No More Learning

The Germans have destroyed the last great harvest
of culture which was to be garnered for Europe,
it destroyed the Renaissance. Does anybody at
last understand, will anybody understand what the
Renaissance was? The transvaluation of Christian
values, the attempt undertaken with all means, an
instincts and all genius to make the opposite values,
the noble values triumph. . Hitherto there has
been only this great war : there has never yet been
a more decisive question than the Renaissance,-my
question is the question of the Renaissance :—there
has never been a more fundamental, a more direct
and a more severe attack, delivered with a whole
front upon the centre of the foe. To attack at the
decisive quarter, at the very seat of Christianity,
and there to place noble values on the throne,—that
is to say, to introduce them into the instincts, into
the most fundamental needs and desires of those
sitting there. . . . I see before me a possibility
perfectly magic in its charm and glorious colouring
-it seems to me to scintillate with all the quiver-
ing grandeur of refined beauty, that there is an art
at work within it which is so divine, so infernally
divine, that one might seek through millenniums in
vain for another such possibility; I see a spectacle
so rich in meaning and so wonderfully paradoxical
to boot, that it would be enough to make all the
gods of Olympus rock with immortal laughter,
Cæsar Borgia as Pope. . . . Do you understand me?
O


## p. 229 (#249) ############################################

A CRITICISM OF CHRISTIANITY
229
Very well then, this would have been the
triumph which I alone am longing for to-day :
this would have swept Christianity away! —What
happened? A German monk, Luther, came to
Rome. This monk, with all the vindictive instincts
of an abortive priest in his body, foamed with rage
over the Renaissance in Rome. . . . Instead of, with
the profoundest gratitude, understanding the vast
miracle that had taken place, the overcoming of
Christianity at its headquarters,—the fire of his hate
knew only how to draw fresh fuel from this spectacle.
A religious man thinks only of himself. —Luther
saw the corruption of the Papacy when the very
reverse stared him in the face: the old corruption,
the peccatum originale, Christianity no longer sat
upon the Papal chair! But Life! The triumph
of Life! The great yea to all lofty, beautiful and
daring things! And Luther reinstated the
Church; he attacked it. The Renaissance thus
became an event without meaning, a great in vain
-Ah these Germans, what have they not cost us
already! In vain—this has always been the achieve-
ment of the Germans. —The Reformation, Leibniz,
Kant and so-called German philosophy, the Wars
of Liberation, the Empire—in each case are in vain
for something which had already existed, for some-
thing which cannot be recovered. . . . I confess it,
these Germans are my enemies : I. despise every
sort of uncleanliness in concepts and valuations in
them, every kind of cowardice in the face of every
honest yea or nay. For almost one thousand years,
now, they have tangled and confused everything
they have laid their hands on; they have on their
.
.


## p. 230 (#250) ############################################

230
THE ANTICHRIST
conscience all the half-measures, all the three-eighth
measures of which Europe is sick ; they also have
the most unclean, the most incurable, and the most
irrefutable kind of Christianity-Protestantism--on
their conscience. . . . If we shall never be able to
get rid of Christianity, the Germans will be to blame.
62
-With this I will now conclude and pronounce
my judgment. I condemn Christianity and confront
it with the most terrible accusation that an accuser
has ever had in his mouth. To my mind it is the
greatest of all conceivable corruptions, it has had
the will to the last imaginable corruption. The
Christian Church allowed nothing to escape from
its corruption; it converted every value into its
opposite, every truth into a lie, and every honest
impulse into an ignominy of the soul. Let anyone
dare to speak to me of its humanitarian blessings !
To abolish any sort of distress was opposed to its
profoundest interests; its very existence depended
on states of distress; it created states of distress in
order to make itself immortal. . . . The cancer germ
of sin, for instance: the Church was the first to en-
rich mankind with this misery! —The “equality of
souls before God,” this falsehood, this pretext for the
rancunes of all the base-minded, this anarchist bomb
of a concept, which has ultimately become the re-
volution, the modern idea, the principle of decay of
the whole of social order,—this is Christian dyna-
mite. . . . The “humanitarian" blessings of Chris-
tianity! To breed a self-contradiction, an art of
self-profanation, a will to lie at any price, an aversion,
-


## p. 231 (#251) ############################################

A CRITICISM OF CHRISTIANITY
231
1
a contempt of all good and honest instincts out of
humanitas! Is this what you call the blessings of
Christianity ? —Parasitism as the only method of the
Church; sucking all the blood, all the love, all the
hope of life out of mankind with anæmic and sacred
ideals. A “Beyond” as the will to deny all reality;
the cross as the trade-mark of the most subterranean
form of conspiracy that has ever existed,-against
health, beauty, well-constitutedness, bravery, intel-
lect, kindliness of soul, against Life itself. .
This eternal accusation against Christianity I
would fain write on all walls, wherever there are
walls,- I have letters with which I can make even
the blind see. . . . I call Christianity the one great
curse, the one enormous and innermost perversion,
the one great instinct of revenge, for which no means
are too venomous, too underhand, too underground
and too petty,–I call it the one immortal blemish
of mankind.
And time is reckoned from the dies nefastus
upon which this fatality came into being—from the
first day of Christianity ! -why not rather from its
last day? -From to-day? -Transvaluation of all
Values ! . .


