Some say, the
language
was fixed on such a
day of such a month, and that, from that
moment, the introduction of a new word
became a barbarism; others affirm, that the
rules of the drama were definitely settled
in such a year (and it is a great pity that a
genius, which would now set about making
any change in them, was not born before
that year), in which every literary discus-
?
day of such a month, and that, from that
moment, the introduction of a new word
became a barbarism; others affirm, that the
rules of the drama were definitely settled
in such a year (and it is a great pity that a
genius, which would now set about making
any change in them, was not born before
that year), in which every literary discus-
?
Madame de Stael - Germany
handle.
net/2027/hvd.
32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.
hathitrust.
org/access_use#pd-google
? 94 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
that is, it cannot long consist principally, in
not believing, in not understanding, and in
what it disdains. We must have a philo-
sophy of belief, of enthusiasm, a philosophy
which confirms by reason, what sentiment
reveals to us.
The adversaries of Kant have accused him
of having merely repeated the arguments of
the ancient idealists; they have pretended
that the doctrine of the German philosopher
was only an old system in a new language.
This reproach has no foundation. There are
not only new ideas, but a particular character,
in the doctrine of Kant.
It savours of the philosophy of the eigh-
teenth century, although it was intended to re-
fute the doctrines of that philosophy, because
it is natural to man always to catch the spirit
of the age in which he lives, even when his
intention is to oppose it. The philosophy of
Plato is more poetical than that of Kant,
the philosophy of Mallebranche more reli-
gious; but the great merit of the German
philosopher has been to raise up moral dig-
nity, by setting all that is fine in the heart,
on the basis of a theory deduced from the
strongest reasoning. The opposition which
it has been endeavoured to show between
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? KANT. 95
reason and sentiment, necessarily leads rea-
son on to selfishness, and reduces sentiment
to folly; but Kant, who seemed to be called
to conclude all the grand intellectual al-
liances, has made the soul one focus, in
which all our faculties are in contact with
each other.
The polemical part of the works of Kant,
that in which he attacks the philosophy of
the materialists, would be of itself a master-
piece. That philosophy has struck its roots
so deeply into the mind, so much irreligion
and selfishness has been the result of it, that
those men ought to be regarded as benefac-
tors to their country, who have even com-
batted a system so pernicious, and revived
the ideas of Plato, of Descartes, and of
Leibnitz: but the philosophy of the new
German school contains a crowd of ideas
which are peculiar to it; it is founded upon
the greatest extent of scientific knowledge,
which has been increasing every day, and
upon a singularly abstract and logical mode
of reasoning; for, although Kant blames
the use of such reasoning, in the examina-
tion of truths which are out of the circle of
experience, he shows in his writings a power
of mind, on metaphysical subjects, which
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 96 PHILOSOPHI' AND MORALS.
places him, in that respect, in the first rank
of thinkers.
It cannot be denied that the style of Kant,
in his " Examination of pure Reason," de-
serves almost all the reproaches with which
his adversaries have treated it. He has made
use of a phraseology very difficult to under-
stand, and of the most tiresome new crea-
tion of words. He lived alone with his own
thoughts, and persuaded himself that it was
necessary to have new words for new ideas,
and yet there are words to express every
thing.
In those objects which are in themselves
the most clear, Kant is frequently guided by
a very obscure system of metaphysics; and
it is only in those regions of thought where
darkness prevails in general, that he displays
the torch of light: like the Israelites, who
had for their guide a column of fire by night,
and a pillar of a cloud by day.
No one in France would give himself
the trouble of studying works so thickly set
with difficulties, as those of Kant; but he
had to do with patient and persevering
readers. This, certainly, was not a reason
for his abusing their patience; perhaps,
however, he would not have been able to
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? KANT. 97
search so deeply into the science of the hu*.
man understanding, if he had attached more
importance to the choice of the expressions
which he made use of in explaining it.
The ancient philosophers always divided
their doctrines into two distinct parts; one
which they reserved for the initiated, and
another which they professed in public.
Kant's manner of writing is quite different,
when his theory, or the application of it, is
the subject.
In his metaphysical treatises, he makes use
of words as arithmetical figures, and gives
them whatever value he pleases, without
troubling himself with that which they have
derived from custom. This appears to me a
great error; for the attention of the reader
is exhausted in efforts to understand the
language, before he arrives at the ideas, and
what is known never serves as a step to what
is unknown.
We must nevertheless give Kant the jus-
tice he deserves, even as a writer, when he
lays aside his scientific language. In speak-
ing of the arts, and still more of morality,
his style is almost always "perfectly clear,
energetic, and simple. How admirable does
his doctrine then appear! How well does
VOL. III. H
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 98 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
he express the sentiment of the beautiful and
the love of duty! With what force does he
separate them both from all calculations of
interest or of utility! How he ennobles
actions by their source, and not by their suc-
cess! In a word, what grandeur of morality
docs he not give to man, whether he exa-
mines him in himself, or whether he considers
him in his relations towards others;--to man,
that exile of heaven, that prisoner upon
earth, so great as an exile, so miserable as a
captive!
We might extract from the writings of
Kant a multitude of brilliant ideas on all
subjects; perhaps, indeed, it is to this doc-
trine alone, that, at the present day, we
must look for conceptions at once ingenious
and new; for the notions of the materialists
no longer offer, in any thing, what is interest-
ing or original. Smartness of wit against
what is serious, noble, and divine, is worn
out; and in future it will be impossible to
restore to the human race any of the qualities
of youth, but by returning to religion by the
road of philosophy, and to sentiment by the
way of reason.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 99
CHAPTER VII.
Of the most celebrated Philosophers before
and after Kant.
The spirit of philosophy, from its nature,
cannot be generally diffused in any country.
In Germany, however, there is such a tend-
ency towards habits of reflection, that the
German nation may be considered, by dis-
tinction, as the nation of metaphysics. It
possesses so many men capable of under-
standing the mo3t abstract questions, that
even the public are found to take an interest
in the arguments usually employed in dis-
cussions of that nature.
Every man of talent has his own way of
thinking on philosophical questions. Writers
of the second and third rank, in Germany,
are sufficiently deep to be of the first rank in
other countries. Those who are rivals, have
the same hatred towards one another there
as elsewhere; but no one would dare to
enter the lists, without having evinced, by
serious study, a real love for the science in
h2
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 100 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
which he was engaged. It is not enough
ardently to desire success; it must be de-
served, before the candidate can be even
admitted to start for it. The Germans, how-
ever indulgent they may be to defects of
form in a work, are unmerciful with respect
to its real value; and, when they perceive
any thing superficial, in the mind, the feel-
ing, or the knowledge of a writer, they try
to borrow the very pleasantry of the French,
to turn what is frivolous into ridicule.
