The course of
Connecticut
was not unlike that of Rhode
Island, in many respects.
Island, in many respects.
Arthur Schlesinger - Colonial Merchants and the American Revolution
"Adams, with
his crew, and the haughty Sultans of the South juggled the whole con-
clave of the Delegates," was the way a Maryland merchant phrased it
in a published letter. 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, p. 1194.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION 439
them to assert themselves despite the obligations of per-
petual secrecy. 1
The special concession granted to South Carolina in the
Association caused much comment, even in radical circles.
The writer just mentioned called upon the New York dele-
gates to state why the South Carolina delegates had suc-
ceeded better than they in securing special indulgences for
their constituents. 2 A Virginia scribbler protested that the
tobacco interests had been sacrificed to the rice planters and
wheat exporters. 8 One distracted fellow burst into verse,
eighty-two stanzas in length, in the following manner:
LIX
Suppose all truth the Congress say,
No doubt they make the worst;
Can we, my Friends, for many a day,
Be so completely curst,
LX
As have no cloaths, no grog, no tea,
To cheer our drooping spirits;
And snug in clover smugglers see,
Who have not half our merits.
LXI
Isn't it now a pretty story,
One smells it in a trice,
If I send wheat, I am a Tory,
But Charles-town may send RICE. 4
Even the Albany Committee of Correspondence, upon a
plea of the necessity for harmony, took occasion to inquire
of the New York delegates upon what principle a discrimi-
nation had been allowed in favor of South Carolina. 5
1 What Think Ye of Congress NowT, pp. 23-24. Vide also Alarm
to Legislature, p. g n.
* What Think Ye of Congress NowT, p. 40.
1N. Y. Gasetteer, Apr. 13, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. ii, p. 163.
4 Poor Man's Advice to his Poor Neighbours (New York, 1774).
*N. Y. Journ. , Feb. 16, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1097-1098.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 440
THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
Notwithstanding the polemics of the opposition, the work
of establishing the administrative machinery for the Asso-
ciation had gotten irresistibly under way. The fact of the
matter was that the moderate elements, lacked an nrpan1M-
tion through whirh to fyr-r"fy t^H^ "ppng1^iop at this crit-
ical juncture. 1 Indeed, the logic of their own position in-
clined them to avoid all extra-legal organization even for
purposes of self-defense. 2 Furthermore, the coup of the
radicals in nationalizing the committee system shook to the
center such control as the moderates had already established
in various localities. The energies of the friends of the As-
sociation were first directed to the appointment of commit-
tees of observation and inspection in the local subdivisions of
the several provinces, and to obtaining formal sanction for
the Association from the provincial assembly or other pro-
vincial meeting, [ft was not specified in the Association that
endorsement by a provincial body was necessary--though
perhaps it was hinted at in Article xiv--but in any case it
was good politicsT) The remainder of this chapter will be
devoted to the progress that was made along these lines.
Massachusetts, being the storm centre of the contest with
Great Britain, was one of the earliest provinces to move.
The leading ports (Boston harbor being closed) led the
way: Marblehead and Newburyport appointed committees
1 Cf. Gage's view; . ; Am. Arch. , vol. i, p. 981.
*" Pray examine the Province law throughout, and all other law
authorities that ever were held in repute by the English nation," de-
clared "Spectator" to the signers of a loyalist association, "and you
will not find one instance wherein they justify a number of men in
combining together in any league whatsoever to support the law, but
quite the reverse; for the law is supported in another manner; it is
maintained by Magistrates and Officers . . . and not by a number of
men combining together. " N. H. Gas. , Mch. 31, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. ,
vol. ii, p. 252.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION
441
early in November, and Salem about a month later. Gov-
ernor Gage had deemed it unsafe to permit the Assembly
to meet; and the radical leadership of the province had
therefore devolved upon the provincial congress, which was,
to a large extent, the rejected Assembly under a different
name. When the provincial congress met on November 23,
1774, in their first session after the adjournment of the
Continental Congress, they lost no time in taking under
consideration the proceedings of the Continental Congress;
and on December 5 they voted their endorsement, recom-
mending that committees of inspection be chosen in every
town and district not already having such committees. 1
The town of Boston now acted. After unanimously
voting to continue the committee of correspondence--that
grain of mustard that had now become a great tree--the
town meeting on December 7 appointed a committee of
sixty-three, headed by Gushing, Hancock and Sam Adams,
to enforce the Association. It is significant of the trend of
events that a goodly majority of the Sixty-Three were
small shopkeepers, mechanics and other men of non-mer-
cantile employment; and that among the members appeared
such names as Thomas Chase and John Avery, the distil-
lers, Paul Revere, the silversmith, and Henry Bass, the
radical merchant,--men who had been " Sons of Liberty"
in the earlier times and had hitherto been nameless for the
purposes of the public press and committee rosters. 2 The
1 Mass. Spy, Dec. 8, 1774; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 993-998.
1 An unfriendly characterization of the Sixty-Three supplies inter-
esting facts concerning certain obscure members of this committee.
