No More Learning

17c. None are the object of one.
No knowledge is the object of the knowledge of Extinction whose only object is Extinction obtained through conscious effort (pratisamkhydnirodba).
***
? How many dharmas constitute in their totality the object of the ten knowledges? How many dharmas constitute the object of each
108 knowledge?
109 17d. The totality of their object is ten dharmas.
What are these ten dharmas?
18a-b. Dharmas of the Three Dhatus, pure dharmas, unconditioned, each category being twofold.
The conditioned dharmas are divided into eight classes: dharmas of Kamadhatu, of Rupadhatu, of Arupyadhatu, plus the pure dharmas, all being either associated with the mind or not (samprayukta, viprayukta, ii. 22).
The unconditioned dharmas are divided into two classes, good 110
and neutral.
Which of these two classes of dharmas are the object of the ten knowledges?
1. Worldly conventional knowledge is related to ten dharmas; 2. a knowledge of dharmas is related to five: two dharmas of
111
Kamadhatu, associated or not with the mind; unconditioned dharma; 3. inferential knowledge is related to seven: two of Rupadhatu, two of Arupyadhatu, and two pure, which make six, and a good unconditioned dharma; 4-5. the knowledge of Suffering and of Origin are related to only good unconditioned dharmas; 7. a knowledge of the Path is related to the two pure dharmas; 8. a knowledge of the mind of another is related to three; the dharmas associated with the mind which are of Kamadhatu, and of the Rupadhatu, and pure; 9-10. the Knowledge of Destruction and the Knowledge of Non-Arising are related to nine dharmas, with the exception of neutral uncondi- tioned dharmas.
***
The Knowledges 1121
and a good
? 1122 Chapter Seven
Can one, through a single knowledge,
dharmas}
No. Yet
18c-d. One conventional knowledge, with the exception of its own complex, knows the rest as non-self.
When a moment of conventional knowledge knows all the
dharmas as not being a self, this is with the exception, in the
totality of the dharmas, of 1. itself, this same moment of
conventional knowledge, for the subject of knowledge cannot be its 113
own object; 2. the mental dharmas which are associated with it, for they have the same object as it does; and 3. the dharmas disassociated from the mind but which accompany it, for example, its characteristics (ii. 45c), for they are too close.
This conventional knowledge of universal consciousness belongs only to Kamadhatu, being prajna of hearing or reflection (srutamayi, cintamayt, vi. English trans, p. 913), not prajna of absorption (bhavanamayt, iv. 123c), for the conventional knowl- edge which is of this third type of prajna always has a determined sphere for its object. If it were otherwise one could obtain at one
114
The different categories of humans are endowed with how many knowledges?
A common person possesses only worldly conventional knowledge; when he is detached [from Kamadhatu], he also possesses a knowledge of the mind of another.
and the same time detachment with respect to all of the spheres.
***
112
know all of the
? As for the Aryan,
19a-b. Not detached, in the first pure moment, he possesses one knowledge.
An Aryan who is not detached through a worldly path before entering the Path, in the moment in which the Patience which is the knowledge of the dharmas related to Suffering (duhkhe dharmajndnaksdnti, vi. 25c) arises, possesses a single knowledge, namely worldly conventional knowledge, because this Patience is not a knowledge (vii. 1).
19c. In the second moment, he possesses three knowledges.
At the moment of the knowledge of dharmas related to Suffering, he possesses worldly conventional knowledge, a knowledge of dharmas, and a knowledge of Suffering.
19c-d. Beyond, in four moments, each time adding a knowledge.
A knowledge is added in each of four subsequent moments; at the fourth moment (the inferential knowledge of suffering) there is inferential knowledge; at the sixth moment (a knowledge of dharmas related to Origin) there is the knowledge of origin; at the tenth moment (the knowledge of the dharmas as they relate to Extinction), there is the knowledge of Extinction; and at the fourteenth moment (the knowledge of the dharmas as related to the Path), there is the knowledge of the Path.
Consequently, having attained the knowledge of the dharmas
115
For an Aryan who, before entering into the Pure Path (the Path of Seeing), has obtained detachment through a worldly path,
related to the Path, the ascetic possesses seven knowledges.
