on the frontiers of Raetia by
Antonius
Primus to xxii.
William Smith - 1844 - Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities - b
(Dirksen, Bruchstücke early as the reign of M.
Aurelius ; by some as low
aus den Schriflen der Römischen Juristen, p. 101 ; as Diocletian ; while others have fixed upon
Maiansius, ad XXX. Ictorum Fragm. Comment various points intermediate between these two
vol. ii. p. 208–217. )
[J. T. G. ] extremes. The critics who, with Van Hoven,
FELIX MAGNIS, a fellow-student and cor- carry him back as far as the middle of the second
respondent of Sidonius Apollinaris, and conse- century, rest their opinion chiefly on the purity of
quently lived between A. D. 430—480. Felix was his diction, upon the indications afforded by allu-
of the family of the Philagrii (Sidon. Propempt. ad sions to the state of the Church, both as to its
Libell. 90, Ep. ii. 3), and was, raised to the rank internal constitution, and to the attention which it
of patrician (Ep. ii. 3). The letters of Sidonius to attracted from without, upon the strong resem-
Felix are curiously illustrative of the distress and blance which the piece bears to those Apologies
dismemberment of the Roman provinces north of which confessedly belong to the period in question,
the Alps in the fifth century, A. D.
and upon the probability that the Fronto twice
A poem (Carm. ix. ) and five letters (ii. 3, iii. named in the course of the colloquy is the same
4, 7, iv. 5, 10) are addressed by Sidonius to with the rhetorician, M. Cornelius Fronto, so
Felix.
(W. B. D. ] celebrated under the Antonines. But this posi-
FELIX, M. MINU'CIUS, a distinguished tion, although defended with great learning, can
Roman lawyer, the author of a dialogue entitled scarcely be maintained against the positive eri-
Octavius, which occupies a conspicuous place among dence afforded by St. Jerome, who, in his account
the early Apologies for Christianity. The speakers of illustrious men, where the individuals men-
are Caecilius Natalis, a Pagan, and Octavius Janu- tioned succeed each other in regular chronological
arius, a true believer, who, while rambling along order, sets down Minucius Felix after Tertullian
the shore near Ostia during the holidays of the and before Cyprian, an arrangement confirmed by
vintage with their common friend Minucius, are a paragraph in the Epistola ad Magnum, and not
led into a discussion in consequence of an act of contradicted by another in the Apologia ad Pan-
homage paid by Caecilius to a statue of Serapis, a machium, where Tertullian, Cyprian, and Felix,
proceeding which calls forth severe, although indi- are grouped together in the same clause. The cir-
rect animadversions from Octavius. Irritated by cumstance that certain sentences in the Octarius and
these remarks, Caecilius commences a lengthened in the De Idolorum Vanitate are word for word the
discourse, in which he combines a formal defence same, although it proves that one writer copied
of his own practice with an attack upon the prin- from the other, leads to no inference as to which
ciples of his companion. His arguments are of a was the original. We may therefore acquiesce in
twofold character. On the one hand he assails re- the conclusion that our author flourished about
vealed religion in general, and on the other the A. D. 230. That he was a lawyer, and attained to
Christian religion specially. Octavius replies to eminence in pleading, is distinctly asserted both by
all his objections with great force and eloquence ; St. Jerome and Lactantius ; but beyond this we
and when he concludes, Caecilius, feeling himself know nothing of his personal history, except in so
defeated, freely acknowledges his errors, and de far as we are led by his own words to believe that
clares himself a convert to the truth.
he was by birth a Gentile, and that his conversion
The tone of this production is throughout earnest did not take place until he had attained to man-
and impressive ; the arguments are well selected, hood. We are further told (Hieron. I. c. ) that a
and stated with precision ; the style is for the book entitled De Fato, or Contra Mathematicas,
most part terse and pregnant, and the diction is was circulated under his name, but that, although
extremely pure ; but it frequently wears the aspect evidently the work of an accomplished man, it
of a cento in which a number of choice phrases was so different in style and general character from
have been culled from various sources. There is, the Octarius, that they could scarcely have pro-
moreover, occasionally a want of simplicity, and ceeded from the same pen.
some of the sentiments are expressed in language It has already been remarked that this dialogue
which borders upon declamatory inflation. But was long supposed to form a part of the treatise of
these blemishes are not so numerous as to affect Arnobius, Adversus Gentes. It was first assigned
seriously our favourable estimate of the work as a to its rightful owner, and printed in an indepen-
whole, which, in the opinion of many, entitles the dent form, by Balduinus (Heidelberg. 1560), who
author to rank not much below Lactantius. Its prefixed a dissertation, in which he proved his
a
## p. 145 (#161) ############################################
FENESTELLA.