It is my intention to give, in this chapter,
a hasty glimpse of the principal opinions
of the philosophers who have attracted no-
tice before and since the time of Kant;
the course which his successors "have taken
cannot well be judged of, without turning
back to see what was the state of opinions
at the time when the doctrines of Kantism
first prevailed in Germany; it was opposed
at the same time to the system of Locke,
as tending 10 materialism, and to the school
of Leibnitz, as reducing every thing to ab-
straction.
The ideas of Leibnitz were lofty; but his
disciples, Wolf at their head, have encum-
bered them with forms of logic and meta-
physics. Leibnitz had said, our ideas that
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 101
come by the senses are confused, and that
those only which belong to the immediate
perceptions of the mind are clear: without
doubt his intention by that was to show,
that truths, which are invisible, are more
certain and more in harmony with our
moral nature, than all that we learn by the
evidence of the senses. Wolf and his dis-
ciples have drawn this consequence from it,
that every thing, about which our mind can.
be employed, must be reduced into abstract
ideas. Kant inspired interest and warmth
into this lifeless idealism; he assigned to ex-
perience, as well as to the innate faculties,
its just proportion; and the art with which
he applied his theory to every thing that
is interesting to mankind, to morality, to
poetry, and to the fine arts, extended the
influence of it.
Three leading men, Lessing, Hemsterhuis,
and Jacobi, preceded Kant in the career of
philosophy. They had no school, because
they founded no system; but they began the
attack against the doctrine of the materialists.
Of these three, Lessing is the one whose opi-
nions, on this point, are the least decided;
^however, he had too enlarged a mind to be
confined within the narrow circle which is so
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 102 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
easily drawn, when we renounce the highest
truths. Lessing's all-powerful polemics dis-
closed doubt upon the most important ques-
tions, and led to new inquiries of every kind.
Lessing himself cannot be considered either
as a materialist or as an idealist; but the
necessity of examination and study to
the acquisition of knowledge, was the main
spring of his doctrine. "If the Almighty/'
said he, " were to hold Truth in one hand,
"and the Search after truth in the other,
"it is the latter I should ask of him in pre-
"ference. "
Lessing was not orthodox in religion.
Christianity, in him, was not a necessary
thing, like sentiment; and yet he was ca-
pable of admiring it philosophically. He
understood its relations with the human
heart, and he ever considers all the different
ways of thinking, from a point of view,
where he is able to see them all. Nothing
intolerant, no exclusion, is to be found in
his writings. When we take our stand, in
the centre of universal ideas, we never
fail to have sincerity, depth, and extent of
mind. Whatever is unjust, vain, and nar-
row, is derived from the desire of refer-
ring every thing to certain partial views,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 10$
which we have taken and appropriated to
ourselves, and which we make the objects of
our self-love.
Lessing expresses, in an acute and plain
style, opinions full of warmth. Hemsterhuis,
a Dutch philosopher, was the first who, in
the middle of the eighteenth century, showed,
in his writings, the greater part of the liberal
ideas, upon which the new German school is
founded. His works are also very remark-
able, for the contrast which there is between
the character of his style, and the thoughts
which it conveys. Lessing is an enthusiast,
with an ironical manner; Hemsterhuis, an
enthusiast, with the language of a mathema-
tician. Writers who devote the most abstract
metaphysics to the defence of the most ex-
alted systems, and who conceal the liveliness
of imagination under the austerity of logic,
are a phenomenon which is scarcely to be
found, except amongst the German nations.
Men, who are always upon their guard
against imagination, when they have it not,
are more ready to trust those writers who
banish talent and sensibility from philoso-
phical discussions, as if it were not, at least,
as easy to be absurd, upon such subjects, in
syllogisms as with eloquence. For a syllo-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 104 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
gism, which always takes for its basis that
such a thing is or is not, reduces the im-
mense crowd of our impressions to a simple
alternative, in every case; whilst eloquence
embraces them all together. Nevertheless,
although Hemsterhuis has too frequently ex-
pressed philosophical truths,' in an algebraic
manner, there is a sentiment of morality, a
real love of the beautiful, in his writings,
which cannot but be admired; he was one of
the first to feel the union which exists be-
tween idealism, or (as I should rather say)
the free-will of man, and the stoic morality;
and it is in this point of view, above all, that
the new doctrine of the Germans is of great
importance.
Even before the writings of Kant had ap-
peared, Jacobi had attacked the philosophy
of sensation, and still more victoriously the
system of morality founded upon interest.
He flid not confine himself strictly, in his
philosophy, to abstract forms of reasoning.
His analysis of the human soul is full of elo-
quence and of charms. In the following
chapters, I shall examine the finest part of
his works, that which relates to morality;
but, as a philosopher, he deserves separate
honour. Better instructed than any one else
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 105
in the history of ancient and modern philo-
sophy, he devoted his studies to the support
of the most simple truths. The first amongst
the philosophers of his day, he made religious
feeling the foundation of our whole intellec-
tual nature; and, it may be said, that he
has only learnt the language of metaphysi-
cians and learned men, to do homage, in it,
to virtue and divinity.
Jacobi has shown himself the opposer of
the philosophy of Kant, but he does not
attack it as if he was himself the partisan of
the philosophy of sensation *. On the con-
trary, his objection to Kant is, that he does
not rely sufficiently upon the support of re-
ligion, considered as the only possible phi-
losophy in those truths which are beyond the
reach of experience.
The doctrine of Kant has met with many
other opponents in Germany; but it has not
been attacked by those who have not under-
stood it, or by those who opposed the opi-
nions of Locke and Condillac, as a complete
answer to it. Leibnitz still retained too
great an ascendant over the minds of his
countrymen, for them not to pay respect to
* This philosophy has, in Germany, generally received
the name of The Empiric Philosophy.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 106 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
any opinion which was analogous to his. A
long list of writers have, for ten years, been
incessantly engaged in writing commentaries
on the works of Kant. But, at the present
day, the German philosophers, although
agreeing with Kant as to the spontaneous
activity of thought, have adopted each a
system of his own on that point. In fact,
who is there who has never endeavoured,
according to his abilities, to understand him-
self? But, because man has given an innu-
merable variety of explanations of his nature,
does it therefore follow that such a philoso-
phical examination is useless? Certainly not.