## p. 232 (#252) ############################################



## p. 233 (#253) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
AND
EXPLANATORY NOTES TO
THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA. ”


## p. 234 (#254) ############################################



## p. 235 (#255) ############################################

TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE
THE notes concerning the Eternal Recurrence, in
this volume, are said by Mrs Foerster-Nietzsche to
have been the first that Nietzsche ever wrote on the
subject of his great doctrine. This being so, they
must have been composed towards the autumn of
the year 1881.
I have already pointed out elsewhere (Will to
Power, vol. ii. , Translator's Preface) how much im-
portance Nietzsche himself ascribed to this doctrine,
and how, until the end, he regarded it as the inspira-
tion which had led to his chief work, Thus Spake
Zarathustra. For the details relating to its incep-
tion, however, I would refer the reader to Mrs
Foerster-Nietzsche's Introduction to her brother's
chief work, which was translated for the eleventh
volume of this Edition of the Complete Works.
In reading these notes it would be well to refer
to Nietzsche's other utterances on the subject which
are to be found at the end of vol. ii. of the Will to
Power, and also, if possible, to have recourse to the
original German text. Despite the greatest care, I
confess that in some instances, I have felt a little
doubt as to the precise English equivalent for the
thoughts expressed under the heading Eternal Re-
currence; and, though I have attributed this difficulty
to the extreme novelty of the manner in which the
335


## p. 236 (#256) ############################################

236
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
subject is presented, it is well that the reader should
be aware that such doubt has been entertained.
For I disbelieve utterly in mere verbal translation,
however accurate, and would question anybody's
right to convert a German sentence into English-
even though he were so perfect in both languages as
to be almost absolutely bilingual, if he did not
completely grasp the thought behind the sentence.
The writing of the collected Explanatory Notes to
Thus Spake Zarathustra, cannot be given any exact
date. Some of them consist of comments, written
down by Nietzsche after the completion of the book,
and kept as the nucleus of an actual commentary
to Zarathustra, which it seems to have been his in-
tention, one day, to write; while others are merely
memoranda and rough sketches, probably written
before the completion of the work, and which served
the purpose of a draft of his original plan. The
reader who knows Thus Spake Zarathustra will be
able to tell wherein the book ultimately differed
from the plan visible in these preliminary notes.
As an authoritative, though alas! all too frag-
mentary elucidation of a few of the more obscure
passages of Zarathustra, some of these notes are of
the greatest value; and, in paragraph 73, for in-
stance, there is an interpretation of the Fourth and
Last Part, which I myself would have welcomed
with great enthusiasm, at the time when I was
having my first struggles with the spirit of this
great German sage's life work.
ANTHONY M. LUDOVICI.


## p. 237 (#257) ############################################

I. ETERNAL RECURRENCE
1. THE DOCTRINE EXPOUNDED AND
SUBSTANTIATED.
I
The extent of universal energy is limited; it is not
“infinite”: we should beware of such excesses in
our concepts! Consequently the number of states,
changes, combinations, and evolutions of this energy,
although it may be enormous and practically incal-
culable, is at any rate_definite and not unlimited.
The time, however, in which this universal energy
works its changes is infinite—that is to say, energy
remains eternally the same and is eternally active:-
at this moment an infinity has already elapsed, that
is to say, every possible evolution must already have
taken place. Consequently the present process of
evolution must be a repetition, as was also the one
before it, as will also be the one which will follow.
And so on forwards and backwards! Inasmuch as
the entire state of all forces continually returns,
Xeverything has existed an infinite number of times.
Whether, apart from this, anything exactly like
something that formerly existed has ever appeared,
is completely beyond proof. It would seem that
each complete state of energy forms all qualities
afresh even to the smallest degree, so that two dif-
ferentcompletestates could have nothing in common.
237


## p. 238 (#258) ############################################

238
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
Is it to be supposed that in one and the same com-
plete states two precisely similar things could appear
-for instance two leaves ? I doubt it: it would
take for granted that they had both had an abso-
lutely similar origin, and in that case we should have
to assume that right back in infinity two similar
things had also existed despite all the changes in the
complete states and their creation of new qualities
-an impossible assumption.
2
Formerly it was thought that unlimited energy
was a necessary corollary to unlimited activity in
time, and that this energy could be exhausted by
no form of consumption. Now it is thought that
energy remains constant and does not require to
be infinite. It is eternally active but it is no longer
able eternally to create new forms, it must repeat
itself: that is my conclusion.
3
Anincalculablenumber ofcompletestatesofenergy
have existed, but these have not been infinitely dif-
ferent: for if they had been, unlimited energy would
have been necessary. The energy of the universe
can only have a given number of possible qualities.
4
The endless evolution of new forms is a contra-
diction, for it would implyeternallyincreasing energy.
But whence would it grow? Whence would it de-
rive its nourishment and its surplus of nourishment?


