No More Learning

handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? MODERN PHILOSOPHY.
telligible to the ordinary English reader, the results of these
abstruse and difficult speculations. Yet the pecularities of Fichte's philosophical system are so intimately bound up
with the personal character of its author, that both lose
something of their completeness when considered apart
from each other. And it is principally with a view to illus-
trate the harmony between his life and his philosophy that
an attempt is here made to point out some of its distinguish-
ing features. As Fichte's system may be considered the
complement of those which preceded it, we must view it
in connexion with the more important of these.
The final results of the philosophy of Locke were two-fold.
In France, the school of Condillac, imitating the example of
the English philosopher rather than following out his first
principles, occupied itself exclusively with the phenomena of
sensation, leaving out of sight the no less indisputable facts
to which reflection is our sole guide. The consequence was
a system of unmixed materialism, a deification of physical
nature, and ultimately, avowed atheism. In Great Britain,
the philosophy of experience was more justly treated : both
sources of human knowledge which Locke indicated at the
outset of his inquiry--although in the body of his essay he
analyzed one of them only--were recognised by his followers
in his own land, until Berkeley resolved the phenomena of
sensation into those of reflection, and the same method which
in France led to materialism, in England produced a system
of intellectual idealism. Berkeley's principles were pushed
to the extreme by Hume, who applying to the phenomena
of reflection precisely the same analysis which Berkeley ap-
plied to those of sensation, demolished the whole fabric of
human knowledge, and revealed, under the seemingly sub-
stantial foundations on which men had hitherto built their
faith a yawning gulf of impenetrable obscurity and scepticism.
Feeling, thought, nay consciousness itself became but fleeting
phantasms without any abiding subject in which they could
inhere.
It may be safely affirmed that, notwithstanding the outcry
which greeted the publication of the "Essay of Human
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 5G
MEMOIR OF FICHTE.
Nature," and the senseless virulence which still loads the
memory of its author with abuse, none of his critics have
hitherto succeeded in detecting a fallacy in his main argu-
ment. Admit his premises, and you cannot consistently
stop short of his conclusions. The Aristotelian theory of
perception, which up to this period none had dared to
impugn, having thus led, by a strictly necessary movement,
to the last extreme of scepticism, the reaction which fol-
lowed, under Reid and the school of Common Sense, was
naturally founded on a denial of the doctrine of representa-
tion, and on a more close analysis of our knowledge of the
external world, and of the processes by which we acquire
that knowledge. It has thus occurred that the distinguished
philosophers of the Scotch School, although deserving of all
gratitude for their acute investigations into the intellectual
and moral phenomena of man, have yet confined themselves
exclusively to the department of psychological analysis, and
have thrown little direct light on the higher questions of
metaphysical speculation. This was reserved for the modern
school of Germany, of which Kant may be considered the
head. Stewart, although contemporary with the philoso-
pher of Konigsberg, seems to have had not only an imper-
fect, but a quite erroneous, conception of his doctrines.
Kant admitted the validity of Hume's conclusions re-
specting our knowledge of external things, on the premises
from which they were deduced. He admitted that the
human intellect could not go beyond itself, could not furnish
us with any other than subjective knowledge. We are in-
deed constrained to assume the existence of an outward
world to which we refer the impressions which come to us
through our senses, but these impressions having to pass
through the prism of certain inherent faculties or " catego-
rias" of the understanding, by which their original character
is modified, or perhaps altogether changed, we are not en-
titled to draw from them any conclusions as to the nature of
the source whence they emanate. Our knowledge of the
outward world is thus limited to the bare admission of its
existence, and stands in the same relation to the outward
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? MODERN PHILOSOPHY--KANT.
57
world itself as the impressions conveyed to the eye through
a kaleidoscope do to the collection of objects within the in-
strument . But is the outward world, which we are thus
forced to abandon to doubt, the only reality for man? Do
we not find in consciousness something more than a cogni-
tive faculty 1 We find besides, Will, Freedom, Self-deter-
mination; and here is a world altogether independent of
sense, and of the knowledge of outward things. Freedom
is the root, the very ground-work of our being; free deter-
mination is the most intimate and certain fact in our
nature. To this freedom we find an absolute law addressed,
--the unconditional law of morality. Here, then, in the
practical world of duty, of free obedience, of moral deter-
mination, we have the true world of man, in which the
moral agent is the only existence, the moral act the only
reality. In this super-sensual world we regain, by the prac-
tical movement of Reason, our convictions of infinite and
absolute existence, from the knowledge of which, as objec-
tive realities, we are shut out by the subjective limitations
of the Understanding. Between the world of sense and the
world of morality, and indissolubly connected with both,
stands the aesthetic world, or the system of relations we
hold with external things through our ideas of the Beauti-
ful, the Sublime, &c. ; which thus forms the bond of union
between the sensible and spiritual worlds. These three
worlds exhaust the elements of human consciousness.
