No More Learning

Neither of these statements is correct. Changes of scenery
and even 'perspective in scene' were in vogue, if not common,
long before 1656 As to women on the stage, not to mention
some earlier examples, Mrs Coleman, who 'played' the part of
Ianthe in The Siege, had already sung in The First Day's Enter-
tainment and was chosen, doubtless, in both instances for her voice
rather than for her acting® In 1658, D'Avenant opened the
.
Cockpit theatre in Drury lane, producing there two similar
operas, The Cruelty of the Spaniards in Peru and The History
of Sir Francis Draket. Their ‘historical' intent and scenic
novelty may well have disarmed puritan suspicion, though Richard
Cromwell is said to have ordered an enquiry into the performance
at the Cockpit, of which, however, nothing came.
Affairs were now moving rapidly towards the restoration of
king Charles. General Monck arrived in London in the first days
of February 1659/60, and one John Rhodes, a bookseller and
sometime keeper of the wardrobe of the king's company at Black-
friars, obtained a licence from the existing authorities for the
formation of a dramatic company. A second company gathered
at the Red Bull, a third at Salisbury court in Whitefriars, and
Sir Henry Herbert, master of the revels, awoke to the duties
(and prospective emoluments) of an office for long years held by
him in hope and abeyance. Upon his restoration, king Charles
issued a patent to Thomas Killigrew and Sir William D'Avenant,
1 Act v, sc. 1.
? In the performance of Cartwright's Royall Slave at Oxford, in August 1686, the
scene was changed eight times. See the quarto of this play of 1639. Jonson alluded
to 'a piece of perspective' in 1600, Cynthia's Revels, induction, Gifford-Cunningham's
Jonson, vol. II, p. 210.
8 French actresses appeared in London as early as 1629 and were very unfavourably
received ; in masques and like entertainments ladies had long taken prominent part.
On this topic, see Lawrence, W. J. , 'Early French Players in England,' Anglia, vol.
XXXII, p. 61.
• Incorporated in The Playhouse to be Let, printed in the folio of 1673.


## p. 119 (#141) ############################################

Thomas Killigrew
119
empowering them to 'erect' two companies of players'. This
raised a storm of protest, especially from Herbert, who imme-
diately petitioned the king and council and brought action in the
courts, singling out D'Avenant as his peculiar foe and describing
him as one who had 'obtained leave of Oliver and Richard Crom-
well to vent his operas at a time when your petitioner owned not
their authority? ' In the first instance, combination, and then a
second division, of the two companies followed; but, before long,
the claims of Herbert were adjusted and the two royal patentees
were upheld. Their troupes soon became known, Killigrew's as
the king's, and D'Avenant's as the duke of York's, company of
players. In 1661, the latter company removed to a new playhouse
built for them in Lincoln's inn fields, Portugal row, and, later, in
1673, after the death of D'Avenant, to the sumptuous theatre in
Salisbury court, Fleet street, a site previously known as Dorset
garden. D'Avenant's house was commonly called 'the opera' from
the performance of musical plays there. But D'Avenant by no
means gave an undivided attention to such productions. The
king's company (Killigrew's), variously housed before 1663, re-
moved in that year to the Theatre Royal in Drury lane, Covent
garden.
Thomas Killigrew, a member of a loyal Cornish family, had
been reared a page in the court of Charles I, and continued a
favourite companion of that monarch's son and successor. As
groom of his majesty's bedchamber, Killigrew remained a privi-
leged servant in the royal household and was reputed, from his
ready colloquial wit, the king's jester. His earlier plays were
written abroad and acted before the closing of the theatres.
Among them are The Prisoners, Claracilla and The Princess,
tragicomedies of approved adventurous romantic type. They
mark, in their extravagance of adventure, exaggerated character
and inflated rhetoric, a step from the immediate imitators of
Fletcher to the restoration heroic play, and group naturally with
the like efforts of Sir William Lower and Lodowick Carlell.
A later tragicomedy by Killigrew, Cecilia and Clorinda, borrowed
its subject, in part, from Le Grand Cyrus, a sufficient indication,
perhaps, of the general nature of the poet's sources for serious
plays Among several comedies that appear in the collected
1 This patent bears date 21 August 1660, and is issued to the two patentees jointly.
It is printed entire by Malone in the prolegomena to his edition of Shakespeare, 1821,
vol. I, pp. 249–251.
2 See the same, p. 247, where the petition of Sir Henry Herbert and other papers
in this controversy are reprinted.