## p. 239 (#259) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
239
The assumption that the universe is an organism
contradicts the very essence of the organic.
5
In what principle and belief is that decisive turn-
ing point in philosophical thought best expressed
which has come into being thanks to the preponder-
ance of the scientific spirit over the religious and
God-creating one? We insist upon the fact that
the world as a sum of energy must not be regarded
as unlimited—we forbid ourselves the concept in-
finite energy, because it seems incompatible with
the concept energy.
6
An unlimited number of new changes and states
on the part of limited energy is a contradiction,
however extensive one may imagine it to be, and
however economical the changes may be, provided
it is infinite. We are therefore, forced to conclude:
(1) either that the universe began its activity at a
given moment of time and will end in a similar
fashion,—but the beginning of activity is absurd;
if a state of equilibrium had been reached it would
have persisted to all eternity ;(2) Or there is no such
thing as an endless number of changes, but a circle
consisting of a definite number of them which con-
a
tinually recurs : activity is eternal, the number of
the products and states of energy is limited.
1
7
If all the possible combinations and relations of
forces had not already been exhausted, then an
infinity would not yet lie behind us. Now since


## p. 240 (#260) ############################################

240
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
infinite time must be assumed, no fresh possibility can
exist and everything must have appeared already,
and moreover an infinite number of times.
a
8
The present world of forces leads back to a state
of greatest simplicity in these forces: it likewise
leads forwards to such a state,—cannot and must
not both states be identical? No incalculable
number of states can evolve out of a system of
limited forces, that is to say, out of a given quantity
of energy which may be precisely measured. Only
when we falsely assume that space is unlimited,
and that therefore energy gradually becomes dissi-
pated, can the final state be an unproductive and
lifeless one.
9
First principles. —The last physical state of energy
which we can imagine must necessarily be the first
also. The absorption of energy in latent energy
must be the cause of the production of the most
vital energy
For a highly positive state must
follow a negative state. Space like matter is a
subjective form, time is not. The notion of
space
first arose from the assumption that space could be
empty. But there is no such thing as empty space.
Everything is energy.
We cannot think of that which moves and that
which is moved together, but both these things
constitute matter and space. We isolate.
IO
Concerning the resurrection of the world. -Out


## p. 241 (#261) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
241
of two negatives, when they are forces, a positive
arises. (Darkness comes of light opposed to light,
cold arises from warmth opposed to warmth, &c. ,
&c. )
II
An uncertain state of equilibrium occurs just as
seldom in nature as two absolutely equal triangles.
Consequently anything like a static state of energy
in general is impossible. If stability were possible
it would already have been reached.
I2
Either complete equilibrium must in itself be an
impossibility, or the changes of energy introduce
themselves in the circular process before that equi-
librium which is in itself possible has appeared. -
But it would be madness to ascribe a feeling of
self-preservation to existence ! And the same
applies to the conception of a contest of pain and
pleasure among atoms.
13
Physics supposes that energy may be divided
up: but every one of its possibilities must first be
adjusted to reality. There can therefore be no
question of dividing energy into equal parts; in
every one of its states it manifests a certain quality,
and qualities cannot be subdivided : hence a state
of equilibrium in energy is impossible.
14
If energy had ever reached a stage of equilibrium
that stage would have persisted: it has therefore
16


## p. 242 (#262) ############################################

242
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
never reached such a stage. The present condition
of things contradicts this assumption. If we assume
that there has ever been a state absolutely like the
present one this assumption is in no wise refuted
by the present state. For, among all the endless
possibilities, this case must already have occurred,
as an infinity is already behind us. If equilibrium
were possible it would already have been reached. -
And if this momentary state has already existed
then that which bore it and the previous one also
would likewise have existed and so on backwards,
-and from this it follows that it has already existed
not only twice but three times, just as it will exist
again not only twice but three times,-in fact an
infinite number of times backwards and forwards.
That is to say, the whole process of Becoming con-
sists of a repetition of a definite number of precisely
similar states. —Clearly the human brain cannot be
left to imagine the whole series of possibilities: but
in any case, quite apart from our ability to judge or
our inability to conceive the whole range of possi-
bilities, the present state at least is a possible one-
because it is a real one.
We should therefore say:
in the event of the number of possibilities not being
infinite, and assuming that in the course of unlimited
time a limited number of these must appear, all real
states must have been preceded by similar states ?
Because from every given moment a whole infinity is
to be calculated backwards ? The stability of forces
and their equilibrium is a possible alternative: but
it has not been reached ; consequently the number
of possibilities is greater than the number of real
states. The fact that nothing similar recurs could


