107
support of the federal government, as will be a counter-
poise to the ambition of others, and will make it difficult for
them to unite the people in opposition to the just and ne-
cessary measures of the union.
support of the federal government, as will be a counter-
poise to the ambition of others, and will make it difficult for
them to unite the people in opposition to the just and ne-
cessary measures of the union.
Hamilton - 1834 - Life on Hamilton - v2
, 119, 140.
t In a defence of Jefferson, published in Virginia, September 19, 1800, it
is stated, that a committee was appointed on the 26th November, 1781, to
state any charges and receive such information as may be offered respecting
the administration of the late executive. On the day appointed for the in-
quiry, Jefferson took his seat as one of the delegates. The member who
moved the investigation absented himself, and the committee reported, "no
information being offered on the subject matter except rumours," their opin-
ion that those rumours were groundless; and passed a resolution " to obviate
all future, and remove all former, unmerited censure. "
t January 2d, 1781.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
99
should be claimed only as co-extensive with her territory,"
and instructed her delegates, "that every other and fur-
ther demand should be ceded, if insisting on the same, is
deemed an impediment to a treaty with Spain. "
A few days* after this resolution had passed, the com-
mittee to which the complaints of Vergennes against
Adams had been referred, reported a letter to be address-
ed to him by the president of congress. He was informed
that the opinion of the French minister relative to the time
and circumstances proper for communicating his powers
and entering upon the execution of them, was well founded,
congress having no expectations " from the influence which
the people may have on the British councils ! "f
De La Luzerne had succeeded Gerard as envoy to the
United States. On his arrival, he had a conference with
General Washington, and, as has been previously stated,
in this interview, among a variety of topics, he proposed a
co-operation in a contemplated expedition by Spain against
the Floridas--that being the only object which in her self-
ish policy she cared to gain, in the hope of annexing them
to Louisiana. Washington prudently declined discussing
the policy of the measure, merely stating, that, as a military
question, he saw no objection in case the enemy's force
should be withdrawn from South Carolina and Georgia.
This idea was subsequently submitted to congress by an
agent of Spain through the French ambassador; and with
a view to gratify the expectations of that country, a de-
tachment from the main army was ordered, though at
great hazard, to Carolina to make a diversion. Having
attained this object, encouraged by the recent letter to
Adams, and confirmed in his hopes by the late vote of Vir-
ginia, a formal communication^ was made by the French
ambassador to a committee of congress of the corre-
* January 10, 1781. t 5 D. C. 306. t Jan. 28, 1781.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 100
THE LIFE OF
spondence which had passed between Spain and Great
Britain.
This was followed by an earnest representation of the
danger that Great Britain, having an insuperable reluc-
tance to admit the idea of the independence of the United
States, would involve France in her relations with other
European powers; that thus an armed mediation was to
be feared, which, unless the United States increased their
efforts to dispossess the British of their territories, might
compel the allies to accept of terms which would leave
England mistress of her actual possessions, or to continue
the war under the disadvantages of having the forces of
the mediation united with those of their enemies.
This representation was well adapted to produce alarm.
A second conference was had, in which the anxiety of
Spain for an alliance was stated. The importance of
"moderation" in their negotiation with her was suggested,
and her views specified. These were, that the United
States should confine their limits to settlements permitted
by the proclamation of seventeen hundred and sixty-three,
and that a precise and invariable western boundary should
be fixed--the exclusive navigation of the Mississippi--the
possession of the Floridas, and of the lands between that
western boundary and the eastern side of that river. The
consequences of these stipulations were avowed, that the
United States should be excluded from the navigation of
that river, because by such limitations no territories would
belong to them on its borders, and that the southern states
should be restricted from any settlements or conquests in
those territories, they being the possessions of the crown of
Great Britain, which Spain proposed to occupy and retain
"as a permanent conquest. "
More than a month had elapsed since the resolution of
Virginia passed. It was passed under circumstances
which would have justified a pause, and a demand of new
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
101
instructions. Yet in obedience to this resolution, * and thus
urged by the French minister,f Madison prepared an in-
struction to Jay, not to insist upon the free navigation of
that river to the ocean, "provided such cession shall be un-
alterably insisted upon by Spain;" but to be satisfied with
a guarantee by her of its use to their own citizens, in
common with her subjects, above the southern boundary
of the United States, and to exert every effort to obtain a
free port or ports below that boundary . J This instruc-
tion passed. ?
The impolicy of this act was manifested by the conduct
of Spain. Though intended to be secret, it was made
* Col. Grayson, of Virginia, calls it "a disgraceful proposition. "--Debates
in Virginia Convention.
t1 Mad. 66, Madison says--" In this important business, which go deeply
affects the claims and interests of Virginia, and which I know she has so
much at heart, I have not the satisfaction to harmonize in sentiment with
my colleague. " "He," Colonel Bland, "has embraced an opinion that we
have no just claim to the subject in controversy between us and Spain, and
that it is the interest of Virginia not to adhere to it. "
In the Life of Arthur Lee, vol. 2, 384-5, Nov. 20,1786, a letter from Col.
Bland to Lee is to be seen. Bland writes--" I cannot agree with you on the
policy of Spain or the eastern states to relinquish tq Spain the navigation of
the Mississippi, even for a moment. It is a right which we have confirmed
to us by treaty. It is a right which nature has given us. It is a right
which nature will claim. It is a right which it is impossible in Spain to de-
prive us of; and in the attempt, she has shown that she considered it a right.
Why else should she endeavour to barter another privilege for it? Have
you not mistaken the effect of the exclusion? I rather think that, could it
be carried into execution, it would stifle the germ of agriculture and im-
provement. "
As such were the sentiments of Bland, the statements of Madison on this
subject would appear to require elucidation.
In a letter of Madison, App. to vol. 1, p. 21, he says--" Congress seized the
first moment also for revoking their instruction to Mr. Jay. " This is a slight
inaccuracy; this instruction was not revoked until late in the following year.
$ 2S. J. 397. --Feb. 15,1781.
5 Massachusetts, Connecticut, North Carolina, negative; New-York, di.
vided.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 102
THE LIFE OF
known to her before the information of it reached the
American envoy at Madrid. Convinced that this great
object was secured, no motive existed to depart from the
policy she had adopted. Nothing was promised or denied,
but a clew was given to her purposes by the observation
of her prime minister to Jay, "that all these affairs could
with more facility be adjusted by a general peace than
now; for that such a particular and even secret treaty
with us might then be made, as would be very convenient
to both. " Discouraging as every appearance was, the
mission was prosecuted with diligence, patience, firmness,
and discernment, until all efforts proved fruitless. Two
hundred years had not effaced from her iron memory how
much she had suffered by a revolt. She now saw in
every throe of liberty the loss of her western empire;
nor, could she have forgotten it for a moment, would
bigotry have failed to remind her that it was a revolt of
heretics.
