No More Learning

In fact he was fully employed in extending the
area of his small state, which at first comprised little beyond the
immediate neighbourhood of Ghazni. In the first twelve years of his
reign he extended his frontiers to the Oxus on the north and
approximately to the present boundary between Afghānistān and
Persia on the west. Two years after his accession Jaipāl, raja of the
Punjab, again invaded the kingdom of Ghazni from the east, but
terms of peace were arranged, and in 986 Sabuktigin, whose power
had been rapidly growing, invaded his enemy's territory and carried
off inany captives and much booty. Two years later he againg attack-
ed Jaipāl and compelled him to cede Kābul and much other territory,
but these expeditions were undertaken rather as measures of reprisal
and for the purpose of securing his dominions than with any intention
of propagating the faith.
In October 994 Sabuktigīn, by aiding Nūh II of Bukhājā to expel
Abu 'Ali Sūnjūr, a rebel and a leader of the Ismāʻīlian heretics, from
Khurāsān, obtained the government of that province, to which he
appointed as his deputy, his eldest son, the famous Mahmūd.
Sabuktigin died, in August 997, near Balkh, having firmly laid the
foundations of the great empire which was to be extended and con-
solidated by his more famous son.
The nobles of Balkh, in obedience to Sabuktigin’s will, acknow.
ledged as their sovereign his younger son Ismā‘il, but a party favour-
ed the claims of the more able and energetic Mahmūd. Mahmūd
wrote to his brother demanding the cession of Ghazni and promis-
ing to retain him as governor of Balkh, but his demand was rejected,
and the two brothers, one from Nishāpūr and the other from Balkh,
marched on Ghaznī. In a battle fought near the city Ismā īl was
defeated and compelled to take refuge in the fortress, but his nobles
surrendered him to his brother, who imprison ed him for the rest of
his life.
Mahmud was born on November 1, 971, and was therefore
twenty-seven years of age when he deposed his brother and ascended
the throne in 998. His kingdom at the time of his accession com-
prised the country now known as Afghānistān, and Khurāsān, or
eastern Persia. In the following year he added to it the province
of Sīstān. After this success he sought formal recognition of his
sovereignty from the Caliph, al-Qădir Billāh, who sent him a robe


## p. 13 (#49) ##############################################

II ]
MAHMOD
13
of investment and a patent conferring on him the titles Yamin-ud-
Daulah and Amin-ul Millah, from the former of which his successors
are known to eastern historians as the Yamini dynasty. It was on
this occasion that he is said to have vowed to undertake every year
an expedition against the idolators of India, but intestine troubles
claimed his immediate attention. 'Abd-ul-Malik II, the last Sāmānid
ruler of Bukhārā, was driven from his kingdom in 999 by Abu'l-
Husain Nasr I, Ilak Khān, Kāshghar, and his brother, Abu Ibrāhīm
al-Mustansir, who had found an asylum in Gurgān, thrice attempted
to establish himself in Khurāsān, where his forefathers had held sway.
Twice he drove Nasr, Mahmūd's brother, from Nīshāpūr, only to be
expelled when Nasr returned with reinforcements, and on the third
occasion he was defeated and fled to the Ghuzz Turkmans, with whom
he took refuge.
It is difficult to follow the long series of expeditions led by
Mahmud into India in pursuance of his vow, to reconcile the
accounts of historians who contradict not only one another but them-
selves, and to identify places disguised under a script ambiguous in it-
self and mutilated by generations of ignorant scribes. The number of
these expeditions is almost invariably given as twelve, but there are
few historians who do not give accounts, more or less detailed, of
more than twelve. The first is said to have been undertaken in 999 or
1000, when Mahmud, after annexing Sīstān, crossed the Indian
frontier and plundered or annexed some towns, but the authority for
this expedition is slight, Mahmūd had at this time little leisure
for foreign aggression, and the campaign may be regarded either as
apocryphal or as a foray undertaken by some of his officers.
In September, 1001, Mahmud left Ghazni with 15,000 horse and
advanced to Peshāwar, where Jaipāl I of the Punjab was prepared to
meet him with 12,000 horse, 30,000 foot and 300 elephants. The raja
was expecting reinforcements and was in no haste to engage before
their arrival, but Mahmūd's impetuosity left him no choice, and on
November 27th the two armies advanced to the attack, discharging
clouds of arrows. Those of the Hindus did great execution, but
the Muslims had the better mark, and their arrows, as well as the
swords of their horsemen, rendered many of Jaipāls elephants unma-
nageable or useless. The Hindus could not withstand the impetuosity
of the Muslim horse and by noon were in full flight, leaving 15,000
dead on the field or slain in the pursuit. Jaipāl and fifteen of his
relations were captured, and their jewels, including a necklace of
enormous value worn by the raja, formed part of Mahmūd's plunder-


## p. 14 (#50) ##############################################

14
THE GHAZNAVIDS
(ch.
After the battle Mahmūd attacked and plundered Und', then
an important city, and Jaipāl was permitted to ransom himself for a
large sum of money and a hundred and fifty elephants, but as the
ransom was not at once forthcoming was obliged to leave hostages
for its payment. His son, Anandpāl, made good the deficiency and
the hostages were released before Mahmūd returned to Ghazni, his
soldiers speeding them on their way with a contemptuous buffet on
their hinder parts.
After Mahmud's departure Jaipāl, overwhelmed with shame and
mortification, bowed to the decision of his subjects, who refused to
acknowledge a king who had been a captive in the hands of the
Muslims, and, after designating Anandpāl as his successor, mounted
a funeral pyre and perished in the flames.
in 1002 Mahmūd was occupied in crushing a rebellion in Sīstān.
The leader of the rebels escaped death by means of a ready tongue
and when brought before his conqueror addressed him by the then
unfamiliar title of Sultān? He was pardoned and rewarded with
the government of another district, Sīstān being included in the pro-
vincial government of Khurāsān.
In his campaign against Jaipāl Mahmūd had expected aid from
Bajra, the ruler of Bhātiya, the modern Uch, who had been on friendly
terms with Sabuktigin, but he had been disappointed and in 1004
he marched from Ghazni to punish Bajra for his failure to support
him. He was stoutly opposed but defeated Bajra before Uch and
compelled him to flee for refuge to the jungles on the banks of the
Indus, where, to esca pe capture by the Muslims, he stabbed himself.
His head was carried to Mahmūd and a general massacre of his dis-
organised troops followed. Mahmūd, after plundering Uch, re-
mained there for some time, engaged in making arrangements for
the permanent annexation of the state and the conversion of its
inhabitants, and it was not until the rivers were in flood in 1005 that
he set out on his return journey. In crossing them he lost his plunder
and much of his baggage, and was attacked during his retreat by
Abu-'l-Fath Dāūd, the ruler of Multān, and suffered considerable
loss.
Dāūd was the grandson of Shaikh Hamid Lodi, who had esta-
blished himself in Multān and had always cultivated friendly rela-
1 This is the town variously called Hind, Ohind, and Waihind. It is situated
in 34° 2' N. and 72° 27' E. fifteen miles above Attock, on the west bank of the Indus.
2 According to another account the Caliph bestowed this title on Mahmūd,
who is said to have been the first prince so honoured, but this is improbable, for
Mahmūd never used it on his coins but was always content with the designation of
Amir, which seems to have been that by which the Caliph distinguished him.


