et le Steele
Philosophique
(Paris, 1870) ; J.
Windelband - History of Philosophy
1882) ; Henry Home, pseud.
for Lord Kaines (1680-1782 ; Essays on the Principles of Morality and Xatural Iteligion, 1751; Elements of Criticism, 1762); Edmund Burke (1730-1707; J'hitosophical Inquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beauti
ful, 1766); Adam Ferguson (1724-1816; Institutions of Moral Philosophy, 1769), and in a certain sense also, Adam Smith (1723-1790; Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1760) ; the principle of authority was defended by Joseph Butler ( 1002-1762; Sermons upon Human Mature, 1726) [Butler, in Blackwood series by W. h. Collins, 1881], and William Paley (1743-1806; Principles of Moral and IWiticnl Philosophy, 1785). The ethics of the associonational psychology ww developed chiefly by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832 ; Introduction to the Principles of . Morals and Legislation, 1789; Traiti de legislation Civile et I'rnale, brought together by E. Dumont, 1801 ; Deontology, ed. by J. Bowring, 1H34 ; works in 11 vols. , Edin. 1843). — In a peculiar isolated position appears Bernhard de Mandeville (1670-1733 ; The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices made Public Benefits, 171)0, later with illustrative dialogues, 1728; Inquiry into the Oiigin of Moral Virtue, 1732 ; Free Thoughts on Religion, Church, tiovern- nvnt. 1720). ' On him cf. P. Sakmann (Freiburg. 1898).
The literature of Deism coincides, for the most part, with the above-named literature of moral philosophy ; but in addition to those named the following writers are also prominent : John Toland (1670-1722 ; Christianity not Myste rious. 1000 ; Letters to Serena, 1704 ; Adeisidtemon, 1700 ; Pantheisticon, 1710) ; Anthony Collins (1876-1720; . 4 Discourse of Free Thinking, 1713) ; Matthew Tindal i 1050-1733; Christianity as Old as the Creation, 17:10) ; Thomas Chubb '1079-1747 ; A Discourse concerning Reason \rith Regard to Religion, 1730) ;
rhoraa* Morgan (died 1743 ; The Moral Philosopher, 3 parts, 1737 ff. ) ; finally, I-oni BoUngbroke (1672-1761); works ed. by Mollet in 6 vols. , 1763 f. ; cf. V. v Kaumer, Ahhandl. der Berl. Akad. 1840). —Cf. V. Lechler, Oetchichte des
emjlivhen Deismus (Stuttgart and Tub. 1841).
England's greatest philosopher is David Home, bom, 1711, in Edinburg, and
rducated there. After he had spent some time as merchant, he lived for several years in France, occupied in study, and composed bis work of genius, the Treatise on Human Mature (printed 1739 f. ). The failure of this book induced
him to work it over and publish it under the title Inquiry concerning Human Cnderstanding, as a second volume of his more successful Essays, Moral, Politi- rul aud Literary (1748), and to add An Inquiry concerning the Principles of M'-rals (1761), and also The Matural History of Religion (1766). As librarian of the Advocates' Library in Edinburg he found opportunity to write his History iff England. After a stay in Paris, where he received great honour and came
into connection with Koussean among others, he was for some time I'nder- N<-t rotary of State in the Foreign Office, but finally returned to KdinburR. where hr died, 1776. The Dialogues concerning Saturn! Religion and some smaller trraiiwit appeared posthumously. Ed. of his works by (ireen and (irose In 4 vols. (Lond. 1876). His autobiography was published by his friend, Adam Smith (1777). Cf. J. H. Burton. Life and Correspondence of D. H. (Edin.
I8IO-50) ; E. Feuerlein in the Zeitschr. " iJer liedankc" (Berlin, 1863 f. ) ; K. Pfleiderer. Empirismus und Skeptis in D. H. 's Philosophic (Berlin, 1874) ; T. Huxley, D. H. (Lond. 1870) ; Fr. Jodl, Uben n. Philosophie D. H. 's (Halle, 1873); A. Meinong, Hume-Studien (Vienna, 1877, 1882) ; (i. v. Oizvcki, Die Ethlk D. H. 's (Breslsu, 1878). fW. Knight, Blackwood series, 1886; cap.
Int. by T. H. (ireen in bis ed. of the works. Selby-Bigge eds. of the Treatise i I88t>) and the Enquiry (with Introd. 1894), Clar. Press, are excellent.
442 Philosophy of the Enlightenment. [Part V.
The Scottish School was founded by Thomas Reid (1710-1796, Professor at Glasgow ; Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principle* of Common Sense, 1764 ; Essays on the. Intellectual Power* of Man, 1786 ; Essays on the Active Powers of Man, 1788, complete ed. by W. Hamilton, Edin. 1827). [Selections ed. by E. H. Sneath, N. Y. 1892, contains bibliog. Cf. A. Seth, Scottish Philoso phy, Edin. and Lond. 1886, and art. Reid in Enc. Brit. } Besides Jame? Oswald (died 1793, Appeal to Common Sense in Behalf of Religion, 1766) and . fames Beattie (died 1806, Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth, 1770), the school had its chief academical and literary representative in Dugald Stewart (1763-1828, Professor in Edinburg ; Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind, 3 parts, 1792-1827 ; ed. of his works by W. Hamilton, 10 vols. , Edin. 1864 ff. ).
Pierre Bayle, the type of sceptical polyhistory, born 1647 at Carlat, led a life disquieted by twice changing his Confession, was finally a professor in Sedan and Rotterdam, and died 1706. His influential life work is embodied in his Dietionnaire Historique et Critique (1695 and 1697). Cf. L. Feuerbach, P. Bayle nach seinen fur die Geschichte der Philosophic und Menschheit interessan- testen Momenten, Ansbach, 1833.