But while Kant, by throwing the bridge of aesthetic feel-
ing over the chasm which separates the sensible from the
purely spiritual world, established an outward communica- ? tion between them, he did not attempt to reconcile--he
maintained the impossibility of reconciling--their essential
opposition. So far as the objective world is concerned, his
system is one of mere negation. It is in this reconciliation,
--in tracing this opposition to its source,--in the establish-
ment of the unity of the sensible and spiritual worlds, that
Fichte's "Wissenchaftslehre" follows out and completes the
philosophical system of which Kant had laid the founda-
tion. In it, for the first time, philosophy becomes, not a
I
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 58
MEMOIR OF FICHTE.
theory of knowledge, but knowledge itself: for in it the
apparent division of the subject thinking from the object
thought of is abolished, by penetrating to the primitive
unity out of which this opposition arises.
The origin of this opposition, and the principle by which
it is to be reconciled, must be sought for in the nature of
the thinking subject itself. Our own consciousness is the
source of all our positive and certain knowledge. It pre-
cedes, and is the ground of, all other knowledge; nay it
embraces within itself everything which we truly know.
The facts of our own mental experience alone possess true
reality for us; whatever is more than these, however pro-
bable as an inference, does not belong to the sphere of
knowledge. Here, then, in the depths of the mind itself,
we must look for a fixed and certain starting point for
philosophy. Fichte finds such a starting point in the pro-
position or axiom (A= A. ) This proposition is at once recog-
nised by every one as absolutely and unconditionally true.
But in affirming this proposition we also affirm our own ex-
istence, for the affirmation itself is our own mental act. The
proposition may therefore be changed into (Ego=Ego. ) But
this affirmation itself postulates the existence of something
not included in its subject, or in other words, out of the
affirmative axiom (A=A) there arises the negative proposition
(--A not=A,) or as before, (Non-Ego not= Ego. ) In this act
of negation the mind assumes the existence of a Non-Ego
opposed to itself, and forming a limitation to its own
existence. This opposition occurs in every act of conscious-
ness; and in the voluntary and spontaneous limits which
the mind thus sets to its own activity, it creates for itself
an objective world.
The fundamental character of finite being is thus the
supposition of itself (thesis), and of something opposed to
itself (anti-thesis); which two conceptions are reciprocal, mu-
tually imply each other, and are hence identical (synthesis. )
The Ego affirms the Non-Ego, and is affirmed in it; the
two conceptions are indissoluble, nay they are but one con-
ception modified by different attitudes of the mind. But as
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? "W1SSENSCHAFTSLEHKE. "
these attitudes are in every case voluntarily assumed by the
Ego, it is itself the only real existence, and the Non-Ego, as
well as the varied aspects attributed to it, are but different
forms of the activity of the Ego. Here, then, Realism and
Idealism coincide in the identity of the subject and object
of thought, and the absolute principle of knowledge is dis-
covered in the mind itself.
But in thus establishing the Non-Ego as a limit to its
own free activity, the Ego does not perform a mere arbitrary
act . It constantly sets before it, as its aim or purpose, the
realization of its own nature; and this effort after self-
development is the root of our practical existence. This
effort is limited by the Non-Ego,--the creation of the Ego
itself for the purposes of its own moral life. Hence the practical Ego must regard itself as acted upon by influences
from without, as restrained by something other than itself,
--in one word, as finite. But this limitation, or in other
words the Non-Ego, is a mere creation of the Ego, without
true life or existence in itself, and only assumed as a field
for the self-development of the Ego. Let us suppose this
assumed obstacle removed or laid aside, and the original
activity of the Ego left without limitation or restraint . In
this case, the finite individuality of the Ego disappears with
the limitations which produce it, and we ascend to the first
principle of a spiritual organization in which the multiform
phenomena of individual life are embraced in an Infinite
all-comprehending Unity, -- "an Absolute Ego, in whose
self-determination all the Non-Ego is determined. "
Fichte has been accused of teaching a system of mere Egoism, of elevating the subjective personality of man into
the place of God. No one who is acquainted with any of
his later writings can fail to see the falsity of this charge;
but as it has been alleged that in these works he abandoned
the principles which he advocated in earlier life, it may not
be unimportant to show that the charge is utterly ground-
less, and inapplicable even to the first outlines of his phi-
losophical theory. The following passages occur in a let-
ter to Jacobi, dated 30th August 1795, when transmitting
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 60
MEMOIR OF FICHTE.
