Jason went first to the island of Lemnos in the Aegean Sea, and
there Jason and Hypsipyle became parents of a son named Euneus.
there Jason and Hypsipyle became parents of a son named Euneus.
Ovid - 1934 - Metamorphoses in European Culture - v2
They were twins, he said, and at first grew like
normal boys. But, when the down appeared on their cheeks, feathered
wings resembling those of their father began to sprout from their sides.
Ovid then mentioned them, rather abruptly, as followers of Jason in
quest of the Golden Fleece. At this point he digressed from the mythical
63
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SIX
history of Athens, and he did not return to it until the middle of the fol-
lowing book.
Ovid spoke of the twins as sailing with the Minyae. This name
ancient authors frequently used to designate the crew of the Argo. Its
origin appears to have been uncertain. Apollonius had suggested that
Jason and his bravest followers were descendants of King Minyas, the
founder of Orchomenus in Boeotia. Ovid spoke of the Argo as the first
ship to sail the seas. In this he followed a tradition common among the
ancients, to which he had alluded already in his Amores, but here
the statement obviously was contradicted by his preceding account of
Tereus.
After Ovid's time the myth of Orithyia was retold by Statius.
During the Renaissance Ovid's narrative interested two leading poets.
Camoens showed Orithyia persuading Boreas to allay the storm, in
order that Gama might arrive safely in India. Milton in his Elegy on a
Fair Infant declared that, when Boreas carried off Orithyia, Winter re-
solved to emulate his example. After long search he found a worthy
bride in the infant but unwittingly killed her with his cold embrace.
Piombo treated the story of Orithyia in painting. Rubens made it
the theme of a famous work. Flamen used it in a statue for the gardens
of the Tuileries.
*******
Of the seven major tales in Book Six the majority were of early
origin and often had been treated by Greek authors. The tales of Niobe,
Marsyas, and Orithyia also had been favorite themes of Greek art. Of
the twenty-seven lesser tales twelve were of early origin, and a number
of these had been popular with Greek authors and artists. But fifteen
had appeared only in Alexandrian times. Although Roman authors had
shown interest in many of the tales, they had told in full only those of
Alcmena and Philomela, and the Tereus of Accius afterwards perished
with the fall of Rome. It was Ovid who made these many stories acces-
sible during the Middle Ages, and his work continued to be the most
convenient source during modern times.
Although Ovid had the advantage of many stories which long had
attracted attention, he seldom used the earlier versions. In the tale of
Iphimidia he followed the Odyssey, and in the tale of Philomela he drew
much from Sophocles. Otherwise he took his outlines entirely from Alex-
andrian authors, and he owed the tale of Philyra to Vergil. Often Ovid
64
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? BOOK SIX
preferred an Alexandrian source merely because it happened to be the
most convenient, but sometimes by using a little known Alexandrian
author he was able to give the familiar tale a new and very interesting
development. To novelty of this kind in the older stories he added the
further novelty of many other stories which were unfamiliar or wholly
unknown.
In the Sixth Book, the influence of the Manual became more im-
portant than it had been since Book Three. The Manual furnished the
outline for more than half of the major tales, including the important
myth of Niobe, and for several of the lesser tales. The effect of Nicander
became more important than it had been during the preceding book.
Nicander provided the outline for the three major tales of Arachne, the
Lycian Peasants, and Marsyas. Callimachus supplied the important
minor tale of Latona at Delos, incidents of which appeared in each of
the three chief stories in the first half of the book. For three lesser myths
Ovid seems to have used Boeus. At least thirteen lesser tales he bor-
rowed from Alexandrian authors whom we cannot identify, and eight of
these we know only from him.
Throughout the book Ovid found a difficult problem of adjustment.
Almost always the tales which he selected had had no previous relation
to one another. Ovid was obliged to invent a plausible relation of time
and circumstance. On several occasions he was glad to repeat methods
which had proved helpful in his previous books. And in the tale of
Arachne he resorted again to the method of having a character in one
story narrate still others. But he did this in a new manner and with un-
usually brilliant success. In many cases the question of relative dates
proved exceedingly difficult. Ovid wished to give his tales an appearance
of orderly, historical succession. This was difficult in the case of tales
which hitherto had remained isolated. And it was much more difficult in
the case of many other tales which well-known tradition had associated
differently with stories appearing elsewhere in Ovid's poem. To remove
or lessen the inconsistency required continual use of tact and skill.
Ovid not only chose many tales which were new but improved his
material continually by valuable innovations. He took from Phidias sug-
gestions for the contest of Athena with Neptune and from Scopas an
important incident in the tragedy of Niobe. Theocritus and Varro of
Atax suggested a new transformation of Marsyas. Vergil aided Ovid in
many tales, notably those of Arachne, Philomela, and Orithyia. And
Ovid borrowed important incidents from his own earlier stories of Io and
65
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SIX
Pentheus. But he did not stop with these. Continually he added further
improvements of his own invention. And to the myth of Arachne he gave
special interest by contrasting it elaborately with the previous tale of
the Muses and the Pierids.
By the use of much new material, by great originality and manifold
skill, Ovid made the Sixth Book one of the most remarkable in his mas-
terpiece. And this despite much that was unattractive in his subjects.
Yet few of his books will show more numerous and glaring faults. The
justly famous tales of Arachne, Niobe, and Philomela are marred by
passages of crude maladjustment. The tales of Niobe and Philomela
afford flagrant examples of ill-timed wit. And the stories of Niobe,
Philomela, and Marsyas contain needless obscurities, which (in the case
of the two latter tales) have sometimes perplexed their warmest ad-
mirers. Readers greatly interested in the subject have been willing to
overlook these shortcomings in the treatment. But even those without
such interest will find these faults accompanied and more than compen-
sated by extraordinary merit.
