No More Learning

A Copy of an Address from Mr. Gordon to the
Begum.
Begum Saib, of exalted dignity and generosity,
whom God preserve!
After presenting the usual professions of servitude,
&c. , in the customary manner, my address is presented.
Your gracious letter, in answer to the petition of
your servant from Goondah, exalted me. From the
contents I became unspeakably impressed with the
honor it conferred. May the Almighty protect that
royal purity, and bestow happiness, increase of wealth,.
and prosperity!
VOL. VIII. 30
? ? ? ? 466 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
The welfare of your servant is entirely owing to
your favor and benlevolence. A few days have elapsed
since I arrived at Goondah with the Colonel Saib.
This is presented for your Highness's information.
I cherish hopes from your generosity, that, considering me in the light of one of your servants, you will always continue to exalt and honor me with your gracious letters.
May the sun of prosperity continually shine!
Copy of a Letter to Mahomed Jewar Ali Khdn and
Behar Ali Khdn, from MJr. Gordon.
Sirs, my indulgent friends,
Remain under, &c. , &c.
After compliments. I have the pleasure to acquaint you that yesterday having taken leave of you,
I passed the night at Noorgunge, and next morning,
about ten or eleven o'clock, through your favor and
benevolence, arrived safe at Goondah. Mir Aboo
Buksh, zemindar, and Mir Rustum Ali, accompa-:iied me.
To what extent can I prolong the praises of you,
my beneficent friends? May the Supreme Being, for
this benign, compassionate, humane action, have you
in His keeping, and increase your prosperity, and
speedily grant me the pleasure of an interview!
Until which time continue to favor me with friendly
letters, and oblige me by any commands in my power
to execute.
May your wishes be ever crowned with success!
My compliments, &c. , &c. , &c.
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 467
Copy of a Letter from Colonel Iannay to Jewar Ali
Khan and Behar Ali Khan.
KhEhn Saib, my indulgent friends,
Remain under the protection of the Supreme Being!
After compliments, and signifying my earnest desire of an interview, I address you.
Your friendly letter, fraught with kindness, I had
the pleasure to receive in a propitious hour, and your
inexpressible kindness in sending for Mir Nassar Ali
with a force to Taunda, for the purpose of conducting
Mr. Gordon, with all his baggage, who is now arrived
at Fyzabad.
This event has afforded me the most excessive pleasure and satisfaction. May the Omnipotence preserve
you, my steadfast, firm friends! The pen of friendship
itself cannot sufficiently express your generosity and
benevolence, and that of the Begum of high dignity,
who so graciously has interested herself in this matter. Inclosed is an address for her, which please to
forward. I hope from your friendship, until we meet,
you will continue to honor me with an account of
your health and welfare. What further can I write?
V. - REVOLUTIONS IN FURRUCKABAD.
I. THAT a prince called Ahmed Kha1n was of a family amongst the most distinguished in Hilndostan, and
of a nation famous through that empire for its valor
in acquiring, and its policy and prudence in well governing the territories it had acquired, called the Patans, or Afghans, of which the Rohillas were a branch. The said Ahmed Khaln had fixed his residence ill the
? ? ? ? 468 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
city of Furruckabad, and in the first wars of this nation in India the said Ahmed Khan attached himself
to the Company against Sujah Dowlah, then an enemy,
now a dependant on that Company. Ahmed Khan,
towards the close of his life, was dispossessed of a large
part of his dominions by the prevalence of the Mahratta power; but his son, a minor, succeeded to his
pretensions, and to the remainder of his dominions.
The Mahrattas were expelled by Sujah ul Dowlah, the
late Vizier, who, finding a want of the services of the
son and successor of Ahmed Khan, called Muzuffer
Jung, did not only guaranty him in the possession of
what he then actually held, but engaged to restore
all the other territories which had been occupied by
the Mahrattas; and this was confirmed by repeated
treaties and solemn oaths, by the late Vizier and by
the present. But neither the late nor the present
Vizier fulfilled their engagements, or observed their
oaths: the former having withheld what he had stipulated to restore; and the latter not only subjecting
him to a tribute, instead of restoring him to what his
father had unjustly withheld, but having made a further invasion by depriving him of fifteen of his districts, levying the tribute of the whole on the little that remained, and putting the small remains of his
territory under a sequestrator or collector appointed
by Almas Ali Khan, who did grievously afflict and
oppress the prince and territory aforesaid.
That the hardships of his case being frequently represented to Warren Hastings, Esquire, he did suggest
a doubt whether " that little ought to be still subject
to tribute," indicating that the said tribute might be
hard and inequitable, - but, whatever its justice might
have been, that, " from the earliest period of our con
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 469
nection with the present Nabob of Oude, it had invariably continued a part of the funds assigned by his
Excellency as a provision for the liquidation of the
several public demands of this government [Calcutta]
upon him; and in consequence of the powers the board
deemed it expedient to vest in the Resident at his
court for the collection of the Company's assignments,
a sezauwil [a sequestrator] has always been stationed
to enforce by every means in his power the payment
of the tribute. " And the said tribute was, in consequence of this arrangement, not paid to the Nabob,
but to the British Resident at Oude; and the same
being therefore under the direction and for the sole
use of the Company, and indeed the prince himself
wholly dependent, the representatives of the said Company were responsible for the protection of the prince,
and for the good government of the country.
II. That the said Warren Hastings did, on the 22d
of May, 1780, represent to the board of Calcutta the
condition of the said country in the following manner.
" To the total want of all order, regularity, or authority in his government [the Furruckabad government], among other obvious causes, it may, no doubt, be owing, that the country of Furruckabad is become
an almost entire waste, without cultivation or inhabitants; that the capital, which but a very short time
ago was distinguished as one of the most populous
and opulent commercial cities in Hindostan, at present
exhibits nothing but scenes of the most wretched poverty, desolation, and misery; and the Nabob himself,
though in possession of a tract of country which with
only common care is notoriously capable of yielding
? ? ? ? 470 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
an annual revenue of between thirty and forty lacs
[three or four hundred thousand pounds], with no
military establishment to maintain, scarcely commanding the means of bare subsistence. " And the said Warren Hastings, taking into consideration the said state of the country and its prince, and that the latter had
4"preferredfrequent complaints" (which complaints the
said Hastings to that time did not lay before the board,
as his duty required) " of the hardships and indignities
to which he is subjected by the conduct of the sezauwil [sequestrator] stationed in the country for the
purpose of levying the annual tribute which he is
bound by treaty to pay to the Subah of Oude," he, the
said Warren Hastings, did declare himself " extremely desirous, as well from motives of common justice as
due regard to the rank which that chief holds among the
princes of Hindostan, of affording him relief. " And
he, the said Warren Hastings, as the means of the said
relief, did, with the consent of the board, order the
said native sequestrator to be removed, and an English Resident, a servant of the Company, to be appointed in his room, declaring i' he understood a local interference to be indispensably necessary for realizing
the Vizier's just demands. "
III. That the said native sequestrator being withdrawn, and a Resident appointed, no complaint whatever concerning the collection of the revenue, or of
any indignities offered to the prince of the country
or oppression of his subjects by the said Resident, was
made to the Superior Council at Calcutta; yet the
said Warren Hastings did, nevertheless, in a certain
paper, purporting to be a treaty made at Chunar with
the Nabob of Oude, on the 19th September, 1781. , at
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 471
the request of the said Nabob, consent to an article
therein, " That no English Resident be appointed to
Furruckabad, and that the present be recalled. " And
the said Warren Hastings, knowing that the Nabob
of Oude was ill-affected towards the said Nabob of
Furruckabad, and that he was already supposed to
have oppressed him, did justify his conduct on the
principles and in the words following: " That, if the
Nabob Muzuffer Jung must endure oppression, (and
I dare not at this time propose his total relief,) it concerns the reputation of our government to remove our participation in it. " And the said Warren Hastings making, recording, and acting upon the first of
the said false and inhuman suppositions, most scandalous to this nation, namely, that princes paying money wholly for the use of the Company, and directly to its agent, for the maintenance of British troops, by whose force and power the said revenue was in
effect collected, must of necessity endure oppression,
and that our government at any time dare not propose
their total relief, was an high offence and misdemeanor
in the said Warren Hastings, and the rather, because
in the said treaty, as well as before and after, the said
Hastings, who pretended not to dare to relieve those
oppressed by the Nabob of Oude, did assume a complete authority over the said Nabob himself, and did dare to oppress him.
IV. That the second principle assumed by the said
Warren Hastings, as ground for voluntarily abandoning the protection of those whom he had before undertaken to relieve, on the sole strength of his own
authority, and in full confidence of the lawful foundation thereof, and for delivering over the persons so
? ? ? ? 472 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
taken into protection, under false names and pretended descriptions, to known oppression, asserting
that the reputation of the Company was saved by removing this apparent participation, when the new as
well as the old arrangements were truly and substantially acts of the British government, was disingenuous, deceitful, and used to cover unjustifiable designs: since the said Warren Hastings well knew
that all oppressions exercised by the Nabob of Oude
were solely, and in this instance particularly, upheld
by British force, and were imputed to this nation;
and because he himself, in not more than three days
after the execution of this treaty, and in virtue thereof, did direct the British Resident at Oude, in orders
to which he required his most implicit obedience, " that
the ministers [the Nabob of Oude's ministers] are to
choose all aumils and collectors of revenue with your
concurrence. " And the dishonor to the Company,
in thus deceitfully concurring in oppression, which
they were able and were bound to prevent, is much
aggravated by the said Warren Hastings's receiving
from the person to whose oppression he had delivered
the said prince, as a private gift or donation to himself and for his own use, a sum of money amounting
to one hundred thousand pounds and upwards, which
might give just ground of suspicion that the said gift
from the oppressor to the person surrendering the
person injured to his mercy might have had some
share in the said criminal transaction.
V. That the said Warren Hastings did (in the paper justifying the said surrender of the prince put
by himself under the protection of the East India
Company) assert, " that it was a fact, that the Na
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 473
bob Muzuffer Jung [the Nabob of Furruckabad] is
equally urgent with the Nabob Vizier for the removal
of a Resident," without producing, as he ought to
have done, any document to prove his improbable assertion, namely, his assertion that the oppressed prince
did apply to his known enemy and oppressor, the Nabob of Oude, (who, if he would, was not able to relieve him against the will of the English government,)
rather than to that English government, which he
must have conceived to be more impartial, to which
he had made his former complaint, and which was
alone able to relieve him.
VI. That the said Warren Hastings, in the said
writing, did further convey an insinuation of an ambiguous, but, on any construction, of a suspicious and
dangerous import, viz. : " It is a fact, that Mr. Shee's
[the Resident's] authority over the territory of Fur
ruckabad is in itself as much subversive of that [of
the lawful rulers] as that of the Vizier's aumil [collector] ever was, and is the more oppressive as the
power from whence it is derived is greater. " The
said assertion proceeds upon a supposition of the illegality both of the Nabob's and the Company's government; all consideration of the title to authority
being, therefore, on that supposition, put out of the
question, and the whole turning only upon the exercise of authority, the said Hastings's suggestion, that
the oppression of government must be in proportion to
its power, is the result of a false and dangerous principle, and such as it is criminal for any person intrusted with the lives and fortunes of men to entertain, much more, publicly to profess as a rule of action, as the same hath a direct tendency to make
? ? ? ? 474 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
the new and powerful government of this kingdom in
India dreadful to the natives and odious to the world.
But if the said Warren Hastings did mean thereby
indirectly to insinuate that oppressions had been actually exercised under the British authority, he was bound to inquire into these oppressions, and to animadvert on the person guilty of the same, if proof thereof could be had, - and the more, as the authority was given by himself, and the person exercising it was by himself also named. And the said Warren
Hastings did on another occasion assert that " wheth
er they were well or ill-founded he never had an opportunity to ascertain. " But it is not true that the
said Hastings did or could want such opportunity:
the fact being, that the said Warren Hastings did never cause anlly inquiry to be made into any supposed abuses during the said Residency, but did give a
pension of fifteen hundred pounds a year to the said
late Resident as a compensation to him for an injury
received, and did afterwards promote the Resident,
as a faithful servant of the Company, (and nothing
appears to show him otherwise,) to a judicial office
of high trust, - thereby taking away all credit from
any grounds asserted or insinuated by the said Hastings for delivering the said Nabob of Furruckabad to the hand of a known enemy and oppressor, who had
already, contrary to repeated treaties, deprived him
of a large part of his territories.
VII. That, onil the said Warren Hastings's representation of the transaction aforesaid to the Court of Directors, they did heavily and justly censure the
said Warren Hastings for the same, and did convey
their censure to him, recommending relief to the suf
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 475
fering prince, but without any order for sending a
new Resident: being, as it may be supposed, prevented from taking that step by the faith of the treaty
made at Chunar.
VIII. That all the oppressions foreseen by him,
the said Warren Hastings, when he made the article
aforesaid in the treaty of Chunar, did actually happen: for, immediately on the removal of the British
Resident, the country of Furruckabad was subjected
to the discretion of a certain native manager of revenue, called Almas Ali Khan, who did impoverish
and oppress the country and insult the prince, and
did deprive him of all subsistence from his own estates,- taking from him even his gardens and the
tombs of his ancestors, and the funds for maintaining
the same.
IX. That, on complaint of those proceedings, the
said Hastings did of his own authority, and without
communicating with his Council, direct the native
collector aforesaid to be removed, and the territory
of Furruckabad to be left to the sole management of
its natural prince. But in a short time the said Hastings, pretending to receive many complaints purporting that the tribute to the Nabob remained wholly unpaid, and the agent to the prince of Furruckabad
at the Presidency, and afterwards chief manager to
the prince aforesaid, having, as the said Warren Hastings saith, " had the insolence to propagate a report
that the interference to which his master owed the
power he then enjoyed was purchased through him,"
he, the said Hastings, did again (but, as before, without the Council) " withdraw his protection and inter
? ? ? ? 476 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
ference altogether," on or about the month of August,
1782, and did signify his resolution, through the Resident, Middleton, to the Nabob Vizier. But the said
Hastings asserts that "the consequence of this his
own second dereliction of the prince of Furruckabad
was an aggravated renewal of the severities exercised
against his government, and the reappointment of a
sezauwil, with powers delegated or assumed, to the
utter extinction of the rights of Muzuffer Jung, and
actually depriving him of the means of subsistence. "
And the said Hastings did receive, on the 16th of
February, 1783, from the prince aforesaid, a bitter
complaint of the same to the following tenor.
"' The miseries which have fallen upon my country,
and the poverty and distress which have been heaped
upon me by the reappointment of the sezauwil, are
such, that a relation of them would, I am convinced,
excite the strongest feelings of compassion in your
breast. But it is impossible to relate them: on one
side, my country ruined and uncultivated to a degree
of desolation which exceeds all description; on the
other, my domestic concerns and connections involved in such a state of distress and horror, that even
the relations, the children, and the wives of my father are
starving in want of daily bread, and are on the point of
flying voluntary exiles from their country and from
each other. "
But although the said Hastings did, on the 16th of
February, receive and admit the justice of the said
complaint, and did not deny the urgent necessity of
redress, the said letter containing the following sentence, "If there should be any delay in your acceptance of this proposal, my existence and the existence of my family will become dificult and doubful," - and
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 477
although he did admit the interference to be the more
urgently demanded, "as the services of the English
troops have been added to enforce the authority of
the sezauwil," -- and although he admits also, that,
even before that time, similar complaints and applications had been made, - yet he did withhold the said letter of complaint, a minute of which he asserts he
had, at or about that time, prepared for the relief of
the sufferer, from the Board of Council, and did not
so much as propose anything relative to the same
for seven months after, viz. , until the 6th of October,
1783: the said letter and minute being, as he asserts,
" withheld, from causes not necessary to mention, from
presentation. " By which means the,aid country and
prince did suffer a long continuance of unnecessary
hardship, from which the said Hastings confessed it
was his duty to relieve them, and that a British Resident was necessary at Furruckabad, " from a sense
of submission to the implied orders of the Court of
Directors in their letter of 1783, lately received,
added to the conviction I have L ONIVG SINCE entertained of the necessity of such an appointment for the preservation of our national credit, and the means
of rescuing an:ancient and respectable family from
ruinl. "
And the said Warren Hastings did at length perform what he thought had long since been necessary;
and in contradiction to his engagements with the
Nabob in the treaty of Chunar, and against his
strong remonstrances, urging his humiliation from
this measure, and the faith of the agreement, and
against his own former declaration that it concerned
the reputation of our government to remove our participation in the oppressions which he, the said Hast
? ? ? ? 478 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
ings, supposed the prince of Furruckabad must undergo, did once more recommend to the Council a
British Resident at Furruckabad, and the withdrawing the native sezauwil: no course being left to the
said Hastings to take which was not a violation of
some engagement, and a contradiction to some principle of justice and policy by him deliberately advanced and entered on record. That Mr. Willes being appointed Resident, and
having arrived at Furruckabad on the 25th of February, 1784, with instructions to inquire minutely into
the state of the country and the ruling family, he, the
said Resident, Willes, in obedience thereto, did fillly
explain to him, the Governor-General, the said Warren Hastings, (he being then out of the Company's
provinces, at Lucknow, on a delegation which respected this very country, as part of the dependencies of
Oude,) the situation of the province of Furruckabad;
but the said Warren Hastings did not take or recommend any measure whatsoever for the relief thereof
in consequence of the said representation, nor even
communicate to the Council-General the said representation; and it was not until the 28th of June, 1783
[1785? ], that is, sixteen months from the arrival of
the Resident at his station, that anything was laid before the board relative to the regulation or relief of
the distressed country aforesaid, and that not from
the said Warren Hastings, but from other members
of the Council: which purposed neglect of duty,
joined to the preceding wilful delay of seven months
in proposing the said relief originally, caused near
two years' delay. And the said Warren Hastings is
further culpable in not communicating to the Council
Board the order which he had, of his own authority,
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 479
and without any powers from them, given to the said
Resident, Willes, and did thereby prevent them from
taking such steps as might counteract the ill effects of
the said order; which order purported, that the said
Willes was not to interfere with the Nabob of Furruckabad's government, for the regulation of which
he was ill effect appointed to the Residency, - declaring as follows: "I rely much on your moderation
and good judgment, which I' hope will enable you to
regulate your conduct towards the Nabob and his servants in such a manner, that, without interfering in
the executive part of his government, you may render
him essential service by your council and advice. "
And this restriction the said Hastings did impose,
which totally frustrated the purpose of the Resident's
mission, though he well knew, and had frequently
stated, the extreme imbecility and weakness of the
said Nabob of Furruckabad, and his subjection to unworthy servants; and in the Minute of Consultation
upon whlich he founded the appointment did state
the Nabob of Furruckabad " as a weak and unexperienced young man, who had abandoned himself entirely. to the discretion of his servants, and the restoration of his independence was followed by a total breach of the engagements he had promised to fulfil, attended by pointed instances of contumacy and disrespect";
and' inl the said minute the'said Hastings adds, (as
before mentioned,) his principal servant and manager had propagated a report that the " interference"
(niamely, his, the said Hastings's, interference) " to
which his master owed the power he then enjoyed
was purchased by him," the principal servant aforesaid: yet lie, the said Hastings, who had assigned on
record the character of the said Nabob, and the con
? ? ? ? 480 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
duct of his servants, and the aforesaid report of his
principal servant, so highly dishonorable to him, the
said Hastings, as reasons for taking away the independency of the Nabob of Furruckabad, and the subjecting him to the oppression of the Nabob of Oude's
officer, Almas Ali, did again himself establish the pretended independence of the said prince of Furruckabad, and the real independence of his corrupt and perfidious servants, not against the Nabob of Oude, but,against a British Resident appointed by himself (" as a character eminently qualified for such a charge ")
for the correction of those evils, and for rendering the
prince aforesaid an useful ally to the Company, and
restoring his dominions to order and plenty.
That the said Hastings did not only disable the
Resident at Furruckabad by his said prohibitory letter, but did render his very remaining at all in that
station perfectly precarious by a subsequent letter,
rendering him liable to dismission by the Vizier, --
thereby changing the tenure of the Resident's office,
and changing him from a minister of the Company,
dependent on the Governor-General and Council, to
a dependant upon an unresponsible power, -in this
also acting without the Council, and by his own
usurped authority: and accordingly the said Resident
did declare, in his letter of the 24th of April, 1785,'" that the situation of the country was more distressful than when he [the prince of Furruckabad] addressed himself for relief in 1783, and that he was
sorry to say that his appointment at Furruckabad
was of no use "; that, though the old tribute could
not be paid, owing to famine and other causes, it was
increased by a new imposition, making the whole
equal the entire gross produce of the revenue; that
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 481
therefore there will not be " anything for the subsist.
ence of the Nabob and family. " And the uncles of the
said Nabob of Furruckabad, the brethren of the late
Ahmed Khan, (who had rendered important services
to the Company,) and their children, in a petition to
the Resident, represented that soon after the succession of Muzuffer Jung " their misery commenced.
The jaghires [lands and estates] on which they subsisted were disallowed. Our distress is great: we
have neither clothes nor food. Though we felt hurt
at the idea of explaining our situation, yet, could we
have found a mode of conveyance, we would have
proceeded to Calcutta for redress. The scarcity of
grain this season is an additional misfortune. With
difficulty we support life. From your presence without the provinces we expect relief. It is not the custom of the Company to deprive the zemindars and jaghiredars of the means of subsistence. To your
justice we look up. "
This being the situation of the person and family
of the Nabob of Furruckabad and his nearest relations, the state of the country and its capital, prevented from all relief by the said Warren Hastings,
is described in the following words by the Resident,
Willes.
"Almas Ali has taken the purgunnah of Marara at
a very inadequate rent, and his aumils have seized
many adjacent villages: the purgunnahs of Cocutmow
and Souje are constantly plundered by his people.
The collection of the ghauts near Futtyghur has been
seized by the Vizier's cutwal, and the zemindars in
four purgunnahs are so refractory as to have fortified
themselves in their gurries, and to refuse all payments
of revenue. This is the state of the purgunnahs.
VOL. VIII. 31
? ? ? ? 482 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
And Furruckabad, which was once the seat of great
opulence and trade, is now daily deserted by its inhabitants, its walls mouldering away, without police, without protection, exposed to the depredations of a banditti of two or three hundred robbers, who, night after night,
enter it for plunder, murdering all who oppose them.
The ruin that has overtaken this country is not to be
wondered at, when it is considered that there has been
no state, no stable government, for many years. There
has been the Nabob Vizier's authority, his ministers',
the Residents' at Lucknow, the sezauwils', the camp
authority, the Nabob Muzuffer Jung's, and that of
twenty duans or advisers: no authority sufficiently
predominant to establish any regulations for the benefit of the country, whilst each authority has been exerted, as opportunity offered, for temporary purposes.
" Such being the present deplorable state of Furruckabad and its districts, in the ensuing year it will
be in vain to look for revenue, if some regulations
equal to the exigency be not adopted. The whole
country will be divided between the neighboring powerful aumils, the refractory zemindars, and banditti
of robbers; and the Patans, who might be made useful subjects, will fly from the scene of anarchy. The
crisis appears now come, that either some plan of government should be resolved on, so as to form faithful
subjects on the frontier, or the country be given up
to its fate: and if it be abandoned, there can be little
doubt but that the Mahrattas will gladly seize on a
station so favorable to incursions into the Vizier's
dominions, will attach to their interests the Hindoo
zemindars, and possess themselves of forts, which,
with little expense being made formidable, would
give employment perhaps to the whole of our force,
should it be ever necessary to recover them. "
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 483
That the Council at Calcutta, on the representation
aforesaid made by the Resident at Furruckabad, did
propose and record a plan for the better government
of the said country, but did delay the execution of the
same until the arrangements made by the said Hastings with the Nabob Vizier should be known; but
the said Hastings, as far as in him lay, did entirely
set aside any plan that could be formed for that purpose upon the basis of a British Resident at Furruckabad, by engaging with the said Nabob Vizier that no British influence shall be employed within his dominions, and he has engaged to that prince not to abandon him to any other mode of relation; and he has informed the Court of Directors that the territories
of the Nabob of Oude will be ruined, if Residents are
sent into them, observing, that " Residents never will
be sent for any other purposes than those of vengeance
and corruption.
"
That the said Warren Hastings did declare to the
Court of Directors, that in his opinion the mode of
relief most effectual, and most lenient with regard
to Furruckabad, would be to nominate one of the
family of the prince to superintend his affairs and to
secure the payments; but this plan, which appears to
be most connected with the rights of the ruling family, whilst it provides against the imbecility of the
natural lord, and is free from his objection to a Resident, is the only one which the said Hastings never
has executed, or even proposed to execute.
That the said Hastings, by the agreements aforesaid, has left the Company in such an alternative,
that they can neither relieve the said prince of Furruckabad from oppression without a breach of the
engagements entered into by him, the said Hastings,
? ? ? ? 484 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
with the Nabob Vizier in the name of the Company,
nor suffer him to remain under the said oppression
without violating all faith and all the rules of justice
with regard to him. And the said Hastings hath
directly made or authorized no less than six revolutions in less than five years in the aforesaid harassed province; by which frequent and rapid changes of
government, all of them made in contradiction to all
his own declared motives and reasons for the several
acts successively done and undone in this transaction,
the distresses of the country and the disorders in its
administration have been highly aggravated; and in
the said irregular proceedings, and in the gross and
complicated violations of faith with all parties, the
said Hastings is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.
VI. - DESTRUCTION OF THE RAJAHI OF SAHLONE.
I. THAT the late Nabob of Oude, Sujah ul Dowlah,
did (on what reasons of policy or pretences of justice
is unknown) dispossess a certain native person of distinction, or eminent Rajah, residing in the country of Sahlone, " the lineal descendant of the most powerful Hindoo family in that part of Hindostan," of his patrimonial estate, and conferred the same, or part
of the same, on his, the Nabob's, mother, as a jaghire,
or estate, for the term of her life: and the mother
of the Nabob, in order to quiet the country, and to
satisfy in some measure the principal and other inhabitants, did allow and pay a certain pension to the said Rajah; which pension, on the general confiscation of jaghires, made at the instigation of the said
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 485
Warren Hastings, and by the letting the lands so confiscated to farmers at rack-rents, was discontinued and
refused to be paid; and the discontinuance of the said
pension, " on account of the personal respect borne to
the Rajah, (as connections with him are sought for,
and thought to confer honor,)" did cause an universal discontent and violent commotions in the district of Sahlone, and other parts of the province of
Oude, with great consequent effusion of blood, and
interruption, if not total discontinuance, to the collection of the revenues in those parts, other than as
the same was irregularly, and with great damage to
the country, enforced by British troops.
II. That Mr. Lumsdaine, the officer employed to
reduce those disordered parts of the province to submission, after several advantages gained over the Rajah and his adherents, and expelling him from the country, did represent the utter impossibility of bringing it to a permanent settlement " merely by forcible
methods; as in any of his [the Rajah's] incursions it
would not be necessary to bring even a force with
him, as the zemindars [landed proprietors and freeholders] are much attached to the Rajah, whom they
consider as their hereditary prince, and never fail to
assist him, and that his rebellion against government
is not looked on as a crime": and Mr. Lumsdaine
declared it " as his clear opinion, that the allowing the
said Rajah a pension suitable to his rank and influence in the country would be the most certain mode
of obtaining a permanent peace," -alleging, among
other cogent reasons, " that the expense of the force
necessary to be employed to subdue the country might
be spared, and employed elsewhere, and that the
? ? ? ? 486 ARTICLES OF CHARGE.
people would return to their villages with their cattle
and effects, and of course government have some security for the revenue, whereas at present they have none. " And the representation containing that prudent and temperate counsel, given by a military man of undoubted information and perfect experience in
the local circumstances of the country, was transmitted by the Resident,. Bristow, to the said Warren Hastings, who did wilfully and criminally omit to order any relief to the said Rajah in conformity to the general sense and wishes of the inhabitants, a compliance with whose so reasonable an expectation his duty in restoring the tranquillity of the country and
in retrieving the honor of the English government
did absolutely require; but instead of making such
provision, a price was set upon his head, and several
bodies of British troops being employed to pursue
him, after many skirmishes and much bloodshed and
mutual waste of the country, the said Rajah, honored
and respected by the natives, was hunted down, and
at length killed in a thicket.
END OF VOL. VIII.
? ? ? The works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke.
Burke, Edmund, 1729-1797.
Boston : Little, Brown, and company, 1869.
http://hdl. handle. net/2027/miun. aba1206. 0009. 001
Public Domain
http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd
We have determined this work to be in the public domain, meaning that it is not subject to copyright. Users are free to copy, use, and redistribute the work in part or in whole. It is possible that current copyright holders, heirs or the estate of the authors of individual portions of the work, such as illustrations or photographs, assert copyrights over these portions. Depending on the nature of subsequent use that is made, additional rights may need to be obtained independently of anything we can address.
? ? ? THE
WORKS
OF
THE RIGHT HONORABLEEDMUND BURKE. THIRD EDITION.
VOL. IX.
BOSTON:
LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY.
1 869.
? ? ? ? CONTENTS OF- VOL. IX.
PAGs
ARTICLES OF CHARGE OF HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS
AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS, ESQUIRE, LATE GOVERNORGENERAL OF BENGAL: PRESENTED TO THE HOUSE OF Cozi3fONS IN APRIL AND MAY, 1786. - ARTICLES VII. - XXII. ART. VII. CONTRACTS. 3
VIII. PRESENTS. . . . . . 22
IX. RESIGNATION OF THE OFFICE OF GOVERNORGENERAL. . . 42
X. SURGEON-GENERAL'S CONTRACT. ~
XI. CONTRACTS FOR POOLBUNDY REPAIRS
XII. CONTRACTS FOR OPIUM. . . -63
XIII. APPOINTMENT OF R. J. SULIVAN
XIV. RANNA OF GOHUD. . . . . . 72
XV. REVENUES. . PART I.
PART II. . . 87
XVI. MISDEMEANORS IN OUDE. . . .
XVII. MAHOMED REZA KHAiN. . .
XVIII. THE MOGUL DELIVERED UP TO THE MAHRATTAS. . 202'
XIX. LIBEL ON THE COURT OF DIRECTORS 2. 28
XX. MAHRATTA WAR AND PEAC. . . 238
XXI. CORRESPONDENCE. . . 266
XXII. FYZOOLA KHAN.
PART I. RIGHTS OF FYZOOLA KHiN, ETC. , BEFORE THE TREATY OF LALL-DANG. . 268
79
95 179
60
60
70
? ? ? ? iv CONTENTS.
PAGB
PART II. RIGHTS OF FYZOOLA KHXN UNDER THE
TREATY OF LALL-DANG. 275
PART III. GUARANTY OF THE TREATY OF LALLDANG. . 278 PART' IV. THANKS OF THE BOARD TO FYZOOLA
KHN. . . . . . 286
PART V. DEMAND OF FIVE THOUSAND HORSE 287
PART VI. TREATY OF CHUNAR. . 296
PART VII. CONSEQUENCES OF THE TREATY OF CHUNAR. . 302
PART VIII. PECUNIARY COMMUTATION OF THE STIPULATED AID. 306
PART IX. FULL VINDICATION OF FYZOOLA KHaN
BY MAJOR PALMER AND MR. HASTINGS. . 313
APPENDIX TO THE EIGHTH AND SIXTEENTH CHARGES 319 SPEECHES IN THE IMPEACHMENT OF WARREN HASTINGS, ESQUIRE, LATE GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF BENGAL. SPEECH IN OPENING THE IMPEACHMENT.
FIRST DAY: FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1788. . 329
SECOND DAY: SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 16. 396
? ? ? ? ARTICLES OF CHARGE
OF
HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS AGAINST
WARREN HASTINGS, ESQUIRE,
LATE GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF BENGAL' PRESENTED TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS IN APRIL AND MAY, 1786.
ARTICLES VII. - XXII.
VOL. IX. I
? ? ? ? ARTICLES OF CHARGE
AGAINST
WARREN HASTINGS, ESQ. ,
LATE GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF BENGAL. (CONTINUED. )
VII. - CONTRACTS.
THAT the Court of Directors of the East India
Company had laid down the following fundamental rules for the conduct of such of the Company's business in Bengal as could be performed by contract,
and had repeatedly and strictly ordered the Governor
and Council of Fort William to observe those rules,
viz. : That all contracts should be publicly advertised, and the most reasonable proposals accepted;
that the contracts of provisions, and for furnishing
draught and carriage bullocks for the army, should
be annual; and that they should not fail to advertise
for and receive proposals for those contracts every
year.
That the said Warren Hastings, in direct disobedience to the said positive orders, and, as the Directors themselves say, by a most deliberate breach of his duty,
did, in September, 1777, accept of proposals offered
by Ernest Alexander Johnson for providing draught
and -carriage bullocks, and for victualling the Europeans, without advertising for proposals, as he was expressly commanded to do, and extended the contract for three years, which was positively ordered to
? ? ? ? 4 ARTICLES OF CHARGE
be annual, --and, notwithstanding that extension of
the period, which ought at least to have been compensated by some advantage to the Company in the conditions, did conclude the said contract upon terms
less advantageous than the preceding contract, and therefore not on the lowest terms procurable. That the said
Warren Hastings, in defiance of the judgment and
lawful orders of his superiors, which in this case left
him no option, declared, that he disapproved of publishing for proposals, and that the contract was reduced too
low already: thereby avowing himself the advocate of
the contractor, against whom, as representative of the
Company, and guardian of their interests, he properly was party, and preferring the advantage of the
contractor to those of his own constituents and employers. That the Court of Directors of the East India Company, having carefully considered the circumstances and tendency of this transaction, condemned it in the: strongest terms, declaring, that they would
not permit the contract to be continued, and that, "if
the contractor should think himself aggrieved, and
take measures. in consequence by which the Company became involved in loss or damage, they should
certainly hold the majority of the Council responsible for such loss or damage, and proceed against
them accordingly. " -That the said Warren Hastings, in defiance of orders, which the Directors say
were plain and unequivocal, did, in January, 1777,
receive from George Templer a proposal essentially
different from the advertisement published by the
Governor-General and Council for receiving proposals
for feeding the Company's elephants, and did accept
thereof, not only without having recourse to the proper
means for ascertaining whether the said proposal was
? ? ? ? AGAINST WARREN HASTINGS. 5
the lowest that would be offered, but with another
actually before the board nearly thirty per cent lower
than that made by the said George Templer, to whom
the said Warren Hastings granted a contract, in the
terms proposed by the said Templer, for three years,
and did afterwards extend the same to five years, with
new and distinct conditions, accepted by the said Warren Hastings, without advertising for fresh proposals,
by which the Company were very considerable losers:
on all which the Court of Directors declared, " that
this waste of their property could not be permitted;
that he, the said Warren Hastings, had disregarded
their authority, and disobeyed their orders, in not taking the, lowest offers"; and they ordered that the contract for elephants should be annulled: and the said
Directors further declared, that, "if the contractor
should recover damages of the Company for breach
of engagement, they were. determined, in such case,
to institute a suit at law against those members of the
board who had presumed, in direct breach of their orders, to prefer the interest of an individual to that
of the Company. " -That the said Warren Hastings
did, in the year 1777, conclude with F- - Forde
a contract for an armed vessel for the pilotage of the
Chittagong river, and for the defence of the coast
and river against the incursions of robbers, for the
term of five years, in further disobedience of the
Company's orders respecting the mode and duration
of contracts, and with a considerable increase of expense to the Company.