A few days after congress had yielded in relation to the
navigation- of the Mississippi, the French ambassador
transmitted to them a letter from his king, assuring them
of his determination to assist them as far as his own wants
and the extraordinary and enormous expenses of the war
would permit. This communication was followed by a
memorial showing the extent of the proposed aids, but an-
nouncing that the second division of the French army
could not be expected that campaign. A second memo-
rial was presented, in which the acceptance by Great Bri-
tain of the mediation of Russia was announced; and a
request was made for the appointment of a committee to
discuss with him the manner of conducting the negotia-
tion, the extent of the powers of the commissioners, the ex-
tent to which they were to be used, and the confidence to
be reposed in the plenipotentiaries and cabinet of France.
"Moderation" was again inculcated.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
103
It has been seen that Adams had been driven with in-
dignity from Paris. Apprehensive of his resentment, and
of the influence which his suspicions and those of Dana as
to the policy of France might have upon their conduct at
a moment when indications were given of a desire on the
part of Great Britain to terminate the contest, it became
important to France to exercise over them an absolute
control.
The instructions to Adams, penned by Gouverneur Mor-
ris, had directed him to govern himself by the alliance of the
United States with France--"by the advice of our allies, by
his knowledge of our interests, and by his own discretion. "
To correct what France deemed an error in these in-
structions, the French minister having on the seventh of
May, at the earnest entreaties of Virginia, despatched a
fleet to the Chesapeake under Destouches, sought a con-
ference with congress. After stating that the appointment
of Dana was premature, and the opinion of the council
that he ought not to make any use of his powers at this
moment, " lest the dignity of the country should suffer by
his being refused," he proceeded to comment on the
conduct of Adams. He stated "circumstances to prove
the necessity" of a line "being drawn" of which Adams
might not be allowed to lose sight, and dwelt especially
on the use which he thought he had a right to make of his
powers to treat with Great Britain. He then added, that
"if congress put any confidence in the king's friendship
and benevolence, they would be impressed with the neces-
sity of prescribing to their plenipotentiary a perfect and
open confidence in the French minister, and a thorough re-
liance on the king; and would direct him to take no step
without the approbation of his majesty" and as to the man-
ner of executing his instructions, "to receive his directions
from the Count de Vergennes. " This conference was fol-
lowed by the annunciation, while the instructions were
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? THE LIFE OF
before a committee of congress, that the king of France
had granted "a gratuitous subsidy" of six millions of
livres.
After much discussion,* instructions were given to the
American plenipotentiaries to accept the mediation of
the emperors of Russia and Germany, but not to accede to
any treaty of peace "which shall not effectually secure
the independence and sovereignty of the thirteen states,
according to the form and effect of the treaties with his
most christian majesty, and in which those treaties shall
not be left in their full force and validity. " Thus the ex-
press preliminary acknowledgment of independence was
abandoned.
With a view to secure to France the control of the ne-
gotiation, the American minister was instructed " to make
the most confidential communications upon all subjects to
the ministry of France, and to undertake nothing without
their knowledge and concurrence;" and authority was
given to agree to a truce. These instructions were direct-
ed to be communicated confidentially to the French am-
bassador. He objected to them. They were ordered to
be reconsidered. The clause, "you will use your own
judgment and prudence, in securing the interest of the
United States," was erased, and the words, "you are at
liberty to secure," were substituted; and after the word
"concurrence," an addition was made, by which the min-
ister was directed "ultimately to govern himself by their
advice and opinion. "
This last clause, so derogatory from the dignity of the
country, it was moved four days after to reconsider; but
the motion was rejected. This vote was followed by a
conference, in which the magnitude of the king's bounty
was stated at large. It will be remarked with surprise,
? June 11, 1781. --2 S. J. 439.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
that on the first of the preceding amendments, the only
negative states were Massachusetts and Rhode Island;
that as to the last, the only dissentients were Massachu-
setts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut; and that on the
motion to reconsider, the only affirmative states were
Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Delaware,
New-York not being represented. It is due to the memory
of a gallant soldier of Virginia to record, that while the
vote of that state was given by Jones and Madison in fa-
vour of these amendments, Colonel Bland opposed them
in every stage. * f
* The negatives were : Massachusetts--Lovell and Ward; Rhode Island--
Vamum; Connecticut--Huntington, (Elsworth and Sherman, who took
their seats on the 4th of June preceding;) Pennsylvania--Montgomery and
T. Smith; Virginia--Bland.
t The clause as ultimately adopted ran thus--after referring to former
instructions as to boundaries--" fromt which you will perceive the desires
and expectations of congress, but we think it unsafe, at this distance, to
tie you up by absolute and peremptory directions upon any other subject
than the two essential articles above mentioned. You are, therefore, at
liberty to secure the interest of the United States in such manner as cir-
cumstances may direct, and as the state of the belligerent and disposition
of the mediating powers may require. For this purpose, you are to make
the most candid and confidential communications upon all subjects to the
ministers of our generous ally, the king of France; to undertake nothing
in the negotiations for peace or truce without their knowledge and concur-
rence; and ultimately to govern yourselves by their advice and opinion,
endeavouring in your whole conduct to make them sensible how much we
rely on his majesty's influence for effectual support in every thing that may
be necessary to the present security or future prosperity of the United States
of America.
"If a difficulty should arise in the course of the negotiation for peace, from
the backwardness of Britain to make a formal acknowledgment of our
independence, you are at liberty to agree to a truce, or to make such other
concessions as may not affect the substance of what we contend for; and
provided that Great Britain be not left in possession of any part of the
thirteen United States. "
t SB. J. 446.
14
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 106
THE LIFE OP
This degrading concession* to France was not the only
consequence of the recent invasion of Virginia. A pro-
posal was soon after made that the states should empower
congress to compel, by an armed, land, or naval force, any
delinquent state "to yield prompt obedience to all just re-
quisitions on them; and as to those that had little or no
foreign trade of their own, that all inland trade with such
states as supplied them with foreign merchandise might be
interdicted, and the concurrence of the latter enforced, in
case of refusal, by operations on their foreign trade. "
"There is a collateral reason," Madison observed, "which
interests the states who are feeble in maritime resources
in such a plan. A navy so formed, and under the orders
of the general council of the state, would not only be a
guard against aggressions and insults from abroad, but,
without it, what is to protect the southern states, for many
years to come, against the insults and aggressions of their
northern brethren. "-)- So remote were his ideas at that
time from a national government. While Madison was
thus proposing to provide for future wars between the
states, Hamilton, as has been seen, was urging measures to
strengthen the union. "Force cannot effect it. The ap-
plication of it," he said, "is always disagreeable, the issue
uncertain. It will be wiser to obviate the necessity of it,
by interesting such a number of individuals in each state in
* Two days after, Gouverneur Morris wrote to Jay: "But when you come
to find by your instructions that you must ultimately obey the dictates of the
French minister, I am sure there is something in your bosom which will re-
volt at the servility of your situation. Do I not know you well enough to
believe that you will not act in this new capacity? I think I do; and there-
fore I will express my concern that you must decline the honour, if that name
can be applied to such offices. Decline, however, with decency, though with
dignity. I mean always if no alteration takes place, which shall be done if I
can effectuate it, though I almost despair. No other congress will surrender
all, as this has, to an ally. "
t Madison Papers, v. 1, p. 87: Madison to Jefferson, who approved the idea.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
107
support of the federal government, as will be a counter-
poise to the ambition of others, and will make it difficult for
them to unite the people in opposition to the just and ne-
cessary measures of the union. "*
As the independence of Adams had been complained of
by the French minister, it was proposed that other per-
sons should be united with him in the mission. This was
at first rejected, but four other commissioners, Franklin,
Jay, Jefferson and Laurens, were subsequently added.
