A
notebook
in tb?
McHugh-Roland-1976-The-Sigla-of-Finnegans-Wake
" m i d d e n " ( I IO.
2S ) o r " m u d _ nwund" (III.
34).
n.
e midden is a symool, elaborated later.
for the inhabited world in which men have left 50 many traCC$.
The letter Stand.
at a .
ymbol for all .
nempts al wrinen communication including aU <<her !
ctttr.
, all the world'.
lile"ilure, Th.
Boo/!
of Kdl" aU manuscripts.
all the s.
aned books of the world.
and al.
o
Fi>fM({ans Wak. itsclf. One =""n why Th. Bo. ;k of K. //j i. in_ dudedh= i. that it was once "",olen by night . . . and found afler a lapst of some months, concealed unde. sods. . . ? ?
The . . . . . . . . . tonl of l. S are s,ill Xin search of m but they now poSscs. only the exhumed manif. . . to wh"eby to reconstruct him. Their oommentary is drier and more reserved than any 50 far. n. ey ClIplain the discov. ry of the document and pro<:<<d suc- cinctly '0 . :<amine its pans. Their reckoning intimates approval: they call FWa polyhedron of IICripture (107. 08) and urge il5 readtr. {() cultivate paticru:c (108. 08-16) and pay attention to the enveloping circumstanCC1 of nylc. od vocabulary. The inlention ii not to dazzle the . rudent with Lotin ,nd Grecok glosuries (1I~. 36--II3. (U). The ciphe. . . . doubl1. . . . oonccal obscenities or
political s=""(IIS. I1-' 16. ~S) but it is assuredly not gibberish and w. shOuld he gra,dul for the 1;111. w . do und. . . . . tand (118. 28- 119 . 0\1).
Behind thi. dtfensiveconoution;, seems thaI the paleognlphers understand their ttx' Ie. . wen than th<:y think. . Al I ' 3. 34- "4. :1O
tbey reproach the author to doe following effect' 'I am a worktr, anxious 1() please everybody; you au a hourgcois and l<;rribly sorry
? when it'. rime tOg<> home again. We cannnt sec eye to eye. Whcre in tit<: waste is the wisdom? ' UltiTT\4ltely the narrato. . . can he seen to posse", the A viewpOint, and in this they ""cord wi,h their equi? valent> in the other book I chapte. . . .
T o posit. general rule, boo! < I il A ', prt"SCn. . . . 'ion <>f C and his wnrks whilst boo! < III i, C'. presentation of A and hi? . In bo,h Cltt<1 the narrato. . . arc X, biased towsrdt C or A as the case TT\4ly be.
A, a oci<:n'il1 A reacts to enigma by focusing down in . ea",h ofan ultimate cause or panicle. Having r<ad the liSt of titles and scrutinized the envelope he needs the Joan of a len. (112. 01- 2),
draW! ! nearer (II 3. 30-33) and findo the Jin<1 <>f writing. What i. their PlJl"POS'" could it be geodetic? Perhaps a polemical funct;"n
can be di. e<weo:ed.
Individual syllables are classified by their phonetic ( . t 6. 21\-33)
and etymological (117. 12-15) characters. T he paragraph "9. 1{)- n}. 10 <i<:o. :cnds to the province of separate letters and w<; find bete trune specific designation, of slgla (119. 17-)2). ' Finally at 124? 01- 3 we arrive at the ullima,e minutia<:, punctuation mark,. Putting two and two togt:\l\er it b<<rnncs obvious that thete were inflicted by ? that odi"". and . til! insufficiently maleotinutted note? . . . . . tch<r . . . Sh. . . . , the Penman'. Thus )( ",Ive the problem of auth"r-ship. M r Athenon"! >OIeo that Th4 BooI. qf K. tls was dated by Sir Edward Sullivan', analysis of its puru:tuation marks, and . he I. S narrator says that C'. 'paper wound,' were made 'to _ intro-
dUce a notion of tiou:' (. 24-1{)-1 1). The Notion of"Tlme
Theinstillationoftimemakes 124actuCiaJpageinFW. Ci, a. sod? atcd with time (the elm'. growth) and A with space (the stone's fixity). This will permit sUMequent alignments of C with . a. (the river <>ftime), and A with m (the city as I fixed poin. ). Time:md ,pace begin to interact in 1. 6.