## p. 120 (#142) ############################################

I 20 The Restoration Drama
edition of Killigrew's works, 1664, The Parson's Wedding, like-
wise a pre-restoration play, is the most conspicuous. This is a
comedy of almost unexampled coarseness, a quality which the
author had not found in his source, Calderon's Dama Duende.
Many of Killigrew's plays were acted after the reopening of
the theatres and The Parson's Wedding enjoyed unusual popu-
larity. Two other Killigrews, brothers of Thomas, brought their
contributions to the stage? Sir William Killigrew published, in
1664, three plays, Selindra, Pandora and Ormasdes, or Love and
Friendship. The last was subsequently rewritten under the
influence of the new heroic drama. A fourth dramatic work of
this author, The Siege of Urbin, has been with justice described
as 'a capable and sympathetic play. Not all of these were acted.
Henry Killigrew, a younger brother, wrote but one play, so far
as is known. It was published first in 1638 under the title The
Conspiracy, and, rewritten, in 1653, as Pallantus and Eudora.
Thomas Killigrew the younger, also a writer of plays, belongs to
a later generation.
The works of Sir William D'Avenant, posthumously collected,
bear date 1683. D'Avenant staged most of his plays and some of
them were not undeservedly successful. Several of his rewritten
plays, such as Love and Honour, The Wits and The Platonick
Lovers, long remained popular favourites; but his work sub-
sequent to the restoration is made up largely of older dramas
refashioned to meet new conditions. Thus, we hear of Macbeth,
staged with 'alterations, amendments, additions and new songs'
besides a divertissement, and of Beatrice and Benedick thrust into
Measure for Measure and the result renamed The Law Against
Lovers. Romeo and Juliet was transformed into a comedy and
acted alternately with the Shakespearean version? .
The répertoire of the first years of the restoration exhibits an
active revival of the masterpieces of the earlier drama. Between
the opening of the new theatres and April 1663, Pepys saw Othello,
Henry IV, A Midsummer Nighťs Dream, Jonson's Silent Woman
1 See bibliography.
? As to James Howard's Romeo and Juliet, see ante, p. 20 note 3. As to D'Avenant
and Dryden's version of The Tempest, and Shadwell's alterations see ante, p. 28 and
note 2. Other like adaptations are Shadwell's Timon of Athens, Ravenscroft's Titus
Andronicus, Tate's King Lear, and Betterton's Henry IV. D'Avenant rewrote The
Two Noble Kinsmen as The Rivals, Waller transmuted The Maides Tragedy into a
comedy by a new fifth act, Betterton adapted The Prophetesse, Vanbragh The Pilgrim,
D'Urfey The Sea Voyage, Tate The Island Princesse, all of them originally Fletcher's.
Farquhar's Inconstant is an adaptation of The Wild-Goose Chase.


## p. 121 (#143) ############################################

Comedies on the Political Reaction I
121
and Bartholomew Fayre, Fletcher's Tamer Tamed, The Beggars
Bush and Beaumont's Knight of the Burning Pestle, Middleton's
Changeling, Shirley's Cardinall, Massinger's Bond-Man and several
more! Hamlet was among the first plays revived, and it furnished
one of Betterton's most signal triumphs. A taste for the heroic in
drama, a heritage from Fletcher and his imitators in the previous
age, is noticeable in D'Avenant's own Siege of Rhodes and, more
especially, in his really fine tragicomedy, Love and Honour.
How this was to spring into full flower in the heroic plays of
Dryden, Orrery and others, has been already shown in an earlier
chapter? The beginnings of opera, also, may be postponed for
the moment.
A distinctive feature of the earlier drama of the restoration is
its reflection of the current political reaction. The playwrights, to
a man, extolled absolute monarchy and branded as disloyal any.
one who failed obsequiously to observe and follow the lead and
the wishes of the king. As to the puritan, while he was in power,
few had dared openly to lampoon him; but, with the swing of
popular loyalty back to the monarchy, the church and the old
established order of things, the puritan became fair game for
the satire of his foes. General Monck was still in the north, and
Lambert, sent to oppose him, had been but recently deserted by
his troops, when John Tatham staged his satirical piece of dramatic
journalism, The Rump. Tatham had been a contriver of pageants
for the city and had written a pastoral, Love Crowns the End, so
far back as 1632, a tragedy of no great merit, ominously called
The Distracted State, and a piece of bitter satire against the
Scots, whom the author appears especially to have hated, entitled
The Scotch Figgaries. In The Rump, or the Mirrour of the Late
Times, Tatham boldly lampoons Lambert, Fleetwood, Hewson and
other notabilities of the moment, representing the widow of Crom-
well as an undignified scold and lady Lambert as preposterously
and irrationally eager to thrust her husband into the succession to
the protectorate, so that she may be addressed 'your highness. '
Several scenes of this comedy are not without a certain comic
effectiveness; and the final reduction of these lofty personages to
street vendors, peddling their wares, displays the popular humour
and temper of the moment. Another typical comedy of the type
is Sir Robert Howard's The Committee, produced in 1665 and long
A list of the plays of Rhodes's company is made up largely of works of Fletcher,
See Genest, vol. 1, p. 31.
? See ante, chap. I.