FEROX.
145
a
FELIX.
cal point of view is not rery
jous topics are touched upon
ew being evidently to furnish
most common popular objeto
of Dupin, who imagined that
ndency to materialism, seems
i upon a misapprehension of
massages whose orthodony be
the Octarius was for a long
ing to Amobius, and was
e eighth book of his treate
twithstanding the express
e, whose words (de ling
to leare no room for les
;
which Minucius Felir
By some he is placed as
urelius; by some as low
hers hare fixed upon
te between these 170
0, with Van Horen,
e middle of the second
hiefly on the purity of
tions afforded by allo-
'burch, both as to its
he attention which it
the strong resci-
to those Apologies
e period in question
it the Fronto twice
olloquy is the same
rnelius Fronta, s
Ps. But this posi-
Teat learning, co
the positive eri-
ho, in his account
individuals nens
alar chronological
after Tertulian
ent confirmed by
lagnum, and Dot
point so indisputably, that we are surprised that | i. 6; Hieron. in Euseb. Chron. Ol. cxcix; Diomedes,
such an error should have escaped the keen eyes of p. 361. ed. Putsch ; Non. Marcell
. ii. s. v. Prae-
Erasmus and other great scholars. Since that sente, iii. s. v. Reticulum, iv. s. o. Rumor; Madrig.
time a vast number of editions have been pub de Ascon. Ped. &c. p. 64. )
(W. R. )
lished, a full account of which will be found in FE'NIUS RUFUS. (Rupus)
Funccius, Schönemann, and Bähr. For general FERE'TRIUS, a surname of Jupiter, which is
purposes, that of Jac. Gronovius (8vo. Lug. Bat. probably derived from ferire, to strike; for persons
1707) forming one of the series of Variorum who took an oath called upon Jupiter, if they
Classics ; that of Lindner (8vo. Longosal. 1760) swore falsely, to strike them as they struck the
reprinted, with a preface by Ernesti (ibid. 1773) ; victim they sacrificed to him. (Fest. s. r. Lapidem
and that of Muralto, with a preface, by Orelli Silicem. ) Others derived it from ferre, because he
(8vo. Turic. 1836), will be found the most useful. was the giver of peace, or because people dedicated
The German translations by J. G. Russwurm (4to. (fercbant) to him spolia opima. (Fest. s. v. Fere-
Hamb. 1824), and by J. H. B. Lübkert (8vo. irius ; Liv. i. 10 ; Propert. iv. 10. 46 ; comp.
Leip. 1836), may be consulted with advantage. JUPITER. )
(L. S. )
In illustration, we may read the essay of Bal- FEROʻNIA, an ancient Italian divinity, who
duinus, which is appended to the edition of Gro originally belonged to the Sabines and Faliscans,
novius ; J. D. Van Hoven, Epistola ad Gerh. and was introduced by them among the Romans.
Meermann, 4to. Camp. 1766, reprinted in Lind-Greek writers, as usual, describe her as of Greek
ner's edition of 1773; H. Meier, Comment. de origin. Dionysius (ii. 49) thus relates, that the
Mirucio Felice (8vo. Turic. 1824); and the re- Lacedaemonians who emigrated at the time of
marks prefixed to the translation of Russwurm. Lycurgus, after long wanderings (pepóuevos), at
(Hieronym. de Viris Il. 58, Ep. ad Magnum, length landed in Italy, where they founded a town
Apolog. ad Pammach. , Epitaph. Nepot. ; Lactant. Feronia, and built a temple to the goddess Fero-
Dio. Instit. i. 9, v. l. ; Dupin, Bibl. Eccles. vol. i. p. nia. But, however this may be, it is extremely
117; Funccius, de L. L. Vegeta Senectute, x. & 10– difficult to form a definite notion of the nature of
16 ; Le Nourry, Apparat. ad Bibl. Patr. vol. ii. diss. this goddess. Some consider her to have been
i. ; Schröck, Kirchengescht. vol. iï. p. 417; Schöne- the goddess of liberty, because at Terracina slaves
mann, Bibl. Patr. Lat. ii. & 2; Bähr, Gesch. der were emancipated in her temple (Serv. ad Aen.
