It seems likely that after the death of Claudian
(404) and that of his hero, Stilicho, the political
poems (with the exception of the Panegyric on Probinus and Olybrius,4 which did not concern
Stilicho) were collected" and published separately.
(404) and that of his hero, Stilicho, the political
poems (with the exception of the Panegyric on Probinus and Olybrius,4 which did not concern
Stilicho) were collected" and published separately.
Claudian - 1922 - Loeb
vi.
1710 ( = Dessau 2949).
Now in the Naples Museum.
[CI. ] Claudiani v. c. | [Cla]udio Claudiano v. c, tri | [bu]no et notario, inter ceteras | [de]centes artes prae[g]loriosissimo
| [po]etarum, licet ad memoriam sem|piternam carmina ab eodem | scripta sufficiant, adtamen | testimonii gratia ob iudicii sui | [f]idem, dd. nn. Arcadius et Honorius | [fe-] licissimi et doctissimi | imperatores senatu petente I statuam in foro divi Traiani | erigi collocarique iusserunt.
ffiv evl Bipyi\ioio vbov [ koX Movaav \ KXavStavdv 'PwjUt; /cat ] /3a<7t\% Zdeeav.
v. c. =vir clarissimus, i. e. (roughly) The Rt. Hon. dd. nn. = domini nostri. The inscription may be translated: — To Claudius Claudianus v. c, son of Claudius Claudianus v. c, tribune and notary {i. e. Permanent Secretary), master of the ennobling arts but above all a poet and most famous of poets,
though his own poems are enough to ensure his immortality, yet, in thankful memory of his discretion and loyalty, their serene and learned majesties, the Emperors Arcadius and Honorius have, at the instance of the senate, bidden this statue to be raised and set up in the Forum of the Emperor Trajan of blessed memory. —
Rome and her kings to one who has combined A Homer's music with a Vergil's mind.
- xxv. 7.
8 John Lydus (fie magistr. i. 47) writes oStos 6 Jla. tp\aywv, but this, as Birt has shown, is merely an abusive appellation,
xii
INTRODUCTION
Suidas and the lines of Sidonius Apollinaris,1 which clearly refer to Claudian and which give Canopus as the place of his birth. (Canopus is almost certainly to be taken as synonymous with Egypt. ) But besides these two statements we have only to look at his
interest in things Egyptian, e. g. his poems on the Nile, the Phoenix, etc. , at such passages as his account of the rites at Memphis,2 at such phrases as " nostro cognite Nilo," 3 to see that the poet is an Egyptian himself. It is probable that, whether or not he spent all his early life in Egypt, Claudian did not visit Rome until 394. We know from his own state ment 4 that his first essays in literature were all of them written in Greek and that it was not until the year 395 that he started to write Latin. It is not unlikely, therefore, that his change of country and of literary language were more or less contempo raneous, and it is highly probable that he was in Rome before January 3, 395, on which day his
friends the Anicii (Probinus and Olybrius) entered
their consulship. Speaking, moreover, of Stilicho's consulship in 400 Claudian mentions a five
absence. 5 Not long after January 3, 395, Claudian seems to have betaken himself to the court at Milan, and it is from there that he sends letters to Probinus and Olybrius. 6 Here the poet seems to have stayed for five years, and here he seems to
1 Sid. Ap. Carm. ix. 274.
2 viii. 570 et sqq.
3 Carm. min. corp. xix. 3 : cf. also Carm. min. corp.
xxii. 20.
4 Carm. min. corp. xli. 13.
6 xxiii. 23.
• Carm. min. corp. xl. and xli. ; see ref. to Via Flaminia
upon
years'
in xl. 8.
xiii
INTRODUCTION
have won for himself a position of some importance. As we see from the inscription quoted above, he became vir clarissimus, tribunus et notarius, and, as he does not continue further along the road of honours (does not, for instance, become a vir spectabilis) we must suppose that he served in some capacity on Stilicho's private staff. No doubt he became a sort of poet laureate.
"
The Emperor Honorius became consul for the third time on January 3, 396, and on this occasion
Claudian read his Panegyric in the emperor's pres ence. 2
Some five weeks before this event another of greater importance had occurred in the East. This was the murder of Rufinus, the praetorian prefect, amid the circumstances that have been related above. The date of the composition of Claudian's two poems " In Rufinum " is certainly to be placed. within the years 395-397, and the mention of a " tenuem moram " 3 makes it probable that Book II.
It is probable that the
during the first two years of his sojourn at the court of Milan. The poem is dedicated, or addressed, to Florentinus,1 who was praefectus urbi from August 395 to the end of 397 when he fell into disgrace with Stilicho. It is to this circumstance that we are to attribute the unfinished state of Claudian's poem.
was written considerably later than Book I. references, moreover, in the Preface to Book II. to
a victory of Stilicho clearly point to that general's defeat of the Goths near Elis in 397.
To the year 398 belong the Panegyric on the 1 Praef. ii. SO.
xiv
! vi. 17.
3 iv. 15.
