nough while drying, wcll, what you do gt"t is, weU, a poa;li~ly grotesqutly
distorlm
nw:rom,.
Hart-Clive-1962-Structure-and-Motif-in-Finnegans-Wake
.
.
,Londoo.
'1In,vol.
I,p.
s.
.
.
.
.
?
SK otis.
'53
? ComS/Mndtnu s
Joya finds a convenient technical tum fur all this: 'an. . . tt>- 1I1OiI,,', defined hy the Sittnln 0,,/? ? 1 1::",lul< Didi. " 'J as 'Intcrcommunicalion ""tw. ,. . . . tlO'(),-='d',channels,orb~ncllCs, by ? connecting cross branch. Olig. of the cross conneo;ions ""tWffll the anen. :. and vcillS, elc. ; DOW of u. . . . . of any branching . )'Stem'.
The fundamental act of copulation is . pecifically dclino:d in these terml:
. H umperfe1dl and Anuruka, wedded now evcl"fIlOI"e in ann. . . to- moses by Il ground plan ofthe pl. ~hunl"", wh;"ke",d beau . nd
dona. h""Ua. ' (S85. ~~)
In the timelcas Book tV all the disparate elements of Fu-pM 1I'. d:t are said to be 'ana. tomosinlly assimilaltd' (615. 0S), j. . . 1
. . . in Ufflsn:oll mankind had been mytlic;ally uniU:d: '. . . OUr grandam, which we are linked up wilh by . . ,o:'"'! i~ . n. . . tt>-
nl<l! U of nave1coro? . ' (U 374)
The anlltomosical conncxion typifio:d by this copuluion
scene i. nOI always ", flatly and unilt1. . l. gillativdy carnal. Any form of cross-pollination or troII-fertililation may oerve the same Iymbolic pUIf'O"". l"e analtomosu of615. "5 ",ferl in the
firsl place to the fertilisalion of the fIowerl which figure 10 1"'lC1y in the Quinel motif'; these arc the chutely liornt;""" rainbow? girb whose sauality KelTlS oomcIww always able to avoid Ihe direcl $Ullying OOIIlacl of the flo b. At Ibe o;nodQt levd of this promising tMmc tl>c girls, like the Bl. . . . . . . ! Virgin Gerty MacDowell, but even Ie. mod. . t than . he, ga ture lewdly . nd ,. 11 f(lr feniliution at ninety paces' distance from the immaculate Shaun (~37). The requo t is ofcourse ambiguo. . . and is in part. tribute 10 Shaun', faboJlous and Rabelailian physical cndowmatts but at . . . . . ther more spiritual Ievd a debaKd ,~rsionofthe Holy Ghoft'l vioil to Ma ry is clearly being
""OTked out:
'lend UI, your adorablo, thou (Werbl,. 001, a wise and letten
play of all you can tt:i~, chief ~Itecb chappy, from your holy pot! noW you h u t MCenained ~remonially our naIIICI. Unclean you art not. ' (037. 18)
I iN betow, cn. . . p<",. r. ;p. . , I.
,,.
? COrrtspo'lIJmcu
The Incarnation is of coUJ~ a . pleDdid example of myttical corr~pondtIlQ.
Joy<< found much mo~ than an . ppropriate terminology to help him develop the idea of 'an. . . tomoais'. The th"""Y of 'psychic erc coroupondetloea' 6guud V<'ry 1"'8"ly in lhe repotu of the So. :icty for Psychical R_areh during me fint two <kc. odoea oflhis century, and Mr, Stuart Gilbert . . . . \lI'eI me thatJoyec tool< a particular intUQt ill thai' papcn. The theory concern. the appt"<>Iimatdy timultaneous t""",,riprion by widely ocparaled ? lftlJiri,,~? of 'mcosaga' purporting to come fromalingledeparted. pintwhoisattemprinlJto~tahl"h his 5II. . . . . ival in Ihe n a t world. In the simpiCllt cue, the two . . . . . . ages an: cloocly related by sorne COmmon word, phraoc Or image, or by IU inclusion of a11~ to tome fact of which neither 'medium' could have foreknowledge. In order to demonotrate that tdepathy betwoen the m M iU m I wu not the rmehanism of these ph(:I\Omena,~, the spirill had r<<oune to even suhller me:uu. Allee JohllXln wrotel :
~ charactemUcofthesec;av, OratLeastofoomeofthem- is thu we do notlI"t in the writing orone automatist anything like a nw::<::hanical '~rbatim reproduction of phrutt in the other; we do not even gel tho! :. arne idea exprwcd in different w a y t , _ might wdI E't:Iuit fro m d iffCt telepathy bet'A'eet1 them. . ' Vhat we get is a fragmentary utterance in one seript, whkh . . . . . "" to haw no particular point or meaning. and alFOlher fragmentary Ulletall(e in the other, of an equally pointleos character; but wh. en """ put the tWO together, we see that they . upple=nt one another, a"d that there i. apparently one: coherent ida underlying both, but only partially exp" ? ed in
each. '
TItere is. , I think, a ,ugg(ltion of the phr;illC' 'we do not get , . ,
What we gel;' ? . . ' etc. , in the dcscziptioJ1 of the 'distorted negative' (that ii, Finlllllll\S Wod. iuel? ) at I ' J . 26:
'Well, alEn05t any photo;'1 . . . ? orch his clzcmicoll will tip an)'OflC alking him tho Itaser that if a n. gatiV<' of a hone happens to
, '()" ~ i\u""""ti< Wrilin! ! <II Mn. Ho'b""', }',. . . . . . . . " V . ~ J. , I't,? <hi<oI_, . 01. XXII, 'goI\, p. ! 7~.
