ve ever preferved for Athens, and for all
her Citizens, may now be prefent to me in this Contention :
and next, that they will infpire you to determine in fuch a
Manner, as may beft promote the general Glory of the State,
and preferve to every fingle Perfon the Religion of his Oath inr
violable.
her Citizens, may now be prefent to me in this Contention :
and next, that they will infpire you to determine in fuch a
Manner, as may beft promote the general Glory of the State,
and preferve to every fingle Perfon the Religion of his Oath inr
violable.
Demosthenes - Orations - v2
net/2027/uc2.
ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www.
hathitrust.
org/access_use#pd
? AGAINST CTESIPHON. 351
thus indebted to his Merit, that he muft plead this Caufe
himfelf. Let us afk the Judges, whether they know Chabrias,
Iphicrates and Timotheus ; or wherefore they gave them fuch
honorary Rewards, and eredled Statues to them. They will
unanimoufly anfwer, to Chabrias, for his naval Vidlory at
Naxos ; to Iphicrates, for having cut to pieces the Lacedaemo-
nian Phalanx; to Timotheus, for his Expedition to Corcyra;
to others, for their many great and glorious Services performed
in War. If it fhould be afked, why then refufe this Honour
to Demofthenes ? Becaufe he is corrupt, a Coward, a Defcr-
ter of his Poft in Battle. Whether will you therefore honour
Him, or difhonour yourfelves and them, who gallantly loft
their Lives in your Defence ? Imagine you behold them, with
every Expreilion of Mifery and Indignation, lamenting his
being crowned ; for if we carry, beyond the Limits of Attica,
either Timber or Stones, or Pieces of Iron, things fenfelefs and
inanimate, that have accidentally fallen and killed an human
Creature ; or if, when a Citizen hath been guilty of Self-Mur-
der, we bury the Hand, that committed the Deed, feparately
from the Body ; it will be terrible indeed, that Demofthenes,,
O Athenians, the Man, who decreed this laft unfortunate Ex~
peditlon ; who betrayed the Army by his Cowardice,, fhall be
honoured and rewarded. The Dead will be infuhed, and the
Living difcouraged, when they behold, that Death is placed
before them as the only Reward of their Virtue, and that evea
their Virtue fhall itfelf be loft; to Remembrance.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:59 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 352 ORATION OF iESCHINES
But of more Importance the Confideration^ if our Youtfi
fhoiild afk upon what Model they fhall form their future Lives,
what will you anfwer ? You are confcious, that neither the
Places appointed for their Exercifes, nor the Schools, nor their
Mufic, are fufficient to form them to Virtue, but far more ef-
ficacious our public Proclamations. Is a Man proclaimed in
the Theatre to be crowned for his Integrity, his Courage, and
Love of his Country, who is infamous for the Turpitude and
Impurity of his Life ? Our Youth are inftantly corrupted in
their Principles. Is an impious and a proftituted Wretch, like
Ctefiphon, punifhed, as he deferves ? Others are inftrudled.
Is a Father, who hath pafTed a Decree in Oppofition to every
Sentiment of Honour and Juftice, capable, when he returns
home, of forming his Son to Virtue ? His Son will undoubted-
ly pay him little Attention, and his Advice at fuch a Time will
juftly be called tedious and impertinent. Not therefore as
Judges only, but as Magiftrates ading in View of their Coun-
try, you fhould give Judgement in fuch a Manner as will juflify
you to your abfent Fellow-Citizens, when they fhall demand
what Sentence you have pronounced. For be well afTured,
Athenians, that the I Republic will always be thought to bear
fome Refemblance to the Perfon we crown. Will it not be
therefore infamous in you to refemble the Cowardice of this
Demofthenes ; not the Magnanimity of your Anceftors ?
But how fliall you efcape fuch Infamy? Keep a ftrong
Guard
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:59 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? AGAINST CTESIPHON. 1^53
Guard upon thofe, who afTume to themfelves the Style of pub-
lic Virtue and Philanthropy, yet in their private Chara6lers
are difhoneft and perfidious. For Love of our Country and of
Liberty, are Expreflions, that lie open in common to every
Body, and in general, they, who take FoflefTion of the Words,
are fartheft diftant from them in their Adions. When you
therefore find an Orator ardently defirous of Crowns and Pro-
clamations in the general Aflemblies of Greece, command him
to bring back his vague Oration, and his Aflertions (as the Law
directs) to the Proofs of a Life worthy of Praife, and of un-
blemifKed Morals. If he cannot give you fuch Teftimony, do
not ratify the Praifes, with which he is proclaimed ; and thus
be careful to preferve what yet remains of your Authority.
But does it not appear to you moft terrible, that the Senate
and People are treated with Contempt ; that Difpatches and
Embaflies come to private Houfes, not from Perfons of inferior
Rank, but from the greateft Potentates of Europe and Afia ?
The very Crimes our Laws make punifhable with Death, a
certain Party do not deny their having committed, but profefs
them in Prelence of the People, and read their Difpatches to
each other. Some of them defire you to look up to them, as
to the Guardians of your Democracy ; others demand Rewards,
as Prefervers of the Republic ; while the People, from very
Dejedion of Spirit by their Misfortunes, as if they were grown
aged and doting in their Underftanding, affume to themfelves
the Name alone of a popular Goverment, but have yielded the
Vol. IL Z z Power
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:59 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 354 ORATION OF ^SCHINES
Power to others. Thus you depart from this AfTembly, not
like Perfons, who had confulted upon the Welfare of their
Country, but Hke Guefts, who had divided the Fragments of a
public Entertainment.
That I do not trifle with your Attention, let the following
Remarks convince you. There was a certain-- with Grief I
mention the Calamities of the Republic fo frequently -- there
was a certain private Citizen, who attempting to fail to Samos
alone, was the very fame Day condemned and executed by Sen-
tence of the Areopagus. Another, who had taken Refuge in
Rhodes, unable to fupport with Fortitude the Dangers of the
Commonwealth, was lately impeached, and acquitted only
becaufe the Votes were equal. Had a fingle Suffrage more
been given againft him, he had been either baniflied, or put
to Death. (43) Let us now place the prefent Inftance in Op-
pofition to thefe. An Orator, the Author of all our Misfor-
tunes, deferted his Poft in Battle, and afterwards fled from the
Defence of Athens ; yet now prefumes to think he deferves a
CroWn, and the Honours of a Proclamation. Will you not
drive him hence into Banifhment, this common Peft of Greece ?
Will you not rather feize and punifli this public Robber ; this
Pyratc, who fiils through your Conftitiition upon the Power
of Words ? Remember too the particular Circumftances of
the
(43) A Decree was pafTed immediately of the Jaft Perfon, who thus deferted iiis-
after the Defeat at Chsronea, to make Country, was Leocrates. He was pro~
it punilhable with Death for any of the feciued by Lycurgus, whofe Speech is
Citizens to leave Athens. The Name flill extant. Tourreil.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:59 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? AGAINST CTESIPHON. 355
the Time, in which you pronounce this Judgement. The Pythian
Games are in a (tw Days approaching, and the general States
of Greece will be aflembled. The Republic is already calum-
niated for the Adminiftration of Demofthenes, and if you de-
termine this Crown in his Favour, you will appear to have
afl;ed in Confederacy with them, who violated the general
Peace; on the contrary, you will acquit the People of fuch Ca-
lumnies.
Do not therefore determine with an Indifference, as if the
Interefts of fome foreign State, not thofe of your native Coun-
try, were concerned. Do not diftribute your Honours to mecr
Ambition, but give them with Difcernment. Place your
Bounty upon Perfons moft eAimable ; upon Men more worthy
of your Praile. Do not depend upon your Ears only, but with
your Eyes examine, what Kind of Citizens they are, who fup-
port the Caufe of Demofthenes. Were they his Companions
in hunting, or the gymnaftic Exercifes in his Youth? No; by
Olympic Jupiter. He never uncoupled the Hounds to roufe
the favage Boar; never was anxious to obtain a vigorous Ha-
bit of Body, but exercifed thofe Arts alone, which he well
knew how to pra(5life againft the wealthy.