to him a copy of the first edition of the Wissenschaftslehre,
and seem to be quite conclusive as to the fact that the
Absolute Ego of his earlier teaching may be scientifically,
as well as morally, identified with the highest results of his
later doctrines. *
dFtcfjte to gjarobi.
"I have read your writings again this summer during
the leisure of a charming country residence,--read them
again and again, and I am everywhere, but especially in
"Allwill" astonished at the striking similarity of our phi-
losophical convictions. The public will scarcely believe in
this similarity, and perhaps you yourself may not readily do
so, for in that case it would be required of you to deduce
the details of a whole system from the uncertain outlines of
an introduction. You are indeed well known to be a
Realist, and I to be a transcendental Idealist more severe
than even Kant himself; for with him there is still recog-
nised a multiform object of experience, whilst I maintain,
in plain language, that this object is itself produced by us
through our own creative power. Permit me to come to an
understanding with you on this point.
"My Absolute Ego is obviously not the Individual;--
although this has been maintained by offended courtiers
and chagrined philosophers, in order to impute to me the
scandalous doctrine of practical Egoism. But the Individual
must be deduced from the Absolute Eyo. Thus the Wissen-
* schaftslehre enters at once into the domain of natural right.
A finite being--as may be shown by deduction--can only
conceive of itself as a sensuous existence in a sphere of
sensuous existences, over one portion of which--(a portion
which can have no beginning)--it exercises causality, and
with another portion of which--(a portion to which we
ascribe the notion of causality),--it stands in relations of
reciprocal influence;--and in so far it is called an Indivi-
dual: (the conditions of Individuality are Bights. ) So surely as it affirms itself as an Individual, so surely does it affirm
such a sphere; for both are reciprocal notions. When we
regard ourselves as Individuals--in which case we always
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? "W1SSENSCHAFTSLEHRK. "
til
look upon ourselves as living, and not as philosophizing or
poetizing,--we take our stand upon that point of view
which I call practical;--that of the Absolute Ego being
speculative. Henceforward, from this practical point of
view there is a world for us, independent of ourselves, which
we can only modify; and thus too the Pure Ego, which
does not disappear from this region, is necessarily placed
without us, objectified, and called God. How could we
otherwise have arrived at the qualities which we ascribe to
God, and deny to ourselves, had we not first discovered
them in ourselves, and only denied them to ourselves in one
particular respect--t. e. , as Individuals? This practical
point of view is the domain of Realism; by the deduction
and recognition of this point from the side of speculation
itself arises that complete reconciliation of philosophy with
the Common Sense of man, which is promised in the Wis-
senschaftslehre.
"To what end, then, is the speculative point of view, and
with it all philosophy, if it belong not to life? Had hu-
manity never tasted of this forbidden fruit, it might indeed
have done without philosophy. But there is implanted
within us a desire to gaze upon this region which transcends
all individuality, not by a mere reflected light, but in direct
and immediate vision; and the first man who raised a
question concerning the existence of God, broke through
the restrictive limits, shook humanity to its deepest founda-
tions, and set it in a controversy with itself which is not
yet adjusted, and which can be adjusted only by a bold ad-
vance to that highest region of thought from which the
speculative and practical points of view are seen to be
united. We begin to philosophize from presumption, and thus
become bankrupt of our innocence; we see our nakedness,
and then philosophize from necessity for our redemption.
"But do I not philosophize as confidently with you, and
write as openly, as if I were already assured of your in-
terest in my philosophy? Indeed my heart tells me that
I do not deceive myself in assuming the existence of this
interest.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 62
MEMOIR OK FICHTE.