John Pull1ng was "Bully of the Mohawk tribe;" John Winthrop, Jr. .
was "Alias Joyce Jr. , Chairman of the Committee for tarring and
feathering;" Captain Ruddock, "supposed to be one Abiel Ruddock,
formerly head of the Mob on the fifth of November;" Joseph Eayres,
"carpenter, eminent for erecting Liberty poles. " 2 M. H. S. Procs. f
vol. xii, pp. 139-142.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 442
THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
meeting recommended that the towns of the province should
follow the example of Weymouth and facilitate enforce-
ment by publishing copies of the Association in sufficient
number to supply every head of family. 1
Most of the towns followed the advice of the provincial
congress, and did not go to the trouble of appointing special
committees of observation and inspection; for they had
already established committees for the enforcement of the
Solemn League and Covenant, now superseded by the Asso-
ciation. Marshfield presented the only instance of a deter-
mination to defeat the Association by town action. The
citizens of that town had won for themselves the privilege
of drinking tea and killing sheep by obtaining the presence
of a detachment of British troops; and on February 20,
1775, a town meeting, duly licensed by Governor Gage
under the Massachusetts Government Act, rejected the re-
solves of the Continental and Provincial Congresses and all
other illegal assemblages. A minority protest, signed later
by sixty-four names, made the most of a bad situation by
charging trickery and misrepresentation. 8 In summing up,
it would appear that Massachusetts waft well e^ujppefl with
to nrever1r anv svstfnn*;- ? '"f":TCT? ments ofthe
New Hampshire had always been laggard in entering
into extra-legal organization. While the Continental Con-
gress was yet in session, organized opposition to the out-
come of the Congress was begun in Hillsborough County. *
lMtus. Spy, Dec. 8, 1774; also Bos. Town Recs. (7770- 7777), pp. 205-207.
* Bos. Eve. Post, Mch. 6, 13, 1775; also -t Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp.
1177-1178, 1249-1251.
1 Twenty-three inhabitants of Frances-Town and fifty-four inhabi-
tants of New Boston signed agreements pledging their opposition to the
unlawful proceedings of men who pretended to maintain the very
liberties that they were trampling under foot. On Nov. 7, the town
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION 443
However, in October, the fifty-two voters in attendance at
a town meeting at Portsmouth rescinded the action of fifty-
six voters at a previous meeting against furnishing dona-
tions to stricken Boston, and proceeded to appoint a "Com-
mittee of Ways and Means " of forty-five members. One-
half of the number refused to act, according to Governor
Wentworth; but when news of the proceedings of the Con-
tinental Congress reached Portsmouth, the remainder of
the committee at once assumed the duties of supervising the
execution of the Association. Governor Wentworth re-
ported on December 2 that the measures of the Continental
Congress were " received implicitly " by the province. 1 On
the same day as his letter, the provincial committee, which
had been appointed by the first New Hampshire convention,
called upon the inhabitants of the province for a general
submission to the Association. In the subsequent weeks,
the various towns began to establish committees of inspec-
tion. 8
Since the Assembly had not met for ten months past and
was not likely to sit again soon, a convention of the province
was held at Exeter on January 25, 1775, which unanimously
endorsed the Association. In an address to the province,
the inhabitants were exhorted to adhere to it strictly and to
support their committees of inspection. 8 Just how many
of Hollis in the same county adopted similar resolutions. N. H. Gas. ,
Nov. 18, 1774, Feb. 10, 1775. While the Continental Congress was
still sitting, a mob at Portsmouth prevented the landing of a shipment
of tea but permitted the payment of the duty on it. Ibid. , Sept. 16,
23, 1774; 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 786-787.
1 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 981-982, 1013.
1The organization of the following committees was noted in the
newspapers: in December, Exeter, New Market; in January, Parish of
Hawke, Temple, Kingstown, Epsom, Greenland. At Brentwood, the
committee of correspondence took over the duties of the committee of
inspection in February.