Thus a preponderance, it was hoped, would be secured to
the party attached to France.
Adams still retained powers to form a commercial treaty
with Great Britain, the terms of which, it has been seen,
required that no privileges should be granted to England
not conferred on France, excluded any peculiar limitations
in her favour, and stipulated expressly for a participation in
the fisheries; but in all other matters gave him full discre-
tion to treat on terms of equality and reciprocity. It
was possible that Great Britain might avail herself of
these powers, as by a commercial treaty she would avoid
the express acknowledgment of independence; and that
thus the whole object of the recent instructions, to submit
to the control of France, would be defeated.
To prevent such a result, a great stroke of policy was
resorted to. An additional instruction was moved by Madi-
sonf--that in negotiating a treaty with Great Britain,
Adams should enter into no such treaty unless in addition
to the stipulations as to the fisheries; all the objects included
in their original ultimatum of seventeen hundred and
seventy-nine, as to a treaty of peace, as the same stood
prior to their instructions of the fifteenth of June, should
be in such treaty of commerce explicitly acknowledged
and stipulated to the United States.
* Ante, vol. 1, p. 371.
t June 29,1781. --2 S. J. 458.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 108
THE LIFE OF
The insuperable obstacle on the part of Great Britain,
it had been fully ascertained, was a preliminary acknow-
ledgment of independence. This original ultimatum re-
quired* it as a preliminary article to any negotiation,
that Great Britain shall agree to treat with the United
States "as sovereign, free, and independent. " Thus all
possibility of exercising his powers by Adams would have
been prevented. That such was the object of this motion,
and not the securing a preliminary acknowledgment, must
be inferred from the fact that the mover of the resolution
voted for the instructions of the fifteenth of June, by which
this previous acknowledgment of independence was waived,
and it was to become merely an article of treaty.
This last motion was rejected, three states voting for it. f
Baffled in this effort to interpose an impassable barrier to
all direct negotiation with England, the only alternative
that remained, was to withdraw his powers to form a
treaty, and at the instanee of Madison the commission to
Adams was revoked. J
Having succeeded in obtaining the entire control of the
negotiation for peace, and, by the revocation of the powers
granted to Adams, having closed the door upon Great
Britain, it might have been supposed that France would
have felt herself secure; but she still saw cause of appre-
hension. Adams was in Holland, England was represent-
ed at the Hague, and it was impossible to foresee the con-
sequences of a negotiation being opened between them.
These were to be prevented.
On his arrival at Amsterdam, Adams suggested the im-
portance of maintaining an official agent there, and he was
* 2 S. J. 225
t Connecticut, Virginia, and North Carolina--(Elsworth, Bland, and
Smith, dissenting. )
t July 23, 1781 j vol. 4, No. 36, state department; Madison seconded by
Sharpe.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
109
empowered to negotiate a loan; he soon after intimated
the advantages to be derived from a resident embassy at
the Hague. The suggestion was approved, and he was
commissioned as minister plenipotentiary to the United
Provinces.
As early as seventeen hundred and seventy-eight, the
regency of Amsterdam had evinced a disposition to enter
into commercial regulations with America. They applied
to the states-general for a convoy to vessels carrying naval
stores to France, and protested against a refusal of it.
This gave a pretext to that nation to announce to them
"the necessity of protecting their commerce, in order to
enjoy the privileges of neutrality. " This was not done,
and a rescript was issued by France excluding Holland
from those privileges, and interdicting a part of her pro-
ductions. These decisive measures produced the intended
effect, and a naval force was directed by the states-general
to be equipped for that purpose.
Soon after, an American squadron under the command
of Paul Jones entered the Texel with several prizes. He
was ordered to leave the waters of Holland. While there,
an address was presented by the British minister, demand-
ing the seizure of the king's vessels in the hands of a
"pirate and an outlaw. " This demand was not acceded
to, but Jones was again, commanded to sail. Having re-
fused with great indignation the offer from the French
ambassador of a letter of marque, he departed.
But a short time elapsed when a plan of a treaty with
the United States was framed by the authorities at Am-
sterdam. This drew an angry remonstrance from England.
Measures of defence were taken by that city; orders in
council were issued by Great Britain for hostilities, and St.
Eustatia was captured. Adams resolved to seize upon this*
moment to make an impression. He addressed letters to
the envoys of Russia, Denmark, and Sweden, announcing
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 110
THE LIFE OF
the resolution of congress concurring with the regulations
of the "marine treaty," and at the same moment asked of
the French ambassador the Duke de la Vauguyon to aid
him. The former did not answer his letters; the latter stated
that he had no instructions on the subject. Relying on the
support of several of the provinces, he presented a memorial
to the states-general, and urged his reception at the Hague.
He was discountenanced by Vauguyon, and was refused.
In a conference between La Luzerne and congress, they
were informed that,* " on being apprised of the intention
of Mr. Adams to display his character as a minister, the
duke gave him no assistance on that occasion, knowing the
application would have no favourable issue. "
The perseverance of Adams alarmed Vergennes, and
within a few days after his powers to form a commercial
treaty with Great Britain had been revoked, the French
ambassador appeared again before congress. He stated
the accession of Holland to the armed neutrality, the hos-
tile acts of Great Britain, the opinion of the council of
his king that a "prudent and able man"f should be sent to
Holland with full powers; that it would likewise be advan-
tageous to give proper instructions to that minister, and as
it is impossible at this distance to have quick information,
it would be proper to have further instructions given by
Dr. Franklin, in order to avoid all inconsistency or contra-
diction, and that the political operations of congress, aim-
ing towards the same end, may of course be more success-
ful. Had Franklin, as Adams alleged, been the "index
of Vergennes," a better expedient could not have been
devised by France to point the way to the American resi-
dent at the Hague; but neither this nor the hint as to the
selection of "a prudent and able man," could be acted
upon without offending New-England.
? 3 s. J. 35.
t 2 S. J. 4G6. ^Tuly 23, 1781.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
Ill
The original instructions to Adams were, "to adopt, in
whole or without any essential alteration," a plan of treaty
which was transmitted from Philadelphia, with restrictions
"not to admit any thing inconsistent with the treaties with
France, or not conforming to the proposed regulations of
the congress of northern powers. "
The only device was, to limit these instructions 5 and
with that view a report was adopted, which, after acknow-
ledging this effort by the king of France to make a coali-
tion with Holland, as a fresh proof of his solicitude for
their interests, stated to the French minister the previous
appointment of Adams with special instructions to con-
form to the treaty with France, and empowered him to enter
into a joint alliance with France, Holland, and Spain, on
condition that no party shall conclude either truce or peace
with Great Britain without the formal consent of the
whole first obtained. In all other matters, he was to use
his best discretion; and he was directed "to confer upon
all occasions in the most confidential manner with his most
christian majesty's minister" at the Hague. *
While these measures were taken in America, Adams
was invited by Vergennes to Paris, to consult upon the
proposed mediation of Austria and Russia.