The Knowledges 1123
? we must add the knowledge of the mind of another. A samayavi-
rnukta Arhat (vi. 50, 56) possesses nine knowledges, by adding the
Knowledge of Extinction; an asamayavimukta Arhat in addition
116
117 How many knowledges does the ascetic cultivate (acquire) at
one and the same time in different stages, the Path of Seeing the Truths, and in the Path of Meditation, etc. ?
With respect to the fifteen minds (vi. 28c-d) of the Path of Seeing:
possesses the Knowledge of Non-Arising (vi. 50).
20a-c. In Seeing, future patiences and knowledges exist to 118
the extent to which they are produced.
Those which are produced are acquired or cultivated. For
example, when an ascetic produces the Patience of the knowledge
of the dhannas related to Suffering, he cultivates future Patience of
this same type, and he takes possession of future Patience of this
same type. [And so on to the Patience of the inferential knowledge
Why, in the Path of Seeing, is there only acquisition of the
knowledge and the aspects of the type of knowledge and the 120
When the Patience of the knowledge of the dharmas related to
Suffering is produced, the gotra,--that is to say, the seed or the
cause--of this Patience, and the gotras of its four aspects, are
121
grasped,
related to Suffering, etc. , are not grasped. As for the aspects, we see that the four aspects of each Truth are of the same type, for they have the same object. When one of them is produced, the gotras of the others are grasped.
20c-d. In the Path of Seeing one also acquires conventional
knowledge at the moment of the three inferential
122 knowledges.
119
etc. ) are also acquired when any one of the aspects is produced.
of the Path].
The four aspects of this Patience (impermanence,
aspects produced?
whereas the gotras of the knowledge of dharmas
The ascetic takes possession of future conventional knowledge
? at the moment of the three inferential knowledges of Suffering, Origin, and Extinction (moments 4, 8, and 12 of the Path of Seeing, vi. 26b): not at the moment of the knowledge of the dbarmas, because, in the knowledge of the dharmas, each Truth has not been understood in its totality, but only relating to Kamadhatu.
21a. This conventional knowledge is termed "the end of
125 abhisamaya. "
It is termed abhisamaydntika jnana, because it is cultivated (=acquired) at the end of the comprehension of each Truth.
Why does an ascetic not take possession of it at the moment of inferential knowledge of the Path (sixteenth moment of compre- hension or abhisamaya, the first moment of the Path of Medita- tion)?
a. Because the Path has not been understood (abhisamita) formerly, through a worldly path, under its aspects of Path, Truth,
124 etc. (above p. 1111).
b. Because the Path is not susceptible of being understood in its
entirety. Suffering, its Origin, and its Extinction can be respec-
tively known, abandoned, realized, in their entirety; but the Path
cannot be practiced (= actualized) in its entirety. Without doubt
one cannot say of a person who is in the Path of Seeing, that, at the
end of his comprehension of the Truths of Origin and Extinction,
he has complete abandoning of Origin, and complete realization of
125
Extinction: yet a time will come when this abandoning and this
realization will be complete. But the same does not hold for the Path, given the diversity of families {gotta) of the Sravakas, Pratyekabuddhas, and Buddha.
Some say: Because conventional knowledge accompanies the Path of Seeing. Now the sixteenth moment of this "comprehen- sion" (the inferential knowledge of the Path) forms part of the
126
comprehension" in the sixteenth moment.
Path of Meditation.
We would say that this argument does not hold, for one should
Thus one does not acquire "the end of
The Knowledges 1125
? not regard the fact that conventional knowledge does not
127 accompany the Path of Meditation as a proof.
21b. It is not destined to arise.
At no moment is there the possibility for it to arise.
This knowledge does not arise when the ascetic is in contem- plation, nor when the ascetic has left his contemplation (=Seeing of the Truths). On the one hand this knowledge is incompatible with his contemplation (see above p. 1122); on the other hand the
128 mind, outside of its contemplation, is too coarse.