*4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1180-1182.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 444 THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
New Hampshire towns finally organized committees of in-
spection, it is impossible to say. It is important to note, on
the one hand, that much had been done to develop a public
opinion favorable to the Association; and on the other, that
the chief avenues of trade with the world were well guarded
by the presence of the " Forty-Five" at Portsmouth, and
by a network of committees along the overland routes
through Massachusetts.
In Rhode Island, the first official action appears to have
been taken on December 5, 1774, when the General Assem-
bly voted its thanks to the Continental Congress and recom-
mended the selection of committees of inspection to the
towns of the provinces. 1 Within two weeks Newport and
Providence, the leading ports, had acted on the recommen-
dation. 2 It would appear that similar action was taken by
the smaller towns.
The course of Connecticut was not unlike that of Rhode
Island, in many respects. Early in November, 1774, the
Connecticut General Assembly unanimously approved the
proceedings of Congress and sent orders into the several
towns for a strict compliance therewith. 8 The action of
the legislature gained immediate attention; and by the end
of the year the establishment of twenty-eight committees
had been noted in the newspapers. 4 Other towns acted
later.
1R. I. Col Rees. , voL vii, p. 263.
1Ibid. , vol. vii, pp. 284-285.
1 Mass. Gas. & Post-Boy, Nov. 14, 1774; Hollister, G. H. , History of
Connecticut (Hartford, 1857), vol. ii, p. 159.
4 In November, the ten parishes of New Haven County; Woodbury,
Pomfret, Waterbury, Derby, Milford, Wallingford; in December,
Windham, Saybrook, Danbury, Lebanon, Guilford, Simsbury, New
London, Stratford, Hartford, Norwich, Sharon, Fairfield.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION 445
One section of Connecticut, represented by a group of the
smaller towns of Fairfield County in the western part of
the province, sought to prevent the acceptance of the Asso-
ciation. The animus appears to have been sectarian, being
one phase of the long-standing antagonism of the strong
Episcopalian element in these towns to Congregationalist
undertakings. 1 The two largest towns of the county, Strat-
ford and Fairfield, chose committees of inspection in De-
cember, and the town of Redding took similar action a little
later. But on January 30, 1775, a town meeting at Ridge-
field rejected the Association with only three dissenting
votes out of a total present of nearly two hundred, and de-
nounced the Congress as unconstitutional. 2 A large meet-
ing of the town of Newtown rejected the Association with
but one dissenting vote a week later. 8 These defiant reso-
lutions emboldened one hundred and forty-one inhabitants
of Redding and the vicinity to denounce and forswear all
committees in a written statement;4 and caused the town
of Danbury to revoke the appointment of a committee of
inspection, made at an earlier meeting, and to refuse to
send delegates to a projected county convention. 5 But Dan-
bury underwent another change of heart, for when the
convention of Fairfield County assembled on February 14,
1AT. Y. Gasetteer, Feb. 16, 1775. Vide also Gilbert, G. A. , "The
Connecticut Loyalists," Am. Hist. Rev. , vol. iv, pp. 273-281. One-
third of the people of Fairfield County were Episcopalians. Beards-
ley, History of the Episcopal Church in Conn. (Boston, 1865), vol. i,
p. 289.
1 N. Y. Gasetteer, Feb. 2, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1202-1203.
1 Ibid. , vol. i, p. 1215; also N. Y. Gasetteer, Feb. 23, 1775.
4 Ibid. , Feb. 23, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1258-1260. One
hundred and twenty men signed similar resolves at New Milford, a town
in Litchfield County across the Housatonic from Fairfield County.
Ibid. , vol. i, p. 1270; also N. Y. Gasetteer, Mch. 16.
1 Ibid. , Feb. 23, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1038-1039, 1215-1216.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 446 THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
Ridgefield and Newtown were the only towns not repre-
sented.
Now began a series of efforts on the part of the radicals
to discredit and defeat these opponents of the Association.