He announced his arrival; an audience was granted, and
the subject was opened. ')-
The propositions of the mediators were upon the basis,J
* 2 S. J. 472. --August 16, 1781.
t In his letter to congress, he says--" The letter announcing my ar-
rival, I sent by my servant, who waited until the count descended from the
council, when he delivered it into his hand. He broke the seal, read the
letter, and said he was sorry he could not see Mr. Adams, but he was obliged
to go into the country immediately after dinner; that Mr. Adams 'seroit
dans le cas de voir M. de Rayneval,' who lived at such a sign, in such a
street. After dinner I called on M. de Rayneval, who stated the object, and
an interview was appointed with the minister. "--6 D. C. 92.
t 6 D. C. 100. --July 11,1781.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 112
THE LIFE OF
that a treaty should be negotiated between Great Britain
and the American colonies without the intervention of any
of the belligerent powers, but to be signed conjointly with
that of those powers, and that there should be a general
armistice for one year from a period to be defined. The
comments of the American minister stated that there
would be no objection to such a separate treaty, consist-
ent with their obligations to their allies, without the inter-
vention of any of the belligerents, or (unless demanded)
of the mediators. The conjoint signature was approved,
but the proposed armistice or a truce, as suggested by
Vergennes, was objected to except under two express pre-
liminary conditions:--the continuance of the subsisting
treaties until the acknowledgment of independence by
Great Britain, and the antecedent removal of the British
forces; and this truce was to be of sufficient duration to
imply a virtual relinquishment of the objects of the war,
and to be agreed to before the opening of another cam-
paign.
But the great question was stated to be, the acknowledg-
ment of independence; and "as the United States can
never consent that their independence shall be discussed
before any sovereign," it was suggested that if the impe-
rial courts would "lay down, as a preliminary, the sove-
reignty of the United States, and admit their minister to
a congress," a treaty might be commenced with Great
Britain, "without any express acknowledgment of sove-
reignty until the treaty should be concluded. " The reply
of Vergennes, addressed to Adams as agent of the United
States, represented the necessity of certain preliminaries
being adjusted before the American minister could be ad-
mitted to the congress. His answer, proceeding on the
supposition that it was intended to acknowledge the inde-
pendence of the American states, proposed "that the
character of their minister sholild be ascertained before
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
113
any congress met, that he might take his place as soon as
it opened. . A second letter adverted to a most extraordi-
nary suggestion--that the separate states of America should
choose an agent foY each, to attend the congress. Adams
urged Vergennes not to countenance this idea, " apprising
him, that though it had been mentioned only as a tran-
sient speculation, that he felt it to be a duty to inform
him that congress would remonstrate against it in the
most solemn manner. " No other correspondence passed
upon this subject, but from the statement of La Lu-
zerne to congress, it appeared that England insisted upon
the dependence of America being pre-established, and
that thus there would be no possibility of a mediation for
peace.
Adams returned to Amsterdam, approved* and obeyed
his last instructions. In order to learn whether he should
visit the president of the states-general, he consulted
Vauguyon, observing "that congress had wisely enjoined
it upon him to confer in the most confidential manner
with his excellency, and that he had "made it a law to
take no important step without his approbation. " Vau-
guyon waited the orders of his principal, and informed
Adams that the minister " sees no objection to the visit on
the subject of his memorial, provided, without any official
writing, he limited himself to the inquiry, whether his
memorial had been the subject of deliberation, and what
answer he should communicate to congress. " The memo-
rial was referred for consideration; and after some delay--
after the capture of Cornwallis and the victories of Greene
had changed the British ministry, and peace was inevitable,
--France sanctioned his reception, and he was gratified by
a public acknowledgment. During these interesting mo-
ments, he received a letter from the secretary of foreign
6 D. C. 198.
15
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 114
THE LIFE OF
affairs disapproving his having printed his memorial, and
having urged his admission to court. His reply shows his
views of the effects of this measure,* and of the conse-
? John Adams to congreis. --6 Dip. Corres. 258. --" The proposition to the
president being taken ad referendum, it became a subject of the delibera-
tion of the sovereignty. The prince, therefore, and the whole court, are
legally bound to treat it with respect, and me with decency ; at least, it would
be criminal in them to treat me or the subject with indecency. If it had
not been presented and printed, I am very sure I could not long have resided
in the republic; and what would have been the consequence to the friends
of liberty, I know not. They were so disheartened and intimidated, and the
Anglomanes were so insolent, that no man can say that a sudden frenzy
might not have been excited among the soldiery and people, to demand a
junction with England, as there was in the year 1748. Such a revolution
would have injured America and her allies, have prolonged the war, and
have been the total loss and ruin of the republic.
"Immediately upon the presentation of my memorial, M. Van Berckel ven.
tnred to present his requite and demand for a trial. This contributed still
further to raise the spirits of the good people, and soon after the burgomasters
of Amsterdam appeared with their proposition for giving the prince a com-
mittee for a council, and in course their attack upon the duke; all which
together excited such an enthusiasm in the nation, and among the officers
of the navy, as produced the battle of the Doggerbank, which never would
have happened, in all probability, but would have been eluded by secret or-
ders and various artifices, if the spirit raised in the nation by the chain of
proceedings of which the American memorial was the first and an essential
link, had not rendered a display of the national bravery indispensable for the
honour of the navy, and perhaps for the safety of the court.
"The memorial as a composition, has very little merit; yet almost every
gazette in Europe has inserted it, and most of them with a compliment, none
without any criticism. When I was in Paris and Versailles afterwards, no
man ever expressed to me the smallest disapprobation of it, or the least appre-
hension that it could do any harm. On the contrary, several gentlemen of
letters expressed higher compliments upon it than it deserved. The king of
Sweden has done it a most illustrious honour, by quoting one of the most ma-
terial sentiments in it, in a public answer to the king of Great Britain; and the
emperor of Germany has since done the author of it the honour to desire in the
character of Count Falkenstein to see him, and what is more remarkable, ha>>
adopted the sentiments of it concerning religious liberty into a code of laws
for his dominions,--the greatest effort in favour of humanity, next to the
American revolution, which has been produced in the eighteenth century.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
115
quences of his firmness. It also discloses his indignation
at the influence which had been exerted against him,
charging expressly, that it was the design of the French
"As my mission to this republic was wisely communicated to the court of
Versailles, who can say that this transaction of congress had not some influ-
ence in bringing De Grasse into the Chesapeake Bay? Another thing I
ought to mention; I have a letter from Mr. Jay, informing me that ip the
month of June last, M. Del Campo was appointed by the court of Madrid to
treat with him; the exact time when my memorial appeared at Madrid.