During ancient times the Sixth Book had a very important influ-
ence. It affected interestingly the work of the younger Seneca, Lucan,
and Statius, and the tale of Arachne became a center of violent religious
controversy between Pagan and Christian. In the Middle Ages several
tales interested profoundly the leading poets of the time. With the
Renaissance the effect became still more important and more widely dif-
fused. And again in the nineteenth century many prominent poets man-
ifested unusual interest.
Among authors not ordinarily showing influence of the Metamor-
phoses were Sidney, Byron, and Lesconte de Lisle. A notable effect ap-
peared in the case of Chretien de Troyes, Milton, and Lewis Morris.
Dante and Camoens showed their interest in a great number of tales.
And the Sixth Book as a whole affected deeply the work of Chaucer and
Shakespeare. But with no author was its influence so remarkable as with
Spenser.
A number of tales attracted modern painters and they became the
theme of several influential masterpieces. The tales of Leda, Antiopa,
and Orithyia interested modern sculptors. Those of Arachne and Philo-
mela had a notable effect on modern science.
66
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? BOOK SEVEN
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? CONTENTS OF BOOK SEVEN
PAGE
Jason and Medea . . . . . . . . . . 69
Aeson Rejuvenated . . . . . . . . . 97
Pelias and Medea's Flight to Athens . . . . . . 109
The Origin of Aconite . . . . . . . 120
Deeds of Theseus and Preparations of Minos . . . . 125
Creation of the Myrmidons . . . . . . . . 129
Cephalus and Procris . . . ? . . . . 142
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? JASON AND MEDEA
Jason and Medea
As Ovid had observed in the previous tale, the Argo was regarded
as the first ship ever launched on the sea. The name appears to have
meant originally Swift One, in allusion to the vessel's rapid motion. Af-
terwards the inventor of the ship was supposed to have been a certain
Argus inhabiting Iolcus, a port of Thessaly, and the Argo was thought
to have been named in his honor. The tradition of the voyage seems to
have originated with a prehistoric expedition undertaken by the people
of Iolcus about the middle of the thirteenth century B. C. King Pelias
made Jason commander of the Argo and sent him on a quest. The object
originally assigned is not clear, but probably it was some idea of finding
treasure or of obtaining wealth by trade. This voyage was regarded not
only as the first expedition by sea but as an ambitious and difficult one,
which passed the limit of the known world and encountered all the mys-
terious perils of sea and shore.
Jason went first to the island of Lemnos in the Aegean Sea, and
there Jason and Hypsipyle became parents of a son named Euneus.
Jason's visit was thought to account for an actual prehistoric settlement
made by Thessalians in the island of Lemnos. Proceeding from there,
Jason accomplished his mission and at length returned to Iolcus. At
least so much of the story had taken form earlier than the time of the
first recorded literature, for the Iliad spoke of Pelias as a former king
of Iolcus and of Euneus, son of Jason, as king of Lemnos at the period
of the Trojan War.
The Odyssey referred to the story of the Argo as well known to all
and noted many further circumstances. Pelias, it observed, was a son of
Neptune and of Tyro (cf. Arachne, Bk. 6), and Tyro later married
Cretheus, founder and first king of Iolcus, and became the mother of
Aeson. This implied that Pelias was a usurper and that Aeson ought
legally to have succeeded his father as king of Iolcus, an idea which later
authors mentioned explicitly. According to fairy lore popular in all
countries of the world, a young hero, going on a quest, visited the home
of a malevolent sorcerer and attained his object in spite of the sorcerer's
opposition. This, the Odyssey noted, was the case with Jason. He vis-
ited the home of Aeetes, child of the Sun and the Oceanid Perse, brother
of Circe the evil enchantress. And Aeetes himself was an evil enchanter.
69
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SEVEN
Although subsequent authors did not repeat the statement that Aeetes
was an enchanter, they often implied that it was true.
While Jason was returning from the land of Aeetes, the Odyssey
continued, he encountered the Wanderers or Whirling Rocks (Planctae).
These were beetling cliffs, pounded by heavy waves and frequented by
storms of fire. Even the doves carrying ambrosia to Jupiter could not
pass this danger unharmed, for always the rock destroyed one of them
and Jupiter had to procure another in its place. Because Jason was spe-
cially favored by Juno, his vessel passed safely by; but other ships per-
ished with all on board. Circe afterwards informed Ulysses that the
Wanderers lay not far from her island and close to the home of the
Sirens, and she advised him to,choose a different route on which he would
meet the less formidable perils of Scylla and Charybdis.
Apollonius afterwards gave a clearer account of Jason's adventure.
The fire, he said, kept spurting out from the cliffs into a mist, which
always hid the sea; and great waves continually poured over sharp
ledges, which skirted the base of the rock. Juno persuaded Vulcan to
quench the fire while Jason was passing and she caused Thetis and other
nymphs to lift the Argo over the successive reefs, a labor so great that it
required an entire day in springtime. The Odyssey had not localized the
Wanderers definitely. Apollonius and other Alexandrian Greeks asso-
ciated them with the western Mediterranean and Sicily. In this region
were the mountainous Lipari Islands, still famous for Stromboli and
other active volcanoes.