"Allwill gives the transcendental Idealists the hope of
an enduring peace and even of a kind of alliance, if they
will but content themselves with finding their own limits,
and making these secure. I believe that I have now ful-
filled this condition. If I have moreover, from this sup-
posed hostile land, guaranteed and secured to Realism itself
its own proper domain, then I may lay claim not merely to
a kind of alliance, but to an alliance of the completest
kind. "
Still more decisive on this point is the following passage
from a review of Schulz's "JEnesidemus," in the Literatur
Zeitung for 1794 :--
"In the Pure Ego, Reason is not practical, neither is it so
in the Ego as Intelligence; it becomes so only by the effort
of these to unite. That this principle must lie at the root
of Kant's doctrine itself, although he has nowhere distinctly
declared it;--further, how a practical philosophy arises
through the representation by the intelligent Ego to itself
of this hyper-physical effort, in its progressive ascent
through the various steps which man must traverse in theo-
retical philosophy,--this is not the place to show. Such an
union,--an Ego in whose Self-determination all the Non-
Ego is determined (the Idea of God)--is the highest object
of this effort. Such an effort, when the intelligent Ego
conceives this object as something external to itself, is
faith:--(Faith in God. ) This effort can never cease, until
after the attainment of its object; that is, Intelligence can-
not regard as the last any moment of its existence in which
this object has not yet been attained,--(Faith in an Eternal
Existence. ) In these ideas, however, there is nothing possible
for us but Faith;--t. e. Intelligence has here no empirical
perception for its object, but only the necessary effort of the
Ego; and throughout all Eternity nothing more than this
can become possible. But this faith is by no means a mere
probable opinion; on the contrary, it possesses, at least ac-
cording to the testimony of our inmost convictions, the same
degree of certainty with the immediately certain postulate
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? MORAL RELATIONS OF THE FINITE EGO.
G3
'[am'--a certainty infinitely superior to all objective cer-
tainty, which can only become possible mediately, through
the existence of the intelligent Ego. ^Enesidemus indeed
demands an objective proof for the existence of God and the
Immortality of the soul. What can he mean by this? Or
does objective certainty appear to him superior to subjec-
tive certainty 1 The axiom--'I am myself--possesses only
subjective certainty; and so far as we can conceive of the
self-consciousness of God, even God is subjective so far as
regards himself. And then, as to an objective existence of
Immortality! (these are ^Enesidemus' own words),--should
any being whatever, contemplating its existence in time, de-
clare at any moment of that existence--'Now, I am eternal! '
--then, on that very account, it could not be eternal. "
We have seen that the attitude of the finite Ego towards
the Non-Ego is practical; towards the Infinite Ego, specu-
lathe. In the first relation we find ourselves surrounded
by existences, over one part of which we exercise causality,
and with the other (in whom we suppose an independent
causality) we are in a state of reciprocal influence. In these
relations the active and moral powers of man find their
sphere. The moral law imparts to its objects--to all
things whose existence is implied in its fulfilment--the
same certainty which belongs to itself. The outward world
assumes a new reality, for we have imperative duties to
perform which demand its existence. Life ceases to be an
empty show without truth or significance;--it is our field of
duty, the theatre on which our moral destiny is to be
wrought out. The voice of conscience, of highest reason,
bids us know, love, and honour beings like ourselves;--and
those beings crowd around us. The ends of their and our
existence demand the powers and appliances of physical life
for their attainment;--that life, and the means of sustaining
and using it, stand before us. The world is nothing more than the sphere and object of human activity; it exists be-
cause the purposes of our moral life require its existence. Of the law of duty we are immediately certain;--the world
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 64
MKMOIR OF FICHTK.
becomes a reality to us by means of that previous certainty.
Our life begins with an action, not a thought; we do not
act because we know, but we know because we are called
upon to act.
But not only does the law of human activity require our
faith in its immediate objects and implements; it also
points to a purpose, an aim, in our actions, lying beyond
themselves, to which they stand related as means to an end.
Not that the moral law is dependent on the perception of
this end--the moral law is absolute and imperative in it-
self ;--but we necessarily connect with our actions some
future result as a consequence to which they inevitably
tend, as the final accomplishment of the purpose which gave
them birth.
The moral sense cannot find such a fulfilment
in the present life;--the forces of nature, the desires and
passions of men, constantly oppose its dictates. It revolts
against the permanence of things as they now are, and un-
ceasingly strives to make them better. Nor can the indi-
vidual look for such an accomplishment of the moral law of
his nature in the progressive improvement of his species.