You may possibly say, that my imagination and self-love carry me extraor-
dinary lengths; but when one is called upon to justify an action, one should
look all round. All I contend for is, that the memorial has certainly done
no harm; that it is probable it has done some good, and that it is possible
it has done much more than can be proved. A man always makes an awk-
ward figure when he is justifying himself and his own actions, and I hope I
shaJJ be pardoned. It is easy to say, ' il abonde trop dans son tens; il eft
twin et glorieux; U eft plein de liii-mime; il ne vpii que lui;' and other
modest things of that sort, with which even your Malcsherbes, your Turgots,
and Neckers, are sometimes sacrificed to very small intrigues.
t In a defence of Jefferson, published in Virginia, September 19, 1800, it
is stated, that a committee was appointed on the 26th November, 1781, to
state any charges and receive such information as may be offered respecting
the administration of the late executive. On the day appointed for the in-
quiry, Jefferson took his seat as one of the delegates. The member who
moved the investigation absented himself, and the committee reported, "no
information being offered on the subject matter except rumours," their opin-
ion that those rumours were groundless; and passed a resolution " to obviate
all future, and remove all former, unmerited censure. "
t January 2d, 1781.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
99
should be claimed only as co-extensive with her territory,"
and instructed her delegates, "that every other and fur-
ther demand should be ceded, if insisting on the same, is
deemed an impediment to a treaty with Spain. "
A few days* after this resolution had passed, the com-
mittee to which the complaints of Vergennes against
Adams had been referred, reported a letter to be address-
ed to him by the president of congress. He was informed
that the opinion of the French minister relative to the time
and circumstances proper for communicating his powers
and entering upon the execution of them, was well founded,
congress having no expectations " from the influence which
the people may have on the British councils ! "f
De La Luzerne had succeeded Gerard as envoy to the
United States. On his arrival, he had a conference with
General Washington, and, as has been previously stated,
in this interview, among a variety of topics, he proposed a
co-operation in a contemplated expedition by Spain against
the Floridas--that being the only object which in her self-
ish policy she cared to gain, in the hope of annexing them
to Louisiana. Washington prudently declined discussing
the policy of the measure, merely stating, that, as a military
question, he saw no objection in case the enemy's force
should be withdrawn from South Carolina and Georgia.
This idea was subsequently submitted to congress by an
agent of Spain through the French ambassador; and with
a view to gratify the expectations of that country, a de-
tachment from the main army was ordered, though at
great hazard, to Carolina to make a diversion. Having
attained this object, encouraged by the recent letter to
Adams, and confirmed in his hopes by the late vote of Vir-
ginia, a formal communication^ was made by the French
ambassador to a committee of congress of the corre-
* January 10, 1781. t 5 D. C. 306. t Jan. 28, 1781.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 100
THE LIFE OF
spondence which had passed between Spain and Great
Britain.
This was followed by an earnest representation of the
danger that Great Britain, having an insuperable reluc-
tance to admit the idea of the independence of the United
States, would involve France in her relations with other
European powers; that thus an armed mediation was to
be feared, which, unless the United States increased their
efforts to dispossess the British of their territories, might
compel the allies to accept of terms which would leave
England mistress of her actual possessions, or to continue
the war under the disadvantages of having the forces of
the mediation united with those of their enemies.
This representation was well adapted to produce alarm.
A second conference was had, in which the anxiety of
Spain for an alliance was stated. The importance of
"moderation" in their negotiation with her was suggested,
and her views specified. These were, that the United
States should confine their limits to settlements permitted
by the proclamation of seventeen hundred and sixty-three,
and that a precise and invariable western boundary should
be fixed--the exclusive navigation of the Mississippi--the
possession of the Floridas, and of the lands between that
western boundary and the eastern side of that river. The
consequences of these stipulations were avowed, that the
United States should be excluded from the navigation of
that river, because by such limitations no territories would
belong to them on its borders, and that the southern states
should be restricted from any settlements or conquests in
those territories, they being the possessions of the crown of
Great Britain, which Spain proposed to occupy and retain
"as a permanent conquest. "
More than a month had elapsed since the resolution of
Virginia passed. It was passed under circumstances
which would have justified a pause, and a demand of new
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
101
instructions. Yet in obedience to this resolution, * and thus
urged by the French minister,f Madison prepared an in-
struction to Jay, not to insist upon the free navigation of
that river to the ocean, "provided such cession shall be un-
alterably insisted upon by Spain;" but to be satisfied with
a guarantee by her of its use to their own citizens, in
common with her subjects, above the southern boundary
of the United States, and to exert every effort to obtain a
free port or ports below that boundary . J This instruc-
tion passed. ?
The impolicy of this act was manifested by the conduct
of Spain. Though intended to be secret, it was made
* Col. Grayson, of Virginia, calls it "a disgraceful proposition. "--Debates
in Virginia Convention.
t1 Mad. 66, Madison says--" In this important business, which go deeply
affects the claims and interests of Virginia, and which I know she has so
much at heart, I have not the satisfaction to harmonize in sentiment with
my colleague. " "He," Colonel Bland, "has embraced an opinion that we
have no just claim to the subject in controversy between us and Spain, and
that it is the interest of Virginia not to adhere to it. "
In the Life of Arthur Lee, vol. 2, 384-5, Nov. 20,1786, a letter from Col.
Bland to Lee is to be seen. Bland writes--" I cannot agree with you on the
policy of Spain or the eastern states to relinquish tq Spain the navigation of
the Mississippi, even for a moment. It is a right which we have confirmed
to us by treaty. It is a right which nature has given us. It is a right
which nature will claim. It is a right which it is impossible in Spain to de-
prive us of; and in the attempt, she has shown that she considered it a right.
Why else should she endeavour to barter another privilege for it? Have
you not mistaken the effect of the exclusion? I rather think that, could it
be carried into execution, it would stifle the germ of agriculture and im-
provement. "
As such were the sentiments of Bland, the statements of Madison on this
subject would appear to require elucidation.
In a letter of Madison, App. to vol. 1, p. 21, he says--" Congress seized the
first moment also for revoking their instruction to Mr. Jay. " This is a slight
inaccuracy; this instruction was not revoked until late in the following year.
$ 2S. J. 397. --Feb. 15,1781.
5 Massachusetts, Connecticut, North Carolina, negative; New-York, di.
vided.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 102
THE LIFE OF
known to her before the information of it reached the
American envoy at Madrid. Convinced that this great
object was secured, no motive existed to depart from the
policy she had adopted. Nothing was promised or denied,
but a clew was given to her purposes by the observation
of her prime minister to Jay, "that all these affairs could
with more facility be adjusted by a general peace than
now; for that such a particular and even secret treaty
with us might then be made, as would be very convenient
to both. " Discouraging as every appearance was, the
mission was prosecuted with diligence, patience, firmness,
and discernment, until all efforts proved fruitless. Two
hundred years had not effaced from her iron memory how
much she had suffered by a revolt. She now saw in
every throe of liberty the loss of her western empire;
nor, could she have forgotten it for a moment, would
bigotry have failed to remind her that it was a revolt of
heretics.
A few days after congress had yielded in relation to the
navigation- of the Mississippi, the French ambassador
transmitted to them a letter from his king, assuring them
of his determination to assist them as far as his own wants
and the extraordinary and enormous expenses of the war
would permit. This communication was followed by a
memorial showing the extent of the proposed aids, but an-
nouncing that the second division of the French army
could not be expected that campaign. A second memo-
rial was presented, in which the acceptance by Great Bri-
tain of the mediation of Russia was announced; and a
request was made for the appointment of a committee to
discuss with him the manner of conducting the negotia-
tion, the extent of the powers of the commissioners, the ex-
tent to which they were to be used, and the confidence to
be reposed in the plenipotentiaries and cabinet of France.