(44) Now mark thelnfolence of the Man, and when he boafts,
that by his Negotiations in his Embafly, he wrefted Byzantium
out
(44) Here the Peroration begins. It is great, beautiful, fublime, pathetic, ani
Z z 2 affeftiiig.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 356 ORATION OF i^SCHINES
out of the Hands of Philip ; engaged the Acarnanians to forfake
his Party : aftonifhed the Thebans with his Eloquence (for he
prefumes you are now arrived at fuch Excefs of Simplicity,
as to believe, you have educated in Athens the very God-
defs of Perfuafion, not a pernicious Calumniator) when at the
Conclulion of his Defence he calls upon the Partners and Aflb-
ciates of his Corruptions to be his Advocates, imagine you be-
hold upon this very Tribunal where I ftand, the Perfons, who
have eminently well deferved of the Republic, ranged in Op~
pofition to their Arrogance : Solon, who adorned your Demo-
cracy with its wifefl: Laws ; Solon, equally eminent as a Phi-
lofopher and a Legiflator ; imagine you behold him imploring
you with that modeft Dignity, fo befitting his Character, never
to fuffer the Eloquence of Demofthenes to have a greater In-
fluence over you, than the Religion of your Oaths, and the
Obligations of your Laws. Imagine Ariftides, who regulated
with [o much Equity the general Contributions of Greece for
her common Defence ; whofe Daughters the People portioned
after his Death ; imagine him in Anguifh and Sorrow deploring
the Contumely, with which Juftice is treated, and afking " if
" your Anceflors almofl: put to Death the Zelite Arthmius, an
*' Inhabitant of Athens, and received by her People with the pub-
*' lie Rites of Hofpitality, becaufe he brought Gold from Perfia
" into
afFe(5ling. Solon, Ariftides, Themifto- tice of the Sentence now to be pronounced,
cles, all the Heroes, who had facrificed Our Orator engages all Nature in his
their Lives at Marathon and Plataea in Quarrel, and raifes all the Powers of
Defence of their Country, are called forth Earth and Heaven, of Gods and Men,
from their Tombs to witnefs to the Juf- againft his Adverfary. Tourreil.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? AGAINST CTESIPHON. 357
*' into Greece : if they banifhcd him by Proclamation, not from
" Athens only, but from all her Dominions, will you not
*' blufli to crown this Demofthenes with a golden Crown, who
*' did not indeed bring Gold from Perfia, but hath amafled it
" by every Kind of Corruption, and even now pofleffes it. "
Will not Themiftoclesj and they, who died at Marathon and
Platsea ; will not the very Sepulchres of your Anceftors burft
forth into Groans, if he, who confeffes he confpired againft
Greece with the Barbarians, fhall be crowned by your Decree ?
Here therefore, O Earth, and Sun, and Virtue, and Intel-
ligence, and Erudition, by which we diftinguifh between things
beautiful and deformed, be witnefs I have endeavoured to fup-
port your Influence, and have pleaded the Caufe of the Re-
public. If I have fpoken with that Force and Dignity befitting
this Impeachment, I have fpoken to theutmoft of my Wiflies ; if
not, to the utmoft of my Abilities. May you, both from the
Arguments I have mentioned, and thofe I have pafTed over hi
Silence, pronounce fuch a Sentence, as in itfelf may be mofl;
agreeable to Juftice, and conducive to the Frofperity of the Re-
public.
(45) BiCo'^B'fixa. Some Word muft the Powers here invoked by our Oraror,
be underfiood. The Commentators and f^ol^'^ ? pe>>i auxiliuniqtie tuli, and upon his
Tranflators fuppofe rv TreXsi, the Com- Authority the prefent Trandation. Mi-
monwealth. Lambinu's alone feems to chines in another Place in this Oration,
have read v^7v, which he applies to all Bayi^u ku\ tu Biu, kui t? y^ t;? >>e^<<.
End of the Oration againfl Ctesiphon,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? ^j^X? ;^|)(? j5|)^R|)(|? ^(? j(R)
ORATION XVIII.
DEMOSTHENES
IN DEFENCE OF
C TESIPHON.
(|J^)(5J(R)(R)(R)(5J^E)(R)i5X^j(^^X|J^^(5J^^^
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? DEMOSTHENES
IN DEFENCE OF
CTESIPHO N.
1 First implore, O Men of Athens, all our Gods, and all
our Goddefles, that the fame Meafure of AfFedlion for this '
Republic in general, and for every fingle Citizen among you,
which hath ever been the Guide of all my Adlions, may be
iiowprefent to me in this Conteft. Next, as of exceeding Im-
portance to you, to the facred Obligation of your Oaths, and
to your Glory, I do implore the fame Deities to imprefs upon
your Minds a Refolution not to make my Profecutor, your
Advifer,
The Solemnity, with which our Ora-
tor opens his Defence, inuft have com-
manded the Attention of his Audience,
and the religious Confidence of his Prayer
to the Gods imprefled upon them a fa-
vourable Opinion of his Piety, that bed
Aflli ranee he could give of his Integrity.
The pathetic Profeffions of his Zeal for
the Republic in general, and for every
individual Citizen in particular, had a
Right of Claim to an equal Return of
their Affedlion. 'I hefe Sentiments a
Tranflation may poflibly be ab! e to ex-
prefs ; but when the Ancients talk to us
with Rapture of a peculiar Harmony in
the Words and Meafures of the Origi-
nal, and the Influence it muft necefiarily
have had upon an Athenian Audience,
a Tranflator can only lament the Lofs
of fo exquifite a Pleafure : a Lofs, per-
haps, for ever irrecoverable. But when
Quintilian tells us, our Orator opened
his Oration in a timid, low, fubmifTive
Tone of Voice, and imrigines his Aftion
was fuited to that Tone, does he not
afcribe rather too much to his Timidity
and SubmilTion ? Should he not recol-
left, that the Solemnity of Prayer re-
quires a folemn Firmnefs in the Voice,
and an Adion of fuperior Dignity ?
\\'ould nor any Aftion of this temperate
Kind be much unequal to the Vehemence
and Ardour and Sublimity of this Ex. -
ordium ?
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 360 DEMOSTHENES
Advifer, or admit him to dired: in what Manner, I ought to
make my Defence (that would be mod unjuft) but to confult the
Laws themfelves, and your own Oath, in which, among other
Sentiments of perfe6l Equity, this Maxim is written. Let both
Parties be heard with Impartiality. This ExprefTion
not only obliges you not to bring with you to this Affembly any
premeditated Sentence ; not only obliges you to treat both
Parties with equal Favour, but to fuffer each of them to ar-
range his Arguments, and the Proofs of his Defence in whatever
Order he pleafes.
Among many Difadvantages, under which I labour in this
Caufe, more than ^fchines, there are two, O Men of Athens,
of greater Moment. One, that the Objedl, for which we con-
tend is by no Means equal ; fince very unequal indeed is my
lofing your Efteem, and his being unable to fucceed in this
Indidment. For fhould I lofe-- But I will not begin my De-
fence with any ill-omened or inaulpicious Expreffion. -- Yet cer-
tainly the Contention between us is very unequal. There is
another Difadvantage, under which I labour, that Nature
hath implanted in the Breafts of human Kind, to liften with
Pleafure to Calumny and Inve6lives, but to hear the Man,
who praifes himfelf, with Pain and Indignation. Thus the
pleafurable Part is allotted to Him; and what is ofFenfive, I
may venture to fay, to all Mankind, remains to me. lYet if
under this Apprehcnfion, I fhould pafs over in Silence the Ser-
vices
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 361
vices I have rendered to the Commonwealth, I fhall appear
unable to refute the Crimes whereof I am accufed, or to (hew
myfelf worthy of thofe Honours, I profefs to deferve. Or if
I enter into the Particulars of thofe Services, and of my general
Adminiftration, I fhall often be compelled to fpeak of myfelf.
This I will endeavour with all poflible Moderation, which if
an abfolute NecefHty (hould fometimes oblige me to tranfgrefs,
the Man, who hath impofed fuch a Conteft upon me, fhould
alone in Juftice be condemned.
I BELIEVE, you will unanimoufly acknowledge, that this
Caufe is of common Concernment to me and Ctefiphon, nor
ought to be regarded by me with lefs Anxiety and Attention.
, For to be defpoiled of all we poflefs, efpecially by the Malice
of an Enemy, is with Pain and Difficulty to be fupported ; but
infupportable indeed, to be defpoiled of your Efteem and Af-
fedlion, themoft valuable of all human Bleflings. Since there-
fore I am thus interefted in this Trial, I with equal Earneftnefs
demand from your Integrity, and implore from your Com-
paflion, that you will hear my Defence againft thefe Accufati-
ons with that impartial Spirit, which the Laws command : thole
Laws, which Solon, ever well affedioned towards this Repub-
lic, and zealous for the Liberty of its Conftitution, founded in
the earlieft State of the Commonwealth ; which he deemed ne^-
cefiary, for the Prefervation of their Authority, not only to en-
grave upon public Tables, but to imprefs upon the Confciences
Voh' H. , A a a of
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 362 DEMOSTHENES
of our Judges, by the Solemnity of an Oath, whenever they
afcended this Tribunal. Not from his Diffidence, in mv O-
pinion, of your Integrity, but confcious how impoflible, fo
powerful is the Profecutor by the Advantage of fpeaking firft,
that the Defendant in thefe Indidlments ever fhould efcape
being condemned, unlefs his Judges will univerfally preferve
their Piety towards the Gods ; receive the Juftice of his Plea
with Benignity of Mind , render themfelves equal and impartial-
Hearers to either Party, and thus take perfect Cognizance of
the whole TriaL
But fince I am this Day to render an Account, as it appears,
both of my whole private Life, and of my public Adminiftra-
tion, I will again, as in the Beginning, invoke the Gods, and
in your Prefence implore them to grant, that fuch a Meafure
of Affedion, as I ha.
ve ever preferved for Athens, and for all
her Citizens, may now be prefent to me in this Contention :
and next, that they will infpire you to determine in fuch a
Manner, as may beft promote the general Glory of the State,
and preferve to every fingle Perfon the Religion of his Oath inr
violable.