This variety itself is a proof of the interest
which such an examination ought to inspire.
In our days, people would be glad to have
done with moral nature, and would readily
pay its reckoning to hear no more of it.
Some say, the language was fixed on such a
day of such a month, and that, from that
moment, the introduction of a new word
became a barbarism; others affirm, that the
rules of the drama were definitely settled
in such a year (and it is a great pity that a
genius, which would now set about making
any change in them, was not born before
that year), in which every literary discus-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHER*. 107
sion, past, present, and future, was deter-
mined without appeal. At last, it has been
decided in metaphysics above all, that since
the days of Condillac it has been impossible
to take a single step more, without going
out of the way. It is allowed that the phy-
sical sciences are making progress, because it
cannot be denied; but, in the career of phi-
losophy and literature, the human mind is to
be obliged to be incessantly running the ring
of vanity around the same circle.
To remain attached to that experimental
philosophy which offers a species of evi-
dence, false in principle, although specious
in form, is by no means to simplify the sys-
tem of the universe. By considering every
thing as not existing which is beyond the
reach of our sensations, it is easy to give light
enough to a system, the limits of which we
ourselves prescribe; it is a work which de-
pends upon the doer of it. But does every
thing beyond those limits exist the less, be-
cause it is counted as nothing? The imper-
fect truth of speculative philosophy is ever
much nearer to the essence of things, than
that apparent light which belongs to the
art of solving difficulties of a certain order.
When one reads in the philosophical writings
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 108 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
of the last century these phrases so frequently
repeated, this is all the truth that exists,
every thing else is chimerical, it puts one in
mind of the well-known story of a French
actor, who, before he would fight with a
man much fatter than himself, proposed to
chalk out on his adversary's body a line, the
hits on the outside of which should go for
nothing. Yet there was the same nature
without that line as within it, and equally
capable of receiving a mortal wound. In the
same manner, those who place the pillars of
Hercules on the boundary of their horizon,
cannot prevent the existence of a nature be-
yond their own, in which there exists a
higher degree of life, than in the sphere of
matter to which they would confine us.
TKe two most celebrated philosophers who
have succeeded Kant, are Fichte and Schel-
ling. They too pretended to simplify his
system; but it was by putting in its place a
species of philosophy more elevated even than
his, that they hoped to accomplish it.
Kant had, with a firm hand, separated the
two empires of the soul and of the senses.
This philosophical duality was fatiguing to
minds which love to repose in simple ideas.
From the days of the Greeks to our own*
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 109
this axiom has often been repeated, that every
thing is one, and the efforts of philosophers
have always been directed to find in one
single principle, either in the soul or in na-
ture, an explanation of the world. I shall,
nevertheless, venture to sav, that it appears
to me to be one of the titles which Kant's
philosophy has to the confidence of enlight-
ened men, that it affirms, what we feel to be
the case, that there exists both a soul and an
external nature, and that they act mutually
one upon the other by such or such laws. I
know not why a greater degree of philoso-
phical elevation is to be found in the idea of
one single principle, whether material or in-
tellectual; . there being one, or two, does not
render the universe more easy of comprehen-
sion, and our feeling agrees better with those
systems that acknowledge a distinction be-
tween physics and morality.
Fichte and Schelling have divided between
them the empire which Kant acknowledged
to be a divided one, and each has chosen
that his own half should be the whole. Both
have gone out of the sphere of ourselves, and
have been desirous of rising to a knowledge
of the system of the universe. Very dif-
ferent in that from Kant, who has applied as
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 110 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
much power of mind so show those things,
at the knowledge of which the human mind
can never arrive, as to explain those which
are within its reach.
No philosopher, however, before Fichte,
had extended the system of idealism with
such scientific strictness; he makes the whole
universe consist of the activity of mind. All
conception, all imagination, proceeds from
that; it is on account of this system that
he has been suspected of unbelief. He was
heard to say, that, in his next lesson, he
should create God, and the world was scan-
dalized with reason at such an expression. --
What he meant by it was, that he should
show how the idea of the Divinity arose, and
was developed in the mind of man. The
principal merit of Fichte's philosophy is, the
incredible attention that it implies; for he is
not contented with referring every thing to the
inward existence of man, to the self which
forms the basis of every thing, but he goes
on to distinguish in this self what is
transient and what is permanent. In fact,
when we reflect on the operations of the
understanding, we think ourselves eye-wit-
nesses of our own thoughts; we think we
see them pass before us like a stream,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. Ill
whilst the portion of self, which is con-
templating them, is immoveable. It often
happens to those who unite an impassioned
character to an observing mind, to sec
themselves suffer, and to feel within them-
selves a being superior to its own pain,
which observes it, and reproves or pities it
by turns. ,
We are subject to continual changes from
the external circumstances of our life, and
yet we always have the feeling of our iden-
tity. What is it, then, that attests this
identity, if not that self ', always the same,
which sees another self, modified by im-
pressions from without, pass before its tri-
bunal?
It is to this immoveable soul, the witness
of the moveable soul, that Fichte attributes
the gift of immortality, and the power of
creating, or (to translate more exactly) of
drawing to a focus in itself the image of the
universe. This system, which makes every
thing rest on the summit of our existence,
and places a pyramid on its point, is . singu-
larly difficult to follow. It strips our ideas
of the colours which so well enable us to
understand them; and the fine arts, poetry,
and the contemplation of nature, disappear
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 112 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
in abstractions which are without any mix-
ture of imagination or sensibility.
Fichte considers the exterior world only
as a boundary of our existence, on which
thought is at work. In his system, this
boundary is created by the soul itself, the
activity of which is constantly exerted on
the web it has formed. What Fichte has
written upon the metaphysical self', is a little
like the waking of Pygmalion's statue, which,
touching alternately itself and the stone on
which it was placed, says, by turns, This is I,
and This is not I; but when, taking the hand
of Pygmalion, it exclaims, This indeed is I--
that excites a sentiment which is much be-
yond the sphere of abstract ideas. Idealism,
stripped of sentiment, has nevertheless the
advantage of exciting, to the highest degree,
the activity of the mind; but nature and
love, by this system, lose all their charms;
for, if the objects which we see, and the
beings whom we love, are nothing but the
works of our own ideas, it is man himself
that may be considered as the great cceliba-
tary of the world.