"Moderation" was again inculcated.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
103
It has been seen that Adams had been driven with in-
dignity from Paris. Apprehensive of his resentment, and
of the influence which his suspicions and those of Dana as
to the policy of France might have upon their conduct at
a moment when indications were given of a desire on the
part of Great Britain to terminate the contest, it became
important to France to exercise over them an absolute
control.
The instructions to Adams, penned by Gouverneur Mor-
ris, had directed him to govern himself by the alliance of the
United States with France--"by the advice of our allies, by
his knowledge of our interests, and by his own discretion. "
To correct what France deemed an error in these in-
structions, the French minister having on the seventh of
May, at the earnest entreaties of Virginia, despatched a
fleet to the Chesapeake under Destouches, sought a con-
ference with congress. After stating that the appointment
of Dana was premature, and the opinion of the council
that he ought not to make any use of his powers at this
moment, " lest the dignity of the country should suffer by
his being refused," he proceeded to comment on the
conduct of Adams. He stated "circumstances to prove
the necessity" of a line "being drawn" of which Adams
might not be allowed to lose sight, and dwelt especially
on the use which he thought he had a right to make of his
powers to treat with Great Britain. He then added, that
"if congress put any confidence in the king's friendship
and benevolence, they would be impressed with the neces-
sity of prescribing to their plenipotentiary a perfect and
open confidence in the French minister, and a thorough re-
liance on the king; and would direct him to take no step
without the approbation of his majesty" and as to the man-
ner of executing his instructions, "to receive his directions
from the Count de Vergennes. " This conference was fol-
lowed by the annunciation, while the instructions were
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? THE LIFE OF
before a committee of congress, that the king of France
had granted "a gratuitous subsidy" of six millions of
livres.
After much discussion,* instructions were given to the
American plenipotentiaries to accept the mediation of
the emperors of Russia and Germany, but not to accede to
any treaty of peace "which shall not effectually secure
the independence and sovereignty of the thirteen states,
according to the form and effect of the treaties with his
most christian majesty, and in which those treaties shall
not be left in their full force and validity. " Thus the ex-
press preliminary acknowledgment of independence was
abandoned.
With a view to secure to France the control of the ne-
gotiation, the American minister was instructed " to make
the most confidential communications upon all subjects to
the ministry of France, and to undertake nothing without
their knowledge and concurrence;" and authority was
given to agree to a truce. These instructions were direct-
ed to be communicated confidentially to the French am-
bassador. He objected to them. They were ordered to
be reconsidered. The clause, "you will use your own
judgment and prudence, in securing the interest of the
United States," was erased, and the words, "you are at
liberty to secure," were substituted; and after the word
"concurrence," an addition was made, by which the min-
ister was directed "ultimately to govern himself by their
advice and opinion. "
This last clause, so derogatory from the dignity of the
country, it was moved four days after to reconsider; but
the motion was rejected. This vote was followed by a
conference, in which the magnitude of the king's bounty
was stated at large. It will be remarked with surprise,
? June 11, 1781. --2 S. J. 439.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
that on the first of the preceding amendments, the only
negative states were Massachusetts and Rhode Island;
that as to the last, the only dissentients were Massachu-
setts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut; and that on the
motion to reconsider, the only affirmative states were
Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Delaware,
New-York not being represented. It is due to the memory
of a gallant soldier of Virginia to record, that while the
vote of that state was given by Jones and Madison in fa-
vour of these amendments, Colonel Bland opposed them
in every stage. * f
* The negatives were : Massachusetts--Lovell and Ward; Rhode Island--
Vamum; Connecticut--Huntington, (Elsworth and Sherman, who took
their seats on the 4th of June preceding;) Pennsylvania--Montgomery and
T. Smith; Virginia--Bland.
t The clause as ultimately adopted ran thus--after referring to former
instructions as to boundaries--" fromt which you will perceive the desires
and expectations of congress, but we think it unsafe, at this distance, to
tie you up by absolute and peremptory directions upon any other subject
than the two essential articles above mentioned. You are, therefore, at
liberty to secure the interest of the United States in such manner as cir-
cumstances may direct, and as the state of the belligerent and disposition
of the mediating powers may require. For this purpose, you are to make
the most candid and confidential communications upon all subjects to the
ministers of our generous ally, the king of France; to undertake nothing
in the negotiations for peace or truce without their knowledge and concur-
rence; and ultimately to govern yourselves by their advice and opinion,
endeavouring in your whole conduct to make them sensible how much we
rely on his majesty's influence for effectual support in every thing that may
be necessary to the present security or future prosperity of the United States
of America.
"If a difficulty should arise in the course of the negotiation for peace, from
the backwardness of Britain to make a formal acknowledgment of our
independence, you are at liberty to agree to a truce, or to make such other
concessions as may not affect the substance of what we contend for; and
provided that Great Britain be not left in possession of any part of the
thirteen United States. "
t SB. J. 446.
14
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 106
THE LIFE OP
This degrading concession* to France was not the only
consequence of the recent invasion of Virginia. A pro-
posal was soon after made that the states should empower
congress to compel, by an armed, land, or naval force, any
delinquent state "to yield prompt obedience to all just re-
quisitions on them; and as to those that had little or no
foreign trade of their own, that all inland trade with such
states as supplied them with foreign merchandise might be
interdicted, and the concurrence of the latter enforced, in
case of refusal, by operations on their foreign trade. "
"There is a collateral reason," Madison observed, "which
interests the states who are feeble in maritime resources
in such a plan. A navy so formed, and under the orders
of the general council of the state, would not only be a
guard against aggressions and insults from abroad, but,
without it, what is to protect the southern states, for many
years to come, against the insults and aggressions of their
northern brethren. "-)- So remote were his ideas at that
time from a national government. While Madison was
thus proposing to provide for future wars between the
states, Hamilton, as has been seen, was urging measures to
strengthen the union. "Force cannot effect it. The ap-
plication of it," he said, "is always disagreeable, the issue
uncertain. It will be wiser to obviate the necessity of it,
by interesting such a number of individuals in each state in
* Two days after, Gouverneur Morris wrote to Jay: "But when you come
to find by your instructions that you must ultimately obey the dictates of the
French minister, I am sure there is something in your bosom which will re-
volt at the servility of your situation. Do I not know you well enough to
believe that you will not act in this new capacity? I think I do; and there-
fore I will express my concern that you must decline the honour, if that name
can be applied to such offices. Decline, however, with decency, though with
dignity. I mean always if no alteration takes place, which shall be done if I
can effectuate it, though I almost despair. No other congress will surrender
all, as this has, to an ally. "
t Madison Papers, v. 1, p. 87: Madison to Jefferson, who approved the idea.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
107
support of the federal government, as will be a counter-
poise to the ambition of others, and will make it difficult for
them to unite the people in opposition to the just and ne-
cessary measures of the union. "*
As the independence of Adams had been complained of
by the French minister, it was proposed that other per-
sons should be united with him in the mission. This was
at first rejected, but four other commissioners, Franklin,
Jay, Jefferson and Laurens, were subsequently added.