If this is so, how can one say that one takes possession of conventional knowledge, and that conventional knowledge is "cultivated. "
[The Sarvastivadins answer:] Formerly it was not acquired, but now it is acquired.
How can it be acquired, since it is not produced?
[The Sarvastivadins answer:] It is termed acquired because it is acquired [and not because it should be produced].
"Acquired because it is acquired," is an unprecedented manner
ofspeaking. Youdonotthusexplainhowconventional knowledge
is cultivated. This point should be understood in the same way as
the Former Masters [the Sautrantikas] understood it. According to
these Masters, one acquires conventional knowledge through the
power of the Aryamarga (=the Path of Seeing). After one has left
the contemplation of the Aryamarga, a conventional knowledge
bearing on the Truths is realized, and it is much more distin-
guished than that which preceeds the obtaining of the Aryamarga
itself. When one says that an ascetic acquired this conventional
knowledge through the Path of Seeing, one means to speak of the
acquisition of a personality (asraya) capable of realizing of this
129
containing gold is called the acquisition of gold itself.
conventional knowledge,
as the acquisition of a mineral 130
? ^ The Knowledges 1127
The Vaibhasikas do not accept this manner of seeing things. They hold that the so-called abhisamaydntika conventional knowledge is an unarisen dharma.
131 21c. From the sphere or from a lower sphere.
When one realizes the Path of Seeing of a certain sphere (bhumi), one acquires, in the future, the conventional knowledge of this sphere or of a lower sphere. This means that if one realizes the Path of Seeing in the state of Anagamya, one acquires, in the future, the Path of Seeing of a single sphere (i. e. , Anagamya), and one acquires, in the future, the conventional knowledge of two spheres (Anagamya and Kamadhatu): and so on until: if one realizes the Path of Seeing in the Fourth Dhyana, one acquires, in the future, the Path of Seeing of six spheres (Anagamya, Dhyanantara, and the Four Dhyanas), and one acquires, in the future, the conventional knowledge of seven spheres (the same, plus Kamadhatu).
21c. In Extinction, the last.
If one cultivates conventional knowledge at the end of Suffering and Origin, -- that is to say in the moments of the inferential knowledge of Suffering and the inferential knowledge of Origin, -- conventional knowledge is by nature the four foundations of mindfulness (vi. 14).
If one cultivates at the end of Extinction,--that is, in the moment of the inferential knowledge of Extinction,--it is only the last foundation of mindfulness, namely the foundation of mindfulness related to dharrnas.
2 Id. It has the aspects of its Truth.
? 1128 Chapter Seven
When one cultivates conventional knowledge at the end of the comprehension of a certain truth, the conventional knowledge takes on the aspects of this Truth and has this Truth for its object.
2 Id. It proceeds from effort.
Being acquired through the power of the Path of Seeing, it is exclusively obtained through effort; it does not arise from detachment.
***
The knowledges are so called because knowledge is the major element in them; if one takes into consideration their followings, they make up four skandhas in Kamadhatu, and five skandhas in Rfipadhatu (by adding dhyanasamvaralaksanarupa, iv. 13c).
***
132
states of the Path of Meditation?
How many knowledges does one cultivate in the different
22a. In the sixteenth, six, through non-detachment.
One should add "are cultivated" {bhavyante, according to vii.
20a). In the sixteenth moment (the inferential knowledge of the
Path), the ascetic who is not detached from Kamadhatu cultivates
(i. e. , takes possession of and actualizes) two knowledges in the
133
present; he cultivates (takes possession of) six knowledges in
the future: namely the knowledge of dharmas, inferential 134
knowledge, and knowledges of the Four Truths.
22b. Through detachment, seven.
? With respect to the ascetic already detached from Kamadhatu, at the moment when he attains inferential knowledge of the Path, one should add the cultivation of the knowledge of the mind of another, the seventh.
22c-d. Above, in the Path of Meditation associated with sensual desire, there is the cultivation of seven.