Of the works of Voltaire (Francois Arouet le Jeune, 1694-1778 ; the main events of his literary life are his flight to London, his stay with the Marquise du Chatelet in Cirey, his visit with Frederick the Great in Potsdam, and his rest in old age at the country seat Ferney, near Geneva), the following are principally to be considered here : Lettres sur les Anglais (1784), Mitaphysiqne de Newton (1740), Elements de la Philosophic de Newton mis a la Purtee de lout le Monde (1741), Examen important de Mylord Bolingbroke (1736), Can- dide ou sur V Optimisme (1767), Dietionnaire Philosophique (1764), Le Philosophe Ignorant (1767), Reponse au Systeme de la Nature (1777), the poem Les Svstemes, etc. Cf. E. Bersot, La Philosophic de V. (Paris, 1848); D. F. Strauss,
maticians such as Maupertuis (1098-1759 ; active in connection with the Berlin Academy ; Essai de Philosophic Morale, 1760 ; Essai de Cosmologie, 1751 ; controversial writings between him and the Wolffian, S. Konig, collected Leips. 1758), or d'Alembert (Melanges de Litterature, <THistoire et de Philoso phic, 1752); others proceed more naturalistically, such as Button (1708-1788; Histoire Naturelle Ge. nerale et Particuliere, 1749 ff. ) and Jean Battiste Robinet (1735-1820; De la Nature, 1761 ; Considerations Philosophiques de la Grada tion Naturelle des Formes d'Etre 1767).
Sensualism appears in connection with materialism in Julien Offrai de Lamettrie (1709-1761 ; Histoire Naturelle de V Ame, 1745; V Homme Machine, 1748 ; VArtde Jouir, 1751 ; (Euvres, Berlin, 1751 ; on him F. A. Lange, Gesch. des Mater. , I. 326 ff. [Eng. tr. Hist, of Mater. , Vol. II. 49 ff. ] ; Nerfee Quepat, Paris, 1873); it appears solely as psychological theory with Charles Bonnet (1720-1793 ; Essai de Psychologic, 1755 ; Essai Analytique sur les Facullis de VAme, 1769 ; Considerations sur les Corps Organises, 1762 ; Contemplation de la Nature, 1764 ; Palingenesies Philosophiques, 1769), and with a positivistic pointing in Etienne Bonnot de Condillac (1715-1780 ; Essai sur VOrigine de la
V. (Leips. 1870); J. Morley, V. (Lond. and N. Y. 1872).
More sceptical in metaphysical aspects appear natural scientists and mathe
Connaissance Humaine, 1746; Traite des Systimes, 1749; Traiti des Sensa tions, 1754 ; Logique, 1780 ; Langue des Calculs in the complete edition, Paris, 1798 ; cf. F. Rethorfi, C. ou VEmpirisme et le Rational isme, Paris, 1864). The last representatives of these theories are, on the one hand, Pierre Jean George Cabanis (1767-1808 ; Les Rapports du Physique et du Moral de V Homme, 1802 ;
(Euvres, Paris, 1821-25), on the other side, Antoine Louis Claude Destutt de Tracy (1754-1836; Elements d" Ideologic, in 4 parts, 1801-16, together 1826). — Cf. Fr. Picavet, Les Ideologues (Paris, 1891).
The literary concentration of the Enlightenment movement in France was the Encyclopaedia (Encyclopedic ou Dietionnaire Raisoonides Sciences, des Art* et des Metiers, 28 vols. , 1762-1772, supplement <uid maex, 7 \uls. , extending to 1780). Besides d'Alembert, who wrote me introduction, the editor and intellectual head of the circle from which it proceeded was Denis Diderot (1713-1784; Pensees Philosophiques, 1746 ; Pensees sur /' Interpretation de la Nature, 1754 ; of the posthumous publications the Promenade d'un Sceptique, the Entretien
Philoiophy of the Enlightenment. 443
d'Alemhtrt et de Diderot, and the Rive cTAlembert are to be emphasised , worthy of mention also is the Essai de Peinture; (Euvret Completes, Paris, 1875, 20 vols. ; cf. K. Rosenkranz, D. , $ein Leben und seine Werke, Leips. 1866 ; J. Morley, D. and the Encyclopedists, Lond. 1878). Further collaborators upon the Encyclopedia (aside from Voltaire and Kousseau, who became separated from the work at an early date) were Turgot (article Existence), Daubenton. Jaucourt, Duclos, Grimm, Holbacb, etc. From the same circle ("Les Philo- KipKes ") proceeded later the Byateme de la Nature (pseud, author, Mirabeau, 1770), which is in the main to be attributed to Dietrich von Holbach (1723-1789, from the Palatinate ; Le bon Sens ou Idees Naturelles oppose** aux Idees Sur- naturelles, 1772 ; Elements de la Morale Universelle, 1776, etc. ). [On the Systeme de la Nature cf. Lange, Hist, of Mat. , II. 92 ft. ] With him co-oper ated Grimm (1723-1807 ; Correspondence LitUraire, 1812), the mathematician Lagrange, the Abbe Galiani, Naigeon, and others ; the concluding chapter, " Abrege du Code de la Nature. " is perhaps from Diderot's pen ; Helvrftiua wrote a very popular exposition, " Vrai Sens du Systeme de la Nature," 1771. The same writer (Claude Adrien Helvetius, 1716-1771) gave the sharpest expres sion to the morals of the sensualislic associational psychology in his much read book, De VEsprit C1768 ; cf. also his posthumous work, De VHomme de ses Facultis etdeson Education, 1772V
The theory of English constitutionalism was adopted in France by Montes quieu (1689-1766 ; Lettres Persanes, 1721 ; De V Esprit des Lois, 1748). Social problems were treated on the one side by the so-called Physiocrats such as Queanay (Tableaux Economiques, 1768; ; Turgot (Reflexions sur la Forma tion et la Distribution des Richesses, 1774, opposed by Ualiani, Dialogues sur le
Commerce des Dies') and others, on the other side by the Communists such as Morally (Code de la Nature, 1766), and Mably, the brother of Condillac (De la legislation ou Principes des Lois, 1776.