## p. 15 (#51) ##############################################

11 ]
DEFEAT OF ANANDPAL
15
tions with Sabuktigin, but his grandson had embraced the doctrines
of the Ismāʻili sect, and was therefore as abominable in Mahmūd's
eyes as any idolator in India. In the autumn of 1005 Mahmud
had marched against him, and in order to avoid the passage of
the rivers in their lower waters marched by way of Und, in the
dominions of Anandpā), of whose subservience he was assured.
Anandpāl, however, opposed his advance, but was defeated and
fied into Kashmir, and Mahmūd pursued his way through the
Punjab, plundering the country as he advanced.
The defeat of Anandpāl and Mahmūd's triumphal and devas-
tating progress overcame the resolution of Dāūd, who shut himself
up in Multān, and when Mahmúd prepared to form the siege of
the city offered as the price of peace a yearly tribute of 20,000
golden dirhams and abjuration of his heretical doctrines. The
invasion of his northern province by the Turks of Transoxiana
under Abu'l-Husain Nasr I of Bukhārā obliged Mahmūd to accept
these terms, and he returned with all speed towards the Oxus, ap.
pointing as governor of Ond, by which place he marched, Sukhpāl,
a grandson of Jaipāl, who, having been taken prisoner with his
grandfather, had accepted Islam, and was now known as Nawāsa
Shāh. We are not concerned with the details of Mahmūd's cam-
paign against the Ilak Khān, who was defeated and driven across
the Oxus, but it is an interesting fact that a corps of Indians formed
part of the victorious army.
On his return towards Ghazni in 1007 Mahmūd learnt that
Nawāsa Shāh had apostatised, was expelling the subordinate Muslim
officers from the district committed to his charge, and purposed to
rule it either as an independent sovereign or as the vassal of his
uncle, Anandpal. He marched at once towards Ond and ordered
those of his officers whose fiefs lay near that district to attack the
renegade. They captured Nawāsa Shāh and the treasure which he
had amassed and carried him before Mahmūd, who confiscated his
wealth and imprisoned him in a fortress for the remainder of his life.
In the following year Mahmūd resolved further to chastise
Anandpāl for his opposition to the passage of the Muslim army
through his dominions on its way to Multān, and in the autumn of
1008 marched to Peshāwar. Anandpāl, who had been aware of his
intention, had appealed for aid to other Hindu rajas, and one his-
torian mentions the rajas of Ujjain, Gwalior, Kālinjar, Kanauj,
Delhi, and Ajmer as having either marched in person or sent troops
to his assistance. The number and consequence of his allies are
perhaps exaggerated, but it is evident from Mahmūd's excessive


## p. 16 (#52) ##############################################

16
[ CH.
THE GHAZNAVIDS
caution that Anandpāl had received a considerable accession of
strength and that the army which he led into the field was a very
different force from that which Mahmud had so easily brushed aside
on his way to Multān. Among the most valuable of Anandpāl's
auxiliaries were the wild and warlike Khokars from the lower hills
of Kashmir.
The Hindu army was encamped between Und and Peshāwar,
and Mahmūd lay in camp before it for forty days without venturing
to attack it, although each day's delay brought it fresh reinforce-
ments and the only inconvenience which it suffered arose from the
difficulty of provisioning so great a force. This was alleviated by
the devotion of the men's wives, who sold their jewels to enable
their husbands to keep the field.
Mahmūd protected his flanks with entrenchments and instead
of following his usual impetuous tactics strove to entice the enemy
to attack him in his own strong position. In this he succeeded and
the Hindus attacked on December 31. A force of 30,000 Khokars,
bareheaded and barefooted and armed with strange weapons,
charged both his flanks simultaneously, passed over his trenches,
and did such execution among his troops that he was meditating a
retreat when a fortunate accident decided the day in his favour.
Anandpāl's elephant took fright and bore his rider from the field
and the Hindus, believing their leader's flight to be intentional,
broke and fled. The battle was now at an end and the pursuit
began. The Muslims pursued their enemy for a great distance,
slaying 8000 and taking thirty elephants and much other plunder.
The dispersal of this great army opened the way for a raid into
India and Mahmūd marched towards the fortress of Nagarkot,
or Kāngra, famous for its wealth. So little had his victory and
subsequent advance been expected that the fortress had been left
without a garrison, and was occupied only by the Brāhmans and
servants of the temple, who appeared on the walls and offered to
surrender. After some parleying the gates were opened to Mahmud
on the third day after his arrival, and the booty which fell into his
hands is said to have amounted to 700,000 golden dīnārs, besides
large quantities of vessels of gold and silver and of unworked gold
and silver, and jewels. With this plunder he returned to Ghazni
and exhibited it, piled on carpets in the courtyard of his palace, to
the wondering eyes of his subjects.
A year later he marched to Ghūr", a small district in the hills
between Ghazni and Herāt, which had hitherto remained inde-
? Usually written Ghor but Ghūr is correct.


## p. 16 (#53) ##############################################

The Cambridge History of India, Vol. III
Map 1

84
68
72
76
60
84
88
2
. Cher
36
KARKQTAS
Perashur
. Ghazi
Und
KINGDOM
Jbelum
Cbenab
GAZYNT
Ravi
Kangra
Lāhoro
Beas
Multās
Sutlej
Bhatinda
Thanekar
Brabmeputra
Indus
Ganges
Jumna
Hādsi
TOMARAS
DELHi Bhraa
CHAUHĀNS
Budtok
Muttrad
Sambhar
Ajudhya
PRATIHARAS
Gwalior
Manajstis
Bepants
PAWARS
CHANDELS
Anhilvara
KĀLACHURTS
Ujjain
KACAHYABASS
25
Luni
Chimbel
Prayas
. Odantapuri
(Bihar)
PĀLAS
KER
Tropic of
Cancer
Beyt Shankhadhar
Dwarka
(Sanath)\CHĀLOKYAS
Narbade
Mabaned
(SOLANKIS)
Tapti
Deogin Pengenga
YADAVAS
dapio ?
Godavari
Bbime Kaliyani
CHĀLŪRKAS
o
Warangal
KALINGAS
KÁKATĪYAS
Krisbro
Tungobada
Pennt
Dtārayatipura)
Н.
Kort
с
10
Madura
INDIA
in 1022
The boundary of the Kingdom of Ghazni is shown
thus:-
10 Contries and Proples sous . . . CHAUHANS
Tow. . .
Parashür
Riven. . .
Mehānodi
Scalos
30 99 100 909
English Miles
100
2_100 200 300
Kilometres
YANDYAR
68
72
76
BO
84
89


## p. 16 (#54) ##############################################



## p. 17 (#55) ##############################################

in ]
DEFEAT OF BHÎMPĂL
iz
a
pendent under its Tājik or Persian rulers, defeated its prince,
Muhammad bin Sūrī, and reduced him to the position of a vassal.
This expedition, though not directly connected with the history of
India is interesting in view of the subsequent relations between the
princes of Ghūr and those of Ghaznī. The former exterminated the
latter and achieved what they had never even attempted-the perma-
nent subjugation of northern India.
Later in 1010 Mahmud again invaded India. There are some
discrepancies regarding his objective, which the later historians, who
confound this expedition with that of 1014, describe as Thānesar. He
probably intended to reach Delhi but he was met at Tarāori, about
seven miles north of Karnāl, by a large Hindu army, which he defeat-
ed and from which he took much plunder, with which he returned
to Ghazni.
In 1011 he visited Multān, where his authority was not yet
firmly established, brought the province under more efficient control,
and extinguished the still glowing embers of heresy.
Meanwhile Anandpāl had died and had been succeeded by his
son, Jaipāl II, who made the fortress of Nandana? his chief stronghold,
and in 1013 Mahmūd invaded India to attack him. On hearing of
Mahmūd's advance he retired into the mountains, leaving his son Nidar
Bhimpāl, or Bhimpāl the Fearless, to defend his kingdom. The accounts
of the campaign are strangely at variance with one another. Accord.
ing to one Bhimpäl was besieged in Nandana and forced to surrender
while according to another he ventured to meet Mahmūd in the
open field, and was with difficulty defeated. Defeated, however, he
was, and Mahmúd turned into the hills in the hope of capturing him,
but captured only his baggage. Large numbers of the natives of the
country, guilty of no crime but that of following the religion of their
fathers, were carried off to Ghazni as slaves, and the remarks of one
historian probably reflect contemporary Muslim opinion on this
practice : 'Slaves were so plentiful that they became very cheap and
men of respectability in their native land were degraded to the
position of slaves of common shopkeepers. But this is the goodness
of God, who bestows honour on His own religion and degrades
infidelity. ' An officer named Sārugh was appointed governor of
Nandana and held that position at the time of Mahmûd's death.
Mahmud was next attracted by the wealth of the sacred city of
Thānesar, between Ambāla and Karnāl, and in 1014 marched from
Ghazni. When Jaipāl heard of his intention he sent a mission to
1 Situated in 30° 43' N. and 73° 17' E.
C. H. I. II.
2