It must be acknowledged, however, that
the system of Fichte has two great advan-
tages; the one is its stoic morality, which"
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 113
admits of no excuses; for, every thing pro-
ceeding from self, it is self alone which has
to answer for the use it makes of the will:
the other is an exercise of thought, at once
so severe and so subtile, that a man who had
mastered the system, even though he should
not adopt it, would have acquired a capacity
of attention, and a sagacity in analysis, which
would afterwards make any other kind of
study a plaything to him.
In whatever manner the utility of meta-
physics is judged of, it cannot be denied, that
it is the gymnastic exercise of the mind. It
is usual to set children on different kinds of
wrestling in their earliest years, although it
may never be necessary for them to fight in
that manner. It may be truly said, that the
study of the "ideal system of metaphysics is
almost a certain means of developing the
moral faculties of those who devote them-
selves to it. Thought, like every thing pre-
cious, resides at the bottom of ourselves;
for, on the surface, there is nothing but folly
and insipidity. But when men are early
obliged to dive into their own minds, and to
see all that passes within them, they draw
from thence a power, and plainness of judg-
ment, which are never lost.
VOL. HI. I
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 114 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
For abstract ideas, Fichte has a mathe-
matical head, like Euler or La Grange. He
has a singular contempt for all expressions
which in any manner relate to substance;
existence even is too common a word for him.
Being, principle, essence, are words scarcely
airy enough to mark the subtile shades in his
opinions. It might be said, that he was
afraid of coming in contact with realities,
and was always shrinking from them. In
reading his works, or conversing with him,
one loses the consciousness of this world,
and feels it necessary, like the ghosts de-
scribed by Homer, to recall to one's self the
remembrances of life.
Materialism absorbs the soul by degrading
it; the idealism of Fichte, by exalting it,
separates it from nature; in both extremes,
sentiment, which is the real beauty of exist-
ence, has not the rank it deserves.
Schejling has much more knowledge of
nature and the fine arts than Fichte, and his
lively imagination could not be satisfied with
abstract ideas; but, like Fichte, his object
is to reduce existence to a single principle.
He treats with profound contempt all philo-
sophers who admit two principles; and will
not allow the name of Philosophy to any
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 115
system but that which unites every thing,
and explains every thing. Unquestionably
he is right in saying that system would be
the best; but where is it? Schelling pre-
tends, that nothing is more absurd than the
expression, so commonly used--the philoso-
phy of Tlaho -- the philosophy of Aristotle.
Should we say, The geometry of Euler--the
geometry of La Grange? There is but one,
philosophy, according to Schelling, or there
must be none at all. Certainly, if by phi-
losophy we only understand the enigma of
the universe, we may say, with truth, that
there is no philosophy.
The system of Kant appeared insufficient
to Schelling, as it did to Fichte; because he
acknowledges two natures, two sources of
our ideas--external objects, and the faculties
of the soul. But, in order to arrive at that
unity, so much desired; in order to get rid
of that double life, physical and moral, which
gives so much offence to the partisans of
simple ideas, Schelling refers every thing to
nature, while Fichte makes every thing spring
from the soul. Fichte sees nothing in nature
but the opposite of mind: in his eyes it is
only a limit or a chain, from which we are
constantly to endeavour to free ourselves.
i2
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 116 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS. <
The system of Schelling gives more rest, and
greater delight, to the imagination; never-
theless it necessarily returns into that of
Spinosa; but, instead of sinking the mind
down to the level of matter, which is the
practice in our days, Schelling endeavours to
raise matter up to mind; and although
his theory entirely depends upon physical
nature, it is/ nevertheless, a very ideal one
at the bottom, and still more so in its form.
The ideal and the real supply, in his lan-
guage, the place of intelligence and matter,
of imagination and experience; and it is in
the re-union of these two powers in complete
harmony, that, in his opinion, the single
principle of the organized world consists.
This harmony, of which the two poles and
the centre form the image, and which is
comprised in the number three, so myste-
rious at all times, has supplied Schelling
with the most ingenious applications. He
believes it is to be found* in the fine arts, as
well as in nature; and his works on physical
science are thought highly of, even by those
learned men who confine themselves to the
consideration of facts, and their results. In-
deed, in examining the mind, he endeavours
to demonstrate how sensations and intel-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 117
lectual conceptions are confounded in the
sentiment which unites Avhatever is involun-
tary and reflective in both of them, and thus
contains all the myitery of life.
What is most interesting in these sys-
tems is their developements. The first basis
of the pretended explanation of the world
is equally true, and equally false, in the
. greater number of theories; for all of them
are comprised in the immense thought,
which it is their object to embrace: but,
in their application to the things of this
world, these theories are very refined, and
often throw great light on many particular
objects.
Schelling, it cannot be denied, approaches
nearly to the philosophers called Pantheists,
that is to say, who attribute to nature all the
attributes of the Divinity. But what dis-
tinguishes him is, the astonishing sagacity
with which he h^s managed to connect his
doctrine with the art? and sciences; he is
instructive, and requires thought, in all his
observations: and the depth of his mind is
particularly surprising when he does not pre-
tend to appljr it to the secret of the universe;
for no man can attain a superiority which
cannot exist between beings of the same
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 118
PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
kind, at whatever distance they may be
placed from each other.
To kee|>> up the ideas of religion in the
midst of the apotheosis of nature, the school
of Schelling supposes that the individual
within us perishes, but that the inward
qualities which we possess, enter again into
the great whole of the eternal creation.
Such an immortality is terribly like death;
for physical death itself is nothing but
universal nature recalling to herself the gifts
she had given to the individual.
Schelling draws from his system some
very noble conclusions on the necessity of
cultivating in the soul its immortal qualities,
those which are in relation with the uni-
verse, and of despising every thing in us
which relates to our circumstances alone.
But are not the affections of the heart, and
even conscience itself, allied to the relations
of this life? In most situations we feel two
distinct motions--that which unites us with
the general order, and that which leads us to
our particular interests; the sentiment of
duty, and personality. The noblest of these
motions is the universal. But it is, exactly,
because we have an instinct which would
preserve our existence, that it is a fine thing
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 119
to sacrifice that instinct; it is because we are
beings, whose centre is in ourselves, that
our attraction towards the assemblage of all
things is generous; in a word, it is because
we. exist individually and distinctly, that we
can choose out and love one another. What
then becomes of that abstract immortality
which would strip us of our dearest recollec-
tions as mere accidental modifications?