Further details about Jason appeared in the Theogony. Pelias, it
seems, not only had usurped the throne of Aeson but had been guided by
an evil purpose when he sent Jason on the quest. This might have been
inferred from the account in the Odyssey, but the Theogony added much
that was new. According to popular fairy lore that suggested the ad-
venture with Aeetes, the enchanter had a beautiful daughter, and the
young hero loved her and carried her off. This was true in the tale of
Jason. Aeetes had married the Ocean nymph Idyia (Knowing One), and
they had a daughter Medea (Contriving One). Jason, aided by the gods,
carried off the fair-ankled Medea and at last brought her safely to
Iolcus. The Theogony added that Medea was distinguished by the bril-
liant eyes, which Apollonius later declared characteristic of all descend-
ants of the Sun. Medea bore a child, Medus, whom Chiron reared in the
mountains.
The Theogony seemed to imply that Medus was a child of Jason.
70
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? JASON AND MEDEA
Later authors thought ordinarily that he was the son of Aegeus of
Athens. They referred to him as founder of the race of Medes. The
Theogony did not speak of Medea as herself an enchantress. This idea
was recorded soon after in the epic called Returns, and it became an
essential part of the tale.
The evil enchantress Circe lived in an island so distressing for trav-
elers that it bore the name Aeaea (Oh Dear! Oh Dear! ). Her brother,
the evil enchanter Aeetes, inhabited a city so grievous for travelers that
it bore the similar name of Aea (Oh Dear! ). In fact the name Aeetes
appears to have signified "Man of Oh Dear. " Mimnermus, who first re-
corded the name of his residence, described the city as lying eastwards
by the margin of Ocean, where the flame of the Sun is stored in a treas-
ury. Presumably Aeetes lived near his father, the Sun, in the country of
the sunrise.
Meanwhile the Catalogues had mentioned other circumstances af-
fecting the voyage of the Argo. Chief among these was the tale of the
famous Fleece. A number of early peoples, after giving up the practice
of human sacrifice, have invented a myth to explain why human victims
were replaced by animals. In a noble Old Testament narrative God
tested the loyalty of Abraham by commanding him to offer his son Isaac
and then forbade the sacrifice of the child and accepted that of a ram.
In the Greek tale Jupiter commanded Athamas, ruler of Orchomenus in
Boeotia, to offer his son Phrixus but later directed that a ram should be
offered in his place.
The myth seems originally to have been as follows. Athamas and
his wife, the goddess Nephele (Cloud), became parents of a son Phrixus
and a daughter Helle. Jupiter for some reason devastated the country
with famine and inspired an oracle to the effect that he must be ap-
peased by the sacrifice of Phrixus. But he allowed Nephele to save her
child. From Mercury she obtained the supernatural ram which had been
the offspring of Neptune and Theophane (cf. Arachne, Bk. 6) and she
put on the creature's back both Phrixus and Helle. In Hindu mythology
the god Indra was once a ram which could travel by flight through the
air. A similar power was given the ram obtained by Nephele. Rising
from the ground, it proceeded in a northeasterly direction over land and
sea. As it flew above the strait leading from the Aegean to the Propontis,
Helle fell into the water and perished, giving the strait its historical
name, the Hellespont. Continuing to the eastern end of the Black Sea,
the ram descended to earth in the region called either Colchis or Colchos.
71
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SEVEN
Then the animal, which was gifted with human speech, commanded
Phrixus to offer it as a sacrifice and in this way to free himself from the
requirement of Jupiter. Meanwhile the people of Orchomenus tried to
obey the oracle by sacrificing Athamas in place of his son, and, although
the king escaped, both Athamas and his descendants continued in dan-
ger of being sacrificed to Jupiter. They could be safe only if someone
should bring evidence that the god was appeased.
The Catalogues, Hecataeus, and Herodotus all alluded to the story.
Sophocles told it in his Athamas. But he was unwilling to admit that
Jupiter had commanded the sacrifice of a human being. Athamas, he
said, had neglected his wife and had courted Ino, princess of Thebes
(cf. Bks. 3 and 4). Marrying her, he became father of two other sons.
Then Ino, who desired to assure their inheriting the crown, scorched the
seed grain, caused a famine, and obtained a false oracle commanding
the sacrifice. Nephele, who had left Athamas in displeasure, returned to
save her children. Euripides and the Manual repeated the new version,
with some changes of detail. Greek authors and artists often treated the
myth, and Ovid told it in his Fasti, ending with a transformation of the
ram into the constellation of that name (Aries).
The ram that saved Phrixus was distinguished by a remarkable
fleece. According to some authorities, it was colored as brilliantly as if
it had been dyed in Tyrian purple. The Catalogues thought rather that
it was golden, and this became the usual opinion. An object so remark-
able as this would be in itself a treasure, and it was even more valuable
as evidence that Athamas and his family had appeased the wrath of
Jupiter. The Greeks, informed perhaps by Nephele, were aware of its
importance. But Phrixus had gone with the Fleece to the limits of the
known world, and he never was able to restore it. Almost all authorities
agreed that he had no further relations with Greece and spent the rest
of his life in Colchis.
The Argo had visited Aeetes in quest of treasure. It occurred to
the early Greeks that his quest might well have been for the treasure of
the Golden Fleece. The Catalogues implied the idea, Mimnermus stated
it clearly, and it became an essential part of the story. Hitherto Aeetes
had reigned over a kingdom in the region of sunrise. According to the
new idea, he must have been ruler of Colchis. Both the Catalogues and
Simonides implied this, and Pindar stated it clearly. Aeetes must also
have got possession of the Fleece. Sophocles explained that Phrixus
72
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? JASON AND MEDEA
gave him the Fleece and received in return an older daughter of Aeetes
named Chalciope.