## p. 18 (#56) ##############################################

18
THE GHAZNAVIDS
[CH.
Ghazni, offering to send him fiſty elephants annually if he would
spare so sacred a place, but Mahmud rejected the offer and required
of Jaipāl a free passage through his territory. Jaipāl perforce assented,
but warned Bijayapāl, the Towār raja of Delhi, of the approach of
the invader, thus enabling him to summon others to his assistance.
Mahmúd marched with such rapidity through the Punjab as to
forestall Bijayapāl's preparations, and found the shrine at Thānesar
undefended. He entered it without encountering serious opposi-
tion', plundered it of its vast treasures, and destroyed its idols,
except the principal object of worship, which was sent to Ghazni
to be buried in a public thoroughfare, where it might be trodden
underfoot by the people. After this easy success Mahmūd wished to
march on Delhi, but was over-ruled by his advisers, who were averse
from advancing so far into India until the annexation of the Punjab
should have furnished a base of operations within its borders.
In 1015 Mahmūd invaded Kashmir and besieged Lohkot or
Loharkot, but the weather was so inclement and the garrison so
constantly received reinforcements that he was compelled to raise
the siege and retire. This was his first serious reverse in India.
His army lost its way in the unfamiliar highlands and its retreat
was interrupted by flooded valleys, but at length, after much toil, it
debouched into the open country and returned to Ghazni in
disorder.
In 1016 and 1017 Mahmūd was occupied in Khvārazm and in
the northern provinces of his empire, and it was not until 1018
that he was able again to turn his attention to India. He now
prepared to penetrate further into the country than on any former
occasion, and to plunder the rich temples of Hindustan proper.
With an army of 100,000 horse raised in his own dominions and
20,000 volunteers from Turkistān, Transoxiana, and the confines of
Khūrāsān, soldiers of fortune eager to share in the rich spoils of
India, he marched from Ghazni in September, before the rainy
season in India was well past, and, guided by the Lohara raja of
Kashmir, crossed with some difficulty the Indus and the rivers of
the Punjab. On December 2 he crossed the Jumna and pursued his
march southwards. Avoiding Delhi, he followed the eastern bank
of the Jumna until he reached Baran, the modern Bulandshahr,
1 According to al-'Utbi, one of the earliest authorities, the Hindus had
assembled, and it was only after overcoming a desperate resistance that Mahmūd
entered the shrine, but al-'Utbi's topography is faulty, and he appears to be con.
founding this expedition with another.


## p. 19 (#57) ##############################################

11)
CAPTURE OF KÁNAUI
19
the first strong place which lay in his path. Hardat, the governor,
fied from the fortress and left the garrison to make what terms
they might with the invader. They propitiated him by the sur-
render of a great quantity of treasure and thirty elephants, and he
passed thence to Mahāban, on the eastern bank of the Jumna. Kul
Chandra, the governor of this place, drew up his forces and made
some attempt to withstand the Muslims but his army was put to
flight and he first slew his wife and son and then committed suicide.
Besides much other spoil eighty elephants were taken by Mahmud
at Mahāban, and he crossed the river in order to attack Muttra, the
reputed birthplace of Krishna and one of the most sacred shrines in
India. The city, though fortified and belonging to Bijayapāl, the
raja of Delhi, undefended, and Mahmūd entered it and plundered it
without hindrance. His hand was not stayed by his admiration of
its marble palaces and temples, unsparingly expressed in the dispatch
in which he announced his success, and the temples were rilled and,
as far as time permitted, destroyed. The plunder taken was enor-
mous, but it is difficult to believe stories of a sapphire weighing over
sixteen pounds and a half and of five idols of pure gold, over five
yards in height, though the quantity of gold taken may very well
have been over 548 pounds, as is recorded.
Mahmûd continued his march and on December 20 arrived be-
ſore Kanauj, the capital of Rāhtor Rājputs, whose raja, Jaichand,
terrified by the numbers, the discipline and achievements of the in-
vading army, withdrew from his strong city, the ramparts of which
were covered by seven detached forts, and left it open to Mahmūd,
who occupied both the city and the forts. The raja returned and
preserved his city from destruction by making submission to the
conqueror and surrendering eighty-five elephants, much treasure and
a large quantity of jewels.
From Kanauj Mahmūd marched to Manaich, afterwards known
as Zafarābād, near Jaunpur. The fortress was strongly garrisoned
and well furnished with supplies, but a vigorous siege of fifteen days
reduced the defenders to such despair that they performed the rite of
jauhar, first slaying their wives and children and then rushing out to
perish on the swords of the enemy.
>
1 This Hindi word signifies taking one's own life' and is applied to a rite
performed by Rajputs when reduced to the last extremity. First the women and
children are destroyed, or destroy themselves, usually by fire, and the men, arrayed
in saffron robes, rush on the enemy sword in hand and fight until all are slain.
Instances of the performance of this rite, the object of which is to preserve the
honour of the women from violation by the enemy, are common in Indian history.
2-2


## p. 20 (#58) ##############################################

20
(CH
THE GHAŻNAVIDS
After plundering Manaich, Mahmud attacked Asni, a fortress in
the immediate neighbourhood, defended by deep ditches and a dense
jungle, that is to say an enclosure of quickset bamboos, similar to
that which now surrounds the city of Rāmpur in Rohilkhand and
forms an impenetrable obstacle. Asni was the stronghold of a
powerful chief named either Chandpāl or Chandāl Bor, who had
recently been at war with Jaichand. On hearing of Mahmūd's ap-
proach he fled, leaving his capital a prey to the invader.
From Asni Mahmud inarched westwards to a town which ap-
pears in Muslim chronicles as Sharva and may perhaps be identified
with Seūnza on the Ken, between Kālinjar and Banda or Sriswagarh
on the Pahūj not far from Kūnch. This town was the residence of
another Jaichand, who is said to have been long at enmity with
Jaichand of Kanauj and even now held his foe's son in captivity.
Jaichand of Kanauj, who wished to terminate the strife and had sent
his son Bhimpal to arrange marriage between his sister and Jaichand
of Sharva, wrote to the latter dissuading him from rashly attempting
to measure his strength against that of the invader, and Jaichand of
Sharva followed this advice and left his capital, taking with him into
the forest in which he took refuge the greater part of his army and
his elephants. Mahmūd, not content with the plunder of Sharva,
pursued him by difficult and stony tracks into the forest, suddenly
attacked him shortly before midnight on January 5, 1019, and de-
feated him. Jaichand's elephants were captured, specie and jewels
rewarded the exertions of the victors, and captives were so numerous
that slaves could be purchased in the camp at prices ranging from
two to ten dirhams.
After this victory, the last exploit of a most laborious and ad-
venturous campaign, Mahmūd returned to Ghazni, and the booty
was counted. It is impossible to reconcile the conflicting accounts
of the enormous quantity of treasure taken, but the plunder in.
cluded over 380 elephants and 53,000 human captives. Of these
poor wretches many were sold to foreign merchants, so that Indian
slaves became plentiful in Transoxiana, 'Iraq and Khurāsān, 'and
the fair, the dark, and rich and the poor were commingled in one
common servitude. '
It was after this most successful raid that Mahmūd founded at
Ghazni the great Friday mosquel known as 'the Bride of Heaven'
1 In a Muslim city cach quarter has its mosque for the daily prayers, but it is
the duty of the faithful to assemble on Fridays at a central mosque in order that
the whole congregation may make a united act of worship. This mosque is known
as the Masjid. ;-Jåmi', 'the mosque which gathers all together. ' The expression
'Friday mosque' is not a literal translation, but is a convenient English equivalent.


