No More Learning

22.

The ascetic priest has, wherever he has obtained
the mastery, corrupted the health of the soul, he
has consequently also corrupted taste in artibus
et litteris — he corrupts it still. " Consequently ? "
I hope I shall be granted this " consequently " ;
at any rate, I am not going to prove it first. One
solitary indication, it concerns the arch-book of
Christian literature, their real model, their " book-
in-itself. " In the very midst of the Grseco-Roman
splendour, which was also a splendour of books,
face to face with an ancient world of writings
which had not yet fallen into decay and ruin, at a
time when certain books were still to be read, to
possess which we would give nowadays half our
literature in exchange, at that time the simplicity
and vanity of Christian agitators (they are gener-
ally called Fathers of the Church) dared to declare :
"We too have our classical literature, we do not
need that of the Greeks" — and meanwhile they



## p. (#202) ################################################

1 88 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

proudly pointed to their books of legends, their
letters of apostles, and their apologetic tractlets,
just in the same way that to-day the English
" Salvation Army " wages its fight against Shake-
speare and other " heathens " with an analogous
literature. You already guess it, I do not like the
" New Testament " ; it almost upsets me that I
stand so isolated in my taste so far as concerns
this valued, this over-valued Scripture ; the taste of
two thousand years is against me ; but what
boots it ! " Here I stand ! I cannot help my-
self " * — I have the courage of my bad taste. The
Old Testament — yes, that is something quite
different, all honour to the Old Testament ! I find
therein great men, an heroic landscape, and one
of the rarest phenomena in the world, the in-
comparable naivete of the strong heart; further
still, I find a people. In the New, on the contrary,
just a hostel of petty sects, pure rococo of the
soul, twisting angles and fancy touches, nothing but
conventicle air, not to forget an occasional whiff of
bucolic sweetness which appertains to the epoch
{and the Roman province) and is less Jewish than
Hellenistic. Meekness and braggadocio cheek by
jowl ; an emotional garrulousness that almost
deafens ; passionate hysteria, but no passion ; pain-
ful pantomime ; here manifestly every one lacked
good breeding. How dare any one make so much
fuss about their little failings as do these pious
little fellows ! No one cares a straw about it — let

* " Here I stand ! I cannot help myself. God help me !
Amen" — were Luther's words before the Reichstag at
Worms. — H. B. S.



## p. (#203) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS ? 1 89

alone God. Finally they actually wish to have
"the crown of eternal life," do all these little
provincials ! In return for what, in sooth ? For
what end? It is impossible to carry insolence
any further. An immortal Peter ! who could
stand him ! They have an ambition which makes
one laugh: the thing dishes up cut and dried his
most personal life, his melancholies, and common-
or-garden troubles, as though the Universe itself
were under an obligation to bother itself about
them, for it never gets tired of wrapping up God
Himself in the petty misery in which its troubles
are involved. And how about the atrocious form of
this chronic hobnobbing with God ? This Jewish,
and not merely Jewish, slobbering and clawing
importunacy towards God ! — There exist little
despised " heathen nations " in East Asia, from
whom these first Christians could have learnt
something worth learning, a little tact in worship-
ing ; these nations do not allow themselves to say
aloud the name of their God. This seems to me
delicate enough, it is certain that it is too delicate,
and not only for primitive Christians ; to take a
contrast, just recollect Luther, the most " eloquent "
and insolent peasant whom Germany has had,
think of the Lutherian tone, in which he felt quite
the most in his element during his tite-d-tites
with God. Luther's opposition to the mediaeval
saints of the Church (in particular, against " that
devil's hog, the Pope "), was, there is no doubt, at
bottom the opposition of a boor, who was offended
at the good etiquette of the Church, that worship-
etiquette of the sacerdotal code, which only admits



## p. (#204) ################################################

1 90 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

to the holy of holies the initiated and the silent,
and shuts the door against the boors. These
definitely were not to be allowed a hearing in this
planet — but Luther the peasant simply wished it
otherwise ; as it was, it was not German enough for
him. He personally wished himself to talk direct,
to talk personally, to talk " straight from the
shoulder" with his God. Well, he's done it.
The ascetic ideal, you will guess, was at no time
and in no place, a school of good taste, still less of
good manners — at the best it was a school for
sacerdotal manners : that is, it contains in itself
something which was a deadly enemy to all good
manners. Lack of measure, opposition to measure
it is itself a " non plus ultra"

23-

The ascetic ideal has corrupted not only health
and taste, there are also third, fourth, fifth, and
sixth things which it has corrupted — I shall take
care not to go through the catalogue (when should
I get to the end ? ). I have here to expose not
what this ideal effected ; but rather only what it
means, on what it is based, what lies lurking
behind it and under it, that of which it is the pro-
visional expression, an obscure expression bristling
with queries and misunderstandings. And with
this object only in view I presumed " not to spare "
my readers a glance at the awfulness of its results,
a glance at its fatal results ; I did this to prepare
them for the final and most awful aspect presented
to me by the question of the significance of that



## p. (#205) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS? 191

ideal. Vyh^t is the significance pX. . the„ power of
that idealjJbe_monstjousness_ofjts ^ower ? Why-
is it given such an amount of scope? Why is
not a better resistance offered against it ? The
ascetic ideal expresses one will : where is the
opposition will, in which an opposition ideal
expresses itself? The ascetic ideal has an aim- —
this goal is, putting it generally, that all the other
interests of human life should, measured by its
standard, appear petty and narrow ; it explains
epochs, nations, men, in reference to this one end ;
it forbids any other interpretation, any other end ;
it repudiates, denies, affirms, confirms, only in the
sense of its own interpretation (and was there ever
a more thoroughly elaborated system of interpre-
tation ? ) ; it subjects itself to no power, rather does
it believe In its own precedence over everjr"power
^^^^it~believes that nothing~p6w^firl exists "in-the
world that has not first got to receive~fronr""it""~a
meaningj_a_j;ight_to^^^exist,_a^ Y^^, as ^eing an
i nstrument in its w ork,_a-. . wa-V-and_means^tQ_iis,
end, to one end. Where is the counte rpart o{
tS 5~"complete sys te m of will, end, and interpreta-
t ion ? Why is the counterpart lacking WKere
is the other " one aim " ? But I am told it is not
lacking, tnat not "only has it fought a long and
fortunate fight with that ideal, but that further ^
has _ already won the mastery o ver th at ideal in
a1] ^sppntialc ■ Ipf- ni^r w^^"le_iiiodern scjmce^ attest
_this — that modern science, which, like th e genuin e
reality-philosophy which i t is, manifestly believes
in it self alone, manifestlyT ias the courage to"l3e
itSelf, the will to be itself, and has got oiTwell