Beyond the sixteenth moment, that is, in the rest of the Path of
135 Meditation, as long as one has not obtained detachment, in the
preparatory paths, the uninterrupted paths, the paths of deliver- ance, and in the excellent paths,--there is cultivation of seven knowledges, namely a knowledge of the dharmas, inferential knowledge, the knowledges of the Four Truths, and worldly, conventional knowledge.
136
If one cultivates a worldly path, one also, in the present,
cultivates worldly conventional knowledge. If one cultivates a transworldly path, one also, in the present, cultivates one of the four knowledges of the dharmas. One will cultivate the other six knowledges in the future.
23a-d. In the uninterrupted paths of the victory over seven spheres, of the acquisition of the supernormal knowledges, and of the quality of Immovability, of mixed meditation. And also in the eight paths of higher deliverance.
Based on the preceding, add "there is cultivation of seven knowledges. "
One cultivates seven knowledges, the same as above, in the uninterrupted paths (paths of the expulsion of the defilements and the obstacles) which make up:
1. victory over seven spheres, that is to say detachment from the Four Dhyanas and the three Arupyas: these spheres are "vanquished" when one is detached from them;
The Knowledges 1129
? 2. the acquisition of five supernormal knowledges, with the exception of the sixth (vii. 42);
3. entry into Immovability (vi. 57,60c, English trans, p. 1002);
4. the mixed meditation (vi. 42) of the Saiksa.
137
If the ascetic cultivates these paths through a worldly path,
he cultivates, in the present, conventional knowledge; if he follows a transworldly path, he cultivates in the present one of the four inferential knowledges, and one of the two knowledges of dharmas (Extinction and the Path).
In the acquisition of the quality of Immovability, he does not cultivate conventional knowledge; for this latter is not opposed to Bhavugra. Here the Knowledge of the Destruction is the seventh knowledge.
Above the detachment from the seven spheres, in the first eight paths of deliverance of Bhavagra, the ascetic cultivates, in the future, seven knowledges, namely the knowledge of dharmas, inferential knowledge, the knowledges of the Four Truths, and the
138
knowledge of the mind of another;
conventional knowledge, because this knowledge is not opposed to Bhavagra.
He cultivates, in the present, one of the four inferential knowledges or one of the two knowledges of dharmas (Extinction and the Path).
24a-b. The Saiksa, in the path of deliverance of the perfectioning of the faculties, cultivates six or seven knowledges.
The Saiksa (in opposition to the Asaiksa who enters the state of Immovability) in the path of deliverance (third stage) of the perfectioning of his faculties (vi. 60c), cultivates six knowledges
he does not cultivate
? ^ The Knowledges 1131
when he is not detached (i. e. , when he is not an Anagamin). When he is detached, he cultivates seven knowledges, the knowledge of the mind of another being the seventh.
Some other masters say that conventional knowledge is
cultivated by one who is not detached as well as by one who is
13 detached. *
In the preparatory path (praj/ogamdrga, first stage), both of them cultivate this knowledge.
24c. In the uninterrupted path, he cultivates six knowl- edges.
140
Detached or non-detached, he cultivates six knowledges, above, in the uninterrupted path (second stage) of the perfection- ing of his faculties. He does not cultivate conventional knowledge, because the perfectioning of the faculties resembles the Path of Seeing; he does not cultivate the knowledge of the mind of another because this knowledge is absent from the uninterrupted path: in fact this knowledge does not oppose the defilements.
24d. The same in the victory over Bhavagra.
In the uninterrupted paths of detachment from Bhavagra, the oaik? a cultivates six knowledges.
25a. At the moment of the knowledge of destruction, nine knowledges.
The ninth path of deliverance of detachment from Bhavagra is called the Knowledge of Destruction (vi. 44d). [The first eight have been discussed vii. 23c-d]. The ascetic then cultivates nine
as
? 1132 Chapter Seven
knowledges, with the exception of the Knowledge of Non-Arising.
25b. An Immovable One cultivates ten knowledges.
The saint who is from the beginning an Immovable One (vi.
57c) cultivates ten knowledges at the moment when he produces the Knowledge of Destruction, for at this moment he obtains the Knowledge of Non-Arising (vi. 50a).
25c. Ten knowledges also in the last deliverance in the passage to the state of Immovability.