## p. 21 (#59) ##############################################

11 ]
DEFEAT OF NANDA
21
and the college which was attached to it. His example was eagerly
followed by his nobles, who had been enriched by the spoils of India
and were amply supplied with servile labour ; and mosques, colleges,
caravanserais, and hospices sprang up on every side.
The date of Mahmūd's next expedition is given by some histo-
rians as 1019, but those authorities are to be preferred which place
it in 1021. Its occasion was the formation of a confederacy, headed
by Nanda, raja of Kālinjar, for the purpose of punishing Jaichand
of Kanauj for his pusillanimity and ready submission to the invader.
Nanda led the army to Kanauj and defeated and slew Jaichand,
whose death Mahmūd resolved to avenge, and an army greater
than any which he had hitherto led into India was assembled at
Ghaznī for the purpose. Jaipāl II, who had tamely acquiesced in
Mahmūd's passage through the Punjab, was now dead, or had
abdicated the throne, and had been succeeded by his more spirited
son, Bhimpāl the Fearless, who joined the Hindu confederacy but,
instead of rashly opposing Mahmud on his western frontier where
he would have been beyond the reach of help from his allies, with-
drew to the banks of the Jumna, where they might have supported
him. Here Mahmud found him encamped, and hesitated to attempt
the
passage
of the swollen river in the face of his army, but eight
Muslim officers, apparently without their king's permission or
knowledge, suddenly crossed the river with their contingents,
surprised the Hindus and put them to flight. The eight officers
continued to advance and occupied a city which cannot now be
identified', and Mahmūd, whose way was cleared before him, crossed
the Jumna and the Ganges, and found Nanda awaiting him on the
banks of the Sai with an army of 36,000 horse, 105,000 foot, and
6 40 elephants. Before this host Mahmül's heart failed him for a
moment, and he repented of having left Ghaznī, but prayer restored
his courage and he prepared for battle on the following day. In
the night, however, Nanda was unaccountably stricken with panic
and fled with a few attendants, leaving his army, his camp and his
baggage at the mercy of the invader. The confusion which prevailed
among the Hindus on the discovery of Nanda's Aight was at first
suspected by Mahmud to be a stratagem to induce him to attack,
but having ascertained that it was genuine he permitted his army
to plunder the camp, and a vast quantity of booty was collected
without a blow. Of Nanda's elephants 580 were taken and Mahmūd,
1 Professor Dowson has suggested that it was Bārī, in the present state of
Dholpur, but the identification is unconvincing.


## p. 22 (#60) ##############################################

22
[CH.
THE GHAZNAVIDS
who was apprehensive of disturbances in the Punjab, returned, con-
tent with this victory, to Ghaznī.
Later in the same year he led an expedition into two districts
disguised in Persian histories under the names of Qirāt and Nür and
said to have been situated between the boundaries of India and
Turkistan. The most probable conjecture identifies them with the
districts of Dir, Swāt, and Bajaur. The enterprise was successful
and the command of the last named district having been bestowed
upon 'Ali bin Qadr, a Saljuq Turk, Mahmud again invaded Kashmir
and besieged Loharkot, but abandoned the siege after a month and
retired from Kashmir. He did not return at once to Ghazni, but
marched into the Punjab to chastise Bhimpāl for having joined the
confederacy of the rajas of Hindūstān. The army, instead of
besieging Lahore, dispersed throughout the neighbouring country
in order to subsist upon it and to prevent supplies from reaching
the capital, and Bhimpāl was reduced to such straits that he fled
and sought an asylum with the Chauhan raja of Ajmer. His flight
marks the formal annexation of the Punjab by Mahmūd, who may
henceforth be regarded as an Indian ruler. Less than a century
and a half after his death the Indian province of his great empire
became the kingdom and the sole refuge of his descendants.
In the autumn of 1022 Mahmūd again invaded Hindūstān in
order to inflict further punishment on Nanda of Kālinjar. He
marched through the Doāb, crossed the Jumna below Delhi, and
was attracted by the strong fortress of Gwalior, to which he laid
siege but, finding that the operation was likely to be protracted,
permitted the Kachhwāha raja to compound for a formal submission
by a gift of no more than thirty-five elephants, and pursued his way
towards his real objective, Kālinjar, to the reduction of which he
was prepared to devote more time. After a protracted siege Nanda
was permitted to redeem his stronghold for three hundred elephants
which, instead of being formally delivered, were mischievously driven
in a body towards the Muslim camp, in the hope that they would
throw it into confusion ; but the Turks had by now some experience
of elephants, and caught and managed them. According to a possibly
mythical account of the event, their success compelled the unwilling
admiration of Nanda, who addressed to Mahmud an encomiastic
poem which was so highly praised by learned Hindus in the Muslim
camp that its author was rewarded with the government of fifteen
ortresses, a grant probably as hollow as the flattery which had
earned it. After this composition with Nanda, Mahmūd returned to
Ghazni with his spoils,
1
1


## p. 23 (#61) ##############################################

11 ]
SOMNĀTH
23
In 1023 he was occupied in Transoxiana and in the following year
set out on his most famous expedition into India. There is a con-
flict of authority on the subject of the date of his departure from
Ghaznī, but he appears to have left his capital on October 17, 1024,
at the head of his own army and a body of 30,000 composed, as on
a former occasion, of volunteers from Turkistān and other countries,
attracted by the hope of booty.
It is said that the impudent vaunts of the Brāhmans attached
to the wealthy religious establishment of Somnāth, on the coast of
Kāthīāwār suggested to Mahmūd the desirability of striking a blow
at this centre of Hinduism. The wealth and importance of the
shrine far exceeded those of any temple which he had yet attacked.
One thousand Brāhmans daily attended the temple, three hundred
barbers were maintained to serve the pilgrims visiting it, and three
hundred and fifty of the unfortunate women whom the Hindus
dedicate nominally to the service of their gods and actually to the
appetites of their priests danced continually before the idol, which
was a huge lingam or phallus. These priests and attendants were
supported from the endowments of the temple, which are said to
have consisted of the revenues of. 10,000 villages, the idol was washed
daily with water brought from the Ganges, 750 miles distant, and
the jewels of the temple were famed throughout the length and
breadth of India.
The Brāhmans attached to this famous shrine boasted that
their master Shiva, the moon-lord, was the most powerful of all the
gods and that it was only owing to his displeasure with other gods
that the invader had been permitted to plunder and pollute their
shrines. This provocative vaunt suggested to Mahmūd the des-
truction of the temple of Somnāth as the readiest means to a
wholesale conversion of the idolators.
He reached Multān on November 20 and decided to march
across the great desert of India to Ajmer. In his arduous under-
taking he made elaborate preparations. Each trooper was ordered
to carry with him fodder, water and food for several days, and
Mahmud supplemented individual efforts by loading his own estab-
lishment of 30,000 camels with water and supplies for the desert
march. These precautions enabled his army to cross the desert
without mishap, and on its reaching Ajmer, or rather the Chauhān
capital of Sāmbhar, for the modern city of Ajmer was not then
built, the raja fled and the invaders plundered the city and slew
many Hindus, but did not attempt the reduction of the fortress.
From Sāmbhar the army marched towards Anhiļvāra, now known