Would you, say they in Germany, rise again
in all your present circumstances ? --Would
you be revived a Baron, or a Marquis?
? 94 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
that is, it cannot long consist principally, in
not believing, in not understanding, and in
what it disdains. We must have a philo-
sophy of belief, of enthusiasm, a philosophy
which confirms by reason, what sentiment
reveals to us.
The adversaries of Kant have accused him
of having merely repeated the arguments of
the ancient idealists; they have pretended
that the doctrine of the German philosopher
was only an old system in a new language.
This reproach has no foundation. There are
not only new ideas, but a particular character,
in the doctrine of Kant.
It savours of the philosophy of the eigh-
teenth century, although it was intended to re-
fute the doctrines of that philosophy, because
it is natural to man always to catch the spirit
of the age in which he lives, even when his
intention is to oppose it. The philosophy of
Plato is more poetical than that of Kant,
the philosophy of Mallebranche more reli-
gious; but the great merit of the German
philosopher has been to raise up moral dig-
nity, by setting all that is fine in the heart,
on the basis of a theory deduced from the
strongest reasoning. The opposition which
it has been endeavoured to show between
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? KANT. 95
reason and sentiment, necessarily leads rea-
son on to selfishness, and reduces sentiment
to folly; but Kant, who seemed to be called
to conclude all the grand intellectual al-
liances, has made the soul one focus, in
which all our faculties are in contact with
each other.
The polemical part of the works of Kant,
that in which he attacks the philosophy of
the materialists, would be of itself a master-
piece. That philosophy has struck its roots
so deeply into the mind, so much irreligion
and selfishness has been the result of it, that
those men ought to be regarded as benefac-
tors to their country, who have even com-
batted a system so pernicious, and revived
the ideas of Plato, of Descartes, and of
Leibnitz: but the philosophy of the new
German school contains a crowd of ideas
which are peculiar to it; it is founded upon
the greatest extent of scientific knowledge,
which has been increasing every day, and
upon a singularly abstract and logical mode
of reasoning; for, although Kant blames
the use of such reasoning, in the examina-
tion of truths which are out of the circle of
experience, he shows in his writings a power
of mind, on metaphysical subjects, which
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 96 PHILOSOPHI' AND MORALS.
places him, in that respect, in the first rank
of thinkers.
It cannot be denied that the style of Kant,
in his " Examination of pure Reason," de-
serves almost all the reproaches with which
his adversaries have treated it. He has made
use of a phraseology very difficult to under-
stand, and of the most tiresome new crea-
tion of words. He lived alone with his own
thoughts, and persuaded himself that it was
necessary to have new words for new ideas,
and yet there are words to express every
thing.
In those objects which are in themselves
the most clear, Kant is frequently guided by
a very obscure system of metaphysics; and
it is only in those regions of thought where
darkness prevails in general, that he displays
the torch of light: like the Israelites, who
had for their guide a column of fire by night,
and a pillar of a cloud by day.
No one in France would give himself
the trouble of studying works so thickly set
with difficulties, as those of Kant; but he
had to do with patient and persevering
readers. This, certainly, was not a reason
for his abusing their patience; perhaps,
however, he would not have been able to
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? KANT. 97
search so deeply into the science of the hu*.
man understanding, if he had attached more
importance to the choice of the expressions
which he made use of in explaining it.
The ancient philosophers always divided
their doctrines into two distinct parts; one
which they reserved for the initiated, and
another which they professed in public.
Kant's manner of writing is quite different,
when his theory, or the application of it, is
the subject.
In his metaphysical treatises, he makes use
of words as arithmetical figures, and gives
them whatever value he pleases, without
troubling himself with that which they have
derived from custom. This appears to me a
great error; for the attention of the reader
is exhausted in efforts to understand the
language, before he arrives at the ideas, and
what is known never serves as a step to what
is unknown.
We must nevertheless give Kant the jus-
tice he deserves, even as a writer, when he
lays aside his scientific language. In speak-
ing of the arts, and still more of morality,
his style is almost always "perfectly clear,
energetic, and simple. How admirable does
his doctrine then appear! How well does
VOL. III. H
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 98 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
he express the sentiment of the beautiful and
the love of duty! With what force does he
separate them both from all calculations of
interest or of utility! How he ennobles
actions by their source, and not by their suc-
cess! In a word, what grandeur of morality
docs he not give to man, whether he exa-
mines him in himself, or whether he considers
him in his relations towards others;--to man,
that exile of heaven, that prisoner upon
earth, so great as an exile, so miserable as a
captive!
We might extract from the writings of
Kant a multitude of brilliant ideas on all
subjects; perhaps, indeed, it is to this doc-
trine alone, that, at the present day, we
must look for conceptions at once ingenious
and new; for the notions of the materialists
no longer offer, in any thing, what is interest-
ing or original. Smartness of wit against
what is serious, noble, and divine, is worn
out; and in future it will be impossible to
restore to the human race any of the qualities
of youth, but by returning to religion by the
road of philosophy, and to sentiment by the
way of reason.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 99
CHAPTER VII.
Of the most celebrated Philosophers before
and after Kant.
The spirit of philosophy, from its nature,
cannot be generally diffused in any country.
In Germany, however, there is such a tend-
ency towards habits of reflection, that the
German nation may be considered, by dis-
tinction, as the nation of metaphysics. It
possesses so many men capable of under-
standing the mo3t abstract questions, that
even the public are found to take an interest
in the arguments usually employed in dis-
cussions of that nature.
Every man of talent has his own way of
thinking on philosophical questions. Writers
of the second and third rank, in Germany,
are sufficiently deep to be of the first rank in
other countries. Those who are rivals, have
the same hatred towards one another there
as elsewhere; but no one would dare to
enter the lists, without having evinced, by
serious study, a real love for the science in
h2
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 100 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
which he was engaged. It is not enough
ardently to desire success; it must be de-
served, before the candidate can be even
admitted to start for it. The Germans, how-
ever indulgent they may be to defects of
form in a work, are unmerciful with respect
to its real value; and, when they perceive
any thing superficial, in the mind, the feel-
ing, or the knowledge of a writer, they try
to borrow the very pleasantry of the French,
to turn what is frivolous into ridicule.