Römisch. Litt. Suppl. Band ü. Abtheil. § 18 - viii. 465), and because on one occasion the freed-
21. )
(W. R. ] men at Rome collected a sum of money for the
FELIX, SEXTI’LIUS, was stationed, a. d. 70, purpose of offering it to her as a donation. (Liv.
on the frontiers of Raetia by Antonius Primus to xxii. 1. ) Others look upon her as the goddess of
watch the movements of Porcius Septiminus, pro- commerce and traffic, because these things were
curator of that province under Vitellius. Felix carried on to a great extent during the festival
remained in Raetia until the following year, when which was celebrated in honour of her in the town
he assisted in quelling an insurrection of the Tre of Feronia, at the foot of mount Soracte. But
viri. (Tac. Hist. iii. 5, iv. 70. ) [W. B. D. ] commerce was carried on at all festivals at which
FENESTELLA, a Roman historian, of con- many people met, and must be looked upon as a
siderable celebrity, who flourished during the reign natural result of such meetings rather than as their
of Augustus, and died, according to the Eusebian cause. (Dionys. iii. 32 ; Strab. v. p. 226 ; Liv.
Chronicle, a. D. 21, in the 70th year of his age. xxvi. 11, xxvii. 4 ; Sil. Ital. xii. 84. ) Others
His great work, entitled Annales, frequently quoted again regard her as a goddess of the earth or the
by Asconius, Pliny, A. Gellius, and others, ex- lower world, and as akin to Mania and Tellus,
tended to at least twenty-two books, as appears partly because she is said to have given to her son
from a reference in Nonius, and seems to have three souls, so that Evander had to kill him thrice
contained very minute, but not always perfectly before he was dead (Virg. Acn. iii. 564), and
accurate, information with regard to the internal partly on account of her connection with Soranus,
affairs of the city. The few fragments preserved whose worship strongly resembled that of Feronia.
relate almost exclusively to events subsequent to [SORANUS. ] Besides the sanctuaries at Terracina
the Carthaginian wars; but whether the narrative and near mount Soracte, she had others at Trebula,
Teached from the foundation of Rome to the down in the country of the Sabines, and at Luna in
fall of the republic, or comprehended only a portion Etruria. (Comp. Serv. ad Aen. xi. 785 ; Varro,
of that space, we have no means of determining. de L. L. v. 74 ; Müller, die Etrusker, vol. i. p. 302,
We are certain, however, that it embraced the vol. ii. p. 65, &c. )
(L. S. ]
greater part of Cicero's career. In addition to the FEROX, JU’LIUS. (FEROX, URSEIUS. ]
Annales, we find a citation in Diomedes from FEROX, URSEIUS, a Roman jurist, who pro-
“Fenestellam in libro Epitomarum secundo," of bably flourished between the time of Tiberius and
which no other record remains ; and St. Jerome Vespasian, and ought not to be confounded (as
speaks of Carmina as well as histories ; but the Panziroli has done, De claris Interpr. Juris. 38)
Archaica, ascribed in some editions of Fulgentius with the Julius Ferox who was consul, A. D. 100,
to Fenestella, must belong, if such a work ever in the reign of Trajan (Plin. Ep. ii. 11, vii. 13),
existed, to some writer of a much later epoch. and who is mentioned in an ancient inscription
A treatise, De Sacerdotiis et Magistratibus (Gruter, vol. i. p. 349) as curator alvei et riparum
Romanorum Libri II. , published at Vienna in Tiberis et cloacarum. The jurist Ferox was certainly
1510, under the name of Fenestella, and often re- anterior to the jurist Julianus, who, according to
printed, is, in reality, the production of a certain the Florentine Index to the Digest, wrote four
Andrea Domenico Fiocchi, a Florentine jurist of books upon Urseins. In the Collatio Legum Mo
the fourteenth century. (Plin. H. N. viij. 7, ix. 17, saicarum et Romanarum (xi. 7), inserted in the
35, xv. 1, xxx. 11 ; Senec. Epist. 108; Suet. collections of Antejustinian law, is an extract from
Vil Terent. ; Gell. xv. 28; Lactant. de Falsa Rel. Ulpian, citing a tenth book of Urseius ; but what
pologia ad Par-
san, and Felir,
ause.