## p. 24 (#62) ##############################################

24
THE GHAZNAVIDS
[CH.
as Pātan, in Gujarāt, capturing on its way an unnamed fortress
which furnished it with water and supplies. Mahmud, on arriving
at Anhilvāra early in January, 1025, discovered that the raja,
Bhimdeo, and most of the inhabitants had fled, and the army,
having plundered the supplies left in the city, continued its march
to Somnāth. On his way thither Mahmud captured several small
forts and in the desert of Kāthīāwār encountered a force of 20,000,
apparently part of Bhimdeo's army, which he defeated and dis-
persed. Two days' march from Somnāth stood the town of Dewalwāra,
the inhabitants of which, secure in the protection of the god, had
refused to seek safety in flight and paid for this misplaced confidence
with their lives.
On reaching Somnāth the Muslims perceived the Hindus in
large numbers on the walls, and were greeted with jeers and threats.
On the following day they advanced to the assault and, having driven
the Hindus from the walls with well directed showers of arrows,
placed their scaling ladders and effected a lodgement on the
rampart. Many Hindus fell in the street-fighting which followed but
by dusk the Muslims had not established themselves sufficiently to
justify their remaining in the town during the night, and withdrew
to renew the attack on the following morning. They then drove the
defenders, with terrible slaughter, through the streets towards the
temple. From time to time bands of Hindus entered the temple
and after passionate prayers for the moon-lord's aid sallied forth to
fight and to die. At length a few survivors fled towards the sea and
attempted to escape in boats, but Mahmūd had foreseen this and
his soldiers, provided with boats, pursued and destroyed them.
When the work of blood was finished Mahmud entered the
temple, the gloom of which was relieved by the light from costly
lamps which flickered on the fifty-six polished pillars supporting
the roof, on the gems which adorned the idol, and on a huge golden
chain, the bells attached to which summoned to their duties the
relays of attendant priests. As the eyes of the conqueror fell upon
the hewn stone, three yards in height above the pavement, which
had received the adoration of generations of Hindus, he raised his
mace in pious zeal and dealt it a heavy blow. Some historians
relate that when he commanded that the idol should be shattered
the Brāhmans offered to redeem it with an enormous sum of money,
and that their prayers were seconded by the arguments of his
courtiers who urged that the destruction of one idol would not
extinguish idolatry and that the money might be employed for


## p. 25 (#63) ##############################################

II ]
SACK OF SOMNĀTH
25
>
pious purposes. To both Mahmūd replied that he would be a
breaker, not a seller of idols, and the work of destruction went
forward. When the idol was broken asunder gems worth more
than a hundred times the ransom offered by the Brāhmans were
found concealed in a cavity within it and Mahmūd's iconoclastic
zeal was materially rewarded ; but this story appears to be an
embellishment, by later historians, of the earlier chronicles. Of the
fragments of the idol two were sent to Ghazni to form steps at the
entrance of the great mosque and the royal palace, and two are
said to have been sent to Mecca and Medina, where they were
placed in public streets to be trodden underfoot.
Mahmūd was now informed that Bhimdeo of Anhilvāra had
taken reſuge in the island of Beyt Shankhodhar, at the north-
western extremity of the peninsular of Kāthīāwār, and pursued him
thither. If the chroniclers are to be credited it was possible in those
days to reach the island on horseback at low tide for native guides
are said to have pointed out the passage to Mahmud and to have
warned him that he and his troops would perish if the tide, or the
wind rose while they were attempting it. Mahmūd nevertheless
led his army across and Bhimdeo was so dismayed by his determi-
nation and intrepidity that he fled from the fortress in a mean
disguise and left it at the mercy of the invaders, who slew all the
males in the town and enslaved the women, among whom, accord-
ing to one authority, were some of the ladies of Bhimdeo's family.
From Beyt Shankhodhar Mahmud returned to Anhilvāra, where
he halted for some time to refresh his troops. It is difficult to believe
that the climate and situation of the city and the reputed existence
of gold mines in its neighbourhood induced Mahmūd seriously to
propose that the court should be transferred thither. The historian
responsible for this statement adds that Mahmud's proposal was
successfully combated by his counsellors, who impressed upon him
the impossibility of controlling from Anhilvāra the turbulent pro-
vince of Khurāsān, the acquisition and retention of which had been
so difficult and so costly; and Mahmúd prepared to return to Ghazni.
The line of retreat chosen was through the desert of Sind to Multān,
for Mahmūd was loth to risk his booty in a battle with the raja of
1 The stronghold is variously styled in Persian texts Kandana, Khandana, and
Khandaba, in which some resemblance to the last two syllables of the name of the
island can be traced, but the Persian script, being easily corruptible by ignorant or
careless scribes, is ill-suited for the preservation of the correct forms of proper names,
and it is the description of Bhimdeo's rețreat that enables us to identify it with Beyt
Shankhodhar,


## p. 26 (#64) ##############################################

26
(CH.
THE GHAZNAVIDS
Sāmbhar, who had closed with a great army the line by which he
had advanced.
The army suffered much in its retreat, first through the arid
desert of Sind and next through the Sind-Sāgar Doāb, where it was
so harassed and delayed by the Jāts of that region that it was not
until the spring of 1026 that it reached Ghazni.
Mahmūd's vanity was flattered after his return by the receipt
of complimentary letters from the Caliph al-Qadir Billāh conferring
fresh titles on him, distinguishing his sons in the same manner, and
formally recognizing him as ruler of Khurāsān, Hindūstān, Sīstān,
and Khvārazm, the whole of which great empire, with the exception
of India, where he held only one province, actually acknowledged
his sway:
In the autumn of this year Mahmūd made his last incursion into
India, a punitive expedition against the Jāts who had harassed his
retreat. He marched to Multān and there prepared a fleet of 1400
boats, each armed with an iron spike projecting from the prow
and similar spikes projecting from the gunwale on either side and
carrying a crew of twenty men armed with bows and arrows and
hand grenades of naphtha. The Jāts launched four, or, according
to some authorities, eight thousand boats and attacked the Muslims,
but their boats were pierced or capsized by the spikes and the
victory was so complete that the Jāts, almost to a man, were drown-
ed or slain. The Muslims then disembarked on the islands where
the Jāts had placed their wives and families for safety and carried
off the women and children as slaves.
The remainder of Mahmūd's reign was occupied by the suppres-
sion of the Saljūq Turks, whom he had incautiously encouraged too
far and by the annexation of western Persia. He died at Ghazni
on April 21, 1030.
It is only in a limited sense that Mahmūd can be described as
an Indian sovereign, for it was not until the later years of his reign
that he annexed and occupied the Punjab, the only Indian province
which he held, but he was the first to carry the banner of Islam
into the heart of India and to tread the path in which so many follow-
ed him. He founded an Indian dynasty, for the later kings of his
house, stripped of all their possessions in Persia, Transoxiana, and
Afghānistān, were fain to content themselves with the kingdom of
the Punjab, which had been but an insignificant province of his great
empire.
To Muslim historians Mahmúd is one of the greatest of the
champions of Islam. How far his Indian raiềs and massacres were