It is my intention to give, in this chapter,
a hasty glimpse of the principal opinions
of the philosophers who have attracted no-
tice before and since the time of Kant;
the course which his successors "have taken
cannot well be judged of, without turning
back to see what was the state of opinions
at the time when the doctrines of Kantism
first prevailed in Germany; it was opposed
at the same time to the system of Locke,
as tending 10 materialism, and to the school
of Leibnitz, as reducing every thing to ab-
straction.
The ideas of Leibnitz were lofty; but his
disciples, Wolf at their head, have encum-
bered them with forms of logic and meta-
physics. Leibnitz had said, our ideas that
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 101
come by the senses are confused, and that
those only which belong to the immediate
perceptions of the mind are clear: without
doubt his intention by that was to show,
that truths, which are invisible, are more
certain and more in harmony with our
moral nature, than all that we learn by the
evidence of the senses. Wolf and his dis-
ciples have drawn this consequence from it,
that every thing, about which our mind can.
be employed, must be reduced into abstract
ideas. Kant inspired interest and warmth
into this lifeless idealism; he assigned to ex-
perience, as well as to the innate faculties,
its just proportion; and the art with which
he applied his theory to every thing that
is interesting to mankind, to morality, to
poetry, and to the fine arts, extended the
influence of it.
Three leading men, Lessing, Hemsterhuis,
and Jacobi, preceded Kant in the career of
philosophy. They had no school, because
they founded no system; but they began the
attack against the doctrine of the materialists.
Of these three, Lessing is the one whose opi-
nions, on this point, are the least decided;
^however, he had too enlarged a mind to be
confined within the narrow circle which is so
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 102 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
easily drawn, when we renounce the highest
truths. Lessing's all-powerful polemics dis-
closed doubt upon the most important ques-
tions, and led to new inquiries of every kind.
Lessing himself cannot be considered either
as a materialist or as an idealist; but the
necessity of examination and study to
the acquisition of knowledge, was the main
spring of his doctrine. "If the Almighty/'
said he, " were to hold Truth in one hand,
"and the Search after truth in the other,
"it is the latter I should ask of him in pre-
"ference. "
Lessing was not orthodox in religion.
Christianity, in him, was not a necessary
thing, like sentiment; and yet he was ca-
pable of admiring it philosophically. He
understood its relations with the human
heart, and he ever considers all the different
ways of thinking, from a point of view,
where he is able to see them all. Nothing
intolerant, no exclusion, is to be found in
his writings. When we take our stand, in
the centre of universal ideas, we never
fail to have sincerity, depth, and extent of
mind. Whatever is unjust, vain, and nar-
row, is derived from the desire of refer-
ring every thing to certain partial views,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 10$
which we have taken and appropriated to
ourselves, and which we make the objects of
our self-love.
Lessing expresses, in an acute and plain
style, opinions full of warmth. Hemsterhuis,
a Dutch philosopher, was the first who, in
the middle of the eighteenth century, showed,
in his writings, the greater part of the liberal
ideas, upon which the new German school is
founded. His works are also very remark-
able, for the contrast which there is between
the character of his style, and the thoughts
which it conveys. Lessing is an enthusiast,
with an ironical manner; Hemsterhuis, an
enthusiast, with the language of a mathema-
tician. Writers who devote the most abstract
metaphysics to the defence of the most ex-
alted systems, and who conceal the liveliness
of imagination under the austerity of logic,
are a phenomenon which is scarcely to be
found, except amongst the German nations.
Men, who are always upon their guard
against imagination, when they have it not,
are more ready to trust those writers who
banish talent and sensibility from philoso-
phical discussions, as if it were not, at least,
as easy to be absurd, upon such subjects, in
syllogisms as with eloquence. For a syllo-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 104 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
gism, which always takes for its basis that
such a thing is or is not, reduces the im-
mense crowd of our impressions to a simple
alternative, in every case; whilst eloquence
embraces them all together. Nevertheless,
although Hemsterhuis has too frequently ex-
pressed philosophical truths,' in an algebraic
manner, there is a sentiment of morality, a
real love of the beautiful, in his writings,
which cannot but be admired; he was one of
the first to feel the union which exists be-
tween idealism, or (as I should rather say)
the free-will of man, and the stoic morality;
and it is in this point of view, above all, that
the new doctrine of the Germans is of great
importance.
Even before the writings of Kant had ap-
peared, Jacobi had attacked the philosophy
of sensation, and still more victoriously the
system of morality founded upon interest.
He flid not confine himself strictly, in his
philosophy, to abstract forms of reasoning.
His analysis of the human soul is full of elo-
quence and of charms. In the following
chapters, I shall examine the finest part of
his works, that which relates to morality;
but, as a philosopher, he deserves separate
honour. Better instructed than any one else
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 105
in the history of ancient and modern philo-
sophy, he devoted his studies to the support
of the most simple truths. The first amongst
the philosophers of his day, he made religious
feeling the foundation of our whole intellec-
tual nature; and, it may be said, that he
has only learnt the language of metaphysi-
cians and learned men, to do homage, in it,
to virtue and divinity.
Jacobi has shown himself the opposer of
the philosophy of Kant, but he does not
attack it as if he was himself the partisan of
the philosophy of sensation *. On the con-
trary, his objection to Kant is, that he does
not rely sufficiently upon the support of re-
ligion, considered as the only possible phi-
losophy in those truths which are beyond the
reach of experience.
The doctrine of Kant has met with many
other opponents in Germany; but it has not
been attacked by those who have not under-
stood it, or by those who opposed the opi-
nions of Locke and Condillac, as a complete
answer to it. Leibnitz still retained too
great an ascendant over the minds of his
countrymen, for them not to pay respect to
* This philosophy has, in Germany, generally received
the name of The Empiric Philosophy.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 106 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
any opinion which was analogous to his. A
long list of writers have, for ten years, been
incessantly engaged in writing commentaries
on the works of Kant. But, at the present
day, the German philosophers, although
agreeing with Kant as to the spontaneous
activity of thought, have adopted each a
system of his own on that point. In fact,
who is there who has never endeavoured,
according to his abilities, to understand him-
self? But, because man has given an innu-
merable variety of explanations of his nature,
does it therefore follow that such a philoso-
phical examination is useless? Certainly not.
This variety itself is a proof of the interest
which such an examination ought to inspire.
In our days, people would be glad to have
done with moral nature, and would readily
pay its reckoning to hear no more of it.
