is a philosophical interpretation, although spirit is a topic common to both the theology of spirit and the philosophy of spirit. spirit is not a simple topic, nor only one of faith (fide), but is instead linked with reason and knowledge in such a way that the empty, rationalistic (i. e. enlightenment) result is avoided. 55 the move from 'god' to 'spirit' can be explained by Hegel's aversion to theology, in as far as it has borrowed determinations from metaphysical ontology without inquir- ing into their validity. if, on the contrary, spirit is really the topic of the Christian or Christian-inspired community, then--according to Hegel's argument--everybody can accept that content containing (absolute) spirit. such a spirit is never a being that is fully independent of subjective and objective spirit, for, only in developing its notion, does spirit show how far it can take up the concept and thus being, in consciousness, also the full singularisation of its concept.
secondly, although Hegel accepts the doctrine of immortality as a specifically Christian one, he gives a philosophical interpretation of it; immortality must be interpreted as (its) own knowledge and thus as eter- nal (V5, 227 or also 140). this knowledge accepts the right of the subject to perform its action with insight. that is, morality does not imply strange or universalistic (or even Christian) commands, but the subjective version of a freedom (of infinite value) in conformity with a common freedom. in this way, it would be possible (in principle) for everybody to accept this philosophical reconstruction. However, such an account or interpretation seems not to be in conformity with scripture, according to a fundamental- ist reading of the Bible.
thirdly, Hegel offers a very specific interpretation of 'grace': it is not specifically only grace for some (as in the doctrine of predestination), but rather a task (in or of freedom) for everybody, insofar as grace is the recon- ciliation performed in and through spirit. according to this doctrine, evil is (after Christ) reconciled (not only for particular religious people, but also for everybody). evil is (according to Christianity) not an ontological
55 on this point, t. guz makes a difficult statement; his overall thesis is that Hegel's logic and philosophy is only a development of lutheran theology; but at least on one point he himself gives the counterexample: faith for luther is not ex ratione, whereas Hegel accepts the rationality of every religion and of faith. see t. guz, Zum Gottesbegriff G. W. F. Hegels im Ru? ckblick auf das Gottesversta? ndnis Martin Luthers: eine metaphysische Untersu- chung, Frankfurt am main: P. lang 1998, p. 230, note 193!
? 268 lu de vos
category (that would be a return to manichaeism or to the religion of the Pharisees)56 (V5, 226-7), but a thought (linked with consciousness) and a moral one (with implications for ethicity--in the relation of the subjec- tive part in ethical relations, or insofar as it may not concretise its duty in the right way). evil is just a moral category, and indicates in its communal form a 'bad existence', that may happen to exist ('Daseyn'), as there are bad states (e. g. tyranny), bad religions (for Hegel, this includes the roman Catholic version of Christianity), bad sciences (e. g. phrenology), (16: 261), but it does not have actuality ('Wirklichkeit') in a philosophical sense, insofar as a merely bad existence is an existence that will end at a certain moment without achieving its own purpose and without concep- tual result. 57 the claim valid for everybody, however, is to realise the rec- onciliation, in as far as everybody presents him- or herself as spirit. 58 even if this is contrary to specific (Protestant) doctrines of particular grace, it makes sense in terms of the Christian doctrine of reconciliation of, and salvation for all people of 'good willing', i. e. for all those who are acting in a really free way. in this interpretation, it is only the Protestant thematic principle of grace that enables, in its radical (philosophical) account, for everybody, the independence of the law of the community from specific Christian doctrine, so that there historically arises inner justice and ethic- ity of the state (see 18: 173).
c. Protestantism is Not Only a Religious, but also an Historical Principle59 Protestantism is not only a distinct theology, not only a doctrine of sal-
vation in the development of cult, but it also has, as such a doctrine, an
56 accordingly, no historical event is such a bad 'in itself '. the only event of such impor- tance could be the crucifixion of Jesus out of which (o felix culpa) he has appeared for the community as Christ.
57 even the genocides of the 20th century (of Hitler, stalin, Pol Pot, etc. ) have had--too late--an end: the result is, at least in one case, a resurrection of common freedom.
58 even in history, there is no theodicy-problem of evil. Bad and evil events are not pro- duced by a world spirit, but are produced by spirits, the sense of which is to be reconciled by considering, that--even with such elements--there may be a progression of freedom and of consciousness thereof. For a discussion of history as theodicy of freedom and not of god, see W. Hu? ffer, Theodizee der Freiheit. (Hegel-studien. Beiheft 46), Hamburg: Bouvier Verlag 2002. that there is no notion of god who could be the object of protest for what humans themselves do in history, see W. Jaeschke, Hegel-Handbuch, stuttgart & Weimar: J. B. metzler 2003, pp. 412-414.
59 see J. dierken, Hegels 'protestantisches Prinzip', in: Hegels Vorlesungen u? ber die Philoso- phie der Weltgeschichte (Hegel-studien. Beiheft 38), Bonn: Bouvier Verlag 1998, pp. 123-146. For a composite view, see r. gascoigne, Religion, Rationality and Community, dordrecht: martinus nijhoff Publishers 1985, pp. 266-7.
? hegel and protestantism 269
historical principle out of cult (see specifically V3, 340 as well as V5, 269). With this specific insight into the structure of history in Christian times, we come to Hegel's most specific (later) insight, that the Protestant world is that world in which Christian freedom appears in actuality ('Wirklich- keit') for everybody, insofar as only therein is rational ethicity (which is attainable in principle for everyone) the realised, free goal of the devel- opment of Protestant Christianity, in opposition to the 'Catholic' non- realisation.
this claim in principle, on the political and historical differences between the Christian churches, is given by Hegel on the occasion of a festival in the Oratio in Sacris Saecularibus tertiis Traditae Confessio- nis Augustanae (Speech for the Celebration of the Jubilee of the Confessio Augustana, 1830). 60 this Oratio (speech) has a negative thesis: against Catholicism, Hegel posits that faith and doctrine are no longer the pur- view of a commission of scholars nor of a spiritual-clerical ('geistliche') authority. Furthermore, there is no need for a separate holiness, because it is just such a view on holiness that makes impossible any real reconcili- ation among Catholic states, either as ethicity or in their constitution. .
the positive doctrine of the Oratio amounts to one main point. reli- gion is not merely a private affair, but rather, the (Christian) religion is the womb of real freedom. 61 Because Christian religion teaches freedom, there can be no possible separation of religion and state. therefore, only some specific state can be with some corresponding religion. religion and ethicity have the same character, which is also the case in the soul of the individual. this elaboration is seen in the philosophy of history: the (reli- gious) spirit is the basis of all other forms; it is one individuality, whose essence can be represented as god, and venerated and enjoyed within religion. the german nations are educated in and through Christianity, being taught that man is free (18: 153). this acceptance of Christian reli- gion is only the beginning, not the full realisation of freedom. there is a difference between the Christian principle (for all german nations) and the evolution thereof. thus, history shows differences of level in the elabo- ration of freedom.
60 see J. ritter, Hegel und die Reformation (1968), in: J. ritter, Metaphysik und Politik, Frankfurt am main: suhrkamp 1969, pp. 310-317 (first edition in: Unbefangenes Christen- tum, mu? nchen, 1968, pp. 89-99).