De raptu
was written
"
; the
INTRODUCTION
fourth consulship of Honorius and the poems cele brating the marriage of the emperor to Stilicho's daughter, Maria. We have already seen that the Gildo episode and Claudian's poem on that subject are to be attributed to this same year.
The consuls for the year 399 were both, in different ways, considered worthy of the poet's pen. Perhaps the most savage of all his poems was directed against Eutropius, the eunuch chamberlain, whose claim to the consulship the West never recognized,1 while a Panegyric on Flavius Manlius Theodoras made amends for an abusive epigram which the usually more politic Claudian had previously levelled at him. 2
At the end of 399, or possibly at the beginning of 400, Claudian returned to Rome 3 where, probably in February,4 he recited his poem on the consulship of Stilicho ; and we have no reason for supposing that the poet left the capital from this time on until his departure for his ill-starred journey four years
later. In the year 402,6 as has already been men tioned, Stilicho defeated Alaric at Pollentia, and Claudian recited his poem on the Gothic war some time during the summer of the same year. The scene of the recitation seems to have been the Bibliotheca Templi Apollinis. 6 It was in this year, too, that the poet reached the summit of his great-
1 Cf. xxii. 291 et sqq.
2 Carm. min. xxi.
3 xxiii. 23.
1 So Birt, Praef. p. xlii. note 1.
6 It should perhaps be mentioned that this date is dis
puted : see Crees, Claudian as an Historical Authority,
pp. 175 et sqq.
6 xxv. 4"Pythia
. . . domus. "
XV
INTRODUCTION
ness in the dedication of the statue which, as we have seen, was accorded to him by the wishes of the emperor and at the demand of the senate.
The last of Claudian's datable public poems is that on the sixth consulship of Honorius. It was composed probably towards the end of 403 and recited in Rome on (or after) the occasion of the emperor's triumphant entry into the city. The emperor had just returned after inflicting a defeat on the Goths at Verona in the summer of 403. It is reasonable to suppose that this triumphant entry (to which the poem refers in some detail, 11. 331-639) took place on the day on which the emperor assumed the consular office, viz. January 3, 404.
In the year 404 Claudian seems to have married some protegee of Serena's. Of the"two poems ad dressed to her the " Laus Serenae is clearly the earlier, and we may take the other, the " Epistola ad Serenam," to be the last poem Claudian ever wrote. It is a poem which seems to have been written on his honeymoon, during the course of which he died. 1
It is not easy to arrive at any just estimate of Claudian as a writer, partly because of an inevitable tendency to confuse relative with absolute standards, and partly (and it is saying much the same thing in other words) because it is so hard to
separate Claudian the poet from Claudian the manipulator of
the Latin language. If we compare his latinity with that of his contemporaries (with the possible exception of Rutilius) or with that of such a poet as Sidonius Apollinaris, who came not much more
1 This suggestion is Vollmer's : see his article on Claudian in Pauly-Wissowa, in. ii. p. 2655.
xvi
INTRODUCTION
than half a century after him, it is hard to withhold
our admiration from a writer who could, at least as
far as his language is concerned, challenge comparison with poets such as Valerius Flaccus, Silius Italicus, and Statius—poets who nourished about three cen turies before him. 1 I doubt whether, subject matter set aside, Claudian might not deceive the very elect into thinking him a contemporary of Statius, with whose Silvae his own shorter poems have much in common.
Even as a poet Claudian is not always despicable, His descriptions are often clever, e. g. the Aponus, and
many passages in the " De raptu. "
His treatment of somewhat commonplace and often threadbare themes is not seldom successful —for example, the
poem on the Phoenix and a four-line description of the horses of the dawn in the Panegyric on Honorius' fourth consulship 3 — and he has a happy knack of phrase-making which often relieves a tedious page :
ille vel aerata Danaen in turre latentem eliceret 4
he says of the pander Eutropius.
But perhaps Claudian 's forte is invective. The
panegyrics
(with the doubtful exception of that on
1 Still more striking is the comparison of Claudian's latinity with that of his contemporary, the authoress of the frankly colloquial Peregrinatio ad loca sancta (see Grandgent,
Vulgar Latin, p. 5 : Wolfflin, " Ober die Latinitat der P. ad 1. sancta," in Archiv filr lat. Lexilcographie, iv. 259).
3 viii. 561-4 (dawns seem to suit him : cf. i. 1-6). 1 xviii. 82, 83.
8 It is not impossible that this poem is a translation or at least an adaptation of a Greek (Alexandrine) original. So Forster, Der Raub und die Rilckkehr der Persephone, Stuttgart, 1874.
2
xvii
INTRODUCTION
Manlius, which is certainly brighter than the others) are uniformly dull, but the poems on Rufinus and Eutropius are, though doubtless in the worst of taste, at least in parts amusing.