## p. (#206) ################################################


192 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

enough without God, another world, and nega-
tive virtues. " —
WltR~all their noisy agitator-babble, however,
they effect nothing with me ; these trumpeters of
reality are bad musicians, their voices do not come
from the deeps with sufificient audibility, t hey are no t

I the mouthpie ce for the ab YSS,ofscientificiaiQwledge

I -—for to-day scientific k52^? ^S5_i^ ^" abyss — the
word " science," in such trumpeter-niquths, is a pros"
titution, an abuse^ an impertinence. The truth is

\ j usT tTie~oppositg ^from what is maintainej _jn~lEe"
asceHcjEiory. . Scienc e ha s to-day absolutely no
beli ef in itself, let alone m aiTTdeal superior" to
It self, a nd wherever science still consistTorpassidiT7

/ love, ardour, suffering, it is not the opposition to
that ascetic ideal, but rather the incarnation of its

\ latest and noblest form. Does that ring strange ?
'There are enough brave and decent working people,
even among the learned men of to-day, who like
their little corner, and who, just because they are
pleased so to do, become at times indecently loud
with their demand, that people to-day should be
quite content, especially in science — for in science
there is so much useful work to do. I do not deny
it — -there is nothing I should like less than to spoil
the delight of these honest workers in their handi-
work ; for I rejoice in their work. But the fact of
science requiring hard work, the fact of its having
contented workers, is absolutely no proof of science
as a whole having to-day one end, one will, one
ideal, one passion for a great faith ; the contrary, as
I have said, is the case. When science is not the
latest manifestation of the ascetic ideal — but these



## p. (#207) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS ? 1 93

are cases of such rarity, selectness, and exquisite-
ness, as to preclude the general judgment being
affected thereby — science is a hiding-place for every
kind of cowardice, disbelief, remorse, despectio sui,
bad conscience — it is the very anxiety that springs
from having no ideal, the suffering from the lack
of a great love, the discontent with an enforced
moderation. Oh, what does all science not cover
to-day? How mucETara nvTate. does itlnoF try
Jfo^oxer ? The diligence of our best scholars, their
senseless industry, their burning the candle of their
brain at both ends — their very mastery in their
handiwork — how often is the real meaning of all
that to prevent themselves conTiiiumg to see a
cer tain thing ? Science as a self-a naesthetic : do you
Unow that? You wound them — every one who
consorts with scholars experiences this — you wound
them sometimes to the quick through just a harm-
less word ; when you think you are paying them a
compliment you embitter them beyond all bounds,
simply because you didn't have {he finesse to infer
the real kind of customers you had to tackle,
the sufferer kind (who won't own up even to
themselves what they really are), the dazed and
iinrni;ifjriniis ki'nij jyho have on ly one' fear — coming
to consciousness.

-^ 24

And now look at the other side, at those rare
cases, of which I spoke, the most supreme idealists
to be found nowadays among philosophers and
scholars. Have we, perchance, found in them the
sought-for opponents of the ascetic ideal, its anti-
N



## p. (#208) ################################################

194 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

idealists} In fact, they believe themselves to be
such, these " unbelievers " (for they are all of them
that) : It seeriisThat this ideaj s their last remn ant
of faith, tEe~i3ea of being opponents of this ideal,
so earnest are they on this subject, so passionate
in word and gesture; — but does it follow that
what they believe must necessarily be truel We
" knowers " have grown by degrees suspicious of
all kinds of believers, our suspicion has step by
step habituated us to draw just the opposite con-
clusions to what people have drawn before ; that
is to say, wherever the strength of a belief is parti-
cularly prominent to draw the conclusion of the
difficulty of proving what is believed, the conclusion
of its actual improbability. f We do no t again deny
that " faith produces salvation " Vfor~iMf^very
'^«/5«Jwe. _d^'3enyJ:hat faith /roz'4J_anytHingjJ^~
a . strong faith, which produces ha ppiness, causes
suspicion of the object of that faith, it does no t
"establish ~its " truth," it does establish a certain
prob ability of — illusiou^ What is now the~posi-
tion in these cases ? These solitaries and deniers
of to-day; these fanatics in one thing, in their claim
to intellectual cleanness ; these hard, stern, contin-
ent, heroic spirits, who constitute the glory of our
time ; all these pale atheists, anti- Christians, im-
moralists. Nihilists; these sceptics, " ephectics," and
" hectics " of the intellect (in a certain sense they
are the latter, both collectively and individually);
these supreme idealists of knowledge, in whom
alone nowadays the intellectual conscience dwells
and is alive — in point of fact they believe them-
selves as far away as possible from the ascetic