If iEfchines had profecuted me only upon the exprefs Articles
of this Indidlment, I fhould have entered immediately into the
Legality of the Decree, with which I am thus honoured by
the Senate. But fmce he hath confumed a no lefs abun-
dant
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 363
dant Quantity of Words in Reflexions mofl impertinent to his
Caufe, and hath multiplied his Falfehoods againft me, I hold
it neceflary and fitting, O Men of Athens, briefly to anfwer,
firfl:, to his Calumnies, that none of you may be influenced by
Arguments thus totally foreign to the Subje^^, and hear me from
thence with Prejudice or Abhorrence, when I make my juft
Defence againfl: this Profecution. To thofe Invecflives there-
fore, with which he hath maligned my private Reputation, be-
hold, how Ample and ingenuous is my Anfwer. If you are
confcious, that I am indeed fuch a Man, as he hath calumni-
oufly reprefented me (nor have I ever lived any v\'here, but a-
mong you alone) do not fuffer me to fpeak ; and however un-
blameable, or even meritorious, my whole Adminifl:ration may
poflibly have been, this Moment rife from the Tribunal, and
pronounce my Sentence. But if you believe and are convinced,
that I am a Man of better Morals, than my Accufer ; that I
am defcended from a more reputable Family ; from Anceflors
(that I may avoid faying any thing offenflve) not inferior to any
of thofe, who maintain the fecond Rank of Birth among our
Citizens, let him not find Credit with you in any other In-
fiance ; for it is manifefl:, that all other Inflances are equally
the Produce of his Invention. \ Then continue to me in the
prefent Contefl that Favour and Benevolence, which in many
former Trials I have conftantly experienced.
Famed as you are, ijEfchines, for Malignity and Subtlety,
A a a 2 YOU
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 364 DEMOSTHENES
you have furely been exceilively weak in imagining that I
would pafs over in Silence the Condudl and Services of my pub-
lic Ad minift ration, to vindicate my private Chara(S]:er againft
your Invedives. I fhall not ad in this Manner. I am not
yet fo abfurdly blind, but fhall enter immediately into the Me-
rits of my political Condud, which you malignantly traduce,
and fhall afterwards, if it can be any Pleafure to my Audience,
recoiled the exceflive Licentioufnefs of thofe Invedives.
Numerous indeed, and atrocious are the Crimes whereof I am
accufed. For fome of them the Laws ordain very fevere, and
even the laft Punifhments. (i) But the fole Defign of this
Profecution evinces at once the Malice, Outrage, Defamation
and Infults of an Enemy, with every other ExprefTion of his
Malevolence. Such Profecutions, by the Gods, O Men of
Athens, are neither equitable, or juft in themfelves, nor a-
greeable to your Conftitution. For we neither ought to take
away the Privilege, that every Citizen fhould enjoy, of addrefs-
ing and fpeaking to the People, neither fhould it be abufed to
the bad Purpofes of Malice and Envy. (2) But when iEfchines
faw
(i) Thfre is not perhaps an Inftance moved, and our Author vindicated from
in Doftor Taylor's Edition of a more the Charge of Obfcurity, and Confufion
venturous and fortunate Criticifm, than in his reafoning, fo injurious, and fo con-
on the Paffage before us. It was univer- trary to his Charadter. It were little
Tally acknowledged obfcure ; it was in ufeful to an Englifli Reader to enter into
general thought to be corrupt. But by the Particulars of this Criticifm, and the
a judicious Arrangement of the different learned will be far better fatisfied by con-
Members of the Period, which were be- fulting Doftor Taylor,
fore confufed and in Diforder, the Suf- (2) The Words in the Original are
picion of Corruption in the Text is re- differently underftood by Lambinus
whole
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 365
faw me committing thefe Crimes, efpecially if they were of fuch
enormous Magnitude, as he now moft tragically reprefcnts
them, it was his Duty to have urged againft me the proper
PuniOiments, that the Laws have appointed, and proportioned
to fuch Crimes. If he faw my Adions merited an Impeach-
ment of Treafon, he ought to have impeached me. If I had
propofed a Decree in Oppofition to any eftablifhed Laws, he
(hould have preferred an Indidlment for that particular Decree.
For every other Crime I was capable of committing, or for
which he now purfues me with repeated Slanders and Calum-
nies, there are peculiar Laws, and Punifliments, and Trials,
to which very fevere and numerous Penalties are annexed, and
all thefe he was at Liberty to have employed. Had he aded
in this Manner ; had this been his Method of proceeding, the
prefent Profecution would have been confiftent with his general
Condu6l. But fince he thus departs from our ftated, equitable
Forms ; fince he negle6led to inform againft me upon the im-
mediate Commiflion of thefe Crimes, and now, after fuch a
Length of Time hath intervened, colleds his Proofs, his Ri-
baldry and his Invedives, it is the meer Mockery of a theatri-
cal Reprefentation. The Profecution is directed againft me,
though the Indidment be laid againft Ctefiphon. His Enmity
to me appears upon the Face of the whole Caufe, but never
having
whofe Tranflation is adopted in general Orator objefled againft the Injuftice of
by Dodor Taylor. Non enimjus adeundi iEfchines, who would have hindered him
ad populuin, caiifaque dicendi potejiatem from pleading and appearing in this Cuife
(tii^uam eripere . . . oportet. As if our before the People.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 366 DEMOSTHENES
having dared to attack me diredlly, he now manifeftly endea-
vours to take away the good Name and Reputation of an-
other. Yet in Addition to every other Argument, O Men of
Athens, that might w^ith utmoft Juftice be urged in Defence
of Ctefiphon, I think, it may very reafonably be pleaded in
his Favour, that iEfchines and I fliould ourfelves profecute our
own Difputes, and not leave our mutual Quarrels to fearch for
others, upon whom to fix our proper Ignominy or Misfortunes.
To a6l in any Manner were mofl; iniquitous. 'Befides it is im-
poflible, that the Crimes objcded to me can ever affe6t Ctefi-
phon ; and if ^^fchines imagined, he could have fucceeded in
profecuting me diredly, he never would have laid his Indidt-
ment againft Him.
By thefe Inftances, it is eafy to perceive, that all the refl: are
in the fame Manner neither founded in Equity, nor Truth.
I fhall however feparately examine each particular Article of the
Charge, efpecially thofe, that relate to the Peace, and our Em-
bafiy to Philip, in which he hath falfely imputed to me the
very Crimes, committed by him and Philocrates. , But it is ne-
ceflary, O Men of Athens, and perhaps not foreign totheCaufe,
that I fliould recall to your Remembrance the Situation of Af-
fairs during that Period, from whence you may behold each
-particular IVanfidion in its ov/n proper Circumftances. IWhen
the Confederates had declared War againft the Phocjeans, in
which I had no Concernment, for I was not then engaged in
the
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTE SIPHON. 367
the Adminiftratlon, you were at firft well inclined to aflifl: that
People, though confcious how unjuftiliable their Conducft. /f
You would have taken Pleafure in any Misfortune, that might
have happened to the Thebans ; neither was your Refentment
againft them unreafonablc or unjuft, for they had not ufed with
Moderation the Advantages they gained at Leudlra. Pelopon-
nefus was divided into Parties. The Enemies of the Lacedse-
monians could neither totally fubdue that People, nor could
the Governors, whom they had eflabliflied, any longer main-
tain their Authority in their feveral Cities, while not among
the Peloponnefians only, but all the other States of Greece,,
there was a fecret Spirit of Difcord and Confufion, that appa-
rently mufi; foon break out into open War. Philip obferving
thefe Diforders (for they were eafily to be obferved) profufely
lavifhes his Treafures to corrupt particular Traitors in every
iingle State ; then throws them all into Confudon, and amidft
the univerfal Commotion urges them to their mutual Defl:ru6ti-
on. j Thus, while fome were greatly criminal, and others
equally imprudent, Philip carried his Defigns into Execution,
and became the general Terrour of Greece. As it was evident,
that the! Thebans, exhaufted by the Length of the Phocaean'
War (the Thebans, at that Time, impradicable and infolent,.