## p. 27 (#65) ##############################################

nI ]
MASODI
27
inspired by a desire of propagating his faith, for which purpose they
were ill adapted, and how far by avarice, must remain uncertain,
for Mahmūd's character was complex. Though zealous for Islam
he maintained a large body of Hindu troops, and there is no reason
to believe that conversion was a condition of their service. The
avarice most conspicuously displayed in his review of his riches
before his death and in his undignified lamentations over the pros-
pect of leaving them gave way to lavishness where his religion
or his reputation was concerned. His patronage of architecture
adorned Ghazni with many a noble building and his no less munifi-
cent patronage of letters made his court the home of Firdausi,
'Asāirī, Asadi of Tūs, Minūchihri of Balkh, 'Unsuri, 'Asjadi of Marv,
Farrukhi, Daqiqi; and many other poets of less note.
of less note. His treatment
of the first-named poet, whom he paid for his great epic in silver
instead of the promised gold, is remembered to his discredit, though
it was probably due less to his niggardliness than to a courtier's
jealousy.
Some European historians, ignorant of the principles of oriental
abuse and of the Islamic law of legitimacy have asserted, on the
authority of the satire which Firdausī, after his disappointment,
fulminated against his patron, that Mahmūd was a bastard, but
Firdausi's charge against him is only that his mother was not of
noble birth. He seems to have been the son of a concubine or hand.
maiden, but by the law of Islam the son of a concubine or handmaiden
is as legitimate as the son of a regularly married wiſe.
The story of the contest between Mahmūd's two sons is a mere
repetition of that of the contest between Mahmud and his brother
Ismāʻīl. Mas'ūd, the abler of the two, was at Hamadān when his
father died, and at once set out for Ghaznī, where a party of the
nobles had, in obedience to Mahmūd's will, acknowledged
Muhammad as their sovereign. Masʼūd was joined during his
advance by several of the leading nobles, including Ayāz, Mahmūd's
favourite slave and confidential adviser, and on October 4 those
who had hitherto supported Muhammad perceived that his cause
was lost, imprisoned him, and joined his brother, who had reached
Herat, but their tardy submission availed them little, and they were
either executed or imprisoned for life. The unfortunate Muhammad
was blinded, and was carried by Masóūd to Balkh, which for a time
became the royal residence.
Mas'ud never attempted to emulate his father's activity, but
history now sheds more light on the administration of the Indian
province of the empire. The government of the Punjab had been


## p. 28 (#66) ##############################################

28
[CH.
THE GHAZNAVIDS
SO
entrusted by Mahmúd to a Turkish officer named Ariyāruq, whom
Mas'ud summoned to Balkh. He was charged with oppression and
extortion, with preventing his victims from having access to their
sovereign, and with retaining with treasonable intent a large part
of the revenue. His power was great that it was considered
unlikely that he would obey the summons of Mas“ūd, but he pre-
sented himself at Balkh with a large contingent of Indian troops
and by ingratiating himself with the leading courtiers contrived to
evade for some time an inquiry into his administration, but his
enemies watched their opportunity and one day, when they knew
that he was drunk, persuaded Masóūd to summon him to court. He
was constrained to obey and Mas'ud incensed both by his dilatori.
ness in appearing and by the unseemliness of his conduct, caused
him to be arrested as a preliminary to an investigation. His Indian
troops were disposed to attempt a rescue but were dissuaded by
the threat that the first act of violence would be the signal for his
execution and by the promise that they should not suffer by the
change of masters, the royal officers were thus enabled to enter
Ariyāruq's quarters, and seize his movable property, his treasure,
and, more important than all, his accounts, which ſurnished ample
evidence of his misconduct. He was sent to Ghūr, where he was
put to death, and his friend Asaftigin Ghāzi shortly afterwards
shared his fate.
Masʼūd entered Ghazni on May 23, 1031, and incurred much
odium hy requiring, against the advice of his counsellors, a refund
of all the largesse which had been distributed by his brother on his
proclamation as Amir.
The affairs of the empire were now suffering from the loss of
Mahmūd's strong guiding hand. Western Persia was disturbed and
a new governor was sent thither, but the Punjab was in even greater
confusion, for no governor had been appointed since the recall of
Ariyāruq, and the officers sent to seize his property and conduct a
local inquiry into his administration were unable to cope with the
opposition of his relations and their dependants and partisans.
.
There was nobody at court fit for the important post of governor
of the Indian province, and Masóūd with some misgivings, appointed
to it his father's treasurer, Ahmad Niyāltigin, whose honesty was
dubious and whose inexperience of civil and military affairs was
notorious. It was believed that the retention of his son at Ghazni
as a hostage would ensure his fidelity and the instructions issued
for the guidance of officials in India indicate the nature of the
įrregularities of Ariyāruq's administration. They were not to under.


## p. 29 (#67) ##############################################

11 ]
TROUBLES AT LAHORË
29
take, without special permission, expeditions beyond the limits of the
Punjab, but were to accompany Ahmad on any expedition which he
might undertake ; they were not to drink, play polo, or mix in social
intercourse with the Hindu officers at Lahore ; and they were to
refrain from wounding the susceptibilities of those officers and their
troops by inopportune displays of religious bigotry.
Mas'ud would have visited the Punjab in person had his presence
not been more urgently required in the north, where the Saljuqs
threatened Balkh, and in the west, where the governor of 'Irāq
needed support and where the daily expected death of the Caliph,
al-Qadir Billāh, might breed fresh disorders. The news of his death
actually reached Balkh on November 9. Ahmad Niyāltigin, on
arriving in India, at once quarrelled with Abu-'l-Hasan, 'the Shīrāzi
Qāzi,' one of the officials who had been sent to collect the revenue
and inquire into Ariyāruq's administration. Abu-'l-Hasan was in-
clined to resent what he regarded as his supersession by Ahmad and
the latter's success in collecting revenue which he himself had been
unable to collect, but his opposition was based chiefly on the new.
comer's treasonable designs. Ahmad's appointment had turned his
head, and he encouraged the circulation of a rumour that his mother
had been guilty of an intrigue with Mahmud, of which he was the
offspring, and planned an expedition to distant Benares, the wealth
of which might enable him to establish himself as an independent
sovereign in India. Abu-'l-Hasan advised him to devote his atten-
tion to the civil administration and to delegate the actual command
of the troops to a military officer, but was curtly told to mind his
own business. Each party then reported the other to Mas'ūd, Ahmad
complained that Abu-'l-Hasan was attempting to undermine his
authority and Abu-'l-Hasan warned his master of Ahmad's designs.
In this contest Abu-'l-Hasan was worsted. He was ordered to
confine his attention to the collection of the revenue, which was his
affair, and to leave the general civil and military administration to
the governor.
Mas'ud suffered for his neglect of the warning. Ahmad led his
troops to Benares? , indulged them with twelve hours' plunder of
1 The date of this expedition coincides nearly with the date (June 19, 1033),
assigned for the death of the mythical hero Sālār Masíūd, popularly known as
Ghazi Miyān, at Balrāich. Sālār Masóūd is said to have been the son of Sālār Sāhū
and Māmal, sister of Mahmūd. The only work, pretending to be a history, which
treats of him, is the Mir‘āt. i-Masóūdi, written in the reign of Jahāngir by 'Abd-ur-
Rahmãn Chishti, who cites as his authority 'an old book written by Mullā
Muhammad of Ghazni, a servant of Sultan Mahmūd,' but no trace of ihis old
book’ is to be found and there is little reason for believing that it ever existed, save
in the imagination of ‘Abd-ur-Rahmān Chishti, who seems to have been a crazy
and credulous retailer of popular legends. The marvellous exploits of the young


## p. 30 (#68) ##############################################

30
( CH.
THE GHAZNAVIDS
the city and in 1034 returned to Lahore with enormous wealth. He
reported his success in glowing terms to Masóūd, but his report was
not accompanied by the expected remittance of spoil. Abu-'l-Hasan
reported at the same time that Ahmad was employing the plunder
of Benares in the raising of a large army recruited from the most
turbulent and disaffected ruffians of Lahore and the Punjab, that he
openly boasted of being the son of Mahmūd, and that he was on the
point of repudiating his allegiance. This report was corroborated by
Ahmad's conduct and it was decided to treat him as a rebel. There
was an awkward pause when Mas'ud asked who would undertake
the task of crushing the rebellion. The Muslim nobles, who under-
stood the difficulty of the enterprise and disliked the Indian climate,
were mute, and their silence was the opportunity of the Hindu Tilak,
who offered his services as a native who knew the country and for
whom the climate had no terrors.
Tilak was of humble origin, being the son of a barber, but was
handsome, enterprising and accomplished, speaking and writing well
both Hindi and Persian. From the service of Abu-'l-Hasan he had
been promoted to that of Mahmūd's minister and eventually to that
of Mahmúd himself. He had deserved well of Mas“ūd, for he had,
at considerable personal risk, consistently supported his cause against
that of his brother, and had been rewarded, after his accession, with
the chief command of the Hindu troops and the rank of a noble of
the empire.
When Tilak reached India he found that the officers and troops
who remained loyal to Masóūd had taken refuge in a fortress near
Lahore, where they were besieged by Ahmad. He occupied Lahore,
seized several Muslims known to be partisans of Ahmad, and caused
their right hands to be struck off. This ruthless measure so terrified
the rebellious troops that many of them deserted Ahmad and joined
Tilak. Judicious bribery still further thinned the ranks of the rebel
army, and when Ahmad was forced to stand and face his pursuers
he was defeated, and was deserted by all save a body of three
hundred horse. Instead of pursuing him Tilak offered the lately
rebellious Jāts the royal pardon and a sum of 500,000 dirhams as
the price of Ahmad's head. The Jāts surrounded the fugitive, slew
hero need not be related here, but he and his four mythical companions have
become objects of worship to a peculiar sect, the Pachpirijas, or followers of the five
saints, which embraces ignorant Hindus as well as ignorant Muslims and is of great
interest to students of folklore. There is probably some slender historical foundation
for the myth, but it can no longer be traced. See E. and D. II, 513-549 and The
Heroes Five, by the late Mr. R. Greeven, I. C. S. (Allahabad, 1898).