The ascetic who obtains the state of Immovability through the perfectioning of his faculties also cultivates ten knowledges in the last path (the ninth path of deliverance) of this perfectioning (vi. 60c).
25d. In the cases not mentioned, there is cultivation of eight knowledges.
What are the cases not mentioned?
1. The ninth path of deliverance from detachment to Kama- dhatu (excluded from the definition 22c-d);
2. the paths of deliverance from detachment to the seven spheres, to the five supernormal knowledges, to mixed meditation of the Saiksa (excluded from the definitions 23a-c);
3. the first eight paths of deliverance of the perfectioning of the faculties leading to the state of Immovability (excluded from the definition 25c); and
4. the preparatory path and the excellent path (prayogamdrga and visesamdrga) of one who is detached (or an Anagamin).
? In all these paths, there is cultivation of eight future knowl- edges, with the exception of the Knowledge of Destruction and the Knowledge of Non-Arising. This is the case for the Saiksa.
##*
The ASaiksa, in the preparatory path, the path of deliverance, and the excellent path of the five supernormal knowledges and of mixed meditation, cultivates nine knowledges (with the exception of the Knowledge of Non-Arising) or ten knowledges, depending on whether the Asaiksa is a samayavimukta or an asamayavimukta. In the uninterrupted paths of the same (five supernormal knowledges and mixed meditation), he cultivates either eight or nine knowledges, with the exception of the knowledge of the mind of another in both cases.
Nevertheless, in the path of deliverance of the two supernor- mal knowledges which are neutral (the divine eye and divine hearing), --this path being itself morally neutral--there is no
141 cultivation of any future knowledge.
As for the Prthagjana,--in the ninth path of deliverance of detachment from Kamadhatu and the three Dhyanas; in the preparatory paths; in the paths of deliverance of the three supernormal knowledges; in the realizations of the spiritual
142
qualities, Apramanas, Vimoksas, etc. :
cultivated in the Dhyanas (and not in the sdmantakas),--he cultivates, in the future, conventional knowledge and the knowl- edge of the mind of another; but not in the nirvedhabhagiyas because three constitute the following of the Path of Seeing.
In the other cases, obtaining a path not previously obtained, he cultivates solely, in the future, conventional knowledge.
***
The Knowledges 1133
all these paths being
? 1134 Chapter Seven
To which sphere does the knowledge belong which is culti- vated in the worldly and transworldly paths?
A knowledge of the mind of another, a future cultivation,
belongs to the sphere which serves as the support of the Path, or
143 rather to the sphere which one obtains through the Path.
It is not a rule that pure knowledge, cultivated in the future, will belong to the sphere which serves as the support for its arising.
26a-b. The knowledge that one cultivates in the future belongs to the sphere from which one is detached, to the sphere acquired, or to a lower sphere.
When, in order to become detached from one sphere an ascetic cultivates the paths (prayoga, etc. ) of the two classes, pure or impure, he cultivates pure knowledges which are either of the sphere which he obtains for the first time by these paths, of the
144 sphere which is the support of the path, or of a lower sphere.
26c. In the knowledge of destruction, the pure is also of all
145 spheres.
At the moment when a knowledge of the destruction of the cankers arises (vi. 44d), there is cultivated the qualities of all the
146
spheres, including the impure ones,
Vimoksas, etc. In fact, Vajropamasamadhi cuts off these ties which are the possessions of the defilements; all the qualities will be found in a series freed from the defilements; one can thus say that they "breathe" (or that they open, that they inflate), in the manner
147
of a sack when one cuts the ropes that bind it. The Arhat has
obtained rule over his mind: all the good dharmas come towards 148
him, as vassals come to present their homage to a prince who
149 accedes to supreme kingship.
namely the Apramanas, the
? Is everything that has been previously obtained also cultivated?
26d. That which has been obtained previously is not cultivated.
What is cultivated is what has not been obtained. That which, having been obtained and lost is obtained anew--that is to say, is newly realized or actualized--is not cultivated, that is, the ascetic does not take possession of it for the future. Because this has been
150
Does the term "cultivation" (bhavana) only designate acquisi- tion?