The most notable figure of the French Enlightenment was Jean Jacques Rousseau (born, 1712, In Geneva, died, 1778, in Ermenonvllle after an adven turous life, which toward the end was troubled by melancholy and hallucinations of persecution). His main writings — aside from the autobiographical Confes sions [tx. , Lond. 1876] — are Discours sur lei Sciences et les Arts (1760), his- euurs sur V Origine et les Fondemens de VIntgalitt parmi Irs Hommes (\~~3), La Nouvelle Htloise (1761), Emile ou sur V Education (1762) [abr. tr. , Boston, 18861, Du Control Social (1762). Cf. F. Brockerhoff, if. , sein Leben und seine
Werke (Leips. 1863 and 1874) ; E. Feuerlein in " Der Oedanke " (Berlin, I860) ; L. Moreau, J. J. R.
et le Steele Philosophique (Paris, 1870) ; J. Morley, . /. J. R. ( Loud. 1873) ; R. Fester, R. und die deutsche Ueschichtsphilosophie (Stuttgart, 1MX» ; [E. Caird, R. in Essays, Vol. I. |.
The philosophical theory of the Revolution was developed chiefly by Charles Francois de St. -Lambert (1716-1803 ; Principes des Marurs chez toutes les Nations ou Catechisme Universel, 1798), Const. Fr. C'hassebreuf Comte de Volney (1767-1820; Les Ruines, 1791; La Loi Naturelle ou Principes Phy siques de la Morale, diduits de F Organisation de V Homme el de V Vnicers ou
Catfchisme du Citoyen Francois, 1793), Marie Jean Ant. Nic. de Condorcet ( 1743-1794 ; Esquisse <Tun Tableau Historique du l*rogres de V Esprit Humain, 1796), Dominique Garat (1749-1833; cf. Conte Rendu des Stance* des Ecoles Normales, IL 1-40). Cf. L. Ferraz, La Philosophic de la Revolution (l*aris, 1800).
Gottfried WUhelm Leibnis, the many-sided founder of German philosophy, was born, 1640, in Lei pule, studied there and at Jena, received his decree in Altorf, and was then, through his acquaintance with Boyneburg, drawn into the diplomatic service of the Elector of Mayence. In this service, pursuing political and scientific plans of his own, he travelled as a member of an embassy to Paris and London, with an incidental visit to Spinoza in The Hague, and then entered the service of the court of Hanover and Brunswick as librarian and court his torian. In all these positions he was active in his public and diplomatic capacity
in the Interests of the German national spirit and of peace between the Confes sions. Later he lived at the court of the first Prussian (Jueen Sophie Charlotte, a Hanoverian princess, in Charlottenberg and Berlin, where the Academy was founded under his direction ; afterwards he lived for some time iu Vienna, to
444 Philotophy of the Enlightenment. [Part V.
consult archives. Here be gave the stimulus for the foundation of an academy, a project which was later carried out, and the St. Petersburg Academy was also due to his influence. He died, 1716, at Hanover. The manifold nature of his activity, and the way in which his life was split up, is shown also in the fact that his scientific views are, for the most part, deposited only in fragmentary essays, and in an incredibly extensive correspondence. The best edition of his philo sophical writings is the most recent by C. J. Gerhardt, 7 vols. (Berlin, 1876-90;. The metaphysical treatises have been cited above (p. 382). For bis influence upon the philosophy of the Enlightenment, the following come chiefly into con sideration, aside from the correspondence with Bayle and Clarke: Esaai* dt Thiodicee sur la Bonti de Dieu, la Liberti dt l'Homme et I'Origint du Mnl (Amsterdam, 1710), and the Xouceaux Essais sur I'EnUndrmi-nt Humain. first published in 1765, by Raspe. Cf. G. E. Guhrauer, G. W. Frhr. r. L. (Breslau. 1842) ; E. Pfleiderer, L. alt Patriot, Staatsmann und Bildungstrager (Leips. 1870); art. L. in Erich und Gruber's Enc. , by W. Windelband ; L. Feuer- bacb, Darstellung, Enttcicklung und Kritik der L. 'schen Phil. (Ansbacb, 184-1) ; E. Xourisson, La Philosophic dt L. (Paris, 1860) ; L. Grote, L. und stint Zeit
J. T. Men, L. (Lond. 1884); [J. Dewey, Leibniz's -Veto Essays, Chicago, 1888; art. Leibniz in Enc. Brit. , by Sorley ; Eng. tr. of Imp. Phil. Wonts, by G. M. Duncan, New
(Hanover, 1869); O. Caspari, L. 's Philosophit (Leips. 1870) ;
Haven, 1890 ; of the Sew Essays, by A. G. Langley, Lond. and N. Y. 1893]. Among the most influential " Enlighteners " in Germany was Leibniz's con
temporary and fellow-countryman, Christian Thomasius (1655-1728; Einlei- tung zur Vernunftlehre, Ausfuhrung der Vernunftlehre, both in 1691 ; F. inl. znr Sittenlfhre, 1692 ; Ausfuhrung d. Sittenlehre, 1696 ; Fundamenla Juris Xatutvt et Gentium ex Sensu Communi Deducta, 1705 ; cf. A. Luden. C. Th. , Berlin, 1805).
The centre of scientific life in Germany during the eighteenth century was formed by the teaching and school of Christian Wolff. He was born, 1679. in Breslau, studied at Jena, was Privat-docent at Leipsic, and taught in Halle until he was driven away in 1723 at the instigation of his orthodox opponents ; he then became Professor at Marburg. In 1740 Frederick the Great called him back to Halle with great honour, and he was active there until bis death in 1754. He treated the entire compass of philosophy in Latin and German text books ; the latter all bear the title VernSnftige Gedanken [" Rational Thoughts," treating psychology, metaphysics, physics, physiology, botany, astronomy, ethics, politics, etc. ] ; in detail: von den Kraflen des menschlichen Verstander, 1712 ; von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch alien Dingen uber- haupt, 1719; von der Menschen Thunund Lassen, 1720; torn gesellnchafllichen Leben der Menschen, 1721 ; von den Wirkungen der Natur, 1723 ; von den Absichten der natiirlichen Dinge, 1724; von den Theilen der Menschen, Thiert und Pfianzen, 1725. The Latin works, Philosophia Rationalis sive Logica. 1718; Philosophia Piima sive Ontologia, 1728; Cosmologia, 1731; Psychnlo- gia Empirica, 1732 ; Rationalis, 1734 ; Theologia Xaturalis, 1736 ; Philosophia Practica Universalis, 1738 ; Jus Xaturm, 1740 ff. ; Jus Gentium, 1749 ; Philo sophia Moralis, posthumously pub. , 1756. — Cf. K. G. Ludovici, Ausfiihrlicher Entwurfeiner vollstandigen Historieder Wolf schen Philosophic (Leips. 1736 ff. ). Also W. L. G. v. Eberstein, Versuch einer Geschichte der Logik und Metaphysik bei den Deutschen von Leibniz an (Halle, 1799).