## p. 31 (#69) ##############################################

ti )
HINDU MERCENARIES
31
him, and demanded their reward. Tilak retorted that they had
,
already received it from the plunder of Ahmad's camp, but
after some chaffering Ahmad's head and his son, who had been
taken alive, were surrendered in consideration of the royal pardon
and 100,000 dirhams. Tilak presented his prizes to Masóūd at Marv
and was rewarded by further tokens of his master's favour.
On August 29, 1036, Masóūd sent his second son, Majdūd, to
India, as governor of the Punjab, and vowed, when he himself fell
sick in the following year, that if he recovered he would lead an
expedition into India and capture the fortress of Hānsī. On his
recovery his advisers warned him in vain of the folly of engaging in
a purposeless enterprise in India while the Saljūqs were threatening
his northern and eastern provinces : Masóūd insisted on the fulfil-
ment of his vow and on October 5, 1037, he left Ghazni for India.
On November 8 he reached the Jhelum and was detained there for
a fortnight by an illness serious enough to startle his conscience
into abjuration of the sin of wine-bibbing, and his wine was poured
into the river and the use of intoxicants forbidden in his army.
By November 29 he was able to take the field and on December 20
arrived before Hānsi and opened the siege of the fortress. In spite
of an obstinate resistance the town was stormed on January 1, 1038,
after the walls had been breached in five places, and was sacked ;
the Brāhmans and the fighting men were put to the sword and the
women and children were enslaved.
Mas'ūd returned to Ghaznī on February 11 to learn that the
Saljūqs were besieging the ancient town of Rai, near the modern
Tehran, and had also invaded Khurāsān. He encouraged his officers
with promises of speedy relief but lingered at Ghazni until the
following winter and by the time he had taken the field Chaghar
Beg Dāūd the Saljūq was in possession of Nishāpūr. The campaign
against the Saljūqs was ended by a crushing defeat sustained by
Mas'ud in 1040 at Tāliqān, three marches from Marv, Khvārazm
was lost, and Mas'ûd was compelled to retreat to Ghazni while the
Saljūqs besieged Balkh. It was during this campaign that the
character of the Hindu troops was first impugned. The Muslim
officers complained that five hundred of them could not be induced
to face ten Turkmāns, and the Hindu officers retorted that while
the Muslim troops had fared well their men were starved, and had
received no four for four months. When it was suggested that an
Indian corps should be raised for the expulsion of the Saljūqs,
Masóūd exclaimed, with petulant ingratitude, Never! These are
the men who lost us Mary. '


## p. 32 (#70) ##############################################

32
[ch.
THE GHAZNAVIDS
On November 13 Masʼūd, overcome by craven fear, set out from
Ghazni for Lahore, taking with him the women of his harem, what
remained of his father's treasure, and the brother whom he had
blinded years before. He was now an object of contempt to his
own troops, and when he reached the Marīgala pass, a few miles
east of Hasan Abdāl, his guards fell upon his treasure-laden camels,
divided the spoils, and gaining possession of the person of the blind
Muhammad, acclaimed him as their Amir. Mas'ūd was arrested
and brought before the brother whom he had so cruelly mutilated,
and was overwhelmed with shame when Muhammad told him that
he bore him no malice and bade him choose his place of residence.
Masóūd chose the fortress of Girī and was sent thither, but was put
to death a few months later by order of Muhammad's son, Ahmad.
Masóūd's son Maudūd, who was at Balkh, marched to Ghaznī
on hearing of his father's deposition and Muhammad turned back to
meet him. In the winter of 1041-42 the two armies encountered
one another at Nangrahār, about half-way between Ghazni and
the Indus, and after an obstinate conflict Maudūd was victorious
and avenged his father's fate by putting to death with torture
Muhammad and all his sons except two, 'Abd-ur-Rahīm, whom he
spared in return for consideration shown for the imprisoned Mas'ūd,
and Nāmi, who was governor of the Punjab. An officer sent to
India had no difficulty in defeating and slaying Nāmī, but there still
remained Maudūd's own brother, Majdūd, who had been appointed
by his father to the government of the Indian province and had
proved himself an energetic and capable commander. He had cap-
tured the important town of Thānesar and was now at Hānsī,
awaiting a favourable opportunity for attacking Delhi, but cn learn-
ing that Maudūd had sent an army against him returned rapidly
to Lahore, and arrived there on July 27, 1042. Maudūd's troops
reached the city one or two days later and it appeared probable
that they would declare for the more capable and more popular
Majdūd, but on the morning of July 30 he was found dead in his
bed. No cause is assigned for his death, and it may have been due
to heat stroke, or some other rapidly fatal disease, but it is more
probable that agents of Maudūd had been at work.
Maudūd's authority was now established in the Punjab but it
commanded none of the respect which the Hindus had yielded to
the great Mahmud, and two years later Mahipal, raja of Delhi, re-
captured without difficulty Hānsī, Thānesar, and Kāngra, inflaming
the zeal of his troops by exhibiting to them at the temple in the
last-named fortress a replica of the famous idol carried off by
>


## p. 33 (#71) ##############################################

n]
MAUDOD AND 'ALI
33
Mahmud, now believed to have returned by a miracle to its former
shrine.
Mahīpāl was encouraged by his success at Kāngra to advance
even to the walls of Lahore, and besieged the city, but the nobles,
who had been too deeply engaged in quarrels regarding precedence,
fiefs, and titles to send relief to the three lost fortresses, showed a
united front to the enemy at the gates, and Mahīpāl was obliged to
retire.
In 1046 Maudūd's chamberlain renewed the feud with Ghūr by
invading the small principality with a large force, and capturing
two princes of the ruling house, who were carried to Ghazni and
put to death.
In 1048 Maudūd, in order to allay the strife between the nobles
of the Punjab, appointed his two eldest sons, Mahmūd and Mansūr,
to the government of Lahore and Peshāwar, and at the same time
sent Bu 'Ali Hasan, Kotwall of Ghaznī, to India to curb the aggres-
sion of the Hindus, in which task he succeeded well and captured
a fortress which cannot now be identified with any certainty, but
he fell a victim to one of the intrigues so common in oriental courts,
and was rewarded, on his return to Ghazni, by being cast into
prison, where his enemies anticipated the probability of his restora-
tion to power by murdering him.
Maudūd died of an intestinal complaint on December 22, 1049,
while preparing to visit his father-in-law, Chaghar Beg Dāūd the
Saljūq, and in accordance, it was said, with his will, his infant son
Masóūd, aged three, was proclaimed Amīr by the servants of his
household, who proposed that the boy's mother, the daughter of
Chaghar Beg Dāūd, should exercise the powers of regency, but the
nobles of Ghaznī, who had not been consulted, refused to ratify
this arrangement, and on December 29 deposed the child and pro-
claimed his uncle, “Ali Abu-'l-Hasan, who married his brother's
widow, the Saljūq princess.
‘Ali proved to be a feeble ruler, and in 1052 his uncle, 'Izz-ud-
daulah 'Abd-ur-Rashid, the sixth son of Mahmūd, was released
from the fortress in which he had been imprisoned, advanced on
Ghazni, deposed his nephew, and ascended the throne ; while the
daughter of Chaghar Beg Dāūd, bitterly resenting her husband's
deposition, left Ghazni and returned to her father.
‘Abd-ur-Rashid was a scholar with a taste for theology, but was
as little fitted as 'Ali to hold the reins of government in troubled
times. He appointed to the government of the Punjab Nūshtigin,
1 The Kotwal of a large city corresponded to the officer whom we designate
Commissioner of Police, and exercised also extensive magisterial powers.
C. H. I. III.
3