The cir
he Otaries and
rd for word ibe
writer copied
ce as to which
e acquiesce in
uristed about
nd attaided to
erted boob br
cond this re
ercept in 59
beliere that
is conversion
ned to mas
1. c. ) that a
Cathematics
t, altborga
ed man, it
tacter fra
bare pas
is dialogue
VOL. II.
L
treatise of
assigned
indepede
50), srbo
ored bis
## p. 146 (#162) ############################################
146
FEROX
FEROX.
.
$
was the precise subject of his works has not been part of the extract which appears to be the text
recorded, although it might perhaps be collected upon which Julianus comments. To this it may
from an attentive examination of the extracts from be answered, but without much plausibility, that
Julianus ad Urscium, in the Digest. In Dig. 9. Julianus took Urseius with the notes of Cassius und
tit. 2. s. 27. & 1, Urseius is quoted by Ulpian as Proculus as the subject of his commentary.
reporting an opinion of Proculus (et ita Proculuin It is singular that the meaning of the word apud
eristimasse Urscius refert), and hence it has been in such connection, if it be not used in different
inferred that Urseius was a Proculian. In a frag- meanings, – important though it appears to be at
ment of Paulus (Dig. 39. tit. 3. s. 11. 0 2) occurs first view, for the sake of legal biography and
the controverted expression, apud Ferocem Procu- chronology, to determine what that meaning is,
lus ait. Conversely, in Dig. 44. tit. 5. s. I. $ 10, is still a matter of undecided controversy. On the
Cassius (i. e. C. Cassius Longinus) is quoted by one hand we have in an extract from Paulus (Dig.
Ulpian as reporting an opinion of Urseius (et Cus- 17. tit. 2. s. 65. $ 8), Serrius apud Alfenum nolui;
sius existimasse Urscium refert); and, in Dig. 7. tit. in another extract from Paulus (Dig. 50. tit. 16.
4. s. 10. 5, again occurs, in a fragment of Ulpian, s. 77), Serrius apud Alfonum putat; and, in an
the controverted expression, Cassius apud Urseium extract from Marcellus (Dig. 46. tit. 3. s. 67), apud
scribit. Does the expression, apu Ferocem Pro Alfenum Servius respondet. In these cases Servius,
culus ait, mean that "Proculus is represented by Cicero's contemporary, who was the preceptor of
Ferox as saying what follows, or does it mean that Alfenus Varus (Dig. 1. tit. 2. s. 2. 44), can
Proculus, in his notes upon Ferox, says ? Is it scarcely be understood as commenting upon his
parallel to the expression, in the mouth of an junior. So we have Serrius apud Melam scribit,
English lawyer, Litlleton says, in Coke? or to the in an extract from Ulpian (Dig. 33. tit. 9. s. 3.
expression, Coke on Littleton, says ? The former $ 10). Now Mela, though he may have been born
interpretation seems more probable, if we merely before Servius died, was probably a generation later
consider that in Dig. 9. tit. 2. s. 27. § 1, Urseius is than Servius. On the other hand, we have (U'l-
represented as quoting Proculus, for the latter in- pian in Dig. 7. tit. 1. s. 17. Q 1) Aristo apud
terpretation would require us to suppose that each Cassium notat. Now Cassius was an elder con-
cited the other, and it is not thought likely that a temporary of Aristo, who seems to have been a
senior and more distinguished jurist would cite or pupil of Cassius (Dig. 4. tit. 8. s. 40), and to re-
comment upon a junior contemporary. But this ar- port his responsa (Dig. 17. tit. 2. s. 29. Ø 2), and
gument is reversed in the case of Urseius and Cas- we have evidence that Aristo wrote notes on Cas-
sius. If we admit that Cassius cites Urseius, sius. (Ulpian in Dig. 7. tit. 1. s. 7. $ 3.