Were the highest grade of earthly perfection conceived and
attained in the physical and moral world--(as it is conceivable
and attainable)--Reason would still propose a higher grade
beyond it. And even this measure of perfection could not
be appropriated by humanity as its own,--as the result of its
own exertions,--but must be considered as the creation of an
unknown power, by whose unseen agency the basest passions
of men, and even their vices and crimes, have been made
the instruments of this consummation; while too often
their good resolutions appear altogether lost to the world,
or even to retard the purposes which they were apparently
designed to promote. The chain of material causes and
effects is not affected by the motives and feelings which
prompt an action, but solely by the action itself; and the
purposes of mere physical existence would be as well, or
even better promoted by an unerring mechanism as by the
agency of free beings. Nevertheless, if moral obedience be
a reasonable service, it must have its result; if the Reason
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? MORAL RELATIONS OF THE FINITE EGO.
05
which commands it be not an utterly vain delusion, its law must be fulfilled. That law is the first principle of our nature, and it gives us the assurance, our faith in which no difficulty can shake, that no moral act can be fruitless, no work of Reason utterly lost. A chain of causes and effects,
in which Freedom is superfluous and without aim, cannot
thus be the limit of our existence: the law of our being can-
not be fulfilled in the world of sense;--there must then be
a super-sensual world in which it may be accomplished. In
this purely spiritual world, will alone is the first link of a chain of consequences which pervades the whole invisible realm of being; as action, in the sensual world, is the first
link of a material chain which runs through the whole
system of nature. Will is the active living principle of the
super-sensual world; it may break forth in a material act,
which belongs to the sensual world, and do there that which
pertains to a material act to do;--but, independently of all
physical manifestation, it flows forth in endless spiritual
activity. Here human Freedom is untrammeled by earthly
obstructions, and the moral law of our being may find that
accomplishment which it sought in vain in the world of
sense
.
But although we are immediately conscious that our Will,
our moral activity, must lead to consequences beyond itself,
we yet cannot know what those consequences may be, nor
how they are possible. In respect of the nature of these results, the present life is, in relation to the future, a life in faith. In the future life we shall possess these results, for
we shall then make them the groundwork of new activity,
and thus the future life will be, in relation to the present, a life in sight. But the spiritual world is even now with us, for we are already in possession of the principle from which
it springs. Our Will, our free activity, is the only attribute
which is solely and exclusively our own; and by it we are
already citizens of the eternal world; the kingdom of
heaven is here, or nowhere--it cannot become more imme-
diately present at any point of finite existence. This life is
the beginning of our being; the outward world is freely
K
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 06
MEMOIR OF FICHTE.
given to us as a firm ground on which we may commence
our course; the future life is its continuation, for which we
must ourselves create a starting-period in the present; and
should the aim of this second life prove as unattainable to
finite power as the end of the first is to us now, then the
fresh strength, the firmer purpose, the clearer sight which
shall be its immediate growth, will open to us another and
a higher sphere of activity. But the world of duty is an
infinite world;--every finite exertion has but a definite
aim;--and beyond the highest point toward which our la-
bouring being strives, a higher still appears; and to such
progression we can conceive no end. By free determination
--in the effort after moral perfection,--we have laid hold on
Eternal Life.
In the physical world we see certain phenomena following
each other with undeviating regularity. We cannot see
that what we name cause has in itself any power over that
which we call effect, that there is any relation between them
except that of invariable sequence. But we suppose a law
under which both subsist, which regulates the mode of their
existence, and by the efficiency of which the order of their
succession is determined. So likewise, in the spiritual
world, we entertain the firmest conviction that our moral
Will is connected with certain consequences, though we
cannot understand how mere Will can of itself produce such
consequences. We here again conceive of a law under which
our Will, and the Will of all finite beings, exists, in virtue
of which it is followed by certain results, and out of which
all our relations with other beings arise. So far as our Will
is simply an internal act, complete in itself, it lies wholly
within our own power;--so far as it is a fact in the super-
sensual world--the first of a train of spiritual consequences,
it is not dependent on ourselves, but on the law which
governs the super-sensual world. But the super-sensual
world is a world of Freedom, of living activity; its principle
cannot therefore be a mechanical force, but must itself
possess this Freedom--this living activity. It can be no-
thing else than self-determining Reason. But self-deter-
mining Reason is Will. The law of the super-sensual world
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? FAITH IN THE ABSOLUTE.