61 Freedom is not restricted to Christianity, but, for the first time in history, it is Christi- anity that learns that everybody (and not only a citizen, nor a specific person) is free.
? 270 lu de vos
Protestantism is the destruction of the obedience (to the clergy) of all free Christian people. such servitude, within the form of free religion, con- tains its own contradiction. Crucial in Hegel's account are the events of the 16th century. the historical reaction to the 'Catholic' middle ages can be found in the position of the lutheran or evangelical doctrines. Karl V had been content, according to Hegel, with the pillage of rome, and not achieving liberation from the Pope. in augsburg, it was the Holy spirit, which 'seized the moment' and went further in initiating a spiritual free- dom, a step the emperor was not able to take. What is sacred ('heilig') is not strictly the purview of the priests (or the theologians), but is also given to laymen (16: 249). the so-called laymen have their own judgment and authority to speak about religion, which is confirmed by the testimony of spirit. everybody performs and perfects his or her own relation to god in spirit, which is consciousness of reason, or of god himself. the state can become, through the will of god, an implicitly (in itself ) independent, worldly, instantiated ethical form, which is the basis for the government of all justly governed states. the rights of the community as well as the ethical duties of all persons are in this way recognised by god.
if both government and church have the same inspiration, it is impos- sible for a government to have foreign, external (e. g. Catholic) influence. the principles of religion and state come together in the truth of all free- dom. man cannot have confidence in a law if he is not convinced that religion is not in contradiction with it, as is the case in Catholicism, where the rules of sanctity are proscribed by the roman church. Family, prop- erty and freedom in the state are necessary prerequisites for a free com- munity. in this sense, the Catholic religion does not give rise to the inner justice and ethicity of the state, which is present in the inwardness of the Protestant principle. only the reformation reveals the total divine and spiritual process in man; this free man exists as free insofar as he wills the true and lawfully ethical, and knows it as the universal.
after the treaty of Westphalia, the Protestant principle, sanctified free- dom, is taken up by Friedrich ii, on the worldly side. 62 such Protestantism is the basis and origin of the constitution of the state. in other words, without Christian reconciliation in the Protestant church (which sanctifies freedom), there is no authentic conviction of loyalty to the constitution of
62 see e. Weisser-lohmann, "reformation" und "Friedrich ii" in den geschichtsphilo- sophischen Vorlesungen Hegels, in: Hegels Vorlesungen u? ber die Philosophie der Weltge- schichte (Hegel-studien. Beiheft 38), Bonn, Bouvier Verlag 1998, pp. 95-121.
? hegel and protestantism 271
a state. While there is a good result in Prussia and other german nations (but not in austria), this is only a partial reconciliation, as long as other countries are not reconciled in this manner. the remaining differences between them, the failures to renew the civil law in France, and the influ- ence of Protestantism itself are at the foreground of Hegel's last course on history (Vie, 59 ff ). thus, there remain difficulties of content, within his- tory! in north america, there was an atomistic, individualised liberal Prot- estantism, that--for Hegel--remained merely at the level of the market (i. e. civil society), and did not arrive at a real constitutional state. in south america, the negative influence of Catholicism was still dominant, so that in the known world of Hegel's time, the reconciliation of Protestantism is only fully realized in (constitutionally interpreted) Prussia (Vie, 240-1).
at this point, the state is reconciled with god and god with state. Civil freedom and justice are the fruits of this attained freedom in god, because religious and philosophical consciousness of the will of god are no longer distinct from consciousness of that which is true and lawful: an ethic- ity, which promotes and fulfils even the sensuous character of the body within its sublated form as free member of the community, in as far a he may marry and fulfil his economic necessities. For the human spirit, the knowledge of god is the origin or most certain principle of all ethical action. What cannot be deduced from god and is not sanctified by him, is not able to move in joyful obedience to the law. 63
4. Philosophy of religion or of History?
is Hegel's philosophy, which combines rational interpretations of religion with views on history in order to conceive what is actual, criticisable as insufficiently religious or insufficiently Protestant, or is it criticisable as insufficiently philosophical?
in all texts cited here, Hegel claims to demonstrate the rationality of the definitive, consummate religion or to indicate that the historical Christian religion corresponds to the concept of what is rational (and not, importantly, the other way around). With Hegel's emphasis on spirit, his presentation of religion and Christian religion in particular, is made ratio- nally, in the same sense in which he presents a rational view of history.
63 this sanctification is not a second world of holiness (like 'in Catholicism'), but it is the final, not immediately arising, justification of what is done spiritually in ethicity (i. e. the consciousness of the truth), not a justification on a case-by-case basis.
? 272 lu de vos
His philosophy of religion (and also of history) is, first and foremost, phi- losophy. it is not dependent on the truth-claims of religion in general or any denomination in particular. His philosophy of religion exposes the form of conceptual knowledge about religion, in which religion (or abso- lute spirit) (and also history) is the topic (i. e. the content) of the discus- sion, not its premise. such a Hegelian project is not dependent upon the theology of Christianity, nor does it wish to be. on the contrary, insofar as religion and Christianity have rationality, it is philosophy that can dem- onstrate the intelligibility in the historical evolution from religious com- munity to its political, historical shape. For Hegel, the realisation of truth in spirit is performed, in its ultimate instance, by the concept. For the task of philosophy is to conceive the present, even a divided actuality, as an actuality, which only conceals its own reconciliation if people remain at the level of their own subjective (nai? ve) impression, but which may be understood as reconciled, if they try to conceive it as rational (and within the search of rationality).
How far can religion be transformed and yet still recognised by religious people? if the salvation of all is the goal, then every discussion about reli- gion has to be conducted in a manner that is understandable for all. Hegel, at the very least, tries to formulate his claims in such a way. He presents the topics of Christian religion as such: god, creation, incarnation, death and resurrection in or as spirit. as with other topics presented in other philosophical disciplines, these topics are treated without (presupposed) metaphysical notions. in other words, these 'metaphysical concepts' are presented in their (negatively reformulated) speculative form. in this way, religion is not taken up as the final word, certainly not as theology or as the clergy would have it, but rather only as a (particular) religious claim. even in criticizing and opposing such a philosophy of religion, the people and theologians can contribute to a more complex elaboration of what reli- gion is for thinking, and for the thinking of thinking itself.
in the philosophically rational sense in which the philosophy of reli- gion is presented, the philosophical topics are therefore actually the con- cept and the idea. therein a number of specific problems has risen for a speculative philosophy of religion. in what sense is 'god' indeed the best example of the concept of the idea? in what sense does the logical- speculative concept indeed structure the Christian religion? neither with logic as such, nor with specific parts, is a 'specific' relation or parallelism immediately given. such questions are difficult exegetical and systematic problems, which could not be taken up in this treatment of Hegel's view
hegel and protestantism 273
on Protestantism. However, answers to these questions are needed for a minimal understanding of the consistency of Hegel's actual philosophy of religion, and certainly for any rational critique of it.