aus den Schriflen der Römischen Juristen, p. 101 ; as Diocletian ; while others have fixed upon
Maiansius, ad XXX. Ictorum Fragm. Comment various points intermediate between these two
vol. ii. p. 208–217. )
[J. T. G. ] extremes. The critics who, with Van Hoven,
FELIX MAGNIS, a fellow-student and cor- carry him back as far as the middle of the second
respondent of Sidonius Apollinaris, and conse- century, rest their opinion chiefly on the purity of
quently lived between A. D. 430—480. Felix was his diction, upon the indications afforded by allu-
of the family of the Philagrii (Sidon. Propempt. ad sions to the state of the Church, both as to its
Libell. 90, Ep. ii. 3), and was, raised to the rank internal constitution, and to the attention which it
of patrician (Ep. ii. 3). The letters of Sidonius to attracted from without, upon the strong resem-
Felix are curiously illustrative of the distress and blance which the piece bears to those Apologies
dismemberment of the Roman provinces north of which confessedly belong to the period in question,
the Alps in the fifth century, A. D.
and upon the probability that the Fronto twice
A poem (Carm. ix. ) and five letters (ii. 3, iii. named in the course of the colloquy is the same
4, 7, iv. 5, 10) are addressed by Sidonius to with the rhetorician, M. Cornelius Fronto, so
Felix.
(W. B. D. ] celebrated under the Antonines. But this posi-
FELIX, M. MINU'CIUS, a distinguished tion, although defended with great learning, can
Roman lawyer, the author of a dialogue entitled scarcely be maintained against the positive eri-
Octavius, which occupies a conspicuous place among dence afforded by St. Jerome, who, in his account
the early Apologies for Christianity. The speakers of illustrious men, where the individuals men-
are Caecilius Natalis, a Pagan, and Octavius Janu- tioned succeed each other in regular chronological
arius, a true believer, who, while rambling along order, sets down Minucius Felix after Tertullian
the shore near Ostia during the holidays of the and before Cyprian, an arrangement confirmed by
vintage with their common friend Minucius, are a paragraph in the Epistola ad Magnum, and not
led into a discussion in consequence of an act of contradicted by another in the Apologia ad Pan-
homage paid by Caecilius to a statue of Serapis, a machium, where Tertullian, Cyprian, and Felix,
proceeding which calls forth severe, although indi- are grouped together in the same clause. The cir-
rect animadversions from Octavius. Irritated by cumstance that certain sentences in the Octarius and
these remarks, Caecilius commences a lengthened in the De Idolorum Vanitate are word for word the
discourse, in which he combines a formal defence same, although it proves that one writer copied
of his own practice with an attack upon the prin- from the other, leads to no inference as to which
ciples of his companion. His arguments are of a was the original. We may therefore acquiesce in
twofold character. On the one hand he assails re- the conclusion that our author flourished about
vealed religion in general, and on the other the A. D. 230. That he was a lawyer, and attained to
Christian religion specially. Octavius replies to eminence in pleading, is distinctly asserted both by
all his objections with great force and eloquence ; St. Jerome and Lactantius ; but beyond this we
and when he concludes, Caecilius, feeling himself know nothing of his personal history, except in so
defeated, freely acknowledges his errors, and de far as we are led by his own words to believe that
clares himself a convert to the truth.
he was by birth a Gentile, and that his conversion
The tone of this production is throughout earnest did not take place until he had attained to man-
and impressive ; the arguments are well selected, hood. We are further told (Hieron. I. c. ) that a
and stated with precision ; the style is for the book entitled De Fato, or Contra Mathematicas,
most part terse and pregnant, and the diction is was circulated under his name, but that, although
extremely pure ; but it frequently wears the aspect evidently the work of an accomplished man, it
of a cento in which a number of choice phrases was so different in style and general character from
have been culled from various sources. There is, the Octarius, that they could scarcely have pro-
moreover, occasionally a want of simplicity, and ceeded from the same pen.
some of the sentiments are expressed in language It has already been remarked that this dialogue
which borders upon declamatory inflation. But was long supposed to form a part of the treatise of
these blemishes are not so numerous as to affect Arnobius, Adversus Gentes. It was first assigned
seriously our favourable estimate of the work as a to its rightful owner, and printed in an indepen-
whole, which, in the opinion of many, entitles the dent form, by Balduinus (Heidelberg. 1560), who
author to rank not much below Lactantius. Its prefixed a dissertation, in which he proved his
a
## p. 145 (#161) ############################################
FENESTELLA.