## p. 122 (#144) ############################################

I 22
The Restoration Drama
a
popular? It tells directly and not without force the story of a
hypocritical puritan committee of sequestration, made up of such
personages as Nehemiah Catch, Jonathan Headstrong and Ezekiel
Scrape, and how they and a dishonest guardian were outwitted by
two clever maidens and their cavalier lovers. A better written
comedy, though it was less successful in its day, is Cowley's Cutter
of Coleman Street, brought out by D'Avenant among his earliest
ventures? . While such characters as 'merry, sharking' Cutter,
who turns puritan for his worldly welfare and has visions of the
downfall of Babylon, are amusing, and the dialogue abounds in
clever thrusts at the cant and weaknesses of fallen puritanism,
Cowley's comedy cannot be pronounced a dramatic success. Never-
theless, the truthfulness of his portraiture of colonel Jolly, the
drunken cavalier, reeling on the edge of dishonesty, and driven in
his need to composition with the saints,' brought down on the
poet's head the displeasure of some who know no vices excepting
those that flourish among their enemies. Comedies satirising the
puritans continued popular throughout the reign of Charles II, as
is seen from such productions as Lacy's The Old Troop (before
1665), Crowne's City Politics, 1673, and Mrs Behn’s The Round-
heads, 1682, a shameless appropriation of Tatham's The Rump.
Turning now to individual playwrights of the restoration not
incidentally treated in the paragraphs above, we find some that
preserved untouched the older traditions of English comedy.
Foremost among them was John Wilson, a native of Plymouth,
and a student of the law, called to the bar in 1646. Through the
good offices of the duke of York, whose secretary he had been in
Ireland, Wilson became recorder of Londonderry and, throwing
himself into the Jacobite cause, remained in Dublin after the
accession of king William. He died in London in 1696. Wilson
is the author of four plays, the earliest of which, The Cheats, was
written in 1662 and enjoyed an extraordinary popularity on the
stage. It is a prose comedy frankly following the manner of
Jonson. Mopus, the quack astrologer, the sharking bravoes, Bilboe
and Titere Tu, the nonconformist minister Scruple who finds the
light that leads to conformity on £300 a year, but is steadied in
protest against the wiles of Babylon by an offer of 400—all are
pure Jonson, but rung to new changes that defy the suggestions
of plagiarism. Not less Jonsonian is Wilson's second comedy, The
1 Cf. ante, chap. 1, p. 20 note 3.
Cowley's play was originally called The Guardian. It was acted at Cambridge in
1641, and published under this earlier title in 1650. Cf. ante, vol. vii, p. 62,


## p. 123 (#145) ############################################

John Wilson
123
Projectors, 1664. Here, a group of these sharks (a favourite
subject for ridicule with Jonson himself) are represented, busy with
their victim, Sir Gudgeon Credulous, and the long line of usurers
on the stage is bettered in Suckdry and his servant and foil, Lean-
chops! Wilson's comedy is vigorous, full of effective and good-
humoured caricature, and successfully imitative of the better
features of his master's art. Besides these excellent comedies,
Wilson is the author of a tragedy, Andronicus Comnenius, of
admirable conduct and vigour, and written in blank verse of a
freedom compacted with firmness that recalls the better work
of the previous age. The actual story of Andronicus Comnenus,
hypocritical, treacherous and pitiless in his murderous path of
devastation to a throne, strangely parallels the story of the hunch-
back Richard of historical and dramatic fable. Such, however,
seems to have been the author's literary conscience that, save for
one scene, which closely resembles the courtship of lady Anne by
Richard, he has treated his theme originally and with inventive
variety. The date of Andronicus Comnenius is noticeable; for,
in 1664, the stage was ringing with Dryden's Rival-Ladies, and
his and Sir Robert Howard's Indian Queen. Wilson's fourth
play, Belphegor, or the Marriage of the Devil, printed in 1691,
is less interesting, though elaborated with much detail. The story,
referable to Machiavelli's well known novella, had been treated
before in English drama and may have been suggested to Wilson
by Jonson's unsuccessful play of similar theme, The Divell is an
Asse.
Among other names which occur in the dramatic annals of the
years immediately following the return of king Charles is that
of Sir Robert Stapylton, the author of a comedy, The Slighted
Maid, described by Genest as 'a pretty good comedy' and as 'not
acted for the first time in 16634. ' Stapylton's tragicomedy, The
Stepmother, followed in the same year. He is the author, too,
of a tragedy on Hero and Leander. Stapylton was a translator
from French and the classics, and of some repute in his day. His
post as gentleman-usher to king Charles doubtless disposed him,
like other royal servants, to an interest in the drama. Whether
the trivial but witty comedy, Mr Anthony, printed in 1690, be the
1 This play was likewise influenced by the Aulularia of Plautus.
2 Compare Richard III, act I, sc. 2, and Andronicus Comnenius, act iv, sc. 3. Wilson
invariably writes Comnenius for Comnenus.
: Compare Haughton's The Devil and his Dame, mentioned in Henslowo's diary,
and especially Dekker's If It Be Not Good, the Divel is in it.
* Genest, Some Account of the English Stage, vol. I, p. 46.
3