. "
? Curresptmdmces
melt .
nough while drying, wcll, what you do gt"t is, weU, a poa;li~ly grotesqutly distorlm nw:rom,. ,. of all"","", of bone- bappy v:01uc:s and maTT,! of mdtwhile hone. '
The acwum in lhe Society'. reporl rontinueslat. r':
'[in the . piri1-Jneosaga] ? . . repeated injunctiont aro 10 b. fOllnd for IDe application of pl'O<< es docribed as /Jam-",. [10 uruhcalhc]. IWXIt. lID wcave Or bind together], IM/H'/'Glltfl [10 IUperJ>OiC'], to the woro. of the ocr;pl; in p;. rticular, il is w o- ltantly urg. . . ! lhal if some words were taken, . . . . . and :oome po:oous of rnpcrposition we", lItell applied, "'Jilrf>>MU, IICno. . W1>uld he secll wru,re now there ;. apparent DOnsc=. BUI no definite din:ctlo. . . . have ~ been gi. -. :n . . to thia procw of superposition . . . ' (Of. ~99. 08: '" . upetl>botitioul Quoint a quinoid. ned')
A n. . moo of. och injunctions to '. upuP'*" an:. qUQUd': 'Whn you h,. . . . . , done is alwaY' dioaociatM. i imp"""" it by <koying foltU j wcave tog('lher, wcave ! ogClher alway. :
'T o one IUperpoting ",,! "Cain things on . <:rUin things, cvtrything . . cl. . . . r. '
'Why do you not supc. ". ,. . , . . II in a bundle and perceive the trmb? '
'TwoI"old is the toil, but wbol~ ? . . [ef. 288-"31 In m)'lter1a I we,. ve riddJ~ for you and cenain othe. . for whom it i.
right. '
One 01" tbac statementl mUSl. have: had," . poc:iaJ appeal ror
J oyo:e':
'Nodding he lup<:rpoocd wilh gn:at labour and not without th~ belp oI" the artilicer. '
~ot only doco F;IUIt~1UU W. dt contain," number of . . :ampla of the 'verbatim reproduction of phra. es', but both it and UlJwu mau usc oI"tcchniqlla whi. c:b K<:m toow. m. . ch 10 the genuine W =pon<kncc idea o. . dine<! . by AliceJohn",n. ~fOli&
are often comprehenliblc only wh~n all their OCCum:nCU an: related togc:th. :r, a pan from on~ ",,";011 combinillg wilh . . part
,'On"'"Auwmati<: Writ;'. . . 0( M. . . HoI! &nd',"'-diII4'~1MSo<i<j)< j",l'odU<J &~, vol. " "II, t~, p. 3)'8.
? 0,. <>t. , pp. ! 'I'}-&.