No. Cultivation is of four types: 1. acquisition, 2. practice, 3. opposition, and 4. expulsion.
27. Cultivation of good conditioned dharmas is acquisition and practice; there is cultivation of opposition and
151 expulsion with respect to impure dharmas.
152
There is cultivation of acquisition and practice with respect
to the good conditioned dharmas, acquisition with respect to the future and acquisition and practice with respect to the present. These two cultivations rest on the first two efforts, effort for the arising of what has not yet arisen, and effort for the growth of what has already arisen.
acquired and rejected in the past.
There is cultivation of opposition
respect to impure dharmas; they rest on the last two efforts, effort for the non-arising of what has not arisen, and effort for the
155
destruction of what has already arisen.
Thus the good but impure dharmas are susceptible of four
153
154
and expulsion
with
? 1136 Chapter Seven ^____
types of cultivation; the pure dharmas are susceptible of the first two; the defiled and neutral dharmas of the last two.
The Vaibhasikas of the West say that there are six types of cultivation: four as above, plus the cultivation of constraint (samvarabhdvana), and the cultivation of inspection {vibhavanab- havana).
156
The first is the cultivation of the organs, the eye, etc. ; the
second is the cultivation of the body, as it says in the Sutra, "These
157
six organs well subdued, well guarded. . . " and, "There is in the
158 body the beard, hair, etc. "
The Vaibhasikas of Kasmir however think that these two
cultivations should be included within the cultivation of opposition
159 and expulsion.
***
spiritual qualities (gunas), which are made up of the knowledges. Among these qualities, there are first those which are uniquely
161
proper to the Buddha, which the Bodhisattva acquires at the
moment of the Knowledge of Destruction (vi. 45) in becoming an Arhat and, at the same time, a Buddha.
These qualities are eighteen in number.
28a-b. The dharmas unique to the Buddha are eighteen, the powers, etc.
The ten powers, the four absences of fear, the three founda-
162
tions of mindfulness, and great compassion:
constitutes the eighteen dharmas unique to the Buddha, so called because others do not acquire them by becoming Arhats.
We have explained the knowledges. Now we must explain the 160
this group
? 163 We shall examine first the nature of the powers.
28c-29. There are ten knowledges in sthdndsthdna\ [eight in karmaphala\ nine in the dhyanas, etc. , in the Indriyas, in the Abhimoksas, in the Dhatus; nine or ten in the paths; two are conventional knowledge; and extinction is made up
164 of six or ten knowledges. ]
The power which consists of the knowledge of what is possible
and what is impossible {sthdndsthdna, vii. 30c) is made up of ten 165
28d. Eight in kannaphala\
The power which consists of the knowledge of the retribution
of actions is made up of eight knowledges, with the exception of
166 the knowledge of the Path and Extinction.
29a. Nine in the Dhyanas, etc. , in the Indriyas, in the Abhimoksas, in the Dhatus;
The power of the knowledge of the Dhyanas, Vimoksas,
167
Samadhis and Samapattis; the power of the knowledge of the
168
knowledges.
degree of the moral faculties of beings;
the power of the 169
knowledge of the different aspirations of beings; and the power
of the knowledge of the different acquired dispositions of
170
excluding the knowledge of extinction.
beings
--these four powers are made up of nine knowledges,
29b. Nine or ten in the paths;
? 1138 Chapter Seven
The power of the knowledge of the paths which lead to the
different realms of rebirth and to Nirvana, is made up of either
nine knowledges or ten knowledges. If one understands "the Path
with its result/' this power then includes the knowledge of
extinction (which is the result of the Path); but if one understands
"the Path without its result/' then this power is made up of nine 171
29c. Two are conventional knowledges;
The power of the knowledge of former abodes and the power of the knowledge of the death and rebirth of beings are both conventional knowledges.
29d. Destruction is made up of six or ten knowledges.