though now mofl: unfortunate, and depreffed) muft have been
compelled to fly to you for Succours, Philip, thatfucha Meafure
might not take Effed, and that the two Republics fhould nof
unite in Interefts and AUiance, promifed Peace to You,, and
Affiftance:
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 368 DEMOSTHENES
Affiftance to them. What was it therefore, that confpired
with PhiHp to render you, I had almoft faid, thus voluntarily
deceived ? The Cowardice or Imprudence, perhaps we fhould
rather fay, they both concurred, of all the other Grecian States ;
who when you were engaged in a long and uninterrupted War for
the common Liberties and Welfare of Greece, as the Fa6t itfelf
indifputably evinced, yet never afTifted you either with Subli-
dies or Troops, or any other Requifite for your Support.
jThis Treatment you juftly, and with proper Dignity refented,
and readily affented to Philip's Propofals|
Upon thefe Confiderations was the Peace, which you had
granted to Philip, concluded ; not by any Influence of mine,
as iEfchines hath calumnioufly aflerted. His Crimes, with thofe
of Philocrates, and their mutual Venality in the Negotiations
of this Peace will be found, upon ftrid and juft Inquiry, to
have occafioned the prefent Situation of your Affairs ; every
Particular of which, in pure Regard to Truth, I fhall pundtu-
ally and regularly explain. If aught injurious to the Republic
fhould appear to have been committed in the Courfe of this
Tranfadion, I am perfedly innocent>>
'The firft, who mentioned, and fpoke in Favour of the Peace
was Ariftodemus, the Comedian. He, who feconded the Motion,
and preferred a Decree for concluding it ; he, who had fold
himfelf along with Ariftodemus for that Purpofe, was Philocrates j
your
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 369
your Accomplice, i^fchines, not mine, though you fhould burfl:
with aflerting the Falfehood. / They, who fupported it with
their Suffrages, whatever might have been their Motives (for I
fnall not inquire at prefent) were Eubulus and Cephifophon. I
never had the leafl Concernment in it. However, though fuch
was the real State of that Affair ; though it be demonftrated by
Truth itfelf, yet i^fchines is impudent enough to affert, that
1 was not only the Author of this Peace, but that I hindered its
being concluded with the common Confent of all the other
States of Greece in their general Allembly. Yet Thou-- by
what Name can I juftly call thee ? -- though prefent, though
beholding me defpoiling the Commonwealth of fuch Advan-
tages, and fuch a Confederacy, as you now reprefent in that
Strain of Tragedy and Declamation, didft thou ever fhev/ any
Refentment or Indignation; ever come forward on this Tri-
bunal to inform the People, or explain that Condud, which
you now accufe ? 1 Or if indeed I had fold myfelf to Philip,
and hindered the Grecian States from being included in the ge-
neral Peace, ^ it remained to you, not to be filent, but to ex-
claim; to teftify againft me, and lay open the Affair to thefe,
our prefent Audience. / You never adled in this Manner. That
Voice of thine was never heard. But indeed no Embafiy was
ever fent to any of the Grecians ; their Sentiments were long
before fufficiently apparent, and ^fchines hath not uttered a
Syllable of Truth upon the Subjed. Befides, /he brands the
Republic itfelf with Infamy by his Falfehoods. For if you
Vol. ir. B b b could
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 370 DEMOSTHENES.
could encourage the Grecians to enter into a War againft Phi-
lip, and at the fame Time fend AmbafTadors to him with Pro-
pofals of a feparate Peace, it were the Villaiay of an Eurybatus,,
not the Condudl befitting the Republic, or the Honour of its.
Citizens. But never, there never were any fuch Embaffies.
For with what Intention could you have fent them at that
Period ? To exhort the Grecians to Peace ? It was already
univerfal. To War ? You yourfelves were negotiating a Peace.
Thus it appears, that I was neither a Principal, nor indeed in.
any Meafure an Agent in concluding it, and that all the other
Calumnies he hath invented againft me are equally falfe.
Now recoiled what was the general Tenour of his Conduct
and mine after the Peace was concluded. From thence you
will eafily difcern, who with Ardour fupported Philip in all his
Defigns ; who directed their Adions to your Interefb, and
were zealous for the Republic. , I preferred a Decree in the
Senate, that AmbaiTadors (hould fail with utmoft Expedition to
wherever they heard Philip refided, and receive his Oaths of
Ratification. But they thought proper not to obey this De-
cree, the Force and Importance of v^^hich, O Men of Athens^
I fhall now lay before you. It was Philip's Intereft to delay,
and yours to haften the Ratification of the Peace, as much as
polfible. Why ? Becaufe, not only fron the Moment you had
fvvorn to ratify, but even from the Moment you had entertained
Hopes of even a pofilbility of concluding it, you abandoned all
your
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 371
your military Operations. Philip, on the Contrary, during
that vvjiole Time profecuted his Schemes with greater Vigour;
prefuming, as the Event hath proved, that he might continue
in firm FofTeflion of whatever Places he could rend from the
Republic before he had fworn, and that you would never re-
new the War to recover them^< Forefeeing thefe Confequences,
and reafoning upon them with Attention, I propofed this De-
cree, which commanded our Ambafiadors to fet fail with all
pofTible Expedition ; to find Philip, and tender him the Oaths
of F-atification ; that while your Confederates, the Thracians,
continued in PofTefiion of Serrium, and Myrtenon, and Ergif-
ce (whofe Names our Declaimer now treats with Ridicule) the
Ratifications might be then mutually exchanged ; that Philip
might neither feize upon thefe important Fortreffes, by which
he might afterwards make himfelf Mailer of Thrace, nor by
the abundant Treafjres and numerous Forces, he might raife
from thofe Conquefls, more eafily carry his other Projeds into
Execution. Yet iEfchines never cites this Decree, nor orders
it to be read. But if I have given my Opinion in the Senate,
that Philip's Ambafladors fliall be publicly received, this Opi-
nion he treats with the feverefl: Malignity. : But in what Man-
ner fhould I have adled ? Should I have preferred a Decree to
forbid their being introduced into your Afiembly, who came
hither (C)n Purpofe to confer with you ? Should I have ordered
the Manager not to appoint Seats for them in the Theatre,
which however they might purchafed for two Oboli, though
B b b 2 no
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 372 DEMOSTHENES
no fuch Order ever were given ? Ought I rather to have been
anxious to fave this Httle Pittance, or, Hke thefe Trators, have
fold the whole Republic to Philip ? Take and read this De-
cree, which iEfchines, apparently confcious of its Importance,,
hath paffed over in Silence^
The Decree.
Under the Archonfhipof Mneiiphilus, on the thirtieth Day
of July, the Pandionian Tribe being Presidents of the Council),
Demofthenes delivered this Opinion: Whereas Philip hath
fent an Embafly to Athens to negotiate a Peace, of which he
hath ratified certain preliminary Articles ; it therefore feemeth
good to the Senate and People of Athens, in Order, that this
Peace, approved of in the firft general Allembly, may be finally
concluded, that five AmbafiTadors be eledted out of the whole
Body of our Citizens, and when their Eledlion is confirmedi
that they depart without Delay to whatever Place they are in-
formed Philip fiiall refide, and there interchange the Oaths of
Ratification, according to the Articles of Convention between:
Him and the Athenian People, mutually including their com-
mon Confederates. Eubulus, ^Slfchines, Ctefiphon, Demo-
crates, and Cleon, are appointed Ambaffadors.
When in my Zeal for the Interefts of the Commonwealth^
certainly not thofc of Philip, I had preferred this Decree, your
very excellent Ambaffadors, little folicitous for its Succefs, fat
dowa
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 373
down indolently three whole Months in Macedonia, 'till I^ilip
returned from Thrace, after having reduced and ruined the
whole Country, although in ten, or rather in three or four
Days, they might have arrived at the Hellefpont, and by de-
manding his Oath before he had fubdued that Kingdom
have preferved it from Deftrucftion. For either he would
not have invaded it in our Prefence, or we fhould have
rejeded his Oaths. Thus he muft neceflarily have been dis-
appointed of the Peace he defired. He could not have enjoyed
that, and his Conquefts together. Such was the firft Inftance
of Perfidy in Philip during our Embafly, or of Venality in
thefe Traitors, whom the Gods deteft, and againft whom I
then profefled, and do now, and fhall for ever profefs an irrecon-
cileable Enmity and Hatred.
Behold another more flagrant Ad of Villainy, that imme-
diately followed. When Philip, after having made himfelf
Mafter of Thrace by the Difobedience of thefe Ambafladors to
my Decree, had confented to ratify the Peace, he once more
bribed them not to depart from Macedonia, untill he had cora-
pleated the Forces he was then railing againft the Phocceans. .