Conclusion
is it really necessary to ask, as most interpreters do, as a philosophical question, whether Hegel is a (good) Christian,64 or, more specifically, an orthodox, or a heterodox one? 65 Philosophically speaking, the question would rather seem to be whether Hegel has sufficiently demonstrated the rationality and intelligibility of Protestant Christian religion, and its impact in history, insofar as this impact is not limited to aspects of (a given, subjective) faith.
neither the atheistic claim that god is not elevated above of all the rest (god is indeed, for Hegel, the truth of nature and history), nor the irreli- gious claim that there is no spiritualisation of the world, are Hegel's fun- damental positions. it is rather, the claim that god cannot be thought of as independent of every (religious) thought (in this formulation, it is clear that such a claim of independency is contradictory). this claim means there could not be a valuable ontology of religion anymore, since ontol- ogy is based on having contents, rather than being elaborated in concepts. accordingly, for Hegel, god must be presented as spirit in religion as well as in philosophy.
the philosophical point, however, is the following: has Hegel suffi- ciently grounded the rational insight that Christianity, in its Protestant expression and in its historical evolution, is valid as a good, consummated religion of reconciled freedom? moreover, has he shown for everybody (whether or not he or she is a philosopher) that such a religion has basi- cally contributed, to the real, lived, historical freedom of us all?
64 J. Burbidge, 'is Hegel a Christian? ', in: J. Burbidge, Hegel on Logic and Religion, albany: state University of new York Press 1992, pp. 141-153.
65 see Hodgson, o. c. , 100, who gives a catalogue of theological questions, as if either a theologian or anyone else could decide what orthodoxy is; nobody has 'Unfehlbarkeit', with exception of the self-given claim of the Pope. For a Catholic discussion see H. Ku? ng, Unfehlbar? Eine Anfrage, Zu? rich: Benziger Verlag 1998. asking such questions (which takes over the role of the (Catholic) Holy see, or even of every inquisition) seems to be the affair of god, who is--in the event that he would be interested in such questions? not Hegel's rational living spirit of community.
? Contributors
Paul Cobben is Professor of Philosophy at tilburg university (the nether- lands) and chairman of Dutch-Flemish Centre for German idealism (www . cvdi. eu). His publications focus on practical philosophy, combining a sys- tematic and historical approach. Among his books: Das endliche Selbst. Identita? t und Differenz zwischen Hegels >>Pha? nomenologie des Geistes<< und Heideggers >>Sein und Zeit<<, Wu? rzburg: Ko? nigshausen und neumann 1999; Das Gesetz der multikulturellen Gesellschaft. Eine Aktualisierung von Hegels >>Grundlinien der Philosphie des Rechts<<, Wu? rzburg: Ko? nigshausen und neumann 2002; Hegel-Lexikon (ed. ), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftlichen buchgesellschaft 2006; The Nature of the Self. Recognition in the Form of Right and Morality, berlin/new York: De Gruyter 2009; Institutions of Edu- cation: then and today (ed. ), Leiden/boston: brill 2010.
Paul Cruysberghs (1944) is an emeritus Professor at the institute of Phi- losophy of the Catholic university of Leuven (belgium), where he taught philosophical anthropology and aesthetics. He published on anthropol- ogy, aesthetics, and ethics, especially in German idealism (Hegel) and in Kierkegaard. He is a co-editor of the Hegel-Lexikon (Darmstadt, Wissen- schaftliche buchgesellschaft, 2006) and translated recently Kierkegaard's Sygdommen til Doden into Dutch, budel: Damon 2010.
Dr Herman van Erp was, until his retirement in 2009, associate professor for social Philosophy and Ethics at tilburg university (netherlands). He is still adjunct professor for Philosophy at the university of Fort Hare in south-Africa. the main subject of his research concerns fundamental eth- ics and political philosophy. important authors for him are Kant, Hegel, Marx, Popper, rawls and Levinas. one of his books is translated in Eng- lish: Political Reason and Interest. A philosophical legitimation of the politi- cal order in a pluralistic society, London: Ashgate 2000. His last articles in English are concerning democratic legitimacy within a European con- stitution, Hegel's concept of freedom and history, and Kant's concept of sublimity.
sander Griffioen (1941) graduated in Political Economy and Philosophy. He wrote a dissertation on Hegel's philosophy of finitude (De Roos en het
276 contributors
Kruis, Assen: van Gorcum 1976). He was a senior Member at the toronto institute for Christian studies, and taught Philosophy at the Vrije univer- siteit (Amsterdam) from 1979-2002. From 2002-2006 he was special pro- fessor for intercultural Philosophy, his area of specialization being China. in 2005 and 2007 he gave courses on Chinese thought at tilburg uni- versity. His publications include: Pluralisms and Horizons, (with richard Mouw), Grand rapids: Eerdmans 1993 (2nd print); 'towards a Philosophy of God. A study in William Desmond's thought', in Philosophia Reformata 75 (2010), 117-140; 'Proximity and Distance. China and the Christian West', in: J. D. Gort, H. Jansen, W. stoker (eds. ), Crossroad Discourses between Christianity and Culture, Festschrift in Honor of Hendrik M. Vroom, Amsterdam/new York: rodopi 2010, pp. 471-486.
Peter Jonkers (1954) studied Philosophy at the Catholic university of Leuven, belgium. in 1982, he defended his dissertation at this university on Hegel's Faith and Knowledge. Currently, he is full professor of philoso- phy at the school of Catholic theology of tilburg university, the nether- lands. His main areas of research include German idealism, metaphysics, philosophy of religion, and philosophy of culture. some of his recent pub- lications are: God in France. Eight contemporary French Thinkers on God (2005); Hegel-Lexikon (2006); "Jacobi, ein ? Galimathias' der spekulativen Vernunft? " (2007); Religions Challenged by Contingency (2008); 'Justifying sacrifice' (2008); 'religious truth in a Globalising World' (2009); 'Can Free- dom of religion replace the Virtue of tolerance? ' (2010); 'the Dialectics of Pluralism and social Cohesion' (2011); 'orthopraxis and being Faithful to one's tradition' (2011).
Heinz Kimmerle (1930) is a retired professor of Philosophy at Eras- mus university rotterdam (Eur). He did his PhD in 1957 with Hans- Georg Gadamer at the university of Heidelberg on the hermeneutics of schleiermacher. For six years he worked at the Hegel-archive in bonn and bochum. in 1970 he got his 'Habilitation' (teaching license) for philosophy at the ruhr university bochum. During the last five years of his position at Eur (1990-1995) he had as a special teaching subject 'intercultural phi- losophy', mainly African philosophy. in 1996 he started the 'Foundation for intercultural Philosophy and Art'. And in 2003 was conferred on him the honorary doctorate of Literature and Philosophy by the university of south Africa (unisA) in Pretoria.
contributors 277
Dr. bart C. Labuschagne (1962) teaches philosophy of Law at Leiden university. He wrote a dissertation on the philosophical aspects of the freedom of religion (1995). His interests are the Philosophy of Law, reli- gion, Ethics and Politics. He publishes mainly about the role of religion in democratic, post-secular societies. He is also a translator of Hegel in Dutch. He has written a number of articles and books, among others, lately: Religion, Politics and Law. Philosophical Reflections on the Sources of Normative Order in Society, edited with reinhard W. sonnenschmidt, Leiden: brill 2009, 'towards a new relationship between the Private, Public and sacred Domains', in: t. buksinski (ed. ), Religion in the Public Spheres, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2011.