Among the Wolffians may be named, perhaps, G. B. Bilfiiiger (1693-1750, Dilucidationes Philosophies de Deo, Anima Humana, Mundo, etc. , 1725) ; M. Knutzen (died 1751 ; Systema Causarum Efficientium, 1746 ; cf. B. Erd- mann, M. Kn. und seine, Zeit. Leips. 1876) ; J. Chr. Oottsched (1700-1766; Erste Grunde der yesammten Weltweissheit, 1734) ; Alex. Baumgarten (1714- 1762; Metaphysica, 1739; ^Esthetica, 1750-58).
As representatives of the geometrical method appear M. G. Hansen (1683- 1762; Ars Inveniendi, 1727) and G. Ploucquet (1716-1790; cf. A. F. Bock, Summlung von Schriften, toelche dem logisrhen Calciil des Hernn P. bttreffen, Frankfort and Leips. 1766) ; as opponents of the same, Pierre Crouaas (1663- 1748; Logik, 1712 and 1724; Lehre vom Schiinen, 1712), Andreas Rudiger (1071-1731 ; De Sensu Vert el Falsi, 1709; Philosophia Synthetica, 1707) ami Chr. A. Croatua (1712-1775 ; Enttcurf der nothwendigen Vernunfticahrheiten,
1745 ; Wey zur Geioissheit und Zuverlassiykeit der menschlichen Erkenntnist,
1747. )
An eclectic intermediate position is taken by J. Fi\,Budde (1667-1729;.
Philosophy of the Enlightenment. 445
Institution** Pkilo*ophioz Eclectics, 1706) and by the historians of philosophy, J. J. Bracket and D. Tiodmann, and also by Joh. Lossius (Die physiehen Ursachen des Wahren, 1776) ami A. Platner (1744-1818; Philoiophische Aphorismen, 1776 and 1782).
Of more independent importance are J. H. Lambert (born, 1728. at Miil- hausen. died, 1777, in Berlin ; Kosmologische Britfe, 1761 ; Neue* Organon, 1764; Arehitektonik, 1771) and Nic. Tetena (17. 36M806; Philotophisehe Ver- ntrhe iiber die Mentchliche A'atur und ihre Entwicklung, 1776 f. ; cf. Fr. Harms,
Ueber die Ptycholoyie dee N. T, Berlin, 1887). Both stand in literary connec tion with Kant (cf. l'art VI. ch. 1), whose pre-critical writings belong like wise in this setting ; these are principally Allgemeine Saturgetehiehte und
Theorir de* Himmel*, 1766 ; Principiorum Primortim Cognitioni* Melaphysicoz Xora Dilueidatio, 1765 ; Mohndologia Phytiea, 1756 ; Die falsehe Spitzfindig- keit der virr syllogistischen Figvren, 1762 ; Der einzig mogliche, Beieeitgrund zu einer Demonstration det Daseins Oottes, 1763 ; Versiteh. den Begriff der nega- tiren Griissen in die Welticeisheit einzufuhren, 1763 ; Ueber die Deutlichkeit der Grundsatze der naturliehen Theologie und Moral, 1764 ; Beobaehtungen iiber
da* fiefnhl de* Schtinen und Erhabenen, 1764 ; TrSume eine* Geistersehere, ertnutert durch TrSume der Metaphysik, 1766; De Mundi Sensibilis atque iHtelligibili* Forma et Principiis, 1770. CI. R. Zimmerman, Lambert der Vor- gUnger Kant'*, 1879. [On Lambert and Tetens, cf. A. Riehl, Der philoso- phiM-he Kritirirmut, Leips. 1876. For the pre-critical writings of Kant, K. Caird, The Critical Philonophy of Immanuel Kant, Glasgow, Lond. , and N. Y. 1889. Fischer's Kant; Cohen, Die *y*temati*chen Begriffe in Kant'* vorkrit- iachen Sehriften, and the works cited in first par. , p. 636. ]
Deism found a vigorous and instnictive support in Germany anions numer ous Wolffian*, though nothing new in principle was added. Characteristic of this was the translation of the Bible by Lorens Schmidt. The standpoint of historical criticism of the biblical writings was maintained by Salomon Semler
The sharpest consequences of the deistic criticism were drawn hy Samuel Reimarua (1699-1768; Abhamllungen eon den vornehmsten M'ahr- kriten der nnOirlirhen Religion, 1754 ; Brtrachtitng iiber die Triebe der Thiere, 1760, especially his Sehutzerhrift fur die verniinftigen Verehrrr (fotte*, 1767 [not pub. ], from which Leasing' edited the " Wolfenbiittler Fragmente," and, wi more recent time, Dav. Fr. Strauss edited an extract, Leipe. 1862). Joh. Chr. Rdelmann was a Spinozistic free-thinker (1698-1767). Cf. K. Monckeberg, Ilrimaru* und Edelmann (Hamburg, 1867).
The movement of the so-called Pietism, allied to Mysticism, which was begun by Spener (1635-1706), and carried forward with organising energy by Aug. Herm. Francke (1663-1727), had only an indirect influence upon phil osophy during this period ; at a still farther distance stand the more isolated members of mystic sect* such as Gottfried Arnold (1666-1714) and Conrad
IMppel (1673-1734).