## p. 124 (#146) ############################################

I 24
The Restoration Drama
work of Roger Boyle, earl of Orrery, or not, its clear following
of the models of earlier comedy is sufficient to place it here!
Orrery is memorable for lis heroic dramas, which have been already
noted? The duke of Newcastle, too, and his clever duchess had
both long been dabblers in the drama. But, neither the tutorship
of Ben Jonson, nor that of Shirley later, contrived to produce in
either of the pair results deserving serious attention from the
student of literature. Two comedies by the duke-The Humorous
Lovers and The Triumphant Widow-were acted 'after the re-
storation' and printed in 1673. Twenty-one plays by the duchess
were published in a folio volume of 1662. They have been described
as 'fertile in invention and as tending to extravaganza and an
excess of unrefined fun' Thus, in the midst of a steady revival
of the plays of the old drama, extending, in accordance with the
gross taste of the court, to comedies of Middleton and Brome, the
first years of the restoration passed by.
But comedy, on the revival of the stage, was not to be confined
to the satire of contemporary allusion and a following of the
humours of Jonson. In a striking passage of his Life of Dryden,
Sir Walter Scott declares that the English audience of the re-
storation
had not the patience for the regular comedy depending upon delicate turns
of expression and nicer delineations of character. The Spanish comedy,
with its bustle, machinery, disguise and complicated intrigue, was much more
agreeable to their taste 4,
And this is true, although French models were drawn upon far
more frequently than Spanish, in whatever degree the finer lines
of the former were, at times, obscured in the process. The degree
and character of the influence of Spanish literature on the drama
of England has been much misunderstood. The position taken by
Ward, many years ago, to the effect that the connection between
the Spanish and the English drama is far from intimate and that
among the elements peculiar to the Spanish drama none can be
shown to have been taken over by our own and assimilated to its
growth,' may be declared to be a position substantially correct".
The earliest English play directly traceable to a Spanish source is
6
Genest, Sonie Account of the English Stage, vol. 1, p. 129, dates the acting of this
play, 1671–72. Pepys described another comedy of Orrery, Guzman, as . as mean
a thing . . . as hath been upon the stage a great while. ' Pepys's Diary, ed. Wheatley,
vol. VIII, p. 296.
* See ante, p. 21 note 1.
8 Ward, vol. II, p. 335.
* Dryden, ed. Scott-Saintsbury, vol. I, p. 62.
6 Ward, vol. II, p. 267.
3
8


## p. 125 (#147) ############################################

Early Spanish Influences
125
Calisto and Melebea, an adaptation to the stage of the dramatic
novel, Celestina, the work, chiefly if not wholly, of Fernando de
Rojas, and published about 1530. This work has already been
described, together with the violent didactic conclusion with which
the unknown English adapter made amends for his choice of so
romantic a story? As is well known, the Spanish scholar, Juan
Luis Vives, friend of Sir Thomas More, visited England on the
invitation of Henry VIII, who placed him as a reader on rhetoric
at Corpus Christi college, Oxford. It has been thought that the
English dramatic version of Celestina may have had some relation
to Vives and his visit, although he anathematised the Spanish
production as a work of infamy in his treatise De Institutione
Christianae Feminae. It is somewhat strange that Calisto and
Melebea had no successor. However, it played its part in relieving
the old moral drama of abstractions by the substitution of living
human figures in a story of actual life. It was to Italy, not to
Spain, that the predecessors of Shakespeare, as well as most of
his contemporaries, turned instinctively for romantic material.
Spain was an enemy and, as such, was maligned and misunder-
stood? Yet the figure of Philip, once a sovereign of England,
was represented in at least one chronicle history with dignity;
and a number of dramas, strictly Elizabethan, laid their scene in
the peninsula and affected to follow annals of Spain. Kyd's
Spanish Tragedie and its imitation or burlesque, The First
Part of Jeronimo, remain of undiscovered source; and Greene's
Alphonsus King of Arragon is a composite of the biography of
more than one sovereign of that name, as his queen Eleanor
of Edward I is an outrageous distortion of one of the most
estimable and charitable women that ever sat on the throne of
England. The same playwright's Battell of Alcazar and the
anonymous Captain Stukeley, which deals in part with the same
topic, drew on material more nearly approaching the historical.
Yet neither of these, nor Lusts Dominion (although details of
the death of the king in that piece have been thought to have
been suggested by the death of Pbilip II), can be traced to any
definite Spanish source, much less to anything bearing the title
of Spanish literature. Nor need we surmise that such lost
i See ante, vol. 7, pp. 99, 100.
? On the mutual repugnance of the two nations in the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries, see some excellent paragraphs by Schevill, R. , in Romanische Forschungen,
XX, 1907, pp. 626–634.
Philip II appears as a character in Thomas Heywood's If you know not me,
You know no bodie. A Philip of Spain, now lost, is mentioned by Henslowe in 1602.
3