FEROX.
145
a
FELIX.
cal point of view is not rery
jous topics are touched upon
ew being evidently to furnish
most common popular objeto
of Dupin, who imagined that
ndency to materialism, seems
i upon a misapprehension of
massages whose orthodony be
the Octarius was for a long
ing to Amobius, and was
e eighth book of his treate
twithstanding the express
e, whose words (de ling
to leare no room for les
;
which Minucius Felir
By some he is placed as
urelius; by some as low
hers hare fixed upon
te between these 170
0, with Van Horen,
e middle of the second
hiefly on the purity of
tions afforded by allo-
'burch, both as to its
he attention which it
the strong resci-
to those Apologies
e period in question
it the Fronto twice
olloquy is the same
rnelius Fronta, s
Ps. But this posi-
Teat learning, co
the positive eri-
ho, in his account
individuals nens
alar chronological
after Tertulian
ent confirmed by
lagnum, and Dot
point so indisputably, that we are surprised that | i. 6; Hieron. in Euseb. Chron. Ol. cxcix; Diomedes,
such an error should have escaped the keen eyes of p. 361. ed. Putsch ; Non. Marcell
. ii. s. v. Prae-
Erasmus and other great scholars. Since that sente, iii. s. v. Reticulum, iv. s. o. Rumor; Madrig.
time a vast number of editions have been pub de Ascon. Ped. &c. p. 64. )
(W. R. )
lished, a full account of which will be found in FE'NIUS RUFUS. (Rupus)
Funccius, Schönemann, and Bähr. For general FERE'TRIUS, a surname of Jupiter, which is
purposes, that of Jac. Gronovius (8vo. Lug. Bat. probably derived from ferire, to strike; for persons
1707) forming one of the series of Variorum who took an oath called upon Jupiter, if they
Classics ; that of Lindner (8vo. Longosal. 1760) swore falsely, to strike them as they struck the
reprinted, with a preface by Ernesti (ibid. 1773) ; victim they sacrificed to him. (Fest. s. r. Lapidem
and that of Muralto, with a preface, by Orelli Silicem. ) Others derived it from ferre, because he
(8vo. Turic. 1836), will be found the most useful. was the giver of peace, or because people dedicated
The German translations by J. G. Russwurm (4to. (fercbant) to him spolia opima. (Fest. s. v. Fere-
Hamb. 1824), and by J. H. B. Lübkert (8vo. irius ; Liv. i. 10 ; Propert. iv. 10. 46 ; comp.
Leip. 1836), may be consulted with advantage. JUPITER. )
(L. S. )
In illustration, we may read the essay of Bal- FEROʻNIA, an ancient Italian divinity, who
duinus, which is appended to the edition of Gro originally belonged to the Sabines and Faliscans,
novius ; J. D. Van Hoven, Epistola ad Gerh. and was introduced by them among the Romans.
Meermann, 4to. Camp. 1766, reprinted in Lind-Greek writers, as usual, describe her as of Greek
ner's edition of 1773; H. Meier, Comment. de origin. Dionysius (ii. 49) thus relates, that the
Mirucio Felice (8vo. Turic. 1824); and the re- Lacedaemonians who emigrated at the time of
marks prefixed to the translation of Russwurm. Lycurgus, after long wanderings (pepóuevos), at
(Hieronym. de Viris Il. 58, Ep. ad Magnum, length landed in Italy, where they founded a town
Apolog. ad Pammach. , Epitaph. Nepot. ; Lactant. Feronia, and built a temple to the goddess Fero-
Dio. Instit. i. 9, v. l. ; Dupin, Bibl. Eccles. vol. i. p. nia. But, however this may be, it is extremely
117; Funccius, de L. L. Vegeta Senectute, x. & 10– difficult to form a definite notion of the nature of
16 ; Le Nourry, Apparat. ad Bibl. Patr. vol. ii. diss. this goddess. Some consider her to have been
i. ; Schröck, Kirchengescht. vol. iï. p. 417; Schöne- the goddess of liberty, because at Terracina slaves
mann, Bibl. Patr. Lat. ii. & 2; Bähr, Gesch. der were emancipated in her temple (Serv. ad Aen.