Eaxtpixical psychology was represented among the Germans in the eigh
teenth century by numerous names, comprehensive collections, text-books, and •pecial investigations. There are C'asimir von Creuz (1724-1770), Joh. Gottl.
ful, 1766); Adam Ferguson (1724-1816; Institutions of Moral Philosophy, 1769), and in a certain sense also, Adam Smith (1723-1790; Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1760) ; the principle of authority was defended by Joseph Butler ( 1002-1762; Sermons upon Human Mature, 1726) [Butler, in Blackwood series by W. h. Collins, 1881], and William Paley (1743-1806; Principles of Moral and IWiticnl Philosophy, 1785). The ethics of the associonational psychology ww developed chiefly by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832 ; Introduction to the Principles of . Morals and Legislation, 1789; Traiti de legislation Civile et I'rnale, brought together by E. Dumont, 1801 ; Deontology, ed. by J. Bowring, 1H34 ; works in 11 vols. , Edin. 1843). — In a peculiar isolated position appears Bernhard de Mandeville (1670-1733 ; The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices made Public Benefits, 171)0, later with illustrative dialogues, 1728; Inquiry into the Oiigin of Moral Virtue, 1732 ; Free Thoughts on Religion, Church, tiovern- nvnt. 1720). ' On him cf. P. Sakmann (Freiburg. 1898).
The literature of Deism coincides, for the most part, with the above-named literature of moral philosophy ; but in addition to those named the following writers are also prominent : John Toland (1670-1722 ; Christianity not Myste rious. 1000 ; Letters to Serena, 1704 ; Adeisidtemon, 1700 ; Pantheisticon, 1710) ; Anthony Collins (1876-1720; . 4 Discourse of Free Thinking, 1713) ; Matthew Tindal i 1050-1733; Christianity as Old as the Creation, 17:10) ; Thomas Chubb '1079-1747 ; A Discourse concerning Reason \rith Regard to Religion, 1730) ;
rhoraa* Morgan (died 1743 ; The Moral Philosopher, 3 parts, 1737 ff. ) ; finally, I-oni BoUngbroke (1672-1761); works ed. by Mollet in 6 vols. , 1763 f. ; cf. V. v Kaumer, Ahhandl. der Berl. Akad. 1840). —Cf. V. Lechler, Oetchichte des
emjlivhen Deismus (Stuttgart and Tub. 1841).
England's greatest philosopher is David Home, bom, 1711, in Edinburg, and
rducated there. After he had spent some time as merchant, he lived for several years in France, occupied in study, and composed bis work of genius, the Treatise on Human Mature (printed 1739 f. ). The failure of this book induced
him to work it over and publish it under the title Inquiry concerning Human Cnderstanding, as a second volume of his more successful Essays, Moral, Politi- rul aud Literary (1748), and to add An Inquiry concerning the Principles of M'-rals (1761), and also The Matural History of Religion (1766). As librarian of the Advocates' Library in Edinburg he found opportunity to write his History iff England. After a stay in Paris, where he received great honour and came
into connection with Koussean among others, he was for some time I'nder- N<-t rotary of State in the Foreign Office, but finally returned to KdinburR. where hr died, 1776. The Dialogues concerning Saturn! Religion and some smaller trraiiwit appeared posthumously. Ed. of his works by (ireen and (irose In 4 vols. (Lond. 1876). His autobiography was published by his friend, Adam Smith (1777). Cf. J. H. Burton. Life and Correspondence of D. H. (Edin.
I8IO-50) ; E. Feuerlein in the Zeitschr. " iJer liedankc" (Berlin, 1863 f. ) ; K. Pfleiderer. Empirismus und Skeptis in D. H. 's Philosophic (Berlin, 1874) ; T. Huxley, D. H. (Lond. 1870) ; Fr. Jodl, Uben n. Philosophie D. H. 's (Halle, 1873); A. Meinong, Hume-Studien (Vienna, 1877, 1882) ; (i. v. Oizvcki, Die Ethlk D. H. 's (Breslsu, 1878). fW. Knight, Blackwood series, 1886; cap.
Int. by T. H. (ireen in bis ed. of the works. Selby-Bigge eds. of the Treatise i I88t>) and the Enquiry (with Introd. 1894), Clar. Press, are excellent.
442 Philosophy of the Enlightenment. [Part V.
The Scottish School was founded by Thomas Reid (1710-1796, Professor at Glasgow ; Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principle* of Common Sense, 1764 ; Essays on the. Intellectual Power* of Man, 1786 ; Essays on the Active Powers of Man, 1788, complete ed. by W. Hamilton, Edin. 1827). [Selections ed. by E. H. Sneath, N. Y. 1892, contains bibliog. Cf. A. Seth, Scottish Philoso phy, Edin. and Lond. 1886, and art. Reid in Enc. Brit. } Besides Jame? Oswald (died 1793, Appeal to Common Sense in Behalf of Religion, 1766) and . fames Beattie (died 1806, Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth, 1770), the school had its chief academical and literary representative in Dugald Stewart (1763-1828, Professor in Edinburg ; Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind, 3 parts, 1792-1827 ; ed. of his works by W. Hamilton, 10 vols. , Edin. 1864 ff. ).
Pierre Bayle, the type of sceptical polyhistory, born 1647 at Carlat, led a life disquieted by twice changing his Confession, was finally a professor in Sedan and Rotterdam, and died 1706. His influential life work is embodied in his Dietionnaire Historique et Critique (1695 and 1697). Cf. L. Feuerbach, P. Bayle nach seinen fur die Geschichte der Philosophic und Menschheit interessan- testen Momenten, Ansbach, 1833.