In the earliest accounts Jason appears to have chosen as his fol-
lowers only men from Iolcus. The Catalogues added that Hercules sailed
with Jason but continued with him only as far as Northern Greece.
Pherecydes and Herodotus repeated the idea. Theocritus imagined that
Hercules went as far as Mysia on the eastern shore of the Propontis and
that he was left there while seeking his beloved attendant Hylas. This
became the usual tradition, and some authors supposed that he continued
on foot from Mysia to Colchis. Other famous heroes were included in the
crew from time to time, until the Argo was said to have carried all those
living in the generation before the Trojan War. The Manual added even
the heroine Atalanta, daughter of Schoeneus (cf. Bk. 10). In the begin-
ning, Jason's followers were pictured as remaining passive while Jason
performed the various exploits. Later they assumed more prominence:
often an adventure was transferred from Jason to one of them, so that
in the account of Apollonius, Jason himself became a relatively colorless
character.
The Catalogues mentioned another important incident of the
voyage. Prehistoric Greeks had referred to sudden, violent winds as
the Harpies (Snatchers). In the Iliad the West Wind and the Harpy
Podarge (Swift Foot) had been parents of two horses driven by Achilles.
In the Odyssey the Harpies were spoken of as carrying off any person
who vanished mysteriously. Both Telemachus and Eumaeus feared that
Ulysses had met this fate. Penelope told how the Harpies carried away
three daughters of Pandareos and made them servants to the Furies.
This event was portrayed later in the famous sculptured tomb of Xan-
thus. The Iliad and Odyssey said nothing about the form of the Harpies.
But in the following century the Greeks appear to have been influenced
by an Egyptian idea of the human soul as appearing after death in the
shape of a bird with a human head. The Theogony spoke of Thaumas
and the Oceanid Electra as parents of two Harpies, Aello (Stormwind)
and Ocypete (Swift Flyer), and described them as fair-tressed, winged
beings able to keep up with winds and birds. The Manual repeated this
account but named other Harpies also, without indicating their parent-
age. Aeschylus pictured the Harpies as hideous bird-like creatures, an
idea that was followed in most later accounts. Since it was characteristic
of violent winds to soil everything with dust, and characteristic of pred-
atory birds to be noisome and foul, Apollonius imagined the Harpies as
73
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SEVEN
filthy creatures ruining what they did not carry away. Vergil, repeating
these ideas, described them as having the faces of pale, emaciated women
and having feathered bodies with claw-like hands; and he suggested
their being identical with the Furies.
Two of these creatures the Catalogues associated with a blind king
Phineus. Apparently Phineus was an enchanter, who employed the
Harpies for his evil purposes. They transported him to the region of
the Black Sea and appear to have acted as his agents in opposing
the Argonauts. The sons of Boreas, Zetes and Calais, vanquished the
Harpies and pursued them southwards through the air. One Harpy
perished in a river of southern Greece, which afterwards bore the name
Harpys. The other took refuge in a group of islands to the south. There
Mercury required the pursuers to turn back, and the islands were called
the Strophades (Turning Point) from this event. Meanwhile the van-
quished Phineus gave the other Argonauts information which was neces-
sary for the success of their voyage.
This adventure Aeschylus made the subject of his drama called
Phineus, and later authors included it regularly in the tradition of the
Argo. Vergil seems to have imagined at least three Harpies, for he
named as the eldest of them Celaeno (Dusky One). The country in which
the Argonauts met with Phineus was thought usually to have been
Bithynia, on the northeastern shore of the Propontis.
The Catalogues observed that Phineus had incurred blindness will-
ingly in order to enjoy length of days. But, according to the Great
Eoiae, the gods blinded him for telling matters which they desired to
conceal. This became the usual explanation. Apollonius and Vergil
supposed that Phineus had been himself a victim of the Harpies. As an
additional punishment the gods had assigned these creatures to plunder
and defile his food, so that he was reduced to extreme hunger and misery.
According to Apollonius, the gods allowed Zetes and Calais to drive off
the Harpies, and in return for the deliverance Phineus gave information
about the voyage.
The Catalogues offered also the earliest precise statement as to the
route by which Jason returned from the city of Aeetes. After arriving
at the shores of Colchis, a ship could enter the mouth of the Phasis River
and continue eastwards up the stream. Beyond this fact the author had
no definite information, but he had heard that in time the traveler would
reach a great body of salt water. And he imagined the Phasis as a strait
leading into the eastern part of the Ocean which was reported to encircle
74
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? JASON AND MEDEA
the known world. This route, he said, was followed by Jason and the
Argo. The mythographer Hecataeus added that, after proceeding south-
wards along the coast of Ocean, the Argo entered the upper course of
the river Nile and returned to the Mediterranean Sea. But, according to
Pindar, the Argo followed the coast of Ocean until it arrived at the
southern coast of Libya. Then the heroes transported their ship over-
land in a northerly direction for twelve days. Arriving at a certain Lake
Tritonis, they continued by water to the Mediterranean.
These accounts of a return by way of the east and south had as-
sumed that a ship could reach the Ocean by sailing up the Phasis. Shortly
after Pindar's time the Greeks learned that it could not. The situation
proved to be as follows. Travelers up the Phasis proceeded inland until
the stream became too shallow, continued on foot through a pass in the
mountains, and arrived at the salt Caspian Sea. From there an ancient
trade route led eastwards through Persia to unknown countries of Cen-
tral Asia. Checked by the new information, the Greeks fell back tem-
porarily on the idea that Jason must have returned by very nearly
the same route which he had followed on his outward voyage. And
both Sophocles and Callimachus told of his coming home through the
Propontis.