Claudian's faults are easy to find. He mistook
memory for inspiration and so is often wordy and tedious, as for instance in his three poems on Stilicho's
consulship. 1 Worse than this he is frequently ob scure and involved—witness his seven poems on the drop of water contained within the rock crystal. 2 The besetting sin, too, of almost all post-Virgilian Roman poets, I mean a " conceited " frigidity, is one into which he is particularly liable to fall. Examples are almost too numerous to cite but the following are typical : " nusquam totiensque sepultus " 3 of the body of Rufinus, torn limb from limb by the infuriated soldiery ; " caudamque in puppe re- torquens Ad proram iacet usque leo " 4 of one of the animals brought from Africa for the games at
Stilicho's triumph ; " saevusque Damastor, Ad de- pellendos iaculum cum quaereret "hostes, Germani rigidum misit pro rupe cadaver 5 of the giant Pallas turned to stone by the Gorgon's head on
Minerva's shield. Consider, too, the remarkable
1 Honourable exception should be made of xxi. 291 et sqq. —one of the best and most sincere things Claudian ever wrote.
2 It is worth observing that not infrequently Claudian is making " tentamina," or writing alternative lines : e. g. Carm. min. corp. vii. 1 and 2, and almost certainly the four lines of id. vi. v. is quite likely " a trial " for some such passage as xv. 523.
3 v. 453.
4 xxiv. 357-8.
5 Carm. min. corp. liii. 101-3.
xviii
INTRODUCTION
statement that Stilicho, in swimming the Addua, showed greater bravery than Horatius Cocles be cause, while the latter swam away from Lars Por- senna, the former " dabat . . . Geticis
bellis. " 1
Two of the poems are interesting as touching upon Christianity (Carm. min. corp. xxxii. " De salvatore," and 1. "In Iacobum"). The second of these two poems can scarcely be held to be serious, and although the first is unobjectionable it cannot be said to stamp its author as a sincere Christian. Orosius 2 and S. Augustine 3 both declare him to have been a heathen, but it is probable that, like his master Stilicho, Claudian rendered the new and orthodox religion at least lip-service.
It seems likely that after the death of Claudian
(404) and that of his hero, Stilicho, the political
poems (with the exception of the Panegyric on Probinus and Olybrius,4 which did not concern
Stilicho) were collected" and published separately. The " Carmina minora may have been published about the same time. The subsequent conflation of these two portions came to be known as " Claudianus maior," the " De raptu " being " Claudianus minor. "
The mss. of Claudian's poems fall into two main classes :
(1) Those which Birt refers to as the Codices
1 xxviii. 490.
2 vii. 35 "Paganus pervicacissimus. "
2 Civ. dei, v. 26 "a Christi numine alienus. "
4 This poem does not seem to have been associated with
the others till the 12th century.
pectora
xix
INTRODUCTION
maiores and which contain the bulk of the poems but seldom the " De raptu. "
xx
(2) Those which Birt calls the Codices minores
and which contain (generally exclusively) the " De raptu. "
Class (1) may be again divided into (a) mss. proper ; (6) excerpts. I give Birt's abbreviations.
(a) The most important are :
R = Cod. Veronensis 163. 9th century. Contains only the " Carmina minora. "
G = Cod. Sangallensis S n. 429. 9th century. Contains only the (Latin) " Giganto-
machia. "
G («c) = Cod. Reginensis 123. 11th century. Contains only " De Nilo. "
V = Cod. Vaticanus 2809. 12th century.
P = Cod. Parisinus lat. 18,552. 12th or 13th
century. " Contains all the
" cept (as usual) the " De raptu " and
" Pan. Prob. et Olyb. " C = Cod. Bruxellensis 5380-4.
century.
II = Cod. Parisinus lat. 8082.
No " minora. " (? ) 12th-13th
Carmina maiora
ex
13th century. This is Heinsius' " Regius. " The ms. once belonged to Petrarch and still
bears his name.
B = Cod. Neapolitanus Borbonicus 1111 E
47. 13th century.
A = Cod. Ambrosianus S 66. 15th century.
Contains all the " maiora " except the " De raptu " and " Pan. Prob. et Olyb. " J = Cod. Cantabrigiensis coll. Trinitatis
0. 3. 22. 13th century.
INTRODUCTION
Besides these are many inferior mss. referred to collectively by Birt as r.
(6) Consists of
E = Excerpta Florentina. 15th century. e = Excerpta Gyraldina . 1 6th century .
Each of them resembles the other closely and both come from a common parent.
Under (6) may further be mentioned the Basel
edition of Isengrin (1534), which preserves an in dependent tradition.
Birt postulates an archetype (12), dating between 6th and 9th centuries, and two main " streams,"
x and y ; y being again subdivided into w and z. The following is the family " tree. " Letters en
closed in brackets refer to non-existent mss. (fl)
:
(*)
g v p=p I
ABeE Of class (2) may be mentioned :
S = Cod. Parisinus lat. 15,005. 13th or 14th century.
a) (a)
(? )
(D)
liII
n=n c r (? )
I
INTRODUCTION
corp. Christi 6042. 13th 12th or 13th Crucis. 12th
century.
A'j_Codd. Oxonienses Bodleiani. 13th
century.
= Cod. Antverpiensis N. 71. 14th century.
to be observed that in Birt's edition, and in any other that accepts his " sigla," ABC and stand for different mss. according to whether they refer, or do not refer, to the " De raptu. "
Some mss. contain scholia but none of these go back before the 12th or even the 13th century.