## p. 243 (#263) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
243
a
not be explained by appealing to accident, but only
by supposing that a certain intention, that no similar
things should recur, were actually inherent in the
essence of energy: for, if we grant that the number
of cases is enormous, the occurrence of like cases is
more probable than absolute disparity.
15
Let us think backwards a moment. If the world
had a goal, this goal must have been reached : if a
certain (unintentional) final state existed for the
world, this state also would have been reached. If
it were in any way capable of a stationary or stable
condition, and if in the whole course of its existence
only one second of Being, in the strict sense of the
word, had been possible, then there could no longer
be such a process as evolution, and therefore no
thinking and no observing of such a process. If on
the other hand the world were something which con-
tinually renovated itself, it would then be understood
to be something miraculous and free to create itself
-in fact something divine. Eternal renovation pre-
supposes that energy voluntarily increases itself, that
it not only has the intention, but also the power, to
avoid repeating itself or to avoid returning into a
previous form, and that every instant it adjusts itself
in every one of its movements to prevent such a con-
tingency,—or that it was incapable of returning to
a state it had already passed through. That would
mean that the whole sum of energy was not constant,
any more than its attributes were. But a sum of
energy which would be inconstant and which would
fluctuate is quite unthinkable. Let us not indulge
1


## p. 244 (#264) ############################################

244
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
our fancy any longer with unthinkable things in
order to fall once more before the concept of a
Creator (multiplication out of nothing, reduction out
of nothing, absolute arbitrariness and freedom in
growth and in qualities) :-
16
He who does not believe in the circular process
of the universe must pin his faith to an arbitrary
God—thus my doctrine becomes necessary as op-
posed to all that has been said hitherto in matters
of Theism.
17
The hypothesis which I would oppose to that of
the eternal circular process :—Would it be just as
possible to explain the laws of the mechanical world
as exceptions and seemingly as accidents among the
things of the universe, as one possibility only among
an incalculable number of possibilities? Would it
be possible to regard ourselves as accidentally thrust
into this corner of the mechanical universal arrange-
ment? —That all chemical philosophy is likewise an
exception and an accident in the world's economy,
and finally that organic life is a mere exception and
accident in the chemical world? Should we have
to assume as the most general form of existence
a world which was not yet mechanical, which was
outside all mechanical laws (although accessible to
them)? —and that as a matter of fact this world
would be the most general now and for evermore,
so that the origin of the mechanical world would be
a lawless game which would ultimately acquire such
consistency as the organic laws seem to have now


## p. 245 (#265) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
245
from our point of view ? So that all our mechanical
laws would be not eternal, but evolved, and would
havesurvived innumerable different mechanical laws,
or that they had attained supremacy in isolated
corners of the world and not in others ? _It would
seem that we need caprice, actual lawlessness, and
only a capacity for law, a primeval state of stupidity
which is not even able to concern itself with
mechanics ? The origin of qualities presupposes the
existence of quantities, and these, for their part,
might arise from a thousand kinds of mechanical
processes.
Is not the existence of some sort of irregularity
and incomplete circular form in the world about us,
a sufficient refutation of the regular circularity of
everything that exists? Whence comes this variety
within the circular process ? Is not everything far
too complicated to have been the outcome of unity?
And are not the many chemical laws and likewise
the organic species and forms inexplicable as the
result of homogeneity? or of duality ? —Supposing
there were such a thing as a regular contracting
energy in all the centres of force in the universe,
the question would be, whence could the most in-
significant difference spring? For then the whole
world would have to be resolved into innumerable
completely equal rings and spheres of existence and
we should have an incalculable number of exactly
equal worlds side by side. Is it necessary for me
to assume this? Must I suppose that an eternal
sequence of like worlds also involves eternal juxta-
position of like worlds ? But the multifariousness
and disorder in the world which we have known
1