## p. 34 (#72) ##############################################

34
THE GHAŽNAVIDS
[CH
an able and active officer who recovered the fortress of Kāngra
and restored order, but in Tughril 'the Ingrate', another servant,
who had been a slave of Mahmûd, he was less fortunate. Tughril
was sent to Sīstān and reduced that province to obedience, but it
was his own authority and not his master's that he established.
His successes, which appear to have included some victories over
the Saljuqs', who now ruled Khurāsān, cnabled him to raise and
maintain a large army, with which he marched to Ghazni, defeated
and put to death 'Abd-ur-Rashid and nine other members of the
royal house, and ascended the throne. His treachery was generally
abhorred, and he was assassinated, after a reign of forty days, by
the royal guards. Nūshtigin, who had left India on hearing of
Tughril's usurpation, arrived at Ghazni a few days after his death
and took counsel with the nobles regarding the filling of the vacant
throne. There still survived, imprisoned in a fortress, Farrukhzād
and Ibrāhīm, two sons of Mas'ud I, and the nobles elected the latter,
but, on discovering that he was in feeble health, transferred their
suffrages to his brother. Almost immediately after Farrukhzād's
enthronement the kingdom was invaded by Chaghar Beg Dāūd who,
after being defeated by Nūshtigin, summoned to his assistance his
more famous son Alp Arsalān, against whom Farrukhzād took the
field in person. Alp Arsalān gained an indecisive victory and retired
with his prisoners, leaving in Farrukhzād's hands those taken from
Chaghar Beg Dāūd by Nūshtigin. An exchange formed the basis
of a treaty of peace, and on Farrukhzād's death in March, 1059,
his brother Ibrāhīm, who succeeded him, renewed the treaty and
arranged a marriage between his son Mas'ūd and the daughter of
Malik Shāh, Alp Arsalān's son. The treaty was faithfully observed
by the Saljūqs during Ibrāhīm's long reign, and the security of his
northern and western frontiers enabled him to devote his attention
to India. In 1079 he crossed the southern border of the Punjab
and captured the town of Ajūdhan, now known as Pāk Pattan.
In the course of the same campaign he is said to have taken a town
named Rūpāl, which was perhaps the place of that name in Mahi
Kāntha, as he appears to have advanced towards the western coast
and to have come upon
settlement of Pārsīs which may be
identified with Nāvsārī in Gujarāt. This is the only supposition by
which it is possible to explain a Muslim historian's obviously in-
1 According to another account of Tughril's career in Sistān he temporarily
transferred his allegiance to the Saljūgs, and, having acquired the art of war
according to their system, utilized his knowledge for the destruction of his master,
but he does not appear to have been acting, in his rebellion, as an agent of the
Saljuqs.
a


## p. 35 (#73) ##############################################

11 ]
BAHRĀM
35
accurate statement that he reached a town populated exclusively by
Khurāsānīs who had been deported to India by Afrāsiyāb.
Ibrāhīm died on August 25, 1099, after a comparatively peaceful
reign of forty-two years, and was succeeded by his twenty-third son,
'Alā-ud-Daulah Mas'ūd III, surnamed al-Karim, who had married
the daughter of Malik Shāh. The chief events of his peaceful reign
of seventeen years were an expedition beyond the Ganges, led by
Tughātigin of Lahore, of whose exploits no details are given, and the
appointment of Husain, son of Sām, to the government of Ghūr,
which is interesting as evidence that the Shansabāni princes were
still vassals of Ghaznī. Mas'ûd III died in 1115 at the age of fifty-
seven, and was succeeded by his son Shīrzād, who was deposed in
the following year by his brother Arsalān 'Abd-ul-Malik. Arsalān's
half brother Bahrām, who was the son of the Saljūq princess, fled
for refuge to his uncle, Sultān Sanjar, in Khurāsān, and Arsalān was
foolish enough to treat his stepmother with indignity, and even to
offer her a gross insult. His folly incensed Sanjar, who was already
a
disposed to espouse the cause of his nephew Bahrām, and he advanced
on Ghazni with a large army.
Arsalān was defeated within a few
miles of the city and fled to India, and Sanjar placed Bahrām on the
throne and returned to Khurāsān. Arsalān, on learning of his
departure, returned to Ghazni and expelled Bahrām. In 1117 Sanjar,
who had succeeded, on the death of his brother Muhammad, to the
sovereignty of all the dominions of the Great Saljūqs, was too much
occupied with his own affairs to be able to send assistance to Bahrām,
but in 1118 he provided him with troops, and he marched to Ghazni
and defeated and captured his brother.
aptured his brother. He was at first disposed to
spare his life, but, on discovering that he was hatching scheines for
the recovery of the throne, put him to death.
Shortly after his accession Bahrām marched into India to re-
duce to obedience Muhammad Bāhlim, who, having been appointed
governor of the Punjab by Arsalān, refused to acknowledge his
Bāhlim was defeated and captured on January 22, 1119,
but Bahrām, with culpable leniency, not only pardoned but rein-
stated him, and returned to Ghazni. Bāhlīm displayed great energy
in subduing the minor Hindu chieftains on the borders of the Punjab
and established himself in Nāgaur, where he again repudiated his
allegiance to Bahrām. Bahrām marched from Ghazni against the
rebel, who foolishly advanced northward and met him in the neigh-
bourhood of Multān, where he was defeated, and in attempting to
escape was swallowed up, with two of his sons, in a quicksand. He
successor.
3-2


## p. 36 (#74) ##############################################

36
( CH.
THE GHAŻNAVIDS
deserves to be remembered, because he established Muhammadan
rule over provinces which had never acknowledged the authority of
the greatest of the Ghaznavids. Nāgaur is situated more than 300
miles to the south of Lahore, and it is said that Bāhlim was accom-
panied, on his march against Bahrām, by ten sons, each of whom
ruled a province or district.
The later years of Bahrām's reign were overshadowed by the
menace of the growing power of the Shansabānī princes of Ghūr,
who had husbanded their resources while the Ghaznavids and the
Saljūqs were at strife. Qutb-ud-din Muhammad of Ghūr, having
quarrelled with his brother, fled to Ghazni and married a daughter
of Bahrām, who, after harbouring him for some time, suspected him
of plotting against him and removed him by poison. Qutb-ud din's
next brother, Saif-ud-din, prince of Ghūr, invaded the Ghaznavid
dominions to avenge his brother's death, defeated Bahrām, drove
him to India, and occupied Ghazni, appointing his brother Bahā.
ud-din Sãm his lieutenant in Ghúr. In 1149 Bahrām returned
suddenly from India, surprised Saif-ud-din, and put him to flight.
He was pursued and overtaken and was induced to surrender by a
promise that his life should be spared, but the perfidious Bahrām,
having secured his enemy, first publicly exposed him to the derision
of the populace and then put him to death. Baha-ud-din Sām is
said to have died of grief for his brother, and another brother,
'Alā-ud-din Husain, succeeded to the principality and in 1151 took a
terrible revenge for Saif-ud-din's death.