Henk oosterling (1952) is associate professor Philosophy at the Eras- mus university rotterdam, teaching French philosophy of differences, aesthetics, and intercultural philosophy with a focus on Japanese culture and buddhism. He studied martial arts in Japan. His academic research program Intermediality thematizes the crossovers between philosophy, arts and politics. recently he co-edited Intermedialities. Philosophy, Arts, and Politics (2011). He is the series editor of Studies in Intercultural Phi- losophy (rodopi). in 2004 he initiated rotterdam skillcity, a strategic concept for urban renovation and intercultural and eco-social education that has been adopted by the rotterdam city council as the blueprint of the 10 year renovation of rotterdam south. As director of this Foundation he supervises long term educational and societal projects in the socio- economic deprived neighbourhoods in rotterdam. More information: www. henkoosterling. nl.
timo slootweg (1962) studied Philosophy and History. He taught Phi- losophy of History in rotterdam. since 2004 he has been teaching Philoso- phy of Law and Ethics at the university of Leiden (the netherlands). His dissertation dealt with the ethical meaning of time, history and historical consciousness in the philosophies of Hegel, Heidegger and Derrida (2000). His publications are concerned with the relation between Law and Love; Knowledge and Faith; Christian Existentialism and Personalism; Dialecti- cal and Dialogical theology. recent publication on Hegel's Philosophy of religion: 'Love and Violence: Dialectical reflections on the Phenomenol- ogy of the Crusade' (2009); 'Das Go? ttliche Gebot und der Geist der Liebe. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Hegels fru? hen theologischen Voraussetzungen', Hegel-Jahrbuch 2010).
278 contributors
Gerrit steunebrink (1948) is a lecturer on Metaphysics and Philosophy of Culture and religion at the radboud university in nijmegen, the neth- erlands. He published on religion, esthetics and metaphysics. His favorite authors are Kant, Hegel, Jaspers and Adorno. He published too on reli- gion and modernity in political and intercultural perspective. the islamic world, especially of modernizing turkey, has his attention in these pub- lications. to his English publications belong: ? Civil society, religion and the nation, Modernization in intercultural context: russia, Japan, turkey? , rodopi 2004 (edited with E. van der Zweerde) and ? sovereignty, the nation state, and islam? in: Ethical Perspectives 2008, 1.
Lu De Vos (1953) teaches Philosophy at HiW of KuLeuven (belgium). He has published on classical German philosophy (Kant, Jacobi, Fichte, Hegel and schelling). Co-editor of Hegel-Lexikon. His areas of interest are funda- mental problems in metaphysics, philosophy of religion and aesthetics.
Abe, M. 70, 74, 75
Abraham 128, 129, 143, 145, 151, 153, 154,
218, 219
Adams, R. 151
Adamson, P. 232
Adonis 93
Adorno, Th. W. 53, 73 Ahriman 91
Al-Afghani 227
Al-Djabiri, M. A. 234 Al-Ghazali 229, 231, 232, 233, 234 Anaxagoras 66
Angerona 166
Antigone 120
Appiah, K. A. 18,
Aquinas, Thomas 226, 231, 232, 233 Aristophanes 122
Aristotle 83
Averroes 228, 229, 232, 233, 234 Avicenna 228, 229, 231, 232, 234
Bacchus 115, 117
Bataille, G. 70
Baum, M. 10
Bayle, P. 55 Behrens-Abousef, D. 235 Bloch, E. 29
Bonsiepen, W. 9
Bopp, F. 57
Bossouet, J. B. 29
Brahma(n) 40, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 53, 59,
60, 61, 68
Buber, M. 147, 151 Bubner, R. 123 Buchanan, F. 57 Buchner, H. 9 Buck-Morss, S. 15 Bu? rgel, J. Ch. 240 Burke, E. 211 Burnett, Ch. 232
Caesar 173
Carra de Vaux, B. 233
Cavacci, J. A. 14
Ceres 115, 117
Chapelle, A. 2
Christ, J. 55, 69, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 136,
137, 149, 150, 173, 177, 180, 188, 189, 190,
191, 193, 195, 197, 203, 219, 247, 256, 258,
260, 261, 266, 267, 268 Cicero 28
Cobben, P. 8, 253 Colebrooke, H. Th. 44, 56, 60 Confucius 23, 24, 28, 59 Cramer, W. 249
Creon 119 Creutzer, G. F. 53 Critchley, S. 141
Dadi, I. 15
DeFrancis, J. 26
Deleuze, G. 54, 76, 77
Derrida, J. 4, 19, 54, 76, 126, 139, 141, 143,
144, 154, 155
Descartes, R. 5, 254 Desmond, W. 259
Dierken, J. 182, 197, 202, 268 Dilthey, W. 126, 241 Dilworth, D. 70, 71
Du? sing, K. 10, 12
Eckhart, M. 204, 237 Elberfeld, R. 70, 71 Evans, C. S. 151, 152
Fames 166
Faure, B. 68, 69
Faure, M. 69
Fichte, J. G. 11, 12, 54, 71, 77, 139, 246 Febris 166
Fornax 166
Forster, J. G. A. 31
Fortuna 166, 168, 171
Foucault, M. 76
Fourche, T. 16
Fukuyama, F. 70
Fulda, H. F. 246, 249, 259
Gadamer, H. G. 2
Gardet, L. 232
Gascoigne, R. 268
Gaziaux, E. 246
Gelugpa 58
Goethe, J. W. 6, 22, 28, 213, 223, 225, 227,
237, 239, 240 Guattari, F.
Hegel is lutheran insofar as he is a child of his time. 52 therefore, he offers a very reflected Protestantism, that has learned to avoid the nonsensical (metaphysical) versions of (pre-enlightened) Christianity. if we now look at lutheran Protestantism in relation to three common topics, the three 'sola-principles' of luther, we can try to discern how and in what way Hegel is reacting on them.
does Hegel's philosophy accept 'sola fide'? For Hegel, faith is necessary in relation to Christ's death and resurrection, (V5: 284) to begin a reli- gious Christian community. But faith is only one of the religious expres- sions and is one-sided, although Hegel also accepts devotion as a kind of practical faith. Hegel presents specific theological topics from Christian faith, such as the trinity, the son of man, and spirit. spirit is considered the basic notion of religion, as well as of the philosophical doctrine of religion. For, in the pietist Protestantism of his day, there is the minimal form of immediate knowledge, where god is given in consciousness as spirit. it is just this form that is interesting to Hegel, so that he can link that consciousness with philosophy, which justifies it.
is there a philosophical understanding of 'sola scriptura'? Hegel accepts the Bible as the basis of Christian faith and as a book of the people (in their own language). However, such a Biblical basis is not sufficient. Hegel is aware of the problems of reading the Bible and of translation, and exegetical, (rationalistic) ways of reading the text,53 and that, in modern times, a lot of problems have arisen for which 'the letter' alone has no solution. thus, only 'the spirit' could provide a solution, but it must be inspired spirit, and that inspiration is only certain by the witness of that spirit; and the highest witness is for him: philosophical thinking.
52 insofar as he is not taking into account the eastern churches (deliberately, in his manuscript V5: 89).