The power of the knowledge of the destruction of the cankers is made up of six or ten knowledges. One can consider the knowledge of the destruction of the cankers in and of itself as the knowledge of the destruction of the cankers which is made up of the knowledge of the dharmas, inferential knowledge, the knowledge of extinction, the Knowledge of Destruction, the Knowledge of Non-Arising, and conventional knowledge; or one can understand the knowledge of the destruction of the cankers as the knowledge which is produced in a series where the cankers have been expelled: the ten knowledges exist in such a series.
***
As for the spheres which serve as the support for the powers:
30a-c. The power of former abodes and the power of death-rebirth lie in the Dhyanas; the others in all the spheres.
knowledges.
? The knowledge of former abodes and the knowledge of the death and rebirth of beings have the Dhyanas for their spheres; the other powers are of all the spheres, Kamadhatu, Anagamya, the Four Dhyunas, Dhyanantara, and the Four Arupyas.
They arise in a male body in Jambudvlpa, that is to say in the
172 Buddha, for Buddhas do not appear outside of Jambudvlpa.
In others this tenfold knowledge is not called a power: it is only in the series of the Buddha that it is called a power, because, elsewhere, it is shackled.
30c-d. Why? Because its power does not know any obstacle.
The knowledge which knows all the objects of knowledge without any obstacle is called a power. This is why the ten powers exist only in the Buddha, because the Buddha, having expelled all the cankers and all the traces (vdsand, see vii. 32d) of ignorance, knows all objects of his own accord. It is not the same for the knowledges of others, and as a consequence these knowledges are not called powers.
According to tradition, Sariputra refused a person who asked
173
for admission to the Order; he was not capable of seeing the
number of the previous and subsequent births of a pigeon chased
174
i
The Buddha's knowledge is exercised without obstacle, the
power of his mind is infinite and envelopes all objects (see p. 1146). ***
If such is the power of his mind, what is the power of his body?
31a. Narayana power in his body; [according to others, in his parts; this is a power the seventh term of a series which
by a hawk (? ).
The Knowledges 1139
? 1140 Chapter Seven
begins with the elephant and in which each term is worth
175 ten times the preceeding; it consists of a tangible. ]
Narayana is the name of a power and also the name of one who possesses this power, namely the god Narayana: the same for Canura and Mahanagna. The power of the body of the Buddha is equal to that of Narayana.
31b. According to others, in his parts;
According to others, each part of his body (samdhi) possesses this power.
The Bhadanta, [the Darstantika Master], says that his physical power is like his mental power, that is, infinite; for, if it were otherwise, the body of the Blessed One would not be able to
176 support infinite knowledge.
The Buddhas have nagdgranthi power in their body parts, Pratyekabuddhas have samkald power, and Cakravartins have
177 sanku power.
What is the extent of Narayana power?
31c. This is a power the seventh term of a series which begins with the elephant and in which each term is worth ten times the preceeding;
178 There is a series: prdkrtahastin, gandhahastin, mahanagna,
179
praskandin, vardriga, cdnura, and narayana. The power of each
term is worth ten times the power of the preceeding term: ten
180
According to others, this is the case for the first six terms; but ten cdnuras are equal to a hali-ndrdyana, and two half-ndrdyanas are equal to one narayana.
prdkrtahastins make one gandhahastin and so on.
? According to the author of this book, among the definitions of
the physical power of the Buddha, that one is true which makes
181 this power the greatest.
31d. It consists of a tangible.
The physical power of the Buddha is, by its nature, a tangible (sprastavyayatana). It consists of primary elements of a special nature.
According to others, however, it is a rupa derived from the primary eletoents, but a derived rupa different from the seven
182 derived tangibles, slaksnatva, etc. (i. 10d).
1Sb As for the four assurances (vaisdradya),
32a-c. Assurance is fourfold
The Buddha possesses four assurances which are explained in the Sutra.
32c. Resembling the first, the tenth, the second, and the seventh power.
1. The first assurance, the assurance that he has attained supreme comprehension with respect to all the dharmas, resem- bles the first power (the power of the knowledge of what is possible and what is impossible); it consists of ten knowledges, and can exist (lit. "be supported") in all of the spheres.