## p. (#209) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS ? 195

ideal, do these " free, very free spirits " : and yet,
if I may reveal what they themselves cannot see
— for they stand too near themselves : this ideal is
simply their ideal, they represent it nowadays and
perhaps no one else, they themselves are its most
spiritualised product, its most advanced picket of
skirmishers and scouts, its most insidious delicate
and elusive form of seduction. — If I am in any
way a reader of riddles, then I will be one with this
sentence : for some time past there have been no
free spirits ; for they siiir~BeUeve in WufK. ~ When
the Christian TS'usaSers in the East came into
collision with that invincible order of assassins,
that order of free spirits /ar excellence, whose lowest
grade lives in a state of discipline such as no order
of monks has ever attained, then in some way or
other they managed to get an inkling of that
symbol and tally-word, that was reserved for the
highest grade alone as their secretum, " Nothing is"
true, everything is allowed," — in sooth, that was
freedom of thought, thereby was taking leave of the
very belief in truth. Has indeed any European,
any Christian freethinker, ever yet wandered into
this proposition and its labyrinthine consequences ?
Does he know from experience the Minotauros of
this den. — I doubt it — nay, I know otherwise.
Nothing is more really alien to these " mono-
fanatics," these so-called " free spirits," than freedom
and unfettering in that sense ; in no respect are
they more closely tied, the absolute fanaticism of
their belief in truth is unparalleled. I know all this
perhaps too much from experience at close quarters
— that dignified philosophic abstinence to which



## p. (#210) ################################################

196 ^ THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

-subelief like that binds its adherents, that stoicism
of the intellect, which eventually vetoes negation
as rigidly as it does affirmation, that wish for
standing still in front of the actual, the factum
brutum, that fatalism in "fetitsfaits" [ce petit faital-
ism, as I call it), in which French Science now
attempts a kind of moral superiority over German,
this renunciation of interpretation generally (that
is, of forcing, doctoring, abridging, omitting, sup-
pressing, inventing, falsifying, and all the other
essential attributes of interpretation) — all this, con-
sidered broadly, expresses the asceticism of virtue,
quite as efficiently as does any repudiation of the
senses (it is at bottom only a modus of that repudia-
tion). But what forces it intq^that unqualified
will_for truth is iihe faith in the ascetic ideal itself,
even_thougH"Tf "taKe~tEeTorm of its unconscious
iniperatives,-— make lio"' mistake about it, it is~tEe~
faith, I repeat, in a ■metaphysica l valu ej^nintrinsic^
j^"ueortruth, of a cKaracter which is only w^ranted_
and guaranteed in this ideal (it stands and falls with
thartd"eal)7~ Judged strictly, there does not exist
a science without its " hypotheses," the thought of
such a science is inconceivable, illogical : a philo-
sophy, a faith, must always exist first to enable
science to gain thereby a direction, a meaning, a
limit and method, a ri£:ht to existence. (He who
holds a contrary opinion on the subject — ^he, for ex-
ample, who takes it upon himself to establish philo-
sophy " upon a strictly scientific basis " — has first
got to " turn up-side-down " not only philosophy
but also truth itself — the gravest insult which
could possibly be offered to two such respectable



## p. (#211) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS? 197

females ! ) Yes, there is no doubt about it — and
here I quote my Joyful Wisdom, cp. Book V. Aph.
344 : " The tnan who is truthful in that daring
and extreme f ashion, which is the presupposition
of the faith in science, asserts thereby a different'
-world fro m that of life, na ture, and history ; and In
soTaTas he asserts the existence ofjhat^different
world, come, must he notsinularly repudiate jts
counterpartT^rs" world , oar w orld? Th e belief on
whi ch our faith in scien ce is based has remained to
this ^y a me taphysjcaLbelief — even we knowers
of to-day, we godless foes of metaphysics, we too
take our fire from that conflagration which was
kindled by a thousand-year-old faith, from that
C hristian belief, which was also Plato's benef7tHe
beli ef that God is truth, that truth is Siyine. . . .
But what if this belief becomes more and more in-
credible, what if nothing proves itself tob^ divine,
unless It be error, blindness, lies-— -what if God
Himse^^roved_Himself_. to- be^our oldest lie? " —
It is necessary to stop at this point and to consider
the situation carefully. Science itself now needs a
j ustification (which is not for a minute to say that
there is such a justification). Turn in this context
to the most ancient and the most modern philo-
sophers : they all fail to realise the extent of the
need of a justification on the part of the Will for
Truth — here is a gap in every philosophy — what
is it caused by ? Because up to the present the
ascetic ideal dominated all philosophy, because
Truth was fixed as Being, as God, as the Supreme
Court of Appeal, because Truth was not allowed
to be a problem. Do you understand this



## p. (#212) ################################################

(igS \ THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

" allowed " ? 1 F rom the minute that the belief in
the God of t he ascetic ideal is repudiatedTth ere "
exTsts a ite w^odlem : the problem of the vaTueoT^^
truth. [ The Will for Truth needed a critiq ^ue^^^r'
us "define b y these words-QUt-DisoLlask^iJhe value
of truth is tentatively toJbe_ccMedin_^uestionr7y~:^
' (If this seems too laconically expressed, I recom-
mend the reader to peruse again that passage from
the Joyful Wisdom which bears the title, " How far
we also are still pious," Aph. 344, and best of all
the whole fifth book of that work, cis well as the
Preface to The Dawn of Day! )

25.

No ! You can't get round me with science, when
I search for the natural antagonists of the ascetic
ideal, when I put the question : " Where is the op-
posed will in which the opponent ideal expresses
itself? " Science is not, by a long way, independent
enough to fulfil this function ; in every depar tment
sci ence needs an id eal valu e, a p o wer whi ch creates
values,_aild. Jn__whose service it can believe in iSelf
— scie nce itself never creates value s. Its relation
to the aacet ic ideal js ^ot in itself antagOTiiSc";
speaking roughly, it r ather repre sents the progress-
ive force in the^ inner _ evolution of thaTTdealT
Tested more exactly, its o ppositi on and antagori^
isHL-are--XQncgnjM_XLQt_mtL_the ideal JtsafTlJat
only with that ideal's niitwnrks^'ts^ outer^arb, its
masquerade, with itstemporary harciening,stiffenm"g,
and_dogmatising;;-it_makes-the- life jE^the ideal
f ree on c e more, while it repudiates its superficial