For he was apprehenfive, that if they returned hither, and
made their Report of his intended Expedition, you might your-
felves march to the AfTiftance of your Allies, or embarking on
board your Gallies, as you had done once before, might fhut
up the Streights beween Eubcea and the Continenti He there-
fore.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2.
? AGAINST CTESIPHON. 351
thus indebted to his Merit, that he muft plead this Caufe
himfelf. Let us afk the Judges, whether they know Chabrias,
Iphicrates and Timotheus ; or wherefore they gave them fuch
honorary Rewards, and eredled Statues to them. They will
unanimoufly anfwer, to Chabrias, for his naval Vidlory at
Naxos ; to Iphicrates, for having cut to pieces the Lacedaemo-
nian Phalanx; to Timotheus, for his Expedition to Corcyra;
to others, for their many great and glorious Services performed
in War. If it fhould be afked, why then refufe this Honour
to Demofthenes ? Becaufe he is corrupt, a Coward, a Defcr-
ter of his Poft in Battle. Whether will you therefore honour
Him, or difhonour yourfelves and them, who gallantly loft
their Lives in your Defence ? Imagine you behold them, with
every Expreilion of Mifery and Indignation, lamenting his
being crowned ; for if we carry, beyond the Limits of Attica,
either Timber or Stones, or Pieces of Iron, things fenfelefs and
inanimate, that have accidentally fallen and killed an human
Creature ; or if, when a Citizen hath been guilty of Self-Mur-
der, we bury the Hand, that committed the Deed, feparately
from the Body ; it will be terrible indeed, that Demofthenes,,
O Athenians, the Man, who decreed this laft unfortunate Ex~
peditlon ; who betrayed the Army by his Cowardice,, fhall be
honoured and rewarded. The Dead will be infuhed, and the
Living difcouraged, when they behold, that Death is placed
before them as the only Reward of their Virtue, and that evea
their Virtue fhall itfelf be loft; to Remembrance.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:59 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 352 ORATION OF iESCHINES
But of more Importance the Confideration^ if our Youtfi
fhoiild afk upon what Model they fhall form their future Lives,
what will you anfwer ? You are confcious, that neither the
Places appointed for their Exercifes, nor the Schools, nor their
Mufic, are fufficient to form them to Virtue, but far more ef-
ficacious our public Proclamations. Is a Man proclaimed in
the Theatre to be crowned for his Integrity, his Courage, and
Love of his Country, who is infamous for the Turpitude and
Impurity of his Life ? Our Youth are inftantly corrupted in
their Principles. Is an impious and a proftituted Wretch, like
Ctefiphon, punifhed, as he deferves ? Others are inftrudled.
Is a Father, who hath pafTed a Decree in Oppofition to every
Sentiment of Honour and Juftice, capable, when he returns
home, of forming his Son to Virtue ? His Son will undoubted-
ly pay him little Attention, and his Advice at fuch a Time will
juftly be called tedious and impertinent. Not therefore as
Judges only, but as Magiftrates ading in View of their Coun-
try, you fhould give Judgement in fuch a Manner as will juflify
you to your abfent Fellow-Citizens, when they fhall demand
what Sentence you have pronounced. For be well afTured,
Athenians, that the I Republic will always be thought to bear
fome Refemblance to the Perfon we crown. Will it not be
therefore infamous in you to refemble the Cowardice of this
Demofthenes ; not the Magnanimity of your Anceftors ?
But how fliall you efcape fuch Infamy? Keep a ftrong
Guard
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:59 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? AGAINST CTESIPHON. 1^53
Guard upon thofe, who afTume to themfelves the Style of pub-
lic Virtue and Philanthropy, yet in their private Chara6lers
are difhoneft and perfidious. For Love of our Country and of
Liberty, are Expreflions, that lie open in common to every
Body, and in general, they, who take FoflefTion of the Words,
are fartheft diftant from them in their Adions. When you
therefore find an Orator ardently defirous of Crowns and Pro-
clamations in the general Aflemblies of Greece, command him
to bring back his vague Oration, and his Aflertions (as the Law
directs) to the Proofs of a Life worthy of Praife, and of un-
blemifKed Morals. If he cannot give you fuch Teftimony, do
not ratify the Praifes, with which he is proclaimed ; and thus
be careful to preferve what yet remains of your Authority.
But does it not appear to you moft terrible, that the Senate
and People are treated with Contempt ; that Difpatches and
Embaflies come to private Houfes, not from Perfons of inferior
Rank, but from the greateft Potentates of Europe and Afia ?
The very Crimes our Laws make punifhable with Death, a
certain Party do not deny their having committed, but profefs
them in Prelence of the People, and read their Difpatches to
each other. Some of them defire you to look up to them, as
to the Guardians of your Democracy ; others demand Rewards,
as Prefervers of the Republic ; while the People, from very
Dejedion of Spirit by their Misfortunes, as if they were grown
aged and doting in their Underftanding, affume to themfelves
the Name alone of a popular Goverment, but have yielded the
Vol. IL Z z Power
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:59 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 354 ORATION OF ^SCHINES
Power to others. Thus you depart from this AfTembly, not
like Perfons, who had confulted upon the Welfare of their
Country, but Hke Guefts, who had divided the Fragments of a
public Entertainment.
That I do not trifle with your Attention, let the following
Remarks convince you. There was a certain-- with Grief I
mention the Calamities of the Republic fo frequently -- there
was a certain private Citizen, who attempting to fail to Samos
alone, was the very fame Day condemned and executed by Sen-
tence of the Areopagus. Another, who had taken Refuge in
Rhodes, unable to fupport with Fortitude the Dangers of the
Commonwealth, was lately impeached, and acquitted only
becaufe the Votes were equal. Had a fingle Suffrage more
been given againft him, he had been either baniflied, or put
to Death. (43) Let us now place the prefent Inftance in Op-
pofition to thefe. An Orator, the Author of all our Misfor-
tunes, deferted his Poft in Battle, and afterwards fled from the
Defence of Athens ; yet now prefumes to think he deferves a
CroWn, and the Honours of a Proclamation. Will you not
drive him hence into Banifhment, this common Peft of Greece ?
Will you not rather feize and punifli this public Robber ; this
Pyratc, who fiils through your Conftitiition upon the Power
of Words ? Remember too the particular Circumftances of
the
(43) A Decree was pafTed immediately of the Jaft Perfon, who thus deferted iiis-
after the Defeat at Chsronea, to make Country, was Leocrates. He was pro~
it punilhable with Death for any of the feciued by Lycurgus, whofe Speech is
Citizens to leave Athens. The Name flill extant. Tourreil.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 04:59 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? AGAINST CTESIPHON. 355
the Time, in which you pronounce this Judgement. The Pythian
Games are in a (tw Days approaching, and the general States
of Greece will be aflembled. The Republic is already calum-
niated for the Adminiftration of Demofthenes, and if you de-
termine this Crown in his Favour, you will appear to have
afl;ed in Confederacy with them, who violated the general
Peace; on the contrary, you will acquit the People of fuch Ca-
lumnies.
Do not therefore determine with an Indifference, as if the
Interefts of fome foreign State, not thofe of your native Coun-
try, were concerned. Do not diftribute your Honours to mecr
Ambition, but give them with Difcernment. Place your
Bounty upon Perfons moft eAimable ; upon Men more worthy
of your Praile. Do not depend upon your Ears only, but with
your Eyes examine, what Kind of Citizens they are, who fup-
port the Caufe of Demofthenes. Were they his Companions
in hunting, or the gymnaftic Exercifes in his Youth? No; by
Olympic Jupiter. He never uncoupled the Hounds to roufe
the favage Boar; never was anxious to obtain a vigorous Ha-
bit of Body, but exercifed thofe Arts alone, which he well
knew how to pra(5life againft the wealthy.