The county convention denounced a selectman of Newtown
who had sold some copies of the Association for a pint of
flip, and called upon those citizens of Ridgefield and New-
town, who were attached to their country, to stand forth
and affix their signatures to the measures of Congress, so
that all commerce and connection might be withdrawn from
the other inhabitants of the towns. 1 In view of the ap-
proaching session of the Assembly at New Haven, the town
meeting at the capital resolved unanimously that no person
should entertain the deputies who were expected from the
delinquent towns. 2 The Connecticut Assembly, when it
met in March, appointed a committee to investigate condi-
tions in the two towns and to determine how far any per-
sons holding provincial commissions were concerned in
promoting resolutions in direct opposition of the repeated
resolves of the legislature. 8 The dissentients at Redding
were held up for public neglect by the committee of obser-
vation of that town. 4
These tactics of the radicals brought only partial results. 8
On March 20, fifty-five inhabitants of Ridgefield accepted
the invitation of the county convention and pledged them-
selves to the Continental Association. By April 12, seventy
inhabitants of Newtown had signed a statement disowning
the action of the town meeting. Finally, in December,
1775, Ridgefield appointed a committee of inspection and
1 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1236-1238; also N. Y. Journ. , Feb. 23, 1775.
* Conn. Cour. , Mch. 6, 1775; Mass. Gas. & Post-Boy, Mch. 13.
* 4 Am. Arch. , vol. ii, p. 107.
4 Ibid. , vol. i, pp. 1259-1260; also Ar. Y. Journ. , Apr. 20, 1775.
1 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1238-1239; vol. ii, p. 1135.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION
447
fell heartily into line. The town of Newtown remained
obdurate with respect to the Association, although the
selectmen and principal inhabitants were prevailed upon to
give bond not to take up arms against the colonies. An
active loyalist sympathizer was able to write as late as
October, 1781, that "Newtown and the Church-of-England
part of Redding were, he believed, the only parts of New
England that had refused to comply with the doings of
Congress. " * But so far as Connecticut as a whole was
concerned, the province was exceedingly well organized to
supervise the enforcement of the Association. Ridgefield
and Newtown were, after all, small inland towns and of no
importance commercially.
In New York the movement for establishing committees
of observation and inspection displayed many of the ear-
marks of the earlier contests between moderate and radical.
But there were some significant differences. Thus, the
measures adopted by the Continental Congress contained,
by implication, a sanction of the radical party in New York
city, hitherto discredited and outgeneraled by the moder-
ates. 2 It remained to be proved whether the radicals could
realize on this asset. The leading radical organization, the
Committee of Mechanics, took an early occasion to transmit
their thanks to the New York delegates for the "wise,
prudent and spirited measures" of the Congress--meas-
ures which they well knew had been adopted against the
best judgment of these very delegates. 8
1 Am. Hist. Rev. , vol. iv, p. 279 and n.
1" Behold the wretched state to which we are reduced," wrote Wil-
kins in Alarm to the Legislature, "A foreign power is brought in to
govern this province. Laws made at Philadelphia, by factious men
from New-England, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia
and the Carolinas, are imposed upon us by the most imperious menaces. "
? N. Y. Gasetteer, Nov. 24, 1774; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, p. 087.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 448 THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
The moderates found themselves in something of a
dilemma: either they must oppose the united voice of the
continent as embodied in the Congress and thus list them-
selves with the office-holding gentry, or they must perpet-
uate their ascendancy in the extra-legal movement and thus
keep a controlling hand in the enforcement of the Associa-
tion. The academic minds of the party chose the logical
course; and important members of the community, like the
Reverend Samuel Seabury, the Reverend Miles Cooper, the
Reverend Charles Inglis and the Reverend Thomas Chand-
ler, denounced the Congress and all its doings, and became
"loyalists," or " Tories. " But the men of practical affairs,
of large business connections and of political experience,
did not dare to follow their lead, for they had too much at
stake. "The Merchants," wrote Colden on November 2,
1774, "are at present endeavouring to sift out each others
Sentiments upon the Association proposed by the Congress.
A certain sign, I take it, that they wish to avoid it. " 1
Eventually they accepted the necessities of their situation
and determined to make a fight for the control of affairs,
reserving for a future contingency their exit from the
movement. 2 Thus, Isaac Low continued to exert his influ-
ence as head of the " Fifty-One," and served as chairman
of the later committees of Sixty and One Hundred; but,
aware that his influence was waning, he refused to partici-
pate in the provincial convention in the latter part of April,
and likewise eliminated himself as a candidate for the
Second Continental Congress.
The old committee of " Fifty-One," the bulwark of the
mercantile interests, made the first move with reference to
the Association. Expressing no intention of dissolving
1 Colden, Letter Books, vol. ii, pp. 369-370.
1 Vide ibid. , vol. ii, p. 372.
his crew, and the haughty Sultans of the South juggled the whole con-
clave of the Delegates," was the way a Maryland merchant phrased it
in a published letter. 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, p. 1194.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION 439
them to assert themselves despite the obligations of per-
petual secrecy. 1
The special concession granted to South Carolina in the
Association caused much comment, even in radical circles.