## p. (#213) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS

elements. These two phenomena, science and'lEe'
ascetic ideal, both rest on the same basis — I have
already made this clear — t he bas is,! s ay, oft he same
over-appreciation of truth (more accurately the
sSme beliet m tbElmpossibtlity of valuing and of
criticis ing tru5E J, and consequently they are neces-
sarily allies, so that, in the event of their being
attacked, they must always be attacked and called
into question together. A valuation of the ascetic
ideal inevita bly entails a~vaIu "ation '61 sclen'ce~as
wettT'lose no time in seeing this clearly, and be
sharp" to catch it ! { Art, I am speaking provision-
ally, for I will treat it on some other occasion in
greater detail, — art, I repeat, in which lying is
sanctified and the will for deception has good con-
science on its side, is much more fundamentally
opposed to the^ascetic Heal than is science : Plato's
instinctlelt this — Plato, the greatest enemy of art
which Europe has produced up to the present.
Plato versus Homer, that is the complete, the true
antagoni smr^on the oiTe ji de7Tfie~wHo le4iearted
" transcendental," t he great defamer of life ; on the
ot her, its involuntary panegyrist, t he golden nature.
An artistic subservi ence to the servj ce ofthe ascetic"
ideal is consequently the most absolute artistic
corrupt ion that there can be, though~unfortunaterv^
it is one of the most frequent phases, for nothing
is more corruptible than an artis t. ') Considered
physiologically, moreover, science rests on the samci
b asis as does the ascet ic ideal : a certain impovensh~\
mep,t of life is the pre suppositioEToTtEeTatter as of \
the former — add, frijjidity. of the emotions, slacken-
mg ol the tempo , the substitution of dialectic for



## p. (#214) ################################################

200 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

instinct, seriousness impressed on mien and gesture
(^HTiousneis, that^most unmistakable sign of strenu-~"
ous metabolism, of struggling, toiling life). Con-
sider the periods in a nation in which the learned
man comes into prominence ; they are the periods
of exhaustion, often of sunset, of decay — the
effervescing strength, the confidence in life, the con-
fidence in the future are no more. The preponder-
ence of the mandarins never signifies any good, any
more than does the advent of democracy, or arbi-
tration instead of war, equal rights for women, the
religion of pity, and all the other symptoms of
declining life. (Science handled as a problem ! what
is the meaning of science ? — upon this point the
Preface to the Birth of Tragedy^ No ! this
" modern _ science " — mark you this we ll-— is at
times the best ally for the ascetic ideal, 3nd_S2Ee
very'Teason that_itJs_jLlk_ally^jvhicr^_mostjjn-
coriscious, most automatic, most secret, and most
subterranean ! They have been playing into each
'Other's" hands up to the present, have these "poor
in spirit" and the scientific opponents of that
ideal (take care, by the bye, not to think that
these opponents are the antithesis of this ideal,
that they are the rich in spirit — that they are
not; I have called them the hectic in spirit).
As for these celebrated victories of science;
there is no doubt that they are victories — but
victories over what ? There was not for a single
minute any victory among their list over the
ascetic ideal, rather was it made stronger, that is
to say, more elusive, more abstract, more insidious,
from the fact that a wall, an outwork, that had got



## p. (#215) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS ? 20I

built on to the main fortress and disfigured its
appearance, should from time to time be ruthlessly
destroyed and broken down by science. Does any
one seriously suggest that the downfall of the theo-
logical astronomy signified the downfall of that
ideal ? — Has, perchance, man grown /ess in need of
a transcendental solution of his riddle of existence,
because since that time this existence has become
more random, casual, and superfluous in the visible
order of the universe? Has there not been since
the time of Copernicus an unbroken progress in the
self-belittling of man and his will for belittling
himself? Alas, his belief in his dignity, his unique-
ness, his irreplaceableness in the scheme of existence,
is gone — he has become animal, literal, unqualified,
and unmitigated animal, he who in his earlier belief
was almost God (" child of God," " demi-God ").
Since Copernicus man seems to have fallen on to
a steep plane — he rolls faster and faster away from
the centre — whither ? into nothingness ? into the
"thrilling sensation of his own nothingness"! — Well !
this would be the straight way — to the o/<3f ideal ? —
All science (and by no means only astronomy, with
regard to the humiliating and deteriorating effect of
which Kant has made a remarkable confession, " it
annihilates my own importance"), all science, natural
as much as unnatural — by unnaturaT"! mean'fKe

^^^^^in^5j2iJ[^-? 3=^~"°^'^? :5i^l£f^°'^* tol:alk
man out of his present opinion ofhimself, as_thou^
tHat^oginion hadJBeen nothing Butabizarre piece
of conceit ; you might go so far as to say that science ""
finds its p eculiar pride, its peculiar bitter fcmnlSf"
stoical ataraxia, in preserving man's contempt of



## p. (#216) ################################################

202 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

himself, that state which it took so much trouble

to bring about, as m an's final apd m ost serious claim
to self-a ppre ciation (rightly so, in point of fact, for
he who despises is always " one who has not for-
gotten how to appreciate "). But does all this
involve anyreal effort to counteract the ascetic ideal ?
Is it really seriously suggested that Kant's victory
over the theological dogmatism about "God,"
" Soul," " Freedom," " Immortality," has damaged
that ideal in any way (as the theologians have
imagined to be the case for a long time past) ? —
And in this connection it does not concern us for
a single minute, if Kant himself intended any such
consummation. It is certain that from the time
of Kant every type of transcendentalist is playing a
winning game — they are emancipated from the
theologians ; what luck ! — he has revealed to them
that secret art, by which they can now pursue their
" heart's desire " on their own responsibility, and
with all the respectability of science. Similarly,
who can grumble at the agnostics, reverers, as
they are, of the unknown and the absolute
mystery, if they now worship their very query as
God? (Xaver Doudan talks somewhere of the
ravages which I'habitude dadmirer rinintelligible
au lieu de rester tout simplement dans Vinconnu
has produced — the ancients, he thinks, must have
been exempt from those ravages. ) Supposing
that everything, " known " to man, lails to
^tisty_iiisj(ifiaEEs,_and^onjffie contrary contradicts"
ancL horrifies them, wh at a divine way out of all
this to be able to look for the responsibility, not
in jhe _iLdesJjdng-! ! -l)ut, ia "Jsnojving 'M;^-" There"~



## p. (#217) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS ? 203

knowledge. Consequentl y^^^&xe. _jg__„a
^wHaF'irn'ovel elegantia syllogismi\ what
a triumph for the ascetic ideal !

26.

Or, perchance, does the whole ol modem-history
show in its demeanouiL_greate r co nfi dence in li fe,
greater confidence in its ideals ? It s 1nftiest_. pre- ^
t ension is now to be a mirror \ it repudiates all
teleology: it will have no more " proving " ; it
disdains to play the judge, and thereby shows its
good taste — it asserts as little as it den ies, it
fixes, it " describes. " All this is to a high
de gree ascetic , b ut~aF the same time it~i s~"Ccr'a'
mnrVi frrpafpi- Ae-<^rc-f- ■n-! hiN<:fic ■ make no mistake
about this ! You see in the historian a gloomy,
hard, but determined gaze, — an eye that looks out
as an isolated North Pole explorer looks out
(perhaps so as not to look within, so as not to
look back ? ) — there is snow — here is life silenced,
the last crows which caw here are called
"whither? " "Vanity," "Nada" — here nothing
more flourishes and grows, at the most the
metapolitics of St. Petersburg and the " pity "
of Tolstoi. But as for that other school of
historians, a perhaps still more " modern " school,
a voluptuous and lascivious school which ogles
life and the ascetic ideal with equal fervour, which
uses. , the word " artist " as a glove, and has
nowadays established a " corner " for itself, in all
the praise given to contemplation ; oh, what a
thirst do these sweet intellectuals excite even for



## p. (#218) ################################################

204 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

ascetics and winter landscapes ! Nay ! The
devil take these " contemplative " folk !
How
much liefer would I wander with those histoficaT"
Nihilists through the glooniiest, gr^7~ coi Tmist P:^ "---
nay, I shall not mind listening (supposing I have
To choosej to one who is_£ompletely u nhisto rical
and antUhistorical (a man, like Diihring for in-
""slance, over whose periods a hitherto shy and
unavowed species of " beautiful souls " has grown
intoxicated in contemporary Germany, the species
anarchistica within the educated proletariate).
T he "co ntemplative" are a hundred times worse
— I never knew anything which produced such
intense nausea as one of those " objective " chairs^
one of those scented mannikins - about - town
of history, a thing half-priest, half-satyr (Renan
parfuni), which betrays by the high, shrill falsetto
of his applause what he lacks and where he lacks
it, who betrays where in this case the Fates have
plied their ghastly shears, alas ! in too surgeon-
like a fashion ! This is distasteful to me, and
irritates my patience ; let him keep patient at such
sights who has nothing to lose thereby, — such a
sight enrages me, such spectators embitter me
against the " play," even more than does the play
itself (history itself, you understand) ; Anacreontic
moods imperceptibly come over me. This Nature,
who gave to the steer its horn, to the lion its
Xaay! oSovTcov, for what purpose did Nature give
me my foot ? — To kick, by St. Anacreon, and
not merely to run away ! To trample on all the

* E. ff. Lectureships.



## p. (#219) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS ? 205

worm-eaten " chairs," the cowardly contemglators,
tEe lascivious "eunuchs ^history, the . flir±er&„with^
ascetE"T(3eals,)the righteous hypocrites of im^
potenSTj All reverence on my part to the ascetic
ideal, tn so far as it is honourable ! So long as
irtielieves in Itseli" and plays no pranks on us !
But I like not all these coquettish bugs who have
an ' msati ate aiiTWtitm-"iT]r^ mell"~of'T he jflfinjte7-
until eventually the infinite smells of bugs ; I like
not the whited sepulchres with their stagey re-
production of life ; I likenot_the_,iii:gd_and^ the
used up who wra p the mselves in wisdom and look
'£oH^^^21^ like not the agitators dressed up
as B&oes, who hide their dummy-heads behind the
stalking-horse of an ideal ; I like not the ambitious
artists who would fain play the ascetic and the
priest, and are at bottom nothing but tragic
clowns ; I like not, again, these newest speculators
in idealism, the Anti-Semites, who nowadays roll
their eyes in the patent Christian-Aryan-man-of-
honour fashion, and by an abuse of moralist atti-
tudes and agitation dodges, so cheap as to exhaust
any patience, strive to excite all the blockhead
elements in the populace (the invariable success
of every kind of intellectual charlatanism in
present-day Germany hangs together with the
almost indisputable and already quite palpable
desolation of the German mind, whose cause I
look for in a too exclusive diet, of papers, politics,
beer, and Wagnerian music, not forgetting the
condition precedent of this diet, the national
exclusiveness and vanity, the strong but narrow
principle, " Germany, Germany above every-



## p. (#220) ################################################

206 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

thing,"* and finally the paralysis agitans of
" modern ideas "). Europe nowadays is, above
all, wealthy and ingenious in means of excite-
ment; it apparently has no more crying necessity
than stimulantia and alcohol. Hence the enormous
counterfeiting of ideals, those most fiery spirits of
the mind ; hence too the repulsive, evil- smelling,
perjured, pseudo - alcoholic air everywhere. I
should like to know how many cargoes of imita-
tion idealism, of hero-costumes and high falutin'
clap-trap, how many casks of sweetened pity
liqueur (Firm : la religion de la souffrance), how
many crutches of righteous indignation for the help
of these flat-footed intellects/liow many comedians
of the Christian moral ideal would need to-day
to be exported from Europe, to enable its air to
smell pure againj It is obvious that, in regard
to this over-production, a new trade possibility
lies open ; it is obvious that there is a new
business to be done in little ideal idols and
obedient " idealists " — don't pass over this tip !
Who has sufficient courage? We have in our
hands the possibility of idealising the whole earth.
But what am I talking about courage ? we only
need one thing here — a hand, a free, a very free
hand.

27.

Enough ! enough ! let us leave these curiosities
and complexities of the modern spirit, which excite
as much laughter as disgust. Our problem can

* An allusion to the well-known patriotic song. — H. B. S



## p. (#221) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS ? 207

certainly do without them, the problem of the
meaning of the ascetic ideal — what has it got to
do with yesterday or to-day ? those things shall
be handled by me more thoroughly and severely
in another connection (under the title " A Contribu-
tion to the History of European Nihilism," I refer
for this to a work which I am preparing: The
Will to Power, an Attempt at a Transvaluation
of All Values). The only reason why I come to
allude to it here is this : the ^cetic ideal has at
times, even in the most intellgctuaLapherey^only
one real^^^;,of«iOTdes_jjTdj/«»2«^^rj„;,„ these are_

the comedians of this ideal — for they awake mis-
trust. PLyerywhere otherwi^j_w]^£g_the_ mind Is
at work seriously, powerfully, and without counter-
feiting, it dispenses altogether now wjth_an ideal
(the pSpnlar expression for this abstinence is
" Atheism ") — with the exception of the will for\
truth. But this will, this7i? iw«5«/'"of ^fTTdeal, is.
It you win believe~me, 'fEaF ideal itself in its
severest and cleverest formulation, esoteric through
and through, stripped of all outworks, and conse-
quently not so much its rernnant as its kernel.
UnqualiHed honest atheism (and its air only'cTo
we breathe, we, the most intellectual men of this
age) is not op posed to that ideal, to the extent
that "it appears to be; it is rather one of the final
p hases of its evolution , one of its syllogisms and ,
pieces of inherent logic — it _is the awe-inspiring
catastrophe of a two-thousand-year training ini
truth, Which"Trnally forbids itself the lie of the
^e[ief~in'God. l^The same course of development
m india-^quite independently, and consequently



## p. (#222) ################################################

208 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

of some demonstrative value — the same ideal
driving to the same conclusion the decisive point
reached five hundred years before the European
era, or more precisely at the time of Buddha —
it started in the Sankhyam philosophy, and then
this was popularised through Buddha, and made
into a religion. )

What, I put the question with all strictness,
has really triumphed over the Christian God?
The answer stands in my Joyful Wisdom, Aph.
357: " the Christian morality itself, the idea of
truth, taken as it was with increasing seriousness,
the confessor-subtlety of the Christian conscience
translated and sublimated into the scientific con-
science into intellectual cleanness at any price.
Regarding Nature as though it were a proof of
the goodness and guardianship of God ; interpret-
ing history in honour of a divine reason, as a con-
stanF proof"6r~armbfal order of the world and a
moral teTeology : explaining our own personal ex-
periences, as pious men have for long enough ex-
plained them, as though every arrangement, every
nod, every single thing were invented and sent
out of love for the salvation of the soul ; all this
is now done away with, all this has the conscience
'Sgainst^-^^ a«d-is— regardeJ" By every subtler con-
science~as' disreputable, dishonourableTasTying,
feminism, w^akness,~cbwai^ice-^-^by"tneans of tliis
severity, if by means of anything at all, are we,
in sooth, good Europeans and heirs of^ Europe's
longest and bravest self-mastery. " . . 1 All great
things go to ruin by reasoji of themselves, by reason
ofiaiTact of self-dissolution : so wills the law of life,



## p. (#223) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS Y 209

the law of nece ssary " self-masitery:-'Leven. Jn the
essence oOife-^^ver is the law-giver finally ex-
pbsedToThe^cry, " patere legem quam ipse tulisti" ;
in thus wise did Christianity go to ruin as a dogma,
through its own morality^ Tn 'tFus wise must
Christianity go" again to ruin to-day "as~a~m6rality
-^Wfe are standing on tRe lfhfeshold o f this evenj^
lX? te r^Christian _ truthfulness has^ drawn, oiie in-
clusion after the other, i t finally draws i ts strongest
cdndaston^'^s'^ncXusiow against itself; this, how-
BV5i7 happensTwhen it puts the question, "jsihat is
the meaning of every will for truth V^ And here
again do I touch on my problem, on our problem,
my unknown friends (for as yet / know of no
friends) : what sense has our whole being, if it
does not 'mean that in our own selv^that wTT
15r tr uth has'co'Hrg 'to its "o wn consciousness a s
problem}- — By reason of this attainment
""consciousness'Tifi th e part of the wTTT _

fiiorality Irom henceforward— ;4here js no doub t
about It — goes to pieces : this is that great
hundfeJ-act play that is reserved for the next two
centuries of Europe, the most terrible, the most
mysterious, and perhaps also the most hopeful of
all plays. ~~ ~"

28.

If you except the ascetic ideal, man, the animal
man had no meaning. His existence on earth
contained no end ; " What is the purpose of man
at all ? " was a question without an answer ; the
will ior man and the world was lacking; befilnd
every great human destiny rang as a refrain a still



## p. (#224) ################################################

2IO -\ THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

!

■gUgater " Vanity ! " The ascetic ideal s impW
means this rffiaFsomething was lacking, that^
trenrentfous^T^^ encircled man — he did not know"
how to justify himself, to explain himself, to afHrni
himself, Tie suffered Trom the problem'of his owir
memimg. He sufTered also in other ways, he wai
in the main a diseased animal ; but_Jiispro^leiH_^
was not suffering itself, but the lack of an answer
to ~that~cryrng~questibri," " ~To'wEatpurpose^sP^^
suffer ? " \ Man7 the bravest animal and l:lie~one
most inured to suffering, does not repudiate suffer ing
in itself : he wills it, he even seeks it out, provIHed
that he is shown a meaning for it, a purpose of
su ffering. (T^- A^'i'^ suffering , but the senselessness of
suffering was the curse whichtin_then lay spread
over humanity — -and the ascetic ideal gave~ii~a
meaning ! l ~rF was up till then the only meaning;
but any meaning~is~BeReF than no meaning; the
Ascetic ideaFwas in that connection the "fdute de
■mieux" par excellence that existed at that time.
In that ideal suffering found an explanation ; the
tremendous gap seemed filled ; the door to all
suicidal Nihilism was closed. The explanation —
there is no doubt about it — brought in its train
new suffering, deeper, more penetrating, more
venomous, gnawing more brutally into lifeOt
brought all suffering under the_perspective oT"
"g ml t; b Pt'tn" spite of^ all that — ;man was saved
the'reby7Tle'^d a meaning, and from henceforth
vfantS'Tnore like a leaf in the wind, a shuttle-
cock of chance, of nonsense, hejcould now " will "
somethingj— absolutely immaterial to what end,
to what purpose, with what means he wished :



## p. (#225) ################################################

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ASCETIC IDEALS ? 211

the will itself was saved. It is absolutely impos-
sible to disguise what in point of fact is made
clear by every complete will that has taken its
direction from the ascetic ideal : this hate of thel
human, and even more of the animal, and more
still of the material, this horror of the senses, of
reason itself, thi s fear of hap pin ess and b eauty,]
this desire to g et right away from all illusion,!
change, growth, death, wishing and even desiring
— airthis means- — -let us have the courage to
grasp it — a will for Nothingness, a wi ll oppose d
to life, a repudiation of the most fundam ental
. condifiohs ot_lite, but it is an d remains a wi ll ! — i
and Td" say at the end that which I said at thej
beginning-pman will w ish Nothingnes s jaX\^t\\^
not wish at oK]



## p. (#226) ################################################



## p. (#227) ################################################

PEOPLES AND COUNTRIES.

Translated by J. M. KENNEDY.



## p. (#228) ################################################



## p. (#229) ################################################

[The following twenty-seven fragments were intended by
Nietzsche to form a supplement to Chapter VIII. oi Beyond
Good and Evil, dealing with Peoples and Countries. ]

The Europeans now imagine themselves as re-
presenting, in the main, the highest types of men
on earth.

A characteristic of Europeans : inconsistency
between word and deed ; the Oriental is true to
himself in daily life. How the European has
established colonies is explained by his nature,
which resembles that of a beast of prey.

This inconsistency is explained by the fact that
Christianity has abandoned the class from which
it sprang.

This is the difference between us and the
Hellenes: their morals grew up among the
governing castes. Thucydides' morals are the
same as those that exploded everywhere with
Plato.

Attempts towards honesty at the Renaissance,
for example : always for the benefit of the arts.
Michael Angelo's conception of God as the
"Tyrant of the World" was an honest one.



## p. (#230) ################################################

2l6 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

I rate Michael Angelo higher than Raphael,
because, through all the Christian clouds and
prejudices of his time, he saw the ideal of a
culture nobler than the Christo - Raphaelian :
whilst Raphael truly and modestly glorified only
the values handed down to him, and did not carry
within himself any inquiring, yearning instincts.
Michael Angelo, on the other hand, saw and felt
the problem of the law-giver of new values : the
problem of the conqueror made perfect, who first
had to subdue the " hero within himself," the man
exalted to his highest pedestal, master even of his
pity, who mercilessly shatters and annihilates
everything that does not bear his own stamp,
shining in Olympian divinity. Michael Angelo
was naturally only at certain moments so high
and so far beyond his age and Christian Europe •
for the most part he adopted a condescending
attitude towards the eternal feminine in Christi-
anity ; it would seem, indeed, that in the end he
broke down before her, and gave up the ideal of
his most inspired hours. It was an ideal which
only a man in the strongest and highest vigour of
life could bear ; but not a man advanced in years !
Indeed, he would have had to demolish Christi-
anity with his ideal ! But he was not thinker
and philosopher enough for that. Perhaps
Leonardo da Vinci alone of those artists had a
really super-Christian outlook. He knows the
East, the " land of dawn," within himself as well
as without himself. There is something super-



## p. (#231) ################################################

PEOPLES AND COUNTRIES. 217

European and silent in him : a characteristic of
every one who has seen too wide a circle of things
good and bad.

4-

How much we have learnt and learnt anew in
fifty years ! The whole Romantic School with
its belief in " the people " is refuted ! No Homeric
poetry as " popular " poetry ! No deification of
the great powers of Nature ! No deduction from
language-relationship to race-relationship ! No
" intellectual contemplations " of the supernatural !
No truth enshrouded in religion !

The problem of truthfulness is quite a new one.
I am astonished. From this standpoint we regard
such natures as Bismarck as culpable out of care-
lessness, such as Richard Wagner out of want of
modesty; we would condemn Plato for his pia
fraus, Kant for the derivation of his Categorical
Imperative, his own belief certainly not having
come to him from this source.

Finally, even doubt turns against itself: doubt
in doubt. And the question as to the value of
truthfulness and its extent lies there.

5.

What I observe with pleasure in the German is
his Mephistophelian nature ; but, to tell the truth,
one must have a higher conception of Mephis-
topheles than Goethe had, who found it necessary
to diminish his Mephistopheles in order to magnify
his "inner Faust. " The true German Mephis-



## p. (#232) ################################################

2l8 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

topheles is much more dangerous, bold, wicked,
and cunning, and consequently more open-hearted:
remember the nature of Frederick the Great, or
of that much greater Frederick, the Hohenstaufen,
Frederick li.

The real German Mephistopheles crosses the
Alps, and believes that everything there belongs
to him. Then he recovers himself, like Winckel-
mann, like Mozart. He looks upon Faust and
Hamlet as caricatures, invented to be laughed at,
and upon Luther also. Goethe had his good
German moments, when he laughed inwardly at
all these things. But then he fell back again
into his cloudy moods.

Perhaps the Germans have only grown up in a
wrong climate ! There is something in them that
might be Hellenic ! — something that is awakened
when they are brought into touch with the South —
Winckelmann, Goethe, Mozart. We should not
forget, however, that we are still young. Luther
is still our last event ; our last book is still the
Bible. The Germans have never yet " moralised. "
Also, the very food of the Germans was their
doom : its consequence, Philistinism.

7-

The Germans are a dangerous people: they

are experts at inventing intoxicants. Gothic,

rococo (according to Semper), the historical sense

and exoticism, Hegel, Richard Wagner — Leibniz,



## p. (#233) ################################################

PEOPLES AND COUNTRIES. 219

too (dangerous at the present day) — (they even
idealised the serving soul as the virtue of scholars
and soldiers, also as the simple mind). The
Germans may well be the most composite people
on earth.

" The people of the Middle," the inventors of
porcelain, and of a kind of Chinese breed of Privy
Councillor.

8.

The smallness and baseness of the German
soul were not and are not consequences of the
system of small states ; for it is well known that
the inhabitants of much smaller states were proud
and independent : and it is not a large state per
se that makes souls freer and more manly. The
man whose soul obeys the slavish command :
" Thou shalt and must kneel ! " in whose body
there is an involuntary bowing and scraping to
titles, orders, gracious glances from above — well,
such a man in an " Empire " will only bow all the
more deeply and lick the dust more fervently in
the presence of the greater sovereign than in the
presence of the lesser: this cannot be doubted.
We can still see In the lower classes of Italians
that aristocratic self-sufficiency ; manly discipline
and self-confidence still form a part of the long
history of their country : these are virtues which
once manifested themselves before their eyes. A
poor Venetian gondolier makes a far better figure
than a Privy Councillor from Berlin, and is even
a better man in the end — any one can see this.
Just ask the women.



## p. (#234) ################################################

220 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

9-

Most artists, even some of the greatest (in-
cluding the historians) have up to the present
belonged to the serving classes (whether they
serve people of high position or princes or women
or " the masses "), not to speak of their dependence
upon the Church and upon moral law. Thus
Rubens portrayed the nobility of his age; but
only according to their vague conception of taste,
not according to his own measure of beauty — on
the whole, therefore, against his own taste. Van
Dyck was nobler in this respect : who in all those
whom he painted added a certain amount of what
he himself most highly valued : he did not descend
from himself, but rather lifted up others to him-
self when he " rendered. "

The slavish humility of the artist to his public
(as Sebastian Bach has testified in undying and
outrageous words in the dedication of his High
Mass) is perhaps more difficult to perceive in
music ; but it is all the more deeply engrained.
A hearing would be refused me if I endeavoured
to impart my views on this subject. Chopin
possesses distinction, like Van Dyck. The dis-
position of Beethoven is that of a proud peasant ;
of Haydn, that of a proud servant. Mendelssohn,
too, possesses distinction — like Goethe, in the
most natural way in the world.

lo.

We could at any time have counted on the
fingers of one hand those German learned men



## p. (#235) ################################################

PEOPLES AND COUNTRIES. 221

who possessed wit: the remainder have under-
standing, and a few of them, happily, that famous
"childlike character" which divines. . . . It is
our privilege : with this " divination " German
science has discovered some things which we can
hardly conceive of, and which, after all, do not
exist, perhaps. It is only the Jews among the
Germans who do not " divine " like them.

II.

As Frenchmen reflect the politeness and esprit
of French society, so do Germans reflect some-
thing of the deep, pensive earnestness of their
mystics and musicians, and also of their silly
childishness. The Italian exhibits a great deal
of republican distinction and art, and can show
himself to be noble and proud without vanity.

12.

A larger number of the higher and better-
endowed men will, I hope, have in the end so
much self-restraint as to be able to get rid of their
bad taste for affectation and sentimental darkness,
and to turn against Richard Wagner as much as
against Schopenhauer. These two Germans are
leading us to ruin ; they flatter our dangerous
qualities. A stronger future is prepared for us in
Goethe, Beethoven, and Bismarck than in these
racial aberrations. We have had no philosophers
yet



## p. (#236) ################################################

222 THE GENEALOGY OF MORALS.

13-

The peasant is the commonest type of noblesse,
for he is dependent upon himself most of all.
Peasant blood is still the best blood in Germany
— for example, Luther, Niebuhr, Bismarck.

Bismarck a Slav. Let any one look upon the
face of Germans. Everything that had manly,
exuberant blood in it went abroad. Over the
smug populace remaining, the slave-souled people,
there came an improvement from abroad, especially
by a mixture of Slavonic blood.

The Brandenburg nobility and the Prussian
nobility in general (and the peasant of certain
North German districts), comprise at present the
most manly natures in Germany.

That the manliest men shall rule : this is only
the natural order of things.

14.

The future of German culture rests with the
sons of the Prussian officers.

15-

There has always been a want of wit in
Germany, and mediocre heads attain there to the
highest honours, because even they are rare.
What is most highly prized is diligence and per-
severance and a certain cold-blooded, critical out-
look, and, for the sake of such qualities, German
scholarship and the German military system have
become paramount in Europe.



## p. (#237) ################################################

PEOPLES AND COUNTRIES. 223

16.

Parliaments may be very useful to a strong and
versatile statesman : he has something there to
rely upon (every such thing must, however, be
able to resist ! ) — upon which he can throw a great
deal of responsibility. On the whole, however, I
could wish that the counting mania and the
superstitious belief in majorities were not estab-
lished in Germany, as with the Latin races, and
that one could finally invent something new even
in politics ! It is senseless and dangerous to let
the custom of universal suffrage — which is still
but a short time under cultivation, and could
easily be uprooted — take a deeper root : whilst,
of course, its introduction was merely an expedient
to steer clear of temporary diiificulties.

17-

Can any one interest himself in this German
Empire ? Where is the new thought ? Is it only
a new combination of power ? All the worse, if
it does not know its own mind. Peace and laisser
aller are not types of politics for which I have
any respect. Ruling, and helping the highest
thoughts to victory — the only things that can
make me interested in Germany.