2. The second assurance, the assurance that he has the knowledge of the destruction of all the defilements, resembles the tenth power, the power of the knowledge of the destruction of the defilements: it consists of ten knowledges, and can exist in six spheres.
The Knowledges 1141
? 1142 Chapter Seven
3. The third assurance, the assurance that he can fully explain the dharmas, resembles the second power, the power of the
184 knowledges, and can exist in all of the spheres.
knowledge of the retribution of actions:
it consists of eight
4. The fourth assurance, the assurance that he can explain the Path leading to definitive deliverance, resembles the seventh power, the power of the knowledge of the paths which lead to the different realms of rebirth and to Nirvana: it consists of ten or nine knowledges, and can exist in all of the spheres.
How can the knowledges be called assurances (vaifdradya)?
The word vaisaradya signifies "absence of fear" {nirbhayatd). By reason of the fact that he knows that he has understood all the dharmaSy destroyed all the defilements, etc. , the Buddha is free from fear in the assemblies. Thus vaisaradya is knowledge.
[In our opinion] the assurances, being a result of knowledge,
185 are not knowledge by nature.
***
What are the three applications of mindfulness of the Buddha?
lS6 32d. Three are mindfulness and awareness {prajnd).
187
The Sutra
mindfulness of the Buddha: 1. When his disciples, unanimous, respectfully listen, accept and practice his teaching, he experiences neither joy nor satisfaction, but he remains indifferent, in full mindfulness and awareness. 2. When his disciples, unanimous, do not hear, do not accept and do not practice his teaching, he does not experience displeasure nor impatience, but he remains indifferent, in full mindfulness and awareness. 3. When some of his disciples hear, accept and practice his teaching, while others, not hearing, do not accept and do not practice his teaching, he does
explains at length the three applications of
? not experience joy and displeasure, but remains indifferent in full mindfulness and awareness. These three applications of mindful- ness are, by their nature, mindfulness and awareness.
But a Sravaka who is free from the cankers, whose disciples are either respectful or not respectful, or respectful and not respectful, experiences neither joy nor displeasure, nor either joy or displeasure. Why consider the three applications of mindfulness as dhannas unique to a Buddha?
Because the Buddha has abandoned joy and displeasure along with their traces. Or rather because the disciples are the disciples of the Buddha: it is admirable that the Buddha does not experience either joy or displeasure from their respect or disrespect; but the disciples are not the disciples of the Sravakas from whom they receive the teaching: there is nothing admirable in the fact that these Sravakas do not experience joy or displeasure.
***
33a. Great compassion is a conventional mental state; [it is
great through its factors, its aspects, its object, its equality,
and its excellence; it differs from (ordinary) compassion in
188 eight ways. ]
Great compassion is, by its nature, conventional knowledge (vii. 2b). In the contrary case, it would be, in its nature, absence of hatred as is ordinary compassion (viii. 29); like ordinary compas- sion, it would not embrace all beings of the Three Dhatus, it would not envision the three types of suffering.
Why is the compassion of the Blessed One termed "great"?
33b. It is great through its factors, its aspects, its object, its equality, and its excellence.
? 1. By reason of its factors (sambhara); it is produced in fact by a great provisioning (sambhara) of merit (punya) and knowledge (jfldna)TM
2. By reason of its aspects, of the modality under which it grasps things: it considers things as painful by reason of the threefold suffering, the suffering inherent in suffering itself, the suffering inherent in change, and the suffering inherent in the samskaras (vi. 3),190 whereas ordinary compassion only envisions the suffering inherent in suffering itself.
? . ? ? reason of the object, for it has for its object all beings in the Three Dhatus.
4. By reason of its equality, for it is equally concerned with the happiness and benefit of all being.
5. By reason of its excellence, for no other compassion which has arisen surpasses it. 191
How does great compassion differ from ordinary compassion?
33c. It differs from ordinary compassion in eight ways.
1. With respect to its nature: ordinary compassion is absence of hatred, whereas great compassion is absence of ignorance.
2. With respect to its aspect: ordinary compassion takes on the form of one suffering, whereas great compassion takes on the form of threefold suffering.