. "
? Corrtspomknces
front another to build up the sen. . . AoJoya puu it: 'let ~ry ~uplc ~ 10 crosscomplintcntary: (613-'0)
Ao u,ua! ;n Fi""",(4m W"*,, Jora gives a glancing a<;know? lcdgment of hi; so"r<:~. In 1l1. 3-the chapter most directly conceTTl~d witb th~ tecltnique. and theories of spiritualisnt' _ there is a paragraph containing. apart from an obvious allU. $ion to Ew. apia Paladino, what Ottm {o be a! hcioru to Alie<:Johnson and the 'twin Olr<:arru' of croM. correspondences:
'Aliciou. . twimtr<:atru cwinestraines . . . Double her . . . Take your fint thoughu away from her . ? . Is ,be having an ambi. dual a<;t he"",lf? ' (5,0. [7)
The whole of 11l. 3 is written in a style very closely approxi? mating the utraordinarily long and detailed reporu in the
"'{)(e(~j '! ! tlu S""iett Jor Pv<hical RlJMfrh of experiments in cr~rr""ponden=. The ",lution to Shem's fint riddle "fthe unive= becomes clear only when all of it< parts-that i. . all of Fi_~= Wa,b-have bttn aIOCmbled and examined together. The whole book is a rna" ofCl'OM-colTCSJIOnding material which
the r<:ader must syntherue in order to undu$\and: like the '~ges', no one part of it is romprehemible witl",,,t the rest. One of (he most r<:marnble of all the many ""'rip! ! ! quoted by Alie<:Johnwn is an automatic poem written in '901 by ~n. Verrall, one of the best known '. . nsitives'. IU rdcvance to the
cosmic riddle ofFj,,"'g= Wdt is immediately obvious': &> jflJSh ,,,"essW. . ,;. wItS j" a gl. . . "
t/u; whilt w t tlroaming Jedr<< b. ho/t! tIum fMJs. raIIlIINwkiU011 lludWakmtdso",
<a<hftiUin& imago helps imprint tk whole
arul 'PJ/MrJmd. ~ wMt . . . . . . first imprustd filli so llu ItUliint, ~r, fInd 1M ,ul,
and wIril. U'I 0111)' wakh llu """In's Iwnd,
"" glimpJt """''''! if'''""ojllu building piamsd,
sto. . uponsto"" I1rtb<iirkmmtsarise, till t/u; fair Jabric j/<Islus i~ I1rt skUl.
, J. S. Ath""on, 'Spicitual;. m in FMI"'" Wa. ', Xok, oM Q~, ""'_
'99. '95-f, p_ '-n HoitaDd,,~, of . . . . ~
, 'On th< AU"""'"tic Wri';"g 0I'~, I"p~~,vol,XXII,'9"6,p_378,
'57
? Correspondences
It may Ix noted that, like tho opirit. . . :ommunicatiom, Shem's riddle i1 not asked, but 'dictited' (170. <>3). If not an aesthetic justification of. Joyce'. methods, this simulation oftho habits of
the >pirit> does at least ""plain and provi<:I.
'53
? ComS/Mndtnu s
Joya finds a convenient technical tum fur all this: 'an. . . tt>- 1I1OiI,,', defined hy the Sittnln 0,,/? ? 1 1::",lul< Didi. " 'J as 'Intcrcommunicalion ""tw. ,. . . . tlO'(),-='d',channels,orb~ncllCs, by ? connecting cross branch. Olig. of the cross conneo;ions ""tWffll the anen. :. and vcillS, elc. ; DOW of u. . . . . of any branching . )'Stem'.
The fundamental act of copulation is . pecifically dclino:d in these terml:
. H umperfe1dl and Anuruka, wedded now evcl"fIlOI"e in ann. . . to- moses by Il ground plan ofthe pl. ~hunl"", wh;"ke",d beau . nd
dona. h""Ua. ' (S85. ~~)
In the timelcas Book tV all the disparate elements of Fu-pM 1I'. d:t are said to be 'ana. tomosinlly assimilaltd' (615. 0S), j. . . 1
. . . in Ufflsn:oll mankind had been mytlic;ally uniU:d: '. . . OUr grandam, which we are linked up wilh by . . ,o:'"'! i~ . n. . . tt>-
nl<l! U of nave1coro? . ' (U 374)
The anlltomosical conncxion typifio:d by this copuluion
scene i. nOI always ", flatly and unilt1. . l. gillativdy carnal. Any form of cross-pollination or troII-fertililation may oerve the same Iymbolic pUIf'O"". l"e analtomosu of615. "5 ",ferl in the
firsl place to the fertilisalion of the fIowerl which figure 10 1"'lC1y in the Quinel motif'; these arc the chutely liornt;""" rainbow? girb whose sauality KelTlS oomcIww always able to avoid Ihe direcl $Ullying OOIIlacl of the flo b. At Ibe o;nodQt levd of this promising tMmc tl>c girls, like the Bl. . . . . . . ! Virgin Gerty MacDowell, but even Ie. mod. . t than . he, ga ture lewdly . nd ,. 11 f(lr feniliution at ninety paces' distance from the immaculate Shaun (~37). The requo t is ofcourse ambiguo. . . and is in part. tribute 10 Shaun', faboJlous and Rabelailian physical cndowmatts but at . . . . . ther more spiritual Ievd a debaKd ,~rsionofthe Holy Ghoft'l vioil to Ma ry is clearly being
""OTked out:
'lend UI, your adorablo, thou (Werbl,. 001, a wise and letten
play of all you can tt:i~, chief ~Itecb chappy, from your holy pot! noW you h u t MCenained ~remonially our naIIICI. Unclean you art not. ' (037. 18)
I iN betow, cn. . . p<",. r. ;p. . , I.