Aeschylus treated the early part of the voyage in three plays, which
now are lost. In the first of these he narrated the departure from Iolcus
and named at least a few of the Argonauts.
normal boys. But, when the down appeared on their cheeks, feathered
wings resembling those of their father began to sprout from their sides.
Ovid then mentioned them, rather abruptly, as followers of Jason in
quest of the Golden Fleece. At this point he digressed from the mythical
63
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SIX
history of Athens, and he did not return to it until the middle of the fol-
lowing book.
Ovid spoke of the twins as sailing with the Minyae. This name
ancient authors frequently used to designate the crew of the Argo. Its
origin appears to have been uncertain. Apollonius had suggested that
Jason and his bravest followers were descendants of King Minyas, the
founder of Orchomenus in Boeotia. Ovid spoke of the Argo as the first
ship to sail the seas. In this he followed a tradition common among the
ancients, to which he had alluded already in his Amores, but here
the statement obviously was contradicted by his preceding account of
Tereus.
After Ovid's time the myth of Orithyia was retold by Statius.
During the Renaissance Ovid's narrative interested two leading poets.
Camoens showed Orithyia persuading Boreas to allay the storm, in
order that Gama might arrive safely in India. Milton in his Elegy on a
Fair Infant declared that, when Boreas carried off Orithyia, Winter re-
solved to emulate his example. After long search he found a worthy
bride in the infant but unwittingly killed her with his cold embrace.
Piombo treated the story of Orithyia in painting. Rubens made it
the theme of a famous work. Flamen used it in a statue for the gardens
of the Tuileries.
*******
Of the seven major tales in Book Six the majority were of early
origin and often had been treated by Greek authors. The tales of Niobe,
Marsyas, and Orithyia also had been favorite themes of Greek art. Of
the twenty-seven lesser tales twelve were of early origin, and a number
of these had been popular with Greek authors and artists. But fifteen
had appeared only in Alexandrian times. Although Roman authors had
shown interest in many of the tales, they had told in full only those of
Alcmena and Philomela, and the Tereus of Accius afterwards perished
with the fall of Rome. It was Ovid who made these many stories acces-
sible during the Middle Ages, and his work continued to be the most
convenient source during modern times.
Although Ovid had the advantage of many stories which long had
attracted attention, he seldom used the earlier versions. In the tale of
Iphimidia he followed the Odyssey, and in the tale of Philomela he drew
much from Sophocles. Otherwise he took his outlines entirely from Alex-
andrian authors, and he owed the tale of Philyra to Vergil. Often Ovid
64
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? BOOK SIX
preferred an Alexandrian source merely because it happened to be the
most convenient, but sometimes by using a little known Alexandrian
author he was able to give the familiar tale a new and very interesting
development. To novelty of this kind in the older stories he added the
further novelty of many other stories which were unfamiliar or wholly
unknown.
In the Sixth Book, the influence of the Manual became more im-
portant than it had been since Book Three. The Manual furnished the
outline for more than half of the major tales, including the important
myth of Niobe, and for several of the lesser tales. The effect of Nicander
became more important than it had been during the preceding book.
Nicander provided the outline for the three major tales of Arachne, the
Lycian Peasants, and Marsyas. Callimachus supplied the important
minor tale of Latona at Delos, incidents of which appeared in each of
the three chief stories in the first half of the book. For three lesser myths
Ovid seems to have used Boeus. At least thirteen lesser tales he bor-
rowed from Alexandrian authors whom we cannot identify, and eight of
these we know only from him.
Throughout the book Ovid found a difficult problem of adjustment.
Almost always the tales which he selected had had no previous relation
to one another. Ovid was obliged to invent a plausible relation of time
and circumstance. On several occasions he was glad to repeat methods
which had proved helpful in his previous books. And in the tale of
Arachne he resorted again to the method of having a character in one
story narrate still others. But he did this in a new manner and with un-
usually brilliant success. In many cases the question of relative dates
proved exceedingly difficult. Ovid wished to give his tales an appearance
of orderly, historical succession. This was difficult in the case of tales
which hitherto had remained isolated. And it was much more difficult in
the case of many other tales which well-known tradition had associated
differently with stories appearing elsewhere in Ovid's poem. To remove
or lessen the inconsistency required continual use of tact and skill.
Ovid not only chose many tales which were new but improved his
material continually by valuable innovations. He took from Phidias sug-
gestions for the contest of Athena with Neptune and from Scopas an
important incident in the tragedy of Niobe. Theocritus and Varro of
Atax suggested a new transformation of Marsyas. Vergil aided Ovid in
many tales, notably those of Arachne, Philomela, and Orithyia. And
Ovid borrowed important incidents from his own earlier stories of Io and
65
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SIX
Pentheus. But he did not stop with these. Continually he added further
improvements of his own invention. And to the myth of Arachne he gave
special interest by contrasting it elaborately with the previous tale of
the Muses and the Pierids.
By the use of much new material, by great originality and manifold
skill, Ovid made the Sixth Book one of the most remarkable in his mas-
terpiece. And this despite much that was unattractive in his subjects.
Yet few of his books will show more numerous and glaring faults. The
justly famous tales of Arachne, Niobe, and Philomela are marred by
passages of crude maladjustment. The tales of Niobe and Philomela
afford flagrant examples of ill-timed wit. And the stories of Niobe,
Philomela, and Marsyas contain needless obscurities, which (in the case
of the two latter tales) have sometimes perplexed their warmest ad-
mirers. Readers greatly interested in the subject have been willing to
overlook these shortcomings in the treatment. But even those without
such interest will find these faults accompanied and more than compen-
sated by extraordinary merit.