The chief editions of Claudian are as follows
Ed. princeps
Celsanus, Vicenza, 1482.
Ugolentus, Parma, 1500. Parrhasius, Milan, 1500. Camers, Vienna, 1510.
Aldine ed. (Asulanus), 1523.
Isengrin ed. (Michael Bentinus), Basel, 1534. 1 Claverius, Paris, 1602.
Like Bentinus, Claverius used certain mss. (in his case those of the library of Cuiacius) unknown to us. 2
See section on mss.
Koch, De codicibus Cuiacianis quibus in edendo Claudiano Claverius usus est, Marburg, 1889.
xx
C = Cod. 228.
Cantabrigiensis coll. 13th century.
D = Cod. century.
Musei Britannici
W = Cod. Antverpiensis iii. 59. century.
F = Cod. Florentinus bibl. St.
ii
21
t is
:
:
(? )
V
V
INTRODUCTION
Plantin ed. (Scaliger), 1603.
Elzevir ed. (Heinsius), Leyden, 1650.
Amsterdam, 1665. Barth, Hanau, 1612.
Frankfort, 1650.
Delphin ed. (Pyrrho), Paris, 1677. Burmann, Amsterdam, 1760.
Konig, Gottingen, 1808.
These last three have good explanatory notes.
The first critical edition is that of L. Jeep (Leipzig,
1876-79).
In 1892 Birt published what must be considered
as the standard edition of Claudian —-vol. x. in the Monumenta Germaniae historica series. Birt was the first to put the text of Claudian on a firm footing, and it is his edition that I have followed, appending critical notes only where I differ from him. 1
The latest edition of Claudian is that of Koch (Teubner, Leipzig, 1893). Koch was long associated with Birt in his researches into textual questions connected with Claudian, and his text is substantially the same as that of Birt.
1 I should like if possible to anticipate criticism by frankly stating that the text of this edition makes no claims to being based on scientific principles. I have followed Birt not because I think him invariably right but because his is at present the standard text. Where I differ from him (and this is but in a few places) I do so not because I prefer the authority of another ms. or because I am convinced of the Tightness of a conjecture, but because Birt's conservatism commits him (in my opinion) to untranslatable readings, in which cases my choice of a variant is arbitrary. Of the principle of difficilior lectio I pragmatically take no account.
xxiii
INTRODUCTION
So far as I know, there is no English prose transla tion of Claudian already in the field, though various of his poems, notably the " De raptu," have found many verse translators, and in 1817 his complete works were put into English verse by A. Hawkins. An Italian version was published by Domenico Grillo in Venice
in 1716, a German one by Wedekind in Darmstadt in 1868, and there exist two French prose transla
tions, one by MM. Delatour and Geruzez Nisard, Paris, 1850) and one by M. Heguin de Guerle (Gamier freres, Collection Panckoucke, Paris,
1865).
Of Claudiana may be mentioned Vogt, De Clau-
J. H. E. Crees' Claudian as an Historical Authority (Cambridge His torical Essays, No. 17, 1908) ; Professor Postgate's
Panegirici di Claudiano (1909) ;
article on the editions of Birt and Koch in the Class. Rev. (vol. ix. pp. 162 et sqq. ), and the same scholar's Emendations in the Class. Quarterly of 1910 (pp. 257 et sqq. ). Reference may also be made to Pro fessor Bury's appendix to vol. iii. of his edition of Gibbon (1897, under " Claudian ") and to Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. xxx. The En comiums of Claudius Claudianus. Vollmer's article in Pauly-Wissowa's Lexicon is a mine of information, but for completeness Birt's introduction (over 200 pp. long) stands alone.
The curious may find an interesting light thrown xxiv
(ed.
diani carminum quae Stilickonem praedicant jide kistorica (1863) ; Ney, Vindictae Claudianeae (1865) ; T. Hodgkin's Claudian, the last of the Roman Poets (1875) ; E. Arens' Quaestiones Claudianae (1894) ; two studies by A. Parravicini, (1) Studio di retorica sulle opere di Claudio Claudiano (1905), and (2) /
INTRODUCTION
on Claudian and his circle by Sudermann's play, Die Lobgesange des Claudian (Berlin, 1914).
All Claudian 's genuine works are translated in the present volumes with the exception of the two-line fragment " De Lanario " (Birt, c. m. c. Hi [lxxxviii. )j.
The appendix " vel spuria vel suspecta continens has been rejected both by Birt and Koch, and I have in this followed their example. The eight Greek poems attributed to Claudian are at least of doubtful authenticity, though Birt certainly makes out a good case for the " Gigantomachia " (a fragment of 77 lines). The remainder consists of short epi
two on the well-worn theme of the water enclosed in the crystal and two Christian ones.
These last are almost certainly not the work of Claudius Claudianus but of Claudianus Mamertus,
grams,
of Vienne circ. 474 a. d. We know from Sidonius (Ep. iv. 3. 8) that this Claudian was a writer of sacred poetry both in Greek and Latin —indeed the famous " Pange lingua " is attributed to him.
A word should perhaps be said as to the numbering
of the poems.
It is much to be regretted that Birt did not cut
adrift from Gesner's system, or at least that he only did so in the " Carmina minora. " The resultant discrepancy in his (and Koch's) edition between the order of the poems and their numbering is un doubtedly a nuisance, but I have not felt justified,
in so slight a work as the present one, in departing from the now traditional arrangement.
[CI. ] Claudiani v. c. | [Cla]udio Claudiano v. c, tri | [bu]no et notario, inter ceteras | [de]centes artes prae[g]loriosissimo
| [po]etarum, licet ad memoriam sem|piternam carmina ab eodem | scripta sufficiant, adtamen | testimonii gratia ob iudicii sui | [f]idem, dd. nn. Arcadius et Honorius | [fe-] licissimi et doctissimi | imperatores senatu petente I statuam in foro divi Traiani | erigi collocarique iusserunt.
ffiv evl Bipyi\ioio vbov [ koX Movaav \ KXavStavdv 'PwjUt; /cat ] /3a<7t\% Zdeeav.
v. c. =vir clarissimus, i. e. (roughly) The Rt. Hon. dd. nn. = domini nostri. The inscription may be translated: — To Claudius Claudianus v. c, son of Claudius Claudianus v. c, tribune and notary {i. e. Permanent Secretary), master of the ennobling arts but above all a poet and most famous of poets,
though his own poems are enough to ensure his immortality, yet, in thankful memory of his discretion and loyalty, their serene and learned majesties, the Emperors Arcadius and Honorius have, at the instance of the senate, bidden this statue to be raised and set up in the Forum of the Emperor Trajan of blessed memory. —
Rome and her kings to one who has combined A Homer's music with a Vergil's mind.
- xxv. 7.
8 John Lydus (fie magistr. i. 47) writes oStos 6 Jla. tp\aywv, but this, as Birt has shown, is merely an abusive appellation,
xii
INTRODUCTION
Suidas and the lines of Sidonius Apollinaris,1 which clearly refer to Claudian and which give Canopus as the place of his birth. (Canopus is almost certainly to be taken as synonymous with Egypt. ) But besides these two statements we have only to look at his
interest in things Egyptian, e. g. his poems on the Nile, the Phoenix, etc. , at such passages as his account of the rites at Memphis,2 at such phrases as " nostro cognite Nilo," 3 to see that the poet is an Egyptian himself. It is probable that, whether or not he spent all his early life in Egypt, Claudian did not visit Rome until 394. We know from his own state ment 4 that his first essays in literature were all of them written in Greek and that it was not until the year 395 that he started to write Latin. It is not unlikely, therefore, that his change of country and of literary language were more or less contempo raneous, and it is highly probable that he was in Rome before January 3, 395, on which day his
friends the Anicii (Probinus and Olybrius) entered
their consulship. Speaking, moreover, of Stilicho's consulship in 400 Claudian mentions a five
absence. 5 Not long after January 3, 395, Claudian seems to have betaken himself to the court at Milan, and it is from there that he sends letters to Probinus and Olybrius. 6 Here the poet seems to have stayed for five years, and here he seems to
1 Sid. Ap. Carm. ix. 274.
2 viii. 570 et sqq.
3 Carm. min. corp. xix. 3 : cf. also Carm. min. corp.
xxii. 20.
4 Carm. min. corp. xli. 13.
6 xxiii. 23.
• Carm. min. corp. xl. and xli. ; see ref. to Via Flaminia
upon
years'
in xl. 8.
xiii
INTRODUCTION
have won for himself a position of some importance. As we see from the inscription quoted above, he became vir clarissimus, tribunus et notarius, and, as he does not continue further along the road of honours (does not, for instance, become a vir spectabilis) we must suppose that he served in some capacity on Stilicho's private staff. No doubt he became a sort of poet laureate.
"
The Emperor Honorius became consul for the third time on January 3, 396, and on this occasion
Claudian read his Panegyric in the emperor's pres ence. 2
Some five weeks before this event another of greater importance had occurred in the East. This was the murder of Rufinus, the praetorian prefect, amid the circumstances that have been related above. The date of the composition of Claudian's two poems " In Rufinum " is certainly to be placed. within the years 395-397, and the mention of a " tenuem moram " 3 makes it probable that Book II.
It is probable that the
during the first two years of his sojourn at the court of Milan. The poem is dedicated, or addressed, to Florentinus,1 who was praefectus urbi from August 395 to the end of 397 when he fell into disgrace with Stilicho. It is to this circumstance that we are to attribute the unfinished state of Claudian's poem.
was written considerably later than Book I. references, moreover, in the Preface to Book II. to
a victory of Stilicho clearly point to that general's defeat of the Goths near Elis in 397.
To the year 398 belong the Panegyric on the 1 Praef. ii. SO.
xiv
! vi. 17.
3 iv. 15.
De raptu
was written
"
; the
INTRODUCTION
fourth consulship of Honorius and the poems cele brating the marriage of the emperor to Stilicho's daughter, Maria. We have already seen that the Gildo episode and Claudian's poem on that subject are to be attributed to this same year.
The consuls for the year 399 were both, in different ways, considered worthy of the poet's pen. Perhaps the most savage of all his poems was directed against Eutropius, the eunuch chamberlain, whose claim to the consulship the West never recognized,1 while a Panegyric on Flavius Manlius Theodoras made amends for an abusive epigram which the usually more politic Claudian had previously levelled at him. 2
At the end of 399, or possibly at the beginning of 400, Claudian returned to Rome 3 where, probably in February,4 he recited his poem on the consulship of Stilicho ; and we have no reason for supposing that the poet left the capital from this time on until his departure for his ill-starred journey four years
later. In the year 402,6 as has already been men tioned, Stilicho defeated Alaric at Pollentia, and Claudian recited his poem on the Gothic war some time during the summer of the same year. The scene of the recitation seems to have been the Bibliotheca Templi Apollinis. 6 It was in this year, too, that the poet reached the summit of his great-
1 Cf. xxii. 291 et sqq.
2 Carm. min. xxi.
3 xxiii. 23.
1 So Birt, Praef. p. xlii. note 1.
6 It should perhaps be mentioned that this date is dis
puted : see Crees, Claudian as an Historical Authority,
pp. 175 et sqq.
6 xxv. 4"Pythia
. . . domus. "
XV
INTRODUCTION
ness in the dedication of the statue which, as we have seen, was accorded to him by the wishes of the emperor and at the demand of the senate.
The last of Claudian's datable public poems is that on the sixth consulship of Honorius. It was composed probably towards the end of 403 and recited in Rome on (or after) the occasion of the emperor's triumphant entry into the city. The emperor had just returned after inflicting a defeat on the Goths at Verona in the summer of 403. It is reasonable to suppose that this triumphant entry (to which the poem refers in some detail, 11. 331-639) took place on the day on which the emperor assumed the consular office, viz. January 3, 404.
In the year 404 Claudian seems to have married some protegee of Serena's. Of the"two poems ad dressed to her the " Laus Serenae is clearly the earlier, and we may take the other, the " Epistola ad Serenam," to be the last poem Claudian ever wrote. It is a poem which seems to have been written on his honeymoon, during the course of which he died. 1
It is not easy to arrive at any just estimate of Claudian as a writer, partly because of an inevitable tendency to confuse relative with absolute standards, and partly (and it is saying much the same thing in other words) because it is so hard to
separate Claudian the poet from Claudian the manipulator of
the Latin language. If we compare his latinity with that of his contemporaries (with the possible exception of Rutilius) or with that of such a poet as Sidonius Apollinaris, who came not much more
1 This suggestion is Vollmer's : see his article on Claudian in Pauly-Wissowa, in. ii. p. 2655.
xvi
INTRODUCTION
than half a century after him, it is hard to withhold
our admiration from a writer who could, at least as
far as his language is concerned, challenge comparison with poets such as Valerius Flaccus, Silius Italicus, and Statius—poets who nourished about three cen turies before him. 1 I doubt whether, subject matter set aside, Claudian might not deceive the very elect into thinking him a contemporary of Statius, with whose Silvae his own shorter poems have much in common.
Even as a poet Claudian is not always despicable, His descriptions are often clever, e. g. the Aponus, and
many passages in the " De raptu. "
His treatment of somewhat commonplace and often threadbare themes is not seldom successful —for example, the
poem on the Phoenix and a four-line description of the horses of the dawn in the Panegyric on Honorius' fourth consulship 3 — and he has a happy knack of phrase-making which often relieves a tedious page :
ille vel aerata Danaen in turre latentem eliceret 4
he says of the pander Eutropius.
But perhaps Claudian 's forte is invective. The
panegyrics
(with the doubtful exception of that on
1 Still more striking is the comparison of Claudian's latinity with that of his contemporary, the authoress of the frankly colloquial Peregrinatio ad loca sancta (see Grandgent,
Vulgar Latin, p. 5 : Wolfflin, " Ober die Latinitat der P. ad 1. sancta," in Archiv filr lat. Lexilcographie, iv. 259).
3 viii. 561-4 (dawns seem to suit him : cf. i. 1-6). 1 xviii. 82, 83.
8 It is not impossible that this poem is a translation or at least an adaptation of a Greek (Alexandrine) original. So Forster, Der Raub und die Rilckkehr der Persephone, Stuttgart, 1874.
2
xvii
INTRODUCTION
Manlius, which is certainly brighter than the others) are uniformly dull, but the poems on Rufinus and Eutropius are, though doubtless in the worst of taste, at least in parts amusing.
Claudian's faults are easy to find. He mistook
memory for inspiration and so is often wordy and tedious, as for instance in his three poems on Stilicho's
consulship. 1 Worse than this he is frequently ob scure and involved—witness his seven poems on the drop of water contained within the rock crystal. 2 The besetting sin, too, of almost all post-Virgilian Roman poets, I mean a " conceited " frigidity, is one into which he is particularly liable to fall. Examples are almost too numerous to cite but the following are typical : " nusquam totiensque sepultus " 3 of the body of Rufinus, torn limb from limb by the infuriated soldiery ; " caudamque in puppe re- torquens Ad proram iacet usque leo " 4 of one of the animals brought from Africa for the games at
Stilicho's triumph ; " saevusque Damastor, Ad de- pellendos iaculum cum quaereret "hostes, Germani rigidum misit pro rupe cadaver 5 of the giant Pallas turned to stone by the Gorgon's head on
Minerva's shield. Consider, too, the remarkable
1 Honourable exception should be made of xxi. 291 et sqq. —one of the best and most sincere things Claudian ever wrote.
2 It is worth observing that not infrequently Claudian is making " tentamina," or writing alternative lines : e. g. Carm. min. corp. vii. 1 and 2, and almost certainly the four lines of id. vi. v. is quite likely " a trial " for some such passage as xv. 523.
3 v. 453.
4 xxiv. 357-8.
5 Carm. min. corp. liii. 101-3.
xviii
INTRODUCTION
statement that Stilicho, in swimming the Addua, showed greater bravery than Horatius Cocles be cause, while the latter swam away from Lars Por- senna, the former " dabat . . . Geticis
bellis. " 1
Two of the poems are interesting as touching upon Christianity (Carm. min. corp. xxxii. " De salvatore," and 1. "In Iacobum"). The second of these two poems can scarcely be held to be serious, and although the first is unobjectionable it cannot be said to stamp its author as a sincere Christian. Orosius 2 and S. Augustine 3 both declare him to have been a heathen, but it is probable that, like his master Stilicho, Claudian rendered the new and orthodox religion at least lip-service.
It seems likely that after the death of Claudian
(404) and that of his hero, Stilicho, the political
poems (with the exception of the Panegyric on Probinus and Olybrius,4 which did not concern
Stilicho) were collected" and published separately. The " Carmina minora may have been published about the same time. The subsequent conflation of these two portions came to be known as " Claudianus maior," the " De raptu " being " Claudianus minor. "
The mss. of Claudian's poems fall into two main classes :
(1) Those which Birt refers to as the Codices
1 xxviii. 490.
2 vii. 35 "Paganus pervicacissimus. "
2 Civ. dei, v. 26 "a Christi numine alienus. "
4 This poem does not seem to have been associated with
the others till the 12th century.
pectora
xix
INTRODUCTION
maiores and which contain the bulk of the poems but seldom the " De raptu. "
xx
(2) Those which Birt calls the Codices minores
and which contain (generally exclusively) the " De raptu. "
Class (1) may be again divided into (a) mss. proper ; (6) excerpts. I give Birt's abbreviations.
(a) The most important are :
R = Cod. Veronensis 163. 9th century. Contains only the " Carmina minora. "
G = Cod. Sangallensis S n. 429. 9th century. Contains only the (Latin) " Giganto-
machia. "
G («c) = Cod. Reginensis 123. 11th century. Contains only " De Nilo. "
V = Cod. Vaticanus 2809. 12th century.
P = Cod. Parisinus lat. 18,552. 12th or 13th
century. " Contains all the
" cept (as usual) the " De raptu " and
" Pan. Prob. et Olyb. " C = Cod. Bruxellensis 5380-4.
century.
II = Cod. Parisinus lat. 8082.
No " minora. " (? ) 12th-13th
Carmina maiora
ex
13th century. This is Heinsius' " Regius. " The ms. once belonged to Petrarch and still
bears his name.
B = Cod. Neapolitanus Borbonicus 1111 E
47. 13th century.
A = Cod. Ambrosianus S 66. 15th century.
Contains all the " maiora " except the " De raptu " and " Pan. Prob. et Olyb. " J = Cod. Cantabrigiensis coll. Trinitatis
0. 3. 22. 13th century.
INTRODUCTION
Besides these are many inferior mss. referred to collectively by Birt as r.
(6) Consists of
E = Excerpta Florentina. 15th century. e = Excerpta Gyraldina . 1 6th century .
Each of them resembles the other closely and both come from a common parent.
Under (6) may further be mentioned the Basel
edition of Isengrin (1534), which preserves an in dependent tradition.
Birt postulates an archetype (12), dating between 6th and 9th centuries, and two main " streams,"
x and y ; y being again subdivided into w and z. The following is the family " tree. " Letters en
closed in brackets refer to non-existent mss. (fl)
:
(*)
g v p=p I
ABeE Of class (2) may be mentioned :
S = Cod. Parisinus lat. 15,005. 13th or 14th century.
a) (a)
(? )
(D)
liII
n=n c r (? )
I
INTRODUCTION
corp. Christi 6042. 13th 12th or 13th Crucis. 12th
century.
A'j_Codd. Oxonienses Bodleiani. 13th
century.
= Cod. Antverpiensis N. 71. 14th century.
to be observed that in Birt's edition, and in any other that accepts his " sigla," ABC and stand for different mss. according to whether they refer, or do not refer, to the " De raptu. "
Some mss. contain scholia but none of these go back before the 12th or even the 13th century.
The chief editions of Claudian are as follows
Ed. princeps
Celsanus, Vicenza, 1482.
Ugolentus, Parma, 1500. Parrhasius, Milan, 1500. Camers, Vienna, 1510.
Aldine ed. (Asulanus), 1523.