Thus a preponderance, it was hoped, would be secured to
the party attached to France.
Adams still retained powers to form a commercial treaty
with Great Britain, the terms of which, it has been seen,
required that no privileges should be granted to England
not conferred on France, excluded any peculiar limitations
in her favour, and stipulated expressly for a participation in
the fisheries; but in all other matters gave him full discre-
tion to treat on terms of equality and reciprocity. It
was possible that Great Britain might avail herself of
these powers, as by a commercial treaty she would avoid
the express acknowledgment of independence; and that
thus the whole object of the recent instructions, to submit
to the control of France, would be defeated.
To prevent such a result, a great stroke of policy was
resorted to. An additional instruction was moved by Madi-
sonf--that in negotiating a treaty with Great Britain,
Adams should enter into no such treaty unless in addition
to the stipulations as to the fisheries; all the objects included
in their original ultimatum of seventeen hundred and
seventy-nine, as to a treaty of peace, as the same stood
prior to their instructions of the fifteenth of June, should
be in such treaty of commerce explicitly acknowledged
and stipulated to the United States.
* Ante, vol. 1, p. 371.
t June 29,1781. --2 S. J. 458.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 108
THE LIFE OF
The insuperable obstacle on the part of Great Britain,
it had been fully ascertained, was a preliminary acknow-
ledgment of independence. This original ultimatum re-
quired* it as a preliminary article to any negotiation,
that Great Britain shall agree to treat with the United
States "as sovereign, free, and independent. " Thus all
possibility of exercising his powers by Adams would have
been prevented. That such was the object of this motion,
and not the securing a preliminary acknowledgment, must
be inferred from the fact that the mover of the resolution
voted for the instructions of the fifteenth of June, by which
this previous acknowledgment of independence was waived,
and it was to become merely an article of treaty.
This last motion was rejected, three states voting for it. f
Baffled in this effort to interpose an impassable barrier to
all direct negotiation with England, the only alternative
that remained, was to withdraw his powers to form a
treaty, and at the instanee of Madison the commission to
Adams was revoked. J
Having succeeded in obtaining the entire control of the
negotiation for peace, and, by the revocation of the powers
granted to Adams, having closed the door upon Great
Britain, it might have been supposed that France would
have felt herself secure; but she still saw cause of appre-
hension. Adams was in Holland, England was represent-
ed at the Hague, and it was impossible to foresee the con-
sequences of a negotiation being opened between them.
These were to be prevented.
On his arrival at Amsterdam, Adams suggested the im-
portance of maintaining an official agent there, and he was
* 2 S. J. 225
t Connecticut, Virginia, and North Carolina--(Elsworth, Bland, and
Smith, dissenting. )
t July 23, 1781 j vol. 4, No. 36, state department; Madison seconded by
Sharpe.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
109
empowered to negotiate a loan; he soon after intimated
the advantages to be derived from a resident embassy at
the Hague. The suggestion was approved, and he was
commissioned as minister plenipotentiary to the United
Provinces.
As early as seventeen hundred and seventy-eight, the
regency of Amsterdam had evinced a disposition to enter
into commercial regulations with America. They applied
to the states-general for a convoy to vessels carrying naval
stores to France, and protested against a refusal of it.
This gave a pretext to that nation to announce to them
"the necessity of protecting their commerce, in order to
enjoy the privileges of neutrality. " This was not done,
and a rescript was issued by France excluding Holland
from those privileges, and interdicting a part of her pro-
ductions. These decisive measures produced the intended
effect, and a naval force was directed by the states-general
to be equipped for that purpose.
Soon after, an American squadron under the command
of Paul Jones entered the Texel with several prizes. He
was ordered to leave the waters of Holland. While there,
an address was presented by the British minister, demand-
ing the seizure of the king's vessels in the hands of a
"pirate and an outlaw. " This demand was not acceded
to, but Jones was again, commanded to sail. Having re-
fused with great indignation the offer from the French
ambassador of a letter of marque, he departed.
But a short time elapsed when a plan of a treaty with
the United States was framed by the authorities at Am-
sterdam. This drew an angry remonstrance from England.
Measures of defence were taken by that city; orders in
council were issued by Great Britain for hostilities, and St.
Eustatia was captured. Adams resolved to seize upon this*
moment to make an impression. He addressed letters to
the envoys of Russia, Denmark, and Sweden, announcing
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 110
THE LIFE OF
the resolution of congress concurring with the regulations
of the "marine treaty," and at the same moment asked of
the French ambassador the Duke de la Vauguyon to aid
him. The former did not answer his letters; the latter stated
that he had no instructions on the subject. Relying on the
support of several of the provinces, he presented a memorial
to the states-general, and urged his reception at the Hague.
He was discountenanced by Vauguyon, and was refused.
In a conference between La Luzerne and congress, they
were informed that,* " on being apprised of the intention
of Mr. Adams to display his character as a minister, the
duke gave him no assistance on that occasion, knowing the
application would have no favourable issue. "
The perseverance of Adams alarmed Vergennes, and
within a few days after his powers to form a commercial
treaty with Great Britain had been revoked, the French
ambassador appeared again before congress. He stated
the accession of Holland to the armed neutrality, the hos-
tile acts of Great Britain, the opinion of the council of
his king that a "prudent and able man"f should be sent to
Holland with full powers; that it would likewise be advan-
tageous to give proper instructions to that minister, and as
it is impossible at this distance to have quick information,
it would be proper to have further instructions given by
Dr. Franklin, in order to avoid all inconsistency or contra-
diction, and that the political operations of congress, aim-
ing towards the same end, may of course be more success-
ful. Had Franklin, as Adams alleged, been the "index
of Vergennes," a better expedient could not have been
devised by France to point the way to the American resi-
dent at the Hague; but neither this nor the hint as to the
selection of "a prudent and able man," could be acted
upon without offending New-England.
? 3 s. J. 35.
t 2 S. J. 4G6. ^Tuly 23, 1781.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
Ill
The original instructions to Adams were, "to adopt, in
whole or without any essential alteration," a plan of treaty
which was transmitted from Philadelphia, with restrictions
"not to admit any thing inconsistent with the treaties with
France, or not conforming to the proposed regulations of
the congress of northern powers. "
The only device was, to limit these instructions 5 and
with that view a report was adopted, which, after acknow-
ledging this effort by the king of France to make a coali-
tion with Holland, as a fresh proof of his solicitude for
their interests, stated to the French minister the previous
appointment of Adams with special instructions to con-
form to the treaty with France, and empowered him to enter
into a joint alliance with France, Holland, and Spain, on
condition that no party shall conclude either truce or peace
with Great Britain without the formal consent of the
whole first obtained. In all other matters, he was to use
his best discretion; and he was directed "to confer upon
all occasions in the most confidential manner with his most
christian majesty's minister" at the Hague. *
While these measures were taken in America, Adams
was invited by Vergennes to Paris, to consult upon the
proposed mediation of Austria and Russia.