During ancient times the Sixth Book had a very important influ-
ence. It affected interestingly the work of the younger Seneca, Lucan,
and Statius, and the tale of Arachne became a center of violent religious
controversy between Pagan and Christian. In the Middle Ages several
tales interested profoundly the leading poets of the time. With the
Renaissance the effect became still more important and more widely dif-
fused. And again in the nineteenth century many prominent poets man-
ifested unusual interest.
Among authors not ordinarily showing influence of the Metamor-
phoses were Sidney, Byron, and Lesconte de Lisle. A notable effect ap-
peared in the case of Chretien de Troyes, Milton, and Lewis Morris.
Dante and Camoens showed their interest in a great number of tales.
And the Sixth Book as a whole affected deeply the work of Chaucer and
Shakespeare. But with no author was its influence so remarkable as with
Spenser.
A number of tales attracted modern painters and they became the
theme of several influential masterpieces. The tales of Leda, Antiopa,
and Orithyia interested modern sculptors. Those of Arachne and Philo-
mela had a notable effect on modern science.
66
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? BOOK SEVEN
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? CONTENTS OF BOOK SEVEN
PAGE
Jason and Medea . . . . . . . . . . 69
Aeson Rejuvenated . . . . . . . . . 97
Pelias and Medea's Flight to Athens . . . . . . 109
The Origin of Aconite . . . . . . . 120
Deeds of Theseus and Preparations of Minos . . . . 125
Creation of the Myrmidons . . . . . . . . 129
Cephalus and Procris . . . ? . . . . 142
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? ? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? JASON AND MEDEA
Jason and Medea
As Ovid had observed in the previous tale, the Argo was regarded
as the first ship ever launched on the sea. The name appears to have
meant originally Swift One, in allusion to the vessel's rapid motion. Af-
terwards the inventor of the ship was supposed to have been a certain
Argus inhabiting Iolcus, a port of Thessaly, and the Argo was thought
to have been named in his honor. The tradition of the voyage seems to
have originated with a prehistoric expedition undertaken by the people
of Iolcus about the middle of the thirteenth century B. C. King Pelias
made Jason commander of the Argo and sent him on a quest. The object
originally assigned is not clear, but probably it was some idea of finding
treasure or of obtaining wealth by trade. This voyage was regarded not
only as the first expedition by sea but as an ambitious and difficult one,
which passed the limit of the known world and encountered all the mys-
terious perils of sea and shore.
Jason went first to the island of Lemnos in the Aegean Sea, and
there Jason and Hypsipyle became parents of a son named Euneus.
Jason's visit was thought to account for an actual prehistoric settlement
made by Thessalians in the island of Lemnos. Proceeding from there,
Jason accomplished his mission and at length returned to Iolcus. At
least so much of the story had taken form earlier than the time of the
first recorded literature, for the Iliad spoke of Pelias as a former king
of Iolcus and of Euneus, son of Jason, as king of Lemnos at the period
of the Trojan War.
The Odyssey referred to the story of the Argo as well known to all
and noted many further circumstances. Pelias, it observed, was a son of
Neptune and of Tyro (cf. Arachne, Bk. 6), and Tyro later married
Cretheus, founder and first king of Iolcus, and became the mother of
Aeson. This implied that Pelias was a usurper and that Aeson ought
legally to have succeeded his father as king of Iolcus, an idea which later
authors mentioned explicitly. According to fairy lore popular in all
countries of the world, a young hero, going on a quest, visited the home
of a malevolent sorcerer and attained his object in spite of the sorcerer's
opposition. This, the Odyssey noted, was the case with Jason. He vis-
ited the home of Aeetes, child of the Sun and the Oceanid Perse, brother
of Circe the evil enchantress. And Aeetes himself was an evil enchanter.
69
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SEVEN
Although subsequent authors did not repeat the statement that Aeetes
was an enchanter, they often implied that it was true.
While Jason was returning from the land of Aeetes, the Odyssey
continued, he encountered the Wanderers or Whirling Rocks (Planctae).
These were beetling cliffs, pounded by heavy waves and frequented by
storms of fire. Even the doves carrying ambrosia to Jupiter could not
pass this danger unharmed, for always the rock destroyed one of them
and Jupiter had to procure another in its place. Because Jason was spe-
cially favored by Juno, his vessel passed safely by; but other ships per-
ished with all on board. Circe afterwards informed Ulysses that the
Wanderers lay not far from her island and close to the home of the
Sirens, and she advised him to,choose a different route on which he would
meet the less formidable perils of Scylla and Charybdis.
Apollonius afterwards gave a clearer account of Jason's adventure.
The fire, he said, kept spurting out from the cliffs into a mist, which
always hid the sea; and great waves continually poured over sharp
ledges, which skirted the base of the rock. Juno persuaded Vulcan to
quench the fire while Jason was passing and she caused Thetis and other
nymphs to lift the Argo over the successive reefs, a labor so great that it
required an entire day in springtime. The Odyssey had not localized the
Wanderers definitely. Apollonius and other Alexandrian Greeks asso-
ciated them with the western Mediterranean and Sicily. In this region
were the mountainous Lipari Islands, still famous for Stromboli and
other active volcanoes.
Further details about Jason appeared in the Theogony. Pelias, it
seems, not only had usurped the throne of Aeson but had been guided by
an evil purpose when he sent Jason on the quest. This might have been
inferred from the account in the Odyssey, but the Theogony added much
that was new. According to popular fairy lore that suggested the ad-
venture with Aeetes, the enchanter had a beautiful daughter, and the
young hero loved her and carried her off. This was true in the tale of
Jason. Aeetes had married the Ocean nymph Idyia (Knowing One), and
they had a daughter Medea (Contriving One). Jason, aided by the gods,
carried off the fair-ankled Medea and at last brought her safely to
Iolcus. The Theogony added that Medea was distinguished by the bril-
liant eyes, which Apollonius later declared characteristic of all descend-
ants of the Sun. Medea bore a child, Medus, whom Chiron reared in the
mountains.