## p. 126 (#148) ############################################

126
The Restoration Drama
productions as Wadeson's Humorous Earle of Gloster with his
Conquest of Portingall (1600), The Conqueste of Spayne by
John a Gaunt, in which Day, Hathway and Haughton conspired,
or Chettle and Dekker's Kinge Sebastiane of Portingalle (these
last two in 1601), were any more closely associated with actual
literature of the peninsula, however this last may have touched
on a topic of some contemporary historical interest. Indeed, the
number of English dramas up to the death of Elizabeth which
can be traced even remotely to a source ultimately Spanish is
surprisingly small.
Marlowe's Tamburlaine was partially drawn
from Pedro Mexia's Silva de varia lección; but this last had
been translated into Italian, French and English (by Thomas
Fortescue in his Foreste or Collection of Histories) long before
Marlowe came to write. And, in Shakespeare's Two Gentlemen
of Verona, the story of Julia and Proteus was suggested by that
of Felix and Felismena in the second book of the Diana of the
Portuguese Spaniard Montemayor. But the probable intervention
of the now lost play, The History of Felix and Philiomena, acted
3 January 1585, should dispose of any theory of a direct Shake-
spearean contact with this much-exploited Spanish source. Other
Shakespearean examples of 'Spanish influence' have been affirmed.
Such are the correspondences between Twelfth Night and the
Comedia de los Engaños of Lope de Rueda; but both could have
found a common source in Bandello or, possibly, in a dramatised
version by an academy at Siena called Gl Ingannati'; and such,
too, is the notion that Shakespeare drew on Conde Lucanor for
his Taming of the Shrew, a comedy obviously recast from the
earlier anonymous Taming of a Shrew, combined with a plot of
Italian extraction, immediately derived from Gascoigne's comedy,
Supposes. A more interesting suggestion is that which traces the
sources of The Tempest to the fourth chapter of 'a collection of
mediocre tales,' entitled Noches de Invierno, the work of one
Antonio de Eslava and first published at Pamplona in 16091.
Fitzmaurice-Kelly has given the weight of his authority to a
respectful treatment of this source, adding:
This provenance may be thought to lend colour to the tradition that
Shakespeare dramatised an episode from Don Quixote-a book that he might
1 For this and much else in these paragraphs, the writer is indebted to Fitzmaurice-
Kelly's most valuable paper, The Relations between Spanish and English Literature,
1910. See, also, two notes by Perott, J. de, on this topic and a Spanish parallel to
Love's Labour's Lost in the Shakespeare-Jahrbuch, vol. XLV, 1908, pp. 151–4; and
the valuable paper by Schevill, R. , 'On the Influence of Spanish Literature on English
in the Early Seventeenth Century' in Romanische Forschungen, u. s.


## p. 127 (#149) ############################################

Spanish Personages in English Plays 127
a
easily have read in Shelton's translation published in 1612, or, perhaps, even
in the manuscript which Shelton had kept by him for some four or five years.
At any rate, the following entry occurs under the date 1633 in the register
of the Stationers' company:-'The History of Cardenio by Mr. Fletcher and
Shakespeare, 208. '1
As to Spanish personages interspersed through Elizabethan drama,
it has been well said: “They were either arrogant, boastful,
pompously affected or cruel,' sheer caricatures, in a word, drawn
with an unfriendly pen? Middleton's Lazarillo in Blurt Master-
.
Constable (a sad perversion of that delightful rascal, his namesake
of Tormes), and Jonson's ridiculous caricature in the pretended
Don Diego of The Alchemist are sufficient illustrations of this.
As to the boasters and bullies of the playwrights, Bobadill, Captain
Tucca, Ancient Pistol and the rest, there was no need to bespeak
them in Spain. For such traits of the kind as were not derived
from observation can show a clear literary descent from the Miles
Gloriosus of Plautus. That Shakespeare contrived to keep his
Don Armado human, as well as absurdly lofty and vainglorious,
is partly due to the fact that Armado is the portrait of an actual
mad Spaniard, known as 'fantastical Monarcho,' who haunted the
London of his day. And Armado, too, had had his immediate
literary model in Lyly's contribution, Sir Thopas in Endimion,
to the Plautine line of descent just mentioned.
Towards the end of the reign of king James I, Spanish litera-
ture became better known in England, and we naturally look for
the effect of this on English drama. But this relation was still
general and established largely through French and Italian trans-
lation; and it is easy to make too much of it. The plays of
Beaumont and Fletcher have been alleged to disclose more
especially that contact between the dramas of the two nations
which some scholars have striven anxiously to establish ; and
this, notwithstanding the accurate statement of Dryden as to
dramatic plots that 'Beaumont and Fletcher had most of theirs
from Spanish novels. ' Some seventeen of the fifty-two plays
commonly attributed to Beaumont and Fletcher have been traced,
in a greater or less measure of indebtedness, to Spanish literature.
? U. s. pp. 21, 22.
2 Underhill, J. G. , Spanish Literature in the England of the Tudors, 1899, p. 357.
3 Middleton might have had his Lazarillo in English, long since translated by
David Rowland and printed in 1576. There is no reason for assuming that Ben
Jonson knew Spanish ; his few allusions to Don Quixote and the Spanish phrases of
The Alchemist to the contrary notwithstanding. See Schevill, R. , U. s. pp. 612, 613.
* Preface to An Evening's Love, Works of Dryden, ed. Scott-Saintsbury, vol. in,
p. 252.