## p.
246 (#266) ############################################

246
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
hitherto contradicts this; no such universal similarity
has existed in evolution, for in that case even for
our part of the cosmos a regular spherical form
must have been formed. Should the production of
qualities not be subject to any strict laws ? Can it
be possible that different things have been derived
from “energy”? Arbitrarily? Is the conformity
to law which we observe perhaps only a deception ?
Is it possible that it is not a primeval law? Is it
possible that the multifariousness of qualities even
in our part of the world is the result of the absolute
occurrence of arbitrary characteristics ? But that
these characteristics no longer appear in our corner
of the globe? Or that our corner of existence has
adopted a rule which we call cause and effect when
all the while it is no such thing (an arbitrary pheno-
menon become a rule, as for instance oxygen and
hydrogen in chemistry)? ? ? Is this rule simply a
protracted kind of mood ?
18
a
If the universe had been able to become an organ-
ism it would have become one already. As a whole
we must try and regard it in the light of a thing as
remote as possible from the organic. I believe that
even our chemical affinity and coherence may be
perhaps recently evolved and that these appearances
only occur in certain corners of the universe at cer-
tain epochs. Let us believe in absolute necessity
in the universe but let us guard against postulat-
ing any sort of law, even if it be a primitive and
mechanical one of our own experience, as ruling
over the whole and constituting one of its eternal


## p. 247 (#267) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
247
characteristics. -All chemical qualities might have
been evolved and might disappear and return.
In-
numerablecharacteristics might have been developed
which for us,—from our limited point of view in
time and space, defy observation. The transfor-
mation of a chemical quality may perhaps now be
taking place, but so slowly that it escapes our most
delicate calculations,
19
Inorganic matter, even though in most cases it
may once have been organic, can have stored up no
experience,—it is always without a past! If the
reverse were the case a repetition would be impos-
sible—for then matter would for ever be producing
new qualities with new pasts.
20
We must guard against ascribing any aspiration
or any goal to this circular process: Likewise we
must not, from the point of view of our own needs,
regard it as either monotonous or foolish, &c. We
may grant that the greatest possible irrationality, as
also its reverse, may be an essential feature of it :
but we must not value it according to this hypo-
thesis. Rationality or irrationality cannot stand as
attributes of the universe. We must not think of
the law of this circular process as a thing evolved,
by drawing false analogies with the circular motions
occurring within the circle. There was no primitive
chaos followed gradually by a more harmonious and
finally definite circular motion of all forces : On
the contrary everything is eternal and unevolved.
If there ever was a chaos of forces, then that chaos


## p. 248 (#268) ############################################

248
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
itself was eternal and was repeated at its particular
moment of time in the turn of the world wheel. The
circular process is not the outcome of evolution, it
is a primitive principle like the quantum of energy,
and allows of no exception or violation. All Be-
coming takes place within the circular process and
the quantum of energy which constitutes it: there-
fore we must not apply ephemeral processes like
those for instance of heavenly bodies, of the ebb and
flow of tides, of day and night, of the seasons, to the
drawing of analogies for characterising the eternal
circular process.
21
The “chaos of the universe,” inasmuch as it ex-
cludes any aspiration to a goal, does not oppose the
thought of the circular process: the latter is simply
an irrational necessity, absolutely free from any
formal ethical or ästhetical significance. Arbi-
trariness in small things as in great is completely
lacking here.
22
Let us guard against believing that the universe
has a tendency to attain to certain forms, or that
it aims at becoming more beautiful, more perfect,
more complicated! All that is anthropomorphism !
Anarchy, ugliness, form - are unrelated concepts.
There is no such thing as imperfection in the realm
of mechanics.
Everything has returned : Sirius, and the spider,
and thy thoughts at this moment, and this last
thought of thine that all these things will return.


## p. 249 (#269) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
249
23
Our whole world consists of the ashes of an incal-
culable number of living creatures: and even if
living matter is ever so little compared with the
whole, everything has already been transformed
into life once before and thus the process goes on.
If we grant eternal time we must assume the eternal
change of matter.
24
Whoever thou mayest be, beloved stranger, whom
I meet here for the first time, avail thyself of this
happy hour and of the stillness around us, and above
us, and let me tell thee something of the thought
which has suddenly risen before me like a star which
would fain shed down its rays upon thee and every
one, as befits the nature of light. -
a
25
The world of energy suffers no diminution : other-
:
wise with eternal time it would have grown weak
and finally have perished altogether. The world of
energy suffers no stationary state, otherwise this
would already have been reached, and the clock of
the universe would be at a standstill. The world
of energy does not therefore reach a state of equi-
librium; for no instant in its career has it had rest;
its energy and its movement have been the same
for all time. Whatever state this world could have
reached must ere now have been attained, and not
only once but an incalculable number of times. This
applies to this very moment. It has already been
here once before, and several times, and will recur
1