Some say, the language was fixed on such a
day of such a month, and that, from that
moment, the introduction of a new word
became a barbarism; others affirm, that the
rules of the drama were definitely settled
in such a year (and it is a great pity that a
genius, which would now set about making
any change in them, was not born before
that year), in which every literary discus-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHER*. 107
sion, past, present, and future, was deter-
mined without appeal. At last, it has been
decided in metaphysics above all, that since
the days of Condillac it has been impossible
to take a single step more, without going
out of the way. It is allowed that the phy-
sical sciences are making progress, because it
cannot be denied; but, in the career of phi-
losophy and literature, the human mind is to
be obliged to be incessantly running the ring
of vanity around the same circle.
To remain attached to that experimental
philosophy which offers a species of evi-
dence, false in principle, although specious
in form, is by no means to simplify the sys-
tem of the universe. By considering every
thing as not existing which is beyond the
reach of our sensations, it is easy to give light
enough to a system, the limits of which we
ourselves prescribe; it is a work which de-
pends upon the doer of it. But does every
thing beyond those limits exist the less, be-
cause it is counted as nothing? The imper-
fect truth of speculative philosophy is ever
much nearer to the essence of things, than
that apparent light which belongs to the
art of solving difficulties of a certain order.
When one reads in the philosophical writings
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 108 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
of the last century these phrases so frequently
repeated, this is all the truth that exists,
every thing else is chimerical, it puts one in
mind of the well-known story of a French
actor, who, before he would fight with a
man much fatter than himself, proposed to
chalk out on his adversary's body a line, the
hits on the outside of which should go for
nothing. Yet there was the same nature
without that line as within it, and equally
capable of receiving a mortal wound. In the
same manner, those who place the pillars of
Hercules on the boundary of their horizon,
cannot prevent the existence of a nature be-
yond their own, in which there exists a
higher degree of life, than in the sphere of
matter to which they would confine us.
TKe two most celebrated philosophers who
have succeeded Kant, are Fichte and Schel-
ling. They too pretended to simplify his
system; but it was by putting in its place a
species of philosophy more elevated even than
his, that they hoped to accomplish it.
Kant had, with a firm hand, separated the
two empires of the soul and of the senses.
This philosophical duality was fatiguing to
minds which love to repose in simple ideas.
From the days of the Greeks to our own*
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 109
this axiom has often been repeated, that every
thing is one, and the efforts of philosophers
have always been directed to find in one
single principle, either in the soul or in na-
ture, an explanation of the world. I shall,
nevertheless, venture to sav, that it appears
to me to be one of the titles which Kant's
philosophy has to the confidence of enlight-
ened men, that it affirms, what we feel to be
the case, that there exists both a soul and an
external nature, and that they act mutually
one upon the other by such or such laws. I
know not why a greater degree of philoso-
phical elevation is to be found in the idea of
one single principle, whether material or in-
tellectual; . there being one, or two, does not
render the universe more easy of comprehen-
sion, and our feeling agrees better with those
systems that acknowledge a distinction be-
tween physics and morality.
Fichte and Schelling have divided between
them the empire which Kant acknowledged
to be a divided one, and each has chosen
that his own half should be the whole. Both
have gone out of the sphere of ourselves, and
have been desirous of rising to a knowledge
of the system of the universe. Very dif-
ferent in that from Kant, who has applied as
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 110 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
much power of mind so show those things,
at the knowledge of which the human mind
can never arrive, as to explain those which
are within its reach.
No philosopher, however, before Fichte,
had extended the system of idealism with
such scientific strictness; he makes the whole
universe consist of the activity of mind. All
conception, all imagination, proceeds from
that; it is on account of this system that
he has been suspected of unbelief. He was
heard to say, that, in his next lesson, he
should create God, and the world was scan-
dalized with reason at such an expression. --
What he meant by it was, that he should
show how the idea of the Divinity arose, and
was developed in the mind of man. The
principal merit of Fichte's philosophy is, the
incredible attention that it implies; for he is
not contented with referring every thing to the
inward existence of man, to the self which
forms the basis of every thing, but he goes
on to distinguish in this self what is
transient and what is permanent. In fact,
when we reflect on the operations of the
understanding, we think ourselves eye-wit-
nesses of our own thoughts; we think we
see them pass before us like a stream,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. Ill
whilst the portion of self, which is con-
templating them, is immoveable. It often
happens to those who unite an impassioned
character to an observing mind, to sec
themselves suffer, and to feel within them-
selves a being superior to its own pain,
which observes it, and reproves or pities it
by turns. ,
We are subject to continual changes from
the external circumstances of our life, and
yet we always have the feeling of our iden-
tity. What is it, then, that attests this
identity, if not that self ', always the same,
which sees another self, modified by im-
pressions from without, pass before its tri-
bunal?
It is to this immoveable soul, the witness
of the moveable soul, that Fichte attributes
the gift of immortality, and the power of
creating, or (to translate more exactly) of
drawing to a focus in itself the image of the
universe. This system, which makes every
thing rest on the summit of our existence,
and places a pyramid on its point, is . singu-
larly difficult to follow. It strips our ideas
of the colours which so well enable us to
understand them; and the fine arts, poetry,
and the contemplation of nature, disappear
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 112 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
in abstractions which are without any mix-
ture of imagination or sensibility.
Fichte considers the exterior world only
as a boundary of our existence, on which
thought is at work. In his system, this
boundary is created by the soul itself, the
activity of which is constantly exerted on
the web it has formed. What Fichte has
written upon the metaphysical self', is a little
like the waking of Pygmalion's statue, which,
touching alternately itself and the stone on
which it was placed, says, by turns, This is I,
and This is not I; but when, taking the hand
of Pygmalion, it exclaims, This indeed is I--
that excites a sentiment which is much be-
yond the sphere of abstract ideas. Idealism,
stripped of sentiment, has nevertheless the
advantage of exciting, to the highest degree,
the activity of the mind; but nature and
love, by this system, lose all their charms;
for, if the objects which we see, and the
beings whom we love, are nothing but the
works of our own ideas, it is man himself
that may be considered as the great cceliba-
tary of the world.
It must be acknowledged, however, that
the system of Fichte has two great advan-
tages; the one is its stoic morality, which"
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 113
admits of no excuses; for, every thing pro-
ceeding from self, it is self alone which has
to answer for the use it makes of the will:
the other is an exercise of thought, at once
so severe and so subtile, that a man who had
mastered the system, even though he should
not adopt it, would have acquired a capacity
of attention, and a sagacity in analysis, which
would afterwards make any other kind of
study a plaything to him.