A$ Edmund Epstein ObservCi, 'Since 1. 6 wll composed after I. S and 1. 7 w e " , dcafrcd (in COOIIiderable detail), the end of I. S
:md tit<: beginning <>f 1. 7 still dovetail very neotly. ''' The inter_ posed 1. 6 is strikingly nonlinear, with ito twelve qU<1. iQn. of eq~1 gravity and highly uneqWlllength. In my view it ('OrlSti",rc. the final pronouncement of science on m :md hi, companions, . f'er which ouly the artist, C, hat l i = to penetrate further.
? Disoouooed beIoor, Po 'J+ "Boo,t" >\6.
" -'be T\lm;oa- """,,,', ca, . . . .
T he Notion of Time 3'
? ?
A notebook in tb? Bri. ish Mutwm",uppliet w tin. dnof. of
1. 6 atld also a list of
,
itsqun. ions: m
. i,,,,romspondina: 10
, ,
?
0
,
?
X ?
,,
0 ? -
7
, "
? ?
"
A
"
1 m"". S tttn rho . . . tlc lI. I'''''''' of m in 1. 6. ? : . his catllloau< of
Inrib",. . . does ~ ''''&itS' any form of currenl a<:tivi. y and ha, noI rho,. . ,rore been ooflli<iered in the m chapler. II ,. 1 rood pIa<:.
to look rnr ,. . ,latively "'nmodified quotalinn. For in. tlrwe, the dubious . tI. omenl thl' there . ,. . , twrn. y_fnur Dublin' in tho Uni. ed States ('30. 2:7"-41) comee from Dillon CoIigra. ve. " AI 1)4. 1)~ 10)'00 ua<:I an acooo. lIIl of the I rish plund<< of Vileina;-
and wi. active, large. and _Ufnrmcd ~. ''' 136. OS~ dno"" on 'Culhwcllind 0 1",",';n TIl. M. . b. ? ,. . w. . : 'II f. . . . ' wind dries, as fir . . fIIin _ CS, as fir U lun rum, . . far II _ . "elella. '''
1. 6. 2-10 will be coruidered in the I ppropriate ehaplen, bUI ? ? C'. quu. ion compri," only {DUr wordl, ",e muot tum to tha, of A 00 undentlnd the brothe", a. thi' poin? . 1. 6. 1( ;, l. r~ ly . n absuuse . ra;ument ap in'l tlme, made by Profe>>ot JO<\OI (A). II drl. . . . . considentbly on 1M midi uport jnyce made by Wyndham Lewil ;n T,- IliId Wm. . . . M. . . . . . . Lzuri. denounced UOoJJU II 1 product of rho twentieth-<<ntu'1' 'time philosophy', "'1Udl ok?
::~. :v::. . ;. ,~~;'~~~~~Sodo" ,~),_ . . n. . . . . <I. . . CuA;'"",. . . 000'B,. . . . ,. fl. TO<Id{I,. . '. 0,'"? '. -'
. ~
" Sot Molin< G! a;""""
VlIl. , (1971), ~
~ N. . . . on,. ,. <<
s
?
.
on<! W)""dllom t. . . w? ? , ,IWN
'
~
carried I. . . . . y their 101"1, youlhful,
held Lim<:rid< in 968:
bria'" , ma. chb. , girls; their bloomina. silkd . d ~ . . . . . . . en;
0. . . . . . . ,,:10,0001o,-a'169)'~ " pon;. IIy", . . ! to,. A<Io! iI><Ct I if> "'"'I''XII. , (197'), ! l$.
"1"110 . 11 I ? , . . . . .