67
must thus be a Will;--a will operating without material
implement or manifestation, which is in itself both act and
product, which is eternal and unchangeable,--so that on it
finite beings may securely rely, as the physical man does on
the laws of his world, that through it, all their moral acts of
Will, and these only, shall lead to certain and unfailing
results. In this Living Will, as the principle of the spiritual
world, has our moral Will its first consequence; and through
Him its energy is propagated throughout the series of finite
beings who are the products of the Infinite Will. He is the
spiritual bond which unites all free beings together:--not
immediately can they know or influence each other, for they
are separated from each other by an impassable barrier;-- their mutual knowledge comes through Him alone, to whom
all are equally related. Our faith in duty, and in the ob-
jects of duty, is only faith in Him, in His wisdom, in His
truth He is thus the creator and sustainer of all things;
for in Him alone all the thronging forms which people our
dream of life "live and move and have their being. " All
partake His essence:--material nature disappears, but its
images are invested with a new reality. All our life is His
life; and we are eternal, for He is eternal. Birth and the
grave are no more; but, in their stead, undying energy and
immortal youth. Of Him--the Infinite One,--of the mode
of His being, we know nothing, nor need we to know; we
cannot pierce the inaccessible light in which He dwells, but
through the shadows which veil His presence from us, an
endless stream of life, power, and action flows around and
about us, bearing us and all finite things onward to new life,
love, and beauty.
"The Oxe remains, the many change and pass;
Heaven's light for ever shines, Earth's shadows fly;
Life, like a dome of many-coloured glass, Stains the white radiance of Eternity,
Until Death tramples it to fragments. "
All Death in nature is Birth,--the assumption of a new garment, to replace the old vesture which humanity has laid
aside in its progress to higher being. And serene above all
change, the unattainable object of all finite effort--fountain
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? MEMOIR OF FICHTE.
of our life--home of our spirits--Thou art--the One Being,
--the I AM,--for whom Reason has no idea, and Language
no name.
"Sublime and living Will, named by no name, compassed
by no thought, I may well raise my soul to Thee, for Thou
and I are not divided. Thy voice sounds within me, mine
resounds in Thee; and all my thoughts, if they are but good
and true, live in Thee also. In Thee, the Incomprehensible,
I myself, and the world in which I live, become clearly com-
prehensible to me, all the secrets of my existence are laid
open, and perfect harmony arises in my soul.
"Thou art best known to the childlike, devoted, simple
mind. To it Thou art the searcher of hearts, who seest its
inmost depths; the ever-present true witness of its thoughts,
who knowest its truth, who knowest it though all the world
know it not. Thou art the Father who ever desirest its
good, who rulest all things for the best. To Thy will it un-
hesitatingly resigns itself: 'Do with me,' it says,'what thou
wilt; I know that it is good, for it is Thou who dost it. '
The inquisitive understanding, which has heard of Thee,
but seen Thee not, would teach us Thy nature; and, as Thy
image, shows us a monstrous and incongruous shape, which
the sagacious laugh at, and the wise and good abhor.
"I hide my face before Thee, and lay my hand upon my
mouth. How Thou art, and seemest to Thine own being, I
can never know, any more than I can assume Thy nature,
11 After thousands upon thousands of spirit-lives, I shall com-
IIprehend Thee as little as I do now in this earthly house.
That which I conceive, becomes finite through my very
conception of it; and this can never, even by endless exalta-
litjon, rise into the Infinite. Thou differest from men, not in
degree but in nature. In every stage of their advancement
they think of Thee as a greater man, and still a greater:
but never as God--the Infinite,--whom no measure can
mete. I have only this discursive, progressive thought, and
I can conceive of no other:--how can I venture to ascribe it
to Thee ? ''in the idea of person there are imperfections,
limitations:--how I can clothe Thee with it without these y
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ABSOLUTE RELIGION.
69
"I will not attempt that which the imperfection of my
finite nature forbids, and which would be useless to me :--
how Thou art, I may not know. But Thy relations to me--
the mortal--and to all mortals, lie open before my eyes,--
were I but what I ought to be,--and surround me more
clearly than the consciousness of my own existence. Thou
workest in me the knowledge of my duty, of my vocation in
the world of reasonable beings :--how, I know not, nor need
I to know. Thou knowest what I think and what I will:--
how Thou canst know, through what act Thou bringest about
that consciousness, I cannot understand,--nay, I know that
the idea of an act, of a particular act of consciousness, be-
longs to me alone, and not to Thee,--the Infinite One.