Of the works of Voltaire (Francois Arouet le Jeune, 1694-1778 ; the main events of his literary life are his flight to London, his stay with the Marquise du Chatelet in Cirey, his visit with Frederick the Great in Potsdam, and his rest in old age at the country seat Ferney, near Geneva), the following are principally to be considered here : Lettres sur les Anglais (1784), Mitaphysiqne de Newton (1740), Elements de la Philosophic de Newton mis a la Purtee de lout le Monde (1741), Examen important de Mylord Bolingbroke (1736), Can- dide ou sur V Optimisme (1767), Dietionnaire Philosophique (1764), Le Philosophe Ignorant (1767), Reponse au Systeme de la Nature (1777), the poem Les Svstemes, etc. Cf. E. Bersot, La Philosophic de V. (Paris, 1848); D. F. Strauss,
maticians such as Maupertuis (1098-1759 ; active in connection with the Berlin Academy ; Essai de Philosophic Morale, 1760 ; Essai de Cosmologie, 1751 ; controversial writings between him and the Wolffian, S. Konig, collected Leips. 1758), or d'Alembert (Melanges de Litterature, <THistoire et de Philoso phic, 1752); others proceed more naturalistically, such as Button (1708-1788; Histoire Naturelle Ge. nerale et Particuliere, 1749 ff. ) and Jean Battiste Robinet (1735-1820; De la Nature, 1761 ; Considerations Philosophiques de la Grada tion Naturelle des Formes d'Etre 1767).
Sensualism appears in connection with materialism in Julien Offrai de Lamettrie (1709-1761 ; Histoire Naturelle de V Ame, 1745; V Homme Machine, 1748 ; VArtde Jouir, 1751 ; (Euvres, Berlin, 1751 ; on him F. A. Lange, Gesch. des Mater. , I. 326 ff. [Eng. tr. Hist, of Mater. , Vol. II. 49 ff. ] ; Nerfee Quepat, Paris, 1873); it appears solely as psychological theory with Charles Bonnet (1720-1793 ; Essai de Psychologic, 1755 ; Essai Analytique sur les Facullis de VAme, 1769 ; Considerations sur les Corps Organises, 1762 ; Contemplation de la Nature, 1764 ; Palingenesies Philosophiques, 1769), and with a positivistic pointing in Etienne Bonnot de Condillac (1715-1780 ; Essai sur VOrigine de la
V. (Leips. 1870); J. Morley, V. (Lond. and N. Y. 1872).
More sceptical in metaphysical aspects appear natural scientists and mathe
Connaissance Humaine, 1746; Traite des Systimes, 1749; Traiti des Sensa tions, 1754 ; Logique, 1780 ; Langue des Calculs in the complete edition, Paris, 1798 ; cf. F. Rethorfi, C. ou VEmpirisme et le Rational isme, Paris, 1864). The last representatives of these theories are, on the one hand, Pierre Jean George Cabanis (1767-1808 ; Les Rapports du Physique et du Moral de V Homme, 1802 ;
(Euvres, Paris, 1821-25), on the other side, Antoine Louis Claude Destutt de Tracy (1754-1836; Elements d" Ideologic, in 4 parts, 1801-16, together 1826). — Cf. Fr. Picavet, Les Ideologues (Paris, 1891).
The literary concentration of the Enlightenment movement in France was the Encyclopaedia (Encyclopedic ou Dietionnaire Raisoonides Sciences, des Art* et des Metiers, 28 vols. , 1762-1772, supplement <uid maex, 7 \uls. , extending to 1780). Besides d'Alembert, who wrote me introduction, the editor and intellectual head of the circle from which it proceeded was Denis Diderot (1713-1784; Pensees Philosophiques, 1746 ; Pensees sur /' Interpretation de la Nature, 1754 ; of the posthumous publications the Promenade d'un Sceptique, the Entretien
Philoiophy of the Enlightenment. 443
d'Alemhtrt et de Diderot, and the Rive cTAlembert are to be emphasised , worthy of mention also is the Essai de Peinture; (Euvret Completes, Paris, 1875, 20 vols. ; cf. K. Rosenkranz, D. , $ein Leben und seine Werke, Leips. 1866 ; J. Morley, D. and the Encyclopedists, Lond. 1878). Further collaborators upon the Encyclopedia (aside from Voltaire and Kousseau, who became separated from the work at an early date) were Turgot (article Existence), Daubenton. Jaucourt, Duclos, Grimm, Holbacb, etc. From the same circle ("Les Philo- KipKes ") proceeded later the Byateme de la Nature (pseud, author, Mirabeau, 1770), which is in the main to be attributed to Dietrich von Holbach (1723-1789, from the Palatinate ; Le bon Sens ou Idees Naturelles oppose** aux Idees Sur- naturelles, 1772 ; Elements de la Morale Universelle, 1776, etc. ). [On the Systeme de la Nature cf. Lange, Hist, of Mat. , II. 92 ft. ] With him co-oper ated Grimm (1723-1807 ; Correspondence LitUraire, 1812), the mathematician Lagrange, the Abbe Galiani, Naigeon, and others ; the concluding chapter, " Abrege du Code de la Nature. " is perhaps from Diderot's pen ; Helvrftiua wrote a very popular exposition, " Vrai Sens du Systeme de la Nature," 1771. The same writer (Claude Adrien Helvetius, 1716-1771) gave the sharpest expres sion to the morals of the sensualislic associational psychology in his much read book, De VEsprit C1768 ; cf. also his posthumous work, De VHomme de ses Facultis etdeson Education, 1772V
The theory of English constitutionalism was adopted in France by Montes quieu (1689-1766 ; Lettres Persanes, 1721 ; De V Esprit des Lois, 1748). Social problems were treated on the one side by the so-called Physiocrats such as Queanay (Tableaux Economiques, 1768; ; Turgot (Reflexions sur la Forma tion et la Distribution des Richesses, 1774, opposed by Ualiani, Dialogues sur le
Commerce des Dies') and others, on the other side by the Communists such as Morally (Code de la Nature, 1766), and Mably, the brother of Condillac (De la legislation ou Principes des Lois, 1776.