Isengrin ed. (Michael Bentinus), Basel, 1534. 1 Claverius, Paris, 1602.
Like Bentinus, Claverius used certain mss. (in his case those of the library of Cuiacius) unknown to us. 2
See section on mss.
Koch, De codicibus Cuiacianis quibus in edendo Claudiano Claverius usus est, Marburg, 1889.
xx
C = Cod. 228.
Cantabrigiensis coll. 13th century.
D = Cod. century.
Musei Britannici
W = Cod. Antverpiensis iii. 59. century.
F = Cod. Florentinus bibl. St.
ii
21
t is
:
:
(? )
V
V
INTRODUCTION
Plantin ed. (Scaliger), 1603.
Elzevir ed. (Heinsius), Leyden, 1650.
Amsterdam, 1665. Barth, Hanau, 1612.
Frankfort, 1650.
Delphin ed. (Pyrrho), Paris, 1677. Burmann, Amsterdam, 1760.
Konig, Gottingen, 1808.
These last three have good explanatory notes.
The first critical edition is that of L. Jeep (Leipzig,
1876-79).
In 1892 Birt published what must be considered
as the standard edition of Claudian —-vol. x. in the Monumenta Germaniae historica series. Birt was the first to put the text of Claudian on a firm footing, and it is his edition that I have followed, appending critical notes only where I differ from him. 1
The latest edition of Claudian is that of Koch (Teubner, Leipzig, 1893). Koch was long associated with Birt in his researches into textual questions connected with Claudian, and his text is substantially the same as that of Birt.
1 I should like if possible to anticipate criticism by frankly stating that the text of this edition makes no claims to being based on scientific principles. I have followed Birt not because I think him invariably right but because his is at present the standard text. Where I differ from him (and this is but in a few places) I do so not because I prefer the authority of another ms. or because I am convinced of the Tightness of a conjecture, but because Birt's conservatism commits him (in my opinion) to untranslatable readings, in which cases my choice of a variant is arbitrary. Of the principle of difficilior lectio I pragmatically take no account.
xxiii
INTRODUCTION
So far as I know, there is no English prose transla tion of Claudian already in the field, though various of his poems, notably the " De raptu," have found many verse translators, and in 1817 his complete works were put into English verse by A. Hawkins. An Italian version was published by Domenico Grillo in Venice
in 1716, a German one by Wedekind in Darmstadt in 1868, and there exist two French prose transla
tions, one by MM. Delatour and Geruzez Nisard, Paris, 1850) and one by M. Heguin de Guerle (Gamier freres, Collection Panckoucke, Paris,
1865).
Of Claudiana may be mentioned Vogt, De Clau-
J. H. E. Crees' Claudian as an Historical Authority (Cambridge His torical Essays, No. 17, 1908) ; Professor Postgate's
Panegirici di Claudiano (1909) ;
article on the editions of Birt and Koch in the Class. Rev. (vol. ix. pp. 162 et sqq. ), and the same scholar's Emendations in the Class. Quarterly of 1910 (pp. 257 et sqq. ). Reference may also be made to Pro fessor Bury's appendix to vol. iii. of his edition of Gibbon (1897, under " Claudian ") and to Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. xxx. The En comiums of Claudius Claudianus. Vollmer's article in Pauly-Wissowa's Lexicon is a mine of information, but for completeness Birt's introduction (over 200 pp. long) stands alone.
The curious may find an interesting light thrown xxiv
(ed.
diani carminum quae Stilickonem praedicant jide kistorica (1863) ; Ney, Vindictae Claudianeae (1865) ; T. Hodgkin's Claudian, the last of the Roman Poets (1875) ; E. Arens' Quaestiones Claudianae (1894) ; two studies by A. Parravicini, (1) Studio di retorica sulle opere di Claudio Claudiano (1905), and (2) /
INTRODUCTION
on Claudian and his circle by Sudermann's play, Die Lobgesange des Claudian (Berlin, 1914).
All Claudian 's genuine works are translated in the present volumes with the exception of the two-line fragment " De Lanario " (Birt, c. m. c. Hi [lxxxviii. )j.
The appendix " vel spuria vel suspecta continens has been rejected both by Birt and Koch, and I have in this followed their example. The eight Greek poems attributed to Claudian are at least of doubtful authenticity, though Birt certainly makes out a good case for the " Gigantomachia " (a fragment of 77 lines). The remainder consists of short epi
two on the well-worn theme of the water enclosed in the crystal and two Christian ones.
These last are almost certainly not the work of Claudius Claudianus but of Claudianus Mamertus,
grams,
of Vienne circ. 474 a. d. We know from Sidonius (Ep. iv. 3. 8) that this Claudian was a writer of sacred poetry both in Greek and Latin —indeed the famous " Pange lingua " is attributed to him.
A word should perhaps be said as to the numbering
of the poems.
It is much to be regretted that Birt did not cut
adrift from Gesner's system, or at least that he only did so in the " Carmina minora. " The resultant discrepancy in his (and Koch's) edition between the order of the poems and their numbering is un doubtedly a nuisance, but I have not felt justified,
in so slight a work as the present one, in departing from the now traditional arrangement.