Thou wiliest that my free obedience shall bring with it
eternal consequences:--the act of Thy will I cannot com-
prehend,--I know only that it is not like mine. Thou doest, and Thy will itself is the deed: but the way of Thy working is not as my ways,--I cannot trace it. Thou livest
and art, for Thou knowest and wiliest and workest, omni-
present to finite Reason; but Thou art not as / now and
always must conceive of being. "*
Such is a very broken and imperfect outline of the most
complete system of Transcendental Idealism ever offered to
the world. To those few among British students, who, amid
the prevailing degradation of sentiment and frivolity of
thought, have pondered the deep mysteries of being until
the common logic, which pretends to grasp its secret, seems
a vain and presumptuous trifling with questions which lie
far beyond its reach, and who find in the theological solu-
tion but a dry and worthless husk which conceals the kernel
of truth it was only meant to preserve,--to such it may be
no unacceptable service to have pointed the way to a modern
Academe, where the moral dignity of the Athenian sage is
united with the poetic sublimity and intellectual keenness
of his two most distinguished pupils. If by such humble
* " Bestimmung des Meim-hen,' Hock III.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 70
MEMOIR OF FICHTE.
guidance any should be induced to turn aside towards that
retreat, let them not be deterred if at first the path should
seem to lack something of the smoothness of the well-
trodden highway on which they have hitherto travelled ;--
let them proceed courageously;--it will lead them into calm
sunshine, and beside clear and refreshing streams;--nor
shall they return thence without nobler thoughts and higher
aspirations.
Fichte lived in close retirement in Zurich. The manners
of the inhabitants did not please him, and he seldom came
out into society. His wife, his father-in-law, Lavater, and a
few others, composed his circle. Rahn enjoyed in no ordi-
nary degree the society of his distinguished son-in-law; and
it is pleasing to know that the celebrated and venerable
preacher preserved, even in advanced age, a keen relish for
new truth, a perfect openness of mind not frequently met
with in his profession. At his request Fichte prepared a
short course of lectures, by which his friends might be intro-
duced to an acquaintance with the Critical Philosophy, the
fame of which had now reached Switzerland. At the con-
clusion of the lectures Lavater addressed a letter of thanks
to his young instructor, full of the strongest expressions of
gratitude and esteem, in which he styles himself his " pupil,
friend, and fellow-man. " Up to the period of his death, this
excellent man retained the warmest feelings of friendship
towards the philosopher;--and the following lines, written
some years after Fichte's departure from Zurich; whatever
may be their value in other respects, serve at least to show
the respect, almost approaching to reverence, with which
Fichte was regarded by one who was himself no ordinary
man :--
"Brntyctle nut metnim Cooe. an Jtjerrn Pro tenor jTirfite. 1800.
'Unerretdjbarer iPaiftr, ? >tin Dafepn berorift mir tat Baffin,
(C)inrf etttgen (C)rifle*, bem &obe (C)eifler tnflra&tm!
. Somitefl it S5u jrorifetn: icb, (IctUe Didb ftIbfl oor t>ia) fetbfl mir;
Bt'&tt Vit in Etr felbfl ben (C)trabl be<< eroigen Stifle*. "
Although Fichte had as yet published nothing to which
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? LITERARY CORRESPONDENCE :--REINHOLD. 71
his name was attached, he had nevertheless acquired an ex-
tensive philosophical reputation. In several powerful and
searching criticisms which appeared in the "Allgemeine
Literatur Zeitung," the hand of the author of the " Critique
of Revelation" was discovered. He was now generally
looked upon as the man who was destined to complete the
philosophy of Kant, and was thus led into literary corre-
spondence with some of the most distinguished men of the
day. At the head of these must be placed Reinhold, the professor of philosophy at Jena, who had hitherto stood fore-
most among the disciples of Kant. The relation between
these two celebrated men was a most remarkable one.