## p. 128 (#150) ############################################

128
The Restoration Drama
Eighteen others remain unidentified as to source, and some of these
disclose a content and a manner not unlike the ruling traits of the
drama of Spain. If, then, we consider the almost incredible mass
of the writings of Lope de Vega (to mention him only), unread by
English and even by Spanish scholars, and further keep in mind
that those conversant with Spanish drama are not always con-
versant with English and vice versa, it would be rash to affirm
that the last word has been said on a topic as yet not seriously
opened. Our present information, however, may be set forth as
follows, although, with regard to the plays on Spanish subjects
attributed to Beaumont and Fletcher, it should be premised that
most of them were composed at a date precluding the possibility
that Beaumont had a hand in them! Cervantes was Fletcher's
favourite Spanish author; and he seems to have been acquainted
solely with his prose. From the Novelas Exemplares, the English
poet drew the major plots of The Chances, The Queene of Corinth,
The Faire Maide of the Inne and Loves Pilgrimage, with the
underplot of Rule a Wife And have a Wife as well. The Custome
of the Countrey is derived from the romance of Persiles y Sigis-
munda, the last work to come from the great Spaniard's hand.
As to Don Quixote, apart from possible suggestions for certain
episodes of Beaumont's Knight of the Burning Pestle, the plot
of The Coxcombe, an episode of The Double Marriage and a
personage of The Prophetesse have been traced by various critics
to the same immortal romances. Besides Cervantes, Fletcher
drew on Lope de Vega for his Pilgrim, on Juan de Flores for
Women pleas'd and on Gonzalo de Cespedes for The Spanish
Curate and The Maid in the Mill; and not one of these originals
is a play, nor need Fletcher have read a word of Spanish to have
become acquainted with them; for all had been translated into
French or English and were readily accessible to his hand4.
About two only of the Fletcherian plays has any question on
these points arisen. Loves Cure, first printed in the folio of
1647, but commonly dated back to the early years of king James,
has been referred to a comedy by Guillen de Castro, written at
>
a
1 Cf. ante, appendix to vol. vi, chap. v.
? On this topic, see the sane words of Schevill, U. 8. pp. 617—624; and the intro-
duction, by Murch, H. S. , in his ed. of this play, Yale Studies in English, 1908.
3 See, on this topic, Fitzmaurice-Kelly, preface to Shelton's Don Quixote, Koeppel,
Quellenstudien,' Münchener Beiträge, 1895, and Rapp, Studien über das englische
Theater, 1892.
4
* See the résumé of this subject in the present writer's Elizabethan Drama, vol. 11,
p. 215.


## p. 129 (#151) ############################################

Later Spanish Influences
129
so late a date as to make it quite impossible that Fletcher could
have seen it? . Again, Fletcher's Island Princesse has been re-
ferred to a source in the writings of the younger Argensola, not
translated out of Spanish at such a date that Fletcher could have
seen it? But these matters are still under discussion, and, on
this particular subject, we may take refuge in the judgment of
Fitzmaurice-Kelly who writes: 'Suffice it to say that, at the
present stage, the balance of probabilities is against the view that
Fletcher knew Spanish. '
If we turn to other dramatists, we find an occasional contempo-
rary of Fletcher following in his footsteps. The Spanish Gipsie, a
tragicomedy by Middleton and William Rowley, is made up of an
effective combination of two stories of Cervantes, La Fuerza de
la Sangre and La Gitanilla. Rowley collaborated, too, with
Fletcher in The Maid in the Mill, a comedy based on a story
of Gonzalo de Cespedes, translated by Leonard Digges and called
Gerardo, the Unfortunate Spaniard. Rowley's own powerful
tragedy Alls Lost by Lust, draws on Spanish story, though his
precise source remains problematic4. Once more, A Very Woman,
by Massinger, is derived from a story of the Novelas Exemplares.
The same dramatist's Renegado is said to be based on Cervantes's
Los Baños de Argel, and similarities have been traced between
the same two authors in The Fatall Dowry and the interlude,
El Viejo celoso. Moreover, it is said that neither of these Spanish
pieces was translated in Massinger's lifetime, although this is not
to be considered certain. We may not feel sure that a Spanish
play has actually influenced an English play by direct borrowing,
until we reach Shirley, who, on credible authority, is reported to
have utilised El Castigo del Pensèque of Tirso de Molina in The
Opportunitie and Lope de Vega's Don Lope de Cardona in The
Young Admirall. Fitzmaurice-Kelly sceptically observes, even as
to these examples : 'a minute demonstration of the extent of
Shirley's borrowings would be still more satisfactory. '
The last two volumes of Dodsley's Old Plays contain several
dramas of the restoration which are Spanish in scene. Of these,
The Rebellion by Thomas Rawlins seems wholly fanciful with its
hero disguised as a tailor and its crowded and improbable in-
· Stiefel in Herrig's Archiv, vol. xcix, p. 271.
2 See the same in vol. II, pp. 277 ff.
: The Relations between Spanish and English Literature, pp. 22, 23.
* On the topic, see the edition of the play by Stork, C. W. , Publications of the
University of Pennsylvania, 1910, vol. XII, p. 70.
5 The Relations, as above, p. 23.
9
E. L. VIII.
CH. V.