The Theogony seemed to imply that Medus was a child of Jason.
70
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? JASON AND MEDEA
Later authors thought ordinarily that he was the son of Aegeus of
Athens. They referred to him as founder of the race of Medes. The
Theogony did not speak of Medea as herself an enchantress. This idea
was recorded soon after in the epic called Returns, and it became an
essential part of the tale.
The evil enchantress Circe lived in an island so distressing for trav-
elers that it bore the name Aeaea (Oh Dear! Oh Dear! ). Her brother,
the evil enchanter Aeetes, inhabited a city so grievous for travelers that
it bore the similar name of Aea (Oh Dear! ). In fact the name Aeetes
appears to have signified "Man of Oh Dear. " Mimnermus, who first re-
corded the name of his residence, described the city as lying eastwards
by the margin of Ocean, where the flame of the Sun is stored in a treas-
ury. Presumably Aeetes lived near his father, the Sun, in the country of
the sunrise.
Meanwhile the Catalogues had mentioned other circumstances af-
fecting the voyage of the Argo. Chief among these was the tale of the
famous Fleece. A number of early peoples, after giving up the practice
of human sacrifice, have invented a myth to explain why human victims
were replaced by animals. In a noble Old Testament narrative God
tested the loyalty of Abraham by commanding him to offer his son Isaac
and then forbade the sacrifice of the child and accepted that of a ram.
In the Greek tale Jupiter commanded Athamas, ruler of Orchomenus in
Boeotia, to offer his son Phrixus but later directed that a ram should be
offered in his place.
The myth seems originally to have been as follows. Athamas and
his wife, the goddess Nephele (Cloud), became parents of a son Phrixus
and a daughter Helle. Jupiter for some reason devastated the country
with famine and inspired an oracle to the effect that he must be ap-
peased by the sacrifice of Phrixus. But he allowed Nephele to save her
child. From Mercury she obtained the supernatural ram which had been
the offspring of Neptune and Theophane (cf. Arachne, Bk. 6) and she
put on the creature's back both Phrixus and Helle. In Hindu mythology
the god Indra was once a ram which could travel by flight through the
air. A similar power was given the ram obtained by Nephele. Rising
from the ground, it proceeded in a northeasterly direction over land and
sea. As it flew above the strait leading from the Aegean to the Propontis,
Helle fell into the water and perished, giving the strait its historical
name, the Hellespont. Continuing to the eastern end of the Black Sea,
the ram descended to earth in the region called either Colchis or Colchos.
71
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SEVEN
Then the animal, which was gifted with human speech, commanded
Phrixus to offer it as a sacrifice and in this way to free himself from the
requirement of Jupiter. Meanwhile the people of Orchomenus tried to
obey the oracle by sacrificing Athamas in place of his son, and, although
the king escaped, both Athamas and his descendants continued in dan-
ger of being sacrificed to Jupiter. They could be safe only if someone
should bring evidence that the god was appeased.
The Catalogues, Hecataeus, and Herodotus all alluded to the story.
Sophocles told it in his Athamas. But he was unwilling to admit that
Jupiter had commanded the sacrifice of a human being. Athamas, he
said, had neglected his wife and had courted Ino, princess of Thebes
(cf. Bks. 3 and 4). Marrying her, he became father of two other sons.
Then Ino, who desired to assure their inheriting the crown, scorched the
seed grain, caused a famine, and obtained a false oracle commanding
the sacrifice. Nephele, who had left Athamas in displeasure, returned to
save her children. Euripides and the Manual repeated the new version,
with some changes of detail. Greek authors and artists often treated the
myth, and Ovid told it in his Fasti, ending with a transformation of the
ram into the constellation of that name (Aries).
The ram that saved Phrixus was distinguished by a remarkable
fleece. According to some authorities, it was colored as brilliantly as if
it had been dyed in Tyrian purple. The Catalogues thought rather that
it was golden, and this became the usual opinion. An object so remark-
able as this would be in itself a treasure, and it was even more valuable
as evidence that Athamas and his family had appeased the wrath of
Jupiter. The Greeks, informed perhaps by Nephele, were aware of its
importance. But Phrixus had gone with the Fleece to the limits of the
known world, and he never was able to restore it. Almost all authorities
agreed that he had no further relations with Greece and spent the rest
of his life in Colchis.
The Argo had visited Aeetes in quest of treasure. It occurred to
the early Greeks that his quest might well have been for the treasure of
the Golden Fleece. The Catalogues implied the idea, Mimnermus stated
it clearly, and it became an essential part of the story. Hitherto Aeetes
had reigned over a kingdom in the region of sunrise. According to the
new idea, he must have been ruler of Colchis. Both the Catalogues and
Simonides implied this, and Pindar stated it clearly. Aeetes must also
have got possession of the Fleece. Sophocles explained that Phrixus
72
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? JASON AND MEDEA
gave him the Fleece and received in return an older daughter of Aeetes
named Chalciope.
In the earliest accounts Jason appears to have chosen as his fol-
lowers only men from Iolcus. The Catalogues added that Hercules sailed
with Jason but continued with him only as far as Northern Greece.
Pherecydes and Herodotus repeated the idea. Theocritus imagined that
Hercules went as far as Mysia on the eastern shore of the Propontis and
that he was left there while seeking his beloved attendant Hylas. This
became the usual tradition, and some authors supposed that he continued
on foot from Mysia to Colchis. Other famous heroes were included in the
crew from time to time, until the Argo was said to have carried all those
living in the generation before the Trojan War. The Manual added even
the heroine Atalanta, daughter of Schoeneus (cf. Bk. 10). In the begin-
ning, Jason's followers were pictured as remaining passive while Jason
performed the various exploits. Later they assumed more prominence:
often an adventure was transferred from Jason to one of them, so that
in the account of Apollonius, Jason himself became a relatively colorless
character.
The Catalogues mentioned another important incident of the
voyage. Prehistoric Greeks had referred to sudden, violent winds as
the Harpies (Snatchers). In the Iliad the West Wind and the Harpy
Podarge (Swift Foot) had been parents of two horses driven by Achilles.
In the Odyssey the Harpies were spoken of as carrying off any person
who vanished mysteriously. Both Telemachus and Eumaeus feared that
Ulysses had met this fate. Penelope told how the Harpies carried away
three daughters of Pandareos and made them servants to the Furies.
This event was portrayed later in the famous sculptured tomb of Xan-
thus. The Iliad and Odyssey said nothing about the form of the Harpies.
But in the following century the Greeks appear to have been influenced
by an Egyptian idea of the human soul as appearing after death in the
shape of a bird with a human head. The Theogony spoke of Thaumas
and the Oceanid Electra as parents of two Harpies, Aello (Stormwind)
and Ocypete (Swift Flyer), and described them as fair-tressed, winged
beings able to keep up with winds and birds. The Manual repeated this
account but named other Harpies also, without indicating their parent-
age. Aeschylus pictured the Harpies as hideous bird-like creatures, an
idea that was followed in most later accounts. Since it was characteristic
of violent winds to soil everything with dust, and characteristic of pred-
atory birds to be noisome and foul, Apollonius imagined the Harpies as
73
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? METAMORPHOSES -- BOOK SEVEN
filthy creatures ruining what they did not carry away. Vergil, repeating
these ideas, described them as having the faces of pale, emaciated women
and having feathered bodies with claw-like hands; and he suggested
their being identical with the Furies.
Two of these creatures the Catalogues associated with a blind king
Phineus. Apparently Phineus was an enchanter, who employed the
Harpies for his evil purposes. They transported him to the region of
the Black Sea and appear to have acted as his agents in opposing
the Argonauts. The sons of Boreas, Zetes and Calais, vanquished the
Harpies and pursued them southwards through the air. One Harpy
perished in a river of southern Greece, which afterwards bore the name
Harpys. The other took refuge in a group of islands to the south. There
Mercury required the pursuers to turn back, and the islands were called
the Strophades (Turning Point) from this event. Meanwhile the van-
quished Phineus gave the other Argonauts information which was neces-
sary for the success of their voyage.
This adventure Aeschylus made the subject of his drama called
Phineus, and later authors included it regularly in the tradition of the
Argo. Vergil seems to have imagined at least three Harpies, for he
named as the eldest of them Celaeno (Dusky One). The country in which
the Argonauts met with Phineus was thought usually to have been
Bithynia, on the northeastern shore of the Propontis.
The Catalogues observed that Phineus had incurred blindness will-
ingly in order to enjoy length of days. But, according to the Great
Eoiae, the gods blinded him for telling matters which they desired to
conceal. This became the usual explanation. Apollonius and Vergil
supposed that Phineus had been himself a victim of the Harpies. As an
additional punishment the gods had assigned these creatures to plunder
and defile his food, so that he was reduced to extreme hunger and misery.
According to Apollonius, the gods allowed Zetes and Calais to drive off
the Harpies, and in return for the deliverance Phineus gave information
about the voyage.
The Catalogues offered also the earliest precise statement as to the
route by which Jason returned from the city of Aeetes. After arriving
at the shores of Colchis, a ship could enter the mouth of the Phasis River
and continue eastwards up the stream. Beyond this fact the author had
no definite information, but he had heard that in time the traveler would
reach a great body of salt water. And he imagined the Phasis as a strait
leading into the eastern part of the Ocean which was reported to encircle
74
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-26 11:20 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015005276665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? JASON AND MEDEA
the known world. This route, he said, was followed by Jason and the
Argo. The mythographer Hecataeus added that, after proceeding south-
wards along the coast of Ocean, the Argo entered the upper course of
the river Nile and returned to the Mediterranean Sea. But, according to
Pindar, the Argo followed the coast of Ocean until it arrived at the
southern coast of Libya. Then the heroes transported their ship over-
land in a northerly direction for twelve days. Arriving at a certain Lake
Tritonis, they continued by water to the Mediterranean.
These accounts of a return by way of the east and south had as-
sumed that a ship could reach the Ocean by sailing up the Phasis. Shortly
after Pindar's time the Greeks learned that it could not. The situation
proved to be as follows. Travelers up the Phasis proceeded inland until
the stream became too shallow, continued on foot through a pass in the
mountains, and arrived at the salt Caspian Sea. From there an ancient
trade route led eastwards through Persia to unknown countries of Cen-
tral Asia. Checked by the new information, the Greeks fell back tem-
porarily on the idea that Jason must have returned by very nearly
the same route which he had followed on his outward voyage. And
both Sophocles and Callimachus told of his coming home through the
Propontis.
Aeschylus treated the early part of the voyage in three plays, which
now are lost. In the first of these he narrated the departure from Iolcus
and named at least a few of the Argonauts.