The writer just mentioned called upon the New York dele-
gates to state why the South Carolina delegates had suc-
ceeded better than they in securing special indulgences for
their constituents. 2 A Virginia scribbler protested that the
tobacco interests had been sacrificed to the rice planters and
wheat exporters. 8 One distracted fellow burst into verse,
eighty-two stanzas in length, in the following manner:
LIX
Suppose all truth the Congress say,
No doubt they make the worst;
Can we, my Friends, for many a day,
Be so completely curst,
LX
As have no cloaths, no grog, no tea,
To cheer our drooping spirits;
And snug in clover smugglers see,
Who have not half our merits.
LXI
Isn't it now a pretty story,
One smells it in a trice,
If I send wheat, I am a Tory,
But Charles-town may send RICE. 4
Even the Albany Committee of Correspondence, upon a
plea of the necessity for harmony, took occasion to inquire
of the New York delegates upon what principle a discrimi-
nation had been allowed in favor of South Carolina. 5
1 What Think Ye of Congress NowT, pp. 23-24. Vide also Alarm
to Legislature, p. g n.
* What Think Ye of Congress NowT, p. 40.
1N. Y. Gasetteer, Apr. 13, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. ii, p. 163.
4 Poor Man's Advice to his Poor Neighbours (New York, 1774).
*N. Y. Journ. , Feb. 16, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1097-1098.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 440
THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
Notwithstanding the polemics of the opposition, the work
of establishing the administrative machinery for the Asso-
ciation had gotten irresistibly under way. The fact of the
matter was that the moderate elements, lacked an nrpan1M-
tion through whirh to fyr-r"fy t^H^ "ppng1^iop at this crit-
ical juncture. 1 Indeed, the logic of their own position in-
clined them to avoid all extra-legal organization even for
purposes of self-defense. 2 Furthermore, the coup of the
radicals in nationalizing the committee system shook to the
center such control as the moderates had already established
in various localities. The energies of the friends of the As-
sociation were first directed to the appointment of commit-
tees of observation and inspection in the local subdivisions of
the several provinces, and to obtaining formal sanction for
the Association from the provincial assembly or other pro-
vincial meeting, [ft was not specified in the Association that
endorsement by a provincial body was necessary--though
perhaps it was hinted at in Article xiv--but in any case it
was good politicsT) The remainder of this chapter will be
devoted to the progress that was made along these lines.
Massachusetts, being the storm centre of the contest with
Great Britain, was one of the earliest provinces to move.
The leading ports (Boston harbor being closed) led the
way: Marblehead and Newburyport appointed committees
1 Cf. Gage's view; . ; Am. Arch. , vol. i, p. 981.
*" Pray examine the Province law throughout, and all other law
authorities that ever were held in repute by the English nation," de-
clared "Spectator" to the signers of a loyalist association, "and you
will not find one instance wherein they justify a number of men in
combining together in any league whatsoever to support the law, but
quite the reverse; for the law is supported in another manner; it is
maintained by Magistrates and Officers . . . and not by a number of
men combining together. " N. H. Gas. , Mch. 31, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. ,
vol. ii, p. 252.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION
441
early in November, and Salem about a month later. Gov-
ernor Gage had deemed it unsafe to permit the Assembly
to meet; and the radical leadership of the province had
therefore devolved upon the provincial congress, which was,
to a large extent, the rejected Assembly under a different
name. When the provincial congress met on November 23,
1774, in their first session after the adjournment of the
Continental Congress, they lost no time in taking under
consideration the proceedings of the Continental Congress;
and on December 5 they voted their endorsement, recom-
mending that committees of inspection be chosen in every
town and district not already having such committees. 1
The town of Boston now acted. After unanimously
voting to continue the committee of correspondence--that
grain of mustard that had now become a great tree--the
town meeting on December 7 appointed a committee of
sixty-three, headed by Gushing, Hancock and Sam Adams,
to enforce the Association. It is significant of the trend of
events that a goodly majority of the Sixty-Three were
small shopkeepers, mechanics and other men of non-mer-
cantile employment; and that among the members appeared
such names as Thomas Chase and John Avery, the distil-
lers, Paul Revere, the silversmith, and Henry Bass, the
radical merchant,--men who had been " Sons of Liberty"
in the earlier times and had hitherto been nameless for the
purposes of the public press and committee rosters. 2 The
1 Mass. Spy, Dec. 8, 1774; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 993-998.
1 An unfriendly characterization of the Sixty-Three supplies inter-
esting facts concerning certain obscure members of this committee.
John Pull1ng was "Bully of the Mohawk tribe;" John Winthrop, Jr. .
was "Alias Joyce Jr. , Chairman of the Committee for tarring and
feathering;" Captain Ruddock, "supposed to be one Abiel Ruddock,
formerly head of the Mob on the fifth of November;" Joseph Eayres,
"carpenter, eminent for erecting Liberty poles. " 2 M. H. S. Procs. f
vol. xii, pp. 139-142.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 442
THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
meeting recommended that the towns of the province should
follow the example of Weymouth and facilitate enforce-
ment by publishing copies of the Association in sufficient
number to supply every head of family. 1
Most of the towns followed the advice of the provincial
congress, and did not go to the trouble of appointing special
committees of observation and inspection; for they had
already established committees for the enforcement of the
Solemn League and Covenant, now superseded by the Asso-
ciation. Marshfield presented the only instance of a deter-
mination to defeat the Association by town action. The
citizens of that town had won for themselves the privilege
of drinking tea and killing sheep by obtaining the presence
of a detachment of British troops; and on February 20,
1775, a town meeting, duly licensed by Governor Gage
under the Massachusetts Government Act, rejected the re-
solves of the Continental and Provincial Congresses and all
other illegal assemblages. A minority protest, signed later
by sixty-four names, made the most of a bad situation by
charging trickery and misrepresentation. 8 In summing up,
it would appear that Massachusetts waft well e^ujppefl with
to nrever1r anv svstfnn*;- ? '"f":TCT? ments ofthe
New Hampshire had always been laggard in entering
into extra-legal organization. While the Continental Con-
gress was yet in session, organized opposition to the out-
come of the Congress was begun in Hillsborough County. *
lMtus. Spy, Dec. 8, 1774; also Bos. Town Recs. (7770- 7777), pp. 205-207.
* Bos. Eve. Post, Mch. 6, 13, 1775; also -t Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp.
1177-1178, 1249-1251.
1 Twenty-three inhabitants of Frances-Town and fifty-four inhabi-
tants of New Boston signed agreements pledging their opposition to the
unlawful proceedings of men who pretended to maintain the very
liberties that they were trampling under foot. On Nov. 7, the town
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION 443
However, in October, the fifty-two voters in attendance at
a town meeting at Portsmouth rescinded the action of fifty-
six voters at a previous meeting against furnishing dona-
tions to stricken Boston, and proceeded to appoint a "Com-
mittee of Ways and Means " of forty-five members. One-
half of the number refused to act, according to Governor
Wentworth; but when news of the proceedings of the Con-
tinental Congress reached Portsmouth, the remainder of
the committee at once assumed the duties of supervising the
execution of the Association. Governor Wentworth re-
ported on December 2 that the measures of the Continental
Congress were " received implicitly " by the province. 1 On
the same day as his letter, the provincial committee, which
had been appointed by the first New Hampshire convention,
called upon the inhabitants of the province for a general
submission to the Association. In the subsequent weeks,
the various towns began to establish committees of inspec-
tion. 8
Since the Assembly had not met for ten months past and
was not likely to sit again soon, a convention of the province
was held at Exeter on January 25, 1775, which unanimously
endorsed the Association. In an address to the province,
the inhabitants were exhorted to adhere to it strictly and to
support their committees of inspection. 8 Just how many
of Hollis in the same county adopted similar resolutions. N. H. Gas. ,
Nov. 18, 1774, Feb. 10, 1775. While the Continental Congress was
still sitting, a mob at Portsmouth prevented the landing of a shipment
of tea but permitted the payment of the duty on it. Ibid. , Sept. 16,
23, 1774; 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 786-787.
1 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 981-982, 1013.
1The organization of the following committees was noted in the
newspapers: in December, Exeter, New Market; in January, Parish of
Hawke, Temple, Kingstown, Epsom, Greenland. At Brentwood, the
committee of correspondence took over the duties of the committee of
inspection in February.
*4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1180-1182.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 444 THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
New Hampshire towns finally organized committees of in-
spection, it is impossible to say. It is important to note, on
the one hand, that much had been done to develop a public
opinion favorable to the Association; and on the other, that
the chief avenues of trade with the world were well guarded
by the presence of the " Forty-Five" at Portsmouth, and
by a network of committees along the overland routes
through Massachusetts.
In Rhode Island, the first official action appears to have
been taken on December 5, 1774, when the General Assem-
bly voted its thanks to the Continental Congress and recom-
mended the selection of committees of inspection to the
towns of the provinces. 1 Within two weeks Newport and
Providence, the leading ports, had acted on the recommen-
dation. 2 It would appear that similar action was taken by
the smaller towns.
The course of Connecticut was not unlike that of Rhode
Island, in many respects. Early in November, 1774, the
Connecticut General Assembly unanimously approved the
proceedings of Congress and sent orders into the several
towns for a strict compliance therewith. 8 The action of
the legislature gained immediate attention; and by the end
of the year the establishment of twenty-eight committees
had been noted in the newspapers. 4 Other towns acted
later.
1R. I. Col Rees. , voL vii, p. 263.
1Ibid. , vol. vii, pp. 284-285.
1 Mass. Gas. & Post-Boy, Nov. 14, 1774; Hollister, G. H. , History of
Connecticut (Hartford, 1857), vol. ii, p. 159.
4 In November, the ten parishes of New Haven County; Woodbury,
Pomfret, Waterbury, Derby, Milford, Wallingford; in December,
Windham, Saybrook, Danbury, Lebanon, Guilford, Simsbury, New
London, Stratford, Hartford, Norwich, Sharon, Fairfield.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION 445
One section of Connecticut, represented by a group of the
smaller towns of Fairfield County in the western part of
the province, sought to prevent the acceptance of the Asso-
ciation. The animus appears to have been sectarian, being
one phase of the long-standing antagonism of the strong
Episcopalian element in these towns to Congregationalist
undertakings. 1 The two largest towns of the county, Strat-
ford and Fairfield, chose committees of inspection in De-
cember, and the town of Redding took similar action a little
later. But on January 30, 1775, a town meeting at Ridge-
field rejected the Association with only three dissenting
votes out of a total present of nearly two hundred, and de-
nounced the Congress as unconstitutional. 2 A large meet-
ing of the town of Newtown rejected the Association with
but one dissenting vote a week later. 8 These defiant reso-
lutions emboldened one hundred and forty-one inhabitants
of Redding and the vicinity to denounce and forswear all
committees in a written statement;4 and caused the town
of Danbury to revoke the appointment of a committee of
inspection, made at an earlier meeting, and to refuse to
send delegates to a projected county convention. 5 But Dan-
bury underwent another change of heart, for when the
convention of Fairfield County assembled on February 14,
1AT. Y. Gasetteer, Feb. 16, 1775. Vide also Gilbert, G. A. , "The
Connecticut Loyalists," Am. Hist. Rev. , vol. iv, pp. 273-281. One-
third of the people of Fairfield County were Episcopalians. Beards-
ley, History of the Episcopal Church in Conn. (Boston, 1865), vol. i,
p. 289.
1 N. Y. Gasetteer, Feb. 2, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1202-1203.
1 Ibid. , vol. i, p. 1215; also N. Y. Gasetteer, Feb. 23, 1775.
4 Ibid. , Feb. 23, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1258-1260. One
hundred and twenty men signed similar resolves at New Milford, a town
in Litchfield County across the Housatonic from Fairfield County.
Ibid. , vol. i, p. 1270; also N. Y. Gasetteer, Mch. 16.
1 Ibid. , Feb. 23, 1775; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1038-1039, 1215-1216.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 446 THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
Ridgefield and Newtown were the only towns not repre-
sented.
Now began a series of efforts on the part of the radicals
to discredit and defeat these opponents of the Association.
The county convention denounced a selectman of Newtown
who had sold some copies of the Association for a pint of
flip, and called upon those citizens of Ridgefield and New-
town, who were attached to their country, to stand forth
and affix their signatures to the measures of Congress, so
that all commerce and connection might be withdrawn from
the other inhabitants of the towns. 1 In view of the ap-
proaching session of the Assembly at New Haven, the town
meeting at the capital resolved unanimously that no person
should entertain the deputies who were expected from the
delinquent towns. 2 The Connecticut Assembly, when it
met in March, appointed a committee to investigate condi-
tions in the two towns and to determine how far any per-
sons holding provincial commissions were concerned in
promoting resolutions in direct opposition of the repeated
resolves of the legislature. 8 The dissentients at Redding
were held up for public neglect by the committee of obser-
vation of that town. 4
These tactics of the radicals brought only partial results. 8
On March 20, fifty-five inhabitants of Ridgefield accepted
the invitation of the county convention and pledged them-
selves to the Continental Association. By April 12, seventy
inhabitants of Newtown had signed a statement disowning
the action of the town meeting. Finally, in December,
1775, Ridgefield appointed a committee of inspection and
1 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1236-1238; also N. Y. Journ. , Feb. 23, 1775.
* Conn. Cour. , Mch. 6, 1775; Mass. Gas. & Post-Boy, Mch. 13.
* 4 Am. Arch. , vol. ii, p. 107.
4 Ibid. , vol. i, pp. 1259-1260; also Ar. Y. Journ. , Apr. 20, 1775.
1 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, pp. 1238-1239; vol. ii, p. 1135.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? RATIFICATION OF THE ASSOCIATION
447
fell heartily into line. The town of Newtown remained
obdurate with respect to the Association, although the
selectmen and principal inhabitants were prevailed upon to
give bond not to take up arms against the colonies. An
active loyalist sympathizer was able to write as late as
October, 1781, that "Newtown and the Church-of-England
part of Redding were, he believed, the only parts of New
England that had refused to comply with the doings of
Congress. " * But so far as Connecticut as a whole was
concerned, the province was exceedingly well organized to
supervise the enforcement of the Association. Ridgefield
and Newtown were, after all, small inland towns and of no
importance commercially.
In New York the movement for establishing committees
of observation and inspection displayed many of the ear-
marks of the earlier contests between moderate and radical.
But there were some significant differences. Thus, the
measures adopted by the Continental Congress contained,
by implication, a sanction of the radical party in New York
city, hitherto discredited and outgeneraled by the moder-
ates. 2 It remained to be proved whether the radicals could
realize on this asset. The leading radical organization, the
Committee of Mechanics, took an early occasion to transmit
their thanks to the New York delegates for the "wise,
prudent and spirited measures" of the Congress--meas-
ures which they well knew had been adopted against the
best judgment of these very delegates. 8
1 Am. Hist. Rev. , vol. iv, p. 279 and n.
1" Behold the wretched state to which we are reduced," wrote Wil-
kins in Alarm to the Legislature, "A foreign power is brought in to
govern this province. Laws made at Philadelphia, by factious men
from New-England, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia
and the Carolinas, are imposed upon us by the most imperious menaces. "
? N. Y. Gasetteer, Nov. 24, 1774; also 4 Am. Arch. , vol. i, p. 087.
? ? Generated for (University of Chicago) on 2014-08-19 01:37 GMT / http://hdl. handle. net/2027/mdp. 39015011480665 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www. hathitrust. org/access_use#pd-google
? 448 THE COLONIAL MERCHANTS: 1763-1776
The moderates found themselves in something of a
dilemma: either they must oppose the united voice of the
continent as embodied in the Congress and thus list them-
selves with the office-holding gentry, or they must perpet-
uate their ascendancy in the extra-legal movement and thus
keep a controlling hand in the enforcement of the Associa-
tion. The academic minds of the party chose the logical
course; and important members of the community, like the
Reverend Samuel Seabury, the Reverend Miles Cooper, the
Reverend Charles Inglis and the Reverend Thomas Chand-
ler, denounced the Congress and all its doings, and became
"loyalists," or " Tories. " But the men of practical affairs,
of large business connections and of political experience,
did not dare to follow their lead, for they had too much at
stake. "The Merchants," wrote Colden on November 2,
1774, "are at present endeavouring to sift out each others
Sentiments upon the Association proposed by the Congress.
A certain sign, I take it, that they wish to avoid it. " 1
Eventually they accepted the necessities of their situation
and determined to make a fight for the control of affairs,
reserving for a future contingency their exit from the
movement. 2 Thus, Isaac Low continued to exert his influ-
ence as head of the " Fifty-One," and served as chairman
of the later committees of Sixty and One Hundred; but,
aware that his influence was waning, he refused to partici-
pate in the provincial convention in the latter part of April,
and likewise eliminated himself as a candidate for the
Second Continental Congress.
The old committee of " Fifty-One," the bulwark of the
mercantile interests, made the first move with reference to
the Association. Expressing no intention of dissolving
1 Colden, Letter Books, vol. ii, pp. 369-370.
1 Vide ibid. , vol. ii, p. 372.