(44) Now mark thelnfolence of the Man, and when he boafts,
that by his Negotiations in his Embafly, he wrefted Byzantium
out
(44) Here the Peroration begins. It is great, beautiful, fublime, pathetic, ani
Z z 2 affeftiiig.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 356 ORATION OF i^SCHINES
out of the Hands of Philip ; engaged the Acarnanians to forfake
his Party : aftonifhed the Thebans with his Eloquence (for he
prefumes you are now arrived at fuch Excefs of Simplicity,
as to believe, you have educated in Athens the very God-
defs of Perfuafion, not a pernicious Calumniator) when at the
Conclulion of his Defence he calls upon the Partners and Aflb-
ciates of his Corruptions to be his Advocates, imagine you be-
hold upon this very Tribunal where I ftand, the Perfons, who
have eminently well deferved of the Republic, ranged in Op~
pofition to their Arrogance : Solon, who adorned your Demo-
cracy with its wifefl: Laws ; Solon, equally eminent as a Phi-
lofopher and a Legiflator ; imagine you behold him imploring
you with that modeft Dignity, fo befitting his Character, never
to fuffer the Eloquence of Demofthenes to have a greater In-
fluence over you, than the Religion of your Oaths, and the
Obligations of your Laws. Imagine Ariftides, who regulated
with [o much Equity the general Contributions of Greece for
her common Defence ; whofe Daughters the People portioned
after his Death ; imagine him in Anguifh and Sorrow deploring
the Contumely, with which Juftice is treated, and afking " if
" your Anceflors almofl: put to Death the Zelite Arthmius, an
*' Inhabitant of Athens, and received by her People with the pub-
*' lie Rites of Hofpitality, becaufe he brought Gold from Perfia
" into
afFe(5ling. Solon, Ariftides, Themifto- tice of the Sentence now to be pronounced,
cles, all the Heroes, who had facrificed Our Orator engages all Nature in his
their Lives at Marathon and Plataea in Quarrel, and raifes all the Powers of
Defence of their Country, are called forth Earth and Heaven, of Gods and Men,
from their Tombs to witnefs to the Juf- againft his Adverfary. Tourreil.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? AGAINST CTESIPHON. 357
*' into Greece : if they banifhcd him by Proclamation, not from
" Athens only, but from all her Dominions, will you not
*' blufli to crown this Demofthenes with a golden Crown, who
*' did not indeed bring Gold from Perfia, but hath amafled it
" by every Kind of Corruption, and even now pofleffes it. "
Will not Themiftoclesj and they, who died at Marathon and
Platsea ; will not the very Sepulchres of your Anceftors burft
forth into Groans, if he, who confeffes he confpired againft
Greece with the Barbarians, fhall be crowned by your Decree ?
Here therefore, O Earth, and Sun, and Virtue, and Intel-
ligence, and Erudition, by which we diftinguifh between things
beautiful and deformed, be witnefs I have endeavoured to fup-
port your Influence, and have pleaded the Caufe of the Re-
public. If I have fpoken with that Force and Dignity befitting
this Impeachment, I have fpoken to theutmoft of my Wiflies ; if
not, to the utmoft of my Abilities. May you, both from the
Arguments I have mentioned, and thofe I have pafTed over hi
Silence, pronounce fuch a Sentence, as in itfelf may be mofl;
agreeable to Juftice, and conducive to the Frofperity of the Re-
public.
(45) BiCo'^B'fixa. Some Word muft the Powers here invoked by our Oraror,
be underfiood. The Commentators and f^ol^'^ ? pe>>i auxiliuniqtie tuli, and upon his
Tranflators fuppofe rv TreXsi, the Com- Authority the prefent Trandation. Mi-
monwealth. Lambinu's alone feems to chines in another Place in this Oration,
have read v^7v, which he applies to all Bayi^u ku\ tu Biu, kui t? y^ t;? >>e^<<.
End of the Oration againfl Ctesiphon,
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? ^j^X? ;^|)(? j5|)^R|)(|? ^(? j(R)
ORATION XVIII.
DEMOSTHENES
IN DEFENCE OF
C TESIPHON.
(|J^)(5J(R)(R)(R)(5J^E)(R)i5X^j(^^X|J^^(5J^^^
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? DEMOSTHENES
IN DEFENCE OF
CTESIPHO N.
1 First implore, O Men of Athens, all our Gods, and all
our Goddefles, that the fame Meafure of AfFedlion for this '
Republic in general, and for every fingle Citizen among you,
which hath ever been the Guide of all my Adlions, may be
iiowprefent to me in this Conteft. Next, as of exceeding Im-
portance to you, to the facred Obligation of your Oaths, and
to your Glory, I do implore the fame Deities to imprefs upon
your Minds a Refolution not to make my Profecutor, your
Advifer,
The Solemnity, with which our Ora-
tor opens his Defence, inuft have com-
manded the Attention of his Audience,
and the religious Confidence of his Prayer
to the Gods imprefled upon them a fa-
vourable Opinion of his Piety, that bed
Aflli ranee he could give of his Integrity.
The pathetic Profeffions of his Zeal for
the Republic in general, and for every
individual Citizen in particular, had a
Right of Claim to an equal Return of
their Affedlion. 'I hefe Sentiments a
Tranflation may poflibly be ab! e to ex-
prefs ; but when the Ancients talk to us
with Rapture of a peculiar Harmony in
the Words and Meafures of the Origi-
nal, and the Influence it muft necefiarily
have had upon an Athenian Audience,
a Tranflator can only lament the Lofs
of fo exquifite a Pleafure : a Lofs, per-
haps, for ever irrecoverable. But when
Quintilian tells us, our Orator opened
his Oration in a timid, low, fubmifTive
Tone of Voice, and imrigines his Aftion
was fuited to that Tone, does he not
afcribe rather too much to his Timidity
and SubmilTion ? Should he not recol-
left, that the Solemnity of Prayer re-
quires a folemn Firmnefs in the Voice,
and an Adion of fuperior Dignity ?
\\'ould nor any Aftion of this temperate
Kind be much unequal to the Vehemence
and Ardour and Sublimity of this Ex. -
ordium ?
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 360 DEMOSTHENES
Advifer, or admit him to dired: in what Manner, I ought to
make my Defence (that would be mod unjuft) but to confult the
Laws themfelves, and your own Oath, in which, among other
Sentiments of perfe6l Equity, this Maxim is written. Let both
Parties be heard with Impartiality. This ExprefTion
not only obliges you not to bring with you to this Affembly any
premeditated Sentence ; not only obliges you to treat both
Parties with equal Favour, but to fuffer each of them to ar-
range his Arguments, and the Proofs of his Defence in whatever
Order he pleafes.
Among many Difadvantages, under which I labour in this
Caufe, more than ^fchines, there are two, O Men of Athens,
of greater Moment. One, that the Objedl, for which we con-
tend is by no Means equal ; fince very unequal indeed is my
lofing your Efteem, and his being unable to fucceed in this
Indidment. For fhould I lofe-- But I will not begin my De-
fence with any ill-omened or inaulpicious Expreffion. -- Yet cer-
tainly the Contention between us is very unequal. There is
another Difadvantage, under which I labour, that Nature
hath implanted in the Breafts of human Kind, to liften with
Pleafure to Calumny and Inve6lives, but to hear the Man,
who praifes himfelf, with Pain and Indignation. Thus the
pleafurable Part is allotted to Him; and what is ofFenfive, I
may venture to fay, to all Mankind, remains to me. lYet if
under this Apprehcnfion, I fhould pafs over in Silence the Ser-
vices
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 361
vices I have rendered to the Commonwealth, I fhall appear
unable to refute the Crimes whereof I am accufed, or to (hew
myfelf worthy of thofe Honours, I profefs to deferve. Or if
I enter into the Particulars of thofe Services, and of my general
Adminiftration, I fhall often be compelled to fpeak of myfelf.
This I will endeavour with all poflible Moderation, which if
an abfolute NecefHty (hould fometimes oblige me to tranfgrefs,
the Man, who hath impofed fuch a Conteft upon me, fhould
alone in Juftice be condemned.
I BELIEVE, you will unanimoufly acknowledge, that this
Caufe is of common Concernment to me and Ctefiphon, nor
ought to be regarded by me with lefs Anxiety and Attention.
, For to be defpoiled of all we poflefs, efpecially by the Malice
of an Enemy, is with Pain and Difficulty to be fupported ; but
infupportable indeed, to be defpoiled of your Efteem and Af-
fedlion, themoft valuable of all human Bleflings. Since there-
fore I am thus interefted in this Trial, I with equal Earneftnefs
demand from your Integrity, and implore from your Com-
paflion, that you will hear my Defence againft thefe Accufati-
ons with that impartial Spirit, which the Laws command : thole
Laws, which Solon, ever well affedioned towards this Repub-
lic, and zealous for the Liberty of its Conftitution, founded in
the earlieft State of the Commonwealth ; which he deemed ne^-
cefiary, for the Prefervation of their Authority, not only to en-
grave upon public Tables, but to imprefs upon the Confciences
Voh' H. , A a a of
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 362 DEMOSTHENES
of our Judges, by the Solemnity of an Oath, whenever they
afcended this Tribunal. Not from his Diffidence, in mv O-
pinion, of your Integrity, but confcious how impoflible, fo
powerful is the Profecutor by the Advantage of fpeaking firft,
that the Defendant in thefe Indidlments ever fhould efcape
being condemned, unlefs his Judges will univerfally preferve
their Piety towards the Gods ; receive the Juftice of his Plea
with Benignity of Mind , render themfelves equal and impartial-
Hearers to either Party, and thus take perfect Cognizance of
the whole TriaL
But fince I am this Day to render an Account, as it appears,
both of my whole private Life, and of my public Adminiftra-
tion, I will again, as in the Beginning, invoke the Gods, and
in your Prefence implore them to grant, that fuch a Meafure
of Affedion, as I ha.
ve ever preferved for Athens, and for all
her Citizens, may now be prefent to me in this Contention :
and next, that they will infpire you to determine in fuch a
Manner, as may beft promote the general Glory of the State,
and preferve to every fingle Perfon the Religion of his Oath inr
violable.