,,.
? COrrtspo'lIJmcu
The Incarnation is of coUJ~ a . pleDdid example of myttical corr~pondtIlQ.
Joy<< found much mo~ than an . ppropriate terminology to help him develop the idea of 'an. . . tomoais'. The th"""Y of 'psychic erc coroupondetloea' 6guud V<'ry 1"'8"ly in lhe repotu of the So. :icty for Psychical R_areh during me fint two <kc. odoea oflhis century, and Mr, Stuart Gilbert . . . . \lI'eI me thatJoyec tool< a particular intUQt ill thai' papcn. The theory concern. the appt"<>Iimatdy timultaneous t""",,riprion by widely ocparaled ? lftlJiri,,~? of 'mcosaga' purporting to come fromalingledeparted. pintwhoisattemprinlJto~tahl"h his 5II. . . . . ival in Ihe n a t world. In the simpiCllt cue, the two . . . . . . ages an: cloocly related by sorne COmmon word, phraoc Or image, or by IU inclusion of a11~ to tome fact of which neither 'medium' could have foreknowledge. In order to demonotrate that tdepathy betwoen the m M iU m I wu not the rmehanism of these ph(:I\Omena,~, the spirill had r<<oune to even suhller me:uu. Allee JohllXln wrotel :
~ charactemUcofthesec;av, OratLeastofoomeofthem- is thu we do notlI"t in the writing orone automatist anything like a nw::<::hanical '~rbatim reproduction of phrutt in the other; we do not even gel tho! :. arne idea exprwcd in different w a y t , _ might wdI E't:Iuit fro m d iffCt telepathy bet'A'eet1 them. . ' Vhat we get is a fragmentary utterance in one seript, whkh . . . . . "" to haw no particular point or meaning. and alFOlher fragmentary Ulletall(e in the other, of an equally pointleos character; but wh. en """ put the tWO together, we see that they . upple=nt one another, a"d that there i. apparently one: coherent ida underlying both, but only partially exp" ? ed in
each. '
TItere is. , I think, a ,ugg(ltion of the phr;illC' 'we do not get , . ,
What we gel;' ? . . ' etc. , in the dcscziptioJ1 of the 'distorted negative' (that ii, Finlllllll\S Wod. iuel? ) at I ' J . 26:
'Well, alEn05t any photo;'1 . . . ? orch his clzcmicoll will tip an)'OflC alking him tho Itaser that if a n. gatiV<' of a hone happens to
, '()" ~ i\u""""ti< Wrilin! ! <II Mn. Ho'b""', }',. . . . . . . . " V . ~ J. , I't,? <hi<oI_, . 01. XXII, 'goI\, p. ! 7~.
. "
? Curresptmdmces
melt .
nough while drying, wcll, what you do gt"t is, weU, a poa;li~ly grotesqutly distorlm nw:rom,. ,. of all"","", of bone- bappy v:01uc:s and maTT,! of mdtwhile hone. '
The acwum in lhe Society'. reporl rontinueslat. r':
'[in the . piri1-Jneosaga] ? . . repeated injunctiont aro 10 b. fOllnd for IDe application of pl'O<< es docribed as /Jam-",. [10 uruhcalhc]. IWXIt. lID wcave Or bind together], IM/H'/'Glltfl [10 IUperJ>OiC'], to the woro. of the ocr;pl; in p;. rticular, il is w o- ltantly urg. . . ! lhal if some words were taken, . . . . . and :oome po:oous of rnpcrposition we", lItell applied, "'Jilrf>>MU, IICno. . W1>uld he secll wru,re now there ;. apparent DOnsc=. BUI no definite din:ctlo. . . . have ~ been gi. -. :n . . to thia procw of superposition . . . ' (Of. ~99. 08: '" . upetl>botitioul Quoint a quinoid. ned')
A n. . moo of. och injunctions to '. upuP'*" an:. qUQUd': 'Whn you h,. . . . . , done is alwaY' dioaociatM. i imp"""" it by <koying foltU j wcave tog('lher, wcave ! ogClher alway. :
'T o one IUperpoting ",,! "Cain things on . <:rUin things, cvtrything . . cl. . . . r. '
'Why do you not supc. ". ,. . , . . II in a bundle and perceive the trmb? '
'TwoI"old is the toil, but wbol~ ? . . [ef. 288-"31 In m)'lter1a I we,. ve riddJ~ for you and cenain othe. . for whom it i.