Although their characters were very different, although they
never saw each other, they lived on terms of the most in-
timate and trustful confidence, such as is commonly attained
by long-tried friendship alone. In their extensive corre-
spondence, Fichte's powerful and commanding intellect
evidently possesses great ascendency over the more diffident
and pliable nature of Reinhold; but his influence never in-
terferes with the mental freedom of his friend. On the
other hand, Reinhold's open enthusiastic character, and his
pure love of truth, engaged the warm affection and sympathy
of his more daring correspondent;--while the frequent mis-
understandings which lend an almost dramatic interest to
their letters, afford room for the exhibition of manly and
generous kindness in both. In 1797 Reinhold abandoned
his own system and accepted the " Wissenschaftslehre," an-
nouncing the change to Fichte in the following terms :--
"I have at length come to understand your "Wissen-
schaftslehre," or, what is the same thing to me--philosophy
without nickname. It now stands before me as a perfect
whole, founded on itself--the pure conception of self-conscious
Reason,--the mirror of our better selves. Individual parts
are still obscure to me, but they cannot now deprive me of
my comprehension of the whole; and their number is dimin-
ishing every day. Beside it lie the ruins of the edifice which
cost me so much time and labour, in which I thought to
dwell so securely and commodiously, to entertain so many
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? >-
72
MEMOIR OF FICHTE.
guests,--in which I laughed, not without self-gratulation, over
so many Kantists who mistook the scaffolding for the house
itself. This catastrophe would have caused me much pain
for a time, if it had happened by the hand of scepti-
cism. "
"Adieu! I salute you with the deepest gratitude. Is
personal intercourse absolutely necessary to the growth of
friendship? I doubt it. For indeed it is not mere gratitude,
not mere reverence,--it is heartfelt love that I feel for you,
since I now, through your philosophy, understand yourself. "
In Fichte's literary correspondence while at Zurich we
find the first intimations of his departure from the system
of Kant, and his plan of a complete and comprehensive
philosophy. He could not rest satisfied with results alone,
unless he could perceive the grounds on which they rested.
His reason imperatively demanded absolute unity of con-
ception, without separation, without division,--above all
without opposition. Writing to Niethammer in October
1793 he says--"My conviction is that Kant has only indi-
cated the truth, but neither unfolded nor proved it. This
singular man either has a power of divining truth, without
being himself conscious of the grounds on which it rests;
or he has not esteemed his age worthy of the communication
of those grounds; or he has shrunk from attracting that
superhuman reverence during his life, which sooner or later
must be his in some degree. " And as the great idea of his
own system dawned upon his mind, he says to Stephani,--
"I have discovered a new principle, from which all philosophy
can easily be deduced In a couple of years
we shall have a philosophy with all the clearness of geo-
metrical demonstration. "--To the development of this
scheme he devoted all the energies of his powerful intellect
during the leisure of his retirement, He refused an invita-
tion to become tutor to the Prince of Mecklenberg-Strelitz:
--" I desire," he says, " nothing but leisure to execute my
plan,--then fortune may do with me what it wilL"
But his studies were soon broken in upon by a call of
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? INVITATION TO JENA.
73
another and more important nature. This was his appoint-
ment as Professor Supernumerarius of Philosophy at the
University of Jena, in room of Reinhold who removed to
Kiel. The distinguished honour of this invitation, unasked
and unexpected, and the extensive field of usefulness which
it opened up to him, determined Fichte at once to accept it.
Unable, however, to satisfy himself that his views were as
yet so fully matured and settled as to justify him in entering
at once upon the important duties of a teacher, invested as
these were to his mind with a peculiar sacredness and so-
lemnity, he endeavoured to obtain a postponement of his
inauguration which had been fixed for Easter 1794, in order
that, by the more complete elaboration of the principle which
he had discovered, he might be able to elevate his philosophy
at once to the rank of positive science. For this purpose he
requested a year's delay. But as it was considered that the
interests of the University might suffer by the chair remain-
ing so long vacant, his request was refused,--with permission,
however, to devote the greater part of his time, during the
first year, to study. He therefore sent an unconditional ac-
ceptance, and plunged at once into the most arduous pre-
paration for his new duties.
Weimar and its neighbouring University was at this time
the focus of German literature and learning. The Grand
Duke Charles Augustus had gathered around him the most
distinguished men of his age, and Wieland, Herder, Goethe,
Schiller and Humboldt shed a more than Medicean lustre
upon the little Saxon Court. Probably at no other period
was so much high genius, engaged in every department of
mental exertion, gathered together in one spot. The Uni-
versity, too, was the most numerously frequented of any in
Germany, not by the youth of Saxony alone, but by students
from almost every part of Europe: Switzerland, Denmark,
Poland, Hungary, the Free Cities, and even France, sent
their sons to Jena for education. The brilliant intellect-
ual circle at Weimar presented to the cultivated mind at-
tractions which could be found nowhere else; whilst at Jena
L
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-11-27 00:09 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/wu. 89090378035 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust.