following are
mentioned
:- Διφίλα δημηγορικές
41.
41.
William Smith - 1844 - Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities - a
A.
Deinarchus, p.
106, &c.
; Westermann, Quaest.
Wolf, Proleg. ad Leptin. p. 124; Schaefer, Amurat. | Demosth. iii. p. 96, &c.
Crit. i. p. 686.
26 and 27. The two orations against Aphobus
13. Περί Συμμοριών, was delivered in Β. C. 354. were delivered in B. c. 364.
See Amersfoordt, Introduct. in Orut. de Symmor. 28. Προς 'Αφοβον ψευδομαρτυριών, is suspected
Lugdun. Bat. 1821, reprinted in Schaefer's Appar. of being spurious by Westermann, Quaest. Dem.
Crit. vol. i. ; Parreidt, Disputat. de Instit. eo i. p. ll, &c. Comp. Schömann, de Jure Publ.
Athen. cujus ordinat. et correct. in orat. Itepi Evuu. Graec. p. 274.
inscripta suadet Deinosth. , Magdeburg, 1836.
29 and 30. The two orations against Onetor.
14. Υπέρ Μεγαλοπολιτών, Β. C. 353.
See Schmeisser, de kc Tutelari ap. Athen. , &c. ,
15. Περί της Ροδίων ελευθερίας, Β. C. 351. Freiburg, 1829. The genuineness of these ora-
16. IIepl TWV 7pòs 'Anéfavopov ouvonkův, refers tions is suspected by Böckh, Pull. Econ. of Athens,
to B. c. 325, and was recognized as spurious by the Index, s. v. Demosthenes.
ancients themselves. (Dionys. de Admir. vi dic. 31. Παραγραφή προς Ζηνόθεμιν, falls after the
Dom. 57; Liban. Argum. p. 211. )
year B. c. 355.
32. Προς 'Aπατούριον παραγραφή, 1s of uncertain
II. JUDICIAL OR PRIVATE OKATIONS.
date.
17. Depi Etepávou, or on the Crown, was de- 33. Προς Φορμίωνα περί δανείου, was spoken in
livered in B. c. 330. There are numerous separate
B. c. 332. See Baumstark, Prologom. in Oriut.
editions of this famous oration ; the best are by I. / Demosth. adr. Phorm. , lleidelberg, 1826.
## p. 990 (#1010) ###########################################
990)
DEMOSTHENES.
DEMOSTHENES.
mentim.
34. Προς την Λακρίτου παραγραφήν, is of un- ποίητος, διεγγύησεν, “Ιππαρχος, and Κωλιάς ;
certain date, and its genuineness is doubted by Schaefer, appar. Crit. v. p. 527. )
some of the ancients.
See the Greck Argu-
III. Suow SPEECHES.
35. “Υπέρ Φορμίωνος παραγραφή, belongs to B. C. 59. 'Ehitá10s, refers to 1. c. 338, but is uir
350.
questionably spurious. (Dionys. de Admir. ri dic.
36. Upo's Mavtalvetov Topaypaori, falls after Dem. 23, 44 ; Liban. p. 6; llarpocrat. s. rr. Aizei-
B. C. 317.
oat and Kerporis ; Phot. Bill. p. 491; Suid. s. r.
37. Πρός Ναυσίμαχον και Ξενοπείθη παραγραφή, Δημοσθένης ; Bekker, Auccl. p. 354; Wester-
js of uncertain date.
mann, Quaest. Den. ii. p. 49, &c. ) Its genuine-
33. Προς Βοιωτών περί του ονόματος, belongs to ness is defended by Becker (Demosth. als Slauism.
B. c. 351 or 350, and was ascribed by some of the u. licu. ii. p. 466, &c. ) and Kriiger (in Seebode's
ancients to Deinarchus. (Dionys. Hal. Deinarch. Archir', i. 2, p. 277).
13. ) See Böckl, Urkund. über, das All. Secu'cscu, 60. 'Epwtirós, is, like the former, a spurious
p. 22, dic.
production. (Dionys, de Admir, ri dic. Dom. 14;
39. Προς Βοιωτών υπέρ προικός μητρώας, Β. C. Liban. p. 6; Pollux, iii. 144; Phot. Bill. I. c. ;
347.
Westermann, Quacst. Dem. ii. p. 70, &c. )
40. Πρός Σπουδίαν υπέρ προικός, of uncertain Among the lost orations of Demosthenes the
date.
following are mentioned :- Διφίλα δημηγορικές
41. Προς φαίνιππον περί αντιδόσεως, of uncer- citourti Supeds. (Dionys. Deinurch. 11. ) 2. Kata
tain date. The genuineness of this oration is MédOvtos. (Pollux, viii. 53; Harpocr. S. τ. Δεκα-
doubted by the author of the argum. to it, Böckh, Tebe. v. ) 3. lipòs Tu veuktov Trapaypaon. (Bek-
Index to Publ. Econ. of Athens, and Schaefer, ker, Anecd. p. 90. ) 4. Slepi xpvolov (Athen. xiii.
Appar. Crit. r. p. 63.
p. 592) is perhaps the same as the droogía Tv
12. Προς Μακάρτατον περ! Αγνίου κλήρου, of | δώρων. (Dionys. Εp. ad 4 mm. i. 12, wlio, how-
uncertain date. See de Boor, Prolegom. zu der erer, in Demosth. 57, declares it a spurious ora-
Rele des Demostl. Clem. Nulariatus, Hamburg, 1 tion. ) 5. Dep Toũ Anh • Đỗoiva: “Apiakov, was
1838.
spurious according to Dionysius. (Demosth. 57. )
43. Προς Λευχάρη περί του κλήρου, of uncertain | 6. Κατα Δημάδου. (Bekker, Anecd. p. 335. ) A
date.
fragment of it is probably extant in Alexand. de
44 and 45. The two orations against Stephanus, Fiqur. p. 478, cd. Walz. 7. Npos Kpitiav tepi
belong to the time previous to B. c. 313. The Toù {ventORMUlatos. (Harpocrat. s. v. 'Evenio-
genuineness of the first is doubted by I. Bekker. Knuua, where Dionysius doubts its genuineness. )
See C. I). Beel, Diutribe in Demosth. Orat. in 8. 'Taèp Ortopwv, probably not a work of Demos-
Stephan. , Lugdun. Bat. 1825.
thenes. (Suid. s. v. Aua. ) 9. 'Trèp Latúpou tíls
46. Περί Ευέργου και Μνησιβούλου ψευδομαρ- Η επιτροπής προς Χαρίδημος, belonged according to
Tupwv, belongs to the time after B. c. 355. Its Callimachus (ap. Phot. Bill. p. 491) to Deinarchus.
genuineness is doubted by Harpocr. s. rr. 'Ekario- Besides the ancient and modern historians of
Tpouv and inuévnv, H. Wolf, Bockh (1. c. ), and the time of Philip and Alexander, the following
I. Bekker. See Schaefer, Appar. Crit. v. p. 216. works will be found useful to the student of De-
47. Kard 'OA VUT lodu pou Badons, after B. c. mosthenes : Schott, litae Parallelae Aristot. et
313.
Demosth. Antwerp, 1603; Becker, Demosthenes
48. Ipós Truóleov útep xpéws, falls between als Staatsmann und Redner, Halle, 1816, 2 vols.
B c. 363 and 354, but is considered spurious by ivo. ; Westermann, Quaestiones Demosthenicae, in
Harpocrat. s. r. Kakotexvrâv, Böckh, and Bekker four parts, Leipzig, 1830-1837, Geschichte der
(see Schaefer, Appar. Crit. v. p. 264). It is de Griech. Beredtsamkeit, &$ 56, 57, and Beilaçe, vii.
fended by Rumpf, de Orat. adlr. Timoth. , Giessen, p. 297. &c. ; Böhneke, Studien auf dem Gebiete der
1821.
Attischen Redner, Berlin, 1843. [LS]
49. Προς Πολυκλέα περί του επιτριηραρχήματος, DEMO'STHENES (Anuool'évos). 1. The fa-
after B. c. 36).
ther of the orator. See above.
50. Περί του Στεφάνου της τριηραρχίας, after 2. A Bithynian, wrote a history of his native
B. C. 36), is suspected by Becker, Demosth. als country, of which the tenth book is quoted by
Staatsmann und. Redner, p. 465.
Stephanus of Byzantium. (s. rr. Koooós, Marowaoi;
51. Προς Κάλλιππον, spoken in B. c. 364. comp. 5. τι. Τάρας, Ταρσίς, Τευμησσός, 'Αλεξαν-
52. Προς Νικόστρατον περί των 'Αρεθουσίου | δρεία, 'Αρτάκη; Εtym. Mag. 5. τ. Ηραία. ) He
dvopatóduv, of uncertain date, was suspected by further wrote an account of the foundations of
Harpocrat. 5. τ. 'Απογραφή.
towns (Ktíoers), which is likewise several times
53. Κατα Κόνωνος αικίας, Β. C. 343.
quoted by Stephanus. Euphorion wrote a poem
54. Προς Καλλακλέα περί χωρίου, of uncertain | against this historian under the title of Δημοσθένης,
date.
of which a fragment is still extant. (Bekker, Ance-
55. Κατα Διονυσοδώρου βλάβης, Β. C. 329. dot. p. 1383 ; comp. Meineke, de Euphorionc, p. 31. )
56. "Έφεσις προς Ευβουλίδην, after B. C. 346. 3. A Thracian, a Greek grammarian, who wrote
57. Kata Deokpívov ¢võe? is, belongs to B. c. according to Suidas (s.
Wolf, Proleg. ad Leptin. p. 124; Schaefer, Amurat. | Demosth. iii. p. 96, &c.
Crit. i. p. 686.
26 and 27. The two orations against Aphobus
13. Περί Συμμοριών, was delivered in Β. C. 354. were delivered in B. c. 364.
See Amersfoordt, Introduct. in Orut. de Symmor. 28. Προς 'Αφοβον ψευδομαρτυριών, is suspected
Lugdun. Bat. 1821, reprinted in Schaefer's Appar. of being spurious by Westermann, Quaest. Dem.
Crit. vol. i. ; Parreidt, Disputat. de Instit. eo i. p. ll, &c. Comp. Schömann, de Jure Publ.
Athen. cujus ordinat. et correct. in orat. Itepi Evuu. Graec. p. 274.
inscripta suadet Deinosth. , Magdeburg, 1836.
29 and 30. The two orations against Onetor.
14. Υπέρ Μεγαλοπολιτών, Β. C. 353.
See Schmeisser, de kc Tutelari ap. Athen. , &c. ,
15. Περί της Ροδίων ελευθερίας, Β. C. 351. Freiburg, 1829. The genuineness of these ora-
16. IIepl TWV 7pòs 'Anéfavopov ouvonkův, refers tions is suspected by Böckh, Pull. Econ. of Athens,
to B. c. 325, and was recognized as spurious by the Index, s. v. Demosthenes.
ancients themselves. (Dionys. de Admir. vi dic. 31. Παραγραφή προς Ζηνόθεμιν, falls after the
Dom. 57; Liban. Argum. p. 211. )
year B. c. 355.
32. Προς 'Aπατούριον παραγραφή, 1s of uncertain
II. JUDICIAL OR PRIVATE OKATIONS.
date.
17. Depi Etepávou, or on the Crown, was de- 33. Προς Φορμίωνα περί δανείου, was spoken in
livered in B. c. 330. There are numerous separate
B. c. 332. See Baumstark, Prologom. in Oriut.
editions of this famous oration ; the best are by I. / Demosth. adr. Phorm. , lleidelberg, 1826.
## p. 990 (#1010) ###########################################
990)
DEMOSTHENES.
DEMOSTHENES.
mentim.
34. Προς την Λακρίτου παραγραφήν, is of un- ποίητος, διεγγύησεν, “Ιππαρχος, and Κωλιάς ;
certain date, and its genuineness is doubted by Schaefer, appar. Crit. v. p. 527. )
some of the ancients.
See the Greck Argu-
III. Suow SPEECHES.
35. “Υπέρ Φορμίωνος παραγραφή, belongs to B. C. 59. 'Ehitá10s, refers to 1. c. 338, but is uir
350.
questionably spurious. (Dionys. de Admir. ri dic.
36. Upo's Mavtalvetov Topaypaori, falls after Dem. 23, 44 ; Liban. p. 6; llarpocrat. s. rr. Aizei-
B. C. 317.
oat and Kerporis ; Phot. Bill. p. 491; Suid. s. r.
37. Πρός Ναυσίμαχον και Ξενοπείθη παραγραφή, Δημοσθένης ; Bekker, Auccl. p. 354; Wester-
js of uncertain date.
mann, Quaest. Den. ii. p. 49, &c. ) Its genuine-
33. Προς Βοιωτών περί του ονόματος, belongs to ness is defended by Becker (Demosth. als Slauism.
B. c. 351 or 350, and was ascribed by some of the u. licu. ii. p. 466, &c. ) and Kriiger (in Seebode's
ancients to Deinarchus. (Dionys. Hal. Deinarch. Archir', i. 2, p. 277).
13. ) See Böckl, Urkund. über, das All. Secu'cscu, 60. 'Epwtirós, is, like the former, a spurious
p. 22, dic.
production. (Dionys, de Admir, ri dic. Dom. 14;
39. Προς Βοιωτών υπέρ προικός μητρώας, Β. C. Liban. p. 6; Pollux, iii. 144; Phot. Bill. I. c. ;
347.
Westermann, Quacst. Dem. ii. p. 70, &c. )
40. Πρός Σπουδίαν υπέρ προικός, of uncertain Among the lost orations of Demosthenes the
date.
following are mentioned :- Διφίλα δημηγορικές
41. Προς φαίνιππον περί αντιδόσεως, of uncer- citourti Supeds. (Dionys. Deinurch. 11. ) 2. Kata
tain date. The genuineness of this oration is MédOvtos. (Pollux, viii. 53; Harpocr. S. τ. Δεκα-
doubted by the author of the argum. to it, Böckh, Tebe. v. ) 3. lipòs Tu veuktov Trapaypaon. (Bek-
Index to Publ. Econ. of Athens, and Schaefer, ker, Anecd. p. 90. ) 4. Slepi xpvolov (Athen. xiii.
Appar. Crit. r. p. 63.
p. 592) is perhaps the same as the droogía Tv
12. Προς Μακάρτατον περ! Αγνίου κλήρου, of | δώρων. (Dionys. Εp. ad 4 mm. i. 12, wlio, how-
uncertain date. See de Boor, Prolegom. zu der erer, in Demosth. 57, declares it a spurious ora-
Rele des Demostl. Clem. Nulariatus, Hamburg, 1 tion. ) 5. Dep Toũ Anh • Đỗoiva: “Apiakov, was
1838.
spurious according to Dionysius. (Demosth. 57. )
43. Προς Λευχάρη περί του κλήρου, of uncertain | 6. Κατα Δημάδου. (Bekker, Anecd. p. 335. ) A
date.
fragment of it is probably extant in Alexand. de
44 and 45. The two orations against Stephanus, Fiqur. p. 478, cd. Walz. 7. Npos Kpitiav tepi
belong to the time previous to B. c. 313. The Toù {ventORMUlatos. (Harpocrat. s. v. 'Evenio-
genuineness of the first is doubted by I. Bekker. Knuua, where Dionysius doubts its genuineness. )
See C. I). Beel, Diutribe in Demosth. Orat. in 8. 'Taèp Ortopwv, probably not a work of Demos-
Stephan. , Lugdun. Bat. 1825.
thenes. (Suid. s. v. Aua. ) 9. 'Trèp Latúpou tíls
46. Περί Ευέργου και Μνησιβούλου ψευδομαρ- Η επιτροπής προς Χαρίδημος, belonged according to
Tupwv, belongs to the time after B. c. 355. Its Callimachus (ap. Phot. Bill. p. 491) to Deinarchus.
genuineness is doubted by Harpocr. s. rr. 'Ekario- Besides the ancient and modern historians of
Tpouv and inuévnv, H. Wolf, Bockh (1. c. ), and the time of Philip and Alexander, the following
I. Bekker. See Schaefer, Appar. Crit. v. p. 216. works will be found useful to the student of De-
47. Kard 'OA VUT lodu pou Badons, after B. c. mosthenes : Schott, litae Parallelae Aristot. et
313.
Demosth. Antwerp, 1603; Becker, Demosthenes
48. Ipós Truóleov útep xpéws, falls between als Staatsmann und Redner, Halle, 1816, 2 vols.
B c. 363 and 354, but is considered spurious by ivo. ; Westermann, Quaestiones Demosthenicae, in
Harpocrat. s. r. Kakotexvrâv, Böckh, and Bekker four parts, Leipzig, 1830-1837, Geschichte der
(see Schaefer, Appar. Crit. v. p. 264). It is de Griech. Beredtsamkeit, &$ 56, 57, and Beilaçe, vii.
fended by Rumpf, de Orat. adlr. Timoth. , Giessen, p. 297. &c. ; Böhneke, Studien auf dem Gebiete der
1821.
Attischen Redner, Berlin, 1843. [LS]
49. Προς Πολυκλέα περί του επιτριηραρχήματος, DEMO'STHENES (Anuool'évos). 1. The fa-
after B. c. 36).
ther of the orator. See above.
50. Περί του Στεφάνου της τριηραρχίας, after 2. A Bithynian, wrote a history of his native
B. C. 36), is suspected by Becker, Demosth. als country, of which the tenth book is quoted by
Staatsmann und. Redner, p. 465.
Stephanus of Byzantium. (s. rr. Koooós, Marowaoi;
51. Προς Κάλλιππον, spoken in B. c. 364. comp. 5. τι. Τάρας, Ταρσίς, Τευμησσός, 'Αλεξαν-
52. Προς Νικόστρατον περί των 'Αρεθουσίου | δρεία, 'Αρτάκη; Εtym. Mag. 5. τ. Ηραία. ) He
dvopatóduv, of uncertain date, was suspected by further wrote an account of the foundations of
Harpocrat. 5. τ. 'Απογραφή.
towns (Ktíoers), which is likewise several times
53. Κατα Κόνωνος αικίας, Β. C. 343.
quoted by Stephanus. Euphorion wrote a poem
54. Προς Καλλακλέα περί χωρίου, of uncertain | against this historian under the title of Δημοσθένης,
date.
of which a fragment is still extant. (Bekker, Ance-
55. Κατα Διονυσοδώρου βλάβης, Β. C. 329. dot. p. 1383 ; comp. Meineke, de Euphorionc, p. 31. )
56. "Έφεσις προς Ευβουλίδην, after B. C. 346. 3. A Thracian, a Greek grammarian, who wrote
57. Kata Deokpívov ¢võe? is, belongs to B. c. according to Suidas (s.