,". GwyoJ""""ond~J__(I_ ,J. M. 0. . . . '90S'),
C
? str<>y1 the patt",m and model! created by ! he intellect 10 "'nder t:\ngible its environment. Joyce'. in",rior monologue fo",os the reado< literally to become the writt. by an imidiou, mental in- va,ion, leading him by its own pe",e.
Fi>fM({ans Wak. itsclf. One =""n why Th. Bo. ;k of K. //j i. in_ dudedh= i. that it was once "",olen by night . . . and found afler a lapst of some months, concealed unde. sods. . . ? ?
The . . . . . . . . . tonl of l. S are s,ill Xin search of m but they now poSscs. only the exhumed manif. . . to wh"eby to reconstruct him. Their oommentary is drier and more reserved than any 50 far. n. ey ClIplain the discov. ry of the document and pro<:<<d suc- cinctly '0 . :<amine its pans. Their reckoning intimates approval: they call FWa polyhedron of IICripture (107. 08) and urge il5 readtr. {() cultivate paticru:c (108. 08-16) and pay attention to the enveloping circumstanCC1 of nylc. od vocabulary. The inlention ii not to dazzle the . rudent with Lotin ,nd Grecok glosuries (1I~. 36--II3. (U). The ciphe. . . . doubl1. . . . oonccal obscenities or
political s=""(IIS. I1-' 16. ~S) but it is assuredly not gibberish and w. shOuld he gra,dul for the 1;111. w . do und. . . . . tand (118. 28- 119 . 0\1).
Behind thi. dtfensiveconoution;, seems thaI the paleognlphers understand their ttx' Ie. . wen than th<:y think. . Al I ' 3. 34- "4. :1O
tbey reproach the author to doe following effect' 'I am a worktr, anxious 1() please everybody; you au a hourgcois and l<;rribly sorry
? when it'. rime tOg<> home again. We cannnt sec eye to eye. Whcre in tit<: waste is the wisdom? ' UltiTT\4ltely the narrato. . . can he seen to posse", the A viewpOint, and in this they ""cord wi,h their equi? valent> in the other book I chapte. . . .
T o posit. general rule, boo! < I il A ', prt"SCn. . . . 'ion <>f C and his wnrks whilst boo! < III i, C'. presentation of A and hi? . In bo,h Cltt<1 the narrato. . . arc X, biased towsrdt C or A as the case TT\4ly be.
A, a oci<:n'il1 A reacts to enigma by focusing down in . ea",h ofan ultimate cause or panicle. Having r<ad the liSt of titles and scrutinized the envelope he needs the Joan of a len. (112. 01- 2),
draW! ! nearer (II 3. 30-33) and findo the Jin<1 <>f writing. What i. their PlJl"POS'" could it be geodetic? Perhaps a polemical funct;"n
can be di. e<weo:ed.
Individual syllables are classified by their phonetic ( . t 6. 21\-33)
and etymological (117. 12-15) characters. T he paragraph "9. 1{)- n}. 10 <i<:o. :cnds to the province of separate letters and w<; find bete trune specific designation, of slgla (119. 17-)2). ' Finally at 124? 01- 3 we arrive at the ullima,e minutia<:, punctuation mark,. Putting two and two togt:\l\er it b<<rnncs obvious that thete were inflicted by ? that odi"". and . til! insufficiently maleotinutted note? . . . . . tch<r . . . Sh. . . . , the Penman'. Thus )( ",Ive the problem of auth"r-ship. M r Athenon"! >OIeo that Th4 BooI. qf K. tls was dated by Sir Edward Sullivan', analysis of its puru:tuation marks, and . he I. S narrator says that C'. 'paper wound,' were made 'to _ intro-
dUce a notion of tiou:' (. 24-1{)-1 1). The Notion of"Tlme
Theinstillationoftimemakes 124actuCiaJpageinFW. Ci, a. sod? atcd with time (the elm'. growth) and A with space (the stone's fixity). This will permit sUMequent alignments of C with . a. (the river <>ftime), and A with m (the city as I fixed poin. ). Time:md ,pace begin to interact in 1. 6.