He announced his arrival; an audience was granted, and
the subject was opened. ')-
The propositions of the mediators were upon the basis,J
* 2 S. J. 472. --August 16, 1781.
t In his letter to congress, he says--" The letter announcing my ar-
rival, I sent by my servant, who waited until the count descended from the
council, when he delivered it into his hand. He broke the seal, read the
letter, and said he was sorry he could not see Mr. Adams, but he was obliged
to go into the country immediately after dinner; that Mr. Adams 'seroit
dans le cas de voir M. de Rayneval,' who lived at such a sign, in such a
street. After dinner I called on M. de Rayneval, who stated the object, and
an interview was appointed with the minister. "--6 D. C. 92.
t 6 D. C. 100. --July 11,1781.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 112
THE LIFE OF
that a treaty should be negotiated between Great Britain
and the American colonies without the intervention of any
of the belligerent powers, but to be signed conjointly with
that of those powers, and that there should be a general
armistice for one year from a period to be defined. The
comments of the American minister stated that there
would be no objection to such a separate treaty, consist-
ent with their obligations to their allies, without the inter-
vention of any of the belligerents, or (unless demanded)
of the mediators. The conjoint signature was approved,
but the proposed armistice or a truce, as suggested by
Vergennes, was objected to except under two express pre-
liminary conditions:--the continuance of the subsisting
treaties until the acknowledgment of independence by
Great Britain, and the antecedent removal of the British
forces; and this truce was to be of sufficient duration to
imply a virtual relinquishment of the objects of the war,
and to be agreed to before the opening of another cam-
paign.
But the great question was stated to be, the acknowledg-
ment of independence; and "as the United States can
never consent that their independence shall be discussed
before any sovereign," it was suggested that if the impe-
rial courts would "lay down, as a preliminary, the sove-
reignty of the United States, and admit their minister to
a congress," a treaty might be commenced with Great
Britain, "without any express acknowledgment of sove-
reignty until the treaty should be concluded. " The reply
of Vergennes, addressed to Adams as agent of the United
States, represented the necessity of certain preliminaries
being adjusted before the American minister could be ad-
mitted to the congress. His answer, proceeding on the
supposition that it was intended to acknowledge the inde-
pendence of the American states, proposed "that the
character of their minister sholild be ascertained before
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
113
any congress met, that he might take his place as soon as
it opened. . A second letter adverted to a most extraordi-
nary suggestion--that the separate states of America should
choose an agent foY each, to attend the congress. Adams
urged Vergennes not to countenance this idea, " apprising
him, that though it had been mentioned only as a tran-
sient speculation, that he felt it to be a duty to inform
him that congress would remonstrate against it in the
most solemn manner. " No other correspondence passed
upon this subject, but from the statement of La Lu-
zerne to congress, it appeared that England insisted upon
the dependence of America being pre-established, and
that thus there would be no possibility of a mediation for
peace.
Adams returned to Amsterdam, approved* and obeyed
his last instructions. In order to learn whether he should
visit the president of the states-general, he consulted
Vauguyon, observing "that congress had wisely enjoined
it upon him to confer in the most confidential manner
with his excellency, and that he had "made it a law to
take no important step without his approbation. " Vau-
guyon waited the orders of his principal, and informed
Adams that the minister " sees no objection to the visit on
the subject of his memorial, provided, without any official
writing, he limited himself to the inquiry, whether his
memorial had been the subject of deliberation, and what
answer he should communicate to congress. " The memo-
rial was referred for consideration; and after some delay--
after the capture of Cornwallis and the victories of Greene
had changed the British ministry, and peace was inevitable,
--France sanctioned his reception, and he was gratified by
a public acknowledgment. During these interesting mo-
ments, he received a letter from the secretary of foreign
6 D. C. 198.
15
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 114
THE LIFE OF
affairs disapproving his having printed his memorial, and
having urged his admission to court. His reply shows his
views of the effects of this measure,* and of the conse-
? John Adams to congreis. --6 Dip. Corres. 258. --" The proposition to the
president being taken ad referendum, it became a subject of the delibera-
tion of the sovereignty. The prince, therefore, and the whole court, are
legally bound to treat it with respect, and me with decency ; at least, it would
be criminal in them to treat me or the subject with indecency. If it had
not been presented and printed, I am very sure I could not long have resided
in the republic; and what would have been the consequence to the friends
of liberty, I know not. They were so disheartened and intimidated, and the
Anglomanes were so insolent, that no man can say that a sudden frenzy
might not have been excited among the soldiery and people, to demand a
junction with England, as there was in the year 1748. Such a revolution
would have injured America and her allies, have prolonged the war, and
have been the total loss and ruin of the republic.
"Immediately upon the presentation of my memorial, M. Van Berckel ven.
tnred to present his requite and demand for a trial. This contributed still
further to raise the spirits of the good people, and soon after the burgomasters
of Amsterdam appeared with their proposition for giving the prince a com-
mittee for a council, and in course their attack upon the duke; all which
together excited such an enthusiasm in the nation, and among the officers
of the navy, as produced the battle of the Doggerbank, which never would
have happened, in all probability, but would have been eluded by secret or-
ders and various artifices, if the spirit raised in the nation by the chain of
proceedings of which the American memorial was the first and an essential
link, had not rendered a display of the national bravery indispensable for the
honour of the navy, and perhaps for the safety of the court.
"The memorial as a composition, has very little merit; yet almost every
gazette in Europe has inserted it, and most of them with a compliment, none
without any criticism. When I was in Paris and Versailles afterwards, no
man ever expressed to me the smallest disapprobation of it, or the least appre-
hension that it could do any harm. On the contrary, several gentlemen of
letters expressed higher compliments upon it than it deserved. The king of
Sweden has done it a most illustrious honour, by quoting one of the most ma-
terial sentiments in it, in a public answer to the king of Great Britain; and the
emperor of Germany has since done the author of it the honour to desire in the
character of Count Falkenstein to see him, and what is more remarkable, ha>>
adopted the sentiments of it concerning religious liberty into a code of laws
for his dominions,--the greatest effort in favour of humanity, next to the
American revolution, which has been produced in the eighteenth century.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-20 03:41 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uva. x000275492 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? HAMILTON.
115
quences of his firmness. It also discloses his indignation
at the influence which had been exerted against him,
charging expressly, that it was the design of the French
"As my mission to this republic was wisely communicated to the court of
Versailles, who can say that this transaction of congress had not some influ-
ence in bringing De Grasse into the Chesapeake Bay? Another thing I
ought to mention; I have a letter from Mr. Jay, informing me that ip the
month of June last, M. Del Campo was appointed by the court of Madrid to
treat with him; the exact time when my memorial appeared at Madrid.
You may possibly say, that my imagination and self-love carry me extraor-
dinary lengths; but when one is called upon to justify an action, one should
look all round. All I contend for is, that the memorial has certainly done
no harm; that it is probable it has done some good, and that it is possible
it has done much more than can be proved. A man always makes an awk-
ward figure when he is justifying himself and his own actions, and I hope I
shaJJ be pardoned. It is easy to say, ' il abonde trop dans son tens; il eft
twin et glorieux; U eft plein de liii-mime; il ne vpii que lui;' and other
modest things of that sort, with which even your Malcsherbes, your Turgots,
and Neckers, are sometimes sacrificed to very small intrigues.