53 Hegel is here alluding to the discussion between lessing and goeze, as well as to schleiermacher.
? 266 lu de vos
is there a philosophical justification of 'sola gratia'? Hegel remarks in his courses54 that there seems to be a theological opposition between grace and freedom. He himself, however, interprets the enjoyment ('Genuss'), that i am in the grace of god, or that his spirit is living in me, as the conscious union of reconciliation. it is just this reconciliation for all (not just for individuals or particular communities) that provides a conceptual solution to the problem. if everyone can use his own freedom (or spirit) to realise spirit, then grace is present for everybody. Perhaps here, this strange sort of philosophical interpretation is not bound to a particular church but is really aware of the Christian sense of salvation. it is in fact not the church that is the aim of the Christian message, but the salvation of the world (by Christ himself and not some church or another), sublated in spirit as such. For the sake of participation in this reconciliation, Hegel is interested in the sacrifice of the heart, not through a symbolic cultic act, but in reality, so that the subject attains an "absolute conviction" ('Gesin- nung') (V5, p. 284), which is at the same time the Christian (Protestant) inspiration for (and the guarantee of ) worldly institutions! such a convic- tion instantiates the morally active subjectivity (of everybody), the result of the freedom of history, within ethical institutions, insofar as these are absolutely guaranteed by god. such a conviction is not the same as Prot- estant-theological moralism, or the (felt) claim of absolute moral 'ought's' about families or states. Hegel's critique of such forms is the critique of a (in Hegel's view) sectarian (or traditionally understood) Protestantism (as the case of de Wette has shown). the same philosophical argument is valid against Catholicism: neither a church, nor theologians (as semi- priests) has the authority to render binding decisions (or to criticise in a sermon legally discussed decisions), for, in that case, they repeat the servitude of the laymen by prescribing what is valid for, and also the valid insight of, everybody!
Hegel's philosophical view of the Protestant position is thus not a tra- ditional, 'nai? ve' (or felt) lutheran view. Very specifically, and against com- mon Protestant inspiration, it consists only of three main views. these topics are indeed taken from the Christian tradition, but are worked out in such a way that they are rationally understood (but not of course in the sense of simply being de-mythologized and reduced to preconceived
54 in both courses, there are no further remarks about the teleologically difficult prob- lem that the activity of grace could present difficulties in relation to freedom (V3: 249, 1824).
? hegel and protestantism 267
scientific results) and elevated to a rational core available to everybody, which is the task of philosophy itself.
First of all, God as spirit is a philosophical interpretation, although spirit is a topic common to both the theology of spirit and the philosophy of spirit. spirit is not a simple topic, nor only one of faith (fide), but is instead linked with reason and knowledge in such a way that the empty, rationalistic (i. e. enlightenment) result is avoided. 55 the move from 'god' to 'spirit' can be explained by Hegel's aversion to theology, in as far as it has borrowed determinations from metaphysical ontology without inquir- ing into their validity. if, on the contrary, spirit is really the topic of the Christian or Christian-inspired community, then--according to Hegel's argument--everybody can accept that content containing (absolute) spirit. such a spirit is never a being that is fully independent of subjective and objective spirit, for, only in developing its notion, does spirit show how far it can take up the concept and thus being, in consciousness, also the full singularisation of its concept.
secondly, although Hegel accepts the doctrine of immortality as a specifically Christian one, he gives a philosophical interpretation of it; immortality must be interpreted as (its) own knowledge and thus as eter- nal (V5, 227 or also 140). this knowledge accepts the right of the subject to perform its action with insight. that is, morality does not imply strange or universalistic (or even Christian) commands, but the subjective version of a freedom (of infinite value) in conformity with a common freedom. in this way, it would be possible (in principle) for everybody to accept this philosophical reconstruction. However, such an account or interpretation seems not to be in conformity with scripture, according to a fundamental- ist reading of the Bible.
thirdly, Hegel offers a very specific interpretation of 'grace': it is not specifically only grace for some (as in the doctrine of predestination), but rather a task (in or of freedom) for everybody, insofar as grace is the recon- ciliation performed in and through spirit. according to this doctrine, evil is (after Christ) reconciled (not only for particular religious people, but also for everybody). evil is (according to Christianity) not an ontological
55 on this point, t. guz makes a difficult statement; his overall thesis is that Hegel's logic and philosophy is only a development of lutheran theology; but at least on one point he himself gives the counterexample: faith for luther is not ex ratione, whereas Hegel accepts the rationality of every religion and of faith. see t. guz, Zum Gottesbegriff G. W. F. Hegels im Ru? ckblick auf das Gottesversta? ndnis Martin Luthers: eine metaphysische Untersu- chung, Frankfurt am main: P. lang 1998, p. 230, note 193!
? 268 lu de vos
category (that would be a return to manichaeism or to the religion of the Pharisees)56 (V5, 226-7), but a thought (linked with consciousness) and a moral one (with implications for ethicity--in the relation of the subjec- tive part in ethical relations, or insofar as it may not concretise its duty in the right way). evil is just a moral category, and indicates in its communal form a 'bad existence', that may happen to exist ('Daseyn'), as there are bad states (e. g. tyranny), bad religions (for Hegel, this includes the roman Catholic version of Christianity), bad sciences (e. g. phrenology), (16: 261), but it does not have actuality ('Wirklichkeit') in a philosophical sense, insofar as a merely bad existence is an existence that will end at a certain moment without achieving its own purpose and without concep- tual result. 57 the claim valid for everybody, however, is to realise the rec- onciliation, in as far as everybody presents him- or herself as spirit. 58 even if this is contrary to specific (Protestant) doctrines of particular grace, it makes sense in terms of the Christian doctrine of reconciliation of, and salvation for all people of 'good willing', i. e. for all those who are acting in a really free way. in this interpretation, it is only the Protestant thematic principle of grace that enables, in its radical (philosophical) account, for everybody, the independence of the law of the community from specific Christian doctrine, so that there historically arises inner justice and ethic- ity of the state (see 18: 173).
c. Protestantism is Not Only a Religious, but also an Historical Principle59 Protestantism is not only a distinct theology, not only a doctrine of sal-
vation in the development of cult, but it also has, as such a doctrine, an
56 accordingly, no historical event is such a bad 'in itself '. the only event of such impor- tance could be the crucifixion of Jesus out of which (o felix culpa) he has appeared for the community as Christ.
57 even the genocides of the 20th century (of Hitler, stalin, Pol Pot, etc. ) have had--too late--an end: the result is, at least in one case, a resurrection of common freedom.
58 even in history, there is no theodicy-problem of evil. Bad and evil events are not pro- duced by a world spirit, but are produced by spirits, the sense of which is to be reconciled by considering, that--even with such elements--there may be a progression of freedom and of consciousness thereof. For a discussion of history as theodicy of freedom and not of god, see W. Hu? ffer, Theodizee der Freiheit. (Hegel-studien. Beiheft 46), Hamburg: Bouvier Verlag 2002. that there is no notion of god who could be the object of protest for what humans themselves do in history, see W. Jaeschke, Hegel-Handbuch, stuttgart & Weimar: J. B. metzler 2003, pp. 412-414.
59 see J. dierken, Hegels 'protestantisches Prinzip', in: Hegels Vorlesungen u? ber die Philoso- phie der Weltgeschichte (Hegel-studien. Beiheft 38), Bonn: Bouvier Verlag 1998, pp. 123-146. For a composite view, see r. gascoigne, Religion, Rationality and Community, dordrecht: martinus nijhoff Publishers 1985, pp. 266-7.