## p. 130 (#152) ############################################

130
The Restoration Drama
cident. The Marriage Night, printed in 1664, by Henry viscount
Falkland is an abler drama, reproducing, however, in more than
one forcible passage, personages and situations of the earlier
Elizabethan drama. Both of these were written before the closing
of the theatres, but it is doubtful if the latter was ever acted.
Other pre-restoration dramas of Spanish plot are The Parson's
Wedding, which Killigrew had of Calderon’s Dama Duende, and
Fanshawe's translation of two comedies of Antonio de Mendoza! .
With Tuke's Adventures of Five Hours (written in 1662) and
Digby's Elvira, or The Worst Not always True (printed in 1667),
we reach unquestionable examples of the immediate adaptation
of Spanish dramas to the English stage. This is not the place in
which to dilate on the glories of the Spanish stage, the moral
purpose of Alarcon, the brilliancy and wit of Tirso de Molina, the
happy fertility of Lope de Vega, the clarity of thought and lofty
sentiment of Calderon, greatest of the Spanish dramatists. Both
the comedies just mentioned are favourable specimens of the
popular comedias de capa y espada, invented by Lope de Vega.
Two ladies, a gallant and his friend, their lovers, a jealous brother
or a difficult father, with the attendant servants of all parties ;
mistake, accident, intrigue and involvement, honour touched and
honour righted-such is the universal recipe of the comedy of
cloak and sword. As to these adapters of the species to England,
George Digby, earl of Bristol, had played no unimportant part as
ambassador of king James I at Madrid, where he translated two
other comedies of Calderon besides No Siempre lo peor es cierto,
the original of Elvira. Sir Samuel Tuke had served at Marston
moor and followed the prince into exile. He was much favoured by
Charles, who is said to have suggested Los Empeños de Seis Horas
(now assigned to Antonio Coello and not, as formerly, to Calderon)
as 'an excellent design' for an English play? Elvira is little more
than a translation, stiff
, formal and, while by no means wanting
in action, protracted if not chargeable with repetitions. It was
not printed until 1667, and we have no record of the performance
of it. Tuke's Adventures of Five Hours is a better play and,
as rewritten, was sufficiently adapted to the conditions of the
English stage to gain a deserved success. Into the relations of
Tuke's play to the coming heroic drama of Dryden, we cannot
here enter. Its importance, despite its Castilian gravity and
some rimed couplets, seems, in this respect, likely to be exag-
1 Fiestas de Aranjuez and Querer por solo querer, printed in 1670 and 1671.
9 Fitzmaurice-Kelly, J. , Littérature Espagnole, traduction Davray, 1904, p. 345.


## p. 131 (#153) ############################################

• Spanish Plots'
131
6
gerated! So, too, although important as the earliest play of
Spanish plot acted after the restoration, it is too much to claim for
The Adventures the 'reintroduction of a type of the drama of
intrigue 'which, from that day to this, has never left the English
stage? ' Dryden attacked The Adventures, but Pepys declared :
when all is done, [it] is the best play that ever I read in my
life 3. '
The coffers of Spanish drama, thus opened, continued to afford
English playwrights their treasures. Dryden's Rival-Ladies and
An Evening's Love or the Mock Astrologer have been referred
to Spanish sources : the last is Calderon by way of Corneille.
Dryden's earliest dramatic effort, The Wild Gallant, has also been
thought to be of Spanish origin. But this is an error, referable
to a misreading of the prologue; the source is certainly English
and, doubtless, Dryden's own invention". With Sir Thomas St
Serfe's Taruzo's Wiles, or the Coffee House, founded on Moreto's
No puede ser, the earl of Orrery's Guzman and Mrs Behn's Dutch
Lover and The Rover, we complete the list of dramas in the earlier
years of the restoration which have been alleged to be of Spanish
plot". Crowne's Sir Courtly Nice is a later comedy, said, like-
wise, to have been suggested by the taste of king Charles and
derived from Moreto’s No puede ser, and 'the most amusing
scenes' of Wycherley's comedy, The Gentleman Dancing-master,
have been assigned to a source in Calderon's El Maestro de
Danzar. More commonly, however, Spanish influences filtered
into England through the drama of France. It may be doubted
whether any 'Spanish plot' of Dryden exhibits more than an
indirect origin of this nature. In later decades, this was almost
invariably the case. Thus, Steele's Lying Lover, The Perplexed
6
See Child, O. G. , in Modern Language Notes, vol. xix, 1904, p. 166, and the
unpublished thesis of Gaw, A. , on this play, 1908, in the library of the University o.
Pennsylvania. Cf. ante, p. 16 note 2.
2 Hume, M. , Spanish Influence on English Literature, 1905, p. 291.
3 Pepys's Diary, ed. Wheatley, H. B. , vol. v, p. 403.
• Dryden's words, 'It is your author's lot To be endangered by a Spanish plot,'
not • with a Spanish plot' as often quoted, refer to his rivalry with Tuke's Adventures,
not to the source of his own play. Just below, he affirms, . This play is English and
the growth your own. ' This point is made by Gaw in his thesis, referred to in a note
above.
o The Dutch Lover is referred by Langbaine to a Spanish story; The Rover is
an adaptation of Kiliigrew's Thomaso. For both of these, see below, p. 141 of this
volume. The False Count, 1682, is another play by Mrs Behn of Spanish type.
Langbaine finds a hint' in it, however, . borrowed from Molière's Les Précieuses
Ridicules. '
9--2