Römisch. Litt. Suppl. Band ü. Abtheil. § 18 - viii. 465), and because on one occasion the freed-
21. )
(W. R. ] men at Rome collected a sum of money for the
FELIX, SEXTI’LIUS, was stationed, a. d. 70, purpose of offering it to her as a donation. (Liv.
on the frontiers of Raetia by Antonius Primus to xxii. 1. ) Others look upon her as the goddess of
watch the movements of Porcius Septiminus, pro- commerce and traffic, because these things were
curator of that province under Vitellius. Felix carried on to a great extent during the festival
remained in Raetia until the following year, when which was celebrated in honour of her in the town
he assisted in quelling an insurrection of the Tre of Feronia, at the foot of mount Soracte. But
viri. (Tac. Hist. iii. 5, iv. 70. ) [W. B. D. ] commerce was carried on at all festivals at which
FENESTELLA, a Roman historian, of con- many people met, and must be looked upon as a
siderable celebrity, who flourished during the reign natural result of such meetings rather than as their
of Augustus, and died, according to the Eusebian cause. (Dionys. iii. 32 ; Strab. v. p. 226 ; Liv.
Chronicle, a. D. 21, in the 70th year of his age. xxvi. 11, xxvii. 4 ; Sil. Ital. xii. 84. ) Others
His great work, entitled Annales, frequently quoted again regard her as a goddess of the earth or the
by Asconius, Pliny, A. Gellius, and others, ex- lower world, and as akin to Mania and Tellus,
tended to at least twenty-two books, as appears partly because she is said to have given to her son
from a reference in Nonius, and seems to have three souls, so that Evander had to kill him thrice
contained very minute, but not always perfectly before he was dead (Virg. Acn. iii. 564), and
accurate, information with regard to the internal partly on account of her connection with Soranus,
affairs of the city. The few fragments preserved whose worship strongly resembled that of Feronia.
relate almost exclusively to events subsequent to [SORANUS. ] Besides the sanctuaries at Terracina
the Carthaginian wars; but whether the narrative and near mount Soracte, she had others at Trebula,
Teached from the foundation of Rome to the down in the country of the Sabines, and at Luna in
fall of the republic, or comprehended only a portion Etruria. (Comp. Serv. ad Aen. xi. 785 ; Varro,
of that space, we have no means of determining. de L. L. v. 74 ; Müller, die Etrusker, vol. i. p. 302,
We are certain, however, that it embraced the vol. ii. p. 65, &c. )
(L. S. ]
greater part of Cicero's career. In addition to the FEROX, JU’LIUS. (FEROX, URSEIUS. ]
Annales, we find a citation in Diomedes from FEROX, URSEIUS, a Roman jurist, who pro-
“Fenestellam in libro Epitomarum secundo," of bably flourished between the time of Tiberius and
which no other record remains ; and St. Jerome Vespasian, and ought not to be confounded (as
speaks of Carmina as well as histories ; but the Panziroli has done, De claris Interpr. Juris. 38)
Archaica, ascribed in some editions of Fulgentius with the Julius Ferox who was consul, A. D. 100,
to Fenestella, must belong, if such a work ever in the reign of Trajan (Plin. Ep. ii. 11, vii. 13),
existed, to some writer of a much later epoch. and who is mentioned in an ancient inscription
A treatise, De Sacerdotiis et Magistratibus (Gruter, vol. i. p. 349) as curator alvei et riparum
Romanorum Libri II. , published at Vienna in Tiberis et cloacarum. The jurist Ferox was certainly
1510, under the name of Fenestella, and often re- anterior to the jurist Julianus, who, according to
printed, is, in reality, the production of a certain the Florentine Index to the Digest, wrote four
Andrea Domenico Fiocchi, a Florentine jurist of books upon Urseins. In the Collatio Legum Mo
the fourteenth century. (Plin. H. N. viij. 7, ix. 17, saicarum et Romanarum (xi. 7), inserted in the
35, xv. 1, xxx. 11 ; Senec. Epist. 108; Suet. collections of Antejustinian law, is an extract from
Vil Terent. ; Gell. xv. 28; Lactant. de Falsa Rel. Ulpian, citing a tenth book of Urseius ; but what
pologia ad Par-
san, and Felir,
ause.
The cir
he Otaries and
rd for word ibe
writer copied
ce as to which
e acquiesce in
uristed about
nd attaided to
erted boob br
cond this re
ercept in 59
beliere that
is conversion
ned to mas
1. c. ) that a
Cathematics
t, altborga
ed man, it
tacter fra
bare pas
is dialogue
VOL. II.
L
treatise of
assigned
indepede
50), srbo
ored bis
## p. 146 (#162) ############################################
146
FEROX
FEROX.
.
$
was the precise subject of his works has not been part of the extract which appears to be the text
recorded, although it might perhaps be collected upon which Julianus comments. To this it may
from an attentive examination of the extracts from be answered, but without much plausibility, that
Julianus ad Urscium, in the Digest. In Dig. 9. Julianus took Urseius with the notes of Cassius und
tit. 2. s. 27. & 1, Urseius is quoted by Ulpian as Proculus as the subject of his commentary.
reporting an opinion of Proculus (et ita Proculuin It is singular that the meaning of the word apud
eristimasse Urscius refert), and hence it has been in such connection, if it be not used in different
inferred that Urseius was a Proculian. In a frag- meanings, – important though it appears to be at
ment of Paulus (Dig. 39. tit. 3. s. 11. 0 2) occurs first view, for the sake of legal biography and
the controverted expression, apud Ferocem Procu- chronology, to determine what that meaning is,
lus ait. Conversely, in Dig. 44. tit. 5. s. I. $ 10, is still a matter of undecided controversy. On the
Cassius (i. e. C. Cassius Longinus) is quoted by one hand we have in an extract from Paulus (Dig.
Ulpian as reporting an opinion of Urseius (et Cus- 17. tit. 2. s. 65. $ 8), Serrius apud Alfenum nolui;
sius existimasse Urscium refert); and, in Dig. 7. tit. in another extract from Paulus (Dig. 50. tit. 16.
4. s. 10. 5, again occurs, in a fragment of Ulpian, s. 77), Serrius apud Alfonum putat; and, in an
the controverted expression, Cassius apud Urseium extract from Marcellus (Dig. 46. tit. 3. s. 67), apud
scribit. Does the expression, apu Ferocem Pro Alfenum Servius respondet. In these cases Servius,
culus ait, mean that "Proculus is represented by Cicero's contemporary, who was the preceptor of
Ferox as saying what follows, or does it mean that Alfenus Varus (Dig. 1. tit. 2. s. 2. 44), can
Proculus, in his notes upon Ferox, says ? Is it scarcely be understood as commenting upon his
parallel to the expression, in the mouth of an junior. So we have Serrius apud Melam scribit,
English lawyer, Litlleton says, in Coke? or to the in an extract from Ulpian (Dig. 33. tit. 9. s. 3.
expression, Coke on Littleton, says ? The former $ 10). Now Mela, though he may have been born
interpretation seems more probable, if we merely before Servius died, was probably a generation later
consider that in Dig. 9. tit. 2. s. 27. § 1, Urseius is than Servius. On the other hand, we have (U'l-
represented as quoting Proculus, for the latter in- pian in Dig. 7. tit. 1. s. 17. Q 1) Aristo apud
terpretation would require us to suppose that each Cassium notat. Now Cassius was an elder con-
cited the other, and it is not thought likely that a temporary of Aristo, who seems to have been a
senior and more distinguished jurist would cite or pupil of Cassius (Dig. 4. tit. 8. s. 40), and to re-
comment upon a junior contemporary. But this ar- port his responsa (Dig. 17. tit. 2. s. 29. Ø 2), and
gument is reversed in the case of Urseius and Cas- we have evidence that Aristo wrote notes on Cas-
sius. If we admit that Cassius cites Urseius, sius. (Ulpian in Dig. 7. tit. 1. s. 7. $ 3.