? hegel and protestantism 269
historical principle out of cult (see specifically V3, 340 as well as V5, 269). With this specific insight into the structure of history in Christian times, we come to Hegel's most specific (later) insight, that the Protestant world is that world in which Christian freedom appears in actuality ('Wirklich- keit') for everybody, insofar as only therein is rational ethicity (which is attainable in principle for everyone) the realised, free goal of the devel- opment of Protestant Christianity, in opposition to the 'Catholic' non- realisation.
this claim in principle, on the political and historical differences between the Christian churches, is given by Hegel on the occasion of a festival in the Oratio in Sacris Saecularibus tertiis Traditae Confessio- nis Augustanae (Speech for the Celebration of the Jubilee of the Confessio Augustana, 1830). 60 this Oratio (speech) has a negative thesis: against Catholicism, Hegel posits that faith and doctrine are no longer the pur- view of a commission of scholars nor of a spiritual-clerical ('geistliche') authority. Furthermore, there is no need for a separate holiness, because it is just such a view on holiness that makes impossible any real reconcili- ation among Catholic states, either as ethicity or in their constitution. .
the positive doctrine of the Oratio amounts to one main point. reli- gion is not merely a private affair, but rather, the (Christian) religion is the womb of real freedom. 61 Because Christian religion teaches freedom, there can be no possible separation of religion and state. therefore, only some specific state can be with some corresponding religion. religion and ethicity have the same character, which is also the case in the soul of the individual. this elaboration is seen in the philosophy of history: the (reli- gious) spirit is the basis of all other forms; it is one individuality, whose essence can be represented as god, and venerated and enjoyed within religion. the german nations are educated in and through Christianity, being taught that man is free (18: 153). this acceptance of Christian reli- gion is only the beginning, not the full realisation of freedom. there is a difference between the Christian principle (for all german nations) and the evolution thereof. thus, history shows differences of level in the elabo- ration of freedom.
60 see J. ritter, Hegel und die Reformation (1968), in: J. ritter, Metaphysik und Politik, Frankfurt am main: suhrkamp 1969, pp. 310-317 (first edition in: Unbefangenes Christen- tum, mu? nchen, 1968, pp. 89-99).
61 Freedom is not restricted to Christianity, but, for the first time in history, it is Christi- anity that learns that everybody (and not only a citizen, nor a specific person) is free.
? 270 lu de vos
Protestantism is the destruction of the obedience (to the clergy) of all free Christian people. such servitude, within the form of free religion, con- tains its own contradiction. Crucial in Hegel's account are the events of the 16th century. the historical reaction to the 'Catholic' middle ages can be found in the position of the lutheran or evangelical doctrines. Karl V had been content, according to Hegel, with the pillage of rome, and not achieving liberation from the Pope. in augsburg, it was the Holy spirit, which 'seized the moment' and went further in initiating a spiritual free- dom, a step the emperor was not able to take. What is sacred ('heilig') is not strictly the purview of the priests (or the theologians), but is also given to laymen (16: 249). the so-called laymen have their own judgment and authority to speak about religion, which is confirmed by the testimony of spirit. everybody performs and perfects his or her own relation to god in spirit, which is consciousness of reason, or of god himself. the state can become, through the will of god, an implicitly (in itself ) independent, worldly, instantiated ethical form, which is the basis for the government of all justly governed states. the rights of the community as well as the ethical duties of all persons are in this way recognised by god.
if both government and church have the same inspiration, it is impos- sible for a government to have foreign, external (e. g. Catholic) influence. the principles of religion and state come together in the truth of all free- dom. man cannot have confidence in a law if he is not convinced that religion is not in contradiction with it, as is the case in Catholicism, where the rules of sanctity are proscribed by the roman church. Family, prop- erty and freedom in the state are necessary prerequisites for a free com- munity. in this sense, the Catholic religion does not give rise to the inner justice and ethicity of the state, which is present in the inwardness of the Protestant principle. only the reformation reveals the total divine and spiritual process in man; this free man exists as free insofar as he wills the true and lawfully ethical, and knows it as the universal.
after the treaty of Westphalia, the Protestant principle, sanctified free- dom, is taken up by Friedrich ii, on the worldly side. 62 such Protestantism is the basis and origin of the constitution of the state. in other words, without Christian reconciliation in the Protestant church (which sanctifies freedom), there is no authentic conviction of loyalty to the constitution of
62 see e. Weisser-lohmann, "reformation" und "Friedrich ii" in den geschichtsphilo- sophischen Vorlesungen Hegels, in: Hegels Vorlesungen u? ber die Philosophie der Weltge- schichte (Hegel-studien. Beiheft 38), Bonn, Bouvier Verlag 1998, pp. 95-121.
? hegel and protestantism 271
a state. While there is a good result in Prussia and other german nations (but not in austria), this is only a partial reconciliation, as long as other countries are not reconciled in this manner. the remaining differences between them, the failures to renew the civil law in France, and the influ- ence of Protestantism itself are at the foreground of Hegel's last course on history (Vie, 59 ff ). thus, there remain difficulties of content, within his- tory! in north america, there was an atomistic, individualised liberal Prot- estantism, that--for Hegel--remained merely at the level of the market (i. e. civil society), and did not arrive at a real constitutional state. in south america, the negative influence of Catholicism was still dominant, so that in the known world of Hegel's time, the reconciliation of Protestantism is only fully realized in (constitutionally interpreted) Prussia (Vie, 240-1).
at this point, the state is reconciled with god and god with state. Civil freedom and justice are the fruits of this attained freedom in god, because religious and philosophical consciousness of the will of god are no longer distinct from consciousness of that which is true and lawful: an ethic- ity, which promotes and fulfils even the sensuous character of the body within its sublated form as free member of the community, in as far a he may marry and fulfil his economic necessities. For the human spirit, the knowledge of god is the origin or most certain principle of all ethical action. What cannot be deduced from god and is not sanctified by him, is not able to move in joyful obedience to the law. 63
4. Philosophy of religion or of History?
is Hegel's philosophy, which combines rational interpretations of religion with views on history in order to conceive what is actual, criticisable as insufficiently religious or insufficiently Protestant, or is it criticisable as insufficiently philosophical?
in all texts cited here, Hegel claims to demonstrate the rationality of the definitive, consummate religion or to indicate that the historical Christian religion corresponds to the concept of what is rational (and not, importantly, the other way around). With Hegel's emphasis on spirit, his presentation of religion and Christian religion in particular, is made ratio- nally, in the same sense in which he presents a rational view of history.
63 this sanctification is not a second world of holiness (like 'in Catholicism'), but it is the final, not immediately arising, justification of what is done spiritually in ethicity (i. e. the consciousness of the truth), not a justification on a case-by-case basis.
? 272 lu de vos
His philosophy of religion (and also of history) is, first and foremost, phi- losophy. it is not dependent on the truth-claims of religion in general or any denomination in particular. His philosophy of religion exposes the form of conceptual knowledge about religion, in which religion (or abso- lute spirit) (and also history) is the topic (i. e. the content) of the discus- sion, not its premise. such a Hegelian project is not dependent upon the theology of Christianity, nor does it wish to be. on the contrary, insofar as religion and Christianity have rationality, it is philosophy that can dem- onstrate the intelligibility in the historical evolution from religious com- munity to its political, historical shape. For Hegel, the realisation of truth in spirit is performed, in its ultimate instance, by the concept. For the task of philosophy is to conceive the present, even a divided actuality, as an actuality, which only conceals its own reconciliation if people remain at the level of their own subjective (nai? ve) impression, but which may be understood as reconciled, if they try to conceive it as rational (and within the search of rationality).
How far can religion be transformed and yet still recognised by religious people? if the salvation of all is the goal, then every discussion about reli- gion has to be conducted in a manner that is understandable for all. Hegel, at the very least, tries to formulate his claims in such a way. He presents the topics of Christian religion as such: god, creation, incarnation, death and resurrection in or as spirit. as with other topics presented in other philosophical disciplines, these topics are treated without (presupposed) metaphysical notions. in other words, these 'metaphysical concepts' are presented in their (negatively reformulated) speculative form. in this way, religion is not taken up as the final word, certainly not as theology or as the clergy would have it, but rather only as a (particular) religious claim. even in criticizing and opposing such a philosophy of religion, the people and theologians can contribute to a more complex elaboration of what reli- gion is for thinking, and for the thinking of thinking itself.
in the philosophically rational sense in which the philosophy of reli- gion is presented, the philosophical topics are therefore actually the con- cept and the idea. therein a number of specific problems has risen for a speculative philosophy of religion. in what sense is 'god' indeed the best example of the concept of the idea? in what sense does the logical- speculative concept indeed structure the Christian religion? neither with logic as such, nor with specific parts, is a 'specific' relation or parallelism immediately given. such questions are difficult exegetical and systematic problems, which could not be taken up in this treatment of Hegel's view
hegel and protestantism 273
on Protestantism. However, answers to these questions are needed for a minimal understanding of the consistency of Hegel's actual philosophy of religion, and certainly for any rational critique of it.
Conclusion
is it really necessary to ask, as most interpreters do, as a philosophical question, whether Hegel is a (good) Christian,64 or, more specifically, an orthodox, or a heterodox one? 65 Philosophically speaking, the question would rather seem to be whether Hegel has sufficiently demonstrated the rationality and intelligibility of Protestant Christian religion, and its impact in history, insofar as this impact is not limited to aspects of (a given, subjective) faith.
neither the atheistic claim that god is not elevated above of all the rest (god is indeed, for Hegel, the truth of nature and history), nor the irreli- gious claim that there is no spiritualisation of the world, are Hegel's fun- damental positions. it is rather, the claim that god cannot be thought of as independent of every (religious) thought (in this formulation, it is clear that such a claim of independency is contradictory). this claim means there could not be a valuable ontology of religion anymore, since ontol- ogy is based on having contents, rather than being elaborated in concepts. accordingly, for Hegel, god must be presented as spirit in religion as well as in philosophy.
the philosophical point, however, is the following: has Hegel suffi- ciently grounded the rational insight that Christianity, in its Protestant expression and in its historical evolution, is valid as a good, consummated religion of reconciled freedom? moreover, has he shown for everybody (whether or not he or she is a philosopher) that such a religion has basi- cally contributed, to the real, lived, historical freedom of us all?
64 J. Burbidge, 'is Hegel a Christian? ', in: J. Burbidge, Hegel on Logic and Religion, albany: state University of new York Press 1992, pp. 141-153.
65 see Hodgson, o. c. , 100, who gives a catalogue of theological questions, as if either a theologian or anyone else could decide what orthodoxy is; nobody has 'Unfehlbarkeit', with exception of the self-given claim of the Pope. For a Catholic discussion see H. Ku? ng, Unfehlbar? Eine Anfrage, Zu? rich: Benziger Verlag 1998. asking such questions (which takes over the role of the (Catholic) Holy see, or even of every inquisition) seems to be the affair of god, who is--in the event that he would be interested in such questions? not Hegel's rational living spirit of community.
? Contributors
Paul Cobben is Professor of Philosophy at tilburg university (the nether- lands) and chairman of Dutch-Flemish Centre for German idealism (www . cvdi. eu). His publications focus on practical philosophy, combining a sys- tematic and historical approach. Among his books: Das endliche Selbst. Identita? t und Differenz zwischen Hegels >>Pha? nomenologie des Geistes<< und Heideggers >>Sein und Zeit<<, Wu? rzburg: Ko? nigshausen und neumann 1999; Das Gesetz der multikulturellen Gesellschaft. Eine Aktualisierung von Hegels >>Grundlinien der Philosphie des Rechts<<, Wu? rzburg: Ko? nigshausen und neumann 2002; Hegel-Lexikon (ed. ), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftlichen buchgesellschaft 2006; The Nature of the Self. Recognition in the Form of Right and Morality, berlin/new York: De Gruyter 2009; Institutions of Edu- cation: then and today (ed. ), Leiden/boston: brill 2010.
Paul Cruysberghs (1944) is an emeritus Professor at the institute of Phi- losophy of the Catholic university of Leuven (belgium), where he taught philosophical anthropology and aesthetics. He published on anthropol- ogy, aesthetics, and ethics, especially in German idealism (Hegel) and in Kierkegaard. He is a co-editor of the Hegel-Lexikon (Darmstadt, Wissen- schaftliche buchgesellschaft, 2006) and translated recently Kierkegaard's Sygdommen til Doden into Dutch, budel: Damon 2010.
Dr Herman van Erp was, until his retirement in 2009, associate professor for social Philosophy and Ethics at tilburg university (netherlands). He is still adjunct professor for Philosophy at the university of Fort Hare in south-Africa. the main subject of his research concerns fundamental eth- ics and political philosophy. important authors for him are Kant, Hegel, Marx, Popper, rawls and Levinas. one of his books is translated in Eng- lish: Political Reason and Interest. A philosophical legitimation of the politi- cal order in a pluralistic society, London: Ashgate 2000. His last articles in English are concerning democratic legitimacy within a European con- stitution, Hegel's concept of freedom and history, and Kant's concept of sublimity.
sander Griffioen (1941) graduated in Political Economy and Philosophy. He wrote a dissertation on Hegel's philosophy of finitude (De Roos en het
276 contributors
Kruis, Assen: van Gorcum 1976). He was a senior Member at the toronto institute for Christian studies, and taught Philosophy at the Vrije univer- siteit (Amsterdam) from 1979-2002. From 2002-2006 he was special pro- fessor for intercultural Philosophy, his area of specialization being China. in 2005 and 2007 he gave courses on Chinese thought at tilburg uni- versity. His publications include: Pluralisms and Horizons, (with richard Mouw), Grand rapids: Eerdmans 1993 (2nd print); 'towards a Philosophy of God. A study in William Desmond's thought', in Philosophia Reformata 75 (2010), 117-140; 'Proximity and Distance. China and the Christian West', in: J. D. Gort, H. Jansen, W. stoker (eds. ), Crossroad Discourses between Christianity and Culture, Festschrift in Honor of Hendrik M. Vroom, Amsterdam/new York: rodopi 2010, pp. 471-486.
Peter Jonkers (1954) studied Philosophy at the Catholic university of Leuven, belgium. in 1982, he defended his dissertation at this university on Hegel's Faith and Knowledge. Currently, he is full professor of philoso- phy at the school of Catholic theology of tilburg university, the nether- lands. His main areas of research include German idealism, metaphysics, philosophy of religion, and philosophy of culture. some of his recent pub- lications are: God in France. Eight contemporary French Thinkers on God (2005); Hegel-Lexikon (2006); "Jacobi, ein ? Galimathias' der spekulativen Vernunft? " (2007); Religions Challenged by Contingency (2008); 'Justifying sacrifice' (2008); 'religious truth in a Globalising World' (2009); 'Can Free- dom of religion replace the Virtue of tolerance? ' (2010); 'the Dialectics of Pluralism and social Cohesion' (2011); 'orthopraxis and being Faithful to one's tradition' (2011).
Heinz Kimmerle (1930) is a retired professor of Philosophy at Eras- mus university rotterdam (Eur). He did his PhD in 1957 with Hans- Georg Gadamer at the university of Heidelberg on the hermeneutics of schleiermacher. For six years he worked at the Hegel-archive in bonn and bochum. in 1970 he got his 'Habilitation' (teaching license) for philosophy at the ruhr university bochum. During the last five years of his position at Eur (1990-1995) he had as a special teaching subject 'intercultural phi- losophy', mainly African philosophy. in 1996 he started the 'Foundation for intercultural Philosophy and Art'. And in 2003 was conferred on him the honorary doctorate of Literature and Philosophy by the university of south Africa (unisA) in Pretoria.
contributors 277
Dr. bart C. Labuschagne (1962) teaches philosophy of Law at Leiden university. He wrote a dissertation on the philosophical aspects of the freedom of religion (1995). His interests are the Philosophy of Law, reli- gion, Ethics and Politics. He publishes mainly about the role of religion in democratic, post-secular societies. He is also a translator of Hegel in Dutch. He has written a number of articles and books, among others, lately: Religion, Politics and Law. Philosophical Reflections on the Sources of Normative Order in Society, edited with reinhard W. sonnenschmidt, Leiden: brill 2009, 'towards a new relationship between the Private, Public and sacred Domains', in: t. buksinski (ed. ), Religion in the Public Spheres, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2011.
Henk oosterling (1952) is associate professor Philosophy at the Eras- mus university rotterdam, teaching French philosophy of differences, aesthetics, and intercultural philosophy with a focus on Japanese culture and buddhism. He studied martial arts in Japan. His academic research program Intermediality thematizes the crossovers between philosophy, arts and politics. recently he co-edited Intermedialities. Philosophy, Arts, and Politics (2011). He is the series editor of Studies in Intercultural Phi- losophy (rodopi). in 2004 he initiated rotterdam skillcity, a strategic concept for urban renovation and intercultural and eco-social education that has been adopted by the rotterdam city council as the blueprint of the 10 year renovation of rotterdam south. As director of this Foundation he supervises long term educational and societal projects in the socio- economic deprived neighbourhoods in rotterdam. More information: www. henkoosterling. nl.
timo slootweg (1962) studied Philosophy and History. He taught Phi- losophy of History in rotterdam. since 2004 he has been teaching Philoso- phy of Law and Ethics at the university of Leiden (the netherlands). His dissertation dealt with the ethical meaning of time, history and historical consciousness in the philosophies of Hegel, Heidegger and Derrida (2000). His publications are concerned with the relation between Law and Love; Knowledge and Faith; Christian Existentialism and Personalism; Dialecti- cal and Dialogical theology. recent publication on Hegel's Philosophy of religion: 'Love and Violence: Dialectical reflections on the Phenomenol- ogy of the Crusade' (2009); 'Das Go? ttliche Gebot und der Geist der Liebe. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Hegels fru? hen theologischen Voraussetzungen', Hegel-Jahrbuch 2010).
278 contributors
Gerrit steunebrink (1948) is a lecturer on Metaphysics and Philosophy of Culture and religion at the radboud university in nijmegen, the neth- erlands. He published on religion, esthetics and metaphysics. His favorite authors are Kant, Hegel, Jaspers and Adorno. He published too on reli- gion and modernity in political and intercultural perspective. the islamic world, especially of modernizing turkey, has his attention in these pub- lications. to his English publications belong: ? Civil society, religion and the nation, Modernization in intercultural context: russia, Japan, turkey? , rodopi 2004 (edited with E. van der Zweerde) and ? sovereignty, the nation state, and islam? in: Ethical Perspectives 2008, 1.
Lu De Vos (1953) teaches Philosophy at HiW of KuLeuven (belgium). He has published on classical German philosophy (Kant, Jacobi, Fichte, Hegel and schelling). Co-editor of Hegel-Lexikon. His areas of interest are funda- mental problems in metaphysics, philosophy of religion and aesthetics.
Abe, M. 70, 74, 75
Abraham 128, 129, 143, 145, 151, 153, 154,
218, 219
Adams, R. 151
Adamson, P. 232
Adonis 93
Adorno, Th. W. 53, 73 Ahriman 91
Al-Afghani 227
Al-Djabiri, M. A. 234 Al-Ghazali 229, 231, 232, 233, 234 Anaxagoras 66
Angerona 166
Antigone 120
Appiah, K. A. 18,
Aquinas, Thomas 226, 231, 232, 233 Aristophanes 122
Aristotle 83
Averroes 228, 229, 232, 233, 234 Avicenna 228, 229, 231, 232, 234
Bacchus 115, 117
Bataille, G. 70
Baum, M. 10
Bayle, P. 55 Behrens-Abousef, D. 235 Bloch, E. 29
Bonsiepen, W. 9
Bopp, F. 57
Bossouet, J. B. 29
Brahma(n) 40, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 53, 59,
60, 61, 68
Buber, M. 147, 151 Bubner, R. 123 Buchanan, F. 57 Buchner, H. 9 Buck-Morss, S. 15 Bu? rgel, J. Ch. 240 Burke, E. 211 Burnett, Ch. 232
Caesar 173
Carra de Vaux, B. 233
Cavacci, J. A. 14
Ceres 115, 117
Chapelle, A. 2
Christ, J. 55, 69, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 136,
137, 149, 150, 173, 177, 180, 188, 189, 190,
191, 193, 195, 197, 203, 219, 247, 256, 258,
260, 261, 266, 267, 268 Cicero 28
Cobben, P. 8, 253 Colebrooke, H. Th. 44, 56, 60 Confucius 23, 24, 28, 59 Cramer, W. 249
Creon 119 Creutzer, G. F. 53 Critchley, S. 141
Dadi, I. 15
DeFrancis, J. 26
Deleuze, G. 54, 76, 77
Derrida, J. 4, 19, 54, 76, 126, 139, 141, 143,
144, 154, 155
Descartes, R. 5, 254 Desmond, W. 259
Dierken, J. 182, 197, 202, 268 Dilthey, W. 126, 241 Dilworth, D. 70, 71
Du? sing, K. 10, 12
Eckhart, M. 204, 237 Elberfeld, R. 70, 71 Evans, C. S. 151, 152
Fames 166
Faure, B. 68, 69
Faure, M. 69
Fichte, J. G. 11, 12, 54, 71, 77, 139, 246 Febris 166
Fornax 166
Forster, J. G. A. 31
Fortuna 166, 168, 171
Foucault, M. 76
Fourche, T. 16
Fukuyama, F. 70
Fulda, H. F. 246, 249, 259
Gadamer, H. G. 2
Gardet, L. 232
Gascoigne, R. 268
Gaziaux, E. 246
Gelugpa 58
Goethe, J. W. 6, 22, 28, 213, 223, 225, 227,
237, 239, 240 Guattari, F.