In whatever manner the utility of meta-
physics is judged of, it cannot be denied, that
it is the gymnastic exercise of the mind. It
is usual to set children on different kinds of
wrestling in their earliest years, although it
may never be necessary for them to fight in
that manner. It may be truly said, that the
study of the "ideal system of metaphysics is
almost a certain means of developing the
moral faculties of those who devote them-
selves to it. Thought, like every thing pre-
cious, resides at the bottom of ourselves;
for, on the surface, there is nothing but folly
and insipidity. But when men are early
obliged to dive into their own minds, and to
see all that passes within them, they draw
from thence a power, and plainness of judg-
ment, which are never lost.
VOL. HI. I
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 114 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
For abstract ideas, Fichte has a mathe-
matical head, like Euler or La Grange. He
has a singular contempt for all expressions
which in any manner relate to substance;
existence even is too common a word for him.
Being, principle, essence, are words scarcely
airy enough to mark the subtile shades in his
opinions. It might be said, that he was
afraid of coming in contact with realities,
and was always shrinking from them. In
reading his works, or conversing with him,
one loses the consciousness of this world,
and feels it necessary, like the ghosts de-
scribed by Homer, to recall to one's self the
remembrances of life.
Materialism absorbs the soul by degrading
it; the idealism of Fichte, by exalting it,
separates it from nature; in both extremes,
sentiment, which is the real beauty of exist-
ence, has not the rank it deserves.
Schejling has much more knowledge of
nature and the fine arts than Fichte, and his
lively imagination could not be satisfied with
abstract ideas; but, like Fichte, his object
is to reduce existence to a single principle.
He treats with profound contempt all philo-
sophers who admit two principles; and will
not allow the name of Philosophy to any
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 115
system but that which unites every thing,
and explains every thing. Unquestionably
he is right in saying that system would be
the best; but where is it? Schelling pre-
tends, that nothing is more absurd than the
expression, so commonly used--the philoso-
phy of Tlaho -- the philosophy of Aristotle.
Should we say, The geometry of Euler--the
geometry of La Grange? There is but one,
philosophy, according to Schelling, or there
must be none at all. Certainly, if by phi-
losophy we only understand the enigma of
the universe, we may say, with truth, that
there is no philosophy.
The system of Kant appeared insufficient
to Schelling, as it did to Fichte; because he
acknowledges two natures, two sources of
our ideas--external objects, and the faculties
of the soul. But, in order to arrive at that
unity, so much desired; in order to get rid
of that double life, physical and moral, which
gives so much offence to the partisans of
simple ideas, Schelling refers every thing to
nature, while Fichte makes every thing spring
from the soul. Fichte sees nothing in nature
but the opposite of mind: in his eyes it is
only a limit or a chain, from which we are
constantly to endeavour to free ourselves.
i2
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 116 PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS. <
The system of Schelling gives more rest, and
greater delight, to the imagination; never-
theless it necessarily returns into that of
Spinosa; but, instead of sinking the mind
down to the level of matter, which is the
practice in our days, Schelling endeavours to
raise matter up to mind; and although
his theory entirely depends upon physical
nature, it is/ nevertheless, a very ideal one
at the bottom, and still more so in its form.
The ideal and the real supply, in his lan-
guage, the place of intelligence and matter,
of imagination and experience; and it is in
the re-union of these two powers in complete
harmony, that, in his opinion, the single
principle of the organized world consists.
This harmony, of which the two poles and
the centre form the image, and which is
comprised in the number three, so myste-
rious at all times, has supplied Schelling
with the most ingenious applications. He
believes it is to be found* in the fine arts, as
well as in nature; and his works on physical
science are thought highly of, even by those
learned men who confine themselves to the
consideration of facts, and their results. In-
deed, in examining the mind, he endeavours
to demonstrate how sensations and intel-
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 117
lectual conceptions are confounded in the
sentiment which unites Avhatever is involun-
tary and reflective in both of them, and thus
contains all the myitery of life.
What is most interesting in these sys-
tems is their developements. The first basis
of the pretended explanation of the world
is equally true, and equally false, in the
. greater number of theories; for all of them
are comprised in the immense thought,
which it is their object to embrace: but,
in their application to the things of this
world, these theories are very refined, and
often throw great light on many particular
objects.
Schelling, it cannot be denied, approaches
nearly to the philosophers called Pantheists,
that is to say, who attribute to nature all the
attributes of the Divinity. But what dis-
tinguishes him is, the astonishing sagacity
with which he h^s managed to connect his
doctrine with the art? and sciences; he is
instructive, and requires thought, in all his
observations: and the depth of his mind is
particularly surprising when he does not pre-
tend to appljr it to the secret of the universe;
for no man can attain a superiority which
cannot exist between beings of the same
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 118
PHILOSOPHY AND MORALS.
kind, at whatever distance they may be
placed from each other.
To kee|>> up the ideas of religion in the
midst of the apotheosis of nature, the school
of Schelling supposes that the individual
within us perishes, but that the inward
qualities which we possess, enter again into
the great whole of the eternal creation.
Such an immortality is terribly like death;
for physical death itself is nothing but
universal nature recalling to herself the gifts
she had given to the individual.
Schelling draws from his system some
very noble conclusions on the necessity of
cultivating in the soul its immortal qualities,
those which are in relation with the uni-
verse, and of despising every thing in us
which relates to our circumstances alone.
But are not the affections of the heart, and
even conscience itself, allied to the relations
of this life? In most situations we feel two
distinct motions--that which unites us with
the general order, and that which leads us to
our particular interests; the sentiment of
duty, and personality. The noblest of these
motions is the universal. But it is, exactly,
because we have an instinct which would
preserve our existence, that it is a fine thing
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-22 00:49 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/hvd. 32044051734390 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? GERMAN PHILOSOPHERS. 119
to sacrifice that instinct; it is because we are
beings, whose centre is in ourselves, that
our attraction towards the assemblage of all
things is generous; in a word, it is because
we. exist individually and distinctly, that we
can choose out and love one another. What
then becomes of that abstract immortality
which would strip us of our dearest recollec-
tions as mere accidental modifications?
Would you, say they in Germany, rise again
in all your present circumstances ? --Would
you be revived a Baron, or a Marquis?