## p. 132 (#154) ############################################

132
The Restoration Drama
Lover of Mrs Centlivre and Colley Cibber's She Would and She
Would Not are derivative plays and only remotely Spanish.
We may summarise what has been said on a subject of con-
siderable difficulty as follows. Spanish literary influences on the
drama in Tudor times were slight and confined, almost entirely,
to an occasional plot, derived, as a rule, through some foreign
intermediary. In the reign of James I, Beaumont and Fletcher,
Massinger and William Rowley, alone among dramatists of note,
drew on Spanish sources for their plays; and, though the question
cannot be regarded as definitely settled, it seems likely that their
sources lay wholly in fiction, translated into other and, to them,
more familiar languages of the continent or into English. It was
in the reign of king Charles I, that Spanish drama for the first
time came into a closer touch with the English stage. That touch
was closest at the restoration, when the cavalier returned with
his foreign luggage and the taste of the king conspired with the
experiences of his courtiers to foster many experiments. But
Spanish influence was soon eclipsed by that of France, aided by
the strong national spirit that prolonged the influence of Jonson
and his contemporaries for generations after their decease.
In turning to a consideration of the influences of French
literature on the drama of the restoration, it is customary to
give unusual weight to the example of the romans de longue
haleine, those extraordinary expressions in protracted hyperbole
of ideal conduct, sentiment and conversation, with which the finer
-pirits of the days of Louis XIV sought to elevate and ennoble
social life? But, as a matter of fact, much of this influence was
already in full flood far back in the reign of king Charles I, as the
cult of Platonic love, about 1633, and the ideals of love and honour
which it fostered are alone sufficient to attest? To what extent
the ideals of this one time fashionable cult may be surmised to
have persisted to affect appreciably the conduct of the returning
exiles is a question for the historian of social conditions. On the
drama, such ideals had a marked, if superficial, effect. The life of
the court of king Charles II, was, at best, a coarse replica of that
of Versailles; and the heroic drama, the roots of which lie deeper
than in the supersoil of romance, reproduced mostly externals,
grandiloquence of language, loftiness of sentiment, incredible
· For a list of restoration plays referred to the influences of the romances of the
Scudérys and other like writers, see Ward, vol. III, p. 309 note.
· See, as to this, especially D'Avenant's apotheosis of Platonic love in his grand
masque, The Temple of Love, his Love and Honour, both 1634, and his Platonick
Lovers, 1635.


## p. 133 (#155) ############################################

Molière and Restoration Comedy 133
valour, with courtesy and honour drawn and twisted into an
impossible code. More immediate in its effects was the con-
temporary French stage, in which much of the literature of
exaggerated sentiment was reproduced by forgotten authors, who
live now only in the satire which their extravagance inspired in
the commonsense of Boileau. But the subject of this influence,
and of that of the classicism of Corneille and Racine in particular,
as well as the use of the rimed couplet in the English drama, and
its relations to the heroic play are treated elsewhere; our concern
here is with comedy,
It was in 1653 that Molière, after his long apprenticeship in
the provinces, brought out his L'Étourdi in Paris; and, from that
date onward to his death, just twenty years later, he remained the
master and the example of the most brilliant comedy of modern
times. Molière's earlier work thus corresponds, in point of time,
with the latest years of exile, when many Englishmen of rank were
amusing themselves in Paris, and peculiarly open to lighter im-
pressions from the idleness of their lives. No one foreign author
has been so plundered by English playwrights as Molière; and his
humane spirit, his naturalness, adaptability and dramatic aptitude
stood the borrowers in good stead, in recalling them from the
intricacies of Spanish intrigue and the wearisome repetition at
second hand of the 'humours' of Ben Jonson. That the finer
qualities of Molière, his verve, his buoyancy, ease and success of
plot, and sure characterisation, escaped his English imitators is
not to be denied; for, apart from the circumstance that few of
them were men of more than mediocre parts, the genius of Molière
towers above the imitation of any age. A list of the borrowings
of restoration comedy from the drama of Molière and his con-
temporaries would unduly burden this page. D'Avenant, Dryden,
Sedley, Wycherley, Vanbrugh, Crowne and Shadwell all owe debts
of plot, character, design and dialogue to French comedy; and,
even where the debt may not be specifically ascertainable, the
1 Cf. ante, pp. 14 . and 18 ff. and post, chap.