The most notable figure of the French Enlightenment was Jean Jacques Rousseau (born, 1712, In Geneva, died, 1778, in Ermenonvllle after an adven turous life, which toward the end was troubled by melancholy and hallucinations of persecution). His main writings — aside from the autobiographical Confes sions [tx. , Lond. 1876] — are Discours sur lei Sciences et les Arts (1760), his- euurs sur V Origine et les Fondemens de VIntgalitt parmi Irs Hommes (\~~3), La Nouvelle Htloise (1761), Emile ou sur V Education (1762) [abr. tr. , Boston, 18861, Du Control Social (1762). Cf. F. Brockerhoff, if. , sein Leben und seine
Werke (Leips. 1863 and 1874) ; E. Feuerlein in " Der Oedanke " (Berlin, I860) ; L. Moreau, J. J. R.
et le Steele Philosophique (Paris, 1870) ; J. Morley, . /. J. R. ( Loud. 1873) ; R. Fester, R. und die deutsche Ueschichtsphilosophie (Stuttgart, 1MX» ; [E. Caird, R. in Essays, Vol. I. |.
The philosophical theory of the Revolution was developed chiefly by Charles Francois de St. -Lambert (1716-1803 ; Principes des Marurs chez toutes les Nations ou Catechisme Universel, 1798), Const. Fr. C'hassebreuf Comte de Volney (1767-1820; Les Ruines, 1791; La Loi Naturelle ou Principes Phy siques de la Morale, diduits de F Organisation de V Homme el de V Vnicers ou
Catfchisme du Citoyen Francois, 1793), Marie Jean Ant. Nic. de Condorcet ( 1743-1794 ; Esquisse <Tun Tableau Historique du l*rogres de V Esprit Humain, 1796), Dominique Garat (1749-1833; cf. Conte Rendu des Stance* des Ecoles Normales, IL 1-40). Cf. L. Ferraz, La Philosophic de la Revolution (l*aris, 1800).
Gottfried WUhelm Leibnis, the many-sided founder of German philosophy, was born, 1640, in Lei pule, studied there and at Jena, received his decree in Altorf, and was then, through his acquaintance with Boyneburg, drawn into the diplomatic service of the Elector of Mayence. In this service, pursuing political and scientific plans of his own, he travelled as a member of an embassy to Paris and London, with an incidental visit to Spinoza in The Hague, and then entered the service of the court of Hanover and Brunswick as librarian and court his torian. In all these positions he was active in his public and diplomatic capacity
in the Interests of the German national spirit and of peace between the Confes sions. Later he lived at the court of the first Prussian (Jueen Sophie Charlotte, a Hanoverian princess, in Charlottenberg and Berlin, where the Academy was founded under his direction ; afterwards he lived for some time iu Vienna, to
444 Philotophy of the Enlightenment. [Part V.
consult archives. Here be gave the stimulus for the foundation of an academy, a project which was later carried out, and the St. Petersburg Academy was also due to his influence. He died, 1716, at Hanover. The manifold nature of his activity, and the way in which his life was split up, is shown also in the fact that his scientific views are, for the most part, deposited only in fragmentary essays, and in an incredibly extensive correspondence. The best edition of his philo sophical writings is the most recent by C. J. Gerhardt, 7 vols. (Berlin, 1876-90;. The metaphysical treatises have been cited above (p. 382). For bis influence upon the philosophy of the Enlightenment, the following come chiefly into con sideration, aside from the correspondence with Bayle and Clarke: Esaai* dt Thiodicee sur la Bonti de Dieu, la Liberti dt l'Homme et I'Origint du Mnl (Amsterdam, 1710), and the Xouceaux Essais sur I'EnUndrmi-nt Humain. first published in 1765, by Raspe. Cf. G. E. Guhrauer, G. W. Frhr. r. L. (Breslau. 1842) ; E. Pfleiderer, L. alt Patriot, Staatsmann und Bildungstrager (Leips. 1870); art. L. in Erich und Gruber's Enc. , by W. Windelband ; L. Feuer- bacb, Darstellung, Enttcicklung und Kritik der L. 'schen Phil. (Ansbacb, 184-1) ; E. Xourisson, La Philosophic dt L. (Paris, 1860) ; L. Grote, L. und stint Zeit
J. T. Men, L. (Lond. 1884); [J. Dewey, Leibniz's -Veto Essays, Chicago, 1888; art. Leibniz in Enc. Brit. , by Sorley ; Eng. tr. of Imp. Phil. Wonts, by G. M. Duncan, New
(Hanover, 1869); O. Caspari, L. 's Philosophit (Leips. 1870) ;
Haven, 1890 ; of the Sew Essays, by A. G. Langley, Lond. and N. Y. 1893]. Among the most influential " Enlighteners " in Germany was Leibniz's con
temporary and fellow-countryman, Christian Thomasius (1655-1728; Einlei- tung zur Vernunftlehre, Ausfuhrung der Vernunftlehre, both in 1691 ; F. inl. znr Sittenlfhre, 1692 ; Ausfuhrung d. Sittenlehre, 1696 ; Fundamenla Juris Xatutvt et Gentium ex Sensu Communi Deducta, 1705 ; cf. A. Luden. C. Th. , Berlin, 1805).
The centre of scientific life in Germany during the eighteenth century was formed by the teaching and school of Christian Wolff. He was born, 1679. in Breslau, studied at Jena, was Privat-docent at Leipsic, and taught in Halle until he was driven away in 1723 at the instigation of his orthodox opponents ; he then became Professor at Marburg. In 1740 Frederick the Great called him back to Halle with great honour, and he was active there until bis death in 1754. He treated the entire compass of philosophy in Latin and German text books ; the latter all bear the title VernSnftige Gedanken [" Rational Thoughts," treating psychology, metaphysics, physics, physiology, botany, astronomy, ethics, politics, etc. ] ; in detail: von den Kraflen des menschlichen Verstander, 1712 ; von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch alien Dingen uber- haupt, 1719; von der Menschen Thunund Lassen, 1720; torn gesellnchafllichen Leben der Menschen, 1721 ; von den Wirkungen der Natur, 1723 ; von den Absichten der natiirlichen Dinge, 1724; von den Theilen der Menschen, Thiert und Pfianzen, 1725. The Latin works, Philosophia Rationalis sive Logica. 1718; Philosophia Piima sive Ontologia, 1728; Cosmologia, 1731; Psychnlo- gia Empirica, 1732 ; Rationalis, 1734 ; Theologia Xaturalis, 1736 ; Philosophia Practica Universalis, 1738 ; Jus Xaturm, 1740 ff. ; Jus Gentium, 1749 ; Philo sophia Moralis, posthumously pub. , 1756. — Cf. K. G. Ludovici, Ausfiihrlicher Entwurfeiner vollstandigen Historieder Wolf schen Philosophic (Leips. 1736 ff. ). Also W. L. G. v. Eberstein, Versuch einer Geschichte der Logik und Metaphysik bei den Deutschen von Leibniz an (Halle, 1799).