If iEfchines had profecuted me only upon the exprefs Articles
of this Indidlment, I fhould have entered immediately into the
Legality of the Decree, with which I am thus honoured by
the Senate. But fmce he hath confumed a no lefs abun-
dant
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 363
dant Quantity of Words in Reflexions mofl impertinent to his
Caufe, and hath multiplied his Falfehoods againft me, I hold
it neceflary and fitting, O Men of Athens, briefly to anfwer,
firfl:, to his Calumnies, that none of you may be influenced by
Arguments thus totally foreign to the Subje^^, and hear me from
thence with Prejudice or Abhorrence, when I make my juft
Defence againfl: this Profecution. To thofe Invecflives there-
fore, with which he hath maligned my private Reputation, be-
hold, how Ample and ingenuous is my Anfwer. If you are
confcious, that I am indeed fuch a Man, as he hath calumni-
oufly reprefented me (nor have I ever lived any v\'here, but a-
mong you alone) do not fuffer me to fpeak ; and however un-
blameable, or even meritorious, my whole Adminifl:ration may
poflibly have been, this Moment rife from the Tribunal, and
pronounce my Sentence. But if you believe and are convinced,
that I am a Man of better Morals, than my Accufer ; that I
am defcended from a more reputable Family ; from Anceflors
(that I may avoid faying any thing offenflve) not inferior to any
of thofe, who maintain the fecond Rank of Birth among our
Citizens, let him not find Credit with you in any other In-
fiance ; for it is manifefl:, that all other Inflances are equally
the Produce of his Invention. \ Then continue to me in the
prefent Contefl that Favour and Benevolence, which in many
former Trials I have conftantly experienced.
Famed as you are, ijEfchines, for Malignity and Subtlety,
A a a 2 YOU
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 364 DEMOSTHENES
you have furely been exceilively weak in imagining that I
would pafs over in Silence the Condudl and Services of my pub-
lic Ad minift ration, to vindicate my private Chara(S]:er againft
your Invedives. I fhall not ad in this Manner. I am not
yet fo abfurdly blind, but fhall enter immediately into the Me-
rits of my political Condud, which you malignantly traduce,
and fhall afterwards, if it can be any Pleafure to my Audience,
recoiled the exceflive Licentioufnefs of thofe Invedives.
Numerous indeed, and atrocious are the Crimes whereof I am
accufed. For fome of them the Laws ordain very fevere, and
even the laft Punifhments. (i) But the fole Defign of this
Profecution evinces at once the Malice, Outrage, Defamation
and Infults of an Enemy, with every other ExprefTion of his
Malevolence. Such Profecutions, by the Gods, O Men of
Athens, are neither equitable, or juft in themfelves, nor a-
greeable to your Conftitution. For we neither ought to take
away the Privilege, that every Citizen fhould enjoy, of addrefs-
ing and fpeaking to the People, neither fhould it be abufed to
the bad Purpofes of Malice and Envy. (2) But when iEfchines
faw
(i) Thfre is not perhaps an Inftance moved, and our Author vindicated from
in Doftor Taylor's Edition of a more the Charge of Obfcurity, and Confufion
venturous and fortunate Criticifm, than in his reafoning, fo injurious, and fo con-
on the Paffage before us. It was univer- trary to his Charadter. It were little
Tally acknowledged obfcure ; it was in ufeful to an Englifli Reader to enter into
general thought to be corrupt. But by the Particulars of this Criticifm, and the
a judicious Arrangement of the different learned will be far better fatisfied by con-
Members of the Period, which were be- fulting Doftor Taylor,
fore confufed and in Diforder, the Suf- (2) The Words in the Original are
picion of Corruption in the Text is re- differently underftood by Lambinus
whole
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 365
faw me committing thefe Crimes, efpecially if they were of fuch
enormous Magnitude, as he now moft tragically reprefcnts
them, it was his Duty to have urged againft me the proper
PuniOiments, that the Laws have appointed, and proportioned
to fuch Crimes. If he faw my Adions merited an Impeach-
ment of Treafon, he ought to have impeached me. If I had
propofed a Decree in Oppofition to any eftablifhed Laws, he
(hould have preferred an Indidlment for that particular Decree.
For every other Crime I was capable of committing, or for
which he now purfues me with repeated Slanders and Calum-
nies, there are peculiar Laws, and Punifliments, and Trials,
to which very fevere and numerous Penalties are annexed, and
all thefe he was at Liberty to have employed. Had he aded
in this Manner ; had this been his Method of proceeding, the
prefent Profecution would have been confiftent with his general
Condu6l. But fince he thus departs from our ftated, equitable
Forms ; fince he negle6led to inform againft me upon the im-
mediate Commiflion of thefe Crimes, and now, after fuch a
Length of Time hath intervened, colleds his Proofs, his Ri-
baldry and his Invedives, it is the meer Mockery of a theatri-
cal Reprefentation. The Profecution is directed againft me,
though the Indidment be laid againft Ctefiphon. His Enmity
to me appears upon the Face of the whole Caufe, but never
having
whofe Tranflation is adopted in general Orator objefled againft the Injuftice of
by Dodor Taylor. Non enimjus adeundi iEfchines, who would have hindered him
ad populuin, caiifaque dicendi potejiatem from pleading and appearing in this Cuife
(tii^uam eripere . . . oportet. As if our before the People.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 366 DEMOSTHENES
having dared to attack me diredlly, he now manifeftly endea-
vours to take away the good Name and Reputation of an-
other. Yet in Addition to every other Argument, O Men of
Athens, that might w^ith utmoft Juftice be urged in Defence
of Ctefiphon, I think, it may very reafonably be pleaded in
his Favour, that iEfchines and I fliould ourfelves profecute our
own Difputes, and not leave our mutual Quarrels to fearch for
others, upon whom to fix our proper Ignominy or Misfortunes.
To a6l in any Manner were mofl; iniquitous. 'Befides it is im-
poflible, that the Crimes objcded to me can ever affe6t Ctefi-
phon ; and if ^^fchines imagined, he could have fucceeded in
profecuting me diredly, he never would have laid his Indidt-
ment againft Him.
By thefe Inftances, it is eafy to perceive, that all the refl: are
in the fame Manner neither founded in Equity, nor Truth.
I fhall however feparately examine each particular Article of the
Charge, efpecially thofe, that relate to the Peace, and our Em-
bafiy to Philip, in which he hath falfely imputed to me the
very Crimes, committed by him and Philocrates. , But it is ne-
ceflary, O Men of Athens, and perhaps not foreign totheCaufe,
that I fliould recall to your Remembrance the Situation of Af-
fairs during that Period, from whence you may behold each
-particular IVanfidion in its ov/n proper Circumftances. IWhen
the Confederates had declared War againft the Phocjeans, in
which I had no Concernment, for I was not then engaged in
the
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTE SIPHON. 367
the Adminiftratlon, you were at firft well inclined to aflifl: that
People, though confcious how unjuftiliable their Conducft. /f
You would have taken Pleafure in any Misfortune, that might
have happened to the Thebans ; neither was your Refentment
againft them unreafonablc or unjuft, for they had not ufed with
Moderation the Advantages they gained at Leudlra. Pelopon-
nefus was divided into Parties. The Enemies of the Lacedse-
monians could neither totally fubdue that People, nor could
the Governors, whom they had eflabliflied, any longer main-
tain their Authority in their feveral Cities, while not among
the Peloponnefians only, but all the other States of Greece,,
there was a fecret Spirit of Difcord and Confufion, that appa-
rently mufi; foon break out into open War. Philip obferving
thefe Diforders (for they were eafily to be obferved) profufely
lavifhes his Treafures to corrupt particular Traitors in every
iingle State ; then throws them all into Confudon, and amidft
the univerfal Commotion urges them to their mutual Defl:ru6ti-
on. j Thus, while fome were greatly criminal, and others
equally imprudent, Philip carried his Defigns into Execution,
and became the general Terrour of Greece. As it was evident,
that the! Thebans, exhaufted by the Length of the Phocaean'
War (the Thebans, at that Time, impradicable and infolent,.
though now mofl: unfortunate, and depreffed) muft have been
compelled to fly to you for Succours, Philip, thatfucha Meafure
might not take Effed, and that the two Republics fhould nof
unite in Interefts and AUiance, promifed Peace to You,, and
Affiftance:
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 368 DEMOSTHENES
Affiftance to them. What was it therefore, that confpired
with PhiHp to render you, I had almoft faid, thus voluntarily
deceived ? The Cowardice or Imprudence, perhaps we fhould
rather fay, they both concurred, of all the other Grecian States ;
who when you were engaged in a long and uninterrupted War for
the common Liberties and Welfare of Greece, as the Fa6t itfelf
indifputably evinced, yet never afTifted you either with Subli-
dies or Troops, or any other Requifite for your Support.
jThis Treatment you juftly, and with proper Dignity refented,
and readily affented to Philip's Propofals|
Upon thefe Confiderations was the Peace, which you had
granted to Philip, concluded ; not by any Influence of mine,
as iEfchines hath calumnioufly aflerted. His Crimes, with thofe
of Philocrates, and their mutual Venality in the Negotiations
of this Peace will be found, upon ftrid and juft Inquiry, to
have occafioned the prefent Situation of your Affairs ; every
Particular of which, in pure Regard to Truth, I fhall pundtu-
ally and regularly explain. If aught injurious to the Republic
fhould appear to have been committed in the Courfe of this
Tranfadion, I am perfedly innocent>>
'The firft, who mentioned, and fpoke in Favour of the Peace
was Ariftodemus, the Comedian. He, who feconded the Motion,
and preferred a Decree for concluding it ; he, who had fold
himfelf along with Ariftodemus for that Purpofe, was Philocrates j
your
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 369
your Accomplice, i^fchines, not mine, though you fhould burfl:
with aflerting the Falfehood. / They, who fupported it with
their Suffrages, whatever might have been their Motives (for I
fnall not inquire at prefent) were Eubulus and Cephifophon. I
never had the leafl Concernment in it. However, though fuch
was the real State of that Affair ; though it be demonftrated by
Truth itfelf, yet i^fchines is impudent enough to affert, that
1 was not only the Author of this Peace, but that I hindered its
being concluded with the common Confent of all the other
States of Greece in their general Allembly. Yet Thou-- by
what Name can I juftly call thee ? -- though prefent, though
beholding me defpoiling the Commonwealth of fuch Advan-
tages, and fuch a Confederacy, as you now reprefent in that
Strain of Tragedy and Declamation, didft thou ever fhev/ any
Refentment or Indignation; ever come forward on this Tri-
bunal to inform the People, or explain that Condud, which
you now accufe ? 1 Or if indeed I had fold myfelf to Philip,
and hindered the Grecian States from being included in the ge-
neral Peace, ^ it remained to you, not to be filent, but to ex-
claim; to teftify againft me, and lay open the Affair to thefe,
our prefent Audience. / You never adled in this Manner. That
Voice of thine was never heard. But indeed no Embafiy was
ever fent to any of the Grecians ; their Sentiments were long
before fufficiently apparent, and ^fchines hath not uttered a
Syllable of Truth upon the Subjed. Befides, /he brands the
Republic itfelf with Infamy by his Falfehoods. For if you
Vol. ir. B b b could
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 370 DEMOSTHENES.
could encourage the Grecians to enter into a War againft Phi-
lip, and at the fame Time fend AmbafTadors to him with Pro-
pofals of a feparate Peace, it were the Villaiay of an Eurybatus,,
not the Condudl befitting the Republic, or the Honour of its.
Citizens. But never, there never were any fuch Embaffies.
For with what Intention could you have fent them at that
Period ? To exhort the Grecians to Peace ? It was already
univerfal. To War ? You yourfelves were negotiating a Peace.
Thus it appears, that I was neither a Principal, nor indeed in.
any Meafure an Agent in concluding it, and that all the other
Calumnies he hath invented againft me are equally falfe.
Now recoiled what was the general Tenour of his Conduct
and mine after the Peace was concluded. From thence you
will eafily difcern, who with Ardour fupported Philip in all his
Defigns ; who directed their Adions to your Interefb, and
were zealous for the Republic. , I preferred a Decree in the
Senate, that AmbaiTadors (hould fail with utmoft Expedition to
wherever they heard Philip refided, and receive his Oaths of
Ratification. But they thought proper not to obey this De-
cree, the Force and Importance of v^^hich, O Men of Athens^
I fhall now lay before you. It was Philip's Intereft to delay,
and yours to haften the Ratification of the Peace, as much as
polfible. Why ? Becaufe, not only fron the Moment you had
fvvorn to ratify, but even from the Moment you had entertained
Hopes of even a pofilbility of concluding it, you abandoned all
your
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 371
your military Operations. Philip, on the Contrary, during
that vvjiole Time profecuted his Schemes with greater Vigour;
prefuming, as the Event hath proved, that he might continue
in firm FofTeflion of whatever Places he could rend from the
Republic before he had fworn, and that you would never re-
new the War to recover them^< Forefeeing thefe Confequences,
and reafoning upon them with Attention, I propofed this De-
cree, which commanded our Ambafiadors to fet fail with all
pofTible Expedition ; to find Philip, and tender him the Oaths
of F-atification ; that while your Confederates, the Thracians,
continued in PofTefiion of Serrium, and Myrtenon, and Ergif-
ce (whofe Names our Declaimer now treats with Ridicule) the
Ratifications might be then mutually exchanged ; that Philip
might neither feize upon thefe important Fortreffes, by which
he might afterwards make himfelf Mailer of Thrace, nor by
the abundant Treafjres and numerous Forces, he might raife
from thofe Conquefls, more eafily carry his other Projeds into
Execution. Yet iEfchines never cites this Decree, nor orders
it to be read. But if I have given my Opinion in the Senate,
that Philip's Ambafladors fliall be publicly received, this Opi-
nion he treats with the feverefl: Malignity. : But in what Man-
ner fhould I have adled ? Should I have preferred a Decree to
forbid their being introduced into your Afiembly, who came
hither (C)n Purpofe to confer with you ? Should I have ordered
the Manager not to appoint Seats for them in the Theatre,
which however they might purchafed for two Oboli, though
B b b 2 no
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? 372 DEMOSTHENES
no fuch Order ever were given ? Ought I rather to have been
anxious to fave this Httle Pittance, or, Hke thefe Trators, have
fold the whole Republic to Philip ? Take and read this De-
cree, which iEfchines, apparently confcious of its Importance,,
hath paffed over in Silence^
The Decree.
Under the Archonfhipof Mneiiphilus, on the thirtieth Day
of July, the Pandionian Tribe being Presidents of the Council),
Demofthenes delivered this Opinion: Whereas Philip hath
fent an Embafly to Athens to negotiate a Peace, of which he
hath ratified certain preliminary Articles ; it therefore feemeth
good to the Senate and People of Athens, in Order, that this
Peace, approved of in the firft general Allembly, may be finally
concluded, that five AmbafiTadors be eledted out of the whole
Body of our Citizens, and when their Eledlion is confirmedi
that they depart without Delay to whatever Place they are in-
formed Philip fiiall refide, and there interchange the Oaths of
Ratification, according to the Articles of Convention between:
Him and the Athenian People, mutually including their com-
mon Confederates. Eubulus, ^Slfchines, Ctefiphon, Demo-
crates, and Cleon, are appointed Ambaffadors.
When in my Zeal for the Interefts of the Commonwealth^
certainly not thofc of Philip, I had preferred this Decree, your
very excellent Ambaffadors, little folicitous for its Succefs, fat
dowa
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2. ark:/13960/t9x06c69h Public Domain / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
? IN DEFENCE OF CTESIPHON. 373
down indolently three whole Months in Macedonia, 'till I^ilip
returned from Thrace, after having reduced and ruined the
whole Country, although in ten, or rather in three or four
Days, they might have arrived at the Hellefpont, and by de-
manding his Oath before he had fubdued that Kingdom
have preferved it from Deftrucftion. For either he would
not have invaded it in our Prefence, or we fhould have
rejeded his Oaths. Thus he muft neceflarily have been dis-
appointed of the Peace he defired. He could not have enjoyed
that, and his Conquefts together. Such was the firft Inftance
of Perfidy in Philip during our Embafly, or of Venality in
thefe Traitors, whom the Gods deteft, and againft whom I
then profefled, and do now, and fhall for ever profefs an irrecon-
cileable Enmity and Hatred.
Behold another more flagrant Ad of Villainy, that imme-
diately followed. When Philip, after having made himfelf
Mafter of Thrace by the Difobedience of thefe Ambafladors to
my Decree, had confented to ratify the Peace, he once more
bribed them not to depart from Macedonia, untill he had cora-
pleated the Forces he was then railing againft the Phocceans. .
For he was apprehenfive, that if they returned hither, and
made their Report of his intended Expedition, you might your-
felves march to the AfTiftance of your Allies, or embarking on
board your Gallies, as you had done once before, might fhut
up the Streights beween Eubcea and the Continenti He there-
fore.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-12-27 05:00 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/uc2.