right. '
One 01" tbac statementl mUSl. have: had," . poc:iaJ appeal ror
J oyo:e':
'Nodding he lup<:rpoocd wilh gn:at labour and not without th~ belp oI" the artilicer. '
~ot only doco F;IUIt~1UU W. dt contain," number of . . :ampla of the 'verbatim reproduction of phra. es', but both it and UlJwu mau usc oI"tcchniqlla whi. c:b K<:m toow. m. . ch 10 the genuine W =pon<kncc idea o. . dine<! . by AliceJohn",n. ~fOli&
are often comprehenliblc only wh~n all their OCCum:nCU an: related togc:th. :r, a pan from on~ ",,";011 combinillg wilh . . part
,'On"'"Auwmati<: Writ;'. . . 0( M. . . HoI! &nd',"'-diII4'~1MSo<i<j)< j",l'odU<J &~, vol. " "II, t~, p. 3)'8.
? 0,. <>t. , pp. ! 'I'}-&.
. "
? Corrtspomknces
front another to build up the sen. . . AoJoya puu it: 'let ~ry ~uplc ~ 10 crosscomplintcntary: (613-'0)
Ao u,ua! ;n Fi""",(4m W"*,, Jora gives a glancing a<;know? lcdgment of hi; so"r<:~. In 1l1. 3-the chapter most directly conceTTl~d witb th~ tecltnique. and theories of spiritualisnt' _ there is a paragraph containing. apart from an obvious allU. $ion to Ew. apia Paladino, what Ottm {o be a! hcioru to Alie<:Johnson and the 'twin Olr<:arru' of croM. correspondences:
'Aliciou. . twimtr<:atru cwinestraines . . . Double her . . . Take your fint thoughu away from her . ? . Is ,be having an ambi. dual a<;t he"",lf? ' (5,0. [7)
The whole of 11l. 3 is written in a style very closely approxi? mating the utraordinarily long and detailed reporu in the
"'{)(e(~j '! ! tlu S""iett Jor Pv<hical RlJMfrh of experiments in cr~rr""ponden=. The ",lution to Shem's fint riddle "fthe unive= becomes clear only when all of it< parts-that i. . all of Fi_~= Wa,b-have bttn aIOCmbled and examined together. The whole book is a rna" ofCl'OM-colTCSJIOnding material which
the r<:ader must syntherue in order to undu$\and: like the '~ges', no one part of it is romprehemible witl",,,t the rest. One of (he most r<:marnble of all the many ""'rip! ! ! quoted by Alie<:Johnwn is an automatic poem written in '901 by ~n. Verrall, one of the best known '. . nsitives'. IU rdcvance to the
cosmic riddle ofFj,,"'g= Wdt is immediately obvious': &> jflJSh ,,,"essW. . ,;. wItS j" a gl. . . "
t/u; whilt w t tlroaming Jedr<< b. ho/t! tIum fMJs. raIIlIINwkiU011 lludWakmtdso",
<a<hftiUin& imago helps imprint tk whole
arul 'PJ/MrJmd. ~ wMt . . . . . . first imprustd filli so llu ItUliint, ~r, fInd 1M ,ul,
and wIril. U'I 0111)' wakh llu """In's Iwnd,
"" glimpJt """''''! if'''""ojllu building piamsd,
sto. . uponsto"" I1rtb<iirkmmtsarise, till t/u; fair Jabric j/<Islus i~ I1rt skUl.
, J. S. Ath""on, 'Spicitual;. m in FMI"'" Wa. ', Xok, oM Q~, ""'_
'99. '95-f, p_ '-n HoitaDd,,~, of . . . . ~
, 'On th< AU"""'"tic Wri';"g 0I'~, I"p~~,vol,XXII,'9"6,p_378,
'57
? Correspondences
It may Ix noted that, like tho opirit. . . :ommunicatiom, Shem's riddle i1 not asked, but 'dictited' (170. <>3). If not an aesthetic justification of. Joyce'. methods, this simulation oftho habits of
the >pirit> does at least ""plain and provi<:I.