Among the Wolffians may be named, perhaps, G. B. Bilfiiiger (1693-1750, Dilucidationes Philosophies de Deo, Anima Humana, Mundo, etc. , 1725) ; M. Knutzen (died 1751 ; Systema Causarum Efficientium, 1746 ; cf. B. Erd- mann, M. Kn. und seine, Zeit. Leips. 1876) ; J. Chr. Oottsched (1700-1766; Erste Grunde der yesammten Weltweissheit, 1734) ; Alex. Baumgarten (1714- 1762; Metaphysica, 1739; ^Esthetica, 1750-58).
As representatives of the geometrical method appear M. G. Hansen (1683- 1762; Ars Inveniendi, 1727) and G. Ploucquet (1716-1790; cf. A. F. Bock, Summlung von Schriften, toelche dem logisrhen Calciil des Hernn P. bttreffen, Frankfort and Leips. 1766) ; as opponents of the same, Pierre Crouaas (1663- 1748; Logik, 1712 and 1724; Lehre vom Schiinen, 1712), Andreas Rudiger (1071-1731 ; De Sensu Vert el Falsi, 1709; Philosophia Synthetica, 1707) ami Chr. A. Croatua (1712-1775 ; Enttcurf der nothwendigen Vernunfticahrheiten,
1745 ; Wey zur Geioissheit und Zuverlassiykeit der menschlichen Erkenntnist,
1747. )
An eclectic intermediate position is taken by J. Fi\,Budde (1667-1729;.
Philosophy of the Enlightenment. 445
Institution** Pkilo*ophioz Eclectics, 1706) and by the historians of philosophy, J. J. Bracket and D. Tiodmann, and also by Joh. Lossius (Die physiehen Ursachen des Wahren, 1776) ami A. Platner (1744-1818; Philoiophische Aphorismen, 1776 and 1782).
Of more independent importance are J. H. Lambert (born, 1728. at Miil- hausen. died, 1777, in Berlin ; Kosmologische Britfe, 1761 ; Neue* Organon, 1764; Arehitektonik, 1771) and Nic. Tetena (17. 36M806; Philotophisehe Ver- ntrhe iiber die Mentchliche A'atur und ihre Entwicklung, 1776 f. ; cf. Fr. Harms,
Ueber die Ptycholoyie dee N. T, Berlin, 1887). Both stand in literary connec tion with Kant (cf. l'art VI. ch. 1), whose pre-critical writings belong like wise in this setting ; these are principally Allgemeine Saturgetehiehte und
Theorir de* Himmel*, 1766 ; Principiorum Primortim Cognitioni* Melaphysicoz Xora Dilueidatio, 1765 ; Mohndologia Phytiea, 1756 ; Die falsehe Spitzfindig- keit der virr syllogistischen Figvren, 1762 ; Der einzig mogliche, Beieeitgrund zu einer Demonstration det Daseins Oottes, 1763 ; Versiteh. den Begriff der nega- tiren Griissen in die Welticeisheit einzufuhren, 1763 ; Ueber die Deutlichkeit der Grundsatze der naturliehen Theologie und Moral, 1764 ; Beobaehtungen iiber
da* fiefnhl de* Schtinen und Erhabenen, 1764 ; TrSume eine* Geistersehere, ertnutert durch TrSume der Metaphysik, 1766; De Mundi Sensibilis atque iHtelligibili* Forma et Principiis, 1770. CI. R. Zimmerman, Lambert der Vor- gUnger Kant'*, 1879. [On Lambert and Tetens, cf. A. Riehl, Der philoso- phiM-he Kritirirmut, Leips. 1876. For the pre-critical writings of Kant, K. Caird, The Critical Philonophy of Immanuel Kant, Glasgow, Lond. , and N. Y. 1889. Fischer's Kant; Cohen, Die *y*temati*chen Begriffe in Kant'* vorkrit- iachen Sehriften, and the works cited in first par. , p. 636. ]
Deism found a vigorous and instnictive support in Germany anions numer ous Wolffian*, though nothing new in principle was added. Characteristic of this was the translation of the Bible by Lorens Schmidt. The standpoint of historical criticism of the biblical writings was maintained by Salomon Semler
The sharpest consequences of the deistic criticism were drawn hy Samuel Reimarua (1699-1768; Abhamllungen eon den vornehmsten M'ahr- kriten der nnOirlirhen Religion, 1754 ; Brtrachtitng iiber die Triebe der Thiere, 1760, especially his Sehutzerhrift fur die verniinftigen Verehrrr (fotte*, 1767 [not pub. ], from which Leasing' edited the " Wolfenbiittler Fragmente," and, wi more recent time, Dav. Fr. Strauss edited an extract, Leipe. 1862). Joh. Chr. Rdelmann was a Spinozistic free-thinker (1698-1767). Cf. K. Monckeberg, Ilrimaru* und Edelmann (Hamburg, 1867).
The movement of the so-called Pietism, allied to Mysticism, which was begun by Spener (1635-1706), and carried forward with organising energy by Aug. Herm. Francke (1663-1727), had only an indirect influence upon phil osophy during this period ; at a still farther distance stand the more isolated members of mystic sect* such as Gottfried Arnold (1666-1714) and Conrad
IMppel (1673-1734).
Eaxtpixical psychology was represented among the Germans in the eigh
teenth century by numerous names, comprehensive collections, text-books, and •pecial investigations. There are C'asimir von Creuz (1724-1770), Joh. Gottl.