## p. 250 (#270) ############################################

250
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
in the same way, with all forces distributed as they
are to-day: and the same holds good of the moment
of time which bore the present and of that which
shall be the child of the present. Fellow-man!
Your whole life, like a sandglass, will always be re-
versed and will ever run out again,-a long minute
of time will elapse until all those conditions out of
which you were evolved return in the wheel of the
cosmic process. And then you will find every pain
and every pleasure, every friend and every enemy,
every hope and every error, every
blade of
grass
and
every ray of sunshine once more, and the whole
fabric of things that makes up your life. This ring
in which you are but a grain will glitter afresh for
And in every one of these cycles of human
life there will be one hour where for the first time
one man, and then many, will perceive the mighty
thought of the eternal recurrence of all things :
and for mankind this is always the hour of Noon.
ever.
2. THE EFFECTS OF THE DOCTRINE UPON
MANKIND
26
How can we give weight to our inner life without
making it evil and fanatical towards people who
think otherwise. Religious belief is declining and
man is beginning to regard himself as ephemeral
and unessential, a point of view which is making
him weak; he does not exercise so much effort in
striving or enduring. What he wants is momentary
enjoyment. He would make things light for him-
self,—and a good deal of his spirit gets squandered
in this endeavour.


## p. 251 (#271) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
- 251
1
27
The political mania at which I smile just as
į
merrily as my contemporaries smile at the religious
mania of former times is above all Materialism, a
belief in the world, and in the repudiation of a “Be-
yond,” of a "back-world. ” The object of those who
believe in the latter is the well-being of the ephemeral
individual: that is why Socialism is its fruit; for
with Socialism ephemeral individuals wish to secure
their happiness by means of socialisation. They
have no reason to wait, as those men had who
believed in eternal souls, in eternal development les mans
and eternal amelioration. My doctrine is : Live so
44
that thou mayest desire to live againsthat is thy
duty,—for in any case thou wilt live again! He
unto whom striving is the greatest happiness, let
him strive; he unto whom peace is the greatest
happiness, let him rest; he unto whom subordina-
tion, following, obedience, is the greatest happiness,
let him obey. All that is necessary is that he should
know what it is that gives him the highest happi-
ness, and to fight shy of no means! Eternity is at
stake!
28
“But if everything is necessary, what control have
I over my actions ? ” Thought and faith are a
form of ballast which burden thee in addition to other
burdens thou mayest have, and which are even more
weighty than the latter. Sayest thou that nutrition,
the land of thy birth, air, and society change thee
and deterinine thee? Well, thy opinions do this
to a much greater degree, for they even prescribe
end
ع۔


## p. 252 (#272) ############################################

252
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
thy nourishment, thy land of adoption, thy atmo-
sphere, and thy society for thee. —If thou ever
assimilatest the thought of thoughts it will also alter
thee. The question which thou wilt have to answer
before every deed that thou doest : “is this such a
deed as I am prepared to perform an incalculable
number of times? " is the best ballast.
29
The mightiest of all thoughts absorbs a good deal
of energy which formerly stood at the disposal of
other aspirations, and in this way it exercises a
modifying influence; it creates new laws of motion
in energy, though no new energy. But it is precisely
in this respect that there lies some possibility of
determining new emotions and new desires in men.
30
Let us try and discover how the thought that
something gets repeated has affected mankind
hitherto (the year, for instance, or periodical illnesses,
waking and sleeping, &c. ). Even supposing the re-
currence of the cycle is only a probability or a
possibility, even a thought, even a possibility, can
shatter us and transform us. It is not only feelings
and definite expectations that do this! See what
effect the thought of eternal damnation has had !
31
From the moment when this thought begins to
prevail all colours will change their hue and a new
history will begin.


## p. 253 (#273) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
253
32
The history of the future: this thought will tend
to triumph ever more and more, and those who dis-
believe in it will be forced, according to their nature,
ultimately to die out.
He, alone, who will regard his existence as cap-
able of eternal recurrence will remain over : but
among such as these a state will be possible of which
the imagination of no utopist has ever dreamt!
-
33
Ye fancy that ye
will have a long rest ere your
second birth takes place,—but do not deceive your-
selves ! 'Twixt your last moment of consciousness
and the first ray of the dawn of your new life no
time will elapse,—as a flash of lightning will the
space go by, even though living creatures think it
is billions of years, and are not even able to reckon
it. Timelessness and immediate re-birth arc com-
patible, once intellect is eliminated!
34
Thou feelest that thou must soon take thy leave
perhaps—and the sunset glow of this feeling pierces
through thy happiness. Give heed to this sign : it
means that thou lovest life and thyself, and life as
it has hitherto affected thee and moulded thee,
and that thou cravest for its eternity-Non alia sed
hæc vita sempiterna !
Know also, that transiency singeth its short song
for ever afresh and that at the sound of the first
verse thou wilt almost die of longing when thou
thinkest that it might be for the last time.