A$ Edmund Epstein ObservCi, 'Since 1. 6 wll composed after I. S and 1. 7 w e " , dcafrcd (in COOIIiderable detail), the end of I. S
:md tit<: beginning <>f 1. 7 still dovetail very neotly. ''' The inter_ posed 1. 6 is strikingly nonlinear, with ito twelve qU<1. iQn. of eq~1 gravity and highly uneqWlllength. In my view it ('OrlSti",rc. the final pronouncement of science on m :md hi, companions, . f'er which ouly the artist, C, hat l i = to penetrate further.
? Disoouooed beIoor, Po 'J+ "Boo,t" >\6.
" -'be T\lm;oa- """,,,', ca, . . . .
T he Notion of Time 3'
? ?
A notebook in tb? Bri. ish Mutwm",uppliet w tin. dnof. of
1. 6 atld also a list of
,
itsqun. ions: m
. i,,,,romspondina: 10
, ,
?
0
,
?
X ?
,,
0 ? -
7
, "
? ?
"
A
"
1 m"". S tttn rho . . . tlc lI. I'''''''' of m in 1. 6. ? : . his catllloau< of
Inrib",. . . does ~ ''''&itS' any form of currenl a<:tivi. y and ha, noI rho,. . ,rore been ooflli<iered in the m chapler. II ,. 1 rood pIa<:.
to look rnr ,. . ,latively "'nmodified quotalinn. For in. tlrwe, the dubious . tI. omenl thl' there . ,. . , twrn. y_fnur Dublin' in tho Uni. ed States ('30. 2:7"-41) comee from Dillon CoIigra. ve. " AI 1)4. 1)~ 10)'00 ua<:I an acooo. lIIl of the I rish plund<< of Vileina;-
and wi. active, large. and _Ufnrmcd ~. ''' 136. OS~ dno"" on 'Culhwcllind 0 1",",';n TIl. M. . b. ? ,. . w. . : 'II f. . . . ' wind dries, as fir . . fIIin _ CS, as fir U lun rum, . . far II _ . "elella. '''
1. 6. 2-10 will be coruidered in the I ppropriate ehaplen, bUI ? ? C'. quu. ion compri," only {DUr wordl, ",e muot tum to tha, of A 00 undentlnd the brothe", a. thi' poin? . 1. 6. 1( ;, l. r~ ly . n absuuse . ra;ument ap in'l tlme, made by Profe>>ot JO<\OI (A). II drl. . . . . considentbly on 1M midi uport jnyce made by Wyndham Lewil ;n T,- IliId Wm. . . . M. . . . . . . Lzuri. denounced UOoJJU II 1 product of rho twentieth-<<ntu'1' 'time philosophy', "'1Udl ok?
::~. :v::. . ;. ,~~;'~~~~~Sodo" ,~),_ . . n. . . . . <I. . . CuA;'"",. . . 000'B,. . . . ,. fl. TO<Id{I,. . '. 0,'"? '. -'
. ~
" Sot Molin< G! a;""""
VlIl. , (1971), ~
~ N. . . . on,. ,. <<
s
?
.
on<! W)""dllom t. . . w? ? , ,IWN
'
~
carried I. . . . . y their 101"1, youlhful,
held Lim<:rid< in 968:
bria'" , ma. chb. , girls; their bloomina. silkd . d ~ . . . . . . . en;
0. . . . . . . ,,:10,0001o,-a'169)'~ " pon;. IIy", . . ! to,. A<Io! iI><Ct I if> "'"'I''XII. , (197'), ! l$.
"1"110 . 11 I ? , . . . . .
,". GwyoJ""""ond~J__(I_ ,J. M. 0. . . . '90S'),
C
? str<>y1 the patt",m and model! created by ! he intellect 10 "'nder t:\ngible its environment. Joyce'. in",rior monologue fo",os the reado< literally to become the writt. by an imidiou, mental in- va,ion, leading him by its own pe",e.