## p. 254 (#274) ############################################

254
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
35
وشه
Let us stamp the impress of eternity upon our
lives! This thought contains more than all the
religions which taught us to contemn this life as a
thing ephemeral, which bade us squint upwards to
another and indefinite existence.
L!
hi
36
We must not strive after distant and unknown
states of bliss and blessings and acts of grace, but
we must live so that we would fain live again and
live for ever so, to all eternity ! Our duty is present
with us every instant.
!
37
The leading tendencies :(1) We must implant the
love of life, the love of every man's own life in
every conceivable way! However each individual
may understand this love of self his neighbour will
acquiesce, and will have to learn great tolerance
towards it : however much it may often run counter
to his taste,-provided the individual in question
really helps to increase his joy in his own life!
(2. ) We must all be one in our hostility towards
everything and everybody who tends to cast a slur
upon the value of life: towards all gloomy, dissatis-
fied and brooding natures. We must prevent these
from procreating! But our hostility itself must be
a means to our joy! Thus we shall laugh; we shall
mock and we shall exterminate without bitterness!
Let this be our mortal combat.
This life is thy eternal life!
: :uܕܐ
.
7


## p. 255 (#275) ############################################

THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
255
38
What was the cause of the downfall of the Alex-
andrian culture? With all its useful discoveries
and its desire to investigate the nature of this world,
it did not know how to lend this life its ultimate
importance, the thought of a Beyond was more
important to it! To teach anew in this regard is
still the most important thing of all :—perhaps if
metaphysics are applied to this life in the most em-
phatic way,—as in the case of my doctrine !
,
39
This doctrine is lenient towards those who do not
believe in it. It speaks of no hells and it contains
no threats. He who does not believe in it has but
a fleeting life in his consciousness.
40
It would be terrible if we still believed in sin, but
whatever we may do, however often we may repeat
it, it is all innocent. If the thought of the eternal
recurrence of all things does not overwhelm thee,
then it is not thy fault: and if it does overwhelm
thee, this does not stand to thy merit either. - We
think more leniently of our forebears than they
themselves thought of themselves; we mourn over
the errors which were to them constitutional; but
we do not mourn over their evil.
41
Let us guard against teaching such a doctrine
as if it were a suddenly discovered religion! It


## p. 256 (#276) ############################################

256
THE ETERNAL RECURRENCE
must percolate through slowly, and whole genera-
tions must build on it and become fruitful through
it,-in order that it may grow into a large tree
which will shelter all posterity. What are the two
thousand years in which Christianity has maintained
its sway? For the mightiest thought of all many
millenniums will be necessary,—long, long, long will
it have to remain puny and weak !
42
For this thought we do not require thirty years
of glory with drums and fifes, and thirty years of
grave-digging followed by an eternity of macaber-
esque stillness, as is the case with so many other
famous thoughts.
Simple and well-nigh arid as it is, this thought
must not even require eloquence to uphold it.
43
Are ye now prepared ? Ye must have experi-
enced every form of scepticism and ye must have
wallowed with voluptuousness in ice-cold baths,-
otherwise ye have no right to this thought; I wish
to protect myself against those who are over-ready
to believe, likewise against those who gush over any-
thing! I would defend my doctrine in advance.
It must be the religion of the freest, most cheerful
and most sublime souls, a delightful pastureland
somewhere between golden ice and a pure heaven!


## p. 257 (#277) ############################################

EXPLANATORY NOTES TO
>
THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA”
17


## p. 258 (#278) ############################################



## p. 259 (#279) ############################################

I
ALL goals have been annihilated : valuations are
turning against each other :
People call him good who hearkens to the dictates
of his own heart, but they also call him good who
merely does his duty;
People call the mild and conciliating man good,
but they also call him good who is brave, inflexible
and severe;
People call him good who does not do violence to
himself, but they also call the heroes of self-mastery
good;
People call the absolute friend of truth good, but
they also call him good who is pious and a trans-
figurer of things;
People call him good who can obey his own voice,
but they also call the devout man good;
People call the noble and the haughty man good,
but also him who does not despise and who does
not assume condescending airs.
People call him good who is kindhearted and who
steps out of the way of broils, but he who thirsts for
fight and triumph is also called good;
People call him good who always wishes to be
first, but they also call him good who does not wish
to bę ahead of anybody in anything.
259


## p. 260 (#280) ############################################

260 NOTES ON "THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA”
2
We possess a powerful store of moral feelings, but
a
we have no goal for them all. They mutually con-
tradict each other : they have their origin in different
tables of values.
There is a wonderful amount of moral power, but
there is no longer any goal towards which all this
power can be directed.
3
All goals have been annihilated, mankind must
give themselves a fresh goal. It is an error to sup-
pose that they had one: they gave themselves all
the goals they ever had. But the prerequisites of
all previous goals have been annihilated.
Science traces the course of things but points to
no goal: what it does give consists of the funda-
mental facts upon which the new goal must be
based.
4
The profound sterility of the nineteenth century.
I have not encountered a single man who really had
a new ideal to bring forward. The character of
German music kept me hoping longest, but in vain.
A stronger type in which all our powers are syn-
thetically correlated—this constitutes my faith.
Apparently everything is decadence. We should
so direct this movement of decline that it may pro-
vide the strongest with a new form of existence.
5
The dissolution of morality, in its practical con-
sequences, leads to the atomistic individual, and


## p. 261 (#281) ############################################

NOTES ON “THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA” 261
further to the subdivision of the individual into a
quantity of parts—absolute liquefaction.
That is why a goal is now more than ever neces-
sary; and love, but a new love.
6
I
say: “ As long as your morality hung over me
I breathed like one asphyxiated. That is why I
throttled this snake. I wished to live, consequently
it had to die. ”
7
As long as people are still forced to act, that is to
say as long as commands are given, synthesis (the
suppression of the moral man) will not be realised
To be unable to be otherwise : instincts and com-
manding reason extending beyond any immediate
object: the ability to enjoy one's own nature in
action.
8
None of them wish to bear the burden of the
commander ; but they will perform the most strenu-
ous task if only thou commandest them.
9
We must overcome the past in ourselves : we
must combine the instincts afresh and direct the
whole together to one goal :-an extremely difficult
undertaking! It is not only the evil instincts which
have to be overcome,—the so-called good instincts
must be conquered also and consecrated anew!
IO
No leaps must be made in virtue! But everyone
must be given a different path! Not leading to the


## p. 262 (#282) ############################################

262 NOTES ON “THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA
highest development of each! Yet everyone may
be a bridge and an example for others.
II
To help, to pity, to submit and to renounce per-
sonal attacks with a good will,—these things may
make even insignificant and superficial men toler-
able to the eye: such men must not be contradicted
in their belief that this good will is “virtue in itself. ”
12
Man makes a deed valuable: but how might a
deed make man valuable ?
13
Morality is the concern of those who cannot free
themselves from it: for such people morality there-
fore belongs to the conditions of existence. It is
impossible to refute conditions of existence: the
only thing one can do is not to have them.
14
If it were true that life did not deserve to be
welcomed, the moral man, precisely on account
of his self-denial and obligingness, would then be
guilty of misusing his fellow to his own personal
advantage.
15
“Love thy neighbour ”—this would mean first
and foremost : “Let thy neighbour go his own
way”—and it is precisely this kind of virtue that
is the most difficult!


## p. 263 (#283) ############################################

1
NOTES ON “THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA” 263
16
The bad man as the parasite. We must not be
merely feasters and gourmets of life: this is ignoble.
17
It is a noble sense which forbids our being only
a
feasters and gourmets of life—this sense revolts
against hedonism-: we want to perform something
in return ! —But the fundamental feeling of the
masses is that one must live for nothing,—that is
their vulgarity.
18
The converse valuations hold good for the lower
among men: in their case therefore it is necessary
to implant virtues. They must be elevated above
their lives, by means of absolute commands and
terrible taskmasters.
19
What is required: the new law must be made
practicable—and out of its fulfilment, the overcom-
ing of this law, and higher law, must evolve. Zara-
thustra defines the attitude towards law, inasmuch
as he suppresses the law of laws which is morality.
Laws as the backbone. They must be worked
at and created, by being fulfilled. The slavish
attitude which has reigned hitherto towards law!
20
The self-overcoming of Zarathustra as the proto-
type of mankind's self-overcoming for the benefit
of Superman. To this end the overcoming of
morality is necessary.


## p. 264 (#284) ############################################

264 NOTES ON "THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA”
21
The type of the lawgiver, his development and
his suffering. What is the purpose of giving laws
at all ?
Zarathustra is the herald who calls forth many
lawgivers.
!
22
Individual instruments.
1. The Commanders, the mighty–who do not
love, unless it be that they love the images accord-
ing to which they create. The rich in vitality,
the versatile, the free, who overcome that which is
extant.
2. The obedient, the “emancipated”-love and
reverence constitute their happiness, they have a
sense of what is higher (their deficiencies are made
whole by the sight of the lofty).
3. The slaves, the order of“ henchmen"— : they
must be made comfortable, they must cultivate pity
for one another.
23
The giver, the creator, the teacher—these are
preludes of the ruler.
24
All virtue and all self-mastery has only one pur-
pose: that of preparing for the ruler!
25
Every sacrifice that the ruler makes is rewarded
a hundredfold.
26
How much does not the warrior, the prince, the


## p. 265 (#285) ############################################

NOTES ON “THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA” 265
man who is responsible for himself, sacrifice !